56
Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA EQUATIONS OF MOTION FOR A CONVENTIONAL AIRCRAFT

A e 5362 Ac Modeling

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Homework assigned

Citation preview

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    EQUATIONS OF MOTION FOR A CONVENTIONAL

    AIRCRAFT

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    PROBLEM DEFINITION

    Roskam, J., Airplane Flight Dynamics and Automatic Flight Controls - Part I, Design, Analysis and Research Corporation, Lawrence, KS, 1995.

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    Note: These equations are only valid in Inertial Space

    Newtons Law of Linear Motion

    ForcesAppliedMomentumLinear

    dsdVdVdtd

    dtd

    SVA

    VA +=

    Fgr

    Eulers Law of Angular Motion

    Moments AppliedMomentumAngular

    +=

    SA

    VA

    VdSdVdV

    dtd

    dtd Frgrrr

    EQUATIONS OF MOTION general

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    +++=

    ++=

    dmdtddm

    dtddm

    dtddm

    dtd

    dtdLHS

    dmdtd

    dtdLHS

    V

    P

    VVP

    P

    VP

    PV

    'P

    rrrrrrrr

    rrrr

    ''

    ''

    ' )()(

    dVr Ap =+= dm define also and :using gEliminatin rrr

    Moments AppliedMomentumAngular

    +=

    SA

    VA

    VdSdVdV

    dtd

    dtd Frgrrr

    ANGULAR MOTION EQUATION

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    Assumption 1: P is the Vehicle Center of Mass and rP is a constant for V. Assumption 2: Mass is a constant, i.e.,

    0= V

    dmr

    0=dtdm

    +=

    +++=

    +++=

    dmdtddm

    dtd

    dtdLHS

    dmdtd

    dtddmdm

    dtddm

    dtd

    dtdLHS

    dmdtddm

    dtddm

    dtddm

    dtd

    dtdLHS

    Vv

    PP

    V

    P

    VVP

    v

    PP

    V

    P

    VVP

    P

    VP

    rrrr

    rrrrrrrr

    rrrrrrrr

    ''

    ''

    ''

    ''

    ''

    0 0

    ANGULAR MOTION EQUATION

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    MASS DISTRIBUTION aircraft and spacecraft

    ! A constant mass distribution infers that the center of gravity remains constant during the period of interest. ? For stability and control purposes, aircraft responses are typically evaluated

    for a duration of 30 to 60 seconds. ? For orbital spacecraft, the period of interest can range from several minutes

    to several hours. ! Phenomena which violate the constant mass/moment of inertia

    distribution include: ? Fuel sloshing ? Shifting payloads

    i wandering passengers on commercial aircraft i solar panel deployment and communication antenna reorientation on spacecraft

    ? Expendable payloads i weapons i reconnaissance pods

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    CONSTANT MASS aircraft and rockets

    17.2 19,300 - 100,000 112,000 Delta

    27.7 1,800,000 - 4,500,000 6,500,000 Saturn 5

    0.05 3.3 200 1,020 6,800 GA Twin

    0.18 99 5,940 17,600 54,000 Fighter

    0.22 1,500 90,000 291,000 675,000 SST

    Mass Change % Takeoff weight

    Mass Change (lbs)

    Cruise Fuel Consumption

    (lbs/hr)

    Maximum Fuel Weight

    (lbs)

    Takeoff Weight (lbs)

    Type

    t = 60 seconds

    Reference 2-1

    ! If the mass change is within 5% after 60 seconds, the constant mass assumption is considered acceptable. ? Reasonable for airplanes, but not for rockets.

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    +=

    ++=

    dmdtd

    dtddm

    dtdLHS

    dmdtd

    dtddm

    dtddm

    dtd

    dtdLHS

    VV

    PP

    VV

    PP

    v

    PP

    rrrr

    rrrrrr

    2

    '2'

    2

    '2'

    ''0

    Special Identity:

    0

    0

    0)(

    0

    0

    2

    2

    2

    2

    2

    2

    =

    =

    +

    =

    =

    V Spp

    V

    pp

    V SVpp

    V SVp

    V SVp

    dsdmdmdt

    d

    dsdmdmdtd

    dsdmdmdtd

    dsdmdmdtd

    dtd

    Frgrr

    r

    Fgrrr

    Fgrr

    Fgrr

    ANGULAR MOTION EQUATION

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    Returning to the LHS:

    ++=

    +=

    dmdtd

    dtddSdmLHS

    dmdtd

    dtddm

    dtdLHS

    VSP

    VP

    VV

    PP

    rrFrgr

    rrrr

    ''

    2

    '2'

    Now Looking at the RHS:

    +++=

    +++=

    SSP

    VVP

    SP

    VP

    dSdSdmdmRHS

    dSdmRHS

    FrFrgrgr

    Frrgrr''

    '' ])[(])[(

    0 Vover constant is V

    == Vrggrg:3 Assumption dmdm

    ANGULAR MOTION EQUATION

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    GRAVITATIONAL FORCES aircraft and spacecraft

    ! The Flat Earth Assumption implies that the gravitational vector is oriented along the positive Z axis. ? Aircraft

    i not reasonable for intercontinental flight ? Orbital spacecraft

    i not reasonable even for small vehicles ! Assuming constant gravitational acceleration over the entire volume

    means that each mass element is subject to the same gravitational acceleration. ? Aircraft

    i applies in virtually all cases ? Orbital spacecraft

    i does not apply

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    Forming the Total Equation:

    ++=

    ++

    SSP

    VP

    VSP

    VP dSdSdmdmdt

    ddtddSdm FrFrgrrrFrgr ''''

    Therefore: =

    SVdSdm

    dtd

    dtd Frrr

    Under the assumptions: 1. P is the Center of Mass 2. Mass is constant 3. g is constant over V Note: The Rotational Motion Equations are only a function of r.

    ANGULAR MOTION EQUATION

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    frame. rotating Z)Y, (X,

    in theobserver an by seen as of change of rate theis t

    :Where

    tdtd

    :is frame coordinate fixed )Z,Y ,X( in theobserver an by seen as of change

    of rate then theframe, coordinate fixed )Z,Y ,X( the torelative , rate,angular an at rotating is that frame coordinate a is Z)Y,(X, If

    resides.observer hein which t framecoordinate on the depend will vector theof change of rate observed The

    Z)Y,(X,

    Z)Y,(X,)Z,Y ,X(

    AA

    AAA

    A

    A

    +=

    VECTOR DERIVATIVES

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    Eliminating r using: dmdVAP =+= and' rrr'

    +=

    +

    SVVP dsFdmgdmrrdt

    ddtd )( '

    Again assuming: Mass is a constant, i.e., and g is constant over V. 0=dtdm

    +=+SVV

    P dsmdmdtddm

    dtd

    dtd Fgrr ][][ 2

    2'

    0

    ForcesAppliedMomentumLinear

    dsdVdVdtd

    dtd

    SVA

    VA +=

    Fgr

    LINEAR MOTION EQUATION

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    LINEAR MOTION EQUATION

    TAPP mm FFgVV ++=+

    ][

    0

    +=+SVV

    P dsmdmdtddm

    dtd

    dtd Fgrr ][][ 2

    2'

    TAV

    P mdmdtd FFgV ++= ][

    :gives over constant are and , that Noting VPP VV

    Notes: ! The Linear Motion Equations are only concerned with the motion of the Center of Mass

    Defining new variables: t

    ds P P T A S

    '

    and ; r V F F F = + = 2 '

    2p

    P t

    =r

    V

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    Returning to the Angular Motion Equation

    =

    SVdSdm

    dtd

    dtd Frrr

    Expanding using the Chain Rule

    =

    +

    SV

    dSdmdtd

    dtd

    dtd Frrrrr 2

    2

    )(

    0

    Introducing the notation: TS

    AdS MMFr +=

    TAV

    dmdtd MMrr += 2

    2

    ANGULAR MOTION EQUATION

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    Now accounting for the rotation of the coordinate frames:

    rrrrr

    rrr

    +++=

    +=

    ttdtd

    andtdt

    d

    2

    2

    2

    2

    Therefore:

    TAVV

    dmdmdtd

    dtd MMrrrrr +=+=

    )([22

    Assumption 4: The body is rigid. i.e., 022

    ==tt

    rr

    ANGULAR MOTION EQUATION

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    ELASTIC STRUCTURES aircraft and spacecraft

    ! The Rigid Body Assumption implies that all mass elements maintain their relative distance to each other, except for mass elements which are a part of rotating machinery.

    ! Volume and surface integrals can only be evaluated if the external geometry is known. ? Aircraft

    i geometry is known if the aircraft is rigid i if highly elastic (the usual case), then aeroelastic equilibrium must be

    established before the external shape of the aircraft can be determined i an assumption which is nearly always made, but which is never actually valid

    ? Spacecraft i lightweight, elastic structures, often significantly more elastic than aircraft i validity varies from spacecraft to spacecraft i antennas and solar arrays large contributors to elasticity

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    i, j, and k are unit vectors along the (X, Y, Z) body fixed axes.

    kjigkjiMkjiF

    kjirkjiVkji

    P

    zyx

    zyx

    gggNMLFFF

    zyxWVURQP

    ++=

    ++=

    ++=

    ++=

    ++=

    ++=

    BODY AXIS unit vectors and components

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    BODY AXIS

    Note: Positive Signs Shown

    component definitions

    Linear and Angular Velocities Aerodynamic and Thrust Moments

    Aerodynamic and Thrust Forces Acceleration of Gravity

    Ref. Roskams book

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    INERTIAS body axis moments and products

    Y

    X

    Z

    Convair B-36D Peacemaker

    =

    =

    =

    +=

    +=

    +=

    Vyz

    Vxz

    Vxy

    Vzz

    Vyy

    Vxx

    dmyzI

    dmxzI

    dmxyI

    dmyxI

    dmzxI

    dmzyI

    )(

    )(

    )(

    22

    22

    22

    By Symmetry: Ixy = Iyz = 0

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    INERTIAS highly asymmetric aircraft

    Blohm & Voss BV 141 B-0

    Oblique Flying Wing

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    EQUATION SUMMARY Linear Motion

    "")(

    "")(

    "")(

    EquationLiftFFmgVPUQWm

    EquationSideforceFFmgWPURVm

    EquationDragFFmgWQVRUm

    zTzAz

    yTyAy

    xTxAx

    ++=+

    ++=+

    ++=+

    Drag Equation Sideforce Equation Lift Equation

    Angular Motion Assuming the x-z plane is plane of symmetry, i.e., 0== yzxy II

    TAxzxxyyxzzz

    TAxzzzxxyy

    TAyyzzxzxzxx

    NNQRIPQIIPIRI

    MMRPIPRIIQI

    LLRQIIPQIRIPI

    +=+++

    +=++

    +=+

    )(

    )()(

    )(

    22

    Rolling Moment Equation Pitching Moment Equation Yawing Moment Equation

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    ! Most airplanes are equipped with spinning rotors (propellers/turbine engines) that exert gyroscopic moments on the airframe.

    ! Gyroscopic moments are often negligible due to opposite rotations: ? Counter-rotating propellers ? Twin spool turbines

    SPINNING ROTORS gyroscopic moments

    Boeing V-22 Osprey Tiltrotor

    iR

    Assume one or more spinning rotors with total angular momentum

    where each rotor has moment of inertia and spins with angular velocity

    x y zh h h= + +h i j k

    1

    n

    i ii=

    = h h

    1i i

    n

    i R Ri

    I =

    = h

    iRI

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    ( )( ) ( )

    ( )

    2 2

    XX XZ XZ XX YY z y A T

    YY XX ZZ x z A T

    ZZ XZ YY XX XZ y x A T

    I P I R I PQ I I RQ Qh Rh L L

    I Q I I PR IXZ P R Rh Ph M M

    I R I P I I PQ I QR Ph Qh N N

    + + = +

    + + + = +

    + + + = +

    A A TV

    d d dr dvdt dt dt

    + = +r h M M

    SPINNING ROTORS gyroscopic moments

    The angular momentum equation can then be written

    Taking the vector derivative of and assuming , 0iR

    =ddth

    Note that the gyroscopic moments appear with coupling.

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    The orientation of the body frame relative to the fixed frame can be specified using Euler Angles.

    RELATIVE ORIENTATION inertial and body coordinate frames

    Reference 2-2

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    EULER ATTITUDE ANGLES definition

    Reference 2-2

    yaw attitude anglepitch attitude angleroll attitude angle

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    =

    RQP

    seccossecsin0sincos0

    tancostansin1

    Notes: 1. This is a set of non-linear differential equations 2. In general, 3. These equation are not defined at i.e., there is a singularity.

    RandQP

    ,.,deg90=

    KINEMATIC EQUATIONS Euler angle and body axis rates

    1 0 sin0 cos cos sin0 sin cos cos

    PQR

    =

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    EQUATIONS OF MOTION observations

    ! The Equations of Motion are a set of 9 differential equations: ? First order ? Nonlinear ? Coupled ? Ordinary

    ! The Variables are: ?

    ! The aerodynamic and thrust Forcing Functions:

    ?

    are functions of: ? Velocity ? Angle-of-attack ? Sideslip angle

    TATATATATATA NandNMMLLFFFFFF zzyyxx ,,,,,,,,,,

    and , R, Q, P, W,V, U,

    ? Time ? Altitude ? Configuration

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    Angle-of-Attack

    Sideslip Angle

    Grumman F11F-1 Tiger

    AERODYNAMIC ANGLES

    XI

    XB

    VP

    VP XB

    definitions

    Note: All Angles Shown Are Positive

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    Angle-of-Attack

    Sideslip Angle

    AERODYNAMIC ANGLES approximations

    Grumman F11F-1 Tiger

    v U1

    u

    1

    1 1

    sin v vU U

    =

    u

    U1

    w

    1

    1 1

    sin w wU U

    =

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    FORCES AND MOMENTS longitudinal perturbations

    ! With

    ! There are separate equations for the aerodynamic and thrust forces and moments.

    1 1

    and ; controls and :E Fw w

    U U = =

    X X X X X XX E F

    E F

    Z Z Z Z Z ZZ E F

    E F

    E FE F

    F F F F F Ff u qu q

    F F F F F Ff u qu q

    M M M M M Mm u qu q

    = + + + + +

    = + + + + +

    = + + + + +

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    FORCES AND MOMENTS lateral / directional perturbations

    ! With

    ! There are separate equations for the aerodynamic and thrust forces and moments.

    RR

    AA

    RR

    AA

    RR

    YA

    A

    YYYYYY

    NNrrNp

    pNNNn

    LLrrLp

    pLLLl

    FFrr

    FppFFFf

    +

    +

    +

    +

    +

    =

    +

    +

    +

    +

    +

    =

    +

    +

    +

    +

    +

    =

    1 1

    and ; controls and :A Rv v

    U U = =

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    FORCES AND MOMENTS shorthand notation

    ! Dividing by mass, each term becomes a longitudinal linear or angular acceleration.

    ! Letting , dimensional derivatives are the linear or angular acceleration per change in the associated motion variable. ? is the pitch angular acceleration imparted to the airplane as the result

    of a unit change in angle-of-attack.

    ! There will be separate equations for the aerodynamic and thrust forces and moments.

    FEquYY

    FEquZ

    FEquX

    FE

    FE

    FE

    MMqMMMuMmI

    ZZqZZZuZfm

    XXqXXXuXfm

    +++++=

    +++++=

    +++++=

    1

    1

    1

    M

    variablemoment 1 momentvariable m

    =

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    FORCES AND MOMENTS shorthand notation

    ! Dividing by mass, each term becomes a longitudinal linear or angular acceleration.

    ! Letting , dimensional derivatives are the linear or angular acceleration per change in the associated control variable. ? is the sideforce linear acceleration imparted to the airplane as the result

    of a unit change in rudder deflection.

    ! There will be separate equations for the aerodynamic and thrust forces and moments.

    controlforce 1 force

    control m =

    RY

    RArpZZ

    RArpXX

    RArpY

    RA

    RA

    RA

    NNrNpNNNnI

    LLrLpLLLlI

    YYrYpYYYfm

    +++++=

    +++++=

    +++++=

    1

    1

    1

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    LIFT AND DRAG FORCES definitions

    Grumman F11F-1 Tiger

    Lift

    U1

    Drag

    XB

    ZB

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    In body axes,

    1

    211 12

    21 11 1 1 1 1 12 2

    1

    cos cos

    cos cos (2 )

    X

    X

    A D

    A DD

    F D U SC

    F CU S SC UU U

    = =

    =

    1 1

    1

    211 1 1 112

    1 1 11

    1

    1111

    2 21cos cos

    cos 2

    X

    X

    u

    A D DD D

    AD D

    F C CC Cu U S u q S uU U U U UU

    U

    F uu q S C CU U

    = =

    =

    Then

    Or

    NON-DIMENSIONAL DERIVATIVES

    UCU

    UUCC DDDu

    =

    = 1

    1

    Define the derivative:

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    In body axes:

    1

    211 12

    21 11 1 1 1 1 12 2

    1

    cos cos

    cos cos (2 )

    X

    X

    A D

    A DD

    F D U SC

    F CU S SC UU U

    = =

    =

    uUC

    UUC

    USqu

    UC

    UCSUu

    UF DDDDAX

    =

    =

    1

    1

    11

    1

    2112

    1

    1

    11212Then:

    Or [ ]1

    1

    11

    2UuCCSqu

    UF

    DDA

    u

    X =

    NON-DIMENSIONAL DERIVATIVES

    UCU

    UUCC DDDu

    =

    = 1

    1

    Define the derivative:

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    DIMENSIONAL DERIVATIVES longitudinal linear accelerations

    )sec(

    )sec(2

    )sec(2

    )sec()2(

    )(sec)2(

    )sec()sec()2(

    )(sec)2(

    )(sec)2(

    21

    1

    1

    11

    1

    1

    211

    1

    1

    2121

    1

    1

    11

    1

    1

    11

    1

    11

    =

    =

    =

    +

    =+

    =

    =+

    =

    +=

    +=

    ftmSCq

    Z

    ftmU

    CcSqZft

    mU

    CcSqZ

    ftm

    CCSqZ

    mUCCSq

    Z

    ftmSCq

    Xftm

    CCSqX

    mU

    CCSqX

    mUCCSq

    X

    E

    E

    q

    u

    E

    E

    XuXu

    L

    L

    q

    L

    DLLLu

    DLD

    TT

    uTDD

    u

    Note: All Quantities are Linear Acceleration per Unit of Applied Variable

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    )(sec

    )(sec2

    )(sec

    )sec()2(

    )sec()2(

    21

    1

    1

    2

    1

    21

    11

    1

    1

    11

    1

    1

    1

    1

    =

    =

    =

    +

    =

    +

    =

    YY

    M

    YY

    M

    YY

    M

    YY

    TT

    uT

    YY

    MMu

    ICcSq

    M

    UI

    CcSqM

    ICcSq

    M

    ftUI

    CCcSqM

    ftUI

    CCcSqM

    E

    E

    MuM

    u

    DIMENSIONAL DERIVATIVES longitudinal angular accelerations

    Note: All Quantities are Angular Acceleration per Unit of Applied Variable

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    )(sec)(sec

    )(sec2

    )(sec2

    )(sec)sec(

    )sec()sec(2

    )sec(2

    )sec(

    2121

    1

    1

    211

    1

    21

    2121

    211

    1

    1

    1

    1

    121

    ==

    ==

    ==

    ==

    =

    =

    XX

    L

    XX

    L

    XX

    Lr

    XX

    L

    p

    XX

    LY

    YYr

    Y

    p

    Y

    ICbSq

    LI

    CbSqL

    UICbSq

    LUICbSq

    L

    ICbSq

    LftmSCq

    Y

    ftmSCq

    YftmU

    CbSqY

    ftmU

    CbSqYft

    mSCq

    Y

    R

    R

    A

    A

    rp

    R

    R

    A

    A

    r

    p

    DIMENSIONAL DERIVATIVES lateral linear accelerations

    Note: All Quantities are Linear Acceleration per Unit of Applied Variable

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    )(sec)(sec

    )(sec2

    )(sec2

    )(sec)(sec

    2121

    1

    1

    211

    1

    21

    2121

    ==

    ==

    ==

    ZZ

    N

    ZZ

    N

    ZZ

    Nr

    ZZ

    N

    p

    ZZ

    N

    TZZ

    N

    ICbSq

    NI

    CbSqN

    UICbSq

    NUICbSq

    N

    I

    CbSqN

    ICbSq

    N

    R

    R

    A

    A

    rp

    T

    DIMENSIONAL DERIVATIVES lateral angular accelerations

    Note: All Quantities are Angular Acceleration per Unit of Applied Variable

  • Dr. Kamesh Subbarao Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UTA

    STATIC STABILITY CRITERIA

    r q p w v u Forces and Moments wU1

    =vU1 =

    xx TAF F+

    yy TAF F+

    zz TAF F+

    TAL L+

    TAM M+

    TAN N+

    Du 0C >

    y 0C

    l 0C nr 0C