Upload
ammar-al-hejazi
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
1/100
A Case Study of Total Quality Management in a
Manufacturing and Construction Firm
by
Ammar Al-Saket
dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree
Magister Ingeneriae
in
Engineering Management
in the
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
at the
RAND AFRIKAANS UNIVERSITY
SUPERVISOR: PROF. LEON PRETORIUS
CO-SUPERVISOR: PROF. JHC PRETORIUS
January 2003
Johannesburg
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
2/100
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION AND PROBLEM STATEMENT
1.1 Prologue … … … … … … … … … 11.2 Total Quality Management … … … … … … 2
1.3 Problem Statement and Research Objectives … … … … 4
1.4 The Research Approach … … … … … … … 4
1.5 The Organisation of the Dissertation… … … … … … 4
CHAPTER 2
THE CONCEPT OF TQM
2.1 History and Evolution of TQM … … … … … … 6
2.2 The Meaning of Quality … … … … … … … 102.3 TQM Principles … … … … … … … … 17
2.4 TQM System Approach … … … … … … … 21
2.5 Quality Standards … … … … … … … … 30
2.6 Conclusion … … … … … … … 33
CHAPTER 3
QUALITY CONTROL
3.1 The Meaning of Quality Control … … … … … … 35
3.2 Quality Control and Quality Assurance … … … … … 40
3.3 Quality Control System Approach… … … … … … 413.4 Process Control … … … … … … … … 45
3.5 Quality Control Tools … … … … … … … 51
3.6 Conclusion … … … … … … … … 59
CHAPTER 4
CASE STUDY OF PROCESS CONTROL
4.1 Introduction … … … … … … … … … 604.2 ABC Steel’s Process Control Approach … … … … … 614.3 Areas for Improvement in the ABC Steel’s Process Control Approach … 65
4.4 Recommendations to Improve ABC Steel Process Control … … 714.5 Conclusion … .. … … … … … … 75
CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 5.1 Conclusion … … … … … … … … 77
5.2 Recommendations for Future Research … … … … … 79
BIBLIOGRAPHY … … … … … … … … 80
APPENDICES … … … … … … … … 83
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
3/100
ABSTRACT
Total Quality Management (TQM) is a managerial approach that views quality to be a
result of integrating all organisational activities e.g. engineering, manufacturing,
marketing and administration work. It aims broadly at maintaining and improving quality
standards and to achieve customer satisfaction. TQM’s major components are quality
planning, quality control and quality improvement.
Quality control is responsible for transforming quality planning and quality improvement
outcomes into daily routine work. However, quality control can be implemented by
systematically going around the Plan, Do, Check, Act (PDCA) control cycle, with whichorganisation may achieve continuous small steps of improvement.
An entire enterprise can be better controlled when it is regarded as a set of processes.
Process is controlled by the same systematic way of implementing PDCA cycle. Some
tools are suggested in this dissertation to control processes. These are statistical process
control (SPC), root cause analysis (RCA) and the Feedback Loop.
Beyond information gleaned from literature on quality control a case study of a steel
manufacturing and construction firm is also presented. Some areas for improvement in
the quality arena of this firm are identified based on the results of quality management
gained from literature.
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
4/100
ACRONYMS
AQL = Acceptable Quality Level
CWQC = Company-Wide Quality Control
ISO = International Organisation for Standards
MBNQP = Malcolm Baldridge National Quality Programme
NCR = Non-Conformance Report
OHSAS = Occupation Health and Safety Management Standards
PDCA = Plan –
Do –
Check –
Act
PPM = Part Per Million
QA = Quality Assurance
QC = Quality Control
RCA = Root Cause Analysis
SA = Situation Appraisal
SAEF = South African Excellence Foundation
SPC = Statistical Process Control
SQC = Statistical/Strategic Quality Control
TAT = Turn-around-time
TQC = Total Quality Control
TQM = Total Quality Management
ZD = Zero Defect
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
5/100
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1: The Six Steps of PDCA Cycle … … … … … 3
Table 2.1: Examples for Categories of Quality … … … … 11
Table 2.2: Quality Definition and Quality Factors … … … … 14
Table 2.3: Definitions of TQM … … … … … … 23
Table 3.1: Control Cycle … … … … … … … 36
Table 3.2: Elementary Statistical Methods … … … … … 52
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
6/100
LIST OF DIAGRAMS
Fig. 2.1: Evolution and Development of Quality Control … … … 7
Fig 2.2: A Comprehensive Approach to Quality … … … … 17
Fig.2.3: Road-Map for Generalised Quality Planning Process … … 24
Fig. 2.4: PDCA Control Cycle … … … … … … 25
Fig. 2.5: Kaizen and Kairyo Improvements … … … … … 27
Fig. 2.6: An Integrated TQM Model … … … … … … 29
Fig. 3.1: Interrelationship of the Three Major Quality Management Activities 38
Fig. 3.2: Stages of Major Management Activities … … … … 39
Fig. 3.3: Quality Control Cycles in Management Activities … … … 40
Fig. 3.4: Company-wide Quality Control … … … … … 41
Fig. 3.5: Aspects to be Controlled … … … … … … 43
Fig. 3.6: Repeated Application of the PDCA Control Cycle … … … 44
Fig. 3.7: Baldridge’s Steps toward a Mature Process Approach … … 47
Fig. 3.8: Process Context … … … … … … … 48
Fig. 3.9: Data Collection (Check) Sheet for Measurable Quantities … … 53
Fig. 3.10: An Example of a Histogram … … … … … 53
Fig. 3.11: The Pareto Diagram … … … … … … … 54
Fig. 3.12: Cause and Effect Diagram … … … … … … 55
Fig. 3.13: Using Histograms to Direct Quality Control Activities … … 56
Fig. 3.14: Scatter Diagram … … … … … … … 57
Fig. 3.15: A Typical Control Chart … … … … … … 57
Fig. 3.16: Feedback Loop … … … … … … … 58
Fig. 4.1: Integrated Management System Flowchart … … … … 61
Fig. 4.2: QA/QC Progress Flowchart … … … … … … 61
Fig. 4.3: Non-Conformance / Corrective Action (NCR) Report … … 66
Fig. 4.4: Weld Reject Rates in Percentages for 2002 … … … … 68
Fig. 4.5: General Flowchart Depicting the Sequence of Work Instruction
Processes of ABC Steel … … … … … … 69
Fig. 4.6: Work Instruction – Inspection of Painted Steel … … … 69
Fig 4.7: Monthly Rework Costs (Rands) for September and October 2002 … 70
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
7/100
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The idea of writing on the subject of Total Quality Management started from an indirect
suggestion when Prof. L Pretorius proposed to a group of students a number of topics one
of which is now the title of this dissertation which he encouraged me to write.
Several people have made invaluable contributions towards this dissertation. Firstly, I
would like to thank Prof. L Pretorius for the leadership, hints and insightful notes he has
provided which have gone a long way in shaping the dissertation in the manner it is. My
thanks and appreciation also goes to Prof. JH Pretorius for the invaluable comments and
suggestions he offered.
The quality manager for ABC Steel Engineering Company (the case study) facilitated this
research to give it a practical flavour by investing his time, support and full access to the
company’s literature for which I am very grateful.
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
8/100
DECLARATION
I hereby declare that all the research work, except wherever it has been appropriately
acknowledged by relevant references, is my own work.
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
9/100
DEDICATION
To my wife Leenah who strove to ensure a suitable environment for me to write this
research. Thank you Leenah for your prayer and support.
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
10/100
1
CHAPTER 1 Introduction and
Problem Statement
1.1 Prologue
t Ford Motor Company, in 1974, Paul Hartman reported that more than 80 percent
of the automobiles had to go to a rework facility immediately after the assembly
line (Jablonski, 1994:11). Deming (1994:22) mentions that 23 percent of the cost
of running a hospital in the US goes towards administration against a comparable 5 percent in
other places. These two and many other examples urge questions like: how are we doing our
business? What is the right approach of doing business? And how can we achieve a quality
product?
Deming is well-known in his contribution to the Japanese quality movement. He reports
(1994:57) that in 1950, he was invited to deliver lectures about quality management in Japan.
Japan, he claims, has been turned around through his presentations to top management and
engineers on ‗system of production‘. They had great knowledge but what has ignited Japan is
the change in the managerial approach, which has resulted in the production of quality
products.
The word quality is rather an attractive term for both organisations and customers. It became
like a slogan that forms new international business trends at all levels.
Many organisations claim having a quality programme in some way or another. On the other
hand, libraries and electronic information retrieval systems are flooded with literature on the
subject. The above-mentioned observations may be due to the following reasons:
A
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
11/100
2
Today‘s business environment, which is characterised by rapid advances in technology,
global competition and rising customer expectations. (Wolking, 1996:1)
The term ‗quality‘ itself maybe subjective i.e. having different meanings to different people under varying circumstances (Ceronio, 1996:15), which implies having different
approaches in order to achieve quality.
Today‘s business environment and the nature of the term quality itself imply that the quality
concept is an ever-changing one, hence, continuous attention must be paid in order to catch
up with the ever-changing quality standards to control moving targets in an internationally
competitive market. (Feigenbaum, 1983:7)
1.2 Total Quality Management
Total Quality Management is a managerial approach aiming at achieving quality in a broad
sense. Today‘s environment urges Total Quality Management (TQM) to be a managerial
approach and style so as to achieve customer satisfaction and global competitiveness. TQM is
based on the following principles: quality integration, quality first, customer satisfaction,
continuous improvement, prevention rather than inspection, factual-based decision and
workforce involvement.
Quality management aims at conducting the inherent managerial elements of planning,
control and improvement (Juran, 1992:14) based on the total quality principles. The expected
results of TQM are better organisation performance, increased productivity, more effective
and efficient processes and more competitive products. However, the ultimate results of
implementing TQM are achieving customer satisfaction and global competitiveness. For
these outcomes to be achieved, management is required to invest in a quality programme by
training people, establishing new infrastructure, delegating managerial duties to others and
the implementation of quality concepts broadly, throughout the organisation, whereas
planning, process and products are included as well as suppliers, employees and customers
are considered in the whole quality programme. In the current research the focus is on TQM
principles in broad terms and quality control in particular.
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
12/100
3
Quality Control
Quality control is a managerial activity of evaluating and implementing the outcomes of
quality planning and quality improvement programmes. Several approaches may be followed
to conduct quality control. Juran (1989:145) suggests a three-step approach to quality control
namely: evaluating actual performance; comparing actual performance to goal, and taking
action on the difference.
To evaluate the performance, information is needed and all stakeholders should participate in
getting the information. Customers too can efficiently give information regarding
product/service performance. However the workforce often gives information that adequately
reflects operation process quality. Management can measure the performance relevant to their
level as well.
Another approach to quality control is known as the Plan, Do, Check, Act Cycle. This
approach considers planning for quality control as part of quality control stage. Ishikawa
(1985:59) breaks down PDCA cycle into six steps presented in Table 1.1.
1 Determination of Goals and Targets
2 Determining Methods of reaching Goals
3 Engaging in Education and Training
4 Implementing Work
5 Checking the Effects of Implementation
6 Taking Appropriate Action
Table 1.1: The Six Steps of PDCA Cycle (Ishikawa, 1985:59)
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
13/100
4
For the manufacturing field, Zairi (1991:37) advocates concepts that are mainly statistically-
based techniques for achieving, maintaining and improving on quality control of products and
services. These concepts are based on typically the following stages:
Measuring with manufacturing,
Recording of measurement.
Analysing the records,
using the analysis for feedback and corrective action.
In summary, the concept of control includes all activities and arrangements which empower
the organisation to be able to achieve their objectives effectively and economically.
1.3 Problem Statement and Research Objectives
This research aims at presenting aspects of TQM and generally how it can be integrated into
the organisation. Other matters related to quality such as quality standards will be briefly
presented as well. More attention will be given to quality control, its essence, where it fits in
within the whole TQM framework and what its mechanisms are. A case study of ABC Steel
Engineering Company (ABC Steel) is employed to present and examine practicalities of a
managerial process control system. Suggestions and broadly formulated recommendations on
how to improve the process control are also given.
1.4 The Research Approach
The nature of the study is a descriptive one. Therefore, an exploration is done in order to
describe the concepts and mechanism of TQM and quality control. More attention is given to
identifying the meanings of concepts under discussion, and that, in turn, forms a well-defined
basis for evaluation of other related aspects afterwards. This implies that the research work is
mainly based on widely accepted pioneering TQM ideas and established quality standards. A
discussion on the process control system of the case study based on ABC Steel‘s managerial
approach based on the firm‘s literature is presented. A case study on process control is
examined against the theoretical outcomes of quality process control.
1.5 The Organisation of the Dissertation
This chapter has highlighted some concepts of TQM as well as the objectives and approach
of this research. The rest of the research is organised in the following manner: Chapter 2
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
14/100
5
discusses TQM, its principles and system approach. In addition, it traces the historical
development of the quality concept as well as quality standards.
Chapter 3 expands on the concept of quality control and where it fits in the TQM framework.
A more detailed discussion is presented on examination of the process as an essential part of
quality control covering issues such as the nature of the process, characteristics of and how
the process is controlled. Some tools used in quality control are briefly presented before
concluding the chapter.
Chapter 4 presents the ABC Steel‘s managerial process control case study by evaluating it
using the tools and framework presented in Chapter 3. Recommendations for improving the
company‘s control process are accordingly given.
The research concludes in chapter five with a summary and recommendations on the work
presented in chapters preceding it.
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
15/100
6
CHAPTER 2 The Concept of
TQM
2.1 History and Evolution of TQM
uality control as it is known today did not exist in the eighteenth and nineteenth
century. However some quality control activities would be performed informally by
individuals at workshop level (Garvin, 1988:3). The development and evolution of
Quality Control started during and spanned the entire twentieth century (Feigenbaum,
1983:15). In 1913, JC Penney became one of the earliest people who presented the
fundamentals of Total Quality Management philosophy when he suggested concepts such as
―customer satisfaction‖, ―fairness‖, ―quality‖, ―value‖, ―associate training‖, and ―rewards for
performance‖ to be managerial bases for the business (Jablonski, 1994:29-30). Furthermore,
Fredrick W. Taylor who is known as the ‗father of scientific management‘ presented other
quality concepts in the early 1900s as well (Garvin, 1988:5).
Anyone tracing the development of TQM throughout the twentieth century, may easily notice
the gap between TQM development as a theory in literature as opposed to TQM development
in practice and implementation particularly in the USA notwithstanding that is where it
originated (Kinlaw, 1992:viii). For example, it took more than fifty years for Walter A.
Shewhart‘s (a physicist with Bell Telephone Laboratories, the birth place of the American
quality), teachings in the book ‗The Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product
published in 1931 to be recognised and implemented in the USA (Kinlaw, 1992:vii). Nevertheless, the development of the approach to quality control in the USA went through
Q
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
16/100
7
four broad stages: operator quality control, inspection quality control, statistical quality
control and total quality control (see Fig. 2.1 adapted from Feigenbaum, (1983:16) below).
Evolution and
Development
TQMUSA
Quality Assurance
USA
TQMJapan
Statistical
QC
Inspection
QC
Operator
QC
1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 Years
Fig. 2.1: Evoluti on and Development of Quali ty Control[Feigenbaum, (1983:16), Adapted]
2.1.1 Operator Quali ty Control
Up to 1900 when goods were produced in small volumes, quality control activities were
performed by artisans and skilled craftsmen (Garvin, 1988:3). That period of time in the
quality control movement is termed the Operator Quality Control Era (Feigenbaum,
1983:15). Some features of this era were that quality control was performed mainly in the
product-manufacturing field and was not a responsibility assigned to an independent person.
However, the operator performed quality control as part of his job.
When one goes back, however, to the early 1800s, a breakthrough in this field may be
acknowledged when a rational gauging system was put in place. Under the set up, a model of
a product is kept from use as it serves as a standard for measuring the degree of conformity of
subsequent output (Garvin, 1988:4). Another innovative idea in the field of quality was the
1819 proposal of introducing the inspection concept to control product quality, though not
formally adopted and recognised immediately.
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
17/100
8
2.1.2 I nspection Qual ity Control
Inspection quality control may be the first directly linked concept to TQM that ever was
formally introduced. In the early 1900s Fredrick W Taylor gave this concept more acceptance
by singling it out as a task for bosses to manage their businesses effectively (Garvin, 1988:5).
Enhancing Taylor‘s idea in 1922, G.S. Radford published the book ‘The Control of Quality in
Manufacturing’ in which he clearly stated the direct link between inspection activity and
quality control. All these efforts have pushed inspection concept to become formally linked to
quality control and to be part of management where as it is performed on an independent
basis, to the extent that by 1924, for example, a department for inspection engineering was
established at Western Electric (Garvin, 1988:6). However, products during this stage was
not yet produced in huge volumes, therefore, 100% inspection i.e. ‗inspection f or all units of
production was conceivable (Feigenbaum, 1983:16).
2.1.3 Statistical Qual i ty Contr ol
A statistical theory was originated over 80 years ago by Sir Ronald Fisher. (Jablonski,
1994:29). Shewhard pioneered a breakthrough of statistical quality control (SQC) through his
publication in 1931 based on statistical principles (Garvin, 1988:6). He realised in a single
volume that in any work process there would be natural variation such that limits should be
specified to distinguish acceptable product fluctuating within these two limits (Kinlaw,
1992:vii). Then, Shewhard was working within a team at Bell Telephone Laboratories at
Western Electric, where they had a programme for nationwide telephone network
standardisation and uniformity, the challenge they faced was how to extract big amounts of
information regarding units‘ quality from a section of inspection data. Consequently, some
statistical techniques such as sampling, control charts and using prediction and probability
rules were adopted and developed (Garvin, 1988:8).
Another challenge that prompted the use of SQC was the mass production that was required
for World War II (Feigenbaum, 1983:15) when the ordnance department of the USA Army
faced a problem of getting large quantities of arms from different suppliers at an acceptable
level of quality (Garvin, 1988:9). Another contributor to this field was E.W. Deming. He
added to Shewhard‘s work and developed his own version of SQC. All in all, by the late
1940s, inspection that was based on statistical techniques had become the primary method of
control quality (Garvin, 1988:12)
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
18/100
9
2.1.4 Total Qual ity Control
The concept of TQC grew rather slowly in the USA (Kinlaw, 1992:vii) although many TQC
aspects were developed in the USA in the 1950s. Quality was implemented in the American
and European industries only in the 1980s (Kinlaw, 1992:viii). The reason for this according
to Feigenbaum‘s opinion was that prior to that, there was no ‗willingness or the ability of
business and governmental organisations to take adequate steps concerning the findings of
technical and statistical work‘ (Feigenbaum, 1983:16). He continues by saying that ‗the
quality problem could not be handled by existing decision making structures.‘ In other words,
quality control still was seen as a duty for inspection group or statistical quality control
coordinator at the shop-floor level. However, this level of the decision-making structures
could not comprehend the quality problem broadly and this excluded the involvement of the
management system and the administration work in the quality problem.
On the other hand, Japanese quality before the 1940s was limited to inspection quality. Even
the SQC approach was limited to a small group of experts (Garvin, 1988:179). However, the
post-war era saw dramatic progress in the Japanese quality, and that happened over a
relatively very short period of time. (Kinlaw, 1992:vii). In fact, quality control was
introduced to Japanese by some American experts (Garvin, 1988:180)
The most well known expert who contributed to Japanese quality is W. Edward Deming
(Garvin, 1988:180). He was invited to Japan in 1950 to deliver a series of lectures on SQC
(and the system of production) to the leaders of Japan industry (Deming, 1994:57). Other
experts such as Joseph M. Juran followed Deming‘s footsteps in 1954 and presented seminars
on the system of total quality management in organisations (Garvin, 1988:182-3). Their
contributions influenced the Japanese dramatically (Deming, 1994:57). Basically, the 1950s
became a watershed era in the Japanese transformation from ‗copier‘ to quality leaders.
(Jablonski, 1994:29).
The Japanese realised the special need for an own approach to quality. In this regard, they
initiated an effort in 1956. In 1962 the Japanese had innovated the concept of quality control
circle. (Ishikawa, 1984:6) By 1968 they had developed their own version of TQM, and
presented it as Company Wide Quality Control (CWQC) (Ishikawa, 1985:45) and the most
prime aspects of TQM were perfected in Japan between 1950-1965 (Galgano, 1994:xiii)
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
19/100
10
Quality control progress in the USA took a different route and initially less momentum than
the Japanese one. The 1950s had seen invaluable theoretical contribution. For instance, the
publication ‘Quality Control Handbook’ by J.M Juran in 1951, tackled the economics of
quality (Garvin, 1988:12). In addition, during 1956 A.V Feigenbaum proposed a
comprehensive approach to quality in his publication ‘Total Quality Control’
(Garvin,1988:13)
On the quality concepts implementation side, in 1961-62 Martin Company took a new step by
adopting a programme called ―Zero Defect‖ (ZD) rather than the concept of ―Acceptable
Quality Levels‖ (AQL) that had been proposed by the war department in the 1942. The
program ZD was based on quality principles such as: workers motivation and training, as
well as the idea of being the ZD becoming an achievable objective. (Garvin, 1988:17) In fact,
some authors termed the period of the two decades of 1950s and 1960s of quality control
movement as Quality Assurance (Garvin, 1988:18).
In the early 1980s, the Americans felt the gap between quality of their products and the
Japanese ones (Jablonski, 1994:12). They realised that quality is a crucial factor for business
success in the modern international business environment (Feigenbaum, 1983:17).
Subsequently, the TQM approach begun to be adopted in the 1980s, as part of managerial
strategies in the USA and European industries as well as in the service sector and government
(Galgano, 1994:xiv). In the late 1980s major aspects of TQM had been integrated (Jablonski,
1994:12). A later dimension added to TQM related to emerging environmental and health
issues. Today, it is noticeable that most leading companies have adopted TQM programme
(Galgano, 1994:xiv).
2.2 The Meaning of Quality
The dictionary gives a long list of the meanings of the word ‗quality‘ many of which are
subjective. (Peach, 1997:36) However, some of the meanings of quality as applied in the field
of management in general and manufacturing in particular are examined in this section.
David A Garvin (1988) discusses the term quality where he dedicates three chapters of his
book in an attempt to offer a comprehensive meaning for quality. He begins the third chapter
of his book with a conceptualisation of the term ‗quality‘ by raising questions of whether
quality can be a subjective term or an objective one; absolute or relative; and what its
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
20/100
11
relationship with variables such as price, cost, productivity and market share is. He then
categorises most of the definitions into five principal groups namely: the transcendent,
product-based, user-based, manufacturing-based and value-based. (Garvin, 1988:39-40)
Table 2.1 presents some examples for each one of the mentioned categories.
Group Examples of Definitions
I . Tr anscendent "Quality is neither mind nor matter, but a third entity independent of
the two ... even though Quality cannot be defined, you know what it is.
" (Robert M. Pirsig, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance [New
York: Bantam Books, 1974], pp. 185, 213)
" . . . a condition of excellence implying fine quality as distinct
from poor quality.... Quality is achieving or reaching for the highest
standard as against being satisfied with the sloppy or fraudulent."(Barbara W. Tuchman, "The Decline of Quality," New York Times
Magazine, November 2, 1980, p. 38)
I I . Product-based "Differences in quality amount to differences in the quantity of some
desired ingredient or attribute." (Lawrence Abbott, Quality and
Competition [New York: Columbia University Press, 1955, pp. 126-27)
"Quality refers to the amounts of the unpriced attributes contained in
each unit of the priced attribute." (Keith B. Leffier, "Ambiguous
Changes in Product Quality," American Economic Review, December
1982, p. 956)
I I I . User-based "Quality consists of the capacity to satisfy wants . (Corwin D. Edwards,
"The Meaning of Quality," Quality Progress, October 1968, p. 37)
"In the final analysis of the marketplace, the quality of a product
depends on how well it fits patterns of consumer preferences." (AlfredA. Kuelm and Ralph L. Day, "Strategy of Product Quality, "Harvard
Business Review, November-December 1962, p. 101) "Quality is fitness for use. (J. M. Juran, ed., Quality Control Handbook,
Third Edition [New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974, p. 22)
I V. M anufacturing-based "Quality [means] conformance to requirements. " (Philip B. Crosby,
Quality Is Free [New York: New American Library, 1979], p. 15)
"Quality is the degree to which a specific product conforms to a designor specification." (Harold L. Gilmore, "Product Conformance Cost,"
Quality Progress, June 1974, p. 16)
V. Value-based "Quality is the degree of excellence at an acceptable price and the
control of variability at an acceptable cost." (Robert A. Broh, Managing
Quality for Higher Profits [New York. McGraw-Hill, 1982], p. 3)
"Quality means best for certain customer conditions. These conditionsare (a) the actual use and (b) the selling price of the product." (Armand
V. Feigenbaum, Total Quality Control [New York: McGraw-Hill,1961], p.1)
Table 2.1: Examples for Categories of Quali ty(Garvin, 1988:40)
For more convenience, out of these five approaches for defining quality, an elaboration will
be made on two of them, namely: manufacturing-based and user-based definitions.
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
21/100
12
2.2.1 Manufactur ing-Based Defi ni tions of Qual ity
Manufacturing-based definitions of quality look at quality from a manufacturing viewpoint,
where pre-determined requirements, design activities and manufacturing practices are the
bases of quality pr oduct and accordingly, the quality definition will be ‗conformance to
requirement‘ (Crosby, 1990:40)
Crosby argues that this definition offers practical meaning for quality. In addition, it
considers that zero-defect product is the only acceptable quality level since 100 percent
conformance to requirements is the only acceptable quality measure. However, it is
management‘s prime responsibility to create the right requirements in order to meet customer
real needs. (Crosby, 1990:40-1)
On the other, hand Jur an (1992:11) finds the definition of quality to be ―conformance to
specifications‖ or ―conformance to standards‖. This is a problematic definition when applied
at managerial levels as a product is meant to meet customer needs while a conformance to
specifications is just one of many means for achieving that objective on the part of the
manufacturer. Furthermore, standards and specifications are static while ‗quality is a moving
target.‘ Lawton (1993:80) supports Juran‘s observation by mentioning that requir ements are
often specified by the producer who ‗may have only a partial relationship to customer
desires.‘
Gavin (1988:45) realises this criticism when he says that the definition ‗conformance to
specifications‘ considers that the product, which is of customer‘s interest and deviates from
specifications is likely to be described as poor quality product, as such, this would be a
serious problem in that definition of quality.
All in all, as ISO 9000-1 notes that specification, in itself might not guarantee that a
customer‘s requirements are met (Peach, 1997:37)
2.2.2 User-Based Defini tions of Qual ity
User-based definitions of quality view quality from the customer side. The quality of the
product is determined by the user or by the customer (Feigenbaum, 1983:7). Hence, the
product which is regarded as having the highest quality is the one, which best satisfies
customer‘s preferences (Garvin, 1988:43). A popular definition underlying this approach is
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
22/100
13
the one by Juran (1989:1) where he defines quality as ‗fitness for use.‘ He then identifies two
dimensions of quality namely: product features that meet customer needs and freedom from
deficiencies. However, Garvin points out basic problems with the user-based approach is that
it equates quality with maximum customer satisfaction: though related, they are not identical.
In addition, in order to achieve satisfaction from wide range of customers, it would be
practically difficult to comprehend varying individual preferences and to transform those into
a ‗meaningful definition of quality at the market level.‘ Besides, by considering quality to be
exclusively customer determined, the product‘s impact on the environment, health, safety and
social concerns are not explicitly addressed. In the case where these concerns are considered,
it would be at individual level only.
2.2.3 Comprehensive Approach for a Defin iti on of Quali ty
Juran (1992:9) reports that to date, there is no consensus on the adoption of a simple
comprehensive phrase to describe quality. Garvin (1988:46-7) goes further in pointing out the
potential conflict that exists between members of marketing, engineering and manufacturing
departments within an organisation due to them holding different views of what constitutes
quality. Marketers tend to see quality from the customers viewpoint; hence, their concern is
what happens to the product outside the factory. Engineers in general, focus mainly on
specifications and how to translate product performance into precise measurements while
manufacturing departments would look at the meaning of quality from a different standpoint
altogether. They would tend to prefer the practical meaning of quality i.e. ‗conformance to
specifications‘ and doing things right the first time while reducing waste.
These three approaches are not unified. Therefore, a serious problem in communication may
exist within an organisation. However, an organisation can take advantage of these dissimilar
perspectives of quality in order to enhance its position, as this would be an adoption of a
comprehensive meaning of quality rather than the pursuit of satisfying a particular definition
of quality. In supporting Garvin‘s findings, Galgano (1994:3) states that ‗quality becomes a
comprehensive and unifying concept.‘ He goes further by relating the internal structure of the
organisation to the quality concept itself. Moreover, he considers quality to be a changing
concept — increasing constantly over time.
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
23/100
14
Most of the definitions that are based on the comprehensive approach for quality consider
that there are several dimensions for quality. However, it must be customer-oriented. In
addition, each definition specifies a set of factors and conditions that correlate with quality.
Table 2.2 presents several selected definitions of quality that are based on the comprehensive
approach. It also gives a set of quality factors correlating with each one of the definitions.
Quality Definition Quality FactorsThe total composite product and service
characteristics of marketing, engineering,
manufacturing and maintenance through
which the product and service in use will
meet the expectations of customer
(Feigenbaum, 1983:7)
1. The actual use
2. The selling price3. The specification of dimensions and operating
characteristics
4. The life and reliability objectives
5. The safety requirements
6.
The relevant standards7. The engineering, manufacturing, and quality costs
8. The production conditions under which the article
is manufactured
9. The field installation and maintenance and service
objectives
10. The energy-utilization and material conservationfactors
11. The environmental and other "side" effects
considerations
12. The costs of customer operation and use and
product service (Feigenbaum, 1983:9)
According to ISO 8404 (1994), quality is“the totality of characteristics of an entity
that bear on its ability to satisfy stated and
implied needs.” (Peach, 1997:36)
Clause 4.5 of ISO 9000-1 looks at the following fourfacets:
Quality due to the definition of needs for the
product
Quality due to product design
Quality due to conformance to product design
Quality due to product support (Peach, 1997:36)
Japanese Industrial Standard JIS Z8101
(1981) defines quality as a totality of the
characteristics or performance that can be
used to determine whether or not a product
or service fulfils its intended applications.
(Ozeki and Asaka, 1990:4)
The effect of the product or service on society
Quality characteristics which maybe unique for
each product or service. (Ozeki and Asaka, 1990:4)
Quality becomes both a reference point anda goal for all activities undertaken within a
company. Quality embraces and unifies
every element contributing to excellence
(Galgano, 1994:4)
Competitiveness, delivery cost, moral, productivity, profit, product quality, or volume performance, service,
safety, concern for the environment, the stockholders‘
interest.
The eight dimensions of quality together,
cover a broad range of concepts. Several of
the dimensions involve measurable product
attributes; others reflect individual
preferences. Some are objective and
timeless other shift with changing fashions.
Some are inherent characteristics of goods
while others are ascribed characteristics.
(Garvin, 1988:60)
Performance, features, reliability, conformance,
durability, serviceability, aesthetics, perceived quality.
(Garvin, 1988:45-50)
Table 2.2: Quality Definiti on and Quality Factors
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
24/100
15
By looking at quality definitions and factors in Table 2.2, it may be useful to categorise them
into broader quality dimensions.
2.2.4 Qual ity Dimensions
The comprehensive approach sets the quality concept as a base and a goal for all operational
and organisational activities undertaken. (Galgano, 1994:4) Therefore, quality should be a
multi-dimensional concept with keeping customer satisfaction as the focal point.
Nevertheless, the main quality dimensions are briefly presented below:
Operational Dimension: Operational dimension of quality deals, mainly, with
engineering, manufacturing and quality of outputs such as: specifications, conformance,
product features, delivery service and product quality.
Reliability Dimension: Reliability dimension may include durability, serviceability,
maintainability.
Economical Dimension: Economical dimension of quality is concerned with balancing
between quality value and quality cost for each quality characteristic (Juran, Sedar and
Gryna, 1962:10). Factors such as cost, productivity, profit and competitiveness fall into
this dimension.
Organisational Dimension: The organisational dimension deals mainly with quality of
organisational structure and performance.
Social and Environmental Dimensions: Social and environmental dimensions are
quality characteristics regarding these dimensions within and outside the organisation
such as moral, safety, internal customers‘ interest, waste, pollution and so on.
While considering the meaning of quality to be customer satisfaction-oriented, the following
notes should be taken into account:
Both the internal and external customers should be satisfied and the stockholders‘
interest should be recognised.
When specifying customer needs, those needs may be expressly stated by customer or
implied (latent) needs that a customer expects to be fulfilled (Peach, 1997:36).
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
25/100
16
Quality activity may constitute one of two broad efforts. Firstly, it may involve the
elimination of negative features of quality such as non-conformance to requirements.
This is sometimes called negative quality or reactive quality because the organisation
responds to a negative situation. The aim of reactive quality is to reduce customer
dissatisfaction. The other category of quality activities basically aims at increasing
customer satisfaction by as an example, improving a product or service. This kind of
quality is also termed positive quality (Galgano, 1994:6-7)
Quality is customer-oriented. However, other quality factors are essentials to the quality
concept as well. Each product might have its own array of quality factors (Ozeki and
Asaka, 1990:4). What is fundamental is the right combination of factors in a balanced
manner in order to achieve customer satisfaction as well as producing a quality product.
(Galgano, 1994:5)
All in all, quality in the management field has been broadened to cover other meanings of
product quality. Basically, it embodies all aspects of excellence that ensure the production of
a quality product and achieving customer satisfaction. Furthermore, quality aspects may be
grouped into three broader fields (see Fig. 2.2 below) namely, quality of output, quality to
satisfy customer and organisational and operational quality.
Quality output looks at process output and results measured against pre-specified
quality characteristics, requirements and standards.
Quality to satisfy internal and external customers and, lastly,
Organisational operational quality, which mainly is concerned with an organisational
structure and culture as well as conducting managerial functions that achieve quality.
Included under this field are engineering, manufacturing, marketing and administration
activities.
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
26/100
17
Quality
Quality of
OrganisationalStructures and
Operations
Quality to
Satisfy
Customer
Quality
Output
Organisational Structure
and Culture.Managerial Activities.
Organisational
Performance.
Engineering,
Manufacturing, Marketing
and Administration.
External Customer
Internal
Customer
Impact on
Environment or
Society
Process
Output
Quality
Product Quality
Explicit Needs
Implicit Needs
Interests of all
Stockholders
Work Environment
ProductQuality.
Delivery.
Cost.
Service.
Fig 2.2: A Comprehensive Approach to Qual ity
2.3 TQM Principles
Before going further in describing TQM, it is important to discuss the philosophical
principles of TQM. TQM is a managerial methodology. Therefore, it is a framework of
principles as well as a systems approach. It is a philosophy trying to analyse what factors
influence business quality, as well as tools with which quality can be controlled and assured.
There are different approaches that can be adopted to achieve quality, but all these
approaches lie under one methodology. The following concepts form part of the principles of
TQM and its philosophy:
a)
Quality Integration
Organisation starts its business by identifying customer needs, passes through design
to manufacturing then inspection. The last step will be marketing and selling. This is
the traditional way of doing business. At the end of the day, management wishes to
present a quality product and to enhance its competitive position. Questions that arise
about this sequence are: how can management assure quality and where does quality
fit in the sequence.
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
27/100
18
TQM philosophy is that quality cannot be achieved only by applying inspection at the
end of the process, rather it is a quality of conducting all these processes, and
integrating all interdependent components to accomplish the goal of the whole
organisation. Ishikawa captures the spirit of TQM by saying: ―Quality means quality
of work, quality of service, quality of information, quality of process, quality of
divisions, quality of people including workers, engineers, managers and executives,
quality of system, quality of company, quality of objectives, briefly speaking, it is
Total Quality, or as the Japanese call it, Company-wide Quality‖ (1985:45).
b)
Quality First
Management, continuously, wants organisations to produce good products at low cost,
that is, to be competitive and to increase the market share, or at least, to survive and
maintain the same level of market share. TQM aims at serving this purpose. However,
management, sometimes has the tendency to rather get short-run profit than long-run
holistic organisation advancement. Management that adopts ‗quality-first‘ strategy
will increasingly gain customer confidence. Sales increase gradually as a result and
hence profit ultimately winning on the international market in the long-run (Ishikawa,
1985:104). In fact, Deming (1982:1) puts it clear by making a statement that:
―productivity increases with improvement of quality.‖
c)
Customer Orientation
Customer satisfaction is the top priority for business and basic condition for success.
Basically, there would be no business without the customer (Galgano, 1994:15).
Therefore, quality management considers the customer as a basic value that guides an
organisation‘s activities.
In addition, a customer need should form an essential input for the designing and
production process and influences the decision-making process to the extent that
Kottler (2000:23) turns the organisation chart up-side-down by putting the customer
at the top of the pyramid.
So TQM directs that an or ganisation‘s objectives, structure and managerial process
should be established in such a way that it serves the customer.
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
28/100
19
The customer can be outside the organisation or within the organisation. The
customers outside the organisation are the clientele while those within are the
employees. Since an organisation accomplishes a particular job in a network of
interdependencies, an employee who receives an input, naturally, it is an output of the
preceding process. In this case, the employee is a customer of the predecessor
(Jablonski, 1994:44-5). Both inside and outside customers play a major role to the
organisation‘s success. Therefore, Ishikawa (1985:45) proposes that manufacturers
must study the requirements of consumers and to consider their opinions when they
design and develop a product.
d)
Continuous Improvement
Organisations are living in a dynamic environment. Products are designed to satisfy
customer needs, which are ever increasing. Three factors that shape today‘s business
environment, are rising customer expectations; continuous advances in technology
and competition. These force management to adopt a ‗continuous improvement‘
strategy as a normal way of managing a business.
On the other hand, with organisations confronting challenges continuously,
immediately responding to action is a real need. A plan for prevention of these
problems from occurring in the first place is rather important. Moreover, a programme
for upgrading machines, processes and tools as well as inventing new opportunities
and developing products are essentials for achieving competitiveness. Therefore,
continuous improvement must be viewed as a regular part of the organisation‘s
performance. (Kinlow, 1992:13-15)
e)
Prevention rather than Inspection
The traditional way of management is to do inspection at the end of the production
process. This approach, as Ishikawa (1985:77) notes, was abandoned at a relatively
early period in Japan. Some of the criticisms on this approach are listed below:
Inspection is costly. Ishikawa reports that the ratio of inspectors to line workers in
the West is up to an average of 15%.
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
29/100
20
Inspection approach does not ensure product and process improvement. On the
contrary, an inspection approach is an implicit suggestion of having a mistake
somewhere in the process, and accordingly, the inspector must pick out defective
products.
The same problem will be continuously committed. By the 1980s, about a third of
the work in the US economy consisted of redoing prior work because products
and processes were not perfect. (Juran, 1989:199)
Deming (1982:22) summarises this idea by saying ‗inspection is too late, ineffective
and costly.‘ The TQM approach is to ‗do it right the first time‘ rather than to react
after the problem happened. Problem prevention can be assured by controlling all
processes, discovering problems, identifying their root causes then improving the
process in order to avoid the problems.
f)
Factual-Based Decisions
Management needs continuously to make decisions. In organisations not based on
quality, decision-making is based on opinion or personal experience of designers,
manufacturing engineers, inspectors, etc. in the absence of data (Juran, 1980:8). Then,
blaming and finger pointing start to shift responsibility for any mistake.
Ishikawa (1985:109) proposes the following steps for conducting factual-based
decision in order to ensure that any analysis has the right basis for decision-making:
Clearly recognising facts, then
Expressing those facts with accurate data, and finally,
Utilising statistical methods to analyse the data
Facts can be properly identified by recognising everyone involved in the process,
within and outside the organisation including: management, supervisors, workforce,
suppliers and customers. All these individuals can contribute to a mutually benefiting
solution. Of particular importance is the fact that their contribution relates to their
field of concern (Jablonski, 1994:48).
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
30/100
21
g)
Workforce Involvement
Juran (1989:261) defines workforce as all employees except the managerial hierarchy
and ‗professional‘ specialists. Traditional management tends to ignore workforce
ability of participating in managerial activities. Galgano (1994:68) observes that
workforce involvement is important when he writes ‗human beings have unlimited
resources and immense capabilities.‘ Galgano goes further in putting forward a
condition for organisation‘s ultimate success defined in terms of its management of
human resources.
TQM requires that management must provide the workforce with knowledge and
training, the workforce must understand the organisation‘s objectives and processes as
well as where their role fits in the organisation so that they contribute efficiently in
the improvement of the organisation. Ishikawa (1985:90) explains one of the aspects
of the Japanese approach to TQM as their insistence on having all divisions and
employees involved in promoting quality control in addition to quality control
specialist. Moreover, Juran (1989:261-2) suggests that in order to achieve a quality
workforce contribution, management should:
motivate the workforce to make a contribution
provide them with required training to enable them to make a contribution.
Juran goes on to say that the workforce can contribute in the following managerial
aspects:
Quality Control: This comes first because controlling is the dominant form of
quality related responsibility assigned to the workforce.
Quality Improvement: This comes after the contributions emanating from
quality control.
Quality Planning: This becomes the least the workforce can participate in.
2.4 TQM System Approach
The battle of quality management to invade the business field is already over. Quality has
now become an important factor for achieving economic success and organisation‘s
continuity (Lawton, 1993:xi) Before proceeding in discussing the TQM system approach it
may be useful to define what TQM is.
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
31/100
22
2.4.1 Defini tion of Total Quali ty Management (TQM )
After an elaboration of the meaning of the term quality has been made, it becomes relatively
easy to define total quality management. TQM is a managerial approach that achieves the
broad meaning of quality. Firstly, however the meaning of the term ‗management‘ is
addressed. Crosby (1979:21) defines management as the function responsible for establishing
the purpose of an operation, determining measurable objectives and taking the action
necessary to accomplish those objectives. Crosby mentions two specific responsibilities of
management as establishing operation‘s purpose and measurable objectives as well as
ranking necessary actions to accomplish those objectives.
Ozeki and Asaka (1990:6) define management as ‗planning and implementing controls for
organised activities in a rational and efficient manner.‘ It therefore follows from these
definitions that planning and control are central to management. However, Ozeki and Asaka
break ‗controlling‘ into a four -step cycle of plan-do-check-act, which is known as PDCA
cycle. The postulation of Ozeki and Asaka is that repeated use of the PDCA cycle results in
improvement (1990:46). In other words, management‘s responsibilities according to the view
of the two include three main aspects viz. planning, controlling and improvement. In fact,
Juran (1992:14) puts it clearer by mentioning that management covers three areas of process
of planning, control and improvement in what he termed ‗Juran‘s Trilogy.‘
Perhaps the plausible way in proceeding to define TQM at this stage is to define the term
quality management. Juran (1989:82) defines quality management as the totality of ways
through which quality planning, quality control and quality improvement are achieved. For a
broader understanding, other definitions for TQM are presented in Table 2.3 below:
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
32/100
23
1 According to ISO 8402: 1994, Quality management is ― all activities of the overallmanagement function that determine the quality policy, objectives and responsibilities andimplement them by means such as quality planning, quality control, quality assurance andquality improvement within the quality system‖. (Peach, 1997:37 )
2 ―Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS 8101- 1981), defines Quality Control (QC) as a systemof techniques for economically producing goods and services that meet the customer‘srequirements.‖ (Ozeki and Asaka, 1990:1)
3 ―Total quality control is an effective system for integrating the quality- development, qualitymaintenance, and quality- improvement efforts of the various groups in an organization so
as to enable marketing, engineering, production and service at the most economical levelswhich allow for full customer satisfaction.‖ (Feigenbaum, 1983: 6)
4 ―To practice quality control is to develop, design, produce and service a quality product
which is most economical, most useful and always satisfactory to the consumer.‖ (Ishikawa,1985:44).
5 ―A cooperative form of doing business that relies on the talents and capabilities of bothlabor an management to continually improve quality and productivity using teams‖.
(Jablonski, 1994:41)
Table 2.3: Defini tions of TQM
It is also worthwhile to mention that quality management should not be seen in isolation from
the general responsibilities of management. Rather, it should be seen as an integral part of theorganisation‘s overall system. (Peach, 1997:37-8)
Once management adopts TQM as a strategy, however, certain arrangements should be done.
Such arrangements are the subject of strategic quality.
2.4.2 Strategic Quali ty Management
Strategic quality management SQM is defined as a systematic approach for setting and
meeting quality goals throughout the company (Juran, 1989:176). Once management decides
to implement TQM, it is essential to make changes in certain arrangements within the
organisation‘s structure and culture. Juran (1989:179) suggests six major changes to apply in
order to adopt managing for quality approach which are listed below:
The establishment of broad quality goals as part of the company‘s business plan.
The adoption of cultural change that is aligned with TQM philosophy.
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
33/100
24
The rearrangement of priorities knowing that Quality first, customer satisfaction,
employee participation and continuous improvement form part of the core of the
foundation of TQM.
Creating a new infrastructure to accommodate TQM requirements such as instituting aquality council and training facilities.
Extensive training for the entire hierarchy.
Upper-management participation in managing for quality.
Strategic quality management, basically, is concerned with setting an organisation‘s quality
objectives, mapping out the route and the means for reaching these objectives. It is about
making necessary arrangements and TQM programme requirements and the practising of
overall control.
As mentioned above, the main components of quality management are quality planning,
quality control and quality improvement. Those components are briefly explained in the
sections that follow.
2.4.3 Quali ty Plann ing
Quality planning is conducted to map out a route towards TQM. Juran‘s definition (1989:82)for quality planning is that it is ‗the activity of (a) determining customer needs, and (b)
developing the product features and processes required to meet those needs‘ (see Fig. 2.3
below).
Fig.2.3: Road-Map for Generali sed Quali ty Planning Process(Juran, 1989:88)
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
34/100
25
Quality planning is therefore concerned with the organisation‘s goals, product features as
well as processes. It has been mentioned above that all levels within the organisation should
participate in quality planning. Suppliers and customers are also expected to participate
somehow in the planning. For example, customers can participate effectively in identifying
client needs and factors of customer satisfaction.
The quality-planning route should end with simple specific tasks and directions for operating
workforces to satisfy particular definite customer needs. The plan should identify the
processes for transforming customer needs into product specifications. These processes
should be established carefully focussing on meeting the following goals of a product:
meeting customer needs
meeting specifications
most economical
In a nutshell, the processes must assure a quality product.
2.4.4 Quali ty Control
Quality control is a fundamental part of quality management, it is a managerial process
conducted throughout the organisation to achieve organisation‘s objectives. Juran (1989:145)
defines control as a managerial process during which we:
Evaluate actual performance
Compare actual performance to goals
Take action on the difference
Similarly, another methodology for conducting control is known as PDCA Control Cycle.
The PDCA Control Cycle is shown in the diagram (Fig. 2.4) below.
Fig. 2.4: PDCA Control Cycle (Ozeki and Asaka, 1990:7)
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
35/100
26
The PDCA Control Cycle as shown in the diagram (Fig.2.4), according to Ozeki and Asaka
(1990:7) consists of:
Plan: Determine your goals and develop a process for achieving these goals
Do: Implement your plan
Check: Evaluate the results of your plan and its implementation
Action: Take the necessary action constituting quality control.
More details on quality control are discussed in the chapter that follows.
2.4.5 Quali ty Improvement
Quality improvement acts as wheels on which the whole organisation is driven forwards.
Basically, quality improvement is a necessity for the organisation‘s management because of
the following reasons:
To survive in the competitive environment
To catch up with rising customer satisfaction levels
To keep abreast with continuously changing quality criteria
To overcome the shortcomings of new technology
With improvement is implied the ‗organised creation of beneficial change; the attainment of
unprecedented level of performance.‘ (Juran, 1989:28) It therefore follows that quality
improvement is a beneficial change in the organisation‘s objectives, structure, process and
product to increase performance as well as to eliminate deficiencies.
Improvement may be either small yet constant steps of progress or one drastic step taken
periodically. The former is termed Kaizen (Japanese for ‗small improvements‘) and the latter
Kairyo (Japanese for ‗one great improvement‘). The diagram (Fig. 2.5) depicts these two
concepts, which constitute quality improvement.
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
36/100
27
Fig. 2.5: Kaizen and Kairyo Improvements (Galgano, 1994:123)
Kaizen improvement is a systematic approach directed at organisation‘s routine processes
and could be conducted by everyone. On the other hand, Kairyo is conducted mainly by
adopting improvements on a project-by-project basis and usually, it is undertaken by a
specific group of people expected to produce a breakthrough result (Galgano, 1994:123-4)
Both these kinds of improvements can take the form of a specific improvement strategy.
Kinlaw (1992:15) suggests five different improvement strategies. They are listed hereunder:
Responding to an immediate problem.
Preventing the occurrence or recurrence of a problem
Upgrading machines, methods and techniques
Experimenting to improve an operation or work process
Creating a new opportunity to anticipate the developing needs of a customer
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
37/100
28
An organisation, may basically adopt one or more improvement strategies. However, several
approaches are suggested in order to carry out an improvement programme. These are usually
step-by-step approaches. Five stages are common to a number of quality improvement
approaches. These stages are:
Adoption of a programme for improvement
Setting standards for improvement
Preparation for programme implementation such as the establishment of a quality
council
Remove obstacles and delays which may prevent implementation
Conduct improvement and check results
Quality improvement should be a continuous activity in the organisation. Improvement
should be the organisation‘s culture and the basis for rewarding and recognition system.
So far the main features of the TQM framework have been presented. However, the matter of
how this whole framework works requires much more discussion. It is to this that the focus of
this research turns.
2.4.6 TQM Mechanism
TQM is a managerial approach that deals with the dynamic business environment which
consists of complex interdependencies of relationships aimed at producing quality output.
The TQM mechanism relies on the premises of considering TQM as an integral part of the
business plan and quality is a function of all the managerial aspects throughout the
organisation. In order to achieve quality, all activities of engineering, manufacturing,
marketing and administration should be considered within the quality system. Therefore,
achieving quality, implies integrating all factors that affect it.
The author of this research suggests the following TQM model presented in Fig. 2.6 where it
is believed that the model explains the mechanism and the framework of TQM within the
organisation.
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
38/100
29
Fig. 2.6: An I ntegrated TQM Model
The following points are explanatory comments on the TQM Model as presented in Fig. 2.6
Quality standards and customer (internal and external) satisfaction are the two top
priorities and they must guide and influence the organisation‘s objectives and
business process.
The main inputs that form quality standards are:
- Customer satisfaction requirement
- Business environmental factors such as technology, environmental issues,
health concerns, social aspects, legal issues, market issues and competitiveness
- Feedback loop of supplier-customer chain outputs
All these aspects interact with quality standards which themselves go through a process of adjustment and change over time (see diagram Fig. 2.6).
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
39/100
30
The whole supplier-customer chain basically affects quality. Therefore, supplier,
business process as well as business process output must be directly influenced by
requirements of quality standard and customer satisfaction.
Management uses a process approach to accomplish business objectives. These
processes are managed by the implementation of PDCA management cycle.
At the practical level, management should be participatory and committed to the
quality programme consequences. In addition, management needs to use TQM
techniques and tools such as Statistical Quality Control (SQC), adopting team
approach, providing quality leadership, conducting training programmes and
establishing a quality council. However, business process (macro- and micro-process)
must continuously ―go around the PDCA‖ cycle.
2.5 Quality Standards
The term ‗standards‘ as it is used in this context implies ―documented agreements co ntaining
technical specifications or other precise criteria to be used consistently as rules, guidelines or
definitions of characteristics, to ensure that materials, products, processes and services are fit
for their purpose‖ (ISO, 2002).
From the 1950s, many organisations developed quality standards that suit their own
businesses since their activities were restricted, mainly, to the local economy. By the 1970s,
the expansion of an organisation‘s activities at national level, resulted in replacing many
firm-specific standards by national standards. However, in the 1990s, international
competition and the globalised marketplace made it imperative for international standards to
play a role to facilitate international trade and to unify the international quality language
particularly for the international contractual agreements (Peach, 1997:10-11)
In this section, an overview of four quality standards is presented.
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
40/100
31
2.5.1 ISO 9000
The International Organisation for Standards (ISO) is a worldwide federation of one national
standard body from each one of the more than 140 member countries. ISO 9000 is one of a
series of the ISO standards. ISO 9000 series of standards was first issued in 1987 and it
qualifies organisations‘ quality management system and it compr ises of two basic kinds of
standards (Peach, 1997:11), which are:
Product standards (quality assurance)
Quality system (management system)
However, ISO 9000: 2000 family consists of four primary standards (ISO, 2002), namely:
ISO 9000: Quality management system; fundamentals and vocabulary
ISO 9001: Quality management system requirements that demonstrate its capability to
meet customer requirements and enhance customer satisfaction
ISO 9004: Quality management systems; guidance for performance improvement to
enhance satisfaction for interested parties
ISO 19011: Guidelines on quality and/or environmental management systems
auditing.
Details of the ISO 9000 family are listed in Appendix A.
2.5.2 The Malcolm Baldr idge National Quali ty Programme (MBNQP)
The Malcolm Baldridge National Quality Programme is an award/recognition system. It was
established in 1988 to recognise American organisations that excel in the quality management
field (Arcaro, 1995:1). The criteria are designed to help organisations use an integrated
managerial approach to improve organisational management performance system which
results in:
Delivery of ever-improving value to customer, contributing to market success.
Improvement of overall organisational effectiveness and capabilities.
Organisational and personal learning (NIST, 2001).
The award is given in categories of manufacturing, service and small business in addition to
education and health care fields which were a latter inclusion in 1999 (NIST, 2002).
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
41/100
32
The applicant‘s quality management is reviewed based on a seven point criteria namely:
leadership. Strategic planning, customer and market focus, information and analysis, human
resource focus, process management and business results. However, each one of these criteria
are broken down into several clusters.
Appendix B presents the areas considered for performance excellence.
2.5.3 Deming Pr ize
The Deming Prize is another award/recognition system. It was established in 1951 by the
Union of Japanese Scientists and Engineers (JUSE) in honour of W.E. Deming who has
introduced basic concepts of TQM to the Japanese in the 1950s and thereafter.
Deming Prize concentrates mainly on effective planning of organisational and operational
aspects. (Su, 2003).
The Prize is an annual award given to individuals and groups that demonstrate successful
―company wide quality control.‖ Assessment is made in ten categories viz.: policies,
organisation, information, standardisation, human resources, quality assurance, maintenance,
improvement, effects and future plans.
Appendix C shows details of categories of the Deming Prize.
2.5.4 The South A fr ican Excell ence Foundation
The South African Excellence Foundation (SAEF) is a not-for-gain company established by a
grouping of South African organisations in 1997 to support other organisations, large and
small, private and public, service and manufacturing throughout South Africa in order to
enhance their management systems through:
Promoting awareness and the importance of quality
Recognising organisations which achieve excellence
Increasing the understanding of the requirements for performance excellence (SAEF,
2002)
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
42/100
33
SAEF‘s quality model is based on the American and European quality foundations with
different emphasis in a way that it suits South African national priorities.
The South Africa Excellence Model (SAEM) provides organisations with an ―integrated,
result-oriented framework for implementing and assessing process for managing all
operations.‖ The model criteria addresses the following areas: leadership; policy and strategy;
customer and market focus; people management; resources and information management;
process; impact on society; customer satisfaction; people satisfaction; supplier and
partnership programme and business results (SAEF, 2002).
Appendix D shows areas considered for excellence under the SAEM.
2.6 Conclusion
During the eighteenth and nineteenth century there was no quality control as it is known
today. However, in the twentieth century, quality control development has gone through three
broad stages, each stage took about 20 years, the stages are:
Inspection quality control
Statistical quality control
Total quality control
In the early 1990s all total quality control concepts have emerged as an integrated managerial
approach, and most of the leading companies adopt Total Quality Management (TQM)
programme. While in Japan TQM had been perfected more than 20 years before that.
The meaning of quality in the manufacturing field has been broadened to contain several
dimensions of engineering, manufacturing and marketing activities. In addition, product
reliability aspects are part of quality concept as well, Moreover, economical issues and
organizational arrangements as well as production impact on society and environment are
essential components that are contained in the quality concept. All these quality factors that
comprise quality should be composed in a balanced way while keeping customer satisfaction
as the focal point.
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
43/100
34
TQM is a managerial methodology, therefore it is a principles and system approach. Some of
TQM principles are: quality integration; quality first; customer orientation; continuous
improvement strategy; prevention rather than inspection and factual-based decisions and
work force involvement.
TQM can be defined as: ―the totality of ways through which we achieve quality planning,
quality control, and quality improvement‖ (Juran, 1989:82). Planning, control and
improvement comprises the main components of organisation quality system. Quality
planning aims, basically, at determining customer needs, translate those needs into products
features then develop process required to meet those needs. Quality control is a managerial
activity with which an organisation achieves its objectives, and it can be carried out by
―going around Plan-Do-Check-Act‖ control cycle.
Finally, quality improvement is a necessity for today‘s organisations, mainly directed at
raising the quality level or eliminate deficiencies. Improvement programme can be carried
out on a project-by-project basis. Improvement can also be within routine work on a
continuous basis. However overall organisational quality objectives, organisational structure,
culture as well as quality programme requirements are the bases for the whole TQM system
and strategic quality management.
The TQM mechanism is based on the premises quality standards and customer satisfaction
being the top priorities. In addition, the whole supplier-customer chain affects quality.
Therefore, the TQM approach is to maintain and improve customer satisfaction as well as
quality standards by integrating and interacting all factors that form the business
environment.
Quality control is an essential component of the TQM system. More detail on quality control
is presented in chapter 3.
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
44/100
35
CHAPTER 3 Quality
Control
3.1 The Meaning of Quality Control
ictionary meanings of the word ‗control‘ are many but some of them are:
―to exercise directing, restraining or governing influence over‖
―to regulate, verify as an experiment by comparison with a parallel
experiment or other relevant standard.‖
―To check.‖ (Webster, 1992:284)
Three ideas of the word ‗control‘ are implied by the above-listed meanings. These are: to
direct; to regulate, and to check results against relevant standards. All these definitions are
relevant to how the word ‗control‘ is used in the field of management.
Quality control (QC) is the practice of control activities in order to achieve quality goals.
Therefore, quality control in the manufacturing field can be defined as to direct (regulate and
check) work activities in order to achieve manufacturing quality objectives. However, several
writers suggest more detailed definitions for quality control. In fact, they deal with this term
as a system that consists of interrelated components so as to fulfil a particular objective(s).
Most of these control components, basically, revolve around the components of Plan- Do-
Check-Act (PDCA) management cycle.
D
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
45/100
36
Ozeki and Asaka (1990:45) define the term quality control as ―defining the objective of the
job, developing and carrying out a plan to meet that objective, and checking to determine if
the anticipated results are achieved. If the anticipated results are not achieved, modifications
are made in the work procedure to fulfil the plan.‖
Feigenbaum‘s (1983:10) definition is not far from Ozeki and Asaka‘s. He reasons that quality
control is the procedure for meeting the quality goal. He then specifies, almost the same
PDCA cycle components to be used as steps in such a control. The point of departure for
Feigenbaum is the concept of planning for improvement.
For Ishikawa (1985:59), the emphasis is on the economical dimension. He postulates that
quality control has to be economical. He further points out that satisfaction of the customer is
the reason why a firm has to be engaged in quality control (1985:55). Ishikawa‘s PDCA cycle
is a redefined one presented with six steps as shown in Table 3.1:
1 Determination of Goals and Targets
2 Determining Methods of reaching Goals
3 Engaging in Education and Training
4 Implementing Work
5 Checking the Effects of Implementation
6 Taking Appropriate Action
Table 3.1: Contr ol Cycle (Ishikawa, 1985:59)
As shown in Table 3.1, Ishikawa breaks down the ‗plan‘ step in PDCA cycle into two,
namely, ‗Determination of Goals and Targets‘ and ‗Determination of Methods of Reaching
those Goals.‘ In addition, Ishikawa considers engaging in education and training as part of the
implementation step of the control cycle.
More dimensions of the quality control concept are given by Galgano (1994:108). He sees
quality control to be a revolution in attitude that influences the whole organisation movement
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
46/100
37
as well as a means of empowering the organisation‘s constitution. According to Galgano‘s
view, quality control is ‗basically prevention‘, whereby, work continuity and performance
level are maintained. In addition, QC is carried out by applying the PDCA cycle repeatedly
basing it on statistical methods. He asserts that the ultimate objective of QC is customer
satisfaction.
All in all, the above-mentioned definitions view QC as a continuous procedure aimed at
planning and implementing all activities throughout the organisation, appraising conformance
and checking results against the planned and then taking corrective action accordingly. QC is
basically prevention. Its objective is to achieve the organisation‘s goals. However, the
ultimate objective is to fulfil customer needs.
By looking at the definition of quality control, it is obvious that quality control is a basic
condition for successful management, since it improves the organisation‘s performance and
eliminates product deficiencies (Feigenbaum, 1983:10). A noteworthy remark of particular
importance at this stage is one made by Feigenbaum (1983:11) and Galgano (1994:107) that
although QC may be discussed in separation from other management activities such as
quality planning and quality improvement, in practice, it does not have a specific stage,
hence, cannot be isolated in the whole organisation‘s operations. It starts from identification
of customer needs and ends only when customer needs have been satisfactorily met
(Feigenbaum, 1983:11). It is evident that ISO 9000:2000 (ISO:2001) adopts a ‗process
approach‘ to establish a quality management system and the PDCA cycle, is deployed
throughout the entire quality management system process.
Consequently, a legitimate question that arises is that what is the difference between quality
control on one hand and quality planning as well as quality improvement on the other. Where
does quality control fit in, in the whole quality management framework? In an attempt to
answer all such questions, Peach (1997:23) considers that the four of quality management
activities namely: quality planning, quality control, quality assurance and quality
improvement are correlated to the classic PDCA management cycle, where, each activity is
managed by the application of the whole PDCA cycle. However, quality planning focuses on
the ‗Plan Step‘; quality control focuses on the ‗Do Step‘; quality assurance focuses on the
‗Check Step,‘ and quality improvement focuses on the ‗Act Step.‘ Therefore, quality control
is basically, an essential part of both management activities of quality planning and quality
improvement. In other words, there is an inherent step of control, which in turn implements
8/20/2019 A Al-Saket (TQM Dissertation)
47/100
38
the plans and checks the results against the planned. The diagram (Fig. 3.1) depicts the
interrelationship of the three major quality management activities of planning, control and
improvement.
Fig. 3.1: I nterrelationship of the Three Major Quali ty Management Activiti es
The diagram (Fig. 3.1) shows Juran‘s Road Map of the planning process in the quality
planning section, column (B), (Juran, 1989:88). Column (C) shows Crosby‘s 14 steps for
continuous improvement. The quality control column (B) includes the PDCA Control Cycle
of daily routine work as well as overlapping on the control aspects of both quality planning
and quality improvement.
Apart from Peach‘s approach presented above, Juran (1992:16-17) presents another view for
the relationships of the three major management activitie