NATIONALCLEANUP WORKSHOP

A Big Step Increase in the EM TD Program

Office of Environmental Management

No EM Mission

Completed State

Completed Site

Remaining EM Mission

MISSION SUCCESS AND CHALLENGE

MISSION SUCCESS

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014

$152 billion total spent.Completed 91 of 107 major sites.

Profile of Historical EM Annual Costs

US Dollars in

 Billions Average Annual Budget = $6B

MISSION CHALLENGE

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

2016 2026 2036 2046 2056 2066

$235 billion to‐go estimate.2065 completion forecast.

Cost Profile of Remaining Work

US Dollars in

 Billions

Historical Annual Budget Level = $6B

$28 billion gap

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014

Historical Ann

ual Percent of

EM Techn

ology Man

agem

ent F

unding

MISSION SUCCESS AND CHALLENGESource Control and 

Containment(1989‐2002)

5.49%

AcceleratedSite Closure(2003‐2010)

0.66%

Current(2011‐Now)0.23% 

What’s Next?  A Big Step Increase?

HOW DO WE

ENABLE INNOVATION AND

EXPLOIT THE STATE-OF-THE-ART?

WHAT IS THE NEXT

BIG STEP INCREASE?

GERALD BOYD, Vice President, Stoller Newport News Nuclear; Member, Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Task Force on EM Technology Development

MARK GILBERTSON, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Site Restoration, DOE-EM

DR. TERRY MICHALSKE, Director, Savannah River National Laboratory

KEVIN SMITH, Manager, Office of River Protection, DOE-EM

PANELISTS