86
A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals By: Paul L. Cary By: Paul L. Cary Toxicology Laboratory Toxicology Laboratory University of University of Missouri Missouri

A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

  • Upload
    kalei

  • View
    29

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals. By: Paul L. Cary Toxicology Laboratory University of Missouri. Best Practices. frequency of testing random testing witness collection & specimen integrity custody & control accurate results & confirmation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

A Best Practices Review of Drug

Detection for Court Professionals

By: Paul L. CaryBy: Paul L. Cary

Toxicology LaboratoryToxicology Laboratory

University of MissouriUniversity of Missouri

Page 2: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Best Practices frequency of testing random testing witness collection & specimen

integrity custody & control accurate results & confirmation rapid turn-around time

Page 3: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Drug Testing Basics

Page 4: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Reasons for Drug Testing - WHY? act as a deterrent to future drug useact as a deterrent to future drug use identify participants who are maintaining identify participants who are maintaining

abstinenceabstinence identify participants who have relapsedidentify participants who have relapsed

rapid interventionrapid intervention efficient utilization of limited resourcesefficient utilization of limited resources

provides incentive, support and accountability provides incentive, support and accountability for participantsfor participants

adjunct to treatment & frames sanction decisionsadjunct to treatment & frames sanction decisions

Page 5: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Drug Testing Specimens

urine - current specimen of choiceurine - current specimen of choice generally readily available - large quantitiesgenerally readily available - large quantities contains high concentrations of drugscontains high concentrations of drugs good analytical specimengood analytical specimen provides both recent and past usageprovides both recent and past usage

alternative specimensalternative specimens breathbreath hairhair sweat - patch test sweat - patch test saliva - oral fluidssaliva - oral fluids

Page 6: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Characteristics of a Good Drug Test: scientifically valid

employs proven methods & techniques accepted by the scientific community

legally defensible able to withstand challenge established court track record scrutinized by legal/judicial review

therapeutically beneficial provides accurate profile of client’s drug use provides rapid results for appropriate response

Page 7: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

When to Test? KEEP ‘EM GUESSING ! effective drug testing must be random

unexpected, unannounced, unanticipated limit time between notification & testing

test as often as possible - twice weekly consider use of multiple specimens (hair,

saliva, sweat) testing frequency remains constant

throughout phase progression

Page 8: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Drug Testing Reality Check

When developing and administering your When developing and administering your drug testing program drug testing program assumeassume that the that the participants you are testing know participants you are testing know moremore about about urine drug testing than you do!urine drug testing than you do!

Sources:Sources: InternetInternet High Times magazineHigh Times magazine other court clientsother court clients

Page 9: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Client Contracts

Page 10: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

The Importance of “Specificity” in a Client

Contract: “I understand . . . . . .” I will be tested for the presence of drugs in my

system on a random basis according to procedures established by the Drug Court Team and/or my treatment provider.

I understand that I will be given a location and time to report for my drug test.

I understand that it is my responsibility to report to the assigned location at the time given for the test.

Page 11: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

The Importance of “Specificity” in a Client

Contract: I understand that if I am late for a test, or miss

a test, it will be considered as a positive test for drugs/alcohol and that I may be sanctioned.

I understand that if I fail to produce a urine specimen or if the sample provided is not of sufficient quantity, it will be considered as a positive test for drugs/alcohol and that I may be sanctioned.

I understand that if I produce a dilute urine sample it will be considered as a positive test for drugs/alcohol and that I may be sanctioned.

Page 12: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

The Importance of “Specificity” in a Client

Contract: I have been informed that the ingestion of

excessive amounts of fluids can result in a diluted urine sample and I understand that my urine sample will be tested to ensure the sample is not dilute.

I understand that substituting or altering my specimen or trying in any way to modify my body fluids for the purposes of changing the drug testing results will be considered as a positive test for drugs/alcohol and will result in sanctioning and may be grounds for immediate termination from drug court.

Page 13: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Challenging Urine Collection Strategies

Page 14: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

“Witnessed” collection (for urine)

single most important aspect of single most important aspect of effective drug testing programeffective drug testing program

urine collections not witnessed are of urine collections not witnessed are of little or no assessment valuelittle or no assessment value

denial component of substance abuse denial component of substance abuse requires requires ““direct observationdirect observation”” collections of participantscollections of participants

Page 15: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Sample Collection: pre-collection preparationpre-collection preparation

site selectionsite selection minimize access to water sourcesminimize access to water sources use an area with a scant floorplanuse an area with a scant floorplan find privacy & securityfind privacy & security

gather supplies beforehandgather supplies beforehand obtain proper collection receptacleobtain proper collection receptacle

removal of outer clothingremoval of outer clothing

Page 16: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Sample Collection: (continued)

wash hands prior to donationwash hands prior to donation ““witnesswitness”” collection collection

additional clothing removaladditional clothing removal body inspectionbody inspection squat and coughsquat and cough

label sample correctly label sample correctly

Page 17: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Sample Collection: (continued)

accept sample & inspectaccept sample & inspect temperature (90-100˚ F)temperature (90-100˚ F) color (no color color (no color diluted ?) diluted ?) odor (bleach, sour apples, odor (bleach, sour apples,

aromatics, vinegar, etc.) aromatics, vinegar, etc.) solids or other unusual particulatessolids or other unusual particulates

store sample properlystore sample properly forensic sample - custody & control

Page 18: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Developing control strategies to prevent sample tampering is critical.

Once clients understand that they cannot beat the system, they are much more likely to engage in the therapeutic process toward recovery.

Page 19: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Drug Testing Methods

Page 20: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Two-Step Testing Approach

screening test – designed to separate screening test – designed to separate negative samples from samples that are negative samples from samples that are ““presumptivelypresumptively”” positive positive

confirmation test – follow-up procedure confirmation test – follow-up procedure designed to validate positive test resultsdesigned to validate positive test results distinctly different analytical techniquedistinctly different analytical technique more specific and more sensitivemore specific and more sensitive

Page 21: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Step One – Screening

often based on immunoassay often based on immunoassay technologytechnology

more drug – more binding - more more drug – more binding - more ““colorcolor”” produced – more instrument detector produced – more instrument detector responseresponse

numerous commercial manufacturersnumerous commercial manufacturers designed for high throughput designed for high throughput

instrumentation or on-site devicesinstrumentation or on-site devices

Page 22: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

On-site DOA screening often based on immunoassay technologyoften based on immunoassay technology concept of color concept of color ““switchswitch”” ““dynamicdynamic”” versus versus ““staticstatic”” calibration calibration hand-held cassettes or test-cup deviceshand-held cassettes or test-cup devices one test at a time - no batchingone test at a time - no batching available in DOA panels or single drugsavailable in DOA panels or single drugs numerous commercial manufacturersnumerous commercial manufacturers

differential sensitivity & selectivitydifferential sensitivity & selectivity

Page 23: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

On-site Drug Detection:

Follow package insert guidance exactly!

Page 24: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

On-site Drug Detection:

Intensity of band is NOT quantitative!

Page 25: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Step Two - Confirmation

gas chromatography-mass gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) or LC/MSspectrometry (GC/MS) or LC/MS drug molecules separated by physical drug molecules separated by physical

characteristicscharacteristics identified based on chemical identified based on chemical ““finger-finger-

printprint”” considered considered ““gold standardgold standard””

other chromatographic techniquesother chromatographic techniques

Page 26: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Why confirm ? Is it really necessary to confirm drugs that Is it really necessary to confirm drugs that

tested positive by initial screening tests?tested positive by initial screening tests? Why canWhy can’’t the court adjudicate cases t the court adjudicate cases

based on the screening test results? based on the screening test results?

FALSE POSITIVESFALSE POSITIVES

Page 27: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Drug tests & cross reactivity: screening tests can and do react to screening tests can and do react to ““non-non-

targettarget”” compounds compounds amphetaminesamphetamines benzodiazepinesbenzodiazepines

obtain list of interfering compounds from obtain list of interfering compounds from lab or on-site test vendorlab or on-site test vendor

initial screening (initial screening (““instantinstant”” tests) may only tests) may only be 60-70% accuratebe 60-70% accurate

confirm positive results

Page 28: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Interpretation ofDrug Test Results

Page 29: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Negative or None Detected Results

indicates that no drugs or breakdown indicates that no drugs or breakdown products (metabolites), tested for, were products (metabolites), tested for, were detected in the sample testeddetected in the sample tested

no such thing as no such thing as ““zerozero”” tolerance or tolerance or ““drug drug freefree””

negative does not mean NO drugs present negative does not mean NO drugs present

Page 30: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Negative/None Detected Interpretation client is not using a drug that can be detected by the test client is not using a drug that can be detected by the test

Other possible explanationsOther possible explanations client not using enough drugclient not using enough drug clientclient’’s drug use is too infrequents drug use is too infrequent collection too long after drug usecollection too long after drug use urine is tamperedurine is tampered test being used not sensitive enoughtest being used not sensitive enough client using drug not on testing listclient using drug not on testing list

Page 31: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Negative/None Detected Interpretation

nono need to second-guess every need to second-guess every ““negativenegative”” result result notnot suggesting withholding positive reinforcement & rewards suggesting withholding positive reinforcement & rewards

for positive behaviorsfor positive behaviors drug testing is a monitoring tool drug testing is a monitoring tool assess none detected drug testing results in the context of assess none detected drug testing results in the context of

your clientyour client’’s overall program compliance (or non-compliance) s overall program compliance (or non-compliance) and their lifeand their life’’s skills success (or lack thereof)s skills success (or lack thereof)

Page 32: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Positive Test Result Interpretation

indicates that drug(s) or breakdown products indicates that drug(s) or breakdown products (metabolites), tested for, were detected in the (metabolites), tested for, were detected in the sample testedsample tested

drug presence is above the drug presence is above the ““cutoffcutoff”” level level greatest confidence achieved with confirmationgreatest confidence achieved with confirmation ALWAYS confirm positive results in original ALWAYS confirm positive results in original

samplesample

Page 33: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Typical Cutoff Levelsscreening & confirmation

amphetamines *amphetamines * 500 ng/mL ng/mL 250 ng/mL ng/mL benzodiazepinesbenzodiazepines 300 ng/mL300 ng/mL variablevariable cannabinoids * cannabinoids * 20 & 50 ng/mL20 & 50 ng/mL 15 ng/mL15 ng/mL cocaine (crack)*cocaine (crack)* 150 ng/mL ng/mL 100 ng/mL ng/mL opiates (heroin) *opiates (heroin) * 300/2000 ng/mL 300/2000 ng/mL variablevariable phencyclidine (Pphencyclidine (PCP) * CP) * 25 ng/mL25 ng/mL 25 ng/mL25 ng/mL alcoholalcohol 20 mg/dL20 mg/dL 10 mg/dL10 mg/dL

* SAMHSA (formerly NIDA) drugs* SAMHSA (formerly NIDA) drugs

Page 34: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

What is a “cutoff” level ? cutoffs are not designed to frustrate CJ cutoffs are not designed to frustrate CJ

professionalsprofessionals a drug concentration, a drug concentration, administrativelyadministratively

established for a drug test that allows the test to established for a drug test that allows the test to distinguish between negative and positive sample - distinguish between negative and positive sample - ““thresholdthreshold””

cutoffs provide important safeguards:cutoffs provide important safeguards: scientific purposes (detection accuracy)scientific purposes (detection accuracy) legal protections (evidentiary admissibility)legal protections (evidentiary admissibility)

measured in ng/mL = ppbmeasured in ng/mL = ppb

Page 35: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

The Issue of UrineDrug Concentrations

Page 36: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Drug Tests are Qualitative

screening/monitoring drug tests are screening/monitoring drug tests are designed to determine the presence designed to determine the presence or absence of drugs - NOT their or absence of drugs - NOT their concentrationconcentration

drug tests are NOT quantitativedrug tests are NOT quantitative

Page 37: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Drug concentrations or levels associated with urine testing are, for the most part, USELESS !

cannabinoidscannabinoids 517 ng/mL517 ng/mL opiates opiates negativenegative cocaine metabolite cocaine metabolite negativenegative amphetamines amphetamines negativenegative

Page 38: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

The Twins

A B

200 mg Wonderbarb@ 8:00 AM

Collect urine 8:00 PM12 hours later

Page 39: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

The Twins - urine drug test results

A BWonderbarb = 638 ng/mL Wonderbarb = 3172 ng/mL

Page 40: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

The Twins - urine drug test results

A B

physiological make up

exact amount drug consumed

exact time of ingestion

exact time between drug exposure and urine collection

AND YET . . . . .

Page 41: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

The Twins - urine drug test results

A BWonderbarb = 638 ng/mL Wonderbarb = 3172 ng/mL

Twin B’s urine drug level is 5 times higher

than Twin A

Page 42: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Are any of the following questions being asked in your court? How positive is he/she?How positive is he/she? Are his/her levels increasing or decreasing?Are his/her levels increasing or decreasing? Is that a high level?Is that a high level? Is he/she almost negative?Is he/she almost negative? Is this level from new drug use or continued Is this level from new drug use or continued

elimination from prior usage?elimination from prior usage? What is his/her baseline THC level?What is his/her baseline THC level? Does that level indicate relapse?Does that level indicate relapse? Why is his/her level not going down? (or up?)Why is his/her level not going down? (or up?)

Page 43: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Urine drug concentrations are of little or no interpretative value. The utilization of urine drug test levels by drug courts generally produces interpretations that are inappropriate, factually unsupportable and without a scientific foundation. Worst of all for the court system, these urine drug level interpretations have no forensic merit.

THE ISSUE

Page 44: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals
Page 45: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Scientific Rationale

Technical IssuesTechnical Issues testing not lineartesting not linear tests measure total drug concentrationstests measure total drug concentrations

PhysiologicalPhysiological variability of urine outputvariability of urine output differential elimination of drug differential elimination of drug

componentscomponents

Page 46: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

THIS ?does 219 mean new use?

639 is really high for THC, isn’t it?

432 indicates he going up, right?

115 is down from yesterday, probably continued elimination?

is 22 above the cutoff?

don’t we need to considerrelapse at 57?

307 – well she’s almost negative, correct?

I think 1200 is a new record, isn’t it?

515 is much higher thanlast week, right?

Page 47: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

OR THIS ?Negative or Positive

Page 48: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

The Drug Detection Window

Page 49: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Drug Detection Times - by Drug(this is general guidance!)

amphetamines: up to 4 days amphetamines: up to 4 days cocaine: up to 72 hourscocaine: up to 72 hours opiates: up to 5 daysopiates: up to 5 days PCP: up to 6 daysPCP: up to 6 days barbiturates: up to a weekbarbiturates: up to a week benzodiazepines: up to a weekbenzodiazepines: up to a week . . then there. . then there’’s alcohol & cannabinoids s alcohol & cannabinoids

Page 50: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Cannabinoid Detection in Urine Conventional wisdom has led to the common

assumption that cannabinoids will remain detectable in urine for 30 days or longer following the use of marijuana.

RESULT: delay of therapeutic intervention hindered timely use of judicial sanctioning fostered denial of marijuana usage by clients

Page 51: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals
Page 52: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Cannabinoids - Recent/Relevant Research

30+ day detection window often exaggerates 30+ day detection window often exaggerates duration of detection windowduration of detection window

reasonable & pragmatic court guidancereasonable & pragmatic court guidance detection time: at 50 ng/mL cutoffdetection time: at 50 ng/mL cutoff

up to 3 days for single event/occasional useup to 3 days for single event/occasional use up to 10 days for heavy chronic useup to 10 days for heavy chronic use

detection time: at 20 ng/mL cutoffdetection time: at 20 ng/mL cutoff up to 7 days for single event/occasional useup to 7 days for single event/occasional use up to 21 days for heavy chronic useup to 21 days for heavy chronic use

Page 53: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Recent Cannabinoid Use versus Non-recent use (double sanction issue):

How do drug courts discriminate between How do drug courts discriminate between new drug exposure and continued elimination new drug exposure and continued elimination from previous (chronic) use ?from previous (chronic) use ? an issue only in first phase of programan issue only in first phase of program only drug that poses concern is only drug that poses concern is

cannabinoidscannabinoids ““two negative testtwo negative test”” rule – two back-to-back rule – two back-to-back

negative drug tests post clean outnegative drug tests post clean out

Page 54: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

EtG & EtS – Strategy for Monitoring Alcohol

Abstinence

Page 55: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Alcohol is the most commonly abused substance by drug court clients and the most difficult substance to detect in abstinence monitoring.

Page 56: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Advantages of Ethyl Glucuronide & Ethyl Sulfate unique biological marker of alcohol use (no unique biological marker of alcohol use (no

false positives)false positives) direct marker indicating recent usedirect marker indicating recent use longer detection window than alcohollonger detection window than alcohol stable in stored specimens (non-volatile) stable in stored specimens (non-volatile) is not formed by fermentationis not formed by fermentation is not detected in the urine of abstinent is not detected in the urine of abstinent

subjectssubjects

Page 57: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Extending the detection window

Page 58: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Advantages of Ethyl Glucuronide & Ethyl Sulfate unique biological marker of alcohol use (no unique biological marker of alcohol use (no

false positives)false positives) direct marker indicating recent usedirect marker indicating recent use longer detection window than alcohollonger detection window than alcohol stable in stored specimens (non-volatile) stable in stored specimens (non-volatile) is not formed by fermentationis not formed by fermentation is not detected in the urine of abstinent is not detected in the urine of abstinent

subjectssubjects

Page 59: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Disadvantages of EtG/EtS testing available at relatively few laboratoriestesting available at relatively few laboratories EtG testing more costly than abused drugsEtG testing more costly than abused drugs

expensive LC/MS/MS technologyexpensive LC/MS/MS technology introduction of new testing approachesintroduction of new testing approaches

most significant concern – casual, inadvertent, most significant concern – casual, inadvertent, environmental alcohol exposure causing environmental alcohol exposure causing positive resultspositive results

Page 60: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Sources of “Incidental” Alcohol Exposure

OTC medications (Nyquil, Vicks Formula 44)OTC medications (Nyquil, Vicks Formula 44) mouthwashes (Listermint & Cepacol)mouthwashes (Listermint & Cepacol) herbal/homeopathic medications (i.e., tincture of gingko biloba - memory)herbal/homeopathic medications (i.e., tincture of gingko biloba - memory) foods containing alcohol (such as vanilla extract, baked Alaska, cherries foods containing alcohol (such as vanilla extract, baked Alaska, cherries

jubilee, etc.)jubilee, etc.) ““non-alcoholicnon-alcoholic”” beers (O beers (O’’DoulDoul’’s, Sharps)s, Sharps) colognes & body sprayscolognes & body sprays insecticides (DEET)insecticides (DEET) alcohol-based hand sanitizers (Purell, GermX)alcohol-based hand sanitizers (Purell, GermX)

Page 61: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Is a positive urine EtG/EtS test result a definitive indicator of relapse or prohibited drinking?

Is a positive urine EtG/EtS test result sufficient justification for client sanctioning?

Page 62: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Consensus Cutoffs: EtG minimum of 500 ng/mLEtG minimum of 500 ng/mL EtS minimum of 100 ng/mLEtS minimum of 100 ng/mL

Page 63: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Positive EtG Result (500 ng/mL): a result reported as EtG positive in excess of the a result reported as EtG positive in excess of the

500 ng/mL cutoff is consistent with the recent 500 ng/mL cutoff is consistent with the recent ingestion of alcohol-containing products (1-2 days ingestion of alcohol-containing products (1-2 days prior to specimen collection) by a monitored clientprior to specimen collection) by a monitored client

studies examining studies examining ““incidentalincidental”” exposure widely exposure widely conclude that results in excess of the 500 ng/mL conclude that results in excess of the 500 ng/mL cutoff are cutoff are notnot associated with inadvertent or associated with inadvertent or environment ethanol sources environment ethanol sources

Page 64: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Negative EtG Result (500 ng/mL): a result reported as EtG negative is a result reported as EtG negative is

indicative of a client who has not ingested indicative of a client who has not ingested beverage alcohol within 1-2 days prior to beverage alcohol within 1-2 days prior to specimen collectionspecimen collection

a negative result is a negative result is notnot proof of abstinence proof of abstinence advertised advertised ““80-hour80-hour”” window of detection window of detection

not not ““real-worldreal-world”” applicable applicable

Page 65: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals
Page 66: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Why Courts Should Use EtG/EtS

Page 67: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Best Practices for EtG/EtS Testing:

provide those being monitored with an provide those being monitored with an alcohol use advisory document - EtG/EtS alcohol use advisory document - EtG/EtS specific contract - mandatoryspecific contract - mandatory

use appropriate cutoffs:use appropriate cutoffs: EtG - 500 ng/mLEtG - 500 ng/mL EtS - 100 ng/mLEtS - 100 ng/mL

test for EtS (ethyl sulfate) - biomarker of test for EtS (ethyl sulfate) - biomarker of choicechoice

Page 68: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

When in doubt, don’t use, consume

or apply!

Page 69: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

The Effective Use of Urine Creatinine Measurements in

Abstinence Monitoring

Page 70: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

The most common form of specimen tampering is sample

dilution.

Creatinine testing is a specimen validity issue!

Page 71: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

EVERY urine sample collected for drug detection should be

tested for creatinine!

You can’t intervene to changebehavior if you don’t know a

client has relapsed!

Page 72: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

What is creatinine ? creatinine is produced as a result of muscle creatinine is produced as a result of muscle

metabolismmetabolism creatinine is produced by the body at a relatively creatinine is produced by the body at a relatively

constant rate throughout the dayconstant rate throughout the day creatinine is a compound that is unique to biological creatinine is a compound that is unique to biological

material (i.e. urine, other body fluids)material (i.e. urine, other body fluids) creatinine measurements can:creatinine measurements can:

determine the determine the ““strengthstrength”” or concentration of a or concentration of a urine sampleurine sample

ensure the sample being tested ensure the sample being tested ISIS urine urine

Page 73: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Two Types of Urine Specimen Dilution

pre collection dilutionpre collection dilution consumption of large consumption of large

quantities of fluids quantities of fluids priorprior to to collectioncollection

post collection dilutionpost collection dilution adding fluid to specimen adding fluid to specimen postpost

collectioncollection

Page 74: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Pre-Collection Dilution high-volume ingestion of fluids (water high-volume ingestion of fluids (water

loading, flushing, hydrating, etc.) loading, flushing, hydrating, etc.) may be in conjunction with products may be in conjunction with products

designed to designed to ““enhanceenhance”” drug elimination or drug elimination or removal of drugs (Gold Seal, Clean removal of drugs (Gold Seal, Clean ‘‘n Clear, n Clear, Test-Free, Naturally Klean, etc.) Test-Free, Naturally Klean, etc.)

no evidence these products have any no evidence these products have any additional effect on drug elimination additional effect on drug elimination

Page 75: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Client has a bladder full of urine with a drug concentration of greater than the cutoff level of the test - thus producing a positive result.

Urine in the bladder is diluted bythe consumption of large amounts ofnon-drug containing fluid; which results in a drug concentration that is less than the cutoff level of the test - thus producing a negative result.

DILUTION GOAL

Page 76: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Water contains no drugs! easiest, cheapest, simplesteasiest, cheapest, simplest urines with a creatinines of less than 20 mg/dL urines with a creatinines of less than 20 mg/dL

are considered are considered ““dilutedilute”” and rarely reflect an and rarely reflect an accurate picture of recent drug useaccurate picture of recent drug use

dilute samples are more like water than like dilute samples are more like water than like urineurine

incidence of low creatinines in a population incidence of low creatinines in a population undergoing random drug testing is significantly undergoing random drug testing is significantly (up to 10 times) greater than a non-drug tested (up to 10 times) greater than a non-drug tested populationpopulation

Page 77: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

The “Normal” Urine Creatinine

normal urine creatinine: 2005 study normal urine creatinine: 2005 study ““Urinary Urinary Creatinine Concentrations in the U.S. PopulationCreatinine Concentrations in the U.S. Population ”” determine the mean (based upon 22,245 determine the mean (based upon 22,245 participants) was 130 mg/dLparticipants) was 130 mg/dL

study was not associated with drug testingstudy was not associated with drug testing subjects came from a variety of ethnic groupssubjects came from a variety of ethnic groups samples were collected AM, mid-day, and PMsamples were collected AM, mid-day, and PM less than 1% below 20 mg/dLless than 1% below 20 mg/dL less than 1% greater than 400 mg/dLless than 1% greater than 400 mg/dL

Page 78: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Creatinine Facts some diseases that produce low urinary creatininessome diseases that produce low urinary creatinines

muscle wasting disease - RAREmuscle wasting disease - RARE some kidney aliments - RARE some kidney aliments - RARE

low creatinines ARE NOT routinely associated with: low creatinines ARE NOT routinely associated with: pregnancypregnancy diabetesdiabetes obesityobesity exerciseexercise high-blood pressurehigh-blood pressure being vegetarianbeing vegetarian

Page 79: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

More Creatinine Issues

rapid ingestion (90 minutes) of 2-4 quarts rapid ingestion (90 minutes) of 2-4 quarts of fluid will almost always produce low of fluid will almost always produce low creatinines & negative urine drug tests creatinines & negative urine drug tests within one hourwithin one hour

recovery time of urine creatinine and recovery time of urine creatinine and drug concentrations can take up to 10 drug concentrations can take up to 10 hourshours

Page 80: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

“Dilute” Result Interpretation: negative or none detected results should never be

interpreted as indicating no drug use (abstinence), because if, in fact, drugs were present, they probably could not be detected by the test

positive drug test results from a dilute sample however, are considered valid (donor was not able to dilute the sample sufficiently to deceive the test)

Page 81: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Two final thoughts about dilute urine samples . . . . .

a creatinine of less than 20 mg/dL (associated with a drug test) is nearly always an attempt by the donor to avoid drug use detection - REGARDLESS of how much liquid was consumed in order to achieve this result

place a dilute sample prohibition in your client contract and sanction for repeat dilute samples

Page 82: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

SUMMARY TEST FOR CREATININE! incorporate creatinine guidance in your SOPs and incorporate creatinine guidance in your SOPs and

client contractclient contract institute a dilute sample prohibitioninstitute a dilute sample prohibition understand very low urine creatinine levels are understand very low urine creatinine levels are

NOT normal occurrencesNOT normal occurrences dilute samples aredilute samples are nearly always nearly always an attempt by an attempt by

the donor to avoid drug use detectionthe donor to avoid drug use detection sanction for repeat dilute testssanction for repeat dilute tests follow urine creatinine patternsfollow urine creatinine patterns

Page 83: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Ten Principles of Drug Testing 1. Design an effective drug detection program, place the

policies and procedures into written form & communicate to court staff and clients alike.

2. Develop a client contract that clearly enumerates the responsibilities and expectations of the

court’s drug detection program.

3. Select a drug testing specimen & testing methodology that provides results that are scientifically valid, forensically defensible and therapeutically beneficial.

Page 84: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Ten Principles of Drug Testing 4. Ensure that the sample collection process supports

effective abstinence monitoring practices; (random/unannounced selection & witnessed/direct observation sample collection)

5. Confirm of all positive screening results using alternative testing methods.

6. Determine the creatinine concentrations of all urine samples to identify tampering.

7. Eliminate of the use of urine levels for the interpretation of client drug use behavior.

Page 85: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

Ten Principles of Drug Testing 8. Establish drug testing result interpretation

guidelines that have a sound scientific foundation and that meet a strong evidentiary standard.

9. In response to drug testing results, develop therapeutic invention strategies that promote behavioral change and support recovery.

10. Understand that drug detection represents only a single supervision strategy in an overall abstinence

monitoring program.

Page 86: A Best Practices Review of Drug Detection for Court Professionals

email address: [email protected]@health.missouri.edu