Upload
ami
View
43
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A conversation about transfer students. Rick Adrion PI CAITE PI ECEP. ECEP History & Context. 2 successful regional alliances (CAITE & Georgia Computes!) NSF asked us to think about how to become a national resource High-Level Plan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
A conversation about transfer students
Rick AdrionPI CAITEPI ECEP
ECEP History & Context• 2 successful regional alliances (CAITE & Georgia
Computes!)– NSF asked us to think about how to become a
national resource• High-Level Plan
• Refine and integrate CAITE & Georgia Computes! interventions and practices
• Take to other states & regions (partners, associates, others through CSTA & STARS) • Our experiences, practices and out comes• Those of our “experts bureau”
Background• Georgia Computes!
– Summer camps (Girl Scouts , YWCA, Cool Girls. general) & after-school programs
– Teach HS teachers how to teach computing– Workshops on new approaches to motivate computing education and Train-
the-Trainers for USG to replicate• CAITE
– Pathways (recruiting, retention, advising, alignment, institutional change) within 15 public institutions (9 CCs) focused on community colleges in underserved regions
– Regional outreach (community colleges, school districts, Boys & Girls clubs, Girls Inc., Citizen Schools, FIRST Robotics, BATEC, TechHub, NE-LSAMP, UM-LSAMP, NEAGEP, ...)
– Teacher Professional Development • Both tightly integrated with evaluation
Questions• how is HE in GA organized?
– 2-year TCSG -> workforce oriented? CTE?– 2-year USG -> workforce oriented? CTE?
transfer?– Access schools?– Do 4-year schools offer AS/AA degrees?– How do 2-year certificates differ from degrees
Articulation• common course numbering?• course equivalencies?• guaranteed admission?• transfer offfices?• transfer pathways?
– What are the patterns of transfer?
What are your goals?
What I found
Does this suggest that increasing diversity is not a primary goal?
What I found
A different view
What I found
Does this suggest that TCSG is a target rather than USG 2-year grads?
What I found
Again is TCSG a target? But what about women?
Associate degree programs in USG & TCSG
Does this indicate the difficulty of supporting transfer?
USG Institutions
Research Universities
State Universities
Regional Universities
State Colleges
Two-Year Colleges
1,850 5,976
2,041
5,037
6,805
11,833 482
1786,263
2,061
1,083 1,731
In-State non-USG/OOS
4,412 4,552224 127
532
61
33,122 3,733
What I found - Transfers
Does this suggest that increasing articulation within USG is a target?
NCWIT job GA projections
These data suggest that production falls short of demand?
GA Pathways• GAcollege411 – students, parents, advisors site for college prep. Info• General education transfer between USG institutions• University System of Georgia (USG) and Technical College System of
Georgia (TCSG)– Complete College Georgia, 2012
• Articulation Agreement between systems (January, 2012)• AS degree articulation (new degrees)• General education course transfer
• Georgia Transfer Articulation Cooperative Services (GAtracs) – Transfer student portal
• Regents Approve 17 General Education Courses for Transfer to Support Complete College Goals - March 14, 2012
Complete College Georgia• Goal:To increase
the percentage of Georgians who hold high quality college credentials to 60 per cent by 2020.
• Why?
Equity and broader workforce
The National Picture
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), Spring 2011, Enrollment component.
Jobs Held by level of degree
Community College roles• Career Technical Education CTE
– connected to Perkins Act HS CTE programs• Life Long Learning
– Skill Enhancement– Individual Interests– Dual Enrollment
• "Junior College" (Transfer)• Developmental Courses
– GED– Poor K12 preparation– 2nd Chances Survey of CC student intentions
Source NCES
Diversity in enrollment
Source: NCES 2010 Digest of Educational Statistics Table 236
Issues• Gatekeeper vs. Gateway• Awareness of opportunities• CTE vs. transfer• Financial Incentives• Academic Incentives• Institutional agents• Mentoring and retention• Curricular Alignment
Institutional agents2-year Institution 4-year Institution Issues• Faculty member • Academic Counselor• Admissions Counselor• Special program director
from a 4-year institution • Tutoring center director • College dean from a 4-year
institution• Special program director• Academic dean from a 4-
year institution• Academic dean • Peers advisors (academic
advisors)
• Peer advisor (orientation program)
• Special program director• University advisor• Peer mentor (residence
hall advisor)• Faculty advisor• Special program dean• Faculty member• Provost
• through the first semester or year at the community college wondering what they were doing there
• felt overpowered by the sheer physicality of the 4-year campus
• plagued by feelings of doubt as to whether they belonged at college, particularly at a selective institution
• many had been told explicitly or implicitly in HS that they were not “college material.”
Source: Dowd, A. C., Pak, J. H., & Bensimon, E. M. (2013). The role of institutional agents in promoting transfer access.Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21(15).
CCG: Create a Cadre of Champions• On Campus
– Administration? – Faculty? – Students? – Student Affairs?
• State and Regional – Political leadership? – Employers? – Non-profits/
foundations? – Community/
advocacy groups? – Faith-based?
Transfer SAI-Four-Year College Version
(1) Recruitment, admission, and orientation services;
(2) Financial aid; (3) Personnel; (4) Publicity and public statements; (5) Institutional transfer policies and practices; (6) Partnerships and collaboration with
community colleges; (7) Barriers to transfer access; (8) Institutional mission
http://cue.usc.edu/assests/CUE_Transfer_Access-Self_Assessment_Inventory_4Year.pdf
Transfer SAI-Two-Year College Version
(1) Transfer counseling services for students; (2) Financial support for students seeking to
transfer to selective four-year institutions; (3) Personnel; (4) Publicity and public statements; (5) Institutional transfer policies and practices; (6) Partnerships and collaboration with
selective four-year institutions; (7) Barriers to transfer access; (8) Institutional missionhttp://cue.usc.edu/assests/CUE_Transfer_Access_Self_Assessment_Inventory_2Year.pdf
Assessing Pathways
WHAT CAITE DID
Supporting College Transitions: HS-CC/4YR and CC-4YR• Goals:
–Increase the interest, enrollment and retention in computing programs
–Promote CC pathways, both transfer & CTE
–Increase the transfers to and retention in 4YR colleges
Supporting College Transitions: HS-CC/4YR and CC-4YR
• Strategies– Outreach to underserved communities (via CC
regions), using the CAITE network (career fairs, open houses)
– Develop pathway support infrastructure (advising, information, mentoring, targeted programs)
– Address articulation, alignment, program/course equivalency
~230Miles
~325Miles
~150Miles
~52Miles
USG = 33 InstitutionsTCSG = 26 institutionsServe 79% of total students
UMass = 5 campusesState Universites = 7 + 2CC = 15 + 1Serve 43% of total Students
How can this work in GA? Some comparisons
College Enrollments
More comparisons• 86% of ~81K GA recent HS grads going to
college enrolled in GA HE; 85% of all GA residents who were freshmen attended college in their home state.
• GA has 132 incolleges and universities –27 Public 4-year institutions–40 Public 2-year institutions–32 Private 4-year institutions, nonprofit–2 Private 2-year institutions, nonprofit–18 Private 4-year institutions, for-profit–13 Private 2-year institutions, for-profit
• 59% of ~64K recent MA HS grads going to college enrolled in MA HE; 67% of all MA residents who were freshmen attended college in their home state.
• MA has 124 colleges and universities:–14 Public 4-year institutions–16 Public 2-year institution–80 Private 4-year institutions, nonprofit–3 Private 2-year institutions, nonprofit–7 Private 4-year institutions, for-profit–4 Private 2-year institutions, for-profit
CAITE Pathways: Increasing Interest• Introducing the opportunities
–Career fairs, transfer fairs, open houses, CC days
–Information resources–Working in CC “draw” areas–Reaching college counselors, teachers–In many underserved regions, a community college is the expected pathway, but•Perhaps only to a job•And CC pathways are not promoted by HS counselors
BCC
UM D
BSU
CCCC
How might this work in GA?
Promoting Community Colleges• Our partner BATEC
– Close connection with industry and industry needs– 4YR pathways for CTE and transfer students
• MassTransfer– programs with the full transfer of credit, guaranteed admission, and a
tuition discount– Potential for a STEM block
• Community College Connection– priority review of application, transfer credits, financial need; on-
campus housing; priority advising and course registration• ABLE4STEM
– 2 components: 1) establishing course-specific "2+2" articulation agreements for the entry of associate of science graduates of CCs into STEM majors at UMass and 2) "reverse transfer" of credits to community colleges for AS degree completion by CC students who enter UMass
"Go to the Front of the Line"
ABLE4STEM @ UMASS
CC Pathways: Enabling Successful Transfer
• Transfer Summits, Regional Meetings, Faculty visits & IT4U–Renew articulation agreements and equivalencies
–Develop Roadmaps to Transfer
–Build on MassTransfer–Increase awareness
Transfer & Regional Summits, Portals
CCG Summit in Feb 2013 organized regional WG; can AACCD do this too?
Can AACCD create a portal or leverage GACollege411?
CC Pathways: Enrollment & Retention
• Builds on the Transfer effort– Articulation, alignment, equivalency and pathway
support – Alternative pathways
• (e.g., CTECS/IT program at UMB)• Enhanced by
– Strengthening programs (joint/shared offerings)– Mentoring at both CC and 4YR– Incentives (financial aid, housing, registration)
TCSGUSG, or USG USG CS/IT alignment: articulation, course equivalencies, roadmaps or alternative pathways?
TCSGUSG, or USG USG CS/IT financial/academic incentives
Some examples; Source: Complete College America
Guided Pathways to Success• Whole Programs of Study
• Students choose coherent programs, not random, individual courses.
• Informed Choice• Choice becomes more informed,
deliberate, and simpler.• No wasted credits
• All courses count toward degrees.
• Default pathways• Students remain on their chosen
path unless given approval to change.
• Intrusive, on-time advising• Academic advising is intrusive,
just in time, efficient, and cost effective.
GPS is something that CCG is promoting
CAITE's CC Pathway Successes• CAITE is contributing to both growing and increasing
diversity in enrollments.– The four UMass campuses are seeing a significant increase in CS
enrollments, due in part to an increase in transfer students– Computing-related associate degrees awarded to female
and underrepresented minority students at CAITE partner institutions have increased 29% in CC from 2007 to 2010
– UMass enrollments are increasing at a greater rate than those at comparable institutions nationally. Community college enrollment is up dramatically.
Extra Slides
Some CC4-Year Programs• MassTransfer
http://www.mass.edu/masstransfer/ Community college students who complete associate degrees or any student in the Massachusetts public higher education system who completes the MassTransfer Block (General Education)– Full transfer of credit (up to 60 credits)– Guaranteed admission with GPA 2.5+– Tuition waiver 33% with GPA 3.0+
• UMass Amherst Community College Connectionhttp://www.umass.edu/umccc/ • Designed for community college graduates who participated in Joint Admissions or
MassTransfer programs• Guaranteed admission with a 2.5 or higher cumulative GPA, and you are in good
academic, financial, and disciplinary status at all previously attended colleges• Waiver of in-state tuition with graduation GPA of 3.0 or higher (67%)• Benefits include: priority processing for admission, transfer credit, financial aid,
housing, and course registration
CAITE’s Peer Mentoring (PM) Program• CAITE’s “peer mentor” program utilizes supplemental peer
instruction (SPI), facilitated study groups (FSG), and peer-led team learning (PLTL) models, adapted to each campus.
– Weekly sessions supplement regular class meetings and are led by trained “peer” (student) mentors
– Sessions focus on supplementing and enriching course material. They are free and open to all students in class
Fall 2010 Spring 2011 Fall 2011 TotalUnique Campuses 7 7 8 8Courses supported 10 9 12 31
Course enrollments 600 410 444 1454
Student attendees 147 84 186 417
Participation in CAITE Peer Mentoring, Fall 2010-Fall 2011
Course Performance differences between peer mentoring participants and non-participants*
from -10% to -1% from 0% to 9% from 10% to 19% from 20% to 29% from 30% to 39% from 40% to 49% from 50% to 59%0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Differences in Pass Rates (participants vs. non-participants)
University Community College
PM Pass Rate - Non-PM Pass Rate
Num
ber o
f Cla
sses
*Data collected between fall 2010 and fall 2011; 29 courses evaluated
ECEP CC Pathway EvaluationIndicator Two: Organizational Capacity
Organization Capacity Evaluation MethodTwo-year colleges
Increased transfer of CS/IT students into 4-year schools
Institutional enrollment and transfer dataInstitutional course performance dataCount of new pathwaysIncreased student retention in CS/IT
Four-year colleges
Increased student retention in CS/IT Institutional enrollment and transfer dataInstitutional course performance dataCount of new pathwaysTrain-the-trainer follow-up surveys
Increased curricular alignment with 2-year schools
✔
✔• Increased pass rates in courses with mentoring• Gathered baseline data on retention in majors and courses, but
difficulties in getting updates due to data collection demands.
✔✔