5
© 2018 Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 180 Original Article INTRODUCTION Pain is the most common complaint in osteoarthritis (OA), which restricts the physical activity of the patients as well as decreases work performance. [1] In OA of the knee, pain may arise from periosteal elevation, trabecular microfractures, capsular distension, and/or synovial inflammation. Factors complicating determination of the source of pain may include varus or vagus deformity, weight issues, and the emotional impact of chronic pain. Once the cause of pain is identified, treatment plan can be formulated. [2] Pain is the most common reason in patients with OA to seek medical help. [3] The current treatment strategies for OA aim to educate the patient about OA, alleviate pain, optimize and maintain joint function and prevent or suppress the progression of adverse structural change affecting the joint tissues. [4] Commonly used pharmacological agents for pain management are nonsteroidal anti‑inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). [5] Most of the patients with OA take medication for a long period and have a number of comorbidities, which requires concomitant medication, increasing the likelihood of adverse events including gastrointestinal (GI) injury. [6] There is an increasing demand for more effective and safer treatment for OA. Piroxicam is an NSAID, an oxicam derivative, which are enolic acids that inhibit cyclooxygenase (COX) enzyme non A Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety of Piroxicam and Naproxen in the Management of Pain in Osteoarthritis of the Knee Yaseen Mohammed, Sarala Narayana, H. S. Arun 1 Departments of Pharmacology and 1 Orthopaedics, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research, Kolar, Karnataka, India Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease and cause for functional disability. OA is characterized by the insidious onset of pain and limited range of movements. Piroxicam and naproxen are used in OA, rheumatoid arthritis, acute gouty arthritis, migraine, dysmenorrhea, and postoperative pain. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of these drugs in patients with OA of the knee. Materials and Methods: This was a randomized, open‑label, comparative, parallel group study conducted in patients with OA of knee joints. They received either oral piroxicam 20 mg or naproxen 500 mg twice daily for 6 weeks. The pain was assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores at baseline, 2 nd ,4 th , and 6 th week. Patient satisfaction score (PSS) and quality of life were assessed at follow‑up. Adverse effects were assessed using the World Health Organization causality scale. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used. Results: A total of 110 patients were recruited, 47 males and 63 females, 100 completed the study (51 in Group P and 49 in Group N). Both piroxicam and naproxen significantly reduced VAS and WOMAC scores at the 2 nd ,4 th , and 6 th week (P = 0.001) compared to baseline, but this was not significant between the groups. PSS was significantly (P = 0.03) high at 4 th and 6 th week when compared to week 2 with both medications, but between the medications, it was insignificant (P = 0.10). The adverse effects such as epigastric discomfort, nausea, and vomiting were observed with both the drugs, but it was more with naproxen. Conclusion: Piroxicam was as effective as naproxen in relieving pain and improving the range of movements with less adverse effects. Keywords: Knee joints, naproxen, osteoarthritis, piroxicam Address for correspondence: Dr. Sarala Narayana, Departments of Pharmacology, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India. E‑mail: [email protected] Access this article online Quick Response Code: Website: www.jnsbm.org DOI: 10.4103/jnsbm.JNSBM_154_17 Abstract How to cite this article: Mohammed Y, Narayana S, Arun HS. A comparative study of efficacy and safety of piroxicam and naproxen in the management of pain in osteoarthritis of the knee. J Nat Sc Biol Med 2018;9:180‑4. This is an open access journal, and arcles are distributed under the terms of the Creave Commons Aribuon‑NonCommercial‑ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non‑commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creaons are licensed under the idencal terms. For reprints contact: [email protected]

A Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety of Piroxicam

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety of Piroxicam

© 2018 Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow180

Original Article

IntroductIon

Painisthemostcommoncomplaintinosteoarthritis(OA),whichrestrictsthephysicalactivityofthepatientsaswellasdecreasesworkperformance.[1]InOAoftheknee,painmayarisefromperiostealelevation,trabecularmicrofractures,capsulardistension,and/orsynovialinflammation.Factorscomplicating determination of the source of painmayincludevarusorvagusdeformity,weight issues, and theemotionalimpactofchronicpain.Oncethecauseofpainis identified, treatment plan can be formulated.[2] Painis themost common reason in patientswithOA to seekmedicalhelp.[3]ThecurrenttreatmentstrategiesforOAaimtoeducate thepatientaboutOA,alleviatepain,optimizeandmaintain joint function and prevent or suppress theprogressionofadversestructuralchangeaffectingthejointtissues.[4]

Commonlyusedpharmacologicalagentsforpainmanagementare nonsteroidal anti‑inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).[5]Most of the patientswithOA takemedication for a longperiodandhaveanumberofcomorbidities,whichrequiresconcomitantmedication,increasingthelikelihoodofadverseevents includinggastrointestinal (GI) injury.[6]There is anincreasingdemandformoreeffectiveandsafertreatmentforOA.PiroxicamisanNSAID,anoxicamderivative,whichareenolicacidsthatinhibitcyclooxygenase(COX)enzymenon

A Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety of Piroxicam and Naproxen in the Management of Pain in Osteoarthritis of the

KneeYaseen Mohammed, Sarala Narayana, H. S. Arun1

Departments of Pharmacology and 1Orthopaedics, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research, Kolar, Karnataka, India

Introduction: Osteoarthritis(OA)isadegenerativejointdiseaseandcauseforfunctionaldisability.OAischaracterizedbytheinsidiousonsetofpainandlimitedrangeofmovements.PiroxicamandnaproxenareusedinOA,rheumatoidarthritis,acutegoutyarthritis,migraine,dysmenorrhea,andpostoperativepain.TheaimofthisstudywastocomparetheefficacyandsafetyofthesedrugsinpatientswithOAoftheknee.Materials and Methods:Thiswasarandomized,open‑label,comparative,parallelgroupstudyconductedinpatientswithOAofkneejoints.Theyreceivedeitheroralpiroxicam20mgornaproxen500mgtwicedailyfor6weeks.ThepainwasassessedusingVisualAnalogScale(VAS)andWesternOntarioandMcMasterUniversitiesArthritisIndex(WOMAC)scoresatbaseline,2nd,4th,and6thweek.Patientsatisfactionscore(PSS)andqualityoflifewereassessedatfollow‑up.AdverseeffectswereassessedusingtheWorldHealthOrganizationcausalityscale.Descriptiveandinferentialstatisticswereused. Results:Atotalof110patientswererecruited,47malesand63females,100completedthestudy(51inGroupPand49inGroupN).BothpiroxicamandnaproxensignificantlyreducedVASandWOMACscoresatthe2nd,4th,and6thweek(P=0.001)comparedtobaseline,butthiswasnotsignificantbetweenthegroups.PSSwassignificantly(P=0.03)highat4thand6thweekwhencomparedtoweek2withbothmedications,butbetweenthemedications,itwasinsignificant(P=0.10).Theadverseeffects suchasepigastricdiscomfort,nausea,andvomitingwereobservedwithboth thedrugs,but itwasmorewithnaproxen.Conclusion:Piroxicamwasaseffectiveasnaproxeninrelievingpainandimprovingtherangeofmovementswithlessadverseeffects.

Keywords:Kneejoints,naproxen,osteoarthritis,piroxicam

Address for correspondence: Dr. Sarala Narayana, Departments of Pharmacology, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College,

Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India.

E‑mail: [email protected]

Access this article online

Quick Response Code:Website:www.jnsbm.org

DOI:10.4103/jnsbm.JNSBM_154_17

Abstract

How to cite this article: MohammedY, Narayana S,Arun HS.Acomparativestudyofefficacyandsafetyofpiroxicamandnaproxeninthemanagementofpaininosteoarthritisoftheknee.JNatScBiolMed2018;9:180‑4.

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‑NonCommercial‑ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non‑commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

For reprints contact: [email protected]

Page 2: A Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety of Piroxicam

Mohammed, et al.: Mohammed et al Piroxicam and naproxen in osteoarthritis

Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine ¦ Volume 9 ¦ Issue 2 ¦ July-December 2018 181

selectively.Itresultsininhibitionofprostaglandinproduction,whichisthemainmediatorofpain.Ithasalonghalf‑life(t½)ofapproximately50handavailableasoralformulation,andhence, it is suitable for use inOA.[5] It is also used in themanagementofpostoperativepain,musculoskeletaldisorders,anddysmenorrhea.[7]IthasshownclinicalefficacyinrelievingpainassociatedwithOAandrheumatoidarthritis,especiallywhere there is an associated inflammatory component.[8] Italso suppresses primary and secondary lesions of adjuvantarthritis.[9]NaproxenisanNSAID,apropionicacidderivativeandisanonselectiveCOXenzymeinhibitor.Itiswell‑absorbedorallyandhasat½of14h.[5]Ithasclinicallyprovenefficacywithregardtoanalgesiaandreliefofmorningstiffness.[10]Ithassideeffectssuchasabdominalpain,gastritis,drowsiness,nausea,vomiting,dizziness,andpruritis.

mAterIAls And methods

A randomized, open‑label, comparative, parallel group,prospectivestudywasconductedinpatientsdiagnosedwithOAofkneejoints.ThisstudywascarriedoutbytheDepartmentsofPharmacologyandOrthopaedicsinR.LJalappaHospitalandResearchCentreattachedtoSriDevarajUrsMedicalCollege,Tamaka,Kolar,fromJanuary2015toJune2016.Patientsofeithergender,agedbetween40and70yearswithsymptomaticidiopathicOAofbilateralkneejointinvolvementforaminimumperiodof6months,radiologicalevidenceofOAofkneejointsandmorning stiffnessof<30mindurationwith crepitusonmotionwere included in the study.Exclusioncriteriawere:patientswithahistoryofsurgeryoracutetraumatothekneejointwithin6months,historyofpepticulcer,GIbleeding,psychiatricillness and bronchial asthma, acute inflammatory arthritis,pseudogout, or severe osteoporosis, thosewith derangedhepaticorrenalparametersandalsowhowerehypersensitivetopiroxicamornaproxen.PatientswithpainduetoOAofkneejointswererecruited,randomizedbysimplerandomizationina1:1ratiointotwogroupsof55each,withGroupPreceivingpiroxicam20mgandGroupNreceivingnaproxen500mg,bothmedicationsgivenorallytwicedailyfor6weeks.Patientswerefollowedupat2nd,4th,and6thweek.Thepatientsrecruitedinbothgroupswerematchedintermsofage,gender,weight,andbodymassindex(BMI).Theywereinstructedtoperformthemildexercise(kneeflexionandhamstringstretch),applyhotfomentation,anduseIndianstyletoilet.

Demographicdetailsandrelevanthistorywerecollectedfromthepatientat the timeof recruitment.Clinicalexaminationincluding general physical examination and knee jointsexamination(inspection,palpation,therangeofmovementsandmeasurements) was performed. Routine laboratoryinvestigations such as complete hemogram, randombloodsugar,bloodurea,serumcreatinine, liver function test,andurine routinewere carried out at baseline.X‑rays of kneejointsweretakenatbaselinefordiagnosis.Rheumatoidfactorwasdonewhenrequired.TheVisualAnalogScale(VAS)[6]andWesternOntario andMcMasterUniversitiesArthritisIndex (WOMAC)[1] scoreswere assessed at baseline and

at each follow‑up.TheVAS scorewas graded from 0 to10accordingtopatient’sresponse.WOMACisasubjectivescoreconsistingofsubscalesintermsofpain,stiffness,andphysicalfunction.Alltheparametersweregradedonascaleof0–4dependingontheseverity,fromnonetosevere.ThereductioninWOMACscoreindirectlyindicatesimprovementin thequalityof life(QOL).If theVASscorewas>3afterinitiatingthetreatmentwithstudydrugs,oraltramadol50mgwas used as rescue analgesic. Patients’ satisfactionwithrespecttopainreliefwasassessedusingpatient’ssatisfactionscore(PSS)ateachfollow‑up.PSSwasgradedas1=poor,2=fair,3=good,and4=excellent.Duringthefollow‑up,thesafetyofthedrugswasmonitoredusingtheWorldHealthOrganizationcausalityscale.

Statistical methodsTodetectameandifferenceofVASscoreof0.98attheendof1monthwithaneffectsizeof0.564,powerof80%,alphaerrorof5%,anddropoutrateof10%,therequiredsamplesizewas55patientspergroup.Thedemographicdatawereanalyzedusingdescriptivestatistics.TheVASandWOMACscoreswereassessedusingrepeatedmeasureanalysisofvariancefollowedbyBonferroniposthoc testwithin thegroup andunpairedt‑testbetweenthegroups.AdverseeventswereanalyzedusingChi‑squaretest.Patient’ssatisfactionscorewasanalyzedusingWilcoxonandMann–WhitneyU‑test.QOLwasanalyzedusingdescriptivestatistics.Thevalueof P <0.05wasconsideredasstatisticallysignificant.

results

PatientswithOAofboththekneejointsrecruitedwere110but100patientscompletedthe6weeksstudyperiod[Figure1].Theanalysiswasperformedforpatientswhohavecompletedthestudy.Thedemographicparameterssuchasage,gender‑wisedistribution,BMI,andoccupationwerecomparableinboththegroups.Among110patients, themajorityofpatientsinbothgroupswerefemales(57.3%).Housewivesconstitutedfor>40%inboththegroups[Table1].

TheVASscorewithinthegroupsandbetweenbothmedicationsisrepresentedinTable2.

ThereductioninmeanVASscorewasstatisticallysignificantateachfollow‑upcomparedtobaselineinbothgroups(P=0.001).Byweek6,therewassignificant(P=0.001)decreaseinVASscorewithboththemedications.ThereductioninmeanVASscorewasnotsignificant(P=0.20, P =0.81, P =0.38)betweenthetreatmentsatanypointoftime[Table2].Theareaunderthecurveforareductioninpaininpatientsreceivingmedicationsin both the groups [Figure 2]was calculated by trapezoidmethod.Thedecreaseintheareaoftrapezoidoveraperiodindicatesthereducedintensityofpainwithbothmedications.Whenthisareawascomparedbetweenmedications,itwaslesswithpiroxicam(5.33)comparedtonaproxen(5.45)atweek6.

TheWOMAC scorewithin the groups and between bothmedicationsisrepresentedinTable3.Thereductioninpain,

Page 3: A Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety of Piroxicam

Mohammed, et al.: Mohammed et al Piroxicam and naproxen in osteoarthritis

Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine ¦ Volume 9 ¦ Issue 2 ¦ July-December 2018182

stiffness, and physical function scoreswere statisticallysignificant (P = 0.001) atweeks 2, 4, and 6 compared tobaselinewith both themedications [Table 3]. Based onthe physical function subscale ofWOMAC, reduction inscoreindicatesgradualimprovementintheQOLat2nd,4th,and6thweek.When the scoresof subcaleswere comparedbetween groups, the reductionwas insignificant at eachfollow‑up.ThereductioninWOMACscorewasstatisticallysignificant (P = 0.001) atweeks 2, 4, and 6 compared to

baselinewithboththemedications.Morethan75%decreaseinthescorewasobservedatweek6.ThereductioninmeanWOMAC scorewas insignificant between piroxicam andnaproxenatallthefollow‑upvisits.

Inpiroxicamgroup,64.7%ofpatientsgradedtheirsatisfactionas good at both 4th and 6thweek.Nearly 5.9%of patientsexpressed their satisfaction as excellent atweek 6.ThisincreaseinPSSatbothweekswasstatisticallysignificantascomparedtoweek2(P=0.03).At4thweek,60.7%ofpatientsgradedtheirsatisfactionasgood,whereas63.2%at6thweekingroupN.PSSwassignificantlyimprovedat4thand6thweekcompared toweek 2with naproxen (P = 0.03). PSSwasinsignificantbetweenthemedications(P=0.10)[Figure3].Adverseeffectswithpiroxicamandnaproxenwereepigastricdiscomfort(19.2%vs.32%),nausea(15.3%vs.18.8%),andvomiting(15.3%vs.24.5%).Thesesymptomsweretreatedwithomeprazole20mgoncedailytilltheysubsided.

dIscussIon

OA is one of the most common degenerative diseaseparticularlyaffectingthekneejoints,anditisthemajorcause

Table 1: Comparison of demographic parameters between Group P and Group N

Variables Group P (n=55) Group N (n=55)Age(years),mean±SD 55.24±9.80 52.03±9.00Male/female 23/32 24/31BMI(kg/m2),mean±SD 25.80±4.32 26.00±4.57Housewife 24 22Farmer 16 18Teacher 8 9Tailor 7 6BMI:Bodymassindex,SD:Standarddeviation

Figure 1: Consort flow chart representing recruitment, randomization and follow‑up

Page 4: A Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety of Piroxicam

Mohammed, et al.: Mohammed et al Piroxicam and naproxen in osteoarthritis

Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine ¦ Volume 9 ¦ Issue 2 ¦ July-December 2018 183

of disability in elderly.OA is a disease of synovial jointscharacterizedbyinflammationofthejointcapsule,cartilagelossalongwithperiarticularbonedamage.Itisassociatedwithpain,impairedmuscularstability,reducedrangeofmovement,andfunctionaldisability.OArarelyoccursbeforetheageof

40yearsbutby75yearsatleast85%ofthepopulationhaveeitherclinicalorradiographicevidenceofthedisease.OAisanappropriatemodeltoassesstheefficacyofnewanalgesicsatrepeateddoses.[5]NSAIDsarewidelyusedforthetreatmentof pain in patientswithOA.However, they are associatedwithadverseeffectsmainlyGI,suchasepigastricdiscomfort,dyspepsia,abdominalpain,nausea,andvomiting.Thus,thedecisiontoprescribeNSAIDsisbasedontheireffectivenesstoreducepainwithlessadverseeffects.

In thepresent study,110patientsdiagnosedwithmoderateto severeOA of both the knee jointswere recruited andrandomizedasshowninFigure1.Theyreceivedpiroxicam20mginGroupPornaproxen500mgingroupNtwicedailyfor6weeks.Onehundredpatientscompletedthestudyperiod.Mostofthepatients(70%)wereinthefifthdecadeoflifewhichsubstantiatesthatOAoccurrenceincreasesasageadvances.Someof thefactorscontributing toOAinelderlycouldbedegenerativechangesinthemenisci,jointligaments,increasedboneturnoveraswellascalcificationofjointtissues.[11]

Thefemalepatientsweremoreinboththegroups.AstudybyRugstadetal.,comparingpiroxicam20mgwithnaproxen750mgoncedailyinOAofthekneealsohadmorefemalepatients.[12]Thiscouldbebecauseinwomen,tendonsaremoreelasticandkneejointsarenotalignedstraightasinmenwhichleadtoinjuriesandmaymanifestasOAinthelaterpartoftheirlife.Inaddition,femalepatientswhosemothershadOAmightdevelopthisdiseaseinthesamejointandatthesameage.Estrogenprotectscartilagefrominflammation,butduringandaftermenopause,thedecreasedestrogenlevelleadstohighriskofOA.[13]Obesitycontributes toextra stressonknees,whichleadstocartilagebreakdown,andinthisstudy,mostpatientswereoverweight.

WeobservedthatbothpiroxicamandnaproxensignificantlyreducedtheVASscoresat2nd,4th,and6thweekcomparedtobaseline[Table2].Thereduction inpainwassignificant inpatientsreceivingeithermedication,andalsotherewasagoodclinicalresponse.Betweenthegroups,reductioninVASscorewasnotstatisticallysignificantatanyofthefollow‑upvisits.InastudybyRichyetal.,piroxicamwassimilarinefficacycomparedtootherNSAIDsinreducingpaininpatientswithOAoftheknee.[14]Allegrinietal.havereportedthatpiroxicam

Table 3: Comparison of subscales of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index within and between the groups at all evaluation points

Mean±SD P (between groups)Group P Group N

PainsubscaleBaseline 13.25±2.25 13.27±1.95 0.422ndweek 09.92±1.74* 09.81±1.62* 0.364thweek 07.03±1.34* 07.00±1.41* 0.286thweek 04.35±0.82* 04.41±0.86* 0.17

StiffnesssubscaleBaseline 04.73±0.50 04.58±0.53 0.262ndweek 03.51±0.50* 03.55±0.54* 0.414thweek 02.51±0.50* 02.55±0.54* 0.746thweek 02.00±0.00* 02.02±0.14* 0.32

PhysicalfunctionsubscaleBaseline 39.63±3.34 39.56±2.92 0.542ndweek 29.66±3.57* 30.40±2.85* 0.404thweek 19.47±3.08* 20.07±3.25* 0.126thweek 09.52±2.28* 09.89±1.99* 0.20

*P=0.001whencomparingtheevaluationpointswithbaseline.SD:Standarddeviation

Table 2: Comparison of mean visual analog scale scores within and between the groups at all evaluation points

Mean±SD P (between groups)

Group P Group NBaseline 8.00±1.51 7.78±1.45 0.402ndweek 5.52±1.35* 5.45±1.32* 0.204thweek 3.53±1.10* 3.55±1.12* 0.816thweek 1.80±0.70* 1.90±0.60* 0.38*P=0.001whencomparingtheevaluationpointswithbaseline.SD:Standarddeviation

Figure 3: Patient’s satisfaction scoreFigure 2: Area under curve – piroxicam and naproxen

Page 5: A Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety of Piroxicam

Mohammed, et al.: Mohammed et al Piroxicam and naproxen in osteoarthritis

Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine ¦ Volume 9 ¦ Issue 2 ¦ July-December 2018184

patchwaseffectivecomparedtoplaceboinreducingpainduetoOAofthelumbarvertebra.[15]Alhoetal.studyshowedthatpiroxicamandnaproxenweresimilarinefficacywhenusedforOAofthehipjoint.[16]Inthisstudy,theintensityofpainexperiencedbythepatientsover6weeksisrepresentedbytheareaunderthecurveandthosereceivingpiroxicam(5.33)hadmarginallybetterpainreliefcomparedtonaproxen(5.45)atweek6asshowninFigure2.

The parameters ofWOMACdepicting pain, stiffness, andphysicalfunctionweresignificantlyreducedinbothgroupsateachfollow‑upcomparedtobaseline[Table3].Inthisstudy,boththedrugssignificantlyreducedWOMACscoreat2nd,4th,and6thweekcomparedtobaseline.ReductioninWOMACscoreimpliesareductioninpain,improvementinflexibilityofjoints,andrangeofmovements.Thishelpsthepatientincarryingoutday‑to‑dayactivitiesindependently,thusreductioninthisscoreindicatesimprovementintheQOLofthepatients.TherewasnosignificantreductioninWOMACscoresbetweenthegroupsduringthefollow‑upperiod.InastudybySmithetal., itwasobserved thatNSAIDssuchaspiroxicamandnaproxenreducedpainsimilartoopioidsinpatientswithOAoftheknee.[17]ReductioninVASandWOMACscorestothesameextentbyboththedrugsinourstudyimpliesthattheyareequallyefficaciousinreducingthesymptomsandsignsofOA.

Wealso assessed thePSSat 2nd, 4th, and6thweek. Inboththegroups,morenumberofpatients expressed satisfactionas “Good” with the study medications. There was animprovementinPSSinboththegroupsfrom2ndweekto4thand6thweek[Figure3].Therewasnosignificantdifferenceinthesatisfactionscorebetweenpiroxicamandnaproxen(P=0.10).This shows thatpatients inboth thegroupshadpain reliefandwere able to perform their regular activitieswith lessdependence.Most of our patientswere in thefifth decadeof life duringwhich they have to depend on their familymembersforsupport,sincetheycouldcarryouttheiractivitiesindependently,theirsatisfactionscoresimproved.

In this study, bothmedicationswerewell‑tolerated, andadverse effectsweremild in nature.The adverse effectssuch as epigastric discomfort, nausea, and vomiting,wereobservedwithboththedrugs,butthenumberwasmorewithnaproxen than piroxicam, and thesemanifestationsweretreatedsymptomatically. In thestudydonebyRichyetal.,patientswithOAof knee observed that piroxicam causedlesser adverse effects compared to otherNSAIDs exceptmeloxicam.TheadverseeffectswerelessevenwithtwicedailyadministrationofpiroxicamcomparedtooncedailyintakeofotherNSAIDs.[14]

conclusIon

The pain relief and patient satisfactionwere similarwithboththedrugsbutanumberofadverseeffectswerelesswithpiroxicam,suggestingittobeabetteralternativetonaproxeninpatientswithOAofkneejoints.

Financial support and sponsorshipNil.

Conflicts of interestTherearenoconflictsofinterest.

references1. EssexMN,BeharR,O’ConnellMA,BrownPB.Efficacyandtolerability

ofcelecoxibandnaproxenversusplaceboinhispanicpatientswithkneeosteoarthritis.IntJGenMed2014;7:227‑35.

2. Capel M, Tornero J, Zamorano JL, Oyagüez I, Casado MÁ,Sánchez‑Covisa J, et al. Efficiency of naproxen/esomeprazole inassociation for osteoarthrosis treatment in Spain. Reumatol Clin2014;10:210‑7.

3. CesarePE,HaudenschildDR,SamuelsJ,AbramasonSB.Pathogenesisof osteoarthritis. In:FirsteinGS,BuddRC,GabrielSE,Mcinnes IB,O’Dell JR, editors. Kelley’s Text Book of Rheumatology. 9th ed.Philadelphia:Elsevier;2013.p.1617‑35.

4. SchiffM,MinicM.Comparison of the analgesic efficacy and safetyof non‑prescription doses of naproxen sodium and ibuprofen in thetreatmentofosteoarthritisoftheknee.JRheumatol2004;31:1373‑83.

5. GrosserT,SmythEM,FitzgeraldGA.Anti‑inflamatory,antipyreticandanalgesicagents;Pharmacotherapyofgout.In:BruntonLL,ChabnerB,Knollman BC, editors. Goodman & Gilman’s the PharmacologicalBasis of Therapeutics. 12th ed. Newyork: McGraw Hill Publication;2011.p.959‑1004.

6. PrakasamAK,SalmanP,SenthilkumarN.ComparativeassessmentofanalgesiceffectofdifferentNSAID’sinthemanagementoflowbackpain.IntJPharmtechRes2011;3:1260‑4.

7. Mohammad S, Singh V, Wadhwani P, Tayade HP, Rathod OK.Sublingual piroxicam in the management of postoperative pain aftersurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolar.IndianJDentRes2012;23:839‑40.

8. Deb J, Majumder J, Bhattacharyya S, Jana SS. A novel naproxenderivative capable of displaying anti‑cancer and anti‑migratorypropertiesagainsthumanbreastcancercells.BMCCancer2014;14:567.

9. EssexMN,O’ConnellMA,BeharR,BaoW. Efficacy and safety ofnonsteroidal anti‑inflammatory drugs in Asian patients with kneeosteoarthritis:Summaryofarandomized,placebo‑controlledstudy.IntJRheumDis2016;19:262‑70.

10. GiménezM,PujolJ,AliZ,López‑SolàM,Contreras‑RodríguezO,DeusJ,et al.Naproxeneffectsonbrainresponsetopainfulpressurestimulationin patients with knee osteoarthritis: A double‑blind, randomized,placebo‑controlled,single‑dosestudy.JRheumatol2014;41:2240‑8.

11. ShaneAndersonA, Loeser RF.Why is osteoarthritis an age‑relateddisease?BestPractResClinRheumatol2010;24:15‑26.

12. RugstadHE,HundalO,HolmeI,HerlandOB,HusbyG,GierckskyKE,et al.Piroxicamandnaproxenplasmaconcentrations inpatientswithosteoarthritis: Relation to age, sex, efficacy and adverse events. ClinRheumatol1986;5:389‑98.

13. Suszynski M. Why More Women have Osteoarthritis?Available from: http://www.everydayhealth.com/osteoarthritis/osteoarthritis‑and‑gender.aspx.[Lastaccessedon2016Oct20].

14. Richy F, Scarpignato C, LanasA, Reginster JY. Efficacy and safetyof piroxicam revisited.Aglobalmeta‑analysis of randomised clinicaltrials.PharmacolRes2009;60:254‑63.

15. AllegriniA, Nuzzo L, Pavone D, Tavella‑ScaringiA, Giangreco D,Bucci M, et al. Efficacy and safety of piroxicam patch versuspiroxicamcreaminpatientswithlumbarosteoarthritis.Arandomized,placebo‑controlledstudy.Arzneimittelforschung2009;59:403‑9.

16. AlhoA, Jaer O, Slungaard U, Holme I. Piroxicam and naproxen inpatientswithosteoarthritisofthehipwaitingfortotalhipreplacement.ClinRheumatol1988;7:208‑13.

17. SmithSR,DeshpandeBR,CollinsJE,KatzJN,LosinaE.Comparativepainreductionoforalnon‑steroidalanti‑inflammatorydrugsandopioidsfor knee osteoarthritis: Systematic analytic review. OsteoarthritisCartilage2016;24:962‑72.