Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Ain Shams Engineering Journal (2014) 5, 1043–1057
Ain Shams University
Ain Shams Engineering Journal
www.elsevier.com/locate/asejwww.sciencedirect.com
CIVIL ENGINEERING
A layer equation method for 1-D consolidation
under time-dependent reloading
* Corresponding author. Address: P.O. Box 465, Port Said, Egypt.
Mobile: +20 1112584579.E-mail addresses: [email protected] (R. Herrmann),
[email protected] (M. El Gendy).
Peer review under responsibility of Ain Shams University.
Production and hosting by Elsevier
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2014.07.004
2090-4479 � 2014 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Ain Shams University.
R. Herrmann a, M. El Gendy b,*
a Geotechnical Institute, Siegen University, Germanyb Faculty of Engineering, Port Said University, Egypt
Received 1 April 2013; revised 26 May 2014; accepted 10 July 2014Available online 12 August 2014
KEYWORDS
1-D consolidation settle-
ment;
Layered soil model;
Nonlinear consolidation
theory
Abstract Most of available meshless methods for time-dependent settlement problems depend on
deriving an algebraic equation for each layer, in which, the derived equation has an infinite number
of series functions with an infinite number of coefficients. In this paper, a Layer Equation Method
(LEM) is adapted for analyzing time-dependent settlement problems. The technique of LEM is a
semi-analytical solution that deals with a limited number of algebraic equations instead of solving
numerically the partial differential equations. Consequently, it leads to a significant reduction in
variables of the problem. This method can take into account any variable initial stress along the
clay layers. It is also applicable for stress coefficient technique, in which the vertical stress in any
node at coordinate (x, y, z) may be considered. An application for the method on reloading
time-dependent settlement of clay is presented in which a deep excavation is necessary for buildings
with basements. In this case, the soil stress reduces due to excavation, and the reloading of the soil
should be taken into account.� 2014 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Ain Shams University.
1. Introduction
Most of the available meshless methods for time-dependentsettlement problems depend on deriving an algebraic equationfor each layer; some of these methods were introduced by Lee
et al. [1], Xie et al. [2–4], Zhuang et al. [5] and Morris [6]. In thesolution, the derived equation has an infinite number of series
functions with an infinite number of coefficients. Also the ori-ginal solution of the 1-D consolidation problem presented byTerzaghi [7] was a formula with infinite series. Infinite series
may be lead to oscillation. Furthermore, the methods assumeda uniformly initial applied stress on the clay layers or regularshapes of stress such as a triangular shape [8]. In a better case,
the stress was assumed as a continuous function in depth [1].The reason is that it is difficult to generate infinite coefficientsto represent the applied variable stress on the clay.
In this study, a Layer Equation Method (LEM) is proposedfor analyzing time-dependent settlement problems. LEMdepends on selecting a number of nodes in the clay layers alongthe z-axis. Consequently, a better representation for applied
Notation
Aj area around node j (m2)
Aij coefficient of basis functions for layer iBij coefficient of basis functions for layer iCj constants of basis functionsCC compression index (–)
Cci compressibility index of layer i (–)Cri recompression index of layer i (–)Cai coefficient of secondary consolidation for
layer i (–)Cari reloading coefficient of secondary consolidation
for layer i (–)
cvi coefficient of consolidation of layer i (year/m2)ei void ratio at time t of layer i (–)eoi initial void ratio of layer i (–)epi void ratio for layer i at the end of primary consol-
idation (–)fl,j stress coefficient of node l due to contact force at
node j on the surface (1/m2)
H total thickness of clay layers (m)hi thickness of layer i (m)hpi thickness of the compressible soil layer i at time tp
(m)kvi coefficient of permeability of layer i (m/year)kvoi initial coefficients of permeability in a layer
i (m/year)M number of steps-load increment (–)mvi coefficient of volume change of layer i (m2/kN)mvoi initial coefficients of volume change in a layer i
(m2/kN)m number of grid nodes (–)mi number of sub-layers in a layer i (–)
mvi coefficients of volume change in a layer i (m2/kN)mri coefficients of volume change for reloading in a
layer i (m2/kN)
N number of function terms (number of studiednodes)
Qj contact force at node j (kN)qc contact pressure at the surface due to construction
load (kN/m2)qj contact pressure at node j (kN/m2)r total number of studied nodes of clay layers (–)
ssi secondary consolidation settlement of a layer i (m)spi primary consolidation settlement of a layer i (m)Skt sum of primary consolidation settlements in all
layers at the required time t (m)Sku sum of finial consolidation settlements in all lay-
ers, when Dui = 0 (m)
t time for which excess pore water pressure is com-
puted (year)tc construction time (year)tp time at the end of primary consolidation (year)Tvi time factor for layer i, Tvi = cvit/H
2 (–)
u(z, t) excess pore water pressure at any vertical depth zand time t (kN/m2)
Up degree of consolidation at the required time t in
terms of stressUs degree of consolidation at the required time t in
terms of settlement
zi vertical coordinate of layer i (m)cw unit weight of the water (kN/m3)ni local depth ratio of layer i, ni = zi/hi (–)kj differential equation operator
li parameter of the coefficient of consolidation andthickness of layer i
rl initial vertical stress in a node depth l (kN/m2)
r0i effective stresses at time t of layer i (kN/m2)r0oi initial effective stresses at the middle of layer i
(kN/m2)
r0ci pre-consolidation pressure of a layer i (kN/m2)uj(z) a set of basis functions in the variable z onlywj(t) coefficients of basis functions in the variable t only
xj index of the exponential functions in matrix (Ev)Dqi load increment at variable interval of times
(kN/m2)Dti interval of times, Dt= tc/(M � 1) (year)
Dui average excess power water pressure at time t inlayer i (kN/m2)
Duoi initial average stress in a layer i (kN/m2)
Dzi depth increment in sub-layer i (m)Dr0i increment of vertical stress at time t in a layer
i (kN/m2)
Dr0ri reloading increment of vertical stress in a layeri (kN/m2)
Dr0ei loading increment of vertical stress in a layeri (kN/m2)
{C} vector of constants Cj, j = 1 to N[D] diagonal square matrix due to variable loading[Ev] diagonal square matrix of exponential functions
{R}n vector o obtained from boundary conditions{u} vector of the excess pore water pressure
uj, j= 1 to N
{u}o vector of initial excess pore water pressure{Dq}k vector of applied load at interval k[U] matrix of basis functions.
1044 R. Herrmann, M. El Gendy
stress on soil layers can be represented. The method is alsoideal for using a stress coefficient technique, which may be
extended to study the interaction of irregular loaded areason the surface or contact pressure due to foundation rigidity.LEM requires fewer equation terms, in which fewer termsare sufficient to give excellent results compared to the available
closed-form solution of time-dependent settlement problems.However, algebraic equations of clay layers are developedfrom an initial stress applied to a specified number of grid
nodes, which can represent the excess pore water pressure atany node on the layers.
LEM is used to investigate the behavior of the excess porewater pressure when the clay changes from an over-consoli-dated state to a normally-consolidated state during the consol-idation process because the stress applied to the clay layers
varies with time. These states were studied for a single claylayer by Xie et al. [9]. They had determined the moving depthof the interface between over-and normally-consolidated zones
cv1
kv1
mv1
Layer n
Layer i
Layer 1
zi
r
Pervious
H
h1
hi
hn
Pervious or impervious
z1
cvi
kvi
mvi
cvn
kvn
mvnr-1
12
43
Initial stress
Ground surface
Contact forces
k
l
Figure 2 Multi-layered system.
A layer equation method for 1-D consolidation under time-dependent reloading 1045
in a layer. The layer is considered to have an impervious base.The initial load applied to the layer in each interval incrementof time was uniform. Also, the initial vertical effective stress
due to weight of the entire layer itself was uniform. Besides,only two coefficients of consolidation were considered; onefor the normally-consolidated zone; and the other for the
over-consolidated zone. They had considered this case as adouble-layered soil. In fact, the initial applied stress generatedon the soil from the surface loading is not uniform throughout
the clay depth. It is greater near the surface than at the base. Inaddition, maybe the clay has a pervious top and base. It is alsoknown that the initial vertical effective stress increases withdepth. This means that at any sub-layer within the clay, the
state may change from over- to normally-consolidated, espe-cially for a thick clay layer. The analysis in this study takes intoaccount the nonlinear response of the excess pore water pres-
sure due to the change of compressibility and permeability ofthe soil during the consolidation process.
2. Mathematical modeling
2.1. Formulation of excess pore water pressure
2.1.1. Defining basic functions
To formulate the analysis, the loaded area on the surface isdivided into triangular elements as shown in Fig. 1. Then thecontact pressure is represented by a series of contact forcesQj on the element nodes. The soil under the loaded area may
consist of multi-layered system of clay with different soilparameters and is divided into n sub-layers with r nodes asshown in Fig. 2. Stress coefficients for the nodes under the
loaded area due to contact forces can be determined asdescribed by El Gendy [10].
According to El Gendy [10], for a set of grid nodes of m
contact forces Qj at the surface, the vertical stress rl in a nodedepth l under the surface node k is attributed to stresses causedby all of the contact forces on that node:
rl ¼Xmj¼1
fl;jQj ð1Þ
where fl, j is the stress coefficient of node l due to the contact
force at node j on the surface (1/m2). It depends only on thegeometry of the loaded area and the soil layer.
Each layer in Fig. 2 has different soil parameters and geom-
etries. kvi (m/year), cvi (year/m2), mvi (m
2/kN), zi (m) and hi (m)are the coefficient of permeability, the coefficient of consolida-tion, the coefficient of volume change, the depth and the thick-
ks
j
At node j is:qj = Contact pressure at node jQj = Contact force at node jAj = Area around node jQj = qj . Aj
Figure 1 Loaded area with mesh of elements on the surface.
ness of the ith soil layer, respectively. H (m) is the totalthickness of the clay layers.
At a time t= 0, Eq. (1), for the entire clay layers at a sec-
tion in the z-axis passing through point k, in matrix formbecomes:
frgo ¼ ½f�fQgo ð2Þ
where {r}o is the initial vertical stress vector at time t= 0; [f] isthe stress coefficient matrix; and {Q}o is the initial contactforce vector at time t= 0.
The solution depends on choosing a formula that representsthe excess pore water pressure along the z-axis and satisfies theboundary conditions. A partial differential equation such as
the consolidation equation can be solved and expressed in aseries of N terms as:
uðz; tÞ ¼XNj¼1
CjujðzÞwjðtÞ ð3Þ
where u(z, t) is the excess pore water pressure at any vertical
depth z and time t (kN/m2); uj(z) is a set of basic functionsin the variable z only; wj(t) are coefficients of basic functionsin the variable t only; Cj are constants of basic functions;
and N is the number of function terms (number of studiednodes); z is the vertical coordinate (m); and t is the time forwhich excess pore water pressure is computed (year).
Coefficients and constants of basic functions can be obtainedby selecting a set of N arbitrary nodes and their function valuesu(z, t). The basic functions are chosen to satisfy the boundary
condition. The boundary conditions for double drainage areu(0, t) = 0 and u(Ho, t) = 0, while those for single drainageare u(0, t) = 0 and ou(Ho, t)/oz= 0.To selectN arbitrary nodes,each layer is divided into mi sub-layers with depth increment
Dzi = hi/mi, which gives a total r nodes. For a pervious bottom
1046 R. Herrmann, M. El Gendy
boundary the excess pore water pressure at the bottom bound-ary is known and equal to zero. Therefore, studied nodes in thiscase are less than those of an impervious bottom boundary by a
node. The number of studied nodes will beN = r � 1 for a per-vious bottom boundary, while that for an impervious bottomboundary will beN = r. Suitable basic functions for excess pore
water pressure problems are as follows:
ujðzÞ ¼ Aij sinðlikjniÞ þ Bij cosðlikjniÞ ð4Þ
and corresponding coefficients are:
wjðtÞ ¼ expð�l2i k
2j TviÞ ð5Þ
where for a layer i, ni is the local depth ratio, ni = zi/hi; Aij and
Bij are coefficients of basic functions; kj is the differential equa-tion operator; and li is the parameter of the coefficient of con-solidation and thickness, li ¼ ðhi=h1Þ
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffifficv1=cvi
p. Tvi is the time
factor, Tvi ¼ cvit=h2i .
Now, the equation for excess pore water pressure ui(z, t) forlayer i in a multi-layered system may be expressed as follows:
uiðz; tÞ ¼XNj¼1
Cj Aij sinðlikjniÞ þ Bij cosðlikjniÞ� �
exp �l2i k
2j Tvi
� �
ð6Þ
To satisfy the condition of the governing differential equa-
tion for 1-D consolidation (Terzaghi’s equation) cvi@2ui@z2¼ @ui
@t,
the following equations should be satisfied:
l21k
2j Tv1 ¼ l2
2k2j Tv2 ¼ � � � ¼ l2
nk2j Tvn ¼ xjt ð7Þ
where xj ¼ cv1h21
k2j .
Eq. (6) may be written for N studied nodes in a matrix formas:
fug ¼ ½U�½Ev�tfCg ð8Þ
where {u} is the vector of the excess pore water pressure uj,j= 1 to N; {C} is the vector of constants Cj, j= 1 to N; [U]is the matrix of basic functions; and [Ev] is the diagonal square
matrix of the exponential functions.Details of the matrix [U] is listed in Appendix A, while the
diagonal square matrix [Ev] is given by
½Ev� ¼ diag expð�x1Þ expð�x2Þ expð�x3Þ � � � expð�xNÞ½ � ð9Þ
2.1.2. Determining coefficients Aij and Bij
Relations among coefficients Aij and Bij can be obtained usinginterface and boundary conditions. Equating the excess porewater pressures ui(zi, t) = ui+1(zi, t) at layer interfaces, leads to:
Aij sinðlikjniÞ þ Bij cosðlikjniÞ¼ Aðiþ1Þj sinðliþ1kjniþ1Þ þ Bðiþ1Þj cosðliþ1kjniþ1Þ ð10Þ
while equating the vertical velocity of flow
kvi@u@z
� �i¼ kvðiþ1Þ
@u@z
� �iþ1 at layer interfaces, leads to:
likvihiþ1lðiþ1Þkvðiþ1Þhi
Aij cosðlikjniÞ � Bij sinðlikjniÞ� �
¼ Aðiþ1Þj cosðliþ1kjniþ1Þ � Bðiþ1Þj sinðliþ1kjniþ1Þ ð11Þ
At the interface ni = 1 and ni+1 = 0, Eqs. (10) and (11) thenbecome:
Aij sinðlikjÞ þ Bij cosðlikjÞ ¼ Bðiþ1Þj ð12Þlikvihiþ1
lðiþ1Þkvðiþ1Þhi½Aij cosðlikjÞ � Bij sinðlikjÞ� ¼ Aðiþ1Þj ð13Þ
Satisfying free drainage at the top u1(0, t) = 0, requiresthat:
A1j ¼ 1 and B1j ¼ 0 ð14Þ
From Eqs. (12) and (13), coefficients Aij and Bij can beexpressed as:
fRgiþ1 ¼ ½h�ifRgi ð15Þ
where
fRgi ¼ Aij Bijf gT; i ¼ 1; 2; . . . ; n
½h�i ¼gi cosðlikjÞ �gi sinðlikjÞsinðlikjÞ cosðlikjÞ
ð16Þ
and:
gi ¼likvihiþ1
lðiþ1Þkvðiþ1Þhi¼ mvi
mvðiþ1Þ
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffifficvi
cvðiþ1Þ
rð17Þ
The vector {R}n is obtained from boundary conditions of
the two cases of single and double drainages. Applying bound-ary conditions at the base where u = 0 for double drainageand ou/oz = 0 for single drainage, thus gives:
½Sd�fRgn ¼ 0 ð18Þ
where the matrix [Sd] is given by:
½Sd� ¼ sinðlnkjÞ cosðlnkjÞ½ � for double drainage
½Sd� ¼ cosðlnkjÞ � sinðlnkjÞ½ � for single drainageð19Þ
From Eqs. (16) and (19), the following characteristic equationin the unknown Eigen values kj (differential equation opera-tors) can be obtained:
½Sd�½h�n�1fRgn�1 ¼ 0 ð20Þ
The operator kj is the positive root of the above character-
istic equation. Substituting the value of kj obtained from Eq.(20) into Eq. (15), gives coefficients Aij and Bij.
2.1.3. Determining constants Cj
Constants Cj can be found using the initial conditionuj(z,0) = uo(z). Consider a system of linear equations at a set
of N grid nodes at time t= 0 as follows:
fugo ¼ ½U�fCg ð21Þ
where {u}o is the vector of initial excess pore water pressureSubstituting Eq. (21) into Eq. (8), gives the following
matrix equation for excess pore water pressure:
fug ¼ ½U�½Ev�t½U��1fugo ð22Þ
The advantage of Eq. (22) is that raising the diagonal matrix[Ev] to any power of time t is carried out by raising its diagonalelements Evj to that power.
A layer equation method for 1-D consolidation under time-dependent reloading 1047
2.1.4. Degree of consolidation
Integrating Eq. (6) over the entire layer i, gives the average
excess pore water pressure Dui at any time factor in that layeras follows:
Dui ¼1
hi
Z hi
0
uiðz; tÞdz
¼ 1
li
XNj¼1
Cj
kj
Aij½1� cos likj
� �� þ Bij sinðlikjÞ
� �expð�xjtÞ
ð23Þ
The initial average stress Droi in a layer i is given by:
Droi ¼1
hi
Z hi
0
roiðzÞdz ð24Þ
where roi(z) is the initial stress in a layer i due to a foundationload (kN/m2).
The degree of consolidation Up and Us at the required timet can be obtained from either the stress:
Up ¼ 1�Pn
i¼1DuihiPni¼1Droihi
ð25Þ
or the settlement:
Us ¼ 1�Pn
i¼1mviDuihiPni¼1mviDroihi
ð26Þ
2.1.5. Determining excess pore water pressure due to variableloading on the surface
In practice, the total load on clay under a structure is appliedover a period of time. In this case, the total load of construc-
tion on the surface qc can be applied gradually over a time tc asshown in Fig. 3. The governing equation for 1-D consolida-tion, taking into account the variable loading with construc-tion time as indicated by Lee et al. [1], can be expressed as:
cvi@2ui@z2¼ @ui@t� dri
dtð27Þ
An analytical solution for Eq. (27) is difficult. To determinethe excess pore water pressure, the integral can be evaluated bya series of M steps-load increment at the surface Dq at interval
of times Dt (Fig. 3). The load increment at the surface Dq willlead to an increment of vertical stress dri at node i.
Loa
d q
[kN
/m2 ]
Time t [Year]
ΔqΔt
qc
tc t
qc= MΔqtc= (M-1)Δt
Figure 3 Applied load in a series of steps.
For determining the excess pore water pressure due to stepload increments, the excess pore water pressure induced by theprevious load is obtained, and at the same time the excess pore
water pressure induced by the additional load is determined.The results of this process may be expressed explicitly as:
fug1 ¼ ½U�½Ev�Dt½U��1fdugofug2 ¼ ½U�½Ev�Dt½U��1 fug1 þ fdugo
� �fug3 ¼ ½U�½Ev�Dt½U��1 fug2 þ fdugo
� �� � �fugtc ¼ ½U�½Ev�Dt½U��1 fugðM�2Þ þ fdugo
n o
fugt ¼ ½U�½Ev�tr ½U��1 fugtc þ fdugo� �
9>>>>>>>>>>=>>>>>>>>>>;
ð28Þ
In Eq. (28), the total load is applied by M steps of equal loadincrement. Therefore, the additional initial pore water pressurevectors in all steps are the same and equal to fdugo ¼ 1
Mfugo.
Now the vector of pore water pressure at time t may bewritten as:
fugt ¼ ½U�½Ev�trþðM�1ÞDt½U��1fdugo þ ½U�½Ev�trþðM�2ÞDt½U��1fdugoþ � � � þ ½U�½Ev�trþ2Dt½U��1fdugo þ ½U�½Ev�trþDt½U��1fdugoþ ½U�½Ev�tr ½U��1fdugo ð29Þ
where Dt is the time interval (year), Dt= tc/(M � 1); tc is the
construction time (year); tr = t � tc (year); {du}o is the vectorof additional initial pore water pressure; {u}tc is the vector ofpore water pressure at time tc, and {u}k is the vector of porewater pressure at interval k.
Replacing tr by t � tc in the above equation gives:
fugt ¼ ½U�½Ev�t½U��1fdugo þ ½U�½Ev�t�Dt½U��1fdugoþ ½U�½Ev�t�2Dt½U��1fdugo þ � � �
þ ½U�½Ev�t�ðM�1ÞDt½U��1fdugo ð30Þ
Replacing {du}o by 1Mfugo in the above equation and rewriting
the equation gives:
fugt ¼1
M½U�½Ev�t ½I� þ ½Ev��Dt þ ½Ev��2Dt þ ½Ev��3Dt þ � � �
h
þ½Ev��ðM�1ÞDti½U��1fugo ð31Þ
Eq. (31) is rewritten in matrix form as:
fugt ¼ ½U�½Ev�t½D�½U��1fugo ð32Þ
where [D] is a diagonal square matrix. The diagonal elementsof the matrix [D] are defined by:
Dj ¼1
M½1þ exp xjDt
� �þ exp 2xjDt
� �þ � � �
þ exp ðM� 1ÞxjDt� �
� ð33Þ
The summation of the above series when M =1 is givenby:
Dj ¼expðxjtcÞ � 1
xjtcð34Þ
In this case, the equation for excess pore water pressure ui(z, t)for layer i in a multi-layered system becomes:
uiðz;tÞ¼XNj¼1
DjCj½Aij sinðlikjniÞþBij cosðlikjniÞ�expðxjtÞ ð35Þ
Virgin compressionslop Cci
Recompression slope Cri
[-]
1048 R. Herrmann, M. El Gendy
and the average excess power water pressure Dui becomes:
Dui¼1
li
XNj¼1
DjCj
kj
Aij½1� cosðlikjÞ�þBij sinðlikjÞ� �
expð�xjtÞ ð36Þ
Voi
d ra
tio e
ei
eoi
Δσi-Δui
σ'iσ'ci σ'oi
Δe
Stress σ' [kN/m2] (Log scale)
Figure 4 Relationship between void ratio and stress (loading
case), r0oi P r0ci.
Voi
d ra
tio e
[-] Virgin compression
slop C ci
Recompression slope Cri
ei
eoi
Δσi-Δui
σ'iσ'oi σ 'ci
Δe
Stress σ' [kN/m2] (Log scale)
Figure 5 Relationship between void ratio and stress (reloading
case), r0i < r0ci.
2.2. Formulation of consolidation settlement
2.2.1. Nonlinear analysis
Many researchers, Zhung et al. [5], Zhuang and Xie [11], Conteand Troncone [12], Lekha et al. [13], Xie et al. [2,4,14], Chenet al. [15] and Abbasi et al. [16], had used the assumption of
nonlinear analysis proposed by Davis and Raymond [17] tointroduce a nonlinear analysis of 1-D consolidation with vari-able compressibility and permeability. They assumed that the
decrease in permeability is proportional to the decrease incompressibility. Therefore, if the coefficient of consolidationis considered as constant during the consolidation process(Eq. (37)), the only soil variable during the consolidation pro-
cess required for the nonlinear analysis will be the coefficient ofvolume change.
cvi ¼kvi
cwmvi
¼ kvoicwmvoi
ð37Þ
where cw is the unit weight of the water (kN/m3); mvoi is the ini-
tial coefficients of volume change in a layer i (m2/kN); and kvoiis the initial coefficients of permeability in a layer i (m/year).
During the consolidation process, void ratio-effective stressresponse is given by:
ei ¼ eoi � Cci logr0ir0oi
�ð38Þ
where ei (–) and eoi (–) are the void ratios at time t and the ini-tial void ratio of layer i corresponding to effective stresses r0i(kN/m2) and r0oi (kN/m2), respectively, and Cci (–) is the com-pressibility index of layer i.
From Eq. (38), the initial coefficient of volume change mvoi
in a layer i can be estimated as follows:
mvoi ¼�1
1þ eoi
@e
@r0
����r0i¼r0
oi
¼ Cci
ð1þ eoiÞr0oi lnð10Þð39Þ
As the analysis in this paper deals with either normally or
pre-consolidated clay, the compressibility index Cci (–) isreplaced by the recompression index Cri(–) in the case of pre-consolidated clay. Coefficient of volume change at any inter-mediate interval time during the consolidation process may
be determined from the previous time step as described inthe next sections.
2.2.2. Determining stresses in a soil layer
According to Terzaghi’s principle of effective stress, the effec-tive stress r0i in a layer i during the consolidation process canbe given by:
r0i ¼ r0oi þ Dri � Dui ð40Þ
where r0oi is the initial vertical effective stress caused by the
weight of the soil itself at the middle of layer i (kN/m2); Driis the increment of vertical stress at time t in a layer i due tothe applied load on the surface (kN/m2); and Dui is the averageexcess pore water pressure at time t in a layer i (kN/m2).
At the end of consolidation, Dui = 0 and the effective stressr0i in a layer i reaches its final value:
r0i ¼ r0oi þ Dri ð41Þ
As the load on the surface is applied gradually during theconstruction time, tc and the excess pore water pressure varies
during the consolidation process; the value of Dri � Dui defineswhen the clay layer is normally consolidated or pre-consolidated.
2.2.3. Normally consolidated clay (loading case)
According to Fig. 4, a layer i is considered as normally consol-idated clay during the consolidation process when the initial
vertical effective stress r0oi is greater than or equal to thepre-consolidation pressure r0ci.
For normally consolidated clay, the consolidation settle-ment spi of a layer i of thickness hi is given by:
spi ¼Ccihi1þ eoi
logr0oi þ Dri � Dui
r0oi
�ð42Þ
As the layer thickness is assumed to be small, the consolida-
tion settlement spi as a function in the coefficient of volumechange mvi may be also given by:
spi ¼ mviðDri � DuiÞhi ð43Þ
A layer equation method for 1-D consolidation under time-dependent reloading 1049
The coefficient of volume change at any time t during theconsolidation process can be obtained from Eqs. (42) and(43) as follows:
mvi ¼Cci
ð1þ eoiÞðDri � DuiÞlog
r0oi þ Dri � Duir0oi
�ð44Þ
2.2.4. Pre-consolidated clay (reloading case)
The reloading case for a layer i during the consolidation pro-cess is considered when the pre-consolidation pressure r0ci isgreater than the effective stress r0i (Fig. 5). For pre-consoli-
dated clay (reloading case), replacing the compression indexfor loading Cci by the compression index for reloading Cri,gives the settlement spi from Eq. (42) and the coefficient of vol-
ume change from Eq. (44).
2.2.5. Pre-consolidated clay (case of loading and reloading)
In the general case of loading and reloading (Fig. 6), the incre-
ment of vertical stress Dr0i in a layer i is expressed as:
Dr0i ¼ r0ri þ Dr0ei ð45Þ
where Dr0ri ¼ r0ci � r0oi is the reloading increment of verticalstress in a layer i (kN/m2) and Dr0ei ¼ r0oi þ Dri � Dui � r0ci isthe loading increment of vertical stress in a layer i (kN/m2).
The total consolidation settlement is divided into two partsaccording to Fig. 6. In the first part, the clay layer will consol-idate with reloading compression index Cri until the soil pres-
sure reaches pre-consolidation pressure r0ci. In the second partafter reaching the pressure r0ci, the clay layer will consolidatemore with loading compression index Cci until reaching the
final stress r0i.For pre-consolidated clay (the loading and reloading case),
the reloading pressure effect may be taken into consideration
by dividing the consolidation settlement in a layer i into twoterms such that:
spi ¼Crihi1þ eoi
logr0cir0oi
�þ Ccihi1þ eoi
logr0oi þ Dri � Dui
r0ci
�ð46Þ
For the loading and reloading case, the consolidation settle-ment spi as a function in coefficients of volume change mvi forloading and mri for reloading may be also given by:
spi ¼ mri r0ci � r0oi� �
hi þmvi r0oi þ Dri � Dui � r0ci� �
hi ð47Þ
σ'oi
Virgin compressionslope C ci
Recompression slope C ri
Stress σ' [kN/m2] (Log scale)
σ'ci σ'i
eoi
ei
Voi
d ra
tio e
[-]
σ'ci - σ'oi σ'i - σ'ci
σi - ui
e2
e1
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Figure 6 Relationship between void ratio and stress (case of
loading and reloading), r0i > r0ci > r0oi.
The coefficients of volume change for loading and reload-ing at any time t during the consolidation process can beobtained from Eqs. (46) and (47) as follows:
mri ¼ Cri
ð1þeoiÞðr0ci�r0oiÞ logð
r0ci
r0oiÞ
mvi ¼ Cci
ð1þeoiÞ r0oiþDri�Dui�r0
cið Þ logr0oiþDri�Dui
r0ci
� �9>=>; ð48Þ
2.2.6. Degree of consolidation
The degree of consolidation Us of the entire soil layers can beexpressed as:
Us ¼Skt
Sku
ð49Þ
where Skt is the sum of primary consolidation settlements in all
layers at the required time t (m), and Sku is the sum of finalconsolidation settlements in all layers, when Dui = 0 (m).
3. Numerical results
A user-friendly computer program has been developed forsolving time-dependent problems of clay layers using the
method outlined in this paper. With the help of this program,an analysis of two examples was carried out first to verify andtest the proposed method. Then, a general time-dependentproblem was evaluated to show the behavior of excess pore
water pressure during the consolidation process taking intoaccount changing the state from over- to normally-consoli-dated clay.
3.1. Test Example 1: consolidation of a single soil layer
A closed form solution for 1-D consolidation of a single layer
in an infinite sin series is available in the reference Terzaghiand Peck [18]. To verify the proposed method (LEM) fortime-dependent settlement problems for deriving a closed form
solution, the excess pore water pressure and the degree of con-solidation for a single layer calculated analytically by the avail-able closed form solution are compared with those obtained bydescribed LEM in this paper.
According to Terzaghi and Peck [18], the excess pore waterpressure u(z, t) at any depth z and time t can be determinedfrom:
uðz; tÞ ¼ 2uoX1j¼1
1
Mj
sinðMjnÞ exp �M2j Tv
� �ð50Þ
while the degree of consolidation U(t) is determined from:
UðtÞ ¼ 1� 2X1j¼1
1
M2j
exp �M2j Tv
� �ð51Þ
where Mj ¼ p2ð2j� 1Þ; Tv ¼ cvt
H2d
is the time factor in which Hd isthe length of drainage pass, for double drainage Hd =H/2while for single drainage Hd = H; and uo is the initial excesspore water pressure which is constant with depth (kN/m2).
To apply LEM, the single layer is divided into three equalsub-layers, which gives a grid nodes of N = 3. Consequently,an equation in three terms for determining the excess pore
water pressure u(z, t) at any depth z and time t is obtained:
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0D
epth
rat
io z
/HExcess pore water pressure ratio u/q
Tv=0.05 (LEM)
TV=0.197 (LEM)
TV=0.848 (LEM)
Analytical
Figure 7 Excess pore water pressure ratio with depth ratio at
different Tv for double drainage layer.
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Dep
th r
atio
z/H
Excess pore water pressure ratio u/q
Tv=0.05 (LEM)TV=0.197 (LEM)TV=0.848 (LEM)Analytical
Figure 8 Excess pore water pressure ratio with depth ratio at
different Tv for single drainage layer.
cv1=100 [m2/Year]
Layer 2
Layer 1
Pervious
H
h2=9 [m]
z1
1
3
2 uo=100 [kN/m2]
Ground surface Uniform stress q=100 [kN/m2]
cv2=25 [m2/Year]
h1=9 [m]
kv2/ kv1=0.25
Pervious
uo
uo
uoz2
u
Figure 10 Two clay layers with soil properties.
1050 R. Herrmann, M. El Gendy
uðz; tÞ ¼ uoX3j¼1
Cj sinðMjnÞ exp �M2j Tv
� �ð52Þ
Also an equation in three terms for determining the degree ofconsolidation U(t) is obtained:
UðtÞ ¼ 1�X3j¼1
Cj
Mj
exp �M2j Tv
� �ð53Þ
where C1 ¼ 2þffiffiffi3p� �
=3; C2 = 1/3; and C3 ¼ 2�ffiffiffi3p� �
=3
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0
Deg
ree
of c
onso
lidat
ion
U [
%]
Time factor Tv [-]
LEMAnalytical
Figure 9 Degree of consolidation at different Tv.
Results of LEM are compared with those of the closed formsolution. Figs. 7 and 8 show excess pore water pressure ratiosand degrees of consolidation at different time factors. How-
ever, Eqs. (52) and (53) of LEM are derived in three terms;results obtained from LEM are in a good agreement with thoseof the analytical solution of Terzaghi for both cases of doubleand single drainage (see Fig. 9).
3.2. Test Example 2: consolidation of a double-layered soil
To illustrate the hand application of LEM, the excess pore
water pressure for a double-layered soil shown in Fig. 10 afterone year is determined and compared with that obtained byFDM. The two layers are equal in thickness, each of
h1 = h2 = 9 (m). The coefficient of consolidation for the firstlayer is cv1 = 100 (m2/year), while that for the second layeris cv2 = 25 (m2/year). The coefficient of permeability ratio
for the two layers is g = k2/k1 = 0.25. The initial excess porewater pressure is distributed uniformly on the soil layers andequal to uo = 100 (kN/m2). Pervious top and bottom bound-aries are assumed.
According to Eq. (6), equations of excess pore water pres-sure for the two layers when considering three nodes can beexpressed as:
u1ðz; tÞ ¼XN¼3j¼1
Cj½A1j sinðkjnÞ þ B1j cosðkjnÞ� exp �k2j Tv1
� �
u2ðz; tÞ ¼XN¼3j¼1
Cj½A2j sin lkjq� �
þ B2j cos lkjq� �
� expð�l2k2j Tv2Þ
ð54Þ
where ui(z, t) is the excess pore water pressure at any localdepth z and time t for layer i (kN/m2); n is the depth ratio in
local coordinate of layer 1, n = z/h1 with 0 6 n 6 1; q is thedepth ratio in local coordinate of layer 2, q = z/h2 with0 6 q 6 1.
Satisfying free drainage at the top u1(0, t) = 0, requires
that:
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
0 5 10 15 20 25
Dep
th z
[m
]
Excess pore water pressure u [kN/m2]
t=3 Years (LEM)
t=2 Years (LEM)
t=1 Year (LEM)
FDM
Figure 11 Excess pore water pressure with depth at different
times.
A layer equation method for 1-D consolidation under time-dependent reloading 1051
A1j
B1j
� �¼
1
0
� �ð55Þ
Eq. (54) at t= 0 for the first layer becomes:
u1ðz; tÞ ¼ C1 sinðk1nÞ þ C2 sinðk2nÞ þ C3 sinðk3nÞ ð56Þ
and for the second layer becomes:
u2ðz; tÞ ¼ C1½A21 sin lk1qð Þ þ B21 cos lk1qð Þ� þ C2½A22
� sin lk2qð Þ þ B22 cos lk2qð Þ� þ C3½A23
� sin lk2qð Þ þ B23 cosðlk2qÞ� ð57Þ
Coefficients A2j and B2j can be obtained using interface andboundary conditions. Equating the excess pore water pressuresu1(z, 0) = u2(z, 0) at layer interfaces, leads to:
sinðk1Þ ¼ B2j ð58Þ
while equating the vertical velocity of flow at layer interfaces,leads to:
g cosðk1Þ ¼ A2j ð59Þ
Applying the boundary condition for double drainage at
the bottom u2(h2, t) = 0, leads to:
A2j sinðlkjÞ þ B2j cosðlkjÞ ¼ 0 ð60Þ
Eliminating coefficients A2j and B2j from Eqs. (58)–(60),
gives the following characteristic equation in the unknownEigen values kj:
g cos kj
� �sinðlkjÞ þ sin kj
� �cosðlkjÞ ¼ 0 ð61Þ
Substituting the values of l ¼ ðh2=h1Þffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffifficv1=cv2
p¼ 2 and
g = (h2kv1)/lh1kv2 = 2 into Eq. (61).
The characteristic Eq. (61) becomes:
cos 2kj
� �¼ �2
3ð62Þ
The operator kj is the positive root of the above character-istic equation.
kj ¼ 1:1505; 1:991; 4:292 ðj ¼ 1; 2; 3Þ ð63Þ
Substituting the value of kj obtained from Eq. (63) into Eqs.(58) and (59), gives coefficients A2j and B2j.
A2j ¼ 0:816;�0:816;�0:816 ðj ¼ 1; 2; 3ÞB2j ¼ 0:913; 0:913;�0:913 ðj ¼ 1; 2; 3Þ
ð64Þ
Constant Cj can be obtained using the initial condition.
Consider a system of linear equations at the set of N = 3 gridpoints at time t= 0 as follows:
at node 1 where n = 0.5
uo ¼ C1 sinð1:150� 0:5Þ þ C2 sinð1:991� 0:5Þþ C3 sinð4:292� 0:5Þ ð65Þ
at node 2 where n = 1
uo ¼ C1 sinð1:150� 1Þ þ C2 sinð1:991� 1Þþ C3 sinð4:292� 1Þ ð66Þ
at node 3 where q = 0.5
uo¼C1½0:816sin 2�1:150�0:5ð Þþ0:913cos 2�1:150�0:5ð Þ�þC2½�0:816sin 2�1:991�0:5ð Þþ0:913cos 2�1:991�0:5ð Þ�þC3½�0:816sin 2�4:292�0:5ð Þ�0:913cos 2�4:292�0:5ð Þ� ð67Þ
Eqs. (65)–(67) in a matrix form are:
uo
uo
uo
8><>:
9>=>; ¼
0:544 0:839 0:839
0:913 0:913 �0:9131:119 �1:119 1:119
264
375
C1
C2
C3
8><>:
9>=>; ð68Þ
Through inverting the matrix of Eq. (68), the constants of
the basic functions Cj can be obtained as:
C1
C2
C3
8><>:
9>=>; ¼ uo
0:994
0:324
0:224
8><>:
9>=>; ð69Þ
According to Eq. (8), the excess pore water pressure fornodes 1, 2 and 3 of the two soil layers can be expressed as:
u1
u2
u3
8><>:
9>=>;¼ 100
0:544 0:839 0:839
0:913 0:913 �0:9131:119 �1:119 1:119
264
375
exp �1:1502�1:235� �
0 0
0 exp �1:9912�1:235� �
0
0 0 exp �4:2922�1:235� �
264
375
0:994
0:324
0:224
8><>:
9>=>;ð70Þ
where the time factor is given by Tv1 ¼ cv1t=h21 ¼ 1:235.
The values of excess pore water pressure at the three nodesusing LEM obtained from Eq. (70) are:
u1 u2 u3f gT ¼ 10:73 17:90 21:44f gT ð71Þ
The same example is analyzed using the FDM with 0.9 (m)depth increment. Results obtained from FDM after one yearare:
u1 u2 u3f gT ¼ 10:23 16:89 22:46f gT ð72Þ
Furthermore, the excess pore water pressure with depth at
different times obtained from LEM and FDM are comparedin Fig. 11. The comparison shows a good agreement betweenthe two results.
Cv1=4.419*10-8 [m2/Sec]kv1=2.783*10-11 [m/Sec]
Layer 2
Layer 1 1 h1=3.05 [m]
h2=6.10 [m]
Layer 3
Layer 4
2
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
h3=9.14 [m]
h4=6.10 [m]
Cv2=2.062*10-7 [m2/Sec] kv2=8.255*10-11 [m/Sec]
Cv3=5.892*10-8 [m2/Sec]kv3=1.175*10-11 [m/Sec]
Cv4=7.376*10-8 [m2/Sec]kv4=2.946*10-11 [m/Sec]
Pervious or impervious
Pervious
H=
24.3
9 [m
]
Figure 12 Four clay layers with studying nodes and soil
properties.
0.00.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Excess pore water pressure ratio u/q
1052 R. Herrmann, M. El Gendy
3.3. Test Example 3: consolidation of a multi-layered soil
Many authors applied their developed methods for analyzing
the multi-layered system on the example presented by Schiffi-man and Stein [19]. The example was studied by Lee et al.[1] using a general analytical solution, by Chen et al. [15] usingfinite difference method and differential quadrature method,
by Walker [20] using spectral method and by Huang and Grif-fiths [21] using the finite-element method. The soil profile in theexample consists of four layers. The geometry and the soil
properties of the four layers are shown in Fig. 12. The appliedload on the layers was uniform.
To apply LEM, the four layers are divided into 2, 3, 4 and 3
sub-layers, respectively. The total grid nodes for the case ofdouble drainage is N = 11, while that for the case of singledrainage is N= 12. The case of double drainage that was stud-ied by Chen et al. [15] using differential quadrature method
required to divide the soil profile into four differential quadra-ture elements with equally spaced sub-layers. The number ofsampling nodes for the quadrature method of the four layers
was taken as 7, 13, 19 and 13, respectively. This leads to a totalsampling nodes of N = 52. The sub-layer thickness was 0.51
Table 1 Eigen values of the four layers.
Double drainage Single drainage
j kj j kj j kj j kj
1 0.6309 7 3.6397 1 0.2524 7 3.4559
2 0.9367 8 4.0673 2 0.7216 8 3.9392
3 1.4444 9 4.6724 3 1.2326 9 4.2328
4 2.2204 10 5.2145 4 1.9140 10 4.8953
5 2.6107 11 5.7231 5 2.3810 11 5.6192
6 3.0565 – – 6 2.7253 12 5.9248
(m). In LEM, studying nodes are arbitrarily. Sublayers inLEM are 1.53 (m), 2.29 (m), 2.03 (m) and 2.29 (m), respec-tively. Chen et al. [15] studied also the case of double drainage
by finite difference method with the same sub-layer thicknessof 0.51 (m). The results of the quadrature method agreed wellwith the analytical solution while those of the finite difference
had an obvious difference with the analytical solution.Table 1 listed the Eigen values kj of the four layers obtained
from the characteristic equation, Eq. (20). However, kj of LEMare computed by a similar manner to that of Lee et al. [1], theyare different from those of Lee et al. [1] for the same example.This is related to using a different depth ratio in LEM. InLEM, the number of kj is specified by the number of studying
nodes, while that in the general analytical solution of Lee et al.[1] is unlimited.
Figs. 13 and 14 show the excess pore water pressure ratio
with depth ratio at different time factors obtained fromLEM compared with that of the analytical solution presentedby Lee et al. [1] for both cases of single and double drainages.
Fig. 15 shows the degree of consolidation at different time fac-tors Tv = cv1t/H
2 for the double drainage case obtained fromLEM compared with that of the differential quadrature
method presented by Chen et al. [15]. It can be seen from thosefigures that results obtained by LEM are in a good agreementwith those of Lee et al. [1] and Chen et al. [15].
3.4. Application Example 4: nonlinear analysis of a squarefoundation on a finite thick clay layer
An application of LEM is carried out to study the behavior of
a foundation resting on a finite thick clay layer. A square foun-dation shape is considered with a side of B = 10 (m). Thefoundation is subjected to a uniform load of qo = 100 (kN/
m2) and rests on a clay layer of thickness H= 2B as shownin Fig. 16. The groundwater level lies at a depth equal to thefoundation depth Df.
The study examines effects of reloading contact pressure onthe nonlinear consolidation behavior. In the example, the totalcontact pressure on the raft is divided into two terms. The firstterm is reloading contact pressure qv = cDf and the second
term is loading contact pressure qe = qo � qv. Consequently,the total settlement is obtained from two parts. The first partis due to the reloading contact pressure qv, which is estimated
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Dep
th r
atio
z/H
Tv=0.050 (LEM), t=20 Years
Tv=0.020 (LEM), t=8 Years
Tv=0.005 (LEM), t=2 Years
Analytical
Figure 13 Excess pore water pressure ratio with depth ratio at
different Tv for double drainage layer.
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Dep
th r
atio
z/ H
Excess pore water pressure ratio u /q
Tv=0.200 (LEM), t=85 Years
Tv=0.050 (LEM), t=20 years
Tv=0.020 (LEM), t=8 Years
Tv=0.005 (LEM), t=2 Years
Analytical
Figure 14 Excess pore water pressure ratio with depth ratio at
different Tv for single drainage layer.
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25
Deg
ree
of c
onso
lidat
ion
U [
%]
Time factor Tv [-]
LEM
Chen et al. (2005)
Figure 15 Degree of consolidation at different Tv for single
drainage layer.
A layer equation method for 1-D consolidation under time-dependent reloading 1053
from Cr; and the second part is due to the loading contact pres-
sure qe, which is estimated from Cc. Sequence of unloading,loading and reloading are not considered.
B=1
qo=1
GWPerviou
Clay propertieCv
-8
Cc
eo
γγ
=1×10= 0.15= 0.5= 18.5
' = 8.69
H1
GS
Pervious or impe
Figure 16 Section in clay layer wit
3.4.1. Clay properties
The compression indices for loading Cc and for reloading Cr
along with the initial void ratio eo are used to define the con-solidation characteristics of the clay. For the comparison pur-pose, the compression index Cc and the initial void ratio eo are
chosen to make the term Cc/(1+eo) as a constant and equal to0.1 for all calculations. The compression index for reloading Cr
is assumed such that a compression index ratio, rc = Cc/Cr,
gives values 1 (–), 5 (–), 10 (–) and 15 (–). The clay propertiesin this case are:
Coefficient of consolidation Cv = 1 · 10�8 (m2/s)
Compression index for loading Cc= 0.15 (–)
Initial void ratio eo = 0.5 (–)
Unit weight of the clay c = 18.5 (kN/m3)
0
0
s
s[m[-[-[k[k
rv
h
3.4.2. Variables
Referring to Fig. 16, the foundation depth Df is chosen to give
different values of reloading contact pressure qv. Values offoundation depth and their corresponding variables are shownin Table 2.
To carry out the analysis, the clay layer of thickness Hunder the foundation level is subdivided into 10 equal sub-layers with 11 nodes, each of thickness 2.0 (m), while the con-solidation time is divided into 10 equal intervals. The pre-con-
solidation pressure in a node i on the clay layer is given by:
r0ci ¼ r0oi þ Drvi ð73Þ
where Drvi is the increase of vertical stress due to the reloadingpressure at node i (kN/m2).
3.4.3. Analysis and results
To achieve the study, 592 computational analyses have beencarried out for the above variables and parameters. To get
general relations between the different variables, results are
Df
H
[m]
0 [kN/m2]
top
: 2/s]
] ]N/m3] N/m3]
ious base
dimension and soil properties.
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Deg
ree
of c
onso
lidat
ion
U[%
]
Time factor Tv [-]
Up-Pervious
Us-Pervious
Up-Impervious
Us-Impervious
Figure 17 Comparison between Up and Us (rc = 1 and rq = 0.5).
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Deg
ree
of c
onso
lidat
ion
U[%
]
Time factor Tv [-]
Up-Pervious
Us-Pervious
Up-Impervious
Us-Impervious
Figure 18 Comparison between Up and Us (rc = 10 and
rq = 0.5).
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Settl
emen
t rat
io rs
[-]
Time factor Tv [-]
rq=0.00
rq=0.25
rq=0.50
rq=0.75
rq=1.00
Figure 19 Effect of reloading pressure on the settlement ratio rs(pervious boundary-rc = 1).
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Settl
emen
t rat
io rs
[-]
Time factor Tv [-]
rq=0.00
rq=0.25
rq=0.50
rq=0.75
rq=1.00
Figure 20 Effect of reloading pressure on the settlement ratio rs(pervious boundary-rc = 10).
Table 2 Values of foundation depth and their corresponding variables.
Foundation depth Df (m) 0.00 1.35 2.70 4.05 5.41
Total clay layer H1 (m) 20.00 21.35 22.70 24.05 25.41
Reloading contact pressure qv (kN/m2) 0 25 50 75 100
1054 R. Herrmann, M. El Gendy
plotted in dimensionless ratios. The reloading effect isexpressed by a reloading pressure ratio rq(–), which is given by:
rq ¼qvqo
ð74Þ
where qo the contact pressure on the foundation (kN/m2); andqv = cDf is the reloading contact pressure (kN/m2).
Similarly, the settlement effect is expressed by a settlementratio rs (–), which is given by:
rs ¼Sv
So
ð75Þ
where So is the central settlement due to the applied load with-out reloading effect (rq = 0) (m); and Sv is the central settle-ment due to the applied load with reloading effect (rq > 0) (m).
Figs. 17 and 18 show comparisons between Up and Us forpervious and impervious boundaries at different values of Tv
when rc = 1, rc = 10 and rq = 0.5. Unlike the linear analysiswhere Up is equal to Us, the figures indicate that Up and Us
are not equal for either rc = 1 or rc = 10. The development
of settlement in the case of rc = 1 is quicker than the dissipa-tion of excess pore water pressure (i.e., Us > Up). This obser-vation is changed in the case of rc = 10. The greatest rate ofconsolidation occurs for a pervious boundary.
Figs. 19–22 show the variations in settlement ratio rs withthe reloading pressure ratio rq for rc = 1 and rc = 10 at differ-ent values of Tv.
It can be observed from these figures that the reloadingpressure has a considerable influence on the settlement. To fur-ther clarify, consider the following three values of reloading
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Deg
ree
of c
onso
lidat
ion
Us
[%]
Time factor Tv [-]
rc=1
rc=5
rc=10
rc=15
Figure 23 Effect of index ratio on the degree of consolidation Us
(pervious boundary-rq = 0.5).
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Deg
ree
of c
onso
lidat
ion
Us
[%]
Time factor Tv [-]
rc=1
rc=5
rc=10
rc=15
Figure 24 Effect of index ratio on the degree of consolidation Us
(impervious boundary-rq = 0.5).
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Settl
emen
t rat
io rs
[-]
Time factor Tv [-]
rq=0.00
rq=0.25
rq=0.50
rq=0.75
rq=1.00
Figure 22 Effect of reloading pressure on the settlement ratio rs(impervious boundary-rc = 10).
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Settl
emen
t rat
io rs
[-]
Time factor Tv [-]
rq=0.00
rq=0.25
rq=0.50
rq=0.75
rq=1.00
Figure 21 Effect of reloading pressure on the settlement ratio rs(impervious boundary-rc = 1).
A layer equation method for 1-D consolidation under time-dependent reloading 1055
pressures; rq = 0.75, rq = 0.25 and rq = 0.0 for a pervious
boundary at consolidation time of t= 40 years(Tv = 0.0315) and rc = 10, which may represent relativelylarge and small values of rq. Results of these three cases are
presented in values in Table 3. Referring to this table, as a sam-ple, rq = 0.75 meets a foundation depth of Df = 4.05 (m),which gives a reloading contact pressure of qv = 75 (kN/m2).
This means that the first term of settlement is determined fromreloading contact pressure of qv = 75 (kN/m2) and Compres-sion index for reloading Cr = 0.015 (–). In this case, the second
term of settlement is determined from loading contact pressureof qe = qo�qv = 25 (kN/m2) and Compression index for load-ing Cr = 0.15 (–). Similarly, the settlement terms for the othertwo cases can be determined.
Table 3 Values of results at consolidation time of 40 years.
Foundation depth Df (m) 0.00
Total clay layer H1 (m) 20.00
Reloading contact pressure qv = cDf (kN/m2) 0
Reloading pressure ratio rq = qv/qo (–) 0
Total settlement Sv (cm) 37.68
Settlement ratio rs = Sv/So (–) 1.00
From Table 3, it can be concluded that at a relatively smallvalue of rq = 25, the settlement reduces to 35 (%) of that with-
out reloading pressure (at rq = 0 and Df = 0), while at a rela-tively greater value of rq =75, the settlement reduces to 12 (%)of that without reloading pressure. These percentages become
51 (%) and 25 (%) when rc = 1.The development of settling begins quickly and becomes
constant until the end of consolidation process. Both two cases
of pervious and impervious boundaries give nearly the samesettlement magnitude at a specified rc.
The effect of the compression index ratio rc on the degree ofconsolidation Us at different values of Tv when rq = 0.5 for
pervious and impervious boundaries are shown in Figs. 23
1.35 2.70 4.05 5.41
21.35 22.70 24.05 25.41
25 50 75 100
0.25 0.50 0.75 1.0
13.22 4.66 1.24 0.66
0.35 0.12 0.03 0.02
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0D
egre
e of
con
solid
atio
n U
s[%
]Time factor Tv [-]
Tvc=0.0
Tvc=0.03
Tvc=0.25
Figure 25 Effect of loading rate on the degree of consolidation
Us (pervious boundary rc = 10-rq = 0.5).
1056 R. Herrmann, M. El Gendy
and 24. The figures show that the rate of consolidation for apervious boundary is higher than that for an imperviousboundary. The rate of consolidation Us for all values of rcare nearly the same for either pervious or imperviousboundary.
Fig. 25 shows the effect of loading rate on the degree of
consolidation Us at different values of Tv and Tvc = Cvtc/H2
when rc = 10 and rq = 0.5 an for pervious boundary, whileFig. 26 shows this effect for an impervious boundary. As
expected, the quicker the loading the faster the consolidation.
3.4.4. Stability of the analysis
The solution of LEM is considered to be convergence when the
differential equation operator kj of a problem can be obtained.The stability of the solution is investigated by choosing differ-ent studying nodes with different element thicknesses of clay. It
is found that the solution for nonlinear analysis depends on thesub-layer thickness in which a thickness of 2 (m) gives a goodresults. For linear analysis the Test Example 3 is studied. Thesolution was always convergence even for a very small sub-
layer thickness of 0.05 (m).For case of a system having too many layers with extreme
differences in soil properties, the convergence of the solution
may be not occurred. It can overcome this problem by choos-ing sublayers lead to the parameter of the coefficient of
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Deg
ree
of c
onso
lidat
ion
Us
[%]
Time factor Tv [-]
Tvc=0.0
Tvc=0.03
Tvc=0.25
Figure 26 Effect of loading rate on the degree of consolidation
Us (impervious boundary rc = 10-rq = 0.5).
consolidation and thickness, li ¼ ðhi=h1Þffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffifficv1=cvi
pfor all layers
nearly equal to 1.
4. Conclusions
A generalized procedure and method for the solution of thefundamental problem of time-dependent consolidation and
settlement of clay layers is presented. The proposed methodconsiders various analysis aspects of the consolidation prob-lem such as, among others: uniform and time-dependent load-
ing, cycling loading, nonlinear compressibility parameters,multi-layered soil, normal- and over-consolidated clay, andcreep compression. In reality, settlement due to consolidation
consists of two parts: loading and reloading settlements.In this paper, an analysis using the LEM method is devel-
oped to take into account the change of the soil state from over-
to normally-consolidated clay since both reloading and loadingcases can exist during the consolidation process. The initialapplied stress on the clay layer is considered non-uniform.Also, coefficients of compressibility and permeability are con-
sidered to decrease with time and are variable for each layer.The method provides a solution to differential equations forboundary condition problems in which closed form solutions
are not possible or difficult. Three tested examples are pre-sented to verify the method. A study for nonlinear analysis ofa square foundation on a finite thick clay layer is also presented.
The developed LEMmethod depends on selecting a numberof nodes in the soil layers. Consequently, a better representationfor applied stresses on the layers can be represented. It is alsoideal for using a stress coefficient technique, which may be
extended to study the interaction of irregularly loaded areason the surface, or contact pressure due to foundation rigidity.LEM requires fewer equation terms, in which a few terms are
sufficient to give good results. In this method only a limitednumber of Eigen values equal to the selected points are required.
Appendix A. Matrix [U] for double drainage boundaries is
given by:
½U� ¼
B21 B22 B23 � � � � � � � � � B2n
B31 B32 B33 � � � � � � � � � B3n
B41 B42 B43 � � � � � � � � � B4n
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Bðn�1Þ1 Bðn�1Þ2 Bðn�1Þ3 � � � � � � � � � Bðn�1Þn
jBn1j jBn2j jBn3j � � � � � � � � � jBnnj
2666666666664
3777777777775ð76Þ
Matrix [U] for single drainage boundary is given by:
½U� ¼
B21 B22 B23 � � � � � � � � � B2n
B31 B32 B33 � � � � � � � � � B3n
B41 B42 B43 � � � � � � � � � B4n
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �Bn1 Bn2 Bn3 � � � � � � � � � Bnn
Bðnþ1Þ1 Bðnþ1Þ2 Bðnþ1Þ3 � � � � � � � � � Bðnþ1Þn
2666666666664
3777777777775
ð77Þ
A layer equation method for 1-D consolidation under time-dependent reloading 1057
References
[1] Lee P, Xie K, Cheung Y. A study on one-dimensional consoli-
dation of layered systems. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech
1992;16:815–31.
[2] Xie K, Xie X, Jiang W. A study on one-dimensional nonlinear
consolidation of double-layered soil. Comput Geotech
2002;29(2):151–68.
[3] Xie K, Leo C. Analytical solutions of one-dimensional large strain
consolidation of saturated and homogeneous clays. Comput
Geotech 2004;31(4):301–14.
[4] Xie K, Wen J, Xia J. Solution to 1-D consolidation of non-
homogeneous soft clay. J Zhejiang Univ Sci 2005;6A(Suppl. I):
29–34.
[5] Zhuang Y, Xie K, Li X. Nonlinear analysis of consolidation with
variable compressibility and permeability. J Zhejiang Univ Sci
2005;6A(3):181–7.
[6] Morris P. Analytical solutions of linear finite-strain one-dimen-
sional consolidation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 2002:319.
[7] Terzaghi K. Erdbaumechanik auf boden-physikalischen Grund-
lagen. Vienna, Austria: Deuticke; 1925.
[8] Singh S. Estimating consolidation coefficient and final settlement
triangular excess pore-water pressure. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng
2005:1050.
[9] Xie K, Wang K, Chen G, Hu A. One-dimensional consolidation
of over-consolidated soil under time-dependent loading. Front
Archit Civ Eng China 2008;2(1):67–72.
[10] El Gendy M. Developing stress coefficients for raft-deformation
on a thick clay layer. Sci Bull, Fac Eng Ain Shams Univ
2006;41(3):73–108.
[11] Zhuang Y, Xie K. Study on one-dimensional consolidation of soil
under cyclic loading and with varied compressibility. J Zhejiang
Univ Sci 2005;6A(2):141–7.
[12] Conte C, Troncone A. Nonlinear consolidation of thin layer
subjected to time-dependent loading. Can Geotech J
2007;44:717–25.
[13] Lekha K, Krishnaswamy N, Basak P. Consolidation of clays for
variable permeability and compressibility. J Geotech Geoenviron
Eng 2003:1001.
[14] Xie K, Tian Q, Dong Y. Nonlinear analytical solution for one-
dimensional consolidation of soft soil under cycle loading. J
Zhejiang Univ Sci 2006;7(8):1358–64.
[15] Chen R, Zhou W, Wang H, Chen Y. One-dimensional nonlinear
consolidation of multi-layered soil by differential quadrature
method. Comput Geotech 2005;32:358–69.
[16] Abbasi N, Rahimi H, Javadi A, Fakher A. Finite difference
approach for consolidation with variable compressibility and
permeability. Comput Geotech 2007;34:41–52.
[17] Davis E, Raymond G. A non-linear theory of consolidation.
Geotechnique 1965;15(2):161–73.
[18] Terzaghi K, Peck R. Soil mechanics in engineering practice. 2nd
ed. New York: Johm wiley & Sohn Inc.; 1976.
[19] Shiftman L, Stein R. One-dimensional consolidation of layered
systems. J Soil Mech Found Div (Am Soc Civil Eng) 1970;96(4):l
499–504.
[20] Walker R. Analytical solution for modeling soft soil consolidation
by vertical drains. PhD thesis, School of Civil, Mining and
Environmental Engineering, University of Wollongong, NSW
Australia; 2006.
[21] Huang J, Griffiths DV. One-dimensional consolidation theories
for layered soil and coupled and uncoupled solutions by the finite-
element method. Geotechnique 2010;60(9):709–13.
Richard Herrmann is a professor of Geotech-
nical Engineering, in Department of Civil
Engineering, Head of Geotechnical Institute,
Siegen University, Germany. Author’s contact
e-mail id is ‘‘richard.herrmann@uni-siegen.
de’’.
Mohamed El Gendy is a professor of Geo-
technical and Foundation Engineering, in
Department of Civil Engineering and Vice
Dean of Faculty of Engineering in Port Said
University, Egypt. Author’s contact e-mail id
is ‘‘[email protected]’’.