Upload
lybao
View
213
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
A dual reporter system for in situ detection of plasmid transfer in aerobic and 1
anaerobic conditions 2
Jaroslaw E. Król, Linda M. Rogers, Stephen M. Kronea, Eva M. Top
* 3
4
Department of Biological Sciences, Initiative for Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Studies, 5
University of Idaho, PO Box 443051, Moscow, ID 83844-3051 6
a Department of Mathematics, Initiative for Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Studies, University 7
of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-1103 8
9
10
11
Running title: Plasmid transfer detection by a dual reporter system. 12
13
14
*Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected], Phone: 1- 208-885-5015; Fax: 1-208-885-15
7905. 16
Copyright © 2010, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.00226-10 AEM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 7 May 2010
at Univ of Idaho on June 4, 2010
aem.asm
.orgD
ownloaded from
2
Abstract 1
We designed a new genetic tool to detect plasmid transfer in anaerobic and aerobic conditions. 2
The system is based on the T7RNA polymerase gene and a pT7-driven oxygen-independent 3
green fluorescent protein, evoglow®, alone or in combination with red fluorescent protein 4
DsRed. Constructs are available as plasmids and mini-mariner transposons. 5
6
at Univ of Idaho on June 4, 2010
aem.asm
.orgD
ownloaded from
3
Introduction 1
Conjugative plasmid transfer allows exchange of genetic material within and between 2
bacterial populations through direct cell-to-cell contact and plays an important role in bacterial 3
adaptation. This is exemplified by the rapid spread of multi-drug resistance (8) and the 4
abundance of diverse transferable pollutant degradation plasmids (14). While many 5
environmental factors are known to affect plasmid transfer efficiency (5), few studies have 6
addressed the effect of oxygen levels on plasmid transferability, in spite of growing concerns 7
about antibiotic resistance and virulence among facultatively and strictly anaerobic pathogens (2, 8
3, 10, 12, 13). There is thus an obvious need for new methods that allow quantitative analysis of 9
plasmid transfer under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. 10
The traditional method of plasmid transfer detection is based on plating and enumeration 11
of donor, recipient and transconjugant cells on selective media. However, this approach does not 12
allow in situ observation of conjugation in spatially structured populations like bacterial 13
microcolonies and biofilms. Therefore it cannot address questions about the effects of spatial cell 14
organization on plasmid spread. In order to detect plasmid transfer in situ confocal laser scanning 15
microscopy (CLSM) is often used to detect either fluorescently labeled molecular probes or 16
fluorescent proteins encoded by chromosome- or plasmid-located reporter genes (11). Here the 17
challenge is the level of fluorescence, which may depend on many factors. For the frequently 18
used GFP family of fluorescent proteins, an important limiting factor is the concentration of 19
oxygen necessary for protein maturation (9). These fluorescent proteins are therefore not useful 20
in anaerobic or low-oxygen conditions, such as sediments, anaerobic digesters, the human gut, 21
and thick biofilms. 22
at Univ of Idaho on June 4, 2010
aem.asm
.orgD
ownloaded from
4
Recently, a new flavin mononucleotide (FMN)-based oxygen-independent fluorescent 1
protein, called evoglow® (EcFbFP), has been described (4). We propose application of this 2
fluorescent protein to provide a true representation of plasmid transfer in situ that is not 3
confounded by the effects of O2 concentration on fluorescence levels. 4
To allow in situ monitoring of plasmid transfer in both aerobic and anaerobic 5
environments, we constructed a dual reporter system comprised of the fluorescent reporter 6
proteins DsRed and EcFbFP. The red fluorescent protein DsRed (also referred to as RFP) 7
provides very strong and stable fluorescence but requires oxygen in the maturation process (1). It 8
can thus serve as an internal control to confirm conditions of limited oxygen. The system, 9
presented in Fig. 1 consists of two independent elements: the phage T7 RNA polymerase gene 10
and the other is a reporter gene (or genes) driven by the T7 promoter (pT7). Thus when T7 RNA 11
polymerase is not present, the cells show no fluorescence at all. However, when both the 12
polymerase and the reporter genes are present in the same cell, the latter are expressed and 13
fluorescence is detected. Both components are available on plasmid vectors or as a part of the 14
mariner mini-transposon (Supplemental Fig. S1). 15
The T7 RNA polymerase gene was amplified from plasmid pBT20-∆bla-T7pol (6) and 16
cloned into pGem3Zf+ under two promoters, the lactose operon promoter plac and pT7, 17
(resulting in plasmids pGemT7pol, pGemT7cat in Fig. S1a), and subsequently into the mariner 18
mini-transposon delivery vector pBT20-∆bla (6), resulting in pMaT7cat plasmid (Fig. S1b). The 19
presence of two strong promoters should ensure expression of the T7 RNA polymerase gene 20
under most growth conditions. Detailed descriptions of cloning strategy and methods used in this 21
paper are described in Supplemental Materials. 22
at Univ of Idaho on June 4, 2010
aem.asm
.orgD
ownloaded from
5
The second part of the system consists of a broad-host-range plasmid or mariner 1
transposon with one or two reporter genes driven by the pT7 promoter. Plasmid pGLOW-Txn-2
Bs2 (Fig. S1c), which contains the EcFbFp gene driven by pT7 promoter, was obtained from 3
evocatal GmbH (Düsseldorf, Germany). Vector pEvoGlowRed encodes both EcFbFP and DsRed 4
expressed using a single pT7 promoter (Fig. S1d). This construct can be mobilized into a broad 5
range of strains that can be used as recipients in plasmid transfer studies. The vector can also be 6
used as a promoter probe vector, since part of the pGem3Zf+ cloning site (MCS) is located 7
between pT7 and the dsRed-EcFbFP genes. Single PstI, SalI, XbaI and BamHI sites can thus be 8
used to clone foreign DNA fragments and detect promoter activity under both aerobic and 9
anaerobic conditions in bacterial strains not containing the T7 RNA polymerase gene. 10
Since the reporter plasmids described above are based on the broad-host-range vector 11
pBBR1MCS (7), which can replicate and persist in many Gram-negative bacteria, problems due 12
to occasional plasmid loss and mobilization could be encountered. To avoid this, and to further 13
extend the range of organisms in which our system can be used, the gene cassettes containing 14
either EcFbFP or both dsRed and EcFbFP driven by the pT7 promoter were also cloned into the 15
mariner transposon delivery vector pBT20-∆bla (6), resulting in constructs carrying different 16
antibiotic resistance genes (Fig. S1e-k). The mariner transposon can be used for in vivo as well 17
as in vitro mutagenesis, and has been successfully applied in Gram-negative and Gram-positive 18
bacteria (15). 19
To quantify the efficiency of plasmid transfer in relation to the parental strains, one 20
typically also counts donor and/or recipient cells. To simultaneously detect recipients and 21
transconjugants in aerobic conditions with one vector, we first constructed the vector pGlowRed. 22
In this vector the plac-dsRed cassette was cloned into the EcoRV site of the pGLOW-Txn-Bs2 23
at Univ of Idaho on June 4, 2010
aem.asm
.orgD
ownloaded from
6
vector (Fig. S1e). In this case, expression of the dsRed gene is constitutive, driven by the lac 1
promoter as well as the distantly located pKm promoter (red fluorescence), but EcFbFP is 2
expressed only in T7 polymerase-carrying strains (data not shown). Thus, when pGlowRed is 3
present in the recipient, these cells show only red fluorescence, but transconjugants are green and 4
red (yellow). In parallel a mariner transposon containing a constitutively expressed dsRed gene 5
and pT7EcFbFP with Gm and Km resistance genes was constructed (data not shown). 6
To evaluate the feasibility of using EcFbFP and DsRed in plasmid transfer studies in both 7
aerobic and anaerobic conditions, we monitored the transfer of plasmid F’, as it is known to 8
transfer efficiently in both aerobic and anaerobic conditions (12). The plasmid was first marked 9
using pMaT7cat. In two marked plasmids (F’::T7cat1, F’::T7cat2) insertions were located within 10
the lacI gene of the F’ plasmid (See Materials and Methods in Supplemental Materials). Thus, 11
the locations of the MaT7cat transposon in this region do not disturb any of the core genes 12
involved in replication, maintenance/control or transfer functions. Transfer of the marked 13
plasmids to three E. coli K12 recipient strains was observed in simple cross-streak experiments 14
(Fig. S2). The first two recipient strains carried reporter plasmids pGLOW-Txn-Bs2 and 15
pEvoGlowRed; the third strain carried a chromosomal insertion of the mini-transposon 16
MaGlowRedKm (E. coli K12-GR). Donor and recipient precultures were grown anaerobically, 17
then cross-streaked on LB plates and incubated in aerobic or anaerobic conditions at 37ºC. After 18
aerobic incubation transconjugants were observed as bright green fluorescent cells when 19
recipients carried pGLOW-Txn-Bs2, and as both green and red fluorescent cells when recipients 20
contained pEvoGlowRed (Fig. 2a, b). The same results were obtained with aerobically grown 21
precultures (data not shown). In anaerobic conditions only green fluorescence was observed for 22
both types of recipients (Fig. 2c, d). Similarly, green and red fluorescence in the presence, and 23
at Univ of Idaho on June 4, 2010
aem.asm
.orgD
ownloaded from
7
only green fluorescence in the absence, of oxygen was detected when E. coli K12-GR was used 1
as the recipient (data not shown). The lack of red fluorescence under anaerobic conditions was 2
expected and served as an internal control to confirm conditions of limited oxygen. Green color 3
intensity and surface areas of fluorescent transconjugants were qualitatively similar in aerobic 4
and anaerobic conditions. Both marked F’ plasmids showed identical results. Additional filter 5
matings followed by plate counting confirmed that there was no obvious effect of the absence of 6
oxygen on F’ plasmid transfer under these experimental conditions. The average frequency of 7
transconjugants/recipients was not significantly different between anaerobic and aerobic 8
conditions (0.5 and 0.8; p<0.05, Standard t-test). 9
We also validated the use of evoglow® in thick cell layers by growing a colony of E. coli 10
constitutively expressing EcFbFP and RFP on agar plates in alternating aerobic/anaerobic 11
conditions (see Supplemental Methods). The cross section micrograph shows that EcFbFP was 12
expressed all the way down to the agar while the RFP signal was detected only at the edge of the 13
colony (Fig. S3). 14
One caveat of our system is the requirement for recipient strains that contain either the 15
reporter gene(s) or the T7 RNA polymerase gene, thus limiting its use in experiments aimed at 16
monitoring plasmid transfer into indigenous bacterial populations. However, one can detect 17
plasmid transfer from an exogenous donor if indigenous bacteria are first isolated, marked with a 18
reporter or MaT7pol system, and then reintroduced into their ecosystem. 19
In conclusion, we present here the first fluorescent reporter system that allows in situ 20
monitoring of plasmid population dynamics under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions with 21
simultaneous verification of low-oxygen conditions through lack of red fluorescence. So far, all 22
at Univ of Idaho on June 4, 2010
aem.asm
.orgD
ownloaded from
8
other reporter systems used to monitor plasmid transfer were based on GFP and RFP and thus 1
depend on the presence of oxygen. 2
The research was supported by NIH Grant 1R01 GM73821; the Olympus FV1000 3
Multiphotone Confocal Microscope was funded by the M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust (grant # 4
2006-127JVZ022207) and an NIH Small Instrumentation Grant (1S10RR02260601). We thank 5
Dr. L. Forney for helpful suggestions, Dr. A. Paszczynski and K. H. Kucharzyk for use of their 6
anaerobic chamber, and L. Sherick and K. Turner for technical assistance. We are also grateful to 7
Dr. J.-M. Ghigo for providing plasmid F’, and to Prof. T. T. Hoang for pBT20-∆bla-T7pol and 8
pBT20-∆bla. 9
JEK designed the dual reporter system, constructed all vectors, performed the plasmid 10
transfer experiments and wrote the manuscript draft. EMT, LMR, and SMK oversaw the project, 11
provided help with the experimental design and data interpretation, and assisted in writing the 12
manuscript. 13
References. 14
1. Baird, G. S., D. A. Zacharias, and R. Y. Tsien. 2000. Biochemistry, mutagenesis, and 15
oligomerization of DsRed, a red fluorescent protein from coral. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 16
97:11984-11989. 17
2. Biebricher, C. K., and E. M. Duker. 1984. F and type 1 piliation of Escherichia coli. J. 18
Gen. Microbiol. 130:951-957. 19
3. Curtiss, R. I., L. G. Caro, D. P. Allison, and D. R. Stallions. 1969. Early Stages of 20
Conjugation in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 100:1091-1104. 21
at Univ of Idaho on June 4, 2010
aem.asm
.orgD
ownloaded from
9
4. Drepper, T., T. Eggert, F. Circolone, A. Heck, U. Krausz, J.-K. Guterl, M. Wendorff, A. 1
Losi, W. Gartner, and K.-E. Jaeger. 2007. Reporter proteins for in vivo fluorescence 2
without oxygen. Nat. Biotech. 25:443-445. 3
5. Elsas, J. D., and M. J. Bailey. 2002. The ecology of transfer of mobile genetic elements. 4
FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 42:187-197. 5
6. Kang, Y., M. S. Son, and T. T. Hoang. 2007. One step engineering of T7-expression strains 6
for protein production: Increasing the host-range of the T7-expression system. Protein Expr. 7
Purif. 55:325-333. 8
7. Kovach, M. E., R. W. Phillips, P. H. Elzer, R. M. Roop, 2nd, and K. M. Peterson. 1994. 9
pBBR1MCS: a broad-host-range cloning vector. Biotechniques 16:800-802. 10
8. Levy, S. B., and B. Marshall. 2004. Antibacterial resistance worldwide: causes, challenges 11
and responses. Nat. Med. 10:S122-129. 12
9. Reid, B. G., and G. C. Flynn. 1997. Chromophore formation in Green Fluorescent Protein. 13
Biochemistry 36:6786-6791. 14
10. Shoemaker, N. B., C. Getty, E. P. Guthrie, and A. A. Salyers. 1986. Regions in 15
Bacteroides plasmids pBFTM10 and pB8-51 that allow Escherichia coli-Bacteroides shuttle 16
vectors to be mobilized by IncP plasmids and by a conjugative Bacteroides tetracycline 17
resistance element. J. Bacteriol. 166:959-965. 18
11. Sorensen, S. J., M. Bailey, L. H. Hansen, N. Kroer, and S. Wuertz. 2005. Studying 19
plasmid horizontal transfer in situ: A critical review. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 3:700-710. 20
12. Stallions, D. R., and R. I. Curtiss. 1972. Bacterial conjugation under anaerobic conditions. 21
J. Bacteriol. 111:294-295. 22
at Univ of Idaho on June 4, 2010
aem.asm
.orgD
ownloaded from
10
13. Strohmaier, H., R. Noiges, S. Kotschan, G. Sawers, G. Högenauer, E. L. Zechner, and 1
G. Koraimann. 1998. Signal transduction and bacterial conjugation: characterization of the 2
role of ArcA in regulating conjugative transfer of the resistance plasmid R1. J. Mol. Biol. 3
277:309-316. 4
14. Top, E. M., and D. Springael. 2003. The role of mobile genetic elements in bacterial 5
adaptation to xenobiotic organic compounds. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 14:262-269. 6
15. Vos, J. C., I. De Baere, and R. H. Plasterk. 1996. Transposase is the only nematode protein 7
required for in vitro transposition of Tc1. Genes. Dev. 10:755-761. 8
at Univ of Idaho on June 4, 2010
aem.asm
.orgD
ownloaded from
11
1
Fig. 1. Schematic action of the reporter system. Donor strain contains plasmid F’ marked with 2
the T7 RNA polymerase gene, and recipient strains contain the vector pGLOW-TXN-Bs2 (left) 3
or pEvoglowRed (right). Transconjugant cells with both the marked F’ and a reporter gene are 4
green fluorescent (left) or green and red (yellow; right) respectively. 5
6
Fig. 2. Microscopy images of mating mixtures containing either E. coli MG1655Rif (F’::T7cat) 7
(donor) and MG1655Nal (pGLOW-TXN-Bs2) (recipient 1, a and c), or the same donor and 8
MG1655Nal (pEvoGlowRed) (recipient 2, b and d). Mixtures were incubated for 48 hours under 9
aerobic (a, b) and 72 hours under anaerobic (c, d) conditions. Left panel: evoglow®, green 10
fluorescence; right panel: DsRed, red fluorescence; middle panel: overlay of both channels. 11 at Univ of Idaho on June 4, 2010
aem.asm
.orgD
ownloaded from