Upload
braeden-lane
View
21
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A Busy Educational Summer: WI School Report Card, new Cut Scores, and Multiple DPI Initiatives. Updates from the latest and greatest DPI trainings. Eric Larsen CESA 8 School Improvement. Major Shifts. PALS Kindergarten Screener 2012-13. Need for Data Understanding and Analysis 2012-. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
A Busy Educational Summer:WI School Report Card, new Cut Scores, and Multiple DPI InitiativesUpdates from the latest and greatest DPI trainings.
Eric LarsenCESA 8 School Improvement
2
Major Shifts
Common Core State StandardsSince 2010
Smarter Balanced
Assessment2014-15
Educator Effectiveness
2014-15
Accountability Reform
2011-12 to 2013-14
Student Information
System2012-17
Need for Data Understanding and Analysis
2012-
PALS Kindergarten
Screener 2012-13
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
College & Career Ready
High Academic Standards
Support for Individualized
Learning
Data-Informed Decisions
Constructive Accountability
Balanced Assessment
Support for School
Improvement
Effective Educators
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
Higher Expectations for all our StudentsThe Waiver from NCLB has a major
impact on standards, assessment, accountability, and graduation requirements
The goal is for students to navigate through a challenging curriculum and be prepared for a college or career upon high school graduation.
http://www.dpi.wi.gov/oea/acct/accountability.html
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
More Additional Resources As we continue to move forward with
unified messaging, DPI is also creating many documents that can help in these efforts to explain all these changes to your constituents.
Numerous fact sheets, presentations, and letters are available, with more documents to come as created.
http://dpi.wi.gov/sprntdnt/2017_resources.html is the link on the WI DPI website.
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
Standards update:Common Core State Standards
◦ Mathematics◦ English Language Arts◦ Disciplinary Literacy◦ Common Core Essential Elements
Implemented 2014-15Science- Public draft 2nd review fall of 2012,
implementation spring 2013Social Studies- Public Draft mid-November.
Final standards by Summer, 2013Science and Social Studies adoption and
implementation will occur later.
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
DPI going a new DirectionContent and Learning Team is dividingA NEW Common Core Implementation
Team is being created. ◦Led by Emilie Amundson, Director◦Will contain all Math, ELA, Literacy folks.◦Diana Kasbaum, Tamara Maxwell plus new
hires in each content area. Also Reading and all Literacy.
Will start building on “Investigations” work and help develop curricular resources.
Will work with IHEs, CESAs, and other stakeholders to develop and disseminate curricular resources.
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
New Assessments are coming: Proficiency will be measured by new assessments:
WKCE Smarter Balanced (2014-15)WAA-SwD Dynamic Learning Maps (2014-15)ACCESS ASSETS (2015-16) for ELL students
New assessments and Common Core instructional resources will incorporate Universal Design for Learning principles.
New Kindergarten assessment, as required in Act 166, is a screener used to identify struggling readers as soon as possible.
Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening (PALS) developed by the University of Virginia.
PALS reading screener begins immediately (2012-13)
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
PALS Literacy Screener Information
Wisconsin Act 166 requires that an early literacy screener be administered to all kindergarten students.
DPI was charged with selecting a screener that:◦ Is valid and reliable◦ Assesses phonemic awareness and letter sound
knowledge◦ Will begin in the 2012-2013 school year
PALS data should be used to inform early childhood instruction. Screeners are an effective component to an early warning system.
PALS is a screener. It is not part of the School Report Card and is not to be used for accountability purposes.
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
As we prepare for the new report card…….Understand that cut scores have
changed. Previous cut scores were as low
as 13.5 percent to pass a level of proficiency.
Now, it will take an average 64% in reading and a 52% in math to meet the new levels.
Advanced for both is in the mid 90%
This new system sets a bar that kids must pass.
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
Cut Scores Comparison: Reading
WKCE Reading Scale Score by GradePerformance
Level 3 4 5 6 7 8 10Advanced
507 536 546 573 590 613 644Proficient
475 498 503 525 535 548 566Basic
445 462 464 479 486 493 496Minimal
Performance270 280 290 300 310 330 350
READING Minimal Performance Basic Proficient Advanced
Third Grade 270-393 394-429 430-465 466-640
Fourth Grade 280-395 396-439 440-488 489-650
Fifth Grade 290-400 401-443 444-496 497-690
Sixth Grade 300-417 418-456 457-513 514-730
Seventh Grade
310-433 434-466 467-522 523-780
Eighth Grade 330-444 445-479 480-538 539-790
Tenth Grade 350-455 456-502 503-554 555-820
NEW:
OLD:
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
A visual for the OLD Reading cut score table….
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
A visual for the NEW Reading Cut Score table…..
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
New Mathematics Cut Scores WKCE Mathematics Scale
Score by GradePerformanc
e Level 3 4 5 6 7 8 10Advanced 492 526 553 573 591 605 618Proficient 438 474 501 524 544 558 574
Basic 388 425 449 475 500 510 528Minimal
Performance 220 240 270 310 330 350 410
MATHEMATICS Minimal Performance Basic Proficient Advanced
Third Grade 220-391 392-406 407-451 452-630
Fourth Grade 240-420 421-437 438-483 484-650
Fifth Grade 270-444 445-462 463-504 505-680
Sixth Grade 310-463 464-484 485-531 532-700
Seventh Grade 330-479 480-503 504-554 555-710Eighth Grade 350-482 483-512 513-572 573-730Tenth Grade 410-515 516-540 541-594 595-750
NEW
OLD
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
A visual for the OLD Math Cut Score table
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
A visual for the NEW Math Cut Score table.
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
These changes lead to our new accountability report card:Differentiated Accountability and SupportThe new accountability system
has been built around four priority areas, to allow for differentiated reporting across multiple measures.
Instead of only using state test scores to measure school effectiveness, the new system uses multiple measures.
Priority AreasStudent Achievement
An indication of how the students’ level of knowledge and skills in a school compares against state and national standards.
Student Growth An indication of how rapidly a school’s students are gaining knowledge and skills from year to year. This area focuses not on attainment, but the pace of improvement in student performance, no matter where students begin. All improvement is treated as a positive.
Closing Gaps An indication of how much the school is contributing to the closing of statewide achievement gaps.
On-track to Graduation/Postsecondary Readiness
An indication of how successfully students are achieving educational milestones that predict postsecondary success.
18
Accountability Index A comprehensive accountability index has replaced the AYP pass-
fail system. AYP reports are gone; accountability reporting will now be done with School Report Cards (2011-12).
The index is a composite of sub-scales that measure performance across four priority areas :Student AchievementStudent Growth Closing Gaps On-track to Graduation/Postsecondary Readiness
The index score is on a 0–100 scale. Sub-scale scores as well as the index score will be reported to enhance transparency and differentiation.
Student Engagement indicators, if missed, result in a deduction to index scoreTest Participation RateAbsenteeism RateDropout Rate
19
Accountability Ratings schools will receive:
Significantly Exceeds Expectatio
ns
Exceeds Expectatio
ns
Meets Expectatio
ns
Meets Few Expectatio
ns
Fails to Meet
Expectations
Reward School83-100
Reward School73-82.9
Local Improvement
Efforts63-72.9
State Interventions
53-62.9
State InterventionsMany Priority
Schools52.9 and
below
High Performing
Low PerformingWhere most
schools will be
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
A new Change:The report card will
be split into two separate documents.
This page will be the school report card. ◦ Front will be this page◦ Back will include simple
explanations of data.The additional 12
pages will be call the report card detail◦ Numbers to explain the
report card indices.
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
New Elementary/ Middle Report Card
Overall School Score Based on 4
IndicesCategories
School information and sub-group
information
All previous years WKCE scores
converted to new NAEP cut scores
for five years
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
ContinuedThe four priority areas are scored as follows:• Student
Achievement- 25%• Student Growth- 25%• Closing Gaps- 25%• On track indicators:
• Elementary• 20% attendance• 5% 3rd grade
WKCE Reading Scores
• Middle • 20% attendance• 5% 8th grade
WKCE Mathematics Scores
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
Student Engagement Indicators The old RED flags School scores will face
deductions Test participation of the
lowest subgroup◦ 3 year average◦ must be over 95%◦ All students, not just FAY
Absenteeism Rate◦ No more than 13%
Dropout Rate◦ No more than 6%
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
The High School Report Card
A few small differences:
Scoring:◦ Student
Achievement: 37.5%◦ Student Growth 0%◦ Closing Gaps: 37.5%◦ On Track/ Post
Secondary Readiness: 25% 20% is the graduation
rate 5% ACT Participation
and Performance
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
Report Card DetailStudent Achievement A three year
average for Math and Reading◦ Different
weights for scores Advanced: 1.5 Proficient: 1 Basic: .5
◦ Weighted Current year 1.5 Last year 1 2 years ago .5
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
Report Card DetailStudent Achievement, Cont. Sub Group data Breaks out each of your
sub groups and shows exact percentages of each in the Math and Reading Advanced, Proficient, Basic and Minimal categories.
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
Report Card DetailStudent Growth Only Elementary and Middle
School Looking at a trajectory of
expected performance of students
Will give points for growth across categories◦ A point for every category you move
up
◦ Ex: Minimal to Advanced earns 3 points, proficient to Advanced earns 1point.
Will deduct points for regression◦ Only proficient to basic/ minimal
◦ Ex: Proficient falling to minimal loses 2 points
◦ Basic students who fall will lose points in an overall complex formula
Green is Good, Red is bad.
CESA 8 School Improvement 2012
Report Card DetailStudent Growth
◦Breaks out growth by sub-group
◦Displays the amount of kids increasing and declining in each category.