16
A MODEL FOR THE INTEGRAL PLANNING OF ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS AND NATURAL GAS TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS R. Nieva, J. A. Hernández, J. L. Ceciliano, E. de la Torre Instituto de Investigaciones Eléctricas Presented at the IAEE Mexico North American Conference 21 October 2003 México City

A MODEL FOR THE INTEGRAL PLANNING OF ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

A MODEL FOR THE INTEGRAL PLANNING OF ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS AND NATURAL

GAS TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS

R. Nieva, J. A. Hernández, J. L. Ceciliano, E. de la Torre

Instituto de Investigaciones Eléctricas

Presented at the IAEE Mexico North American Conference

21 October 2003

México City

CONTENTS

BACKGROUND

THE MODEL:

OBJECTIVE

SCOPE

MATHEMATICAL NATURE OF THE PROBLEM AND SOLUTION TECHNIQUES

APPLICATION EXPERIENCE

AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT

AN APLICATION EXAMPLE

BACKGROUNDTHE NEED FOR THE INTEGRAL PLANNING OF ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION AND NATURAL GAS TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS

INCREASED USE OF NATURAL GAS IN ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION

LARGE ECONOMIES OF SCALE IN BOTH TYPES OF NETWORKS

SITING DECISIONS OF GENERATION CAPACITY LEADING TO LOWER OVERALL INVESTMENT + OPERATION COSTS

A PREVIOUS MODEL

PEGyT: A MODEL FOR THE LONG-TERM PLANNING OF ELECTRICITY GENERATION AND TRANSMISSION CAPACITIES

NO EXPLICIT CONSIDERATION OF NATURAL GAS TRANSPORTATION NETWORK

SCOPE OF THE MODELA TOOL FOR THE LONG TERM PLANNING OF ELECTRICITY GENERATION CAPACITY

TECHNOLOGY SELECTION, AND DETERMINATION OF SIZE, LOCATION AND INSTALLATION DATES OF THE REQUIRED NEW GENERATION CAPACITY

MINIMIZING THE PRESENT VALUE SUM OF:

ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION COSTS

NEW GENERATION CAPACITY COSTS

NEW ELECTRICTY TRANSMISSION CAPACITY AND OPERATION COSTS

NEW NATURAL GAS TRANSPORTATION CAPACITY AND OPERATION COSTS

SCOPE OF THE MODEL

GUIDELINE PARAMETERS AND CONSTRAINTS • RESERVE MARGIN & OPERATING RESERVE • LENGTH OF PLANNING HORIZON• DISCOUNT RATE• INVESTMENT & EXPANSION CONSTRAINTS

EXISTING INFRAESTRUCTURE• ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION & TRANSMISSION NETWORK• NATURAL GAS TRANSPORTATION NETWORK• PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF NATURAL GAS SOURCES

CAPACITY EXPANSION PLAN

• ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION & TRANSMISSION

• NATURAL GAS TRANSPORT

INVESTMENT AND OPERATIONAL COST ESTIMATES

Long Term Planning

Model(PEGyT II)

CAPACITY ADDITION AND DECOMMISSION PROGRAMS

TECHNOLOGY OPTIONS FOR CAPACITY EXPANSION

SCENARIO DEFINITION • DEMAND PROJECTIONS (ELECTRICITY & NATURAL GAS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE)• FUEL COST TRENDS• TECHNOLOGY COST TRENDS

MODEL FEATURES

LARGE SCALE, MIXED-INTEGER, NONLINEAR, MULTISTAGE OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM

SOLUTION TECHNIQUES:

COMBINATION OF MODERN HEURISTICS (EVOLUTIONARY PROGRAMMING) AND MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING TECHNIQUES

SOLUTION SCHEME: AN EVOLUTIONARY PROGRAMMING APPROACH

• A set of initial plans for the expansion of electric power generation capacity is formed. These plans may be either the result of other planning models or “expert judgment”, or may be randomly generated

Initial “population” of proposed

expansion plans

Evaluation ofexpansion plans

• For each proposed plan, the required new transmission and NG transport capacities are determined and the objective function evaluated

• The objective function is the present value sum of investments, variable production costs of electricity and NG transport. Other objective functions may be adopted, such as the “maximum regret” defined over a set of possible scenarios.

Creation of new,alternative plans

(offspring)

• One or more alternative plans are obtained from each individual in the current population of candidate plans

• Alternative plans are obtained by introducing few changes in the parent individual. The changes may be selected either by a random process or heuristic rules, which may be based on sensitivity measuresEvaluation of new

expansion plans

Competition and Selection

• The size of the population of candidate plans is maintained by selection of the best and elimination of the worst plans

Convergence test

PN Set of best solution plans

SOLUTION SCHEMEEVALUATION STEP: A MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING APPROACH

• Electricity production cost are computed for each year in the planning horizon, by solving a “Hydro-Thermal Coordination Problem” with electricity transmission and NG transportation constraints (an LP programming problem)

• Cost estimates of required new transmission and NG transport capacities are calculated at incremental cost of expansion

Optimal transmission expansion

Optimal NG transport

expansion

• A sequence of nonlinear programming problems is solved (nonlinear objective function and linear constraints)

A PROPOSED PLAN FOR GENERATION CAPACITY EXPANSION

Calculation of variable production costs

Calculation of theobjective function

• The objective function is the present value sum of fixed and variable costs

APPLICATION EXPERIENCE

THE NEW MODEL (PEGyT II) HAS BEEN APPLIED TO SEVERAL CASE STUDIES

THE MEXICAN NORTHWEST ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM

THE MEXICAN INTERCONNECTED ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM

COMPARISON OF SOLUTIONS (NEW VS OLD MODEL) SHOW:

LESS CONCENTRATION OF NEW ELECTRIC GENERATION CAPACITY; SAME TRENDS (TECHNOLOGY, SIZE, LOCATION AND INSTALLATION DATES)

REDUCED REQUIREMENTS OF NEW INTERREGIONAL TRANSMISSION CAPACITY, SAME TRENDS

SLOW CONVERGENCE

80-100 HOURS (PENTIUM IV, 1.4GHZ)

AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT

REDUCING COMPUTATION TIME

POSSIBLE SOLUTION: PARALELL COMPUTATION

THE “EVALUATION” OF PROPOSED “INDIVIDUALS” (CANDIDATE GENERATION EXPANSION PLANS) IS COMPUTATIONALLY EXPENSIVE

EVALUATION OF INDIVIDUALS IS AMENABLE TO PARALELL COMPUTATION

APPLICATION EXAMPLE

THE MEXICAN INTERCONNECTED ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM

PLANNING HORIZON: 2002-2025

ALL DATA TAKEN FROM PUBLIC REFERENCES: NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL

ELECTRIC NETWORK REPRESENTATION: 32 REGIONS, 40 INTERREGIONAL TIES

TECHNOLOGICAL OPTIONS FOR CAPACITY EXPANSION:

9 TYPES OF THERMOELECTRIC GENERATING UNITS

14 HIDROELECTRIC POWER PROJECTS

ELECTRIC INTERREGIONAL TIES AT 230 KV AND 400 KV

NATURAL GAS TRANSPORTATION NETWORK: 96 NODES AND 101 LINKS

NATURAL GAS SOURCES: 6 NATIONAL, 4 BORDER INTERCONNECTIONS, 1 LNG FACILITY

APPLICATION EXAMPLE

THE MEXICAN INTERCONNECTED ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM

(2002-2025)

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

160,000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

2016

2018

2020

2022

2024

Years

MW

atts

Thermo Hydro Maximum Demand

Natural gas 80%

Diesel 1.34%

Coal 5.9%Oil Bunker 10.1%

Nuclear 1.1%Geothermic 0.8%

*Thermoelectric generation capacity : 127,014 MWatts

FUEL MIX FOR ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION IN 2005

PROJECTED DEMAND GROWTH AND ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION CAPACITY

APPLICATION EXAMPLE

THE MEXICAN INTERCONNECTED ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM

(2002-2025)

MEXICAN ELECTRIC SYSTEM

REGIONS

Transmission Capacity in 2002 Reinforcement of Transm. Capacity

INTERREGIONAL TRANSMISSION CAPACITY

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

SNO

R-S

SUR

SSU

R-M

OC

H

MAZ

A-M

OC

H

MAZ

A-LA

GU

MAZ

A-G

UAD

CH

IH-J

UAR

LAG

U-C

HIH

LAG

U-M

ON

T

RIO

E-C

HIH

RIO

E-M

OTY

MO

TY-R

EYN

MO

TY-H

UAS

HU

AS-O

RIE

MAN

Z-G

UAD

GU

AD-S

LPO

GU

AD-B

AJI

LAG

U-S

LPO

BAJI

-SLP

O

LCAR

-BAJ

I

LCAR

-GU

AD

BAJI

-CEN

T

LCAR

-CEN

T

OR

IE-C

ENT

ACAP

-CEN

T

OR

IE-T

EMA

LER

M-G

RIJ

TEM

A-G

RIJ

MIN

A-G

RIJ

TEM

A-M

INA

LER

M-M

ERI

MER

I-CAN

C

MER

I-CH

ET

MEX

I-TIJ

U

TIJU

-EN

SE

CC

ON

-LPA

Z

LPAZ

-CAB

O

SNO

R-J

UAR

HU

AS-S

LPO

MO

TY-S

LPO

INTERREGIONAL TIES

MW

2002 2025

EXISTING (2002) AND ADDITIONAL TRANSMISSION CAPACITY (2025)

APPLICATION EXAMPLE

THE MEXICAN INTERCONNECTED ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM

(2002-2025)

C entros importa dores Centros productores Refuerzos de C apacidad de Transporte

GNL1000 MMPCD

SISTEMA NACIONAL DE GASODUCTOS

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

SNO

RSS

UR

MO

CH

MAZ

AJU

ARC

HIH

LAG

RIO

EM

OTY

REY

NH

UAS

GD

LAM

ANZ

SLPO BA

JILC

ARC

ENT

OR

IEAC

APTE

MA

MIN

AG

RIJ

LER

MM

ERI

CAN

CC

HET

MEX

ITI

JUEN

SEC

CO

NLP

AZC

ABO

BUSES

MW

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

MM

cf/d

Generation Capacity based on NG Consumption of NG

REGIONAL ALLOCATION OF NATURAL GAS BASED ELECTRIC POWER

GENERATION CAPACITY

EXISTING AND ADDITIONAL NATURAL GAS TRANSPORTATION CAPACITY

APPLICATION EXAMPLE

THE MEXICAN INTERCONNECTED ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM

(2002-2025)

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

Years

MM

cf/d

CACTUS CDPEMEX REYNOSA POZARICA LAVENTA MATAPIONC

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

Years

MM

cf/d

REYNOSA JUAREZ BAJACAL ALTAMIRA NACO

NATIONAL PRODUCTION OF NATURAL GAS NATURAL GAS IMPORTS

THANK YOU