17
06/20/22 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 1 Value Signals in the Human OMPFC Network Distinguish Maximizers from Satisficers during Goal Decision- Making Jyrki Suomala, Ph.D; Jarmo Heinonen, Ph.D; Lauri Palokangas, BSc; Jussi Numminen, MD, Ph.D Neuroeconomics Lab, Laurea University of Applied Sciences, Espoo, Finland Helsinki Medical Imaging Center, Töölö Hospital, University of Helsinki, Finland

9/18/2015Laurea University of Applied Sciences1 Value Signals in the Human OMPFC Network Distinguish Maximizers from Satisficers during Goal Decision-Making

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 9/18/2015Laurea University of Applied Sciences1 Value Signals in the Human OMPFC Network Distinguish Maximizers from Satisficers during Goal Decision-Making

04/19/23 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 1

Value Signals in the Human OMPFC Network Distinguish Maximizers from

Satisficers during Goal Decision-Making

Jyrki Suomala, Ph.D; Jarmo Heinonen, Ph.D; Lauri Palokangas, BSc; Jussi Numminen, MD, Ph.D

Neuroeconomics Lab, Laurea University of Applied Sciences, Espoo, Finland Helsinki Medical Imaging Center, Töölö Hospital, University of Helsinki, Finland

Page 2: 9/18/2015Laurea University of Applied Sciences1 Value Signals in the Human OMPFC Network Distinguish Maximizers from Satisficers during Goal Decision-Making

Objective

• Deep-seated goals in decision-making experiment

• Personal wage expectations were used as stimuli

Laurea University of Applied Sciences 2

Page 3: 9/18/2015Laurea University of Applied Sciences1 Value Signals in the Human OMPFC Network Distinguish Maximizers from Satisficers during Goal Decision-Making

04/19/23 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 3

2500 €

2500 €

Yes

No

2500 €

2500 €

2500 €

Accept or Reject

Page 4: 9/18/2015Laurea University of Applied Sciences1 Value Signals in the Human OMPFC Network Distinguish Maximizers from Satisficers during Goal Decision-Making

Prospect Theory▶Prospect Theory (PT) value function explains

a variety of economical choice behaviors ▶Weighted Prospect Theory value function in

accordance to conventional parameterization (Tversky and Kahneman, 1992)

▶Choice behavior was studied in a subjective choice situation.

04/19/23 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 4

Page 5: 9/18/2015Laurea University of Applied Sciences1 Value Signals in the Human OMPFC Network Distinguish Maximizers from Satisficers during Goal Decision-Making

Sample and task

• Eighteen right-handed university students (11

women) - 9 maximizers and 9 satisficers • Subset chosen from a larger study

(n=1209, Gasagrande, 2007)

• The subjects were scanned while engaged in a

task of accept or reject the wage

04/19/23 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 5

Page 6: 9/18/2015Laurea University of Applied Sciences1 Value Signals in the Human OMPFC Network Distinguish Maximizers from Satisficers during Goal Decision-Making

Task to accept or reject the wage offers

04/19/23 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 6

Page 7: 9/18/2015Laurea University of Applied Sciences1 Value Signals in the Human OMPFC Network Distinguish Maximizers from Satisficers during Goal Decision-Making

Behavioral: Maximizers (blue) vs. Satisficers

(red)

04/19/23 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 7

Page 8: 9/18/2015Laurea University of Applied Sciences1 Value Signals in the Human OMPFC Network Distinguish Maximizers from Satisficers during Goal Decision-Making

04/19/23 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 8

▶There were no behavioral differences between Maximizers and Satisficers

Page 9: 9/18/2015Laurea University of Applied Sciences1 Value Signals in the Human OMPFC Network Distinguish Maximizers from Satisficers during Goal Decision-Making

Maximizers group Increased (positive correlation)

04/19/23 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 9

Page 10: 9/18/2015Laurea University of Applied Sciences1 Value Signals in the Human OMPFC Network Distinguish Maximizers from Satisficers during Goal Decision-Making

The brain areas correlate with increased salary offer in the

Maximizers groupthresholds p < 0.001 at voxel level; minimum cluster size 10

voxels

04/19/23 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 10

Number of voxels Local Zmax Location of local Anatomic area Putative 2.0*2.0*2.0 mm cluster maximum Brodman

(in MNI coordinates) area85 4.84 20 62 -10 Right Medial 11

Orbitofrontal cortex270 4.61 4 52 6 Bilateral Anterior 24/32

Cingulate Cortex213 4.37 4 -60 12 Calcarine Sulcus 17

84 4.22 44 30 -14 Right Posterior 11orbitofrontal cortex

67 3.98 -8 -74 -24 Left superiormedial cerebellum

11 3.60 2 62 -12 Left Medial 11orbitofrontal cortex

31 3.47 42 -60 22 Angular Gyrus 39

Page 11: 9/18/2015Laurea University of Applied Sciences1 Value Signals in the Human OMPFC Network Distinguish Maximizers from Satisficers during Goal Decision-Making

Results

▶The goal valuation signal in the right superior temporal gyrus, supramarginal gyrus and insula correlated positively with decreased salary offers in the Maximizers group.

▶Decreased value signal was observed in the dorsal posterior cingulate and superior cerebellum of Satisficers.

04/19/23 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 11

Page 12: 9/18/2015Laurea University of Applied Sciences1 Value Signals in the Human OMPFC Network Distinguish Maximizers from Satisficers during Goal Decision-Making

Results

▶Goal decision value signals were engaged in the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex (OMPFC) network during the experiment in in the Maximizers group.

▶The orbitofrontal cortex should be viewed as a part of a functional network in OMPFC. This network includes both the orbitofrontal cortex and parts of the anterior cingulate cortex and has distinct connections to other parts of the brain (Kringelbach 2005).

04/19/23 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 12

Page 13: 9/18/2015Laurea University of Applied Sciences1 Value Signals in the Human OMPFC Network Distinguish Maximizers from Satisficers during Goal Decision-Making

Results

▶No behavioral differences between Maximizers and Satisficers

however

▶In fMRI results Maximizers and Satisficers differed notably.

04/19/23 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 13

Page 14: 9/18/2015Laurea University of Applied Sciences1 Value Signals in the Human OMPFC Network Distinguish Maximizers from Satisficers during Goal Decision-Making

▶Previous studies have suggested that the behavior of Maximizers and Satisficers

differs in real life contexts (Iyengar, S.S., Wells,

R.E. & Schwartz, B., 2006).

04/19/23 14Laurea University of Applied Sciences

Page 15: 9/18/2015Laurea University of Applied Sciences1 Value Signals in the Human OMPFC Network Distinguish Maximizers from Satisficers during Goal Decision-Making

Results

▶Weighted Prospect Theory value function in accordance to conventional parameterization (Tversky and Kahneman, 1992)

with

▶Goal valuation signals in the OMPFC network correlated positively with increased salary offers in the Maximizers group. Such signal was absent among the Satisficers.

04/19/23 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 15

Page 16: 9/18/2015Laurea University of Applied Sciences1 Value Signals in the Human OMPFC Network Distinguish Maximizers from Satisficers during Goal Decision-Making

Conclusions

▶ Difference occurs also in the neurophysiological level between Maximizers and Satisficers.

▶ Explanation for this might be: the brain has

capability to incorporate cultural considerations into its standard valuation circuitry.

04/19/23 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 16

Page 17: 9/18/2015Laurea University of Applied Sciences1 Value Signals in the Human OMPFC Network Distinguish Maximizers from Satisficers during Goal Decision-Making

Thank you to

Antoine Bechara,

Ming Hsu, Valtteri Leppihalme,

Sini Maunula, Jose Santos,

Tuomas Tolvanen and Tiina Vuorenpää

04/19/23 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 17