Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A High Specific Output Gasoline Low-Temperature Combustion Engine
– 2019 US DOE VTO AMR meeting –
Hanho YunPrincipal Investigator
Propulsion Systems Research LabsGeneral MotorsJune 13, 2019
This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information.
Project ID #ace121
Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Acknowledgment: This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), under Award Number DE-EE0007788.
Overview
TimelineStart Date: January 2017End Date: December 2019Duration: 3 years
Completion: 75%
Goals / Barriers• 15 ~ 17% fuel economy over baseline• Low temperature combustion regimes
for gasoline engines• Effective engine controls for Low
Temperature Combustion• Emissions control challenges for
advanced engine concepts
Project PartnersKey Suppliers
FEV DelphiFederal Moguls BASF
BudgetTotal funding for 3 years$ 1.90 M DOE Share$ 2.04 M GM Share$ 3.94 M Total
Funding received in FY18: $ 456.580Funding for FY19: $ 529,350
2Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Novel low temperature
plasma ignition
Relevance – Objective
Physics-based cylinder pressure
based control Lean, Low temperature combustion
Low cost lean aftertreatment
Downsizing & Boosting
• The primary objective of this project is the development of a gasoline combustion engine system capable of demonstrating a 15-17% fuel economy improvement relative to a contemporary stoichiometric combustion engine using marketplace gasoline(RD587)
• Be consistent with relevant emissions constraints (SULEV30)
Synergistic Integration
• Advanced individual technology should be synergistically integrated to achieve this goal
3Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Approach – Combustion and ControlDevelopment TARGET: High Efficiency; Low NOx; Low Combustion Noise; Controllability
Combustion Strategy IV
Combustion Strategy II
• Maximize LTC operation to cover the FTP cycle, • Develop optimal LTC strategy at various operating conditions, (optimization of valving
strategy, injection and ignition strategy)• Develop ignition timing control methodology at different combustion mode
4
Desired Driving Cycle Profile
Multi-variable Engine
Controller
Desired Torque
Desired Fuel
Multiple actuators management for engine / combustion control
Sensor measurements for air estimation
Sensor measurements for engine / combustion variables controls
Estimated air per cylinder (APC) for fuel control
FPW
Dyno Speed Controller
Calibrated Set-point
Desired engine / combustion variables
Sensor measurements for torque controls
Desired engine speed
LTC Engine
Actuator controls
Sensor measurement for actuator controls
Torque Model
APC Model
Low-level controller
High-level controller
Physics-based engine control significantly reduces calibration efforts by
minimizing tuning parameters
Combustion Strategy III
Combustion Strategy I
Speed (rpm)
Torq
ue (N
m)
Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Approach – Ignition & Aftertreatment
ACIS
• Challenge: the higher in-cylinder pressures demands higher breakdown voltages require smaller gap sizes the more the stability limit is degraded.
• GM in conjunction with Federal Mogul has developed a unique GBDI (Groundless Barrier Discharge Igniter).
• The system provides superior flame-initiation under stoichconditions, as well as LTC combustion phasing control through ozone generation by simply changing the supplying voltages.
05
10152025303540
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40
HR
R [J
/CAD
]
Crank Angle [dATDC]
Pre-strikes OFFPre-strikes ON - 40VPre-strikes ON - 50V
COVIMEP=3.5%
COVIMEP=11.5%
COVIMEP=5.1%
GBDI
LTC
Stoichiometric
UnderfloorTWC/GPF
Ammonia-based SCR lean NOx control
CC TWC: NSC&GOC HC/CO oxidation and NOx reduction under stoich/rich conditions
• PASS is a low cost, lean aftertreatment system that relies on the characteristics of the TWC and SCR to address stoichiometric and lean exhaust gas aftertreatment without the need for supplemental urea injection and/or high PGM loadings. Periodically operate the engine rich to generate NH3 on the TWC and store it on the SCR Under lean conditions, use the stored NH3 on the SCR for NOx conversion.
5Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Approach – Milestones
ACIS GBDI
2017 2018 2019Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Engine build and installationDevelop homogeneous stoich
calibration and controlFTP cycle test
LTC engine build and installation
LTC cal and ctrl at steady state
Implementation of aftertreatment system
Hot FTP testCold FTP test
√√
√√
Go/No-goDecision
Go/No-goDecision
√
6
√
√
Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Technical Accomplishments and ProgressBaseline Engine
• 2.2L 4-cylinder Engine• Compression ratio = 12:1• BOSCH 60-8 hole injector• Conventional spark plug• Single-step camshaft
LTC Engine• Scaled 1.4L 4-cylinder turbo-
charged engine• DELPHI 60/90-10 hole injector• GBDI System (SPK is back-up)• Two-step camshaft• Turbo-charger
60/90deg-10hole
60deg-8hole
7Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Evaluation of GBDI System
8Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Technical Accomplishments and Progress• LTC_NVO Operation• AF = 23:1• NO EGR, single injection, single ignition
• Stoich. Operation• EGR sweep at stoich. operation• Single injection, Single ignition
• LTC_PVO• PVO=100, 8% EGR• Double Injection
9Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Technical Accomplishments and Progress• LTC_PVO Operation• PVO=100, 8% EGR• Double Injection (SOI1=300
bTDC, SOI2=60 bTDC)
10
2%
Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Technical Accomplishments and Progress• Stoich. Operation• 2000 rpm, 26mg• 10% EGR• Single Injection (SOI=290
bTDC)
11Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Drawbacks of GBDI
12Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Technical Accomplishments and Progress
• 1500 rpm, 11 mg (2 bar BMEP)• EGR sweep at stoich. operation• Single injection, Single ignition
• 2000rpm, AF ratio sweep (LTC Operation)
13Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Technical Accomplishments and Progress • Since May 2018, 12 igniters have failed so far.
Date Hour Comment
5/16/2018 0 Failed on start up (70V, 1.5ms); internal arcing detected on bench test.
5/17/2018 0 Coil Failure
5/29/2018 Failed after battery issue; Upper swivel nut broke loose from silicone rubber
6/1/2018 Coil Failure
6/4/2018 Firing only on one side, significant deposit formation
6/5/2018 Firing only on one side, no deposit formation6/7/2018 30 Broke sheathing, carbon tracking6/22/2018 40 Coil Failure7/26/2018 40 Coil Failure8/3/2018 147 Lost plasma8/9/2018 12 Igniter Failure8/8/2018 8 Igniter Failure
14Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Technical Accomplishments and Progress
Combustion Strategy II (kinetics controlled) Lean LTC during NVO operation (Controllability)
EX IN
TDC
EX IN
TDC
• MAP = 95 kPa (WOT); w/o or w/ EGR• Low lift camshaft (negative valve overlap) for hot internal residuals• Low emissions and High efficiency ignition timing control and noise
15Speed (rpm)
Torq
ue (N
m)
Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Technical Accomplishments and Progress
CA50 Controllability• 2000 rpm, 2 bar BMEP, AF=20• Fixed SPK at 55 deg bTDC
CA50 Controllability• 2000 rpm, 4 bar BMEP• Double Injection; 75/25 Split
16Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Technical Accomplishments and Progress Noise Reduction• 2000 rpm, 3.3 bar BMEP• AF = 18• CA50 = 7 deg aTDC• EGR suppresses auto-ignitability
of the mixture combustion begins with flame-burn and auto-ignition takes place later in the cycle the total burn duration is extended ringing decreases
17
50/50
single Noise Reduction • 2000 rpm, 4 bar BMEP• CA50 = 9.5 aTDC• 10% EGR
The more mass for 2nd injection, the lower ringing and NOx emissions due to the extended burn duration
Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Technical Accomplishments and Progress • MAP = 95 kPa (WOT); NO EGR• Low lift camshaft (negative valve overlap) for
hot internal residuals• Combustion stability Reforming for additional
heat; flame burn for combustion robustness
Combustion Strategy I (reactivity controlled )Lean LTC at light load operation (Robustness)
EX IN
TDC
EX IN
TDC
EX IN
TDC
18Speed (rpm)
Torq
ue (N
m)
Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Technical Accomplishments and ProgressRobustness• 1500 rpm, 6 mg• NO EGRQuad injection strategy 1. Significant stability improvement
with slight increase in NOx emissions
2. More precise control of the amount of reforming & flame
Cleaned EngineCondition
19Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Technical Accomplishments and Progress
Combustion Strategy III (plasma assisted auto-ignition) Lean LTC during PVO operation (NOx emissions)
20
EX IN
TDC
EX IN
TDC
• WOT MAP = 95 kPa; w/ EGR• High lift camshaft (Positive Valve Overlap) for internal residuals• High efficiency, low noise and robust NOx emissions
Speed (rpm)
Torq
ue (N
m)
Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Technical Accomplishments and ProgressImprove NOx-COV Trade-off• 2000 rpm, 4.5 bar BMEP• PVO operation• 10% EGR• Combustion phasing is a key
parameter to obtain the best trade-off between NOx emissions and combustion stability
21Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Technical Accomplishments and Progress
• Combustion Strategy IV Boosted Homogeneous Stoich. SI Combustion for high specific output
• Same calibration developed from the baseline engine
22
EX IN
TDC
EX IN
TDC
Speed (rpm)
Torq
ue (N
m)
Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Technical Accomplishments and Progress
Mode1(NVO)
Mode3(PVO)
stoichlean
23
Mode2(NVO)
Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Technical Accomplishments and Progress
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Volumetric efficiency (Experiment)
Vol
umet
ric e
ffici
ency
(Mod
el)
Volumetric Efficiency (R2 = 0.97436)
PVO / SIBoosted SINVO
0 2 4 6 8 10 120
2
4
6
8
10
12
NMEP (bar) - Experiment
NM
EP
(bar
) - M
odel
NMEP (R2 = 0.99252)
PVO / SIBoosted SINVO
Experimental # of data = 103 (65 Lean, 38 Stoich) from 1000 to 3000 rpm
24
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7080
100
120
Pre
ssur
e (k
Pa)
CompressorIntake manifoldExhaust manifold
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 704
6
8
10
Airf
low
(g
/s)
Desired APCAPCMAF
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Nor
mal
ized
Exh
aust
va
lve
timin
g (0
-1)
Time (sec)
Simulation result with the air charge control strategy is applied when the LTC engine is operated in NVO mode.
An air charge control strategy for NVO and PVO mode is developed based on APC model and the partial air pressure in the intake manifold, which is estimated using a feedback from measured mass airflow (MAF).
Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Collaboration and Coordination
WOT PerformanceValidation (1.35L Turbo)
• FEV – GT-POWER modeling support for WOT studies to reduce baseline calibration efforts and hardware risk
• DELPHI – Fuel injector supplier due to the better performance of closely-spaced multiple injection.
• Federal Mogul – Worked together for the development of GBDI
• BASF – Worked together for the development of aftertreatment system
60/90deg-10hole
25
Proposed Future Work and Challenges
26Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
• Refine low temperature combustion, control, and aftertreatment for
smooth transient operation
• Develop a noise control strategy when EGR mismatches during
transient operation
• Develop mode-switching strategy to prevent misfire or partial burn
during mode change
• Demonstrate robust operation over hot FTP – fuel economy benefits
and emissions results consistent with objectives
• Demonstrate robust operation over cold FTP – fuel economy benefits
and emissions results consistent with objectives
SummaryLow Temperature Combustion Engine
• Complete the development of homogeneous stoichiometric SI calibration
and controls
• Successfully demonstrate FTP cycle test (both UDDS and HWFET) for
homogeneous stoichiometric SI operation
• Develop the methodology of combustion phasing control for various
modes of low temperature combustion
• Extend the lean low temperature combustion regime using multiple
injection, EGR and valving strategy
• Complete extensive evaluation of GBDI system
• Complete the development of LTC calibrations and control
27Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels
Thank You !!!
28