7
Go to: Indian J Pharmacol. 2011 Apr; 43(2): 131–136. doi: 10.4103/02537613.77344 PMCID: PMC3081449 A comparative evaluation of price and quality of some branded versus branded– generic medicines of the same manufacturer in India G.L. Singal , Arun Nanda , and Anita Kotwani Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, M. D. University, Rohtak, Haryana, India Department of Pharmacology, V. P. Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Delhi, India Correspondence to: Dr. Anita Kotwani, Email: [email protected] Received 2010 Jun 16; Revised 2010 Sep 6; Accepted 2011 Jan 16. Copyright : © Indian Journal of Pharmacology This is an openaccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionNoncommercialShare Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Abstract Objective: To compare and evaluate the price and quality of “branded” and brandedgeneric equivalents of some commonly used medicines manufactured by the same pharmaceutical company in India. Materials and Methods: Five commonly used medicines: alprazolam, cetirizine, ciprofloxacin, fluoxetine, and lansoprazole manufactured in branded and brandedgeneric versions by the same company were selected. Pricetopatient and pricetoretailers were found for five “pair” of medicines. Both quantitative and qualitative analysis were performed following the methods prescribed in the Indian Pharmacopoeia 2007 on five pair of medicines. The tests performed were identification test, chemical composition estimation test, uniformity of contents test, uniformity of weight, and dissolution studies. Main Outcome Measures: Pricetopatient, retailer markup and qualitative analysis of branded and brandedgeneric medicines. Results: Retailer margin for five branded medicines were in the range of 2530% but for their brandedgenerics version manufactured by the same company it was in the range of 2011016%. Pricetopatient for the branded version of cetirizine, fluoxetine, ciprofloxacin, lansoprazole, and alprozolam was higher by 41%, 33%, 0%, 14%, and 31% than brandedgeneric. Both versions of five medicines were within their permissible range for all the quantitative and qualitative parameters as prescribed in Indian Pharmacopoeia. Conclusion: Difference in pricetopatient was not as huge as it is expected for generics but margins for retailer were very high 1 1

A Comparative Evaluation of Some Branded Versus Branded–Generic Medicines

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

comparative evaluation

Citation preview

  • Goto:

    IndianJPharmacol.2011Apr43(2):131136.doi:10.4103/02537613.77344

    PMCID:PMC3081449

    AcomparativeevaluationofpriceandqualityofsomebrandedversusbrandedgenericmedicinesofthesamemanufacturerinIndiaG.L.Singal,ArunNanda,andAnitaKotwani

    DepartmentofPharmaceuticalSciences,M.D.University,Rohtak,Haryana,IndiaDepartmentofPharmacology,V.P.ChestInstitute,UniversityofDelhi,Delhi,India

    Correspondenceto:Dr.AnitaKotwani,Email:[email protected]

    Received2010Jun16Revised2010Sep6Accepted2011Jan16.

    Copyright:IndianJournalofPharmacology

    ThisisanopenaccessarticledistributedunderthetermsoftheCreativeCommonsAttributionNoncommercialShareAlike3.0Unported,whichpermitsunrestricteduse,distribution,andreproductioninanymedium,providedtheoriginalworkisproperlycited.

    ThisarticlehasbeencitedbyotherarticlesinPMC.

    Abstract

    Objective:

    TocompareandevaluatethepriceandqualityofbrandedandbrandedgenericequivalentsofsomecommonlyusedmedicinesmanufacturedbythesamepharmaceuticalcompanyinIndia.

    MaterialsandMethods:

    Fivecommonlyusedmedicines:alprazolam,cetirizine,ciprofloxacin,fluoxetine,andlansoprazolemanufacturedinbrandedandbrandedgenericversionsbythesamecompanywereselected.Pricetopatientandpricetoretailerswerefoundforfivepairofmedicines.BothquantitativeandqualitativeanalysiswereperformedfollowingthemethodsprescribedintheIndianPharmacopoeia2007onfivepairofmedicines.Thetestsperformedwereidentificationtest,chemicalcompositionestimationtest,uniformityofcontentstest,uniformityofweight,anddissolutionstudies.

    MainOutcomeMeasures:

    Pricetopatient,retailermarkupandqualitativeanalysisofbrandedandbrandedgenericmedicines.

    Results:

    Retailermarginforfivebrandedmedicineswereintherangeof2530%butfortheirbrandedgenericsversionmanufacturedbythesamecompanyitwasintherangeof2011016%.Pricetopatientforthebrandedversionofcetirizine,fluoxetine,ciprofloxacin,lansoprazole,andalprozolamwashigherby41%,33%,0%,14%,and31%thanbrandedgeneric.BothversionsoffivemedicineswerewithintheirpermissiblerangeforallthequantitativeandqualitativeparametersasprescribedinIndianPharmacopoeia.

    Conclusion:

    Differenceinpricetopatientwasnotashugeasitisexpectedforgenericsbutmarginsforretailerwereveryhigh

    1

    1

  • Goto:

    Goto:

    forbrandedgenerics.Qualityofbrandedgenericsissameasfortheirbrandedversion.Thestudyhighlightstheneedtomodifythedrugpricepolicy,regulatethemarkupsingenericsupplychain,conductandwidelypublicizethequalitytestingofgenericsforawarenessofallstakeholders.

    Keywords:Brandedmedicines,brandedgeneric,generics,markups,medicineprice,India,qualitytesting

    Introduction

    Theuseofgenericdrugsissteadilyincreasinginternationallyasaresultofeconomicpressureondrugbudgets.Genericdrugsprovidetheopportunityformajorsavingsinhealthcareexpendituresincetheyareusuallysubstantiallylowerinpricethantheinnovatorbrands.[1]However,physiciansareapprehensiveregardingthequalityofgenericdrugs[2,3]andhaveconcernsabouttheirreliabilityaswellasinterchangeofcertaindrugcategories.[4]Althoughthegenericmedicinesarebioequivalentsoftheirinnovatorcounterpartsandareproducedinsimilarfacilitiesaccordingtogoodmanufacturingpractices,[5]thesearewidelybelievedasinferiorintheirtherapeuticefficacyandqualitytobrandedproducts.[6,7]MarketingpracticesadoptedbymanufacturersofimportedbrandedmedicinesalsopropagatethebeliefthatgenericsareofinferiorqualityasreportedfromcountriesinCentralandEasternEuropeandindependentcountriesemergedfromformerSovietUnion.[8]Thepresentstudywasconductedtocomparethequalityandpriceofgeneric(brandedgeneric)drugproductstotheirexpensivepopularbrand(branded)productsmanufacturedbythesamepharmaceuticalcompanyinIndia.

    Currently,almostallmedicinesinIndiaaresoldunderabrand(trade)nameandmedicinesarecalledasbrandedmedicinesorbrandedgeneric.Inrealsense,Indianmarketdoesnothavebrandedmedicines(anamecommonlygiventoaninnovatorproduct)becausetillJanuary2005productpatentwasnotapplicableinIndia.InIndia,manypharmaceuticalcompaniesmanufacturetwotypesofproductsforthesamemolecule,i.e.thebrandedproductwhichtheyadvertiseandpushthroughdoctorsandbrandedgenericwhichtheyexpectretailerstopushinthemarket.ThesocalledbrandedmedicinesinIndiaaremanufacturedandpromotedbymultinationalsorbyreputedIndianmanufacturers.brandedgenerics,ontheotherhand,arenotpromotedoradvertizedbythemanufacturer.Thiscategorycloselyresemblesformulationsreferredtoasgenericsworldwide.Patientsanddoctorsperceptionforallbrandedgenericsirrespectiveofcompanyisthesame.

    InIndia,genericsubstitutionislegallynotallowedsopatientsawarenessaboutgenericsislimitedanddoctorsandpatientsdonotwantpharmacisttochangethetradenamewrittenbydoctor.Hence,consumerawarenessforthegenerics,varietyoftradenamesavailableinthemarket,andpricevariationisverylimited.Hence,thereisneedtoconductastudythatcandocumentthepricestructureandqualityofthebrandedproductandtheirbrandedgenericversionsmanufacturedinIndia.

    Apairofproductfromthesamecompanywaschosentoappreciatethepricestructureandmarkupsforthetwoversions.

    Methods

    Qualityandpriceofmedicineswerestudiedtoevaluatethetwoversionsofthesametherapeuticmolecule.DatawerecollectedduringSeptembertoNovember2008.

    Selectionofmedicines

    Fivecommonlyusedmedicinesfromdifferentclasseswereselectedwhosebranded(popularbrand)andbrandedgenericversionsweremanufacturedbythesamepharmaceuticalcompany.Thefivemedicineschosenwerealprazolam,(0.25mg),cetirizine(10mg),ciprofloxacin(500mg),fluoxetine(20mg),andlansoprazole(30mg).

    Medicineprice

    Pricetopatientandpricetoretailer(PTR)wereanalyzed.Maximumretailprice(MRP)isthepricetopatientand

  • Goto:

    isalwaysprintedonthepackageinIndia.MedicinesareavailabletopatientattheMRPmentionedonthepackageofmedicine.Detailsofthefive"paired"drugproductssoldunderdifferenttradenameswiththeirMRPwerecheckedphysicallywiththeprivateretailpharmacies(chemistshop).

    PTRisthepriceatwhichwholesaler(distributor)sellstheproducttotheretailerandthebill(voucher)giventoretailerbywholesalermentionsthePTR.PTRforallmedicineswasfoundbylookingatthevouchers.ThispricewascheckedandconfirmedfromFormV(underDPCO,1995)availableatthedistributorsofthecompany.ItismandatoryforallthecompaniestogiveFormVthatgivesdetailsoftheproductwithMRP,PTR,taxespaid,etctotheirdistributors.

    Qualitytesting

    Thetestsampleswereprocuredfromthelicensedauthorizedchemistdealersthroughvalidpurchaseinvoice.Thesamplesizecomprised1010tablets/capsulesofbothbrandedandbrandedgenericversionsofeachdrugproduct.Effortsweremadetoprocurethesetestsamples(pairs)withidenticaldateofmanufacturetoruleoutthepossibilityofdifferenceinassaybecauseofdifferentdatesofmanufacturing.ThequalitativeaswellasquantitativeanalysiswascarriedoutinaGovernmentapprovedlaboratoryfollowingthemethodsprescribedintheIndianPharmacopoeia,(2007)asperthestandardslaiddownintheDrugsandCosmeticsAct1940andRules1945.[9]

    Followingtestswereperformed.

    1. Identificationtest:IdentityofthedrugmoleculewasestablishedbyperformingtheidentificationtestthroughinstrumentalanalysisusingHPLC(highpressureliquidchromatography)orIR(infraredspectroscopy)aspermethodprescribedforeachmedicine.

    2. Chemicalcompositiontest\:ThesamplesweresubjectedtoquantitativeanalysisusingHPLCinstrumentalanalyticalmethodsasprovidedinIndianPharmacopoeia2007.

    3. Uniformityofcontenttest:Toconfirmtheuniformityofcontentsinthebatch,thesampleddosageunitsweresubjectedtouniformityofcontentstestwhereinassayon10unitsofdosageformwereperformedindividuallyusinginstrumentalanalyticalmethods.Thetestforuniformityofcontentisnotapplicabletotablets/capsulescontainingmorethan10mgitwasconductedonlyforalprazolam(0.25mg)andcetirizine(10mg).

    4. Uniformityofweight:All10unitsofsampleweretestedforuniformityofweightasprescribed.5. TestsforDissolution:Thesamplesweresubjectedtodissolutionstudiestoevaluatetheirdrugrelease

    pattern.ThesestudieswereperformedinthedissolutionmediaspecifiedintheindividualmonographoftheIndianPharmacopoeia2007onsixdosageunitsandwereindicativeoftheinvivoavailabilityofactivedrugmoietyfromthedosageform,i.e.tabletorcapsule.

    Results

    ComparativePriceandMarkUpforBrandedandBrandedGenericPairofMedicines

    DetailsoffivepairsofmedicinesincludingtheirtradenameassoldintheIndianmarket,strength,dosageform,andthepharmaceuticalcompanythatmanufacturestheseproductsaregiveninTable1.Pricetopatient(MRP)andpricetoretailer(PTR)foundforallthefivepairofmedicinesistabulatedinTable1.PTRforthebrandedproductofcetirizinewas11timesthepriceforbrandedgenericbythesamecompany.RetailerisearningINR22.76for10tabletsofbrandedgenericcetirizineversusRs8.16forthebrandedversionfromthesamecompany.Forciprofloxacin,theMRPofboththebrandedandbrandedgenericproductwassamebutthebrandedgenericwasavailabletoretailerat3.6timeslesspricethanbrandedmedicinefromthesamecompany.

    Table1ComparativepricestructureofBrandedandBrandedgenericmedicines

  • Goto:

    Thepricetopatient(MRP)ofthebrandedproductforthefivemedicinesevaluatedwas41%,33%,0%,14%,and31%higherthantheMRPofthebrandedgenericversionofthesamecompany.Ontheotherhand,PTRforbrandedgenericwas1112%,397%,266%,170%,and439%lessthanthebrandedversionofcetirizine,fluoxetine,ciprofloxacin,lansoprazole,andalprazolam,respectively.Retailermarkupsforfivepairofmedicinesforbrandedversusbrandedgeneric:cetirizine,fluoxetine,ciprofloxacin,lansoprazole,andalprazolamwere30%versus1016%,25%versus367%,25%versus357%,27%versus201%,and25%versus415%,respectively[Table1].

    QualityofBrandedandBrandedGenericPairofMedicines

    1. Identificationtest:AllthefivepairedmedicinesofbrandedandbrandedgenericsgavepositiveidentificationtestswhentestedonHPLCorIRestablishingtheirchemicalidentity[Tables26].

    Table2ComparativeanalyticalevaluationofbrandedandbrandedgenericdrugproductAlprazolamtablets(0.25mg)

    Table6Comparativeanalyticalevaluationofbranded/brandedgenericdrugproductLansoprazolecapsules(30mg)

    2. Chemicalcompositiontest:ThequantitativeanalysisconductedusingtheHPLCmethodshowedeachunitofthetestedsamplestobewellwithintheprescribedrange[Tables26].

    3. Uniformityofcontent:Thistestwasdoneforalprazolamandcetirizineandresultsforboththeversionsofmedicineswerewithintheprescribedrange[Tables2and3].

    Table3ComparativeanalyticalevaluationofbrandedandbrandedgenericdrugproductCetirizinetablets(10mg)

    4. Uniformityofweight:Eachunitofthesamplewaswithintheprescribedrangeforallthefivepairofmedicines[Tables26]

    5. Dissolutiontest:Thedissolutiontestforallthefivepairedmedicineswerewithinthepermissiblelimitsofthestatutorystandards[Tables26].

    Table4ComparativeanalyticalevaluationofbrandedandbrandedgenericdrugproductCiprofloxacintablets(500mg)

    Table5ComparativeanalyticalevaluationofbrandedandbrandedgenericdrugproductFluoxetinecapsules(20mg)

    Discussion

    ThisisoneofthefirststudiesinIndiaconductedtosystematicevaluatethepricetopatientandretailermarkupforthebrandedandbrandedgenericversionsofthesametherapeuticmoleculemanufacturedbythesamecompany.Thisstudyhasalsoevaluatedthequalityofthetwoversions.Findingsofthestudyrevealedthattherearehugemarkupsforretaileronbrandedgenericmedicines.Theretailermarginforfivebrandedmedicinesstudiedwasin

  • therangeof2530%,butfortheirbrandedgenericsversionmanufacturedbythesamecompanyitwasintherangeof2011016%.BothversionsofallfivemedicinesclearedallthequantitativeandqualitativeparametersasprescribedinIndianPharmacopoeia,2007.Thereexistsawidespreadbeliefamongpeopleanddispensingchemiststhatabrandedproductisbetterintermsofqualityandsafetythanthegeneric.[1012]Asystematicreviewhasshownthatgenericandbrandnamecardiovasculardrugsweresimilarfornearlyallclinicaloutcomes.Thisstudyconcludedthatthereisnoevidenceofsuperiorityofbrandpreparationstogenericdrugs.[13]Suchstudiesmaybehelpfulinpromotinggenericdrugusethatreducesunnecessaryspendingwithoutimprovingclinicaloutcome.Inmostdevelopedcountries,genericmedicinesarepromotedbycompetitionenhancingpoliciesoperatingthroughhealthcarereimbursementstocontainexpenditureandencourageefficientuseofresources.[14]

    Resultsofourstudyrevealedthatpricetopatientforthebrandedgenericversionwasnotmuchlessthantoitsbrandedcounterpartbrandedgenericwasavailableat70100%costofthebrandedproduct.InIndia,medicinepricesaresetinoneofthetwoways.MedicinepricesareunderthepurviewofDepartmentofPharmaceuticalswhichitselfisunderministryofchemicalsandfertilizers.TheDrugPriceControlOrder(DPCO)identifiesactivepharmaceuticalingredients(APIs)forwhichapricingformulaisusedtosettheMRP.Thereareonly74bulkdrugswhichareunderpricecontrol[15]andarecalledscheduledmedicines.ForallothermedicinescallednonscheduledmedicinesthemanufacturersetsthepriceandregistersthatpricewiththeNationalPharmaceuticalPricingAuthority(NPPA)underDepartmentofPharmaceuticals.[16]ThemedicinesaresoldattheprintedMRPontheirlabelanddispensingpharmacistcannotchargeapriceexceedingMRPprintedonthepack,aspertheprovisionsunderparagraph16oftheDPCO,1995.Forscheduledmedicines,theNPPApricingformulasetsthe8%markupforwholesalersand16%forretailers.Fornonscheduledmedicines,thesemarkupsarenotset,butitisagreedbythepartnersofthetradethatforbrandedmedicinesaveragemarkupwouldbearound10%and20%forwholesalersandretailers,respectively.

    Inoursampleofmedicines,onlyciprofloxacinisunderpricecontrolandotherfourbelongtononschedulemedicine.Thestudyrevealedthatevenforthebrandedversionofbothscheduleandnonscheduledmedicines,theretailermarginwasmorethantheestablishedmargin,itwasintherangeof2530%.Forthebrandedgenericversion,theretailermarginswereverylarge,2011016%.Pharmaceuticalcompaniesdecidenotonlythefinalprice(MRP)tothepatientbutalsothemarkupfortheretailer.Ifthemarketingisdonebythecompanyasforthe"branded"versionthenthemajormarkupsareforthecompanyifthemarketingandpromotionaredonebytheretailerasinthecaseofbrandedgenericthenthePTRisless,butMRPisnotmuchdifferent.Therefore,thebrandedgenericsarepromotedbytheretailersformonetaryconsiderationsintotaldisregardtothepatient'sinterests.Theultimateconsumer,i.e.patientisnotbenefitedmuchbypreferringbrandedgenericversionstoitsbrandedversion.Anewspaperreportsthehugeprofitmarginsforretailersrangingfrom500%to1000%ongenericmedicinesinIndia.[17]Thehighmarkupsongenericsaretotallynegatingtheveryconceptofaffordablegenericmedicinesforpatients.

    Unlikedevelopedcountries,peopleindevelopingcountriespaythecostofmedicinesoutofpocket.InIndia,morethan80%healthfinancingisbornebypatients.[18]Indiaisknowntoexportmedicinestovariouscountriesatlowcost,butfacesthechallengeofaccesstoaffordableandqualitymedicinesforitsownpopulation.[19]Hence,thegovernmentshouldhaveapolicywherebythepricesofbrandedgenericdrugscanbemaderealisticandaffordabletocommonman.Weneedtohavelegislationtothateffect.Theprofitmarginspresentlybeingsharedbytradersmustbepassedtoconsumer.

    InIndia,adispensingpharmacistisnotauthorizedtosubstituteabrandedmedicinewithabrandedgeneric(orgeneric)aspertheprovisionsunderRule65oftheDrugsandCosmeticsAct,1940andRules,1945,whichalsoaddtothepatient'sburden.IntheUSAsubstitutionisallowedandpatientsacceptgenericsubstitutionifphysicianapprovesofthesame.Genericsubstitutionrateshaveincreasedremarkablythere,probablyduetogreateracceptancebyphysiciansandpharmacistsaswellasencouragementfromthethirdpartypayers.[20]Cheapergenericsareoneoftheimportantfactorstoreducehealthcarecost.Thepracticeofgenericsubstitutionisstrongly

  • Goto:

    Goto:

    Goto:

    Goto:

    supportedbyhealthauthoritiesinmanydevelopedcountries.[21]Useofgenericdrugs,whicharebioequivalenttobrandnamedrug,canhelpcontainprescriptiondrugspending.[22]GovernmentofIndiahasopenedfewgenericdrugstoresinsomestatesthatsellgenericmedicinesmanufacturedbypublicsectorcompanies.[23]Thequalityofgenericmedicinesavailableonthesestoresatcheaperratesshouldbetestedandcomparedwithpopularbrandsandresultsshouldbewidelypublished.Studiesinvolvingcomparativeevaluationonqualityofbrandedandtheirgenericcounterpartmaybemademandatoryforthegeneric(orbrandedgeneric)manufacturerandtheirreportsshouldbemadepublictopromotegenericuseandprescriptions.

    Oneinherentlimitationofthisstudyisthatwehavetestedpairofbrandedandbrandedgenericmedicinesthatweremanufacturedbythesamereputedcompany.Thoughitisexpectedthatboththeversionsshouldhavethesamequalitybutperceptionforanybrandedgenericissameamongdoctorsandpatients.Sotostartwith,wehavetakenbothbrandedandbrandedgenericproductsofthesamecompanyandstudiednotonlythequalitybutalsothepricestructure.

    Conclusions

    Findingsofthepresentstudyindicatethatboththebrandedandbrandedgenericversionsofthefivepairedmedicineshadidenticalqualityandtheyfulfilledallthecriteriaprescribedbythestatutorystandards.Hence,thegeneralnotionanddoubtregardingthequalityofthebrandedgenericversionofmedicinesneedstobeerasedconductingmoresuchstudiesandpublishingthemwidely.Suitablechangesinthedrugpricepolicymaybemadetohavelowerpricesforbrandedgenericversions.TransparencyinfixingtheMRPbythemanufacturerandclearguidelinesformarkupsatleastforbrandedgenericsisrequiredinpharmaceuticaltrade.Thegovernmentmusttakeupgenericpromotionalschemes,generalawarenessprogramsonqualityofgenericstobuildconfidenceamongprescribers,pharmacists,andconsumers.Availabilityofgenericsorbrandedgenericsinthemarketwithlowerpricetagandassuredqualityisessentialtomakethemedicinesaffordable.

    Acknowledgments

    Weappreciatethecooperationofretailpharmacistsanddistributorswhohelpedusincollectionofthedata.

    FootnotesSourceofSupport:Nil.

    ConflictofInterest:Nonedeclared.

    References

    1.KingDR,KanavosP.Encouragingtheuseofgenericmedicines:Implicationsfortransitioneconomies.CroatMedJ.200243:4629.[PubMed]

    2.TilyardMW,DoveySM,RosentstreichD.Generalpractitionersviewsongenericmedicationandsubstitution.NZMedJ.1990103:31820.[PubMed]

    3.BiswasR,ChatterjeeP,MundleM.Prescribinghabitsofphysiciansinmedicalcollege,Calcutta.IndianJCommunityMed.200025:1615.

    4.HassaliMA,ShafieAA,AwaisuA,IbrahimMI,PingCC,JamshedS.Physiciansviewsongenericmedicines:Anarrativereview.JGenericMed.20107:309.

    5.DavitBM,NwakamaPE,BuehlerGJ,ConnerDP,HaidarSH,PatelDT,etal.Comparinggenericandinnovatordrugs:Areviewof12yearsofbioequivalenceDatafromtheUnitedStatesFoodandDrugAdministrationAnnPharmacother.200943:158397.[PubMed]

    6.ShrankWH,CoxER,FischerMA,MehtaJ,ChoudhryNK.Patientsperceptionsofgenericmedications.

  • HealthAff(Millwood)200928:54656.[PMCfreearticle][PubMed]

    7.HassaliA,StewartK.Qualityuseofgenericmedicines.AustPrescr.200427:801.

    8.JoncheereKD,PaalT.Providingaffordablemedicinesintransitionalcountries.In:DukesMN,HaaijerRuskampFM,JoncheereCP,RietveldAH,editors.Drugsandmoney:Prices,affordabilityandcostcontainment.Amsterdam(Netherlands):ISOPress2003.

    9.MalikV.19thed.Lucknow(India):EasternBookCompany[lastaccessedon2010Jun13].LawsrelatingtoDrugsandCosmetics.Availablefrom:http://webstore.ebcindia.com/product_info.php?products_id=874.

    10.ShafieAA,HassaliMA.PricecomparisonbetweeninnovatorandgenericmedicinessoldbycommunitypharmaciesinthestateofPenang,Malaysia.JGenMed.20086:3542.

    11.FigueirasMJ,MarcelinoD,CortesMA.People'sviewsonthelevelofagreementofgenericmedicinesfordifferentillnesses.PharmWorldSci.200830:5904.[PubMed]

    12.KjoenniksenI,MortenLindbaekM,GranasAG.PatientsattitudestowardsandexperiencesofgenericdrugsubstitutioninNorway.PharmWorldSci.200628:2849.[PubMed]

    13.KesselheimAS,MisonoAS,LeeJL,StedmanMR,BrookhartMA,ChoudhryNK,etal.Clinicalequivalenceofgenericandbrandnamedrugsusedincardiovasculardiseases.JAMA.2008300:251426.[PMCfreearticle][PubMed]

    14.KanavosP,CostaFontJ,SeeleyE.Competitioninoffpatentdrugmarkets:Issues,regulationandevidence.EconomicPolicy.200823:499544.

    15.Drugs(PriceControl)Order,1995,MinistryofChemicalsandFertilizers,Departmentofchemicalsandpetrochemicals,GovernmentofIndia.1995.[lastaccessedon2010Jun1].Availablefrom:http://www.nppaindia.nic.in/drug_price95/txt1.html.

    16.DepartmentofPharmaceuticals,GovernmentofIndia.NPPA.[lastaccessedon2010Jun9].Availablefrom:http://pharmaceuticals.gov.in/

    17.SoodR.Genericdrugcompaniesfleecingpatients.TheTribune,Chandigarh,India,HimachalPlus.2010.Feb9,[lastaccessedon2010Jun13].Availablefrom:http://www.tribuneindia.com/2010/20100210/himplus.htm#1.

    18.CreeseA,KotwaniA,KutzinJ,PillayA.Evauatingpharmaceuticalsforhealthpolicyinlowandmiddleincomecountrysettings.In:FreemantleN,HillS,editors.Evaluatingpharmaceuticalsforhealthpolicyandreimbursement.MassachusettsUSA:BlackwellPublication2004.pp.22743.(incollaborationwithWHOGeneva)

    19.KotwaniA,EwenM,DeyD,IyerS,LakshmiPK,PatelA,etal.MedicinepricesandavailabilityofcommonmedicinesatsixsitesinIndia:Usingastandardmethodology.IndianJMedRes.2007125:64554.[PubMed]

    20.DongChurlS.Trendsofgenericsubstitutionincommunitypharmacies.PharmWorldSci.199921:2605.[PubMed]

    21.SmeatonJ.Thegenericsmarket.AustJPharm.200081:5402.

    22.NightingaleSL.FromtheFoodandDrugAdministration.JAMA.1998279:645.[PubMed]

    23.KotwaniA.WillgenericdrugstoresimproveaccesstoessentialmedicinesforthepoorinIndia?JPublicHealthPolicy.201031:17884.[PubMed]

    ArticlesfromIndianJournalofPharmacologyareprovidedherecourtesyofMedknowPublications