േ GEN CHANCE SALTZMAN, MDC2 TASK FORCE LEAD AND … April 2019 West.pdf · Reduced comm Pre-ATO,...
39
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED This briefing, presentation, or document is for information only. No US Government commitment to sell, loan, lease, co-develop or co-produce defense articles or provide defense services is implied or intended. UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 1 2070 Multi - Domain Operations
േ GEN CHANCE SALTZMAN, MDC2 TASK FORCE LEAD AND … April 2019 West.pdf · Reduced comm Pre-ATO, “Playbooks”, KISS. Intermittent comm Above, plus delegation, mission orders
This briefing, presentation, or document is for information only. No US Government commitment to sell, loan, lease, co-develop
or co-produce defense articles or provide defense services is implied or intended.
UNCLASSIFIED2070 - 1
2070Multi-Domain
Operations
Presenter
Presentation Notes
“THESE SLIDES ARE A COMBINATION OF THOUGHTS AND NOTES FROM LT GEN (RET) NOEL “TOM” JONES, MAJ GEN (RET) ET WILLIAMS, AND BRIG GEN CHANCE SALTZMAN, MDC2 TASK FORCE LEAD AND YOUR’S TRULY…”
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 2
Intro
• My background – JS / HAF / Pacific / NATO / SW Asia (+)
• Why are we here?‒ Understand how cyber capabilities underpin Multi-Domain
Operations (MDO)‒ Examine efforts to improve MDO‒ Help you (and the Joint Force) succeed
• Questions? – Don’t be shy
2
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 3
Your takeaways…
• MDO, at speed, creates problems for an adversary...and vice versa
• Under CSAF’s leadership, USAF is “all in” on MDC2• Planning / executing is challenging … all operators need to
understand processes to ensure effectiveness• We are getting better and will improve by
‒ Building understanding of MDC2‒ Planning for MDC2‒ Maturing MDC2 Constructs‒ Growing MDC2 Cadre
• Need your help to Bridge the Gap, Build Relationships, Participate in Planning Processes
Presenter
Presentation Notes
THIS IS MY SUMMARY…UP FRONT MD OPS, AT SPEED, CREATES PROBLEMS OR DILEMMAS FOR OUR ADVERSARY THE USAF UNDER CSAF IS ALL IN ON MDC2…THERE IS A TASK FORCE ESTABLISHED AND SOME OF THESE SLIDES COME DIRECTLY FROM BRIG GEN SALTZMAN OP LEVEL PLANNING IS HARD…YOU NEED TO BECOME AN EXPERT JUST LIKE YOU ARE AN EXPERT IN CYBEROPERATIONS…OTHERWISE, CYBER CAPABILITIES MAY BE MISUNDERSTOOD, EITHER OVERPROMISING OR BEING UNDER APPRECIATED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 4
• Historical application of force = Distinct / Separate domain• Land – work your lane / battle space• Maritime – battle / strike forces
• Massing of forces to produce effects took time
• Sparse integration of different domain forces until World War I (air domain introduced)
• World War II saw large scale, valiant attempts at MDO…
Is MDO a new concept?
Presenter
Presentation Notes
THESE NOTES COURTESY OF LT GEN (RET) JONES: MDO IS NOT A NEW CONCEPT, BUT IN MY OPINION IS NOW COMPRESSED IN TIME AND SPACE THE HISTORICAL APPLICATION OF FORCE INVOLVED SEPARATE DOMAINS GEOGRAPHIC BOUNDARIES BETWEEN DOMAINS, OR EVEN BOUNDARIES WITHIN DOMAINS KEPT MD OPS TO A MINIMUM THE TIME REQUIRED TO MARSHAL FORCES WAS A CONSTRAINT…ARMIES AND NAVIES DO NOT MOVE FAST WITHOUT AIRLIFT SOME INTEGRATION OCCURRED ALONG SHORELINES—BOMBARDMENT OF ENEMY DEFENSES DURING AMPHIB OPS WORLD WAR 1 DEBUTED FORCE APPLICATION FROM THE AIR…SO IT FORCED INTEGRATION, OR AT LEAST DECONFLICTION EXAMPLES OF WORLD WAR II INTEGRATION: D-DAY, THE BREAKOUT AFTER D-DAY WAS FIRST SUSTAINED CLOSE AIR SUPPORT SUCCESS. USE OF JTACS
• OIF/OEF/OND• Joint planning / basing, JACCE, NALE, Keypads• Some cyber tools available, not fully “contested”
More recent MDO concepts…
Presenter
Presentation Notes
THESE NOTES COURTESY OF LT GEN (RET) JONES: OVER THE YEARS WE HAVE IMPROVED THE INTEGRATION AIRLAND BATTLE BECAME A DOCTRINE THAT WE FOCUSED ON THROUGH INTENSE TRAINING THE FIRST GULF WAR SAW THE DEBUT OF SPACE CAPABILITIES, SOME CYBER WE SAW CAPABILITIES IN CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS AFTER 9/11 IMPORTANT TO NOTE HOWEVER, THAT THESE OPERATIONS WERE LARGLEY ONE SERVICE SUPPORTING ANOTHER. STILL LOTS OF DECONFLICTION EFFORTS TO AVOID INTEGRATION…VERY LITTLE “REAL TIME” SYNCHRONIZATION OF FORCE FROM MULTIPLE DOMAINS
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 6
• Operate Fluidly Across Not Just One Or Two Domains, but All
• One definition:
“Visualizing and executing operations with simultaneityand depth through the air, land, sea, space andcyberspace to dislocate the adversary and outpace hisability to respond” (Dr. James Campbell, ACSCProfessor)
Getting serious about MDO…
Presenter
Presentation Notes
THESE NOTES COURTESY OF LT GEN (RET) JONES: DR. CAMPBELL IS ALSO A RETIRED BRIG GEN
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 7
DoD conducts multi-domain operations, but:• Manpower intensive• Ad hoc• Insufficient tools (and training / exercises)• Data insufficiently accessible
Getting serious about MDO…
Presenter
Presentation Notes
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 8
• Great Power Competition
• Regional Destabilization• Violent Extremist
Actions
8
Strategic Environment
• Resilient, but weakening post-WWII international order
• Rapid military / technology development
• Proliferation of non-state actors
Source - “Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America”, HON Jim Mattis, former SECDEF
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 9
Anti – Access / Area Denial (A2/AD)
“AKA”
Contested Domain Operations
“AKA”
Modern Warfare
9
Modern Warfare
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 10
Contested C4
Impact Potential Mitigation
Kinetic, SCADA Alternate site(s), reconstitutionReduced comm Pre-ATO, “Playbooks”, KISSIntermittent comm Above, plus delegation, mission ordersCyber espionage Data segregationCyber manipulation Operator trainingLogistics disruption Uh-oh
10
Source - “Assured C2 for Airpower: A Proposed US Air Force Cyber Strategy”, Lt Gen Stan T. Kresge, USAF (Ret.), Feb 2017
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 11
• No more away games…
Our Challenge…
Presenter
Presentation Notes
“THESE SLIDES ARE A COMBINATION OF THOUGHTS AND NOTES FROM LT GEN (RET) NOEL “TOM” JONES, MAJ GEN (RET) ET WILLIAMS, AND BRIG GEN CHANCE SALTZMAN, MDC2 TASK FORCE LEAD AND YOUR’S TRULY…”
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 12
• Future conflicts will be decided by the side with an information advantage• We must be postured to respond to relevant information with
high velocity decision-making• We must be able to create complex, simultaneous dilemmas for
adversary• However our current C2…
• Operational Constructs not designed to optimize MDO…• Technology is out of date…• Supporting Structures not designed for MDO
Future conflicts & C2…
Presenter
Presentation Notes
THESE NOTES COURTESY OF BRIG GEN SALTZMAN, MDC2 LEAD FOR CSAF SO THE CSAF NOT ONLY WANTS TO DEVELOP MDO FOR THE USAF, HE WANTS THE USAF TO BE ABLE TO CONTROL MDO!
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 13
Where are we going?
“The victory in future conflict … will go to that leader who can command and control his or her forces to create multiple dilemmas from multiple domains … at a pace that would overwhelm any enemy on the planet while denying the enemy the ability to do the same.”
General David Goldfein, CSAF
Presenter
Presentation Notes
MDC2 IS ONE OF THREE FOCUS AREAS THE CSAF HAS DIRECTED HIS STAFF TO EXAMINE AND SOLVE. (REVITALIZING SQUADRONS, STRENGTHENING JOINT LEADERS & TEAMS, AND MDC2 SEE HIS LETTER FOR HIGHLIGHTS “THE CHANGING NATIONAL SECURITY ENVIRONMENT…” “TO USE A FOOTBALL ANALOGY, …” SO THE CSAF NOT ONLY WANTS TO DEVELOP MDO FOR THE USAF, HE WANTS THE USAF TO BE ABLE TO CONTROL MDO!
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 14
UNCLASSIFIED
Permissive Contested
14
Compress the Loop
DataCollection
DataStorage
DataManagement Network & Access
Data Exploitation
Accelerate “Data to Decision”
Stovepipes
Unstructured
MultipleFormats
ProprietaryControls
SecurityPolicy
LimitedMeta DataTagging
ManuallyIntensiveFusion
LimitedAI & ML
LimitedAutomation
No MDOVisualization
WeakDecisionSupport
SerialData Sharing
InterfacesNot
Interoperable
Highly Contested
ManualCOA DevStovepiped Data
Limits Big Data Analytics
Presenter
Presentation Notes
- IT EVEN ADDRESSES HOW TO COMPRESS THE OODA LOOP…
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 15
UNCLASSIFIED15
How Do We Get There?
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 16
Understand MDC2
16
NET
DEF ENSE
C2ENHANCEMENTS
DEPENDENCY
Assured C2
Foundational Intelligence
Rhetorical Question: What is the impact on enemy kinetic/non-kinetic (e.g. cyber) attack on our ability to do Command and Control (C2)?
Source - “Assured C2 for Airpower: A Proposed US Air Force Cyber Strategy”, Lt Gen Stan T. Kresge, USAF (Ret.), Feb 2017
Presenter
Presentation Notes
This diagram is from a paper written by Lt Gen (ret) Kresge. Anecdote: 13 AF in 2011 “Terminal Fury” exercise: Red Team obtained ATO Blue had no SA it happened Blue had no ability to defend Blue had no understanding about what Red could do Lesson was not about Cyber. It’s about Blue’s ability to conduct C2. That hinges upon a foundation of understanding and three pillars of activity: Foundational Intelligence. What is Red’s ability and intent, versus Blue ability to respond? Net Defense: Which organizations should interact and how? What capes do we need and where? Is everyone a cyber-warrior? C2 Enhancements: How well will C2 systems work in a contested domain? Logistics systems? Dependencies: What is the best balance between Reducing? Reachback? Exquisite?
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 17
• Successful multi-domain C2 cannot be accomplished without cyberspace• Lt Gen (Ret) Kresge, former 13th AF/CC: “When someone
says “cyber,” I hear “C2.”
• MDC2 relies on cyberspace to:• Obtain information…• Move information…• Use information…• To make better decisions…• Faster than the enemy…
Understand MDC2
Presenter
Presentation Notes
LT GEN (RET) KRESGE QUOTE IS FROM HIS PAPER: ASSURED C2 FRO AIRPOWER: A PROPOSED US AIR FORCE CYBER SRATEGY” FEB 2017 THESE NOTES ALSO COURTESY OF ET WILLIAMS, FORMER CYBERCOM/J3 AND PACOM/J6
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 18
Plan for MDC2
• Old Think:1. Build Plan2. Install C4
• New Think:1. Understand C4 Capabilities and Limitations2. Build Plan
18
Source - “Assured C2 for Airpower: A Proposed US Air Force Cyber Strategy”, Lt Gen Stan T. Kresge, USAF (Ret.), Feb 2017
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 19
UNCLASSIFIED19
Mature MDC2 Constructs
Air Space CyberAir Component Commander
- Air Superiority- Air effects for joint fight
Space Component Commander- Space Superiority- Space effects for joint fight
Cyber Component Commander- Cyber Superiority- Cyber effects for joint fight
Area Air Defense Commander- Air Defense Plan- Combat Identification
Space Defense Commander- Space Defense Plan- Combat Identification
as secondary• Assignments in AOCs with additional billets in 505th, COMAFFOR,
JTF HQ, HHQ staffs• Command opportunities for squadron, group and wing (AOCs,
505th CCW)• Eventually ~500x 13O billets
• Grade break down for O-4/O-5/O-6 is approx. 250/125/25• Steady state cross flow ~50x O-4s/year from ~15 feeder career
fields• SEI for 1C3 career field to indicate those managed as C2 Cadre
20
Presenter
Presentation Notes
- YES, YOU MAY BE ASKED TO TAKE YOUR CYBER EXPERTISE AND MATCH IT WITH A JOB AT THE OPERATIONAL LEVEL, BRINGING TOGETHER MULTIPLE DOMAINS…SUPPORTING SOME, OR BEING SUPPORTED (AND THE MAIN EFFORT) FOR CERTAIN OPERATIONS AND MISSIONS
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 21
• Bridge the gap in cyberspace knowledge / understanding between the typical operational commander and the people who technically understand cyberspace
• Develop and sustain key relationships
• Know the Joint Planning Process
• Participate in Deliberate Planning
Your Challenges…
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Here’s a quote from ET: http://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/the-cyberspace-operations-planner#_ftn23 During a recent Joint Advanced Cyber Warfare Course offered by USCYBERCOM J7, the USCYBERCOM J3 Director of Operations, U.S. Air Force Major General Brett Williams, commented that: … [for the most part] commanders don’t understand cyber. This leads to either too-tactical guidance… or abrogation [abolish or hand off] to the signal and [intelligence planners] who [many times] have no idea regarding planning, or haven’t been involved in the planning process from the beginning. Apart from the [operators and] planning community, signal and [intelligence planners] weren’t developed for it.[23] Basically – The Commander gets in the tactical weeds, thinking he can type some commands on a computer, or hands it all off to the “comm guy” or “intel guy” who may or may not have operational-level planning skills…
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 22
Remember this?
1 • Planning Initiation
2 • Mission Analysis
3 • COA Development
4 • COA Analysis/Wargaming
5 • COA Comparison
6 • COA Approval
7 • Plan/Order Development
Presenter
Presentation Notes
JPP is an orderly, analytical set of logical steps to frame a problem; examine a mission; develop, analyze, and compare alternative COAs; select the best COA; and produce a plan or order.��JPP provides a proven process to organize the work of the commander, staff, subordinate commanders, and other partners, to develop plans that will appropriately address the problem. It focuses on defining the military mission and development and synchronization of detailed plans to accomplish that mission. Commanders and staffs can apply the thinking methodology introduced in Chapter IV, “Operational Art and Operational Design,” to discern the correct mission, develop creative and adaptive CONOPS to accomplish the mission, and synchronize those CONOPS so they can be executed. � In a crisis, the steps of JPP may be conducted simultaneously to speed the process. Supporting commands and organizations often conduct JPP simultaneously and iteratively with the supported CCMD. In these cases, once mission analysis begins it continues until the operation is complete. Moreover, steps 4-7 are repeated as often as necessary to integrate new requirements (missions) into the development of the plan. ���
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 23
Joint Planning Process
Presenter
Presentation Notes
JP 5.0 – 6 June 2017: Figure V-2, page 147 Operational design and JPP are complementary tools of the overall planning process. Operational design provides an iterative process that allows for the commander’s vision and mastery of operational art to help planners answer ends―ways―means―risk questions and appropriately structure campaigns and operations in a dynamic OE. The commander, supported by the staff, gains an understanding of the OE, defines the problem, and develops an operational approach for the campaign or operation through the application of operational design during the initiation step of JPP. Commanders communicate their operational approach to their staff, subordinates, supporting commands, agencies, and multinational/nongovernmental entities as required in their initial planning guidance so that their approach can be translated into executable plans. As JPP is applied, commanders may receive updated guidance, learn more about the OE and the problem, and refine their operational approach. Commanders provide their updated approach to the staff to guide detailed planning. This iterative process facilitates the continuing development and refinement of possible COAs into a selected COA with an associated initial CONOPS and eventually into a resource informed executable plan or order. b. The relationship between the application of operational art, operational design, and JPP continues throughout the planning and execution of the plan or order. By applying the operational design methodology in combination with the procedural rigor of JPP, the command can monitor the dynamics of the mission and OE while executing operations in accordance with the current approach and revising plans as needed. By combining these approaches, the friendly force can maintain the greatest possible flexibility and do so in a proactive vice reactive manner �����
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 24
Joint Planning Process
Presenter
Presentation Notes
JP 5.0 – 6 June 2017: Figure V-2, page 147 Operational design and JPP are complementary tools of the overall planning process. Operational design provides an iterative process that allows for the commander’s vision and mastery of operational art to help planners answer ends―ways―means―risk questions and appropriately structure campaigns and operations in a dynamic OE. The commander, supported by the staff, gains an understanding of the OE, defines the problem, and develops an operational approach for the campaign or operation through the application of operational design during the initiation step of JPP. Commanders communicate their operational approach to their staff, subordinates, supporting commands, agencies, and multinational/nongovernmental entities as required in their initial planning guidance so that their approach can be translated into executable plans. As JPP is applied, commanders may receive updated guidance, learn more about the OE and the problem, and refine their operational approach. Commanders provide their updated approach to the staff to guide detailed planning. This iterative process facilitates the continuing development and refinement of possible COAs into a selected COA with an associated initial CONOPS and eventually into a resource informed executable plan or order. b. The relationship between the application of operational art, operational design, and JPP continues throughout the planning and execution of the plan or order. By applying the operational design methodology in combination with the procedural rigor of JPP, the command can monitor the dynamics of the mission and OE while executing operations in accordance with the current approach and revising plans as needed. By combining these approaches, the friendly force can maintain the greatest possible flexibility and do so in a proactive vice reactive manner �����
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 25
Joint Planning Process
Presenter
Presentation Notes
JP 5.0 – 6 June 2017: Figure V-2, page 147 Operational design and JPP are complementary tools of the overall planning process. Operational design provides an iterative process that allows for the commander’s vision and mastery of operational art to help planners answer ends―ways―means―risk questions and appropriately structure campaigns and operations in a dynamic OE. The commander, supported by the staff, gains an understanding of the OE, defines the problem, and develops an operational approach for the campaign or operation through the application of operational design during the initiation step of JPP. Commanders communicate their operational approach to their staff, subordinates, supporting commands, agencies, and multinational/nongovernmental entities as required in their initial planning guidance so that their approach can be translated into executable plans. As JPP is applied, commanders may receive updated guidance, learn more about the OE and the problem, and refine their operational approach. Commanders provide their updated approach to the staff to guide detailed planning. This iterative process facilitates the continuing development and refinement of possible COAs into a selected COA with an associated initial CONOPS and eventually into a resource informed executable plan or order. b. The relationship between the application of operational art, operational design, and JPP continues throughout the planning and execution of the plan or order. By applying the operational design methodology in combination with the procedural rigor of JPP, the command can monitor the dynamics of the mission and OE while executing operations in accordance with the current approach and revising plans as needed. By combining these approaches, the friendly force can maintain the greatest possible flexibility and do so in a proactive vice reactive manner �����
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 26
Joint Planning Process
Presenter
Presentation Notes
JP 5.0 – 6 June 2017: Figure V-2, page 147 Operational design and JPP are complementary tools of the overall planning process. Operational design provides an iterative process that allows for the commander’s vision and mastery of operational art to help planners answer ends―ways―means―risk questions and appropriately structure campaigns and operations in a dynamic OE. The commander, supported by the staff, gains an understanding of the OE, defines the problem, and develops an operational approach for the campaign or operation through the application of operational design during the initiation step of JPP. Commanders communicate their operational approach to their staff, subordinates, supporting commands, agencies, and multinational/nongovernmental entities as required in their initial planning guidance so that their approach can be translated into executable plans. As JPP is applied, commanders may receive updated guidance, learn more about the OE and the problem, and refine their operational approach. Commanders provide their updated approach to the staff to guide detailed planning. This iterative process facilitates the continuing development and refinement of possible COAs into a selected COA with an associated initial CONOPS and eventually into a resource informed executable plan or order. b. The relationship between the application of operational art, operational design, and JPP continues throughout the planning and execution of the plan or order. By applying the operational design methodology in combination with the procedural rigor of JPP, the command can monitor the dynamics of the mission and OE while executing operations in accordance with the current approach and revising plans as needed. By combining these approaches, the friendly force can maintain the greatest possible flexibility and do so in a proactive vice reactive manner �����
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 27
Joint Planning Process
Presenter
Presentation Notes
JP 5.0 – 6 June 2017: Figure V-2, page 147 Operational design and JPP are complementary tools of the overall planning process. Operational design provides an iterative process that allows for the commander’s vision and mastery of operational art to help planners answer ends―ways―means―risk questions and appropriately structure campaigns and operations in a dynamic OE. The commander, supported by the staff, gains an understanding of the OE, defines the problem, and develops an operational approach for the campaign or operation through the application of operational design during the initiation step of JPP. Commanders communicate their operational approach to their staff, subordinates, supporting commands, agencies, and multinational/nongovernmental entities as required in their initial planning guidance so that their approach can be translated into executable plans. As JPP is applied, commanders may receive updated guidance, learn more about the OE and the problem, and refine their operational approach. Commanders provide their updated approach to the staff to guide detailed planning. This iterative process facilitates the continuing development and refinement of possible COAs into a selected COA with an associated initial CONOPS and eventually into a resource informed executable plan or order. b. The relationship between the application of operational art, operational design, and JPP continues throughout the planning and execution of the plan or order. By applying the operational design methodology in combination with the procedural rigor of JPP, the command can monitor the dynamics of the mission and OE while executing operations in accordance with the current approach and revising plans as needed. By combining these approaches, the friendly force can maintain the greatest possible flexibility and do so in a proactive vice reactive manner �����
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 28
Joint Planning Process
1 • Planning Initiation
2 • Mission Analysis
3 • COA Development
4 • COA Analysis/Wargaming
5 • COA Comparison
6 • COA Approval
7 • Plan/Order Development
Presenter
Presentation Notes
JP 5.0 – 6 June 2017: Figure V-2, page 147 Operational design and JPP are complementary tools of the overall planning process. Operational design provides an iterative process that allows for the commander’s vision and mastery of operational art to help planners answer ends―ways―means―risk questions and appropriately structure campaigns and operations in a dynamic OE. The commander, supported by the staff, gains an understanding of the OE, defines the problem, and develops an operational approach for the campaign or operation through the application of operational design during the initiation step of JPP. Commanders communicate their operational approach to their staff, subordinates, supporting commands, agencies, and multinational/nongovernmental entities as required in their initial planning guidance so that their approach can be translated into executable plans. As JPP is applied, commanders may receive updated guidance, learn more about the OE and the problem, and refine their operational approach. Commanders provide their updated approach to the staff to guide detailed planning. This iterative process facilitates the continuing development and refinement of possible COAs into a selected COA with an associated initial CONOPS and eventually into a resource informed executable plan or order. b. The relationship between the application of operational art, operational design, and JPP continues throughout the planning and execution of the plan or order. By applying the operational design methodology in combination with the procedural rigor of JPP, the command can monitor the dynamics of the mission and OE while executing operations in accordance with the current approach and revising plans as needed. By combining these approaches, the friendly force can maintain the greatest possible flexibility and do so in a proactive vice reactive manner �����
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 29
Joint Planning Process
1 • Planning Initiation
2 • Mission Analysis
3 • COA Development
4 • COA Analysis/Wargaming
5 • COA Comparison
6 • COA Approval
7 • Plan/Order Development
1 • Planning Initiation
2 • Mission Analysis
3 • COA Development
4 • COA Analysis/Wargaming
5 • COA Comparison
6 • COA Approval
7 • Plan/Order Development
Presenter
Presentation Notes
JP 5.0 – 6 June 2017: Figure V-2, page 147 Operational design and JPP are complementary tools of the overall planning process. Operational design provides an iterative process that allows for the commander’s vision and mastery of operational art to help planners answer ends―ways―means―risk questions and appropriately structure campaigns and operations in a dynamic OE. The commander, supported by the staff, gains an understanding of the OE, defines the problem, and develops an operational approach for the campaign or operation through the application of operational design during the initiation step of JPP. Commanders communicate their operational approach to their staff, subordinates, supporting commands, agencies, and multinational/nongovernmental entities as required in their initial planning guidance so that their approach can be translated into executable plans. As JPP is applied, commanders may receive updated guidance, learn more about the OE and the problem, and refine their operational approach. Commanders provide their updated approach to the staff to guide detailed planning. This iterative process facilitates the continuing development and refinement of possible COAs into a selected COA with an associated initial CONOPS and eventually into a resource informed executable plan or order. b. The relationship between the application of operational art, operational design, and JPP continues throughout the planning and execution of the plan or order. By applying the operational design methodology in combination with the procedural rigor of JPP, the command can monitor the dynamics of the mission and OE while executing operations in accordance with the current approach and revising plans as needed. By combining these approaches, the friendly force can maintain the greatest possible flexibility and do so in a proactive vice reactive manner �����
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 30
Joint Planning Process
1 • Planning Initiation
2 • Mission Analysis
3 • COA Development
4 • COA Analysis/Wargaming
5 • COA Comparison
6 • COA Approval
7 • Plan/Order Development
JFC
JFMCC JFLCCJFACC
Presenter
Presentation Notes
JP 5.0 – 6 June 2017: Figure V-2, page 147 Operational design and JPP are complementary tools of the overall planning process. Operational design provides an iterative process that allows for the commander’s vision and mastery of operational art to help planners answer ends―ways―means―risk questions and appropriately structure campaigns and operations in a dynamic OE. The commander, supported by the staff, gains an understanding of the OE, defines the problem, and develops an operational approach for the campaign or operation through the application of operational design during the initiation step of JPP. Commanders communicate their operational approach to their staff, subordinates, supporting commands, agencies, and multinational/nongovernmental entities as required in their initial planning guidance so that their approach can be translated into executable plans. As JPP is applied, commanders may receive updated guidance, learn more about the OE and the problem, and refine their operational approach. Commanders provide their updated approach to the staff to guide detailed planning. This iterative process facilitates the continuing development and refinement of possible COAs into a selected COA with an associated initial CONOPS and eventually into a resource informed executable plan or order. b. The relationship between the application of operational art, operational design, and JPP continues throughout the planning and execution of the plan or order. By applying the operational design methodology in combination with the procedural rigor of JPP, the command can monitor the dynamics of the mission and OE while executing operations in accordance with the current approach and revising plans as needed. By combining these approaches, the friendly force can maintain the greatest possible flexibility and do so in a proactive vice reactive manner �����
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 31
Joint Planning Process
1 • Planning Initiation
2 • Mission Analysis
3 • COA Development
4 • COA Analysis/Wargaming
5 • COA Comparison
6 • COA Approval
7 • Plan/Order Development
JFC
JFMCC JFLCCJFACC
1 • Planning Initiation
2 • Mission Analysis
3 • COA Development
4 • COA Analysis/Wargaming
5 • COA Comparison
6 • COA Approval
7 • Plan/Order Development
1 • Planning Initiation
2 • Mission Analysis
3 • COA Development
4 • COA Analysis/Wargaming
5 • COA Comparison
6 • COA Approval
7 • Plan/Order Development
1 • Planning Initiation
2 • Mission Analysis
3 • COA Development
4 • COA Analysis/Wargaming
5 • COA Comparison
6 • COA Approval
7 • Plan/Order Development
Presenter
Presentation Notes
JP 5.0 – 6 June 2017: Figure V-2, page 147 Operational design and JPP are complementary tools of the overall planning process. Operational design provides an iterative process that allows for the commander’s vision and mastery of operational art to help planners answer ends―ways―means―risk questions and appropriately structure campaigns and operations in a dynamic OE. The commander, supported by the staff, gains an understanding of the OE, defines the problem, and develops an operational approach for the campaign or operation through the application of operational design during the initiation step of JPP. Commanders communicate their operational approach to their staff, subordinates, supporting commands, agencies, and multinational/nongovernmental entities as required in their initial planning guidance so that their approach can be translated into executable plans. As JPP is applied, commanders may receive updated guidance, learn more about the OE and the problem, and refine their operational approach. Commanders provide their updated approach to the staff to guide detailed planning. This iterative process facilitates the continuing development and refinement of possible COAs into a selected COA with an associated initial CONOPS and eventually into a resource informed executable plan or order. b. The relationship between the application of operational art, operational design, and JPP continues throughout the planning and execution of the plan or order. By applying the operational design methodology in combination with the procedural rigor of JPP, the command can monitor the dynamics of the mission and OE while executing operations in accordance with the current approach and revising plans as needed. By combining these approaches, the friendly force can maintain the greatest possible flexibility and do so in a proactive vice reactive manner �����
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 32
Joint Planning Process
1 • Planning Initiation
2 • Mission Analysis
3 • COA Development
4 • COA Analysis/Wargaming
5 • COA Comparison
6 • COA Approval
7 • Plan/Order Development
JFC
JFMCC JFLCCJFACC
1 • Planning Initiation
2 • Mission Analysis
3 • COA Development
4 • COA Analysis/Wargaming
5 • COA Comparison
6 • COA Approval
7 • Plan/Order Development
1 • Planning Initiation
2 • Mission Analysis
3 • COA Development
4 • COA Analysis/Wargaming
5 • COA Comparison
6 • COA Approval
7 • Plan/Order Development
1 • Planning Initiation
2 • Mission Analysis
3 • COA Development
4 • COA Analysis/Wargaming
5 • COA Comparison
6 • COA Approval
7 • Plan/Order Development- Know the cyber planners on the JFC staff
- Learn and communicate with your counterpart(s) in sister components
Presenter
Presentation Notes
JP 5.0 – 6 June 2017: Figure V-2, page 147 Operational design and JPP are complementary tools of the overall planning process. Operational design provides an iterative process that allows for the commander’s vision and mastery of operational art to help planners answer ends―ways―means―risk questions and appropriately structure campaigns and operations in a dynamic OE. The commander, supported by the staff, gains an understanding of the OE, defines the problem, and develops an operational approach for the campaign or operation through the application of operational design during the initiation step of JPP. Commanders communicate their operational approach to their staff, subordinates, supporting commands, agencies, and multinational/nongovernmental entities as required in their initial planning guidance so that their approach can be translated into executable plans. As JPP is applied, commanders may receive updated guidance, learn more about the OE and the problem, and refine their operational approach. Commanders provide their updated approach to the staff to guide detailed planning. This iterative process facilitates the continuing development and refinement of possible COAs into a selected COA with an associated initial CONOPS and eventually into a resource informed executable plan or order. b. The relationship between the application of operational art, operational design, and JPP continues throughout the planning and execution of the plan or order. By applying the operational design methodology in combination with the procedural rigor of JPP, the command can monitor the dynamics of the mission and OE while executing operations in accordance with the current approach and revising plans as needed. By combining these approaches, the friendly force can maintain the greatest possible flexibility and do so in a proactive vice reactive manner �����
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 33
Joint Cyber Planning
• Access?• Time, manpower to gain and maintain?• Relevant, current cyber weapons?• Able to synchronize?• Approved?
All answers must be “yes”
33
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 3434
Cap
abilit
ies
(1-n
)
Conditions (1-n)
Conditions-Based Planning(Discussion Model)
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 35
Summary
• MDO, at speed, creates problems for an adversary...and vice versa
• Under CSAF’s leadership, USAF is “all in” on MDC2• Planning / executing is challenging … all operators need to
understand processes to ensure effectiveness• We are getting better and will improve by
• Building understanding of MDC2• Planning for MDC2• Maturing MDC2 Constructs• Growing MDC2 Cadre
• Need your help to Bridge the Gap, Build Relationships, Participate in Planning Processes
Presenter
Presentation Notes
THIS IS MY SUMMARY…UP FRONT
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 36
Questions?
QUESTIONS?
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 37
Strategic – Operational – Tactical“Levels of War”
VS
“Operational Art”
37
CFACC / CFSCC / CFCCC Role
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 38
War Stories
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2070 - 39
Vision of MDO…2030 Vignette
• Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses in a regional conflict• Air Force capability to conduct the mission will include air, space and cyber platforms• Force package built from on-orbit, digital and airborne capabilities• Multiple attack vectors to complicate adversary defense
39
Multi-domain Battle Management?
Supported/Supporting arrangements?
Multi-domain Tasking Cycles?
Multi-node Collaborative Planning?
Multi-domain Package Commander?
Multiple Ops Floors Sync’d?Execution authorities for synchronized multi-domain fires?
Space Superiority as prerequisite?
Presenter
Presentation Notes
- AT THE TACTICAL LEVEL, THE MDC2 TASK FORCE HAS VIGNETTES…MORE ON THIS ONE LATER…
