Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
90 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Paving mixtures containing asphalt emulsions have been successfully mixed and placed using a wide range of techniques and equipment in both the mixing and spreadshying operations Several excellent references are available which contain details on construction methods and equipment which have successfully been used with emulsified asphalt mixtures (3 6 9) Brief discusshysions of the various construction methods follow
91 Mixing and Spreading
Successful mixing and spreading of emulsified asphalt mixtures have been accomplished using diverse techniques ranging from in-place mixing with a motor grader blade to central plant mixing using a batch or drum plant
Blade Blade m1x1ng is probably the least efficient of available mixing methods for emulsions mixtures 6 However it is also the least complicated Basically the procedure consists of spray applying water and emulsion using a distributer truck to a flattened windrow of aggregate Mixing is accomshyplished through blading the materials back and forth several times to distribute the emulsion through the aggregate Spreading of the mixed material is accomplished by careful blading with the grader
Travel Plants A travel plant is a self-propelled pugmill which proportion and mix emulsions and aggregates in place as the plant moves along the road (6) Two types of plants which are classified on method of receiving aggregate are available The first is a dump-feed type which receives aggregate from a dump truck The second is a pick-up typewhich receives aggregate by picking it up from preshyviously prepared windrows With each plant type emulsion is introduced into the mixing chamber using spray bars Generally pick-up type plants leave the mixture in a windrow after mixing Thus the mixture must be spread using a motor grader Dumpfeed plants generally place the mixtures uniformly by use of a screed thus eliminating the necessity of blade spreading The dump feed travel plant has been found to be a very effective successful and popular method of mixing and placing emulsified mixtures
85
Rotary Mixers Rotary mixers generally consist of a mobile mixing chamber which contains rotary shafts with cutting blades mounted on a self-propelled machine (6) The mixer loosens in place material to the required depth and then mixes it with emulsion Emulsified application may be either through a spray bar in the mixer or by a distributer truck ahead of the mixer
Central Plant Emulsified asphalt mixtures have been successfully mixed in standard pugmill batch plants and continuous drum-mix plants Mixtures may be made using either cold (ambient temperature) mixshying or hot (elevated temperature) mixing (6) These mixtures may be spread using conventional equipment and techniques used for hot-mixed asphalt concrete With central plant cold mixed emulsified asphalt mixtures stockpiling of the mixture for long perishyods of time prior to use as is often the case with cutback asphalt mixtures may not be possible Length of time an emulsified asphalt mixture may be stockpiled prior to use depends on the type of emulshysion and aggregate used
92 Compacting
Equipment and techniques used to compact emulsified asphalt mixtures depend on the method used for mixshying and the type of mixture being placed During compaction it is necessary to consider and make appropriate compensation for the amount of water in the mixture
Mixed-in-Place Mixed-in-place emulsified asphalt mixtures generally use local aggregate materials which are of low to marginal quality Compaction of these materials is generally accomplished by initishyally compacting (breakdown rolling using a sheepsshyfoot or pneumatic tired roller just before or just as the emulsified asphalt binder begins to break Attempting to intially compact too soon may result in mixture shoving by the roller due to presence of excessive moisture in the mixture which will deshycrease mixture stability Rolling to meet density requirements may be accomplished using steel wheel pneumatic or vibratory rollers Finish rolling should be performed with a steel wheel roller Further details of compaction techniques and equipshyment may be found in References 3 6 and 9
86
Central Plant Mixed For central plant mixed emulshysified asphalt mixtures rolling should generally be performed as soon as possible after lay down as in many cases due to the time required for hauling and placing of the mixture the emulsion may have begun to break However initial rolling should not be performed until the mixture is stable enough to support the roller Initial rolling is generally accomplished using pneumatic rollers intermediate rolling with either pneumatic or steel wheel rolshylers and finish rolling with steel wheel rollers Further information on compaction of plant-mixed emulsified asphalt mixtures are also found in Refershyences 3 6 and 9
87
100 CONCLUSIONS
Based on testing mixture designs and analyses pershyformed with the materials studied during this investishygation several conclusions regarding the use of solshyvent free asphalt and sulfur-extended asphalt emulshysions with aggregates from California may be drawn
101 Solvent Free Asphalt Emulsions
A summary of ANOVA significant at the 95 percent confidence level is tabulated in Table 33 This table shows for nearly all dependent variables that emulsion type aggregate quality level and aggreshygate are significant effects For several paramshyeters several interactions are also significant Conclusions reached during the asphalt emulsion experiment are
1 Stable solvent free cationic slow set and catshyionic medium set asphalt emulsions can be proshyduced which meet Caltrans specifications for cationic emulsionse
2 Solvent free cationic asphalt emulsions can effectively coat aggregates with minus No 200 mesh contents in excess of 10 percent and sand equivalent values as low as 15 Greater degrees of coating are obtained with solvent free catshyionic slow set emulsions than with solvent free cationic medium set emulsions
3 In the laboratory and for the materials used in this study greater degrees of compaction can be obtained using a conventional cationic medium set emulsion which contains 7 percent solvent than with solvent free asphalt emulsions
4 Higher stabilometer values cohesiometer values and resilient moduli are obtained for laboratory mixtures containing low quality aggregates with the solvent free asphalt emulsions than with the emulsion containing solvent This is believed due to the higher viscosity of the solvent free emulsion residues when compared to the residue from the emulsion containing solvent
88
Table 33
SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL
ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT
DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS A a E AQ AE OE AQE
Emulsion Conpatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA - NA - NA NA
2 Day bdulus y y y - y y y
Full cure Ddulus y y y - - - -Density y y y - - - -Air Voids y y y - - - -
Stabilometer y y y y Y y -Cohesiometer y y y y y - -MVS Stabilometer y y y - y y -MVS Cohesiometer - - y - - - -SWell y y y y y y y
Surface Abrasion y y y y y y y
LEGEND
Effects
A = effect of aggregate type Q = effect of aggregate quality level E = effect of emulsion type
AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction
AQE = three-way interaction
Significance
Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level
NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way
89
5 Laboratory specimens containing solvent free asphalt emulsions experience higher losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivity procedure than specishymens with the asphalt emulsion containing solshyvent This effect however may be related to the lesser degrees of compaction attained when using the solvent free asphalt emulsions as comshypared to the emulsion containing solvent
6 Laboratory specimens which contained the solvent free asphalt emulsions with lower quality aggreshygates experienced higher amounts of swell and greater surface abrasion losses than specimens with the emulsion containing solvent
7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the solvent free asphalt emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thicknesses are required when using solvent free emulsions It is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials which may be an important factor in field performance
8 Most of the paving mixtures investigated which contained the low quality aggregates and the solvent free asphalt emulsions met stabilometer requirements for Caltrans Type C asphalt conshycrete However only three of the mixtures also met moisture vapor susceptibility and swell requirements Mixtures which met these requireshyments were - FH with CSS-0 emulsion GRH with CMS-0 emulsion and GRH with CMS-7 emulsion
9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other considershyations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others
90
- - - --- ----------
102 Sulfur-Extended-Asphalt Emulsions
A summary of ANOVA significance at the 95 percent confidence level is shown in Table 34 This table showsmiddotfor nearly all parameters that emulsion type aggregate quality level and aggregate are signifishycant effects For several parameters several interactions are also significant Conclusions reached during the SEA emulsion experiment are
1 Stable solvent free water based anionic slow set emulsions using sulfur-extended-asphalt (SEA) base stocks can be produced which meet most Caltrans specifications for anionic slow set emulsions
2 Anionic SEA emulsion can effectively coat both low and high quality aggregates
3 Use of SEA emulsions resulted in higher resilshyient modulus values for both low and high qualshyity aggregates than use of the emulsion containshying solvent
4 Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions had higher stabilometer values with low quality aggregates than mixtures with the emulsion containing solshyvent
5 Specimens containing the SEA emulsion with low quality aggregates swelled to a greater extent and experienced higher surface abrasion losses than those with the emulsion containing solvent
6 Specimens containing the SEA emulsions experishyence greater losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivshyity procedure than specimens with the solvent asphalt emulsion indicating a greater sensitivshyity to moisture
7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thickshynesses would be required when using SEA emulshysions Again it is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials
91
Table 34
SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL
SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT
DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS
effect of aggregate type effect of aggregate quality level effect of emulsion type
AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction
A a E AQ AE QE AQE
Emulsion Compatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA y NA y NA NA
2 Day Mxfalus y y y - y y y
Full Cure Mldulus y - y - - - -Density y y y - - y y
Air Voids y y y - - - -
Stabilometer - y y - y - -
COhesiometer - y - - - - -MIS Stabilaneter y y y y y - -
MVS COhesianeter y y y - y y -y
~ y y y y y y
Surface Abrasion
LEGEND
Effects
A = Q = E =
AQE = three-way interaction
Significance
Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level
NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way
92
8 All of the paving mixtures containing low qualshyity aggregates and SEA emulsions studied met Caltrans stabilometer requirements (30 minimum) for Type C asphalt concrete however several mixtures did not meet swell and moisture vapor susceptibility requirements for Type C asphalt concrete Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions which met swell requirements were FH GRH and GRL with SS-15 SEA emulsion and SBH FH FL GRH and GRL with SS-30 SEA emulsion MVS conshyditioned stabilometer value requirements were met only by FL and GRH with the SS-15 SEA emulshysion and GRH with the SS-30 SEA emulsion
9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other consider~ ations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others
93
110 RECOMMENDATIONS
111 This study has investigated the properties of paving mixtures containing several low quality aggregates and several types of emulsified binders Test methshyods and criteria used to design and assess mixture characteristics were those specified for hot-mix asphalt concrete in California An objective of the research study is to determine if solvent free emulshysified binders can be used in place of cutback asphalt binders Therefore in order to permit drawing of appropriate conclusions from the data presented in this report on the effectiveness of the emulsions studied for replacing cutback asphalts additional laboratory work is required It is suggested that properties and characteristics of mixtures containing the project aggregates and cutshyback asphalts be determined The study should evalshyuate the same properties considered in this study Determination of mixture characteristics using cutshyback binders would permit direct comparisons between the cutback and emulsified binder systems and the drawing of more definite conclusions Additionally a study which would determine properties of mixtures containing hot-mixed asphalt cement would be of aid in evaluating results
112 After completion of the additional laboratory studshyies if results so indicate it is recommended that several field experimental studies using aggregates ranging in quality from low to high with solvent free emulsified asphalt binders be undertaken Projects should be constructed in several climatic regions in California (wet and arid) and should include control sections containing both cutback and if possible hot-mixed asphalts Proper labshyoratory mixture designs construction control and field monitoring of results and performance should be used Results of these experiments should proshyvide indications of performance of the various mixtures in actual use
113 Results of this study indicate that mixtures conshytaining the SEA binders are detrimentally affected by moisture to a greater degree than with standard emulsions However performance of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions may be adequate in arid regions Therefore it is recommended that in order
94
to further investigate the usefulness of paving mixshytures containing the SEA emulsions that field experimental test sections using the SEA emulsions be constructed and evaluated$
It is strongly suspected that the moisture vapor susceptibility of the solvent free asphalt emulsion mixes evaluated herein could be reduced by a slight modification of the emulsion formulations This possibility should be evaluated
95
References
1 Request For Proposals Investigation Into The Nature Of Emulsified Asphalts Compatible With California Local Aggregates And Substitution Of Sulfur For Asphalt In Aqueous Emulsified Systems California Air Resource Board Research Division Sacramento Calishyfornia March 1980
2 American Society for Testing and Materials 1981 Annual Book of Standards Part 15 Road Paving Bituminous Materials Travelled Surface Characterisshytics Philadelphia PA 1981
3 Interim Guide to Full-Depth Asphalt Paving Using Varshyious Asphalt Mixes The Asphalt Institute Pacific Coast Division PCD-1 January 1976
4 Kennepahl GJA Logan A and Bean D C Conshyventional Paving Mixes with Sulfur-Asphalt Binders Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975
5 Deme Imants Processing of Sand-Asphalt-Sulfur Mixes Proceedings AAPT Volume 43 1974
6 A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual The Asphalt Instishytute Manual Series No 19 MS-19) March 1979
7 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Use of Cutback Asphalt US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Waste Management Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park North Carolina October 17 1977
8 Highway Chemicals Newsletter Armak Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois Fall 1981
9 Bitumils Mix Manual Chevron USA Asphalt Division January 1977
10 Asphalt Pavement Engineering Wallace Hugh A and Martin J Rogers McGraw Hill Book Company New York 1967
11 Spahr J D The Use of Emulsified Asphalt in Conshystruction and Maintenance Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975
96
12 Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design Asphalt Emulsions Volume 4 1977
13 Dybalski J N 11 The Chemistry of Asphalt Emulsions Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D C January 1976
14 Beagle C w Deflection and Performance of Deep Lift Asphalt Emulsion Base Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976
15 Meier w J Asphalt Emulsion Construction on the Navajo Reservation Twenty-Fifth Annual Arizona Conshyference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 22-23 1976
16 Kallas B F and Shock J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Find Report - Parts I and
11II Research Report 77-1 The Asphalt Institute November 1977
17 Shook J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Analysis of Performance Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976
18 Wimberly C M Emulsified Asphalt Mixes in Arizona Proceedings 24th Annual Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 17-18 1975
19 Izalt J O Galloway B M and Saylock D SandshyAsphalt-Sulfur Pavement Experimental Project Highway US 77 Kennedy County Texas Texas Transportation Institute April 1977
20 McBee w c and Sullivan T A Direct Substitution of Sulfur for Asphalt In Paving Materials 11 Report of Investigations 8303 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines 1978
21 Ludwig A C Gerhardt B B and Dale JM Materials and Techniques for Improving the Engineering Properties of Sulfur Report No FHWA-RD-80-023 Fedshyeral Highway Administration June 1980
22 Jiminez R A and Stakes K J Effects of Heat and Air on the Viscosity of Sulfur-Asphalt Mixtures Preshysented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies San Diego California February 16-18 1981
97
23 Chehovits J G and Anderson D A Upgrading of Marginal Aggregates for Improved Water Resistance of Asphalt Concrete Transportation Research Record 762 pages 46-52 1981
24 Rosner JC and Chehovits J G Highway Binder Materials From Modified Sulfur-Water Emulsionsn Report No FHWARD-82035 Federal Highway Administration November 1981
25 Standard Specifications State of California Department of Transportation January 1978
26 Applied Linear Statistical Models Neter I and Wasserman w Richard D Irwin Inc Homewood Illinois 1974
27 Burr I W and Foster LA A Test For Equality of variances Mimeograph Series No 282 Statistics Department Purdue University Lafayette Indiana 1972
28 Applied Statistical Methods Burr I W Academic Press Inc New York 1974
29 Parr W K Field Observations of the Behavior of Bituminous Pavements As Influenced By Moisture 11 ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 3-16--I959
30 Rice JM Relationship of Aggregate Characteristics to the Effect of Water on Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 17-34 1959
31 Lettman R P and Johnson D L 11 Pressure Induced Stripping in Asphaltic Concrete Highway Research Record 340 pages 13-28 1970
32 Waller F H Jr Emulsion Mix Design Methods An Overview 11 Transportation Research Record 754 1980
33 Design of Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures Report R6-350(74) US Forest Service 1974
34 11Mix Design Procedure For Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Pavement FHWA Region 10 Office of Federal Highway Projects
98
35 Darter M I Ahlfield S R Wilky P L and Wasill R G Development of Emulsified Asphalt Aggregate Cold Mix Design Procedure Research Report 505-5 Department of Civil Engineering University of Illinois 1978
36 A A Gadallah L E Wood and E J Yoder A Suggested Method for the Preparation and Testing of Asphalt-Emulsion-Treated Mixtures Using Marshall Equipment Proceedings AAPT Volume 46 1977
37 Marshall Stability Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois
38 Jiminez R A Final Report-Phase I Asphalt Emulsion Treated Aggregates University of Arizona Research Report HPR-1-13(150) January 1977
39 George K P Interim Report on Criteria for Emulshysified Asphalt Stabilization of Sandy Soils Univershysity of Mississippi for Mississippi State Highway Department October 1976
40 Fong G K Mix Design Methods for Base and Surface Courses Using Emulsified Asphalt A State-of-the-Art Report Report No FHWA-RD-78-113 Federal Highway Administration October 1978
41 Schmidt R J A Practical Method for Measuring the Resilient Modulus of Asphalt-Treated Mixes Highway Research Record 404 1972
42 Manual of Test Volume 2 State of California Department of Transportation Transporation Laboratory Third Edition 1978
43 Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete Manual Series No 2 (MS-2) The Asphalt Institute March 1979
99
-
APPENDIX A
OPTIMUM FLUIDS AT COMPACTION DATA
-
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table Al
Percent Residue
631 631 631
702 702 702
595 595 595
678 678 678
689 689 689
645 645 645
Fluids at Compaction Data css-o
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
467 367 216
1098 998 847
571 413 360
1273 1115 10 62
455 370 341
1050 965 936
590 450 400
1268 1128 1078
492 183 109
1181 872 798
404 311 139
1049 956 784
Dry Density
(pcf)
1304 1337 1347
1283 1326 1306
133l 1310 9 1317
1328 1295 1304
1404 1529 154 1
1429 1466 1462
Al
css-o CSS-0HIGH QUALITY155- DRY LOW QUALITYbull SAN BERNARDINO 1551
bull SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO 150-I I 150 FRESNObull GRANITEROCK bull GRANITEROCK
I ~
145 LoPT=B5 145 () () - -0 0
~140 gt1401 L- 0 PT= 85 OPT=100gt-i
N Cl) OPT=100 Cl)
DRYZ 135 Z 135w w Cl Cl
amp130 amp130 Cl 0
125 125
120 I i I I i I i I I I 120 I I J I I i I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure Al Fluids at Compaction Figure A2 Fluids at Compaction High Quality Aggre-gate CSS-0 Low Quality CSS-0
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A2
Percent Residue
605 605 605
704 704 704
595 595 595
695 695 695
556 556 556
604 604 604
Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-0
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
4 16 316 183
1021 921 788
494 389 262
1198 1093
966
529 392 360
1124 987 955
519 479 301
1214 1174
996
284 187 124
840 743 680
319 256 165
923 860 769
Dry Density
(pcf)
1331 131 6 1316
1305 1320 1313
1282 1313 1312
1321 1298 1279
1478 1479 1463
1452 1463 1453
A3
155 CMS-0 HIGH QUALITY
150~ DRY bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
145 bull GRANITEROCK72_ OPT=90 0 0
~140gt-ii OPT=105i Cl)
Z 135 w 0
gt- D~0 130 middot 0
125 [OPT100
120 I i I i i I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A3 Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-0
155] 150
0 1451 0
~140gt- Cl)
Z 135 w 0
fc130 0
125
120 I 6
CMS-0
LOW QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
bull GRANITEROCK
v[A OPTf90
pound 0 PT12DoOPTr110
7 I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A4 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-0
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A3
Percent Residue
769 769 769
746 746 746
595 595 595
714 714 714
570 570 570
587 587 587
Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-7
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
460 391 294
1229 1160 1063
573 436 301
13 19 1182 1047
513 380 2 57
1108 975 852
513 404 334
1227 1118 1048
231 170 080
801 740 650
263 146 109
850 733 6096
Dry Density
(pcf)
1329 1377 1376
1335 135l 134 2
1357 1333 1342
1299 1317 1308
1519 1523 1498
1503 1517 1514
AS
CMS-7 155-- HIGH QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNOlSO~ nPT80 145
0 -0 -140 middot gt-
r t deg Cl)
Z 135 w Cl
fi130 Cl
125-1
120 I 6
GRANITEROCK
~OPT=105
IJ
I 7
I I i I i I 8 9 10 11 12 13
TOTAL FLUIDS
I 14
I 15
Figure AS Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-7
155
150
145
0 -0
gt--140
t Cl)
Z 135 w Cl
fc 130 Cl
125
120 I 6
CMS-7 LOW QUALITY
C bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
GRANITEROCKOPT 80
~OPT105
~
tos i I I i J i i I I 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A6 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-7
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A4
Percent Residue
765 765 765 765 765 765
815 815 815 815 815 815
765 765 765
817 817 817 817 817 8el7
574 574 574
738 738 738 738 738 738
Fluids at Compaction Data SS 15 SEA
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
563 426 315 580 346 178
1328 1191 1080 1345 1111
943
595 418 309 599 256 137
14 10 1233 1124 1414 1071 952
600 440 356
1365 1205 1121
683 541 418 629 457 283
1500 1358 1235 1446 1274 1100
374 247 128
948 821 702
451 301 175 435 186 073
1189 1039
913 1173
924 811
Dry Density
(pcf)
1289 1319 1335 1286 1331 1332
1278 1314 1315 1276 1304 1299
1281 1325 1313
1259 1290 1303 1275 1292 1294
1450 1485 1482
1428 1459 1468 1437 1465 1465
A7
bull bull
SS 15 SEA 155 HIGH QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot
150 FRESNO
bull GRANITEROCK
145
0 0 -
OPT=75
-_ gt=140 I-ii OPT100co C)
z 135 w _--0PTr1200
gt-0 130--0
125
120 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A7 Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 15 SEA
SS 15 SEA LOW QUALITY155
bull SAN BERNARDINO-
FRESNO 150
bull GRANITEROCK 145
~-0 0 LOPT=80a140gt-t Cf)
Z135 w r-OPT=105 0
gt-0 130 -~middot 0
OPT120J 125
120 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure AB Fluids at Compaction Low Quality SS 15 SEA
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table AS
Percent Residue
688 688 688
722 722 722 722 722 722
680 680 680 680 6 80 680
726 726 7 26 726 726
510 510 510
596 596 596 596 596 596
Fluids at Compaction Data SS 30 SEA
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
595 468 150
1283 1156
838
645 438 267 660 566 440
1367 1160
989 1382 1288 1162
650 531 432 629 422 332
1330 1211 1112 1309 1102 1012
767 614 443 547 370
1493 1340 1169 1273 1096
413 300 167
923 810 677
468 3 46 191 485 258 096
1064 942 787
10 ~ 81 854 692
Dry Density
(pcf)
1299 1337 1332
1286 1319 1324 1281 1302 1326
129l 1315 1333 1294 1333 131 5
1259 1278 1322 1294 1313
1464 1509 1496
1435 1472 1499 1426 1487 1476
A9
SS 30 SEASS 30 SEA LOW QUALITY
155 HIGH QUALITY 1551 bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddotbull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO
FRESNO 150150-I -middotmiddot-- -bull --middotmiddot I ~ t -- a GRANITEROCK a GRANITEROCK
145145
~-bull80 0 --0 00 ~140~140
J-gt- gt-~ I- = OPT=100 Cl)0 Cl) [Ij 135Z 135
lJJ Cl
gt- ~1300 130 middot ClCl ( 0
OPT=110 125~ OPT=115125
120-t----~--------------r---120 I l J J J I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 156 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS TOT AL FLUIDS
Figure A9 Fluids at Compaction Figure AlO Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 30 SEA Low Quality SS 30 SEA
-~
i
APPENDIX B
MIXTURE DESIGN DATA
TABLE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality css-o Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absortied Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
lhit Weight pcf
StabiJcneter Value
~iareter Value
Jesilient -bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
500
----------
40
u 30 ltgt
ffi 20 w ~10
m lt
o
w l 400 lt gt a w t 300 0 iii ~ 200 8
100 12
10111
ui 0
i5 8gt lt
6
4
50
21740
24488
112
194
100
400
1357
375
197
117
345
60
21823
24163
97
199
100
500
1362
330
207
134
271
70
21772
23853
87
208
100
600
1359
272
193
118
260
Iesign 7 0
87
208
100
600
1359
272
193
118
260
24
22d c lt i
20i
= 0 i5
18 gt
16
140
138 - a
~136 z w 0
134
132
bull 500 a
0 400 uil 300 0
~ 200 zi 100 iii w a
--
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE CONTENT Jo (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Bl
TABLE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residue 0intent 50 60 70 Dsian 7 o
Bulk Siecipoundic Gravity 21804
llleoretical Specipoundic Gravity 24280
Air Voids 102
VMA 192
Absorbed Asphalt 063
Efpoundective Asphalt 437
Unit Weight pf 1361
Stabilcirieter Value 427
Cbhesicireter Value 352
Fesilielt Mxlulus 103psi
2-day 85
middotFinlJ 355
50
40
_ gt a 30 w w
~ 20 10
500
300
200
100
8
6
4
l 400 gt
~ w 0
~ 8
12
_ 10
= 0 gt
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
21863 21992
23964 23660
88 71 71
197 200 200
063 063 063
537 637 637
1364 1372 1372
363 313 313
292 234 234
63 83 83 429 232 232
24
22
ci i
20i
= = 0 gt
18
16
138
p6 ~ Q
134 a w
o 132
130
500 Q -
o 400 --3 300 0 ~-~ 200 a ~ 100 w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COtlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
B2
TABLE B3 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllroretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
~fective Asphalt
Unit Weight middotCf
Stabilareter VaJue
Cbhesiareter VaJue
Resilient l-bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
so
11140 gt o30 IU w ~20
m
10
w l 400 gt 0
~ 0 ~ 200 8
100
14
12 11-
In Q
ho C
8
6
50 60 70 Dsi9 7 O 21308 21729 21595 24562 24235 23922
132 103 97 97 210 202 215 215 113 113 113 113 387 487 587 587
1329 1356 1348 1348 378 345 375 375
314 270 280 280
82 96 104 104 281 260 267 267
500
300 ~
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS
24
11-22ci
ltI i i 20 Cl) Q 180 gt
16
138
136 u - 134 Cl) z IU Q
132
130
bull500
400 Inl 300 Q bull~ 200 z ~ 100middot IU 0
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS
FIGURE B3 Mixture Design Data Sari Bernardin6 High Quality CMS o Replication 1
B3
TABLE B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue GJntent
Bulk seecific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity
50
21491
24334
60
21459
24014
70
21526
23709
Iesiqn 70
Air Voids 117 106
VMA 204 212
Absocbed Asphalt 0 72 o 72
Effective Asphalt 428 528
Unit Weight pcf 1341 133 9
Stabilrneter Value 437 406
GJhesiareter Value 337 248 3
Iesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-cay
Final
50
w 40 gt 0 30 w w 0 20 co 10
500
w
3 400 gt 0 w t- 300 w 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
_ 10
0 8gt -lt
6
4
FIGURE
61 66
410 318
24
22~ ci
i 20
~
18 a gt
16
138
_136 u a 134 z ~ w 0
132
130
bull500
a
a 400 -3 300 _ a ~ 200 z ~ 100-
w 0
90 90
21 7 21 7
0 72 072
628 628
1343 1343
344 J44
252 252
82 82
250 250
---------
D 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDU CONTENT I (A_GGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B4
TABLE BS Mixture Design Data San Bernardin9 High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Siecific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
lir Voids
VMA
2bserberl Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stalgtilaneter Value
Cbhesiareter Value 3
Resilient Mgtdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
40
Ill 30 lt( gt a 20 Ill Ill 0 10
~ iii lt CII 0
400
Ill
3 300 lt(
gt a Ill200 == 0
~100 c 8
0
12
10 ui 0
0 8gt 5 lt(
6
4
FIGURE
~
~
5 6 7 84 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
50 60 70 Cesian 70
21652
24484
21904
24149
22005
23828
116
198
107
3-93
135l
345
224
18
240
93 77 77 196 200 200 107 107 107 493 593 593
1367 1373 1373 288 235 235
136 80 80
17 21 21 128 78 78
24
22ci lt(
z 20il
= CII C 0
18 gt
16
I-~
140
+38- ~136 1- z Ill 0 134
132
bull 500 a
o 400 3 300 C
~ 200 z 100 Ill a ~
0 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino_BS High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
BS
TABLE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Residue Content
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Ihegtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tmit WeightL pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesllllleter Value
Iesilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
a 20 UI w i
~10
lt 0
400
3300 lt gt a ~200 w i 0
119 93
197 l93
126 126
374 474
l353 l372
357 283
l26 l03
45 36
203 132
2440
30 22 0 0lt ltgt
16
~100 ~ 8 0 132
500 a
o 400 --ai 300 -
middot 0
~
~
w a
_ 10
ltn 0
0 8gt lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
50 60 70 Cesign 7 o
2l679
24595
21990
24255
22190
23931
- i 20
a 180 gt
140
138 - a
~136 z w 0 134
200
100middot
0 4
73 73
193 193
126 1 26
574 574
1385 1385
235 235
82 82
3l 3l
64 64
-0 $ e
~ 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B6
TABLE B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Pesidue Qlnte~t
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihroretical Speciic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
~tabilcmeter Value
ohesicrneter Value
resilient lbdulus l0 3psi
2-aay
Final
60 72 8 5 Iesicm 75
21762 21906 21779
23981 23617 23245 93 73 63 70
202 205 220 21 0
063 063 063 063
537 657 787 687
1358 1367 1359 1365 375 290 203 270
474 401 239 360
163 172 161 170 449 329 310 320
2440
ii 30 22 ci
Cl c cgt z 20 201 s ~ 310 e 18 0
gt c
0 16
500 140
w
3 400 _138c gt
~ 300 s 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
- 10 0 0 0 8gt c
6
4
FIGURE
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIOUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COITEIT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
il36 z IU Cl 134
132
bull 500
c 400 -
3 300 - Cl
sectl 200 ~- z ~ 100
w
0
B7
111 10 ui e 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
TABLE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
500
400 gt C
72 85 resian 7 s
21873 21738
23581 23210
72 63 70 207 22l 21 0
055 055 055 665 795 695
1365 1356 1365 287 188 265
349 341 345
191 187 190 287 266 280
24 ------------
111 22
Cl Cl lt -i ~ 20
= a 18 0 gt
16 _____________
138
136 a 134 () w a
132
130___________
soar------------ D a
1 400 ~
ui3 300 C
~ 200
100
w C
0---------------------5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUlc CONTENT lt
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
BB
Fesidue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcrreter Value
Cbhesiareter Value 3Resilient -bdulus 10 psi
2-day
Finll
60
m 50 - 40
IIJ ~ 30 CJ lt 1- 20
60
21669
23943
95
205
055
545
1352
560
416
195
425
~ 300 0 ()
~ 200 8
100---------------
12 -------------
RESIDUE CONTENT lto (AGGREGATE BASIS)
TABLE B9 Mixture Design Data San Ber~irdino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Pesiclue Content 60 Z1 as D=sign 7 5
Bulk Spccific Gravity 21697 21368 21255
Iheoretical Specific Gravity 23973 23610 23238
Air Voids 94 95 85 93
VMA 204 225 middot 23 8 230
middot-Absorbed Asphalt 061 061 061 061
Effective Asphalt 539 659 789 689
middot middotmiddotUnit Weight pcf 1354 133 3 1326 1330
-Stabilareter Value 460 375 225 340
CohesianeterValue 400 422 499 440
Iesilient MxUlus 103psi
2-oay 159 i0s 185 185
Final 290 299 283 295
60
w
l 400
24
22
ci 0 i 20l
= Q 180 gt
16
138
136
gt a 134~ 300 w l z0 IU 132 200
8 130
100-----------------_---I
12 ---------------- 500
o 400 10 ~
300 bull bullQ
Q0 8gt ~ 200 z
6 ~ 100
w a4 ___ __________ o
5 6 7 8 9 s 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COtlTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B9 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication l
B9
TABLE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Pesidue Conte1t 60 72 85 resign 75
Bulk Spcecific Gravity
Theoretical Sjeeipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Ohesianeter Value
Pesilient ~us 103psi
2---day
Final
60
50 lt gt cc40 w -w
~30 = CJ
lt 20
21635
24066
10l
206
078
522
1350
51 8
482
151
285
21481
23699
94
221
078
642
1341
378
459
150
286
24
11-22
ci Cl lt
~ 20 z
C 18
0 gt
21302
23323
87 92
237 225
078 078
7 72 6 72
1329 1338
246 350
343 430
162 155
254 280
I 16
500 138
UJ
400 136 lt gt
acc ~ UJ
134 300 z2 UI CJ_32 ~ 200
8 130
bull500
a
c 400 - 10 300 ~ Jf
C0 8gt ~ 200 ~ lt z
6 ~ 100-
UJ 0
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDU~ COrlTENT
(AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino
100 12
~
Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
BlO
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
TABLE Bll
Residue Content
Bulk Secific Gravity
Iheiretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesicrneter Value
Resilient MXiulus l03psi
2-day
Final
60 72 85 D=sign 75
21817 22108 21917
23977 23601 23216
90 63 56 62
200 198 215 200
o 72 o 72 o 72 o 72
528 648 778 678
136l 1380 1368 137 5
242 162 76 130
151 175 215 190
52 63 41 55
202 122 60 110
244middot0
~ 30 22 ci lt 20 i 201 IU = en ~ 10 E 18 m 0lt gt
0 16
----
w
l 400 lt gt a ~ w 0 ~ 8
12
-t
ltn 0 0 gt a lt
FIGURE
5
500
300
200 ~ 100
10
8
6
134
500 a
c 400 -
_ 300 0
g 200
~ 100 ~in IU a
0 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Bll Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
142
I-40 u a
~ 138 in w 0
136 ~
Bll
TABLE Bl2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Pesidue Q)ntent
Bulk Spzcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic
Air Voids
V bull t-LA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Gravity
60
22026
24085
85
192
092
508
72
22062
23705
69
200
092
628
85
21901
23315
61
215
092
758
resign 75
67
205
092
6 58
Unit Weight pcf 1374
Stabiloreter Value 193
Ohesiareter Value 177 3
Resilient Mxrulus 10 psi
2-day 63
Fi-ial 138
40
m 30 J lt gt a 20 IU w 0 10 ~ lt
0
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w 9 ~ 200 _________ 8
100 12
10 9 0 8gt ~6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE 8ASISI
1377
127
193
1367
90
160
137 5
120
180
53
107
32
52
48
95
24
22ci 0 lt
20
= ~
9 18 0 gt
16
142
140 a
~138 z w C
136
134
9
500 a
dego 400-
3 300 ~- a ~ 200 z ~ 100
w a
0 5
~ 6 7 8 9
RES IOU~ CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl2 Mixture Design Data -san Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Bl2
TABLE Bl 3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcrneter VaJue
CJgthesiarneter Value
Pesilient MxbJ11lS 10 3psi
2-day
Final
60
so gt
40a w 0 30 GI 20
500
l 400 gt a w t- 300 w 5 rn ~ 200 8
100 12
Ill 10 0 8gt
6
4
50
21789
24250
10l
164
1 95
305
1360
513
330
191
282
~ bull
~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASIS)
60
21762
2 34 34
91
173
1 95
405
135middot8
567
284
168
434
24
Ill 22ci Cl
is 20
= 0 gt
18
16
142
140- ~138 iii z 0
136
134
bull500
o 400 -
l 300 C
~ 200 z 100 iii a
0 4
70 resign 70
21872
23632
75 75 177 177
1 bull 95 1 95 505 505
136S 136S 393 393
280 280
217 217 482 482
~
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASISI
FIGURE Bl3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality css~o Replication 1
Bl3
--------------
TABLE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Resid= Content 50 60 70 eesicn 7o
Bulk Siecific Gravity 21692 21677 21662
Ihroretical Specific Gravity 24501 24176 23865
Air Voids 115 103 92 92
VMA 169 176 185 185
Absorbed Asphalt 240 240 240 240
Effective Asphalt 260 360 460 460
Unit Weight pcpound 1354
Stabilaneter Value 580
Cohesicrneter Value 270 3Resilielt Mdulus 10 psi
2-day 149
Final 408
60
w so lt gt
w C o w le 0 30 m lt
20
500
w
~ 400 lt gt C
~ 300 w S ~ 200 ~ 8
100 12
- 10 m a 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AG GREGATE BASIS)
1353 1352 1352
442 327 327
276 183 183
173 191 191
373 299 299
24
22d c lt z
20E 18 0 gt
16
140
138 u C
136 w C 134
132
500 C
1 400 gt- m =gt 300 a ~ 200
l 100- IU C
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication
Bl4
2
bull bull bullbull
TABLE Bl5 Mixture Design-Data Fresno High Quality CMS-QReplication 1
Bulk Spcific Gravity
lheoreticaJ Specific Gravity Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mldulus l0 3psi 2-clay
Final
60
m 50 C gt a 40 w w
~ 30 C m
10
~idue Content 50 6_ 0 70 Daisi2 7 O
5oor----------
w
l 400 C gt a ~ 300 w I 0 iii ~ 200 8
100-------------
12 ----------
111 10 C
0 8gt C
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT J
(AG GREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl5 Mixture
21755 21305 23795 23497 86 93 93
163 198 198 l 69 l 69 l69 431 531 531
1336 1329 1329 420 307 307
247 230 230
180 i55 155
246 253 253
24
22d
Cl C
i 20I
J ~ C 18 ~ 0 gt
16
21434
24106
11l
179
l69
331
1337
472
373
175
247
138
136- 134 z w C
132
130
bull 500
dego 400 - l 300 C
~ 200 z l 100 iii w a
0
-~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT J (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Bl5
TABLE Bl6 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
helretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
lbsorled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabil=ter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
Eesilient Mxrulus 10
2-day
Firal
60
50 J gt c 40
~ 30 m 20
500
w
l 400 gt a ~ 300 w
3psi
50 60 70
21339 2 1398 21475
24241 23925 23623
120 106 91
181 187 192
1 94 l 94 1 94
306 406 506
1331 1335 1340
558 43 7 377
340 313 219
149 152 154
317 345 288
Jesign70
91
192
194
506
1340
377
219
154
288
24
22d CJ i sect 20
= a 18 ~ 0 gt
16
138
136
a 134
z w ~ C ~ 200 132 8
130 100
14 500 a
o 400 - 12
3 300 - ~ 0 C gt 10 a ~ 200 ~ z
l 100
8
w a
0 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl6bull Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Bl6
TABLE Bl 7 Mixture Qesign Data Fresno High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
Pesidue Content 50 60 70 Cesign 7 O
Bulk siec~tic Gravity 21959 22101 22128
Iheoretical Specific Gravity 24539 24201 23879
Air Voids 105 87 73 73
VMA 158 160 167 167
~rbed Asphalt 252 252 252 252
Effective Asphalt 248 348 448 448
Unit Weight pcf 1370 1379 1380 1380
S~ter Value 467 370 213 213
Clgthesiareter Value 289 3Resilient l-Ddulus 10 psi
2-clay 47
FinaJ 294
50
Ill 40 o(
gt cc 30 Ill w 0 20 lt 10
500
w l 400 lt gt cc ~ 300 Ill 0 ~ 200 8 ~
100 12
10 deg C
0 gt 8 ~l lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
147 122 122
65 35 35
214 75 75
22
J 20 o(
ii 18 16 ~ 0 gt
14
142
140 u Q
~138 z Ill
Cl 136
134
500 Q
o400 uil 300 Cl
g 200 z ~ 100 ~w cc
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
IIESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Bl7
TABLE Bl8 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Dsiqn 70
Bulk Specific Gravity 22191 22285 22092
Theoretical Specific Gravity 24199 23874 23563
Air Voids 82 66 62 62
VMA 149 153 168 168
Absorled AsphaJt 192 192 192 192
Effective AsphaJt 308 408 508 508
Unit Weight pcf 1385
Stabilareter Value 357
Cohesianeter Value 268 3Resilient MxhIJus 10 psi
2-day 75
Final 217
40
w 30 J lt gt a 20 w w i
~ 10
0
500
w
3 400 gt a
l 300 w i
ltn
~ 200 8
139l
342
238
137 9
233
192
137 9
233
192
84
117
63
73
63
73
20
0 0 ~ i
= 0 gt
18
16
14
12
~
144
142 140 z w 0
138
136 100-----1---1--1---l
12 ---------- 500 0bull
o 400 -11110 en a 3 300 = 0 08gt ~ 200
z 6 ~ 100middot
w a
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT
4
RESIDUE CONTENT
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Bl8
FresnoTABLE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Low Quality css-o Replication 1
Eesidlle Content 60 70 80 Dasi51 7 5
Bulk Specific Gravity 21698 21611 21514 Iheoretical Specilic Gravity 23803 23505 23220
Air Voids 89 81 73 77
VMA 175 186 198 192
Absorbed Asphalt 171 l 71 171 171
Effective Asphalt 429 529 629 679
Unit Weight pcf 1354 1349 1342 1345
Stabi]cmeter Value 513 398 359 380
eohesianeter value 506 449 481 465
Resilient Modulus 10 3psi
2-day 176 176 241 205
Final 312 383 353 365
2460
all so 22 ci cgt
40 I-
20 E
I = g 30 18iii 0 gt
20
16
500
300
100
10
8
6
4
138
136l 400
u -gt a
~ I 0 in l1200 8
12
111 Q
0 gt ~
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE COITENT Jo
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
~ ~ 134 z w 0
132
130
500 -
l 400 -
300 ~n
Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 in Ill IC
0
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Bl9
TABLE B20 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residlle Content i
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihegtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
CJhesiareter Value 3
Resilient Mxfulus 10 psi
2-day
Finll
60
50 lt 40 w w
~ 30 m lt 20
500
w
3 400 lt gt a ~ ~ 300 w 51 rn 200 8
100----------------
12 --------------
10 9 0 8gt lt
6
4 s 6 7 8
RESIDUE COPlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
60 70 80 resign 75
21451 21476 21666
23932 23629 23340
104
185
194
406
1339
586
436
147
313
91
192
1 94
506
1340
403
416
179
347
24
22 0 0 lt
~ 20
= 9 18 0 gt
16
140
138 - Cl
136 w cl34
132
bull 500
-0 400__
3 300 I
~ 200
~ 100 rn w a
0
7 2 82
192 192
194 194
606 656
1352 1345
24 8 325
333 375
186 182
361 358
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COPITEPlT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
~
Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
B20
TABLE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
lesidue Content 60 70 80 resign 75
Bulk Siecific Gravity 21525 21406 21152 lllroretical Specific Gravity 23855 23555 23268 Air Voids 98 91 91 91 VMA 182 194 211 2middot03 1osorled Asphalt 180 1 80 180 180 Effective Asphalt 420 520 620 570 Ulit Weight pcf 1343 1336 1330 1335 Stabilateter Value 487 460 373 415 Oxlesiareter Value 418 392 323 355
3lesilielt Mldulus 10 psi
2-clay 188 177 200 190
Final 289 299 281 290
6or----------- 24
m 50 lt gt 11 40 w w I
~ 30 m lt 20
_J_
22ci 0 lt z
20EE
= 0 180 gt
16
5oor---------- 138
w
l 400 lt gt
136- a ~ 300 w i 0
fa34 z w
~ 200 Cll32 -8
100-----------i-~ 130
12 ------------ 500bulla
10 ________ o 400 - 0
0 gt
8
gJdeg 300 0
~- 200 ---e-
lt z
6 l 100 w 4
5 6 7 8 9 0
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication
B21
1
TABLE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Fesidue Cbntent 55
Bulk Spcific Gravity 21243
lheoretical Specific Gravity 23859
Air Voirls 109
VMA 189
Absorbed Asphalt 152
Effective 1spralt 398
Unit Weight pd 1326
atabil~ter Value 620
Cbhesiareter Value 430 3Fesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-oay 160
Final 387
70
a 60 gt a 50 w w == = 40 0
m
30
500
w l 400 lt gt cc
~ 3001- 0 ~ 200 8
100
16
136
134 u Q
iu2 z w 0 130
128
12 -----------
10 bull
ltIi 0
~ s
6
4middot1-_________ _
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l _AGGREGATE BASIS)
21164
23557
101
200
152
498
1321
481
432
180
377
24
22
z 20Si
= 18e 0 gt
bull 500
o 400-ltIi j 300 0
~ 200 zl 100 w cc
0
65 75 iesiqn 7 s
21095
23269
93 93
210 210
152 l 52
598 598
1316 1316
367 367
450 450
171 171
387 387
-----~bull-----
8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7
FIGURE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B22
1 TABLE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno
Low Quality CMS-7 Replication
70 -~ 0 Cesign 75 Pesidue Content
Bulk Spcific Graviv1
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit Weight pcf
Stallilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mxlulus 10 3psi
2--day
Final
40
Ill 30 c gt 0 20 UI lo Q 10=c 0
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w lo Q 200 8
100
~
60
21829
23899
87
170
197
403
1362
293
206
84 144
21981
23587
67
l73
197
503
1372
200
249
76 131
21960
23289
5middot 7
middot18l
197
603
1370
100
241
69 93
62
177
197
553
1370
150
245
73
110
12
10 5 Q 8gt 5 lt
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (ACGREGATE BASIS)
24
It
22 t-ci c
z 20i
= 5 18 t-Q gt
16
142
140 - 638
z w Q
136
134
bull 500
o 400 - 3 300 0
~ 200 z 100 iii UI 0
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (ACGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno LOW Quality CMS-7 Replication
B23
1
TABLE B24 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Urit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Glhesianeter Value
Resilient Mldulus 10
2-day
Final
40
m 30 gt c 20 w ~ w i
~ 10 m lt ~ 0
3psi
24
22
C C lt i
20~ ~
9 18 0 gt
16
500 142
w 1403 400 gt
Ca gt138I 300 tw
i z w Q 136~ 200
8
134
~
~
100 12 500
C
dego 400 - Ill 10 3 300 0 0 Q8gt ~ 200
~ z 6 100middot
w a
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIOUC CONTENT
(AGGREGATE 8ASIS] (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)
80
21686
23262
68
19l
l91
609
1353
125
215
77
114
Cesign 75
71
184
L 91
559
1360
200
235
77
135
60
21936
23870
81
166
191
409
1369
358
252
84
211
70
21850
23559
73
177
191
509
1364
270
250
77
157
Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE B24 Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B24
TABLE B25 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-Or Replication 1
Residue Clgtntent 47
Bulk Siecific Gravity 23965
llleoretical Specific Gravity 26825
Air Voids 107
VMA 207
Absorbed Asphalt 27
Effective Asphalt 443
Unit Weight pcf 1495
Stabilaneter Value 302
Cohesiaoeter Value 235 3
Resilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-day 158
Final 300
40
30 _ gt a 20I- ii 0_
10iii I-en 0 500----------
Ill
3 400 gt ati 300 ii 0 iii l 200 8
100---i----L---J
12 ----------
jit 10 e 0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I 4
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
57 67 Design 55
24521 24581
26411 26017
72 55 80
196 202 200
27 27 27
543 643 523
1530 1534 1520
247 200 27
275 203 275
164 116 160
276 197 280
24
jlt
22ci c i
20Si
= en e 18 0 gt
16
156
_154 ~ i152 iii z C
150
148
soo----------
dega 400 _
en
~300 ~ ~ 200 1-zl 100 iii w a
01----~-i--J 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Mixture Design Data GraniterockFIGURE B25 High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
B25
TABLE B26 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Besidue Content If 7 57 67 D2sign 55
Bulk SfeCific Gravity 2 4131 24573 24597
lhagtreticai Specific Gravity 26951 26532 26134
Air Voids 105 74 59 78
VMA 20l 195 20l 197
Absorted Asphalt 46 46 46 46
Effective Asphalt 424 524 624 504
Unit Weight pcf 1506 1533 1535 1525
stabi1anaiter Value 282 258 is2 270
Cllhesicmter Value 204 155 138 160
Resilient Mdulus 103psL
2-day 115 143 126 130
Final 313 225 173 240
40
w 30 lt gt a 20 w w la 0 10 m lt
0
~
24
22ci C
lt z
20la ~ = E 18 -0 gt
16
156
154 - a
~152 z w r0
150
148
-
500
o 400 ~
300 0
g 200 ~ z -~ 100
500
w ~ 400 lt gt a IU t- 300 w la 0 ~ 200
~8
100 12
10 0 0 8gt lt
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
w a
o 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT lo RESIDUE CONTENT II
-cGREGATE s-s1s1 (-GGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B26 Mixture Design Data Grani terock High Quality CSS-0 Replication
B26
2
TABLE B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Residue Ogtntent 47 57 67 ~ign 55
Bulk Spcific Gravity 23886 24116 24078
Ihooretical Specific Gravity 26675 26267 25879
Air Voids 105 81 70 82
VMA 210 210 21 8 210
Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 oos 005
Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545
Unit Weight pcf 149l 1505 1502 1505
Stabilareter Value 337 350 250 350
Ogthesicneter Value 238 3
Eesilient Mldulus l0 psi
2-day 104
Final 287
50
Ill 40 J C gt cc 30 Ill Ill l 0
C
10
20iii 500
w
l 400 C gt cc I 300 Ill l 0 in ~ 200 8
100 12
1110 0 0 8gt
c cc
6
4
FIGURE
~
~
177 204 200
144 150 140
254 247 260
24 ----------
a 18 0 gt
16 __i____i_-J
154
j52 u -a
~1501- ------iiiz -Ill 0
148
______________ 146
soar---------- a
o 400 1--
~ 300 _ ~
~ 200 z ~ 100 en w 0
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
B27
8
TABLE B28 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue Ointent 4 7 57 67 Cesign 55
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihroretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
CJlhesianeter Value
Pesilient Mldulus 10 3psi
2-day
Final
40
30 lt gt = w 20 0
- 10 lt
0
500
w - 3 400
lt gt a l 300 w 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
i 10 ui C
0 8gt lt
6
4
FIGURE
23861
26649
10S
207
014
456
1489
338
145
124
307
~
--------
~ 5 6 7 84
RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
24025 23925
26242 25855
85
210
014
556
1499
283
135
135
307
24
22
0 lt i
20i
= 18 0 gt
16
154
152 u Q
i150 z w 0 148
146middot
500- o 400 -
300 _ Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 4
75 87
220 209
014 014
656 536
1493 1490
220 300
129 140
142 130
277 307
_--
~
-___
85 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B28 bull Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B28
TABLE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Pesicllle Cbntent 47 57 67 resign 55 Bulk Siecific Gravity 24618 24637 24728 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26905 26475 26066 Air Voids 84 69 51 71 VlltLA 185 192 197 190 Absocbed Asphalt 047 0 bull 47 047 047 Effective Aspbalt 423 523 623 503 Urit Weight pcf 1536 1537 1543 1537 Stabilaneter Value 410 330 198 350 QJhesianeter Value 166
Resiliextt Mldulus 10 3psi
2-clay
Final
50
40 c
ffi 30 IE g20 iii c
10
500
l 400 c
a ~ 300 IE C ~ 200 8
100 12
ot 10 C
0 8
5
C
6
4
46
158
~
~ 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI
120 131 130
35 30 38
56 28 80
24
gt11 22
c c c
i 2031
= ~ C 180
16
158
156 t-
u - 154 z w 0
152
150
500
~
~ 0
bull a 400 - uil 300 ~
200
C
~ z ~ w a
100middot
8 4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
B29
TABLE B30 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Pesidue Content 4-7 h---7 6 -7 IEsicn 5 5
Bulk Specific Gravity 24519 24638 24706 Iheoretical Specific Gravity 26609 26265 25793 Air Voids 79 62 42 65 VMA 189 192 198 19l
middot Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 005 005 Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545 Unit Weight pcf 1530 1537 1542 1535 Stabilareter Value 420 327 247 350 Cohesiareter Value 126
3Resilient Mldulus 10 psi
Z--day 47 Final 144
50
40 J lt gt a 30 w w
~ 20 m lt 10
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w 2 ~ 200 8 ~
100 12
111- 10 ui 0 gt 8
lt
6
4
114 182 120
43 29 45
79 33 90
24
ii-22
ci 0 lt i
20l ~= 18 0 gt
16
158
156 0
l 154 z ~w c 152
150
500
Q -dego 400 - ui3 300 C
~ 200 z
~ 100middot~
w a ~ 0
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8 4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
FIGURE B30 Mixture Design Data High Quality CMS-7
Graniterock Replication 2
B30
TABLE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
~sidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weigllt pcf
Stabi]aneter Value
Cohes~ter Value
~silient MXJulus 103psi
2--day
final
40
30 C gt ffi20
~10 iii C ltII 0
500
l 400 C gt IC
~ 300 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
11 10 0
0 8gt C
6
4
55 65 75 resign 60 24268 24286 24206
26358 25966 25592 80
200
020
530
t515
80
268
182
338
~
65
207
020
630
t515
t_92
233
169
308
24
bull 220 0 C
ze 20
= 0 18 -0 gt
16
156
154
u i152 ~ z 0
150 bull
148
54 72
21 7 204
020 020
730 580
1511 1515
90 235
193 250
145 175
250 320
500 o 400 - l 300 0
~ 200 zi 100 iii IC
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replicationl
B31
TABLE B32 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residue 0ntent
Bulk Secific Gravity
llleoretical Speipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
-Absorled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
StabilcIIeter Value
Qlhesianeter Value 3Jesilient middotMgtdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
40
m30 lt gt cc20 w
w E
~10 ID lt 0
79
198
027
523
1518
203
243
201
354
~ soar-----------
w
400 lt gt a
~ 300 w E 0 ~ 200 8
100---I--~---------
12 -----------
111 10 C
0 8gt lt
6 --4
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l (ACiCiFIECiATE BASIS)
FIGURE B32 Mixture
55 65 75 Lesign 6 0
24329 24246 24077
26401 26007 25632
68 61 73 208 22l 203
027 027 027 623 723 573
1513 1502 1515
165 110 185 215 205 225
168 184 185 340 272 345
24
22 C C
z i 20
= 0 0
18 gt
16
156
154
a
gt152 en z Ill 0 150
148
bull 500 Q
deg 0 400- =gt 300 0
~ 200 z l 100 w
-
0 4 5 6middot 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(ACiGFIEGATE BASIS)
Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication
B32
2
TABLE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Eesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheore_tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VbullMA
lbsorbed_ Asphalt
Effective_ Asphalt
Qnit Weight pcf
~~ter Value
Q)hesianeter Value
Resiiient Mxlulus 10 3psi
2~y
Final
40
11130 C
a20 =
~10 C m
ltII 0
500
Ill
3 400 C
a ~ 300 w = 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
ll 10 ui E 0 8
c
6
4
I-
1-
55
23824
26318
95
215
014
536
1487
287
381
224
380
65 75
23896 23701 25928 25555 78 73
220 233
014 014 636 736
1491 1479 195 161
265 212
212 196
404 341
24
11 22d
c
z 20i
= ltII E 18 0
16
154
152- a
150 I-
Iesign 6 0
84
218
014
586
1490
240
320
215
395
z w Q
148
bull 146
500 a
c 400 ~ ui
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
l 300 Q
~ 200 zl 100 w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIOUla CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-a Replication 1
B33
- - ----- -
TABLE B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Rssidue Ogtntent
Bulk Secific Gravity
lhairetical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
AbsoIbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stabil~ter Value
Olhesiareter Value 3lesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-day
Firal
40
m 30 lt gt a 20 w w
= ~ 10
m lt
0
- --- -middot -middot 500
w l 400 lt gt
Ea
300 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
1l 10 middot 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 4
FIGURE
55
23834
26371
96
214
022
528
1487
279
207
176
332
65
23784
25978
84
223
022
628
1484
208
270
185
336
75
23628
25604
77
236
022
728
1474
167
334
181
350
iesiqn 6 bull 0
90
21 8
022middot
578
1485
245
240
180
334
~
~
24
1l 22
0
lt i
20i
= 0 gt
18
16
152
150 - 148
~ 146
144
500
o-400 middot --- J 300 C
~ 200 z
middot ~ 100 en a
0 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication
B34
2
B35 Mixture Design Data GraniterockTABLE Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Residue Content 55
Bwk Specific Gravity 24720
lheoretical Specific Gravity 26164
Air Voids 55
VMA 185
Absorbed Asphalt 001
Effective Asphalt 549
Unit Weight pcf 1543
StabilCampTeter value 293
Ohesiareter Value 174
Besilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day 69
Final 153
40
~ 30 _
c gt ffi 20 w I
Q 10
c 0
500
w 3 400 -
c gt a
~ 300 w I g bull ~ 200 8 ----r
100middot
10
8 -
~
Q
0 6gt a =c
4 ~ 2
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS
65 75 DesiSE 60
2 4 720 24515
25767 25388
40 34 48
193 207 189 001 001 001 649 749 599
1543 1530 1543 205 97 250
156 283 170
46 22 55 72 so 110
24
~
22ci C c
i 20i
= Cl 180 gt
16
lSadeg
156
u -a
654 z 0 152
150
500 ii a
a 400 - 3 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7
FIGURE B35 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
B35
12 r---------- 500bull _ 10
o 400 -middot 0 gt 5 C
8
tnl 300 Q
~ 200 z
6 ~ 100 ~ IU 0
4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT I
(AGCREGA TE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
TABLE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
55 65 75 resicn 6 0 Residue Content
Bulk siecific Gravity 24816 2 4721 24560
lheoretical Specific Gravity 26389 25983 25596
Air Voids 60 49 40 55
VMA 182 193 205 187
Absorlei Asphalt middot 035 035 035 035
Effective Asphalt 515 615 715 565
UUt Weight cf 1548 1543 1533 1545
Stabilaneter Value 298 193 130 250
Qlhesicmeter Value 188 I57 118 180 3
Resilient MJdulus 10 psi
soor-----------158
w l 400 Ishy 156 gt lt u
0a
w
300 w ~154E 0 z
w Q ~ 200 152
8 150100----middot-~-1-__c__~
2-day
Final
40
~ 30 J lt gt a 20 w
s 10 0
lt
0
92 43 27 65 186 79 46 135
24
22
~ =
ci lt 0
i 20~
18 0 gt
16
FIGURE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B36
Table B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
FJiuivalent ~sidue amtent 60 70 80 resign 70
Iesidue Ontent
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absomed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
lhit Weight pcpound
Stabilareter Value Ohesiareter Value
~ilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
Ill
50
40 A gt a w 30 w i 0 J
iii 201-
10
400
w3 300 gt a Ill t 200 i 0
8 ~iii ll 100 1-
0 12
lit 10 0 0 8gt a lt
6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)
630
21584
24451
117
210
140
460
1347
415
208
735
21570
24143
107
219
140
560
1346
488
61
840
21385
23848
103
233
140
660
1334
382
63
resign 7 35
107
219
140
560
1346
488
63
96
339 141
325
126
299 141 325
24
lit 22d
Cl
z 20i
= 0 180
gt
16
138
136 ltgt
i134 iii ~ z w 0 132
130
bull 500
o 400 -
3
300 ------------- 0
~ 200 z ~ 100 w o_____________a
9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B37
----
Table B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Pesidue omtent 60 70 80 Design 70
Pesidue omtent 630 735 8 40 Dsign 735
Bulk Specific Gravity 21710 21722 21714
lllroretical Specific Gravity 24298 23995 23705
Air Voids
VMA
lbsorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Chhesianeter Value
Eeilient Mldulus 103psi
2--clay
Final
so
40 J w
gt a 30 w w 0 20 m
10 400
w 300 gt a w 200 w i 100 8
0
12
if 10 a
~0 8gt a lt
6
4
107
205
112
488
1355
395
llO
113
290
95
213
112
588
1356
398
62
122
271
84
22l
112
688
1355
318
70
138
282
24
22 c 0
20
0 180 gt
16
140
138 -a
136 _iii z bull --w 0 134
132
bull 500 a
o 400
m 300 J 0 bull ~ 200 z 100
w a
0
95
213
)12
588
1356
398
62
122
271
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT J
(AGCilEGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B38
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Table B39
Fquivalent ~idue COntent
~idue Cbntent
Bulk SJecific Gravity lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Oihesianeter Value
~ilient Mldulus l03psi
2-day
Fiial
so
w 40 lt gt cc 30 ~ w E
0 20 m lt 10
400
m POO lt gt a U 200 E 0 iii w c 100 8
0
12
- 10 vi Cl
0 gt ac
6
60 70 80
690 805 920
21790 21826 21910
24255 23977 23710
102 90 76
207 214 219
080 080 080
610 710 810
1360 1362 1367
437 400 289
219 229 202
141 158 184
333 282 273
24
~ 22ci
CJ lt z
20ii
= Cl 180
gt
16
----------
~ lo
140
138 Q l136 iii w Cl
134
132
500 Q
0 400 n3 300 Cl
~ 200 i-bull
100
z ~ 0 a
Cesign 70
Cesign 805
90
214
080
710
1362
400
229
158
282
-------
-
-~
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B39 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication l
B39
8
Table B40 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Eesidue cantent
Iesidue Omtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lhagtretical Speiliic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Abro1plusmned Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tklit Weight pcpound
Stabilareter Value
OJhesianeter Value
EEsilient Mldulus l03psi
2-day
Final
50
w 40 J lt gt a 30 w
w i
3 20 lt 0 10
400-----------
DI 3 300 lt gt a wti 200 i 0 w8100
0 -------l--l-1
12 ----------
- 10 ltn 0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
60 70 80 690 805 920
21986 21964- 21948
24499 2A212 23938
103 93 83
200 209 218
124 124 l24
476 576 676
1372 1371 1360
422 403 265
270 306 160
99 140 154
298 310 254
24
-22
ci lt
=i 20i
a 0 18 0 gt
16
140
138 - a
l136 z w 0 134
132
bull500
a
o 400 -
ltn =gt 300 -J a
~ 200 z 100 DI 0
0 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT Ii (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Dsign 70
Design 805
93
209
124
576
1371
403
306
140
310
9
Figure B40 Mixture Design Data High Quality SS-30
San Bernardino SEA Replication 2
B40
Table B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent lesidue ~tent
Ilesidue Omtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lbagtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stabilateter Value
CllhesiaIEter Value
Resilient MXlulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
w 40 i- _ gt 30a w I- ~ w 0 20 m I-CII 10
400
w l 300 gt a w lj 200 0 w 100 8
0
12
111 10 Q
0 8gt a ~
6
4
~
6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
65 75 85 Design 75 683 789 89J tesign 789
21624 21445 21375 24097 23802 23520
103 99 92 213 228 238 100 100 100 550 650 750
1349 1338 1334 423 295 285 70 174 82
150 139 138 318 310 2S4
24
22d i
20ii
= CII Q 180 gt
16
138
- 136
u
134I- z ~132
130
bull 500 o 400 _ l 300 1- Q
sectl 200 I-z ~ 100 CII w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
99
228
100
650
1338
295
174
139
310
5
Figure B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B41
Table B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent PesidJJe Content
Residue Omtent
Bulk Specific GIavity
lheoretical Specific GIavity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit weight pcpound
Stabiloreter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mxulus 103psi
SC
w 40 gt a 30 w w i 0 J 20
10
400
w 3 300 gt a w t 200 i
9 ltI)
w = 1008
0
12
11 10 u a 0 8gt
6
4
2-day
Final
~
~
5 6 7 8 flESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGflEGATE BASIS)
65 75 85
683 788 89J 21424 21394 21455
24147 23851 23567
ll3 103 90
22l 229 234
l09 l09 l09
541 641 741
133 7 1335 1339
412 328 280
129 103 81
167 141 162
325 260 280
24
22ci 0 201
= 0 gt
18
16
i-
138
136 Q i134 _ 0 z w bull0 132
130
soor----------- D C
o 400
ltn3 300 a ~ 200 z 100 (I)
w
-
~
a 0------------ 5 6 7 8 9
flESIOUE CONTENT I
(AGGflEGA TE BASIS)
Design 75
Design 7 86
103
229
l09
641
1335
328
103
141
260
9
Figure B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B42
Table B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent Residue Omtent
Residue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllagtreticalSpecilicGravity
Air Voids
VMA
AbsorlJed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcpound
Stabilcrreter value
Cllhesianeter value
lelilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
400-----------
Illl 300 lt gt a w t 200 lo 0 w 8100
0 ________ ___ __
12 ----------
~ 10 0
~ 8 bull a c
6
4 -_______ ___ __
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS
65 75 85 748 863 978 21752 21661 21638 24136 23863 23602 99 92 83
213 225 234 081 081 081 569 669 769
1357 1352 1350 466 367 235
224 266 138
220 189 209 478 337 281
Ilsign 75
Design 863
92
225
081
669 1352
367
266
189
337
24 ----------
~
220 Cl lt ii 20
0 18 0
gt
16 ----------------14or-----------
138 -0 a 136 z w Q
134
132
= c 400 - l 300 Q
~ 200 f-middot z 100 w a o----------
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
_____________J
Figure B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardinor Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B43
Table B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Iesidue Cbntent 65 75 85 Design 75
lesidue Omtent 748 86~ resign~Zl 863
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleo~tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asjtlalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
lesilient Mxlulus 103psi
2-day
Final
so
w gt 0 30 IE 0 20 iii lt
10
400
3 300 lt gt 0 w l 200 IE 0 X w
100 8
0
12
- 10 en 0 0 8gt
6
4
~ 40 bull
~ 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
21676
23998
97
208
055
595
1353
409
248
189
308
24
22
ci c lt i
20ii
= 0 0
18 gt
16
21711 21641
23729 23472
85 78 85
223 234 223
055 oss 055
695 795 695
1355 135l 1355
283 227 283
187 186 187
198 177 198
255 285 255
140
138 a
136 - z 0 134 --
132
500 a
o 400 -
vi3 300 - 0
sectj 200 z ~ 100
0 0 5 6 middot 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino~ Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B44
Table B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Equivalent Jesidue Content 60 70 80 Design 70
tesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
trut Weight pcpound
Stabilcineter Value
Cbhesiateter Value
tesilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
IU 40 _ C gt 30a IU IU = middoto 20 m C (I) 10
400
IU
300 C gt a IU
ti 200 = 0 ~ IU c 100 8
0
12
10 ai 0 8gt C
6
4
~
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)
630 735 840 Design 7 35
21651 21581 21592
24033 23739 23457
99 91 80 91 180 190 198 190
399 499 599 499 135l 1347 134 7 1347
309 439 358 439
150 236 202 236
140 171 148 171 294 390 367 390
24
bull 22
Cl Cl C
i 20i
= (I) Q 180
gt
16 140
138 0 a
i136 z IU
134 bull bull
Q
132
500 D
c 400 _ 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 IU a
0 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B45
Table B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Residue Cbntent 60 70 80 Design 70 Residue Cbntent 6JO Z35 EdQ Jesign 7 35
Bulk Spcific Gravity 21413 21627 21711 lhroretical Specific Gravity 24321 24017 23726 Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcneter Value
Ohesianeter Value
llesilient Mgtdulus 10 3psi
2-day
Final
so
Ill 40 I lt gt 0 30 w Ill i 0 20 Cl lt
10
400
111
l 300 lt gt 0 w lj 200 i
~ w = 1008 -----___
0
12
II- 10 a 0 8gt lt
6
4
120
189
249
351
1336
407
79
147
361
24
II-22
ci
lt ~ 20i
= 0
0 18
gt
16
138
136 u C
l134 w 132
130
bull 500
C
o 400 ~
---------_J 300 0
~ 200
~ 100 Ill 0
0
99
189
249
451
1350
396
76
165
340
85
193
249
551
1355
360
64
175
305
99
189
249
451
1350
396
76
165
340
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT 1
9 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE COIHENT f
9
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B46
---------
Table B4 7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Bulk Specific Gravity
lhalretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorlled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilaieter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
llesilient MJdulus 103psi
2-clay
Final
50
40w lt(
gt IC 30 w w
0 20 iii lt( ltI)
10
400
w 3 300 ~ lt(
gt IC w t 200 0 iii 111 i 100 8
0 ___ _______ __ _ __
12 ----------
Fquivalent Pesidue Content 60 70 80 Iesign 70
Pesidue Qlntent 690 805 92Q Dcsign 805
21958 22006
24182 23909
92 88 92
18l 188 18l 256 256 256
444 544 444
1370 1373 1370
342 291 342
78 73 78
184 167 184
303 298 303
10 0
0 8gt IC
c 6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B47 Mixture
21880
24453
105
176
256
344
1365
443
58
174
381
24
22ci
5 20
= 0
0 18
gt
16
~ I I
138
136 ~ ~134 bull z 111 0 132
130
bull 500
o 400 3 300 - Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 ltI) 111 IC
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B47
Table B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
El_uivalent Residue Cbntait 60 70 80 Iesign 70
Residue Cbntent 690 aQi 2 2Q Dsign 805 Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Olhesiateter Value
Resilient Mldulus middot103psi
2-day
Final
21816
24403
106
178
244
356
1361
482
136
183
393
21806
24120
96
187
244
456
1361
411
130
187
374
21996
23849
78
189
244
556
1373
314
106
260
361
96
187
244
456
1361
411
130
187
374
24so
w 40 22 ci 0 gt a 30 ~ 20w w = 20 ishy C 18iii 0 gt Ill 10 _ ___ ____________
16 400------------
140
w l 300 138 gt 0
Qa w
636t 200 z0 w --------_ Qw 134c 100 8
0 ___ _____________ 132
bull50012 -----------
a
1 400 -_ 10
ltti ltti l 300 -C 0 C8gt ~ 200 lt z
6 l 100 w a
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT S RESIDUE CONTENT S (AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B48
Table B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
EquivaJent Residue antent 65 75 85 Design 75 Residue Content 63J z aa a 23 resign 7 88 Bulk Specific Gravity 21404 21439 21381 lheoretical Specific Gravity 23563 23286 Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcf
Stabilaneter Value
Cohesianeter Value
~ient 1bdul11S 103psi
2~y
Firal
50
w 40 gt a 30 w w 0 20 iii lt 10
400
3 300 w
gt a w t 200 0 in i w
100 8
0 12
10 0 Q
0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6
23020 92 79 71 79
193 199 209 199 140 140 140 140 510 610 710 610
1336 1338 1334 1338 424 397 308 397 79 308 266 308
173 185 196 185 330 319 285 319
24
22ci c lt
~ 20c Q 180
gt
16
138
136 u -Cl
~134 in ~z w 132
130
soar----------- Qbull
o 400
middot3 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a Q___________ ___ __
7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT deg RESIDUE COIITENT deg (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B49
Table BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Fquivalent lesidue Content
Besidlle 0-ntent
Bulk Specific Gravity
Illeoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pf
Stabilcmeter Value
ltbhesiaieter Value
Besilient Mxlulus 103psi
2--day
Final
50
~ 40 I lt gt 30 w 0 20 01 lt 10
400
w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 w r lOO 8
o 12
10 ai ~ 0 8gt a lt
6
~
4 5 6 7 8
IIESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
65 75 85 683 788 893 21527 21362 21337
24013 23721 23441 104 99 90
188 202 211
225 225 225
425 525 625
1343 1333 1332
410 418 290
261 62 100
188 197 211
334 348 331
24
22 ~ ci c lt
20 f 18 0 gt
16
138
136 0 a
134 z w 0 132
130
500 a
o 400
ai bull 300 I bull C
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
IIESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design 75
Design 788
99
202
225
525
1333
418
62
197
348
Figure BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
BSO
Table B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno
Fquivalent Residue Clintent
Residue 0rrtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorlei Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
thlit Weight pcf
StabiJaneter value
Ohesiaretel value 3lelilient MJdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
50
w
40
c gt a 30 w w = g 20 iii c Ill 10
400----------
middota
l 300 bull c gt a w t 200 = 0 w c 100 8
0 _______ ____ _
12 ------------
_ 10 ~ 8 c
6
4 _________ __
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B51
Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
65 75 85 748 863 978
21728
24022
96
186
200
450
1356
436 100
199
376
24
11 22
c c c
z 20ii
Ill0 180
gt
16
Design 75
Design 863
86
195
200
550
1355
392 260
212
362
21716
23753
86
195
200
550
1355
392 260
212
362
21673
23495
78
205
200
650
1353
378 201
230
3l7
~
140
138 Q j136 bull --_ z w 0134
132
500 Q
o 400 bull -l 300 ~ 0 ~ 200 I-z ~ 100 w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Table B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent lesidue OJntent 65 75 85 Design 75 Pesidue Ointent 748 863 978 Design 863 Bulk Specific Gravity 21595 21708 21637 ~retical Specific Gravity 23977 23708 23452 Air Voids 99 84 77 84 VMA 19l 195 206 195 Absorbed Asphalt l92 l92 l92 l92 Effective Asphalt 458 558 658 558 Unit Weight pf 1347 1354 1350 1354 Stabilareter Value 502 262 239 262 Cllhesianeter Value 257 136 154 136 Pesilient MJdulus 103psi
2--day 217 201 228 201 Final 371 307 290 307
2450
w 40 22 0 0lt ltgt ia 30
bull 20i
= 0 20 18iii 0lt gt 10
16 400
~
~
140
w 3 300 -ltgt
138 lt gt
aa w t 200 deg136 z0 w 0
134 w
100 8
1320
12 500 a
0 400 10
3 300 C 0 Q8gt ~ 200 lt z
6 100 w a
4 0 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT ~ RESIDUE CONTENT ~ (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B52
Table B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent ~sidue Cbntent 45 55 65 Design 55 ~idue Cbntent 473 578 6~~ Design 5 78 Bulk Specific Gravity 24210 24403 24473 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26934 26528 26142 Air Voids
VMA
Absocbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
StabiJaneter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Iesilient M)dulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
w _ 40 C gt II 30w w 0 20 iii C ~
10
400
w l 300 C gt II
iiw
200
~ w --------r 100 8
0 12
ot 10 -0
0 8gt II c
6
4
101 80 64 80 199 20l 206 20l
022 022 022 022 423 523 623 523
151l 1523 1527 1523 308 288 197 288
ll7 ll2 140 112
95 llO 122 llO 306 272 214 272
24
ci 22
C
i -~20Es = E 18 0
gt
16
156
154 - gt152 iii z ~ w 0
150
148
bull 500
o 400 Inl 300 0
~ 200 z ~ 100 w II
0
--~
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT r (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7 8 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B53
Table B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Residue Glntent 45 ss 65 Jesign 55 Residue Omtent 47 5 ZB 6 83 resign ~za Bulk Specific Gravity 24197 24253 24435 lheoretical Specific Gravity 26843 26441 26058 Air Voids 99 83 62 83 VMA 199 206 208 206 Absorbed Asphalt 09 09 09 09 Effective Asphalt 441 541 641 541 lklit Weight P=f 1510 1513 152S 1513 StabLkmter Value 38l 307 204 307 CJgthesianeter Value 73 85 149 85 Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day 170 159 142 159 Final 333 367 193 367
so
w 40 J lt gt 0 30w w le 0 20J
CJ lt 10
24
It
22ci 0 lt i -------20 = 18 0 gt
16 400
____
~
156
w 3 300 154 lt gt - a0 w gt 152l 200 le __-0 z w w c 150 8100
148 0
12 500
D C
o 400 r- 10 -u 300
J 0 9
8 Cgt ~ ~ 200 z
6 ~ 100
w 0
4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE COIITEIIT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B54
----------
Table B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Rep~ication 1
Equivalent Residue Contentmiddot
Residue Ontent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
~tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tklit Weight pcpound
Stabilaneter value
Cbhesiaieter Value
Resilient -bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
45 55 65
518 633 748
24695 24765 24666
26898 26520 26160
82 66 57
187 193 205
001 001 001
449 549 649
154l 1545 1539
41l 310 24l
159 157 165
183 178 193
371 318 250
50
w 40 c gt a 30 w-w == 0 20 ~ 10
400------------
~ 300 lt(
gt a
t 200 == 0 in bullw 8100
0 __ ________ ___ ___
12 ----------
t 10 rti C
~ 8 a c
6
4 s 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI
4
24
Ill 22
0 c c
ze 20
II)
C 18 0
gt
16
158
156- 154 Ill z w 0 152
150
500 iii
8 4
~
0 400-
i300-~ g 200 1-z l 100 iii a 0 __ _______ ____
5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design 55
Design 633
66
193
001
549
1545
310
157
178
318
___
8
Figure B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
BSS
Table B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality
Equivalent Rsidue Content 45
Rsidue Cbntent 518
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllooretical specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
lbsoibed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesicmeter Value 3
Iesilient Mldwus 10 psi
2--day
Final
400-----------
w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 I 0 ltII w8100
olt----__1__--1_---1
12 ----------
10 u
0 8gt a lt
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT l
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
24594
27024
90
190
019
431
1535
450
198
191
360
24
Ill 22
0 C
lt i
20i ~ ltII C 18 C gt
16
158
156 0
i54 iii z ILi
J52
150
SS-30 SEA
55 65
63J 7 ~a 24844
26641
67
190
019
531
1550
324
212
173
308
24856
26276
54
199
019
631
155l
234
225
166
259
_________
~
500----------- 0
dego 400 -
~300~~ C
~ 200 z i 100
w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COIITEHT l
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Replication 2
Design 55
Lesign 633
67
190
019
531
1550
324
212
173
308
Figure B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B56
---------
Table B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality
ElIuivaJent lesidue Omtent
lesidue Cbntent
Bulk Spacific Gravity
~retical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Uut Weight pcf
Stabilaneter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
lesilient Mldulus 103psi
so
w 40 lt gt a 30 w w ~ 20 m lt II)
10
400
w 3 300 lt gt a w lj 200 0 w z 1008
0 12
Ill 10 Q
0 8gt lt
6
4
2-day
Final
~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
so 530
24024
26676
99
207
031
469
1499
354
138
183
352
SS-15 SEA Replication 1
60 70 Design 60 636 7 42 Design 636
24040 23986 26279 25901 85 74
214 223
031 031 569 669
1500 1497 223 149
222 126
159 160 302 234
24
Ill
c 22 ~ c
lt i
20i1
== (II C 180 gt
16
152
150 u -a
648 z w Q
146 1-
144
bull 500 a
o 400 - 3 300 C
~ 200 z ~ 100 (II w a
~ 0
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
85
214
031
569
1500
223 222
159
302
8
Figure B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B57
Table B58 Mixture Design Data Low Quality SS-15
Fquivalent Residue Content 60 60
Rsidue Cbntent 525 630
23944
~retical Specific Gravity
Bulk Sjecific Gravity 26592
Air Voids 100
209VMA
1bsocbed Asphalt 015
Effective Aspbalt 485
Unit Weight pcf 1494
Stabilareter Value 377
Olhesiaeter Value 151
Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi
162
375 2-day
Final
so
w 40 _ gt c 30 w w i
~20 m I-0
10
400
Ill
300 gt w I 200 i 2 w i 100 8
_________ 0 --middotmiddot-
12-------bull------
ti 10 9 0 8gt
6
4
24
- 22ci
0
20i
= 9 18 0 gt
16
152
150 u a
148 z---- w0146
144
500 Q
o 400 _ 300 Q
~ 200 I-z ~ 100
w a
23988
26022
84
215
015
585
1497
307
180
165
356
Graniterock SEA Replication 2
70
735 23793
25830
79
229
015
685
1485
217
170
169
277
~
~
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7
RESIOUE CONTENT li RESIDUE COPlTENT li (AGGREGATE 8ASIS) (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)
Design 60
resign 630
84
215
585
1497
307
180
165
356
8
Figure B58 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B58
Table B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Equivalent esidue omtent 5 0 60 70 Design 60
esidue Cbntent 5 75 690 805 Dsign 690
Bulk Specific Gravity 24389 24362 24419
Jheo=eticaJ Specific Gravity 2 6670 26303 25953
Air Voids 8 6 74 59 7 4
VMA 198 207 214 20 7
Absorbed Asphalt 009 009 009 009
Effective Asphalt 491 591 691 591
Unit Weight pcf 1522 1520 1524 1520
Stabilareter Value 38l 292 220 292
Cbhesiclneter Value 263 186 176 186
~t Mldulus 103psi
2-day 222 222 207 222
Fulal 380 289 293 289
5
w 40 C gt a 30 Ill ~ 20 m C 1- 10
24 ----------
22 bull C Cl C
zi 20
C1 o 18 0 gt
16 ___-________-------i-_-
400---------- 15a------------
156l 300 C gt - a =deg 154ti 200
iii z0 IUiii 0 152 bull bull~ 10018
150 ___ _______ __J0 ---i--J~-L--1
500----------12 ----------- bull o 400 -
Ill 10 ui l 300 -Q
Qg 8 g 200a lt z 6 l 100
iii a
01--J-----__ __4 -------r------- 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
RESIDUE COrlTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B59
Table B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Design 60
Eeidue omtent 575 690 805 D=sign 690
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleo~tical Specific Gravity
1lir Voids
VMA
Absocbed Asralt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcf
Stabilcmeter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
Eeilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
Ill 40 J
lt gt a 30 w I-w 0 20 Ill lt I-
10
400
w 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 Id
8100
0 12
10 m Q
0 8gt 5 lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
~
RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASISI
24371 24441 24445
26744 26373 26020
89 73 61 73
199 205 213 205
019 019 019 019
481 581 681 581
1521 1525 1525 1525
335 236 191 236
220 164 180 164
194 199 191 199
388 329 294 329
24
22
ci 0 lt i
20i
= a
= 18 0 gt
16
158
156 u a
deg154 = w Q
152 ---------150
500 a
1 400 m3 300 1 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100
Ill a
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COHTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B60
APPENDIX C
DATA ANALYSIS SOLVENT FREE AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS
Table Cl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL e_AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
95 85 80
867
76
88
90 85 85
867
29
33
95 85 85
883
58
65
85 70 80
783
76
98
100 100 100
1000
00
00
100 100 100
1000
00
00
C M s 0
D A T A x s
CV
80 80 80
800
00
oo
80 75 75
767
29
38
75 80 70
750
50
67
70 80 75
750
50
67
90 90
100
933
58
62
95 100
95
967
29
30
C M s 1
D A T A
X s
CV
80 75 70
750
50
67
60 70 55
617
76
124
70 70 65
683
-2 9
42
65 70 60
650
50
77
65 70 70
683
29
42
70 60 65
650
50
77
Table C2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating
F01
E 2 ll877 7777778 243aassese9 1)75102041 329 532 ~ middot2 1ll77777777~ 73RBSeSf89 32571~2-~5 3~ 29 532 J 1 150 ooocooo 150JOJOOOO 5f122llll9 414 746
EA ll 8114 llllll11444 2111111111 3J51224 266 396 -E~ middot2- 1-0frOOfr~ 0-9 middot50-middot000 3 oco middot2middot20110816 middot 329 532 Agt 2 77 7777778 38 8815589 17142857 329 532 nJ 4 1555555~55 388881889 171112857 266 396
FR RmiddotJR 36 8166666567 225851B52
------------------------------------------------middot---------------------ronmiddotL 53 -esoo--000000r
Cl
100
P
c5 75 z-t-lt8 50 w t-lt bull css-oC
CMS-0w 25a C middot+ CMS-7 C lt
0-----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Cl Mean AggregateCqqting at middotoesign Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 867 css-o 883 CSS-0 783 css-o 1000 css-o 1000middotcss-o middot I I CMS-0 800 CMS-0 7~ 7 CMS-0 750 CMS-0 933 CMS-0 967lrMS-0 750
I CMS-7 750 CMS-7 617 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 65 0 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating
C2
Table C3 Film Stripping
EMULSION
AGGREGATE SAN
BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK
C s s 0
D A T A
5
0
10
5
5
0
X s
CV
25
35
1414
75
35
47l
25
35
1414
C M s 0
D A T A
0
5
5
7
0
0
X s
CV
25
35
1414
60
14
236
00
oo oo
C M s 7
D A T A
0
0
0
5
0
0
X s
CV
00 OQ 00
25 35
1414
00 00
oo
Table C4 ANOVA Summary Film Stripping
AN-OVA
middotmiddotDPmiddot -ss- F middotFe5
E 2 33 7777778 1euro8888889 23555191 426 802 A 2 -ti8 7777778 343888889 4 7984496 426 802
E X II 4 9 2222226 23055557 3217054 363 642 ERROI 9 645000000 71666667 ---------------TOTAL 17 1762777782
C3
fl w 0 lti 1L a =gt en C w C C-a I-en
40
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-730
20
10
0 SB F GR
Figure C3 Film Stripping
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
css-o 25 css-o 75 css-o 25
GMS-0 25 CMS-0 60 CMS-0 oo
CMS-7 oo CMS-7 25 CMS-7 oo
----middot----middot-middotmiddotmiddot
Nlte Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping
C4
Table CS 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue
Content 10 3 psi
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW D
118 170A 217 205 160 175
C T 83 190 191 182 130 185A s )ts 101 180 204 194 145 180
0 s 25 14 18 16 21 7
CV 246 79 90 84 146 39 D 104 185 155A 190 140 215
C T 82 155 154 171 130 180A M x 93s 170 155 181 135 198
s 16 21 1 13 7 250 CV 167 125 05 74 52 125
D A ab 55 35 73 38 55
C T
82A 48 63 77 45 65 M X s pound81 -- - 52 49 75 42 60 s7 l 5 20 3 5 7
CV 18 96 404 38 11 9 11 8
Table C6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus
A N ) V l
-D-F -SS
E 2 832263888888 _ 2-- -5441-- 722-2222-J 1 89933611111
E~ 4 5386 7777779 -1J- 2- -3-8-1-+-rG-55--5-5-5 7- bull AJ 2 144235~899 EA 4 58024444443
ERROR 113- 3951500 00~-J
---------------------------------------------------------------------TOT-W- -3-5 -11806-4---638 881gt-9-
(116131944444 2720-8611111 89933611111 13466944445 1-9Q lh-5--amp7--+7-8-7211944445
14506111111 219 527-7778
1895577629 -12 394-1541-409569480
61345059 S-~937872 32952081 56gt7870Ll
357 3-S7 443 295
-]y5+ 3S7 295
605 6 05--833 461
-6--05-605 461
cs
bull css-omiddot 300 C CMS-0
M 0 diams CMS-7
(J
3200 gt C 0 E 1-
ffi 100
01----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure CS 2 Day ResiLient Modulus
SAN middotBERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 101 css-o 180 rss-o 204 css-0_194 CSS-0 145 CMS-0 198
CMS-0 93 CMS-0 170 ICMS-0 155 CMS-0 181 CMS-0 135 css-o 180l l l I I CMS-7 81 CMS-7 52 CMS-7 49 CMS-7 75 CMS-7 42 CMS-7 60
Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C6 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking 2 Day
Resilient Modulus 10 3 psi
C6
Table C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Content 10 psi
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A (
s
CV
260
232
246
20
80
320
280
300
28
94
482
299
391
129
33l
365
358
362
5
l4
280
240
260 28
109
320
345
333
18
53
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
267
250
259
12
47
295
280
288
ll
37
253
288
271
25
92
290
387
339
69
203
260
307
284
33
11 7
395
334
365
43
118
C M s 7
D A T A
X
s
CV
78
64
71-
10
139
110
95
103
ll
104
75
73
74
l
19
110
135
123
18
144
80
90
85
7
83
110
135
123
18
144
middotTable C8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus
-~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------F-r05- ---F-01--
E
J El -E- Al EAJ
-ERRJR
2 2-1 4 -~ 2 4
18
3592750555555 -14506 722-2221-171610COOOOJ 147394444445
1---1-1----lf466-li-+ 19215000000 55353333333
2850GOOC0000
17-16375277778 72~336H-1-11
1716100)0000 36848611111 sect8~5833---3-33--9607500000
13840833333 ~ 58-3 33-33 333
11315528C7 -45810702
109385263 23272807 ~U981l-2-1-6067895 3741579
357 -3 r7 443 2 95 3~7-357 295
605 605 833 461 605 605 4 6 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------~- 3-5- -448+1----2-222-2-
C7
bull css-o500
CMS-0 U) diams CMS-7C
C) 400 middoto -
~ 300
J Ci 200
1-z 100 J-UJ UIa
01-------------------------~---~-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
eMS-0 259 ess-a 300 ess-a 391 ess-a 362 eMS-0 284 CMS-0 365
ess-o 246l l l l l ICMS-0 288 eMS-0 271 CMS-0 339 ess-o 260 ess-o 333
CMS-7 71 CMS-7 103 CMS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123
t-ote Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure ca Newrnan-Keuls Ranking Full Cure 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi
ca
Table C9 Density at Design Residue Content pcpound
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
1359
1372
1366
09
07
1365
1365
1365
0
0
1365
1352
1359
09
07
1345
1345
1345
0
0
1520
1525
1523
04
02
1515
1515
1515
0
0
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
1348
1343
1346
04
03
1330
1338
1334
06
04
1329
1340
1335
08
06
1335
1316
1326
- 13
10
1505
1490
1498
11
07
1490
1485
1488
04
02
C M s 7
D A T A
x s
CV
1373 1385
1379
09 06
1375 137 5
1375
0 0
1380
1379
1380
01 01
1370
1360
1365
07 05
1537
1535
1536
01 01
1543
1545
1544
01 01
Table ClO ANOVA Surtunary Density
A II O V ~
-SS F bull O1
E _ 0
2 i
lCB4155555 Z08-tOS389
II 311277~
54207777R 1 ouos2sirrs
4340277
135q23660 -25lS 7i80R63-
1087331173
3S7 3 ~7 443
i()5 605 83
EA Q
4 -2
1599U4U5 _iuseeg
399E11 -3-3UUL45-
10J17398 bull~3785-C7
295 -~S7-
4 f 1 -6CS
A) 2 13772222 o6886111 17251218 357 605 EAJ q 2C361111 5090278 12752262 295 4 61
-ERRJR- 13- 718-()001 399166-7-
35
C9
bull css-o160 CMS-0 diams CMS-7
150
() -a gt 140 -en z w
middotC 13
1201~bull-------------r---------------SBH SBL FH FL ~RH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C9 - Density at Design Residue Content
SAN middotBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 138o CMS-7 1365ICMS-7 1375 CMS-7 1544
css-o 1366
I-7 bull rMS-7 1536
css-o 1365 css-o 1359 css-o 1345 css-o 1523 CSS-0 j515
CMS-0 1346 CMS-0 1334 CMS-0 1335 CMS-0 132 6 CMS-0 1498 CMS-0 1488
Nte Values with a ccmnm vertical line are not statistically different
Figure ClO Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcpound
ClO
Table Cll Air Voids at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
D 87 7 0-A 75 77 80 72
C T 71 70 92 82 78 73A s )s 79 70 84 80 79 73
0 s ll 0 12 04 01 01
CV 143 0 144 45 18 10 D 97 93A 93 91 82 84
C T 90 92 A
91 93 87 90
M x 94 93 92 s 92 84 87 s os 01 01 _0l 04 04
0 53 08 15 15 42 49CV D A 77 62 73 62 71 48
C T 73 61 62 71 65A 55
M X s 75 62 68 67 68 52 s 03 01 08 06 04 057
CV 38 12 115 96 62 96
Table Cl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids
A I O Y 11
-DF ss -F 05 F01
E 2 382650000 191325000 69)150301 3~7 605 -A 2 -2-681667 1340334 ll03567311 -3- 57 605
Q 1 2f677778 26677778 952324f6 4 13 I 33 EA lj 13S33333 3313333 122011409 2 95 Ii 61 ti -2 l8105555- -905-277-8- 326553tO 357 tiOS II) 2 6572221 3296111 11953707 357 605 E~l 4 88411445 2211111 797552 795 4 f 1 ERElll 111 11991)0)00 bull2172222-
-------------------------~------------------------------------------rou1 s SJ 3100000-
Cll
11
10
iP- en 0-0 gt aa
9
8
7
6
5
4
bull css-o CMS-o diams CMS~7
SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
F-igure Cll Air Voids at middotoesign Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 94 CMS-0 93 CMS-0 92 ICMS-0 92 CMS-0 84 ICMS-0 87
IIcss-o 79 css-o 7 0 I II
css-o 79 css-o 73
I ~_ I~ CMS-7 7 5 CMS-7 62 CMS-7 68 CMS-7 48 - - bull-- ~ -----~middot-middotmiddot--middot-middotmiddot-middot ---middotmiddot
~= Values with a OCIlOn vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids
Cl2
Table Cl3 Stabilorneter Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
272
3113
293 29
99
270
265
268 04
13
393
327
360 47
130
380
325
353 39
110
270
270
270 0
0
235
185
210 35
168
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
375
344
360
22
61
340
350
345
07
21
307
377
342
50
145
415
367
39l
33
85
350
300
3-2 5
35
109
240
245
243
04
15
C M s 7
D A T A
x s
CV
235
23-5
235
0
0
130
120
125
07
57
213
233
-223
14
63
150
200
175
35
202
350
350
350
0
0
250
250
25 o_ 0
0
Table Cl4~ ANOVA Summary Stabilorneter Value
A N O V 1
soua= SS r 01
E 2 2
7086172721 9702C93fl9
3543086361 4SS10Uf95
505343236 ~-9189501
357 357
605 605
) 1 175 6950250 1756950250 25053)2i8 443 833 EA 4 6718347112 167 9586 778 23955053 2 95 461 ~ ~544 -4 Q-432-ll-25-0- --S--~ 38 ~5-19- -3 5- ios AJ 2 941227166 47(1euro13583 57122663 357 605 EAJ 4 289779333 72319A33 10314831 2 95 II f 1
Ell ngtR -18 1r2024gt0) -i- bull112472-
---------------------------------------------------------------------0-T- ----5- 4-9B1 is~v~
Cl3
50
w 40 I ltgt a 30w I-w ~ 200 I-m lt 10I-u
0 SSH SBL FH FL GRH
AGGREGATE
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
GRL
Figure Cl3 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 350 CMS-7 250ICMS-0 360 ICMS-0 345 r=ss-o 36o rMS-0 39l
css-o 268 CMS-0 342 css-o 353 CMS-0 325 CMS-0 243Icsbull-bull _ CMS-7 235 CMS-7 12S CMS-7 223 CMS-7 175 css-o 270 css-o 210
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value
Cl4
Table Cl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOWHIGH LOW LOWHIGH D 360193 280 465 275 250A T 234 345 183 375 160 225C A
s x 214 353 232 420 218 238s s 29 11 69 64 18810
136 30 296 152 37 4 74CV D 280 440 230 355 200 320 T A
252 430 219 450 140 240C A M x 266 435 225 403 170 280s s 20 7 67 428 570
74 16 16735 250 202CV D
80 190 122 245 130 170 T A
82 180 192 235 120 180C A M X 81 185 157 240 125 175s s l 7 so 7 777
CV 18 3038 31 5 57 40
Table Cl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value
-SS--
pound 2 1309717272222 654858611111 1102309084 357 605 __ 2 3Ber61222222 194033611--111 -1-1t2J3570 -3 57 605 J 1 12)524904445 120524f94111145 711)1137379 1143 l 33
EA 4 2311~U411111145 57795111111 355~57119 295 4 ~ 1
~ + --8-066---H~i-i--2 ---4-B3-a~--H ~T4-=7-7S~J -3 S7 605 1J 2 111206 7222222 71033511111 ll3~31111 3 57 605 EAJ 4 500gt1111111 12512777778 7587162 235 4 (- 1
RAO- -18 -999 500-000( -1-6--2-7 -75-00000-
--------------------------------------------------------------------tO+--l- el-i- 3-fi-99g6-3-R-~
Cl5
bull css-o500
Q1__________---___-----~
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure ClS CohesiometerValue at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 232rMS-0 435 CMS-0 280rMS-0 266 rss-o 420 tss-o 218
css-o 214 css-o 353 CMS-0 225 CMS-0 403 css-o 238ICMS-0 170
CMS-7 81 CMS-7 185 CMS-7 157 CMS-7 240 CMS-7 125 CMS-7 175
Nrte Values with a oamon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value
~400 -I ltgt cc 300 w 1-w E 2000 -() w c 1008
CMS-0 diams CMS-7
Cl6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Table Cl7 Swell at Design Residue Content in
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
0 0000 0003 0000 0008 0000 0000A C T 0000 0005 0000 0007 0000 0002
A 0000 0004 0000 0009 0000 0000 s j( 00000 00040 00000 00080s 00000 00007
0 s 00000 00010 00000 0 0010 00000 00012
CV 00 250 00 125 00 1732 D 0000 _o 045 0020 0036 0000 0000A 0006 0029 0018 0040 0001 0000TC A 0007 0040 0022 0039 0000 0000
M x 00043 00380 00200 00383 00003 00000 s s 00038 00082 00020 00021 00006 00000 0
874 215CV 100 54 1732 oo
D 0000 0004 0000 0003 0000 0000A T 0000 0002 0000 0000 0000 0000
C A 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000
M x 00000 OQ023s 00000 00010 00000 00000 s 00000 00015 00000 00017 00000 00000
7 oo 655 1732CV 00 00 oo
Table Cl8 ANOVA Summary Swell
P N O V ~
SOUR-middotEmiddot l)f -ss- -lSmiddot F rs FM
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------E 2 C031905 )015953 7576385211 329 532 J 2 0012203 OOOf112 2~97R1n75 329 532 l 000858(1 )()QSf80 11122112111111 414 846
H LI 0016535 00)111311 1963258575 266 396 Emiddot) middot2middot 00079 51- a0ll397S 1eg ~16527 329 532 AJ 2 00011958 )0021179 111 ns1ne 329 532 EAJ II 0006609 OC01652 7e117l97t3 266 396
EDl 36 )000751 OOOJ021
TOBImiddot middot53middot ----008959-9-middot
Cl7
05
04
z 03
-I -I w
u 3 02
01
0 SBH SBL FH
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
FL GRH GRL AGGREGATE
FigureCl Swell at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 00003 css-o 00007CMS-0 00043 CMS-0 -0380 CMS-0 00200 CMS-0 00303
CMS-0 00000css-o 00080 css-o 00000Icss-o 00000 Icss-o 00040 ICSS-0 00000
CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00000CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00023 CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00010
Rte Values with ~--~~~ ~~ lb-le are not ~tatistically different
Figure Cl8 Newman-Keuls Ranking swell in
Cl8
Table Cl9o MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
-------EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
GRANITEROCKFRESNOSAN BERNARDINO
LOW LOWHIGH HIGH LOW HIGH D
124 72198 137 287 243A 227 90145 178 83 260TC 57197 135 252 270A
s 207 104 258 73139 239s s 17 05 56 29 14 17
0 CV 82 280 82638 233 53
D 197 160145 145 90 205A 19l 17092 100 80 220TC 158 105 138190A M x 182 119 11 7 85 205 156 s s 21 37 25 1607 15 0
115 737 105316 21l 83CV D 21 omiddot 240202 185 98 330A
220 20087 181 34588TC 216 210138 223 77 338A M x 215 217142 196 88 338s
s 2111 0805 58 237
23 405 120 22 96118CV
Table C20 ANOVA Summary -MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
----------------------- I N O V A
SO0RE --DF -lS--
middotE __ 2 2
401 11310n -5831137037
2008568519 --2915568519
166S53085 2111762euro92-
3-9 J29
532 532
Q 1 14f5364f296 14653646296 1215099198 4 14 746 EA-Ev
4 -frac34
2784740740 -1-1-i 0359259
696185185 -56-tl-1-79tr30-
5 772 8571 -6450815
266 middot-3-29
396 -5-32middotmiddot
110 2 355470370 177735185 1bull11738C30 329 532 EAO II 12794711075 3198euro9519 25523909 266 396
-Ei8JB 36- 11311 111euro66euro7 120596296
---------------------------------------------------------------------FOTAJ- --5-3- -31131--343-14 8-1-
Cl9
50 bull css-o ti) CMS-0 gt 40 diams CMS-7E I
a w 30I-w E 0 -I 20-ca ltC I-Cl) 10
0--------------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Cl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOWmiddot HIGH LOW
CMS-7 215 CMS-7 142 css-o 104 I ICMS-7 338 CMS-7 21 7
css-o 207 css-o 139 i CMS-7 88 CMS-0 156middot css-o middot
CMS-0 182 CMS-Q 119 CMS-0 117 CMS-0 85 CMS-0 205 css-o 73
Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
C20
-----------------------------------------
Table C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
IEMULSON
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIG_H LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A x s
CV
135 104 104
114
18
157
70 85 51
69
17
248
105 66
136
102
35
343
148 197
-173
35
201
107 101
72
93
19
201
74 107
92
91
17
182
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
128 85
174
119
31
256
73 59 -
66
10
150
69 36 65
56
18
318
158 110
-134
34
253
77 96 68
80
14
178
53 66
113
77
32
408
C M s 7
D A T A x s
CV
141 79 52
91
46
503
185 60 63
103
71
695
125 201
96
141
54
386
192 164 126
161
33
206
131 130 120
127
6
48
72 230
76
126
90
715
Table C22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
l II O Y A
-soaas -OF- -S-S- -F- FrOS
E -llmiddot J
n -tJ-AO EllJ
RROi
----------
2 2 1 u -2-2 4
36middot -------
199090000000 middot 39113 411111111111
4111296296 61982222222
-t-72-1-middot-11181-18-1-754737037011 41156 5185186
85722 middotbull)0(0000 ----------------
995115000000 -1971-7222222
11111216296 151195555556 -360-yen5-110-711 1middot
j8236851852 11166296297
middotmiddot2381 166667
111805138 -0280488 17265A9 6507548
-36111086-15058033
41589422
329 329 414 2 66 329 329 266
532 -532 746 396
-532 532 3915
-----------------------------------lOo-1- middottt 1-300-lamp833-333-3-
C21
400
CJgt ~ 300 I
0 w I-w 200
-~ 0 CJwc 1000 ()
0
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Valueat Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 ll9 CMS-7 103 ICMS-7 141 css-o 173 CMS-7 127 CMS-7 126
css-o ll4 css-o 69 1middotcss-o 102 CMS-7 161 css-o 93 css-o 91
CMS-7 91 CMS-0 66 middotCMS-0 56 CMS~O 134 CMS-0 80 CMS-0 77
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C22 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
C22
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table C23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
724 811 637
724
123
170
1289 -
1276
1283
09
07
627 628 695
650
39
60
622 940
1427
996
405
407
475 407
1276
719
483
672
803 790 498
697
172
247
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
1217 393
1260
957
489
511
2075 2879 1875
2276
532
233
1943 1195 2012
171 7
453
264
1241 1224 1208
1224
1 7
13
676 574 550
600
67
112
986 787 815
863
108
125
C M s 7
D A T A x s
CV
642 620 774
679
83
123
102 426 662
397 281
709
59 7 369 470
479 114
239
588 60l 290
493
176
357
301 263 393
319
67
210
238 284 227
250 30
121
Table C24 ANOVA Surmnary Surface Abrasion
Fmiddot F01middotmiddotss --------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------
e Amiddot
2 -gt
530361248149 22)938237037
315180624075 110469111)519
432152433 1sn1of15
329 329
532 532
1 n
1 4
[14699201852 9733 179629euro
446992gt1952 24332949074
61289-8 3335u~111
414 266
746 396
EJ J
2 2
middot59516003103 85017525926
291seoo1as1 425)8752963
4 9nn2 5 828630
329 329
532 532
EI 4 196475151852 4911877963 57349619 266 396
ERRJl 36 262551800000 72931l~-556
--------------------------------------------------------------------
middotTnUmiddot 53- middot159689-~0964815middot
C23
300
E C)
C)200 Cl)
0 J
z 0 en 100 lti a al lti
01-----r----~---------r---------SBH SBL
Figure C23
SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW
CMS-0 957 CMS-0 2276
css-o 724 css-o 1283
CMS-7 679 CMS-7 397
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content
FRESNO
HIGH
CMS-0 171 7
css-o 65o
CMS-7 479l
LOW
CMS-0 1224
ICSS-0 996
CMS-7 493
GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW
css-o
CMS-0
719
600
ICMS-0 863Icss-
CMS-7 319 CMS-7 250
Ngtte Val~ with~ ~n vertical line are not stati~tically different
Figure C24 Newman-Keuls Ranking Surface Abrasion grams
C24
APPENDIX D
DATA ANALYSIS SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS
----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
Table Dl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15
SEA
D A T A
75 85 85
85 80 85
80 75 70
65 70 70
85 90 90
80 85 85
X s
tV
817
58
71
833
29
35
7-50
50
67
683
29
42
middot88 3
29
33
833
29
35
ss 30 see
D A T A
85 80 85
75 80 80
75 85 85
70 80 70
90 85 95
90 80 90
x s
CV
833
29
35
783
29
37
81 7
58
71
733
58
79
-900
50
56
883
29
33
C M s 7
D A T A
80 75 70
60 70 55
70 70 65
65 70 60
65 70 70
70 )0 65
x s
CV
750 50
67
617 76
124
683 29
42
650 50
77
683 29
42
650
50
77
Table D2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating
rmiddot rs F05 F 0 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------F 2 235 712593 1179 f-296297 553913Q113 329 532 a 2 63 bullTlt1ll81I R 31L97UC7U 1521731 3 29 532 E~
11 3f2 116i14f Jmiddot 39 (1)7111~gtI 1
3~2 ~-2900 9976~5185
17 ~li347F3 UfB47826
4 14 256
746 96
i) ~ pound 2S 11252i 12 29(-29 bull 5086957 329 532
a~ 2 12 ~-~737r o lt19518~ 2E260e7 329 53 2 u ll 1f3 bull illf illt7 41t3S1B52 191156522 2 G6 3~f
iE1190il 3i 76 pound61iz~57 212~-25
Dl
-~ -CJ z I-lt(
0 0 U1 -lt( C bull SS 15 SEA w 25 SS 30 SEA CJ cc
diams CMS - 7CJ lt(
0 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dle Mean Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
I SS-30 733SS-301 $33 SS-15amp 833 lss-301 sn 7 I ISS-30 900 SS-30 883
SS-151 817 SS-301 783 SS-15 683 SS-15 883 SS-15 833SS-lSi 750
CIS--7 750 CS-7 617 OS-7 683 CMS-7 650 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650
Ngtte Values with a comon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating
D2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
Table D3 Film Stripping
EMULSION
AGGREGATE SAN
BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK
s s
15
0 A T A
30
15 20
30 15
25
X s
CV
225
106
47l
250
71
283
200
71 354
s s
30
D A T A
25
25
0
0
5
0
X s
CV
25middoto
oo
00
oo oo
oo
2middotmiddot5
35
1413
C M s 7
D A T A
0
0 0
5
0 0
X s
CV
oo
00 oo
25
35
1413
oo
00 oo
Table D4 ANOVA Swnmary Film Stripping
----------------- ---------------- --middot-----------middot----- middot--middotmiddotmiddot middot- middotmiddot-middot----middot -middot-- middotmiddotmiddot--- --- -------- -A N O V J
-SW~ middotnt r-
pound 2 14333333113 7166666667 27 1S78lttl7 l 2 2]33333333 1165666euro67 middot11t1210~26 Eirl 141 55f 3333335 13958333311 i2894737
Dlli~RI 9 237 50CCDIOmiddot) 2638888P9
lOUL t7 bull--- bullbull - bull- 0 bull bullbull bull- bull bull 0 -------- bull-- bull- bull---bull ---- lt -bullbull bull - bullbullbull--bullbullbullbullbull-bullbull-- bullbullbull bull ___ bull --bull bull bull bull --- bull bull-bullho bullbull bull- bull bull ~-- bull- UO rArr-d bull
D3
cit -w
0 lt( ll a (I)
C w 0 C-a I-ti)
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
20
1
0 SB F GR
Figure D3c Film Stripping
SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO
Iss-3
SS-15
250
225
SS-15~7 250
25
SS-15
ISS-30
200
25
ClIS-7 oo middot SS-30 00 CMS-7 00
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping
D4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue 3Content 10 psi
-------ElAULSWN
----QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCK SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
D S$ 1U H9 171 185 110 159
i22 2~1 165 197 159 165A15Jo-ot----t----+---ii---+----t-----ti 132 140 168 191 135 162
SEA s i3 1 4 9 35 4
CV Ul2 10 25 44 258 26
$5 ---
D
~ A
158
140
189
198 184 187
212
201
178
173
222
199
gtUfl x l49 194 186 207 176 211 SEA s 13 6 2 8 4 16
CV 85 33 11 38 20 77
C M
D A T A
80
82 55 48
35
63
73
77
38
45 55
65
s x 81 52 49 75 42 60
7 s
CV
1
18
5
96 20
404
3
38 5
119
7
118
Table D6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus
--=======-=-middot------=====--=- ---------------------==-~----------=-----e=-----BF SS lS F F05 F01
pound 2 ln~13~ 3lBillllll1l 52367 191141145 3715181747 357 605 I 2 29111 GllS5SSS6 111155 bull 5211778 103289966 357 605 l 1 3l$3351l11112 33$3-3611112 240095590 4113 A33 lEamp liL 31121111l11U1t zst-n22t77 8 ssu21119a 295 461 pound~ 2 1217222222 16093611111 432112657 357 605 III 2 n~ bullEHOq 1a ----------
521iwSSSS5 15S911111111 25Jot 5lll)~Oll)il))I
31l527777R 4117277777~ iJl9166657
22C3627) -2H1157
357 2~95
6~5 11 61
-=====------middot--- -- -- middotmiddot-- --middot-llOl~L lS
DS
bull SS 15 SEA 11 SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
-(D -l Q 0 E J-
ffi 1 J-(J wa gtlt 0 Q--------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL (I
AGGREGATE
Figure D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-3~1 l49 SS-3H J86 SS-10 207 SS-30 176 SS-30 211
SS-15amp 132 SS-15amp l40 SS-151168 SS-l51 l91 ss-lSi 135 SS-15 162I I I CS-7 81 CMS-7 52 OS-7 42 CMS-7 60
llite Values with a amron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent
Figure D6 Newman-Keuls Ranking 2 Day 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi
D6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Table D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Contentr 10 psi
-EMULSION OUALITY LEVELcAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15
SEA
D A T A
325
271
l]JD
260
390
340
319
348
272
367
302
356
x s
CV
29S
38
128
285
35
124
365
35
97
334
21
62
320
67
21 0
329
38
116
ss 30 SEJ
0 A T A
282
310
337
255
303
374
362
307
318
308
289
329
x s
CV
296
20
67
296
58
196
339
50
148
335
39
116
313
7
23
309
28
92
C M s 7
D A T A
78
64
110
95
75
73
110
135
80
90
85
7
83
110
135
x s
CV
71
10
139
103
11
104
74
1
19
123
18
144
123
18
144
Table D8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus
A N O V ll
E 2- 3r39El11 3middotl8tB89 196 994 L19 44 44 5 178 q233024 3 57 6 CS 2 9111~7222223 4058 3611112 3 57577(13 357 6csbulla 11 611~ li9llll41115 ~16 ampll44445 S585579 443 833
_n_ sect 251l-illll41sectl41 -531 31i 11111 AS7121pound3 295 4 61 EJ 2 lt 115 $555555 227 521777 8 1994213 357 605 iampJ 2 170555555 15)277778 0770121 357 605 __ElJ 1324111ilJlilil4 5 208 bull 11Ul 11 bull 184922 2 95 4 ( 1
nan 11 19P73 SOOJIO~ 11111D833l33
middotmiddot-- =--=--=-==-===--c-=-c------_--=--ngtllllll
----------------------------------middot----
D7
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
traquo diams CMS - 7a ()
0--Gl ~- I J _J bull C 02 E I-z w J-(J w C
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATEmiddot
Figure D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HJGH lOW HJGH LOW HIGH LOW
I I I Iss-il51 298 1SS-31l 295 ss-]5~ 365 SS-30 335 1middot SS-15 320 SS-15 329
SS-301 296 SS-l5amp 235 SS-301 339 SS-15 334 SS-30 313 SS-30 309
CIIS--7 71 OS-7 103 CHS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123
t-bte Values with a armon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D8 Newman-Keuls Ranking Full Cure
Resilient Modulus 103 psi
D8
----- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D9 Density at Design Residue Content pcf
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
LOWHJGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH D l341 6 ll339 1347 1338 1523ss 1500A T 1356 133S 1350 1333 1513 1497A
1~ x l351 l337 1349 1336 1518 1499 sSEA 07 02 02 04 07 02
05 02 02 03CV 05 01
D 1362 1352 1370 1355 1545A 1520ss T 1371 1355 1361 1354 1550 1525
30 A
x 1367 1354 1366 1355 1548 1523 SEA 02 06s 06 01 04 04
05 02 05 01 02 02CV D 1373 1375 1380 1370 1537 1543AC T 1385 1375 137 9 1360 1535 1545AM x 1379 1375 1380 1365 1536 1544s s 09 oo 01 07 01 017
06 ooCV 01 05 01 01
Table DlO ANOVA Summary Density
N O V ll -----middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddotmiddot-- -- --------- -------middot --------------- ----- - - -
smI=pound DF ss F F05 F01
pound 2 2738H9 310369445 153505090 357 605 ~ 2 2273iWlllbull38B9 11369544445 5530 gt35704 357 lj -~5 ~ 1 11-6~2SilllaquollO 12 602500C 524057772 443 R33 n I tpoundlUll11 Jl-69lll45 2-324621e 2 95 4 61 E 2 3131poundpound57 15i5S33J 7 7537nB 357 li os lJ 2 ltClfltSf-57 0433334 21458C6 357 s 05 n~ Iii )l216poundfi6lii 9556667 47372764 295 451
EHJii 11l 3 bull nsilraquorn 2019444
------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -- -middotmiddot-middot ----- -middotmiddot - middot-------
35 23611rJC556
D9
1 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
-0 a gt1 ()
z
diams CMS-7
w C
120 SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure D9 Density at Design Residue Coritent
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
OS--7 1379 aS-7 ]375 IClIS-7 l380 IOlS-7 1365 ISS-30 1548 CMS-7 1544ISS-30~ 1367 SS--30~ J354 SS-30~ 1366 SS-30~ 1355 CMS-7 1536 SS-30 1523
SS-15bull 1351 ss-is~ 1337 SS-15bull 1349 ss-1s 1336 SS-15 1518 SS-15 1499
NJte Values with a omron vertical lme are not statistically different
Figure D10 Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcf
DlO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
Table D11 Air Voids at Design Residue Content
-EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
107
)5
9 10l
91
99
79
99
80
83
8 bull5
84
I s
ICY
U)
Ill 9
B4
10l
03
28
95
06
60
89
14
159
82
02
26
85
01
08
ss 30j
SEA
D A T A
90
93
92
85
92
96
86
84
66
67
74
73
x s
CV
92
02
23
89
05
56
94
03
30
85
01
l 7
67
01
ll
74
01
10
C M s 7
D A T A
77
73
62
61
73
62
63
71
71
65
48
55
x s
CV
75
03
38
62
O~l
12
68
08
u5
67
06
96
68
04
62
52
05
96
Table Dl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids
A ll O V A --e--ee-ee=-==== -- -- middot- -- --- middot- - ------- - middot-----middot----middot ______ __________ ---middot- ----- - ------------- -
iiUEllilE ss ~s F F01
E 45111Hoiii6pound 225l08333 812457541 357 605 ll 1~-lilliillt~~)Q 7930)000 2519405 357 505 IJJ 11 ili$6J4141~ 16469444 59230768 443 8 33 E1 2J53ll3ll -5S5333 4 -2 bull 11755245 295 4 6 1
EJ 15672223 bull 783pound 112 2~131820 357 605 I 21022223 bull 1li 1112 bull 3$35365 357 cs
EampJ 2971111ll J27778 26713286 2 95 4t1 iElllllHgt 5cgt~SiIJOIgt -2790556
-middot--middot ------- --middot - middotmiddot- -middotmiddot--middot-- --3li
D11
11 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
-l
a - 8
-a 0 7gt tc ltI 6
5
4 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dll
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot
middot HIGH LOW
SS-]5amp JlJl ISS-ll5~ 10l
ISS-301 92 SS-311l11 89ICMS-7 75 CS-7 fi2
Air Voids at Design Residue Content
FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
=- 95 I I ISS-15 89 SS-15 82 SS-15 8 5
SS-31 94 SS-30 85 SS-30 74ICMS-7 68
OS-7 68 CMS-7 67 SS-30 67 CMS-7 52
Ngtte Values with a ommn vertical line are not statistically dilferent
Figure D12 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids
Dl2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
middotmiddotEMULSION OUAUTY LEVEL
~- AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
48S 3g_g
295
middot 32 8
439
396
397
418
288
307
223
307
X s
CV
443
64
144
312
23
75
418
30
73
408
15
36
298
13
45
265
59
224
ss 3Wo SEA
0 A T A
400
403
367
283
342
411
392
262
310
32-4
292
236
x s
CV
402
02
05
325
59
183
377
49
130
327
92
281
31 7
10
31
264
40
150
C M s 7
D A T A
235
235
130
120
213
233
150
200
350
350
250
250
x s
CV
235
00
00
125
07
57
223
14
63
175
35
202
350
oo oo
250
00
oo
Table Dl4 ANOVA Swnrnary Stabilometer Value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------A N O V A
---------~----------middot------middot-middotmiddot-- -middot--middot--middotmiddot--middot------ bull middotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middot middot------middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot--- --middotmiddot ---_ -- middotmiddot-middotmiddot-- -- - - - -----ss r r05 r01
2 1 i 7~ Sbull1lfipound5161S 5879033333 332259711 357 605 I 2 igtS895QGDgt 279475000 195117552 357 ~os i ll ~l ~
11 111 2 2
l~illflll1111111 7DS nll3331
1~il])2222] 755J5556
~ 111 8 11111~=-- 10115 834 71011111
37 7502778
275769841 128178912
U938281 251M309
11113 295 357 357
833 4f1 605 605
Ell~ 14middot 3~53lt1$1H 116340278 5750926 295 461 fElilli U 25977~illlllCII~ 1111H72222
------------------------ bull- ~bull OOM---bullbullbullbull- - bull------_________ _
roru
013
w J ltC gt a w 1-w E 0 I-m ltC Ishyen
SBH SBL FH FL
bull SS 15 SEA 5S 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-)Sll 441_3 SS-l 325I SS-JSi 4131 SS-15 40 8 CMS-7 350 SS-15 265
SS-30 402 SS-JSa 31_2I ISS-30~ 377 SS-30~ 327 SS-30 317 SS-30 264
CS-7 235 CMS-7 125 ISS-15 298 CMS-7 250
Nlte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D14 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value
Dl4
-------------------
Table Dl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
ii3
ii2
l7-1
ilJD3
236
76
308
62
112
85
222
180
l s
CY
63
lJ1
10
Jl39
SlJ
363
l56
J13
725
185
174
940
99
19
194
201
30
148
ss 30 SEA
0 A T A
229
306
266
187
78
130
260
136
157
212
186
164
x s
CV
268
55
204
227
56
247
104
37
354
198
88
443
185
39
211
175
16
89
C M s 7
D A T A
80
82
190
180
122
192
245
235
130
120
170
180
x s
CV
81
l
18
185
7
38
157
50
315
240
7
30
125
7 57
175
7
40
Table Dl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value
--------------------middot--------------------------------------------------------------A N O V A
-=====-=-=--=-- ===== ss
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1i712 7222222 83563611111 226671165 357 605 I 2 l~12 lllllliilllllllB9 71144441145 129864 357 605 ~ 1l 251116l 144141llllj 2ti-~H~bull4dimiddot4 4 44 5 71775602 443 833 n l4 37511ll 777JTI7JJ S395bull J 9 ~4middot444 2548 5405 295 4 e 1 poundJ 2 72lllS3SlffiifISlmiddot9 3fi22f9111114UU 9026921 357 6C5
n 2 1 iSigt555S
11321Bl 111111I 117lIT177778
33220277778 1277032 9~11333
357 297
605 461
Eliflll 11 f15357 tlOilOOibull 3ilf65Jgt)oo
---------------------------------------middot-------------------------------------------
D15
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7w
J lt(
gt a w Jshyw I 0-() w
8
O--------r-----r-----------r----r-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
c 1
Figure D15
SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW
SS-3(1JlS 268
81IOS-7
ISS-]5i 63 SS-lSl 139
Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 240 SS-30 185 SS-15 201
SS-lSi 155 SS-30l 198 CMS-7 125 SS-30 175
SS-JOi 104 SS-151 185 SS-15 99 CMS-7 175
Note Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Dl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value
D16
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D17 Swell at Design Residue Content in
EfAULSEON
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDI NO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH lOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 s~
D A T A
048 -
0413
06S
069
on
005
006
008
-025 045
005
004
004
005
009
014
Jt s
CY
HS
0010
000
D68
-003
45
bull 006
002
241
035
010
286
004
001
133
009
005
483
ss 30 SEA
D A T A
023
023
020
063
066
055
000
ooo
008
031
023
028
000 000 003
ooo
001
000
x s
CV
022
002
79
061
006
93
003
005
1732
027
004
148
oin
002
1732
ooo
001
1732
C M s 7
D A T A
000
ooo
000
004
002
001
ooo
ooo
000
003
000
ooo 000 000 ooo
ooo
ooo
000
x s
CV
000
ooo
ooo
002
002
655
ooo
ooo
ooo
001
002
1732
ooo
ooo
ooo
ooo
ooo
000
Table D18 ANOVA Summary Swell ( Transformed Data)
A N O Y A
E 2 _1025326 0912663 2353471(154 329 532 -Amiddot middotmiddot2 1366452 0683226 1761825136 329 532 0 1 0368219 03613219 949521081 1114 7116
EA 11 04627$7 0115697 298345558 266 396 -EQ- 2-- --006-903G- -0(134515-middot -8-9003553 middot3l9 -S-32 A) 2 0150358 ~0075179 193863014 329 532 UO 4 0083986 0020997 54143375 26 396
-ERRORmiddot 36 0139606middot 0003178
-TOTIIL 53 --446-576-11
D17
05 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
04
z -J
J w IJJ
SBH SBL
diams CMS - 7
~oo
_02
01
FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dl7 Swell at Design Residue Content
SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-ll51 ii-IS SS-]5i il68 SS-15 a006 SS-15 bull 035 SS-15 004 SS-15 009I I I I SS-3Cli 022 SS-301 061 ISS-301 003 SS-30 bull 027 ISS-30 bull 001 ISS-30 bull 000
ClS-7 000 CIS-7 002 OS-7 000 OIS-7 001 CMS-7 000 CMS-7 000
NJte Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D18 Newman-Keuls Ranking Swell in
D18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
Table Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSl10N
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOWHIGH 0 156 48 175 229 2lO 125ss A ll5 60 20l ll7 228 120T 13_g 4e 170 132 212 130A15 i 137 52 182 200 2l 7 125 smiddotSEA 2l 37 l7 30 lO 05
1middot5]CY 133 92 148 46 40 D 98 106 lll 76 2l 0 lllAss 203 109 76 5l 235 95T ll3 85 63 59 233 125
30 A
x 138 100 83 62 226 llOSEll s 57 l3 25 l3 l4 l5
412 131 298 206 62 136CV D 2lO 202 185 98 330 240A 220 87 18l 88 345 200C T 216 138 223 77 338 2lOAM x 215 142 196 88 338 217s
5805 23 lls 08 2l7
23 405 ll8 120 22 96CV
Table D20 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Stabilorneter Value
N O V A
-------middot------------------------------------------------------ ---------------DF -$ -F os- r01
pound 2 5919875926 2l59917963 39C147075fl 329 53 2 690 i1111pounda$11 iii 345 022110111 US51521111 329 5 32 Ill 1 763129-i296 763 1296 296 100671B132 414 7 U6
Ea t93 11171111]J)7lll 1007863519 1329576P8 266 391bullIEill -2 middot -E~ti35~259 -23middot0-H9fgt29 C-~6522- middot3 29 532 AO 2 S3amp11171t1137ll 11192351$5 55305370 329 532 El s1111i1r1075 135268519 17~qq579 266 396bullmiddotDll~t 311i 27239~333~ 7 5903711)111
53
--------------------------------------------------------middot-----------------------
D19
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA0)
gt diams CMS - 7 l I
a w 30fshyw E 0 J 2-en ltC Ishyen 10
SBH SSL FH FL GRH GRL01amp---------------------------_
AGGREGATE
Figure Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
middotHtGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
QS-1 235 CS-7 142 196 SS-15 200 CMS-7 338 CMS-7 217GS-
Iss-3H uaI I I ISS-3Qi lilG SS-15i ]S2 IOMS-7 88 SS-30 22~ SS-15 125
SS-151 137 ss-i5~ 52 SS-30~ 83 SS-30 62 SS-15 217 SS-30 110
fute Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent
Figure D20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
D20
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Table D2l MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
-------_cEMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
ss 1 sa
D A T A
x s
HIGH
Ul3 ~ JlU
43
64
IOW
~ TWlI ~
--
H1GH
159 1-43 126
143
17
LOW
123 187
60
123
64
HIGH
130 179 153
154
25
LOW
120 104 143
122
20
CV D A5S T A30 x
SEA s
171
139 88
104
110
26
-98 91 -95
4
116
114 116
69
100
27
515
TWT TWT TWT
--
159
111 101 15~
122
28
160
83 65 63
70
11
CV D AC T AM x5 s
7 CV
236
141 79 52
91
46
503
37
185 60 63
103
71
695
267
125 201
96
141
54
386
-192 164 126
161
33
206
23l
131 130 120
127
6
48
157
72 230
76
126
90
715
Too weak to test
Table D22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
SOO~e 55- -f middotFmiddot OS- F01
pound 2 19956 G31tl3Tt 99780165185 52791162 329 532 -1 2- 223ii~ 92592~-~ middot111544629630 -59015431 3middot29 5 32 J 1 n21lliiilliEiiii~ 1middot112106656666 75185029 414 746 lEJ Ill 32il76711ltCl~lll9l 132191851852 43485622 2euro6 396 ~ 2- ~373hllllllllllllllqSmiddot iiilfgtamp 1222-223- -3bull6middot3300811 -3 29 532 1i 2 1S011Hil12 75i0555556 bull ~397100 329 532 Eli
-a~llt-Iii
36 511J7777777
middot5B11113BB333 12799444444 129e l9 25 92 6middot
5771861 266 396
D21
bull SS 15 SEA U) SS 30 SEA gt diams CMS - 7E I
a w J-~ 200 0 en w5 100 0
SBH SBL FH FL AGGREGATE
GRH GRL
Figure D21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINO FRESNO
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 126SS-15 154]03 JCMS-7 161106-7 rmm SS-15 122CMS-7 127SS-30amp 95 ltMgt-7 ]Aj_ SS-15 123
SS-30 70
t-bte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
SS-30 122SS-151 93 SS-l51 fflT SS-30amp 100 SS-30 TWT
Figure D22 Ne-wman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
D22
Table D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW
ss 15 SEA
ss 30 SEA
C M s 7
HIGH D bullbullmiddot 979 715A middot 1143 569T A 1047 599
X - - 1056 - 628 s - - 82 - 77
CV - - 78 - 123
D 987 1474 548A T 907 1536 433 A 1447 615
x - - 947 1486 532 s - 57 46 92
CV - - 60 31 173 D 642 102 597 588 301A T 620 426 369 60l 263 A 774 662 470 290 3q_3
x 679 397 479 493 31 9
s 83 281 114 176 67
CV 123 709 239 357 21 0
1285 1353 1493
1377
106
77
627 72 2 634
661
53
80
238 284 22 7
250
30
121
Specimen swelled during soak could not ne tested Specimen disintegrated during testing
D23
300
E CJgt -200 en
en 0 J
z0 middot cii 100 lt( cc CD lt(
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
01--------r----T----J-----r----r SBH FH FL GRH GRL
middotAGGREGATE
Figure D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content
D24
APPENDIX E
FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL DESIGNS
Table El
Thickness T in Inches to Satisfyl
Tensile Strain Requirements (Reference 3)
Subirade l~octulus psi 30~0 6000 12000 30oco
Jverage Ann~abullAir erlerature J degF lt40 40-55 55-65 gt65 40 40-55 55-65 gt65 lt40 40-55 55-651gt65 lt4 0 40-55 55-65 gt65
T~affic EALbull 10bull
IllIf psi 50000 4 9 66 7 8 91 37 50 5e 66 2 26 28 29 2 2 2 2
1000~0 37 5 3 62 12 27 40 47 53 2 21 25 26 2 2 2 2
300000 21 J4 4 3 51 2 28 31 middot3 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
600000 2 24 3 2 39 2 2 2 _2 28 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2middot 2 2 2 290JCOO 2 2 26 33 2 2 2 22 2 2 2
Traffic EAL= 10s
trJ MR psi bull 50000 83 ll5 139 165 70 97 112 127 54 1-3 83 93 2 3 27 28 29 f-J
42 58 69 78 2 25 27 27100000 63 90 108 129 54 76 91 105
3COOOO 4o 58 73 8 3 3 51 60 73 24 39 ~8 56 2 2 20 22
600000 28 45 55 67 21 37 47 55 2 21 36 44 2 2 2 2
900000 21 37 4 7 57 2 30 39 48 2 21 29 37 2 I 2 2 2
TraCf1c 2 ~AL a 10~ I ia psi bull 50000 130 161 216 2~ 116 16l 187 213 98 131 151 172 63 66 93 58
82 0100000 98 14) 171 203 68 126 152 176 75 106 125 142 52 7 3
3CCOOO 6o 91 11 3 139 55 82 101 122 4 7 69 86 102 31 49 59 59
e~oooo 46 68 86 106 ~o 60 76 94 3middot 3 52 64 i9 2 35 4 r 54
900~00 37 56 72 69 )2 51 63 80 24 4 3 5 4 67 2 28 3 8 ul Trarr1el EAL~ 10 7
la psi bull 50000 192 24 24 24 178 239 24 24 156 205 235 24 12l 153 165 17 3 I
24 24 228 24 119 168 195 222 95 129 147 1s IlCOOCO 1~5 21 0 13 5 193
56 aa 10a 12 I-3CC000 aa 136 167 205 ~-3 12 156 186 74 11l 138 16~
I- l 6 a2 10060~ 1 ouo 6 4 100 125 156 59 92 ll 6 l~ 5 53 82 104 128
108 3 3 53 6 8 859ccooo 53 82 10 5 132 so 77 97 121 4 ~ 68 86
For asphalt volume Vb= 11 are air voids Va= 5 Use Figure El to correct thickness of other valuemiddots of Vb and Va
Table E2
Subsradlt Mcdulus psi
Thickness T in Inches to Satisfys Subgrade Strain Requirements (Reference 3)
6100 120003000 300CC
tr N
A~erage A~nual Ar Te11perature degF
Traffic EALbull 10bull
~IP psi 50000a
100000
300000
600000
900000
Traffic EAL 10 5
MR psibull 50000
lC0000
300000
600000
900000
Tra~~lc EAL c 1c6
MR psibull 50000
100000
300000
600POO
900000
Trafficz EALbull 10 7
MRt psibull 50000
100000
300000
600000
900000
lt40
55
55
55
55
55
81
81
81
81
81
115
115
115
115
115
155
155
155
155
155
40-55
83
60
55
55
55
121
87
81
Bl
Bl
168
123
11
115
ll5
226
165
155
155
155
55-65 gt65 lt40
108 115 46
73 82 46
55 55 46
5_ 45
55 55 46
145 165 69
106 120 69
a1 81 69
81 81 69
81 81 69
201 224 98
14B 165 98
115 115 98
115 115 98
115 115 98
24 24 1)6
199 222 135
15 155 136
155 155 136
155 155 136
40-55
10
50
46
46
46
103
74
69
69
69
150
108
98
98
9B
204
150
135
136
136
55-65 G5 lt40
83 93 30
61 70 30
46 46 30
45 46 30
46 46 30
124 139 55
91 102 55
69 69 55
69 69 55
69 69 55
173 193 83
130 147 83
98 98 83
98 98 83
98 98 83
239 24 120
179 199 120
136 136 120
136 136 120
135 136 120
40-55
4
3~
30
30
30
83
60
55
55
55
122
90
83
83
83
17 5
130
120
middot12 o
120
55-65 gt65 lt~O
62 69 25
46 53 25
30 30 25
30 30 25
30 30 25
9 106 29
82 29i 2 middot 55 55 29
55 55 29
55 55 29
144 15S 60
108 12l 60
83 83 60
83 83 60
83 83 6 0
205 226 90
155 112 90
120 120 90
120 120 90
120 120 90
40-55
31
25
25
25
25
52
30
29
29
29
86
65
60
60
60
127
98
90
90
90
55-65 bull65
33 35
29 3c
25 25 I 25 25 i 25 2s
51 67
47 52
29 29
29 29
29 29
95 10
76 85
60 I 6C
6C i 6o 50
14bull 3 14
112 126
90 90
90 90
90 90
Tj In Tc In 24 2 22
20
18
16 3
14
12 4
~ 10 Va+ vb 5
099
8 08 6
077 7 06
6 805
9045 1003
4 12
14
3 16
18
20
22 2 24
Figure El Correction of Pavement Design Thickness for Air Voids and
Asphalt Content of Mix (Reference 3)
E3
-------
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000 psi
MAAT 55- 65 F-Ul 400 CL
C) 0 300 (J) J
~ 200 0 ~
I- 100z w J-(J) 0+----------------------C w 0 2 4 6 8 middot10 12
THICKNESS IN
1X104 EAL
1X105EAL
Figure E2 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
M-AAT )65 F- -~---Ul 400 1x104 EALCL
CW)
0 300 (J) J 200C 0 ~
-~ 100 w -J -(J) 0w 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a
THICKNESS IN
1X105EAL
Figure E3 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 6000 psi MAAT = )65F
s
E4
w 400 c
()
0 300 () - 200 Cl 0 E
~ 100 w J-
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT 56-65 F
1x10 EALI 4
I 1X105 EAL
w o~---------------------r-w 1 2 3 4a
THICKNESS IN
Figure E4 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT )65F-w 400 4I 1X10 EALc () I 1X105EAL 0 300 I () I - I 200C I0 E I I- 100z w I-J I-() 0w 1 2 3 4c
THICKNESS IN~
Figure ES Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65Fs
ES
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
MAAT 55-65 F-en400 41X10 EALIC
(I) 1X105EAL middot 0
I I 300
en I J 200C 0
f-- 100z w J-en 0LU 2 4 6 8 10 14a
-THICKNESS IN
Figure E6 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
MmiddotAAT )65 F cn4oo I 1X104 EALa
(I) 1X105EAL 0 300
I I
en -I
~200 0 ~ 100 LU --en -I
0-1-----------------------LU 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a THICKNESS IN
Figure E7 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = )65F
E6
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT 55-65 F-u 400 41x10 EAL0
M 1x105EAL 0 T- 300 -en J 200C 0 E I- 100z w-J- en 0w C 0 middot1 2 3 4 middot5 6
THICKNESS IN
Figure E8 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000psi
M-AAT )65 F-en400
I --- - - ~- 1X104 EAL
C
a 1X105 EAL
0 I T- 300
I-en J
200 C 0 E
I- 100z w J-en 0w 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
THICKNESS IN
Figure E9 Thickness For Subgrade StrainRequirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65F
s
E7
Table E3
Thickness Requirements inches
= 6000 psi EAL= 1 X 104 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
MrT
l
CF Tc Ts
246000 34
64 37 43
300000 31
68 4middot 0 43
391000 27
lt 61 33 43
362000 28
64 31 43
260000 28
bull bull 61 35 43
333000 30
65 33 43
C M s 0
Mr Ti CF T Tc
s
259000 29
59 36 43
288000 32
bull 61 3 8 43
271000 32
59 39 43
339000 30
60 37 43
284000 32
59 40 43
365000 29
60 37 43
C M s 7
M T7
l
CF TTc
s
71000 55
65 60 43
103000 47 71
45 43
74000 54
67 53 43
123000 44 69
45 43
85000 52
65 54 43
123000 44
73 46 43
ss 15
M T7
l
CF T Tc s
298000 31
57 40 43
285000 32
59 38 43
365000 28
58 37 43
334000 30
61 36 43
320000 30
60 36 43
329000 30
61 36 43
ss 30
M T7
l
CF Tc Ts
296000 31
60 37 43
296000 31
62 36 43
339000 30
59 38 43
335000 30
bull 63 35 43
313000 31
65 34 43
309000 31
65 34 43
Ngtte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi TI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume middotTc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= llrickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
E8
Table E4
Thickness Requirements inches
Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
246000 68
64 74 70
300000 62 68
62 68
391000 55 61
65 68
362000 57 64
63 68
260000
57 bull 61
68 70
333000 59 65
65 68
C M s 0
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
259000 65 59
80 70
288000 63
bull 61 75 68
271000 64 59
78 70
339000 59 60
72 68
284000 63 59
78 68
365000 57 60
70 68
C M s 7
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
71000 100
bull 65 107 105
103000 90 bull 71
84 88
74000 100
67 102 104
123000 85 69
85 81
85000 95 65
102 97
123000 85 73
78 81
ss 15
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
298000 62 57
78 68
285000 63 59
76 68
365000 57 58
72 68
334000 59 61
72 68
320000 60 60
73 68
329000 59 61
70 68
ss 30
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
296000 62
60 74 68
296000 62
62 71 68
339000 59 59
72 68
335000 59
63 68 68
313000 60
bull 65 65 68
309000 60
65 65 68
1bte
M = Resilient mJdulus in psirf = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
E9
Table ES
Thickness Requirements inches 4
Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M Tdeg
J
CF T Tc
246000 40
64 46 45
300000middot 37 68
37 43
391000 33 61
38 43
362000 35
64 39 43
260000 39
61 45 45
333000 35
65 38 43
C M s 0
MT J
CF T Tc
s
259000 39 59
48 45
288000 38 61
middot4 6 44
271000 38 59
47 44
339000 35 60
43 43
284000 38 59
46 44
365000 35 60
43 43
C M s 7
M T7
J CF T Tc
s
71000 60 65
65 68
103000 52 71
48 64
74000 60 67
60 68
123000 50 bull 69 59 62
85000 58 65
63 67
123000 50 73
49 62
ss 15
M T7
J CF T Tc
s
298000 37 57
50 43
285000 38 59
48 44
365000 35 58
45 43
334000 35 61
43 43
320000 3 6
60 44 43
329000 37 61
45 43
ss 30
M T7
J CF TTc
s
296000 37 60
45 43
296000 37 62
43 43
339000 35 59
44 43
335000 35 bull 63
41 43
313000 36
65 39 43
309000 36
65 39 43
Nrte
M = Resilient nodulus in psiTI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T
5 = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El0
Table E6
Thickness Requirements inches
105E = 6000 psi EAL= 1 x psi MAAT = )65Fs
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
246000
79 64
87 70
300000
74 68
74 70
391000 69
61 81 70
362000 70
64 77 70
260000 77
61 90 70
333000 71
65 77 70
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 77
59 94 70
288000 75
61 90 70
271000 76
59 92 70
339000 71
60 87 70
284000 75
59 91 70
365000 69
60 85 70
C M s 7
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
71000 111
65 118 112
103000 103
middot11 95 98
74000 111
67 110 11l
123000 98
69 95 93
85000 109
65 119 109
123000 98
73 87 93
ss 15
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
298000 74 57
94 70
285000 7 5 59
94 70
365000 69 58
88 70
334000 7 1 middot 61
84 70
320000 72 60
87 70
329000 71 61
84 70
ss 30
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
296000 74
60 90 70
296000 74
62 86 70
339000 71 59
87 70
335000 71
63 82 70
313000 73
bull 65 78 70
309000 73
65 78 70
Note
M = Resilient midulus in psi11 = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness f9r tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade stram requirements inches
Ell
Table E7
Thickness Requirements inches4
= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
middot~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO -GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
246000 2 0
64 23 25
300000 20
68 2middot 0 25
391000 20
61 24 25
362000 20
64 23 25
260000 20
61 24 25
333000 20
65 22 25
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 20
59 25 25
288000 20
bull 61 24 25
271000 20
59 25 25
339000 20
60 25 25
284000 20
59 25 25
365000 20
60 25 25
C M s 7
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
71000 20
65 22 31
103000 20
middot71 20 29
74000 20
67 21 31
123000 20
69 20 28
85000 20
65 22 30
123000 20
73 20 28
ss M T7
l
298000 20
285000 20
365000 20
334000 20
320000 2 0
329000 20
15 CF T Tc
s
57 26 25
59 25 25
58 26 25
61 24 25
bull 60 25 25
61 24 2 i
ss 30
M T7
l
CF TTc
s
296000 20
60 25 25
296000 20
62 24 25
339000 20
59 25 25
335000 20
bull63 23 25
313000 20
65 22 25
309000 20
65 22 25
N)te
M = Resilient nodulus in psi middot T7 = Unrorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inchesct= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume T = Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T~ = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El2
Table E8
Thickness Requirements inches
Es= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s
M T7
l
246000 22
300000 20
391000 20
362000 20
260000 21
333000 20
s 0
CF T Tc
s
64 24 32
68 20 29
61 24 29
64 23 29
61 24 l 1
65 23 29
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 21 59
25 31
288000 21
bull 6J 24 30
271000 21 59
25 30
339000 20 60
25 29
284000
21 59
25 1 n
365000
20 60
25 2 q
C M
M T7
l
71000 27
103000 25
74000 27
123000 24
85000
26
123000
24 s 7
CF T Tc
s
65 28 53
71 24 45
bull 67 28 53
69
23 43
65
27 49
73
22 43
ss M T7
l
298000 20
285000 21
365000 20
334000 20
320000 20
329000 20
15 CF
TTc
s
57 27 29
59 26 30
58 27 29
61 24 29
60 25 29
61 24 2 q
ss 30
M r~i CF T Tc
s
296 ooomiddot 20 60
24 29
296000 20 62
23 29
339000 20 59
24 29
335000 20 63
23 29
313000 20 65
23 29
309000 20 65
23 29
i-krte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psiTf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade strain requirements inches
El3
Table E9
Thickness Requirements inches 4 = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
EMULSION __ QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
246000 20 64
23 25
300000 20 68
21 25
391000 20 61
24 25
362000 20 64
23 25
260000 20 61
24 25
333000 20 65
22 25
C M s 0
259000 20 59
26 25
288000 20
bull 61 middot24 25
271000 20 59
26 25
339000 20 60
25 25
284000 20 59
26 25
365000 20 60
25 25
C M s 7
MT7
1 CF T Tc
s
71000 20 65
22 58
103000 2~0 middotn
20 52
74000 20 67
21 58
123000 20 69
20 48
85000
20 65
22 57
123000
20 73
20 48
$$
15
MTdeg
1
CF T Tc
s
-298 000 20 57
27 25
285000 20 59
26 25
365000 20 58
26 25
334000 20 61
24 25
320000 2 0 60
25 25
329 000 20 61
24 25
ss 30
MT7
1
CF T Tc
s
296000 20 60
25 25
296000 20 62
24 25
339000 20 59
26 25
335000 20 63
23 25
313000 20 65
22 25
309000 20 65
22 25
tote
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot rf = Unagtrrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El4
Table ElO
Thickness Requirements inches 5E = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
s
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T--deg
J
CF T Tc
s
246000
24 64
27 31
300000
23 68
24 29
391000
22 61
25 29
362000
22 64
2_s 29
260000
26 61
31 30
333000
22 65
24 29
C M s 0
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s
259000 23
59 28 30
288000 23
bull 61 27 30
271000 23
59 28 30
339000 22
60 26 29
284000 23
59 28 30
365000 21
60 25 29
C M s 7
ss 15
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s M T--deg
J
CF T Tc
s
71000 28
bull 65 30 61
298000 23 57
25 29
103000 27
~ 71 27 52
285000 23 59
28 30
74000 28
bull 67 28 60
365000 22
58 28 29
123000 26
69 26 48
334000 22 61
25 29
85 000 28
65 31 58
320000 22
60 26 29
123000 26
73 24 48
329000 22 61
25 29
55
30
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s
296000 23
60 27 29
296000 23
62 27 29
339000 22 59
27 29
335000 22
63 25 29
313000 22
65 24 29
309000 23
65 25 29
tbte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot Tf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Ihickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
II11~~~1~~i~IIII 08860 ElS
Rotary Mixers Rotary mixers generally consist of a mobile mixing chamber which contains rotary shafts with cutting blades mounted on a self-propelled machine (6) The mixer loosens in place material to the required depth and then mixes it with emulsion Emulsified application may be either through a spray bar in the mixer or by a distributer truck ahead of the mixer
Central Plant Emulsified asphalt mixtures have been successfully mixed in standard pugmill batch plants and continuous drum-mix plants Mixtures may be made using either cold (ambient temperature) mixshying or hot (elevated temperature) mixing (6) These mixtures may be spread using conventional equipment and techniques used for hot-mixed asphalt concrete With central plant cold mixed emulsified asphalt mixtures stockpiling of the mixture for long perishyods of time prior to use as is often the case with cutback asphalt mixtures may not be possible Length of time an emulsified asphalt mixture may be stockpiled prior to use depends on the type of emulshysion and aggregate used
92 Compacting
Equipment and techniques used to compact emulsified asphalt mixtures depend on the method used for mixshying and the type of mixture being placed During compaction it is necessary to consider and make appropriate compensation for the amount of water in the mixture
Mixed-in-Place Mixed-in-place emulsified asphalt mixtures generally use local aggregate materials which are of low to marginal quality Compaction of these materials is generally accomplished by initishyally compacting (breakdown rolling using a sheepsshyfoot or pneumatic tired roller just before or just as the emulsified asphalt binder begins to break Attempting to intially compact too soon may result in mixture shoving by the roller due to presence of excessive moisture in the mixture which will deshycrease mixture stability Rolling to meet density requirements may be accomplished using steel wheel pneumatic or vibratory rollers Finish rolling should be performed with a steel wheel roller Further details of compaction techniques and equipshyment may be found in References 3 6 and 9
86
Central Plant Mixed For central plant mixed emulshysified asphalt mixtures rolling should generally be performed as soon as possible after lay down as in many cases due to the time required for hauling and placing of the mixture the emulsion may have begun to break However initial rolling should not be performed until the mixture is stable enough to support the roller Initial rolling is generally accomplished using pneumatic rollers intermediate rolling with either pneumatic or steel wheel rolshylers and finish rolling with steel wheel rollers Further information on compaction of plant-mixed emulsified asphalt mixtures are also found in Refershyences 3 6 and 9
87
100 CONCLUSIONS
Based on testing mixture designs and analyses pershyformed with the materials studied during this investishygation several conclusions regarding the use of solshyvent free asphalt and sulfur-extended asphalt emulshysions with aggregates from California may be drawn
101 Solvent Free Asphalt Emulsions
A summary of ANOVA significant at the 95 percent confidence level is tabulated in Table 33 This table shows for nearly all dependent variables that emulsion type aggregate quality level and aggreshygate are significant effects For several paramshyeters several interactions are also significant Conclusions reached during the asphalt emulsion experiment are
1 Stable solvent free cationic slow set and catshyionic medium set asphalt emulsions can be proshyduced which meet Caltrans specifications for cationic emulsionse
2 Solvent free cationic asphalt emulsions can effectively coat aggregates with minus No 200 mesh contents in excess of 10 percent and sand equivalent values as low as 15 Greater degrees of coating are obtained with solvent free catshyionic slow set emulsions than with solvent free cationic medium set emulsions
3 In the laboratory and for the materials used in this study greater degrees of compaction can be obtained using a conventional cationic medium set emulsion which contains 7 percent solvent than with solvent free asphalt emulsions
4 Higher stabilometer values cohesiometer values and resilient moduli are obtained for laboratory mixtures containing low quality aggregates with the solvent free asphalt emulsions than with the emulsion containing solvent This is believed due to the higher viscosity of the solvent free emulsion residues when compared to the residue from the emulsion containing solvent
88
Table 33
SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL
ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT
DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS A a E AQ AE OE AQE
Emulsion Conpatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA - NA - NA NA
2 Day bdulus y y y - y y y
Full cure Ddulus y y y - - - -Density y y y - - - -Air Voids y y y - - - -
Stabilometer y y y y Y y -Cohesiometer y y y y y - -MVS Stabilometer y y y - y y -MVS Cohesiometer - - y - - - -SWell y y y y y y y
Surface Abrasion y y y y y y y
LEGEND
Effects
A = effect of aggregate type Q = effect of aggregate quality level E = effect of emulsion type
AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction
AQE = three-way interaction
Significance
Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level
NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way
89
5 Laboratory specimens containing solvent free asphalt emulsions experience higher losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivity procedure than specishymens with the asphalt emulsion containing solshyvent This effect however may be related to the lesser degrees of compaction attained when using the solvent free asphalt emulsions as comshypared to the emulsion containing solvent
6 Laboratory specimens which contained the solvent free asphalt emulsions with lower quality aggreshygates experienced higher amounts of swell and greater surface abrasion losses than specimens with the emulsion containing solvent
7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the solvent free asphalt emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thicknesses are required when using solvent free emulsions It is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials which may be an important factor in field performance
8 Most of the paving mixtures investigated which contained the low quality aggregates and the solvent free asphalt emulsions met stabilometer requirements for Caltrans Type C asphalt conshycrete However only three of the mixtures also met moisture vapor susceptibility and swell requirements Mixtures which met these requireshyments were - FH with CSS-0 emulsion GRH with CMS-0 emulsion and GRH with CMS-7 emulsion
9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other considershyations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others
90
- - - --- ----------
102 Sulfur-Extended-Asphalt Emulsions
A summary of ANOVA significance at the 95 percent confidence level is shown in Table 34 This table showsmiddotfor nearly all parameters that emulsion type aggregate quality level and aggregate are signifishycant effects For several parameters several interactions are also significant Conclusions reached during the SEA emulsion experiment are
1 Stable solvent free water based anionic slow set emulsions using sulfur-extended-asphalt (SEA) base stocks can be produced which meet most Caltrans specifications for anionic slow set emulsions
2 Anionic SEA emulsion can effectively coat both low and high quality aggregates
3 Use of SEA emulsions resulted in higher resilshyient modulus values for both low and high qualshyity aggregates than use of the emulsion containshying solvent
4 Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions had higher stabilometer values with low quality aggregates than mixtures with the emulsion containing solshyvent
5 Specimens containing the SEA emulsion with low quality aggregates swelled to a greater extent and experienced higher surface abrasion losses than those with the emulsion containing solvent
6 Specimens containing the SEA emulsions experishyence greater losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivshyity procedure than specimens with the solvent asphalt emulsion indicating a greater sensitivshyity to moisture
7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thickshynesses would be required when using SEA emulshysions Again it is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials
91
Table 34
SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL
SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT
DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS
effect of aggregate type effect of aggregate quality level effect of emulsion type
AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction
A a E AQ AE QE AQE
Emulsion Compatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA y NA y NA NA
2 Day Mxfalus y y y - y y y
Full Cure Mldulus y - y - - - -Density y y y - - y y
Air Voids y y y - - - -
Stabilometer - y y - y - -
COhesiometer - y - - - - -MIS Stabilaneter y y y y y - -
MVS COhesianeter y y y - y y -y
~ y y y y y y
Surface Abrasion
LEGEND
Effects
A = Q = E =
AQE = three-way interaction
Significance
Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level
NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way
92
8 All of the paving mixtures containing low qualshyity aggregates and SEA emulsions studied met Caltrans stabilometer requirements (30 minimum) for Type C asphalt concrete however several mixtures did not meet swell and moisture vapor susceptibility requirements for Type C asphalt concrete Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions which met swell requirements were FH GRH and GRL with SS-15 SEA emulsion and SBH FH FL GRH and GRL with SS-30 SEA emulsion MVS conshyditioned stabilometer value requirements were met only by FL and GRH with the SS-15 SEA emulshysion and GRH with the SS-30 SEA emulsion
9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other consider~ ations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others
93
110 RECOMMENDATIONS
111 This study has investigated the properties of paving mixtures containing several low quality aggregates and several types of emulsified binders Test methshyods and criteria used to design and assess mixture characteristics were those specified for hot-mix asphalt concrete in California An objective of the research study is to determine if solvent free emulshysified binders can be used in place of cutback asphalt binders Therefore in order to permit drawing of appropriate conclusions from the data presented in this report on the effectiveness of the emulsions studied for replacing cutback asphalts additional laboratory work is required It is suggested that properties and characteristics of mixtures containing the project aggregates and cutshyback asphalts be determined The study should evalshyuate the same properties considered in this study Determination of mixture characteristics using cutshyback binders would permit direct comparisons between the cutback and emulsified binder systems and the drawing of more definite conclusions Additionally a study which would determine properties of mixtures containing hot-mixed asphalt cement would be of aid in evaluating results
112 After completion of the additional laboratory studshyies if results so indicate it is recommended that several field experimental studies using aggregates ranging in quality from low to high with solvent free emulsified asphalt binders be undertaken Projects should be constructed in several climatic regions in California (wet and arid) and should include control sections containing both cutback and if possible hot-mixed asphalts Proper labshyoratory mixture designs construction control and field monitoring of results and performance should be used Results of these experiments should proshyvide indications of performance of the various mixtures in actual use
113 Results of this study indicate that mixtures conshytaining the SEA binders are detrimentally affected by moisture to a greater degree than with standard emulsions However performance of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions may be adequate in arid regions Therefore it is recommended that in order
94
to further investigate the usefulness of paving mixshytures containing the SEA emulsions that field experimental test sections using the SEA emulsions be constructed and evaluated$
It is strongly suspected that the moisture vapor susceptibility of the solvent free asphalt emulsion mixes evaluated herein could be reduced by a slight modification of the emulsion formulations This possibility should be evaluated
95
References
1 Request For Proposals Investigation Into The Nature Of Emulsified Asphalts Compatible With California Local Aggregates And Substitution Of Sulfur For Asphalt In Aqueous Emulsified Systems California Air Resource Board Research Division Sacramento Calishyfornia March 1980
2 American Society for Testing and Materials 1981 Annual Book of Standards Part 15 Road Paving Bituminous Materials Travelled Surface Characterisshytics Philadelphia PA 1981
3 Interim Guide to Full-Depth Asphalt Paving Using Varshyious Asphalt Mixes The Asphalt Institute Pacific Coast Division PCD-1 January 1976
4 Kennepahl GJA Logan A and Bean D C Conshyventional Paving Mixes with Sulfur-Asphalt Binders Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975
5 Deme Imants Processing of Sand-Asphalt-Sulfur Mixes Proceedings AAPT Volume 43 1974
6 A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual The Asphalt Instishytute Manual Series No 19 MS-19) March 1979
7 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Use of Cutback Asphalt US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Waste Management Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park North Carolina October 17 1977
8 Highway Chemicals Newsletter Armak Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois Fall 1981
9 Bitumils Mix Manual Chevron USA Asphalt Division January 1977
10 Asphalt Pavement Engineering Wallace Hugh A and Martin J Rogers McGraw Hill Book Company New York 1967
11 Spahr J D The Use of Emulsified Asphalt in Conshystruction and Maintenance Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975
96
12 Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design Asphalt Emulsions Volume 4 1977
13 Dybalski J N 11 The Chemistry of Asphalt Emulsions Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D C January 1976
14 Beagle C w Deflection and Performance of Deep Lift Asphalt Emulsion Base Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976
15 Meier w J Asphalt Emulsion Construction on the Navajo Reservation Twenty-Fifth Annual Arizona Conshyference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 22-23 1976
16 Kallas B F and Shock J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Find Report - Parts I and
11II Research Report 77-1 The Asphalt Institute November 1977
17 Shook J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Analysis of Performance Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976
18 Wimberly C M Emulsified Asphalt Mixes in Arizona Proceedings 24th Annual Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 17-18 1975
19 Izalt J O Galloway B M and Saylock D SandshyAsphalt-Sulfur Pavement Experimental Project Highway US 77 Kennedy County Texas Texas Transportation Institute April 1977
20 McBee w c and Sullivan T A Direct Substitution of Sulfur for Asphalt In Paving Materials 11 Report of Investigations 8303 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines 1978
21 Ludwig A C Gerhardt B B and Dale JM Materials and Techniques for Improving the Engineering Properties of Sulfur Report No FHWA-RD-80-023 Fedshyeral Highway Administration June 1980
22 Jiminez R A and Stakes K J Effects of Heat and Air on the Viscosity of Sulfur-Asphalt Mixtures Preshysented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies San Diego California February 16-18 1981
97
23 Chehovits J G and Anderson D A Upgrading of Marginal Aggregates for Improved Water Resistance of Asphalt Concrete Transportation Research Record 762 pages 46-52 1981
24 Rosner JC and Chehovits J G Highway Binder Materials From Modified Sulfur-Water Emulsionsn Report No FHWARD-82035 Federal Highway Administration November 1981
25 Standard Specifications State of California Department of Transportation January 1978
26 Applied Linear Statistical Models Neter I and Wasserman w Richard D Irwin Inc Homewood Illinois 1974
27 Burr I W and Foster LA A Test For Equality of variances Mimeograph Series No 282 Statistics Department Purdue University Lafayette Indiana 1972
28 Applied Statistical Methods Burr I W Academic Press Inc New York 1974
29 Parr W K Field Observations of the Behavior of Bituminous Pavements As Influenced By Moisture 11 ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 3-16--I959
30 Rice JM Relationship of Aggregate Characteristics to the Effect of Water on Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 17-34 1959
31 Lettman R P and Johnson D L 11 Pressure Induced Stripping in Asphaltic Concrete Highway Research Record 340 pages 13-28 1970
32 Waller F H Jr Emulsion Mix Design Methods An Overview 11 Transportation Research Record 754 1980
33 Design of Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures Report R6-350(74) US Forest Service 1974
34 11Mix Design Procedure For Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Pavement FHWA Region 10 Office of Federal Highway Projects
98
35 Darter M I Ahlfield S R Wilky P L and Wasill R G Development of Emulsified Asphalt Aggregate Cold Mix Design Procedure Research Report 505-5 Department of Civil Engineering University of Illinois 1978
36 A A Gadallah L E Wood and E J Yoder A Suggested Method for the Preparation and Testing of Asphalt-Emulsion-Treated Mixtures Using Marshall Equipment Proceedings AAPT Volume 46 1977
37 Marshall Stability Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois
38 Jiminez R A Final Report-Phase I Asphalt Emulsion Treated Aggregates University of Arizona Research Report HPR-1-13(150) January 1977
39 George K P Interim Report on Criteria for Emulshysified Asphalt Stabilization of Sandy Soils Univershysity of Mississippi for Mississippi State Highway Department October 1976
40 Fong G K Mix Design Methods for Base and Surface Courses Using Emulsified Asphalt A State-of-the-Art Report Report No FHWA-RD-78-113 Federal Highway Administration October 1978
41 Schmidt R J A Practical Method for Measuring the Resilient Modulus of Asphalt-Treated Mixes Highway Research Record 404 1972
42 Manual of Test Volume 2 State of California Department of Transportation Transporation Laboratory Third Edition 1978
43 Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete Manual Series No 2 (MS-2) The Asphalt Institute March 1979
99
-
APPENDIX A
OPTIMUM FLUIDS AT COMPACTION DATA
-
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table Al
Percent Residue
631 631 631
702 702 702
595 595 595
678 678 678
689 689 689
645 645 645
Fluids at Compaction Data css-o
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
467 367 216
1098 998 847
571 413 360
1273 1115 10 62
455 370 341
1050 965 936
590 450 400
1268 1128 1078
492 183 109
1181 872 798
404 311 139
1049 956 784
Dry Density
(pcf)
1304 1337 1347
1283 1326 1306
133l 1310 9 1317
1328 1295 1304
1404 1529 154 1
1429 1466 1462
Al
css-o CSS-0HIGH QUALITY155- DRY LOW QUALITYbull SAN BERNARDINO 1551
bull SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO 150-I I 150 FRESNObull GRANITEROCK bull GRANITEROCK
I ~
145 LoPT=B5 145 () () - -0 0
~140 gt1401 L- 0 PT= 85 OPT=100gt-i
N Cl) OPT=100 Cl)
DRYZ 135 Z 135w w Cl Cl
amp130 amp130 Cl 0
125 125
120 I i I I i I i I I I 120 I I J I I i I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure Al Fluids at Compaction Figure A2 Fluids at Compaction High Quality Aggre-gate CSS-0 Low Quality CSS-0
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A2
Percent Residue
605 605 605
704 704 704
595 595 595
695 695 695
556 556 556
604 604 604
Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-0
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
4 16 316 183
1021 921 788
494 389 262
1198 1093
966
529 392 360
1124 987 955
519 479 301
1214 1174
996
284 187 124
840 743 680
319 256 165
923 860 769
Dry Density
(pcf)
1331 131 6 1316
1305 1320 1313
1282 1313 1312
1321 1298 1279
1478 1479 1463
1452 1463 1453
A3
155 CMS-0 HIGH QUALITY
150~ DRY bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
145 bull GRANITEROCK72_ OPT=90 0 0
~140gt-ii OPT=105i Cl)
Z 135 w 0
gt- D~0 130 middot 0
125 [OPT100
120 I i I i i I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A3 Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-0
155] 150
0 1451 0
~140gt- Cl)
Z 135 w 0
fc130 0
125
120 I 6
CMS-0
LOW QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
bull GRANITEROCK
v[A OPTf90
pound 0 PT12DoOPTr110
7 I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A4 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-0
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A3
Percent Residue
769 769 769
746 746 746
595 595 595
714 714 714
570 570 570
587 587 587
Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-7
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
460 391 294
1229 1160 1063
573 436 301
13 19 1182 1047
513 380 2 57
1108 975 852
513 404 334
1227 1118 1048
231 170 080
801 740 650
263 146 109
850 733 6096
Dry Density
(pcf)
1329 1377 1376
1335 135l 134 2
1357 1333 1342
1299 1317 1308
1519 1523 1498
1503 1517 1514
AS
CMS-7 155-- HIGH QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNOlSO~ nPT80 145
0 -0 -140 middot gt-
r t deg Cl)
Z 135 w Cl
fi130 Cl
125-1
120 I 6
GRANITEROCK
~OPT=105
IJ
I 7
I I i I i I 8 9 10 11 12 13
TOTAL FLUIDS
I 14
I 15
Figure AS Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-7
155
150
145
0 -0
gt--140
t Cl)
Z 135 w Cl
fc 130 Cl
125
120 I 6
CMS-7 LOW QUALITY
C bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
GRANITEROCKOPT 80
~OPT105
~
tos i I I i J i i I I 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A6 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-7
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A4
Percent Residue
765 765 765 765 765 765
815 815 815 815 815 815
765 765 765
817 817 817 817 817 8el7
574 574 574
738 738 738 738 738 738
Fluids at Compaction Data SS 15 SEA
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
563 426 315 580 346 178
1328 1191 1080 1345 1111
943
595 418 309 599 256 137
14 10 1233 1124 1414 1071 952
600 440 356
1365 1205 1121
683 541 418 629 457 283
1500 1358 1235 1446 1274 1100
374 247 128
948 821 702
451 301 175 435 186 073
1189 1039
913 1173
924 811
Dry Density
(pcf)
1289 1319 1335 1286 1331 1332
1278 1314 1315 1276 1304 1299
1281 1325 1313
1259 1290 1303 1275 1292 1294
1450 1485 1482
1428 1459 1468 1437 1465 1465
A7
bull bull
SS 15 SEA 155 HIGH QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot
150 FRESNO
bull GRANITEROCK
145
0 0 -
OPT=75
-_ gt=140 I-ii OPT100co C)
z 135 w _--0PTr1200
gt-0 130--0
125
120 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A7 Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 15 SEA
SS 15 SEA LOW QUALITY155
bull SAN BERNARDINO-
FRESNO 150
bull GRANITEROCK 145
~-0 0 LOPT=80a140gt-t Cf)
Z135 w r-OPT=105 0
gt-0 130 -~middot 0
OPT120J 125
120 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure AB Fluids at Compaction Low Quality SS 15 SEA
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table AS
Percent Residue
688 688 688
722 722 722 722 722 722
680 680 680 680 6 80 680
726 726 7 26 726 726
510 510 510
596 596 596 596 596 596
Fluids at Compaction Data SS 30 SEA
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
595 468 150
1283 1156
838
645 438 267 660 566 440
1367 1160
989 1382 1288 1162
650 531 432 629 422 332
1330 1211 1112 1309 1102 1012
767 614 443 547 370
1493 1340 1169 1273 1096
413 300 167
923 810 677
468 3 46 191 485 258 096
1064 942 787
10 ~ 81 854 692
Dry Density
(pcf)
1299 1337 1332
1286 1319 1324 1281 1302 1326
129l 1315 1333 1294 1333 131 5
1259 1278 1322 1294 1313
1464 1509 1496
1435 1472 1499 1426 1487 1476
A9
SS 30 SEASS 30 SEA LOW QUALITY
155 HIGH QUALITY 1551 bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddotbull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO
FRESNO 150150-I -middotmiddot-- -bull --middotmiddot I ~ t -- a GRANITEROCK a GRANITEROCK
145145
~-bull80 0 --0 00 ~140~140
J-gt- gt-~ I- = OPT=100 Cl)0 Cl) [Ij 135Z 135
lJJ Cl
gt- ~1300 130 middot ClCl ( 0
OPT=110 125~ OPT=115125
120-t----~--------------r---120 I l J J J I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 156 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS TOT AL FLUIDS
Figure A9 Fluids at Compaction Figure AlO Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 30 SEA Low Quality SS 30 SEA
-~
i
APPENDIX B
MIXTURE DESIGN DATA
TABLE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality css-o Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absortied Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
lhit Weight pcf
StabiJcneter Value
~iareter Value
Jesilient -bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
500
----------
40
u 30 ltgt
ffi 20 w ~10
m lt
o
w l 400 lt gt a w t 300 0 iii ~ 200 8
100 12
10111
ui 0
i5 8gt lt
6
4
50
21740
24488
112
194
100
400
1357
375
197
117
345
60
21823
24163
97
199
100
500
1362
330
207
134
271
70
21772
23853
87
208
100
600
1359
272
193
118
260
Iesign 7 0
87
208
100
600
1359
272
193
118
260
24
22d c lt i
20i
= 0 i5
18 gt
16
140
138 - a
~136 z w 0
134
132
bull 500 a
0 400 uil 300 0
~ 200 zi 100 iii w a
--
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE CONTENT Jo (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Bl
TABLE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residue 0intent 50 60 70 Dsian 7 o
Bulk Siecipoundic Gravity 21804
llleoretical Specipoundic Gravity 24280
Air Voids 102
VMA 192
Absorbed Asphalt 063
Efpoundective Asphalt 437
Unit Weight pf 1361
Stabilcirieter Value 427
Cbhesicireter Value 352
Fesilielt Mxlulus 103psi
2-day 85
middotFinlJ 355
50
40
_ gt a 30 w w
~ 20 10
500
300
200
100
8
6
4
l 400 gt
~ w 0
~ 8
12
_ 10
= 0 gt
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
21863 21992
23964 23660
88 71 71
197 200 200
063 063 063
537 637 637
1364 1372 1372
363 313 313
292 234 234
63 83 83 429 232 232
24
22
ci i
20i
= = 0 gt
18
16
138
p6 ~ Q
134 a w
o 132
130
500 Q -
o 400 --3 300 0 ~-~ 200 a ~ 100 w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COtlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
B2
TABLE B3 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllroretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
~fective Asphalt
Unit Weight middotCf
Stabilareter VaJue
Cbhesiareter VaJue
Resilient l-bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
so
11140 gt o30 IU w ~20
m
10
w l 400 gt 0
~ 0 ~ 200 8
100
14
12 11-
In Q
ho C
8
6
50 60 70 Dsi9 7 O 21308 21729 21595 24562 24235 23922
132 103 97 97 210 202 215 215 113 113 113 113 387 487 587 587
1329 1356 1348 1348 378 345 375 375
314 270 280 280
82 96 104 104 281 260 267 267
500
300 ~
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS
24
11-22ci
ltI i i 20 Cl) Q 180 gt
16
138
136 u - 134 Cl) z IU Q
132
130
bull500
400 Inl 300 Q bull~ 200 z ~ 100middot IU 0
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS
FIGURE B3 Mixture Design Data Sari Bernardin6 High Quality CMS o Replication 1
B3
TABLE B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue GJntent
Bulk seecific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity
50
21491
24334
60
21459
24014
70
21526
23709
Iesiqn 70
Air Voids 117 106
VMA 204 212
Absocbed Asphalt 0 72 o 72
Effective Asphalt 428 528
Unit Weight pcf 1341 133 9
Stabilrneter Value 437 406
GJhesiareter Value 337 248 3
Iesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-cay
Final
50
w 40 gt 0 30 w w 0 20 co 10
500
w
3 400 gt 0 w t- 300 w 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
_ 10
0 8gt -lt
6
4
FIGURE
61 66
410 318
24
22~ ci
i 20
~
18 a gt
16
138
_136 u a 134 z ~ w 0
132
130
bull500
a
a 400 -3 300 _ a ~ 200 z ~ 100-
w 0
90 90
21 7 21 7
0 72 072
628 628
1343 1343
344 J44
252 252
82 82
250 250
---------
D 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDU CONTENT I (A_GGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B4
TABLE BS Mixture Design Data San Bernardin9 High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Siecific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
lir Voids
VMA
2bserberl Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stalgtilaneter Value
Cbhesiareter Value 3
Resilient Mgtdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
40
Ill 30 lt( gt a 20 Ill Ill 0 10
~ iii lt CII 0
400
Ill
3 300 lt(
gt a Ill200 == 0
~100 c 8
0
12
10 ui 0
0 8gt 5 lt(
6
4
FIGURE
~
~
5 6 7 84 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
50 60 70 Cesian 70
21652
24484
21904
24149
22005
23828
116
198
107
3-93
135l
345
224
18
240
93 77 77 196 200 200 107 107 107 493 593 593
1367 1373 1373 288 235 235
136 80 80
17 21 21 128 78 78
24
22ci lt(
z 20il
= CII C 0
18 gt
16
I-~
140
+38- ~136 1- z Ill 0 134
132
bull 500 a
o 400 3 300 C
~ 200 z 100 Ill a ~
0 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino_BS High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
BS
TABLE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Residue Content
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Ihegtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tmit WeightL pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesllllleter Value
Iesilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
a 20 UI w i
~10
lt 0
400
3300 lt gt a ~200 w i 0
119 93
197 l93
126 126
374 474
l353 l372
357 283
l26 l03
45 36
203 132
2440
30 22 0 0lt ltgt
16
~100 ~ 8 0 132
500 a
o 400 --ai 300 -
middot 0
~
~
w a
_ 10
ltn 0
0 8gt lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
50 60 70 Cesign 7 o
2l679
24595
21990
24255
22190
23931
- i 20
a 180 gt
140
138 - a
~136 z w 0 134
200
100middot
0 4
73 73
193 193
126 1 26
574 574
1385 1385
235 235
82 82
3l 3l
64 64
-0 $ e
~ 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B6
TABLE B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Pesidue Qlnte~t
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihroretical Speciic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
~tabilcmeter Value
ohesicrneter Value
resilient lbdulus l0 3psi
2-aay
Final
60 72 8 5 Iesicm 75
21762 21906 21779
23981 23617 23245 93 73 63 70
202 205 220 21 0
063 063 063 063
537 657 787 687
1358 1367 1359 1365 375 290 203 270
474 401 239 360
163 172 161 170 449 329 310 320
2440
ii 30 22 ci
Cl c cgt z 20 201 s ~ 310 e 18 0
gt c
0 16
500 140
w
3 400 _138c gt
~ 300 s 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
- 10 0 0 0 8gt c
6
4
FIGURE
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIOUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COITEIT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
il36 z IU Cl 134
132
bull 500
c 400 -
3 300 - Cl
sectl 200 ~- z ~ 100
w
0
B7
111 10 ui e 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
TABLE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
500
400 gt C
72 85 resian 7 s
21873 21738
23581 23210
72 63 70 207 22l 21 0
055 055 055 665 795 695
1365 1356 1365 287 188 265
349 341 345
191 187 190 287 266 280
24 ------------
111 22
Cl Cl lt -i ~ 20
= a 18 0 gt
16 _____________
138
136 a 134 () w a
132
130___________
soar------------ D a
1 400 ~
ui3 300 C
~ 200
100
w C
0---------------------5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUlc CONTENT lt
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
BB
Fesidue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcrreter Value
Cbhesiareter Value 3Resilient -bdulus 10 psi
2-day
Finll
60
m 50 - 40
IIJ ~ 30 CJ lt 1- 20
60
21669
23943
95
205
055
545
1352
560
416
195
425
~ 300 0 ()
~ 200 8
100---------------
12 -------------
RESIDUE CONTENT lto (AGGREGATE BASIS)
TABLE B9 Mixture Design Data San Ber~irdino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Pesiclue Content 60 Z1 as D=sign 7 5
Bulk Spccific Gravity 21697 21368 21255
Iheoretical Specific Gravity 23973 23610 23238
Air Voids 94 95 85 93
VMA 204 225 middot 23 8 230
middot-Absorbed Asphalt 061 061 061 061
Effective Asphalt 539 659 789 689
middot middotmiddotUnit Weight pcf 1354 133 3 1326 1330
-Stabilareter Value 460 375 225 340
CohesianeterValue 400 422 499 440
Iesilient MxUlus 103psi
2-oay 159 i0s 185 185
Final 290 299 283 295
60
w
l 400
24
22
ci 0 i 20l
= Q 180 gt
16
138
136
gt a 134~ 300 w l z0 IU 132 200
8 130
100-----------------_---I
12 ---------------- 500
o 400 10 ~
300 bull bullQ
Q0 8gt ~ 200 z
6 ~ 100
w a4 ___ __________ o
5 6 7 8 9 s 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COtlTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B9 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication l
B9
TABLE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Pesidue Conte1t 60 72 85 resign 75
Bulk Spcecific Gravity
Theoretical Sjeeipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Ohesianeter Value
Pesilient ~us 103psi
2---day
Final
60
50 lt gt cc40 w -w
~30 = CJ
lt 20
21635
24066
10l
206
078
522
1350
51 8
482
151
285
21481
23699
94
221
078
642
1341
378
459
150
286
24
11-22
ci Cl lt
~ 20 z
C 18
0 gt
21302
23323
87 92
237 225
078 078
7 72 6 72
1329 1338
246 350
343 430
162 155
254 280
I 16
500 138
UJ
400 136 lt gt
acc ~ UJ
134 300 z2 UI CJ_32 ~ 200
8 130
bull500
a
c 400 - 10 300 ~ Jf
C0 8gt ~ 200 ~ lt z
6 ~ 100-
UJ 0
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDU~ COrlTENT
(AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino
100 12
~
Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
BlO
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
TABLE Bll
Residue Content
Bulk Secific Gravity
Iheiretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesicrneter Value
Resilient MXiulus l03psi
2-day
Final
60 72 85 D=sign 75
21817 22108 21917
23977 23601 23216
90 63 56 62
200 198 215 200
o 72 o 72 o 72 o 72
528 648 778 678
136l 1380 1368 137 5
242 162 76 130
151 175 215 190
52 63 41 55
202 122 60 110
244middot0
~ 30 22 ci lt 20 i 201 IU = en ~ 10 E 18 m 0lt gt
0 16
----
w
l 400 lt gt a ~ w 0 ~ 8
12
-t
ltn 0 0 gt a lt
FIGURE
5
500
300
200 ~ 100
10
8
6
134
500 a
c 400 -
_ 300 0
g 200
~ 100 ~in IU a
0 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Bll Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
142
I-40 u a
~ 138 in w 0
136 ~
Bll
TABLE Bl2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Pesidue Q)ntent
Bulk Spzcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic
Air Voids
V bull t-LA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Gravity
60
22026
24085
85
192
092
508
72
22062
23705
69
200
092
628
85
21901
23315
61
215
092
758
resign 75
67
205
092
6 58
Unit Weight pcf 1374
Stabiloreter Value 193
Ohesiareter Value 177 3
Resilient Mxrulus 10 psi
2-day 63
Fi-ial 138
40
m 30 J lt gt a 20 IU w 0 10 ~ lt
0
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w 9 ~ 200 _________ 8
100 12
10 9 0 8gt ~6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE 8ASISI
1377
127
193
1367
90
160
137 5
120
180
53
107
32
52
48
95
24
22ci 0 lt
20
= ~
9 18 0 gt
16
142
140 a
~138 z w C
136
134
9
500 a
dego 400-
3 300 ~- a ~ 200 z ~ 100
w a
0 5
~ 6 7 8 9
RES IOU~ CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl2 Mixture Design Data -san Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Bl2
TABLE Bl 3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcrneter VaJue
CJgthesiarneter Value
Pesilient MxbJ11lS 10 3psi
2-day
Final
60
so gt
40a w 0 30 GI 20
500
l 400 gt a w t- 300 w 5 rn ~ 200 8
100 12
Ill 10 0 8gt
6
4
50
21789
24250
10l
164
1 95
305
1360
513
330
191
282
~ bull
~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASIS)
60
21762
2 34 34
91
173
1 95
405
135middot8
567
284
168
434
24
Ill 22ci Cl
is 20
= 0 gt
18
16
142
140- ~138 iii z 0
136
134
bull500
o 400 -
l 300 C
~ 200 z 100 iii a
0 4
70 resign 70
21872
23632
75 75 177 177
1 bull 95 1 95 505 505
136S 136S 393 393
280 280
217 217 482 482
~
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASISI
FIGURE Bl3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality css~o Replication 1
Bl3
--------------
TABLE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Resid= Content 50 60 70 eesicn 7o
Bulk Siecific Gravity 21692 21677 21662
Ihroretical Specific Gravity 24501 24176 23865
Air Voids 115 103 92 92
VMA 169 176 185 185
Absorbed Asphalt 240 240 240 240
Effective Asphalt 260 360 460 460
Unit Weight pcpound 1354
Stabilaneter Value 580
Cohesicrneter Value 270 3Resilielt Mdulus 10 psi
2-day 149
Final 408
60
w so lt gt
w C o w le 0 30 m lt
20
500
w
~ 400 lt gt C
~ 300 w S ~ 200 ~ 8
100 12
- 10 m a 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AG GREGATE BASIS)
1353 1352 1352
442 327 327
276 183 183
173 191 191
373 299 299
24
22d c lt z
20E 18 0 gt
16
140
138 u C
136 w C 134
132
500 C
1 400 gt- m =gt 300 a ~ 200
l 100- IU C
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication
Bl4
2
bull bull bullbull
TABLE Bl5 Mixture Design-Data Fresno High Quality CMS-QReplication 1
Bulk Spcific Gravity
lheoreticaJ Specific Gravity Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mldulus l0 3psi 2-clay
Final
60
m 50 C gt a 40 w w
~ 30 C m
10
~idue Content 50 6_ 0 70 Daisi2 7 O
5oor----------
w
l 400 C gt a ~ 300 w I 0 iii ~ 200 8
100-------------
12 ----------
111 10 C
0 8gt C
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT J
(AG GREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl5 Mixture
21755 21305 23795 23497 86 93 93
163 198 198 l 69 l 69 l69 431 531 531
1336 1329 1329 420 307 307
247 230 230
180 i55 155
246 253 253
24
22d
Cl C
i 20I
J ~ C 18 ~ 0 gt
16
21434
24106
11l
179
l69
331
1337
472
373
175
247
138
136- 134 z w C
132
130
bull 500
dego 400 - l 300 C
~ 200 z l 100 iii w a
0
-~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT J (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Bl5
TABLE Bl6 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
helretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
lbsorled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabil=ter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
Eesilient Mxrulus 10
2-day
Firal
60
50 J gt c 40
~ 30 m 20
500
w
l 400 gt a ~ 300 w
3psi
50 60 70
21339 2 1398 21475
24241 23925 23623
120 106 91
181 187 192
1 94 l 94 1 94
306 406 506
1331 1335 1340
558 43 7 377
340 313 219
149 152 154
317 345 288
Jesign70
91
192
194
506
1340
377
219
154
288
24
22d CJ i sect 20
= a 18 ~ 0 gt
16
138
136
a 134
z w ~ C ~ 200 132 8
130 100
14 500 a
o 400 - 12
3 300 - ~ 0 C gt 10 a ~ 200 ~ z
l 100
8
w a
0 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl6bull Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Bl6
TABLE Bl 7 Mixture Qesign Data Fresno High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
Pesidue Content 50 60 70 Cesign 7 O
Bulk siec~tic Gravity 21959 22101 22128
Iheoretical Specific Gravity 24539 24201 23879
Air Voids 105 87 73 73
VMA 158 160 167 167
~rbed Asphalt 252 252 252 252
Effective Asphalt 248 348 448 448
Unit Weight pcf 1370 1379 1380 1380
S~ter Value 467 370 213 213
Clgthesiareter Value 289 3Resilient l-Ddulus 10 psi
2-clay 47
FinaJ 294
50
Ill 40 o(
gt cc 30 Ill w 0 20 lt 10
500
w l 400 lt gt cc ~ 300 Ill 0 ~ 200 8 ~
100 12
10 deg C
0 gt 8 ~l lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
147 122 122
65 35 35
214 75 75
22
J 20 o(
ii 18 16 ~ 0 gt
14
142
140 u Q
~138 z Ill
Cl 136
134
500 Q
o400 uil 300 Cl
g 200 z ~ 100 ~w cc
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
IIESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Bl7
TABLE Bl8 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Dsiqn 70
Bulk Specific Gravity 22191 22285 22092
Theoretical Specific Gravity 24199 23874 23563
Air Voids 82 66 62 62
VMA 149 153 168 168
Absorled AsphaJt 192 192 192 192
Effective AsphaJt 308 408 508 508
Unit Weight pcf 1385
Stabilareter Value 357
Cohesianeter Value 268 3Resilient MxhIJus 10 psi
2-day 75
Final 217
40
w 30 J lt gt a 20 w w i
~ 10
0
500
w
3 400 gt a
l 300 w i
ltn
~ 200 8
139l
342
238
137 9
233
192
137 9
233
192
84
117
63
73
63
73
20
0 0 ~ i
= 0 gt
18
16
14
12
~
144
142 140 z w 0
138
136 100-----1---1--1---l
12 ---------- 500 0bull
o 400 -11110 en a 3 300 = 0 08gt ~ 200
z 6 ~ 100middot
w a
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT
4
RESIDUE CONTENT
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Bl8
FresnoTABLE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Low Quality css-o Replication 1
Eesidlle Content 60 70 80 Dasi51 7 5
Bulk Specific Gravity 21698 21611 21514 Iheoretical Specilic Gravity 23803 23505 23220
Air Voids 89 81 73 77
VMA 175 186 198 192
Absorbed Asphalt 171 l 71 171 171
Effective Asphalt 429 529 629 679
Unit Weight pcf 1354 1349 1342 1345
Stabi]cmeter Value 513 398 359 380
eohesianeter value 506 449 481 465
Resilient Modulus 10 3psi
2-day 176 176 241 205
Final 312 383 353 365
2460
all so 22 ci cgt
40 I-
20 E
I = g 30 18iii 0 gt
20
16
500
300
100
10
8
6
4
138
136l 400
u -gt a
~ I 0 in l1200 8
12
111 Q
0 gt ~
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE COITENT Jo
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
~ ~ 134 z w 0
132
130
500 -
l 400 -
300 ~n
Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 in Ill IC
0
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Bl9
TABLE B20 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residlle Content i
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihegtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
CJhesiareter Value 3
Resilient Mxfulus 10 psi
2-day
Finll
60
50 lt 40 w w
~ 30 m lt 20
500
w
3 400 lt gt a ~ ~ 300 w 51 rn 200 8
100----------------
12 --------------
10 9 0 8gt lt
6
4 s 6 7 8
RESIDUE COPlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
60 70 80 resign 75
21451 21476 21666
23932 23629 23340
104
185
194
406
1339
586
436
147
313
91
192
1 94
506
1340
403
416
179
347
24
22 0 0 lt
~ 20
= 9 18 0 gt
16
140
138 - Cl
136 w cl34
132
bull 500
-0 400__
3 300 I
~ 200
~ 100 rn w a
0
7 2 82
192 192
194 194
606 656
1352 1345
24 8 325
333 375
186 182
361 358
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COPITEPlT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
~
Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
B20
TABLE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
lesidue Content 60 70 80 resign 75
Bulk Siecific Gravity 21525 21406 21152 lllroretical Specific Gravity 23855 23555 23268 Air Voids 98 91 91 91 VMA 182 194 211 2middot03 1osorled Asphalt 180 1 80 180 180 Effective Asphalt 420 520 620 570 Ulit Weight pcf 1343 1336 1330 1335 Stabilateter Value 487 460 373 415 Oxlesiareter Value 418 392 323 355
3lesilielt Mldulus 10 psi
2-clay 188 177 200 190
Final 289 299 281 290
6or----------- 24
m 50 lt gt 11 40 w w I
~ 30 m lt 20
_J_
22ci 0 lt z
20EE
= 0 180 gt
16
5oor---------- 138
w
l 400 lt gt
136- a ~ 300 w i 0
fa34 z w
~ 200 Cll32 -8
100-----------i-~ 130
12 ------------ 500bulla
10 ________ o 400 - 0
0 gt
8
gJdeg 300 0
~- 200 ---e-
lt z
6 l 100 w 4
5 6 7 8 9 0
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication
B21
1
TABLE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Fesidue Cbntent 55
Bulk Spcific Gravity 21243
lheoretical Specific Gravity 23859
Air Voirls 109
VMA 189
Absorbed Asphalt 152
Effective 1spralt 398
Unit Weight pd 1326
atabil~ter Value 620
Cbhesiareter Value 430 3Fesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-oay 160
Final 387
70
a 60 gt a 50 w w == = 40 0
m
30
500
w l 400 lt gt cc
~ 3001- 0 ~ 200 8
100
16
136
134 u Q
iu2 z w 0 130
128
12 -----------
10 bull
ltIi 0
~ s
6
4middot1-_________ _
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l _AGGREGATE BASIS)
21164
23557
101
200
152
498
1321
481
432
180
377
24
22
z 20Si
= 18e 0 gt
bull 500
o 400-ltIi j 300 0
~ 200 zl 100 w cc
0
65 75 iesiqn 7 s
21095
23269
93 93
210 210
152 l 52
598 598
1316 1316
367 367
450 450
171 171
387 387
-----~bull-----
8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7
FIGURE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B22
1 TABLE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno
Low Quality CMS-7 Replication
70 -~ 0 Cesign 75 Pesidue Content
Bulk Spcific Graviv1
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit Weight pcf
Stallilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mxlulus 10 3psi
2--day
Final
40
Ill 30 c gt 0 20 UI lo Q 10=c 0
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w lo Q 200 8
100
~
60
21829
23899
87
170
197
403
1362
293
206
84 144
21981
23587
67
l73
197
503
1372
200
249
76 131
21960
23289
5middot 7
middot18l
197
603
1370
100
241
69 93
62
177
197
553
1370
150
245
73
110
12
10 5 Q 8gt 5 lt
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (ACGREGATE BASIS)
24
It
22 t-ci c
z 20i
= 5 18 t-Q gt
16
142
140 - 638
z w Q
136
134
bull 500
o 400 - 3 300 0
~ 200 z 100 iii UI 0
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (ACGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno LOW Quality CMS-7 Replication
B23
1
TABLE B24 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Urit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Glhesianeter Value
Resilient Mldulus 10
2-day
Final
40
m 30 gt c 20 w ~ w i
~ 10 m lt ~ 0
3psi
24
22
C C lt i
20~ ~
9 18 0 gt
16
500 142
w 1403 400 gt
Ca gt138I 300 tw
i z w Q 136~ 200
8
134
~
~
100 12 500
C
dego 400 - Ill 10 3 300 0 0 Q8gt ~ 200
~ z 6 100middot
w a
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIOUC CONTENT
(AGGREGATE 8ASIS] (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)
80
21686
23262
68
19l
l91
609
1353
125
215
77
114
Cesign 75
71
184
L 91
559
1360
200
235
77
135
60
21936
23870
81
166
191
409
1369
358
252
84
211
70
21850
23559
73
177
191
509
1364
270
250
77
157
Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE B24 Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B24
TABLE B25 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-Or Replication 1
Residue Clgtntent 47
Bulk Siecific Gravity 23965
llleoretical Specific Gravity 26825
Air Voids 107
VMA 207
Absorbed Asphalt 27
Effective Asphalt 443
Unit Weight pcf 1495
Stabilaneter Value 302
Cohesiaoeter Value 235 3
Resilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-day 158
Final 300
40
30 _ gt a 20I- ii 0_
10iii I-en 0 500----------
Ill
3 400 gt ati 300 ii 0 iii l 200 8
100---i----L---J
12 ----------
jit 10 e 0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I 4
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
57 67 Design 55
24521 24581
26411 26017
72 55 80
196 202 200
27 27 27
543 643 523
1530 1534 1520
247 200 27
275 203 275
164 116 160
276 197 280
24
jlt
22ci c i
20Si
= en e 18 0 gt
16
156
_154 ~ i152 iii z C
150
148
soo----------
dega 400 _
en
~300 ~ ~ 200 1-zl 100 iii w a
01----~-i--J 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Mixture Design Data GraniterockFIGURE B25 High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
B25
TABLE B26 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Besidue Content If 7 57 67 D2sign 55
Bulk SfeCific Gravity 2 4131 24573 24597
lhagtreticai Specific Gravity 26951 26532 26134
Air Voids 105 74 59 78
VMA 20l 195 20l 197
Absorted Asphalt 46 46 46 46
Effective Asphalt 424 524 624 504
Unit Weight pcf 1506 1533 1535 1525
stabi1anaiter Value 282 258 is2 270
Cllhesicmter Value 204 155 138 160
Resilient Mdulus 103psL
2-day 115 143 126 130
Final 313 225 173 240
40
w 30 lt gt a 20 w w la 0 10 m lt
0
~
24
22ci C
lt z
20la ~ = E 18 -0 gt
16
156
154 - a
~152 z w r0
150
148
-
500
o 400 ~
300 0
g 200 ~ z -~ 100
500
w ~ 400 lt gt a IU t- 300 w la 0 ~ 200
~8
100 12
10 0 0 8gt lt
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
w a
o 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT lo RESIDUE CONTENT II
-cGREGATE s-s1s1 (-GGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B26 Mixture Design Data Grani terock High Quality CSS-0 Replication
B26
2
TABLE B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Residue Ogtntent 47 57 67 ~ign 55
Bulk Spcific Gravity 23886 24116 24078
Ihooretical Specific Gravity 26675 26267 25879
Air Voids 105 81 70 82
VMA 210 210 21 8 210
Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 oos 005
Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545
Unit Weight pcf 149l 1505 1502 1505
Stabilareter Value 337 350 250 350
Ogthesicneter Value 238 3
Eesilient Mldulus l0 psi
2-day 104
Final 287
50
Ill 40 J C gt cc 30 Ill Ill l 0
C
10
20iii 500
w
l 400 C gt cc I 300 Ill l 0 in ~ 200 8
100 12
1110 0 0 8gt
c cc
6
4
FIGURE
~
~
177 204 200
144 150 140
254 247 260
24 ----------
a 18 0 gt
16 __i____i_-J
154
j52 u -a
~1501- ------iiiz -Ill 0
148
______________ 146
soar---------- a
o 400 1--
~ 300 _ ~
~ 200 z ~ 100 en w 0
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
B27
8
TABLE B28 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue Ointent 4 7 57 67 Cesign 55
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihroretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
CJlhesianeter Value
Pesilient Mldulus 10 3psi
2-day
Final
40
30 lt gt = w 20 0
- 10 lt
0
500
w - 3 400
lt gt a l 300 w 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
i 10 ui C
0 8gt lt
6
4
FIGURE
23861
26649
10S
207
014
456
1489
338
145
124
307
~
--------
~ 5 6 7 84
RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
24025 23925
26242 25855
85
210
014
556
1499
283
135
135
307
24
22
0 lt i
20i
= 18 0 gt
16
154
152 u Q
i150 z w 0 148
146middot
500- o 400 -
300 _ Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 4
75 87
220 209
014 014
656 536
1493 1490
220 300
129 140
142 130
277 307
_--
~
-___
85 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B28 bull Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B28
TABLE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Pesicllle Cbntent 47 57 67 resign 55 Bulk Siecific Gravity 24618 24637 24728 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26905 26475 26066 Air Voids 84 69 51 71 VlltLA 185 192 197 190 Absocbed Asphalt 047 0 bull 47 047 047 Effective Aspbalt 423 523 623 503 Urit Weight pcf 1536 1537 1543 1537 Stabilaneter Value 410 330 198 350 QJhesianeter Value 166
Resiliextt Mldulus 10 3psi
2-clay
Final
50
40 c
ffi 30 IE g20 iii c
10
500
l 400 c
a ~ 300 IE C ~ 200 8
100 12
ot 10 C
0 8
5
C
6
4
46
158
~
~ 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI
120 131 130
35 30 38
56 28 80
24
gt11 22
c c c
i 2031
= ~ C 180
16
158
156 t-
u - 154 z w 0
152
150
500
~
~ 0
bull a 400 - uil 300 ~
200
C
~ z ~ w a
100middot
8 4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
B29
TABLE B30 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Pesidue Content 4-7 h---7 6 -7 IEsicn 5 5
Bulk Specific Gravity 24519 24638 24706 Iheoretical Specific Gravity 26609 26265 25793 Air Voids 79 62 42 65 VMA 189 192 198 19l
middot Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 005 005 Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545 Unit Weight pcf 1530 1537 1542 1535 Stabilareter Value 420 327 247 350 Cohesiareter Value 126
3Resilient Mldulus 10 psi
Z--day 47 Final 144
50
40 J lt gt a 30 w w
~ 20 m lt 10
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w 2 ~ 200 8 ~
100 12
111- 10 ui 0 gt 8
lt
6
4
114 182 120
43 29 45
79 33 90
24
ii-22
ci 0 lt i
20l ~= 18 0 gt
16
158
156 0
l 154 z ~w c 152
150
500
Q -dego 400 - ui3 300 C
~ 200 z
~ 100middot~
w a ~ 0
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8 4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
FIGURE B30 Mixture Design Data High Quality CMS-7
Graniterock Replication 2
B30
TABLE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
~sidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weigllt pcf
Stabi]aneter Value
Cohes~ter Value
~silient MXJulus 103psi
2--day
final
40
30 C gt ffi20
~10 iii C ltII 0
500
l 400 C gt IC
~ 300 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
11 10 0
0 8gt C
6
4
55 65 75 resign 60 24268 24286 24206
26358 25966 25592 80
200
020
530
t515
80
268
182
338
~
65
207
020
630
t515
t_92
233
169
308
24
bull 220 0 C
ze 20
= 0 18 -0 gt
16
156
154
u i152 ~ z 0
150 bull
148
54 72
21 7 204
020 020
730 580
1511 1515
90 235
193 250
145 175
250 320
500 o 400 - l 300 0
~ 200 zi 100 iii IC
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replicationl
B31
TABLE B32 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residue 0ntent
Bulk Secific Gravity
llleoretical Speipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
-Absorled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
StabilcIIeter Value
Qlhesianeter Value 3Jesilient middotMgtdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
40
m30 lt gt cc20 w
w E
~10 ID lt 0
79
198
027
523
1518
203
243
201
354
~ soar-----------
w
400 lt gt a
~ 300 w E 0 ~ 200 8
100---I--~---------
12 -----------
111 10 C
0 8gt lt
6 --4
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l (ACiCiFIECiATE BASIS)
FIGURE B32 Mixture
55 65 75 Lesign 6 0
24329 24246 24077
26401 26007 25632
68 61 73 208 22l 203
027 027 027 623 723 573
1513 1502 1515
165 110 185 215 205 225
168 184 185 340 272 345
24
22 C C
z i 20
= 0 0
18 gt
16
156
154
a
gt152 en z Ill 0 150
148
bull 500 Q
deg 0 400- =gt 300 0
~ 200 z l 100 w
-
0 4 5 6middot 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(ACiGFIEGATE BASIS)
Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication
B32
2
TABLE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Eesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheore_tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VbullMA
lbsorbed_ Asphalt
Effective_ Asphalt
Qnit Weight pcf
~~ter Value
Q)hesianeter Value
Resiiient Mxlulus 10 3psi
2~y
Final
40
11130 C
a20 =
~10 C m
ltII 0
500
Ill
3 400 C
a ~ 300 w = 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
ll 10 ui E 0 8
c
6
4
I-
1-
55
23824
26318
95
215
014
536
1487
287
381
224
380
65 75
23896 23701 25928 25555 78 73
220 233
014 014 636 736
1491 1479 195 161
265 212
212 196
404 341
24
11 22d
c
z 20i
= ltII E 18 0
16
154
152- a
150 I-
Iesign 6 0
84
218
014
586
1490
240
320
215
395
z w Q
148
bull 146
500 a
c 400 ~ ui
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
l 300 Q
~ 200 zl 100 w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIOUla CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-a Replication 1
B33
- - ----- -
TABLE B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Rssidue Ogtntent
Bulk Secific Gravity
lhairetical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
AbsoIbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stabil~ter Value
Olhesiareter Value 3lesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-day
Firal
40
m 30 lt gt a 20 w w
= ~ 10
m lt
0
- --- -middot -middot 500
w l 400 lt gt
Ea
300 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
1l 10 middot 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 4
FIGURE
55
23834
26371
96
214
022
528
1487
279
207
176
332
65
23784
25978
84
223
022
628
1484
208
270
185
336
75
23628
25604
77
236
022
728
1474
167
334
181
350
iesiqn 6 bull 0
90
21 8
022middot
578
1485
245
240
180
334
~
~
24
1l 22
0
lt i
20i
= 0 gt
18
16
152
150 - 148
~ 146
144
500
o-400 middot --- J 300 C
~ 200 z
middot ~ 100 en a
0 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication
B34
2
B35 Mixture Design Data GraniterockTABLE Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Residue Content 55
Bwk Specific Gravity 24720
lheoretical Specific Gravity 26164
Air Voids 55
VMA 185
Absorbed Asphalt 001
Effective Asphalt 549
Unit Weight pcf 1543
StabilCampTeter value 293
Ohesiareter Value 174
Besilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day 69
Final 153
40
~ 30 _
c gt ffi 20 w I
Q 10
c 0
500
w 3 400 -
c gt a
~ 300 w I g bull ~ 200 8 ----r
100middot
10
8 -
~
Q
0 6gt a =c
4 ~ 2
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS
65 75 DesiSE 60
2 4 720 24515
25767 25388
40 34 48
193 207 189 001 001 001 649 749 599
1543 1530 1543 205 97 250
156 283 170
46 22 55 72 so 110
24
~
22ci C c
i 20i
= Cl 180 gt
16
lSadeg
156
u -a
654 z 0 152
150
500 ii a
a 400 - 3 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7
FIGURE B35 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
B35
12 r---------- 500bull _ 10
o 400 -middot 0 gt 5 C
8
tnl 300 Q
~ 200 z
6 ~ 100 ~ IU 0
4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT I
(AGCREGA TE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
TABLE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
55 65 75 resicn 6 0 Residue Content
Bulk siecific Gravity 24816 2 4721 24560
lheoretical Specific Gravity 26389 25983 25596
Air Voids 60 49 40 55
VMA 182 193 205 187
Absorlei Asphalt middot 035 035 035 035
Effective Asphalt 515 615 715 565
UUt Weight cf 1548 1543 1533 1545
Stabilaneter Value 298 193 130 250
Qlhesicmeter Value 188 I57 118 180 3
Resilient MJdulus 10 psi
soor-----------158
w l 400 Ishy 156 gt lt u
0a
w
300 w ~154E 0 z
w Q ~ 200 152
8 150100----middot-~-1-__c__~
2-day
Final
40
~ 30 J lt gt a 20 w
s 10 0
lt
0
92 43 27 65 186 79 46 135
24
22
~ =
ci lt 0
i 20~
18 0 gt
16
FIGURE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B36
Table B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
FJiuivalent ~sidue amtent 60 70 80 resign 70
Iesidue Ontent
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absomed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
lhit Weight pcpound
Stabilareter Value Ohesiareter Value
~ilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
Ill
50
40 A gt a w 30 w i 0 J
iii 201-
10
400
w3 300 gt a Ill t 200 i 0
8 ~iii ll 100 1-
0 12
lit 10 0 0 8gt a lt
6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)
630
21584
24451
117
210
140
460
1347
415
208
735
21570
24143
107
219
140
560
1346
488
61
840
21385
23848
103
233
140
660
1334
382
63
resign 7 35
107
219
140
560
1346
488
63
96
339 141
325
126
299 141 325
24
lit 22d
Cl
z 20i
= 0 180
gt
16
138
136 ltgt
i134 iii ~ z w 0 132
130
bull 500
o 400 -
3
300 ------------- 0
~ 200 z ~ 100 w o_____________a
9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B37
----
Table B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Pesidue omtent 60 70 80 Design 70
Pesidue omtent 630 735 8 40 Dsign 735
Bulk Specific Gravity 21710 21722 21714
lllroretical Specific Gravity 24298 23995 23705
Air Voids
VMA
lbsorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Chhesianeter Value
Eeilient Mldulus 103psi
2--clay
Final
so
40 J w
gt a 30 w w 0 20 m
10 400
w 300 gt a w 200 w i 100 8
0
12
if 10 a
~0 8gt a lt
6
4
107
205
112
488
1355
395
llO
113
290
95
213
112
588
1356
398
62
122
271
84
22l
112
688
1355
318
70
138
282
24
22 c 0
20
0 180 gt
16
140
138 -a
136 _iii z bull --w 0 134
132
bull 500 a
o 400
m 300 J 0 bull ~ 200 z 100
w a
0
95
213
)12
588
1356
398
62
122
271
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT J
(AGCilEGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B38
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Table B39
Fquivalent ~idue COntent
~idue Cbntent
Bulk SJecific Gravity lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Oihesianeter Value
~ilient Mldulus l03psi
2-day
Fiial
so
w 40 lt gt cc 30 ~ w E
0 20 m lt 10
400
m POO lt gt a U 200 E 0 iii w c 100 8
0
12
- 10 vi Cl
0 gt ac
6
60 70 80
690 805 920
21790 21826 21910
24255 23977 23710
102 90 76
207 214 219
080 080 080
610 710 810
1360 1362 1367
437 400 289
219 229 202
141 158 184
333 282 273
24
~ 22ci
CJ lt z
20ii
= Cl 180
gt
16
----------
~ lo
140
138 Q l136 iii w Cl
134
132
500 Q
0 400 n3 300 Cl
~ 200 i-bull
100
z ~ 0 a
Cesign 70
Cesign 805
90
214
080
710
1362
400
229
158
282
-------
-
-~
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B39 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication l
B39
8
Table B40 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Eesidue cantent
Iesidue Omtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lhagtretical Speiliic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Abro1plusmned Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tklit Weight pcpound
Stabilareter Value
OJhesianeter Value
EEsilient Mldulus l03psi
2-day
Final
50
w 40 J lt gt a 30 w
w i
3 20 lt 0 10
400-----------
DI 3 300 lt gt a wti 200 i 0 w8100
0 -------l--l-1
12 ----------
- 10 ltn 0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
60 70 80 690 805 920
21986 21964- 21948
24499 2A212 23938
103 93 83
200 209 218
124 124 l24
476 576 676
1372 1371 1360
422 403 265
270 306 160
99 140 154
298 310 254
24
-22
ci lt
=i 20i
a 0 18 0 gt
16
140
138 - a
l136 z w 0 134
132
bull500
a
o 400 -
ltn =gt 300 -J a
~ 200 z 100 DI 0
0 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT Ii (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Dsign 70
Design 805
93
209
124
576
1371
403
306
140
310
9
Figure B40 Mixture Design Data High Quality SS-30
San Bernardino SEA Replication 2
B40
Table B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent lesidue ~tent
Ilesidue Omtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lbagtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stabilateter Value
CllhesiaIEter Value
Resilient MXlulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
w 40 i- _ gt 30a w I- ~ w 0 20 m I-CII 10
400
w l 300 gt a w lj 200 0 w 100 8
0
12
111 10 Q
0 8gt a ~
6
4
~
6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
65 75 85 Design 75 683 789 89J tesign 789
21624 21445 21375 24097 23802 23520
103 99 92 213 228 238 100 100 100 550 650 750
1349 1338 1334 423 295 285 70 174 82
150 139 138 318 310 2S4
24
22d i
20ii
= CII Q 180 gt
16
138
- 136
u
134I- z ~132
130
bull 500 o 400 _ l 300 1- Q
sectl 200 I-z ~ 100 CII w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
99
228
100
650
1338
295
174
139
310
5
Figure B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B41
Table B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent PesidJJe Content
Residue Omtent
Bulk Specific GIavity
lheoretical Specific GIavity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit weight pcpound
Stabiloreter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mxulus 103psi
SC
w 40 gt a 30 w w i 0 J 20
10
400
w 3 300 gt a w t 200 i
9 ltI)
w = 1008
0
12
11 10 u a 0 8gt
6
4
2-day
Final
~
~
5 6 7 8 flESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGflEGATE BASIS)
65 75 85
683 788 89J 21424 21394 21455
24147 23851 23567
ll3 103 90
22l 229 234
l09 l09 l09
541 641 741
133 7 1335 1339
412 328 280
129 103 81
167 141 162
325 260 280
24
22ci 0 201
= 0 gt
18
16
i-
138
136 Q i134 _ 0 z w bull0 132
130
soor----------- D C
o 400
ltn3 300 a ~ 200 z 100 (I)
w
-
~
a 0------------ 5 6 7 8 9
flESIOUE CONTENT I
(AGGflEGA TE BASIS)
Design 75
Design 7 86
103
229
l09
641
1335
328
103
141
260
9
Figure B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B42
Table B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent Residue Omtent
Residue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllagtreticalSpecilicGravity
Air Voids
VMA
AbsorlJed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcpound
Stabilcrreter value
Cllhesianeter value
lelilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
400-----------
Illl 300 lt gt a w t 200 lo 0 w 8100
0 ________ ___ __
12 ----------
~ 10 0
~ 8 bull a c
6
4 -_______ ___ __
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS
65 75 85 748 863 978 21752 21661 21638 24136 23863 23602 99 92 83
213 225 234 081 081 081 569 669 769
1357 1352 1350 466 367 235
224 266 138
220 189 209 478 337 281
Ilsign 75
Design 863
92
225
081
669 1352
367
266
189
337
24 ----------
~
220 Cl lt ii 20
0 18 0
gt
16 ----------------14or-----------
138 -0 a 136 z w Q
134
132
= c 400 - l 300 Q
~ 200 f-middot z 100 w a o----------
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
_____________J
Figure B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardinor Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B43
Table B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Iesidue Cbntent 65 75 85 Design 75
lesidue Omtent 748 86~ resign~Zl 863
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleo~tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asjtlalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
lesilient Mxlulus 103psi
2-day
Final
so
w gt 0 30 IE 0 20 iii lt
10
400
3 300 lt gt 0 w l 200 IE 0 X w
100 8
0
12
- 10 en 0 0 8gt
6
4
~ 40 bull
~ 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
21676
23998
97
208
055
595
1353
409
248
189
308
24
22
ci c lt i
20ii
= 0 0
18 gt
16
21711 21641
23729 23472
85 78 85
223 234 223
055 oss 055
695 795 695
1355 135l 1355
283 227 283
187 186 187
198 177 198
255 285 255
140
138 a
136 - z 0 134 --
132
500 a
o 400 -
vi3 300 - 0
sectj 200 z ~ 100
0 0 5 6 middot 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino~ Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B44
Table B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Equivalent Jesidue Content 60 70 80 Design 70
tesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
trut Weight pcpound
Stabilcineter Value
Cbhesiateter Value
tesilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
IU 40 _ C gt 30a IU IU = middoto 20 m C (I) 10
400
IU
300 C gt a IU
ti 200 = 0 ~ IU c 100 8
0
12
10 ai 0 8gt C
6
4
~
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)
630 735 840 Design 7 35
21651 21581 21592
24033 23739 23457
99 91 80 91 180 190 198 190
399 499 599 499 135l 1347 134 7 1347
309 439 358 439
150 236 202 236
140 171 148 171 294 390 367 390
24
bull 22
Cl Cl C
i 20i
= (I) Q 180
gt
16 140
138 0 a
i136 z IU
134 bull bull
Q
132
500 D
c 400 _ 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 IU a
0 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B45
Table B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Residue Cbntent 60 70 80 Design 70 Residue Cbntent 6JO Z35 EdQ Jesign 7 35
Bulk Spcific Gravity 21413 21627 21711 lhroretical Specific Gravity 24321 24017 23726 Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcneter Value
Ohesianeter Value
llesilient Mgtdulus 10 3psi
2-day
Final
so
Ill 40 I lt gt 0 30 w Ill i 0 20 Cl lt
10
400
111
l 300 lt gt 0 w lj 200 i
~ w = 1008 -----___
0
12
II- 10 a 0 8gt lt
6
4
120
189
249
351
1336
407
79
147
361
24
II-22
ci
lt ~ 20i
= 0
0 18
gt
16
138
136 u C
l134 w 132
130
bull 500
C
o 400 ~
---------_J 300 0
~ 200
~ 100 Ill 0
0
99
189
249
451
1350
396
76
165
340
85
193
249
551
1355
360
64
175
305
99
189
249
451
1350
396
76
165
340
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT 1
9 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE COIHENT f
9
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B46
---------
Table B4 7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Bulk Specific Gravity
lhalretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorlled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilaieter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
llesilient MJdulus 103psi
2-clay
Final
50
40w lt(
gt IC 30 w w
0 20 iii lt( ltI)
10
400
w 3 300 ~ lt(
gt IC w t 200 0 iii 111 i 100 8
0 ___ _______ __ _ __
12 ----------
Fquivalent Pesidue Content 60 70 80 Iesign 70
Pesidue Qlntent 690 805 92Q Dcsign 805
21958 22006
24182 23909
92 88 92
18l 188 18l 256 256 256
444 544 444
1370 1373 1370
342 291 342
78 73 78
184 167 184
303 298 303
10 0
0 8gt IC
c 6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B47 Mixture
21880
24453
105
176
256
344
1365
443
58
174
381
24
22ci
5 20
= 0
0 18
gt
16
~ I I
138
136 ~ ~134 bull z 111 0 132
130
bull 500
o 400 3 300 - Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 ltI) 111 IC
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B47
Table B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
El_uivalent Residue Cbntait 60 70 80 Iesign 70
Residue Cbntent 690 aQi 2 2Q Dsign 805 Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Olhesiateter Value
Resilient Mldulus middot103psi
2-day
Final
21816
24403
106
178
244
356
1361
482
136
183
393
21806
24120
96
187
244
456
1361
411
130
187
374
21996
23849
78
189
244
556
1373
314
106
260
361
96
187
244
456
1361
411
130
187
374
24so
w 40 22 ci 0 gt a 30 ~ 20w w = 20 ishy C 18iii 0 gt Ill 10 _ ___ ____________
16 400------------
140
w l 300 138 gt 0
Qa w
636t 200 z0 w --------_ Qw 134c 100 8
0 ___ _____________ 132
bull50012 -----------
a
1 400 -_ 10
ltti ltti l 300 -C 0 C8gt ~ 200 lt z
6 l 100 w a
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT S RESIDUE CONTENT S (AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B48
Table B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
EquivaJent Residue antent 65 75 85 Design 75 Residue Content 63J z aa a 23 resign 7 88 Bulk Specific Gravity 21404 21439 21381 lheoretical Specific Gravity 23563 23286 Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcf
Stabilaneter Value
Cohesianeter Value
~ient 1bdul11S 103psi
2~y
Firal
50
w 40 gt a 30 w w 0 20 iii lt 10
400
3 300 w
gt a w t 200 0 in i w
100 8
0 12
10 0 Q
0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6
23020 92 79 71 79
193 199 209 199 140 140 140 140 510 610 710 610
1336 1338 1334 1338 424 397 308 397 79 308 266 308
173 185 196 185 330 319 285 319
24
22ci c lt
~ 20c Q 180
gt
16
138
136 u -Cl
~134 in ~z w 132
130
soar----------- Qbull
o 400
middot3 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a Q___________ ___ __
7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT deg RESIDUE COIITENT deg (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B49
Table BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Fquivalent lesidue Content
Besidlle 0-ntent
Bulk Specific Gravity
Illeoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pf
Stabilcmeter Value
ltbhesiaieter Value
Besilient Mxlulus 103psi
2--day
Final
50
~ 40 I lt gt 30 w 0 20 01 lt 10
400
w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 w r lOO 8
o 12
10 ai ~ 0 8gt a lt
6
~
4 5 6 7 8
IIESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
65 75 85 683 788 893 21527 21362 21337
24013 23721 23441 104 99 90
188 202 211
225 225 225
425 525 625
1343 1333 1332
410 418 290
261 62 100
188 197 211
334 348 331
24
22 ~ ci c lt
20 f 18 0 gt
16
138
136 0 a
134 z w 0 132
130
500 a
o 400
ai bull 300 I bull C
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
IIESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design 75
Design 788
99
202
225
525
1333
418
62
197
348
Figure BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
BSO
Table B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno
Fquivalent Residue Clintent
Residue 0rrtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorlei Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
thlit Weight pcf
StabiJaneter value
Ohesiaretel value 3lelilient MJdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
50
w
40
c gt a 30 w w = g 20 iii c Ill 10
400----------
middota
l 300 bull c gt a w t 200 = 0 w c 100 8
0 _______ ____ _
12 ------------
_ 10 ~ 8 c
6
4 _________ __
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B51
Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
65 75 85 748 863 978
21728
24022
96
186
200
450
1356
436 100
199
376
24
11 22
c c c
z 20ii
Ill0 180
gt
16
Design 75
Design 863
86
195
200
550
1355
392 260
212
362
21716
23753
86
195
200
550
1355
392 260
212
362
21673
23495
78
205
200
650
1353
378 201
230
3l7
~
140
138 Q j136 bull --_ z w 0134
132
500 Q
o 400 bull -l 300 ~ 0 ~ 200 I-z ~ 100 w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Table B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent lesidue OJntent 65 75 85 Design 75 Pesidue Ointent 748 863 978 Design 863 Bulk Specific Gravity 21595 21708 21637 ~retical Specific Gravity 23977 23708 23452 Air Voids 99 84 77 84 VMA 19l 195 206 195 Absorbed Asphalt l92 l92 l92 l92 Effective Asphalt 458 558 658 558 Unit Weight pf 1347 1354 1350 1354 Stabilareter Value 502 262 239 262 Cllhesianeter Value 257 136 154 136 Pesilient MJdulus 103psi
2--day 217 201 228 201 Final 371 307 290 307
2450
w 40 22 0 0lt ltgt ia 30
bull 20i
= 0 20 18iii 0lt gt 10
16 400
~
~
140
w 3 300 -ltgt
138 lt gt
aa w t 200 deg136 z0 w 0
134 w
100 8
1320
12 500 a
0 400 10
3 300 C 0 Q8gt ~ 200 lt z
6 100 w a
4 0 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT ~ RESIDUE CONTENT ~ (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B52
Table B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent ~sidue Cbntent 45 55 65 Design 55 ~idue Cbntent 473 578 6~~ Design 5 78 Bulk Specific Gravity 24210 24403 24473 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26934 26528 26142 Air Voids
VMA
Absocbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
StabiJaneter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Iesilient M)dulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
w _ 40 C gt II 30w w 0 20 iii C ~
10
400
w l 300 C gt II
iiw
200
~ w --------r 100 8
0 12
ot 10 -0
0 8gt II c
6
4
101 80 64 80 199 20l 206 20l
022 022 022 022 423 523 623 523
151l 1523 1527 1523 308 288 197 288
ll7 ll2 140 112
95 llO 122 llO 306 272 214 272
24
ci 22
C
i -~20Es = E 18 0
gt
16
156
154 - gt152 iii z ~ w 0
150
148
bull 500
o 400 Inl 300 0
~ 200 z ~ 100 w II
0
--~
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT r (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7 8 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B53
Table B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Residue Glntent 45 ss 65 Jesign 55 Residue Omtent 47 5 ZB 6 83 resign ~za Bulk Specific Gravity 24197 24253 24435 lheoretical Specific Gravity 26843 26441 26058 Air Voids 99 83 62 83 VMA 199 206 208 206 Absorbed Asphalt 09 09 09 09 Effective Asphalt 441 541 641 541 lklit Weight P=f 1510 1513 152S 1513 StabLkmter Value 38l 307 204 307 CJgthesianeter Value 73 85 149 85 Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day 170 159 142 159 Final 333 367 193 367
so
w 40 J lt gt 0 30w w le 0 20J
CJ lt 10
24
It
22ci 0 lt i -------20 = 18 0 gt
16 400
____
~
156
w 3 300 154 lt gt - a0 w gt 152l 200 le __-0 z w w c 150 8100
148 0
12 500
D C
o 400 r- 10 -u 300
J 0 9
8 Cgt ~ ~ 200 z
6 ~ 100
w 0
4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE COIITEIIT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B54
----------
Table B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Rep~ication 1
Equivalent Residue Contentmiddot
Residue Ontent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
~tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tklit Weight pcpound
Stabilaneter value
Cbhesiaieter Value
Resilient -bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
45 55 65
518 633 748
24695 24765 24666
26898 26520 26160
82 66 57
187 193 205
001 001 001
449 549 649
154l 1545 1539
41l 310 24l
159 157 165
183 178 193
371 318 250
50
w 40 c gt a 30 w-w == 0 20 ~ 10
400------------
~ 300 lt(
gt a
t 200 == 0 in bullw 8100
0 __ ________ ___ ___
12 ----------
t 10 rti C
~ 8 a c
6
4 s 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI
4
24
Ill 22
0 c c
ze 20
II)
C 18 0
gt
16
158
156- 154 Ill z w 0 152
150
500 iii
8 4
~
0 400-
i300-~ g 200 1-z l 100 iii a 0 __ _______ ____
5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design 55
Design 633
66
193
001
549
1545
310
157
178
318
___
8
Figure B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
BSS
Table B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality
Equivalent Rsidue Content 45
Rsidue Cbntent 518
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllooretical specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
lbsoibed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesicmeter Value 3
Iesilient Mldwus 10 psi
2--day
Final
400-----------
w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 I 0 ltII w8100
olt----__1__--1_---1
12 ----------
10 u
0 8gt a lt
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT l
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
24594
27024
90
190
019
431
1535
450
198
191
360
24
Ill 22
0 C
lt i
20i ~ ltII C 18 C gt
16
158
156 0
i54 iii z ILi
J52
150
SS-30 SEA
55 65
63J 7 ~a 24844
26641
67
190
019
531
1550
324
212
173
308
24856
26276
54
199
019
631
155l
234
225
166
259
_________
~
500----------- 0
dego 400 -
~300~~ C
~ 200 z i 100
w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COIITEHT l
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Replication 2
Design 55
Lesign 633
67
190
019
531
1550
324
212
173
308
Figure B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B56
---------
Table B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality
ElIuivaJent lesidue Omtent
lesidue Cbntent
Bulk Spacific Gravity
~retical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Uut Weight pcf
Stabilaneter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
lesilient Mldulus 103psi
so
w 40 lt gt a 30 w w ~ 20 m lt II)
10
400
w 3 300 lt gt a w lj 200 0 w z 1008
0 12
Ill 10 Q
0 8gt lt
6
4
2-day
Final
~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
so 530
24024
26676
99
207
031
469
1499
354
138
183
352
SS-15 SEA Replication 1
60 70 Design 60 636 7 42 Design 636
24040 23986 26279 25901 85 74
214 223
031 031 569 669
1500 1497 223 149
222 126
159 160 302 234
24
Ill
c 22 ~ c
lt i
20i1
== (II C 180 gt
16
152
150 u -a
648 z w Q
146 1-
144
bull 500 a
o 400 - 3 300 C
~ 200 z ~ 100 (II w a
~ 0
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
85
214
031
569
1500
223 222
159
302
8
Figure B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B57
Table B58 Mixture Design Data Low Quality SS-15
Fquivalent Residue Content 60 60
Rsidue Cbntent 525 630
23944
~retical Specific Gravity
Bulk Sjecific Gravity 26592
Air Voids 100
209VMA
1bsocbed Asphalt 015
Effective Aspbalt 485
Unit Weight pcf 1494
Stabilareter Value 377
Olhesiaeter Value 151
Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi
162
375 2-day
Final
so
w 40 _ gt c 30 w w i
~20 m I-0
10
400
Ill
300 gt w I 200 i 2 w i 100 8
_________ 0 --middotmiddot-
12-------bull------
ti 10 9 0 8gt
6
4
24
- 22ci
0
20i
= 9 18 0 gt
16
152
150 u a
148 z---- w0146
144
500 Q
o 400 _ 300 Q
~ 200 I-z ~ 100
w a
23988
26022
84
215
015
585
1497
307
180
165
356
Graniterock SEA Replication 2
70
735 23793
25830
79
229
015
685
1485
217
170
169
277
~
~
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7
RESIOUE CONTENT li RESIDUE COPlTENT li (AGGREGATE 8ASIS) (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)
Design 60
resign 630
84
215
585
1497
307
180
165
356
8
Figure B58 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B58
Table B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Equivalent esidue omtent 5 0 60 70 Design 60
esidue Cbntent 5 75 690 805 Dsign 690
Bulk Specific Gravity 24389 24362 24419
Jheo=eticaJ Specific Gravity 2 6670 26303 25953
Air Voids 8 6 74 59 7 4
VMA 198 207 214 20 7
Absorbed Asphalt 009 009 009 009
Effective Asphalt 491 591 691 591
Unit Weight pcf 1522 1520 1524 1520
Stabilareter Value 38l 292 220 292
Cbhesiclneter Value 263 186 176 186
~t Mldulus 103psi
2-day 222 222 207 222
Fulal 380 289 293 289
5
w 40 C gt a 30 Ill ~ 20 m C 1- 10
24 ----------
22 bull C Cl C
zi 20
C1 o 18 0 gt
16 ___-________-------i-_-
400---------- 15a------------
156l 300 C gt - a =deg 154ti 200
iii z0 IUiii 0 152 bull bull~ 10018
150 ___ _______ __J0 ---i--J~-L--1
500----------12 ----------- bull o 400 -
Ill 10 ui l 300 -Q
Qg 8 g 200a lt z 6 l 100
iii a
01--J-----__ __4 -------r------- 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
RESIDUE COrlTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B59
Table B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Design 60
Eeidue omtent 575 690 805 D=sign 690
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleo~tical Specific Gravity
1lir Voids
VMA
Absocbed Asralt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcf
Stabilcmeter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
Eeilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
Ill 40 J
lt gt a 30 w I-w 0 20 Ill lt I-
10
400
w 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 Id
8100
0 12
10 m Q
0 8gt 5 lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
~
RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASISI
24371 24441 24445
26744 26373 26020
89 73 61 73
199 205 213 205
019 019 019 019
481 581 681 581
1521 1525 1525 1525
335 236 191 236
220 164 180 164
194 199 191 199
388 329 294 329
24
22
ci 0 lt i
20i
= a
= 18 0 gt
16
158
156 u a
deg154 = w Q
152 ---------150
500 a
1 400 m3 300 1 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100
Ill a
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COHTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B60
APPENDIX C
DATA ANALYSIS SOLVENT FREE AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS
Table Cl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL e_AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
95 85 80
867
76
88
90 85 85
867
29
33
95 85 85
883
58
65
85 70 80
783
76
98
100 100 100
1000
00
00
100 100 100
1000
00
00
C M s 0
D A T A x s
CV
80 80 80
800
00
oo
80 75 75
767
29
38
75 80 70
750
50
67
70 80 75
750
50
67
90 90
100
933
58
62
95 100
95
967
29
30
C M s 1
D A T A
X s
CV
80 75 70
750
50
67
60 70 55
617
76
124
70 70 65
683
-2 9
42
65 70 60
650
50
77
65 70 70
683
29
42
70 60 65
650
50
77
Table C2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating
F01
E 2 ll877 7777778 243aassese9 1)75102041 329 532 ~ middot2 1ll77777777~ 73RBSeSf89 32571~2-~5 3~ 29 532 J 1 150 ooocooo 150JOJOOOO 5f122llll9 414 746
EA ll 8114 llllll11444 2111111111 3J51224 266 396 -E~ middot2- 1-0frOOfr~ 0-9 middot50-middot000 3 oco middot2middot20110816 middot 329 532 Agt 2 77 7777778 38 8815589 17142857 329 532 nJ 4 1555555~55 388881889 171112857 266 396
FR RmiddotJR 36 8166666567 225851B52
------------------------------------------------middot---------------------ronmiddotL 53 -esoo--000000r
Cl
100
P
c5 75 z-t-lt8 50 w t-lt bull css-oC
CMS-0w 25a C middot+ CMS-7 C lt
0-----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Cl Mean AggregateCqqting at middotoesign Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 867 css-o 883 CSS-0 783 css-o 1000 css-o 1000middotcss-o middot I I CMS-0 800 CMS-0 7~ 7 CMS-0 750 CMS-0 933 CMS-0 967lrMS-0 750
I CMS-7 750 CMS-7 617 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 65 0 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating
C2
Table C3 Film Stripping
EMULSION
AGGREGATE SAN
BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK
C s s 0
D A T A
5
0
10
5
5
0
X s
CV
25
35
1414
75
35
47l
25
35
1414
C M s 0
D A T A
0
5
5
7
0
0
X s
CV
25
35
1414
60
14
236
00
oo oo
C M s 7
D A T A
0
0
0
5
0
0
X s
CV
00 OQ 00
25 35
1414
00 00
oo
Table C4 ANOVA Summary Film Stripping
AN-OVA
middotmiddotDPmiddot -ss- F middotFe5
E 2 33 7777778 1euro8888889 23555191 426 802 A 2 -ti8 7777778 343888889 4 7984496 426 802
E X II 4 9 2222226 23055557 3217054 363 642 ERROI 9 645000000 71666667 ---------------TOTAL 17 1762777782
C3
fl w 0 lti 1L a =gt en C w C C-a I-en
40
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-730
20
10
0 SB F GR
Figure C3 Film Stripping
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
css-o 25 css-o 75 css-o 25
GMS-0 25 CMS-0 60 CMS-0 oo
CMS-7 oo CMS-7 25 CMS-7 oo
----middot----middot-middotmiddotmiddot
Nlte Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping
C4
Table CS 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue
Content 10 3 psi
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW D
118 170A 217 205 160 175
C T 83 190 191 182 130 185A s )ts 101 180 204 194 145 180
0 s 25 14 18 16 21 7
CV 246 79 90 84 146 39 D 104 185 155A 190 140 215
C T 82 155 154 171 130 180A M x 93s 170 155 181 135 198
s 16 21 1 13 7 250 CV 167 125 05 74 52 125
D A ab 55 35 73 38 55
C T
82A 48 63 77 45 65 M X s pound81 -- - 52 49 75 42 60 s7 l 5 20 3 5 7
CV 18 96 404 38 11 9 11 8
Table C6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus
A N ) V l
-D-F -SS
E 2 832263888888 _ 2-- -5441-- 722-2222-J 1 89933611111
E~ 4 5386 7777779 -1J- 2- -3-8-1-+-rG-55--5-5-5 7- bull AJ 2 144235~899 EA 4 58024444443
ERROR 113- 3951500 00~-J
---------------------------------------------------------------------TOT-W- -3-5 -11806-4---638 881gt-9-
(116131944444 2720-8611111 89933611111 13466944445 1-9Q lh-5--amp7--+7-8-7211944445
14506111111 219 527-7778
1895577629 -12 394-1541-409569480
61345059 S-~937872 32952081 56gt7870Ll
357 3-S7 443 295
-]y5+ 3S7 295
605 6 05--833 461
-6--05-605 461
cs
bull css-omiddot 300 C CMS-0
M 0 diams CMS-7
(J
3200 gt C 0 E 1-
ffi 100
01----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure CS 2 Day ResiLient Modulus
SAN middotBERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 101 css-o 180 rss-o 204 css-0_194 CSS-0 145 CMS-0 198
CMS-0 93 CMS-0 170 ICMS-0 155 CMS-0 181 CMS-0 135 css-o 180l l l I I CMS-7 81 CMS-7 52 CMS-7 49 CMS-7 75 CMS-7 42 CMS-7 60
Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C6 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking 2 Day
Resilient Modulus 10 3 psi
C6
Table C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Content 10 psi
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A (
s
CV
260
232
246
20
80
320
280
300
28
94
482
299
391
129
33l
365
358
362
5
l4
280
240
260 28
109
320
345
333
18
53
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
267
250
259
12
47
295
280
288
ll
37
253
288
271
25
92
290
387
339
69
203
260
307
284
33
11 7
395
334
365
43
118
C M s 7
D A T A
X
s
CV
78
64
71-
10
139
110
95
103
ll
104
75
73
74
l
19
110
135
123
18
144
80
90
85
7
83
110
135
123
18
144
middotTable C8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus
-~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------F-r05- ---F-01--
E
J El -E- Al EAJ
-ERRJR
2 2-1 4 -~ 2 4
18
3592750555555 -14506 722-2221-171610COOOOJ 147394444445
1---1-1----lf466-li-+ 19215000000 55353333333
2850GOOC0000
17-16375277778 72~336H-1-11
1716100)0000 36848611111 sect8~5833---3-33--9607500000
13840833333 ~ 58-3 33-33 333
11315528C7 -45810702
109385263 23272807 ~U981l-2-1-6067895 3741579
357 -3 r7 443 2 95 3~7-357 295
605 605 833 461 605 605 4 6 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------~- 3-5- -448+1----2-222-2-
C7
bull css-o500
CMS-0 U) diams CMS-7C
C) 400 middoto -
~ 300
J Ci 200
1-z 100 J-UJ UIa
01-------------------------~---~-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
eMS-0 259 ess-a 300 ess-a 391 ess-a 362 eMS-0 284 CMS-0 365
ess-o 246l l l l l ICMS-0 288 eMS-0 271 CMS-0 339 ess-o 260 ess-o 333
CMS-7 71 CMS-7 103 CMS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123
t-ote Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure ca Newrnan-Keuls Ranking Full Cure 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi
ca
Table C9 Density at Design Residue Content pcpound
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
1359
1372
1366
09
07
1365
1365
1365
0
0
1365
1352
1359
09
07
1345
1345
1345
0
0
1520
1525
1523
04
02
1515
1515
1515
0
0
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
1348
1343
1346
04
03
1330
1338
1334
06
04
1329
1340
1335
08
06
1335
1316
1326
- 13
10
1505
1490
1498
11
07
1490
1485
1488
04
02
C M s 7
D A T A
x s
CV
1373 1385
1379
09 06
1375 137 5
1375
0 0
1380
1379
1380
01 01
1370
1360
1365
07 05
1537
1535
1536
01 01
1543
1545
1544
01 01
Table ClO ANOVA Surtunary Density
A II O V ~
-SS F bull O1
E _ 0
2 i
lCB4155555 Z08-tOS389
II 311277~
54207777R 1 ouos2sirrs
4340277
135q23660 -25lS 7i80R63-
1087331173
3S7 3 ~7 443
i()5 605 83
EA Q
4 -2
1599U4U5 _iuseeg
399E11 -3-3UUL45-
10J17398 bull~3785-C7
295 -~S7-
4 f 1 -6CS
A) 2 13772222 o6886111 17251218 357 605 EAJ q 2C361111 5090278 12752262 295 4 61
-ERRJR- 13- 718-()001 399166-7-
35
C9
bull css-o160 CMS-0 diams CMS-7
150
() -a gt 140 -en z w
middotC 13
1201~bull-------------r---------------SBH SBL FH FL ~RH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C9 - Density at Design Residue Content
SAN middotBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 138o CMS-7 1365ICMS-7 1375 CMS-7 1544
css-o 1366
I-7 bull rMS-7 1536
css-o 1365 css-o 1359 css-o 1345 css-o 1523 CSS-0 j515
CMS-0 1346 CMS-0 1334 CMS-0 1335 CMS-0 132 6 CMS-0 1498 CMS-0 1488
Nte Values with a ccmnm vertical line are not statistically different
Figure ClO Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcpound
ClO
Table Cll Air Voids at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
D 87 7 0-A 75 77 80 72
C T 71 70 92 82 78 73A s )s 79 70 84 80 79 73
0 s ll 0 12 04 01 01
CV 143 0 144 45 18 10 D 97 93A 93 91 82 84
C T 90 92 A
91 93 87 90
M x 94 93 92 s 92 84 87 s os 01 01 _0l 04 04
0 53 08 15 15 42 49CV D A 77 62 73 62 71 48
C T 73 61 62 71 65A 55
M X s 75 62 68 67 68 52 s 03 01 08 06 04 057
CV 38 12 115 96 62 96
Table Cl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids
A I O Y 11
-DF ss -F 05 F01
E 2 382650000 191325000 69)150301 3~7 605 -A 2 -2-681667 1340334 ll03567311 -3- 57 605
Q 1 2f677778 26677778 952324f6 4 13 I 33 EA lj 13S33333 3313333 122011409 2 95 Ii 61 ti -2 l8105555- -905-277-8- 326553tO 357 tiOS II) 2 6572221 3296111 11953707 357 605 E~l 4 88411445 2211111 797552 795 4 f 1 ERElll 111 11991)0)00 bull2172222-
-------------------------~------------------------------------------rou1 s SJ 3100000-
Cll
11
10
iP- en 0-0 gt aa
9
8
7
6
5
4
bull css-o CMS-o diams CMS~7
SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
F-igure Cll Air Voids at middotoesign Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 94 CMS-0 93 CMS-0 92 ICMS-0 92 CMS-0 84 ICMS-0 87
IIcss-o 79 css-o 7 0 I II
css-o 79 css-o 73
I ~_ I~ CMS-7 7 5 CMS-7 62 CMS-7 68 CMS-7 48 - - bull-- ~ -----~middot-middotmiddot--middot-middotmiddot-middot ---middotmiddot
~= Values with a OCIlOn vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids
Cl2
Table Cl3 Stabilorneter Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
272
3113
293 29
99
270
265
268 04
13
393
327
360 47
130
380
325
353 39
110
270
270
270 0
0
235
185
210 35
168
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
375
344
360
22
61
340
350
345
07
21
307
377
342
50
145
415
367
39l
33
85
350
300
3-2 5
35
109
240
245
243
04
15
C M s 7
D A T A
x s
CV
235
23-5
235
0
0
130
120
125
07
57
213
233
-223
14
63
150
200
175
35
202
350
350
350
0
0
250
250
25 o_ 0
0
Table Cl4~ ANOVA Summary Stabilorneter Value
A N O V 1
soua= SS r 01
E 2 2
7086172721 9702C93fl9
3543086361 4SS10Uf95
505343236 ~-9189501
357 357
605 605
) 1 175 6950250 1756950250 25053)2i8 443 833 EA 4 6718347112 167 9586 778 23955053 2 95 461 ~ ~544 -4 Q-432-ll-25-0- --S--~ 38 ~5-19- -3 5- ios AJ 2 941227166 47(1euro13583 57122663 357 605 EAJ 4 289779333 72319A33 10314831 2 95 II f 1
Ell ngtR -18 1r2024gt0) -i- bull112472-
---------------------------------------------------------------------0-T- ----5- 4-9B1 is~v~
Cl3
50
w 40 I ltgt a 30w I-w ~ 200 I-m lt 10I-u
0 SSH SBL FH FL GRH
AGGREGATE
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
GRL
Figure Cl3 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 350 CMS-7 250ICMS-0 360 ICMS-0 345 r=ss-o 36o rMS-0 39l
css-o 268 CMS-0 342 css-o 353 CMS-0 325 CMS-0 243Icsbull-bull _ CMS-7 235 CMS-7 12S CMS-7 223 CMS-7 175 css-o 270 css-o 210
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value
Cl4
Table Cl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOWHIGH LOW LOWHIGH D 360193 280 465 275 250A T 234 345 183 375 160 225C A
s x 214 353 232 420 218 238s s 29 11 69 64 18810
136 30 296 152 37 4 74CV D 280 440 230 355 200 320 T A
252 430 219 450 140 240C A M x 266 435 225 403 170 280s s 20 7 67 428 570
74 16 16735 250 202CV D
80 190 122 245 130 170 T A
82 180 192 235 120 180C A M X 81 185 157 240 125 175s s l 7 so 7 777
CV 18 3038 31 5 57 40
Table Cl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value
-SS--
pound 2 1309717272222 654858611111 1102309084 357 605 __ 2 3Ber61222222 194033611--111 -1-1t2J3570 -3 57 605 J 1 12)524904445 120524f94111145 711)1137379 1143 l 33
EA 4 2311~U411111145 57795111111 355~57119 295 4 ~ 1
~ + --8-066---H~i-i--2 ---4-B3-a~--H ~T4-=7-7S~J -3 S7 605 1J 2 111206 7222222 71033511111 ll3~31111 3 57 605 EAJ 4 500gt1111111 12512777778 7587162 235 4 (- 1
RAO- -18 -999 500-000( -1-6--2-7 -75-00000-
--------------------------------------------------------------------tO+--l- el-i- 3-fi-99g6-3-R-~
Cl5
bull css-o500
Q1__________---___-----~
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure ClS CohesiometerValue at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 232rMS-0 435 CMS-0 280rMS-0 266 rss-o 420 tss-o 218
css-o 214 css-o 353 CMS-0 225 CMS-0 403 css-o 238ICMS-0 170
CMS-7 81 CMS-7 185 CMS-7 157 CMS-7 240 CMS-7 125 CMS-7 175
Nrte Values with a oamon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value
~400 -I ltgt cc 300 w 1-w E 2000 -() w c 1008
CMS-0 diams CMS-7
Cl6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Table Cl7 Swell at Design Residue Content in
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
0 0000 0003 0000 0008 0000 0000A C T 0000 0005 0000 0007 0000 0002
A 0000 0004 0000 0009 0000 0000 s j( 00000 00040 00000 00080s 00000 00007
0 s 00000 00010 00000 0 0010 00000 00012
CV 00 250 00 125 00 1732 D 0000 _o 045 0020 0036 0000 0000A 0006 0029 0018 0040 0001 0000TC A 0007 0040 0022 0039 0000 0000
M x 00043 00380 00200 00383 00003 00000 s s 00038 00082 00020 00021 00006 00000 0
874 215CV 100 54 1732 oo
D 0000 0004 0000 0003 0000 0000A T 0000 0002 0000 0000 0000 0000
C A 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000
M x 00000 OQ023s 00000 00010 00000 00000 s 00000 00015 00000 00017 00000 00000
7 oo 655 1732CV 00 00 oo
Table Cl8 ANOVA Summary Swell
P N O V ~
SOUR-middotEmiddot l)f -ss- -lSmiddot F rs FM
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------E 2 C031905 )015953 7576385211 329 532 J 2 0012203 OOOf112 2~97R1n75 329 532 l 000858(1 )()QSf80 11122112111111 414 846
H LI 0016535 00)111311 1963258575 266 396 Emiddot) middot2middot 00079 51- a0ll397S 1eg ~16527 329 532 AJ 2 00011958 )0021179 111 ns1ne 329 532 EAJ II 0006609 OC01652 7e117l97t3 266 396
EDl 36 )000751 OOOJ021
TOBImiddot middot53middot ----008959-9-middot
Cl7
05
04
z 03
-I -I w
u 3 02
01
0 SBH SBL FH
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
FL GRH GRL AGGREGATE
FigureCl Swell at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 00003 css-o 00007CMS-0 00043 CMS-0 -0380 CMS-0 00200 CMS-0 00303
CMS-0 00000css-o 00080 css-o 00000Icss-o 00000 Icss-o 00040 ICSS-0 00000
CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00000CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00023 CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00010
Rte Values with ~--~~~ ~~ lb-le are not ~tatistically different
Figure Cl8 Newman-Keuls Ranking swell in
Cl8
Table Cl9o MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
-------EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
GRANITEROCKFRESNOSAN BERNARDINO
LOW LOWHIGH HIGH LOW HIGH D
124 72198 137 287 243A 227 90145 178 83 260TC 57197 135 252 270A
s 207 104 258 73139 239s s 17 05 56 29 14 17
0 CV 82 280 82638 233 53
D 197 160145 145 90 205A 19l 17092 100 80 220TC 158 105 138190A M x 182 119 11 7 85 205 156 s s 21 37 25 1607 15 0
115 737 105316 21l 83CV D 21 omiddot 240202 185 98 330A
220 20087 181 34588TC 216 210138 223 77 338A M x 215 217142 196 88 338s
s 2111 0805 58 237
23 405 120 22 96118CV
Table C20 ANOVA Summary -MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
----------------------- I N O V A
SO0RE --DF -lS--
middotE __ 2 2
401 11310n -5831137037
2008568519 --2915568519
166S53085 2111762euro92-
3-9 J29
532 532
Q 1 14f5364f296 14653646296 1215099198 4 14 746 EA-Ev
4 -frac34
2784740740 -1-1-i 0359259
696185185 -56-tl-1-79tr30-
5 772 8571 -6450815
266 middot-3-29
396 -5-32middotmiddot
110 2 355470370 177735185 1bull11738C30 329 532 EAO II 12794711075 3198euro9519 25523909 266 396
-Ei8JB 36- 11311 111euro66euro7 120596296
---------------------------------------------------------------------FOTAJ- --5-3- -31131--343-14 8-1-
Cl9
50 bull css-o ti) CMS-0 gt 40 diams CMS-7E I
a w 30I-w E 0 -I 20-ca ltC I-Cl) 10
0--------------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Cl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOWmiddot HIGH LOW
CMS-7 215 CMS-7 142 css-o 104 I ICMS-7 338 CMS-7 21 7
css-o 207 css-o 139 i CMS-7 88 CMS-0 156middot css-o middot
CMS-0 182 CMS-Q 119 CMS-0 117 CMS-0 85 CMS-0 205 css-o 73
Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
C20
-----------------------------------------
Table C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
IEMULSON
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIG_H LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A x s
CV
135 104 104
114
18
157
70 85 51
69
17
248
105 66
136
102
35
343
148 197
-173
35
201
107 101
72
93
19
201
74 107
92
91
17
182
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
128 85
174
119
31
256
73 59 -
66
10
150
69 36 65
56
18
318
158 110
-134
34
253
77 96 68
80
14
178
53 66
113
77
32
408
C M s 7
D A T A x s
CV
141 79 52
91
46
503
185 60 63
103
71
695
125 201
96
141
54
386
192 164 126
161
33
206
131 130 120
127
6
48
72 230
76
126
90
715
Table C22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
l II O Y A
-soaas -OF- -S-S- -F- FrOS
E -llmiddot J
n -tJ-AO EllJ
RROi
----------
2 2 1 u -2-2 4
36middot -------
199090000000 middot 39113 411111111111
4111296296 61982222222
-t-72-1-middot-11181-18-1-754737037011 41156 5185186
85722 middotbull)0(0000 ----------------
995115000000 -1971-7222222
11111216296 151195555556 -360-yen5-110-711 1middot
j8236851852 11166296297
middotmiddot2381 166667
111805138 -0280488 17265A9 6507548
-36111086-15058033
41589422
329 329 414 2 66 329 329 266
532 -532 746 396
-532 532 3915
-----------------------------------lOo-1- middottt 1-300-lamp833-333-3-
C21
400
CJgt ~ 300 I
0 w I-w 200
-~ 0 CJwc 1000 ()
0
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Valueat Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 ll9 CMS-7 103 ICMS-7 141 css-o 173 CMS-7 127 CMS-7 126
css-o ll4 css-o 69 1middotcss-o 102 CMS-7 161 css-o 93 css-o 91
CMS-7 91 CMS-0 66 middotCMS-0 56 CMS~O 134 CMS-0 80 CMS-0 77
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C22 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
C22
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table C23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
724 811 637
724
123
170
1289 -
1276
1283
09
07
627 628 695
650
39
60
622 940
1427
996
405
407
475 407
1276
719
483
672
803 790 498
697
172
247
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
1217 393
1260
957
489
511
2075 2879 1875
2276
532
233
1943 1195 2012
171 7
453
264
1241 1224 1208
1224
1 7
13
676 574 550
600
67
112
986 787 815
863
108
125
C M s 7
D A T A x s
CV
642 620 774
679
83
123
102 426 662
397 281
709
59 7 369 470
479 114
239
588 60l 290
493
176
357
301 263 393
319
67
210
238 284 227
250 30
121
Table C24 ANOVA Surmnary Surface Abrasion
Fmiddot F01middotmiddotss --------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------
e Amiddot
2 -gt
530361248149 22)938237037
315180624075 110469111)519
432152433 1sn1of15
329 329
532 532
1 n
1 4
[14699201852 9733 179629euro
446992gt1952 24332949074
61289-8 3335u~111
414 266
746 396
EJ J
2 2
middot59516003103 85017525926
291seoo1as1 425)8752963
4 9nn2 5 828630
329 329
532 532
EI 4 196475151852 4911877963 57349619 266 396
ERRJl 36 262551800000 72931l~-556
--------------------------------------------------------------------
middotTnUmiddot 53- middot159689-~0964815middot
C23
300
E C)
C)200 Cl)
0 J
z 0 en 100 lti a al lti
01-----r----~---------r---------SBH SBL
Figure C23
SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW
CMS-0 957 CMS-0 2276
css-o 724 css-o 1283
CMS-7 679 CMS-7 397
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content
FRESNO
HIGH
CMS-0 171 7
css-o 65o
CMS-7 479l
LOW
CMS-0 1224
ICSS-0 996
CMS-7 493
GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW
css-o
CMS-0
719
600
ICMS-0 863Icss-
CMS-7 319 CMS-7 250
Ngtte Val~ with~ ~n vertical line are not stati~tically different
Figure C24 Newman-Keuls Ranking Surface Abrasion grams
C24
APPENDIX D
DATA ANALYSIS SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS
----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
Table Dl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15
SEA
D A T A
75 85 85
85 80 85
80 75 70
65 70 70
85 90 90
80 85 85
X s
tV
817
58
71
833
29
35
7-50
50
67
683
29
42
middot88 3
29
33
833
29
35
ss 30 see
D A T A
85 80 85
75 80 80
75 85 85
70 80 70
90 85 95
90 80 90
x s
CV
833
29
35
783
29
37
81 7
58
71
733
58
79
-900
50
56
883
29
33
C M s 7
D A T A
80 75 70
60 70 55
70 70 65
65 70 60
65 70 70
70 )0 65
x s
CV
750 50
67
617 76
124
683 29
42
650 50
77
683 29
42
650
50
77
Table D2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating
rmiddot rs F05 F 0 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------F 2 235 712593 1179 f-296297 553913Q113 329 532 a 2 63 bullTlt1ll81I R 31L97UC7U 1521731 3 29 532 E~
11 3f2 116i14f Jmiddot 39 (1)7111~gtI 1
3~2 ~-2900 9976~5185
17 ~li347F3 UfB47826
4 14 256
746 96
i) ~ pound 2S 11252i 12 29(-29 bull 5086957 329 532
a~ 2 12 ~-~737r o lt19518~ 2E260e7 329 53 2 u ll 1f3 bull illf illt7 41t3S1B52 191156522 2 G6 3~f
iE1190il 3i 76 pound61iz~57 212~-25
Dl
-~ -CJ z I-lt(
0 0 U1 -lt( C bull SS 15 SEA w 25 SS 30 SEA CJ cc
diams CMS - 7CJ lt(
0 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dle Mean Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
I SS-30 733SS-301 $33 SS-15amp 833 lss-301 sn 7 I ISS-30 900 SS-30 883
SS-151 817 SS-301 783 SS-15 683 SS-15 883 SS-15 833SS-lSi 750
CIS--7 750 CS-7 617 OS-7 683 CMS-7 650 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650
Ngtte Values with a comon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating
D2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
Table D3 Film Stripping
EMULSION
AGGREGATE SAN
BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK
s s
15
0 A T A
30
15 20
30 15
25
X s
CV
225
106
47l
250
71
283
200
71 354
s s
30
D A T A
25
25
0
0
5
0
X s
CV
25middoto
oo
00
oo oo
oo
2middotmiddot5
35
1413
C M s 7
D A T A
0
0 0
5
0 0
X s
CV
oo
00 oo
25
35
1413
oo
00 oo
Table D4 ANOVA Swnmary Film Stripping
----------------- ---------------- --middot-----------middot----- middot--middotmiddotmiddot middot- middotmiddot-middot----middot -middot-- middotmiddotmiddot--- --- -------- -A N O V J
-SW~ middotnt r-
pound 2 14333333113 7166666667 27 1S78lttl7 l 2 2]33333333 1165666euro67 middot11t1210~26 Eirl 141 55f 3333335 13958333311 i2894737
Dlli~RI 9 237 50CCDIOmiddot) 2638888P9
lOUL t7 bull--- bullbull - bull- 0 bull bullbull bull- bull bull 0 -------- bull-- bull- bull---bull ---- lt -bullbull bull - bullbullbull--bullbullbullbullbull-bullbull-- bullbullbull bull ___ bull --bull bull bull bull --- bull bull-bullho bullbull bull- bull bull ~-- bull- UO rArr-d bull
D3
cit -w
0 lt( ll a (I)
C w 0 C-a I-ti)
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
20
1
0 SB F GR
Figure D3c Film Stripping
SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO
Iss-3
SS-15
250
225
SS-15~7 250
25
SS-15
ISS-30
200
25
ClIS-7 oo middot SS-30 00 CMS-7 00
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping
D4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue 3Content 10 psi
-------ElAULSWN
----QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCK SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
D S$ 1U H9 171 185 110 159
i22 2~1 165 197 159 165A15Jo-ot----t----+---ii---+----t-----ti 132 140 168 191 135 162
SEA s i3 1 4 9 35 4
CV Ul2 10 25 44 258 26
$5 ---
D
~ A
158
140
189
198 184 187
212
201
178
173
222
199
gtUfl x l49 194 186 207 176 211 SEA s 13 6 2 8 4 16
CV 85 33 11 38 20 77
C M
D A T A
80
82 55 48
35
63
73
77
38
45 55
65
s x 81 52 49 75 42 60
7 s
CV
1
18
5
96 20
404
3
38 5
119
7
118
Table D6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus
--=======-=-middot------=====--=- ---------------------==-~----------=-----e=-----BF SS lS F F05 F01
pound 2 ln~13~ 3lBillllll1l 52367 191141145 3715181747 357 605 I 2 29111 GllS5SSS6 111155 bull 5211778 103289966 357 605 l 1 3l$3351l11112 33$3-3611112 240095590 4113 A33 lEamp liL 31121111l11U1t zst-n22t77 8 ssu21119a 295 461 pound~ 2 1217222222 16093611111 432112657 357 605 III 2 n~ bullEHOq 1a ----------
521iwSSSS5 15S911111111 25Jot 5lll)~Oll)il))I
31l527777R 4117277777~ iJl9166657
22C3627) -2H1157
357 2~95
6~5 11 61
-=====------middot--- -- -- middotmiddot-- --middot-llOl~L lS
DS
bull SS 15 SEA 11 SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
-(D -l Q 0 E J-
ffi 1 J-(J wa gtlt 0 Q--------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL (I
AGGREGATE
Figure D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-3~1 l49 SS-3H J86 SS-10 207 SS-30 176 SS-30 211
SS-15amp 132 SS-15amp l40 SS-151168 SS-l51 l91 ss-lSi 135 SS-15 162I I I CS-7 81 CMS-7 52 OS-7 42 CMS-7 60
llite Values with a amron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent
Figure D6 Newman-Keuls Ranking 2 Day 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi
D6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Table D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Contentr 10 psi
-EMULSION OUALITY LEVELcAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15
SEA
D A T A
325
271
l]JD
260
390
340
319
348
272
367
302
356
x s
CV
29S
38
128
285
35
124
365
35
97
334
21
62
320
67
21 0
329
38
116
ss 30 SEJ
0 A T A
282
310
337
255
303
374
362
307
318
308
289
329
x s
CV
296
20
67
296
58
196
339
50
148
335
39
116
313
7
23
309
28
92
C M s 7
D A T A
78
64
110
95
75
73
110
135
80
90
85
7
83
110
135
x s
CV
71
10
139
103
11
104
74
1
19
123
18
144
123
18
144
Table D8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus
A N O V ll
E 2- 3r39El11 3middotl8tB89 196 994 L19 44 44 5 178 q233024 3 57 6 CS 2 9111~7222223 4058 3611112 3 57577(13 357 6csbulla 11 611~ li9llll41115 ~16 ampll44445 S585579 443 833
_n_ sect 251l-illll41sectl41 -531 31i 11111 AS7121pound3 295 4 61 EJ 2 lt 115 $555555 227 521777 8 1994213 357 605 iampJ 2 170555555 15)277778 0770121 357 605 __ElJ 1324111ilJlilil4 5 208 bull 11Ul 11 bull 184922 2 95 4 ( 1
nan 11 19P73 SOOJIO~ 11111D833l33
middotmiddot-- =--=--=-==-===--c-=-c------_--=--ngtllllll
----------------------------------middot----
D7
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
traquo diams CMS - 7a ()
0--Gl ~- I J _J bull C 02 E I-z w J-(J w C
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATEmiddot
Figure D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HJGH lOW HJGH LOW HIGH LOW
I I I Iss-il51 298 1SS-31l 295 ss-]5~ 365 SS-30 335 1middot SS-15 320 SS-15 329
SS-301 296 SS-l5amp 235 SS-301 339 SS-15 334 SS-30 313 SS-30 309
CIIS--7 71 OS-7 103 CHS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123
t-bte Values with a armon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D8 Newman-Keuls Ranking Full Cure
Resilient Modulus 103 psi
D8
----- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D9 Density at Design Residue Content pcf
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
LOWHJGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH D l341 6 ll339 1347 1338 1523ss 1500A T 1356 133S 1350 1333 1513 1497A
1~ x l351 l337 1349 1336 1518 1499 sSEA 07 02 02 04 07 02
05 02 02 03CV 05 01
D 1362 1352 1370 1355 1545A 1520ss T 1371 1355 1361 1354 1550 1525
30 A
x 1367 1354 1366 1355 1548 1523 SEA 02 06s 06 01 04 04
05 02 05 01 02 02CV D 1373 1375 1380 1370 1537 1543AC T 1385 1375 137 9 1360 1535 1545AM x 1379 1375 1380 1365 1536 1544s s 09 oo 01 07 01 017
06 ooCV 01 05 01 01
Table DlO ANOVA Summary Density
N O V ll -----middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddotmiddot-- -- --------- -------middot --------------- ----- - - -
smI=pound DF ss F F05 F01
pound 2 2738H9 310369445 153505090 357 605 ~ 2 2273iWlllbull38B9 11369544445 5530 gt35704 357 lj -~5 ~ 1 11-6~2SilllaquollO 12 602500C 524057772 443 R33 n I tpoundlUll11 Jl-69lll45 2-324621e 2 95 4 61 E 2 3131poundpound57 15i5S33J 7 7537nB 357 li os lJ 2 ltClfltSf-57 0433334 21458C6 357 s 05 n~ Iii )l216poundfi6lii 9556667 47372764 295 451
EHJii 11l 3 bull nsilraquorn 2019444
------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -- -middotmiddot-middot ----- -middotmiddot - middot-------
35 23611rJC556
D9
1 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
-0 a gt1 ()
z
diams CMS-7
w C
120 SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure D9 Density at Design Residue Coritent
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
OS--7 1379 aS-7 ]375 IClIS-7 l380 IOlS-7 1365 ISS-30 1548 CMS-7 1544ISS-30~ 1367 SS--30~ J354 SS-30~ 1366 SS-30~ 1355 CMS-7 1536 SS-30 1523
SS-15bull 1351 ss-is~ 1337 SS-15bull 1349 ss-1s 1336 SS-15 1518 SS-15 1499
NJte Values with a omron vertical lme are not statistically different
Figure D10 Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcf
DlO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
Table D11 Air Voids at Design Residue Content
-EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
107
)5
9 10l
91
99
79
99
80
83
8 bull5
84
I s
ICY
U)
Ill 9
B4
10l
03
28
95
06
60
89
14
159
82
02
26
85
01
08
ss 30j
SEA
D A T A
90
93
92
85
92
96
86
84
66
67
74
73
x s
CV
92
02
23
89
05
56
94
03
30
85
01
l 7
67
01
ll
74
01
10
C M s 7
D A T A
77
73
62
61
73
62
63
71
71
65
48
55
x s
CV
75
03
38
62
O~l
12
68
08
u5
67
06
96
68
04
62
52
05
96
Table Dl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids
A ll O V A --e--ee-ee=-==== -- -- middot- -- --- middot- - ------- - middot-----middot----middot ______ __________ ---middot- ----- - ------------- -
iiUEllilE ss ~s F F01
E 45111Hoiii6pound 225l08333 812457541 357 605 ll 1~-lilliillt~~)Q 7930)000 2519405 357 505 IJJ 11 ili$6J4141~ 16469444 59230768 443 8 33 E1 2J53ll3ll -5S5333 4 -2 bull 11755245 295 4 6 1
EJ 15672223 bull 783pound 112 2~131820 357 605 I 21022223 bull 1li 1112 bull 3$35365 357 cs
EampJ 2971111ll J27778 26713286 2 95 4t1 iElllllHgt 5cgt~SiIJOIgt -2790556
-middot--middot ------- --middot - middotmiddot- -middotmiddot--middot-- --3li
D11
11 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
-l
a - 8
-a 0 7gt tc ltI 6
5
4 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dll
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot
middot HIGH LOW
SS-]5amp JlJl ISS-ll5~ 10l
ISS-301 92 SS-311l11 89ICMS-7 75 CS-7 fi2
Air Voids at Design Residue Content
FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
=- 95 I I ISS-15 89 SS-15 82 SS-15 8 5
SS-31 94 SS-30 85 SS-30 74ICMS-7 68
OS-7 68 CMS-7 67 SS-30 67 CMS-7 52
Ngtte Values with a ommn vertical line are not statistically dilferent
Figure D12 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids
Dl2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
middotmiddotEMULSION OUAUTY LEVEL
~- AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
48S 3g_g
295
middot 32 8
439
396
397
418
288
307
223
307
X s
CV
443
64
144
312
23
75
418
30
73
408
15
36
298
13
45
265
59
224
ss 3Wo SEA
0 A T A
400
403
367
283
342
411
392
262
310
32-4
292
236
x s
CV
402
02
05
325
59
183
377
49
130
327
92
281
31 7
10
31
264
40
150
C M s 7
D A T A
235
235
130
120
213
233
150
200
350
350
250
250
x s
CV
235
00
00
125
07
57
223
14
63
175
35
202
350
oo oo
250
00
oo
Table Dl4 ANOVA Swnrnary Stabilometer Value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------A N O V A
---------~----------middot------middot-middotmiddot-- -middot--middot--middotmiddot--middot------ bull middotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middot middot------middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot--- --middotmiddot ---_ -- middotmiddot-middotmiddot-- -- - - - -----ss r r05 r01
2 1 i 7~ Sbull1lfipound5161S 5879033333 332259711 357 605 I 2 igtS895QGDgt 279475000 195117552 357 ~os i ll ~l ~
11 111 2 2
l~illflll1111111 7DS nll3331
1~il])2222] 755J5556
~ 111 8 11111~=-- 10115 834 71011111
37 7502778
275769841 128178912
U938281 251M309
11113 295 357 357
833 4f1 605 605
Ell~ 14middot 3~53lt1$1H 116340278 5750926 295 461 fElilli U 25977~illlllCII~ 1111H72222
------------------------ bull- ~bull OOM---bullbullbullbull- - bull------_________ _
roru
013
w J ltC gt a w 1-w E 0 I-m ltC Ishyen
SBH SBL FH FL
bull SS 15 SEA 5S 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-)Sll 441_3 SS-l 325I SS-JSi 4131 SS-15 40 8 CMS-7 350 SS-15 265
SS-30 402 SS-JSa 31_2I ISS-30~ 377 SS-30~ 327 SS-30 317 SS-30 264
CS-7 235 CMS-7 125 ISS-15 298 CMS-7 250
Nlte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D14 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value
Dl4
-------------------
Table Dl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
ii3
ii2
l7-1
ilJD3
236
76
308
62
112
85
222
180
l s
CY
63
lJ1
10
Jl39
SlJ
363
l56
J13
725
185
174
940
99
19
194
201
30
148
ss 30 SEA
0 A T A
229
306
266
187
78
130
260
136
157
212
186
164
x s
CV
268
55
204
227
56
247
104
37
354
198
88
443
185
39
211
175
16
89
C M s 7
D A T A
80
82
190
180
122
192
245
235
130
120
170
180
x s
CV
81
l
18
185
7
38
157
50
315
240
7
30
125
7 57
175
7
40
Table Dl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value
--------------------middot--------------------------------------------------------------A N O V A
-=====-=-=--=-- ===== ss
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1i712 7222222 83563611111 226671165 357 605 I 2 l~12 lllllliilllllllB9 71144441145 129864 357 605 ~ 1l 251116l 144141llllj 2ti-~H~bull4dimiddot4 4 44 5 71775602 443 833 n l4 37511ll 777JTI7JJ S395bull J 9 ~4middot444 2548 5405 295 4 e 1 poundJ 2 72lllS3SlffiifISlmiddot9 3fi22f9111114UU 9026921 357 6C5
n 2 1 iSigt555S
11321Bl 111111I 117lIT177778
33220277778 1277032 9~11333
357 297
605 461
Eliflll 11 f15357 tlOilOOibull 3ilf65Jgt)oo
---------------------------------------middot-------------------------------------------
D15
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7w
J lt(
gt a w Jshyw I 0-() w
8
O--------r-----r-----------r----r-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
c 1
Figure D15
SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW
SS-3(1JlS 268
81IOS-7
ISS-]5i 63 SS-lSl 139
Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 240 SS-30 185 SS-15 201
SS-lSi 155 SS-30l 198 CMS-7 125 SS-30 175
SS-JOi 104 SS-151 185 SS-15 99 CMS-7 175
Note Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Dl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value
D16
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D17 Swell at Design Residue Content in
EfAULSEON
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDI NO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH lOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 s~
D A T A
048 -
0413
06S
069
on
005
006
008
-025 045
005
004
004
005
009
014
Jt s
CY
HS
0010
000
D68
-003
45
bull 006
002
241
035
010
286
004
001
133
009
005
483
ss 30 SEA
D A T A
023
023
020
063
066
055
000
ooo
008
031
023
028
000 000 003
ooo
001
000
x s
CV
022
002
79
061
006
93
003
005
1732
027
004
148
oin
002
1732
ooo
001
1732
C M s 7
D A T A
000
ooo
000
004
002
001
ooo
ooo
000
003
000
ooo 000 000 ooo
ooo
ooo
000
x s
CV
000
ooo
ooo
002
002
655
ooo
ooo
ooo
001
002
1732
ooo
ooo
ooo
ooo
ooo
000
Table D18 ANOVA Summary Swell ( Transformed Data)
A N O Y A
E 2 _1025326 0912663 2353471(154 329 532 -Amiddot middotmiddot2 1366452 0683226 1761825136 329 532 0 1 0368219 03613219 949521081 1114 7116
EA 11 04627$7 0115697 298345558 266 396 -EQ- 2-- --006-903G- -0(134515-middot -8-9003553 middot3l9 -S-32 A) 2 0150358 ~0075179 193863014 329 532 UO 4 0083986 0020997 54143375 26 396
-ERRORmiddot 36 0139606middot 0003178
-TOTIIL 53 --446-576-11
D17
05 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
04
z -J
J w IJJ
SBH SBL
diams CMS - 7
~oo
_02
01
FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dl7 Swell at Design Residue Content
SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-ll51 ii-IS SS-]5i il68 SS-15 a006 SS-15 bull 035 SS-15 004 SS-15 009I I I I SS-3Cli 022 SS-301 061 ISS-301 003 SS-30 bull 027 ISS-30 bull 001 ISS-30 bull 000
ClS-7 000 CIS-7 002 OS-7 000 OIS-7 001 CMS-7 000 CMS-7 000
NJte Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D18 Newman-Keuls Ranking Swell in
D18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
Table Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSl10N
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOWHIGH 0 156 48 175 229 2lO 125ss A ll5 60 20l ll7 228 120T 13_g 4e 170 132 212 130A15 i 137 52 182 200 2l 7 125 smiddotSEA 2l 37 l7 30 lO 05
1middot5]CY 133 92 148 46 40 D 98 106 lll 76 2l 0 lllAss 203 109 76 5l 235 95T ll3 85 63 59 233 125
30 A
x 138 100 83 62 226 llOSEll s 57 l3 25 l3 l4 l5
412 131 298 206 62 136CV D 2lO 202 185 98 330 240A 220 87 18l 88 345 200C T 216 138 223 77 338 2lOAM x 215 142 196 88 338 217s
5805 23 lls 08 2l7
23 405 ll8 120 22 96CV
Table D20 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Stabilorneter Value
N O V A
-------middot------------------------------------------------------ ---------------DF -$ -F os- r01
pound 2 5919875926 2l59917963 39C147075fl 329 53 2 690 i1111pounda$11 iii 345 022110111 US51521111 329 5 32 Ill 1 763129-i296 763 1296 296 100671B132 414 7 U6
Ea t93 11171111]J)7lll 1007863519 1329576P8 266 391bullIEill -2 middot -E~ti35~259 -23middot0-H9fgt29 C-~6522- middot3 29 532 AO 2 S3amp11171t1137ll 11192351$5 55305370 329 532 El s1111i1r1075 135268519 17~qq579 266 396bullmiddotDll~t 311i 27239~333~ 7 5903711)111
53
--------------------------------------------------------middot-----------------------
D19
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA0)
gt diams CMS - 7 l I
a w 30fshyw E 0 J 2-en ltC Ishyen 10
SBH SSL FH FL GRH GRL01amp---------------------------_
AGGREGATE
Figure Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
middotHtGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
QS-1 235 CS-7 142 196 SS-15 200 CMS-7 338 CMS-7 217GS-
Iss-3H uaI I I ISS-3Qi lilG SS-15i ]S2 IOMS-7 88 SS-30 22~ SS-15 125
SS-151 137 ss-i5~ 52 SS-30~ 83 SS-30 62 SS-15 217 SS-30 110
fute Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent
Figure D20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
D20
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Table D2l MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
-------_cEMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
ss 1 sa
D A T A
x s
HIGH
Ul3 ~ JlU
43
64
IOW
~ TWlI ~
--
H1GH
159 1-43 126
143
17
LOW
123 187
60
123
64
HIGH
130 179 153
154
25
LOW
120 104 143
122
20
CV D A5S T A30 x
SEA s
171
139 88
104
110
26
-98 91 -95
4
116
114 116
69
100
27
515
TWT TWT TWT
--
159
111 101 15~
122
28
160
83 65 63
70
11
CV D AC T AM x5 s
7 CV
236
141 79 52
91
46
503
37
185 60 63
103
71
695
267
125 201
96
141
54
386
-192 164 126
161
33
206
23l
131 130 120
127
6
48
157
72 230
76
126
90
715
Too weak to test
Table D22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
SOO~e 55- -f middotFmiddot OS- F01
pound 2 19956 G31tl3Tt 99780165185 52791162 329 532 -1 2- 223ii~ 92592~-~ middot111544629630 -59015431 3middot29 5 32 J 1 n21lliiilliEiiii~ 1middot112106656666 75185029 414 746 lEJ Ill 32il76711ltCl~lll9l 132191851852 43485622 2euro6 396 ~ 2- ~373hllllllllllllllqSmiddot iiilfgtamp 1222-223- -3bull6middot3300811 -3 29 532 1i 2 1S011Hil12 75i0555556 bull ~397100 329 532 Eli
-a~llt-Iii
36 511J7777777
middot5B11113BB333 12799444444 129e l9 25 92 6middot
5771861 266 396
D21
bull SS 15 SEA U) SS 30 SEA gt diams CMS - 7E I
a w J-~ 200 0 en w5 100 0
SBH SBL FH FL AGGREGATE
GRH GRL
Figure D21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINO FRESNO
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 126SS-15 154]03 JCMS-7 161106-7 rmm SS-15 122CMS-7 127SS-30amp 95 ltMgt-7 ]Aj_ SS-15 123
SS-30 70
t-bte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
SS-30 122SS-151 93 SS-l51 fflT SS-30amp 100 SS-30 TWT
Figure D22 Ne-wman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
D22
Table D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW
ss 15 SEA
ss 30 SEA
C M s 7
HIGH D bullbullmiddot 979 715A middot 1143 569T A 1047 599
X - - 1056 - 628 s - - 82 - 77
CV - - 78 - 123
D 987 1474 548A T 907 1536 433 A 1447 615
x - - 947 1486 532 s - 57 46 92
CV - - 60 31 173 D 642 102 597 588 301A T 620 426 369 60l 263 A 774 662 470 290 3q_3
x 679 397 479 493 31 9
s 83 281 114 176 67
CV 123 709 239 357 21 0
1285 1353 1493
1377
106
77
627 72 2 634
661
53
80
238 284 22 7
250
30
121
Specimen swelled during soak could not ne tested Specimen disintegrated during testing
D23
300
E CJgt -200 en
en 0 J
z0 middot cii 100 lt( cc CD lt(
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
01--------r----T----J-----r----r SBH FH FL GRH GRL
middotAGGREGATE
Figure D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content
D24
APPENDIX E
FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL DESIGNS
Table El
Thickness T in Inches to Satisfyl
Tensile Strain Requirements (Reference 3)
Subirade l~octulus psi 30~0 6000 12000 30oco
Jverage Ann~abullAir erlerature J degF lt40 40-55 55-65 gt65 40 40-55 55-65 gt65 lt40 40-55 55-651gt65 lt4 0 40-55 55-65 gt65
T~affic EALbull 10bull
IllIf psi 50000 4 9 66 7 8 91 37 50 5e 66 2 26 28 29 2 2 2 2
1000~0 37 5 3 62 12 27 40 47 53 2 21 25 26 2 2 2 2
300000 21 J4 4 3 51 2 28 31 middot3 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
600000 2 24 3 2 39 2 2 2 _2 28 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2middot 2 2 2 290JCOO 2 2 26 33 2 2 2 22 2 2 2
Traffic EAL= 10s
trJ MR psi bull 50000 83 ll5 139 165 70 97 112 127 54 1-3 83 93 2 3 27 28 29 f-J
42 58 69 78 2 25 27 27100000 63 90 108 129 54 76 91 105
3COOOO 4o 58 73 8 3 3 51 60 73 24 39 ~8 56 2 2 20 22
600000 28 45 55 67 21 37 47 55 2 21 36 44 2 2 2 2
900000 21 37 4 7 57 2 30 39 48 2 21 29 37 2 I 2 2 2
TraCf1c 2 ~AL a 10~ I ia psi bull 50000 130 161 216 2~ 116 16l 187 213 98 131 151 172 63 66 93 58
82 0100000 98 14) 171 203 68 126 152 176 75 106 125 142 52 7 3
3CCOOO 6o 91 11 3 139 55 82 101 122 4 7 69 86 102 31 49 59 59
e~oooo 46 68 86 106 ~o 60 76 94 3middot 3 52 64 i9 2 35 4 r 54
900~00 37 56 72 69 )2 51 63 80 24 4 3 5 4 67 2 28 3 8 ul Trarr1el EAL~ 10 7
la psi bull 50000 192 24 24 24 178 239 24 24 156 205 235 24 12l 153 165 17 3 I
24 24 228 24 119 168 195 222 95 129 147 1s IlCOOCO 1~5 21 0 13 5 193
56 aa 10a 12 I-3CC000 aa 136 167 205 ~-3 12 156 186 74 11l 138 16~
I- l 6 a2 10060~ 1 ouo 6 4 100 125 156 59 92 ll 6 l~ 5 53 82 104 128
108 3 3 53 6 8 859ccooo 53 82 10 5 132 so 77 97 121 4 ~ 68 86
For asphalt volume Vb= 11 are air voids Va= 5 Use Figure El to correct thickness of other valuemiddots of Vb and Va
Table E2
Subsradlt Mcdulus psi
Thickness T in Inches to Satisfys Subgrade Strain Requirements (Reference 3)
6100 120003000 300CC
tr N
A~erage A~nual Ar Te11perature degF
Traffic EALbull 10bull
~IP psi 50000a
100000
300000
600000
900000
Traffic EAL 10 5
MR psibull 50000
lC0000
300000
600000
900000
Tra~~lc EAL c 1c6
MR psibull 50000
100000
300000
600POO
900000
Trafficz EALbull 10 7
MRt psibull 50000
100000
300000
600000
900000
lt40
55
55
55
55
55
81
81
81
81
81
115
115
115
115
115
155
155
155
155
155
40-55
83
60
55
55
55
121
87
81
Bl
Bl
168
123
11
115
ll5
226
165
155
155
155
55-65 gt65 lt40
108 115 46
73 82 46
55 55 46
5_ 45
55 55 46
145 165 69
106 120 69
a1 81 69
81 81 69
81 81 69
201 224 98
14B 165 98
115 115 98
115 115 98
115 115 98
24 24 1)6
199 222 135
15 155 136
155 155 136
155 155 136
40-55
10
50
46
46
46
103
74
69
69
69
150
108
98
98
9B
204
150
135
136
136
55-65 G5 lt40
83 93 30
61 70 30
46 46 30
45 46 30
46 46 30
124 139 55
91 102 55
69 69 55
69 69 55
69 69 55
173 193 83
130 147 83
98 98 83
98 98 83
98 98 83
239 24 120
179 199 120
136 136 120
136 136 120
135 136 120
40-55
4
3~
30
30
30
83
60
55
55
55
122
90
83
83
83
17 5
130
120
middot12 o
120
55-65 gt65 lt~O
62 69 25
46 53 25
30 30 25
30 30 25
30 30 25
9 106 29
82 29i 2 middot 55 55 29
55 55 29
55 55 29
144 15S 60
108 12l 60
83 83 60
83 83 60
83 83 6 0
205 226 90
155 112 90
120 120 90
120 120 90
120 120 90
40-55
31
25
25
25
25
52
30
29
29
29
86
65
60
60
60
127
98
90
90
90
55-65 bull65
33 35
29 3c
25 25 I 25 25 i 25 2s
51 67
47 52
29 29
29 29
29 29
95 10
76 85
60 I 6C
6C i 6o 50
14bull 3 14
112 126
90 90
90 90
90 90
Tj In Tc In 24 2 22
20
18
16 3
14
12 4
~ 10 Va+ vb 5
099
8 08 6
077 7 06
6 805
9045 1003
4 12
14
3 16
18
20
22 2 24
Figure El Correction of Pavement Design Thickness for Air Voids and
Asphalt Content of Mix (Reference 3)
E3
-------
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000 psi
MAAT 55- 65 F-Ul 400 CL
C) 0 300 (J) J
~ 200 0 ~
I- 100z w J-(J) 0+----------------------C w 0 2 4 6 8 middot10 12
THICKNESS IN
1X104 EAL
1X105EAL
Figure E2 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
M-AAT )65 F- -~---Ul 400 1x104 EALCL
CW)
0 300 (J) J 200C 0 ~
-~ 100 w -J -(J) 0w 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a
THICKNESS IN
1X105EAL
Figure E3 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 6000 psi MAAT = )65F
s
E4
w 400 c
()
0 300 () - 200 Cl 0 E
~ 100 w J-
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT 56-65 F
1x10 EALI 4
I 1X105 EAL
w o~---------------------r-w 1 2 3 4a
THICKNESS IN
Figure E4 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT )65F-w 400 4I 1X10 EALc () I 1X105EAL 0 300 I () I - I 200C I0 E I I- 100z w I-J I-() 0w 1 2 3 4c
THICKNESS IN~
Figure ES Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65Fs
ES
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
MAAT 55-65 F-en400 41X10 EALIC
(I) 1X105EAL middot 0
I I 300
en I J 200C 0
f-- 100z w J-en 0LU 2 4 6 8 10 14a
-THICKNESS IN
Figure E6 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
MmiddotAAT )65 F cn4oo I 1X104 EALa
(I) 1X105EAL 0 300
I I
en -I
~200 0 ~ 100 LU --en -I
0-1-----------------------LU 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a THICKNESS IN
Figure E7 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = )65F
E6
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT 55-65 F-u 400 41x10 EAL0
M 1x105EAL 0 T- 300 -en J 200C 0 E I- 100z w-J- en 0w C 0 middot1 2 3 4 middot5 6
THICKNESS IN
Figure E8 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000psi
M-AAT )65 F-en400
I --- - - ~- 1X104 EAL
C
a 1X105 EAL
0 I T- 300
I-en J
200 C 0 E
I- 100z w J-en 0w 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
THICKNESS IN
Figure E9 Thickness For Subgrade StrainRequirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65F
s
E7
Table E3
Thickness Requirements inches
= 6000 psi EAL= 1 X 104 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
MrT
l
CF Tc Ts
246000 34
64 37 43
300000 31
68 4middot 0 43
391000 27
lt 61 33 43
362000 28
64 31 43
260000 28
bull bull 61 35 43
333000 30
65 33 43
C M s 0
Mr Ti CF T Tc
s
259000 29
59 36 43
288000 32
bull 61 3 8 43
271000 32
59 39 43
339000 30
60 37 43
284000 32
59 40 43
365000 29
60 37 43
C M s 7
M T7
l
CF TTc
s
71000 55
65 60 43
103000 47 71
45 43
74000 54
67 53 43
123000 44 69
45 43
85000 52
65 54 43
123000 44
73 46 43
ss 15
M T7
l
CF T Tc s
298000 31
57 40 43
285000 32
59 38 43
365000 28
58 37 43
334000 30
61 36 43
320000 30
60 36 43
329000 30
61 36 43
ss 30
M T7
l
CF Tc Ts
296000 31
60 37 43
296000 31
62 36 43
339000 30
59 38 43
335000 30
bull 63 35 43
313000 31
65 34 43
309000 31
65 34 43
Ngtte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi TI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume middotTc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= llrickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
E8
Table E4
Thickness Requirements inches
Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
246000 68
64 74 70
300000 62 68
62 68
391000 55 61
65 68
362000 57 64
63 68
260000
57 bull 61
68 70
333000 59 65
65 68
C M s 0
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
259000 65 59
80 70
288000 63
bull 61 75 68
271000 64 59
78 70
339000 59 60
72 68
284000 63 59
78 68
365000 57 60
70 68
C M s 7
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
71000 100
bull 65 107 105
103000 90 bull 71
84 88
74000 100
67 102 104
123000 85 69
85 81
85000 95 65
102 97
123000 85 73
78 81
ss 15
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
298000 62 57
78 68
285000 63 59
76 68
365000 57 58
72 68
334000 59 61
72 68
320000 60 60
73 68
329000 59 61
70 68
ss 30
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
296000 62
60 74 68
296000 62
62 71 68
339000 59 59
72 68
335000 59
63 68 68
313000 60
bull 65 65 68
309000 60
65 65 68
1bte
M = Resilient mJdulus in psirf = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
E9
Table ES
Thickness Requirements inches 4
Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M Tdeg
J
CF T Tc
246000 40
64 46 45
300000middot 37 68
37 43
391000 33 61
38 43
362000 35
64 39 43
260000 39
61 45 45
333000 35
65 38 43
C M s 0
MT J
CF T Tc
s
259000 39 59
48 45
288000 38 61
middot4 6 44
271000 38 59
47 44
339000 35 60
43 43
284000 38 59
46 44
365000 35 60
43 43
C M s 7
M T7
J CF T Tc
s
71000 60 65
65 68
103000 52 71
48 64
74000 60 67
60 68
123000 50 bull 69 59 62
85000 58 65
63 67
123000 50 73
49 62
ss 15
M T7
J CF T Tc
s
298000 37 57
50 43
285000 38 59
48 44
365000 35 58
45 43
334000 35 61
43 43
320000 3 6
60 44 43
329000 37 61
45 43
ss 30
M T7
J CF TTc
s
296000 37 60
45 43
296000 37 62
43 43
339000 35 59
44 43
335000 35 bull 63
41 43
313000 36
65 39 43
309000 36
65 39 43
Nrte
M = Resilient nodulus in psiTI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T
5 = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El0
Table E6
Thickness Requirements inches
105E = 6000 psi EAL= 1 x psi MAAT = )65Fs
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
246000
79 64
87 70
300000
74 68
74 70
391000 69
61 81 70
362000 70
64 77 70
260000 77
61 90 70
333000 71
65 77 70
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 77
59 94 70
288000 75
61 90 70
271000 76
59 92 70
339000 71
60 87 70
284000 75
59 91 70
365000 69
60 85 70
C M s 7
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
71000 111
65 118 112
103000 103
middot11 95 98
74000 111
67 110 11l
123000 98
69 95 93
85000 109
65 119 109
123000 98
73 87 93
ss 15
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
298000 74 57
94 70
285000 7 5 59
94 70
365000 69 58
88 70
334000 7 1 middot 61
84 70
320000 72 60
87 70
329000 71 61
84 70
ss 30
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
296000 74
60 90 70
296000 74
62 86 70
339000 71 59
87 70
335000 71
63 82 70
313000 73
bull 65 78 70
309000 73
65 78 70
Note
M = Resilient midulus in psi11 = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness f9r tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade stram requirements inches
Ell
Table E7
Thickness Requirements inches4
= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
middot~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO -GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
246000 2 0
64 23 25
300000 20
68 2middot 0 25
391000 20
61 24 25
362000 20
64 23 25
260000 20
61 24 25
333000 20
65 22 25
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 20
59 25 25
288000 20
bull 61 24 25
271000 20
59 25 25
339000 20
60 25 25
284000 20
59 25 25
365000 20
60 25 25
C M s 7
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
71000 20
65 22 31
103000 20
middot71 20 29
74000 20
67 21 31
123000 20
69 20 28
85000 20
65 22 30
123000 20
73 20 28
ss M T7
l
298000 20
285000 20
365000 20
334000 20
320000 2 0
329000 20
15 CF T Tc
s
57 26 25
59 25 25
58 26 25
61 24 25
bull 60 25 25
61 24 2 i
ss 30
M T7
l
CF TTc
s
296000 20
60 25 25
296000 20
62 24 25
339000 20
59 25 25
335000 20
bull63 23 25
313000 20
65 22 25
309000 20
65 22 25
N)te
M = Resilient nodulus in psi middot T7 = Unrorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inchesct= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume T = Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T~ = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El2
Table E8
Thickness Requirements inches
Es= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s
M T7
l
246000 22
300000 20
391000 20
362000 20
260000 21
333000 20
s 0
CF T Tc
s
64 24 32
68 20 29
61 24 29
64 23 29
61 24 l 1
65 23 29
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 21 59
25 31
288000 21
bull 6J 24 30
271000 21 59
25 30
339000 20 60
25 29
284000
21 59
25 1 n
365000
20 60
25 2 q
C M
M T7
l
71000 27
103000 25
74000 27
123000 24
85000
26
123000
24 s 7
CF T Tc
s
65 28 53
71 24 45
bull 67 28 53
69
23 43
65
27 49
73
22 43
ss M T7
l
298000 20
285000 21
365000 20
334000 20
320000 20
329000 20
15 CF
TTc
s
57 27 29
59 26 30
58 27 29
61 24 29
60 25 29
61 24 2 q
ss 30
M r~i CF T Tc
s
296 ooomiddot 20 60
24 29
296000 20 62
23 29
339000 20 59
24 29
335000 20 63
23 29
313000 20 65
23 29
309000 20 65
23 29
i-krte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psiTf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade strain requirements inches
El3
Table E9
Thickness Requirements inches 4 = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
EMULSION __ QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
246000 20 64
23 25
300000 20 68
21 25
391000 20 61
24 25
362000 20 64
23 25
260000 20 61
24 25
333000 20 65
22 25
C M s 0
259000 20 59
26 25
288000 20
bull 61 middot24 25
271000 20 59
26 25
339000 20 60
25 25
284000 20 59
26 25
365000 20 60
25 25
C M s 7
MT7
1 CF T Tc
s
71000 20 65
22 58
103000 2~0 middotn
20 52
74000 20 67
21 58
123000 20 69
20 48
85000
20 65
22 57
123000
20 73
20 48
$$
15
MTdeg
1
CF T Tc
s
-298 000 20 57
27 25
285000 20 59
26 25
365000 20 58
26 25
334000 20 61
24 25
320000 2 0 60
25 25
329 000 20 61
24 25
ss 30
MT7
1
CF T Tc
s
296000 20 60
25 25
296000 20 62
24 25
339000 20 59
26 25
335000 20 63
23 25
313000 20 65
22 25
309000 20 65
22 25
tote
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot rf = Unagtrrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El4
Table ElO
Thickness Requirements inches 5E = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
s
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T--deg
J
CF T Tc
s
246000
24 64
27 31
300000
23 68
24 29
391000
22 61
25 29
362000
22 64
2_s 29
260000
26 61
31 30
333000
22 65
24 29
C M s 0
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s
259000 23
59 28 30
288000 23
bull 61 27 30
271000 23
59 28 30
339000 22
60 26 29
284000 23
59 28 30
365000 21
60 25 29
C M s 7
ss 15
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s M T--deg
J
CF T Tc
s
71000 28
bull 65 30 61
298000 23 57
25 29
103000 27
~ 71 27 52
285000 23 59
28 30
74000 28
bull 67 28 60
365000 22
58 28 29
123000 26
69 26 48
334000 22 61
25 29
85 000 28
65 31 58
320000 22
60 26 29
123000 26
73 24 48
329000 22 61
25 29
55
30
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s
296000 23
60 27 29
296000 23
62 27 29
339000 22 59
27 29
335000 22
63 25 29
313000 22
65 24 29
309000 23
65 25 29
tbte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot Tf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Ihickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
II11~~~1~~i~IIII 08860 ElS
Central Plant Mixed For central plant mixed emulshysified asphalt mixtures rolling should generally be performed as soon as possible after lay down as in many cases due to the time required for hauling and placing of the mixture the emulsion may have begun to break However initial rolling should not be performed until the mixture is stable enough to support the roller Initial rolling is generally accomplished using pneumatic rollers intermediate rolling with either pneumatic or steel wheel rolshylers and finish rolling with steel wheel rollers Further information on compaction of plant-mixed emulsified asphalt mixtures are also found in Refershyences 3 6 and 9
87
100 CONCLUSIONS
Based on testing mixture designs and analyses pershyformed with the materials studied during this investishygation several conclusions regarding the use of solshyvent free asphalt and sulfur-extended asphalt emulshysions with aggregates from California may be drawn
101 Solvent Free Asphalt Emulsions
A summary of ANOVA significant at the 95 percent confidence level is tabulated in Table 33 This table shows for nearly all dependent variables that emulsion type aggregate quality level and aggreshygate are significant effects For several paramshyeters several interactions are also significant Conclusions reached during the asphalt emulsion experiment are
1 Stable solvent free cationic slow set and catshyionic medium set asphalt emulsions can be proshyduced which meet Caltrans specifications for cationic emulsionse
2 Solvent free cationic asphalt emulsions can effectively coat aggregates with minus No 200 mesh contents in excess of 10 percent and sand equivalent values as low as 15 Greater degrees of coating are obtained with solvent free catshyionic slow set emulsions than with solvent free cationic medium set emulsions
3 In the laboratory and for the materials used in this study greater degrees of compaction can be obtained using a conventional cationic medium set emulsion which contains 7 percent solvent than with solvent free asphalt emulsions
4 Higher stabilometer values cohesiometer values and resilient moduli are obtained for laboratory mixtures containing low quality aggregates with the solvent free asphalt emulsions than with the emulsion containing solvent This is believed due to the higher viscosity of the solvent free emulsion residues when compared to the residue from the emulsion containing solvent
88
Table 33
SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL
ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT
DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS A a E AQ AE OE AQE
Emulsion Conpatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA - NA - NA NA
2 Day bdulus y y y - y y y
Full cure Ddulus y y y - - - -Density y y y - - - -Air Voids y y y - - - -
Stabilometer y y y y Y y -Cohesiometer y y y y y - -MVS Stabilometer y y y - y y -MVS Cohesiometer - - y - - - -SWell y y y y y y y
Surface Abrasion y y y y y y y
LEGEND
Effects
A = effect of aggregate type Q = effect of aggregate quality level E = effect of emulsion type
AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction
AQE = three-way interaction
Significance
Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level
NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way
89
5 Laboratory specimens containing solvent free asphalt emulsions experience higher losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivity procedure than specishymens with the asphalt emulsion containing solshyvent This effect however may be related to the lesser degrees of compaction attained when using the solvent free asphalt emulsions as comshypared to the emulsion containing solvent
6 Laboratory specimens which contained the solvent free asphalt emulsions with lower quality aggreshygates experienced higher amounts of swell and greater surface abrasion losses than specimens with the emulsion containing solvent
7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the solvent free asphalt emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thicknesses are required when using solvent free emulsions It is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials which may be an important factor in field performance
8 Most of the paving mixtures investigated which contained the low quality aggregates and the solvent free asphalt emulsions met stabilometer requirements for Caltrans Type C asphalt conshycrete However only three of the mixtures also met moisture vapor susceptibility and swell requirements Mixtures which met these requireshyments were - FH with CSS-0 emulsion GRH with CMS-0 emulsion and GRH with CMS-7 emulsion
9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other considershyations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others
90
- - - --- ----------
102 Sulfur-Extended-Asphalt Emulsions
A summary of ANOVA significance at the 95 percent confidence level is shown in Table 34 This table showsmiddotfor nearly all parameters that emulsion type aggregate quality level and aggregate are signifishycant effects For several parameters several interactions are also significant Conclusions reached during the SEA emulsion experiment are
1 Stable solvent free water based anionic slow set emulsions using sulfur-extended-asphalt (SEA) base stocks can be produced which meet most Caltrans specifications for anionic slow set emulsions
2 Anionic SEA emulsion can effectively coat both low and high quality aggregates
3 Use of SEA emulsions resulted in higher resilshyient modulus values for both low and high qualshyity aggregates than use of the emulsion containshying solvent
4 Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions had higher stabilometer values with low quality aggregates than mixtures with the emulsion containing solshyvent
5 Specimens containing the SEA emulsion with low quality aggregates swelled to a greater extent and experienced higher surface abrasion losses than those with the emulsion containing solvent
6 Specimens containing the SEA emulsions experishyence greater losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivshyity procedure than specimens with the solvent asphalt emulsion indicating a greater sensitivshyity to moisture
7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thickshynesses would be required when using SEA emulshysions Again it is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials
91
Table 34
SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL
SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT
DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS
effect of aggregate type effect of aggregate quality level effect of emulsion type
AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction
A a E AQ AE QE AQE
Emulsion Compatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA y NA y NA NA
2 Day Mxfalus y y y - y y y
Full Cure Mldulus y - y - - - -Density y y y - - y y
Air Voids y y y - - - -
Stabilometer - y y - y - -
COhesiometer - y - - - - -MIS Stabilaneter y y y y y - -
MVS COhesianeter y y y - y y -y
~ y y y y y y
Surface Abrasion
LEGEND
Effects
A = Q = E =
AQE = three-way interaction
Significance
Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level
NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way
92
8 All of the paving mixtures containing low qualshyity aggregates and SEA emulsions studied met Caltrans stabilometer requirements (30 minimum) for Type C asphalt concrete however several mixtures did not meet swell and moisture vapor susceptibility requirements for Type C asphalt concrete Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions which met swell requirements were FH GRH and GRL with SS-15 SEA emulsion and SBH FH FL GRH and GRL with SS-30 SEA emulsion MVS conshyditioned stabilometer value requirements were met only by FL and GRH with the SS-15 SEA emulshysion and GRH with the SS-30 SEA emulsion
9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other consider~ ations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others
93
110 RECOMMENDATIONS
111 This study has investigated the properties of paving mixtures containing several low quality aggregates and several types of emulsified binders Test methshyods and criteria used to design and assess mixture characteristics were those specified for hot-mix asphalt concrete in California An objective of the research study is to determine if solvent free emulshysified binders can be used in place of cutback asphalt binders Therefore in order to permit drawing of appropriate conclusions from the data presented in this report on the effectiveness of the emulsions studied for replacing cutback asphalts additional laboratory work is required It is suggested that properties and characteristics of mixtures containing the project aggregates and cutshyback asphalts be determined The study should evalshyuate the same properties considered in this study Determination of mixture characteristics using cutshyback binders would permit direct comparisons between the cutback and emulsified binder systems and the drawing of more definite conclusions Additionally a study which would determine properties of mixtures containing hot-mixed asphalt cement would be of aid in evaluating results
112 After completion of the additional laboratory studshyies if results so indicate it is recommended that several field experimental studies using aggregates ranging in quality from low to high with solvent free emulsified asphalt binders be undertaken Projects should be constructed in several climatic regions in California (wet and arid) and should include control sections containing both cutback and if possible hot-mixed asphalts Proper labshyoratory mixture designs construction control and field monitoring of results and performance should be used Results of these experiments should proshyvide indications of performance of the various mixtures in actual use
113 Results of this study indicate that mixtures conshytaining the SEA binders are detrimentally affected by moisture to a greater degree than with standard emulsions However performance of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions may be adequate in arid regions Therefore it is recommended that in order
94
to further investigate the usefulness of paving mixshytures containing the SEA emulsions that field experimental test sections using the SEA emulsions be constructed and evaluated$
It is strongly suspected that the moisture vapor susceptibility of the solvent free asphalt emulsion mixes evaluated herein could be reduced by a slight modification of the emulsion formulations This possibility should be evaluated
95
References
1 Request For Proposals Investigation Into The Nature Of Emulsified Asphalts Compatible With California Local Aggregates And Substitution Of Sulfur For Asphalt In Aqueous Emulsified Systems California Air Resource Board Research Division Sacramento Calishyfornia March 1980
2 American Society for Testing and Materials 1981 Annual Book of Standards Part 15 Road Paving Bituminous Materials Travelled Surface Characterisshytics Philadelphia PA 1981
3 Interim Guide to Full-Depth Asphalt Paving Using Varshyious Asphalt Mixes The Asphalt Institute Pacific Coast Division PCD-1 January 1976
4 Kennepahl GJA Logan A and Bean D C Conshyventional Paving Mixes with Sulfur-Asphalt Binders Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975
5 Deme Imants Processing of Sand-Asphalt-Sulfur Mixes Proceedings AAPT Volume 43 1974
6 A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual The Asphalt Instishytute Manual Series No 19 MS-19) March 1979
7 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Use of Cutback Asphalt US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Waste Management Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park North Carolina October 17 1977
8 Highway Chemicals Newsletter Armak Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois Fall 1981
9 Bitumils Mix Manual Chevron USA Asphalt Division January 1977
10 Asphalt Pavement Engineering Wallace Hugh A and Martin J Rogers McGraw Hill Book Company New York 1967
11 Spahr J D The Use of Emulsified Asphalt in Conshystruction and Maintenance Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975
96
12 Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design Asphalt Emulsions Volume 4 1977
13 Dybalski J N 11 The Chemistry of Asphalt Emulsions Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D C January 1976
14 Beagle C w Deflection and Performance of Deep Lift Asphalt Emulsion Base Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976
15 Meier w J Asphalt Emulsion Construction on the Navajo Reservation Twenty-Fifth Annual Arizona Conshyference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 22-23 1976
16 Kallas B F and Shock J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Find Report - Parts I and
11II Research Report 77-1 The Asphalt Institute November 1977
17 Shook J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Analysis of Performance Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976
18 Wimberly C M Emulsified Asphalt Mixes in Arizona Proceedings 24th Annual Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 17-18 1975
19 Izalt J O Galloway B M and Saylock D SandshyAsphalt-Sulfur Pavement Experimental Project Highway US 77 Kennedy County Texas Texas Transportation Institute April 1977
20 McBee w c and Sullivan T A Direct Substitution of Sulfur for Asphalt In Paving Materials 11 Report of Investigations 8303 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines 1978
21 Ludwig A C Gerhardt B B and Dale JM Materials and Techniques for Improving the Engineering Properties of Sulfur Report No FHWA-RD-80-023 Fedshyeral Highway Administration June 1980
22 Jiminez R A and Stakes K J Effects of Heat and Air on the Viscosity of Sulfur-Asphalt Mixtures Preshysented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies San Diego California February 16-18 1981
97
23 Chehovits J G and Anderson D A Upgrading of Marginal Aggregates for Improved Water Resistance of Asphalt Concrete Transportation Research Record 762 pages 46-52 1981
24 Rosner JC and Chehovits J G Highway Binder Materials From Modified Sulfur-Water Emulsionsn Report No FHWARD-82035 Federal Highway Administration November 1981
25 Standard Specifications State of California Department of Transportation January 1978
26 Applied Linear Statistical Models Neter I and Wasserman w Richard D Irwin Inc Homewood Illinois 1974
27 Burr I W and Foster LA A Test For Equality of variances Mimeograph Series No 282 Statistics Department Purdue University Lafayette Indiana 1972
28 Applied Statistical Methods Burr I W Academic Press Inc New York 1974
29 Parr W K Field Observations of the Behavior of Bituminous Pavements As Influenced By Moisture 11 ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 3-16--I959
30 Rice JM Relationship of Aggregate Characteristics to the Effect of Water on Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 17-34 1959
31 Lettman R P and Johnson D L 11 Pressure Induced Stripping in Asphaltic Concrete Highway Research Record 340 pages 13-28 1970
32 Waller F H Jr Emulsion Mix Design Methods An Overview 11 Transportation Research Record 754 1980
33 Design of Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures Report R6-350(74) US Forest Service 1974
34 11Mix Design Procedure For Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Pavement FHWA Region 10 Office of Federal Highway Projects
98
35 Darter M I Ahlfield S R Wilky P L and Wasill R G Development of Emulsified Asphalt Aggregate Cold Mix Design Procedure Research Report 505-5 Department of Civil Engineering University of Illinois 1978
36 A A Gadallah L E Wood and E J Yoder A Suggested Method for the Preparation and Testing of Asphalt-Emulsion-Treated Mixtures Using Marshall Equipment Proceedings AAPT Volume 46 1977
37 Marshall Stability Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois
38 Jiminez R A Final Report-Phase I Asphalt Emulsion Treated Aggregates University of Arizona Research Report HPR-1-13(150) January 1977
39 George K P Interim Report on Criteria for Emulshysified Asphalt Stabilization of Sandy Soils Univershysity of Mississippi for Mississippi State Highway Department October 1976
40 Fong G K Mix Design Methods for Base and Surface Courses Using Emulsified Asphalt A State-of-the-Art Report Report No FHWA-RD-78-113 Federal Highway Administration October 1978
41 Schmidt R J A Practical Method for Measuring the Resilient Modulus of Asphalt-Treated Mixes Highway Research Record 404 1972
42 Manual of Test Volume 2 State of California Department of Transportation Transporation Laboratory Third Edition 1978
43 Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete Manual Series No 2 (MS-2) The Asphalt Institute March 1979
99
-
APPENDIX A
OPTIMUM FLUIDS AT COMPACTION DATA
-
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table Al
Percent Residue
631 631 631
702 702 702
595 595 595
678 678 678
689 689 689
645 645 645
Fluids at Compaction Data css-o
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
467 367 216
1098 998 847
571 413 360
1273 1115 10 62
455 370 341
1050 965 936
590 450 400
1268 1128 1078
492 183 109
1181 872 798
404 311 139
1049 956 784
Dry Density
(pcf)
1304 1337 1347
1283 1326 1306
133l 1310 9 1317
1328 1295 1304
1404 1529 154 1
1429 1466 1462
Al
css-o CSS-0HIGH QUALITY155- DRY LOW QUALITYbull SAN BERNARDINO 1551
bull SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO 150-I I 150 FRESNObull GRANITEROCK bull GRANITEROCK
I ~
145 LoPT=B5 145 () () - -0 0
~140 gt1401 L- 0 PT= 85 OPT=100gt-i
N Cl) OPT=100 Cl)
DRYZ 135 Z 135w w Cl Cl
amp130 amp130 Cl 0
125 125
120 I i I I i I i I I I 120 I I J I I i I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure Al Fluids at Compaction Figure A2 Fluids at Compaction High Quality Aggre-gate CSS-0 Low Quality CSS-0
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A2
Percent Residue
605 605 605
704 704 704
595 595 595
695 695 695
556 556 556
604 604 604
Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-0
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
4 16 316 183
1021 921 788
494 389 262
1198 1093
966
529 392 360
1124 987 955
519 479 301
1214 1174
996
284 187 124
840 743 680
319 256 165
923 860 769
Dry Density
(pcf)
1331 131 6 1316
1305 1320 1313
1282 1313 1312
1321 1298 1279
1478 1479 1463
1452 1463 1453
A3
155 CMS-0 HIGH QUALITY
150~ DRY bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
145 bull GRANITEROCK72_ OPT=90 0 0
~140gt-ii OPT=105i Cl)
Z 135 w 0
gt- D~0 130 middot 0
125 [OPT100
120 I i I i i I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A3 Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-0
155] 150
0 1451 0
~140gt- Cl)
Z 135 w 0
fc130 0
125
120 I 6
CMS-0
LOW QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
bull GRANITEROCK
v[A OPTf90
pound 0 PT12DoOPTr110
7 I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A4 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-0
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A3
Percent Residue
769 769 769
746 746 746
595 595 595
714 714 714
570 570 570
587 587 587
Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-7
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
460 391 294
1229 1160 1063
573 436 301
13 19 1182 1047
513 380 2 57
1108 975 852
513 404 334
1227 1118 1048
231 170 080
801 740 650
263 146 109
850 733 6096
Dry Density
(pcf)
1329 1377 1376
1335 135l 134 2
1357 1333 1342
1299 1317 1308
1519 1523 1498
1503 1517 1514
AS
CMS-7 155-- HIGH QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNOlSO~ nPT80 145
0 -0 -140 middot gt-
r t deg Cl)
Z 135 w Cl
fi130 Cl
125-1
120 I 6
GRANITEROCK
~OPT=105
IJ
I 7
I I i I i I 8 9 10 11 12 13
TOTAL FLUIDS
I 14
I 15
Figure AS Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-7
155
150
145
0 -0
gt--140
t Cl)
Z 135 w Cl
fc 130 Cl
125
120 I 6
CMS-7 LOW QUALITY
C bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
GRANITEROCKOPT 80
~OPT105
~
tos i I I i J i i I I 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A6 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-7
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A4
Percent Residue
765 765 765 765 765 765
815 815 815 815 815 815
765 765 765
817 817 817 817 817 8el7
574 574 574
738 738 738 738 738 738
Fluids at Compaction Data SS 15 SEA
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
563 426 315 580 346 178
1328 1191 1080 1345 1111
943
595 418 309 599 256 137
14 10 1233 1124 1414 1071 952
600 440 356
1365 1205 1121
683 541 418 629 457 283
1500 1358 1235 1446 1274 1100
374 247 128
948 821 702
451 301 175 435 186 073
1189 1039
913 1173
924 811
Dry Density
(pcf)
1289 1319 1335 1286 1331 1332
1278 1314 1315 1276 1304 1299
1281 1325 1313
1259 1290 1303 1275 1292 1294
1450 1485 1482
1428 1459 1468 1437 1465 1465
A7
bull bull
SS 15 SEA 155 HIGH QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot
150 FRESNO
bull GRANITEROCK
145
0 0 -
OPT=75
-_ gt=140 I-ii OPT100co C)
z 135 w _--0PTr1200
gt-0 130--0
125
120 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A7 Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 15 SEA
SS 15 SEA LOW QUALITY155
bull SAN BERNARDINO-
FRESNO 150
bull GRANITEROCK 145
~-0 0 LOPT=80a140gt-t Cf)
Z135 w r-OPT=105 0
gt-0 130 -~middot 0
OPT120J 125
120 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure AB Fluids at Compaction Low Quality SS 15 SEA
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table AS
Percent Residue
688 688 688
722 722 722 722 722 722
680 680 680 680 6 80 680
726 726 7 26 726 726
510 510 510
596 596 596 596 596 596
Fluids at Compaction Data SS 30 SEA
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
595 468 150
1283 1156
838
645 438 267 660 566 440
1367 1160
989 1382 1288 1162
650 531 432 629 422 332
1330 1211 1112 1309 1102 1012
767 614 443 547 370
1493 1340 1169 1273 1096
413 300 167
923 810 677
468 3 46 191 485 258 096
1064 942 787
10 ~ 81 854 692
Dry Density
(pcf)
1299 1337 1332
1286 1319 1324 1281 1302 1326
129l 1315 1333 1294 1333 131 5
1259 1278 1322 1294 1313
1464 1509 1496
1435 1472 1499 1426 1487 1476
A9
SS 30 SEASS 30 SEA LOW QUALITY
155 HIGH QUALITY 1551 bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddotbull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO
FRESNO 150150-I -middotmiddot-- -bull --middotmiddot I ~ t -- a GRANITEROCK a GRANITEROCK
145145
~-bull80 0 --0 00 ~140~140
J-gt- gt-~ I- = OPT=100 Cl)0 Cl) [Ij 135Z 135
lJJ Cl
gt- ~1300 130 middot ClCl ( 0
OPT=110 125~ OPT=115125
120-t----~--------------r---120 I l J J J I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 156 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS TOT AL FLUIDS
Figure A9 Fluids at Compaction Figure AlO Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 30 SEA Low Quality SS 30 SEA
-~
i
APPENDIX B
MIXTURE DESIGN DATA
TABLE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality css-o Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absortied Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
lhit Weight pcf
StabiJcneter Value
~iareter Value
Jesilient -bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
500
----------
40
u 30 ltgt
ffi 20 w ~10
m lt
o
w l 400 lt gt a w t 300 0 iii ~ 200 8
100 12
10111
ui 0
i5 8gt lt
6
4
50
21740
24488
112
194
100
400
1357
375
197
117
345
60
21823
24163
97
199
100
500
1362
330
207
134
271
70
21772
23853
87
208
100
600
1359
272
193
118
260
Iesign 7 0
87
208
100
600
1359
272
193
118
260
24
22d c lt i
20i
= 0 i5
18 gt
16
140
138 - a
~136 z w 0
134
132
bull 500 a
0 400 uil 300 0
~ 200 zi 100 iii w a
--
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE CONTENT Jo (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Bl
TABLE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residue 0intent 50 60 70 Dsian 7 o
Bulk Siecipoundic Gravity 21804
llleoretical Specipoundic Gravity 24280
Air Voids 102
VMA 192
Absorbed Asphalt 063
Efpoundective Asphalt 437
Unit Weight pf 1361
Stabilcirieter Value 427
Cbhesicireter Value 352
Fesilielt Mxlulus 103psi
2-day 85
middotFinlJ 355
50
40
_ gt a 30 w w
~ 20 10
500
300
200
100
8
6
4
l 400 gt
~ w 0
~ 8
12
_ 10
= 0 gt
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
21863 21992
23964 23660
88 71 71
197 200 200
063 063 063
537 637 637
1364 1372 1372
363 313 313
292 234 234
63 83 83 429 232 232
24
22
ci i
20i
= = 0 gt
18
16
138
p6 ~ Q
134 a w
o 132
130
500 Q -
o 400 --3 300 0 ~-~ 200 a ~ 100 w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COtlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
B2
TABLE B3 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllroretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
~fective Asphalt
Unit Weight middotCf
Stabilareter VaJue
Cbhesiareter VaJue
Resilient l-bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
so
11140 gt o30 IU w ~20
m
10
w l 400 gt 0
~ 0 ~ 200 8
100
14
12 11-
In Q
ho C
8
6
50 60 70 Dsi9 7 O 21308 21729 21595 24562 24235 23922
132 103 97 97 210 202 215 215 113 113 113 113 387 487 587 587
1329 1356 1348 1348 378 345 375 375
314 270 280 280
82 96 104 104 281 260 267 267
500
300 ~
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS
24
11-22ci
ltI i i 20 Cl) Q 180 gt
16
138
136 u - 134 Cl) z IU Q
132
130
bull500
400 Inl 300 Q bull~ 200 z ~ 100middot IU 0
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS
FIGURE B3 Mixture Design Data Sari Bernardin6 High Quality CMS o Replication 1
B3
TABLE B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue GJntent
Bulk seecific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity
50
21491
24334
60
21459
24014
70
21526
23709
Iesiqn 70
Air Voids 117 106
VMA 204 212
Absocbed Asphalt 0 72 o 72
Effective Asphalt 428 528
Unit Weight pcf 1341 133 9
Stabilrneter Value 437 406
GJhesiareter Value 337 248 3
Iesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-cay
Final
50
w 40 gt 0 30 w w 0 20 co 10
500
w
3 400 gt 0 w t- 300 w 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
_ 10
0 8gt -lt
6
4
FIGURE
61 66
410 318
24
22~ ci
i 20
~
18 a gt
16
138
_136 u a 134 z ~ w 0
132
130
bull500
a
a 400 -3 300 _ a ~ 200 z ~ 100-
w 0
90 90
21 7 21 7
0 72 072
628 628
1343 1343
344 J44
252 252
82 82
250 250
---------
D 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDU CONTENT I (A_GGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B4
TABLE BS Mixture Design Data San Bernardin9 High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Siecific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
lir Voids
VMA
2bserberl Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stalgtilaneter Value
Cbhesiareter Value 3
Resilient Mgtdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
40
Ill 30 lt( gt a 20 Ill Ill 0 10
~ iii lt CII 0
400
Ill
3 300 lt(
gt a Ill200 == 0
~100 c 8
0
12
10 ui 0
0 8gt 5 lt(
6
4
FIGURE
~
~
5 6 7 84 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
50 60 70 Cesian 70
21652
24484
21904
24149
22005
23828
116
198
107
3-93
135l
345
224
18
240
93 77 77 196 200 200 107 107 107 493 593 593
1367 1373 1373 288 235 235
136 80 80
17 21 21 128 78 78
24
22ci lt(
z 20il
= CII C 0
18 gt
16
I-~
140
+38- ~136 1- z Ill 0 134
132
bull 500 a
o 400 3 300 C
~ 200 z 100 Ill a ~
0 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino_BS High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
BS
TABLE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Residue Content
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Ihegtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tmit WeightL pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesllllleter Value
Iesilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
a 20 UI w i
~10
lt 0
400
3300 lt gt a ~200 w i 0
119 93
197 l93
126 126
374 474
l353 l372
357 283
l26 l03
45 36
203 132
2440
30 22 0 0lt ltgt
16
~100 ~ 8 0 132
500 a
o 400 --ai 300 -
middot 0
~
~
w a
_ 10
ltn 0
0 8gt lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
50 60 70 Cesign 7 o
2l679
24595
21990
24255
22190
23931
- i 20
a 180 gt
140
138 - a
~136 z w 0 134
200
100middot
0 4
73 73
193 193
126 1 26
574 574
1385 1385
235 235
82 82
3l 3l
64 64
-0 $ e
~ 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B6
TABLE B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Pesidue Qlnte~t
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihroretical Speciic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
~tabilcmeter Value
ohesicrneter Value
resilient lbdulus l0 3psi
2-aay
Final
60 72 8 5 Iesicm 75
21762 21906 21779
23981 23617 23245 93 73 63 70
202 205 220 21 0
063 063 063 063
537 657 787 687
1358 1367 1359 1365 375 290 203 270
474 401 239 360
163 172 161 170 449 329 310 320
2440
ii 30 22 ci
Cl c cgt z 20 201 s ~ 310 e 18 0
gt c
0 16
500 140
w
3 400 _138c gt
~ 300 s 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
- 10 0 0 0 8gt c
6
4
FIGURE
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIOUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COITEIT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
il36 z IU Cl 134
132
bull 500
c 400 -
3 300 - Cl
sectl 200 ~- z ~ 100
w
0
B7
111 10 ui e 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
TABLE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
500
400 gt C
72 85 resian 7 s
21873 21738
23581 23210
72 63 70 207 22l 21 0
055 055 055 665 795 695
1365 1356 1365 287 188 265
349 341 345
191 187 190 287 266 280
24 ------------
111 22
Cl Cl lt -i ~ 20
= a 18 0 gt
16 _____________
138
136 a 134 () w a
132
130___________
soar------------ D a
1 400 ~
ui3 300 C
~ 200
100
w C
0---------------------5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUlc CONTENT lt
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
BB
Fesidue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcrreter Value
Cbhesiareter Value 3Resilient -bdulus 10 psi
2-day
Finll
60
m 50 - 40
IIJ ~ 30 CJ lt 1- 20
60
21669
23943
95
205
055
545
1352
560
416
195
425
~ 300 0 ()
~ 200 8
100---------------
12 -------------
RESIDUE CONTENT lto (AGGREGATE BASIS)
TABLE B9 Mixture Design Data San Ber~irdino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Pesiclue Content 60 Z1 as D=sign 7 5
Bulk Spccific Gravity 21697 21368 21255
Iheoretical Specific Gravity 23973 23610 23238
Air Voids 94 95 85 93
VMA 204 225 middot 23 8 230
middot-Absorbed Asphalt 061 061 061 061
Effective Asphalt 539 659 789 689
middot middotmiddotUnit Weight pcf 1354 133 3 1326 1330
-Stabilareter Value 460 375 225 340
CohesianeterValue 400 422 499 440
Iesilient MxUlus 103psi
2-oay 159 i0s 185 185
Final 290 299 283 295
60
w
l 400
24
22
ci 0 i 20l
= Q 180 gt
16
138
136
gt a 134~ 300 w l z0 IU 132 200
8 130
100-----------------_---I
12 ---------------- 500
o 400 10 ~
300 bull bullQ
Q0 8gt ~ 200 z
6 ~ 100
w a4 ___ __________ o
5 6 7 8 9 s 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COtlTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B9 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication l
B9
TABLE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Pesidue Conte1t 60 72 85 resign 75
Bulk Spcecific Gravity
Theoretical Sjeeipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Ohesianeter Value
Pesilient ~us 103psi
2---day
Final
60
50 lt gt cc40 w -w
~30 = CJ
lt 20
21635
24066
10l
206
078
522
1350
51 8
482
151
285
21481
23699
94
221
078
642
1341
378
459
150
286
24
11-22
ci Cl lt
~ 20 z
C 18
0 gt
21302
23323
87 92
237 225
078 078
7 72 6 72
1329 1338
246 350
343 430
162 155
254 280
I 16
500 138
UJ
400 136 lt gt
acc ~ UJ
134 300 z2 UI CJ_32 ~ 200
8 130
bull500
a
c 400 - 10 300 ~ Jf
C0 8gt ~ 200 ~ lt z
6 ~ 100-
UJ 0
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDU~ COrlTENT
(AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino
100 12
~
Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
BlO
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
TABLE Bll
Residue Content
Bulk Secific Gravity
Iheiretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesicrneter Value
Resilient MXiulus l03psi
2-day
Final
60 72 85 D=sign 75
21817 22108 21917
23977 23601 23216
90 63 56 62
200 198 215 200
o 72 o 72 o 72 o 72
528 648 778 678
136l 1380 1368 137 5
242 162 76 130
151 175 215 190
52 63 41 55
202 122 60 110
244middot0
~ 30 22 ci lt 20 i 201 IU = en ~ 10 E 18 m 0lt gt
0 16
----
w
l 400 lt gt a ~ w 0 ~ 8
12
-t
ltn 0 0 gt a lt
FIGURE
5
500
300
200 ~ 100
10
8
6
134
500 a
c 400 -
_ 300 0
g 200
~ 100 ~in IU a
0 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Bll Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
142
I-40 u a
~ 138 in w 0
136 ~
Bll
TABLE Bl2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Pesidue Q)ntent
Bulk Spzcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic
Air Voids
V bull t-LA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Gravity
60
22026
24085
85
192
092
508
72
22062
23705
69
200
092
628
85
21901
23315
61
215
092
758
resign 75
67
205
092
6 58
Unit Weight pcf 1374
Stabiloreter Value 193
Ohesiareter Value 177 3
Resilient Mxrulus 10 psi
2-day 63
Fi-ial 138
40
m 30 J lt gt a 20 IU w 0 10 ~ lt
0
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w 9 ~ 200 _________ 8
100 12
10 9 0 8gt ~6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE 8ASISI
1377
127
193
1367
90
160
137 5
120
180
53
107
32
52
48
95
24
22ci 0 lt
20
= ~
9 18 0 gt
16
142
140 a
~138 z w C
136
134
9
500 a
dego 400-
3 300 ~- a ~ 200 z ~ 100
w a
0 5
~ 6 7 8 9
RES IOU~ CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl2 Mixture Design Data -san Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Bl2
TABLE Bl 3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcrneter VaJue
CJgthesiarneter Value
Pesilient MxbJ11lS 10 3psi
2-day
Final
60
so gt
40a w 0 30 GI 20
500
l 400 gt a w t- 300 w 5 rn ~ 200 8
100 12
Ill 10 0 8gt
6
4
50
21789
24250
10l
164
1 95
305
1360
513
330
191
282
~ bull
~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASIS)
60
21762
2 34 34
91
173
1 95
405
135middot8
567
284
168
434
24
Ill 22ci Cl
is 20
= 0 gt
18
16
142
140- ~138 iii z 0
136
134
bull500
o 400 -
l 300 C
~ 200 z 100 iii a
0 4
70 resign 70
21872
23632
75 75 177 177
1 bull 95 1 95 505 505
136S 136S 393 393
280 280
217 217 482 482
~
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASISI
FIGURE Bl3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality css~o Replication 1
Bl3
--------------
TABLE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Resid= Content 50 60 70 eesicn 7o
Bulk Siecific Gravity 21692 21677 21662
Ihroretical Specific Gravity 24501 24176 23865
Air Voids 115 103 92 92
VMA 169 176 185 185
Absorbed Asphalt 240 240 240 240
Effective Asphalt 260 360 460 460
Unit Weight pcpound 1354
Stabilaneter Value 580
Cohesicrneter Value 270 3Resilielt Mdulus 10 psi
2-day 149
Final 408
60
w so lt gt
w C o w le 0 30 m lt
20
500
w
~ 400 lt gt C
~ 300 w S ~ 200 ~ 8
100 12
- 10 m a 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AG GREGATE BASIS)
1353 1352 1352
442 327 327
276 183 183
173 191 191
373 299 299
24
22d c lt z
20E 18 0 gt
16
140
138 u C
136 w C 134
132
500 C
1 400 gt- m =gt 300 a ~ 200
l 100- IU C
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication
Bl4
2
bull bull bullbull
TABLE Bl5 Mixture Design-Data Fresno High Quality CMS-QReplication 1
Bulk Spcific Gravity
lheoreticaJ Specific Gravity Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mldulus l0 3psi 2-clay
Final
60
m 50 C gt a 40 w w
~ 30 C m
10
~idue Content 50 6_ 0 70 Daisi2 7 O
5oor----------
w
l 400 C gt a ~ 300 w I 0 iii ~ 200 8
100-------------
12 ----------
111 10 C
0 8gt C
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT J
(AG GREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl5 Mixture
21755 21305 23795 23497 86 93 93
163 198 198 l 69 l 69 l69 431 531 531
1336 1329 1329 420 307 307
247 230 230
180 i55 155
246 253 253
24
22d
Cl C
i 20I
J ~ C 18 ~ 0 gt
16
21434
24106
11l
179
l69
331
1337
472
373
175
247
138
136- 134 z w C
132
130
bull 500
dego 400 - l 300 C
~ 200 z l 100 iii w a
0
-~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT J (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Bl5
TABLE Bl6 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
helretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
lbsorled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabil=ter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
Eesilient Mxrulus 10
2-day
Firal
60
50 J gt c 40
~ 30 m 20
500
w
l 400 gt a ~ 300 w
3psi
50 60 70
21339 2 1398 21475
24241 23925 23623
120 106 91
181 187 192
1 94 l 94 1 94
306 406 506
1331 1335 1340
558 43 7 377
340 313 219
149 152 154
317 345 288
Jesign70
91
192
194
506
1340
377
219
154
288
24
22d CJ i sect 20
= a 18 ~ 0 gt
16
138
136
a 134
z w ~ C ~ 200 132 8
130 100
14 500 a
o 400 - 12
3 300 - ~ 0 C gt 10 a ~ 200 ~ z
l 100
8
w a
0 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl6bull Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Bl6
TABLE Bl 7 Mixture Qesign Data Fresno High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
Pesidue Content 50 60 70 Cesign 7 O
Bulk siec~tic Gravity 21959 22101 22128
Iheoretical Specific Gravity 24539 24201 23879
Air Voids 105 87 73 73
VMA 158 160 167 167
~rbed Asphalt 252 252 252 252
Effective Asphalt 248 348 448 448
Unit Weight pcf 1370 1379 1380 1380
S~ter Value 467 370 213 213
Clgthesiareter Value 289 3Resilient l-Ddulus 10 psi
2-clay 47
FinaJ 294
50
Ill 40 o(
gt cc 30 Ill w 0 20 lt 10
500
w l 400 lt gt cc ~ 300 Ill 0 ~ 200 8 ~
100 12
10 deg C
0 gt 8 ~l lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
147 122 122
65 35 35
214 75 75
22
J 20 o(
ii 18 16 ~ 0 gt
14
142
140 u Q
~138 z Ill
Cl 136
134
500 Q
o400 uil 300 Cl
g 200 z ~ 100 ~w cc
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
IIESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Bl7
TABLE Bl8 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Dsiqn 70
Bulk Specific Gravity 22191 22285 22092
Theoretical Specific Gravity 24199 23874 23563
Air Voids 82 66 62 62
VMA 149 153 168 168
Absorled AsphaJt 192 192 192 192
Effective AsphaJt 308 408 508 508
Unit Weight pcf 1385
Stabilareter Value 357
Cohesianeter Value 268 3Resilient MxhIJus 10 psi
2-day 75
Final 217
40
w 30 J lt gt a 20 w w i
~ 10
0
500
w
3 400 gt a
l 300 w i
ltn
~ 200 8
139l
342
238
137 9
233
192
137 9
233
192
84
117
63
73
63
73
20
0 0 ~ i
= 0 gt
18
16
14
12
~
144
142 140 z w 0
138
136 100-----1---1--1---l
12 ---------- 500 0bull
o 400 -11110 en a 3 300 = 0 08gt ~ 200
z 6 ~ 100middot
w a
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT
4
RESIDUE CONTENT
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Bl8
FresnoTABLE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Low Quality css-o Replication 1
Eesidlle Content 60 70 80 Dasi51 7 5
Bulk Specific Gravity 21698 21611 21514 Iheoretical Specilic Gravity 23803 23505 23220
Air Voids 89 81 73 77
VMA 175 186 198 192
Absorbed Asphalt 171 l 71 171 171
Effective Asphalt 429 529 629 679
Unit Weight pcf 1354 1349 1342 1345
Stabi]cmeter Value 513 398 359 380
eohesianeter value 506 449 481 465
Resilient Modulus 10 3psi
2-day 176 176 241 205
Final 312 383 353 365
2460
all so 22 ci cgt
40 I-
20 E
I = g 30 18iii 0 gt
20
16
500
300
100
10
8
6
4
138
136l 400
u -gt a
~ I 0 in l1200 8
12
111 Q
0 gt ~
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE COITENT Jo
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
~ ~ 134 z w 0
132
130
500 -
l 400 -
300 ~n
Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 in Ill IC
0
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Bl9
TABLE B20 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residlle Content i
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihegtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
CJhesiareter Value 3
Resilient Mxfulus 10 psi
2-day
Finll
60
50 lt 40 w w
~ 30 m lt 20
500
w
3 400 lt gt a ~ ~ 300 w 51 rn 200 8
100----------------
12 --------------
10 9 0 8gt lt
6
4 s 6 7 8
RESIDUE COPlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
60 70 80 resign 75
21451 21476 21666
23932 23629 23340
104
185
194
406
1339
586
436
147
313
91
192
1 94
506
1340
403
416
179
347
24
22 0 0 lt
~ 20
= 9 18 0 gt
16
140
138 - Cl
136 w cl34
132
bull 500
-0 400__
3 300 I
~ 200
~ 100 rn w a
0
7 2 82
192 192
194 194
606 656
1352 1345
24 8 325
333 375
186 182
361 358
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COPITEPlT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
~
Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
B20
TABLE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
lesidue Content 60 70 80 resign 75
Bulk Siecific Gravity 21525 21406 21152 lllroretical Specific Gravity 23855 23555 23268 Air Voids 98 91 91 91 VMA 182 194 211 2middot03 1osorled Asphalt 180 1 80 180 180 Effective Asphalt 420 520 620 570 Ulit Weight pcf 1343 1336 1330 1335 Stabilateter Value 487 460 373 415 Oxlesiareter Value 418 392 323 355
3lesilielt Mldulus 10 psi
2-clay 188 177 200 190
Final 289 299 281 290
6or----------- 24
m 50 lt gt 11 40 w w I
~ 30 m lt 20
_J_
22ci 0 lt z
20EE
= 0 180 gt
16
5oor---------- 138
w
l 400 lt gt
136- a ~ 300 w i 0
fa34 z w
~ 200 Cll32 -8
100-----------i-~ 130
12 ------------ 500bulla
10 ________ o 400 - 0
0 gt
8
gJdeg 300 0
~- 200 ---e-
lt z
6 l 100 w 4
5 6 7 8 9 0
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication
B21
1
TABLE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Fesidue Cbntent 55
Bulk Spcific Gravity 21243
lheoretical Specific Gravity 23859
Air Voirls 109
VMA 189
Absorbed Asphalt 152
Effective 1spralt 398
Unit Weight pd 1326
atabil~ter Value 620
Cbhesiareter Value 430 3Fesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-oay 160
Final 387
70
a 60 gt a 50 w w == = 40 0
m
30
500
w l 400 lt gt cc
~ 3001- 0 ~ 200 8
100
16
136
134 u Q
iu2 z w 0 130
128
12 -----------
10 bull
ltIi 0
~ s
6
4middot1-_________ _
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l _AGGREGATE BASIS)
21164
23557
101
200
152
498
1321
481
432
180
377
24
22
z 20Si
= 18e 0 gt
bull 500
o 400-ltIi j 300 0
~ 200 zl 100 w cc
0
65 75 iesiqn 7 s
21095
23269
93 93
210 210
152 l 52
598 598
1316 1316
367 367
450 450
171 171
387 387
-----~bull-----
8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7
FIGURE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B22
1 TABLE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno
Low Quality CMS-7 Replication
70 -~ 0 Cesign 75 Pesidue Content
Bulk Spcific Graviv1
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit Weight pcf
Stallilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mxlulus 10 3psi
2--day
Final
40
Ill 30 c gt 0 20 UI lo Q 10=c 0
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w lo Q 200 8
100
~
60
21829
23899
87
170
197
403
1362
293
206
84 144
21981
23587
67
l73
197
503
1372
200
249
76 131
21960
23289
5middot 7
middot18l
197
603
1370
100
241
69 93
62
177
197
553
1370
150
245
73
110
12
10 5 Q 8gt 5 lt
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (ACGREGATE BASIS)
24
It
22 t-ci c
z 20i
= 5 18 t-Q gt
16
142
140 - 638
z w Q
136
134
bull 500
o 400 - 3 300 0
~ 200 z 100 iii UI 0
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (ACGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno LOW Quality CMS-7 Replication
B23
1
TABLE B24 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Urit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Glhesianeter Value
Resilient Mldulus 10
2-day
Final
40
m 30 gt c 20 w ~ w i
~ 10 m lt ~ 0
3psi
24
22
C C lt i
20~ ~
9 18 0 gt
16
500 142
w 1403 400 gt
Ca gt138I 300 tw
i z w Q 136~ 200
8
134
~
~
100 12 500
C
dego 400 - Ill 10 3 300 0 0 Q8gt ~ 200
~ z 6 100middot
w a
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIOUC CONTENT
(AGGREGATE 8ASIS] (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)
80
21686
23262
68
19l
l91
609
1353
125
215
77
114
Cesign 75
71
184
L 91
559
1360
200
235
77
135
60
21936
23870
81
166
191
409
1369
358
252
84
211
70
21850
23559
73
177
191
509
1364
270
250
77
157
Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE B24 Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B24
TABLE B25 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-Or Replication 1
Residue Clgtntent 47
Bulk Siecific Gravity 23965
llleoretical Specific Gravity 26825
Air Voids 107
VMA 207
Absorbed Asphalt 27
Effective Asphalt 443
Unit Weight pcf 1495
Stabilaneter Value 302
Cohesiaoeter Value 235 3
Resilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-day 158
Final 300
40
30 _ gt a 20I- ii 0_
10iii I-en 0 500----------
Ill
3 400 gt ati 300 ii 0 iii l 200 8
100---i----L---J
12 ----------
jit 10 e 0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I 4
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
57 67 Design 55
24521 24581
26411 26017
72 55 80
196 202 200
27 27 27
543 643 523
1530 1534 1520
247 200 27
275 203 275
164 116 160
276 197 280
24
jlt
22ci c i
20Si
= en e 18 0 gt
16
156
_154 ~ i152 iii z C
150
148
soo----------
dega 400 _
en
~300 ~ ~ 200 1-zl 100 iii w a
01----~-i--J 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Mixture Design Data GraniterockFIGURE B25 High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
B25
TABLE B26 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Besidue Content If 7 57 67 D2sign 55
Bulk SfeCific Gravity 2 4131 24573 24597
lhagtreticai Specific Gravity 26951 26532 26134
Air Voids 105 74 59 78
VMA 20l 195 20l 197
Absorted Asphalt 46 46 46 46
Effective Asphalt 424 524 624 504
Unit Weight pcf 1506 1533 1535 1525
stabi1anaiter Value 282 258 is2 270
Cllhesicmter Value 204 155 138 160
Resilient Mdulus 103psL
2-day 115 143 126 130
Final 313 225 173 240
40
w 30 lt gt a 20 w w la 0 10 m lt
0
~
24
22ci C
lt z
20la ~ = E 18 -0 gt
16
156
154 - a
~152 z w r0
150
148
-
500
o 400 ~
300 0
g 200 ~ z -~ 100
500
w ~ 400 lt gt a IU t- 300 w la 0 ~ 200
~8
100 12
10 0 0 8gt lt
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
w a
o 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT lo RESIDUE CONTENT II
-cGREGATE s-s1s1 (-GGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B26 Mixture Design Data Grani terock High Quality CSS-0 Replication
B26
2
TABLE B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Residue Ogtntent 47 57 67 ~ign 55
Bulk Spcific Gravity 23886 24116 24078
Ihooretical Specific Gravity 26675 26267 25879
Air Voids 105 81 70 82
VMA 210 210 21 8 210
Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 oos 005
Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545
Unit Weight pcf 149l 1505 1502 1505
Stabilareter Value 337 350 250 350
Ogthesicneter Value 238 3
Eesilient Mldulus l0 psi
2-day 104
Final 287
50
Ill 40 J C gt cc 30 Ill Ill l 0
C
10
20iii 500
w
l 400 C gt cc I 300 Ill l 0 in ~ 200 8
100 12
1110 0 0 8gt
c cc
6
4
FIGURE
~
~
177 204 200
144 150 140
254 247 260
24 ----------
a 18 0 gt
16 __i____i_-J
154
j52 u -a
~1501- ------iiiz -Ill 0
148
______________ 146
soar---------- a
o 400 1--
~ 300 _ ~
~ 200 z ~ 100 en w 0
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
B27
8
TABLE B28 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue Ointent 4 7 57 67 Cesign 55
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihroretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
CJlhesianeter Value
Pesilient Mldulus 10 3psi
2-day
Final
40
30 lt gt = w 20 0
- 10 lt
0
500
w - 3 400
lt gt a l 300 w 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
i 10 ui C
0 8gt lt
6
4
FIGURE
23861
26649
10S
207
014
456
1489
338
145
124
307
~
--------
~ 5 6 7 84
RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
24025 23925
26242 25855
85
210
014
556
1499
283
135
135
307
24
22
0 lt i
20i
= 18 0 gt
16
154
152 u Q
i150 z w 0 148
146middot
500- o 400 -
300 _ Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 4
75 87
220 209
014 014
656 536
1493 1490
220 300
129 140
142 130
277 307
_--
~
-___
85 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B28 bull Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B28
TABLE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Pesicllle Cbntent 47 57 67 resign 55 Bulk Siecific Gravity 24618 24637 24728 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26905 26475 26066 Air Voids 84 69 51 71 VlltLA 185 192 197 190 Absocbed Asphalt 047 0 bull 47 047 047 Effective Aspbalt 423 523 623 503 Urit Weight pcf 1536 1537 1543 1537 Stabilaneter Value 410 330 198 350 QJhesianeter Value 166
Resiliextt Mldulus 10 3psi
2-clay
Final
50
40 c
ffi 30 IE g20 iii c
10
500
l 400 c
a ~ 300 IE C ~ 200 8
100 12
ot 10 C
0 8
5
C
6
4
46
158
~
~ 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI
120 131 130
35 30 38
56 28 80
24
gt11 22
c c c
i 2031
= ~ C 180
16
158
156 t-
u - 154 z w 0
152
150
500
~
~ 0
bull a 400 - uil 300 ~
200
C
~ z ~ w a
100middot
8 4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
B29
TABLE B30 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Pesidue Content 4-7 h---7 6 -7 IEsicn 5 5
Bulk Specific Gravity 24519 24638 24706 Iheoretical Specific Gravity 26609 26265 25793 Air Voids 79 62 42 65 VMA 189 192 198 19l
middot Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 005 005 Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545 Unit Weight pcf 1530 1537 1542 1535 Stabilareter Value 420 327 247 350 Cohesiareter Value 126
3Resilient Mldulus 10 psi
Z--day 47 Final 144
50
40 J lt gt a 30 w w
~ 20 m lt 10
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w 2 ~ 200 8 ~
100 12
111- 10 ui 0 gt 8
lt
6
4
114 182 120
43 29 45
79 33 90
24
ii-22
ci 0 lt i
20l ~= 18 0 gt
16
158
156 0
l 154 z ~w c 152
150
500
Q -dego 400 - ui3 300 C
~ 200 z
~ 100middot~
w a ~ 0
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8 4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
FIGURE B30 Mixture Design Data High Quality CMS-7
Graniterock Replication 2
B30
TABLE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
~sidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weigllt pcf
Stabi]aneter Value
Cohes~ter Value
~silient MXJulus 103psi
2--day
final
40
30 C gt ffi20
~10 iii C ltII 0
500
l 400 C gt IC
~ 300 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
11 10 0
0 8gt C
6
4
55 65 75 resign 60 24268 24286 24206
26358 25966 25592 80
200
020
530
t515
80
268
182
338
~
65
207
020
630
t515
t_92
233
169
308
24
bull 220 0 C
ze 20
= 0 18 -0 gt
16
156
154
u i152 ~ z 0
150 bull
148
54 72
21 7 204
020 020
730 580
1511 1515
90 235
193 250
145 175
250 320
500 o 400 - l 300 0
~ 200 zi 100 iii IC
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replicationl
B31
TABLE B32 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residue 0ntent
Bulk Secific Gravity
llleoretical Speipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
-Absorled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
StabilcIIeter Value
Qlhesianeter Value 3Jesilient middotMgtdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
40
m30 lt gt cc20 w
w E
~10 ID lt 0
79
198
027
523
1518
203
243
201
354
~ soar-----------
w
400 lt gt a
~ 300 w E 0 ~ 200 8
100---I--~---------
12 -----------
111 10 C
0 8gt lt
6 --4
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l (ACiCiFIECiATE BASIS)
FIGURE B32 Mixture
55 65 75 Lesign 6 0
24329 24246 24077
26401 26007 25632
68 61 73 208 22l 203
027 027 027 623 723 573
1513 1502 1515
165 110 185 215 205 225
168 184 185 340 272 345
24
22 C C
z i 20
= 0 0
18 gt
16
156
154
a
gt152 en z Ill 0 150
148
bull 500 Q
deg 0 400- =gt 300 0
~ 200 z l 100 w
-
0 4 5 6middot 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(ACiGFIEGATE BASIS)
Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication
B32
2
TABLE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Eesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheore_tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VbullMA
lbsorbed_ Asphalt
Effective_ Asphalt
Qnit Weight pcf
~~ter Value
Q)hesianeter Value
Resiiient Mxlulus 10 3psi
2~y
Final
40
11130 C
a20 =
~10 C m
ltII 0
500
Ill
3 400 C
a ~ 300 w = 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
ll 10 ui E 0 8
c
6
4
I-
1-
55
23824
26318
95
215
014
536
1487
287
381
224
380
65 75
23896 23701 25928 25555 78 73
220 233
014 014 636 736
1491 1479 195 161
265 212
212 196
404 341
24
11 22d
c
z 20i
= ltII E 18 0
16
154
152- a
150 I-
Iesign 6 0
84
218
014
586
1490
240
320
215
395
z w Q
148
bull 146
500 a
c 400 ~ ui
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
l 300 Q
~ 200 zl 100 w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIOUla CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-a Replication 1
B33
- - ----- -
TABLE B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Rssidue Ogtntent
Bulk Secific Gravity
lhairetical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
AbsoIbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stabil~ter Value
Olhesiareter Value 3lesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-day
Firal
40
m 30 lt gt a 20 w w
= ~ 10
m lt
0
- --- -middot -middot 500
w l 400 lt gt
Ea
300 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
1l 10 middot 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 4
FIGURE
55
23834
26371
96
214
022
528
1487
279
207
176
332
65
23784
25978
84
223
022
628
1484
208
270
185
336
75
23628
25604
77
236
022
728
1474
167
334
181
350
iesiqn 6 bull 0
90
21 8
022middot
578
1485
245
240
180
334
~
~
24
1l 22
0
lt i
20i
= 0 gt
18
16
152
150 - 148
~ 146
144
500
o-400 middot --- J 300 C
~ 200 z
middot ~ 100 en a
0 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication
B34
2
B35 Mixture Design Data GraniterockTABLE Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Residue Content 55
Bwk Specific Gravity 24720
lheoretical Specific Gravity 26164
Air Voids 55
VMA 185
Absorbed Asphalt 001
Effective Asphalt 549
Unit Weight pcf 1543
StabilCampTeter value 293
Ohesiareter Value 174
Besilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day 69
Final 153
40
~ 30 _
c gt ffi 20 w I
Q 10
c 0
500
w 3 400 -
c gt a
~ 300 w I g bull ~ 200 8 ----r
100middot
10
8 -
~
Q
0 6gt a =c
4 ~ 2
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS
65 75 DesiSE 60
2 4 720 24515
25767 25388
40 34 48
193 207 189 001 001 001 649 749 599
1543 1530 1543 205 97 250
156 283 170
46 22 55 72 so 110
24
~
22ci C c
i 20i
= Cl 180 gt
16
lSadeg
156
u -a
654 z 0 152
150
500 ii a
a 400 - 3 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7
FIGURE B35 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
B35
12 r---------- 500bull _ 10
o 400 -middot 0 gt 5 C
8
tnl 300 Q
~ 200 z
6 ~ 100 ~ IU 0
4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT I
(AGCREGA TE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
TABLE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
55 65 75 resicn 6 0 Residue Content
Bulk siecific Gravity 24816 2 4721 24560
lheoretical Specific Gravity 26389 25983 25596
Air Voids 60 49 40 55
VMA 182 193 205 187
Absorlei Asphalt middot 035 035 035 035
Effective Asphalt 515 615 715 565
UUt Weight cf 1548 1543 1533 1545
Stabilaneter Value 298 193 130 250
Qlhesicmeter Value 188 I57 118 180 3
Resilient MJdulus 10 psi
soor-----------158
w l 400 Ishy 156 gt lt u
0a
w
300 w ~154E 0 z
w Q ~ 200 152
8 150100----middot-~-1-__c__~
2-day
Final
40
~ 30 J lt gt a 20 w
s 10 0
lt
0
92 43 27 65 186 79 46 135
24
22
~ =
ci lt 0
i 20~
18 0 gt
16
FIGURE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B36
Table B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
FJiuivalent ~sidue amtent 60 70 80 resign 70
Iesidue Ontent
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absomed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
lhit Weight pcpound
Stabilareter Value Ohesiareter Value
~ilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
Ill
50
40 A gt a w 30 w i 0 J
iii 201-
10
400
w3 300 gt a Ill t 200 i 0
8 ~iii ll 100 1-
0 12
lit 10 0 0 8gt a lt
6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)
630
21584
24451
117
210
140
460
1347
415
208
735
21570
24143
107
219
140
560
1346
488
61
840
21385
23848
103
233
140
660
1334
382
63
resign 7 35
107
219
140
560
1346
488
63
96
339 141
325
126
299 141 325
24
lit 22d
Cl
z 20i
= 0 180
gt
16
138
136 ltgt
i134 iii ~ z w 0 132
130
bull 500
o 400 -
3
300 ------------- 0
~ 200 z ~ 100 w o_____________a
9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B37
----
Table B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Pesidue omtent 60 70 80 Design 70
Pesidue omtent 630 735 8 40 Dsign 735
Bulk Specific Gravity 21710 21722 21714
lllroretical Specific Gravity 24298 23995 23705
Air Voids
VMA
lbsorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Chhesianeter Value
Eeilient Mldulus 103psi
2--clay
Final
so
40 J w
gt a 30 w w 0 20 m
10 400
w 300 gt a w 200 w i 100 8
0
12
if 10 a
~0 8gt a lt
6
4
107
205
112
488
1355
395
llO
113
290
95
213
112
588
1356
398
62
122
271
84
22l
112
688
1355
318
70
138
282
24
22 c 0
20
0 180 gt
16
140
138 -a
136 _iii z bull --w 0 134
132
bull 500 a
o 400
m 300 J 0 bull ~ 200 z 100
w a
0
95
213
)12
588
1356
398
62
122
271
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT J
(AGCilEGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B38
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Table B39
Fquivalent ~idue COntent
~idue Cbntent
Bulk SJecific Gravity lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Oihesianeter Value
~ilient Mldulus l03psi
2-day
Fiial
so
w 40 lt gt cc 30 ~ w E
0 20 m lt 10
400
m POO lt gt a U 200 E 0 iii w c 100 8
0
12
- 10 vi Cl
0 gt ac
6
60 70 80
690 805 920
21790 21826 21910
24255 23977 23710
102 90 76
207 214 219
080 080 080
610 710 810
1360 1362 1367
437 400 289
219 229 202
141 158 184
333 282 273
24
~ 22ci
CJ lt z
20ii
= Cl 180
gt
16
----------
~ lo
140
138 Q l136 iii w Cl
134
132
500 Q
0 400 n3 300 Cl
~ 200 i-bull
100
z ~ 0 a
Cesign 70
Cesign 805
90
214
080
710
1362
400
229
158
282
-------
-
-~
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B39 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication l
B39
8
Table B40 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Eesidue cantent
Iesidue Omtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lhagtretical Speiliic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Abro1plusmned Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tklit Weight pcpound
Stabilareter Value
OJhesianeter Value
EEsilient Mldulus l03psi
2-day
Final
50
w 40 J lt gt a 30 w
w i
3 20 lt 0 10
400-----------
DI 3 300 lt gt a wti 200 i 0 w8100
0 -------l--l-1
12 ----------
- 10 ltn 0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
60 70 80 690 805 920
21986 21964- 21948
24499 2A212 23938
103 93 83
200 209 218
124 124 l24
476 576 676
1372 1371 1360
422 403 265
270 306 160
99 140 154
298 310 254
24
-22
ci lt
=i 20i
a 0 18 0 gt
16
140
138 - a
l136 z w 0 134
132
bull500
a
o 400 -
ltn =gt 300 -J a
~ 200 z 100 DI 0
0 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT Ii (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Dsign 70
Design 805
93
209
124
576
1371
403
306
140
310
9
Figure B40 Mixture Design Data High Quality SS-30
San Bernardino SEA Replication 2
B40
Table B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent lesidue ~tent
Ilesidue Omtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lbagtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stabilateter Value
CllhesiaIEter Value
Resilient MXlulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
w 40 i- _ gt 30a w I- ~ w 0 20 m I-CII 10
400
w l 300 gt a w lj 200 0 w 100 8
0
12
111 10 Q
0 8gt a ~
6
4
~
6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
65 75 85 Design 75 683 789 89J tesign 789
21624 21445 21375 24097 23802 23520
103 99 92 213 228 238 100 100 100 550 650 750
1349 1338 1334 423 295 285 70 174 82
150 139 138 318 310 2S4
24
22d i
20ii
= CII Q 180 gt
16
138
- 136
u
134I- z ~132
130
bull 500 o 400 _ l 300 1- Q
sectl 200 I-z ~ 100 CII w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
99
228
100
650
1338
295
174
139
310
5
Figure B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B41
Table B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent PesidJJe Content
Residue Omtent
Bulk Specific GIavity
lheoretical Specific GIavity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit weight pcpound
Stabiloreter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mxulus 103psi
SC
w 40 gt a 30 w w i 0 J 20
10
400
w 3 300 gt a w t 200 i
9 ltI)
w = 1008
0
12
11 10 u a 0 8gt
6
4
2-day
Final
~
~
5 6 7 8 flESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGflEGATE BASIS)
65 75 85
683 788 89J 21424 21394 21455
24147 23851 23567
ll3 103 90
22l 229 234
l09 l09 l09
541 641 741
133 7 1335 1339
412 328 280
129 103 81
167 141 162
325 260 280
24
22ci 0 201
= 0 gt
18
16
i-
138
136 Q i134 _ 0 z w bull0 132
130
soor----------- D C
o 400
ltn3 300 a ~ 200 z 100 (I)
w
-
~
a 0------------ 5 6 7 8 9
flESIOUE CONTENT I
(AGGflEGA TE BASIS)
Design 75
Design 7 86
103
229
l09
641
1335
328
103
141
260
9
Figure B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B42
Table B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent Residue Omtent
Residue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllagtreticalSpecilicGravity
Air Voids
VMA
AbsorlJed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcpound
Stabilcrreter value
Cllhesianeter value
lelilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
400-----------
Illl 300 lt gt a w t 200 lo 0 w 8100
0 ________ ___ __
12 ----------
~ 10 0
~ 8 bull a c
6
4 -_______ ___ __
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS
65 75 85 748 863 978 21752 21661 21638 24136 23863 23602 99 92 83
213 225 234 081 081 081 569 669 769
1357 1352 1350 466 367 235
224 266 138
220 189 209 478 337 281
Ilsign 75
Design 863
92
225
081
669 1352
367
266
189
337
24 ----------
~
220 Cl lt ii 20
0 18 0
gt
16 ----------------14or-----------
138 -0 a 136 z w Q
134
132
= c 400 - l 300 Q
~ 200 f-middot z 100 w a o----------
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
_____________J
Figure B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardinor Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B43
Table B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Iesidue Cbntent 65 75 85 Design 75
lesidue Omtent 748 86~ resign~Zl 863
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleo~tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asjtlalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
lesilient Mxlulus 103psi
2-day
Final
so
w gt 0 30 IE 0 20 iii lt
10
400
3 300 lt gt 0 w l 200 IE 0 X w
100 8
0
12
- 10 en 0 0 8gt
6
4
~ 40 bull
~ 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
21676
23998
97
208
055
595
1353
409
248
189
308
24
22
ci c lt i
20ii
= 0 0
18 gt
16
21711 21641
23729 23472
85 78 85
223 234 223
055 oss 055
695 795 695
1355 135l 1355
283 227 283
187 186 187
198 177 198
255 285 255
140
138 a
136 - z 0 134 --
132
500 a
o 400 -
vi3 300 - 0
sectj 200 z ~ 100
0 0 5 6 middot 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino~ Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B44
Table B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Equivalent Jesidue Content 60 70 80 Design 70
tesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
trut Weight pcpound
Stabilcineter Value
Cbhesiateter Value
tesilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
IU 40 _ C gt 30a IU IU = middoto 20 m C (I) 10
400
IU
300 C gt a IU
ti 200 = 0 ~ IU c 100 8
0
12
10 ai 0 8gt C
6
4
~
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)
630 735 840 Design 7 35
21651 21581 21592
24033 23739 23457
99 91 80 91 180 190 198 190
399 499 599 499 135l 1347 134 7 1347
309 439 358 439
150 236 202 236
140 171 148 171 294 390 367 390
24
bull 22
Cl Cl C
i 20i
= (I) Q 180
gt
16 140
138 0 a
i136 z IU
134 bull bull
Q
132
500 D
c 400 _ 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 IU a
0 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B45
Table B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Residue Cbntent 60 70 80 Design 70 Residue Cbntent 6JO Z35 EdQ Jesign 7 35
Bulk Spcific Gravity 21413 21627 21711 lhroretical Specific Gravity 24321 24017 23726 Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcneter Value
Ohesianeter Value
llesilient Mgtdulus 10 3psi
2-day
Final
so
Ill 40 I lt gt 0 30 w Ill i 0 20 Cl lt
10
400
111
l 300 lt gt 0 w lj 200 i
~ w = 1008 -----___
0
12
II- 10 a 0 8gt lt
6
4
120
189
249
351
1336
407
79
147
361
24
II-22
ci
lt ~ 20i
= 0
0 18
gt
16
138
136 u C
l134 w 132
130
bull 500
C
o 400 ~
---------_J 300 0
~ 200
~ 100 Ill 0
0
99
189
249
451
1350
396
76
165
340
85
193
249
551
1355
360
64
175
305
99
189
249
451
1350
396
76
165
340
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT 1
9 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE COIHENT f
9
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B46
---------
Table B4 7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Bulk Specific Gravity
lhalretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorlled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilaieter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
llesilient MJdulus 103psi
2-clay
Final
50
40w lt(
gt IC 30 w w
0 20 iii lt( ltI)
10
400
w 3 300 ~ lt(
gt IC w t 200 0 iii 111 i 100 8
0 ___ _______ __ _ __
12 ----------
Fquivalent Pesidue Content 60 70 80 Iesign 70
Pesidue Qlntent 690 805 92Q Dcsign 805
21958 22006
24182 23909
92 88 92
18l 188 18l 256 256 256
444 544 444
1370 1373 1370
342 291 342
78 73 78
184 167 184
303 298 303
10 0
0 8gt IC
c 6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B47 Mixture
21880
24453
105
176
256
344
1365
443
58
174
381
24
22ci
5 20
= 0
0 18
gt
16
~ I I
138
136 ~ ~134 bull z 111 0 132
130
bull 500
o 400 3 300 - Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 ltI) 111 IC
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B47
Table B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
El_uivalent Residue Cbntait 60 70 80 Iesign 70
Residue Cbntent 690 aQi 2 2Q Dsign 805 Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Olhesiateter Value
Resilient Mldulus middot103psi
2-day
Final
21816
24403
106
178
244
356
1361
482
136
183
393
21806
24120
96
187
244
456
1361
411
130
187
374
21996
23849
78
189
244
556
1373
314
106
260
361
96
187
244
456
1361
411
130
187
374
24so
w 40 22 ci 0 gt a 30 ~ 20w w = 20 ishy C 18iii 0 gt Ill 10 _ ___ ____________
16 400------------
140
w l 300 138 gt 0
Qa w
636t 200 z0 w --------_ Qw 134c 100 8
0 ___ _____________ 132
bull50012 -----------
a
1 400 -_ 10
ltti ltti l 300 -C 0 C8gt ~ 200 lt z
6 l 100 w a
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT S RESIDUE CONTENT S (AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B48
Table B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
EquivaJent Residue antent 65 75 85 Design 75 Residue Content 63J z aa a 23 resign 7 88 Bulk Specific Gravity 21404 21439 21381 lheoretical Specific Gravity 23563 23286 Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcf
Stabilaneter Value
Cohesianeter Value
~ient 1bdul11S 103psi
2~y
Firal
50
w 40 gt a 30 w w 0 20 iii lt 10
400
3 300 w
gt a w t 200 0 in i w
100 8
0 12
10 0 Q
0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6
23020 92 79 71 79
193 199 209 199 140 140 140 140 510 610 710 610
1336 1338 1334 1338 424 397 308 397 79 308 266 308
173 185 196 185 330 319 285 319
24
22ci c lt
~ 20c Q 180
gt
16
138
136 u -Cl
~134 in ~z w 132
130
soar----------- Qbull
o 400
middot3 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a Q___________ ___ __
7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT deg RESIDUE COIITENT deg (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B49
Table BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Fquivalent lesidue Content
Besidlle 0-ntent
Bulk Specific Gravity
Illeoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pf
Stabilcmeter Value
ltbhesiaieter Value
Besilient Mxlulus 103psi
2--day
Final
50
~ 40 I lt gt 30 w 0 20 01 lt 10
400
w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 w r lOO 8
o 12
10 ai ~ 0 8gt a lt
6
~
4 5 6 7 8
IIESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
65 75 85 683 788 893 21527 21362 21337
24013 23721 23441 104 99 90
188 202 211
225 225 225
425 525 625
1343 1333 1332
410 418 290
261 62 100
188 197 211
334 348 331
24
22 ~ ci c lt
20 f 18 0 gt
16
138
136 0 a
134 z w 0 132
130
500 a
o 400
ai bull 300 I bull C
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
IIESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design 75
Design 788
99
202
225
525
1333
418
62
197
348
Figure BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
BSO
Table B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno
Fquivalent Residue Clintent
Residue 0rrtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorlei Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
thlit Weight pcf
StabiJaneter value
Ohesiaretel value 3lelilient MJdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
50
w
40
c gt a 30 w w = g 20 iii c Ill 10
400----------
middota
l 300 bull c gt a w t 200 = 0 w c 100 8
0 _______ ____ _
12 ------------
_ 10 ~ 8 c
6
4 _________ __
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B51
Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
65 75 85 748 863 978
21728
24022
96
186
200
450
1356
436 100
199
376
24
11 22
c c c
z 20ii
Ill0 180
gt
16
Design 75
Design 863
86
195
200
550
1355
392 260
212
362
21716
23753
86
195
200
550
1355
392 260
212
362
21673
23495
78
205
200
650
1353
378 201
230
3l7
~
140
138 Q j136 bull --_ z w 0134
132
500 Q
o 400 bull -l 300 ~ 0 ~ 200 I-z ~ 100 w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Table B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent lesidue OJntent 65 75 85 Design 75 Pesidue Ointent 748 863 978 Design 863 Bulk Specific Gravity 21595 21708 21637 ~retical Specific Gravity 23977 23708 23452 Air Voids 99 84 77 84 VMA 19l 195 206 195 Absorbed Asphalt l92 l92 l92 l92 Effective Asphalt 458 558 658 558 Unit Weight pf 1347 1354 1350 1354 Stabilareter Value 502 262 239 262 Cllhesianeter Value 257 136 154 136 Pesilient MJdulus 103psi
2--day 217 201 228 201 Final 371 307 290 307
2450
w 40 22 0 0lt ltgt ia 30
bull 20i
= 0 20 18iii 0lt gt 10
16 400
~
~
140
w 3 300 -ltgt
138 lt gt
aa w t 200 deg136 z0 w 0
134 w
100 8
1320
12 500 a
0 400 10
3 300 C 0 Q8gt ~ 200 lt z
6 100 w a
4 0 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT ~ RESIDUE CONTENT ~ (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B52
Table B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent ~sidue Cbntent 45 55 65 Design 55 ~idue Cbntent 473 578 6~~ Design 5 78 Bulk Specific Gravity 24210 24403 24473 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26934 26528 26142 Air Voids
VMA
Absocbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
StabiJaneter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Iesilient M)dulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
w _ 40 C gt II 30w w 0 20 iii C ~
10
400
w l 300 C gt II
iiw
200
~ w --------r 100 8
0 12
ot 10 -0
0 8gt II c
6
4
101 80 64 80 199 20l 206 20l
022 022 022 022 423 523 623 523
151l 1523 1527 1523 308 288 197 288
ll7 ll2 140 112
95 llO 122 llO 306 272 214 272
24
ci 22
C
i -~20Es = E 18 0
gt
16
156
154 - gt152 iii z ~ w 0
150
148
bull 500
o 400 Inl 300 0
~ 200 z ~ 100 w II
0
--~
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT r (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7 8 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B53
Table B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Residue Glntent 45 ss 65 Jesign 55 Residue Omtent 47 5 ZB 6 83 resign ~za Bulk Specific Gravity 24197 24253 24435 lheoretical Specific Gravity 26843 26441 26058 Air Voids 99 83 62 83 VMA 199 206 208 206 Absorbed Asphalt 09 09 09 09 Effective Asphalt 441 541 641 541 lklit Weight P=f 1510 1513 152S 1513 StabLkmter Value 38l 307 204 307 CJgthesianeter Value 73 85 149 85 Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day 170 159 142 159 Final 333 367 193 367
so
w 40 J lt gt 0 30w w le 0 20J
CJ lt 10
24
It
22ci 0 lt i -------20 = 18 0 gt
16 400
____
~
156
w 3 300 154 lt gt - a0 w gt 152l 200 le __-0 z w w c 150 8100
148 0
12 500
D C
o 400 r- 10 -u 300
J 0 9
8 Cgt ~ ~ 200 z
6 ~ 100
w 0
4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE COIITEIIT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B54
----------
Table B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Rep~ication 1
Equivalent Residue Contentmiddot
Residue Ontent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
~tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tklit Weight pcpound
Stabilaneter value
Cbhesiaieter Value
Resilient -bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
45 55 65
518 633 748
24695 24765 24666
26898 26520 26160
82 66 57
187 193 205
001 001 001
449 549 649
154l 1545 1539
41l 310 24l
159 157 165
183 178 193
371 318 250
50
w 40 c gt a 30 w-w == 0 20 ~ 10
400------------
~ 300 lt(
gt a
t 200 == 0 in bullw 8100
0 __ ________ ___ ___
12 ----------
t 10 rti C
~ 8 a c
6
4 s 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI
4
24
Ill 22
0 c c
ze 20
II)
C 18 0
gt
16
158
156- 154 Ill z w 0 152
150
500 iii
8 4
~
0 400-
i300-~ g 200 1-z l 100 iii a 0 __ _______ ____
5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design 55
Design 633
66
193
001
549
1545
310
157
178
318
___
8
Figure B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
BSS
Table B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality
Equivalent Rsidue Content 45
Rsidue Cbntent 518
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllooretical specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
lbsoibed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesicmeter Value 3
Iesilient Mldwus 10 psi
2--day
Final
400-----------
w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 I 0 ltII w8100
olt----__1__--1_---1
12 ----------
10 u
0 8gt a lt
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT l
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
24594
27024
90
190
019
431
1535
450
198
191
360
24
Ill 22
0 C
lt i
20i ~ ltII C 18 C gt
16
158
156 0
i54 iii z ILi
J52
150
SS-30 SEA
55 65
63J 7 ~a 24844
26641
67
190
019
531
1550
324
212
173
308
24856
26276
54
199
019
631
155l
234
225
166
259
_________
~
500----------- 0
dego 400 -
~300~~ C
~ 200 z i 100
w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COIITEHT l
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Replication 2
Design 55
Lesign 633
67
190
019
531
1550
324
212
173
308
Figure B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B56
---------
Table B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality
ElIuivaJent lesidue Omtent
lesidue Cbntent
Bulk Spacific Gravity
~retical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Uut Weight pcf
Stabilaneter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
lesilient Mldulus 103psi
so
w 40 lt gt a 30 w w ~ 20 m lt II)
10
400
w 3 300 lt gt a w lj 200 0 w z 1008
0 12
Ill 10 Q
0 8gt lt
6
4
2-day
Final
~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
so 530
24024
26676
99
207
031
469
1499
354
138
183
352
SS-15 SEA Replication 1
60 70 Design 60 636 7 42 Design 636
24040 23986 26279 25901 85 74
214 223
031 031 569 669
1500 1497 223 149
222 126
159 160 302 234
24
Ill
c 22 ~ c
lt i
20i1
== (II C 180 gt
16
152
150 u -a
648 z w Q
146 1-
144
bull 500 a
o 400 - 3 300 C
~ 200 z ~ 100 (II w a
~ 0
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
85
214
031
569
1500
223 222
159
302
8
Figure B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B57
Table B58 Mixture Design Data Low Quality SS-15
Fquivalent Residue Content 60 60
Rsidue Cbntent 525 630
23944
~retical Specific Gravity
Bulk Sjecific Gravity 26592
Air Voids 100
209VMA
1bsocbed Asphalt 015
Effective Aspbalt 485
Unit Weight pcf 1494
Stabilareter Value 377
Olhesiaeter Value 151
Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi
162
375 2-day
Final
so
w 40 _ gt c 30 w w i
~20 m I-0
10
400
Ill
300 gt w I 200 i 2 w i 100 8
_________ 0 --middotmiddot-
12-------bull------
ti 10 9 0 8gt
6
4
24
- 22ci
0
20i
= 9 18 0 gt
16
152
150 u a
148 z---- w0146
144
500 Q
o 400 _ 300 Q
~ 200 I-z ~ 100
w a
23988
26022
84
215
015
585
1497
307
180
165
356
Graniterock SEA Replication 2
70
735 23793
25830
79
229
015
685
1485
217
170
169
277
~
~
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7
RESIOUE CONTENT li RESIDUE COPlTENT li (AGGREGATE 8ASIS) (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)
Design 60
resign 630
84
215
585
1497
307
180
165
356
8
Figure B58 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B58
Table B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Equivalent esidue omtent 5 0 60 70 Design 60
esidue Cbntent 5 75 690 805 Dsign 690
Bulk Specific Gravity 24389 24362 24419
Jheo=eticaJ Specific Gravity 2 6670 26303 25953
Air Voids 8 6 74 59 7 4
VMA 198 207 214 20 7
Absorbed Asphalt 009 009 009 009
Effective Asphalt 491 591 691 591
Unit Weight pcf 1522 1520 1524 1520
Stabilareter Value 38l 292 220 292
Cbhesiclneter Value 263 186 176 186
~t Mldulus 103psi
2-day 222 222 207 222
Fulal 380 289 293 289
5
w 40 C gt a 30 Ill ~ 20 m C 1- 10
24 ----------
22 bull C Cl C
zi 20
C1 o 18 0 gt
16 ___-________-------i-_-
400---------- 15a------------
156l 300 C gt - a =deg 154ti 200
iii z0 IUiii 0 152 bull bull~ 10018
150 ___ _______ __J0 ---i--J~-L--1
500----------12 ----------- bull o 400 -
Ill 10 ui l 300 -Q
Qg 8 g 200a lt z 6 l 100
iii a
01--J-----__ __4 -------r------- 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
RESIDUE COrlTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B59
Table B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Design 60
Eeidue omtent 575 690 805 D=sign 690
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleo~tical Specific Gravity
1lir Voids
VMA
Absocbed Asralt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcf
Stabilcmeter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
Eeilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
Ill 40 J
lt gt a 30 w I-w 0 20 Ill lt I-
10
400
w 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 Id
8100
0 12
10 m Q
0 8gt 5 lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
~
RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASISI
24371 24441 24445
26744 26373 26020
89 73 61 73
199 205 213 205
019 019 019 019
481 581 681 581
1521 1525 1525 1525
335 236 191 236
220 164 180 164
194 199 191 199
388 329 294 329
24
22
ci 0 lt i
20i
= a
= 18 0 gt
16
158
156 u a
deg154 = w Q
152 ---------150
500 a
1 400 m3 300 1 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100
Ill a
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COHTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B60
APPENDIX C
DATA ANALYSIS SOLVENT FREE AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS
Table Cl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL e_AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
95 85 80
867
76
88
90 85 85
867
29
33
95 85 85
883
58
65
85 70 80
783
76
98
100 100 100
1000
00
00
100 100 100
1000
00
00
C M s 0
D A T A x s
CV
80 80 80
800
00
oo
80 75 75
767
29
38
75 80 70
750
50
67
70 80 75
750
50
67
90 90
100
933
58
62
95 100
95
967
29
30
C M s 1
D A T A
X s
CV
80 75 70
750
50
67
60 70 55
617
76
124
70 70 65
683
-2 9
42
65 70 60
650
50
77
65 70 70
683
29
42
70 60 65
650
50
77
Table C2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating
F01
E 2 ll877 7777778 243aassese9 1)75102041 329 532 ~ middot2 1ll77777777~ 73RBSeSf89 32571~2-~5 3~ 29 532 J 1 150 ooocooo 150JOJOOOO 5f122llll9 414 746
EA ll 8114 llllll11444 2111111111 3J51224 266 396 -E~ middot2- 1-0frOOfr~ 0-9 middot50-middot000 3 oco middot2middot20110816 middot 329 532 Agt 2 77 7777778 38 8815589 17142857 329 532 nJ 4 1555555~55 388881889 171112857 266 396
FR RmiddotJR 36 8166666567 225851B52
------------------------------------------------middot---------------------ronmiddotL 53 -esoo--000000r
Cl
100
P
c5 75 z-t-lt8 50 w t-lt bull css-oC
CMS-0w 25a C middot+ CMS-7 C lt
0-----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Cl Mean AggregateCqqting at middotoesign Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 867 css-o 883 CSS-0 783 css-o 1000 css-o 1000middotcss-o middot I I CMS-0 800 CMS-0 7~ 7 CMS-0 750 CMS-0 933 CMS-0 967lrMS-0 750
I CMS-7 750 CMS-7 617 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 65 0 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating
C2
Table C3 Film Stripping
EMULSION
AGGREGATE SAN
BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK
C s s 0
D A T A
5
0
10
5
5
0
X s
CV
25
35
1414
75
35
47l
25
35
1414
C M s 0
D A T A
0
5
5
7
0
0
X s
CV
25
35
1414
60
14
236
00
oo oo
C M s 7
D A T A
0
0
0
5
0
0
X s
CV
00 OQ 00
25 35
1414
00 00
oo
Table C4 ANOVA Summary Film Stripping
AN-OVA
middotmiddotDPmiddot -ss- F middotFe5
E 2 33 7777778 1euro8888889 23555191 426 802 A 2 -ti8 7777778 343888889 4 7984496 426 802
E X II 4 9 2222226 23055557 3217054 363 642 ERROI 9 645000000 71666667 ---------------TOTAL 17 1762777782
C3
fl w 0 lti 1L a =gt en C w C C-a I-en
40
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-730
20
10
0 SB F GR
Figure C3 Film Stripping
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
css-o 25 css-o 75 css-o 25
GMS-0 25 CMS-0 60 CMS-0 oo
CMS-7 oo CMS-7 25 CMS-7 oo
----middot----middot-middotmiddotmiddot
Nlte Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping
C4
Table CS 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue
Content 10 3 psi
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW D
118 170A 217 205 160 175
C T 83 190 191 182 130 185A s )ts 101 180 204 194 145 180
0 s 25 14 18 16 21 7
CV 246 79 90 84 146 39 D 104 185 155A 190 140 215
C T 82 155 154 171 130 180A M x 93s 170 155 181 135 198
s 16 21 1 13 7 250 CV 167 125 05 74 52 125
D A ab 55 35 73 38 55
C T
82A 48 63 77 45 65 M X s pound81 -- - 52 49 75 42 60 s7 l 5 20 3 5 7
CV 18 96 404 38 11 9 11 8
Table C6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus
A N ) V l
-D-F -SS
E 2 832263888888 _ 2-- -5441-- 722-2222-J 1 89933611111
E~ 4 5386 7777779 -1J- 2- -3-8-1-+-rG-55--5-5-5 7- bull AJ 2 144235~899 EA 4 58024444443
ERROR 113- 3951500 00~-J
---------------------------------------------------------------------TOT-W- -3-5 -11806-4---638 881gt-9-
(116131944444 2720-8611111 89933611111 13466944445 1-9Q lh-5--amp7--+7-8-7211944445
14506111111 219 527-7778
1895577629 -12 394-1541-409569480
61345059 S-~937872 32952081 56gt7870Ll
357 3-S7 443 295
-]y5+ 3S7 295
605 6 05--833 461
-6--05-605 461
cs
bull css-omiddot 300 C CMS-0
M 0 diams CMS-7
(J
3200 gt C 0 E 1-
ffi 100
01----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure CS 2 Day ResiLient Modulus
SAN middotBERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 101 css-o 180 rss-o 204 css-0_194 CSS-0 145 CMS-0 198
CMS-0 93 CMS-0 170 ICMS-0 155 CMS-0 181 CMS-0 135 css-o 180l l l I I CMS-7 81 CMS-7 52 CMS-7 49 CMS-7 75 CMS-7 42 CMS-7 60
Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C6 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking 2 Day
Resilient Modulus 10 3 psi
C6
Table C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Content 10 psi
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A (
s
CV
260
232
246
20
80
320
280
300
28
94
482
299
391
129
33l
365
358
362
5
l4
280
240
260 28
109
320
345
333
18
53
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
267
250
259
12
47
295
280
288
ll
37
253
288
271
25
92
290
387
339
69
203
260
307
284
33
11 7
395
334
365
43
118
C M s 7
D A T A
X
s
CV
78
64
71-
10
139
110
95
103
ll
104
75
73
74
l
19
110
135
123
18
144
80
90
85
7
83
110
135
123
18
144
middotTable C8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus
-~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------F-r05- ---F-01--
E
J El -E- Al EAJ
-ERRJR
2 2-1 4 -~ 2 4
18
3592750555555 -14506 722-2221-171610COOOOJ 147394444445
1---1-1----lf466-li-+ 19215000000 55353333333
2850GOOC0000
17-16375277778 72~336H-1-11
1716100)0000 36848611111 sect8~5833---3-33--9607500000
13840833333 ~ 58-3 33-33 333
11315528C7 -45810702
109385263 23272807 ~U981l-2-1-6067895 3741579
357 -3 r7 443 2 95 3~7-357 295
605 605 833 461 605 605 4 6 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------~- 3-5- -448+1----2-222-2-
C7
bull css-o500
CMS-0 U) diams CMS-7C
C) 400 middoto -
~ 300
J Ci 200
1-z 100 J-UJ UIa
01-------------------------~---~-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
eMS-0 259 ess-a 300 ess-a 391 ess-a 362 eMS-0 284 CMS-0 365
ess-o 246l l l l l ICMS-0 288 eMS-0 271 CMS-0 339 ess-o 260 ess-o 333
CMS-7 71 CMS-7 103 CMS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123
t-ote Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure ca Newrnan-Keuls Ranking Full Cure 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi
ca
Table C9 Density at Design Residue Content pcpound
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
1359
1372
1366
09
07
1365
1365
1365
0
0
1365
1352
1359
09
07
1345
1345
1345
0
0
1520
1525
1523
04
02
1515
1515
1515
0
0
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
1348
1343
1346
04
03
1330
1338
1334
06
04
1329
1340
1335
08
06
1335
1316
1326
- 13
10
1505
1490
1498
11
07
1490
1485
1488
04
02
C M s 7
D A T A
x s
CV
1373 1385
1379
09 06
1375 137 5
1375
0 0
1380
1379
1380
01 01
1370
1360
1365
07 05
1537
1535
1536
01 01
1543
1545
1544
01 01
Table ClO ANOVA Surtunary Density
A II O V ~
-SS F bull O1
E _ 0
2 i
lCB4155555 Z08-tOS389
II 311277~
54207777R 1 ouos2sirrs
4340277
135q23660 -25lS 7i80R63-
1087331173
3S7 3 ~7 443
i()5 605 83
EA Q
4 -2
1599U4U5 _iuseeg
399E11 -3-3UUL45-
10J17398 bull~3785-C7
295 -~S7-
4 f 1 -6CS
A) 2 13772222 o6886111 17251218 357 605 EAJ q 2C361111 5090278 12752262 295 4 61
-ERRJR- 13- 718-()001 399166-7-
35
C9
bull css-o160 CMS-0 diams CMS-7
150
() -a gt 140 -en z w
middotC 13
1201~bull-------------r---------------SBH SBL FH FL ~RH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C9 - Density at Design Residue Content
SAN middotBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 138o CMS-7 1365ICMS-7 1375 CMS-7 1544
css-o 1366
I-7 bull rMS-7 1536
css-o 1365 css-o 1359 css-o 1345 css-o 1523 CSS-0 j515
CMS-0 1346 CMS-0 1334 CMS-0 1335 CMS-0 132 6 CMS-0 1498 CMS-0 1488
Nte Values with a ccmnm vertical line are not statistically different
Figure ClO Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcpound
ClO
Table Cll Air Voids at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
D 87 7 0-A 75 77 80 72
C T 71 70 92 82 78 73A s )s 79 70 84 80 79 73
0 s ll 0 12 04 01 01
CV 143 0 144 45 18 10 D 97 93A 93 91 82 84
C T 90 92 A
91 93 87 90
M x 94 93 92 s 92 84 87 s os 01 01 _0l 04 04
0 53 08 15 15 42 49CV D A 77 62 73 62 71 48
C T 73 61 62 71 65A 55
M X s 75 62 68 67 68 52 s 03 01 08 06 04 057
CV 38 12 115 96 62 96
Table Cl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids
A I O Y 11
-DF ss -F 05 F01
E 2 382650000 191325000 69)150301 3~7 605 -A 2 -2-681667 1340334 ll03567311 -3- 57 605
Q 1 2f677778 26677778 952324f6 4 13 I 33 EA lj 13S33333 3313333 122011409 2 95 Ii 61 ti -2 l8105555- -905-277-8- 326553tO 357 tiOS II) 2 6572221 3296111 11953707 357 605 E~l 4 88411445 2211111 797552 795 4 f 1 ERElll 111 11991)0)00 bull2172222-
-------------------------~------------------------------------------rou1 s SJ 3100000-
Cll
11
10
iP- en 0-0 gt aa
9
8
7
6
5
4
bull css-o CMS-o diams CMS~7
SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
F-igure Cll Air Voids at middotoesign Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 94 CMS-0 93 CMS-0 92 ICMS-0 92 CMS-0 84 ICMS-0 87
IIcss-o 79 css-o 7 0 I II
css-o 79 css-o 73
I ~_ I~ CMS-7 7 5 CMS-7 62 CMS-7 68 CMS-7 48 - - bull-- ~ -----~middot-middotmiddot--middot-middotmiddot-middot ---middotmiddot
~= Values with a OCIlOn vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids
Cl2
Table Cl3 Stabilorneter Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
272
3113
293 29
99
270
265
268 04
13
393
327
360 47
130
380
325
353 39
110
270
270
270 0
0
235
185
210 35
168
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
375
344
360
22
61
340
350
345
07
21
307
377
342
50
145
415
367
39l
33
85
350
300
3-2 5
35
109
240
245
243
04
15
C M s 7
D A T A
x s
CV
235
23-5
235
0
0
130
120
125
07
57
213
233
-223
14
63
150
200
175
35
202
350
350
350
0
0
250
250
25 o_ 0
0
Table Cl4~ ANOVA Summary Stabilorneter Value
A N O V 1
soua= SS r 01
E 2 2
7086172721 9702C93fl9
3543086361 4SS10Uf95
505343236 ~-9189501
357 357
605 605
) 1 175 6950250 1756950250 25053)2i8 443 833 EA 4 6718347112 167 9586 778 23955053 2 95 461 ~ ~544 -4 Q-432-ll-25-0- --S--~ 38 ~5-19- -3 5- ios AJ 2 941227166 47(1euro13583 57122663 357 605 EAJ 4 289779333 72319A33 10314831 2 95 II f 1
Ell ngtR -18 1r2024gt0) -i- bull112472-
---------------------------------------------------------------------0-T- ----5- 4-9B1 is~v~
Cl3
50
w 40 I ltgt a 30w I-w ~ 200 I-m lt 10I-u
0 SSH SBL FH FL GRH
AGGREGATE
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
GRL
Figure Cl3 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 350 CMS-7 250ICMS-0 360 ICMS-0 345 r=ss-o 36o rMS-0 39l
css-o 268 CMS-0 342 css-o 353 CMS-0 325 CMS-0 243Icsbull-bull _ CMS-7 235 CMS-7 12S CMS-7 223 CMS-7 175 css-o 270 css-o 210
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value
Cl4
Table Cl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOWHIGH LOW LOWHIGH D 360193 280 465 275 250A T 234 345 183 375 160 225C A
s x 214 353 232 420 218 238s s 29 11 69 64 18810
136 30 296 152 37 4 74CV D 280 440 230 355 200 320 T A
252 430 219 450 140 240C A M x 266 435 225 403 170 280s s 20 7 67 428 570
74 16 16735 250 202CV D
80 190 122 245 130 170 T A
82 180 192 235 120 180C A M X 81 185 157 240 125 175s s l 7 so 7 777
CV 18 3038 31 5 57 40
Table Cl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value
-SS--
pound 2 1309717272222 654858611111 1102309084 357 605 __ 2 3Ber61222222 194033611--111 -1-1t2J3570 -3 57 605 J 1 12)524904445 120524f94111145 711)1137379 1143 l 33
EA 4 2311~U411111145 57795111111 355~57119 295 4 ~ 1
~ + --8-066---H~i-i--2 ---4-B3-a~--H ~T4-=7-7S~J -3 S7 605 1J 2 111206 7222222 71033511111 ll3~31111 3 57 605 EAJ 4 500gt1111111 12512777778 7587162 235 4 (- 1
RAO- -18 -999 500-000( -1-6--2-7 -75-00000-
--------------------------------------------------------------------tO+--l- el-i- 3-fi-99g6-3-R-~
Cl5
bull css-o500
Q1__________---___-----~
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure ClS CohesiometerValue at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 232rMS-0 435 CMS-0 280rMS-0 266 rss-o 420 tss-o 218
css-o 214 css-o 353 CMS-0 225 CMS-0 403 css-o 238ICMS-0 170
CMS-7 81 CMS-7 185 CMS-7 157 CMS-7 240 CMS-7 125 CMS-7 175
Nrte Values with a oamon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value
~400 -I ltgt cc 300 w 1-w E 2000 -() w c 1008
CMS-0 diams CMS-7
Cl6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Table Cl7 Swell at Design Residue Content in
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
0 0000 0003 0000 0008 0000 0000A C T 0000 0005 0000 0007 0000 0002
A 0000 0004 0000 0009 0000 0000 s j( 00000 00040 00000 00080s 00000 00007
0 s 00000 00010 00000 0 0010 00000 00012
CV 00 250 00 125 00 1732 D 0000 _o 045 0020 0036 0000 0000A 0006 0029 0018 0040 0001 0000TC A 0007 0040 0022 0039 0000 0000
M x 00043 00380 00200 00383 00003 00000 s s 00038 00082 00020 00021 00006 00000 0
874 215CV 100 54 1732 oo
D 0000 0004 0000 0003 0000 0000A T 0000 0002 0000 0000 0000 0000
C A 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000
M x 00000 OQ023s 00000 00010 00000 00000 s 00000 00015 00000 00017 00000 00000
7 oo 655 1732CV 00 00 oo
Table Cl8 ANOVA Summary Swell
P N O V ~
SOUR-middotEmiddot l)f -ss- -lSmiddot F rs FM
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------E 2 C031905 )015953 7576385211 329 532 J 2 0012203 OOOf112 2~97R1n75 329 532 l 000858(1 )()QSf80 11122112111111 414 846
H LI 0016535 00)111311 1963258575 266 396 Emiddot) middot2middot 00079 51- a0ll397S 1eg ~16527 329 532 AJ 2 00011958 )0021179 111 ns1ne 329 532 EAJ II 0006609 OC01652 7e117l97t3 266 396
EDl 36 )000751 OOOJ021
TOBImiddot middot53middot ----008959-9-middot
Cl7
05
04
z 03
-I -I w
u 3 02
01
0 SBH SBL FH
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
FL GRH GRL AGGREGATE
FigureCl Swell at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 00003 css-o 00007CMS-0 00043 CMS-0 -0380 CMS-0 00200 CMS-0 00303
CMS-0 00000css-o 00080 css-o 00000Icss-o 00000 Icss-o 00040 ICSS-0 00000
CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00000CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00023 CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00010
Rte Values with ~--~~~ ~~ lb-le are not ~tatistically different
Figure Cl8 Newman-Keuls Ranking swell in
Cl8
Table Cl9o MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
-------EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
GRANITEROCKFRESNOSAN BERNARDINO
LOW LOWHIGH HIGH LOW HIGH D
124 72198 137 287 243A 227 90145 178 83 260TC 57197 135 252 270A
s 207 104 258 73139 239s s 17 05 56 29 14 17
0 CV 82 280 82638 233 53
D 197 160145 145 90 205A 19l 17092 100 80 220TC 158 105 138190A M x 182 119 11 7 85 205 156 s s 21 37 25 1607 15 0
115 737 105316 21l 83CV D 21 omiddot 240202 185 98 330A
220 20087 181 34588TC 216 210138 223 77 338A M x 215 217142 196 88 338s
s 2111 0805 58 237
23 405 120 22 96118CV
Table C20 ANOVA Summary -MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
----------------------- I N O V A
SO0RE --DF -lS--
middotE __ 2 2
401 11310n -5831137037
2008568519 --2915568519
166S53085 2111762euro92-
3-9 J29
532 532
Q 1 14f5364f296 14653646296 1215099198 4 14 746 EA-Ev
4 -frac34
2784740740 -1-1-i 0359259
696185185 -56-tl-1-79tr30-
5 772 8571 -6450815
266 middot-3-29
396 -5-32middotmiddot
110 2 355470370 177735185 1bull11738C30 329 532 EAO II 12794711075 3198euro9519 25523909 266 396
-Ei8JB 36- 11311 111euro66euro7 120596296
---------------------------------------------------------------------FOTAJ- --5-3- -31131--343-14 8-1-
Cl9
50 bull css-o ti) CMS-0 gt 40 diams CMS-7E I
a w 30I-w E 0 -I 20-ca ltC I-Cl) 10
0--------------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Cl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOWmiddot HIGH LOW
CMS-7 215 CMS-7 142 css-o 104 I ICMS-7 338 CMS-7 21 7
css-o 207 css-o 139 i CMS-7 88 CMS-0 156middot css-o middot
CMS-0 182 CMS-Q 119 CMS-0 117 CMS-0 85 CMS-0 205 css-o 73
Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
C20
-----------------------------------------
Table C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
IEMULSON
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIG_H LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A x s
CV
135 104 104
114
18
157
70 85 51
69
17
248
105 66
136
102
35
343
148 197
-173
35
201
107 101
72
93
19
201
74 107
92
91
17
182
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
128 85
174
119
31
256
73 59 -
66
10
150
69 36 65
56
18
318
158 110
-134
34
253
77 96 68
80
14
178
53 66
113
77
32
408
C M s 7
D A T A x s
CV
141 79 52
91
46
503
185 60 63
103
71
695
125 201
96
141
54
386
192 164 126
161
33
206
131 130 120
127
6
48
72 230
76
126
90
715
Table C22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
l II O Y A
-soaas -OF- -S-S- -F- FrOS
E -llmiddot J
n -tJ-AO EllJ
RROi
----------
2 2 1 u -2-2 4
36middot -------
199090000000 middot 39113 411111111111
4111296296 61982222222
-t-72-1-middot-11181-18-1-754737037011 41156 5185186
85722 middotbull)0(0000 ----------------
995115000000 -1971-7222222
11111216296 151195555556 -360-yen5-110-711 1middot
j8236851852 11166296297
middotmiddot2381 166667
111805138 -0280488 17265A9 6507548
-36111086-15058033
41589422
329 329 414 2 66 329 329 266
532 -532 746 396
-532 532 3915
-----------------------------------lOo-1- middottt 1-300-lamp833-333-3-
C21
400
CJgt ~ 300 I
0 w I-w 200
-~ 0 CJwc 1000 ()
0
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Valueat Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 ll9 CMS-7 103 ICMS-7 141 css-o 173 CMS-7 127 CMS-7 126
css-o ll4 css-o 69 1middotcss-o 102 CMS-7 161 css-o 93 css-o 91
CMS-7 91 CMS-0 66 middotCMS-0 56 CMS~O 134 CMS-0 80 CMS-0 77
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C22 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
C22
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table C23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
724 811 637
724
123
170
1289 -
1276
1283
09
07
627 628 695
650
39
60
622 940
1427
996
405
407
475 407
1276
719
483
672
803 790 498
697
172
247
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
1217 393
1260
957
489
511
2075 2879 1875
2276
532
233
1943 1195 2012
171 7
453
264
1241 1224 1208
1224
1 7
13
676 574 550
600
67
112
986 787 815
863
108
125
C M s 7
D A T A x s
CV
642 620 774
679
83
123
102 426 662
397 281
709
59 7 369 470
479 114
239
588 60l 290
493
176
357
301 263 393
319
67
210
238 284 227
250 30
121
Table C24 ANOVA Surmnary Surface Abrasion
Fmiddot F01middotmiddotss --------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------
e Amiddot
2 -gt
530361248149 22)938237037
315180624075 110469111)519
432152433 1sn1of15
329 329
532 532
1 n
1 4
[14699201852 9733 179629euro
446992gt1952 24332949074
61289-8 3335u~111
414 266
746 396
EJ J
2 2
middot59516003103 85017525926
291seoo1as1 425)8752963
4 9nn2 5 828630
329 329
532 532
EI 4 196475151852 4911877963 57349619 266 396
ERRJl 36 262551800000 72931l~-556
--------------------------------------------------------------------
middotTnUmiddot 53- middot159689-~0964815middot
C23
300
E C)
C)200 Cl)
0 J
z 0 en 100 lti a al lti
01-----r----~---------r---------SBH SBL
Figure C23
SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW
CMS-0 957 CMS-0 2276
css-o 724 css-o 1283
CMS-7 679 CMS-7 397
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content
FRESNO
HIGH
CMS-0 171 7
css-o 65o
CMS-7 479l
LOW
CMS-0 1224
ICSS-0 996
CMS-7 493
GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW
css-o
CMS-0
719
600
ICMS-0 863Icss-
CMS-7 319 CMS-7 250
Ngtte Val~ with~ ~n vertical line are not stati~tically different
Figure C24 Newman-Keuls Ranking Surface Abrasion grams
C24
APPENDIX D
DATA ANALYSIS SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS
----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
Table Dl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15
SEA
D A T A
75 85 85
85 80 85
80 75 70
65 70 70
85 90 90
80 85 85
X s
tV
817
58
71
833
29
35
7-50
50
67
683
29
42
middot88 3
29
33
833
29
35
ss 30 see
D A T A
85 80 85
75 80 80
75 85 85
70 80 70
90 85 95
90 80 90
x s
CV
833
29
35
783
29
37
81 7
58
71
733
58
79
-900
50
56
883
29
33
C M s 7
D A T A
80 75 70
60 70 55
70 70 65
65 70 60
65 70 70
70 )0 65
x s
CV
750 50
67
617 76
124
683 29
42
650 50
77
683 29
42
650
50
77
Table D2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating
rmiddot rs F05 F 0 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------F 2 235 712593 1179 f-296297 553913Q113 329 532 a 2 63 bullTlt1ll81I R 31L97UC7U 1521731 3 29 532 E~
11 3f2 116i14f Jmiddot 39 (1)7111~gtI 1
3~2 ~-2900 9976~5185
17 ~li347F3 UfB47826
4 14 256
746 96
i) ~ pound 2S 11252i 12 29(-29 bull 5086957 329 532
a~ 2 12 ~-~737r o lt19518~ 2E260e7 329 53 2 u ll 1f3 bull illf illt7 41t3S1B52 191156522 2 G6 3~f
iE1190il 3i 76 pound61iz~57 212~-25
Dl
-~ -CJ z I-lt(
0 0 U1 -lt( C bull SS 15 SEA w 25 SS 30 SEA CJ cc
diams CMS - 7CJ lt(
0 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dle Mean Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
I SS-30 733SS-301 $33 SS-15amp 833 lss-301 sn 7 I ISS-30 900 SS-30 883
SS-151 817 SS-301 783 SS-15 683 SS-15 883 SS-15 833SS-lSi 750
CIS--7 750 CS-7 617 OS-7 683 CMS-7 650 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650
Ngtte Values with a comon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating
D2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
Table D3 Film Stripping
EMULSION
AGGREGATE SAN
BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK
s s
15
0 A T A
30
15 20
30 15
25
X s
CV
225
106
47l
250
71
283
200
71 354
s s
30
D A T A
25
25
0
0
5
0
X s
CV
25middoto
oo
00
oo oo
oo
2middotmiddot5
35
1413
C M s 7
D A T A
0
0 0
5
0 0
X s
CV
oo
00 oo
25
35
1413
oo
00 oo
Table D4 ANOVA Swnmary Film Stripping
----------------- ---------------- --middot-----------middot----- middot--middotmiddotmiddot middot- middotmiddot-middot----middot -middot-- middotmiddotmiddot--- --- -------- -A N O V J
-SW~ middotnt r-
pound 2 14333333113 7166666667 27 1S78lttl7 l 2 2]33333333 1165666euro67 middot11t1210~26 Eirl 141 55f 3333335 13958333311 i2894737
Dlli~RI 9 237 50CCDIOmiddot) 2638888P9
lOUL t7 bull--- bullbull - bull- 0 bull bullbull bull- bull bull 0 -------- bull-- bull- bull---bull ---- lt -bullbull bull - bullbullbull--bullbullbullbullbull-bullbull-- bullbullbull bull ___ bull --bull bull bull bull --- bull bull-bullho bullbull bull- bull bull ~-- bull- UO rArr-d bull
D3
cit -w
0 lt( ll a (I)
C w 0 C-a I-ti)
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
20
1
0 SB F GR
Figure D3c Film Stripping
SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO
Iss-3
SS-15
250
225
SS-15~7 250
25
SS-15
ISS-30
200
25
ClIS-7 oo middot SS-30 00 CMS-7 00
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping
D4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue 3Content 10 psi
-------ElAULSWN
----QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCK SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
D S$ 1U H9 171 185 110 159
i22 2~1 165 197 159 165A15Jo-ot----t----+---ii---+----t-----ti 132 140 168 191 135 162
SEA s i3 1 4 9 35 4
CV Ul2 10 25 44 258 26
$5 ---
D
~ A
158
140
189
198 184 187
212
201
178
173
222
199
gtUfl x l49 194 186 207 176 211 SEA s 13 6 2 8 4 16
CV 85 33 11 38 20 77
C M
D A T A
80
82 55 48
35
63
73
77
38
45 55
65
s x 81 52 49 75 42 60
7 s
CV
1
18
5
96 20
404
3
38 5
119
7
118
Table D6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus
--=======-=-middot------=====--=- ---------------------==-~----------=-----e=-----BF SS lS F F05 F01
pound 2 ln~13~ 3lBillllll1l 52367 191141145 3715181747 357 605 I 2 29111 GllS5SSS6 111155 bull 5211778 103289966 357 605 l 1 3l$3351l11112 33$3-3611112 240095590 4113 A33 lEamp liL 31121111l11U1t zst-n22t77 8 ssu21119a 295 461 pound~ 2 1217222222 16093611111 432112657 357 605 III 2 n~ bullEHOq 1a ----------
521iwSSSS5 15S911111111 25Jot 5lll)~Oll)il))I
31l527777R 4117277777~ iJl9166657
22C3627) -2H1157
357 2~95
6~5 11 61
-=====------middot--- -- -- middotmiddot-- --middot-llOl~L lS
DS
bull SS 15 SEA 11 SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
-(D -l Q 0 E J-
ffi 1 J-(J wa gtlt 0 Q--------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL (I
AGGREGATE
Figure D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-3~1 l49 SS-3H J86 SS-10 207 SS-30 176 SS-30 211
SS-15amp 132 SS-15amp l40 SS-151168 SS-l51 l91 ss-lSi 135 SS-15 162I I I CS-7 81 CMS-7 52 OS-7 42 CMS-7 60
llite Values with a amron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent
Figure D6 Newman-Keuls Ranking 2 Day 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi
D6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Table D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Contentr 10 psi
-EMULSION OUALITY LEVELcAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15
SEA
D A T A
325
271
l]JD
260
390
340
319
348
272
367
302
356
x s
CV
29S
38
128
285
35
124
365
35
97
334
21
62
320
67
21 0
329
38
116
ss 30 SEJ
0 A T A
282
310
337
255
303
374
362
307
318
308
289
329
x s
CV
296
20
67
296
58
196
339
50
148
335
39
116
313
7
23
309
28
92
C M s 7
D A T A
78
64
110
95
75
73
110
135
80
90
85
7
83
110
135
x s
CV
71
10
139
103
11
104
74
1
19
123
18
144
123
18
144
Table D8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus
A N O V ll
E 2- 3r39El11 3middotl8tB89 196 994 L19 44 44 5 178 q233024 3 57 6 CS 2 9111~7222223 4058 3611112 3 57577(13 357 6csbulla 11 611~ li9llll41115 ~16 ampll44445 S585579 443 833
_n_ sect 251l-illll41sectl41 -531 31i 11111 AS7121pound3 295 4 61 EJ 2 lt 115 $555555 227 521777 8 1994213 357 605 iampJ 2 170555555 15)277778 0770121 357 605 __ElJ 1324111ilJlilil4 5 208 bull 11Ul 11 bull 184922 2 95 4 ( 1
nan 11 19P73 SOOJIO~ 11111D833l33
middotmiddot-- =--=--=-==-===--c-=-c------_--=--ngtllllll
----------------------------------middot----
D7
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
traquo diams CMS - 7a ()
0--Gl ~- I J _J bull C 02 E I-z w J-(J w C
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATEmiddot
Figure D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HJGH lOW HJGH LOW HIGH LOW
I I I Iss-il51 298 1SS-31l 295 ss-]5~ 365 SS-30 335 1middot SS-15 320 SS-15 329
SS-301 296 SS-l5amp 235 SS-301 339 SS-15 334 SS-30 313 SS-30 309
CIIS--7 71 OS-7 103 CHS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123
t-bte Values with a armon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D8 Newman-Keuls Ranking Full Cure
Resilient Modulus 103 psi
D8
----- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D9 Density at Design Residue Content pcf
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
LOWHJGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH D l341 6 ll339 1347 1338 1523ss 1500A T 1356 133S 1350 1333 1513 1497A
1~ x l351 l337 1349 1336 1518 1499 sSEA 07 02 02 04 07 02
05 02 02 03CV 05 01
D 1362 1352 1370 1355 1545A 1520ss T 1371 1355 1361 1354 1550 1525
30 A
x 1367 1354 1366 1355 1548 1523 SEA 02 06s 06 01 04 04
05 02 05 01 02 02CV D 1373 1375 1380 1370 1537 1543AC T 1385 1375 137 9 1360 1535 1545AM x 1379 1375 1380 1365 1536 1544s s 09 oo 01 07 01 017
06 ooCV 01 05 01 01
Table DlO ANOVA Summary Density
N O V ll -----middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddotmiddot-- -- --------- -------middot --------------- ----- - - -
smI=pound DF ss F F05 F01
pound 2 2738H9 310369445 153505090 357 605 ~ 2 2273iWlllbull38B9 11369544445 5530 gt35704 357 lj -~5 ~ 1 11-6~2SilllaquollO 12 602500C 524057772 443 R33 n I tpoundlUll11 Jl-69lll45 2-324621e 2 95 4 61 E 2 3131poundpound57 15i5S33J 7 7537nB 357 li os lJ 2 ltClfltSf-57 0433334 21458C6 357 s 05 n~ Iii )l216poundfi6lii 9556667 47372764 295 451
EHJii 11l 3 bull nsilraquorn 2019444
------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -- -middotmiddot-middot ----- -middotmiddot - middot-------
35 23611rJC556
D9
1 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
-0 a gt1 ()
z
diams CMS-7
w C
120 SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure D9 Density at Design Residue Coritent
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
OS--7 1379 aS-7 ]375 IClIS-7 l380 IOlS-7 1365 ISS-30 1548 CMS-7 1544ISS-30~ 1367 SS--30~ J354 SS-30~ 1366 SS-30~ 1355 CMS-7 1536 SS-30 1523
SS-15bull 1351 ss-is~ 1337 SS-15bull 1349 ss-1s 1336 SS-15 1518 SS-15 1499
NJte Values with a omron vertical lme are not statistically different
Figure D10 Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcf
DlO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
Table D11 Air Voids at Design Residue Content
-EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
107
)5
9 10l
91
99
79
99
80
83
8 bull5
84
I s
ICY
U)
Ill 9
B4
10l
03
28
95
06
60
89
14
159
82
02
26
85
01
08
ss 30j
SEA
D A T A
90
93
92
85
92
96
86
84
66
67
74
73
x s
CV
92
02
23
89
05
56
94
03
30
85
01
l 7
67
01
ll
74
01
10
C M s 7
D A T A
77
73
62
61
73
62
63
71
71
65
48
55
x s
CV
75
03
38
62
O~l
12
68
08
u5
67
06
96
68
04
62
52
05
96
Table Dl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids
A ll O V A --e--ee-ee=-==== -- -- middot- -- --- middot- - ------- - middot-----middot----middot ______ __________ ---middot- ----- - ------------- -
iiUEllilE ss ~s F F01
E 45111Hoiii6pound 225l08333 812457541 357 605 ll 1~-lilliillt~~)Q 7930)000 2519405 357 505 IJJ 11 ili$6J4141~ 16469444 59230768 443 8 33 E1 2J53ll3ll -5S5333 4 -2 bull 11755245 295 4 6 1
EJ 15672223 bull 783pound 112 2~131820 357 605 I 21022223 bull 1li 1112 bull 3$35365 357 cs
EampJ 2971111ll J27778 26713286 2 95 4t1 iElllllHgt 5cgt~SiIJOIgt -2790556
-middot--middot ------- --middot - middotmiddot- -middotmiddot--middot-- --3li
D11
11 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
-l
a - 8
-a 0 7gt tc ltI 6
5
4 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dll
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot
middot HIGH LOW
SS-]5amp JlJl ISS-ll5~ 10l
ISS-301 92 SS-311l11 89ICMS-7 75 CS-7 fi2
Air Voids at Design Residue Content
FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
=- 95 I I ISS-15 89 SS-15 82 SS-15 8 5
SS-31 94 SS-30 85 SS-30 74ICMS-7 68
OS-7 68 CMS-7 67 SS-30 67 CMS-7 52
Ngtte Values with a ommn vertical line are not statistically dilferent
Figure D12 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids
Dl2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
middotmiddotEMULSION OUAUTY LEVEL
~- AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
48S 3g_g
295
middot 32 8
439
396
397
418
288
307
223
307
X s
CV
443
64
144
312
23
75
418
30
73
408
15
36
298
13
45
265
59
224
ss 3Wo SEA
0 A T A
400
403
367
283
342
411
392
262
310
32-4
292
236
x s
CV
402
02
05
325
59
183
377
49
130
327
92
281
31 7
10
31
264
40
150
C M s 7
D A T A
235
235
130
120
213
233
150
200
350
350
250
250
x s
CV
235
00
00
125
07
57
223
14
63
175
35
202
350
oo oo
250
00
oo
Table Dl4 ANOVA Swnrnary Stabilometer Value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------A N O V A
---------~----------middot------middot-middotmiddot-- -middot--middot--middotmiddot--middot------ bull middotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middot middot------middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot--- --middotmiddot ---_ -- middotmiddot-middotmiddot-- -- - - - -----ss r r05 r01
2 1 i 7~ Sbull1lfipound5161S 5879033333 332259711 357 605 I 2 igtS895QGDgt 279475000 195117552 357 ~os i ll ~l ~
11 111 2 2
l~illflll1111111 7DS nll3331
1~il])2222] 755J5556
~ 111 8 11111~=-- 10115 834 71011111
37 7502778
275769841 128178912
U938281 251M309
11113 295 357 357
833 4f1 605 605
Ell~ 14middot 3~53lt1$1H 116340278 5750926 295 461 fElilli U 25977~illlllCII~ 1111H72222
------------------------ bull- ~bull OOM---bullbullbullbull- - bull------_________ _
roru
013
w J ltC gt a w 1-w E 0 I-m ltC Ishyen
SBH SBL FH FL
bull SS 15 SEA 5S 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-)Sll 441_3 SS-l 325I SS-JSi 4131 SS-15 40 8 CMS-7 350 SS-15 265
SS-30 402 SS-JSa 31_2I ISS-30~ 377 SS-30~ 327 SS-30 317 SS-30 264
CS-7 235 CMS-7 125 ISS-15 298 CMS-7 250
Nlte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D14 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value
Dl4
-------------------
Table Dl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
ii3
ii2
l7-1
ilJD3
236
76
308
62
112
85
222
180
l s
CY
63
lJ1
10
Jl39
SlJ
363
l56
J13
725
185
174
940
99
19
194
201
30
148
ss 30 SEA
0 A T A
229
306
266
187
78
130
260
136
157
212
186
164
x s
CV
268
55
204
227
56
247
104
37
354
198
88
443
185
39
211
175
16
89
C M s 7
D A T A
80
82
190
180
122
192
245
235
130
120
170
180
x s
CV
81
l
18
185
7
38
157
50
315
240
7
30
125
7 57
175
7
40
Table Dl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value
--------------------middot--------------------------------------------------------------A N O V A
-=====-=-=--=-- ===== ss
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1i712 7222222 83563611111 226671165 357 605 I 2 l~12 lllllliilllllllB9 71144441145 129864 357 605 ~ 1l 251116l 144141llllj 2ti-~H~bull4dimiddot4 4 44 5 71775602 443 833 n l4 37511ll 777JTI7JJ S395bull J 9 ~4middot444 2548 5405 295 4 e 1 poundJ 2 72lllS3SlffiifISlmiddot9 3fi22f9111114UU 9026921 357 6C5
n 2 1 iSigt555S
11321Bl 111111I 117lIT177778
33220277778 1277032 9~11333
357 297
605 461
Eliflll 11 f15357 tlOilOOibull 3ilf65Jgt)oo
---------------------------------------middot-------------------------------------------
D15
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7w
J lt(
gt a w Jshyw I 0-() w
8
O--------r-----r-----------r----r-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
c 1
Figure D15
SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW
SS-3(1JlS 268
81IOS-7
ISS-]5i 63 SS-lSl 139
Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 240 SS-30 185 SS-15 201
SS-lSi 155 SS-30l 198 CMS-7 125 SS-30 175
SS-JOi 104 SS-151 185 SS-15 99 CMS-7 175
Note Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Dl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value
D16
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D17 Swell at Design Residue Content in
EfAULSEON
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDI NO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH lOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 s~
D A T A
048 -
0413
06S
069
on
005
006
008
-025 045
005
004
004
005
009
014
Jt s
CY
HS
0010
000
D68
-003
45
bull 006
002
241
035
010
286
004
001
133
009
005
483
ss 30 SEA
D A T A
023
023
020
063
066
055
000
ooo
008
031
023
028
000 000 003
ooo
001
000
x s
CV
022
002
79
061
006
93
003
005
1732
027
004
148
oin
002
1732
ooo
001
1732
C M s 7
D A T A
000
ooo
000
004
002
001
ooo
ooo
000
003
000
ooo 000 000 ooo
ooo
ooo
000
x s
CV
000
ooo
ooo
002
002
655
ooo
ooo
ooo
001
002
1732
ooo
ooo
ooo
ooo
ooo
000
Table D18 ANOVA Summary Swell ( Transformed Data)
A N O Y A
E 2 _1025326 0912663 2353471(154 329 532 -Amiddot middotmiddot2 1366452 0683226 1761825136 329 532 0 1 0368219 03613219 949521081 1114 7116
EA 11 04627$7 0115697 298345558 266 396 -EQ- 2-- --006-903G- -0(134515-middot -8-9003553 middot3l9 -S-32 A) 2 0150358 ~0075179 193863014 329 532 UO 4 0083986 0020997 54143375 26 396
-ERRORmiddot 36 0139606middot 0003178
-TOTIIL 53 --446-576-11
D17
05 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
04
z -J
J w IJJ
SBH SBL
diams CMS - 7
~oo
_02
01
FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dl7 Swell at Design Residue Content
SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-ll51 ii-IS SS-]5i il68 SS-15 a006 SS-15 bull 035 SS-15 004 SS-15 009I I I I SS-3Cli 022 SS-301 061 ISS-301 003 SS-30 bull 027 ISS-30 bull 001 ISS-30 bull 000
ClS-7 000 CIS-7 002 OS-7 000 OIS-7 001 CMS-7 000 CMS-7 000
NJte Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D18 Newman-Keuls Ranking Swell in
D18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
Table Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSl10N
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOWHIGH 0 156 48 175 229 2lO 125ss A ll5 60 20l ll7 228 120T 13_g 4e 170 132 212 130A15 i 137 52 182 200 2l 7 125 smiddotSEA 2l 37 l7 30 lO 05
1middot5]CY 133 92 148 46 40 D 98 106 lll 76 2l 0 lllAss 203 109 76 5l 235 95T ll3 85 63 59 233 125
30 A
x 138 100 83 62 226 llOSEll s 57 l3 25 l3 l4 l5
412 131 298 206 62 136CV D 2lO 202 185 98 330 240A 220 87 18l 88 345 200C T 216 138 223 77 338 2lOAM x 215 142 196 88 338 217s
5805 23 lls 08 2l7
23 405 ll8 120 22 96CV
Table D20 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Stabilorneter Value
N O V A
-------middot------------------------------------------------------ ---------------DF -$ -F os- r01
pound 2 5919875926 2l59917963 39C147075fl 329 53 2 690 i1111pounda$11 iii 345 022110111 US51521111 329 5 32 Ill 1 763129-i296 763 1296 296 100671B132 414 7 U6
Ea t93 11171111]J)7lll 1007863519 1329576P8 266 391bullIEill -2 middot -E~ti35~259 -23middot0-H9fgt29 C-~6522- middot3 29 532 AO 2 S3amp11171t1137ll 11192351$5 55305370 329 532 El s1111i1r1075 135268519 17~qq579 266 396bullmiddotDll~t 311i 27239~333~ 7 5903711)111
53
--------------------------------------------------------middot-----------------------
D19
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA0)
gt diams CMS - 7 l I
a w 30fshyw E 0 J 2-en ltC Ishyen 10
SBH SSL FH FL GRH GRL01amp---------------------------_
AGGREGATE
Figure Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
middotHtGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
QS-1 235 CS-7 142 196 SS-15 200 CMS-7 338 CMS-7 217GS-
Iss-3H uaI I I ISS-3Qi lilG SS-15i ]S2 IOMS-7 88 SS-30 22~ SS-15 125
SS-151 137 ss-i5~ 52 SS-30~ 83 SS-30 62 SS-15 217 SS-30 110
fute Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent
Figure D20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
D20
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Table D2l MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
-------_cEMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
ss 1 sa
D A T A
x s
HIGH
Ul3 ~ JlU
43
64
IOW
~ TWlI ~
--
H1GH
159 1-43 126
143
17
LOW
123 187
60
123
64
HIGH
130 179 153
154
25
LOW
120 104 143
122
20
CV D A5S T A30 x
SEA s
171
139 88
104
110
26
-98 91 -95
4
116
114 116
69
100
27
515
TWT TWT TWT
--
159
111 101 15~
122
28
160
83 65 63
70
11
CV D AC T AM x5 s
7 CV
236
141 79 52
91
46
503
37
185 60 63
103
71
695
267
125 201
96
141
54
386
-192 164 126
161
33
206
23l
131 130 120
127
6
48
157
72 230
76
126
90
715
Too weak to test
Table D22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
SOO~e 55- -f middotFmiddot OS- F01
pound 2 19956 G31tl3Tt 99780165185 52791162 329 532 -1 2- 223ii~ 92592~-~ middot111544629630 -59015431 3middot29 5 32 J 1 n21lliiilliEiiii~ 1middot112106656666 75185029 414 746 lEJ Ill 32il76711ltCl~lll9l 132191851852 43485622 2euro6 396 ~ 2- ~373hllllllllllllllqSmiddot iiilfgtamp 1222-223- -3bull6middot3300811 -3 29 532 1i 2 1S011Hil12 75i0555556 bull ~397100 329 532 Eli
-a~llt-Iii
36 511J7777777
middot5B11113BB333 12799444444 129e l9 25 92 6middot
5771861 266 396
D21
bull SS 15 SEA U) SS 30 SEA gt diams CMS - 7E I
a w J-~ 200 0 en w5 100 0
SBH SBL FH FL AGGREGATE
GRH GRL
Figure D21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINO FRESNO
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 126SS-15 154]03 JCMS-7 161106-7 rmm SS-15 122CMS-7 127SS-30amp 95 ltMgt-7 ]Aj_ SS-15 123
SS-30 70
t-bte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
SS-30 122SS-151 93 SS-l51 fflT SS-30amp 100 SS-30 TWT
Figure D22 Ne-wman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
D22
Table D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW
ss 15 SEA
ss 30 SEA
C M s 7
HIGH D bullbullmiddot 979 715A middot 1143 569T A 1047 599
X - - 1056 - 628 s - - 82 - 77
CV - - 78 - 123
D 987 1474 548A T 907 1536 433 A 1447 615
x - - 947 1486 532 s - 57 46 92
CV - - 60 31 173 D 642 102 597 588 301A T 620 426 369 60l 263 A 774 662 470 290 3q_3
x 679 397 479 493 31 9
s 83 281 114 176 67
CV 123 709 239 357 21 0
1285 1353 1493
1377
106
77
627 72 2 634
661
53
80
238 284 22 7
250
30
121
Specimen swelled during soak could not ne tested Specimen disintegrated during testing
D23
300
E CJgt -200 en
en 0 J
z0 middot cii 100 lt( cc CD lt(
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
01--------r----T----J-----r----r SBH FH FL GRH GRL
middotAGGREGATE
Figure D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content
D24
APPENDIX E
FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL DESIGNS
Table El
Thickness T in Inches to Satisfyl
Tensile Strain Requirements (Reference 3)
Subirade l~octulus psi 30~0 6000 12000 30oco
Jverage Ann~abullAir erlerature J degF lt40 40-55 55-65 gt65 40 40-55 55-65 gt65 lt40 40-55 55-651gt65 lt4 0 40-55 55-65 gt65
T~affic EALbull 10bull
IllIf psi 50000 4 9 66 7 8 91 37 50 5e 66 2 26 28 29 2 2 2 2
1000~0 37 5 3 62 12 27 40 47 53 2 21 25 26 2 2 2 2
300000 21 J4 4 3 51 2 28 31 middot3 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
600000 2 24 3 2 39 2 2 2 _2 28 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2middot 2 2 2 290JCOO 2 2 26 33 2 2 2 22 2 2 2
Traffic EAL= 10s
trJ MR psi bull 50000 83 ll5 139 165 70 97 112 127 54 1-3 83 93 2 3 27 28 29 f-J
42 58 69 78 2 25 27 27100000 63 90 108 129 54 76 91 105
3COOOO 4o 58 73 8 3 3 51 60 73 24 39 ~8 56 2 2 20 22
600000 28 45 55 67 21 37 47 55 2 21 36 44 2 2 2 2
900000 21 37 4 7 57 2 30 39 48 2 21 29 37 2 I 2 2 2
TraCf1c 2 ~AL a 10~ I ia psi bull 50000 130 161 216 2~ 116 16l 187 213 98 131 151 172 63 66 93 58
82 0100000 98 14) 171 203 68 126 152 176 75 106 125 142 52 7 3
3CCOOO 6o 91 11 3 139 55 82 101 122 4 7 69 86 102 31 49 59 59
e~oooo 46 68 86 106 ~o 60 76 94 3middot 3 52 64 i9 2 35 4 r 54
900~00 37 56 72 69 )2 51 63 80 24 4 3 5 4 67 2 28 3 8 ul Trarr1el EAL~ 10 7
la psi bull 50000 192 24 24 24 178 239 24 24 156 205 235 24 12l 153 165 17 3 I
24 24 228 24 119 168 195 222 95 129 147 1s IlCOOCO 1~5 21 0 13 5 193
56 aa 10a 12 I-3CC000 aa 136 167 205 ~-3 12 156 186 74 11l 138 16~
I- l 6 a2 10060~ 1 ouo 6 4 100 125 156 59 92 ll 6 l~ 5 53 82 104 128
108 3 3 53 6 8 859ccooo 53 82 10 5 132 so 77 97 121 4 ~ 68 86
For asphalt volume Vb= 11 are air voids Va= 5 Use Figure El to correct thickness of other valuemiddots of Vb and Va
Table E2
Subsradlt Mcdulus psi
Thickness T in Inches to Satisfys Subgrade Strain Requirements (Reference 3)
6100 120003000 300CC
tr N
A~erage A~nual Ar Te11perature degF
Traffic EALbull 10bull
~IP psi 50000a
100000
300000
600000
900000
Traffic EAL 10 5
MR psibull 50000
lC0000
300000
600000
900000
Tra~~lc EAL c 1c6
MR psibull 50000
100000
300000
600POO
900000
Trafficz EALbull 10 7
MRt psibull 50000
100000
300000
600000
900000
lt40
55
55
55
55
55
81
81
81
81
81
115
115
115
115
115
155
155
155
155
155
40-55
83
60
55
55
55
121
87
81
Bl
Bl
168
123
11
115
ll5
226
165
155
155
155
55-65 gt65 lt40
108 115 46
73 82 46
55 55 46
5_ 45
55 55 46
145 165 69
106 120 69
a1 81 69
81 81 69
81 81 69
201 224 98
14B 165 98
115 115 98
115 115 98
115 115 98
24 24 1)6
199 222 135
15 155 136
155 155 136
155 155 136
40-55
10
50
46
46
46
103
74
69
69
69
150
108
98
98
9B
204
150
135
136
136
55-65 G5 lt40
83 93 30
61 70 30
46 46 30
45 46 30
46 46 30
124 139 55
91 102 55
69 69 55
69 69 55
69 69 55
173 193 83
130 147 83
98 98 83
98 98 83
98 98 83
239 24 120
179 199 120
136 136 120
136 136 120
135 136 120
40-55
4
3~
30
30
30
83
60
55
55
55
122
90
83
83
83
17 5
130
120
middot12 o
120
55-65 gt65 lt~O
62 69 25
46 53 25
30 30 25
30 30 25
30 30 25
9 106 29
82 29i 2 middot 55 55 29
55 55 29
55 55 29
144 15S 60
108 12l 60
83 83 60
83 83 60
83 83 6 0
205 226 90
155 112 90
120 120 90
120 120 90
120 120 90
40-55
31
25
25
25
25
52
30
29
29
29
86
65
60
60
60
127
98
90
90
90
55-65 bull65
33 35
29 3c
25 25 I 25 25 i 25 2s
51 67
47 52
29 29
29 29
29 29
95 10
76 85
60 I 6C
6C i 6o 50
14bull 3 14
112 126
90 90
90 90
90 90
Tj In Tc In 24 2 22
20
18
16 3
14
12 4
~ 10 Va+ vb 5
099
8 08 6
077 7 06
6 805
9045 1003
4 12
14
3 16
18
20
22 2 24
Figure El Correction of Pavement Design Thickness for Air Voids and
Asphalt Content of Mix (Reference 3)
E3
-------
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000 psi
MAAT 55- 65 F-Ul 400 CL
C) 0 300 (J) J
~ 200 0 ~
I- 100z w J-(J) 0+----------------------C w 0 2 4 6 8 middot10 12
THICKNESS IN
1X104 EAL
1X105EAL
Figure E2 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
M-AAT )65 F- -~---Ul 400 1x104 EALCL
CW)
0 300 (J) J 200C 0 ~
-~ 100 w -J -(J) 0w 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a
THICKNESS IN
1X105EAL
Figure E3 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 6000 psi MAAT = )65F
s
E4
w 400 c
()
0 300 () - 200 Cl 0 E
~ 100 w J-
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT 56-65 F
1x10 EALI 4
I 1X105 EAL
w o~---------------------r-w 1 2 3 4a
THICKNESS IN
Figure E4 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT )65F-w 400 4I 1X10 EALc () I 1X105EAL 0 300 I () I - I 200C I0 E I I- 100z w I-J I-() 0w 1 2 3 4c
THICKNESS IN~
Figure ES Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65Fs
ES
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
MAAT 55-65 F-en400 41X10 EALIC
(I) 1X105EAL middot 0
I I 300
en I J 200C 0
f-- 100z w J-en 0LU 2 4 6 8 10 14a
-THICKNESS IN
Figure E6 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
MmiddotAAT )65 F cn4oo I 1X104 EALa
(I) 1X105EAL 0 300
I I
en -I
~200 0 ~ 100 LU --en -I
0-1-----------------------LU 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a THICKNESS IN
Figure E7 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = )65F
E6
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT 55-65 F-u 400 41x10 EAL0
M 1x105EAL 0 T- 300 -en J 200C 0 E I- 100z w-J- en 0w C 0 middot1 2 3 4 middot5 6
THICKNESS IN
Figure E8 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000psi
M-AAT )65 F-en400
I --- - - ~- 1X104 EAL
C
a 1X105 EAL
0 I T- 300
I-en J
200 C 0 E
I- 100z w J-en 0w 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
THICKNESS IN
Figure E9 Thickness For Subgrade StrainRequirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65F
s
E7
Table E3
Thickness Requirements inches
= 6000 psi EAL= 1 X 104 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
MrT
l
CF Tc Ts
246000 34
64 37 43
300000 31
68 4middot 0 43
391000 27
lt 61 33 43
362000 28
64 31 43
260000 28
bull bull 61 35 43
333000 30
65 33 43
C M s 0
Mr Ti CF T Tc
s
259000 29
59 36 43
288000 32
bull 61 3 8 43
271000 32
59 39 43
339000 30
60 37 43
284000 32
59 40 43
365000 29
60 37 43
C M s 7
M T7
l
CF TTc
s
71000 55
65 60 43
103000 47 71
45 43
74000 54
67 53 43
123000 44 69
45 43
85000 52
65 54 43
123000 44
73 46 43
ss 15
M T7
l
CF T Tc s
298000 31
57 40 43
285000 32
59 38 43
365000 28
58 37 43
334000 30
61 36 43
320000 30
60 36 43
329000 30
61 36 43
ss 30
M T7
l
CF Tc Ts
296000 31
60 37 43
296000 31
62 36 43
339000 30
59 38 43
335000 30
bull 63 35 43
313000 31
65 34 43
309000 31
65 34 43
Ngtte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi TI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume middotTc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= llrickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
E8
Table E4
Thickness Requirements inches
Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
246000 68
64 74 70
300000 62 68
62 68
391000 55 61
65 68
362000 57 64
63 68
260000
57 bull 61
68 70
333000 59 65
65 68
C M s 0
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
259000 65 59
80 70
288000 63
bull 61 75 68
271000 64 59
78 70
339000 59 60
72 68
284000 63 59
78 68
365000 57 60
70 68
C M s 7
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
71000 100
bull 65 107 105
103000 90 bull 71
84 88
74000 100
67 102 104
123000 85 69
85 81
85000 95 65
102 97
123000 85 73
78 81
ss 15
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
298000 62 57
78 68
285000 63 59
76 68
365000 57 58
72 68
334000 59 61
72 68
320000 60 60
73 68
329000 59 61
70 68
ss 30
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
296000 62
60 74 68
296000 62
62 71 68
339000 59 59
72 68
335000 59
63 68 68
313000 60
bull 65 65 68
309000 60
65 65 68
1bte
M = Resilient mJdulus in psirf = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
E9
Table ES
Thickness Requirements inches 4
Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M Tdeg
J
CF T Tc
246000 40
64 46 45
300000middot 37 68
37 43
391000 33 61
38 43
362000 35
64 39 43
260000 39
61 45 45
333000 35
65 38 43
C M s 0
MT J
CF T Tc
s
259000 39 59
48 45
288000 38 61
middot4 6 44
271000 38 59
47 44
339000 35 60
43 43
284000 38 59
46 44
365000 35 60
43 43
C M s 7
M T7
J CF T Tc
s
71000 60 65
65 68
103000 52 71
48 64
74000 60 67
60 68
123000 50 bull 69 59 62
85000 58 65
63 67
123000 50 73
49 62
ss 15
M T7
J CF T Tc
s
298000 37 57
50 43
285000 38 59
48 44
365000 35 58
45 43
334000 35 61
43 43
320000 3 6
60 44 43
329000 37 61
45 43
ss 30
M T7
J CF TTc
s
296000 37 60
45 43
296000 37 62
43 43
339000 35 59
44 43
335000 35 bull 63
41 43
313000 36
65 39 43
309000 36
65 39 43
Nrte
M = Resilient nodulus in psiTI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T
5 = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El0
Table E6
Thickness Requirements inches
105E = 6000 psi EAL= 1 x psi MAAT = )65Fs
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
246000
79 64
87 70
300000
74 68
74 70
391000 69
61 81 70
362000 70
64 77 70
260000 77
61 90 70
333000 71
65 77 70
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 77
59 94 70
288000 75
61 90 70
271000 76
59 92 70
339000 71
60 87 70
284000 75
59 91 70
365000 69
60 85 70
C M s 7
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
71000 111
65 118 112
103000 103
middot11 95 98
74000 111
67 110 11l
123000 98
69 95 93
85000 109
65 119 109
123000 98
73 87 93
ss 15
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
298000 74 57
94 70
285000 7 5 59
94 70
365000 69 58
88 70
334000 7 1 middot 61
84 70
320000 72 60
87 70
329000 71 61
84 70
ss 30
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
296000 74
60 90 70
296000 74
62 86 70
339000 71 59
87 70
335000 71
63 82 70
313000 73
bull 65 78 70
309000 73
65 78 70
Note
M = Resilient midulus in psi11 = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness f9r tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade stram requirements inches
Ell
Table E7
Thickness Requirements inches4
= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
middot~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO -GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
246000 2 0
64 23 25
300000 20
68 2middot 0 25
391000 20
61 24 25
362000 20
64 23 25
260000 20
61 24 25
333000 20
65 22 25
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 20
59 25 25
288000 20
bull 61 24 25
271000 20
59 25 25
339000 20
60 25 25
284000 20
59 25 25
365000 20
60 25 25
C M s 7
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
71000 20
65 22 31
103000 20
middot71 20 29
74000 20
67 21 31
123000 20
69 20 28
85000 20
65 22 30
123000 20
73 20 28
ss M T7
l
298000 20
285000 20
365000 20
334000 20
320000 2 0
329000 20
15 CF T Tc
s
57 26 25
59 25 25
58 26 25
61 24 25
bull 60 25 25
61 24 2 i
ss 30
M T7
l
CF TTc
s
296000 20
60 25 25
296000 20
62 24 25
339000 20
59 25 25
335000 20
bull63 23 25
313000 20
65 22 25
309000 20
65 22 25
N)te
M = Resilient nodulus in psi middot T7 = Unrorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inchesct= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume T = Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T~ = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El2
Table E8
Thickness Requirements inches
Es= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s
M T7
l
246000 22
300000 20
391000 20
362000 20
260000 21
333000 20
s 0
CF T Tc
s
64 24 32
68 20 29
61 24 29
64 23 29
61 24 l 1
65 23 29
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 21 59
25 31
288000 21
bull 6J 24 30
271000 21 59
25 30
339000 20 60
25 29
284000
21 59
25 1 n
365000
20 60
25 2 q
C M
M T7
l
71000 27
103000 25
74000 27
123000 24
85000
26
123000
24 s 7
CF T Tc
s
65 28 53
71 24 45
bull 67 28 53
69
23 43
65
27 49
73
22 43
ss M T7
l
298000 20
285000 21
365000 20
334000 20
320000 20
329000 20
15 CF
TTc
s
57 27 29
59 26 30
58 27 29
61 24 29
60 25 29
61 24 2 q
ss 30
M r~i CF T Tc
s
296 ooomiddot 20 60
24 29
296000 20 62
23 29
339000 20 59
24 29
335000 20 63
23 29
313000 20 65
23 29
309000 20 65
23 29
i-krte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psiTf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade strain requirements inches
El3
Table E9
Thickness Requirements inches 4 = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
EMULSION __ QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
246000 20 64
23 25
300000 20 68
21 25
391000 20 61
24 25
362000 20 64
23 25
260000 20 61
24 25
333000 20 65
22 25
C M s 0
259000 20 59
26 25
288000 20
bull 61 middot24 25
271000 20 59
26 25
339000 20 60
25 25
284000 20 59
26 25
365000 20 60
25 25
C M s 7
MT7
1 CF T Tc
s
71000 20 65
22 58
103000 2~0 middotn
20 52
74000 20 67
21 58
123000 20 69
20 48
85000
20 65
22 57
123000
20 73
20 48
$$
15
MTdeg
1
CF T Tc
s
-298 000 20 57
27 25
285000 20 59
26 25
365000 20 58
26 25
334000 20 61
24 25
320000 2 0 60
25 25
329 000 20 61
24 25
ss 30
MT7
1
CF T Tc
s
296000 20 60
25 25
296000 20 62
24 25
339000 20 59
26 25
335000 20 63
23 25
313000 20 65
22 25
309000 20 65
22 25
tote
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot rf = Unagtrrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El4
Table ElO
Thickness Requirements inches 5E = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
s
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T--deg
J
CF T Tc
s
246000
24 64
27 31
300000
23 68
24 29
391000
22 61
25 29
362000
22 64
2_s 29
260000
26 61
31 30
333000
22 65
24 29
C M s 0
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s
259000 23
59 28 30
288000 23
bull 61 27 30
271000 23
59 28 30
339000 22
60 26 29
284000 23
59 28 30
365000 21
60 25 29
C M s 7
ss 15
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s M T--deg
J
CF T Tc
s
71000 28
bull 65 30 61
298000 23 57
25 29
103000 27
~ 71 27 52
285000 23 59
28 30
74000 28
bull 67 28 60
365000 22
58 28 29
123000 26
69 26 48
334000 22 61
25 29
85 000 28
65 31 58
320000 22
60 26 29
123000 26
73 24 48
329000 22 61
25 29
55
30
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s
296000 23
60 27 29
296000 23
62 27 29
339000 22 59
27 29
335000 22
63 25 29
313000 22
65 24 29
309000 23
65 25 29
tbte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot Tf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Ihickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
II11~~~1~~i~IIII 08860 ElS
100 CONCLUSIONS
Based on testing mixture designs and analyses pershyformed with the materials studied during this investishygation several conclusions regarding the use of solshyvent free asphalt and sulfur-extended asphalt emulshysions with aggregates from California may be drawn
101 Solvent Free Asphalt Emulsions
A summary of ANOVA significant at the 95 percent confidence level is tabulated in Table 33 This table shows for nearly all dependent variables that emulsion type aggregate quality level and aggreshygate are significant effects For several paramshyeters several interactions are also significant Conclusions reached during the asphalt emulsion experiment are
1 Stable solvent free cationic slow set and catshyionic medium set asphalt emulsions can be proshyduced which meet Caltrans specifications for cationic emulsionse
2 Solvent free cationic asphalt emulsions can effectively coat aggregates with minus No 200 mesh contents in excess of 10 percent and sand equivalent values as low as 15 Greater degrees of coating are obtained with solvent free catshyionic slow set emulsions than with solvent free cationic medium set emulsions
3 In the laboratory and for the materials used in this study greater degrees of compaction can be obtained using a conventional cationic medium set emulsion which contains 7 percent solvent than with solvent free asphalt emulsions
4 Higher stabilometer values cohesiometer values and resilient moduli are obtained for laboratory mixtures containing low quality aggregates with the solvent free asphalt emulsions than with the emulsion containing solvent This is believed due to the higher viscosity of the solvent free emulsion residues when compared to the residue from the emulsion containing solvent
88
Table 33
SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL
ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT
DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS A a E AQ AE OE AQE
Emulsion Conpatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA - NA - NA NA
2 Day bdulus y y y - y y y
Full cure Ddulus y y y - - - -Density y y y - - - -Air Voids y y y - - - -
Stabilometer y y y y Y y -Cohesiometer y y y y y - -MVS Stabilometer y y y - y y -MVS Cohesiometer - - y - - - -SWell y y y y y y y
Surface Abrasion y y y y y y y
LEGEND
Effects
A = effect of aggregate type Q = effect of aggregate quality level E = effect of emulsion type
AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction
AQE = three-way interaction
Significance
Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level
NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way
89
5 Laboratory specimens containing solvent free asphalt emulsions experience higher losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivity procedure than specishymens with the asphalt emulsion containing solshyvent This effect however may be related to the lesser degrees of compaction attained when using the solvent free asphalt emulsions as comshypared to the emulsion containing solvent
6 Laboratory specimens which contained the solvent free asphalt emulsions with lower quality aggreshygates experienced higher amounts of swell and greater surface abrasion losses than specimens with the emulsion containing solvent
7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the solvent free asphalt emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thicknesses are required when using solvent free emulsions It is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials which may be an important factor in field performance
8 Most of the paving mixtures investigated which contained the low quality aggregates and the solvent free asphalt emulsions met stabilometer requirements for Caltrans Type C asphalt conshycrete However only three of the mixtures also met moisture vapor susceptibility and swell requirements Mixtures which met these requireshyments were - FH with CSS-0 emulsion GRH with CMS-0 emulsion and GRH with CMS-7 emulsion
9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other considershyations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others
90
- - - --- ----------
102 Sulfur-Extended-Asphalt Emulsions
A summary of ANOVA significance at the 95 percent confidence level is shown in Table 34 This table showsmiddotfor nearly all parameters that emulsion type aggregate quality level and aggregate are signifishycant effects For several parameters several interactions are also significant Conclusions reached during the SEA emulsion experiment are
1 Stable solvent free water based anionic slow set emulsions using sulfur-extended-asphalt (SEA) base stocks can be produced which meet most Caltrans specifications for anionic slow set emulsions
2 Anionic SEA emulsion can effectively coat both low and high quality aggregates
3 Use of SEA emulsions resulted in higher resilshyient modulus values for both low and high qualshyity aggregates than use of the emulsion containshying solvent
4 Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions had higher stabilometer values with low quality aggregates than mixtures with the emulsion containing solshyvent
5 Specimens containing the SEA emulsion with low quality aggregates swelled to a greater extent and experienced higher surface abrasion losses than those with the emulsion containing solvent
6 Specimens containing the SEA emulsions experishyence greater losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivshyity procedure than specimens with the solvent asphalt emulsion indicating a greater sensitivshyity to moisture
7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thickshynesses would be required when using SEA emulshysions Again it is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials
91
Table 34
SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL
SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT
DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS
effect of aggregate type effect of aggregate quality level effect of emulsion type
AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction
A a E AQ AE QE AQE
Emulsion Compatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA y NA y NA NA
2 Day Mxfalus y y y - y y y
Full Cure Mldulus y - y - - - -Density y y y - - y y
Air Voids y y y - - - -
Stabilometer - y y - y - -
COhesiometer - y - - - - -MIS Stabilaneter y y y y y - -
MVS COhesianeter y y y - y y -y
~ y y y y y y
Surface Abrasion
LEGEND
Effects
A = Q = E =
AQE = three-way interaction
Significance
Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level
NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way
92
8 All of the paving mixtures containing low qualshyity aggregates and SEA emulsions studied met Caltrans stabilometer requirements (30 minimum) for Type C asphalt concrete however several mixtures did not meet swell and moisture vapor susceptibility requirements for Type C asphalt concrete Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions which met swell requirements were FH GRH and GRL with SS-15 SEA emulsion and SBH FH FL GRH and GRL with SS-30 SEA emulsion MVS conshyditioned stabilometer value requirements were met only by FL and GRH with the SS-15 SEA emulshysion and GRH with the SS-30 SEA emulsion
9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other consider~ ations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others
93
110 RECOMMENDATIONS
111 This study has investigated the properties of paving mixtures containing several low quality aggregates and several types of emulsified binders Test methshyods and criteria used to design and assess mixture characteristics were those specified for hot-mix asphalt concrete in California An objective of the research study is to determine if solvent free emulshysified binders can be used in place of cutback asphalt binders Therefore in order to permit drawing of appropriate conclusions from the data presented in this report on the effectiveness of the emulsions studied for replacing cutback asphalts additional laboratory work is required It is suggested that properties and characteristics of mixtures containing the project aggregates and cutshyback asphalts be determined The study should evalshyuate the same properties considered in this study Determination of mixture characteristics using cutshyback binders would permit direct comparisons between the cutback and emulsified binder systems and the drawing of more definite conclusions Additionally a study which would determine properties of mixtures containing hot-mixed asphalt cement would be of aid in evaluating results
112 After completion of the additional laboratory studshyies if results so indicate it is recommended that several field experimental studies using aggregates ranging in quality from low to high with solvent free emulsified asphalt binders be undertaken Projects should be constructed in several climatic regions in California (wet and arid) and should include control sections containing both cutback and if possible hot-mixed asphalts Proper labshyoratory mixture designs construction control and field monitoring of results and performance should be used Results of these experiments should proshyvide indications of performance of the various mixtures in actual use
113 Results of this study indicate that mixtures conshytaining the SEA binders are detrimentally affected by moisture to a greater degree than with standard emulsions However performance of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions may be adequate in arid regions Therefore it is recommended that in order
94
to further investigate the usefulness of paving mixshytures containing the SEA emulsions that field experimental test sections using the SEA emulsions be constructed and evaluated$
It is strongly suspected that the moisture vapor susceptibility of the solvent free asphalt emulsion mixes evaluated herein could be reduced by a slight modification of the emulsion formulations This possibility should be evaluated
95
References
1 Request For Proposals Investigation Into The Nature Of Emulsified Asphalts Compatible With California Local Aggregates And Substitution Of Sulfur For Asphalt In Aqueous Emulsified Systems California Air Resource Board Research Division Sacramento Calishyfornia March 1980
2 American Society for Testing and Materials 1981 Annual Book of Standards Part 15 Road Paving Bituminous Materials Travelled Surface Characterisshytics Philadelphia PA 1981
3 Interim Guide to Full-Depth Asphalt Paving Using Varshyious Asphalt Mixes The Asphalt Institute Pacific Coast Division PCD-1 January 1976
4 Kennepahl GJA Logan A and Bean D C Conshyventional Paving Mixes with Sulfur-Asphalt Binders Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975
5 Deme Imants Processing of Sand-Asphalt-Sulfur Mixes Proceedings AAPT Volume 43 1974
6 A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual The Asphalt Instishytute Manual Series No 19 MS-19) March 1979
7 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Use of Cutback Asphalt US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Waste Management Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park North Carolina October 17 1977
8 Highway Chemicals Newsletter Armak Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois Fall 1981
9 Bitumils Mix Manual Chevron USA Asphalt Division January 1977
10 Asphalt Pavement Engineering Wallace Hugh A and Martin J Rogers McGraw Hill Book Company New York 1967
11 Spahr J D The Use of Emulsified Asphalt in Conshystruction and Maintenance Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975
96
12 Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design Asphalt Emulsions Volume 4 1977
13 Dybalski J N 11 The Chemistry of Asphalt Emulsions Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D C January 1976
14 Beagle C w Deflection and Performance of Deep Lift Asphalt Emulsion Base Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976
15 Meier w J Asphalt Emulsion Construction on the Navajo Reservation Twenty-Fifth Annual Arizona Conshyference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 22-23 1976
16 Kallas B F and Shock J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Find Report - Parts I and
11II Research Report 77-1 The Asphalt Institute November 1977
17 Shook J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Analysis of Performance Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976
18 Wimberly C M Emulsified Asphalt Mixes in Arizona Proceedings 24th Annual Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 17-18 1975
19 Izalt J O Galloway B M and Saylock D SandshyAsphalt-Sulfur Pavement Experimental Project Highway US 77 Kennedy County Texas Texas Transportation Institute April 1977
20 McBee w c and Sullivan T A Direct Substitution of Sulfur for Asphalt In Paving Materials 11 Report of Investigations 8303 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines 1978
21 Ludwig A C Gerhardt B B and Dale JM Materials and Techniques for Improving the Engineering Properties of Sulfur Report No FHWA-RD-80-023 Fedshyeral Highway Administration June 1980
22 Jiminez R A and Stakes K J Effects of Heat and Air on the Viscosity of Sulfur-Asphalt Mixtures Preshysented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies San Diego California February 16-18 1981
97
23 Chehovits J G and Anderson D A Upgrading of Marginal Aggregates for Improved Water Resistance of Asphalt Concrete Transportation Research Record 762 pages 46-52 1981
24 Rosner JC and Chehovits J G Highway Binder Materials From Modified Sulfur-Water Emulsionsn Report No FHWARD-82035 Federal Highway Administration November 1981
25 Standard Specifications State of California Department of Transportation January 1978
26 Applied Linear Statistical Models Neter I and Wasserman w Richard D Irwin Inc Homewood Illinois 1974
27 Burr I W and Foster LA A Test For Equality of variances Mimeograph Series No 282 Statistics Department Purdue University Lafayette Indiana 1972
28 Applied Statistical Methods Burr I W Academic Press Inc New York 1974
29 Parr W K Field Observations of the Behavior of Bituminous Pavements As Influenced By Moisture 11 ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 3-16--I959
30 Rice JM Relationship of Aggregate Characteristics to the Effect of Water on Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 17-34 1959
31 Lettman R P and Johnson D L 11 Pressure Induced Stripping in Asphaltic Concrete Highway Research Record 340 pages 13-28 1970
32 Waller F H Jr Emulsion Mix Design Methods An Overview 11 Transportation Research Record 754 1980
33 Design of Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures Report R6-350(74) US Forest Service 1974
34 11Mix Design Procedure For Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Pavement FHWA Region 10 Office of Federal Highway Projects
98
35 Darter M I Ahlfield S R Wilky P L and Wasill R G Development of Emulsified Asphalt Aggregate Cold Mix Design Procedure Research Report 505-5 Department of Civil Engineering University of Illinois 1978
36 A A Gadallah L E Wood and E J Yoder A Suggested Method for the Preparation and Testing of Asphalt-Emulsion-Treated Mixtures Using Marshall Equipment Proceedings AAPT Volume 46 1977
37 Marshall Stability Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois
38 Jiminez R A Final Report-Phase I Asphalt Emulsion Treated Aggregates University of Arizona Research Report HPR-1-13(150) January 1977
39 George K P Interim Report on Criteria for Emulshysified Asphalt Stabilization of Sandy Soils Univershysity of Mississippi for Mississippi State Highway Department October 1976
40 Fong G K Mix Design Methods for Base and Surface Courses Using Emulsified Asphalt A State-of-the-Art Report Report No FHWA-RD-78-113 Federal Highway Administration October 1978
41 Schmidt R J A Practical Method for Measuring the Resilient Modulus of Asphalt-Treated Mixes Highway Research Record 404 1972
42 Manual of Test Volume 2 State of California Department of Transportation Transporation Laboratory Third Edition 1978
43 Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete Manual Series No 2 (MS-2) The Asphalt Institute March 1979
99
-
APPENDIX A
OPTIMUM FLUIDS AT COMPACTION DATA
-
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table Al
Percent Residue
631 631 631
702 702 702
595 595 595
678 678 678
689 689 689
645 645 645
Fluids at Compaction Data css-o
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
467 367 216
1098 998 847
571 413 360
1273 1115 10 62
455 370 341
1050 965 936
590 450 400
1268 1128 1078
492 183 109
1181 872 798
404 311 139
1049 956 784
Dry Density
(pcf)
1304 1337 1347
1283 1326 1306
133l 1310 9 1317
1328 1295 1304
1404 1529 154 1
1429 1466 1462
Al
css-o CSS-0HIGH QUALITY155- DRY LOW QUALITYbull SAN BERNARDINO 1551
bull SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO 150-I I 150 FRESNObull GRANITEROCK bull GRANITEROCK
I ~
145 LoPT=B5 145 () () - -0 0
~140 gt1401 L- 0 PT= 85 OPT=100gt-i
N Cl) OPT=100 Cl)
DRYZ 135 Z 135w w Cl Cl
amp130 amp130 Cl 0
125 125
120 I i I I i I i I I I 120 I I J I I i I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure Al Fluids at Compaction Figure A2 Fluids at Compaction High Quality Aggre-gate CSS-0 Low Quality CSS-0
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A2
Percent Residue
605 605 605
704 704 704
595 595 595
695 695 695
556 556 556
604 604 604
Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-0
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
4 16 316 183
1021 921 788
494 389 262
1198 1093
966
529 392 360
1124 987 955
519 479 301
1214 1174
996
284 187 124
840 743 680
319 256 165
923 860 769
Dry Density
(pcf)
1331 131 6 1316
1305 1320 1313
1282 1313 1312
1321 1298 1279
1478 1479 1463
1452 1463 1453
A3
155 CMS-0 HIGH QUALITY
150~ DRY bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
145 bull GRANITEROCK72_ OPT=90 0 0
~140gt-ii OPT=105i Cl)
Z 135 w 0
gt- D~0 130 middot 0
125 [OPT100
120 I i I i i I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A3 Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-0
155] 150
0 1451 0
~140gt- Cl)
Z 135 w 0
fc130 0
125
120 I 6
CMS-0
LOW QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
bull GRANITEROCK
v[A OPTf90
pound 0 PT12DoOPTr110
7 I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A4 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-0
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A3
Percent Residue
769 769 769
746 746 746
595 595 595
714 714 714
570 570 570
587 587 587
Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-7
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
460 391 294
1229 1160 1063
573 436 301
13 19 1182 1047
513 380 2 57
1108 975 852
513 404 334
1227 1118 1048
231 170 080
801 740 650
263 146 109
850 733 6096
Dry Density
(pcf)
1329 1377 1376
1335 135l 134 2
1357 1333 1342
1299 1317 1308
1519 1523 1498
1503 1517 1514
AS
CMS-7 155-- HIGH QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNOlSO~ nPT80 145
0 -0 -140 middot gt-
r t deg Cl)
Z 135 w Cl
fi130 Cl
125-1
120 I 6
GRANITEROCK
~OPT=105
IJ
I 7
I I i I i I 8 9 10 11 12 13
TOTAL FLUIDS
I 14
I 15
Figure AS Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-7
155
150
145
0 -0
gt--140
t Cl)
Z 135 w Cl
fc 130 Cl
125
120 I 6
CMS-7 LOW QUALITY
C bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
GRANITEROCKOPT 80
~OPT105
~
tos i I I i J i i I I 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A6 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-7
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A4
Percent Residue
765 765 765 765 765 765
815 815 815 815 815 815
765 765 765
817 817 817 817 817 8el7
574 574 574
738 738 738 738 738 738
Fluids at Compaction Data SS 15 SEA
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
563 426 315 580 346 178
1328 1191 1080 1345 1111
943
595 418 309 599 256 137
14 10 1233 1124 1414 1071 952
600 440 356
1365 1205 1121
683 541 418 629 457 283
1500 1358 1235 1446 1274 1100
374 247 128
948 821 702
451 301 175 435 186 073
1189 1039
913 1173
924 811
Dry Density
(pcf)
1289 1319 1335 1286 1331 1332
1278 1314 1315 1276 1304 1299
1281 1325 1313
1259 1290 1303 1275 1292 1294
1450 1485 1482
1428 1459 1468 1437 1465 1465
A7
bull bull
SS 15 SEA 155 HIGH QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot
150 FRESNO
bull GRANITEROCK
145
0 0 -
OPT=75
-_ gt=140 I-ii OPT100co C)
z 135 w _--0PTr1200
gt-0 130--0
125
120 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A7 Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 15 SEA
SS 15 SEA LOW QUALITY155
bull SAN BERNARDINO-
FRESNO 150
bull GRANITEROCK 145
~-0 0 LOPT=80a140gt-t Cf)
Z135 w r-OPT=105 0
gt-0 130 -~middot 0
OPT120J 125
120 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure AB Fluids at Compaction Low Quality SS 15 SEA
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table AS
Percent Residue
688 688 688
722 722 722 722 722 722
680 680 680 680 6 80 680
726 726 7 26 726 726
510 510 510
596 596 596 596 596 596
Fluids at Compaction Data SS 30 SEA
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
595 468 150
1283 1156
838
645 438 267 660 566 440
1367 1160
989 1382 1288 1162
650 531 432 629 422 332
1330 1211 1112 1309 1102 1012
767 614 443 547 370
1493 1340 1169 1273 1096
413 300 167
923 810 677
468 3 46 191 485 258 096
1064 942 787
10 ~ 81 854 692
Dry Density
(pcf)
1299 1337 1332
1286 1319 1324 1281 1302 1326
129l 1315 1333 1294 1333 131 5
1259 1278 1322 1294 1313
1464 1509 1496
1435 1472 1499 1426 1487 1476
A9
SS 30 SEASS 30 SEA LOW QUALITY
155 HIGH QUALITY 1551 bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddotbull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO
FRESNO 150150-I -middotmiddot-- -bull --middotmiddot I ~ t -- a GRANITEROCK a GRANITEROCK
145145
~-bull80 0 --0 00 ~140~140
J-gt- gt-~ I- = OPT=100 Cl)0 Cl) [Ij 135Z 135
lJJ Cl
gt- ~1300 130 middot ClCl ( 0
OPT=110 125~ OPT=115125
120-t----~--------------r---120 I l J J J I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 156 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS TOT AL FLUIDS
Figure A9 Fluids at Compaction Figure AlO Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 30 SEA Low Quality SS 30 SEA
-~
i
APPENDIX B
MIXTURE DESIGN DATA
TABLE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality css-o Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absortied Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
lhit Weight pcf
StabiJcneter Value
~iareter Value
Jesilient -bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
500
----------
40
u 30 ltgt
ffi 20 w ~10
m lt
o
w l 400 lt gt a w t 300 0 iii ~ 200 8
100 12
10111
ui 0
i5 8gt lt
6
4
50
21740
24488
112
194
100
400
1357
375
197
117
345
60
21823
24163
97
199
100
500
1362
330
207
134
271
70
21772
23853
87
208
100
600
1359
272
193
118
260
Iesign 7 0
87
208
100
600
1359
272
193
118
260
24
22d c lt i
20i
= 0 i5
18 gt
16
140
138 - a
~136 z w 0
134
132
bull 500 a
0 400 uil 300 0
~ 200 zi 100 iii w a
--
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE CONTENT Jo (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Bl
TABLE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residue 0intent 50 60 70 Dsian 7 o
Bulk Siecipoundic Gravity 21804
llleoretical Specipoundic Gravity 24280
Air Voids 102
VMA 192
Absorbed Asphalt 063
Efpoundective Asphalt 437
Unit Weight pf 1361
Stabilcirieter Value 427
Cbhesicireter Value 352
Fesilielt Mxlulus 103psi
2-day 85
middotFinlJ 355
50
40
_ gt a 30 w w
~ 20 10
500
300
200
100
8
6
4
l 400 gt
~ w 0
~ 8
12
_ 10
= 0 gt
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
21863 21992
23964 23660
88 71 71
197 200 200
063 063 063
537 637 637
1364 1372 1372
363 313 313
292 234 234
63 83 83 429 232 232
24
22
ci i
20i
= = 0 gt
18
16
138
p6 ~ Q
134 a w
o 132
130
500 Q -
o 400 --3 300 0 ~-~ 200 a ~ 100 w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COtlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
B2
TABLE B3 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllroretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
~fective Asphalt
Unit Weight middotCf
Stabilareter VaJue
Cbhesiareter VaJue
Resilient l-bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
so
11140 gt o30 IU w ~20
m
10
w l 400 gt 0
~ 0 ~ 200 8
100
14
12 11-
In Q
ho C
8
6
50 60 70 Dsi9 7 O 21308 21729 21595 24562 24235 23922
132 103 97 97 210 202 215 215 113 113 113 113 387 487 587 587
1329 1356 1348 1348 378 345 375 375
314 270 280 280
82 96 104 104 281 260 267 267
500
300 ~
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS
24
11-22ci
ltI i i 20 Cl) Q 180 gt
16
138
136 u - 134 Cl) z IU Q
132
130
bull500
400 Inl 300 Q bull~ 200 z ~ 100middot IU 0
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS
FIGURE B3 Mixture Design Data Sari Bernardin6 High Quality CMS o Replication 1
B3
TABLE B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue GJntent
Bulk seecific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity
50
21491
24334
60
21459
24014
70
21526
23709
Iesiqn 70
Air Voids 117 106
VMA 204 212
Absocbed Asphalt 0 72 o 72
Effective Asphalt 428 528
Unit Weight pcf 1341 133 9
Stabilrneter Value 437 406
GJhesiareter Value 337 248 3
Iesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-cay
Final
50
w 40 gt 0 30 w w 0 20 co 10
500
w
3 400 gt 0 w t- 300 w 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
_ 10
0 8gt -lt
6
4
FIGURE
61 66
410 318
24
22~ ci
i 20
~
18 a gt
16
138
_136 u a 134 z ~ w 0
132
130
bull500
a
a 400 -3 300 _ a ~ 200 z ~ 100-
w 0
90 90
21 7 21 7
0 72 072
628 628
1343 1343
344 J44
252 252
82 82
250 250
---------
D 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDU CONTENT I (A_GGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B4
TABLE BS Mixture Design Data San Bernardin9 High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Siecific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
lir Voids
VMA
2bserberl Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stalgtilaneter Value
Cbhesiareter Value 3
Resilient Mgtdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
40
Ill 30 lt( gt a 20 Ill Ill 0 10
~ iii lt CII 0
400
Ill
3 300 lt(
gt a Ill200 == 0
~100 c 8
0
12
10 ui 0
0 8gt 5 lt(
6
4
FIGURE
~
~
5 6 7 84 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
50 60 70 Cesian 70
21652
24484
21904
24149
22005
23828
116
198
107
3-93
135l
345
224
18
240
93 77 77 196 200 200 107 107 107 493 593 593
1367 1373 1373 288 235 235
136 80 80
17 21 21 128 78 78
24
22ci lt(
z 20il
= CII C 0
18 gt
16
I-~
140
+38- ~136 1- z Ill 0 134
132
bull 500 a
o 400 3 300 C
~ 200 z 100 Ill a ~
0 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino_BS High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
BS
TABLE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Residue Content
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Ihegtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tmit WeightL pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesllllleter Value
Iesilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
a 20 UI w i
~10
lt 0
400
3300 lt gt a ~200 w i 0
119 93
197 l93
126 126
374 474
l353 l372
357 283
l26 l03
45 36
203 132
2440
30 22 0 0lt ltgt
16
~100 ~ 8 0 132
500 a
o 400 --ai 300 -
middot 0
~
~
w a
_ 10
ltn 0
0 8gt lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
50 60 70 Cesign 7 o
2l679
24595
21990
24255
22190
23931
- i 20
a 180 gt
140
138 - a
~136 z w 0 134
200
100middot
0 4
73 73
193 193
126 1 26
574 574
1385 1385
235 235
82 82
3l 3l
64 64
-0 $ e
~ 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B6
TABLE B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Pesidue Qlnte~t
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihroretical Speciic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
~tabilcmeter Value
ohesicrneter Value
resilient lbdulus l0 3psi
2-aay
Final
60 72 8 5 Iesicm 75
21762 21906 21779
23981 23617 23245 93 73 63 70
202 205 220 21 0
063 063 063 063
537 657 787 687
1358 1367 1359 1365 375 290 203 270
474 401 239 360
163 172 161 170 449 329 310 320
2440
ii 30 22 ci
Cl c cgt z 20 201 s ~ 310 e 18 0
gt c
0 16
500 140
w
3 400 _138c gt
~ 300 s 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
- 10 0 0 0 8gt c
6
4
FIGURE
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIOUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COITEIT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
il36 z IU Cl 134
132
bull 500
c 400 -
3 300 - Cl
sectl 200 ~- z ~ 100
w
0
B7
111 10 ui e 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
TABLE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
500
400 gt C
72 85 resian 7 s
21873 21738
23581 23210
72 63 70 207 22l 21 0
055 055 055 665 795 695
1365 1356 1365 287 188 265
349 341 345
191 187 190 287 266 280
24 ------------
111 22
Cl Cl lt -i ~ 20
= a 18 0 gt
16 _____________
138
136 a 134 () w a
132
130___________
soar------------ D a
1 400 ~
ui3 300 C
~ 200
100
w C
0---------------------5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUlc CONTENT lt
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
BB
Fesidue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcrreter Value
Cbhesiareter Value 3Resilient -bdulus 10 psi
2-day
Finll
60
m 50 - 40
IIJ ~ 30 CJ lt 1- 20
60
21669
23943
95
205
055
545
1352
560
416
195
425
~ 300 0 ()
~ 200 8
100---------------
12 -------------
RESIDUE CONTENT lto (AGGREGATE BASIS)
TABLE B9 Mixture Design Data San Ber~irdino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Pesiclue Content 60 Z1 as D=sign 7 5
Bulk Spccific Gravity 21697 21368 21255
Iheoretical Specific Gravity 23973 23610 23238
Air Voids 94 95 85 93
VMA 204 225 middot 23 8 230
middot-Absorbed Asphalt 061 061 061 061
Effective Asphalt 539 659 789 689
middot middotmiddotUnit Weight pcf 1354 133 3 1326 1330
-Stabilareter Value 460 375 225 340
CohesianeterValue 400 422 499 440
Iesilient MxUlus 103psi
2-oay 159 i0s 185 185
Final 290 299 283 295
60
w
l 400
24
22
ci 0 i 20l
= Q 180 gt
16
138
136
gt a 134~ 300 w l z0 IU 132 200
8 130
100-----------------_---I
12 ---------------- 500
o 400 10 ~
300 bull bullQ
Q0 8gt ~ 200 z
6 ~ 100
w a4 ___ __________ o
5 6 7 8 9 s 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COtlTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B9 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication l
B9
TABLE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Pesidue Conte1t 60 72 85 resign 75
Bulk Spcecific Gravity
Theoretical Sjeeipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Ohesianeter Value
Pesilient ~us 103psi
2---day
Final
60
50 lt gt cc40 w -w
~30 = CJ
lt 20
21635
24066
10l
206
078
522
1350
51 8
482
151
285
21481
23699
94
221
078
642
1341
378
459
150
286
24
11-22
ci Cl lt
~ 20 z
C 18
0 gt
21302
23323
87 92
237 225
078 078
7 72 6 72
1329 1338
246 350
343 430
162 155
254 280
I 16
500 138
UJ
400 136 lt gt
acc ~ UJ
134 300 z2 UI CJ_32 ~ 200
8 130
bull500
a
c 400 - 10 300 ~ Jf
C0 8gt ~ 200 ~ lt z
6 ~ 100-
UJ 0
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDU~ COrlTENT
(AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino
100 12
~
Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
BlO
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
TABLE Bll
Residue Content
Bulk Secific Gravity
Iheiretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesicrneter Value
Resilient MXiulus l03psi
2-day
Final
60 72 85 D=sign 75
21817 22108 21917
23977 23601 23216
90 63 56 62
200 198 215 200
o 72 o 72 o 72 o 72
528 648 778 678
136l 1380 1368 137 5
242 162 76 130
151 175 215 190
52 63 41 55
202 122 60 110
244middot0
~ 30 22 ci lt 20 i 201 IU = en ~ 10 E 18 m 0lt gt
0 16
----
w
l 400 lt gt a ~ w 0 ~ 8
12
-t
ltn 0 0 gt a lt
FIGURE
5
500
300
200 ~ 100
10
8
6
134
500 a
c 400 -
_ 300 0
g 200
~ 100 ~in IU a
0 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Bll Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
142
I-40 u a
~ 138 in w 0
136 ~
Bll
TABLE Bl2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Pesidue Q)ntent
Bulk Spzcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic
Air Voids
V bull t-LA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Gravity
60
22026
24085
85
192
092
508
72
22062
23705
69
200
092
628
85
21901
23315
61
215
092
758
resign 75
67
205
092
6 58
Unit Weight pcf 1374
Stabiloreter Value 193
Ohesiareter Value 177 3
Resilient Mxrulus 10 psi
2-day 63
Fi-ial 138
40
m 30 J lt gt a 20 IU w 0 10 ~ lt
0
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w 9 ~ 200 _________ 8
100 12
10 9 0 8gt ~6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE 8ASISI
1377
127
193
1367
90
160
137 5
120
180
53
107
32
52
48
95
24
22ci 0 lt
20
= ~
9 18 0 gt
16
142
140 a
~138 z w C
136
134
9
500 a
dego 400-
3 300 ~- a ~ 200 z ~ 100
w a
0 5
~ 6 7 8 9
RES IOU~ CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl2 Mixture Design Data -san Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Bl2
TABLE Bl 3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcrneter VaJue
CJgthesiarneter Value
Pesilient MxbJ11lS 10 3psi
2-day
Final
60
so gt
40a w 0 30 GI 20
500
l 400 gt a w t- 300 w 5 rn ~ 200 8
100 12
Ill 10 0 8gt
6
4
50
21789
24250
10l
164
1 95
305
1360
513
330
191
282
~ bull
~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASIS)
60
21762
2 34 34
91
173
1 95
405
135middot8
567
284
168
434
24
Ill 22ci Cl
is 20
= 0 gt
18
16
142
140- ~138 iii z 0
136
134
bull500
o 400 -
l 300 C
~ 200 z 100 iii a
0 4
70 resign 70
21872
23632
75 75 177 177
1 bull 95 1 95 505 505
136S 136S 393 393
280 280
217 217 482 482
~
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASISI
FIGURE Bl3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality css~o Replication 1
Bl3
--------------
TABLE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Resid= Content 50 60 70 eesicn 7o
Bulk Siecific Gravity 21692 21677 21662
Ihroretical Specific Gravity 24501 24176 23865
Air Voids 115 103 92 92
VMA 169 176 185 185
Absorbed Asphalt 240 240 240 240
Effective Asphalt 260 360 460 460
Unit Weight pcpound 1354
Stabilaneter Value 580
Cohesicrneter Value 270 3Resilielt Mdulus 10 psi
2-day 149
Final 408
60
w so lt gt
w C o w le 0 30 m lt
20
500
w
~ 400 lt gt C
~ 300 w S ~ 200 ~ 8
100 12
- 10 m a 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AG GREGATE BASIS)
1353 1352 1352
442 327 327
276 183 183
173 191 191
373 299 299
24
22d c lt z
20E 18 0 gt
16
140
138 u C
136 w C 134
132
500 C
1 400 gt- m =gt 300 a ~ 200
l 100- IU C
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication
Bl4
2
bull bull bullbull
TABLE Bl5 Mixture Design-Data Fresno High Quality CMS-QReplication 1
Bulk Spcific Gravity
lheoreticaJ Specific Gravity Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mldulus l0 3psi 2-clay
Final
60
m 50 C gt a 40 w w
~ 30 C m
10
~idue Content 50 6_ 0 70 Daisi2 7 O
5oor----------
w
l 400 C gt a ~ 300 w I 0 iii ~ 200 8
100-------------
12 ----------
111 10 C
0 8gt C
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT J
(AG GREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl5 Mixture
21755 21305 23795 23497 86 93 93
163 198 198 l 69 l 69 l69 431 531 531
1336 1329 1329 420 307 307
247 230 230
180 i55 155
246 253 253
24
22d
Cl C
i 20I
J ~ C 18 ~ 0 gt
16
21434
24106
11l
179
l69
331
1337
472
373
175
247
138
136- 134 z w C
132
130
bull 500
dego 400 - l 300 C
~ 200 z l 100 iii w a
0
-~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT J (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Bl5
TABLE Bl6 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
helretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
lbsorled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabil=ter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
Eesilient Mxrulus 10
2-day
Firal
60
50 J gt c 40
~ 30 m 20
500
w
l 400 gt a ~ 300 w
3psi
50 60 70
21339 2 1398 21475
24241 23925 23623
120 106 91
181 187 192
1 94 l 94 1 94
306 406 506
1331 1335 1340
558 43 7 377
340 313 219
149 152 154
317 345 288
Jesign70
91
192
194
506
1340
377
219
154
288
24
22d CJ i sect 20
= a 18 ~ 0 gt
16
138
136
a 134
z w ~ C ~ 200 132 8
130 100
14 500 a
o 400 - 12
3 300 - ~ 0 C gt 10 a ~ 200 ~ z
l 100
8
w a
0 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl6bull Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Bl6
TABLE Bl 7 Mixture Qesign Data Fresno High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
Pesidue Content 50 60 70 Cesign 7 O
Bulk siec~tic Gravity 21959 22101 22128
Iheoretical Specific Gravity 24539 24201 23879
Air Voids 105 87 73 73
VMA 158 160 167 167
~rbed Asphalt 252 252 252 252
Effective Asphalt 248 348 448 448
Unit Weight pcf 1370 1379 1380 1380
S~ter Value 467 370 213 213
Clgthesiareter Value 289 3Resilient l-Ddulus 10 psi
2-clay 47
FinaJ 294
50
Ill 40 o(
gt cc 30 Ill w 0 20 lt 10
500
w l 400 lt gt cc ~ 300 Ill 0 ~ 200 8 ~
100 12
10 deg C
0 gt 8 ~l lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
147 122 122
65 35 35
214 75 75
22
J 20 o(
ii 18 16 ~ 0 gt
14
142
140 u Q
~138 z Ill
Cl 136
134
500 Q
o400 uil 300 Cl
g 200 z ~ 100 ~w cc
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
IIESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Bl7
TABLE Bl8 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Dsiqn 70
Bulk Specific Gravity 22191 22285 22092
Theoretical Specific Gravity 24199 23874 23563
Air Voids 82 66 62 62
VMA 149 153 168 168
Absorled AsphaJt 192 192 192 192
Effective AsphaJt 308 408 508 508
Unit Weight pcf 1385
Stabilareter Value 357
Cohesianeter Value 268 3Resilient MxhIJus 10 psi
2-day 75
Final 217
40
w 30 J lt gt a 20 w w i
~ 10
0
500
w
3 400 gt a
l 300 w i
ltn
~ 200 8
139l
342
238
137 9
233
192
137 9
233
192
84
117
63
73
63
73
20
0 0 ~ i
= 0 gt
18
16
14
12
~
144
142 140 z w 0
138
136 100-----1---1--1---l
12 ---------- 500 0bull
o 400 -11110 en a 3 300 = 0 08gt ~ 200
z 6 ~ 100middot
w a
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT
4
RESIDUE CONTENT
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Bl8
FresnoTABLE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Low Quality css-o Replication 1
Eesidlle Content 60 70 80 Dasi51 7 5
Bulk Specific Gravity 21698 21611 21514 Iheoretical Specilic Gravity 23803 23505 23220
Air Voids 89 81 73 77
VMA 175 186 198 192
Absorbed Asphalt 171 l 71 171 171
Effective Asphalt 429 529 629 679
Unit Weight pcf 1354 1349 1342 1345
Stabi]cmeter Value 513 398 359 380
eohesianeter value 506 449 481 465
Resilient Modulus 10 3psi
2-day 176 176 241 205
Final 312 383 353 365
2460
all so 22 ci cgt
40 I-
20 E
I = g 30 18iii 0 gt
20
16
500
300
100
10
8
6
4
138
136l 400
u -gt a
~ I 0 in l1200 8
12
111 Q
0 gt ~
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE COITENT Jo
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
~ ~ 134 z w 0
132
130
500 -
l 400 -
300 ~n
Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 in Ill IC
0
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Bl9
TABLE B20 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residlle Content i
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihegtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
CJhesiareter Value 3
Resilient Mxfulus 10 psi
2-day
Finll
60
50 lt 40 w w
~ 30 m lt 20
500
w
3 400 lt gt a ~ ~ 300 w 51 rn 200 8
100----------------
12 --------------
10 9 0 8gt lt
6
4 s 6 7 8
RESIDUE COPlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
60 70 80 resign 75
21451 21476 21666
23932 23629 23340
104
185
194
406
1339
586
436
147
313
91
192
1 94
506
1340
403
416
179
347
24
22 0 0 lt
~ 20
= 9 18 0 gt
16
140
138 - Cl
136 w cl34
132
bull 500
-0 400__
3 300 I
~ 200
~ 100 rn w a
0
7 2 82
192 192
194 194
606 656
1352 1345
24 8 325
333 375
186 182
361 358
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COPITEPlT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
~
Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
B20
TABLE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
lesidue Content 60 70 80 resign 75
Bulk Siecific Gravity 21525 21406 21152 lllroretical Specific Gravity 23855 23555 23268 Air Voids 98 91 91 91 VMA 182 194 211 2middot03 1osorled Asphalt 180 1 80 180 180 Effective Asphalt 420 520 620 570 Ulit Weight pcf 1343 1336 1330 1335 Stabilateter Value 487 460 373 415 Oxlesiareter Value 418 392 323 355
3lesilielt Mldulus 10 psi
2-clay 188 177 200 190
Final 289 299 281 290
6or----------- 24
m 50 lt gt 11 40 w w I
~ 30 m lt 20
_J_
22ci 0 lt z
20EE
= 0 180 gt
16
5oor---------- 138
w
l 400 lt gt
136- a ~ 300 w i 0
fa34 z w
~ 200 Cll32 -8
100-----------i-~ 130
12 ------------ 500bulla
10 ________ o 400 - 0
0 gt
8
gJdeg 300 0
~- 200 ---e-
lt z
6 l 100 w 4
5 6 7 8 9 0
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication
B21
1
TABLE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Fesidue Cbntent 55
Bulk Spcific Gravity 21243
lheoretical Specific Gravity 23859
Air Voirls 109
VMA 189
Absorbed Asphalt 152
Effective 1spralt 398
Unit Weight pd 1326
atabil~ter Value 620
Cbhesiareter Value 430 3Fesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-oay 160
Final 387
70
a 60 gt a 50 w w == = 40 0
m
30
500
w l 400 lt gt cc
~ 3001- 0 ~ 200 8
100
16
136
134 u Q
iu2 z w 0 130
128
12 -----------
10 bull
ltIi 0
~ s
6
4middot1-_________ _
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l _AGGREGATE BASIS)
21164
23557
101
200
152
498
1321
481
432
180
377
24
22
z 20Si
= 18e 0 gt
bull 500
o 400-ltIi j 300 0
~ 200 zl 100 w cc
0
65 75 iesiqn 7 s
21095
23269
93 93
210 210
152 l 52
598 598
1316 1316
367 367
450 450
171 171
387 387
-----~bull-----
8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7
FIGURE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B22
1 TABLE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno
Low Quality CMS-7 Replication
70 -~ 0 Cesign 75 Pesidue Content
Bulk Spcific Graviv1
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit Weight pcf
Stallilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mxlulus 10 3psi
2--day
Final
40
Ill 30 c gt 0 20 UI lo Q 10=c 0
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w lo Q 200 8
100
~
60
21829
23899
87
170
197
403
1362
293
206
84 144
21981
23587
67
l73
197
503
1372
200
249
76 131
21960
23289
5middot 7
middot18l
197
603
1370
100
241
69 93
62
177
197
553
1370
150
245
73
110
12
10 5 Q 8gt 5 lt
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (ACGREGATE BASIS)
24
It
22 t-ci c
z 20i
= 5 18 t-Q gt
16
142
140 - 638
z w Q
136
134
bull 500
o 400 - 3 300 0
~ 200 z 100 iii UI 0
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (ACGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno LOW Quality CMS-7 Replication
B23
1
TABLE B24 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Urit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Glhesianeter Value
Resilient Mldulus 10
2-day
Final
40
m 30 gt c 20 w ~ w i
~ 10 m lt ~ 0
3psi
24
22
C C lt i
20~ ~
9 18 0 gt
16
500 142
w 1403 400 gt
Ca gt138I 300 tw
i z w Q 136~ 200
8
134
~
~
100 12 500
C
dego 400 - Ill 10 3 300 0 0 Q8gt ~ 200
~ z 6 100middot
w a
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIOUC CONTENT
(AGGREGATE 8ASIS] (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)
80
21686
23262
68
19l
l91
609
1353
125
215
77
114
Cesign 75
71
184
L 91
559
1360
200
235
77
135
60
21936
23870
81
166
191
409
1369
358
252
84
211
70
21850
23559
73
177
191
509
1364
270
250
77
157
Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE B24 Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B24
TABLE B25 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-Or Replication 1
Residue Clgtntent 47
Bulk Siecific Gravity 23965
llleoretical Specific Gravity 26825
Air Voids 107
VMA 207
Absorbed Asphalt 27
Effective Asphalt 443
Unit Weight pcf 1495
Stabilaneter Value 302
Cohesiaoeter Value 235 3
Resilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-day 158
Final 300
40
30 _ gt a 20I- ii 0_
10iii I-en 0 500----------
Ill
3 400 gt ati 300 ii 0 iii l 200 8
100---i----L---J
12 ----------
jit 10 e 0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I 4
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
57 67 Design 55
24521 24581
26411 26017
72 55 80
196 202 200
27 27 27
543 643 523
1530 1534 1520
247 200 27
275 203 275
164 116 160
276 197 280
24
jlt
22ci c i
20Si
= en e 18 0 gt
16
156
_154 ~ i152 iii z C
150
148
soo----------
dega 400 _
en
~300 ~ ~ 200 1-zl 100 iii w a
01----~-i--J 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Mixture Design Data GraniterockFIGURE B25 High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
B25
TABLE B26 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Besidue Content If 7 57 67 D2sign 55
Bulk SfeCific Gravity 2 4131 24573 24597
lhagtreticai Specific Gravity 26951 26532 26134
Air Voids 105 74 59 78
VMA 20l 195 20l 197
Absorted Asphalt 46 46 46 46
Effective Asphalt 424 524 624 504
Unit Weight pcf 1506 1533 1535 1525
stabi1anaiter Value 282 258 is2 270
Cllhesicmter Value 204 155 138 160
Resilient Mdulus 103psL
2-day 115 143 126 130
Final 313 225 173 240
40
w 30 lt gt a 20 w w la 0 10 m lt
0
~
24
22ci C
lt z
20la ~ = E 18 -0 gt
16
156
154 - a
~152 z w r0
150
148
-
500
o 400 ~
300 0
g 200 ~ z -~ 100
500
w ~ 400 lt gt a IU t- 300 w la 0 ~ 200
~8
100 12
10 0 0 8gt lt
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
w a
o 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT lo RESIDUE CONTENT II
-cGREGATE s-s1s1 (-GGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B26 Mixture Design Data Grani terock High Quality CSS-0 Replication
B26
2
TABLE B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Residue Ogtntent 47 57 67 ~ign 55
Bulk Spcific Gravity 23886 24116 24078
Ihooretical Specific Gravity 26675 26267 25879
Air Voids 105 81 70 82
VMA 210 210 21 8 210
Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 oos 005
Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545
Unit Weight pcf 149l 1505 1502 1505
Stabilareter Value 337 350 250 350
Ogthesicneter Value 238 3
Eesilient Mldulus l0 psi
2-day 104
Final 287
50
Ill 40 J C gt cc 30 Ill Ill l 0
C
10
20iii 500
w
l 400 C gt cc I 300 Ill l 0 in ~ 200 8
100 12
1110 0 0 8gt
c cc
6
4
FIGURE
~
~
177 204 200
144 150 140
254 247 260
24 ----------
a 18 0 gt
16 __i____i_-J
154
j52 u -a
~1501- ------iiiz -Ill 0
148
______________ 146
soar---------- a
o 400 1--
~ 300 _ ~
~ 200 z ~ 100 en w 0
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
B27
8
TABLE B28 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue Ointent 4 7 57 67 Cesign 55
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihroretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
CJlhesianeter Value
Pesilient Mldulus 10 3psi
2-day
Final
40
30 lt gt = w 20 0
- 10 lt
0
500
w - 3 400
lt gt a l 300 w 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
i 10 ui C
0 8gt lt
6
4
FIGURE
23861
26649
10S
207
014
456
1489
338
145
124
307
~
--------
~ 5 6 7 84
RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
24025 23925
26242 25855
85
210
014
556
1499
283
135
135
307
24
22
0 lt i
20i
= 18 0 gt
16
154
152 u Q
i150 z w 0 148
146middot
500- o 400 -
300 _ Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 4
75 87
220 209
014 014
656 536
1493 1490
220 300
129 140
142 130
277 307
_--
~
-___
85 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B28 bull Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B28
TABLE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Pesicllle Cbntent 47 57 67 resign 55 Bulk Siecific Gravity 24618 24637 24728 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26905 26475 26066 Air Voids 84 69 51 71 VlltLA 185 192 197 190 Absocbed Asphalt 047 0 bull 47 047 047 Effective Aspbalt 423 523 623 503 Urit Weight pcf 1536 1537 1543 1537 Stabilaneter Value 410 330 198 350 QJhesianeter Value 166
Resiliextt Mldulus 10 3psi
2-clay
Final
50
40 c
ffi 30 IE g20 iii c
10
500
l 400 c
a ~ 300 IE C ~ 200 8
100 12
ot 10 C
0 8
5
C
6
4
46
158
~
~ 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI
120 131 130
35 30 38
56 28 80
24
gt11 22
c c c
i 2031
= ~ C 180
16
158
156 t-
u - 154 z w 0
152
150
500
~
~ 0
bull a 400 - uil 300 ~
200
C
~ z ~ w a
100middot
8 4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
B29
TABLE B30 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Pesidue Content 4-7 h---7 6 -7 IEsicn 5 5
Bulk Specific Gravity 24519 24638 24706 Iheoretical Specific Gravity 26609 26265 25793 Air Voids 79 62 42 65 VMA 189 192 198 19l
middot Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 005 005 Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545 Unit Weight pcf 1530 1537 1542 1535 Stabilareter Value 420 327 247 350 Cohesiareter Value 126
3Resilient Mldulus 10 psi
Z--day 47 Final 144
50
40 J lt gt a 30 w w
~ 20 m lt 10
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w 2 ~ 200 8 ~
100 12
111- 10 ui 0 gt 8
lt
6
4
114 182 120
43 29 45
79 33 90
24
ii-22
ci 0 lt i
20l ~= 18 0 gt
16
158
156 0
l 154 z ~w c 152
150
500
Q -dego 400 - ui3 300 C
~ 200 z
~ 100middot~
w a ~ 0
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8 4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
FIGURE B30 Mixture Design Data High Quality CMS-7
Graniterock Replication 2
B30
TABLE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
~sidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weigllt pcf
Stabi]aneter Value
Cohes~ter Value
~silient MXJulus 103psi
2--day
final
40
30 C gt ffi20
~10 iii C ltII 0
500
l 400 C gt IC
~ 300 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
11 10 0
0 8gt C
6
4
55 65 75 resign 60 24268 24286 24206
26358 25966 25592 80
200
020
530
t515
80
268
182
338
~
65
207
020
630
t515
t_92
233
169
308
24
bull 220 0 C
ze 20
= 0 18 -0 gt
16
156
154
u i152 ~ z 0
150 bull
148
54 72
21 7 204
020 020
730 580
1511 1515
90 235
193 250
145 175
250 320
500 o 400 - l 300 0
~ 200 zi 100 iii IC
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replicationl
B31
TABLE B32 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residue 0ntent
Bulk Secific Gravity
llleoretical Speipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
-Absorled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
StabilcIIeter Value
Qlhesianeter Value 3Jesilient middotMgtdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
40
m30 lt gt cc20 w
w E
~10 ID lt 0
79
198
027
523
1518
203
243
201
354
~ soar-----------
w
400 lt gt a
~ 300 w E 0 ~ 200 8
100---I--~---------
12 -----------
111 10 C
0 8gt lt
6 --4
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l (ACiCiFIECiATE BASIS)
FIGURE B32 Mixture
55 65 75 Lesign 6 0
24329 24246 24077
26401 26007 25632
68 61 73 208 22l 203
027 027 027 623 723 573
1513 1502 1515
165 110 185 215 205 225
168 184 185 340 272 345
24
22 C C
z i 20
= 0 0
18 gt
16
156
154
a
gt152 en z Ill 0 150
148
bull 500 Q
deg 0 400- =gt 300 0
~ 200 z l 100 w
-
0 4 5 6middot 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(ACiGFIEGATE BASIS)
Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication
B32
2
TABLE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Eesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheore_tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VbullMA
lbsorbed_ Asphalt
Effective_ Asphalt
Qnit Weight pcf
~~ter Value
Q)hesianeter Value
Resiiient Mxlulus 10 3psi
2~y
Final
40
11130 C
a20 =
~10 C m
ltII 0
500
Ill
3 400 C
a ~ 300 w = 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
ll 10 ui E 0 8
c
6
4
I-
1-
55
23824
26318
95
215
014
536
1487
287
381
224
380
65 75
23896 23701 25928 25555 78 73
220 233
014 014 636 736
1491 1479 195 161
265 212
212 196
404 341
24
11 22d
c
z 20i
= ltII E 18 0
16
154
152- a
150 I-
Iesign 6 0
84
218
014
586
1490
240
320
215
395
z w Q
148
bull 146
500 a
c 400 ~ ui
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
l 300 Q
~ 200 zl 100 w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIOUla CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-a Replication 1
B33
- - ----- -
TABLE B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Rssidue Ogtntent
Bulk Secific Gravity
lhairetical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
AbsoIbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stabil~ter Value
Olhesiareter Value 3lesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-day
Firal
40
m 30 lt gt a 20 w w
= ~ 10
m lt
0
- --- -middot -middot 500
w l 400 lt gt
Ea
300 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
1l 10 middot 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 4
FIGURE
55
23834
26371
96
214
022
528
1487
279
207
176
332
65
23784
25978
84
223
022
628
1484
208
270
185
336
75
23628
25604
77
236
022
728
1474
167
334
181
350
iesiqn 6 bull 0
90
21 8
022middot
578
1485
245
240
180
334
~
~
24
1l 22
0
lt i
20i
= 0 gt
18
16
152
150 - 148
~ 146
144
500
o-400 middot --- J 300 C
~ 200 z
middot ~ 100 en a
0 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication
B34
2
B35 Mixture Design Data GraniterockTABLE Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Residue Content 55
Bwk Specific Gravity 24720
lheoretical Specific Gravity 26164
Air Voids 55
VMA 185
Absorbed Asphalt 001
Effective Asphalt 549
Unit Weight pcf 1543
StabilCampTeter value 293
Ohesiareter Value 174
Besilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day 69
Final 153
40
~ 30 _
c gt ffi 20 w I
Q 10
c 0
500
w 3 400 -
c gt a
~ 300 w I g bull ~ 200 8 ----r
100middot
10
8 -
~
Q
0 6gt a =c
4 ~ 2
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS
65 75 DesiSE 60
2 4 720 24515
25767 25388
40 34 48
193 207 189 001 001 001 649 749 599
1543 1530 1543 205 97 250
156 283 170
46 22 55 72 so 110
24
~
22ci C c
i 20i
= Cl 180 gt
16
lSadeg
156
u -a
654 z 0 152
150
500 ii a
a 400 - 3 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7
FIGURE B35 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
B35
12 r---------- 500bull _ 10
o 400 -middot 0 gt 5 C
8
tnl 300 Q
~ 200 z
6 ~ 100 ~ IU 0
4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT I
(AGCREGA TE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
TABLE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
55 65 75 resicn 6 0 Residue Content
Bulk siecific Gravity 24816 2 4721 24560
lheoretical Specific Gravity 26389 25983 25596
Air Voids 60 49 40 55
VMA 182 193 205 187
Absorlei Asphalt middot 035 035 035 035
Effective Asphalt 515 615 715 565
UUt Weight cf 1548 1543 1533 1545
Stabilaneter Value 298 193 130 250
Qlhesicmeter Value 188 I57 118 180 3
Resilient MJdulus 10 psi
soor-----------158
w l 400 Ishy 156 gt lt u
0a
w
300 w ~154E 0 z
w Q ~ 200 152
8 150100----middot-~-1-__c__~
2-day
Final
40
~ 30 J lt gt a 20 w
s 10 0
lt
0
92 43 27 65 186 79 46 135
24
22
~ =
ci lt 0
i 20~
18 0 gt
16
FIGURE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B36
Table B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
FJiuivalent ~sidue amtent 60 70 80 resign 70
Iesidue Ontent
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absomed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
lhit Weight pcpound
Stabilareter Value Ohesiareter Value
~ilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
Ill
50
40 A gt a w 30 w i 0 J
iii 201-
10
400
w3 300 gt a Ill t 200 i 0
8 ~iii ll 100 1-
0 12
lit 10 0 0 8gt a lt
6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)
630
21584
24451
117
210
140
460
1347
415
208
735
21570
24143
107
219
140
560
1346
488
61
840
21385
23848
103
233
140
660
1334
382
63
resign 7 35
107
219
140
560
1346
488
63
96
339 141
325
126
299 141 325
24
lit 22d
Cl
z 20i
= 0 180
gt
16
138
136 ltgt
i134 iii ~ z w 0 132
130
bull 500
o 400 -
3
300 ------------- 0
~ 200 z ~ 100 w o_____________a
9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B37
----
Table B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Pesidue omtent 60 70 80 Design 70
Pesidue omtent 630 735 8 40 Dsign 735
Bulk Specific Gravity 21710 21722 21714
lllroretical Specific Gravity 24298 23995 23705
Air Voids
VMA
lbsorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Chhesianeter Value
Eeilient Mldulus 103psi
2--clay
Final
so
40 J w
gt a 30 w w 0 20 m
10 400
w 300 gt a w 200 w i 100 8
0
12
if 10 a
~0 8gt a lt
6
4
107
205
112
488
1355
395
llO
113
290
95
213
112
588
1356
398
62
122
271
84
22l
112
688
1355
318
70
138
282
24
22 c 0
20
0 180 gt
16
140
138 -a
136 _iii z bull --w 0 134
132
bull 500 a
o 400
m 300 J 0 bull ~ 200 z 100
w a
0
95
213
)12
588
1356
398
62
122
271
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT J
(AGCilEGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B38
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Table B39
Fquivalent ~idue COntent
~idue Cbntent
Bulk SJecific Gravity lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Oihesianeter Value
~ilient Mldulus l03psi
2-day
Fiial
so
w 40 lt gt cc 30 ~ w E
0 20 m lt 10
400
m POO lt gt a U 200 E 0 iii w c 100 8
0
12
- 10 vi Cl
0 gt ac
6
60 70 80
690 805 920
21790 21826 21910
24255 23977 23710
102 90 76
207 214 219
080 080 080
610 710 810
1360 1362 1367
437 400 289
219 229 202
141 158 184
333 282 273
24
~ 22ci
CJ lt z
20ii
= Cl 180
gt
16
----------
~ lo
140
138 Q l136 iii w Cl
134
132
500 Q
0 400 n3 300 Cl
~ 200 i-bull
100
z ~ 0 a
Cesign 70
Cesign 805
90
214
080
710
1362
400
229
158
282
-------
-
-~
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B39 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication l
B39
8
Table B40 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Eesidue cantent
Iesidue Omtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lhagtretical Speiliic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Abro1plusmned Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tklit Weight pcpound
Stabilareter Value
OJhesianeter Value
EEsilient Mldulus l03psi
2-day
Final
50
w 40 J lt gt a 30 w
w i
3 20 lt 0 10
400-----------
DI 3 300 lt gt a wti 200 i 0 w8100
0 -------l--l-1
12 ----------
- 10 ltn 0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
60 70 80 690 805 920
21986 21964- 21948
24499 2A212 23938
103 93 83
200 209 218
124 124 l24
476 576 676
1372 1371 1360
422 403 265
270 306 160
99 140 154
298 310 254
24
-22
ci lt
=i 20i
a 0 18 0 gt
16
140
138 - a
l136 z w 0 134
132
bull500
a
o 400 -
ltn =gt 300 -J a
~ 200 z 100 DI 0
0 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT Ii (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Dsign 70
Design 805
93
209
124
576
1371
403
306
140
310
9
Figure B40 Mixture Design Data High Quality SS-30
San Bernardino SEA Replication 2
B40
Table B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent lesidue ~tent
Ilesidue Omtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lbagtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stabilateter Value
CllhesiaIEter Value
Resilient MXlulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
w 40 i- _ gt 30a w I- ~ w 0 20 m I-CII 10
400
w l 300 gt a w lj 200 0 w 100 8
0
12
111 10 Q
0 8gt a ~
6
4
~
6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
65 75 85 Design 75 683 789 89J tesign 789
21624 21445 21375 24097 23802 23520
103 99 92 213 228 238 100 100 100 550 650 750
1349 1338 1334 423 295 285 70 174 82
150 139 138 318 310 2S4
24
22d i
20ii
= CII Q 180 gt
16
138
- 136
u
134I- z ~132
130
bull 500 o 400 _ l 300 1- Q
sectl 200 I-z ~ 100 CII w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
99
228
100
650
1338
295
174
139
310
5
Figure B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B41
Table B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent PesidJJe Content
Residue Omtent
Bulk Specific GIavity
lheoretical Specific GIavity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit weight pcpound
Stabiloreter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mxulus 103psi
SC
w 40 gt a 30 w w i 0 J 20
10
400
w 3 300 gt a w t 200 i
9 ltI)
w = 1008
0
12
11 10 u a 0 8gt
6
4
2-day
Final
~
~
5 6 7 8 flESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGflEGATE BASIS)
65 75 85
683 788 89J 21424 21394 21455
24147 23851 23567
ll3 103 90
22l 229 234
l09 l09 l09
541 641 741
133 7 1335 1339
412 328 280
129 103 81
167 141 162
325 260 280
24
22ci 0 201
= 0 gt
18
16
i-
138
136 Q i134 _ 0 z w bull0 132
130
soor----------- D C
o 400
ltn3 300 a ~ 200 z 100 (I)
w
-
~
a 0------------ 5 6 7 8 9
flESIOUE CONTENT I
(AGGflEGA TE BASIS)
Design 75
Design 7 86
103
229
l09
641
1335
328
103
141
260
9
Figure B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B42
Table B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent Residue Omtent
Residue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllagtreticalSpecilicGravity
Air Voids
VMA
AbsorlJed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcpound
Stabilcrreter value
Cllhesianeter value
lelilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
400-----------
Illl 300 lt gt a w t 200 lo 0 w 8100
0 ________ ___ __
12 ----------
~ 10 0
~ 8 bull a c
6
4 -_______ ___ __
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS
65 75 85 748 863 978 21752 21661 21638 24136 23863 23602 99 92 83
213 225 234 081 081 081 569 669 769
1357 1352 1350 466 367 235
224 266 138
220 189 209 478 337 281
Ilsign 75
Design 863
92
225
081
669 1352
367
266
189
337
24 ----------
~
220 Cl lt ii 20
0 18 0
gt
16 ----------------14or-----------
138 -0 a 136 z w Q
134
132
= c 400 - l 300 Q
~ 200 f-middot z 100 w a o----------
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
_____________J
Figure B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardinor Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B43
Table B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Iesidue Cbntent 65 75 85 Design 75
lesidue Omtent 748 86~ resign~Zl 863
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleo~tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asjtlalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
lesilient Mxlulus 103psi
2-day
Final
so
w gt 0 30 IE 0 20 iii lt
10
400
3 300 lt gt 0 w l 200 IE 0 X w
100 8
0
12
- 10 en 0 0 8gt
6
4
~ 40 bull
~ 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
21676
23998
97
208
055
595
1353
409
248
189
308
24
22
ci c lt i
20ii
= 0 0
18 gt
16
21711 21641
23729 23472
85 78 85
223 234 223
055 oss 055
695 795 695
1355 135l 1355
283 227 283
187 186 187
198 177 198
255 285 255
140
138 a
136 - z 0 134 --
132
500 a
o 400 -
vi3 300 - 0
sectj 200 z ~ 100
0 0 5 6 middot 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino~ Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B44
Table B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Equivalent Jesidue Content 60 70 80 Design 70
tesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
trut Weight pcpound
Stabilcineter Value
Cbhesiateter Value
tesilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
IU 40 _ C gt 30a IU IU = middoto 20 m C (I) 10
400
IU
300 C gt a IU
ti 200 = 0 ~ IU c 100 8
0
12
10 ai 0 8gt C
6
4
~
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)
630 735 840 Design 7 35
21651 21581 21592
24033 23739 23457
99 91 80 91 180 190 198 190
399 499 599 499 135l 1347 134 7 1347
309 439 358 439
150 236 202 236
140 171 148 171 294 390 367 390
24
bull 22
Cl Cl C
i 20i
= (I) Q 180
gt
16 140
138 0 a
i136 z IU
134 bull bull
Q
132
500 D
c 400 _ 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 IU a
0 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B45
Table B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Residue Cbntent 60 70 80 Design 70 Residue Cbntent 6JO Z35 EdQ Jesign 7 35
Bulk Spcific Gravity 21413 21627 21711 lhroretical Specific Gravity 24321 24017 23726 Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcneter Value
Ohesianeter Value
llesilient Mgtdulus 10 3psi
2-day
Final
so
Ill 40 I lt gt 0 30 w Ill i 0 20 Cl lt
10
400
111
l 300 lt gt 0 w lj 200 i
~ w = 1008 -----___
0
12
II- 10 a 0 8gt lt
6
4
120
189
249
351
1336
407
79
147
361
24
II-22
ci
lt ~ 20i
= 0
0 18
gt
16
138
136 u C
l134 w 132
130
bull 500
C
o 400 ~
---------_J 300 0
~ 200
~ 100 Ill 0
0
99
189
249
451
1350
396
76
165
340
85
193
249
551
1355
360
64
175
305
99
189
249
451
1350
396
76
165
340
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT 1
9 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE COIHENT f
9
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B46
---------
Table B4 7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Bulk Specific Gravity
lhalretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorlled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilaieter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
llesilient MJdulus 103psi
2-clay
Final
50
40w lt(
gt IC 30 w w
0 20 iii lt( ltI)
10
400
w 3 300 ~ lt(
gt IC w t 200 0 iii 111 i 100 8
0 ___ _______ __ _ __
12 ----------
Fquivalent Pesidue Content 60 70 80 Iesign 70
Pesidue Qlntent 690 805 92Q Dcsign 805
21958 22006
24182 23909
92 88 92
18l 188 18l 256 256 256
444 544 444
1370 1373 1370
342 291 342
78 73 78
184 167 184
303 298 303
10 0
0 8gt IC
c 6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B47 Mixture
21880
24453
105
176
256
344
1365
443
58
174
381
24
22ci
5 20
= 0
0 18
gt
16
~ I I
138
136 ~ ~134 bull z 111 0 132
130
bull 500
o 400 3 300 - Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 ltI) 111 IC
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B47
Table B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
El_uivalent Residue Cbntait 60 70 80 Iesign 70
Residue Cbntent 690 aQi 2 2Q Dsign 805 Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Olhesiateter Value
Resilient Mldulus middot103psi
2-day
Final
21816
24403
106
178
244
356
1361
482
136
183
393
21806
24120
96
187
244
456
1361
411
130
187
374
21996
23849
78
189
244
556
1373
314
106
260
361
96
187
244
456
1361
411
130
187
374
24so
w 40 22 ci 0 gt a 30 ~ 20w w = 20 ishy C 18iii 0 gt Ill 10 _ ___ ____________
16 400------------
140
w l 300 138 gt 0
Qa w
636t 200 z0 w --------_ Qw 134c 100 8
0 ___ _____________ 132
bull50012 -----------
a
1 400 -_ 10
ltti ltti l 300 -C 0 C8gt ~ 200 lt z
6 l 100 w a
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT S RESIDUE CONTENT S (AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B48
Table B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
EquivaJent Residue antent 65 75 85 Design 75 Residue Content 63J z aa a 23 resign 7 88 Bulk Specific Gravity 21404 21439 21381 lheoretical Specific Gravity 23563 23286 Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcf
Stabilaneter Value
Cohesianeter Value
~ient 1bdul11S 103psi
2~y
Firal
50
w 40 gt a 30 w w 0 20 iii lt 10
400
3 300 w
gt a w t 200 0 in i w
100 8
0 12
10 0 Q
0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6
23020 92 79 71 79
193 199 209 199 140 140 140 140 510 610 710 610
1336 1338 1334 1338 424 397 308 397 79 308 266 308
173 185 196 185 330 319 285 319
24
22ci c lt
~ 20c Q 180
gt
16
138
136 u -Cl
~134 in ~z w 132
130
soar----------- Qbull
o 400
middot3 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a Q___________ ___ __
7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT deg RESIDUE COIITENT deg (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B49
Table BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Fquivalent lesidue Content
Besidlle 0-ntent
Bulk Specific Gravity
Illeoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pf
Stabilcmeter Value
ltbhesiaieter Value
Besilient Mxlulus 103psi
2--day
Final
50
~ 40 I lt gt 30 w 0 20 01 lt 10
400
w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 w r lOO 8
o 12
10 ai ~ 0 8gt a lt
6
~
4 5 6 7 8
IIESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
65 75 85 683 788 893 21527 21362 21337
24013 23721 23441 104 99 90
188 202 211
225 225 225
425 525 625
1343 1333 1332
410 418 290
261 62 100
188 197 211
334 348 331
24
22 ~ ci c lt
20 f 18 0 gt
16
138
136 0 a
134 z w 0 132
130
500 a
o 400
ai bull 300 I bull C
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
IIESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design 75
Design 788
99
202
225
525
1333
418
62
197
348
Figure BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
BSO
Table B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno
Fquivalent Residue Clintent
Residue 0rrtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorlei Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
thlit Weight pcf
StabiJaneter value
Ohesiaretel value 3lelilient MJdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
50
w
40
c gt a 30 w w = g 20 iii c Ill 10
400----------
middota
l 300 bull c gt a w t 200 = 0 w c 100 8
0 _______ ____ _
12 ------------
_ 10 ~ 8 c
6
4 _________ __
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B51
Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
65 75 85 748 863 978
21728
24022
96
186
200
450
1356
436 100
199
376
24
11 22
c c c
z 20ii
Ill0 180
gt
16
Design 75
Design 863
86
195
200
550
1355
392 260
212
362
21716
23753
86
195
200
550
1355
392 260
212
362
21673
23495
78
205
200
650
1353
378 201
230
3l7
~
140
138 Q j136 bull --_ z w 0134
132
500 Q
o 400 bull -l 300 ~ 0 ~ 200 I-z ~ 100 w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Table B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent lesidue OJntent 65 75 85 Design 75 Pesidue Ointent 748 863 978 Design 863 Bulk Specific Gravity 21595 21708 21637 ~retical Specific Gravity 23977 23708 23452 Air Voids 99 84 77 84 VMA 19l 195 206 195 Absorbed Asphalt l92 l92 l92 l92 Effective Asphalt 458 558 658 558 Unit Weight pf 1347 1354 1350 1354 Stabilareter Value 502 262 239 262 Cllhesianeter Value 257 136 154 136 Pesilient MJdulus 103psi
2--day 217 201 228 201 Final 371 307 290 307
2450
w 40 22 0 0lt ltgt ia 30
bull 20i
= 0 20 18iii 0lt gt 10
16 400
~
~
140
w 3 300 -ltgt
138 lt gt
aa w t 200 deg136 z0 w 0
134 w
100 8
1320
12 500 a
0 400 10
3 300 C 0 Q8gt ~ 200 lt z
6 100 w a
4 0 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT ~ RESIDUE CONTENT ~ (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B52
Table B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent ~sidue Cbntent 45 55 65 Design 55 ~idue Cbntent 473 578 6~~ Design 5 78 Bulk Specific Gravity 24210 24403 24473 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26934 26528 26142 Air Voids
VMA
Absocbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
StabiJaneter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Iesilient M)dulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
w _ 40 C gt II 30w w 0 20 iii C ~
10
400
w l 300 C gt II
iiw
200
~ w --------r 100 8
0 12
ot 10 -0
0 8gt II c
6
4
101 80 64 80 199 20l 206 20l
022 022 022 022 423 523 623 523
151l 1523 1527 1523 308 288 197 288
ll7 ll2 140 112
95 llO 122 llO 306 272 214 272
24
ci 22
C
i -~20Es = E 18 0
gt
16
156
154 - gt152 iii z ~ w 0
150
148
bull 500
o 400 Inl 300 0
~ 200 z ~ 100 w II
0
--~
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT r (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7 8 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B53
Table B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Residue Glntent 45 ss 65 Jesign 55 Residue Omtent 47 5 ZB 6 83 resign ~za Bulk Specific Gravity 24197 24253 24435 lheoretical Specific Gravity 26843 26441 26058 Air Voids 99 83 62 83 VMA 199 206 208 206 Absorbed Asphalt 09 09 09 09 Effective Asphalt 441 541 641 541 lklit Weight P=f 1510 1513 152S 1513 StabLkmter Value 38l 307 204 307 CJgthesianeter Value 73 85 149 85 Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day 170 159 142 159 Final 333 367 193 367
so
w 40 J lt gt 0 30w w le 0 20J
CJ lt 10
24
It
22ci 0 lt i -------20 = 18 0 gt
16 400
____
~
156
w 3 300 154 lt gt - a0 w gt 152l 200 le __-0 z w w c 150 8100
148 0
12 500
D C
o 400 r- 10 -u 300
J 0 9
8 Cgt ~ ~ 200 z
6 ~ 100
w 0
4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE COIITEIIT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B54
----------
Table B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Rep~ication 1
Equivalent Residue Contentmiddot
Residue Ontent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
~tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tklit Weight pcpound
Stabilaneter value
Cbhesiaieter Value
Resilient -bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
45 55 65
518 633 748
24695 24765 24666
26898 26520 26160
82 66 57
187 193 205
001 001 001
449 549 649
154l 1545 1539
41l 310 24l
159 157 165
183 178 193
371 318 250
50
w 40 c gt a 30 w-w == 0 20 ~ 10
400------------
~ 300 lt(
gt a
t 200 == 0 in bullw 8100
0 __ ________ ___ ___
12 ----------
t 10 rti C
~ 8 a c
6
4 s 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI
4
24
Ill 22
0 c c
ze 20
II)
C 18 0
gt
16
158
156- 154 Ill z w 0 152
150
500 iii
8 4
~
0 400-
i300-~ g 200 1-z l 100 iii a 0 __ _______ ____
5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design 55
Design 633
66
193
001
549
1545
310
157
178
318
___
8
Figure B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
BSS
Table B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality
Equivalent Rsidue Content 45
Rsidue Cbntent 518
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllooretical specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
lbsoibed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesicmeter Value 3
Iesilient Mldwus 10 psi
2--day
Final
400-----------
w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 I 0 ltII w8100
olt----__1__--1_---1
12 ----------
10 u
0 8gt a lt
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT l
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
24594
27024
90
190
019
431
1535
450
198
191
360
24
Ill 22
0 C
lt i
20i ~ ltII C 18 C gt
16
158
156 0
i54 iii z ILi
J52
150
SS-30 SEA
55 65
63J 7 ~a 24844
26641
67
190
019
531
1550
324
212
173
308
24856
26276
54
199
019
631
155l
234
225
166
259
_________
~
500----------- 0
dego 400 -
~300~~ C
~ 200 z i 100
w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COIITEHT l
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Replication 2
Design 55
Lesign 633
67
190
019
531
1550
324
212
173
308
Figure B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B56
---------
Table B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality
ElIuivaJent lesidue Omtent
lesidue Cbntent
Bulk Spacific Gravity
~retical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Uut Weight pcf
Stabilaneter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
lesilient Mldulus 103psi
so
w 40 lt gt a 30 w w ~ 20 m lt II)
10
400
w 3 300 lt gt a w lj 200 0 w z 1008
0 12
Ill 10 Q
0 8gt lt
6
4
2-day
Final
~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
so 530
24024
26676
99
207
031
469
1499
354
138
183
352
SS-15 SEA Replication 1
60 70 Design 60 636 7 42 Design 636
24040 23986 26279 25901 85 74
214 223
031 031 569 669
1500 1497 223 149
222 126
159 160 302 234
24
Ill
c 22 ~ c
lt i
20i1
== (II C 180 gt
16
152
150 u -a
648 z w Q
146 1-
144
bull 500 a
o 400 - 3 300 C
~ 200 z ~ 100 (II w a
~ 0
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
85
214
031
569
1500
223 222
159
302
8
Figure B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B57
Table B58 Mixture Design Data Low Quality SS-15
Fquivalent Residue Content 60 60
Rsidue Cbntent 525 630
23944
~retical Specific Gravity
Bulk Sjecific Gravity 26592
Air Voids 100
209VMA
1bsocbed Asphalt 015
Effective Aspbalt 485
Unit Weight pcf 1494
Stabilareter Value 377
Olhesiaeter Value 151
Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi
162
375 2-day
Final
so
w 40 _ gt c 30 w w i
~20 m I-0
10
400
Ill
300 gt w I 200 i 2 w i 100 8
_________ 0 --middotmiddot-
12-------bull------
ti 10 9 0 8gt
6
4
24
- 22ci
0
20i
= 9 18 0 gt
16
152
150 u a
148 z---- w0146
144
500 Q
o 400 _ 300 Q
~ 200 I-z ~ 100
w a
23988
26022
84
215
015
585
1497
307
180
165
356
Graniterock SEA Replication 2
70
735 23793
25830
79
229
015
685
1485
217
170
169
277
~
~
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7
RESIOUE CONTENT li RESIDUE COPlTENT li (AGGREGATE 8ASIS) (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)
Design 60
resign 630
84
215
585
1497
307
180
165
356
8
Figure B58 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B58
Table B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Equivalent esidue omtent 5 0 60 70 Design 60
esidue Cbntent 5 75 690 805 Dsign 690
Bulk Specific Gravity 24389 24362 24419
Jheo=eticaJ Specific Gravity 2 6670 26303 25953
Air Voids 8 6 74 59 7 4
VMA 198 207 214 20 7
Absorbed Asphalt 009 009 009 009
Effective Asphalt 491 591 691 591
Unit Weight pcf 1522 1520 1524 1520
Stabilareter Value 38l 292 220 292
Cbhesiclneter Value 263 186 176 186
~t Mldulus 103psi
2-day 222 222 207 222
Fulal 380 289 293 289
5
w 40 C gt a 30 Ill ~ 20 m C 1- 10
24 ----------
22 bull C Cl C
zi 20
C1 o 18 0 gt
16 ___-________-------i-_-
400---------- 15a------------
156l 300 C gt - a =deg 154ti 200
iii z0 IUiii 0 152 bull bull~ 10018
150 ___ _______ __J0 ---i--J~-L--1
500----------12 ----------- bull o 400 -
Ill 10 ui l 300 -Q
Qg 8 g 200a lt z 6 l 100
iii a
01--J-----__ __4 -------r------- 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
RESIDUE COrlTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B59
Table B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Design 60
Eeidue omtent 575 690 805 D=sign 690
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleo~tical Specific Gravity
1lir Voids
VMA
Absocbed Asralt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcf
Stabilcmeter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
Eeilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
Ill 40 J
lt gt a 30 w I-w 0 20 Ill lt I-
10
400
w 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 Id
8100
0 12
10 m Q
0 8gt 5 lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
~
RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASISI
24371 24441 24445
26744 26373 26020
89 73 61 73
199 205 213 205
019 019 019 019
481 581 681 581
1521 1525 1525 1525
335 236 191 236
220 164 180 164
194 199 191 199
388 329 294 329
24
22
ci 0 lt i
20i
= a
= 18 0 gt
16
158
156 u a
deg154 = w Q
152 ---------150
500 a
1 400 m3 300 1 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100
Ill a
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COHTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B60
APPENDIX C
DATA ANALYSIS SOLVENT FREE AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS
Table Cl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL e_AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
95 85 80
867
76
88
90 85 85
867
29
33
95 85 85
883
58
65
85 70 80
783
76
98
100 100 100
1000
00
00
100 100 100
1000
00
00
C M s 0
D A T A x s
CV
80 80 80
800
00
oo
80 75 75
767
29
38
75 80 70
750
50
67
70 80 75
750
50
67
90 90
100
933
58
62
95 100
95
967
29
30
C M s 1
D A T A
X s
CV
80 75 70
750
50
67
60 70 55
617
76
124
70 70 65
683
-2 9
42
65 70 60
650
50
77
65 70 70
683
29
42
70 60 65
650
50
77
Table C2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating
F01
E 2 ll877 7777778 243aassese9 1)75102041 329 532 ~ middot2 1ll77777777~ 73RBSeSf89 32571~2-~5 3~ 29 532 J 1 150 ooocooo 150JOJOOOO 5f122llll9 414 746
EA ll 8114 llllll11444 2111111111 3J51224 266 396 -E~ middot2- 1-0frOOfr~ 0-9 middot50-middot000 3 oco middot2middot20110816 middot 329 532 Agt 2 77 7777778 38 8815589 17142857 329 532 nJ 4 1555555~55 388881889 171112857 266 396
FR RmiddotJR 36 8166666567 225851B52
------------------------------------------------middot---------------------ronmiddotL 53 -esoo--000000r
Cl
100
P
c5 75 z-t-lt8 50 w t-lt bull css-oC
CMS-0w 25a C middot+ CMS-7 C lt
0-----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Cl Mean AggregateCqqting at middotoesign Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 867 css-o 883 CSS-0 783 css-o 1000 css-o 1000middotcss-o middot I I CMS-0 800 CMS-0 7~ 7 CMS-0 750 CMS-0 933 CMS-0 967lrMS-0 750
I CMS-7 750 CMS-7 617 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 65 0 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating
C2
Table C3 Film Stripping
EMULSION
AGGREGATE SAN
BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK
C s s 0
D A T A
5
0
10
5
5
0
X s
CV
25
35
1414
75
35
47l
25
35
1414
C M s 0
D A T A
0
5
5
7
0
0
X s
CV
25
35
1414
60
14
236
00
oo oo
C M s 7
D A T A
0
0
0
5
0
0
X s
CV
00 OQ 00
25 35
1414
00 00
oo
Table C4 ANOVA Summary Film Stripping
AN-OVA
middotmiddotDPmiddot -ss- F middotFe5
E 2 33 7777778 1euro8888889 23555191 426 802 A 2 -ti8 7777778 343888889 4 7984496 426 802
E X II 4 9 2222226 23055557 3217054 363 642 ERROI 9 645000000 71666667 ---------------TOTAL 17 1762777782
C3
fl w 0 lti 1L a =gt en C w C C-a I-en
40
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-730
20
10
0 SB F GR
Figure C3 Film Stripping
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
css-o 25 css-o 75 css-o 25
GMS-0 25 CMS-0 60 CMS-0 oo
CMS-7 oo CMS-7 25 CMS-7 oo
----middot----middot-middotmiddotmiddot
Nlte Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping
C4
Table CS 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue
Content 10 3 psi
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW D
118 170A 217 205 160 175
C T 83 190 191 182 130 185A s )ts 101 180 204 194 145 180
0 s 25 14 18 16 21 7
CV 246 79 90 84 146 39 D 104 185 155A 190 140 215
C T 82 155 154 171 130 180A M x 93s 170 155 181 135 198
s 16 21 1 13 7 250 CV 167 125 05 74 52 125
D A ab 55 35 73 38 55
C T
82A 48 63 77 45 65 M X s pound81 -- - 52 49 75 42 60 s7 l 5 20 3 5 7
CV 18 96 404 38 11 9 11 8
Table C6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus
A N ) V l
-D-F -SS
E 2 832263888888 _ 2-- -5441-- 722-2222-J 1 89933611111
E~ 4 5386 7777779 -1J- 2- -3-8-1-+-rG-55--5-5-5 7- bull AJ 2 144235~899 EA 4 58024444443
ERROR 113- 3951500 00~-J
---------------------------------------------------------------------TOT-W- -3-5 -11806-4---638 881gt-9-
(116131944444 2720-8611111 89933611111 13466944445 1-9Q lh-5--amp7--+7-8-7211944445
14506111111 219 527-7778
1895577629 -12 394-1541-409569480
61345059 S-~937872 32952081 56gt7870Ll
357 3-S7 443 295
-]y5+ 3S7 295
605 6 05--833 461
-6--05-605 461
cs
bull css-omiddot 300 C CMS-0
M 0 diams CMS-7
(J
3200 gt C 0 E 1-
ffi 100
01----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure CS 2 Day ResiLient Modulus
SAN middotBERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 101 css-o 180 rss-o 204 css-0_194 CSS-0 145 CMS-0 198
CMS-0 93 CMS-0 170 ICMS-0 155 CMS-0 181 CMS-0 135 css-o 180l l l I I CMS-7 81 CMS-7 52 CMS-7 49 CMS-7 75 CMS-7 42 CMS-7 60
Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C6 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking 2 Day
Resilient Modulus 10 3 psi
C6
Table C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Content 10 psi
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A (
s
CV
260
232
246
20
80
320
280
300
28
94
482
299
391
129
33l
365
358
362
5
l4
280
240
260 28
109
320
345
333
18
53
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
267
250
259
12
47
295
280
288
ll
37
253
288
271
25
92
290
387
339
69
203
260
307
284
33
11 7
395
334
365
43
118
C M s 7
D A T A
X
s
CV
78
64
71-
10
139
110
95
103
ll
104
75
73
74
l
19
110
135
123
18
144
80
90
85
7
83
110
135
123
18
144
middotTable C8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus
-~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------F-r05- ---F-01--
E
J El -E- Al EAJ
-ERRJR
2 2-1 4 -~ 2 4
18
3592750555555 -14506 722-2221-171610COOOOJ 147394444445
1---1-1----lf466-li-+ 19215000000 55353333333
2850GOOC0000
17-16375277778 72~336H-1-11
1716100)0000 36848611111 sect8~5833---3-33--9607500000
13840833333 ~ 58-3 33-33 333
11315528C7 -45810702
109385263 23272807 ~U981l-2-1-6067895 3741579
357 -3 r7 443 2 95 3~7-357 295
605 605 833 461 605 605 4 6 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------~- 3-5- -448+1----2-222-2-
C7
bull css-o500
CMS-0 U) diams CMS-7C
C) 400 middoto -
~ 300
J Ci 200
1-z 100 J-UJ UIa
01-------------------------~---~-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
eMS-0 259 ess-a 300 ess-a 391 ess-a 362 eMS-0 284 CMS-0 365
ess-o 246l l l l l ICMS-0 288 eMS-0 271 CMS-0 339 ess-o 260 ess-o 333
CMS-7 71 CMS-7 103 CMS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123
t-ote Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure ca Newrnan-Keuls Ranking Full Cure 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi
ca
Table C9 Density at Design Residue Content pcpound
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
1359
1372
1366
09
07
1365
1365
1365
0
0
1365
1352
1359
09
07
1345
1345
1345
0
0
1520
1525
1523
04
02
1515
1515
1515
0
0
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
1348
1343
1346
04
03
1330
1338
1334
06
04
1329
1340
1335
08
06
1335
1316
1326
- 13
10
1505
1490
1498
11
07
1490
1485
1488
04
02
C M s 7
D A T A
x s
CV
1373 1385
1379
09 06
1375 137 5
1375
0 0
1380
1379
1380
01 01
1370
1360
1365
07 05
1537
1535
1536
01 01
1543
1545
1544
01 01
Table ClO ANOVA Surtunary Density
A II O V ~
-SS F bull O1
E _ 0
2 i
lCB4155555 Z08-tOS389
II 311277~
54207777R 1 ouos2sirrs
4340277
135q23660 -25lS 7i80R63-
1087331173
3S7 3 ~7 443
i()5 605 83
EA Q
4 -2
1599U4U5 _iuseeg
399E11 -3-3UUL45-
10J17398 bull~3785-C7
295 -~S7-
4 f 1 -6CS
A) 2 13772222 o6886111 17251218 357 605 EAJ q 2C361111 5090278 12752262 295 4 61
-ERRJR- 13- 718-()001 399166-7-
35
C9
bull css-o160 CMS-0 diams CMS-7
150
() -a gt 140 -en z w
middotC 13
1201~bull-------------r---------------SBH SBL FH FL ~RH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C9 - Density at Design Residue Content
SAN middotBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 138o CMS-7 1365ICMS-7 1375 CMS-7 1544
css-o 1366
I-7 bull rMS-7 1536
css-o 1365 css-o 1359 css-o 1345 css-o 1523 CSS-0 j515
CMS-0 1346 CMS-0 1334 CMS-0 1335 CMS-0 132 6 CMS-0 1498 CMS-0 1488
Nte Values with a ccmnm vertical line are not statistically different
Figure ClO Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcpound
ClO
Table Cll Air Voids at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
D 87 7 0-A 75 77 80 72
C T 71 70 92 82 78 73A s )s 79 70 84 80 79 73
0 s ll 0 12 04 01 01
CV 143 0 144 45 18 10 D 97 93A 93 91 82 84
C T 90 92 A
91 93 87 90
M x 94 93 92 s 92 84 87 s os 01 01 _0l 04 04
0 53 08 15 15 42 49CV D A 77 62 73 62 71 48
C T 73 61 62 71 65A 55
M X s 75 62 68 67 68 52 s 03 01 08 06 04 057
CV 38 12 115 96 62 96
Table Cl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids
A I O Y 11
-DF ss -F 05 F01
E 2 382650000 191325000 69)150301 3~7 605 -A 2 -2-681667 1340334 ll03567311 -3- 57 605
Q 1 2f677778 26677778 952324f6 4 13 I 33 EA lj 13S33333 3313333 122011409 2 95 Ii 61 ti -2 l8105555- -905-277-8- 326553tO 357 tiOS II) 2 6572221 3296111 11953707 357 605 E~l 4 88411445 2211111 797552 795 4 f 1 ERElll 111 11991)0)00 bull2172222-
-------------------------~------------------------------------------rou1 s SJ 3100000-
Cll
11
10
iP- en 0-0 gt aa
9
8
7
6
5
4
bull css-o CMS-o diams CMS~7
SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
F-igure Cll Air Voids at middotoesign Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 94 CMS-0 93 CMS-0 92 ICMS-0 92 CMS-0 84 ICMS-0 87
IIcss-o 79 css-o 7 0 I II
css-o 79 css-o 73
I ~_ I~ CMS-7 7 5 CMS-7 62 CMS-7 68 CMS-7 48 - - bull-- ~ -----~middot-middotmiddot--middot-middotmiddot-middot ---middotmiddot
~= Values with a OCIlOn vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids
Cl2
Table Cl3 Stabilorneter Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
272
3113
293 29
99
270
265
268 04
13
393
327
360 47
130
380
325
353 39
110
270
270
270 0
0
235
185
210 35
168
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
375
344
360
22
61
340
350
345
07
21
307
377
342
50
145
415
367
39l
33
85
350
300
3-2 5
35
109
240
245
243
04
15
C M s 7
D A T A
x s
CV
235
23-5
235
0
0
130
120
125
07
57
213
233
-223
14
63
150
200
175
35
202
350
350
350
0
0
250
250
25 o_ 0
0
Table Cl4~ ANOVA Summary Stabilorneter Value
A N O V 1
soua= SS r 01
E 2 2
7086172721 9702C93fl9
3543086361 4SS10Uf95
505343236 ~-9189501
357 357
605 605
) 1 175 6950250 1756950250 25053)2i8 443 833 EA 4 6718347112 167 9586 778 23955053 2 95 461 ~ ~544 -4 Q-432-ll-25-0- --S--~ 38 ~5-19- -3 5- ios AJ 2 941227166 47(1euro13583 57122663 357 605 EAJ 4 289779333 72319A33 10314831 2 95 II f 1
Ell ngtR -18 1r2024gt0) -i- bull112472-
---------------------------------------------------------------------0-T- ----5- 4-9B1 is~v~
Cl3
50
w 40 I ltgt a 30w I-w ~ 200 I-m lt 10I-u
0 SSH SBL FH FL GRH
AGGREGATE
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
GRL
Figure Cl3 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 350 CMS-7 250ICMS-0 360 ICMS-0 345 r=ss-o 36o rMS-0 39l
css-o 268 CMS-0 342 css-o 353 CMS-0 325 CMS-0 243Icsbull-bull _ CMS-7 235 CMS-7 12S CMS-7 223 CMS-7 175 css-o 270 css-o 210
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value
Cl4
Table Cl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOWHIGH LOW LOWHIGH D 360193 280 465 275 250A T 234 345 183 375 160 225C A
s x 214 353 232 420 218 238s s 29 11 69 64 18810
136 30 296 152 37 4 74CV D 280 440 230 355 200 320 T A
252 430 219 450 140 240C A M x 266 435 225 403 170 280s s 20 7 67 428 570
74 16 16735 250 202CV D
80 190 122 245 130 170 T A
82 180 192 235 120 180C A M X 81 185 157 240 125 175s s l 7 so 7 777
CV 18 3038 31 5 57 40
Table Cl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value
-SS--
pound 2 1309717272222 654858611111 1102309084 357 605 __ 2 3Ber61222222 194033611--111 -1-1t2J3570 -3 57 605 J 1 12)524904445 120524f94111145 711)1137379 1143 l 33
EA 4 2311~U411111145 57795111111 355~57119 295 4 ~ 1
~ + --8-066---H~i-i--2 ---4-B3-a~--H ~T4-=7-7S~J -3 S7 605 1J 2 111206 7222222 71033511111 ll3~31111 3 57 605 EAJ 4 500gt1111111 12512777778 7587162 235 4 (- 1
RAO- -18 -999 500-000( -1-6--2-7 -75-00000-
--------------------------------------------------------------------tO+--l- el-i- 3-fi-99g6-3-R-~
Cl5
bull css-o500
Q1__________---___-----~
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure ClS CohesiometerValue at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 232rMS-0 435 CMS-0 280rMS-0 266 rss-o 420 tss-o 218
css-o 214 css-o 353 CMS-0 225 CMS-0 403 css-o 238ICMS-0 170
CMS-7 81 CMS-7 185 CMS-7 157 CMS-7 240 CMS-7 125 CMS-7 175
Nrte Values with a oamon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value
~400 -I ltgt cc 300 w 1-w E 2000 -() w c 1008
CMS-0 diams CMS-7
Cl6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Table Cl7 Swell at Design Residue Content in
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
0 0000 0003 0000 0008 0000 0000A C T 0000 0005 0000 0007 0000 0002
A 0000 0004 0000 0009 0000 0000 s j( 00000 00040 00000 00080s 00000 00007
0 s 00000 00010 00000 0 0010 00000 00012
CV 00 250 00 125 00 1732 D 0000 _o 045 0020 0036 0000 0000A 0006 0029 0018 0040 0001 0000TC A 0007 0040 0022 0039 0000 0000
M x 00043 00380 00200 00383 00003 00000 s s 00038 00082 00020 00021 00006 00000 0
874 215CV 100 54 1732 oo
D 0000 0004 0000 0003 0000 0000A T 0000 0002 0000 0000 0000 0000
C A 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000
M x 00000 OQ023s 00000 00010 00000 00000 s 00000 00015 00000 00017 00000 00000
7 oo 655 1732CV 00 00 oo
Table Cl8 ANOVA Summary Swell
P N O V ~
SOUR-middotEmiddot l)f -ss- -lSmiddot F rs FM
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------E 2 C031905 )015953 7576385211 329 532 J 2 0012203 OOOf112 2~97R1n75 329 532 l 000858(1 )()QSf80 11122112111111 414 846
H LI 0016535 00)111311 1963258575 266 396 Emiddot) middot2middot 00079 51- a0ll397S 1eg ~16527 329 532 AJ 2 00011958 )0021179 111 ns1ne 329 532 EAJ II 0006609 OC01652 7e117l97t3 266 396
EDl 36 )000751 OOOJ021
TOBImiddot middot53middot ----008959-9-middot
Cl7
05
04
z 03
-I -I w
u 3 02
01
0 SBH SBL FH
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
FL GRH GRL AGGREGATE
FigureCl Swell at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 00003 css-o 00007CMS-0 00043 CMS-0 -0380 CMS-0 00200 CMS-0 00303
CMS-0 00000css-o 00080 css-o 00000Icss-o 00000 Icss-o 00040 ICSS-0 00000
CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00000CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00023 CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00010
Rte Values with ~--~~~ ~~ lb-le are not ~tatistically different
Figure Cl8 Newman-Keuls Ranking swell in
Cl8
Table Cl9o MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
-------EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
GRANITEROCKFRESNOSAN BERNARDINO
LOW LOWHIGH HIGH LOW HIGH D
124 72198 137 287 243A 227 90145 178 83 260TC 57197 135 252 270A
s 207 104 258 73139 239s s 17 05 56 29 14 17
0 CV 82 280 82638 233 53
D 197 160145 145 90 205A 19l 17092 100 80 220TC 158 105 138190A M x 182 119 11 7 85 205 156 s s 21 37 25 1607 15 0
115 737 105316 21l 83CV D 21 omiddot 240202 185 98 330A
220 20087 181 34588TC 216 210138 223 77 338A M x 215 217142 196 88 338s
s 2111 0805 58 237
23 405 120 22 96118CV
Table C20 ANOVA Summary -MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
----------------------- I N O V A
SO0RE --DF -lS--
middotE __ 2 2
401 11310n -5831137037
2008568519 --2915568519
166S53085 2111762euro92-
3-9 J29
532 532
Q 1 14f5364f296 14653646296 1215099198 4 14 746 EA-Ev
4 -frac34
2784740740 -1-1-i 0359259
696185185 -56-tl-1-79tr30-
5 772 8571 -6450815
266 middot-3-29
396 -5-32middotmiddot
110 2 355470370 177735185 1bull11738C30 329 532 EAO II 12794711075 3198euro9519 25523909 266 396
-Ei8JB 36- 11311 111euro66euro7 120596296
---------------------------------------------------------------------FOTAJ- --5-3- -31131--343-14 8-1-
Cl9
50 bull css-o ti) CMS-0 gt 40 diams CMS-7E I
a w 30I-w E 0 -I 20-ca ltC I-Cl) 10
0--------------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Cl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOWmiddot HIGH LOW
CMS-7 215 CMS-7 142 css-o 104 I ICMS-7 338 CMS-7 21 7
css-o 207 css-o 139 i CMS-7 88 CMS-0 156middot css-o middot
CMS-0 182 CMS-Q 119 CMS-0 117 CMS-0 85 CMS-0 205 css-o 73
Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
C20
-----------------------------------------
Table C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
IEMULSON
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIG_H LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A x s
CV
135 104 104
114
18
157
70 85 51
69
17
248
105 66
136
102
35
343
148 197
-173
35
201
107 101
72
93
19
201
74 107
92
91
17
182
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
128 85
174
119
31
256
73 59 -
66
10
150
69 36 65
56
18
318
158 110
-134
34
253
77 96 68
80
14
178
53 66
113
77
32
408
C M s 7
D A T A x s
CV
141 79 52
91
46
503
185 60 63
103
71
695
125 201
96
141
54
386
192 164 126
161
33
206
131 130 120
127
6
48
72 230
76
126
90
715
Table C22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
l II O Y A
-soaas -OF- -S-S- -F- FrOS
E -llmiddot J
n -tJ-AO EllJ
RROi
----------
2 2 1 u -2-2 4
36middot -------
199090000000 middot 39113 411111111111
4111296296 61982222222
-t-72-1-middot-11181-18-1-754737037011 41156 5185186
85722 middotbull)0(0000 ----------------
995115000000 -1971-7222222
11111216296 151195555556 -360-yen5-110-711 1middot
j8236851852 11166296297
middotmiddot2381 166667
111805138 -0280488 17265A9 6507548
-36111086-15058033
41589422
329 329 414 2 66 329 329 266
532 -532 746 396
-532 532 3915
-----------------------------------lOo-1- middottt 1-300-lamp833-333-3-
C21
400
CJgt ~ 300 I
0 w I-w 200
-~ 0 CJwc 1000 ()
0
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Valueat Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 ll9 CMS-7 103 ICMS-7 141 css-o 173 CMS-7 127 CMS-7 126
css-o ll4 css-o 69 1middotcss-o 102 CMS-7 161 css-o 93 css-o 91
CMS-7 91 CMS-0 66 middotCMS-0 56 CMS~O 134 CMS-0 80 CMS-0 77
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C22 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
C22
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table C23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
724 811 637
724
123
170
1289 -
1276
1283
09
07
627 628 695
650
39
60
622 940
1427
996
405
407
475 407
1276
719
483
672
803 790 498
697
172
247
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
1217 393
1260
957
489
511
2075 2879 1875
2276
532
233
1943 1195 2012
171 7
453
264
1241 1224 1208
1224
1 7
13
676 574 550
600
67
112
986 787 815
863
108
125
C M s 7
D A T A x s
CV
642 620 774
679
83
123
102 426 662
397 281
709
59 7 369 470
479 114
239
588 60l 290
493
176
357
301 263 393
319
67
210
238 284 227
250 30
121
Table C24 ANOVA Surmnary Surface Abrasion
Fmiddot F01middotmiddotss --------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------
e Amiddot
2 -gt
530361248149 22)938237037
315180624075 110469111)519
432152433 1sn1of15
329 329
532 532
1 n
1 4
[14699201852 9733 179629euro
446992gt1952 24332949074
61289-8 3335u~111
414 266
746 396
EJ J
2 2
middot59516003103 85017525926
291seoo1as1 425)8752963
4 9nn2 5 828630
329 329
532 532
EI 4 196475151852 4911877963 57349619 266 396
ERRJl 36 262551800000 72931l~-556
--------------------------------------------------------------------
middotTnUmiddot 53- middot159689-~0964815middot
C23
300
E C)
C)200 Cl)
0 J
z 0 en 100 lti a al lti
01-----r----~---------r---------SBH SBL
Figure C23
SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW
CMS-0 957 CMS-0 2276
css-o 724 css-o 1283
CMS-7 679 CMS-7 397
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content
FRESNO
HIGH
CMS-0 171 7
css-o 65o
CMS-7 479l
LOW
CMS-0 1224
ICSS-0 996
CMS-7 493
GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW
css-o
CMS-0
719
600
ICMS-0 863Icss-
CMS-7 319 CMS-7 250
Ngtte Val~ with~ ~n vertical line are not stati~tically different
Figure C24 Newman-Keuls Ranking Surface Abrasion grams
C24
APPENDIX D
DATA ANALYSIS SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS
----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
Table Dl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15
SEA
D A T A
75 85 85
85 80 85
80 75 70
65 70 70
85 90 90
80 85 85
X s
tV
817
58
71
833
29
35
7-50
50
67
683
29
42
middot88 3
29
33
833
29
35
ss 30 see
D A T A
85 80 85
75 80 80
75 85 85
70 80 70
90 85 95
90 80 90
x s
CV
833
29
35
783
29
37
81 7
58
71
733
58
79
-900
50
56
883
29
33
C M s 7
D A T A
80 75 70
60 70 55
70 70 65
65 70 60
65 70 70
70 )0 65
x s
CV
750 50
67
617 76
124
683 29
42
650 50
77
683 29
42
650
50
77
Table D2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating
rmiddot rs F05 F 0 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------F 2 235 712593 1179 f-296297 553913Q113 329 532 a 2 63 bullTlt1ll81I R 31L97UC7U 1521731 3 29 532 E~
11 3f2 116i14f Jmiddot 39 (1)7111~gtI 1
3~2 ~-2900 9976~5185
17 ~li347F3 UfB47826
4 14 256
746 96
i) ~ pound 2S 11252i 12 29(-29 bull 5086957 329 532
a~ 2 12 ~-~737r o lt19518~ 2E260e7 329 53 2 u ll 1f3 bull illf illt7 41t3S1B52 191156522 2 G6 3~f
iE1190il 3i 76 pound61iz~57 212~-25
Dl
-~ -CJ z I-lt(
0 0 U1 -lt( C bull SS 15 SEA w 25 SS 30 SEA CJ cc
diams CMS - 7CJ lt(
0 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dle Mean Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
I SS-30 733SS-301 $33 SS-15amp 833 lss-301 sn 7 I ISS-30 900 SS-30 883
SS-151 817 SS-301 783 SS-15 683 SS-15 883 SS-15 833SS-lSi 750
CIS--7 750 CS-7 617 OS-7 683 CMS-7 650 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650
Ngtte Values with a comon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating
D2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
Table D3 Film Stripping
EMULSION
AGGREGATE SAN
BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK
s s
15
0 A T A
30
15 20
30 15
25
X s
CV
225
106
47l
250
71
283
200
71 354
s s
30
D A T A
25
25
0
0
5
0
X s
CV
25middoto
oo
00
oo oo
oo
2middotmiddot5
35
1413
C M s 7
D A T A
0
0 0
5
0 0
X s
CV
oo
00 oo
25
35
1413
oo
00 oo
Table D4 ANOVA Swnmary Film Stripping
----------------- ---------------- --middot-----------middot----- middot--middotmiddotmiddot middot- middotmiddot-middot----middot -middot-- middotmiddotmiddot--- --- -------- -A N O V J
-SW~ middotnt r-
pound 2 14333333113 7166666667 27 1S78lttl7 l 2 2]33333333 1165666euro67 middot11t1210~26 Eirl 141 55f 3333335 13958333311 i2894737
Dlli~RI 9 237 50CCDIOmiddot) 2638888P9
lOUL t7 bull--- bullbull - bull- 0 bull bullbull bull- bull bull 0 -------- bull-- bull- bull---bull ---- lt -bullbull bull - bullbullbull--bullbullbullbullbull-bullbull-- bullbullbull bull ___ bull --bull bull bull bull --- bull bull-bullho bullbull bull- bull bull ~-- bull- UO rArr-d bull
D3
cit -w
0 lt( ll a (I)
C w 0 C-a I-ti)
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
20
1
0 SB F GR
Figure D3c Film Stripping
SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO
Iss-3
SS-15
250
225
SS-15~7 250
25
SS-15
ISS-30
200
25
ClIS-7 oo middot SS-30 00 CMS-7 00
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping
D4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue 3Content 10 psi
-------ElAULSWN
----QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCK SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
D S$ 1U H9 171 185 110 159
i22 2~1 165 197 159 165A15Jo-ot----t----+---ii---+----t-----ti 132 140 168 191 135 162
SEA s i3 1 4 9 35 4
CV Ul2 10 25 44 258 26
$5 ---
D
~ A
158
140
189
198 184 187
212
201
178
173
222
199
gtUfl x l49 194 186 207 176 211 SEA s 13 6 2 8 4 16
CV 85 33 11 38 20 77
C M
D A T A
80
82 55 48
35
63
73
77
38
45 55
65
s x 81 52 49 75 42 60
7 s
CV
1
18
5
96 20
404
3
38 5
119
7
118
Table D6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus
--=======-=-middot------=====--=- ---------------------==-~----------=-----e=-----BF SS lS F F05 F01
pound 2 ln~13~ 3lBillllll1l 52367 191141145 3715181747 357 605 I 2 29111 GllS5SSS6 111155 bull 5211778 103289966 357 605 l 1 3l$3351l11112 33$3-3611112 240095590 4113 A33 lEamp liL 31121111l11U1t zst-n22t77 8 ssu21119a 295 461 pound~ 2 1217222222 16093611111 432112657 357 605 III 2 n~ bullEHOq 1a ----------
521iwSSSS5 15S911111111 25Jot 5lll)~Oll)il))I
31l527777R 4117277777~ iJl9166657
22C3627) -2H1157
357 2~95
6~5 11 61
-=====------middot--- -- -- middotmiddot-- --middot-llOl~L lS
DS
bull SS 15 SEA 11 SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
-(D -l Q 0 E J-
ffi 1 J-(J wa gtlt 0 Q--------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL (I
AGGREGATE
Figure D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-3~1 l49 SS-3H J86 SS-10 207 SS-30 176 SS-30 211
SS-15amp 132 SS-15amp l40 SS-151168 SS-l51 l91 ss-lSi 135 SS-15 162I I I CS-7 81 CMS-7 52 OS-7 42 CMS-7 60
llite Values with a amron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent
Figure D6 Newman-Keuls Ranking 2 Day 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi
D6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Table D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Contentr 10 psi
-EMULSION OUALITY LEVELcAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15
SEA
D A T A
325
271
l]JD
260
390
340
319
348
272
367
302
356
x s
CV
29S
38
128
285
35
124
365
35
97
334
21
62
320
67
21 0
329
38
116
ss 30 SEJ
0 A T A
282
310
337
255
303
374
362
307
318
308
289
329
x s
CV
296
20
67
296
58
196
339
50
148
335
39
116
313
7
23
309
28
92
C M s 7
D A T A
78
64
110
95
75
73
110
135
80
90
85
7
83
110
135
x s
CV
71
10
139
103
11
104
74
1
19
123
18
144
123
18
144
Table D8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus
A N O V ll
E 2- 3r39El11 3middotl8tB89 196 994 L19 44 44 5 178 q233024 3 57 6 CS 2 9111~7222223 4058 3611112 3 57577(13 357 6csbulla 11 611~ li9llll41115 ~16 ampll44445 S585579 443 833
_n_ sect 251l-illll41sectl41 -531 31i 11111 AS7121pound3 295 4 61 EJ 2 lt 115 $555555 227 521777 8 1994213 357 605 iampJ 2 170555555 15)277778 0770121 357 605 __ElJ 1324111ilJlilil4 5 208 bull 11Ul 11 bull 184922 2 95 4 ( 1
nan 11 19P73 SOOJIO~ 11111D833l33
middotmiddot-- =--=--=-==-===--c-=-c------_--=--ngtllllll
----------------------------------middot----
D7
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
traquo diams CMS - 7a ()
0--Gl ~- I J _J bull C 02 E I-z w J-(J w C
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATEmiddot
Figure D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HJGH lOW HJGH LOW HIGH LOW
I I I Iss-il51 298 1SS-31l 295 ss-]5~ 365 SS-30 335 1middot SS-15 320 SS-15 329
SS-301 296 SS-l5amp 235 SS-301 339 SS-15 334 SS-30 313 SS-30 309
CIIS--7 71 OS-7 103 CHS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123
t-bte Values with a armon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D8 Newman-Keuls Ranking Full Cure
Resilient Modulus 103 psi
D8
----- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D9 Density at Design Residue Content pcf
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
LOWHJGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH D l341 6 ll339 1347 1338 1523ss 1500A T 1356 133S 1350 1333 1513 1497A
1~ x l351 l337 1349 1336 1518 1499 sSEA 07 02 02 04 07 02
05 02 02 03CV 05 01
D 1362 1352 1370 1355 1545A 1520ss T 1371 1355 1361 1354 1550 1525
30 A
x 1367 1354 1366 1355 1548 1523 SEA 02 06s 06 01 04 04
05 02 05 01 02 02CV D 1373 1375 1380 1370 1537 1543AC T 1385 1375 137 9 1360 1535 1545AM x 1379 1375 1380 1365 1536 1544s s 09 oo 01 07 01 017
06 ooCV 01 05 01 01
Table DlO ANOVA Summary Density
N O V ll -----middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddotmiddot-- -- --------- -------middot --------------- ----- - - -
smI=pound DF ss F F05 F01
pound 2 2738H9 310369445 153505090 357 605 ~ 2 2273iWlllbull38B9 11369544445 5530 gt35704 357 lj -~5 ~ 1 11-6~2SilllaquollO 12 602500C 524057772 443 R33 n I tpoundlUll11 Jl-69lll45 2-324621e 2 95 4 61 E 2 3131poundpound57 15i5S33J 7 7537nB 357 li os lJ 2 ltClfltSf-57 0433334 21458C6 357 s 05 n~ Iii )l216poundfi6lii 9556667 47372764 295 451
EHJii 11l 3 bull nsilraquorn 2019444
------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -- -middotmiddot-middot ----- -middotmiddot - middot-------
35 23611rJC556
D9
1 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
-0 a gt1 ()
z
diams CMS-7
w C
120 SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure D9 Density at Design Residue Coritent
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
OS--7 1379 aS-7 ]375 IClIS-7 l380 IOlS-7 1365 ISS-30 1548 CMS-7 1544ISS-30~ 1367 SS--30~ J354 SS-30~ 1366 SS-30~ 1355 CMS-7 1536 SS-30 1523
SS-15bull 1351 ss-is~ 1337 SS-15bull 1349 ss-1s 1336 SS-15 1518 SS-15 1499
NJte Values with a omron vertical lme are not statistically different
Figure D10 Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcf
DlO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
Table D11 Air Voids at Design Residue Content
-EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
107
)5
9 10l
91
99
79
99
80
83
8 bull5
84
I s
ICY
U)
Ill 9
B4
10l
03
28
95
06
60
89
14
159
82
02
26
85
01
08
ss 30j
SEA
D A T A
90
93
92
85
92
96
86
84
66
67
74
73
x s
CV
92
02
23
89
05
56
94
03
30
85
01
l 7
67
01
ll
74
01
10
C M s 7
D A T A
77
73
62
61
73
62
63
71
71
65
48
55
x s
CV
75
03
38
62
O~l
12
68
08
u5
67
06
96
68
04
62
52
05
96
Table Dl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids
A ll O V A --e--ee-ee=-==== -- -- middot- -- --- middot- - ------- - middot-----middot----middot ______ __________ ---middot- ----- - ------------- -
iiUEllilE ss ~s F F01
E 45111Hoiii6pound 225l08333 812457541 357 605 ll 1~-lilliillt~~)Q 7930)000 2519405 357 505 IJJ 11 ili$6J4141~ 16469444 59230768 443 8 33 E1 2J53ll3ll -5S5333 4 -2 bull 11755245 295 4 6 1
EJ 15672223 bull 783pound 112 2~131820 357 605 I 21022223 bull 1li 1112 bull 3$35365 357 cs
EampJ 2971111ll J27778 26713286 2 95 4t1 iElllllHgt 5cgt~SiIJOIgt -2790556
-middot--middot ------- --middot - middotmiddot- -middotmiddot--middot-- --3li
D11
11 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
-l
a - 8
-a 0 7gt tc ltI 6
5
4 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dll
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot
middot HIGH LOW
SS-]5amp JlJl ISS-ll5~ 10l
ISS-301 92 SS-311l11 89ICMS-7 75 CS-7 fi2
Air Voids at Design Residue Content
FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
=- 95 I I ISS-15 89 SS-15 82 SS-15 8 5
SS-31 94 SS-30 85 SS-30 74ICMS-7 68
OS-7 68 CMS-7 67 SS-30 67 CMS-7 52
Ngtte Values with a ommn vertical line are not statistically dilferent
Figure D12 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids
Dl2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
middotmiddotEMULSION OUAUTY LEVEL
~- AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
48S 3g_g
295
middot 32 8
439
396
397
418
288
307
223
307
X s
CV
443
64
144
312
23
75
418
30
73
408
15
36
298
13
45
265
59
224
ss 3Wo SEA
0 A T A
400
403
367
283
342
411
392
262
310
32-4
292
236
x s
CV
402
02
05
325
59
183
377
49
130
327
92
281
31 7
10
31
264
40
150
C M s 7
D A T A
235
235
130
120
213
233
150
200
350
350
250
250
x s
CV
235
00
00
125
07
57
223
14
63
175
35
202
350
oo oo
250
00
oo
Table Dl4 ANOVA Swnrnary Stabilometer Value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------A N O V A
---------~----------middot------middot-middotmiddot-- -middot--middot--middotmiddot--middot------ bull middotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middot middot------middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot--- --middotmiddot ---_ -- middotmiddot-middotmiddot-- -- - - - -----ss r r05 r01
2 1 i 7~ Sbull1lfipound5161S 5879033333 332259711 357 605 I 2 igtS895QGDgt 279475000 195117552 357 ~os i ll ~l ~
11 111 2 2
l~illflll1111111 7DS nll3331
1~il])2222] 755J5556
~ 111 8 11111~=-- 10115 834 71011111
37 7502778
275769841 128178912
U938281 251M309
11113 295 357 357
833 4f1 605 605
Ell~ 14middot 3~53lt1$1H 116340278 5750926 295 461 fElilli U 25977~illlllCII~ 1111H72222
------------------------ bull- ~bull OOM---bullbullbullbull- - bull------_________ _
roru
013
w J ltC gt a w 1-w E 0 I-m ltC Ishyen
SBH SBL FH FL
bull SS 15 SEA 5S 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-)Sll 441_3 SS-l 325I SS-JSi 4131 SS-15 40 8 CMS-7 350 SS-15 265
SS-30 402 SS-JSa 31_2I ISS-30~ 377 SS-30~ 327 SS-30 317 SS-30 264
CS-7 235 CMS-7 125 ISS-15 298 CMS-7 250
Nlte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D14 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value
Dl4
-------------------
Table Dl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
ii3
ii2
l7-1
ilJD3
236
76
308
62
112
85
222
180
l s
CY
63
lJ1
10
Jl39
SlJ
363
l56
J13
725
185
174
940
99
19
194
201
30
148
ss 30 SEA
0 A T A
229
306
266
187
78
130
260
136
157
212
186
164
x s
CV
268
55
204
227
56
247
104
37
354
198
88
443
185
39
211
175
16
89
C M s 7
D A T A
80
82
190
180
122
192
245
235
130
120
170
180
x s
CV
81
l
18
185
7
38
157
50
315
240
7
30
125
7 57
175
7
40
Table Dl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value
--------------------middot--------------------------------------------------------------A N O V A
-=====-=-=--=-- ===== ss
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1i712 7222222 83563611111 226671165 357 605 I 2 l~12 lllllliilllllllB9 71144441145 129864 357 605 ~ 1l 251116l 144141llllj 2ti-~H~bull4dimiddot4 4 44 5 71775602 443 833 n l4 37511ll 777JTI7JJ S395bull J 9 ~4middot444 2548 5405 295 4 e 1 poundJ 2 72lllS3SlffiifISlmiddot9 3fi22f9111114UU 9026921 357 6C5
n 2 1 iSigt555S
11321Bl 111111I 117lIT177778
33220277778 1277032 9~11333
357 297
605 461
Eliflll 11 f15357 tlOilOOibull 3ilf65Jgt)oo
---------------------------------------middot-------------------------------------------
D15
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7w
J lt(
gt a w Jshyw I 0-() w
8
O--------r-----r-----------r----r-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
c 1
Figure D15
SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW
SS-3(1JlS 268
81IOS-7
ISS-]5i 63 SS-lSl 139
Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 240 SS-30 185 SS-15 201
SS-lSi 155 SS-30l 198 CMS-7 125 SS-30 175
SS-JOi 104 SS-151 185 SS-15 99 CMS-7 175
Note Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Dl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value
D16
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D17 Swell at Design Residue Content in
EfAULSEON
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDI NO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH lOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 s~
D A T A
048 -
0413
06S
069
on
005
006
008
-025 045
005
004
004
005
009
014
Jt s
CY
HS
0010
000
D68
-003
45
bull 006
002
241
035
010
286
004
001
133
009
005
483
ss 30 SEA
D A T A
023
023
020
063
066
055
000
ooo
008
031
023
028
000 000 003
ooo
001
000
x s
CV
022
002
79
061
006
93
003
005
1732
027
004
148
oin
002
1732
ooo
001
1732
C M s 7
D A T A
000
ooo
000
004
002
001
ooo
ooo
000
003
000
ooo 000 000 ooo
ooo
ooo
000
x s
CV
000
ooo
ooo
002
002
655
ooo
ooo
ooo
001
002
1732
ooo
ooo
ooo
ooo
ooo
000
Table D18 ANOVA Summary Swell ( Transformed Data)
A N O Y A
E 2 _1025326 0912663 2353471(154 329 532 -Amiddot middotmiddot2 1366452 0683226 1761825136 329 532 0 1 0368219 03613219 949521081 1114 7116
EA 11 04627$7 0115697 298345558 266 396 -EQ- 2-- --006-903G- -0(134515-middot -8-9003553 middot3l9 -S-32 A) 2 0150358 ~0075179 193863014 329 532 UO 4 0083986 0020997 54143375 26 396
-ERRORmiddot 36 0139606middot 0003178
-TOTIIL 53 --446-576-11
D17
05 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
04
z -J
J w IJJ
SBH SBL
diams CMS - 7
~oo
_02
01
FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dl7 Swell at Design Residue Content
SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-ll51 ii-IS SS-]5i il68 SS-15 a006 SS-15 bull 035 SS-15 004 SS-15 009I I I I SS-3Cli 022 SS-301 061 ISS-301 003 SS-30 bull 027 ISS-30 bull 001 ISS-30 bull 000
ClS-7 000 CIS-7 002 OS-7 000 OIS-7 001 CMS-7 000 CMS-7 000
NJte Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D18 Newman-Keuls Ranking Swell in
D18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
Table Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSl10N
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOWHIGH 0 156 48 175 229 2lO 125ss A ll5 60 20l ll7 228 120T 13_g 4e 170 132 212 130A15 i 137 52 182 200 2l 7 125 smiddotSEA 2l 37 l7 30 lO 05
1middot5]CY 133 92 148 46 40 D 98 106 lll 76 2l 0 lllAss 203 109 76 5l 235 95T ll3 85 63 59 233 125
30 A
x 138 100 83 62 226 llOSEll s 57 l3 25 l3 l4 l5
412 131 298 206 62 136CV D 2lO 202 185 98 330 240A 220 87 18l 88 345 200C T 216 138 223 77 338 2lOAM x 215 142 196 88 338 217s
5805 23 lls 08 2l7
23 405 ll8 120 22 96CV
Table D20 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Stabilorneter Value
N O V A
-------middot------------------------------------------------------ ---------------DF -$ -F os- r01
pound 2 5919875926 2l59917963 39C147075fl 329 53 2 690 i1111pounda$11 iii 345 022110111 US51521111 329 5 32 Ill 1 763129-i296 763 1296 296 100671B132 414 7 U6
Ea t93 11171111]J)7lll 1007863519 1329576P8 266 391bullIEill -2 middot -E~ti35~259 -23middot0-H9fgt29 C-~6522- middot3 29 532 AO 2 S3amp11171t1137ll 11192351$5 55305370 329 532 El s1111i1r1075 135268519 17~qq579 266 396bullmiddotDll~t 311i 27239~333~ 7 5903711)111
53
--------------------------------------------------------middot-----------------------
D19
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA0)
gt diams CMS - 7 l I
a w 30fshyw E 0 J 2-en ltC Ishyen 10
SBH SSL FH FL GRH GRL01amp---------------------------_
AGGREGATE
Figure Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
middotHtGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
QS-1 235 CS-7 142 196 SS-15 200 CMS-7 338 CMS-7 217GS-
Iss-3H uaI I I ISS-3Qi lilG SS-15i ]S2 IOMS-7 88 SS-30 22~ SS-15 125
SS-151 137 ss-i5~ 52 SS-30~ 83 SS-30 62 SS-15 217 SS-30 110
fute Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent
Figure D20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
D20
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Table D2l MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
-------_cEMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
ss 1 sa
D A T A
x s
HIGH
Ul3 ~ JlU
43
64
IOW
~ TWlI ~
--
H1GH
159 1-43 126
143
17
LOW
123 187
60
123
64
HIGH
130 179 153
154
25
LOW
120 104 143
122
20
CV D A5S T A30 x
SEA s
171
139 88
104
110
26
-98 91 -95
4
116
114 116
69
100
27
515
TWT TWT TWT
--
159
111 101 15~
122
28
160
83 65 63
70
11
CV D AC T AM x5 s
7 CV
236
141 79 52
91
46
503
37
185 60 63
103
71
695
267
125 201
96
141
54
386
-192 164 126
161
33
206
23l
131 130 120
127
6
48
157
72 230
76
126
90
715
Too weak to test
Table D22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
SOO~e 55- -f middotFmiddot OS- F01
pound 2 19956 G31tl3Tt 99780165185 52791162 329 532 -1 2- 223ii~ 92592~-~ middot111544629630 -59015431 3middot29 5 32 J 1 n21lliiilliEiiii~ 1middot112106656666 75185029 414 746 lEJ Ill 32il76711ltCl~lll9l 132191851852 43485622 2euro6 396 ~ 2- ~373hllllllllllllllqSmiddot iiilfgtamp 1222-223- -3bull6middot3300811 -3 29 532 1i 2 1S011Hil12 75i0555556 bull ~397100 329 532 Eli
-a~llt-Iii
36 511J7777777
middot5B11113BB333 12799444444 129e l9 25 92 6middot
5771861 266 396
D21
bull SS 15 SEA U) SS 30 SEA gt diams CMS - 7E I
a w J-~ 200 0 en w5 100 0
SBH SBL FH FL AGGREGATE
GRH GRL
Figure D21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINO FRESNO
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 126SS-15 154]03 JCMS-7 161106-7 rmm SS-15 122CMS-7 127SS-30amp 95 ltMgt-7 ]Aj_ SS-15 123
SS-30 70
t-bte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
SS-30 122SS-151 93 SS-l51 fflT SS-30amp 100 SS-30 TWT
Figure D22 Ne-wman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
D22
Table D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW
ss 15 SEA
ss 30 SEA
C M s 7
HIGH D bullbullmiddot 979 715A middot 1143 569T A 1047 599
X - - 1056 - 628 s - - 82 - 77
CV - - 78 - 123
D 987 1474 548A T 907 1536 433 A 1447 615
x - - 947 1486 532 s - 57 46 92
CV - - 60 31 173 D 642 102 597 588 301A T 620 426 369 60l 263 A 774 662 470 290 3q_3
x 679 397 479 493 31 9
s 83 281 114 176 67
CV 123 709 239 357 21 0
1285 1353 1493
1377
106
77
627 72 2 634
661
53
80
238 284 22 7
250
30
121
Specimen swelled during soak could not ne tested Specimen disintegrated during testing
D23
300
E CJgt -200 en
en 0 J
z0 middot cii 100 lt( cc CD lt(
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
01--------r----T----J-----r----r SBH FH FL GRH GRL
middotAGGREGATE
Figure D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content
D24
APPENDIX E
FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL DESIGNS
Table El
Thickness T in Inches to Satisfyl
Tensile Strain Requirements (Reference 3)
Subirade l~octulus psi 30~0 6000 12000 30oco
Jverage Ann~abullAir erlerature J degF lt40 40-55 55-65 gt65 40 40-55 55-65 gt65 lt40 40-55 55-651gt65 lt4 0 40-55 55-65 gt65
T~affic EALbull 10bull
IllIf psi 50000 4 9 66 7 8 91 37 50 5e 66 2 26 28 29 2 2 2 2
1000~0 37 5 3 62 12 27 40 47 53 2 21 25 26 2 2 2 2
300000 21 J4 4 3 51 2 28 31 middot3 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
600000 2 24 3 2 39 2 2 2 _2 28 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2middot 2 2 2 290JCOO 2 2 26 33 2 2 2 22 2 2 2
Traffic EAL= 10s
trJ MR psi bull 50000 83 ll5 139 165 70 97 112 127 54 1-3 83 93 2 3 27 28 29 f-J
42 58 69 78 2 25 27 27100000 63 90 108 129 54 76 91 105
3COOOO 4o 58 73 8 3 3 51 60 73 24 39 ~8 56 2 2 20 22
600000 28 45 55 67 21 37 47 55 2 21 36 44 2 2 2 2
900000 21 37 4 7 57 2 30 39 48 2 21 29 37 2 I 2 2 2
TraCf1c 2 ~AL a 10~ I ia psi bull 50000 130 161 216 2~ 116 16l 187 213 98 131 151 172 63 66 93 58
82 0100000 98 14) 171 203 68 126 152 176 75 106 125 142 52 7 3
3CCOOO 6o 91 11 3 139 55 82 101 122 4 7 69 86 102 31 49 59 59
e~oooo 46 68 86 106 ~o 60 76 94 3middot 3 52 64 i9 2 35 4 r 54
900~00 37 56 72 69 )2 51 63 80 24 4 3 5 4 67 2 28 3 8 ul Trarr1el EAL~ 10 7
la psi bull 50000 192 24 24 24 178 239 24 24 156 205 235 24 12l 153 165 17 3 I
24 24 228 24 119 168 195 222 95 129 147 1s IlCOOCO 1~5 21 0 13 5 193
56 aa 10a 12 I-3CC000 aa 136 167 205 ~-3 12 156 186 74 11l 138 16~
I- l 6 a2 10060~ 1 ouo 6 4 100 125 156 59 92 ll 6 l~ 5 53 82 104 128
108 3 3 53 6 8 859ccooo 53 82 10 5 132 so 77 97 121 4 ~ 68 86
For asphalt volume Vb= 11 are air voids Va= 5 Use Figure El to correct thickness of other valuemiddots of Vb and Va
Table E2
Subsradlt Mcdulus psi
Thickness T in Inches to Satisfys Subgrade Strain Requirements (Reference 3)
6100 120003000 300CC
tr N
A~erage A~nual Ar Te11perature degF
Traffic EALbull 10bull
~IP psi 50000a
100000
300000
600000
900000
Traffic EAL 10 5
MR psibull 50000
lC0000
300000
600000
900000
Tra~~lc EAL c 1c6
MR psibull 50000
100000
300000
600POO
900000
Trafficz EALbull 10 7
MRt psibull 50000
100000
300000
600000
900000
lt40
55
55
55
55
55
81
81
81
81
81
115
115
115
115
115
155
155
155
155
155
40-55
83
60
55
55
55
121
87
81
Bl
Bl
168
123
11
115
ll5
226
165
155
155
155
55-65 gt65 lt40
108 115 46
73 82 46
55 55 46
5_ 45
55 55 46
145 165 69
106 120 69
a1 81 69
81 81 69
81 81 69
201 224 98
14B 165 98
115 115 98
115 115 98
115 115 98
24 24 1)6
199 222 135
15 155 136
155 155 136
155 155 136
40-55
10
50
46
46
46
103
74
69
69
69
150
108
98
98
9B
204
150
135
136
136
55-65 G5 lt40
83 93 30
61 70 30
46 46 30
45 46 30
46 46 30
124 139 55
91 102 55
69 69 55
69 69 55
69 69 55
173 193 83
130 147 83
98 98 83
98 98 83
98 98 83
239 24 120
179 199 120
136 136 120
136 136 120
135 136 120
40-55
4
3~
30
30
30
83
60
55
55
55
122
90
83
83
83
17 5
130
120
middot12 o
120
55-65 gt65 lt~O
62 69 25
46 53 25
30 30 25
30 30 25
30 30 25
9 106 29
82 29i 2 middot 55 55 29
55 55 29
55 55 29
144 15S 60
108 12l 60
83 83 60
83 83 60
83 83 6 0
205 226 90
155 112 90
120 120 90
120 120 90
120 120 90
40-55
31
25
25
25
25
52
30
29
29
29
86
65
60
60
60
127
98
90
90
90
55-65 bull65
33 35
29 3c
25 25 I 25 25 i 25 2s
51 67
47 52
29 29
29 29
29 29
95 10
76 85
60 I 6C
6C i 6o 50
14bull 3 14
112 126
90 90
90 90
90 90
Tj In Tc In 24 2 22
20
18
16 3
14
12 4
~ 10 Va+ vb 5
099
8 08 6
077 7 06
6 805
9045 1003
4 12
14
3 16
18
20
22 2 24
Figure El Correction of Pavement Design Thickness for Air Voids and
Asphalt Content of Mix (Reference 3)
E3
-------
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000 psi
MAAT 55- 65 F-Ul 400 CL
C) 0 300 (J) J
~ 200 0 ~
I- 100z w J-(J) 0+----------------------C w 0 2 4 6 8 middot10 12
THICKNESS IN
1X104 EAL
1X105EAL
Figure E2 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
M-AAT )65 F- -~---Ul 400 1x104 EALCL
CW)
0 300 (J) J 200C 0 ~
-~ 100 w -J -(J) 0w 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a
THICKNESS IN
1X105EAL
Figure E3 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 6000 psi MAAT = )65F
s
E4
w 400 c
()
0 300 () - 200 Cl 0 E
~ 100 w J-
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT 56-65 F
1x10 EALI 4
I 1X105 EAL
w o~---------------------r-w 1 2 3 4a
THICKNESS IN
Figure E4 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT )65F-w 400 4I 1X10 EALc () I 1X105EAL 0 300 I () I - I 200C I0 E I I- 100z w I-J I-() 0w 1 2 3 4c
THICKNESS IN~
Figure ES Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65Fs
ES
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
MAAT 55-65 F-en400 41X10 EALIC
(I) 1X105EAL middot 0
I I 300
en I J 200C 0
f-- 100z w J-en 0LU 2 4 6 8 10 14a
-THICKNESS IN
Figure E6 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
MmiddotAAT )65 F cn4oo I 1X104 EALa
(I) 1X105EAL 0 300
I I
en -I
~200 0 ~ 100 LU --en -I
0-1-----------------------LU 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a THICKNESS IN
Figure E7 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = )65F
E6
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT 55-65 F-u 400 41x10 EAL0
M 1x105EAL 0 T- 300 -en J 200C 0 E I- 100z w-J- en 0w C 0 middot1 2 3 4 middot5 6
THICKNESS IN
Figure E8 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000psi
M-AAT )65 F-en400
I --- - - ~- 1X104 EAL
C
a 1X105 EAL
0 I T- 300
I-en J
200 C 0 E
I- 100z w J-en 0w 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
THICKNESS IN
Figure E9 Thickness For Subgrade StrainRequirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65F
s
E7
Table E3
Thickness Requirements inches
= 6000 psi EAL= 1 X 104 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
MrT
l
CF Tc Ts
246000 34
64 37 43
300000 31
68 4middot 0 43
391000 27
lt 61 33 43
362000 28
64 31 43
260000 28
bull bull 61 35 43
333000 30
65 33 43
C M s 0
Mr Ti CF T Tc
s
259000 29
59 36 43
288000 32
bull 61 3 8 43
271000 32
59 39 43
339000 30
60 37 43
284000 32
59 40 43
365000 29
60 37 43
C M s 7
M T7
l
CF TTc
s
71000 55
65 60 43
103000 47 71
45 43
74000 54
67 53 43
123000 44 69
45 43
85000 52
65 54 43
123000 44
73 46 43
ss 15
M T7
l
CF T Tc s
298000 31
57 40 43
285000 32
59 38 43
365000 28
58 37 43
334000 30
61 36 43
320000 30
60 36 43
329000 30
61 36 43
ss 30
M T7
l
CF Tc Ts
296000 31
60 37 43
296000 31
62 36 43
339000 30
59 38 43
335000 30
bull 63 35 43
313000 31
65 34 43
309000 31
65 34 43
Ngtte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi TI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume middotTc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= llrickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
E8
Table E4
Thickness Requirements inches
Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
246000 68
64 74 70
300000 62 68
62 68
391000 55 61
65 68
362000 57 64
63 68
260000
57 bull 61
68 70
333000 59 65
65 68
C M s 0
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
259000 65 59
80 70
288000 63
bull 61 75 68
271000 64 59
78 70
339000 59 60
72 68
284000 63 59
78 68
365000 57 60
70 68
C M s 7
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
71000 100
bull 65 107 105
103000 90 bull 71
84 88
74000 100
67 102 104
123000 85 69
85 81
85000 95 65
102 97
123000 85 73
78 81
ss 15
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
298000 62 57
78 68
285000 63 59
76 68
365000 57 58
72 68
334000 59 61
72 68
320000 60 60
73 68
329000 59 61
70 68
ss 30
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
296000 62
60 74 68
296000 62
62 71 68
339000 59 59
72 68
335000 59
63 68 68
313000 60
bull 65 65 68
309000 60
65 65 68
1bte
M = Resilient mJdulus in psirf = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
E9
Table ES
Thickness Requirements inches 4
Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M Tdeg
J
CF T Tc
246000 40
64 46 45
300000middot 37 68
37 43
391000 33 61
38 43
362000 35
64 39 43
260000 39
61 45 45
333000 35
65 38 43
C M s 0
MT J
CF T Tc
s
259000 39 59
48 45
288000 38 61
middot4 6 44
271000 38 59
47 44
339000 35 60
43 43
284000 38 59
46 44
365000 35 60
43 43
C M s 7
M T7
J CF T Tc
s
71000 60 65
65 68
103000 52 71
48 64
74000 60 67
60 68
123000 50 bull 69 59 62
85000 58 65
63 67
123000 50 73
49 62
ss 15
M T7
J CF T Tc
s
298000 37 57
50 43
285000 38 59
48 44
365000 35 58
45 43
334000 35 61
43 43
320000 3 6
60 44 43
329000 37 61
45 43
ss 30
M T7
J CF TTc
s
296000 37 60
45 43
296000 37 62
43 43
339000 35 59
44 43
335000 35 bull 63
41 43
313000 36
65 39 43
309000 36
65 39 43
Nrte
M = Resilient nodulus in psiTI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T
5 = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El0
Table E6
Thickness Requirements inches
105E = 6000 psi EAL= 1 x psi MAAT = )65Fs
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
246000
79 64
87 70
300000
74 68
74 70
391000 69
61 81 70
362000 70
64 77 70
260000 77
61 90 70
333000 71
65 77 70
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 77
59 94 70
288000 75
61 90 70
271000 76
59 92 70
339000 71
60 87 70
284000 75
59 91 70
365000 69
60 85 70
C M s 7
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
71000 111
65 118 112
103000 103
middot11 95 98
74000 111
67 110 11l
123000 98
69 95 93
85000 109
65 119 109
123000 98
73 87 93
ss 15
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
298000 74 57
94 70
285000 7 5 59
94 70
365000 69 58
88 70
334000 7 1 middot 61
84 70
320000 72 60
87 70
329000 71 61
84 70
ss 30
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
296000 74
60 90 70
296000 74
62 86 70
339000 71 59
87 70
335000 71
63 82 70
313000 73
bull 65 78 70
309000 73
65 78 70
Note
M = Resilient midulus in psi11 = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness f9r tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade stram requirements inches
Ell
Table E7
Thickness Requirements inches4
= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
middot~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO -GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
246000 2 0
64 23 25
300000 20
68 2middot 0 25
391000 20
61 24 25
362000 20
64 23 25
260000 20
61 24 25
333000 20
65 22 25
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 20
59 25 25
288000 20
bull 61 24 25
271000 20
59 25 25
339000 20
60 25 25
284000 20
59 25 25
365000 20
60 25 25
C M s 7
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
71000 20
65 22 31
103000 20
middot71 20 29
74000 20
67 21 31
123000 20
69 20 28
85000 20
65 22 30
123000 20
73 20 28
ss M T7
l
298000 20
285000 20
365000 20
334000 20
320000 2 0
329000 20
15 CF T Tc
s
57 26 25
59 25 25
58 26 25
61 24 25
bull 60 25 25
61 24 2 i
ss 30
M T7
l
CF TTc
s
296000 20
60 25 25
296000 20
62 24 25
339000 20
59 25 25
335000 20
bull63 23 25
313000 20
65 22 25
309000 20
65 22 25
N)te
M = Resilient nodulus in psi middot T7 = Unrorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inchesct= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume T = Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T~ = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El2
Table E8
Thickness Requirements inches
Es= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s
M T7
l
246000 22
300000 20
391000 20
362000 20
260000 21
333000 20
s 0
CF T Tc
s
64 24 32
68 20 29
61 24 29
64 23 29
61 24 l 1
65 23 29
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 21 59
25 31
288000 21
bull 6J 24 30
271000 21 59
25 30
339000 20 60
25 29
284000
21 59
25 1 n
365000
20 60
25 2 q
C M
M T7
l
71000 27
103000 25
74000 27
123000 24
85000
26
123000
24 s 7
CF T Tc
s
65 28 53
71 24 45
bull 67 28 53
69
23 43
65
27 49
73
22 43
ss M T7
l
298000 20
285000 21
365000 20
334000 20
320000 20
329000 20
15 CF
TTc
s
57 27 29
59 26 30
58 27 29
61 24 29
60 25 29
61 24 2 q
ss 30
M r~i CF T Tc
s
296 ooomiddot 20 60
24 29
296000 20 62
23 29
339000 20 59
24 29
335000 20 63
23 29
313000 20 65
23 29
309000 20 65
23 29
i-krte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psiTf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade strain requirements inches
El3
Table E9
Thickness Requirements inches 4 = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
EMULSION __ QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
246000 20 64
23 25
300000 20 68
21 25
391000 20 61
24 25
362000 20 64
23 25
260000 20 61
24 25
333000 20 65
22 25
C M s 0
259000 20 59
26 25
288000 20
bull 61 middot24 25
271000 20 59
26 25
339000 20 60
25 25
284000 20 59
26 25
365000 20 60
25 25
C M s 7
MT7
1 CF T Tc
s
71000 20 65
22 58
103000 2~0 middotn
20 52
74000 20 67
21 58
123000 20 69
20 48
85000
20 65
22 57
123000
20 73
20 48
$$
15
MTdeg
1
CF T Tc
s
-298 000 20 57
27 25
285000 20 59
26 25
365000 20 58
26 25
334000 20 61
24 25
320000 2 0 60
25 25
329 000 20 61
24 25
ss 30
MT7
1
CF T Tc
s
296000 20 60
25 25
296000 20 62
24 25
339000 20 59
26 25
335000 20 63
23 25
313000 20 65
22 25
309000 20 65
22 25
tote
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot rf = Unagtrrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El4
Table ElO
Thickness Requirements inches 5E = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
s
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T--deg
J
CF T Tc
s
246000
24 64
27 31
300000
23 68
24 29
391000
22 61
25 29
362000
22 64
2_s 29
260000
26 61
31 30
333000
22 65
24 29
C M s 0
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s
259000 23
59 28 30
288000 23
bull 61 27 30
271000 23
59 28 30
339000 22
60 26 29
284000 23
59 28 30
365000 21
60 25 29
C M s 7
ss 15
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s M T--deg
J
CF T Tc
s
71000 28
bull 65 30 61
298000 23 57
25 29
103000 27
~ 71 27 52
285000 23 59
28 30
74000 28
bull 67 28 60
365000 22
58 28 29
123000 26
69 26 48
334000 22 61
25 29
85 000 28
65 31 58
320000 22
60 26 29
123000 26
73 24 48
329000 22 61
25 29
55
30
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s
296000 23
60 27 29
296000 23
62 27 29
339000 22 59
27 29
335000 22
63 25 29
313000 22
65 24 29
309000 23
65 25 29
tbte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot Tf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Ihickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
II11~~~1~~i~IIII 08860 ElS
Table 33
SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL
ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT
DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS A a E AQ AE OE AQE
Emulsion Conpatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA - NA - NA NA
2 Day bdulus y y y - y y y
Full cure Ddulus y y y - - - -Density y y y - - - -Air Voids y y y - - - -
Stabilometer y y y y Y y -Cohesiometer y y y y y - -MVS Stabilometer y y y - y y -MVS Cohesiometer - - y - - - -SWell y y y y y y y
Surface Abrasion y y y y y y y
LEGEND
Effects
A = effect of aggregate type Q = effect of aggregate quality level E = effect of emulsion type
AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction
AQE = three-way interaction
Significance
Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level
NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way
89
5 Laboratory specimens containing solvent free asphalt emulsions experience higher losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivity procedure than specishymens with the asphalt emulsion containing solshyvent This effect however may be related to the lesser degrees of compaction attained when using the solvent free asphalt emulsions as comshypared to the emulsion containing solvent
6 Laboratory specimens which contained the solvent free asphalt emulsions with lower quality aggreshygates experienced higher amounts of swell and greater surface abrasion losses than specimens with the emulsion containing solvent
7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the solvent free asphalt emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thicknesses are required when using solvent free emulsions It is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials which may be an important factor in field performance
8 Most of the paving mixtures investigated which contained the low quality aggregates and the solvent free asphalt emulsions met stabilometer requirements for Caltrans Type C asphalt conshycrete However only three of the mixtures also met moisture vapor susceptibility and swell requirements Mixtures which met these requireshyments were - FH with CSS-0 emulsion GRH with CMS-0 emulsion and GRH with CMS-7 emulsion
9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other considershyations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others
90
- - - --- ----------
102 Sulfur-Extended-Asphalt Emulsions
A summary of ANOVA significance at the 95 percent confidence level is shown in Table 34 This table showsmiddotfor nearly all parameters that emulsion type aggregate quality level and aggregate are signifishycant effects For several parameters several interactions are also significant Conclusions reached during the SEA emulsion experiment are
1 Stable solvent free water based anionic slow set emulsions using sulfur-extended-asphalt (SEA) base stocks can be produced which meet most Caltrans specifications for anionic slow set emulsions
2 Anionic SEA emulsion can effectively coat both low and high quality aggregates
3 Use of SEA emulsions resulted in higher resilshyient modulus values for both low and high qualshyity aggregates than use of the emulsion containshying solvent
4 Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions had higher stabilometer values with low quality aggregates than mixtures with the emulsion containing solshyvent
5 Specimens containing the SEA emulsion with low quality aggregates swelled to a greater extent and experienced higher surface abrasion losses than those with the emulsion containing solvent
6 Specimens containing the SEA emulsions experishyence greater losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivshyity procedure than specimens with the solvent asphalt emulsion indicating a greater sensitivshyity to moisture
7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thickshynesses would be required when using SEA emulshysions Again it is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials
91
Table 34
SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL
SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT
DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS
effect of aggregate type effect of aggregate quality level effect of emulsion type
AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction
A a E AQ AE QE AQE
Emulsion Compatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA y NA y NA NA
2 Day Mxfalus y y y - y y y
Full Cure Mldulus y - y - - - -Density y y y - - y y
Air Voids y y y - - - -
Stabilometer - y y - y - -
COhesiometer - y - - - - -MIS Stabilaneter y y y y y - -
MVS COhesianeter y y y - y y -y
~ y y y y y y
Surface Abrasion
LEGEND
Effects
A = Q = E =
AQE = three-way interaction
Significance
Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level
NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way
92
8 All of the paving mixtures containing low qualshyity aggregates and SEA emulsions studied met Caltrans stabilometer requirements (30 minimum) for Type C asphalt concrete however several mixtures did not meet swell and moisture vapor susceptibility requirements for Type C asphalt concrete Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions which met swell requirements were FH GRH and GRL with SS-15 SEA emulsion and SBH FH FL GRH and GRL with SS-30 SEA emulsion MVS conshyditioned stabilometer value requirements were met only by FL and GRH with the SS-15 SEA emulshysion and GRH with the SS-30 SEA emulsion
9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other consider~ ations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others
93
110 RECOMMENDATIONS
111 This study has investigated the properties of paving mixtures containing several low quality aggregates and several types of emulsified binders Test methshyods and criteria used to design and assess mixture characteristics were those specified for hot-mix asphalt concrete in California An objective of the research study is to determine if solvent free emulshysified binders can be used in place of cutback asphalt binders Therefore in order to permit drawing of appropriate conclusions from the data presented in this report on the effectiveness of the emulsions studied for replacing cutback asphalts additional laboratory work is required It is suggested that properties and characteristics of mixtures containing the project aggregates and cutshyback asphalts be determined The study should evalshyuate the same properties considered in this study Determination of mixture characteristics using cutshyback binders would permit direct comparisons between the cutback and emulsified binder systems and the drawing of more definite conclusions Additionally a study which would determine properties of mixtures containing hot-mixed asphalt cement would be of aid in evaluating results
112 After completion of the additional laboratory studshyies if results so indicate it is recommended that several field experimental studies using aggregates ranging in quality from low to high with solvent free emulsified asphalt binders be undertaken Projects should be constructed in several climatic regions in California (wet and arid) and should include control sections containing both cutback and if possible hot-mixed asphalts Proper labshyoratory mixture designs construction control and field monitoring of results and performance should be used Results of these experiments should proshyvide indications of performance of the various mixtures in actual use
113 Results of this study indicate that mixtures conshytaining the SEA binders are detrimentally affected by moisture to a greater degree than with standard emulsions However performance of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions may be adequate in arid regions Therefore it is recommended that in order
94
to further investigate the usefulness of paving mixshytures containing the SEA emulsions that field experimental test sections using the SEA emulsions be constructed and evaluated$
It is strongly suspected that the moisture vapor susceptibility of the solvent free asphalt emulsion mixes evaluated herein could be reduced by a slight modification of the emulsion formulations This possibility should be evaluated
95
References
1 Request For Proposals Investigation Into The Nature Of Emulsified Asphalts Compatible With California Local Aggregates And Substitution Of Sulfur For Asphalt In Aqueous Emulsified Systems California Air Resource Board Research Division Sacramento Calishyfornia March 1980
2 American Society for Testing and Materials 1981 Annual Book of Standards Part 15 Road Paving Bituminous Materials Travelled Surface Characterisshytics Philadelphia PA 1981
3 Interim Guide to Full-Depth Asphalt Paving Using Varshyious Asphalt Mixes The Asphalt Institute Pacific Coast Division PCD-1 January 1976
4 Kennepahl GJA Logan A and Bean D C Conshyventional Paving Mixes with Sulfur-Asphalt Binders Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975
5 Deme Imants Processing of Sand-Asphalt-Sulfur Mixes Proceedings AAPT Volume 43 1974
6 A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual The Asphalt Instishytute Manual Series No 19 MS-19) March 1979
7 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Use of Cutback Asphalt US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Waste Management Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park North Carolina October 17 1977
8 Highway Chemicals Newsletter Armak Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois Fall 1981
9 Bitumils Mix Manual Chevron USA Asphalt Division January 1977
10 Asphalt Pavement Engineering Wallace Hugh A and Martin J Rogers McGraw Hill Book Company New York 1967
11 Spahr J D The Use of Emulsified Asphalt in Conshystruction and Maintenance Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975
96
12 Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design Asphalt Emulsions Volume 4 1977
13 Dybalski J N 11 The Chemistry of Asphalt Emulsions Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D C January 1976
14 Beagle C w Deflection and Performance of Deep Lift Asphalt Emulsion Base Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976
15 Meier w J Asphalt Emulsion Construction on the Navajo Reservation Twenty-Fifth Annual Arizona Conshyference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 22-23 1976
16 Kallas B F and Shock J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Find Report - Parts I and
11II Research Report 77-1 The Asphalt Institute November 1977
17 Shook J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Analysis of Performance Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976
18 Wimberly C M Emulsified Asphalt Mixes in Arizona Proceedings 24th Annual Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 17-18 1975
19 Izalt J O Galloway B M and Saylock D SandshyAsphalt-Sulfur Pavement Experimental Project Highway US 77 Kennedy County Texas Texas Transportation Institute April 1977
20 McBee w c and Sullivan T A Direct Substitution of Sulfur for Asphalt In Paving Materials 11 Report of Investigations 8303 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines 1978
21 Ludwig A C Gerhardt B B and Dale JM Materials and Techniques for Improving the Engineering Properties of Sulfur Report No FHWA-RD-80-023 Fedshyeral Highway Administration June 1980
22 Jiminez R A and Stakes K J Effects of Heat and Air on the Viscosity of Sulfur-Asphalt Mixtures Preshysented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies San Diego California February 16-18 1981
97
23 Chehovits J G and Anderson D A Upgrading of Marginal Aggregates for Improved Water Resistance of Asphalt Concrete Transportation Research Record 762 pages 46-52 1981
24 Rosner JC and Chehovits J G Highway Binder Materials From Modified Sulfur-Water Emulsionsn Report No FHWARD-82035 Federal Highway Administration November 1981
25 Standard Specifications State of California Department of Transportation January 1978
26 Applied Linear Statistical Models Neter I and Wasserman w Richard D Irwin Inc Homewood Illinois 1974
27 Burr I W and Foster LA A Test For Equality of variances Mimeograph Series No 282 Statistics Department Purdue University Lafayette Indiana 1972
28 Applied Statistical Methods Burr I W Academic Press Inc New York 1974
29 Parr W K Field Observations of the Behavior of Bituminous Pavements As Influenced By Moisture 11 ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 3-16--I959
30 Rice JM Relationship of Aggregate Characteristics to the Effect of Water on Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 17-34 1959
31 Lettman R P and Johnson D L 11 Pressure Induced Stripping in Asphaltic Concrete Highway Research Record 340 pages 13-28 1970
32 Waller F H Jr Emulsion Mix Design Methods An Overview 11 Transportation Research Record 754 1980
33 Design of Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures Report R6-350(74) US Forest Service 1974
34 11Mix Design Procedure For Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Pavement FHWA Region 10 Office of Federal Highway Projects
98
35 Darter M I Ahlfield S R Wilky P L and Wasill R G Development of Emulsified Asphalt Aggregate Cold Mix Design Procedure Research Report 505-5 Department of Civil Engineering University of Illinois 1978
36 A A Gadallah L E Wood and E J Yoder A Suggested Method for the Preparation and Testing of Asphalt-Emulsion-Treated Mixtures Using Marshall Equipment Proceedings AAPT Volume 46 1977
37 Marshall Stability Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois
38 Jiminez R A Final Report-Phase I Asphalt Emulsion Treated Aggregates University of Arizona Research Report HPR-1-13(150) January 1977
39 George K P Interim Report on Criteria for Emulshysified Asphalt Stabilization of Sandy Soils Univershysity of Mississippi for Mississippi State Highway Department October 1976
40 Fong G K Mix Design Methods for Base and Surface Courses Using Emulsified Asphalt A State-of-the-Art Report Report No FHWA-RD-78-113 Federal Highway Administration October 1978
41 Schmidt R J A Practical Method for Measuring the Resilient Modulus of Asphalt-Treated Mixes Highway Research Record 404 1972
42 Manual of Test Volume 2 State of California Department of Transportation Transporation Laboratory Third Edition 1978
43 Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete Manual Series No 2 (MS-2) The Asphalt Institute March 1979
99
-
APPENDIX A
OPTIMUM FLUIDS AT COMPACTION DATA
-
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table Al
Percent Residue
631 631 631
702 702 702
595 595 595
678 678 678
689 689 689
645 645 645
Fluids at Compaction Data css-o
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
467 367 216
1098 998 847
571 413 360
1273 1115 10 62
455 370 341
1050 965 936
590 450 400
1268 1128 1078
492 183 109
1181 872 798
404 311 139
1049 956 784
Dry Density
(pcf)
1304 1337 1347
1283 1326 1306
133l 1310 9 1317
1328 1295 1304
1404 1529 154 1
1429 1466 1462
Al
css-o CSS-0HIGH QUALITY155- DRY LOW QUALITYbull SAN BERNARDINO 1551
bull SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO 150-I I 150 FRESNObull GRANITEROCK bull GRANITEROCK
I ~
145 LoPT=B5 145 () () - -0 0
~140 gt1401 L- 0 PT= 85 OPT=100gt-i
N Cl) OPT=100 Cl)
DRYZ 135 Z 135w w Cl Cl
amp130 amp130 Cl 0
125 125
120 I i I I i I i I I I 120 I I J I I i I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure Al Fluids at Compaction Figure A2 Fluids at Compaction High Quality Aggre-gate CSS-0 Low Quality CSS-0
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A2
Percent Residue
605 605 605
704 704 704
595 595 595
695 695 695
556 556 556
604 604 604
Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-0
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
4 16 316 183
1021 921 788
494 389 262
1198 1093
966
529 392 360
1124 987 955
519 479 301
1214 1174
996
284 187 124
840 743 680
319 256 165
923 860 769
Dry Density
(pcf)
1331 131 6 1316
1305 1320 1313
1282 1313 1312
1321 1298 1279
1478 1479 1463
1452 1463 1453
A3
155 CMS-0 HIGH QUALITY
150~ DRY bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
145 bull GRANITEROCK72_ OPT=90 0 0
~140gt-ii OPT=105i Cl)
Z 135 w 0
gt- D~0 130 middot 0
125 [OPT100
120 I i I i i I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A3 Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-0
155] 150
0 1451 0
~140gt- Cl)
Z 135 w 0
fc130 0
125
120 I 6
CMS-0
LOW QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
bull GRANITEROCK
v[A OPTf90
pound 0 PT12DoOPTr110
7 I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A4 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-0
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A3
Percent Residue
769 769 769
746 746 746
595 595 595
714 714 714
570 570 570
587 587 587
Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-7
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
460 391 294
1229 1160 1063
573 436 301
13 19 1182 1047
513 380 2 57
1108 975 852
513 404 334
1227 1118 1048
231 170 080
801 740 650
263 146 109
850 733 6096
Dry Density
(pcf)
1329 1377 1376
1335 135l 134 2
1357 1333 1342
1299 1317 1308
1519 1523 1498
1503 1517 1514
AS
CMS-7 155-- HIGH QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNOlSO~ nPT80 145
0 -0 -140 middot gt-
r t deg Cl)
Z 135 w Cl
fi130 Cl
125-1
120 I 6
GRANITEROCK
~OPT=105
IJ
I 7
I I i I i I 8 9 10 11 12 13
TOTAL FLUIDS
I 14
I 15
Figure AS Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-7
155
150
145
0 -0
gt--140
t Cl)
Z 135 w Cl
fc 130 Cl
125
120 I 6
CMS-7 LOW QUALITY
C bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
GRANITEROCKOPT 80
~OPT105
~
tos i I I i J i i I I 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A6 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-7
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A4
Percent Residue
765 765 765 765 765 765
815 815 815 815 815 815
765 765 765
817 817 817 817 817 8el7
574 574 574
738 738 738 738 738 738
Fluids at Compaction Data SS 15 SEA
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
563 426 315 580 346 178
1328 1191 1080 1345 1111
943
595 418 309 599 256 137
14 10 1233 1124 1414 1071 952
600 440 356
1365 1205 1121
683 541 418 629 457 283
1500 1358 1235 1446 1274 1100
374 247 128
948 821 702
451 301 175 435 186 073
1189 1039
913 1173
924 811
Dry Density
(pcf)
1289 1319 1335 1286 1331 1332
1278 1314 1315 1276 1304 1299
1281 1325 1313
1259 1290 1303 1275 1292 1294
1450 1485 1482
1428 1459 1468 1437 1465 1465
A7
bull bull
SS 15 SEA 155 HIGH QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot
150 FRESNO
bull GRANITEROCK
145
0 0 -
OPT=75
-_ gt=140 I-ii OPT100co C)
z 135 w _--0PTr1200
gt-0 130--0
125
120 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A7 Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 15 SEA
SS 15 SEA LOW QUALITY155
bull SAN BERNARDINO-
FRESNO 150
bull GRANITEROCK 145
~-0 0 LOPT=80a140gt-t Cf)
Z135 w r-OPT=105 0
gt-0 130 -~middot 0
OPT120J 125
120 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure AB Fluids at Compaction Low Quality SS 15 SEA
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table AS
Percent Residue
688 688 688
722 722 722 722 722 722
680 680 680 680 6 80 680
726 726 7 26 726 726
510 510 510
596 596 596 596 596 596
Fluids at Compaction Data SS 30 SEA
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
595 468 150
1283 1156
838
645 438 267 660 566 440
1367 1160
989 1382 1288 1162
650 531 432 629 422 332
1330 1211 1112 1309 1102 1012
767 614 443 547 370
1493 1340 1169 1273 1096
413 300 167
923 810 677
468 3 46 191 485 258 096
1064 942 787
10 ~ 81 854 692
Dry Density
(pcf)
1299 1337 1332
1286 1319 1324 1281 1302 1326
129l 1315 1333 1294 1333 131 5
1259 1278 1322 1294 1313
1464 1509 1496
1435 1472 1499 1426 1487 1476
A9
SS 30 SEASS 30 SEA LOW QUALITY
155 HIGH QUALITY 1551 bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddotbull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO
FRESNO 150150-I -middotmiddot-- -bull --middotmiddot I ~ t -- a GRANITEROCK a GRANITEROCK
145145
~-bull80 0 --0 00 ~140~140
J-gt- gt-~ I- = OPT=100 Cl)0 Cl) [Ij 135Z 135
lJJ Cl
gt- ~1300 130 middot ClCl ( 0
OPT=110 125~ OPT=115125
120-t----~--------------r---120 I l J J J I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 156 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS TOT AL FLUIDS
Figure A9 Fluids at Compaction Figure AlO Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 30 SEA Low Quality SS 30 SEA
-~
i
APPENDIX B
MIXTURE DESIGN DATA
TABLE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality css-o Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absortied Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
lhit Weight pcf
StabiJcneter Value
~iareter Value
Jesilient -bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
500
----------
40
u 30 ltgt
ffi 20 w ~10
m lt
o
w l 400 lt gt a w t 300 0 iii ~ 200 8
100 12
10111
ui 0
i5 8gt lt
6
4
50
21740
24488
112
194
100
400
1357
375
197
117
345
60
21823
24163
97
199
100
500
1362
330
207
134
271
70
21772
23853
87
208
100
600
1359
272
193
118
260
Iesign 7 0
87
208
100
600
1359
272
193
118
260
24
22d c lt i
20i
= 0 i5
18 gt
16
140
138 - a
~136 z w 0
134
132
bull 500 a
0 400 uil 300 0
~ 200 zi 100 iii w a
--
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE CONTENT Jo (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Bl
TABLE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residue 0intent 50 60 70 Dsian 7 o
Bulk Siecipoundic Gravity 21804
llleoretical Specipoundic Gravity 24280
Air Voids 102
VMA 192
Absorbed Asphalt 063
Efpoundective Asphalt 437
Unit Weight pf 1361
Stabilcirieter Value 427
Cbhesicireter Value 352
Fesilielt Mxlulus 103psi
2-day 85
middotFinlJ 355
50
40
_ gt a 30 w w
~ 20 10
500
300
200
100
8
6
4
l 400 gt
~ w 0
~ 8
12
_ 10
= 0 gt
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
21863 21992
23964 23660
88 71 71
197 200 200
063 063 063
537 637 637
1364 1372 1372
363 313 313
292 234 234
63 83 83 429 232 232
24
22
ci i
20i
= = 0 gt
18
16
138
p6 ~ Q
134 a w
o 132
130
500 Q -
o 400 --3 300 0 ~-~ 200 a ~ 100 w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COtlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
B2
TABLE B3 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllroretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
~fective Asphalt
Unit Weight middotCf
Stabilareter VaJue
Cbhesiareter VaJue
Resilient l-bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
so
11140 gt o30 IU w ~20
m
10
w l 400 gt 0
~ 0 ~ 200 8
100
14
12 11-
In Q
ho C
8
6
50 60 70 Dsi9 7 O 21308 21729 21595 24562 24235 23922
132 103 97 97 210 202 215 215 113 113 113 113 387 487 587 587
1329 1356 1348 1348 378 345 375 375
314 270 280 280
82 96 104 104 281 260 267 267
500
300 ~
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS
24
11-22ci
ltI i i 20 Cl) Q 180 gt
16
138
136 u - 134 Cl) z IU Q
132
130
bull500
400 Inl 300 Q bull~ 200 z ~ 100middot IU 0
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS
FIGURE B3 Mixture Design Data Sari Bernardin6 High Quality CMS o Replication 1
B3
TABLE B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue GJntent
Bulk seecific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity
50
21491
24334
60
21459
24014
70
21526
23709
Iesiqn 70
Air Voids 117 106
VMA 204 212
Absocbed Asphalt 0 72 o 72
Effective Asphalt 428 528
Unit Weight pcf 1341 133 9
Stabilrneter Value 437 406
GJhesiareter Value 337 248 3
Iesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-cay
Final
50
w 40 gt 0 30 w w 0 20 co 10
500
w
3 400 gt 0 w t- 300 w 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
_ 10
0 8gt -lt
6
4
FIGURE
61 66
410 318
24
22~ ci
i 20
~
18 a gt
16
138
_136 u a 134 z ~ w 0
132
130
bull500
a
a 400 -3 300 _ a ~ 200 z ~ 100-
w 0
90 90
21 7 21 7
0 72 072
628 628
1343 1343
344 J44
252 252
82 82
250 250
---------
D 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDU CONTENT I (A_GGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B4
TABLE BS Mixture Design Data San Bernardin9 High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Siecific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
lir Voids
VMA
2bserberl Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stalgtilaneter Value
Cbhesiareter Value 3
Resilient Mgtdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
40
Ill 30 lt( gt a 20 Ill Ill 0 10
~ iii lt CII 0
400
Ill
3 300 lt(
gt a Ill200 == 0
~100 c 8
0
12
10 ui 0
0 8gt 5 lt(
6
4
FIGURE
~
~
5 6 7 84 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
50 60 70 Cesian 70
21652
24484
21904
24149
22005
23828
116
198
107
3-93
135l
345
224
18
240
93 77 77 196 200 200 107 107 107 493 593 593
1367 1373 1373 288 235 235
136 80 80
17 21 21 128 78 78
24
22ci lt(
z 20il
= CII C 0
18 gt
16
I-~
140
+38- ~136 1- z Ill 0 134
132
bull 500 a
o 400 3 300 C
~ 200 z 100 Ill a ~
0 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino_BS High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
BS
TABLE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Residue Content
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Ihegtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tmit WeightL pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesllllleter Value
Iesilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
a 20 UI w i
~10
lt 0
400
3300 lt gt a ~200 w i 0
119 93
197 l93
126 126
374 474
l353 l372
357 283
l26 l03
45 36
203 132
2440
30 22 0 0lt ltgt
16
~100 ~ 8 0 132
500 a
o 400 --ai 300 -
middot 0
~
~
w a
_ 10
ltn 0
0 8gt lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
50 60 70 Cesign 7 o
2l679
24595
21990
24255
22190
23931
- i 20
a 180 gt
140
138 - a
~136 z w 0 134
200
100middot
0 4
73 73
193 193
126 1 26
574 574
1385 1385
235 235
82 82
3l 3l
64 64
-0 $ e
~ 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B6
TABLE B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Pesidue Qlnte~t
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihroretical Speciic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
~tabilcmeter Value
ohesicrneter Value
resilient lbdulus l0 3psi
2-aay
Final
60 72 8 5 Iesicm 75
21762 21906 21779
23981 23617 23245 93 73 63 70
202 205 220 21 0
063 063 063 063
537 657 787 687
1358 1367 1359 1365 375 290 203 270
474 401 239 360
163 172 161 170 449 329 310 320
2440
ii 30 22 ci
Cl c cgt z 20 201 s ~ 310 e 18 0
gt c
0 16
500 140
w
3 400 _138c gt
~ 300 s 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
- 10 0 0 0 8gt c
6
4
FIGURE
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIOUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COITEIT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
il36 z IU Cl 134
132
bull 500
c 400 -
3 300 - Cl
sectl 200 ~- z ~ 100
w
0
B7
111 10 ui e 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
TABLE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
500
400 gt C
72 85 resian 7 s
21873 21738
23581 23210
72 63 70 207 22l 21 0
055 055 055 665 795 695
1365 1356 1365 287 188 265
349 341 345
191 187 190 287 266 280
24 ------------
111 22
Cl Cl lt -i ~ 20
= a 18 0 gt
16 _____________
138
136 a 134 () w a
132
130___________
soar------------ D a
1 400 ~
ui3 300 C
~ 200
100
w C
0---------------------5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUlc CONTENT lt
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
BB
Fesidue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcrreter Value
Cbhesiareter Value 3Resilient -bdulus 10 psi
2-day
Finll
60
m 50 - 40
IIJ ~ 30 CJ lt 1- 20
60
21669
23943
95
205
055
545
1352
560
416
195
425
~ 300 0 ()
~ 200 8
100---------------
12 -------------
RESIDUE CONTENT lto (AGGREGATE BASIS)
TABLE B9 Mixture Design Data San Ber~irdino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Pesiclue Content 60 Z1 as D=sign 7 5
Bulk Spccific Gravity 21697 21368 21255
Iheoretical Specific Gravity 23973 23610 23238
Air Voids 94 95 85 93
VMA 204 225 middot 23 8 230
middot-Absorbed Asphalt 061 061 061 061
Effective Asphalt 539 659 789 689
middot middotmiddotUnit Weight pcf 1354 133 3 1326 1330
-Stabilareter Value 460 375 225 340
CohesianeterValue 400 422 499 440
Iesilient MxUlus 103psi
2-oay 159 i0s 185 185
Final 290 299 283 295
60
w
l 400
24
22
ci 0 i 20l
= Q 180 gt
16
138
136
gt a 134~ 300 w l z0 IU 132 200
8 130
100-----------------_---I
12 ---------------- 500
o 400 10 ~
300 bull bullQ
Q0 8gt ~ 200 z
6 ~ 100
w a4 ___ __________ o
5 6 7 8 9 s 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COtlTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B9 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication l
B9
TABLE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Pesidue Conte1t 60 72 85 resign 75
Bulk Spcecific Gravity
Theoretical Sjeeipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Ohesianeter Value
Pesilient ~us 103psi
2---day
Final
60
50 lt gt cc40 w -w
~30 = CJ
lt 20
21635
24066
10l
206
078
522
1350
51 8
482
151
285
21481
23699
94
221
078
642
1341
378
459
150
286
24
11-22
ci Cl lt
~ 20 z
C 18
0 gt
21302
23323
87 92
237 225
078 078
7 72 6 72
1329 1338
246 350
343 430
162 155
254 280
I 16
500 138
UJ
400 136 lt gt
acc ~ UJ
134 300 z2 UI CJ_32 ~ 200
8 130
bull500
a
c 400 - 10 300 ~ Jf
C0 8gt ~ 200 ~ lt z
6 ~ 100-
UJ 0
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDU~ COrlTENT
(AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino
100 12
~
Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
BlO
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
TABLE Bll
Residue Content
Bulk Secific Gravity
Iheiretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesicrneter Value
Resilient MXiulus l03psi
2-day
Final
60 72 85 D=sign 75
21817 22108 21917
23977 23601 23216
90 63 56 62
200 198 215 200
o 72 o 72 o 72 o 72
528 648 778 678
136l 1380 1368 137 5
242 162 76 130
151 175 215 190
52 63 41 55
202 122 60 110
244middot0
~ 30 22 ci lt 20 i 201 IU = en ~ 10 E 18 m 0lt gt
0 16
----
w
l 400 lt gt a ~ w 0 ~ 8
12
-t
ltn 0 0 gt a lt
FIGURE
5
500
300
200 ~ 100
10
8
6
134
500 a
c 400 -
_ 300 0
g 200
~ 100 ~in IU a
0 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Bll Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
142
I-40 u a
~ 138 in w 0
136 ~
Bll
TABLE Bl2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Pesidue Q)ntent
Bulk Spzcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic
Air Voids
V bull t-LA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Gravity
60
22026
24085
85
192
092
508
72
22062
23705
69
200
092
628
85
21901
23315
61
215
092
758
resign 75
67
205
092
6 58
Unit Weight pcf 1374
Stabiloreter Value 193
Ohesiareter Value 177 3
Resilient Mxrulus 10 psi
2-day 63
Fi-ial 138
40
m 30 J lt gt a 20 IU w 0 10 ~ lt
0
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w 9 ~ 200 _________ 8
100 12
10 9 0 8gt ~6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE 8ASISI
1377
127
193
1367
90
160
137 5
120
180
53
107
32
52
48
95
24
22ci 0 lt
20
= ~
9 18 0 gt
16
142
140 a
~138 z w C
136
134
9
500 a
dego 400-
3 300 ~- a ~ 200 z ~ 100
w a
0 5
~ 6 7 8 9
RES IOU~ CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl2 Mixture Design Data -san Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Bl2
TABLE Bl 3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcrneter VaJue
CJgthesiarneter Value
Pesilient MxbJ11lS 10 3psi
2-day
Final
60
so gt
40a w 0 30 GI 20
500
l 400 gt a w t- 300 w 5 rn ~ 200 8
100 12
Ill 10 0 8gt
6
4
50
21789
24250
10l
164
1 95
305
1360
513
330
191
282
~ bull
~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASIS)
60
21762
2 34 34
91
173
1 95
405
135middot8
567
284
168
434
24
Ill 22ci Cl
is 20
= 0 gt
18
16
142
140- ~138 iii z 0
136
134
bull500
o 400 -
l 300 C
~ 200 z 100 iii a
0 4
70 resign 70
21872
23632
75 75 177 177
1 bull 95 1 95 505 505
136S 136S 393 393
280 280
217 217 482 482
~
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASISI
FIGURE Bl3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality css~o Replication 1
Bl3
--------------
TABLE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Resid= Content 50 60 70 eesicn 7o
Bulk Siecific Gravity 21692 21677 21662
Ihroretical Specific Gravity 24501 24176 23865
Air Voids 115 103 92 92
VMA 169 176 185 185
Absorbed Asphalt 240 240 240 240
Effective Asphalt 260 360 460 460
Unit Weight pcpound 1354
Stabilaneter Value 580
Cohesicrneter Value 270 3Resilielt Mdulus 10 psi
2-day 149
Final 408
60
w so lt gt
w C o w le 0 30 m lt
20
500
w
~ 400 lt gt C
~ 300 w S ~ 200 ~ 8
100 12
- 10 m a 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AG GREGATE BASIS)
1353 1352 1352
442 327 327
276 183 183
173 191 191
373 299 299
24
22d c lt z
20E 18 0 gt
16
140
138 u C
136 w C 134
132
500 C
1 400 gt- m =gt 300 a ~ 200
l 100- IU C
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication
Bl4
2
bull bull bullbull
TABLE Bl5 Mixture Design-Data Fresno High Quality CMS-QReplication 1
Bulk Spcific Gravity
lheoreticaJ Specific Gravity Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mldulus l0 3psi 2-clay
Final
60
m 50 C gt a 40 w w
~ 30 C m
10
~idue Content 50 6_ 0 70 Daisi2 7 O
5oor----------
w
l 400 C gt a ~ 300 w I 0 iii ~ 200 8
100-------------
12 ----------
111 10 C
0 8gt C
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT J
(AG GREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl5 Mixture
21755 21305 23795 23497 86 93 93
163 198 198 l 69 l 69 l69 431 531 531
1336 1329 1329 420 307 307
247 230 230
180 i55 155
246 253 253
24
22d
Cl C
i 20I
J ~ C 18 ~ 0 gt
16
21434
24106
11l
179
l69
331
1337
472
373
175
247
138
136- 134 z w C
132
130
bull 500
dego 400 - l 300 C
~ 200 z l 100 iii w a
0
-~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT J (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Bl5
TABLE Bl6 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
helretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
lbsorled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabil=ter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
Eesilient Mxrulus 10
2-day
Firal
60
50 J gt c 40
~ 30 m 20
500
w
l 400 gt a ~ 300 w
3psi
50 60 70
21339 2 1398 21475
24241 23925 23623
120 106 91
181 187 192
1 94 l 94 1 94
306 406 506
1331 1335 1340
558 43 7 377
340 313 219
149 152 154
317 345 288
Jesign70
91
192
194
506
1340
377
219
154
288
24
22d CJ i sect 20
= a 18 ~ 0 gt
16
138
136
a 134
z w ~ C ~ 200 132 8
130 100
14 500 a
o 400 - 12
3 300 - ~ 0 C gt 10 a ~ 200 ~ z
l 100
8
w a
0 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl6bull Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Bl6
TABLE Bl 7 Mixture Qesign Data Fresno High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
Pesidue Content 50 60 70 Cesign 7 O
Bulk siec~tic Gravity 21959 22101 22128
Iheoretical Specific Gravity 24539 24201 23879
Air Voids 105 87 73 73
VMA 158 160 167 167
~rbed Asphalt 252 252 252 252
Effective Asphalt 248 348 448 448
Unit Weight pcf 1370 1379 1380 1380
S~ter Value 467 370 213 213
Clgthesiareter Value 289 3Resilient l-Ddulus 10 psi
2-clay 47
FinaJ 294
50
Ill 40 o(
gt cc 30 Ill w 0 20 lt 10
500
w l 400 lt gt cc ~ 300 Ill 0 ~ 200 8 ~
100 12
10 deg C
0 gt 8 ~l lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
147 122 122
65 35 35
214 75 75
22
J 20 o(
ii 18 16 ~ 0 gt
14
142
140 u Q
~138 z Ill
Cl 136
134
500 Q
o400 uil 300 Cl
g 200 z ~ 100 ~w cc
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
IIESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Bl7
TABLE Bl8 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Dsiqn 70
Bulk Specific Gravity 22191 22285 22092
Theoretical Specific Gravity 24199 23874 23563
Air Voids 82 66 62 62
VMA 149 153 168 168
Absorled AsphaJt 192 192 192 192
Effective AsphaJt 308 408 508 508
Unit Weight pcf 1385
Stabilareter Value 357
Cohesianeter Value 268 3Resilient MxhIJus 10 psi
2-day 75
Final 217
40
w 30 J lt gt a 20 w w i
~ 10
0
500
w
3 400 gt a
l 300 w i
ltn
~ 200 8
139l
342
238
137 9
233
192
137 9
233
192
84
117
63
73
63
73
20
0 0 ~ i
= 0 gt
18
16
14
12
~
144
142 140 z w 0
138
136 100-----1---1--1---l
12 ---------- 500 0bull
o 400 -11110 en a 3 300 = 0 08gt ~ 200
z 6 ~ 100middot
w a
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT
4
RESIDUE CONTENT
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Bl8
FresnoTABLE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Low Quality css-o Replication 1
Eesidlle Content 60 70 80 Dasi51 7 5
Bulk Specific Gravity 21698 21611 21514 Iheoretical Specilic Gravity 23803 23505 23220
Air Voids 89 81 73 77
VMA 175 186 198 192
Absorbed Asphalt 171 l 71 171 171
Effective Asphalt 429 529 629 679
Unit Weight pcf 1354 1349 1342 1345
Stabi]cmeter Value 513 398 359 380
eohesianeter value 506 449 481 465
Resilient Modulus 10 3psi
2-day 176 176 241 205
Final 312 383 353 365
2460
all so 22 ci cgt
40 I-
20 E
I = g 30 18iii 0 gt
20
16
500
300
100
10
8
6
4
138
136l 400
u -gt a
~ I 0 in l1200 8
12
111 Q
0 gt ~
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE COITENT Jo
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
~ ~ 134 z w 0
132
130
500 -
l 400 -
300 ~n
Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 in Ill IC
0
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Bl9
TABLE B20 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residlle Content i
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihegtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
CJhesiareter Value 3
Resilient Mxfulus 10 psi
2-day
Finll
60
50 lt 40 w w
~ 30 m lt 20
500
w
3 400 lt gt a ~ ~ 300 w 51 rn 200 8
100----------------
12 --------------
10 9 0 8gt lt
6
4 s 6 7 8
RESIDUE COPlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
60 70 80 resign 75
21451 21476 21666
23932 23629 23340
104
185
194
406
1339
586
436
147
313
91
192
1 94
506
1340
403
416
179
347
24
22 0 0 lt
~ 20
= 9 18 0 gt
16
140
138 - Cl
136 w cl34
132
bull 500
-0 400__
3 300 I
~ 200
~ 100 rn w a
0
7 2 82
192 192
194 194
606 656
1352 1345
24 8 325
333 375
186 182
361 358
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COPITEPlT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
~
Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
B20
TABLE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
lesidue Content 60 70 80 resign 75
Bulk Siecific Gravity 21525 21406 21152 lllroretical Specific Gravity 23855 23555 23268 Air Voids 98 91 91 91 VMA 182 194 211 2middot03 1osorled Asphalt 180 1 80 180 180 Effective Asphalt 420 520 620 570 Ulit Weight pcf 1343 1336 1330 1335 Stabilateter Value 487 460 373 415 Oxlesiareter Value 418 392 323 355
3lesilielt Mldulus 10 psi
2-clay 188 177 200 190
Final 289 299 281 290
6or----------- 24
m 50 lt gt 11 40 w w I
~ 30 m lt 20
_J_
22ci 0 lt z
20EE
= 0 180 gt
16
5oor---------- 138
w
l 400 lt gt
136- a ~ 300 w i 0
fa34 z w
~ 200 Cll32 -8
100-----------i-~ 130
12 ------------ 500bulla
10 ________ o 400 - 0
0 gt
8
gJdeg 300 0
~- 200 ---e-
lt z
6 l 100 w 4
5 6 7 8 9 0
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication
B21
1
TABLE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Fesidue Cbntent 55
Bulk Spcific Gravity 21243
lheoretical Specific Gravity 23859
Air Voirls 109
VMA 189
Absorbed Asphalt 152
Effective 1spralt 398
Unit Weight pd 1326
atabil~ter Value 620
Cbhesiareter Value 430 3Fesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-oay 160
Final 387
70
a 60 gt a 50 w w == = 40 0
m
30
500
w l 400 lt gt cc
~ 3001- 0 ~ 200 8
100
16
136
134 u Q
iu2 z w 0 130
128
12 -----------
10 bull
ltIi 0
~ s
6
4middot1-_________ _
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l _AGGREGATE BASIS)
21164
23557
101
200
152
498
1321
481
432
180
377
24
22
z 20Si
= 18e 0 gt
bull 500
o 400-ltIi j 300 0
~ 200 zl 100 w cc
0
65 75 iesiqn 7 s
21095
23269
93 93
210 210
152 l 52
598 598
1316 1316
367 367
450 450
171 171
387 387
-----~bull-----
8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7
FIGURE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B22
1 TABLE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno
Low Quality CMS-7 Replication
70 -~ 0 Cesign 75 Pesidue Content
Bulk Spcific Graviv1
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit Weight pcf
Stallilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mxlulus 10 3psi
2--day
Final
40
Ill 30 c gt 0 20 UI lo Q 10=c 0
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w lo Q 200 8
100
~
60
21829
23899
87
170
197
403
1362
293
206
84 144
21981
23587
67
l73
197
503
1372
200
249
76 131
21960
23289
5middot 7
middot18l
197
603
1370
100
241
69 93
62
177
197
553
1370
150
245
73
110
12
10 5 Q 8gt 5 lt
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (ACGREGATE BASIS)
24
It
22 t-ci c
z 20i
= 5 18 t-Q gt
16
142
140 - 638
z w Q
136
134
bull 500
o 400 - 3 300 0
~ 200 z 100 iii UI 0
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (ACGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno LOW Quality CMS-7 Replication
B23
1
TABLE B24 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Urit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Glhesianeter Value
Resilient Mldulus 10
2-day
Final
40
m 30 gt c 20 w ~ w i
~ 10 m lt ~ 0
3psi
24
22
C C lt i
20~ ~
9 18 0 gt
16
500 142
w 1403 400 gt
Ca gt138I 300 tw
i z w Q 136~ 200
8
134
~
~
100 12 500
C
dego 400 - Ill 10 3 300 0 0 Q8gt ~ 200
~ z 6 100middot
w a
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIOUC CONTENT
(AGGREGATE 8ASIS] (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)
80
21686
23262
68
19l
l91
609
1353
125
215
77
114
Cesign 75
71
184
L 91
559
1360
200
235
77
135
60
21936
23870
81
166
191
409
1369
358
252
84
211
70
21850
23559
73
177
191
509
1364
270
250
77
157
Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE B24 Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B24
TABLE B25 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-Or Replication 1
Residue Clgtntent 47
Bulk Siecific Gravity 23965
llleoretical Specific Gravity 26825
Air Voids 107
VMA 207
Absorbed Asphalt 27
Effective Asphalt 443
Unit Weight pcf 1495
Stabilaneter Value 302
Cohesiaoeter Value 235 3
Resilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-day 158
Final 300
40
30 _ gt a 20I- ii 0_
10iii I-en 0 500----------
Ill
3 400 gt ati 300 ii 0 iii l 200 8
100---i----L---J
12 ----------
jit 10 e 0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I 4
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
57 67 Design 55
24521 24581
26411 26017
72 55 80
196 202 200
27 27 27
543 643 523
1530 1534 1520
247 200 27
275 203 275
164 116 160
276 197 280
24
jlt
22ci c i
20Si
= en e 18 0 gt
16
156
_154 ~ i152 iii z C
150
148
soo----------
dega 400 _
en
~300 ~ ~ 200 1-zl 100 iii w a
01----~-i--J 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Mixture Design Data GraniterockFIGURE B25 High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
B25
TABLE B26 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Besidue Content If 7 57 67 D2sign 55
Bulk SfeCific Gravity 2 4131 24573 24597
lhagtreticai Specific Gravity 26951 26532 26134
Air Voids 105 74 59 78
VMA 20l 195 20l 197
Absorted Asphalt 46 46 46 46
Effective Asphalt 424 524 624 504
Unit Weight pcf 1506 1533 1535 1525
stabi1anaiter Value 282 258 is2 270
Cllhesicmter Value 204 155 138 160
Resilient Mdulus 103psL
2-day 115 143 126 130
Final 313 225 173 240
40
w 30 lt gt a 20 w w la 0 10 m lt
0
~
24
22ci C
lt z
20la ~ = E 18 -0 gt
16
156
154 - a
~152 z w r0
150
148
-
500
o 400 ~
300 0
g 200 ~ z -~ 100
500
w ~ 400 lt gt a IU t- 300 w la 0 ~ 200
~8
100 12
10 0 0 8gt lt
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
w a
o 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT lo RESIDUE CONTENT II
-cGREGATE s-s1s1 (-GGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B26 Mixture Design Data Grani terock High Quality CSS-0 Replication
B26
2
TABLE B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Residue Ogtntent 47 57 67 ~ign 55
Bulk Spcific Gravity 23886 24116 24078
Ihooretical Specific Gravity 26675 26267 25879
Air Voids 105 81 70 82
VMA 210 210 21 8 210
Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 oos 005
Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545
Unit Weight pcf 149l 1505 1502 1505
Stabilareter Value 337 350 250 350
Ogthesicneter Value 238 3
Eesilient Mldulus l0 psi
2-day 104
Final 287
50
Ill 40 J C gt cc 30 Ill Ill l 0
C
10
20iii 500
w
l 400 C gt cc I 300 Ill l 0 in ~ 200 8
100 12
1110 0 0 8gt
c cc
6
4
FIGURE
~
~
177 204 200
144 150 140
254 247 260
24 ----------
a 18 0 gt
16 __i____i_-J
154
j52 u -a
~1501- ------iiiz -Ill 0
148
______________ 146
soar---------- a
o 400 1--
~ 300 _ ~
~ 200 z ~ 100 en w 0
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
B27
8
TABLE B28 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue Ointent 4 7 57 67 Cesign 55
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihroretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
CJlhesianeter Value
Pesilient Mldulus 10 3psi
2-day
Final
40
30 lt gt = w 20 0
- 10 lt
0
500
w - 3 400
lt gt a l 300 w 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
i 10 ui C
0 8gt lt
6
4
FIGURE
23861
26649
10S
207
014
456
1489
338
145
124
307
~
--------
~ 5 6 7 84
RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
24025 23925
26242 25855
85
210
014
556
1499
283
135
135
307
24
22
0 lt i
20i
= 18 0 gt
16
154
152 u Q
i150 z w 0 148
146middot
500- o 400 -
300 _ Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 4
75 87
220 209
014 014
656 536
1493 1490
220 300
129 140
142 130
277 307
_--
~
-___
85 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B28 bull Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B28
TABLE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Pesicllle Cbntent 47 57 67 resign 55 Bulk Siecific Gravity 24618 24637 24728 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26905 26475 26066 Air Voids 84 69 51 71 VlltLA 185 192 197 190 Absocbed Asphalt 047 0 bull 47 047 047 Effective Aspbalt 423 523 623 503 Urit Weight pcf 1536 1537 1543 1537 Stabilaneter Value 410 330 198 350 QJhesianeter Value 166
Resiliextt Mldulus 10 3psi
2-clay
Final
50
40 c
ffi 30 IE g20 iii c
10
500
l 400 c
a ~ 300 IE C ~ 200 8
100 12
ot 10 C
0 8
5
C
6
4
46
158
~
~ 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI
120 131 130
35 30 38
56 28 80
24
gt11 22
c c c
i 2031
= ~ C 180
16
158
156 t-
u - 154 z w 0
152
150
500
~
~ 0
bull a 400 - uil 300 ~
200
C
~ z ~ w a
100middot
8 4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
B29
TABLE B30 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Pesidue Content 4-7 h---7 6 -7 IEsicn 5 5
Bulk Specific Gravity 24519 24638 24706 Iheoretical Specific Gravity 26609 26265 25793 Air Voids 79 62 42 65 VMA 189 192 198 19l
middot Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 005 005 Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545 Unit Weight pcf 1530 1537 1542 1535 Stabilareter Value 420 327 247 350 Cohesiareter Value 126
3Resilient Mldulus 10 psi
Z--day 47 Final 144
50
40 J lt gt a 30 w w
~ 20 m lt 10
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w 2 ~ 200 8 ~
100 12
111- 10 ui 0 gt 8
lt
6
4
114 182 120
43 29 45
79 33 90
24
ii-22
ci 0 lt i
20l ~= 18 0 gt
16
158
156 0
l 154 z ~w c 152
150
500
Q -dego 400 - ui3 300 C
~ 200 z
~ 100middot~
w a ~ 0
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8 4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
FIGURE B30 Mixture Design Data High Quality CMS-7
Graniterock Replication 2
B30
TABLE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
~sidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weigllt pcf
Stabi]aneter Value
Cohes~ter Value
~silient MXJulus 103psi
2--day
final
40
30 C gt ffi20
~10 iii C ltII 0
500
l 400 C gt IC
~ 300 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
11 10 0
0 8gt C
6
4
55 65 75 resign 60 24268 24286 24206
26358 25966 25592 80
200
020
530
t515
80
268
182
338
~
65
207
020
630
t515
t_92
233
169
308
24
bull 220 0 C
ze 20
= 0 18 -0 gt
16
156
154
u i152 ~ z 0
150 bull
148
54 72
21 7 204
020 020
730 580
1511 1515
90 235
193 250
145 175
250 320
500 o 400 - l 300 0
~ 200 zi 100 iii IC
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replicationl
B31
TABLE B32 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residue 0ntent
Bulk Secific Gravity
llleoretical Speipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
-Absorled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
StabilcIIeter Value
Qlhesianeter Value 3Jesilient middotMgtdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
40
m30 lt gt cc20 w
w E
~10 ID lt 0
79
198
027
523
1518
203
243
201
354
~ soar-----------
w
400 lt gt a
~ 300 w E 0 ~ 200 8
100---I--~---------
12 -----------
111 10 C
0 8gt lt
6 --4
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l (ACiCiFIECiATE BASIS)
FIGURE B32 Mixture
55 65 75 Lesign 6 0
24329 24246 24077
26401 26007 25632
68 61 73 208 22l 203
027 027 027 623 723 573
1513 1502 1515
165 110 185 215 205 225
168 184 185 340 272 345
24
22 C C
z i 20
= 0 0
18 gt
16
156
154
a
gt152 en z Ill 0 150
148
bull 500 Q
deg 0 400- =gt 300 0
~ 200 z l 100 w
-
0 4 5 6middot 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(ACiGFIEGATE BASIS)
Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication
B32
2
TABLE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Eesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheore_tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VbullMA
lbsorbed_ Asphalt
Effective_ Asphalt
Qnit Weight pcf
~~ter Value
Q)hesianeter Value
Resiiient Mxlulus 10 3psi
2~y
Final
40
11130 C
a20 =
~10 C m
ltII 0
500
Ill
3 400 C
a ~ 300 w = 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
ll 10 ui E 0 8
c
6
4
I-
1-
55
23824
26318
95
215
014
536
1487
287
381
224
380
65 75
23896 23701 25928 25555 78 73
220 233
014 014 636 736
1491 1479 195 161
265 212
212 196
404 341
24
11 22d
c
z 20i
= ltII E 18 0
16
154
152- a
150 I-
Iesign 6 0
84
218
014
586
1490
240
320
215
395
z w Q
148
bull 146
500 a
c 400 ~ ui
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
l 300 Q
~ 200 zl 100 w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIOUla CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-a Replication 1
B33
- - ----- -
TABLE B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Rssidue Ogtntent
Bulk Secific Gravity
lhairetical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
AbsoIbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stabil~ter Value
Olhesiareter Value 3lesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-day
Firal
40
m 30 lt gt a 20 w w
= ~ 10
m lt
0
- --- -middot -middot 500
w l 400 lt gt
Ea
300 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
1l 10 middot 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 4
FIGURE
55
23834
26371
96
214
022
528
1487
279
207
176
332
65
23784
25978
84
223
022
628
1484
208
270
185
336
75
23628
25604
77
236
022
728
1474
167
334
181
350
iesiqn 6 bull 0
90
21 8
022middot
578
1485
245
240
180
334
~
~
24
1l 22
0
lt i
20i
= 0 gt
18
16
152
150 - 148
~ 146
144
500
o-400 middot --- J 300 C
~ 200 z
middot ~ 100 en a
0 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication
B34
2
B35 Mixture Design Data GraniterockTABLE Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Residue Content 55
Bwk Specific Gravity 24720
lheoretical Specific Gravity 26164
Air Voids 55
VMA 185
Absorbed Asphalt 001
Effective Asphalt 549
Unit Weight pcf 1543
StabilCampTeter value 293
Ohesiareter Value 174
Besilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day 69
Final 153
40
~ 30 _
c gt ffi 20 w I
Q 10
c 0
500
w 3 400 -
c gt a
~ 300 w I g bull ~ 200 8 ----r
100middot
10
8 -
~
Q
0 6gt a =c
4 ~ 2
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS
65 75 DesiSE 60
2 4 720 24515
25767 25388
40 34 48
193 207 189 001 001 001 649 749 599
1543 1530 1543 205 97 250
156 283 170
46 22 55 72 so 110
24
~
22ci C c
i 20i
= Cl 180 gt
16
lSadeg
156
u -a
654 z 0 152
150
500 ii a
a 400 - 3 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7
FIGURE B35 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
B35
12 r---------- 500bull _ 10
o 400 -middot 0 gt 5 C
8
tnl 300 Q
~ 200 z
6 ~ 100 ~ IU 0
4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT I
(AGCREGA TE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
TABLE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
55 65 75 resicn 6 0 Residue Content
Bulk siecific Gravity 24816 2 4721 24560
lheoretical Specific Gravity 26389 25983 25596
Air Voids 60 49 40 55
VMA 182 193 205 187
Absorlei Asphalt middot 035 035 035 035
Effective Asphalt 515 615 715 565
UUt Weight cf 1548 1543 1533 1545
Stabilaneter Value 298 193 130 250
Qlhesicmeter Value 188 I57 118 180 3
Resilient MJdulus 10 psi
soor-----------158
w l 400 Ishy 156 gt lt u
0a
w
300 w ~154E 0 z
w Q ~ 200 152
8 150100----middot-~-1-__c__~
2-day
Final
40
~ 30 J lt gt a 20 w
s 10 0
lt
0
92 43 27 65 186 79 46 135
24
22
~ =
ci lt 0
i 20~
18 0 gt
16
FIGURE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B36
Table B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
FJiuivalent ~sidue amtent 60 70 80 resign 70
Iesidue Ontent
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absomed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
lhit Weight pcpound
Stabilareter Value Ohesiareter Value
~ilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
Ill
50
40 A gt a w 30 w i 0 J
iii 201-
10
400
w3 300 gt a Ill t 200 i 0
8 ~iii ll 100 1-
0 12
lit 10 0 0 8gt a lt
6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)
630
21584
24451
117
210
140
460
1347
415
208
735
21570
24143
107
219
140
560
1346
488
61
840
21385
23848
103
233
140
660
1334
382
63
resign 7 35
107
219
140
560
1346
488
63
96
339 141
325
126
299 141 325
24
lit 22d
Cl
z 20i
= 0 180
gt
16
138
136 ltgt
i134 iii ~ z w 0 132
130
bull 500
o 400 -
3
300 ------------- 0
~ 200 z ~ 100 w o_____________a
9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B37
----
Table B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Pesidue omtent 60 70 80 Design 70
Pesidue omtent 630 735 8 40 Dsign 735
Bulk Specific Gravity 21710 21722 21714
lllroretical Specific Gravity 24298 23995 23705
Air Voids
VMA
lbsorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Chhesianeter Value
Eeilient Mldulus 103psi
2--clay
Final
so
40 J w
gt a 30 w w 0 20 m
10 400
w 300 gt a w 200 w i 100 8
0
12
if 10 a
~0 8gt a lt
6
4
107
205
112
488
1355
395
llO
113
290
95
213
112
588
1356
398
62
122
271
84
22l
112
688
1355
318
70
138
282
24
22 c 0
20
0 180 gt
16
140
138 -a
136 _iii z bull --w 0 134
132
bull 500 a
o 400
m 300 J 0 bull ~ 200 z 100
w a
0
95
213
)12
588
1356
398
62
122
271
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT J
(AGCilEGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B38
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Table B39
Fquivalent ~idue COntent
~idue Cbntent
Bulk SJecific Gravity lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Oihesianeter Value
~ilient Mldulus l03psi
2-day
Fiial
so
w 40 lt gt cc 30 ~ w E
0 20 m lt 10
400
m POO lt gt a U 200 E 0 iii w c 100 8
0
12
- 10 vi Cl
0 gt ac
6
60 70 80
690 805 920
21790 21826 21910
24255 23977 23710
102 90 76
207 214 219
080 080 080
610 710 810
1360 1362 1367
437 400 289
219 229 202
141 158 184
333 282 273
24
~ 22ci
CJ lt z
20ii
= Cl 180
gt
16
----------
~ lo
140
138 Q l136 iii w Cl
134
132
500 Q
0 400 n3 300 Cl
~ 200 i-bull
100
z ~ 0 a
Cesign 70
Cesign 805
90
214
080
710
1362
400
229
158
282
-------
-
-~
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B39 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication l
B39
8
Table B40 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Eesidue cantent
Iesidue Omtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lhagtretical Speiliic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Abro1plusmned Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tklit Weight pcpound
Stabilareter Value
OJhesianeter Value
EEsilient Mldulus l03psi
2-day
Final
50
w 40 J lt gt a 30 w
w i
3 20 lt 0 10
400-----------
DI 3 300 lt gt a wti 200 i 0 w8100
0 -------l--l-1
12 ----------
- 10 ltn 0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
60 70 80 690 805 920
21986 21964- 21948
24499 2A212 23938
103 93 83
200 209 218
124 124 l24
476 576 676
1372 1371 1360
422 403 265
270 306 160
99 140 154
298 310 254
24
-22
ci lt
=i 20i
a 0 18 0 gt
16
140
138 - a
l136 z w 0 134
132
bull500
a
o 400 -
ltn =gt 300 -J a
~ 200 z 100 DI 0
0 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT Ii (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Dsign 70
Design 805
93
209
124
576
1371
403
306
140
310
9
Figure B40 Mixture Design Data High Quality SS-30
San Bernardino SEA Replication 2
B40
Table B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent lesidue ~tent
Ilesidue Omtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lbagtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stabilateter Value
CllhesiaIEter Value
Resilient MXlulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
w 40 i- _ gt 30a w I- ~ w 0 20 m I-CII 10
400
w l 300 gt a w lj 200 0 w 100 8
0
12
111 10 Q
0 8gt a ~
6
4
~
6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
65 75 85 Design 75 683 789 89J tesign 789
21624 21445 21375 24097 23802 23520
103 99 92 213 228 238 100 100 100 550 650 750
1349 1338 1334 423 295 285 70 174 82
150 139 138 318 310 2S4
24
22d i
20ii
= CII Q 180 gt
16
138
- 136
u
134I- z ~132
130
bull 500 o 400 _ l 300 1- Q
sectl 200 I-z ~ 100 CII w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
99
228
100
650
1338
295
174
139
310
5
Figure B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B41
Table B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent PesidJJe Content
Residue Omtent
Bulk Specific GIavity
lheoretical Specific GIavity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit weight pcpound
Stabiloreter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mxulus 103psi
SC
w 40 gt a 30 w w i 0 J 20
10
400
w 3 300 gt a w t 200 i
9 ltI)
w = 1008
0
12
11 10 u a 0 8gt
6
4
2-day
Final
~
~
5 6 7 8 flESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGflEGATE BASIS)
65 75 85
683 788 89J 21424 21394 21455
24147 23851 23567
ll3 103 90
22l 229 234
l09 l09 l09
541 641 741
133 7 1335 1339
412 328 280
129 103 81
167 141 162
325 260 280
24
22ci 0 201
= 0 gt
18
16
i-
138
136 Q i134 _ 0 z w bull0 132
130
soor----------- D C
o 400
ltn3 300 a ~ 200 z 100 (I)
w
-
~
a 0------------ 5 6 7 8 9
flESIOUE CONTENT I
(AGGflEGA TE BASIS)
Design 75
Design 7 86
103
229
l09
641
1335
328
103
141
260
9
Figure B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B42
Table B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent Residue Omtent
Residue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllagtreticalSpecilicGravity
Air Voids
VMA
AbsorlJed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcpound
Stabilcrreter value
Cllhesianeter value
lelilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
400-----------
Illl 300 lt gt a w t 200 lo 0 w 8100
0 ________ ___ __
12 ----------
~ 10 0
~ 8 bull a c
6
4 -_______ ___ __
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS
65 75 85 748 863 978 21752 21661 21638 24136 23863 23602 99 92 83
213 225 234 081 081 081 569 669 769
1357 1352 1350 466 367 235
224 266 138
220 189 209 478 337 281
Ilsign 75
Design 863
92
225
081
669 1352
367
266
189
337
24 ----------
~
220 Cl lt ii 20
0 18 0
gt
16 ----------------14or-----------
138 -0 a 136 z w Q
134
132
= c 400 - l 300 Q
~ 200 f-middot z 100 w a o----------
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
_____________J
Figure B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardinor Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B43
Table B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Iesidue Cbntent 65 75 85 Design 75
lesidue Omtent 748 86~ resign~Zl 863
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleo~tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asjtlalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
lesilient Mxlulus 103psi
2-day
Final
so
w gt 0 30 IE 0 20 iii lt
10
400
3 300 lt gt 0 w l 200 IE 0 X w
100 8
0
12
- 10 en 0 0 8gt
6
4
~ 40 bull
~ 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
21676
23998
97
208
055
595
1353
409
248
189
308
24
22
ci c lt i
20ii
= 0 0
18 gt
16
21711 21641
23729 23472
85 78 85
223 234 223
055 oss 055
695 795 695
1355 135l 1355
283 227 283
187 186 187
198 177 198
255 285 255
140
138 a
136 - z 0 134 --
132
500 a
o 400 -
vi3 300 - 0
sectj 200 z ~ 100
0 0 5 6 middot 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino~ Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B44
Table B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Equivalent Jesidue Content 60 70 80 Design 70
tesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
trut Weight pcpound
Stabilcineter Value
Cbhesiateter Value
tesilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
IU 40 _ C gt 30a IU IU = middoto 20 m C (I) 10
400
IU
300 C gt a IU
ti 200 = 0 ~ IU c 100 8
0
12
10 ai 0 8gt C
6
4
~
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)
630 735 840 Design 7 35
21651 21581 21592
24033 23739 23457
99 91 80 91 180 190 198 190
399 499 599 499 135l 1347 134 7 1347
309 439 358 439
150 236 202 236
140 171 148 171 294 390 367 390
24
bull 22
Cl Cl C
i 20i
= (I) Q 180
gt
16 140
138 0 a
i136 z IU
134 bull bull
Q
132
500 D
c 400 _ 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 IU a
0 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B45
Table B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Residue Cbntent 60 70 80 Design 70 Residue Cbntent 6JO Z35 EdQ Jesign 7 35
Bulk Spcific Gravity 21413 21627 21711 lhroretical Specific Gravity 24321 24017 23726 Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcneter Value
Ohesianeter Value
llesilient Mgtdulus 10 3psi
2-day
Final
so
Ill 40 I lt gt 0 30 w Ill i 0 20 Cl lt
10
400
111
l 300 lt gt 0 w lj 200 i
~ w = 1008 -----___
0
12
II- 10 a 0 8gt lt
6
4
120
189
249
351
1336
407
79
147
361
24
II-22
ci
lt ~ 20i
= 0
0 18
gt
16
138
136 u C
l134 w 132
130
bull 500
C
o 400 ~
---------_J 300 0
~ 200
~ 100 Ill 0
0
99
189
249
451
1350
396
76
165
340
85
193
249
551
1355
360
64
175
305
99
189
249
451
1350
396
76
165
340
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT 1
9 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE COIHENT f
9
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B46
---------
Table B4 7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Bulk Specific Gravity
lhalretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorlled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilaieter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
llesilient MJdulus 103psi
2-clay
Final
50
40w lt(
gt IC 30 w w
0 20 iii lt( ltI)
10
400
w 3 300 ~ lt(
gt IC w t 200 0 iii 111 i 100 8
0 ___ _______ __ _ __
12 ----------
Fquivalent Pesidue Content 60 70 80 Iesign 70
Pesidue Qlntent 690 805 92Q Dcsign 805
21958 22006
24182 23909
92 88 92
18l 188 18l 256 256 256
444 544 444
1370 1373 1370
342 291 342
78 73 78
184 167 184
303 298 303
10 0
0 8gt IC
c 6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B47 Mixture
21880
24453
105
176
256
344
1365
443
58
174
381
24
22ci
5 20
= 0
0 18
gt
16
~ I I
138
136 ~ ~134 bull z 111 0 132
130
bull 500
o 400 3 300 - Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 ltI) 111 IC
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B47
Table B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
El_uivalent Residue Cbntait 60 70 80 Iesign 70
Residue Cbntent 690 aQi 2 2Q Dsign 805 Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Olhesiateter Value
Resilient Mldulus middot103psi
2-day
Final
21816
24403
106
178
244
356
1361
482
136
183
393
21806
24120
96
187
244
456
1361
411
130
187
374
21996
23849
78
189
244
556
1373
314
106
260
361
96
187
244
456
1361
411
130
187
374
24so
w 40 22 ci 0 gt a 30 ~ 20w w = 20 ishy C 18iii 0 gt Ill 10 _ ___ ____________
16 400------------
140
w l 300 138 gt 0
Qa w
636t 200 z0 w --------_ Qw 134c 100 8
0 ___ _____________ 132
bull50012 -----------
a
1 400 -_ 10
ltti ltti l 300 -C 0 C8gt ~ 200 lt z
6 l 100 w a
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT S RESIDUE CONTENT S (AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B48
Table B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
EquivaJent Residue antent 65 75 85 Design 75 Residue Content 63J z aa a 23 resign 7 88 Bulk Specific Gravity 21404 21439 21381 lheoretical Specific Gravity 23563 23286 Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcf
Stabilaneter Value
Cohesianeter Value
~ient 1bdul11S 103psi
2~y
Firal
50
w 40 gt a 30 w w 0 20 iii lt 10
400
3 300 w
gt a w t 200 0 in i w
100 8
0 12
10 0 Q
0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6
23020 92 79 71 79
193 199 209 199 140 140 140 140 510 610 710 610
1336 1338 1334 1338 424 397 308 397 79 308 266 308
173 185 196 185 330 319 285 319
24
22ci c lt
~ 20c Q 180
gt
16
138
136 u -Cl
~134 in ~z w 132
130
soar----------- Qbull
o 400
middot3 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a Q___________ ___ __
7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT deg RESIDUE COIITENT deg (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B49
Table BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Fquivalent lesidue Content
Besidlle 0-ntent
Bulk Specific Gravity
Illeoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pf
Stabilcmeter Value
ltbhesiaieter Value
Besilient Mxlulus 103psi
2--day
Final
50
~ 40 I lt gt 30 w 0 20 01 lt 10
400
w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 w r lOO 8
o 12
10 ai ~ 0 8gt a lt
6
~
4 5 6 7 8
IIESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
65 75 85 683 788 893 21527 21362 21337
24013 23721 23441 104 99 90
188 202 211
225 225 225
425 525 625
1343 1333 1332
410 418 290
261 62 100
188 197 211
334 348 331
24
22 ~ ci c lt
20 f 18 0 gt
16
138
136 0 a
134 z w 0 132
130
500 a
o 400
ai bull 300 I bull C
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
IIESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design 75
Design 788
99
202
225
525
1333
418
62
197
348
Figure BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
BSO
Table B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno
Fquivalent Residue Clintent
Residue 0rrtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorlei Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
thlit Weight pcf
StabiJaneter value
Ohesiaretel value 3lelilient MJdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
50
w
40
c gt a 30 w w = g 20 iii c Ill 10
400----------
middota
l 300 bull c gt a w t 200 = 0 w c 100 8
0 _______ ____ _
12 ------------
_ 10 ~ 8 c
6
4 _________ __
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B51
Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
65 75 85 748 863 978
21728
24022
96
186
200
450
1356
436 100
199
376
24
11 22
c c c
z 20ii
Ill0 180
gt
16
Design 75
Design 863
86
195
200
550
1355
392 260
212
362
21716
23753
86
195
200
550
1355
392 260
212
362
21673
23495
78
205
200
650
1353
378 201
230
3l7
~
140
138 Q j136 bull --_ z w 0134
132
500 Q
o 400 bull -l 300 ~ 0 ~ 200 I-z ~ 100 w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Table B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent lesidue OJntent 65 75 85 Design 75 Pesidue Ointent 748 863 978 Design 863 Bulk Specific Gravity 21595 21708 21637 ~retical Specific Gravity 23977 23708 23452 Air Voids 99 84 77 84 VMA 19l 195 206 195 Absorbed Asphalt l92 l92 l92 l92 Effective Asphalt 458 558 658 558 Unit Weight pf 1347 1354 1350 1354 Stabilareter Value 502 262 239 262 Cllhesianeter Value 257 136 154 136 Pesilient MJdulus 103psi
2--day 217 201 228 201 Final 371 307 290 307
2450
w 40 22 0 0lt ltgt ia 30
bull 20i
= 0 20 18iii 0lt gt 10
16 400
~
~
140
w 3 300 -ltgt
138 lt gt
aa w t 200 deg136 z0 w 0
134 w
100 8
1320
12 500 a
0 400 10
3 300 C 0 Q8gt ~ 200 lt z
6 100 w a
4 0 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT ~ RESIDUE CONTENT ~ (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B52
Table B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent ~sidue Cbntent 45 55 65 Design 55 ~idue Cbntent 473 578 6~~ Design 5 78 Bulk Specific Gravity 24210 24403 24473 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26934 26528 26142 Air Voids
VMA
Absocbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
StabiJaneter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Iesilient M)dulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
w _ 40 C gt II 30w w 0 20 iii C ~
10
400
w l 300 C gt II
iiw
200
~ w --------r 100 8
0 12
ot 10 -0
0 8gt II c
6
4
101 80 64 80 199 20l 206 20l
022 022 022 022 423 523 623 523
151l 1523 1527 1523 308 288 197 288
ll7 ll2 140 112
95 llO 122 llO 306 272 214 272
24
ci 22
C
i -~20Es = E 18 0
gt
16
156
154 - gt152 iii z ~ w 0
150
148
bull 500
o 400 Inl 300 0
~ 200 z ~ 100 w II
0
--~
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT r (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7 8 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B53
Table B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Residue Glntent 45 ss 65 Jesign 55 Residue Omtent 47 5 ZB 6 83 resign ~za Bulk Specific Gravity 24197 24253 24435 lheoretical Specific Gravity 26843 26441 26058 Air Voids 99 83 62 83 VMA 199 206 208 206 Absorbed Asphalt 09 09 09 09 Effective Asphalt 441 541 641 541 lklit Weight P=f 1510 1513 152S 1513 StabLkmter Value 38l 307 204 307 CJgthesianeter Value 73 85 149 85 Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day 170 159 142 159 Final 333 367 193 367
so
w 40 J lt gt 0 30w w le 0 20J
CJ lt 10
24
It
22ci 0 lt i -------20 = 18 0 gt
16 400
____
~
156
w 3 300 154 lt gt - a0 w gt 152l 200 le __-0 z w w c 150 8100
148 0
12 500
D C
o 400 r- 10 -u 300
J 0 9
8 Cgt ~ ~ 200 z
6 ~ 100
w 0
4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE COIITEIIT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B54
----------
Table B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Rep~ication 1
Equivalent Residue Contentmiddot
Residue Ontent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
~tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tklit Weight pcpound
Stabilaneter value
Cbhesiaieter Value
Resilient -bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
45 55 65
518 633 748
24695 24765 24666
26898 26520 26160
82 66 57
187 193 205
001 001 001
449 549 649
154l 1545 1539
41l 310 24l
159 157 165
183 178 193
371 318 250
50
w 40 c gt a 30 w-w == 0 20 ~ 10
400------------
~ 300 lt(
gt a
t 200 == 0 in bullw 8100
0 __ ________ ___ ___
12 ----------
t 10 rti C
~ 8 a c
6
4 s 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI
4
24
Ill 22
0 c c
ze 20
II)
C 18 0
gt
16
158
156- 154 Ill z w 0 152
150
500 iii
8 4
~
0 400-
i300-~ g 200 1-z l 100 iii a 0 __ _______ ____
5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design 55
Design 633
66
193
001
549
1545
310
157
178
318
___
8
Figure B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
BSS
Table B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality
Equivalent Rsidue Content 45
Rsidue Cbntent 518
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllooretical specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
lbsoibed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesicmeter Value 3
Iesilient Mldwus 10 psi
2--day
Final
400-----------
w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 I 0 ltII w8100
olt----__1__--1_---1
12 ----------
10 u
0 8gt a lt
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT l
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
24594
27024
90
190
019
431
1535
450
198
191
360
24
Ill 22
0 C
lt i
20i ~ ltII C 18 C gt
16
158
156 0
i54 iii z ILi
J52
150
SS-30 SEA
55 65
63J 7 ~a 24844
26641
67
190
019
531
1550
324
212
173
308
24856
26276
54
199
019
631
155l
234
225
166
259
_________
~
500----------- 0
dego 400 -
~300~~ C
~ 200 z i 100
w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COIITEHT l
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Replication 2
Design 55
Lesign 633
67
190
019
531
1550
324
212
173
308
Figure B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B56
---------
Table B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality
ElIuivaJent lesidue Omtent
lesidue Cbntent
Bulk Spacific Gravity
~retical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Uut Weight pcf
Stabilaneter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
lesilient Mldulus 103psi
so
w 40 lt gt a 30 w w ~ 20 m lt II)
10
400
w 3 300 lt gt a w lj 200 0 w z 1008
0 12
Ill 10 Q
0 8gt lt
6
4
2-day
Final
~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
so 530
24024
26676
99
207
031
469
1499
354
138
183
352
SS-15 SEA Replication 1
60 70 Design 60 636 7 42 Design 636
24040 23986 26279 25901 85 74
214 223
031 031 569 669
1500 1497 223 149
222 126
159 160 302 234
24
Ill
c 22 ~ c
lt i
20i1
== (II C 180 gt
16
152
150 u -a
648 z w Q
146 1-
144
bull 500 a
o 400 - 3 300 C
~ 200 z ~ 100 (II w a
~ 0
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
85
214
031
569
1500
223 222
159
302
8
Figure B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B57
Table B58 Mixture Design Data Low Quality SS-15
Fquivalent Residue Content 60 60
Rsidue Cbntent 525 630
23944
~retical Specific Gravity
Bulk Sjecific Gravity 26592
Air Voids 100
209VMA
1bsocbed Asphalt 015
Effective Aspbalt 485
Unit Weight pcf 1494
Stabilareter Value 377
Olhesiaeter Value 151
Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi
162
375 2-day
Final
so
w 40 _ gt c 30 w w i
~20 m I-0
10
400
Ill
300 gt w I 200 i 2 w i 100 8
_________ 0 --middotmiddot-
12-------bull------
ti 10 9 0 8gt
6
4
24
- 22ci
0
20i
= 9 18 0 gt
16
152
150 u a
148 z---- w0146
144
500 Q
o 400 _ 300 Q
~ 200 I-z ~ 100
w a
23988
26022
84
215
015
585
1497
307
180
165
356
Graniterock SEA Replication 2
70
735 23793
25830
79
229
015
685
1485
217
170
169
277
~
~
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7
RESIOUE CONTENT li RESIDUE COPlTENT li (AGGREGATE 8ASIS) (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)
Design 60
resign 630
84
215
585
1497
307
180
165
356
8
Figure B58 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B58
Table B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Equivalent esidue omtent 5 0 60 70 Design 60
esidue Cbntent 5 75 690 805 Dsign 690
Bulk Specific Gravity 24389 24362 24419
Jheo=eticaJ Specific Gravity 2 6670 26303 25953
Air Voids 8 6 74 59 7 4
VMA 198 207 214 20 7
Absorbed Asphalt 009 009 009 009
Effective Asphalt 491 591 691 591
Unit Weight pcf 1522 1520 1524 1520
Stabilareter Value 38l 292 220 292
Cbhesiclneter Value 263 186 176 186
~t Mldulus 103psi
2-day 222 222 207 222
Fulal 380 289 293 289
5
w 40 C gt a 30 Ill ~ 20 m C 1- 10
24 ----------
22 bull C Cl C
zi 20
C1 o 18 0 gt
16 ___-________-------i-_-
400---------- 15a------------
156l 300 C gt - a =deg 154ti 200
iii z0 IUiii 0 152 bull bull~ 10018
150 ___ _______ __J0 ---i--J~-L--1
500----------12 ----------- bull o 400 -
Ill 10 ui l 300 -Q
Qg 8 g 200a lt z 6 l 100
iii a
01--J-----__ __4 -------r------- 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
RESIDUE COrlTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B59
Table B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Design 60
Eeidue omtent 575 690 805 D=sign 690
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleo~tical Specific Gravity
1lir Voids
VMA
Absocbed Asralt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcf
Stabilcmeter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
Eeilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
Ill 40 J
lt gt a 30 w I-w 0 20 Ill lt I-
10
400
w 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 Id
8100
0 12
10 m Q
0 8gt 5 lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
~
RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASISI
24371 24441 24445
26744 26373 26020
89 73 61 73
199 205 213 205
019 019 019 019
481 581 681 581
1521 1525 1525 1525
335 236 191 236
220 164 180 164
194 199 191 199
388 329 294 329
24
22
ci 0 lt i
20i
= a
= 18 0 gt
16
158
156 u a
deg154 = w Q
152 ---------150
500 a
1 400 m3 300 1 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100
Ill a
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COHTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B60
APPENDIX C
DATA ANALYSIS SOLVENT FREE AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS
Table Cl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL e_AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
95 85 80
867
76
88
90 85 85
867
29
33
95 85 85
883
58
65
85 70 80
783
76
98
100 100 100
1000
00
00
100 100 100
1000
00
00
C M s 0
D A T A x s
CV
80 80 80
800
00
oo
80 75 75
767
29
38
75 80 70
750
50
67
70 80 75
750
50
67
90 90
100
933
58
62
95 100
95
967
29
30
C M s 1
D A T A
X s
CV
80 75 70
750
50
67
60 70 55
617
76
124
70 70 65
683
-2 9
42
65 70 60
650
50
77
65 70 70
683
29
42
70 60 65
650
50
77
Table C2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating
F01
E 2 ll877 7777778 243aassese9 1)75102041 329 532 ~ middot2 1ll77777777~ 73RBSeSf89 32571~2-~5 3~ 29 532 J 1 150 ooocooo 150JOJOOOO 5f122llll9 414 746
EA ll 8114 llllll11444 2111111111 3J51224 266 396 -E~ middot2- 1-0frOOfr~ 0-9 middot50-middot000 3 oco middot2middot20110816 middot 329 532 Agt 2 77 7777778 38 8815589 17142857 329 532 nJ 4 1555555~55 388881889 171112857 266 396
FR RmiddotJR 36 8166666567 225851B52
------------------------------------------------middot---------------------ronmiddotL 53 -esoo--000000r
Cl
100
P
c5 75 z-t-lt8 50 w t-lt bull css-oC
CMS-0w 25a C middot+ CMS-7 C lt
0-----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Cl Mean AggregateCqqting at middotoesign Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 867 css-o 883 CSS-0 783 css-o 1000 css-o 1000middotcss-o middot I I CMS-0 800 CMS-0 7~ 7 CMS-0 750 CMS-0 933 CMS-0 967lrMS-0 750
I CMS-7 750 CMS-7 617 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 65 0 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating
C2
Table C3 Film Stripping
EMULSION
AGGREGATE SAN
BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK
C s s 0
D A T A
5
0
10
5
5
0
X s
CV
25
35
1414
75
35
47l
25
35
1414
C M s 0
D A T A
0
5
5
7
0
0
X s
CV
25
35
1414
60
14
236
00
oo oo
C M s 7
D A T A
0
0
0
5
0
0
X s
CV
00 OQ 00
25 35
1414
00 00
oo
Table C4 ANOVA Summary Film Stripping
AN-OVA
middotmiddotDPmiddot -ss- F middotFe5
E 2 33 7777778 1euro8888889 23555191 426 802 A 2 -ti8 7777778 343888889 4 7984496 426 802
E X II 4 9 2222226 23055557 3217054 363 642 ERROI 9 645000000 71666667 ---------------TOTAL 17 1762777782
C3
fl w 0 lti 1L a =gt en C w C C-a I-en
40
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-730
20
10
0 SB F GR
Figure C3 Film Stripping
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
css-o 25 css-o 75 css-o 25
GMS-0 25 CMS-0 60 CMS-0 oo
CMS-7 oo CMS-7 25 CMS-7 oo
----middot----middot-middotmiddotmiddot
Nlte Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping
C4
Table CS 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue
Content 10 3 psi
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW D
118 170A 217 205 160 175
C T 83 190 191 182 130 185A s )ts 101 180 204 194 145 180
0 s 25 14 18 16 21 7
CV 246 79 90 84 146 39 D 104 185 155A 190 140 215
C T 82 155 154 171 130 180A M x 93s 170 155 181 135 198
s 16 21 1 13 7 250 CV 167 125 05 74 52 125
D A ab 55 35 73 38 55
C T
82A 48 63 77 45 65 M X s pound81 -- - 52 49 75 42 60 s7 l 5 20 3 5 7
CV 18 96 404 38 11 9 11 8
Table C6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus
A N ) V l
-D-F -SS
E 2 832263888888 _ 2-- -5441-- 722-2222-J 1 89933611111
E~ 4 5386 7777779 -1J- 2- -3-8-1-+-rG-55--5-5-5 7- bull AJ 2 144235~899 EA 4 58024444443
ERROR 113- 3951500 00~-J
---------------------------------------------------------------------TOT-W- -3-5 -11806-4---638 881gt-9-
(116131944444 2720-8611111 89933611111 13466944445 1-9Q lh-5--amp7--+7-8-7211944445
14506111111 219 527-7778
1895577629 -12 394-1541-409569480
61345059 S-~937872 32952081 56gt7870Ll
357 3-S7 443 295
-]y5+ 3S7 295
605 6 05--833 461
-6--05-605 461
cs
bull css-omiddot 300 C CMS-0
M 0 diams CMS-7
(J
3200 gt C 0 E 1-
ffi 100
01----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure CS 2 Day ResiLient Modulus
SAN middotBERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 101 css-o 180 rss-o 204 css-0_194 CSS-0 145 CMS-0 198
CMS-0 93 CMS-0 170 ICMS-0 155 CMS-0 181 CMS-0 135 css-o 180l l l I I CMS-7 81 CMS-7 52 CMS-7 49 CMS-7 75 CMS-7 42 CMS-7 60
Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C6 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking 2 Day
Resilient Modulus 10 3 psi
C6
Table C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Content 10 psi
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A (
s
CV
260
232
246
20
80
320
280
300
28
94
482
299
391
129
33l
365
358
362
5
l4
280
240
260 28
109
320
345
333
18
53
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
267
250
259
12
47
295
280
288
ll
37
253
288
271
25
92
290
387
339
69
203
260
307
284
33
11 7
395
334
365
43
118
C M s 7
D A T A
X
s
CV
78
64
71-
10
139
110
95
103
ll
104
75
73
74
l
19
110
135
123
18
144
80
90
85
7
83
110
135
123
18
144
middotTable C8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus
-~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------F-r05- ---F-01--
E
J El -E- Al EAJ
-ERRJR
2 2-1 4 -~ 2 4
18
3592750555555 -14506 722-2221-171610COOOOJ 147394444445
1---1-1----lf466-li-+ 19215000000 55353333333
2850GOOC0000
17-16375277778 72~336H-1-11
1716100)0000 36848611111 sect8~5833---3-33--9607500000
13840833333 ~ 58-3 33-33 333
11315528C7 -45810702
109385263 23272807 ~U981l-2-1-6067895 3741579
357 -3 r7 443 2 95 3~7-357 295
605 605 833 461 605 605 4 6 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------~- 3-5- -448+1----2-222-2-
C7
bull css-o500
CMS-0 U) diams CMS-7C
C) 400 middoto -
~ 300
J Ci 200
1-z 100 J-UJ UIa
01-------------------------~---~-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
eMS-0 259 ess-a 300 ess-a 391 ess-a 362 eMS-0 284 CMS-0 365
ess-o 246l l l l l ICMS-0 288 eMS-0 271 CMS-0 339 ess-o 260 ess-o 333
CMS-7 71 CMS-7 103 CMS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123
t-ote Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure ca Newrnan-Keuls Ranking Full Cure 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi
ca
Table C9 Density at Design Residue Content pcpound
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
1359
1372
1366
09
07
1365
1365
1365
0
0
1365
1352
1359
09
07
1345
1345
1345
0
0
1520
1525
1523
04
02
1515
1515
1515
0
0
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
1348
1343
1346
04
03
1330
1338
1334
06
04
1329
1340
1335
08
06
1335
1316
1326
- 13
10
1505
1490
1498
11
07
1490
1485
1488
04
02
C M s 7
D A T A
x s
CV
1373 1385
1379
09 06
1375 137 5
1375
0 0
1380
1379
1380
01 01
1370
1360
1365
07 05
1537
1535
1536
01 01
1543
1545
1544
01 01
Table ClO ANOVA Surtunary Density
A II O V ~
-SS F bull O1
E _ 0
2 i
lCB4155555 Z08-tOS389
II 311277~
54207777R 1 ouos2sirrs
4340277
135q23660 -25lS 7i80R63-
1087331173
3S7 3 ~7 443
i()5 605 83
EA Q
4 -2
1599U4U5 _iuseeg
399E11 -3-3UUL45-
10J17398 bull~3785-C7
295 -~S7-
4 f 1 -6CS
A) 2 13772222 o6886111 17251218 357 605 EAJ q 2C361111 5090278 12752262 295 4 61
-ERRJR- 13- 718-()001 399166-7-
35
C9
bull css-o160 CMS-0 diams CMS-7
150
() -a gt 140 -en z w
middotC 13
1201~bull-------------r---------------SBH SBL FH FL ~RH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C9 - Density at Design Residue Content
SAN middotBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 138o CMS-7 1365ICMS-7 1375 CMS-7 1544
css-o 1366
I-7 bull rMS-7 1536
css-o 1365 css-o 1359 css-o 1345 css-o 1523 CSS-0 j515
CMS-0 1346 CMS-0 1334 CMS-0 1335 CMS-0 132 6 CMS-0 1498 CMS-0 1488
Nte Values with a ccmnm vertical line are not statistically different
Figure ClO Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcpound
ClO
Table Cll Air Voids at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
D 87 7 0-A 75 77 80 72
C T 71 70 92 82 78 73A s )s 79 70 84 80 79 73
0 s ll 0 12 04 01 01
CV 143 0 144 45 18 10 D 97 93A 93 91 82 84
C T 90 92 A
91 93 87 90
M x 94 93 92 s 92 84 87 s os 01 01 _0l 04 04
0 53 08 15 15 42 49CV D A 77 62 73 62 71 48
C T 73 61 62 71 65A 55
M X s 75 62 68 67 68 52 s 03 01 08 06 04 057
CV 38 12 115 96 62 96
Table Cl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids
A I O Y 11
-DF ss -F 05 F01
E 2 382650000 191325000 69)150301 3~7 605 -A 2 -2-681667 1340334 ll03567311 -3- 57 605
Q 1 2f677778 26677778 952324f6 4 13 I 33 EA lj 13S33333 3313333 122011409 2 95 Ii 61 ti -2 l8105555- -905-277-8- 326553tO 357 tiOS II) 2 6572221 3296111 11953707 357 605 E~l 4 88411445 2211111 797552 795 4 f 1 ERElll 111 11991)0)00 bull2172222-
-------------------------~------------------------------------------rou1 s SJ 3100000-
Cll
11
10
iP- en 0-0 gt aa
9
8
7
6
5
4
bull css-o CMS-o diams CMS~7
SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
F-igure Cll Air Voids at middotoesign Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 94 CMS-0 93 CMS-0 92 ICMS-0 92 CMS-0 84 ICMS-0 87
IIcss-o 79 css-o 7 0 I II
css-o 79 css-o 73
I ~_ I~ CMS-7 7 5 CMS-7 62 CMS-7 68 CMS-7 48 - - bull-- ~ -----~middot-middotmiddot--middot-middotmiddot-middot ---middotmiddot
~= Values with a OCIlOn vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids
Cl2
Table Cl3 Stabilorneter Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
272
3113
293 29
99
270
265
268 04
13
393
327
360 47
130
380
325
353 39
110
270
270
270 0
0
235
185
210 35
168
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
375
344
360
22
61
340
350
345
07
21
307
377
342
50
145
415
367
39l
33
85
350
300
3-2 5
35
109
240
245
243
04
15
C M s 7
D A T A
x s
CV
235
23-5
235
0
0
130
120
125
07
57
213
233
-223
14
63
150
200
175
35
202
350
350
350
0
0
250
250
25 o_ 0
0
Table Cl4~ ANOVA Summary Stabilorneter Value
A N O V 1
soua= SS r 01
E 2 2
7086172721 9702C93fl9
3543086361 4SS10Uf95
505343236 ~-9189501
357 357
605 605
) 1 175 6950250 1756950250 25053)2i8 443 833 EA 4 6718347112 167 9586 778 23955053 2 95 461 ~ ~544 -4 Q-432-ll-25-0- --S--~ 38 ~5-19- -3 5- ios AJ 2 941227166 47(1euro13583 57122663 357 605 EAJ 4 289779333 72319A33 10314831 2 95 II f 1
Ell ngtR -18 1r2024gt0) -i- bull112472-
---------------------------------------------------------------------0-T- ----5- 4-9B1 is~v~
Cl3
50
w 40 I ltgt a 30w I-w ~ 200 I-m lt 10I-u
0 SSH SBL FH FL GRH
AGGREGATE
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
GRL
Figure Cl3 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 350 CMS-7 250ICMS-0 360 ICMS-0 345 r=ss-o 36o rMS-0 39l
css-o 268 CMS-0 342 css-o 353 CMS-0 325 CMS-0 243Icsbull-bull _ CMS-7 235 CMS-7 12S CMS-7 223 CMS-7 175 css-o 270 css-o 210
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value
Cl4
Table Cl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOWHIGH LOW LOWHIGH D 360193 280 465 275 250A T 234 345 183 375 160 225C A
s x 214 353 232 420 218 238s s 29 11 69 64 18810
136 30 296 152 37 4 74CV D 280 440 230 355 200 320 T A
252 430 219 450 140 240C A M x 266 435 225 403 170 280s s 20 7 67 428 570
74 16 16735 250 202CV D
80 190 122 245 130 170 T A
82 180 192 235 120 180C A M X 81 185 157 240 125 175s s l 7 so 7 777
CV 18 3038 31 5 57 40
Table Cl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value
-SS--
pound 2 1309717272222 654858611111 1102309084 357 605 __ 2 3Ber61222222 194033611--111 -1-1t2J3570 -3 57 605 J 1 12)524904445 120524f94111145 711)1137379 1143 l 33
EA 4 2311~U411111145 57795111111 355~57119 295 4 ~ 1
~ + --8-066---H~i-i--2 ---4-B3-a~--H ~T4-=7-7S~J -3 S7 605 1J 2 111206 7222222 71033511111 ll3~31111 3 57 605 EAJ 4 500gt1111111 12512777778 7587162 235 4 (- 1
RAO- -18 -999 500-000( -1-6--2-7 -75-00000-
--------------------------------------------------------------------tO+--l- el-i- 3-fi-99g6-3-R-~
Cl5
bull css-o500
Q1__________---___-----~
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure ClS CohesiometerValue at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 232rMS-0 435 CMS-0 280rMS-0 266 rss-o 420 tss-o 218
css-o 214 css-o 353 CMS-0 225 CMS-0 403 css-o 238ICMS-0 170
CMS-7 81 CMS-7 185 CMS-7 157 CMS-7 240 CMS-7 125 CMS-7 175
Nrte Values with a oamon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value
~400 -I ltgt cc 300 w 1-w E 2000 -() w c 1008
CMS-0 diams CMS-7
Cl6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Table Cl7 Swell at Design Residue Content in
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
0 0000 0003 0000 0008 0000 0000A C T 0000 0005 0000 0007 0000 0002
A 0000 0004 0000 0009 0000 0000 s j( 00000 00040 00000 00080s 00000 00007
0 s 00000 00010 00000 0 0010 00000 00012
CV 00 250 00 125 00 1732 D 0000 _o 045 0020 0036 0000 0000A 0006 0029 0018 0040 0001 0000TC A 0007 0040 0022 0039 0000 0000
M x 00043 00380 00200 00383 00003 00000 s s 00038 00082 00020 00021 00006 00000 0
874 215CV 100 54 1732 oo
D 0000 0004 0000 0003 0000 0000A T 0000 0002 0000 0000 0000 0000
C A 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000
M x 00000 OQ023s 00000 00010 00000 00000 s 00000 00015 00000 00017 00000 00000
7 oo 655 1732CV 00 00 oo
Table Cl8 ANOVA Summary Swell
P N O V ~
SOUR-middotEmiddot l)f -ss- -lSmiddot F rs FM
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------E 2 C031905 )015953 7576385211 329 532 J 2 0012203 OOOf112 2~97R1n75 329 532 l 000858(1 )()QSf80 11122112111111 414 846
H LI 0016535 00)111311 1963258575 266 396 Emiddot) middot2middot 00079 51- a0ll397S 1eg ~16527 329 532 AJ 2 00011958 )0021179 111 ns1ne 329 532 EAJ II 0006609 OC01652 7e117l97t3 266 396
EDl 36 )000751 OOOJ021
TOBImiddot middot53middot ----008959-9-middot
Cl7
05
04
z 03
-I -I w
u 3 02
01
0 SBH SBL FH
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
FL GRH GRL AGGREGATE
FigureCl Swell at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 00003 css-o 00007CMS-0 00043 CMS-0 -0380 CMS-0 00200 CMS-0 00303
CMS-0 00000css-o 00080 css-o 00000Icss-o 00000 Icss-o 00040 ICSS-0 00000
CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00000CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00023 CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00010
Rte Values with ~--~~~ ~~ lb-le are not ~tatistically different
Figure Cl8 Newman-Keuls Ranking swell in
Cl8
Table Cl9o MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
-------EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
GRANITEROCKFRESNOSAN BERNARDINO
LOW LOWHIGH HIGH LOW HIGH D
124 72198 137 287 243A 227 90145 178 83 260TC 57197 135 252 270A
s 207 104 258 73139 239s s 17 05 56 29 14 17
0 CV 82 280 82638 233 53
D 197 160145 145 90 205A 19l 17092 100 80 220TC 158 105 138190A M x 182 119 11 7 85 205 156 s s 21 37 25 1607 15 0
115 737 105316 21l 83CV D 21 omiddot 240202 185 98 330A
220 20087 181 34588TC 216 210138 223 77 338A M x 215 217142 196 88 338s
s 2111 0805 58 237
23 405 120 22 96118CV
Table C20 ANOVA Summary -MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
----------------------- I N O V A
SO0RE --DF -lS--
middotE __ 2 2
401 11310n -5831137037
2008568519 --2915568519
166S53085 2111762euro92-
3-9 J29
532 532
Q 1 14f5364f296 14653646296 1215099198 4 14 746 EA-Ev
4 -frac34
2784740740 -1-1-i 0359259
696185185 -56-tl-1-79tr30-
5 772 8571 -6450815
266 middot-3-29
396 -5-32middotmiddot
110 2 355470370 177735185 1bull11738C30 329 532 EAO II 12794711075 3198euro9519 25523909 266 396
-Ei8JB 36- 11311 111euro66euro7 120596296
---------------------------------------------------------------------FOTAJ- --5-3- -31131--343-14 8-1-
Cl9
50 bull css-o ti) CMS-0 gt 40 diams CMS-7E I
a w 30I-w E 0 -I 20-ca ltC I-Cl) 10
0--------------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Cl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOWmiddot HIGH LOW
CMS-7 215 CMS-7 142 css-o 104 I ICMS-7 338 CMS-7 21 7
css-o 207 css-o 139 i CMS-7 88 CMS-0 156middot css-o middot
CMS-0 182 CMS-Q 119 CMS-0 117 CMS-0 85 CMS-0 205 css-o 73
Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
C20
-----------------------------------------
Table C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
IEMULSON
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIG_H LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A x s
CV
135 104 104
114
18
157
70 85 51
69
17
248
105 66
136
102
35
343
148 197
-173
35
201
107 101
72
93
19
201
74 107
92
91
17
182
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
128 85
174
119
31
256
73 59 -
66
10
150
69 36 65
56
18
318
158 110
-134
34
253
77 96 68
80
14
178
53 66
113
77
32
408
C M s 7
D A T A x s
CV
141 79 52
91
46
503
185 60 63
103
71
695
125 201
96
141
54
386
192 164 126
161
33
206
131 130 120
127
6
48
72 230
76
126
90
715
Table C22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
l II O Y A
-soaas -OF- -S-S- -F- FrOS
E -llmiddot J
n -tJ-AO EllJ
RROi
----------
2 2 1 u -2-2 4
36middot -------
199090000000 middot 39113 411111111111
4111296296 61982222222
-t-72-1-middot-11181-18-1-754737037011 41156 5185186
85722 middotbull)0(0000 ----------------
995115000000 -1971-7222222
11111216296 151195555556 -360-yen5-110-711 1middot
j8236851852 11166296297
middotmiddot2381 166667
111805138 -0280488 17265A9 6507548
-36111086-15058033
41589422
329 329 414 2 66 329 329 266
532 -532 746 396
-532 532 3915
-----------------------------------lOo-1- middottt 1-300-lamp833-333-3-
C21
400
CJgt ~ 300 I
0 w I-w 200
-~ 0 CJwc 1000 ()
0
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Valueat Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 ll9 CMS-7 103 ICMS-7 141 css-o 173 CMS-7 127 CMS-7 126
css-o ll4 css-o 69 1middotcss-o 102 CMS-7 161 css-o 93 css-o 91
CMS-7 91 CMS-0 66 middotCMS-0 56 CMS~O 134 CMS-0 80 CMS-0 77
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C22 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
C22
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table C23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
724 811 637
724
123
170
1289 -
1276
1283
09
07
627 628 695
650
39
60
622 940
1427
996
405
407
475 407
1276
719
483
672
803 790 498
697
172
247
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
1217 393
1260
957
489
511
2075 2879 1875
2276
532
233
1943 1195 2012
171 7
453
264
1241 1224 1208
1224
1 7
13
676 574 550
600
67
112
986 787 815
863
108
125
C M s 7
D A T A x s
CV
642 620 774
679
83
123
102 426 662
397 281
709
59 7 369 470
479 114
239
588 60l 290
493
176
357
301 263 393
319
67
210
238 284 227
250 30
121
Table C24 ANOVA Surmnary Surface Abrasion
Fmiddot F01middotmiddotss --------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------
e Amiddot
2 -gt
530361248149 22)938237037
315180624075 110469111)519
432152433 1sn1of15
329 329
532 532
1 n
1 4
[14699201852 9733 179629euro
446992gt1952 24332949074
61289-8 3335u~111
414 266
746 396
EJ J
2 2
middot59516003103 85017525926
291seoo1as1 425)8752963
4 9nn2 5 828630
329 329
532 532
EI 4 196475151852 4911877963 57349619 266 396
ERRJl 36 262551800000 72931l~-556
--------------------------------------------------------------------
middotTnUmiddot 53- middot159689-~0964815middot
C23
300
E C)
C)200 Cl)
0 J
z 0 en 100 lti a al lti
01-----r----~---------r---------SBH SBL
Figure C23
SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW
CMS-0 957 CMS-0 2276
css-o 724 css-o 1283
CMS-7 679 CMS-7 397
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content
FRESNO
HIGH
CMS-0 171 7
css-o 65o
CMS-7 479l
LOW
CMS-0 1224
ICSS-0 996
CMS-7 493
GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW
css-o
CMS-0
719
600
ICMS-0 863Icss-
CMS-7 319 CMS-7 250
Ngtte Val~ with~ ~n vertical line are not stati~tically different
Figure C24 Newman-Keuls Ranking Surface Abrasion grams
C24
APPENDIX D
DATA ANALYSIS SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS
----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
Table Dl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15
SEA
D A T A
75 85 85
85 80 85
80 75 70
65 70 70
85 90 90
80 85 85
X s
tV
817
58
71
833
29
35
7-50
50
67
683
29
42
middot88 3
29
33
833
29
35
ss 30 see
D A T A
85 80 85
75 80 80
75 85 85
70 80 70
90 85 95
90 80 90
x s
CV
833
29
35
783
29
37
81 7
58
71
733
58
79
-900
50
56
883
29
33
C M s 7
D A T A
80 75 70
60 70 55
70 70 65
65 70 60
65 70 70
70 )0 65
x s
CV
750 50
67
617 76
124
683 29
42
650 50
77
683 29
42
650
50
77
Table D2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating
rmiddot rs F05 F 0 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------F 2 235 712593 1179 f-296297 553913Q113 329 532 a 2 63 bullTlt1ll81I R 31L97UC7U 1521731 3 29 532 E~
11 3f2 116i14f Jmiddot 39 (1)7111~gtI 1
3~2 ~-2900 9976~5185
17 ~li347F3 UfB47826
4 14 256
746 96
i) ~ pound 2S 11252i 12 29(-29 bull 5086957 329 532
a~ 2 12 ~-~737r o lt19518~ 2E260e7 329 53 2 u ll 1f3 bull illf illt7 41t3S1B52 191156522 2 G6 3~f
iE1190il 3i 76 pound61iz~57 212~-25
Dl
-~ -CJ z I-lt(
0 0 U1 -lt( C bull SS 15 SEA w 25 SS 30 SEA CJ cc
diams CMS - 7CJ lt(
0 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dle Mean Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
I SS-30 733SS-301 $33 SS-15amp 833 lss-301 sn 7 I ISS-30 900 SS-30 883
SS-151 817 SS-301 783 SS-15 683 SS-15 883 SS-15 833SS-lSi 750
CIS--7 750 CS-7 617 OS-7 683 CMS-7 650 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650
Ngtte Values with a comon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating
D2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
Table D3 Film Stripping
EMULSION
AGGREGATE SAN
BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK
s s
15
0 A T A
30
15 20
30 15
25
X s
CV
225
106
47l
250
71
283
200
71 354
s s
30
D A T A
25
25
0
0
5
0
X s
CV
25middoto
oo
00
oo oo
oo
2middotmiddot5
35
1413
C M s 7
D A T A
0
0 0
5
0 0
X s
CV
oo
00 oo
25
35
1413
oo
00 oo
Table D4 ANOVA Swnmary Film Stripping
----------------- ---------------- --middot-----------middot----- middot--middotmiddotmiddot middot- middotmiddot-middot----middot -middot-- middotmiddotmiddot--- --- -------- -A N O V J
-SW~ middotnt r-
pound 2 14333333113 7166666667 27 1S78lttl7 l 2 2]33333333 1165666euro67 middot11t1210~26 Eirl 141 55f 3333335 13958333311 i2894737
Dlli~RI 9 237 50CCDIOmiddot) 2638888P9
lOUL t7 bull--- bullbull - bull- 0 bull bullbull bull- bull bull 0 -------- bull-- bull- bull---bull ---- lt -bullbull bull - bullbullbull--bullbullbullbullbull-bullbull-- bullbullbull bull ___ bull --bull bull bull bull --- bull bull-bullho bullbull bull- bull bull ~-- bull- UO rArr-d bull
D3
cit -w
0 lt( ll a (I)
C w 0 C-a I-ti)
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
20
1
0 SB F GR
Figure D3c Film Stripping
SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO
Iss-3
SS-15
250
225
SS-15~7 250
25
SS-15
ISS-30
200
25
ClIS-7 oo middot SS-30 00 CMS-7 00
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping
D4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue 3Content 10 psi
-------ElAULSWN
----QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCK SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
D S$ 1U H9 171 185 110 159
i22 2~1 165 197 159 165A15Jo-ot----t----+---ii---+----t-----ti 132 140 168 191 135 162
SEA s i3 1 4 9 35 4
CV Ul2 10 25 44 258 26
$5 ---
D
~ A
158
140
189
198 184 187
212
201
178
173
222
199
gtUfl x l49 194 186 207 176 211 SEA s 13 6 2 8 4 16
CV 85 33 11 38 20 77
C M
D A T A
80
82 55 48
35
63
73
77
38
45 55
65
s x 81 52 49 75 42 60
7 s
CV
1
18
5
96 20
404
3
38 5
119
7
118
Table D6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus
--=======-=-middot------=====--=- ---------------------==-~----------=-----e=-----BF SS lS F F05 F01
pound 2 ln~13~ 3lBillllll1l 52367 191141145 3715181747 357 605 I 2 29111 GllS5SSS6 111155 bull 5211778 103289966 357 605 l 1 3l$3351l11112 33$3-3611112 240095590 4113 A33 lEamp liL 31121111l11U1t zst-n22t77 8 ssu21119a 295 461 pound~ 2 1217222222 16093611111 432112657 357 605 III 2 n~ bullEHOq 1a ----------
521iwSSSS5 15S911111111 25Jot 5lll)~Oll)il))I
31l527777R 4117277777~ iJl9166657
22C3627) -2H1157
357 2~95
6~5 11 61
-=====------middot--- -- -- middotmiddot-- --middot-llOl~L lS
DS
bull SS 15 SEA 11 SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
-(D -l Q 0 E J-
ffi 1 J-(J wa gtlt 0 Q--------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL (I
AGGREGATE
Figure D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-3~1 l49 SS-3H J86 SS-10 207 SS-30 176 SS-30 211
SS-15amp 132 SS-15amp l40 SS-151168 SS-l51 l91 ss-lSi 135 SS-15 162I I I CS-7 81 CMS-7 52 OS-7 42 CMS-7 60
llite Values with a amron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent
Figure D6 Newman-Keuls Ranking 2 Day 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi
D6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Table D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Contentr 10 psi
-EMULSION OUALITY LEVELcAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15
SEA
D A T A
325
271
l]JD
260
390
340
319
348
272
367
302
356
x s
CV
29S
38
128
285
35
124
365
35
97
334
21
62
320
67
21 0
329
38
116
ss 30 SEJ
0 A T A
282
310
337
255
303
374
362
307
318
308
289
329
x s
CV
296
20
67
296
58
196
339
50
148
335
39
116
313
7
23
309
28
92
C M s 7
D A T A
78
64
110
95
75
73
110
135
80
90
85
7
83
110
135
x s
CV
71
10
139
103
11
104
74
1
19
123
18
144
123
18
144
Table D8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus
A N O V ll
E 2- 3r39El11 3middotl8tB89 196 994 L19 44 44 5 178 q233024 3 57 6 CS 2 9111~7222223 4058 3611112 3 57577(13 357 6csbulla 11 611~ li9llll41115 ~16 ampll44445 S585579 443 833
_n_ sect 251l-illll41sectl41 -531 31i 11111 AS7121pound3 295 4 61 EJ 2 lt 115 $555555 227 521777 8 1994213 357 605 iampJ 2 170555555 15)277778 0770121 357 605 __ElJ 1324111ilJlilil4 5 208 bull 11Ul 11 bull 184922 2 95 4 ( 1
nan 11 19P73 SOOJIO~ 11111D833l33
middotmiddot-- =--=--=-==-===--c-=-c------_--=--ngtllllll
----------------------------------middot----
D7
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
traquo diams CMS - 7a ()
0--Gl ~- I J _J bull C 02 E I-z w J-(J w C
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATEmiddot
Figure D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HJGH lOW HJGH LOW HIGH LOW
I I I Iss-il51 298 1SS-31l 295 ss-]5~ 365 SS-30 335 1middot SS-15 320 SS-15 329
SS-301 296 SS-l5amp 235 SS-301 339 SS-15 334 SS-30 313 SS-30 309
CIIS--7 71 OS-7 103 CHS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123
t-bte Values with a armon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D8 Newman-Keuls Ranking Full Cure
Resilient Modulus 103 psi
D8
----- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D9 Density at Design Residue Content pcf
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
LOWHJGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH D l341 6 ll339 1347 1338 1523ss 1500A T 1356 133S 1350 1333 1513 1497A
1~ x l351 l337 1349 1336 1518 1499 sSEA 07 02 02 04 07 02
05 02 02 03CV 05 01
D 1362 1352 1370 1355 1545A 1520ss T 1371 1355 1361 1354 1550 1525
30 A
x 1367 1354 1366 1355 1548 1523 SEA 02 06s 06 01 04 04
05 02 05 01 02 02CV D 1373 1375 1380 1370 1537 1543AC T 1385 1375 137 9 1360 1535 1545AM x 1379 1375 1380 1365 1536 1544s s 09 oo 01 07 01 017
06 ooCV 01 05 01 01
Table DlO ANOVA Summary Density
N O V ll -----middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddotmiddot-- -- --------- -------middot --------------- ----- - - -
smI=pound DF ss F F05 F01
pound 2 2738H9 310369445 153505090 357 605 ~ 2 2273iWlllbull38B9 11369544445 5530 gt35704 357 lj -~5 ~ 1 11-6~2SilllaquollO 12 602500C 524057772 443 R33 n I tpoundlUll11 Jl-69lll45 2-324621e 2 95 4 61 E 2 3131poundpound57 15i5S33J 7 7537nB 357 li os lJ 2 ltClfltSf-57 0433334 21458C6 357 s 05 n~ Iii )l216poundfi6lii 9556667 47372764 295 451
EHJii 11l 3 bull nsilraquorn 2019444
------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -- -middotmiddot-middot ----- -middotmiddot - middot-------
35 23611rJC556
D9
1 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
-0 a gt1 ()
z
diams CMS-7
w C
120 SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure D9 Density at Design Residue Coritent
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
OS--7 1379 aS-7 ]375 IClIS-7 l380 IOlS-7 1365 ISS-30 1548 CMS-7 1544ISS-30~ 1367 SS--30~ J354 SS-30~ 1366 SS-30~ 1355 CMS-7 1536 SS-30 1523
SS-15bull 1351 ss-is~ 1337 SS-15bull 1349 ss-1s 1336 SS-15 1518 SS-15 1499
NJte Values with a omron vertical lme are not statistically different
Figure D10 Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcf
DlO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
Table D11 Air Voids at Design Residue Content
-EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
107
)5
9 10l
91
99
79
99
80
83
8 bull5
84
I s
ICY
U)
Ill 9
B4
10l
03
28
95
06
60
89
14
159
82
02
26
85
01
08
ss 30j
SEA
D A T A
90
93
92
85
92
96
86
84
66
67
74
73
x s
CV
92
02
23
89
05
56
94
03
30
85
01
l 7
67
01
ll
74
01
10
C M s 7
D A T A
77
73
62
61
73
62
63
71
71
65
48
55
x s
CV
75
03
38
62
O~l
12
68
08
u5
67
06
96
68
04
62
52
05
96
Table Dl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids
A ll O V A --e--ee-ee=-==== -- -- middot- -- --- middot- - ------- - middot-----middot----middot ______ __________ ---middot- ----- - ------------- -
iiUEllilE ss ~s F F01
E 45111Hoiii6pound 225l08333 812457541 357 605 ll 1~-lilliillt~~)Q 7930)000 2519405 357 505 IJJ 11 ili$6J4141~ 16469444 59230768 443 8 33 E1 2J53ll3ll -5S5333 4 -2 bull 11755245 295 4 6 1
EJ 15672223 bull 783pound 112 2~131820 357 605 I 21022223 bull 1li 1112 bull 3$35365 357 cs
EampJ 2971111ll J27778 26713286 2 95 4t1 iElllllHgt 5cgt~SiIJOIgt -2790556
-middot--middot ------- --middot - middotmiddot- -middotmiddot--middot-- --3li
D11
11 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
-l
a - 8
-a 0 7gt tc ltI 6
5
4 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dll
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot
middot HIGH LOW
SS-]5amp JlJl ISS-ll5~ 10l
ISS-301 92 SS-311l11 89ICMS-7 75 CS-7 fi2
Air Voids at Design Residue Content
FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
=- 95 I I ISS-15 89 SS-15 82 SS-15 8 5
SS-31 94 SS-30 85 SS-30 74ICMS-7 68
OS-7 68 CMS-7 67 SS-30 67 CMS-7 52
Ngtte Values with a ommn vertical line are not statistically dilferent
Figure D12 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids
Dl2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
middotmiddotEMULSION OUAUTY LEVEL
~- AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
48S 3g_g
295
middot 32 8
439
396
397
418
288
307
223
307
X s
CV
443
64
144
312
23
75
418
30
73
408
15
36
298
13
45
265
59
224
ss 3Wo SEA
0 A T A
400
403
367
283
342
411
392
262
310
32-4
292
236
x s
CV
402
02
05
325
59
183
377
49
130
327
92
281
31 7
10
31
264
40
150
C M s 7
D A T A
235
235
130
120
213
233
150
200
350
350
250
250
x s
CV
235
00
00
125
07
57
223
14
63
175
35
202
350
oo oo
250
00
oo
Table Dl4 ANOVA Swnrnary Stabilometer Value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------A N O V A
---------~----------middot------middot-middotmiddot-- -middot--middot--middotmiddot--middot------ bull middotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middot middot------middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot--- --middotmiddot ---_ -- middotmiddot-middotmiddot-- -- - - - -----ss r r05 r01
2 1 i 7~ Sbull1lfipound5161S 5879033333 332259711 357 605 I 2 igtS895QGDgt 279475000 195117552 357 ~os i ll ~l ~
11 111 2 2
l~illflll1111111 7DS nll3331
1~il])2222] 755J5556
~ 111 8 11111~=-- 10115 834 71011111
37 7502778
275769841 128178912
U938281 251M309
11113 295 357 357
833 4f1 605 605
Ell~ 14middot 3~53lt1$1H 116340278 5750926 295 461 fElilli U 25977~illlllCII~ 1111H72222
------------------------ bull- ~bull OOM---bullbullbullbull- - bull------_________ _
roru
013
w J ltC gt a w 1-w E 0 I-m ltC Ishyen
SBH SBL FH FL
bull SS 15 SEA 5S 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-)Sll 441_3 SS-l 325I SS-JSi 4131 SS-15 40 8 CMS-7 350 SS-15 265
SS-30 402 SS-JSa 31_2I ISS-30~ 377 SS-30~ 327 SS-30 317 SS-30 264
CS-7 235 CMS-7 125 ISS-15 298 CMS-7 250
Nlte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D14 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value
Dl4
-------------------
Table Dl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
ii3
ii2
l7-1
ilJD3
236
76
308
62
112
85
222
180
l s
CY
63
lJ1
10
Jl39
SlJ
363
l56
J13
725
185
174
940
99
19
194
201
30
148
ss 30 SEA
0 A T A
229
306
266
187
78
130
260
136
157
212
186
164
x s
CV
268
55
204
227
56
247
104
37
354
198
88
443
185
39
211
175
16
89
C M s 7
D A T A
80
82
190
180
122
192
245
235
130
120
170
180
x s
CV
81
l
18
185
7
38
157
50
315
240
7
30
125
7 57
175
7
40
Table Dl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value
--------------------middot--------------------------------------------------------------A N O V A
-=====-=-=--=-- ===== ss
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1i712 7222222 83563611111 226671165 357 605 I 2 l~12 lllllliilllllllB9 71144441145 129864 357 605 ~ 1l 251116l 144141llllj 2ti-~H~bull4dimiddot4 4 44 5 71775602 443 833 n l4 37511ll 777JTI7JJ S395bull J 9 ~4middot444 2548 5405 295 4 e 1 poundJ 2 72lllS3SlffiifISlmiddot9 3fi22f9111114UU 9026921 357 6C5
n 2 1 iSigt555S
11321Bl 111111I 117lIT177778
33220277778 1277032 9~11333
357 297
605 461
Eliflll 11 f15357 tlOilOOibull 3ilf65Jgt)oo
---------------------------------------middot-------------------------------------------
D15
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7w
J lt(
gt a w Jshyw I 0-() w
8
O--------r-----r-----------r----r-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
c 1
Figure D15
SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW
SS-3(1JlS 268
81IOS-7
ISS-]5i 63 SS-lSl 139
Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 240 SS-30 185 SS-15 201
SS-lSi 155 SS-30l 198 CMS-7 125 SS-30 175
SS-JOi 104 SS-151 185 SS-15 99 CMS-7 175
Note Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Dl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value
D16
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D17 Swell at Design Residue Content in
EfAULSEON
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDI NO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH lOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 s~
D A T A
048 -
0413
06S
069
on
005
006
008
-025 045
005
004
004
005
009
014
Jt s
CY
HS
0010
000
D68
-003
45
bull 006
002
241
035
010
286
004
001
133
009
005
483
ss 30 SEA
D A T A
023
023
020
063
066
055
000
ooo
008
031
023
028
000 000 003
ooo
001
000
x s
CV
022
002
79
061
006
93
003
005
1732
027
004
148
oin
002
1732
ooo
001
1732
C M s 7
D A T A
000
ooo
000
004
002
001
ooo
ooo
000
003
000
ooo 000 000 ooo
ooo
ooo
000
x s
CV
000
ooo
ooo
002
002
655
ooo
ooo
ooo
001
002
1732
ooo
ooo
ooo
ooo
ooo
000
Table D18 ANOVA Summary Swell ( Transformed Data)
A N O Y A
E 2 _1025326 0912663 2353471(154 329 532 -Amiddot middotmiddot2 1366452 0683226 1761825136 329 532 0 1 0368219 03613219 949521081 1114 7116
EA 11 04627$7 0115697 298345558 266 396 -EQ- 2-- --006-903G- -0(134515-middot -8-9003553 middot3l9 -S-32 A) 2 0150358 ~0075179 193863014 329 532 UO 4 0083986 0020997 54143375 26 396
-ERRORmiddot 36 0139606middot 0003178
-TOTIIL 53 --446-576-11
D17
05 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
04
z -J
J w IJJ
SBH SBL
diams CMS - 7
~oo
_02
01
FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dl7 Swell at Design Residue Content
SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-ll51 ii-IS SS-]5i il68 SS-15 a006 SS-15 bull 035 SS-15 004 SS-15 009I I I I SS-3Cli 022 SS-301 061 ISS-301 003 SS-30 bull 027 ISS-30 bull 001 ISS-30 bull 000
ClS-7 000 CIS-7 002 OS-7 000 OIS-7 001 CMS-7 000 CMS-7 000
NJte Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D18 Newman-Keuls Ranking Swell in
D18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
Table Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSl10N
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOWHIGH 0 156 48 175 229 2lO 125ss A ll5 60 20l ll7 228 120T 13_g 4e 170 132 212 130A15 i 137 52 182 200 2l 7 125 smiddotSEA 2l 37 l7 30 lO 05
1middot5]CY 133 92 148 46 40 D 98 106 lll 76 2l 0 lllAss 203 109 76 5l 235 95T ll3 85 63 59 233 125
30 A
x 138 100 83 62 226 llOSEll s 57 l3 25 l3 l4 l5
412 131 298 206 62 136CV D 2lO 202 185 98 330 240A 220 87 18l 88 345 200C T 216 138 223 77 338 2lOAM x 215 142 196 88 338 217s
5805 23 lls 08 2l7
23 405 ll8 120 22 96CV
Table D20 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Stabilorneter Value
N O V A
-------middot------------------------------------------------------ ---------------DF -$ -F os- r01
pound 2 5919875926 2l59917963 39C147075fl 329 53 2 690 i1111pounda$11 iii 345 022110111 US51521111 329 5 32 Ill 1 763129-i296 763 1296 296 100671B132 414 7 U6
Ea t93 11171111]J)7lll 1007863519 1329576P8 266 391bullIEill -2 middot -E~ti35~259 -23middot0-H9fgt29 C-~6522- middot3 29 532 AO 2 S3amp11171t1137ll 11192351$5 55305370 329 532 El s1111i1r1075 135268519 17~qq579 266 396bullmiddotDll~t 311i 27239~333~ 7 5903711)111
53
--------------------------------------------------------middot-----------------------
D19
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA0)
gt diams CMS - 7 l I
a w 30fshyw E 0 J 2-en ltC Ishyen 10
SBH SSL FH FL GRH GRL01amp---------------------------_
AGGREGATE
Figure Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
middotHtGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
QS-1 235 CS-7 142 196 SS-15 200 CMS-7 338 CMS-7 217GS-
Iss-3H uaI I I ISS-3Qi lilG SS-15i ]S2 IOMS-7 88 SS-30 22~ SS-15 125
SS-151 137 ss-i5~ 52 SS-30~ 83 SS-30 62 SS-15 217 SS-30 110
fute Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent
Figure D20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
D20
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Table D2l MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
-------_cEMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
ss 1 sa
D A T A
x s
HIGH
Ul3 ~ JlU
43
64
IOW
~ TWlI ~
--
H1GH
159 1-43 126
143
17
LOW
123 187
60
123
64
HIGH
130 179 153
154
25
LOW
120 104 143
122
20
CV D A5S T A30 x
SEA s
171
139 88
104
110
26
-98 91 -95
4
116
114 116
69
100
27
515
TWT TWT TWT
--
159
111 101 15~
122
28
160
83 65 63
70
11
CV D AC T AM x5 s
7 CV
236
141 79 52
91
46
503
37
185 60 63
103
71
695
267
125 201
96
141
54
386
-192 164 126
161
33
206
23l
131 130 120
127
6
48
157
72 230
76
126
90
715
Too weak to test
Table D22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
SOO~e 55- -f middotFmiddot OS- F01
pound 2 19956 G31tl3Tt 99780165185 52791162 329 532 -1 2- 223ii~ 92592~-~ middot111544629630 -59015431 3middot29 5 32 J 1 n21lliiilliEiiii~ 1middot112106656666 75185029 414 746 lEJ Ill 32il76711ltCl~lll9l 132191851852 43485622 2euro6 396 ~ 2- ~373hllllllllllllllqSmiddot iiilfgtamp 1222-223- -3bull6middot3300811 -3 29 532 1i 2 1S011Hil12 75i0555556 bull ~397100 329 532 Eli
-a~llt-Iii
36 511J7777777
middot5B11113BB333 12799444444 129e l9 25 92 6middot
5771861 266 396
D21
bull SS 15 SEA U) SS 30 SEA gt diams CMS - 7E I
a w J-~ 200 0 en w5 100 0
SBH SBL FH FL AGGREGATE
GRH GRL
Figure D21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINO FRESNO
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 126SS-15 154]03 JCMS-7 161106-7 rmm SS-15 122CMS-7 127SS-30amp 95 ltMgt-7 ]Aj_ SS-15 123
SS-30 70
t-bte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
SS-30 122SS-151 93 SS-l51 fflT SS-30amp 100 SS-30 TWT
Figure D22 Ne-wman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
D22
Table D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW
ss 15 SEA
ss 30 SEA
C M s 7
HIGH D bullbullmiddot 979 715A middot 1143 569T A 1047 599
X - - 1056 - 628 s - - 82 - 77
CV - - 78 - 123
D 987 1474 548A T 907 1536 433 A 1447 615
x - - 947 1486 532 s - 57 46 92
CV - - 60 31 173 D 642 102 597 588 301A T 620 426 369 60l 263 A 774 662 470 290 3q_3
x 679 397 479 493 31 9
s 83 281 114 176 67
CV 123 709 239 357 21 0
1285 1353 1493
1377
106
77
627 72 2 634
661
53
80
238 284 22 7
250
30
121
Specimen swelled during soak could not ne tested Specimen disintegrated during testing
D23
300
E CJgt -200 en
en 0 J
z0 middot cii 100 lt( cc CD lt(
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
01--------r----T----J-----r----r SBH FH FL GRH GRL
middotAGGREGATE
Figure D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content
D24
APPENDIX E
FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL DESIGNS
Table El
Thickness T in Inches to Satisfyl
Tensile Strain Requirements (Reference 3)
Subirade l~octulus psi 30~0 6000 12000 30oco
Jverage Ann~abullAir erlerature J degF lt40 40-55 55-65 gt65 40 40-55 55-65 gt65 lt40 40-55 55-651gt65 lt4 0 40-55 55-65 gt65
T~affic EALbull 10bull
IllIf psi 50000 4 9 66 7 8 91 37 50 5e 66 2 26 28 29 2 2 2 2
1000~0 37 5 3 62 12 27 40 47 53 2 21 25 26 2 2 2 2
300000 21 J4 4 3 51 2 28 31 middot3 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
600000 2 24 3 2 39 2 2 2 _2 28 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2middot 2 2 2 290JCOO 2 2 26 33 2 2 2 22 2 2 2
Traffic EAL= 10s
trJ MR psi bull 50000 83 ll5 139 165 70 97 112 127 54 1-3 83 93 2 3 27 28 29 f-J
42 58 69 78 2 25 27 27100000 63 90 108 129 54 76 91 105
3COOOO 4o 58 73 8 3 3 51 60 73 24 39 ~8 56 2 2 20 22
600000 28 45 55 67 21 37 47 55 2 21 36 44 2 2 2 2
900000 21 37 4 7 57 2 30 39 48 2 21 29 37 2 I 2 2 2
TraCf1c 2 ~AL a 10~ I ia psi bull 50000 130 161 216 2~ 116 16l 187 213 98 131 151 172 63 66 93 58
82 0100000 98 14) 171 203 68 126 152 176 75 106 125 142 52 7 3
3CCOOO 6o 91 11 3 139 55 82 101 122 4 7 69 86 102 31 49 59 59
e~oooo 46 68 86 106 ~o 60 76 94 3middot 3 52 64 i9 2 35 4 r 54
900~00 37 56 72 69 )2 51 63 80 24 4 3 5 4 67 2 28 3 8 ul Trarr1el EAL~ 10 7
la psi bull 50000 192 24 24 24 178 239 24 24 156 205 235 24 12l 153 165 17 3 I
24 24 228 24 119 168 195 222 95 129 147 1s IlCOOCO 1~5 21 0 13 5 193
56 aa 10a 12 I-3CC000 aa 136 167 205 ~-3 12 156 186 74 11l 138 16~
I- l 6 a2 10060~ 1 ouo 6 4 100 125 156 59 92 ll 6 l~ 5 53 82 104 128
108 3 3 53 6 8 859ccooo 53 82 10 5 132 so 77 97 121 4 ~ 68 86
For asphalt volume Vb= 11 are air voids Va= 5 Use Figure El to correct thickness of other valuemiddots of Vb and Va
Table E2
Subsradlt Mcdulus psi
Thickness T in Inches to Satisfys Subgrade Strain Requirements (Reference 3)
6100 120003000 300CC
tr N
A~erage A~nual Ar Te11perature degF
Traffic EALbull 10bull
~IP psi 50000a
100000
300000
600000
900000
Traffic EAL 10 5
MR psibull 50000
lC0000
300000
600000
900000
Tra~~lc EAL c 1c6
MR psibull 50000
100000
300000
600POO
900000
Trafficz EALbull 10 7
MRt psibull 50000
100000
300000
600000
900000
lt40
55
55
55
55
55
81
81
81
81
81
115
115
115
115
115
155
155
155
155
155
40-55
83
60
55
55
55
121
87
81
Bl
Bl
168
123
11
115
ll5
226
165
155
155
155
55-65 gt65 lt40
108 115 46
73 82 46
55 55 46
5_ 45
55 55 46
145 165 69
106 120 69
a1 81 69
81 81 69
81 81 69
201 224 98
14B 165 98
115 115 98
115 115 98
115 115 98
24 24 1)6
199 222 135
15 155 136
155 155 136
155 155 136
40-55
10
50
46
46
46
103
74
69
69
69
150
108
98
98
9B
204
150
135
136
136
55-65 G5 lt40
83 93 30
61 70 30
46 46 30
45 46 30
46 46 30
124 139 55
91 102 55
69 69 55
69 69 55
69 69 55
173 193 83
130 147 83
98 98 83
98 98 83
98 98 83
239 24 120
179 199 120
136 136 120
136 136 120
135 136 120
40-55
4
3~
30
30
30
83
60
55
55
55
122
90
83
83
83
17 5
130
120
middot12 o
120
55-65 gt65 lt~O
62 69 25
46 53 25
30 30 25
30 30 25
30 30 25
9 106 29
82 29i 2 middot 55 55 29
55 55 29
55 55 29
144 15S 60
108 12l 60
83 83 60
83 83 60
83 83 6 0
205 226 90
155 112 90
120 120 90
120 120 90
120 120 90
40-55
31
25
25
25
25
52
30
29
29
29
86
65
60
60
60
127
98
90
90
90
55-65 bull65
33 35
29 3c
25 25 I 25 25 i 25 2s
51 67
47 52
29 29
29 29
29 29
95 10
76 85
60 I 6C
6C i 6o 50
14bull 3 14
112 126
90 90
90 90
90 90
Tj In Tc In 24 2 22
20
18
16 3
14
12 4
~ 10 Va+ vb 5
099
8 08 6
077 7 06
6 805
9045 1003
4 12
14
3 16
18
20
22 2 24
Figure El Correction of Pavement Design Thickness for Air Voids and
Asphalt Content of Mix (Reference 3)
E3
-------
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000 psi
MAAT 55- 65 F-Ul 400 CL
C) 0 300 (J) J
~ 200 0 ~
I- 100z w J-(J) 0+----------------------C w 0 2 4 6 8 middot10 12
THICKNESS IN
1X104 EAL
1X105EAL
Figure E2 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
M-AAT )65 F- -~---Ul 400 1x104 EALCL
CW)
0 300 (J) J 200C 0 ~
-~ 100 w -J -(J) 0w 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a
THICKNESS IN
1X105EAL
Figure E3 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 6000 psi MAAT = )65F
s
E4
w 400 c
()
0 300 () - 200 Cl 0 E
~ 100 w J-
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT 56-65 F
1x10 EALI 4
I 1X105 EAL
w o~---------------------r-w 1 2 3 4a
THICKNESS IN
Figure E4 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT )65F-w 400 4I 1X10 EALc () I 1X105EAL 0 300 I () I - I 200C I0 E I I- 100z w I-J I-() 0w 1 2 3 4c
THICKNESS IN~
Figure ES Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65Fs
ES
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
MAAT 55-65 F-en400 41X10 EALIC
(I) 1X105EAL middot 0
I I 300
en I J 200C 0
f-- 100z w J-en 0LU 2 4 6 8 10 14a
-THICKNESS IN
Figure E6 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
MmiddotAAT )65 F cn4oo I 1X104 EALa
(I) 1X105EAL 0 300
I I
en -I
~200 0 ~ 100 LU --en -I
0-1-----------------------LU 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a THICKNESS IN
Figure E7 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = )65F
E6
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT 55-65 F-u 400 41x10 EAL0
M 1x105EAL 0 T- 300 -en J 200C 0 E I- 100z w-J- en 0w C 0 middot1 2 3 4 middot5 6
THICKNESS IN
Figure E8 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000psi
M-AAT )65 F-en400
I --- - - ~- 1X104 EAL
C
a 1X105 EAL
0 I T- 300
I-en J
200 C 0 E
I- 100z w J-en 0w 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
THICKNESS IN
Figure E9 Thickness For Subgrade StrainRequirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65F
s
E7
Table E3
Thickness Requirements inches
= 6000 psi EAL= 1 X 104 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
MrT
l
CF Tc Ts
246000 34
64 37 43
300000 31
68 4middot 0 43
391000 27
lt 61 33 43
362000 28
64 31 43
260000 28
bull bull 61 35 43
333000 30
65 33 43
C M s 0
Mr Ti CF T Tc
s
259000 29
59 36 43
288000 32
bull 61 3 8 43
271000 32
59 39 43
339000 30
60 37 43
284000 32
59 40 43
365000 29
60 37 43
C M s 7
M T7
l
CF TTc
s
71000 55
65 60 43
103000 47 71
45 43
74000 54
67 53 43
123000 44 69
45 43
85000 52
65 54 43
123000 44
73 46 43
ss 15
M T7
l
CF T Tc s
298000 31
57 40 43
285000 32
59 38 43
365000 28
58 37 43
334000 30
61 36 43
320000 30
60 36 43
329000 30
61 36 43
ss 30
M T7
l
CF Tc Ts
296000 31
60 37 43
296000 31
62 36 43
339000 30
59 38 43
335000 30
bull 63 35 43
313000 31
65 34 43
309000 31
65 34 43
Ngtte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi TI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume middotTc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= llrickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
E8
Table E4
Thickness Requirements inches
Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
246000 68
64 74 70
300000 62 68
62 68
391000 55 61
65 68
362000 57 64
63 68
260000
57 bull 61
68 70
333000 59 65
65 68
C M s 0
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
259000 65 59
80 70
288000 63
bull 61 75 68
271000 64 59
78 70
339000 59 60
72 68
284000 63 59
78 68
365000 57 60
70 68
C M s 7
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
71000 100
bull 65 107 105
103000 90 bull 71
84 88
74000 100
67 102 104
123000 85 69
85 81
85000 95 65
102 97
123000 85 73
78 81
ss 15
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
298000 62 57
78 68
285000 63 59
76 68
365000 57 58
72 68
334000 59 61
72 68
320000 60 60
73 68
329000 59 61
70 68
ss 30
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
296000 62
60 74 68
296000 62
62 71 68
339000 59 59
72 68
335000 59
63 68 68
313000 60
bull 65 65 68
309000 60
65 65 68
1bte
M = Resilient mJdulus in psirf = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
E9
Table ES
Thickness Requirements inches 4
Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M Tdeg
J
CF T Tc
246000 40
64 46 45
300000middot 37 68
37 43
391000 33 61
38 43
362000 35
64 39 43
260000 39
61 45 45
333000 35
65 38 43
C M s 0
MT J
CF T Tc
s
259000 39 59
48 45
288000 38 61
middot4 6 44
271000 38 59
47 44
339000 35 60
43 43
284000 38 59
46 44
365000 35 60
43 43
C M s 7
M T7
J CF T Tc
s
71000 60 65
65 68
103000 52 71
48 64
74000 60 67
60 68
123000 50 bull 69 59 62
85000 58 65
63 67
123000 50 73
49 62
ss 15
M T7
J CF T Tc
s
298000 37 57
50 43
285000 38 59
48 44
365000 35 58
45 43
334000 35 61
43 43
320000 3 6
60 44 43
329000 37 61
45 43
ss 30
M T7
J CF TTc
s
296000 37 60
45 43
296000 37 62
43 43
339000 35 59
44 43
335000 35 bull 63
41 43
313000 36
65 39 43
309000 36
65 39 43
Nrte
M = Resilient nodulus in psiTI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T
5 = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El0
Table E6
Thickness Requirements inches
105E = 6000 psi EAL= 1 x psi MAAT = )65Fs
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
246000
79 64
87 70
300000
74 68
74 70
391000 69
61 81 70
362000 70
64 77 70
260000 77
61 90 70
333000 71
65 77 70
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 77
59 94 70
288000 75
61 90 70
271000 76
59 92 70
339000 71
60 87 70
284000 75
59 91 70
365000 69
60 85 70
C M s 7
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
71000 111
65 118 112
103000 103
middot11 95 98
74000 111
67 110 11l
123000 98
69 95 93
85000 109
65 119 109
123000 98
73 87 93
ss 15
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
298000 74 57
94 70
285000 7 5 59
94 70
365000 69 58
88 70
334000 7 1 middot 61
84 70
320000 72 60
87 70
329000 71 61
84 70
ss 30
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
296000 74
60 90 70
296000 74
62 86 70
339000 71 59
87 70
335000 71
63 82 70
313000 73
bull 65 78 70
309000 73
65 78 70
Note
M = Resilient midulus in psi11 = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness f9r tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade stram requirements inches
Ell
Table E7
Thickness Requirements inches4
= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
middot~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO -GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
246000 2 0
64 23 25
300000 20
68 2middot 0 25
391000 20
61 24 25
362000 20
64 23 25
260000 20
61 24 25
333000 20
65 22 25
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 20
59 25 25
288000 20
bull 61 24 25
271000 20
59 25 25
339000 20
60 25 25
284000 20
59 25 25
365000 20
60 25 25
C M s 7
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
71000 20
65 22 31
103000 20
middot71 20 29
74000 20
67 21 31
123000 20
69 20 28
85000 20
65 22 30
123000 20
73 20 28
ss M T7
l
298000 20
285000 20
365000 20
334000 20
320000 2 0
329000 20
15 CF T Tc
s
57 26 25
59 25 25
58 26 25
61 24 25
bull 60 25 25
61 24 2 i
ss 30
M T7
l
CF TTc
s
296000 20
60 25 25
296000 20
62 24 25
339000 20
59 25 25
335000 20
bull63 23 25
313000 20
65 22 25
309000 20
65 22 25
N)te
M = Resilient nodulus in psi middot T7 = Unrorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inchesct= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume T = Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T~ = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El2
Table E8
Thickness Requirements inches
Es= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s
M T7
l
246000 22
300000 20
391000 20
362000 20
260000 21
333000 20
s 0
CF T Tc
s
64 24 32
68 20 29
61 24 29
64 23 29
61 24 l 1
65 23 29
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 21 59
25 31
288000 21
bull 6J 24 30
271000 21 59
25 30
339000 20 60
25 29
284000
21 59
25 1 n
365000
20 60
25 2 q
C M
M T7
l
71000 27
103000 25
74000 27
123000 24
85000
26
123000
24 s 7
CF T Tc
s
65 28 53
71 24 45
bull 67 28 53
69
23 43
65
27 49
73
22 43
ss M T7
l
298000 20
285000 21
365000 20
334000 20
320000 20
329000 20
15 CF
TTc
s
57 27 29
59 26 30
58 27 29
61 24 29
60 25 29
61 24 2 q
ss 30
M r~i CF T Tc
s
296 ooomiddot 20 60
24 29
296000 20 62
23 29
339000 20 59
24 29
335000 20 63
23 29
313000 20 65
23 29
309000 20 65
23 29
i-krte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psiTf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade strain requirements inches
El3
Table E9
Thickness Requirements inches 4 = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
EMULSION __ QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
246000 20 64
23 25
300000 20 68
21 25
391000 20 61
24 25
362000 20 64
23 25
260000 20 61
24 25
333000 20 65
22 25
C M s 0
259000 20 59
26 25
288000 20
bull 61 middot24 25
271000 20 59
26 25
339000 20 60
25 25
284000 20 59
26 25
365000 20 60
25 25
C M s 7
MT7
1 CF T Tc
s
71000 20 65
22 58
103000 2~0 middotn
20 52
74000 20 67
21 58
123000 20 69
20 48
85000
20 65
22 57
123000
20 73
20 48
$$
15
MTdeg
1
CF T Tc
s
-298 000 20 57
27 25
285000 20 59
26 25
365000 20 58
26 25
334000 20 61
24 25
320000 2 0 60
25 25
329 000 20 61
24 25
ss 30
MT7
1
CF T Tc
s
296000 20 60
25 25
296000 20 62
24 25
339000 20 59
26 25
335000 20 63
23 25
313000 20 65
22 25
309000 20 65
22 25
tote
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot rf = Unagtrrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El4
Table ElO
Thickness Requirements inches 5E = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
s
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T--deg
J
CF T Tc
s
246000
24 64
27 31
300000
23 68
24 29
391000
22 61
25 29
362000
22 64
2_s 29
260000
26 61
31 30
333000
22 65
24 29
C M s 0
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s
259000 23
59 28 30
288000 23
bull 61 27 30
271000 23
59 28 30
339000 22
60 26 29
284000 23
59 28 30
365000 21
60 25 29
C M s 7
ss 15
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s M T--deg
J
CF T Tc
s
71000 28
bull 65 30 61
298000 23 57
25 29
103000 27
~ 71 27 52
285000 23 59
28 30
74000 28
bull 67 28 60
365000 22
58 28 29
123000 26
69 26 48
334000 22 61
25 29
85 000 28
65 31 58
320000 22
60 26 29
123000 26
73 24 48
329000 22 61
25 29
55
30
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s
296000 23
60 27 29
296000 23
62 27 29
339000 22 59
27 29
335000 22
63 25 29
313000 22
65 24 29
309000 23
65 25 29
tbte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot Tf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Ihickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
II11~~~1~~i~IIII 08860 ElS
5 Laboratory specimens containing solvent free asphalt emulsions experience higher losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivity procedure than specishymens with the asphalt emulsion containing solshyvent This effect however may be related to the lesser degrees of compaction attained when using the solvent free asphalt emulsions as comshypared to the emulsion containing solvent
6 Laboratory specimens which contained the solvent free asphalt emulsions with lower quality aggreshygates experienced higher amounts of swell and greater surface abrasion losses than specimens with the emulsion containing solvent
7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the solvent free asphalt emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thicknesses are required when using solvent free emulsions It is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials which may be an important factor in field performance
8 Most of the paving mixtures investigated which contained the low quality aggregates and the solvent free asphalt emulsions met stabilometer requirements for Caltrans Type C asphalt conshycrete However only three of the mixtures also met moisture vapor susceptibility and swell requirements Mixtures which met these requireshyments were - FH with CSS-0 emulsion GRH with CMS-0 emulsion and GRH with CMS-7 emulsion
9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other considershyations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others
90
- - - --- ----------
102 Sulfur-Extended-Asphalt Emulsions
A summary of ANOVA significance at the 95 percent confidence level is shown in Table 34 This table showsmiddotfor nearly all parameters that emulsion type aggregate quality level and aggregate are signifishycant effects For several parameters several interactions are also significant Conclusions reached during the SEA emulsion experiment are
1 Stable solvent free water based anionic slow set emulsions using sulfur-extended-asphalt (SEA) base stocks can be produced which meet most Caltrans specifications for anionic slow set emulsions
2 Anionic SEA emulsion can effectively coat both low and high quality aggregates
3 Use of SEA emulsions resulted in higher resilshyient modulus values for both low and high qualshyity aggregates than use of the emulsion containshying solvent
4 Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions had higher stabilometer values with low quality aggregates than mixtures with the emulsion containing solshyvent
5 Specimens containing the SEA emulsion with low quality aggregates swelled to a greater extent and experienced higher surface abrasion losses than those with the emulsion containing solvent
6 Specimens containing the SEA emulsions experishyence greater losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivshyity procedure than specimens with the solvent asphalt emulsion indicating a greater sensitivshyity to moisture
7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thickshynesses would be required when using SEA emulshysions Again it is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials
91
Table 34
SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL
SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT
DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS
effect of aggregate type effect of aggregate quality level effect of emulsion type
AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction
A a E AQ AE QE AQE
Emulsion Compatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA y NA y NA NA
2 Day Mxfalus y y y - y y y
Full Cure Mldulus y - y - - - -Density y y y - - y y
Air Voids y y y - - - -
Stabilometer - y y - y - -
COhesiometer - y - - - - -MIS Stabilaneter y y y y y - -
MVS COhesianeter y y y - y y -y
~ y y y y y y
Surface Abrasion
LEGEND
Effects
A = Q = E =
AQE = three-way interaction
Significance
Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level
NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way
92
8 All of the paving mixtures containing low qualshyity aggregates and SEA emulsions studied met Caltrans stabilometer requirements (30 minimum) for Type C asphalt concrete however several mixtures did not meet swell and moisture vapor susceptibility requirements for Type C asphalt concrete Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions which met swell requirements were FH GRH and GRL with SS-15 SEA emulsion and SBH FH FL GRH and GRL with SS-30 SEA emulsion MVS conshyditioned stabilometer value requirements were met only by FL and GRH with the SS-15 SEA emulshysion and GRH with the SS-30 SEA emulsion
9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other consider~ ations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others
93
110 RECOMMENDATIONS
111 This study has investigated the properties of paving mixtures containing several low quality aggregates and several types of emulsified binders Test methshyods and criteria used to design and assess mixture characteristics were those specified for hot-mix asphalt concrete in California An objective of the research study is to determine if solvent free emulshysified binders can be used in place of cutback asphalt binders Therefore in order to permit drawing of appropriate conclusions from the data presented in this report on the effectiveness of the emulsions studied for replacing cutback asphalts additional laboratory work is required It is suggested that properties and characteristics of mixtures containing the project aggregates and cutshyback asphalts be determined The study should evalshyuate the same properties considered in this study Determination of mixture characteristics using cutshyback binders would permit direct comparisons between the cutback and emulsified binder systems and the drawing of more definite conclusions Additionally a study which would determine properties of mixtures containing hot-mixed asphalt cement would be of aid in evaluating results
112 After completion of the additional laboratory studshyies if results so indicate it is recommended that several field experimental studies using aggregates ranging in quality from low to high with solvent free emulsified asphalt binders be undertaken Projects should be constructed in several climatic regions in California (wet and arid) and should include control sections containing both cutback and if possible hot-mixed asphalts Proper labshyoratory mixture designs construction control and field monitoring of results and performance should be used Results of these experiments should proshyvide indications of performance of the various mixtures in actual use
113 Results of this study indicate that mixtures conshytaining the SEA binders are detrimentally affected by moisture to a greater degree than with standard emulsions However performance of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions may be adequate in arid regions Therefore it is recommended that in order
94
to further investigate the usefulness of paving mixshytures containing the SEA emulsions that field experimental test sections using the SEA emulsions be constructed and evaluated$
It is strongly suspected that the moisture vapor susceptibility of the solvent free asphalt emulsion mixes evaluated herein could be reduced by a slight modification of the emulsion formulations This possibility should be evaluated
95
References
1 Request For Proposals Investigation Into The Nature Of Emulsified Asphalts Compatible With California Local Aggregates And Substitution Of Sulfur For Asphalt In Aqueous Emulsified Systems California Air Resource Board Research Division Sacramento Calishyfornia March 1980
2 American Society for Testing and Materials 1981 Annual Book of Standards Part 15 Road Paving Bituminous Materials Travelled Surface Characterisshytics Philadelphia PA 1981
3 Interim Guide to Full-Depth Asphalt Paving Using Varshyious Asphalt Mixes The Asphalt Institute Pacific Coast Division PCD-1 January 1976
4 Kennepahl GJA Logan A and Bean D C Conshyventional Paving Mixes with Sulfur-Asphalt Binders Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975
5 Deme Imants Processing of Sand-Asphalt-Sulfur Mixes Proceedings AAPT Volume 43 1974
6 A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual The Asphalt Instishytute Manual Series No 19 MS-19) March 1979
7 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Use of Cutback Asphalt US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Waste Management Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park North Carolina October 17 1977
8 Highway Chemicals Newsletter Armak Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois Fall 1981
9 Bitumils Mix Manual Chevron USA Asphalt Division January 1977
10 Asphalt Pavement Engineering Wallace Hugh A and Martin J Rogers McGraw Hill Book Company New York 1967
11 Spahr J D The Use of Emulsified Asphalt in Conshystruction and Maintenance Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975
96
12 Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design Asphalt Emulsions Volume 4 1977
13 Dybalski J N 11 The Chemistry of Asphalt Emulsions Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D C January 1976
14 Beagle C w Deflection and Performance of Deep Lift Asphalt Emulsion Base Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976
15 Meier w J Asphalt Emulsion Construction on the Navajo Reservation Twenty-Fifth Annual Arizona Conshyference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 22-23 1976
16 Kallas B F and Shock J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Find Report - Parts I and
11II Research Report 77-1 The Asphalt Institute November 1977
17 Shook J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Analysis of Performance Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976
18 Wimberly C M Emulsified Asphalt Mixes in Arizona Proceedings 24th Annual Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 17-18 1975
19 Izalt J O Galloway B M and Saylock D SandshyAsphalt-Sulfur Pavement Experimental Project Highway US 77 Kennedy County Texas Texas Transportation Institute April 1977
20 McBee w c and Sullivan T A Direct Substitution of Sulfur for Asphalt In Paving Materials 11 Report of Investigations 8303 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines 1978
21 Ludwig A C Gerhardt B B and Dale JM Materials and Techniques for Improving the Engineering Properties of Sulfur Report No FHWA-RD-80-023 Fedshyeral Highway Administration June 1980
22 Jiminez R A and Stakes K J Effects of Heat and Air on the Viscosity of Sulfur-Asphalt Mixtures Preshysented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies San Diego California February 16-18 1981
97
23 Chehovits J G and Anderson D A Upgrading of Marginal Aggregates for Improved Water Resistance of Asphalt Concrete Transportation Research Record 762 pages 46-52 1981
24 Rosner JC and Chehovits J G Highway Binder Materials From Modified Sulfur-Water Emulsionsn Report No FHWARD-82035 Federal Highway Administration November 1981
25 Standard Specifications State of California Department of Transportation January 1978
26 Applied Linear Statistical Models Neter I and Wasserman w Richard D Irwin Inc Homewood Illinois 1974
27 Burr I W and Foster LA A Test For Equality of variances Mimeograph Series No 282 Statistics Department Purdue University Lafayette Indiana 1972
28 Applied Statistical Methods Burr I W Academic Press Inc New York 1974
29 Parr W K Field Observations of the Behavior of Bituminous Pavements As Influenced By Moisture 11 ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 3-16--I959
30 Rice JM Relationship of Aggregate Characteristics to the Effect of Water on Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 17-34 1959
31 Lettman R P and Johnson D L 11 Pressure Induced Stripping in Asphaltic Concrete Highway Research Record 340 pages 13-28 1970
32 Waller F H Jr Emulsion Mix Design Methods An Overview 11 Transportation Research Record 754 1980
33 Design of Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures Report R6-350(74) US Forest Service 1974
34 11Mix Design Procedure For Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Pavement FHWA Region 10 Office of Federal Highway Projects
98
35 Darter M I Ahlfield S R Wilky P L and Wasill R G Development of Emulsified Asphalt Aggregate Cold Mix Design Procedure Research Report 505-5 Department of Civil Engineering University of Illinois 1978
36 A A Gadallah L E Wood and E J Yoder A Suggested Method for the Preparation and Testing of Asphalt-Emulsion-Treated Mixtures Using Marshall Equipment Proceedings AAPT Volume 46 1977
37 Marshall Stability Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois
38 Jiminez R A Final Report-Phase I Asphalt Emulsion Treated Aggregates University of Arizona Research Report HPR-1-13(150) January 1977
39 George K P Interim Report on Criteria for Emulshysified Asphalt Stabilization of Sandy Soils Univershysity of Mississippi for Mississippi State Highway Department October 1976
40 Fong G K Mix Design Methods for Base and Surface Courses Using Emulsified Asphalt A State-of-the-Art Report Report No FHWA-RD-78-113 Federal Highway Administration October 1978
41 Schmidt R J A Practical Method for Measuring the Resilient Modulus of Asphalt-Treated Mixes Highway Research Record 404 1972
42 Manual of Test Volume 2 State of California Department of Transportation Transporation Laboratory Third Edition 1978
43 Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete Manual Series No 2 (MS-2) The Asphalt Institute March 1979
99
-
APPENDIX A
OPTIMUM FLUIDS AT COMPACTION DATA
-
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table Al
Percent Residue
631 631 631
702 702 702
595 595 595
678 678 678
689 689 689
645 645 645
Fluids at Compaction Data css-o
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
467 367 216
1098 998 847
571 413 360
1273 1115 10 62
455 370 341
1050 965 936
590 450 400
1268 1128 1078
492 183 109
1181 872 798
404 311 139
1049 956 784
Dry Density
(pcf)
1304 1337 1347
1283 1326 1306
133l 1310 9 1317
1328 1295 1304
1404 1529 154 1
1429 1466 1462
Al
css-o CSS-0HIGH QUALITY155- DRY LOW QUALITYbull SAN BERNARDINO 1551
bull SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO 150-I I 150 FRESNObull GRANITEROCK bull GRANITEROCK
I ~
145 LoPT=B5 145 () () - -0 0
~140 gt1401 L- 0 PT= 85 OPT=100gt-i
N Cl) OPT=100 Cl)
DRYZ 135 Z 135w w Cl Cl
amp130 amp130 Cl 0
125 125
120 I i I I i I i I I I 120 I I J I I i I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure Al Fluids at Compaction Figure A2 Fluids at Compaction High Quality Aggre-gate CSS-0 Low Quality CSS-0
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A2
Percent Residue
605 605 605
704 704 704
595 595 595
695 695 695
556 556 556
604 604 604
Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-0
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
4 16 316 183
1021 921 788
494 389 262
1198 1093
966
529 392 360
1124 987 955
519 479 301
1214 1174
996
284 187 124
840 743 680
319 256 165
923 860 769
Dry Density
(pcf)
1331 131 6 1316
1305 1320 1313
1282 1313 1312
1321 1298 1279
1478 1479 1463
1452 1463 1453
A3
155 CMS-0 HIGH QUALITY
150~ DRY bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
145 bull GRANITEROCK72_ OPT=90 0 0
~140gt-ii OPT=105i Cl)
Z 135 w 0
gt- D~0 130 middot 0
125 [OPT100
120 I i I i i I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A3 Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-0
155] 150
0 1451 0
~140gt- Cl)
Z 135 w 0
fc130 0
125
120 I 6
CMS-0
LOW QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
bull GRANITEROCK
v[A OPTf90
pound 0 PT12DoOPTr110
7 I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A4 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-0
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A3
Percent Residue
769 769 769
746 746 746
595 595 595
714 714 714
570 570 570
587 587 587
Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-7
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
460 391 294
1229 1160 1063
573 436 301
13 19 1182 1047
513 380 2 57
1108 975 852
513 404 334
1227 1118 1048
231 170 080
801 740 650
263 146 109
850 733 6096
Dry Density
(pcf)
1329 1377 1376
1335 135l 134 2
1357 1333 1342
1299 1317 1308
1519 1523 1498
1503 1517 1514
AS
CMS-7 155-- HIGH QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNOlSO~ nPT80 145
0 -0 -140 middot gt-
r t deg Cl)
Z 135 w Cl
fi130 Cl
125-1
120 I 6
GRANITEROCK
~OPT=105
IJ
I 7
I I i I i I 8 9 10 11 12 13
TOTAL FLUIDS
I 14
I 15
Figure AS Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-7
155
150
145
0 -0
gt--140
t Cl)
Z 135 w Cl
fc 130 Cl
125
120 I 6
CMS-7 LOW QUALITY
C bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
GRANITEROCKOPT 80
~OPT105
~
tos i I I i J i i I I 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A6 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-7
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A4
Percent Residue
765 765 765 765 765 765
815 815 815 815 815 815
765 765 765
817 817 817 817 817 8el7
574 574 574
738 738 738 738 738 738
Fluids at Compaction Data SS 15 SEA
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
563 426 315 580 346 178
1328 1191 1080 1345 1111
943
595 418 309 599 256 137
14 10 1233 1124 1414 1071 952
600 440 356
1365 1205 1121
683 541 418 629 457 283
1500 1358 1235 1446 1274 1100
374 247 128
948 821 702
451 301 175 435 186 073
1189 1039
913 1173
924 811
Dry Density
(pcf)
1289 1319 1335 1286 1331 1332
1278 1314 1315 1276 1304 1299
1281 1325 1313
1259 1290 1303 1275 1292 1294
1450 1485 1482
1428 1459 1468 1437 1465 1465
A7
bull bull
SS 15 SEA 155 HIGH QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot
150 FRESNO
bull GRANITEROCK
145
0 0 -
OPT=75
-_ gt=140 I-ii OPT100co C)
z 135 w _--0PTr1200
gt-0 130--0
125
120 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A7 Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 15 SEA
SS 15 SEA LOW QUALITY155
bull SAN BERNARDINO-
FRESNO 150
bull GRANITEROCK 145
~-0 0 LOPT=80a140gt-t Cf)
Z135 w r-OPT=105 0
gt-0 130 -~middot 0
OPT120J 125
120 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure AB Fluids at Compaction Low Quality SS 15 SEA
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table AS
Percent Residue
688 688 688
722 722 722 722 722 722
680 680 680 680 6 80 680
726 726 7 26 726 726
510 510 510
596 596 596 596 596 596
Fluids at Compaction Data SS 30 SEA
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
595 468 150
1283 1156
838
645 438 267 660 566 440
1367 1160
989 1382 1288 1162
650 531 432 629 422 332
1330 1211 1112 1309 1102 1012
767 614 443 547 370
1493 1340 1169 1273 1096
413 300 167
923 810 677
468 3 46 191 485 258 096
1064 942 787
10 ~ 81 854 692
Dry Density
(pcf)
1299 1337 1332
1286 1319 1324 1281 1302 1326
129l 1315 1333 1294 1333 131 5
1259 1278 1322 1294 1313
1464 1509 1496
1435 1472 1499 1426 1487 1476
A9
SS 30 SEASS 30 SEA LOW QUALITY
155 HIGH QUALITY 1551 bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddotbull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO
FRESNO 150150-I -middotmiddot-- -bull --middotmiddot I ~ t -- a GRANITEROCK a GRANITEROCK
145145
~-bull80 0 --0 00 ~140~140
J-gt- gt-~ I- = OPT=100 Cl)0 Cl) [Ij 135Z 135
lJJ Cl
gt- ~1300 130 middot ClCl ( 0
OPT=110 125~ OPT=115125
120-t----~--------------r---120 I l J J J I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 156 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS TOT AL FLUIDS
Figure A9 Fluids at Compaction Figure AlO Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 30 SEA Low Quality SS 30 SEA
-~
i
APPENDIX B
MIXTURE DESIGN DATA
TABLE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality css-o Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absortied Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
lhit Weight pcf
StabiJcneter Value
~iareter Value
Jesilient -bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
500
----------
40
u 30 ltgt
ffi 20 w ~10
m lt
o
w l 400 lt gt a w t 300 0 iii ~ 200 8
100 12
10111
ui 0
i5 8gt lt
6
4
50
21740
24488
112
194
100
400
1357
375
197
117
345
60
21823
24163
97
199
100
500
1362
330
207
134
271
70
21772
23853
87
208
100
600
1359
272
193
118
260
Iesign 7 0
87
208
100
600
1359
272
193
118
260
24
22d c lt i
20i
= 0 i5
18 gt
16
140
138 - a
~136 z w 0
134
132
bull 500 a
0 400 uil 300 0
~ 200 zi 100 iii w a
--
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE CONTENT Jo (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Bl
TABLE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residue 0intent 50 60 70 Dsian 7 o
Bulk Siecipoundic Gravity 21804
llleoretical Specipoundic Gravity 24280
Air Voids 102
VMA 192
Absorbed Asphalt 063
Efpoundective Asphalt 437
Unit Weight pf 1361
Stabilcirieter Value 427
Cbhesicireter Value 352
Fesilielt Mxlulus 103psi
2-day 85
middotFinlJ 355
50
40
_ gt a 30 w w
~ 20 10
500
300
200
100
8
6
4
l 400 gt
~ w 0
~ 8
12
_ 10
= 0 gt
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
21863 21992
23964 23660
88 71 71
197 200 200
063 063 063
537 637 637
1364 1372 1372
363 313 313
292 234 234
63 83 83 429 232 232
24
22
ci i
20i
= = 0 gt
18
16
138
p6 ~ Q
134 a w
o 132
130
500 Q -
o 400 --3 300 0 ~-~ 200 a ~ 100 w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COtlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
B2
TABLE B3 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllroretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
~fective Asphalt
Unit Weight middotCf
Stabilareter VaJue
Cbhesiareter VaJue
Resilient l-bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
so
11140 gt o30 IU w ~20
m
10
w l 400 gt 0
~ 0 ~ 200 8
100
14
12 11-
In Q
ho C
8
6
50 60 70 Dsi9 7 O 21308 21729 21595 24562 24235 23922
132 103 97 97 210 202 215 215 113 113 113 113 387 487 587 587
1329 1356 1348 1348 378 345 375 375
314 270 280 280
82 96 104 104 281 260 267 267
500
300 ~
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS
24
11-22ci
ltI i i 20 Cl) Q 180 gt
16
138
136 u - 134 Cl) z IU Q
132
130
bull500
400 Inl 300 Q bull~ 200 z ~ 100middot IU 0
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS
FIGURE B3 Mixture Design Data Sari Bernardin6 High Quality CMS o Replication 1
B3
TABLE B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue GJntent
Bulk seecific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity
50
21491
24334
60
21459
24014
70
21526
23709
Iesiqn 70
Air Voids 117 106
VMA 204 212
Absocbed Asphalt 0 72 o 72
Effective Asphalt 428 528
Unit Weight pcf 1341 133 9
Stabilrneter Value 437 406
GJhesiareter Value 337 248 3
Iesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-cay
Final
50
w 40 gt 0 30 w w 0 20 co 10
500
w
3 400 gt 0 w t- 300 w 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
_ 10
0 8gt -lt
6
4
FIGURE
61 66
410 318
24
22~ ci
i 20
~
18 a gt
16
138
_136 u a 134 z ~ w 0
132
130
bull500
a
a 400 -3 300 _ a ~ 200 z ~ 100-
w 0
90 90
21 7 21 7
0 72 072
628 628
1343 1343
344 J44
252 252
82 82
250 250
---------
D 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDU CONTENT I (A_GGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B4
TABLE BS Mixture Design Data San Bernardin9 High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Siecific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
lir Voids
VMA
2bserberl Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stalgtilaneter Value
Cbhesiareter Value 3
Resilient Mgtdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
40
Ill 30 lt( gt a 20 Ill Ill 0 10
~ iii lt CII 0
400
Ill
3 300 lt(
gt a Ill200 == 0
~100 c 8
0
12
10 ui 0
0 8gt 5 lt(
6
4
FIGURE
~
~
5 6 7 84 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
50 60 70 Cesian 70
21652
24484
21904
24149
22005
23828
116
198
107
3-93
135l
345
224
18
240
93 77 77 196 200 200 107 107 107 493 593 593
1367 1373 1373 288 235 235
136 80 80
17 21 21 128 78 78
24
22ci lt(
z 20il
= CII C 0
18 gt
16
I-~
140
+38- ~136 1- z Ill 0 134
132
bull 500 a
o 400 3 300 C
~ 200 z 100 Ill a ~
0 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino_BS High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
BS
TABLE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Residue Content
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Ihegtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tmit WeightL pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesllllleter Value
Iesilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
a 20 UI w i
~10
lt 0
400
3300 lt gt a ~200 w i 0
119 93
197 l93
126 126
374 474
l353 l372
357 283
l26 l03
45 36
203 132
2440
30 22 0 0lt ltgt
16
~100 ~ 8 0 132
500 a
o 400 --ai 300 -
middot 0
~
~
w a
_ 10
ltn 0
0 8gt lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
50 60 70 Cesign 7 o
2l679
24595
21990
24255
22190
23931
- i 20
a 180 gt
140
138 - a
~136 z w 0 134
200
100middot
0 4
73 73
193 193
126 1 26
574 574
1385 1385
235 235
82 82
3l 3l
64 64
-0 $ e
~ 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B6
TABLE B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Pesidue Qlnte~t
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihroretical Speciic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
~tabilcmeter Value
ohesicrneter Value
resilient lbdulus l0 3psi
2-aay
Final
60 72 8 5 Iesicm 75
21762 21906 21779
23981 23617 23245 93 73 63 70
202 205 220 21 0
063 063 063 063
537 657 787 687
1358 1367 1359 1365 375 290 203 270
474 401 239 360
163 172 161 170 449 329 310 320
2440
ii 30 22 ci
Cl c cgt z 20 201 s ~ 310 e 18 0
gt c
0 16
500 140
w
3 400 _138c gt
~ 300 s 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
- 10 0 0 0 8gt c
6
4
FIGURE
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIOUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COITEIT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
il36 z IU Cl 134
132
bull 500
c 400 -
3 300 - Cl
sectl 200 ~- z ~ 100
w
0
B7
111 10 ui e 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
TABLE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
500
400 gt C
72 85 resian 7 s
21873 21738
23581 23210
72 63 70 207 22l 21 0
055 055 055 665 795 695
1365 1356 1365 287 188 265
349 341 345
191 187 190 287 266 280
24 ------------
111 22
Cl Cl lt -i ~ 20
= a 18 0 gt
16 _____________
138
136 a 134 () w a
132
130___________
soar------------ D a
1 400 ~
ui3 300 C
~ 200
100
w C
0---------------------5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUlc CONTENT lt
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
BB
Fesidue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcrreter Value
Cbhesiareter Value 3Resilient -bdulus 10 psi
2-day
Finll
60
m 50 - 40
IIJ ~ 30 CJ lt 1- 20
60
21669
23943
95
205
055
545
1352
560
416
195
425
~ 300 0 ()
~ 200 8
100---------------
12 -------------
RESIDUE CONTENT lto (AGGREGATE BASIS)
TABLE B9 Mixture Design Data San Ber~irdino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Pesiclue Content 60 Z1 as D=sign 7 5
Bulk Spccific Gravity 21697 21368 21255
Iheoretical Specific Gravity 23973 23610 23238
Air Voids 94 95 85 93
VMA 204 225 middot 23 8 230
middot-Absorbed Asphalt 061 061 061 061
Effective Asphalt 539 659 789 689
middot middotmiddotUnit Weight pcf 1354 133 3 1326 1330
-Stabilareter Value 460 375 225 340
CohesianeterValue 400 422 499 440
Iesilient MxUlus 103psi
2-oay 159 i0s 185 185
Final 290 299 283 295
60
w
l 400
24
22
ci 0 i 20l
= Q 180 gt
16
138
136
gt a 134~ 300 w l z0 IU 132 200
8 130
100-----------------_---I
12 ---------------- 500
o 400 10 ~
300 bull bullQ
Q0 8gt ~ 200 z
6 ~ 100
w a4 ___ __________ o
5 6 7 8 9 s 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COtlTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B9 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication l
B9
TABLE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Pesidue Conte1t 60 72 85 resign 75
Bulk Spcecific Gravity
Theoretical Sjeeipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Ohesianeter Value
Pesilient ~us 103psi
2---day
Final
60
50 lt gt cc40 w -w
~30 = CJ
lt 20
21635
24066
10l
206
078
522
1350
51 8
482
151
285
21481
23699
94
221
078
642
1341
378
459
150
286
24
11-22
ci Cl lt
~ 20 z
C 18
0 gt
21302
23323
87 92
237 225
078 078
7 72 6 72
1329 1338
246 350
343 430
162 155
254 280
I 16
500 138
UJ
400 136 lt gt
acc ~ UJ
134 300 z2 UI CJ_32 ~ 200
8 130
bull500
a
c 400 - 10 300 ~ Jf
C0 8gt ~ 200 ~ lt z
6 ~ 100-
UJ 0
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDU~ COrlTENT
(AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino
100 12
~
Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
BlO
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
TABLE Bll
Residue Content
Bulk Secific Gravity
Iheiretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesicrneter Value
Resilient MXiulus l03psi
2-day
Final
60 72 85 D=sign 75
21817 22108 21917
23977 23601 23216
90 63 56 62
200 198 215 200
o 72 o 72 o 72 o 72
528 648 778 678
136l 1380 1368 137 5
242 162 76 130
151 175 215 190
52 63 41 55
202 122 60 110
244middot0
~ 30 22 ci lt 20 i 201 IU = en ~ 10 E 18 m 0lt gt
0 16
----
w
l 400 lt gt a ~ w 0 ~ 8
12
-t
ltn 0 0 gt a lt
FIGURE
5
500
300
200 ~ 100
10
8
6
134
500 a
c 400 -
_ 300 0
g 200
~ 100 ~in IU a
0 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Bll Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
142
I-40 u a
~ 138 in w 0
136 ~
Bll
TABLE Bl2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Pesidue Q)ntent
Bulk Spzcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic
Air Voids
V bull t-LA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Gravity
60
22026
24085
85
192
092
508
72
22062
23705
69
200
092
628
85
21901
23315
61
215
092
758
resign 75
67
205
092
6 58
Unit Weight pcf 1374
Stabiloreter Value 193
Ohesiareter Value 177 3
Resilient Mxrulus 10 psi
2-day 63
Fi-ial 138
40
m 30 J lt gt a 20 IU w 0 10 ~ lt
0
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w 9 ~ 200 _________ 8
100 12
10 9 0 8gt ~6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE 8ASISI
1377
127
193
1367
90
160
137 5
120
180
53
107
32
52
48
95
24
22ci 0 lt
20
= ~
9 18 0 gt
16
142
140 a
~138 z w C
136
134
9
500 a
dego 400-
3 300 ~- a ~ 200 z ~ 100
w a
0 5
~ 6 7 8 9
RES IOU~ CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl2 Mixture Design Data -san Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Bl2
TABLE Bl 3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcrneter VaJue
CJgthesiarneter Value
Pesilient MxbJ11lS 10 3psi
2-day
Final
60
so gt
40a w 0 30 GI 20
500
l 400 gt a w t- 300 w 5 rn ~ 200 8
100 12
Ill 10 0 8gt
6
4
50
21789
24250
10l
164
1 95
305
1360
513
330
191
282
~ bull
~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASIS)
60
21762
2 34 34
91
173
1 95
405
135middot8
567
284
168
434
24
Ill 22ci Cl
is 20
= 0 gt
18
16
142
140- ~138 iii z 0
136
134
bull500
o 400 -
l 300 C
~ 200 z 100 iii a
0 4
70 resign 70
21872
23632
75 75 177 177
1 bull 95 1 95 505 505
136S 136S 393 393
280 280
217 217 482 482
~
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASISI
FIGURE Bl3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality css~o Replication 1
Bl3
--------------
TABLE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Resid= Content 50 60 70 eesicn 7o
Bulk Siecific Gravity 21692 21677 21662
Ihroretical Specific Gravity 24501 24176 23865
Air Voids 115 103 92 92
VMA 169 176 185 185
Absorbed Asphalt 240 240 240 240
Effective Asphalt 260 360 460 460
Unit Weight pcpound 1354
Stabilaneter Value 580
Cohesicrneter Value 270 3Resilielt Mdulus 10 psi
2-day 149
Final 408
60
w so lt gt
w C o w le 0 30 m lt
20
500
w
~ 400 lt gt C
~ 300 w S ~ 200 ~ 8
100 12
- 10 m a 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AG GREGATE BASIS)
1353 1352 1352
442 327 327
276 183 183
173 191 191
373 299 299
24
22d c lt z
20E 18 0 gt
16
140
138 u C
136 w C 134
132
500 C
1 400 gt- m =gt 300 a ~ 200
l 100- IU C
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication
Bl4
2
bull bull bullbull
TABLE Bl5 Mixture Design-Data Fresno High Quality CMS-QReplication 1
Bulk Spcific Gravity
lheoreticaJ Specific Gravity Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mldulus l0 3psi 2-clay
Final
60
m 50 C gt a 40 w w
~ 30 C m
10
~idue Content 50 6_ 0 70 Daisi2 7 O
5oor----------
w
l 400 C gt a ~ 300 w I 0 iii ~ 200 8
100-------------
12 ----------
111 10 C
0 8gt C
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT J
(AG GREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl5 Mixture
21755 21305 23795 23497 86 93 93
163 198 198 l 69 l 69 l69 431 531 531
1336 1329 1329 420 307 307
247 230 230
180 i55 155
246 253 253
24
22d
Cl C
i 20I
J ~ C 18 ~ 0 gt
16
21434
24106
11l
179
l69
331
1337
472
373
175
247
138
136- 134 z w C
132
130
bull 500
dego 400 - l 300 C
~ 200 z l 100 iii w a
0
-~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT J (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Bl5
TABLE Bl6 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
helretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
lbsorled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabil=ter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
Eesilient Mxrulus 10
2-day
Firal
60
50 J gt c 40
~ 30 m 20
500
w
l 400 gt a ~ 300 w
3psi
50 60 70
21339 2 1398 21475
24241 23925 23623
120 106 91
181 187 192
1 94 l 94 1 94
306 406 506
1331 1335 1340
558 43 7 377
340 313 219
149 152 154
317 345 288
Jesign70
91
192
194
506
1340
377
219
154
288
24
22d CJ i sect 20
= a 18 ~ 0 gt
16
138
136
a 134
z w ~ C ~ 200 132 8
130 100
14 500 a
o 400 - 12
3 300 - ~ 0 C gt 10 a ~ 200 ~ z
l 100
8
w a
0 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl6bull Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Bl6
TABLE Bl 7 Mixture Qesign Data Fresno High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
Pesidue Content 50 60 70 Cesign 7 O
Bulk siec~tic Gravity 21959 22101 22128
Iheoretical Specific Gravity 24539 24201 23879
Air Voids 105 87 73 73
VMA 158 160 167 167
~rbed Asphalt 252 252 252 252
Effective Asphalt 248 348 448 448
Unit Weight pcf 1370 1379 1380 1380
S~ter Value 467 370 213 213
Clgthesiareter Value 289 3Resilient l-Ddulus 10 psi
2-clay 47
FinaJ 294
50
Ill 40 o(
gt cc 30 Ill w 0 20 lt 10
500
w l 400 lt gt cc ~ 300 Ill 0 ~ 200 8 ~
100 12
10 deg C
0 gt 8 ~l lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
147 122 122
65 35 35
214 75 75
22
J 20 o(
ii 18 16 ~ 0 gt
14
142
140 u Q
~138 z Ill
Cl 136
134
500 Q
o400 uil 300 Cl
g 200 z ~ 100 ~w cc
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
IIESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Bl7
TABLE Bl8 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Dsiqn 70
Bulk Specific Gravity 22191 22285 22092
Theoretical Specific Gravity 24199 23874 23563
Air Voids 82 66 62 62
VMA 149 153 168 168
Absorled AsphaJt 192 192 192 192
Effective AsphaJt 308 408 508 508
Unit Weight pcf 1385
Stabilareter Value 357
Cohesianeter Value 268 3Resilient MxhIJus 10 psi
2-day 75
Final 217
40
w 30 J lt gt a 20 w w i
~ 10
0
500
w
3 400 gt a
l 300 w i
ltn
~ 200 8
139l
342
238
137 9
233
192
137 9
233
192
84
117
63
73
63
73
20
0 0 ~ i
= 0 gt
18
16
14
12
~
144
142 140 z w 0
138
136 100-----1---1--1---l
12 ---------- 500 0bull
o 400 -11110 en a 3 300 = 0 08gt ~ 200
z 6 ~ 100middot
w a
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT
4
RESIDUE CONTENT
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Bl8
FresnoTABLE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Low Quality css-o Replication 1
Eesidlle Content 60 70 80 Dasi51 7 5
Bulk Specific Gravity 21698 21611 21514 Iheoretical Specilic Gravity 23803 23505 23220
Air Voids 89 81 73 77
VMA 175 186 198 192
Absorbed Asphalt 171 l 71 171 171
Effective Asphalt 429 529 629 679
Unit Weight pcf 1354 1349 1342 1345
Stabi]cmeter Value 513 398 359 380
eohesianeter value 506 449 481 465
Resilient Modulus 10 3psi
2-day 176 176 241 205
Final 312 383 353 365
2460
all so 22 ci cgt
40 I-
20 E
I = g 30 18iii 0 gt
20
16
500
300
100
10
8
6
4
138
136l 400
u -gt a
~ I 0 in l1200 8
12
111 Q
0 gt ~
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE COITENT Jo
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
~ ~ 134 z w 0
132
130
500 -
l 400 -
300 ~n
Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 in Ill IC
0
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Bl9
TABLE B20 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residlle Content i
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihegtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
CJhesiareter Value 3
Resilient Mxfulus 10 psi
2-day
Finll
60
50 lt 40 w w
~ 30 m lt 20
500
w
3 400 lt gt a ~ ~ 300 w 51 rn 200 8
100----------------
12 --------------
10 9 0 8gt lt
6
4 s 6 7 8
RESIDUE COPlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
60 70 80 resign 75
21451 21476 21666
23932 23629 23340
104
185
194
406
1339
586
436
147
313
91
192
1 94
506
1340
403
416
179
347
24
22 0 0 lt
~ 20
= 9 18 0 gt
16
140
138 - Cl
136 w cl34
132
bull 500
-0 400__
3 300 I
~ 200
~ 100 rn w a
0
7 2 82
192 192
194 194
606 656
1352 1345
24 8 325
333 375
186 182
361 358
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COPITEPlT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
~
Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
B20
TABLE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
lesidue Content 60 70 80 resign 75
Bulk Siecific Gravity 21525 21406 21152 lllroretical Specific Gravity 23855 23555 23268 Air Voids 98 91 91 91 VMA 182 194 211 2middot03 1osorled Asphalt 180 1 80 180 180 Effective Asphalt 420 520 620 570 Ulit Weight pcf 1343 1336 1330 1335 Stabilateter Value 487 460 373 415 Oxlesiareter Value 418 392 323 355
3lesilielt Mldulus 10 psi
2-clay 188 177 200 190
Final 289 299 281 290
6or----------- 24
m 50 lt gt 11 40 w w I
~ 30 m lt 20
_J_
22ci 0 lt z
20EE
= 0 180 gt
16
5oor---------- 138
w
l 400 lt gt
136- a ~ 300 w i 0
fa34 z w
~ 200 Cll32 -8
100-----------i-~ 130
12 ------------ 500bulla
10 ________ o 400 - 0
0 gt
8
gJdeg 300 0
~- 200 ---e-
lt z
6 l 100 w 4
5 6 7 8 9 0
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication
B21
1
TABLE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Fesidue Cbntent 55
Bulk Spcific Gravity 21243
lheoretical Specific Gravity 23859
Air Voirls 109
VMA 189
Absorbed Asphalt 152
Effective 1spralt 398
Unit Weight pd 1326
atabil~ter Value 620
Cbhesiareter Value 430 3Fesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-oay 160
Final 387
70
a 60 gt a 50 w w == = 40 0
m
30
500
w l 400 lt gt cc
~ 3001- 0 ~ 200 8
100
16
136
134 u Q
iu2 z w 0 130
128
12 -----------
10 bull
ltIi 0
~ s
6
4middot1-_________ _
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l _AGGREGATE BASIS)
21164
23557
101
200
152
498
1321
481
432
180
377
24
22
z 20Si
= 18e 0 gt
bull 500
o 400-ltIi j 300 0
~ 200 zl 100 w cc
0
65 75 iesiqn 7 s
21095
23269
93 93
210 210
152 l 52
598 598
1316 1316
367 367
450 450
171 171
387 387
-----~bull-----
8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7
FIGURE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B22
1 TABLE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno
Low Quality CMS-7 Replication
70 -~ 0 Cesign 75 Pesidue Content
Bulk Spcific Graviv1
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit Weight pcf
Stallilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mxlulus 10 3psi
2--day
Final
40
Ill 30 c gt 0 20 UI lo Q 10=c 0
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w lo Q 200 8
100
~
60
21829
23899
87
170
197
403
1362
293
206
84 144
21981
23587
67
l73
197
503
1372
200
249
76 131
21960
23289
5middot 7
middot18l
197
603
1370
100
241
69 93
62
177
197
553
1370
150
245
73
110
12
10 5 Q 8gt 5 lt
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (ACGREGATE BASIS)
24
It
22 t-ci c
z 20i
= 5 18 t-Q gt
16
142
140 - 638
z w Q
136
134
bull 500
o 400 - 3 300 0
~ 200 z 100 iii UI 0
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (ACGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno LOW Quality CMS-7 Replication
B23
1
TABLE B24 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Urit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Glhesianeter Value
Resilient Mldulus 10
2-day
Final
40
m 30 gt c 20 w ~ w i
~ 10 m lt ~ 0
3psi
24
22
C C lt i
20~ ~
9 18 0 gt
16
500 142
w 1403 400 gt
Ca gt138I 300 tw
i z w Q 136~ 200
8
134
~
~
100 12 500
C
dego 400 - Ill 10 3 300 0 0 Q8gt ~ 200
~ z 6 100middot
w a
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIOUC CONTENT
(AGGREGATE 8ASIS] (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)
80
21686
23262
68
19l
l91
609
1353
125
215
77
114
Cesign 75
71
184
L 91
559
1360
200
235
77
135
60
21936
23870
81
166
191
409
1369
358
252
84
211
70
21850
23559
73
177
191
509
1364
270
250
77
157
Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE B24 Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B24
TABLE B25 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-Or Replication 1
Residue Clgtntent 47
Bulk Siecific Gravity 23965
llleoretical Specific Gravity 26825
Air Voids 107
VMA 207
Absorbed Asphalt 27
Effective Asphalt 443
Unit Weight pcf 1495
Stabilaneter Value 302
Cohesiaoeter Value 235 3
Resilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-day 158
Final 300
40
30 _ gt a 20I- ii 0_
10iii I-en 0 500----------
Ill
3 400 gt ati 300 ii 0 iii l 200 8
100---i----L---J
12 ----------
jit 10 e 0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I 4
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
57 67 Design 55
24521 24581
26411 26017
72 55 80
196 202 200
27 27 27
543 643 523
1530 1534 1520
247 200 27
275 203 275
164 116 160
276 197 280
24
jlt
22ci c i
20Si
= en e 18 0 gt
16
156
_154 ~ i152 iii z C
150
148
soo----------
dega 400 _
en
~300 ~ ~ 200 1-zl 100 iii w a
01----~-i--J 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Mixture Design Data GraniterockFIGURE B25 High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
B25
TABLE B26 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Besidue Content If 7 57 67 D2sign 55
Bulk SfeCific Gravity 2 4131 24573 24597
lhagtreticai Specific Gravity 26951 26532 26134
Air Voids 105 74 59 78
VMA 20l 195 20l 197
Absorted Asphalt 46 46 46 46
Effective Asphalt 424 524 624 504
Unit Weight pcf 1506 1533 1535 1525
stabi1anaiter Value 282 258 is2 270
Cllhesicmter Value 204 155 138 160
Resilient Mdulus 103psL
2-day 115 143 126 130
Final 313 225 173 240
40
w 30 lt gt a 20 w w la 0 10 m lt
0
~
24
22ci C
lt z
20la ~ = E 18 -0 gt
16
156
154 - a
~152 z w r0
150
148
-
500
o 400 ~
300 0
g 200 ~ z -~ 100
500
w ~ 400 lt gt a IU t- 300 w la 0 ~ 200
~8
100 12
10 0 0 8gt lt
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
w a
o 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT lo RESIDUE CONTENT II
-cGREGATE s-s1s1 (-GGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B26 Mixture Design Data Grani terock High Quality CSS-0 Replication
B26
2
TABLE B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Residue Ogtntent 47 57 67 ~ign 55
Bulk Spcific Gravity 23886 24116 24078
Ihooretical Specific Gravity 26675 26267 25879
Air Voids 105 81 70 82
VMA 210 210 21 8 210
Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 oos 005
Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545
Unit Weight pcf 149l 1505 1502 1505
Stabilareter Value 337 350 250 350
Ogthesicneter Value 238 3
Eesilient Mldulus l0 psi
2-day 104
Final 287
50
Ill 40 J C gt cc 30 Ill Ill l 0
C
10
20iii 500
w
l 400 C gt cc I 300 Ill l 0 in ~ 200 8
100 12
1110 0 0 8gt
c cc
6
4
FIGURE
~
~
177 204 200
144 150 140
254 247 260
24 ----------
a 18 0 gt
16 __i____i_-J
154
j52 u -a
~1501- ------iiiz -Ill 0
148
______________ 146
soar---------- a
o 400 1--
~ 300 _ ~
~ 200 z ~ 100 en w 0
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
B27
8
TABLE B28 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue Ointent 4 7 57 67 Cesign 55
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihroretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
CJlhesianeter Value
Pesilient Mldulus 10 3psi
2-day
Final
40
30 lt gt = w 20 0
- 10 lt
0
500
w - 3 400
lt gt a l 300 w 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
i 10 ui C
0 8gt lt
6
4
FIGURE
23861
26649
10S
207
014
456
1489
338
145
124
307
~
--------
~ 5 6 7 84
RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
24025 23925
26242 25855
85
210
014
556
1499
283
135
135
307
24
22
0 lt i
20i
= 18 0 gt
16
154
152 u Q
i150 z w 0 148
146middot
500- o 400 -
300 _ Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 4
75 87
220 209
014 014
656 536
1493 1490
220 300
129 140
142 130
277 307
_--
~
-___
85 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B28 bull Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B28
TABLE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Pesicllle Cbntent 47 57 67 resign 55 Bulk Siecific Gravity 24618 24637 24728 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26905 26475 26066 Air Voids 84 69 51 71 VlltLA 185 192 197 190 Absocbed Asphalt 047 0 bull 47 047 047 Effective Aspbalt 423 523 623 503 Urit Weight pcf 1536 1537 1543 1537 Stabilaneter Value 410 330 198 350 QJhesianeter Value 166
Resiliextt Mldulus 10 3psi
2-clay
Final
50
40 c
ffi 30 IE g20 iii c
10
500
l 400 c
a ~ 300 IE C ~ 200 8
100 12
ot 10 C
0 8
5
C
6
4
46
158
~
~ 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI
120 131 130
35 30 38
56 28 80
24
gt11 22
c c c
i 2031
= ~ C 180
16
158
156 t-
u - 154 z w 0
152
150
500
~
~ 0
bull a 400 - uil 300 ~
200
C
~ z ~ w a
100middot
8 4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
B29
TABLE B30 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Pesidue Content 4-7 h---7 6 -7 IEsicn 5 5
Bulk Specific Gravity 24519 24638 24706 Iheoretical Specific Gravity 26609 26265 25793 Air Voids 79 62 42 65 VMA 189 192 198 19l
middot Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 005 005 Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545 Unit Weight pcf 1530 1537 1542 1535 Stabilareter Value 420 327 247 350 Cohesiareter Value 126
3Resilient Mldulus 10 psi
Z--day 47 Final 144
50
40 J lt gt a 30 w w
~ 20 m lt 10
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w 2 ~ 200 8 ~
100 12
111- 10 ui 0 gt 8
lt
6
4
114 182 120
43 29 45
79 33 90
24
ii-22
ci 0 lt i
20l ~= 18 0 gt
16
158
156 0
l 154 z ~w c 152
150
500
Q -dego 400 - ui3 300 C
~ 200 z
~ 100middot~
w a ~ 0
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8 4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
FIGURE B30 Mixture Design Data High Quality CMS-7
Graniterock Replication 2
B30
TABLE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
~sidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weigllt pcf
Stabi]aneter Value
Cohes~ter Value
~silient MXJulus 103psi
2--day
final
40
30 C gt ffi20
~10 iii C ltII 0
500
l 400 C gt IC
~ 300 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
11 10 0
0 8gt C
6
4
55 65 75 resign 60 24268 24286 24206
26358 25966 25592 80
200
020
530
t515
80
268
182
338
~
65
207
020
630
t515
t_92
233
169
308
24
bull 220 0 C
ze 20
= 0 18 -0 gt
16
156
154
u i152 ~ z 0
150 bull
148
54 72
21 7 204
020 020
730 580
1511 1515
90 235
193 250
145 175
250 320
500 o 400 - l 300 0
~ 200 zi 100 iii IC
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replicationl
B31
TABLE B32 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residue 0ntent
Bulk Secific Gravity
llleoretical Speipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
-Absorled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
StabilcIIeter Value
Qlhesianeter Value 3Jesilient middotMgtdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
40
m30 lt gt cc20 w
w E
~10 ID lt 0
79
198
027
523
1518
203
243
201
354
~ soar-----------
w
400 lt gt a
~ 300 w E 0 ~ 200 8
100---I--~---------
12 -----------
111 10 C
0 8gt lt
6 --4
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l (ACiCiFIECiATE BASIS)
FIGURE B32 Mixture
55 65 75 Lesign 6 0
24329 24246 24077
26401 26007 25632
68 61 73 208 22l 203
027 027 027 623 723 573
1513 1502 1515
165 110 185 215 205 225
168 184 185 340 272 345
24
22 C C
z i 20
= 0 0
18 gt
16
156
154
a
gt152 en z Ill 0 150
148
bull 500 Q
deg 0 400- =gt 300 0
~ 200 z l 100 w
-
0 4 5 6middot 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(ACiGFIEGATE BASIS)
Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication
B32
2
TABLE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Eesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheore_tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VbullMA
lbsorbed_ Asphalt
Effective_ Asphalt
Qnit Weight pcf
~~ter Value
Q)hesianeter Value
Resiiient Mxlulus 10 3psi
2~y
Final
40
11130 C
a20 =
~10 C m
ltII 0
500
Ill
3 400 C
a ~ 300 w = 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
ll 10 ui E 0 8
c
6
4
I-
1-
55
23824
26318
95
215
014
536
1487
287
381
224
380
65 75
23896 23701 25928 25555 78 73
220 233
014 014 636 736
1491 1479 195 161
265 212
212 196
404 341
24
11 22d
c
z 20i
= ltII E 18 0
16
154
152- a
150 I-
Iesign 6 0
84
218
014
586
1490
240
320
215
395
z w Q
148
bull 146
500 a
c 400 ~ ui
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
l 300 Q
~ 200 zl 100 w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIOUla CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-a Replication 1
B33
- - ----- -
TABLE B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Rssidue Ogtntent
Bulk Secific Gravity
lhairetical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
AbsoIbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stabil~ter Value
Olhesiareter Value 3lesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-day
Firal
40
m 30 lt gt a 20 w w
= ~ 10
m lt
0
- --- -middot -middot 500
w l 400 lt gt
Ea
300 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
1l 10 middot 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 4
FIGURE
55
23834
26371
96
214
022
528
1487
279
207
176
332
65
23784
25978
84
223
022
628
1484
208
270
185
336
75
23628
25604
77
236
022
728
1474
167
334
181
350
iesiqn 6 bull 0
90
21 8
022middot
578
1485
245
240
180
334
~
~
24
1l 22
0
lt i
20i
= 0 gt
18
16
152
150 - 148
~ 146
144
500
o-400 middot --- J 300 C
~ 200 z
middot ~ 100 en a
0 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication
B34
2
B35 Mixture Design Data GraniterockTABLE Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Residue Content 55
Bwk Specific Gravity 24720
lheoretical Specific Gravity 26164
Air Voids 55
VMA 185
Absorbed Asphalt 001
Effective Asphalt 549
Unit Weight pcf 1543
StabilCampTeter value 293
Ohesiareter Value 174
Besilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day 69
Final 153
40
~ 30 _
c gt ffi 20 w I
Q 10
c 0
500
w 3 400 -
c gt a
~ 300 w I g bull ~ 200 8 ----r
100middot
10
8 -
~
Q
0 6gt a =c
4 ~ 2
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS
65 75 DesiSE 60
2 4 720 24515
25767 25388
40 34 48
193 207 189 001 001 001 649 749 599
1543 1530 1543 205 97 250
156 283 170
46 22 55 72 so 110
24
~
22ci C c
i 20i
= Cl 180 gt
16
lSadeg
156
u -a
654 z 0 152
150
500 ii a
a 400 - 3 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7
FIGURE B35 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
B35
12 r---------- 500bull _ 10
o 400 -middot 0 gt 5 C
8
tnl 300 Q
~ 200 z
6 ~ 100 ~ IU 0
4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT I
(AGCREGA TE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
TABLE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
55 65 75 resicn 6 0 Residue Content
Bulk siecific Gravity 24816 2 4721 24560
lheoretical Specific Gravity 26389 25983 25596
Air Voids 60 49 40 55
VMA 182 193 205 187
Absorlei Asphalt middot 035 035 035 035
Effective Asphalt 515 615 715 565
UUt Weight cf 1548 1543 1533 1545
Stabilaneter Value 298 193 130 250
Qlhesicmeter Value 188 I57 118 180 3
Resilient MJdulus 10 psi
soor-----------158
w l 400 Ishy 156 gt lt u
0a
w
300 w ~154E 0 z
w Q ~ 200 152
8 150100----middot-~-1-__c__~
2-day
Final
40
~ 30 J lt gt a 20 w
s 10 0
lt
0
92 43 27 65 186 79 46 135
24
22
~ =
ci lt 0
i 20~
18 0 gt
16
FIGURE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B36
Table B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
FJiuivalent ~sidue amtent 60 70 80 resign 70
Iesidue Ontent
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absomed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
lhit Weight pcpound
Stabilareter Value Ohesiareter Value
~ilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
Ill
50
40 A gt a w 30 w i 0 J
iii 201-
10
400
w3 300 gt a Ill t 200 i 0
8 ~iii ll 100 1-
0 12
lit 10 0 0 8gt a lt
6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)
630
21584
24451
117
210
140
460
1347
415
208
735
21570
24143
107
219
140
560
1346
488
61
840
21385
23848
103
233
140
660
1334
382
63
resign 7 35
107
219
140
560
1346
488
63
96
339 141
325
126
299 141 325
24
lit 22d
Cl
z 20i
= 0 180
gt
16
138
136 ltgt
i134 iii ~ z w 0 132
130
bull 500
o 400 -
3
300 ------------- 0
~ 200 z ~ 100 w o_____________a
9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B37
----
Table B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Pesidue omtent 60 70 80 Design 70
Pesidue omtent 630 735 8 40 Dsign 735
Bulk Specific Gravity 21710 21722 21714
lllroretical Specific Gravity 24298 23995 23705
Air Voids
VMA
lbsorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Chhesianeter Value
Eeilient Mldulus 103psi
2--clay
Final
so
40 J w
gt a 30 w w 0 20 m
10 400
w 300 gt a w 200 w i 100 8
0
12
if 10 a
~0 8gt a lt
6
4
107
205
112
488
1355
395
llO
113
290
95
213
112
588
1356
398
62
122
271
84
22l
112
688
1355
318
70
138
282
24
22 c 0
20
0 180 gt
16
140
138 -a
136 _iii z bull --w 0 134
132
bull 500 a
o 400
m 300 J 0 bull ~ 200 z 100
w a
0
95
213
)12
588
1356
398
62
122
271
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT J
(AGCilEGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B38
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Table B39
Fquivalent ~idue COntent
~idue Cbntent
Bulk SJecific Gravity lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Oihesianeter Value
~ilient Mldulus l03psi
2-day
Fiial
so
w 40 lt gt cc 30 ~ w E
0 20 m lt 10
400
m POO lt gt a U 200 E 0 iii w c 100 8
0
12
- 10 vi Cl
0 gt ac
6
60 70 80
690 805 920
21790 21826 21910
24255 23977 23710
102 90 76
207 214 219
080 080 080
610 710 810
1360 1362 1367
437 400 289
219 229 202
141 158 184
333 282 273
24
~ 22ci
CJ lt z
20ii
= Cl 180
gt
16
----------
~ lo
140
138 Q l136 iii w Cl
134
132
500 Q
0 400 n3 300 Cl
~ 200 i-bull
100
z ~ 0 a
Cesign 70
Cesign 805
90
214
080
710
1362
400
229
158
282
-------
-
-~
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B39 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication l
B39
8
Table B40 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Eesidue cantent
Iesidue Omtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lhagtretical Speiliic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Abro1plusmned Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tklit Weight pcpound
Stabilareter Value
OJhesianeter Value
EEsilient Mldulus l03psi
2-day
Final
50
w 40 J lt gt a 30 w
w i
3 20 lt 0 10
400-----------
DI 3 300 lt gt a wti 200 i 0 w8100
0 -------l--l-1
12 ----------
- 10 ltn 0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
60 70 80 690 805 920
21986 21964- 21948
24499 2A212 23938
103 93 83
200 209 218
124 124 l24
476 576 676
1372 1371 1360
422 403 265
270 306 160
99 140 154
298 310 254
24
-22
ci lt
=i 20i
a 0 18 0 gt
16
140
138 - a
l136 z w 0 134
132
bull500
a
o 400 -
ltn =gt 300 -J a
~ 200 z 100 DI 0
0 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT Ii (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Dsign 70
Design 805
93
209
124
576
1371
403
306
140
310
9
Figure B40 Mixture Design Data High Quality SS-30
San Bernardino SEA Replication 2
B40
Table B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent lesidue ~tent
Ilesidue Omtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lbagtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stabilateter Value
CllhesiaIEter Value
Resilient MXlulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
w 40 i- _ gt 30a w I- ~ w 0 20 m I-CII 10
400
w l 300 gt a w lj 200 0 w 100 8
0
12
111 10 Q
0 8gt a ~
6
4
~
6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
65 75 85 Design 75 683 789 89J tesign 789
21624 21445 21375 24097 23802 23520
103 99 92 213 228 238 100 100 100 550 650 750
1349 1338 1334 423 295 285 70 174 82
150 139 138 318 310 2S4
24
22d i
20ii
= CII Q 180 gt
16
138
- 136
u
134I- z ~132
130
bull 500 o 400 _ l 300 1- Q
sectl 200 I-z ~ 100 CII w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
99
228
100
650
1338
295
174
139
310
5
Figure B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B41
Table B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent PesidJJe Content
Residue Omtent
Bulk Specific GIavity
lheoretical Specific GIavity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit weight pcpound
Stabiloreter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mxulus 103psi
SC
w 40 gt a 30 w w i 0 J 20
10
400
w 3 300 gt a w t 200 i
9 ltI)
w = 1008
0
12
11 10 u a 0 8gt
6
4
2-day
Final
~
~
5 6 7 8 flESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGflEGATE BASIS)
65 75 85
683 788 89J 21424 21394 21455
24147 23851 23567
ll3 103 90
22l 229 234
l09 l09 l09
541 641 741
133 7 1335 1339
412 328 280
129 103 81
167 141 162
325 260 280
24
22ci 0 201
= 0 gt
18
16
i-
138
136 Q i134 _ 0 z w bull0 132
130
soor----------- D C
o 400
ltn3 300 a ~ 200 z 100 (I)
w
-
~
a 0------------ 5 6 7 8 9
flESIOUE CONTENT I
(AGGflEGA TE BASIS)
Design 75
Design 7 86
103
229
l09
641
1335
328
103
141
260
9
Figure B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B42
Table B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent Residue Omtent
Residue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllagtreticalSpecilicGravity
Air Voids
VMA
AbsorlJed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcpound
Stabilcrreter value
Cllhesianeter value
lelilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
400-----------
Illl 300 lt gt a w t 200 lo 0 w 8100
0 ________ ___ __
12 ----------
~ 10 0
~ 8 bull a c
6
4 -_______ ___ __
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS
65 75 85 748 863 978 21752 21661 21638 24136 23863 23602 99 92 83
213 225 234 081 081 081 569 669 769
1357 1352 1350 466 367 235
224 266 138
220 189 209 478 337 281
Ilsign 75
Design 863
92
225
081
669 1352
367
266
189
337
24 ----------
~
220 Cl lt ii 20
0 18 0
gt
16 ----------------14or-----------
138 -0 a 136 z w Q
134
132
= c 400 - l 300 Q
~ 200 f-middot z 100 w a o----------
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
_____________J
Figure B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardinor Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B43
Table B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Iesidue Cbntent 65 75 85 Design 75
lesidue Omtent 748 86~ resign~Zl 863
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleo~tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asjtlalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
lesilient Mxlulus 103psi
2-day
Final
so
w gt 0 30 IE 0 20 iii lt
10
400
3 300 lt gt 0 w l 200 IE 0 X w
100 8
0
12
- 10 en 0 0 8gt
6
4
~ 40 bull
~ 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
21676
23998
97
208
055
595
1353
409
248
189
308
24
22
ci c lt i
20ii
= 0 0
18 gt
16
21711 21641
23729 23472
85 78 85
223 234 223
055 oss 055
695 795 695
1355 135l 1355
283 227 283
187 186 187
198 177 198
255 285 255
140
138 a
136 - z 0 134 --
132
500 a
o 400 -
vi3 300 - 0
sectj 200 z ~ 100
0 0 5 6 middot 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino~ Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B44
Table B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Equivalent Jesidue Content 60 70 80 Design 70
tesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
trut Weight pcpound
Stabilcineter Value
Cbhesiateter Value
tesilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
IU 40 _ C gt 30a IU IU = middoto 20 m C (I) 10
400
IU
300 C gt a IU
ti 200 = 0 ~ IU c 100 8
0
12
10 ai 0 8gt C
6
4
~
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)
630 735 840 Design 7 35
21651 21581 21592
24033 23739 23457
99 91 80 91 180 190 198 190
399 499 599 499 135l 1347 134 7 1347
309 439 358 439
150 236 202 236
140 171 148 171 294 390 367 390
24
bull 22
Cl Cl C
i 20i
= (I) Q 180
gt
16 140
138 0 a
i136 z IU
134 bull bull
Q
132
500 D
c 400 _ 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 IU a
0 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B45
Table B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Residue Cbntent 60 70 80 Design 70 Residue Cbntent 6JO Z35 EdQ Jesign 7 35
Bulk Spcific Gravity 21413 21627 21711 lhroretical Specific Gravity 24321 24017 23726 Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcneter Value
Ohesianeter Value
llesilient Mgtdulus 10 3psi
2-day
Final
so
Ill 40 I lt gt 0 30 w Ill i 0 20 Cl lt
10
400
111
l 300 lt gt 0 w lj 200 i
~ w = 1008 -----___
0
12
II- 10 a 0 8gt lt
6
4
120
189
249
351
1336
407
79
147
361
24
II-22
ci
lt ~ 20i
= 0
0 18
gt
16
138
136 u C
l134 w 132
130
bull 500
C
o 400 ~
---------_J 300 0
~ 200
~ 100 Ill 0
0
99
189
249
451
1350
396
76
165
340
85
193
249
551
1355
360
64
175
305
99
189
249
451
1350
396
76
165
340
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT 1
9 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE COIHENT f
9
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B46
---------
Table B4 7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Bulk Specific Gravity
lhalretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorlled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilaieter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
llesilient MJdulus 103psi
2-clay
Final
50
40w lt(
gt IC 30 w w
0 20 iii lt( ltI)
10
400
w 3 300 ~ lt(
gt IC w t 200 0 iii 111 i 100 8
0 ___ _______ __ _ __
12 ----------
Fquivalent Pesidue Content 60 70 80 Iesign 70
Pesidue Qlntent 690 805 92Q Dcsign 805
21958 22006
24182 23909
92 88 92
18l 188 18l 256 256 256
444 544 444
1370 1373 1370
342 291 342
78 73 78
184 167 184
303 298 303
10 0
0 8gt IC
c 6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B47 Mixture
21880
24453
105
176
256
344
1365
443
58
174
381
24
22ci
5 20
= 0
0 18
gt
16
~ I I
138
136 ~ ~134 bull z 111 0 132
130
bull 500
o 400 3 300 - Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 ltI) 111 IC
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B47
Table B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
El_uivalent Residue Cbntait 60 70 80 Iesign 70
Residue Cbntent 690 aQi 2 2Q Dsign 805 Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Olhesiateter Value
Resilient Mldulus middot103psi
2-day
Final
21816
24403
106
178
244
356
1361
482
136
183
393
21806
24120
96
187
244
456
1361
411
130
187
374
21996
23849
78
189
244
556
1373
314
106
260
361
96
187
244
456
1361
411
130
187
374
24so
w 40 22 ci 0 gt a 30 ~ 20w w = 20 ishy C 18iii 0 gt Ill 10 _ ___ ____________
16 400------------
140
w l 300 138 gt 0
Qa w
636t 200 z0 w --------_ Qw 134c 100 8
0 ___ _____________ 132
bull50012 -----------
a
1 400 -_ 10
ltti ltti l 300 -C 0 C8gt ~ 200 lt z
6 l 100 w a
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT S RESIDUE CONTENT S (AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B48
Table B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
EquivaJent Residue antent 65 75 85 Design 75 Residue Content 63J z aa a 23 resign 7 88 Bulk Specific Gravity 21404 21439 21381 lheoretical Specific Gravity 23563 23286 Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcf
Stabilaneter Value
Cohesianeter Value
~ient 1bdul11S 103psi
2~y
Firal
50
w 40 gt a 30 w w 0 20 iii lt 10
400
3 300 w
gt a w t 200 0 in i w
100 8
0 12
10 0 Q
0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6
23020 92 79 71 79
193 199 209 199 140 140 140 140 510 610 710 610
1336 1338 1334 1338 424 397 308 397 79 308 266 308
173 185 196 185 330 319 285 319
24
22ci c lt
~ 20c Q 180
gt
16
138
136 u -Cl
~134 in ~z w 132
130
soar----------- Qbull
o 400
middot3 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a Q___________ ___ __
7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT deg RESIDUE COIITENT deg (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B49
Table BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Fquivalent lesidue Content
Besidlle 0-ntent
Bulk Specific Gravity
Illeoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pf
Stabilcmeter Value
ltbhesiaieter Value
Besilient Mxlulus 103psi
2--day
Final
50
~ 40 I lt gt 30 w 0 20 01 lt 10
400
w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 w r lOO 8
o 12
10 ai ~ 0 8gt a lt
6
~
4 5 6 7 8
IIESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
65 75 85 683 788 893 21527 21362 21337
24013 23721 23441 104 99 90
188 202 211
225 225 225
425 525 625
1343 1333 1332
410 418 290
261 62 100
188 197 211
334 348 331
24
22 ~ ci c lt
20 f 18 0 gt
16
138
136 0 a
134 z w 0 132
130
500 a
o 400
ai bull 300 I bull C
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
IIESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design 75
Design 788
99
202
225
525
1333
418
62
197
348
Figure BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
BSO
Table B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno
Fquivalent Residue Clintent
Residue 0rrtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorlei Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
thlit Weight pcf
StabiJaneter value
Ohesiaretel value 3lelilient MJdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
50
w
40
c gt a 30 w w = g 20 iii c Ill 10
400----------
middota
l 300 bull c gt a w t 200 = 0 w c 100 8
0 _______ ____ _
12 ------------
_ 10 ~ 8 c
6
4 _________ __
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B51
Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
65 75 85 748 863 978
21728
24022
96
186
200
450
1356
436 100
199
376
24
11 22
c c c
z 20ii
Ill0 180
gt
16
Design 75
Design 863
86
195
200
550
1355
392 260
212
362
21716
23753
86
195
200
550
1355
392 260
212
362
21673
23495
78
205
200
650
1353
378 201
230
3l7
~
140
138 Q j136 bull --_ z w 0134
132
500 Q
o 400 bull -l 300 ~ 0 ~ 200 I-z ~ 100 w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Table B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent lesidue OJntent 65 75 85 Design 75 Pesidue Ointent 748 863 978 Design 863 Bulk Specific Gravity 21595 21708 21637 ~retical Specific Gravity 23977 23708 23452 Air Voids 99 84 77 84 VMA 19l 195 206 195 Absorbed Asphalt l92 l92 l92 l92 Effective Asphalt 458 558 658 558 Unit Weight pf 1347 1354 1350 1354 Stabilareter Value 502 262 239 262 Cllhesianeter Value 257 136 154 136 Pesilient MJdulus 103psi
2--day 217 201 228 201 Final 371 307 290 307
2450
w 40 22 0 0lt ltgt ia 30
bull 20i
= 0 20 18iii 0lt gt 10
16 400
~
~
140
w 3 300 -ltgt
138 lt gt
aa w t 200 deg136 z0 w 0
134 w
100 8
1320
12 500 a
0 400 10
3 300 C 0 Q8gt ~ 200 lt z
6 100 w a
4 0 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT ~ RESIDUE CONTENT ~ (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B52
Table B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent ~sidue Cbntent 45 55 65 Design 55 ~idue Cbntent 473 578 6~~ Design 5 78 Bulk Specific Gravity 24210 24403 24473 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26934 26528 26142 Air Voids
VMA
Absocbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
StabiJaneter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Iesilient M)dulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
w _ 40 C gt II 30w w 0 20 iii C ~
10
400
w l 300 C gt II
iiw
200
~ w --------r 100 8
0 12
ot 10 -0
0 8gt II c
6
4
101 80 64 80 199 20l 206 20l
022 022 022 022 423 523 623 523
151l 1523 1527 1523 308 288 197 288
ll7 ll2 140 112
95 llO 122 llO 306 272 214 272
24
ci 22
C
i -~20Es = E 18 0
gt
16
156
154 - gt152 iii z ~ w 0
150
148
bull 500
o 400 Inl 300 0
~ 200 z ~ 100 w II
0
--~
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT r (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7 8 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B53
Table B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Residue Glntent 45 ss 65 Jesign 55 Residue Omtent 47 5 ZB 6 83 resign ~za Bulk Specific Gravity 24197 24253 24435 lheoretical Specific Gravity 26843 26441 26058 Air Voids 99 83 62 83 VMA 199 206 208 206 Absorbed Asphalt 09 09 09 09 Effective Asphalt 441 541 641 541 lklit Weight P=f 1510 1513 152S 1513 StabLkmter Value 38l 307 204 307 CJgthesianeter Value 73 85 149 85 Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day 170 159 142 159 Final 333 367 193 367
so
w 40 J lt gt 0 30w w le 0 20J
CJ lt 10
24
It
22ci 0 lt i -------20 = 18 0 gt
16 400
____
~
156
w 3 300 154 lt gt - a0 w gt 152l 200 le __-0 z w w c 150 8100
148 0
12 500
D C
o 400 r- 10 -u 300
J 0 9
8 Cgt ~ ~ 200 z
6 ~ 100
w 0
4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE COIITEIIT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B54
----------
Table B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Rep~ication 1
Equivalent Residue Contentmiddot
Residue Ontent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
~tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tklit Weight pcpound
Stabilaneter value
Cbhesiaieter Value
Resilient -bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
45 55 65
518 633 748
24695 24765 24666
26898 26520 26160
82 66 57
187 193 205
001 001 001
449 549 649
154l 1545 1539
41l 310 24l
159 157 165
183 178 193
371 318 250
50
w 40 c gt a 30 w-w == 0 20 ~ 10
400------------
~ 300 lt(
gt a
t 200 == 0 in bullw 8100
0 __ ________ ___ ___
12 ----------
t 10 rti C
~ 8 a c
6
4 s 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI
4
24
Ill 22
0 c c
ze 20
II)
C 18 0
gt
16
158
156- 154 Ill z w 0 152
150
500 iii
8 4
~
0 400-
i300-~ g 200 1-z l 100 iii a 0 __ _______ ____
5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design 55
Design 633
66
193
001
549
1545
310
157
178
318
___
8
Figure B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
BSS
Table B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality
Equivalent Rsidue Content 45
Rsidue Cbntent 518
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllooretical specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
lbsoibed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesicmeter Value 3
Iesilient Mldwus 10 psi
2--day
Final
400-----------
w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 I 0 ltII w8100
olt----__1__--1_---1
12 ----------
10 u
0 8gt a lt
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT l
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
24594
27024
90
190
019
431
1535
450
198
191
360
24
Ill 22
0 C
lt i
20i ~ ltII C 18 C gt
16
158
156 0
i54 iii z ILi
J52
150
SS-30 SEA
55 65
63J 7 ~a 24844
26641
67
190
019
531
1550
324
212
173
308
24856
26276
54
199
019
631
155l
234
225
166
259
_________
~
500----------- 0
dego 400 -
~300~~ C
~ 200 z i 100
w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COIITEHT l
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Replication 2
Design 55
Lesign 633
67
190
019
531
1550
324
212
173
308
Figure B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B56
---------
Table B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality
ElIuivaJent lesidue Omtent
lesidue Cbntent
Bulk Spacific Gravity
~retical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Uut Weight pcf
Stabilaneter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
lesilient Mldulus 103psi
so
w 40 lt gt a 30 w w ~ 20 m lt II)
10
400
w 3 300 lt gt a w lj 200 0 w z 1008
0 12
Ill 10 Q
0 8gt lt
6
4
2-day
Final
~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
so 530
24024
26676
99
207
031
469
1499
354
138
183
352
SS-15 SEA Replication 1
60 70 Design 60 636 7 42 Design 636
24040 23986 26279 25901 85 74
214 223
031 031 569 669
1500 1497 223 149
222 126
159 160 302 234
24
Ill
c 22 ~ c
lt i
20i1
== (II C 180 gt
16
152
150 u -a
648 z w Q
146 1-
144
bull 500 a
o 400 - 3 300 C
~ 200 z ~ 100 (II w a
~ 0
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
85
214
031
569
1500
223 222
159
302
8
Figure B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B57
Table B58 Mixture Design Data Low Quality SS-15
Fquivalent Residue Content 60 60
Rsidue Cbntent 525 630
23944
~retical Specific Gravity
Bulk Sjecific Gravity 26592
Air Voids 100
209VMA
1bsocbed Asphalt 015
Effective Aspbalt 485
Unit Weight pcf 1494
Stabilareter Value 377
Olhesiaeter Value 151
Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi
162
375 2-day
Final
so
w 40 _ gt c 30 w w i
~20 m I-0
10
400
Ill
300 gt w I 200 i 2 w i 100 8
_________ 0 --middotmiddot-
12-------bull------
ti 10 9 0 8gt
6
4
24
- 22ci
0
20i
= 9 18 0 gt
16
152
150 u a
148 z---- w0146
144
500 Q
o 400 _ 300 Q
~ 200 I-z ~ 100
w a
23988
26022
84
215
015
585
1497
307
180
165
356
Graniterock SEA Replication 2
70
735 23793
25830
79
229
015
685
1485
217
170
169
277
~
~
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7
RESIOUE CONTENT li RESIDUE COPlTENT li (AGGREGATE 8ASIS) (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)
Design 60
resign 630
84
215
585
1497
307
180
165
356
8
Figure B58 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B58
Table B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Equivalent esidue omtent 5 0 60 70 Design 60
esidue Cbntent 5 75 690 805 Dsign 690
Bulk Specific Gravity 24389 24362 24419
Jheo=eticaJ Specific Gravity 2 6670 26303 25953
Air Voids 8 6 74 59 7 4
VMA 198 207 214 20 7
Absorbed Asphalt 009 009 009 009
Effective Asphalt 491 591 691 591
Unit Weight pcf 1522 1520 1524 1520
Stabilareter Value 38l 292 220 292
Cbhesiclneter Value 263 186 176 186
~t Mldulus 103psi
2-day 222 222 207 222
Fulal 380 289 293 289
5
w 40 C gt a 30 Ill ~ 20 m C 1- 10
24 ----------
22 bull C Cl C
zi 20
C1 o 18 0 gt
16 ___-________-------i-_-
400---------- 15a------------
156l 300 C gt - a =deg 154ti 200
iii z0 IUiii 0 152 bull bull~ 10018
150 ___ _______ __J0 ---i--J~-L--1
500----------12 ----------- bull o 400 -
Ill 10 ui l 300 -Q
Qg 8 g 200a lt z 6 l 100
iii a
01--J-----__ __4 -------r------- 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
RESIDUE COrlTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B59
Table B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Design 60
Eeidue omtent 575 690 805 D=sign 690
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleo~tical Specific Gravity
1lir Voids
VMA
Absocbed Asralt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcf
Stabilcmeter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
Eeilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
Ill 40 J
lt gt a 30 w I-w 0 20 Ill lt I-
10
400
w 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 Id
8100
0 12
10 m Q
0 8gt 5 lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
~
RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASISI
24371 24441 24445
26744 26373 26020
89 73 61 73
199 205 213 205
019 019 019 019
481 581 681 581
1521 1525 1525 1525
335 236 191 236
220 164 180 164
194 199 191 199
388 329 294 329
24
22
ci 0 lt i
20i
= a
= 18 0 gt
16
158
156 u a
deg154 = w Q
152 ---------150
500 a
1 400 m3 300 1 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100
Ill a
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COHTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B60
APPENDIX C
DATA ANALYSIS SOLVENT FREE AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS
Table Cl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL e_AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
95 85 80
867
76
88
90 85 85
867
29
33
95 85 85
883
58
65
85 70 80
783
76
98
100 100 100
1000
00
00
100 100 100
1000
00
00
C M s 0
D A T A x s
CV
80 80 80
800
00
oo
80 75 75
767
29
38
75 80 70
750
50
67
70 80 75
750
50
67
90 90
100
933
58
62
95 100
95
967
29
30
C M s 1
D A T A
X s
CV
80 75 70
750
50
67
60 70 55
617
76
124
70 70 65
683
-2 9
42
65 70 60
650
50
77
65 70 70
683
29
42
70 60 65
650
50
77
Table C2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating
F01
E 2 ll877 7777778 243aassese9 1)75102041 329 532 ~ middot2 1ll77777777~ 73RBSeSf89 32571~2-~5 3~ 29 532 J 1 150 ooocooo 150JOJOOOO 5f122llll9 414 746
EA ll 8114 llllll11444 2111111111 3J51224 266 396 -E~ middot2- 1-0frOOfr~ 0-9 middot50-middot000 3 oco middot2middot20110816 middot 329 532 Agt 2 77 7777778 38 8815589 17142857 329 532 nJ 4 1555555~55 388881889 171112857 266 396
FR RmiddotJR 36 8166666567 225851B52
------------------------------------------------middot---------------------ronmiddotL 53 -esoo--000000r
Cl
100
P
c5 75 z-t-lt8 50 w t-lt bull css-oC
CMS-0w 25a C middot+ CMS-7 C lt
0-----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Cl Mean AggregateCqqting at middotoesign Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 867 css-o 883 CSS-0 783 css-o 1000 css-o 1000middotcss-o middot I I CMS-0 800 CMS-0 7~ 7 CMS-0 750 CMS-0 933 CMS-0 967lrMS-0 750
I CMS-7 750 CMS-7 617 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 65 0 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating
C2
Table C3 Film Stripping
EMULSION
AGGREGATE SAN
BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK
C s s 0
D A T A
5
0
10
5
5
0
X s
CV
25
35
1414
75
35
47l
25
35
1414
C M s 0
D A T A
0
5
5
7
0
0
X s
CV
25
35
1414
60
14
236
00
oo oo
C M s 7
D A T A
0
0
0
5
0
0
X s
CV
00 OQ 00
25 35
1414
00 00
oo
Table C4 ANOVA Summary Film Stripping
AN-OVA
middotmiddotDPmiddot -ss- F middotFe5
E 2 33 7777778 1euro8888889 23555191 426 802 A 2 -ti8 7777778 343888889 4 7984496 426 802
E X II 4 9 2222226 23055557 3217054 363 642 ERROI 9 645000000 71666667 ---------------TOTAL 17 1762777782
C3
fl w 0 lti 1L a =gt en C w C C-a I-en
40
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-730
20
10
0 SB F GR
Figure C3 Film Stripping
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
css-o 25 css-o 75 css-o 25
GMS-0 25 CMS-0 60 CMS-0 oo
CMS-7 oo CMS-7 25 CMS-7 oo
----middot----middot-middotmiddotmiddot
Nlte Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping
C4
Table CS 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue
Content 10 3 psi
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW D
118 170A 217 205 160 175
C T 83 190 191 182 130 185A s )ts 101 180 204 194 145 180
0 s 25 14 18 16 21 7
CV 246 79 90 84 146 39 D 104 185 155A 190 140 215
C T 82 155 154 171 130 180A M x 93s 170 155 181 135 198
s 16 21 1 13 7 250 CV 167 125 05 74 52 125
D A ab 55 35 73 38 55
C T
82A 48 63 77 45 65 M X s pound81 -- - 52 49 75 42 60 s7 l 5 20 3 5 7
CV 18 96 404 38 11 9 11 8
Table C6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus
A N ) V l
-D-F -SS
E 2 832263888888 _ 2-- -5441-- 722-2222-J 1 89933611111
E~ 4 5386 7777779 -1J- 2- -3-8-1-+-rG-55--5-5-5 7- bull AJ 2 144235~899 EA 4 58024444443
ERROR 113- 3951500 00~-J
---------------------------------------------------------------------TOT-W- -3-5 -11806-4---638 881gt-9-
(116131944444 2720-8611111 89933611111 13466944445 1-9Q lh-5--amp7--+7-8-7211944445
14506111111 219 527-7778
1895577629 -12 394-1541-409569480
61345059 S-~937872 32952081 56gt7870Ll
357 3-S7 443 295
-]y5+ 3S7 295
605 6 05--833 461
-6--05-605 461
cs
bull css-omiddot 300 C CMS-0
M 0 diams CMS-7
(J
3200 gt C 0 E 1-
ffi 100
01----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure CS 2 Day ResiLient Modulus
SAN middotBERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 101 css-o 180 rss-o 204 css-0_194 CSS-0 145 CMS-0 198
CMS-0 93 CMS-0 170 ICMS-0 155 CMS-0 181 CMS-0 135 css-o 180l l l I I CMS-7 81 CMS-7 52 CMS-7 49 CMS-7 75 CMS-7 42 CMS-7 60
Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C6 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking 2 Day
Resilient Modulus 10 3 psi
C6
Table C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Content 10 psi
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A (
s
CV
260
232
246
20
80
320
280
300
28
94
482
299
391
129
33l
365
358
362
5
l4
280
240
260 28
109
320
345
333
18
53
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
267
250
259
12
47
295
280
288
ll
37
253
288
271
25
92
290
387
339
69
203
260
307
284
33
11 7
395
334
365
43
118
C M s 7
D A T A
X
s
CV
78
64
71-
10
139
110
95
103
ll
104
75
73
74
l
19
110
135
123
18
144
80
90
85
7
83
110
135
123
18
144
middotTable C8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus
-~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------F-r05- ---F-01--
E
J El -E- Al EAJ
-ERRJR
2 2-1 4 -~ 2 4
18
3592750555555 -14506 722-2221-171610COOOOJ 147394444445
1---1-1----lf466-li-+ 19215000000 55353333333
2850GOOC0000
17-16375277778 72~336H-1-11
1716100)0000 36848611111 sect8~5833---3-33--9607500000
13840833333 ~ 58-3 33-33 333
11315528C7 -45810702
109385263 23272807 ~U981l-2-1-6067895 3741579
357 -3 r7 443 2 95 3~7-357 295
605 605 833 461 605 605 4 6 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------~- 3-5- -448+1----2-222-2-
C7
bull css-o500
CMS-0 U) diams CMS-7C
C) 400 middoto -
~ 300
J Ci 200
1-z 100 J-UJ UIa
01-------------------------~---~-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
eMS-0 259 ess-a 300 ess-a 391 ess-a 362 eMS-0 284 CMS-0 365
ess-o 246l l l l l ICMS-0 288 eMS-0 271 CMS-0 339 ess-o 260 ess-o 333
CMS-7 71 CMS-7 103 CMS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123
t-ote Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure ca Newrnan-Keuls Ranking Full Cure 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi
ca
Table C9 Density at Design Residue Content pcpound
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
1359
1372
1366
09
07
1365
1365
1365
0
0
1365
1352
1359
09
07
1345
1345
1345
0
0
1520
1525
1523
04
02
1515
1515
1515
0
0
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
1348
1343
1346
04
03
1330
1338
1334
06
04
1329
1340
1335
08
06
1335
1316
1326
- 13
10
1505
1490
1498
11
07
1490
1485
1488
04
02
C M s 7
D A T A
x s
CV
1373 1385
1379
09 06
1375 137 5
1375
0 0
1380
1379
1380
01 01
1370
1360
1365
07 05
1537
1535
1536
01 01
1543
1545
1544
01 01
Table ClO ANOVA Surtunary Density
A II O V ~
-SS F bull O1
E _ 0
2 i
lCB4155555 Z08-tOS389
II 311277~
54207777R 1 ouos2sirrs
4340277
135q23660 -25lS 7i80R63-
1087331173
3S7 3 ~7 443
i()5 605 83
EA Q
4 -2
1599U4U5 _iuseeg
399E11 -3-3UUL45-
10J17398 bull~3785-C7
295 -~S7-
4 f 1 -6CS
A) 2 13772222 o6886111 17251218 357 605 EAJ q 2C361111 5090278 12752262 295 4 61
-ERRJR- 13- 718-()001 399166-7-
35
C9
bull css-o160 CMS-0 diams CMS-7
150
() -a gt 140 -en z w
middotC 13
1201~bull-------------r---------------SBH SBL FH FL ~RH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C9 - Density at Design Residue Content
SAN middotBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 138o CMS-7 1365ICMS-7 1375 CMS-7 1544
css-o 1366
I-7 bull rMS-7 1536
css-o 1365 css-o 1359 css-o 1345 css-o 1523 CSS-0 j515
CMS-0 1346 CMS-0 1334 CMS-0 1335 CMS-0 132 6 CMS-0 1498 CMS-0 1488
Nte Values with a ccmnm vertical line are not statistically different
Figure ClO Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcpound
ClO
Table Cll Air Voids at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
D 87 7 0-A 75 77 80 72
C T 71 70 92 82 78 73A s )s 79 70 84 80 79 73
0 s ll 0 12 04 01 01
CV 143 0 144 45 18 10 D 97 93A 93 91 82 84
C T 90 92 A
91 93 87 90
M x 94 93 92 s 92 84 87 s os 01 01 _0l 04 04
0 53 08 15 15 42 49CV D A 77 62 73 62 71 48
C T 73 61 62 71 65A 55
M X s 75 62 68 67 68 52 s 03 01 08 06 04 057
CV 38 12 115 96 62 96
Table Cl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids
A I O Y 11
-DF ss -F 05 F01
E 2 382650000 191325000 69)150301 3~7 605 -A 2 -2-681667 1340334 ll03567311 -3- 57 605
Q 1 2f677778 26677778 952324f6 4 13 I 33 EA lj 13S33333 3313333 122011409 2 95 Ii 61 ti -2 l8105555- -905-277-8- 326553tO 357 tiOS II) 2 6572221 3296111 11953707 357 605 E~l 4 88411445 2211111 797552 795 4 f 1 ERElll 111 11991)0)00 bull2172222-
-------------------------~------------------------------------------rou1 s SJ 3100000-
Cll
11
10
iP- en 0-0 gt aa
9
8
7
6
5
4
bull css-o CMS-o diams CMS~7
SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
F-igure Cll Air Voids at middotoesign Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 94 CMS-0 93 CMS-0 92 ICMS-0 92 CMS-0 84 ICMS-0 87
IIcss-o 79 css-o 7 0 I II
css-o 79 css-o 73
I ~_ I~ CMS-7 7 5 CMS-7 62 CMS-7 68 CMS-7 48 - - bull-- ~ -----~middot-middotmiddot--middot-middotmiddot-middot ---middotmiddot
~= Values with a OCIlOn vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids
Cl2
Table Cl3 Stabilorneter Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
272
3113
293 29
99
270
265
268 04
13
393
327
360 47
130
380
325
353 39
110
270
270
270 0
0
235
185
210 35
168
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
375
344
360
22
61
340
350
345
07
21
307
377
342
50
145
415
367
39l
33
85
350
300
3-2 5
35
109
240
245
243
04
15
C M s 7
D A T A
x s
CV
235
23-5
235
0
0
130
120
125
07
57
213
233
-223
14
63
150
200
175
35
202
350
350
350
0
0
250
250
25 o_ 0
0
Table Cl4~ ANOVA Summary Stabilorneter Value
A N O V 1
soua= SS r 01
E 2 2
7086172721 9702C93fl9
3543086361 4SS10Uf95
505343236 ~-9189501
357 357
605 605
) 1 175 6950250 1756950250 25053)2i8 443 833 EA 4 6718347112 167 9586 778 23955053 2 95 461 ~ ~544 -4 Q-432-ll-25-0- --S--~ 38 ~5-19- -3 5- ios AJ 2 941227166 47(1euro13583 57122663 357 605 EAJ 4 289779333 72319A33 10314831 2 95 II f 1
Ell ngtR -18 1r2024gt0) -i- bull112472-
---------------------------------------------------------------------0-T- ----5- 4-9B1 is~v~
Cl3
50
w 40 I ltgt a 30w I-w ~ 200 I-m lt 10I-u
0 SSH SBL FH FL GRH
AGGREGATE
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
GRL
Figure Cl3 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 350 CMS-7 250ICMS-0 360 ICMS-0 345 r=ss-o 36o rMS-0 39l
css-o 268 CMS-0 342 css-o 353 CMS-0 325 CMS-0 243Icsbull-bull _ CMS-7 235 CMS-7 12S CMS-7 223 CMS-7 175 css-o 270 css-o 210
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value
Cl4
Table Cl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOWHIGH LOW LOWHIGH D 360193 280 465 275 250A T 234 345 183 375 160 225C A
s x 214 353 232 420 218 238s s 29 11 69 64 18810
136 30 296 152 37 4 74CV D 280 440 230 355 200 320 T A
252 430 219 450 140 240C A M x 266 435 225 403 170 280s s 20 7 67 428 570
74 16 16735 250 202CV D
80 190 122 245 130 170 T A
82 180 192 235 120 180C A M X 81 185 157 240 125 175s s l 7 so 7 777
CV 18 3038 31 5 57 40
Table Cl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value
-SS--
pound 2 1309717272222 654858611111 1102309084 357 605 __ 2 3Ber61222222 194033611--111 -1-1t2J3570 -3 57 605 J 1 12)524904445 120524f94111145 711)1137379 1143 l 33
EA 4 2311~U411111145 57795111111 355~57119 295 4 ~ 1
~ + --8-066---H~i-i--2 ---4-B3-a~--H ~T4-=7-7S~J -3 S7 605 1J 2 111206 7222222 71033511111 ll3~31111 3 57 605 EAJ 4 500gt1111111 12512777778 7587162 235 4 (- 1
RAO- -18 -999 500-000( -1-6--2-7 -75-00000-
--------------------------------------------------------------------tO+--l- el-i- 3-fi-99g6-3-R-~
Cl5
bull css-o500
Q1__________---___-----~
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure ClS CohesiometerValue at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 232rMS-0 435 CMS-0 280rMS-0 266 rss-o 420 tss-o 218
css-o 214 css-o 353 CMS-0 225 CMS-0 403 css-o 238ICMS-0 170
CMS-7 81 CMS-7 185 CMS-7 157 CMS-7 240 CMS-7 125 CMS-7 175
Nrte Values with a oamon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value
~400 -I ltgt cc 300 w 1-w E 2000 -() w c 1008
CMS-0 diams CMS-7
Cl6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Table Cl7 Swell at Design Residue Content in
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
0 0000 0003 0000 0008 0000 0000A C T 0000 0005 0000 0007 0000 0002
A 0000 0004 0000 0009 0000 0000 s j( 00000 00040 00000 00080s 00000 00007
0 s 00000 00010 00000 0 0010 00000 00012
CV 00 250 00 125 00 1732 D 0000 _o 045 0020 0036 0000 0000A 0006 0029 0018 0040 0001 0000TC A 0007 0040 0022 0039 0000 0000
M x 00043 00380 00200 00383 00003 00000 s s 00038 00082 00020 00021 00006 00000 0
874 215CV 100 54 1732 oo
D 0000 0004 0000 0003 0000 0000A T 0000 0002 0000 0000 0000 0000
C A 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000
M x 00000 OQ023s 00000 00010 00000 00000 s 00000 00015 00000 00017 00000 00000
7 oo 655 1732CV 00 00 oo
Table Cl8 ANOVA Summary Swell
P N O V ~
SOUR-middotEmiddot l)f -ss- -lSmiddot F rs FM
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------E 2 C031905 )015953 7576385211 329 532 J 2 0012203 OOOf112 2~97R1n75 329 532 l 000858(1 )()QSf80 11122112111111 414 846
H LI 0016535 00)111311 1963258575 266 396 Emiddot) middot2middot 00079 51- a0ll397S 1eg ~16527 329 532 AJ 2 00011958 )0021179 111 ns1ne 329 532 EAJ II 0006609 OC01652 7e117l97t3 266 396
EDl 36 )000751 OOOJ021
TOBImiddot middot53middot ----008959-9-middot
Cl7
05
04
z 03
-I -I w
u 3 02
01
0 SBH SBL FH
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
FL GRH GRL AGGREGATE
FigureCl Swell at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 00003 css-o 00007CMS-0 00043 CMS-0 -0380 CMS-0 00200 CMS-0 00303
CMS-0 00000css-o 00080 css-o 00000Icss-o 00000 Icss-o 00040 ICSS-0 00000
CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00000CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00023 CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00010
Rte Values with ~--~~~ ~~ lb-le are not ~tatistically different
Figure Cl8 Newman-Keuls Ranking swell in
Cl8
Table Cl9o MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
-------EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
GRANITEROCKFRESNOSAN BERNARDINO
LOW LOWHIGH HIGH LOW HIGH D
124 72198 137 287 243A 227 90145 178 83 260TC 57197 135 252 270A
s 207 104 258 73139 239s s 17 05 56 29 14 17
0 CV 82 280 82638 233 53
D 197 160145 145 90 205A 19l 17092 100 80 220TC 158 105 138190A M x 182 119 11 7 85 205 156 s s 21 37 25 1607 15 0
115 737 105316 21l 83CV D 21 omiddot 240202 185 98 330A
220 20087 181 34588TC 216 210138 223 77 338A M x 215 217142 196 88 338s
s 2111 0805 58 237
23 405 120 22 96118CV
Table C20 ANOVA Summary -MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
----------------------- I N O V A
SO0RE --DF -lS--
middotE __ 2 2
401 11310n -5831137037
2008568519 --2915568519
166S53085 2111762euro92-
3-9 J29
532 532
Q 1 14f5364f296 14653646296 1215099198 4 14 746 EA-Ev
4 -frac34
2784740740 -1-1-i 0359259
696185185 -56-tl-1-79tr30-
5 772 8571 -6450815
266 middot-3-29
396 -5-32middotmiddot
110 2 355470370 177735185 1bull11738C30 329 532 EAO II 12794711075 3198euro9519 25523909 266 396
-Ei8JB 36- 11311 111euro66euro7 120596296
---------------------------------------------------------------------FOTAJ- --5-3- -31131--343-14 8-1-
Cl9
50 bull css-o ti) CMS-0 gt 40 diams CMS-7E I
a w 30I-w E 0 -I 20-ca ltC I-Cl) 10
0--------------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Cl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOWmiddot HIGH LOW
CMS-7 215 CMS-7 142 css-o 104 I ICMS-7 338 CMS-7 21 7
css-o 207 css-o 139 i CMS-7 88 CMS-0 156middot css-o middot
CMS-0 182 CMS-Q 119 CMS-0 117 CMS-0 85 CMS-0 205 css-o 73
Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
C20
-----------------------------------------
Table C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
IEMULSON
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIG_H LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A x s
CV
135 104 104
114
18
157
70 85 51
69
17
248
105 66
136
102
35
343
148 197
-173
35
201
107 101
72
93
19
201
74 107
92
91
17
182
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
128 85
174
119
31
256
73 59 -
66
10
150
69 36 65
56
18
318
158 110
-134
34
253
77 96 68
80
14
178
53 66
113
77
32
408
C M s 7
D A T A x s
CV
141 79 52
91
46
503
185 60 63
103
71
695
125 201
96
141
54
386
192 164 126
161
33
206
131 130 120
127
6
48
72 230
76
126
90
715
Table C22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
l II O Y A
-soaas -OF- -S-S- -F- FrOS
E -llmiddot J
n -tJ-AO EllJ
RROi
----------
2 2 1 u -2-2 4
36middot -------
199090000000 middot 39113 411111111111
4111296296 61982222222
-t-72-1-middot-11181-18-1-754737037011 41156 5185186
85722 middotbull)0(0000 ----------------
995115000000 -1971-7222222
11111216296 151195555556 -360-yen5-110-711 1middot
j8236851852 11166296297
middotmiddot2381 166667
111805138 -0280488 17265A9 6507548
-36111086-15058033
41589422
329 329 414 2 66 329 329 266
532 -532 746 396
-532 532 3915
-----------------------------------lOo-1- middottt 1-300-lamp833-333-3-
C21
400
CJgt ~ 300 I
0 w I-w 200
-~ 0 CJwc 1000 ()
0
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Valueat Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 ll9 CMS-7 103 ICMS-7 141 css-o 173 CMS-7 127 CMS-7 126
css-o ll4 css-o 69 1middotcss-o 102 CMS-7 161 css-o 93 css-o 91
CMS-7 91 CMS-0 66 middotCMS-0 56 CMS~O 134 CMS-0 80 CMS-0 77
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C22 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
C22
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table C23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
724 811 637
724
123
170
1289 -
1276
1283
09
07
627 628 695
650
39
60
622 940
1427
996
405
407
475 407
1276
719
483
672
803 790 498
697
172
247
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
1217 393
1260
957
489
511
2075 2879 1875
2276
532
233
1943 1195 2012
171 7
453
264
1241 1224 1208
1224
1 7
13
676 574 550
600
67
112
986 787 815
863
108
125
C M s 7
D A T A x s
CV
642 620 774
679
83
123
102 426 662
397 281
709
59 7 369 470
479 114
239
588 60l 290
493
176
357
301 263 393
319
67
210
238 284 227
250 30
121
Table C24 ANOVA Surmnary Surface Abrasion
Fmiddot F01middotmiddotss --------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------
e Amiddot
2 -gt
530361248149 22)938237037
315180624075 110469111)519
432152433 1sn1of15
329 329
532 532
1 n
1 4
[14699201852 9733 179629euro
446992gt1952 24332949074
61289-8 3335u~111
414 266
746 396
EJ J
2 2
middot59516003103 85017525926
291seoo1as1 425)8752963
4 9nn2 5 828630
329 329
532 532
EI 4 196475151852 4911877963 57349619 266 396
ERRJl 36 262551800000 72931l~-556
--------------------------------------------------------------------
middotTnUmiddot 53- middot159689-~0964815middot
C23
300
E C)
C)200 Cl)
0 J
z 0 en 100 lti a al lti
01-----r----~---------r---------SBH SBL
Figure C23
SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW
CMS-0 957 CMS-0 2276
css-o 724 css-o 1283
CMS-7 679 CMS-7 397
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content
FRESNO
HIGH
CMS-0 171 7
css-o 65o
CMS-7 479l
LOW
CMS-0 1224
ICSS-0 996
CMS-7 493
GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW
css-o
CMS-0
719
600
ICMS-0 863Icss-
CMS-7 319 CMS-7 250
Ngtte Val~ with~ ~n vertical line are not stati~tically different
Figure C24 Newman-Keuls Ranking Surface Abrasion grams
C24
APPENDIX D
DATA ANALYSIS SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS
----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
Table Dl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15
SEA
D A T A
75 85 85
85 80 85
80 75 70
65 70 70
85 90 90
80 85 85
X s
tV
817
58
71
833
29
35
7-50
50
67
683
29
42
middot88 3
29
33
833
29
35
ss 30 see
D A T A
85 80 85
75 80 80
75 85 85
70 80 70
90 85 95
90 80 90
x s
CV
833
29
35
783
29
37
81 7
58
71
733
58
79
-900
50
56
883
29
33
C M s 7
D A T A
80 75 70
60 70 55
70 70 65
65 70 60
65 70 70
70 )0 65
x s
CV
750 50
67
617 76
124
683 29
42
650 50
77
683 29
42
650
50
77
Table D2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating
rmiddot rs F05 F 0 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------F 2 235 712593 1179 f-296297 553913Q113 329 532 a 2 63 bullTlt1ll81I R 31L97UC7U 1521731 3 29 532 E~
11 3f2 116i14f Jmiddot 39 (1)7111~gtI 1
3~2 ~-2900 9976~5185
17 ~li347F3 UfB47826
4 14 256
746 96
i) ~ pound 2S 11252i 12 29(-29 bull 5086957 329 532
a~ 2 12 ~-~737r o lt19518~ 2E260e7 329 53 2 u ll 1f3 bull illf illt7 41t3S1B52 191156522 2 G6 3~f
iE1190il 3i 76 pound61iz~57 212~-25
Dl
-~ -CJ z I-lt(
0 0 U1 -lt( C bull SS 15 SEA w 25 SS 30 SEA CJ cc
diams CMS - 7CJ lt(
0 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dle Mean Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
I SS-30 733SS-301 $33 SS-15amp 833 lss-301 sn 7 I ISS-30 900 SS-30 883
SS-151 817 SS-301 783 SS-15 683 SS-15 883 SS-15 833SS-lSi 750
CIS--7 750 CS-7 617 OS-7 683 CMS-7 650 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650
Ngtte Values with a comon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating
D2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
Table D3 Film Stripping
EMULSION
AGGREGATE SAN
BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK
s s
15
0 A T A
30
15 20
30 15
25
X s
CV
225
106
47l
250
71
283
200
71 354
s s
30
D A T A
25
25
0
0
5
0
X s
CV
25middoto
oo
00
oo oo
oo
2middotmiddot5
35
1413
C M s 7
D A T A
0
0 0
5
0 0
X s
CV
oo
00 oo
25
35
1413
oo
00 oo
Table D4 ANOVA Swnmary Film Stripping
----------------- ---------------- --middot-----------middot----- middot--middotmiddotmiddot middot- middotmiddot-middot----middot -middot-- middotmiddotmiddot--- --- -------- -A N O V J
-SW~ middotnt r-
pound 2 14333333113 7166666667 27 1S78lttl7 l 2 2]33333333 1165666euro67 middot11t1210~26 Eirl 141 55f 3333335 13958333311 i2894737
Dlli~RI 9 237 50CCDIOmiddot) 2638888P9
lOUL t7 bull--- bullbull - bull- 0 bull bullbull bull- bull bull 0 -------- bull-- bull- bull---bull ---- lt -bullbull bull - bullbullbull--bullbullbullbullbull-bullbull-- bullbullbull bull ___ bull --bull bull bull bull --- bull bull-bullho bullbull bull- bull bull ~-- bull- UO rArr-d bull
D3
cit -w
0 lt( ll a (I)
C w 0 C-a I-ti)
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
20
1
0 SB F GR
Figure D3c Film Stripping
SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO
Iss-3
SS-15
250
225
SS-15~7 250
25
SS-15
ISS-30
200
25
ClIS-7 oo middot SS-30 00 CMS-7 00
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping
D4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue 3Content 10 psi
-------ElAULSWN
----QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCK SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
D S$ 1U H9 171 185 110 159
i22 2~1 165 197 159 165A15Jo-ot----t----+---ii---+----t-----ti 132 140 168 191 135 162
SEA s i3 1 4 9 35 4
CV Ul2 10 25 44 258 26
$5 ---
D
~ A
158
140
189
198 184 187
212
201
178
173
222
199
gtUfl x l49 194 186 207 176 211 SEA s 13 6 2 8 4 16
CV 85 33 11 38 20 77
C M
D A T A
80
82 55 48
35
63
73
77
38
45 55
65
s x 81 52 49 75 42 60
7 s
CV
1
18
5
96 20
404
3
38 5
119
7
118
Table D6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus
--=======-=-middot------=====--=- ---------------------==-~----------=-----e=-----BF SS lS F F05 F01
pound 2 ln~13~ 3lBillllll1l 52367 191141145 3715181747 357 605 I 2 29111 GllS5SSS6 111155 bull 5211778 103289966 357 605 l 1 3l$3351l11112 33$3-3611112 240095590 4113 A33 lEamp liL 31121111l11U1t zst-n22t77 8 ssu21119a 295 461 pound~ 2 1217222222 16093611111 432112657 357 605 III 2 n~ bullEHOq 1a ----------
521iwSSSS5 15S911111111 25Jot 5lll)~Oll)il))I
31l527777R 4117277777~ iJl9166657
22C3627) -2H1157
357 2~95
6~5 11 61
-=====------middot--- -- -- middotmiddot-- --middot-llOl~L lS
DS
bull SS 15 SEA 11 SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
-(D -l Q 0 E J-
ffi 1 J-(J wa gtlt 0 Q--------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL (I
AGGREGATE
Figure D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-3~1 l49 SS-3H J86 SS-10 207 SS-30 176 SS-30 211
SS-15amp 132 SS-15amp l40 SS-151168 SS-l51 l91 ss-lSi 135 SS-15 162I I I CS-7 81 CMS-7 52 OS-7 42 CMS-7 60
llite Values with a amron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent
Figure D6 Newman-Keuls Ranking 2 Day 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi
D6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Table D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Contentr 10 psi
-EMULSION OUALITY LEVELcAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15
SEA
D A T A
325
271
l]JD
260
390
340
319
348
272
367
302
356
x s
CV
29S
38
128
285
35
124
365
35
97
334
21
62
320
67
21 0
329
38
116
ss 30 SEJ
0 A T A
282
310
337
255
303
374
362
307
318
308
289
329
x s
CV
296
20
67
296
58
196
339
50
148
335
39
116
313
7
23
309
28
92
C M s 7
D A T A
78
64
110
95
75
73
110
135
80
90
85
7
83
110
135
x s
CV
71
10
139
103
11
104
74
1
19
123
18
144
123
18
144
Table D8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus
A N O V ll
E 2- 3r39El11 3middotl8tB89 196 994 L19 44 44 5 178 q233024 3 57 6 CS 2 9111~7222223 4058 3611112 3 57577(13 357 6csbulla 11 611~ li9llll41115 ~16 ampll44445 S585579 443 833
_n_ sect 251l-illll41sectl41 -531 31i 11111 AS7121pound3 295 4 61 EJ 2 lt 115 $555555 227 521777 8 1994213 357 605 iampJ 2 170555555 15)277778 0770121 357 605 __ElJ 1324111ilJlilil4 5 208 bull 11Ul 11 bull 184922 2 95 4 ( 1
nan 11 19P73 SOOJIO~ 11111D833l33
middotmiddot-- =--=--=-==-===--c-=-c------_--=--ngtllllll
----------------------------------middot----
D7
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
traquo diams CMS - 7a ()
0--Gl ~- I J _J bull C 02 E I-z w J-(J w C
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATEmiddot
Figure D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HJGH lOW HJGH LOW HIGH LOW
I I I Iss-il51 298 1SS-31l 295 ss-]5~ 365 SS-30 335 1middot SS-15 320 SS-15 329
SS-301 296 SS-l5amp 235 SS-301 339 SS-15 334 SS-30 313 SS-30 309
CIIS--7 71 OS-7 103 CHS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123
t-bte Values with a armon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D8 Newman-Keuls Ranking Full Cure
Resilient Modulus 103 psi
D8
----- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D9 Density at Design Residue Content pcf
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
LOWHJGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH D l341 6 ll339 1347 1338 1523ss 1500A T 1356 133S 1350 1333 1513 1497A
1~ x l351 l337 1349 1336 1518 1499 sSEA 07 02 02 04 07 02
05 02 02 03CV 05 01
D 1362 1352 1370 1355 1545A 1520ss T 1371 1355 1361 1354 1550 1525
30 A
x 1367 1354 1366 1355 1548 1523 SEA 02 06s 06 01 04 04
05 02 05 01 02 02CV D 1373 1375 1380 1370 1537 1543AC T 1385 1375 137 9 1360 1535 1545AM x 1379 1375 1380 1365 1536 1544s s 09 oo 01 07 01 017
06 ooCV 01 05 01 01
Table DlO ANOVA Summary Density
N O V ll -----middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddotmiddot-- -- --------- -------middot --------------- ----- - - -
smI=pound DF ss F F05 F01
pound 2 2738H9 310369445 153505090 357 605 ~ 2 2273iWlllbull38B9 11369544445 5530 gt35704 357 lj -~5 ~ 1 11-6~2SilllaquollO 12 602500C 524057772 443 R33 n I tpoundlUll11 Jl-69lll45 2-324621e 2 95 4 61 E 2 3131poundpound57 15i5S33J 7 7537nB 357 li os lJ 2 ltClfltSf-57 0433334 21458C6 357 s 05 n~ Iii )l216poundfi6lii 9556667 47372764 295 451
EHJii 11l 3 bull nsilraquorn 2019444
------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -- -middotmiddot-middot ----- -middotmiddot - middot-------
35 23611rJC556
D9
1 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
-0 a gt1 ()
z
diams CMS-7
w C
120 SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure D9 Density at Design Residue Coritent
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
OS--7 1379 aS-7 ]375 IClIS-7 l380 IOlS-7 1365 ISS-30 1548 CMS-7 1544ISS-30~ 1367 SS--30~ J354 SS-30~ 1366 SS-30~ 1355 CMS-7 1536 SS-30 1523
SS-15bull 1351 ss-is~ 1337 SS-15bull 1349 ss-1s 1336 SS-15 1518 SS-15 1499
NJte Values with a omron vertical lme are not statistically different
Figure D10 Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcf
DlO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
Table D11 Air Voids at Design Residue Content
-EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
107
)5
9 10l
91
99
79
99
80
83
8 bull5
84
I s
ICY
U)
Ill 9
B4
10l
03
28
95
06
60
89
14
159
82
02
26
85
01
08
ss 30j
SEA
D A T A
90
93
92
85
92
96
86
84
66
67
74
73
x s
CV
92
02
23
89
05
56
94
03
30
85
01
l 7
67
01
ll
74
01
10
C M s 7
D A T A
77
73
62
61
73
62
63
71
71
65
48
55
x s
CV
75
03
38
62
O~l
12
68
08
u5
67
06
96
68
04
62
52
05
96
Table Dl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids
A ll O V A --e--ee-ee=-==== -- -- middot- -- --- middot- - ------- - middot-----middot----middot ______ __________ ---middot- ----- - ------------- -
iiUEllilE ss ~s F F01
E 45111Hoiii6pound 225l08333 812457541 357 605 ll 1~-lilliillt~~)Q 7930)000 2519405 357 505 IJJ 11 ili$6J4141~ 16469444 59230768 443 8 33 E1 2J53ll3ll -5S5333 4 -2 bull 11755245 295 4 6 1
EJ 15672223 bull 783pound 112 2~131820 357 605 I 21022223 bull 1li 1112 bull 3$35365 357 cs
EampJ 2971111ll J27778 26713286 2 95 4t1 iElllllHgt 5cgt~SiIJOIgt -2790556
-middot--middot ------- --middot - middotmiddot- -middotmiddot--middot-- --3li
D11
11 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
-l
a - 8
-a 0 7gt tc ltI 6
5
4 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dll
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot
middot HIGH LOW
SS-]5amp JlJl ISS-ll5~ 10l
ISS-301 92 SS-311l11 89ICMS-7 75 CS-7 fi2
Air Voids at Design Residue Content
FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
=- 95 I I ISS-15 89 SS-15 82 SS-15 8 5
SS-31 94 SS-30 85 SS-30 74ICMS-7 68
OS-7 68 CMS-7 67 SS-30 67 CMS-7 52
Ngtte Values with a ommn vertical line are not statistically dilferent
Figure D12 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids
Dl2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
middotmiddotEMULSION OUAUTY LEVEL
~- AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
48S 3g_g
295
middot 32 8
439
396
397
418
288
307
223
307
X s
CV
443
64
144
312
23
75
418
30
73
408
15
36
298
13
45
265
59
224
ss 3Wo SEA
0 A T A
400
403
367
283
342
411
392
262
310
32-4
292
236
x s
CV
402
02
05
325
59
183
377
49
130
327
92
281
31 7
10
31
264
40
150
C M s 7
D A T A
235
235
130
120
213
233
150
200
350
350
250
250
x s
CV
235
00
00
125
07
57
223
14
63
175
35
202
350
oo oo
250
00
oo
Table Dl4 ANOVA Swnrnary Stabilometer Value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------A N O V A
---------~----------middot------middot-middotmiddot-- -middot--middot--middotmiddot--middot------ bull middotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middot middot------middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot--- --middotmiddot ---_ -- middotmiddot-middotmiddot-- -- - - - -----ss r r05 r01
2 1 i 7~ Sbull1lfipound5161S 5879033333 332259711 357 605 I 2 igtS895QGDgt 279475000 195117552 357 ~os i ll ~l ~
11 111 2 2
l~illflll1111111 7DS nll3331
1~il])2222] 755J5556
~ 111 8 11111~=-- 10115 834 71011111
37 7502778
275769841 128178912
U938281 251M309
11113 295 357 357
833 4f1 605 605
Ell~ 14middot 3~53lt1$1H 116340278 5750926 295 461 fElilli U 25977~illlllCII~ 1111H72222
------------------------ bull- ~bull OOM---bullbullbullbull- - bull------_________ _
roru
013
w J ltC gt a w 1-w E 0 I-m ltC Ishyen
SBH SBL FH FL
bull SS 15 SEA 5S 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-)Sll 441_3 SS-l 325I SS-JSi 4131 SS-15 40 8 CMS-7 350 SS-15 265
SS-30 402 SS-JSa 31_2I ISS-30~ 377 SS-30~ 327 SS-30 317 SS-30 264
CS-7 235 CMS-7 125 ISS-15 298 CMS-7 250
Nlte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D14 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value
Dl4
-------------------
Table Dl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
ii3
ii2
l7-1
ilJD3
236
76
308
62
112
85
222
180
l s
CY
63
lJ1
10
Jl39
SlJ
363
l56
J13
725
185
174
940
99
19
194
201
30
148
ss 30 SEA
0 A T A
229
306
266
187
78
130
260
136
157
212
186
164
x s
CV
268
55
204
227
56
247
104
37
354
198
88
443
185
39
211
175
16
89
C M s 7
D A T A
80
82
190
180
122
192
245
235
130
120
170
180
x s
CV
81
l
18
185
7
38
157
50
315
240
7
30
125
7 57
175
7
40
Table Dl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value
--------------------middot--------------------------------------------------------------A N O V A
-=====-=-=--=-- ===== ss
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1i712 7222222 83563611111 226671165 357 605 I 2 l~12 lllllliilllllllB9 71144441145 129864 357 605 ~ 1l 251116l 144141llllj 2ti-~H~bull4dimiddot4 4 44 5 71775602 443 833 n l4 37511ll 777JTI7JJ S395bull J 9 ~4middot444 2548 5405 295 4 e 1 poundJ 2 72lllS3SlffiifISlmiddot9 3fi22f9111114UU 9026921 357 6C5
n 2 1 iSigt555S
11321Bl 111111I 117lIT177778
33220277778 1277032 9~11333
357 297
605 461
Eliflll 11 f15357 tlOilOOibull 3ilf65Jgt)oo
---------------------------------------middot-------------------------------------------
D15
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7w
J lt(
gt a w Jshyw I 0-() w
8
O--------r-----r-----------r----r-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
c 1
Figure D15
SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW
SS-3(1JlS 268
81IOS-7
ISS-]5i 63 SS-lSl 139
Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 240 SS-30 185 SS-15 201
SS-lSi 155 SS-30l 198 CMS-7 125 SS-30 175
SS-JOi 104 SS-151 185 SS-15 99 CMS-7 175
Note Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Dl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value
D16
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D17 Swell at Design Residue Content in
EfAULSEON
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDI NO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH lOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 s~
D A T A
048 -
0413
06S
069
on
005
006
008
-025 045
005
004
004
005
009
014
Jt s
CY
HS
0010
000
D68
-003
45
bull 006
002
241
035
010
286
004
001
133
009
005
483
ss 30 SEA
D A T A
023
023
020
063
066
055
000
ooo
008
031
023
028
000 000 003
ooo
001
000
x s
CV
022
002
79
061
006
93
003
005
1732
027
004
148
oin
002
1732
ooo
001
1732
C M s 7
D A T A
000
ooo
000
004
002
001
ooo
ooo
000
003
000
ooo 000 000 ooo
ooo
ooo
000
x s
CV
000
ooo
ooo
002
002
655
ooo
ooo
ooo
001
002
1732
ooo
ooo
ooo
ooo
ooo
000
Table D18 ANOVA Summary Swell ( Transformed Data)
A N O Y A
E 2 _1025326 0912663 2353471(154 329 532 -Amiddot middotmiddot2 1366452 0683226 1761825136 329 532 0 1 0368219 03613219 949521081 1114 7116
EA 11 04627$7 0115697 298345558 266 396 -EQ- 2-- --006-903G- -0(134515-middot -8-9003553 middot3l9 -S-32 A) 2 0150358 ~0075179 193863014 329 532 UO 4 0083986 0020997 54143375 26 396
-ERRORmiddot 36 0139606middot 0003178
-TOTIIL 53 --446-576-11
D17
05 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
04
z -J
J w IJJ
SBH SBL
diams CMS - 7
~oo
_02
01
FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dl7 Swell at Design Residue Content
SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-ll51 ii-IS SS-]5i il68 SS-15 a006 SS-15 bull 035 SS-15 004 SS-15 009I I I I SS-3Cli 022 SS-301 061 ISS-301 003 SS-30 bull 027 ISS-30 bull 001 ISS-30 bull 000
ClS-7 000 CIS-7 002 OS-7 000 OIS-7 001 CMS-7 000 CMS-7 000
NJte Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D18 Newman-Keuls Ranking Swell in
D18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
Table Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSl10N
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOWHIGH 0 156 48 175 229 2lO 125ss A ll5 60 20l ll7 228 120T 13_g 4e 170 132 212 130A15 i 137 52 182 200 2l 7 125 smiddotSEA 2l 37 l7 30 lO 05
1middot5]CY 133 92 148 46 40 D 98 106 lll 76 2l 0 lllAss 203 109 76 5l 235 95T ll3 85 63 59 233 125
30 A
x 138 100 83 62 226 llOSEll s 57 l3 25 l3 l4 l5
412 131 298 206 62 136CV D 2lO 202 185 98 330 240A 220 87 18l 88 345 200C T 216 138 223 77 338 2lOAM x 215 142 196 88 338 217s
5805 23 lls 08 2l7
23 405 ll8 120 22 96CV
Table D20 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Stabilorneter Value
N O V A
-------middot------------------------------------------------------ ---------------DF -$ -F os- r01
pound 2 5919875926 2l59917963 39C147075fl 329 53 2 690 i1111pounda$11 iii 345 022110111 US51521111 329 5 32 Ill 1 763129-i296 763 1296 296 100671B132 414 7 U6
Ea t93 11171111]J)7lll 1007863519 1329576P8 266 391bullIEill -2 middot -E~ti35~259 -23middot0-H9fgt29 C-~6522- middot3 29 532 AO 2 S3amp11171t1137ll 11192351$5 55305370 329 532 El s1111i1r1075 135268519 17~qq579 266 396bullmiddotDll~t 311i 27239~333~ 7 5903711)111
53
--------------------------------------------------------middot-----------------------
D19
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA0)
gt diams CMS - 7 l I
a w 30fshyw E 0 J 2-en ltC Ishyen 10
SBH SSL FH FL GRH GRL01amp---------------------------_
AGGREGATE
Figure Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
middotHtGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
QS-1 235 CS-7 142 196 SS-15 200 CMS-7 338 CMS-7 217GS-
Iss-3H uaI I I ISS-3Qi lilG SS-15i ]S2 IOMS-7 88 SS-30 22~ SS-15 125
SS-151 137 ss-i5~ 52 SS-30~ 83 SS-30 62 SS-15 217 SS-30 110
fute Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent
Figure D20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
D20
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Table D2l MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
-------_cEMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
ss 1 sa
D A T A
x s
HIGH
Ul3 ~ JlU
43
64
IOW
~ TWlI ~
--
H1GH
159 1-43 126
143
17
LOW
123 187
60
123
64
HIGH
130 179 153
154
25
LOW
120 104 143
122
20
CV D A5S T A30 x
SEA s
171
139 88
104
110
26
-98 91 -95
4
116
114 116
69
100
27
515
TWT TWT TWT
--
159
111 101 15~
122
28
160
83 65 63
70
11
CV D AC T AM x5 s
7 CV
236
141 79 52
91
46
503
37
185 60 63
103
71
695
267
125 201
96
141
54
386
-192 164 126
161
33
206
23l
131 130 120
127
6
48
157
72 230
76
126
90
715
Too weak to test
Table D22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
SOO~e 55- -f middotFmiddot OS- F01
pound 2 19956 G31tl3Tt 99780165185 52791162 329 532 -1 2- 223ii~ 92592~-~ middot111544629630 -59015431 3middot29 5 32 J 1 n21lliiilliEiiii~ 1middot112106656666 75185029 414 746 lEJ Ill 32il76711ltCl~lll9l 132191851852 43485622 2euro6 396 ~ 2- ~373hllllllllllllllqSmiddot iiilfgtamp 1222-223- -3bull6middot3300811 -3 29 532 1i 2 1S011Hil12 75i0555556 bull ~397100 329 532 Eli
-a~llt-Iii
36 511J7777777
middot5B11113BB333 12799444444 129e l9 25 92 6middot
5771861 266 396
D21
bull SS 15 SEA U) SS 30 SEA gt diams CMS - 7E I
a w J-~ 200 0 en w5 100 0
SBH SBL FH FL AGGREGATE
GRH GRL
Figure D21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINO FRESNO
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 126SS-15 154]03 JCMS-7 161106-7 rmm SS-15 122CMS-7 127SS-30amp 95 ltMgt-7 ]Aj_ SS-15 123
SS-30 70
t-bte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
SS-30 122SS-151 93 SS-l51 fflT SS-30amp 100 SS-30 TWT
Figure D22 Ne-wman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
D22
Table D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW
ss 15 SEA
ss 30 SEA
C M s 7
HIGH D bullbullmiddot 979 715A middot 1143 569T A 1047 599
X - - 1056 - 628 s - - 82 - 77
CV - - 78 - 123
D 987 1474 548A T 907 1536 433 A 1447 615
x - - 947 1486 532 s - 57 46 92
CV - - 60 31 173 D 642 102 597 588 301A T 620 426 369 60l 263 A 774 662 470 290 3q_3
x 679 397 479 493 31 9
s 83 281 114 176 67
CV 123 709 239 357 21 0
1285 1353 1493
1377
106
77
627 72 2 634
661
53
80
238 284 22 7
250
30
121
Specimen swelled during soak could not ne tested Specimen disintegrated during testing
D23
300
E CJgt -200 en
en 0 J
z0 middot cii 100 lt( cc CD lt(
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
01--------r----T----J-----r----r SBH FH FL GRH GRL
middotAGGREGATE
Figure D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content
D24
APPENDIX E
FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL DESIGNS
Table El
Thickness T in Inches to Satisfyl
Tensile Strain Requirements (Reference 3)
Subirade l~octulus psi 30~0 6000 12000 30oco
Jverage Ann~abullAir erlerature J degF lt40 40-55 55-65 gt65 40 40-55 55-65 gt65 lt40 40-55 55-651gt65 lt4 0 40-55 55-65 gt65
T~affic EALbull 10bull
IllIf psi 50000 4 9 66 7 8 91 37 50 5e 66 2 26 28 29 2 2 2 2
1000~0 37 5 3 62 12 27 40 47 53 2 21 25 26 2 2 2 2
300000 21 J4 4 3 51 2 28 31 middot3 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
600000 2 24 3 2 39 2 2 2 _2 28 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2middot 2 2 2 290JCOO 2 2 26 33 2 2 2 22 2 2 2
Traffic EAL= 10s
trJ MR psi bull 50000 83 ll5 139 165 70 97 112 127 54 1-3 83 93 2 3 27 28 29 f-J
42 58 69 78 2 25 27 27100000 63 90 108 129 54 76 91 105
3COOOO 4o 58 73 8 3 3 51 60 73 24 39 ~8 56 2 2 20 22
600000 28 45 55 67 21 37 47 55 2 21 36 44 2 2 2 2
900000 21 37 4 7 57 2 30 39 48 2 21 29 37 2 I 2 2 2
TraCf1c 2 ~AL a 10~ I ia psi bull 50000 130 161 216 2~ 116 16l 187 213 98 131 151 172 63 66 93 58
82 0100000 98 14) 171 203 68 126 152 176 75 106 125 142 52 7 3
3CCOOO 6o 91 11 3 139 55 82 101 122 4 7 69 86 102 31 49 59 59
e~oooo 46 68 86 106 ~o 60 76 94 3middot 3 52 64 i9 2 35 4 r 54
900~00 37 56 72 69 )2 51 63 80 24 4 3 5 4 67 2 28 3 8 ul Trarr1el EAL~ 10 7
la psi bull 50000 192 24 24 24 178 239 24 24 156 205 235 24 12l 153 165 17 3 I
24 24 228 24 119 168 195 222 95 129 147 1s IlCOOCO 1~5 21 0 13 5 193
56 aa 10a 12 I-3CC000 aa 136 167 205 ~-3 12 156 186 74 11l 138 16~
I- l 6 a2 10060~ 1 ouo 6 4 100 125 156 59 92 ll 6 l~ 5 53 82 104 128
108 3 3 53 6 8 859ccooo 53 82 10 5 132 so 77 97 121 4 ~ 68 86
For asphalt volume Vb= 11 are air voids Va= 5 Use Figure El to correct thickness of other valuemiddots of Vb and Va
Table E2
Subsradlt Mcdulus psi
Thickness T in Inches to Satisfys Subgrade Strain Requirements (Reference 3)
6100 120003000 300CC
tr N
A~erage A~nual Ar Te11perature degF
Traffic EALbull 10bull
~IP psi 50000a
100000
300000
600000
900000
Traffic EAL 10 5
MR psibull 50000
lC0000
300000
600000
900000
Tra~~lc EAL c 1c6
MR psibull 50000
100000
300000
600POO
900000
Trafficz EALbull 10 7
MRt psibull 50000
100000
300000
600000
900000
lt40
55
55
55
55
55
81
81
81
81
81
115
115
115
115
115
155
155
155
155
155
40-55
83
60
55
55
55
121
87
81
Bl
Bl
168
123
11
115
ll5
226
165
155
155
155
55-65 gt65 lt40
108 115 46
73 82 46
55 55 46
5_ 45
55 55 46
145 165 69
106 120 69
a1 81 69
81 81 69
81 81 69
201 224 98
14B 165 98
115 115 98
115 115 98
115 115 98
24 24 1)6
199 222 135
15 155 136
155 155 136
155 155 136
40-55
10
50
46
46
46
103
74
69
69
69
150
108
98
98
9B
204
150
135
136
136
55-65 G5 lt40
83 93 30
61 70 30
46 46 30
45 46 30
46 46 30
124 139 55
91 102 55
69 69 55
69 69 55
69 69 55
173 193 83
130 147 83
98 98 83
98 98 83
98 98 83
239 24 120
179 199 120
136 136 120
136 136 120
135 136 120
40-55
4
3~
30
30
30
83
60
55
55
55
122
90
83
83
83
17 5
130
120
middot12 o
120
55-65 gt65 lt~O
62 69 25
46 53 25
30 30 25
30 30 25
30 30 25
9 106 29
82 29i 2 middot 55 55 29
55 55 29
55 55 29
144 15S 60
108 12l 60
83 83 60
83 83 60
83 83 6 0
205 226 90
155 112 90
120 120 90
120 120 90
120 120 90
40-55
31
25
25
25
25
52
30
29
29
29
86
65
60
60
60
127
98
90
90
90
55-65 bull65
33 35
29 3c
25 25 I 25 25 i 25 2s
51 67
47 52
29 29
29 29
29 29
95 10
76 85
60 I 6C
6C i 6o 50
14bull 3 14
112 126
90 90
90 90
90 90
Tj In Tc In 24 2 22
20
18
16 3
14
12 4
~ 10 Va+ vb 5
099
8 08 6
077 7 06
6 805
9045 1003
4 12
14
3 16
18
20
22 2 24
Figure El Correction of Pavement Design Thickness for Air Voids and
Asphalt Content of Mix (Reference 3)
E3
-------
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000 psi
MAAT 55- 65 F-Ul 400 CL
C) 0 300 (J) J
~ 200 0 ~
I- 100z w J-(J) 0+----------------------C w 0 2 4 6 8 middot10 12
THICKNESS IN
1X104 EAL
1X105EAL
Figure E2 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
M-AAT )65 F- -~---Ul 400 1x104 EALCL
CW)
0 300 (J) J 200C 0 ~
-~ 100 w -J -(J) 0w 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a
THICKNESS IN
1X105EAL
Figure E3 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 6000 psi MAAT = )65F
s
E4
w 400 c
()
0 300 () - 200 Cl 0 E
~ 100 w J-
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT 56-65 F
1x10 EALI 4
I 1X105 EAL
w o~---------------------r-w 1 2 3 4a
THICKNESS IN
Figure E4 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT )65F-w 400 4I 1X10 EALc () I 1X105EAL 0 300 I () I - I 200C I0 E I I- 100z w I-J I-() 0w 1 2 3 4c
THICKNESS IN~
Figure ES Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65Fs
ES
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
MAAT 55-65 F-en400 41X10 EALIC
(I) 1X105EAL middot 0
I I 300
en I J 200C 0
f-- 100z w J-en 0LU 2 4 6 8 10 14a
-THICKNESS IN
Figure E6 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
MmiddotAAT )65 F cn4oo I 1X104 EALa
(I) 1X105EAL 0 300
I I
en -I
~200 0 ~ 100 LU --en -I
0-1-----------------------LU 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a THICKNESS IN
Figure E7 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = )65F
E6
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT 55-65 F-u 400 41x10 EAL0
M 1x105EAL 0 T- 300 -en J 200C 0 E I- 100z w-J- en 0w C 0 middot1 2 3 4 middot5 6
THICKNESS IN
Figure E8 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000psi
M-AAT )65 F-en400
I --- - - ~- 1X104 EAL
C
a 1X105 EAL
0 I T- 300
I-en J
200 C 0 E
I- 100z w J-en 0w 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
THICKNESS IN
Figure E9 Thickness For Subgrade StrainRequirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65F
s
E7
Table E3
Thickness Requirements inches
= 6000 psi EAL= 1 X 104 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
MrT
l
CF Tc Ts
246000 34
64 37 43
300000 31
68 4middot 0 43
391000 27
lt 61 33 43
362000 28
64 31 43
260000 28
bull bull 61 35 43
333000 30
65 33 43
C M s 0
Mr Ti CF T Tc
s
259000 29
59 36 43
288000 32
bull 61 3 8 43
271000 32
59 39 43
339000 30
60 37 43
284000 32
59 40 43
365000 29
60 37 43
C M s 7
M T7
l
CF TTc
s
71000 55
65 60 43
103000 47 71
45 43
74000 54
67 53 43
123000 44 69
45 43
85000 52
65 54 43
123000 44
73 46 43
ss 15
M T7
l
CF T Tc s
298000 31
57 40 43
285000 32
59 38 43
365000 28
58 37 43
334000 30
61 36 43
320000 30
60 36 43
329000 30
61 36 43
ss 30
M T7
l
CF Tc Ts
296000 31
60 37 43
296000 31
62 36 43
339000 30
59 38 43
335000 30
bull 63 35 43
313000 31
65 34 43
309000 31
65 34 43
Ngtte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi TI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume middotTc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= llrickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
E8
Table E4
Thickness Requirements inches
Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
246000 68
64 74 70
300000 62 68
62 68
391000 55 61
65 68
362000 57 64
63 68
260000
57 bull 61
68 70
333000 59 65
65 68
C M s 0
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
259000 65 59
80 70
288000 63
bull 61 75 68
271000 64 59
78 70
339000 59 60
72 68
284000 63 59
78 68
365000 57 60
70 68
C M s 7
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
71000 100
bull 65 107 105
103000 90 bull 71
84 88
74000 100
67 102 104
123000 85 69
85 81
85000 95 65
102 97
123000 85 73
78 81
ss 15
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
298000 62 57
78 68
285000 63 59
76 68
365000 57 58
72 68
334000 59 61
72 68
320000 60 60
73 68
329000 59 61
70 68
ss 30
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
296000 62
60 74 68
296000 62
62 71 68
339000 59 59
72 68
335000 59
63 68 68
313000 60
bull 65 65 68
309000 60
65 65 68
1bte
M = Resilient mJdulus in psirf = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
E9
Table ES
Thickness Requirements inches 4
Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M Tdeg
J
CF T Tc
246000 40
64 46 45
300000middot 37 68
37 43
391000 33 61
38 43
362000 35
64 39 43
260000 39
61 45 45
333000 35
65 38 43
C M s 0
MT J
CF T Tc
s
259000 39 59
48 45
288000 38 61
middot4 6 44
271000 38 59
47 44
339000 35 60
43 43
284000 38 59
46 44
365000 35 60
43 43
C M s 7
M T7
J CF T Tc
s
71000 60 65
65 68
103000 52 71
48 64
74000 60 67
60 68
123000 50 bull 69 59 62
85000 58 65
63 67
123000 50 73
49 62
ss 15
M T7
J CF T Tc
s
298000 37 57
50 43
285000 38 59
48 44
365000 35 58
45 43
334000 35 61
43 43
320000 3 6
60 44 43
329000 37 61
45 43
ss 30
M T7
J CF TTc
s
296000 37 60
45 43
296000 37 62
43 43
339000 35 59
44 43
335000 35 bull 63
41 43
313000 36
65 39 43
309000 36
65 39 43
Nrte
M = Resilient nodulus in psiTI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T
5 = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El0
Table E6
Thickness Requirements inches
105E = 6000 psi EAL= 1 x psi MAAT = )65Fs
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
246000
79 64
87 70
300000
74 68
74 70
391000 69
61 81 70
362000 70
64 77 70
260000 77
61 90 70
333000 71
65 77 70
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 77
59 94 70
288000 75
61 90 70
271000 76
59 92 70
339000 71
60 87 70
284000 75
59 91 70
365000 69
60 85 70
C M s 7
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
71000 111
65 118 112
103000 103
middot11 95 98
74000 111
67 110 11l
123000 98
69 95 93
85000 109
65 119 109
123000 98
73 87 93
ss 15
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
298000 74 57
94 70
285000 7 5 59
94 70
365000 69 58
88 70
334000 7 1 middot 61
84 70
320000 72 60
87 70
329000 71 61
84 70
ss 30
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
296000 74
60 90 70
296000 74
62 86 70
339000 71 59
87 70
335000 71
63 82 70
313000 73
bull 65 78 70
309000 73
65 78 70
Note
M = Resilient midulus in psi11 = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness f9r tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade stram requirements inches
Ell
Table E7
Thickness Requirements inches4
= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
middot~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO -GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
246000 2 0
64 23 25
300000 20
68 2middot 0 25
391000 20
61 24 25
362000 20
64 23 25
260000 20
61 24 25
333000 20
65 22 25
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 20
59 25 25
288000 20
bull 61 24 25
271000 20
59 25 25
339000 20
60 25 25
284000 20
59 25 25
365000 20
60 25 25
C M s 7
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
71000 20
65 22 31
103000 20
middot71 20 29
74000 20
67 21 31
123000 20
69 20 28
85000 20
65 22 30
123000 20
73 20 28
ss M T7
l
298000 20
285000 20
365000 20
334000 20
320000 2 0
329000 20
15 CF T Tc
s
57 26 25
59 25 25
58 26 25
61 24 25
bull 60 25 25
61 24 2 i
ss 30
M T7
l
CF TTc
s
296000 20
60 25 25
296000 20
62 24 25
339000 20
59 25 25
335000 20
bull63 23 25
313000 20
65 22 25
309000 20
65 22 25
N)te
M = Resilient nodulus in psi middot T7 = Unrorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inchesct= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume T = Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T~ = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El2
Table E8
Thickness Requirements inches
Es= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s
M T7
l
246000 22
300000 20
391000 20
362000 20
260000 21
333000 20
s 0
CF T Tc
s
64 24 32
68 20 29
61 24 29
64 23 29
61 24 l 1
65 23 29
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 21 59
25 31
288000 21
bull 6J 24 30
271000 21 59
25 30
339000 20 60
25 29
284000
21 59
25 1 n
365000
20 60
25 2 q
C M
M T7
l
71000 27
103000 25
74000 27
123000 24
85000
26
123000
24 s 7
CF T Tc
s
65 28 53
71 24 45
bull 67 28 53
69
23 43
65
27 49
73
22 43
ss M T7
l
298000 20
285000 21
365000 20
334000 20
320000 20
329000 20
15 CF
TTc
s
57 27 29
59 26 30
58 27 29
61 24 29
60 25 29
61 24 2 q
ss 30
M r~i CF T Tc
s
296 ooomiddot 20 60
24 29
296000 20 62
23 29
339000 20 59
24 29
335000 20 63
23 29
313000 20 65
23 29
309000 20 65
23 29
i-krte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psiTf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade strain requirements inches
El3
Table E9
Thickness Requirements inches 4 = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
EMULSION __ QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
246000 20 64
23 25
300000 20 68
21 25
391000 20 61
24 25
362000 20 64
23 25
260000 20 61
24 25
333000 20 65
22 25
C M s 0
259000 20 59
26 25
288000 20
bull 61 middot24 25
271000 20 59
26 25
339000 20 60
25 25
284000 20 59
26 25
365000 20 60
25 25
C M s 7
MT7
1 CF T Tc
s
71000 20 65
22 58
103000 2~0 middotn
20 52
74000 20 67
21 58
123000 20 69
20 48
85000
20 65
22 57
123000
20 73
20 48
$$
15
MTdeg
1
CF T Tc
s
-298 000 20 57
27 25
285000 20 59
26 25
365000 20 58
26 25
334000 20 61
24 25
320000 2 0 60
25 25
329 000 20 61
24 25
ss 30
MT7
1
CF T Tc
s
296000 20 60
25 25
296000 20 62
24 25
339000 20 59
26 25
335000 20 63
23 25
313000 20 65
22 25
309000 20 65
22 25
tote
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot rf = Unagtrrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El4
Table ElO
Thickness Requirements inches 5E = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
s
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T--deg
J
CF T Tc
s
246000
24 64
27 31
300000
23 68
24 29
391000
22 61
25 29
362000
22 64
2_s 29
260000
26 61
31 30
333000
22 65
24 29
C M s 0
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s
259000 23
59 28 30
288000 23
bull 61 27 30
271000 23
59 28 30
339000 22
60 26 29
284000 23
59 28 30
365000 21
60 25 29
C M s 7
ss 15
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s M T--deg
J
CF T Tc
s
71000 28
bull 65 30 61
298000 23 57
25 29
103000 27
~ 71 27 52
285000 23 59
28 30
74000 28
bull 67 28 60
365000 22
58 28 29
123000 26
69 26 48
334000 22 61
25 29
85 000 28
65 31 58
320000 22
60 26 29
123000 26
73 24 48
329000 22 61
25 29
55
30
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s
296000 23
60 27 29
296000 23
62 27 29
339000 22 59
27 29
335000 22
63 25 29
313000 22
65 24 29
309000 23
65 25 29
tbte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot Tf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Ihickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
II11~~~1~~i~IIII 08860 ElS
- - - --- ----------
102 Sulfur-Extended-Asphalt Emulsions
A summary of ANOVA significance at the 95 percent confidence level is shown in Table 34 This table showsmiddotfor nearly all parameters that emulsion type aggregate quality level and aggregate are signifishycant effects For several parameters several interactions are also significant Conclusions reached during the SEA emulsion experiment are
1 Stable solvent free water based anionic slow set emulsions using sulfur-extended-asphalt (SEA) base stocks can be produced which meet most Caltrans specifications for anionic slow set emulsions
2 Anionic SEA emulsion can effectively coat both low and high quality aggregates
3 Use of SEA emulsions resulted in higher resilshyient modulus values for both low and high qualshyity aggregates than use of the emulsion containshying solvent
4 Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions had higher stabilometer values with low quality aggregates than mixtures with the emulsion containing solshyvent
5 Specimens containing the SEA emulsion with low quality aggregates swelled to a greater extent and experienced higher surface abrasion losses than those with the emulsion containing solvent
6 Specimens containing the SEA emulsions experishyence greater losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivshyity procedure than specimens with the solvent asphalt emulsion indicating a greater sensitivshyity to moisture
7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thickshynesses would be required when using SEA emulshysions Again it is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials
91
Table 34
SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL
SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT
DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS
effect of aggregate type effect of aggregate quality level effect of emulsion type
AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction
A a E AQ AE QE AQE
Emulsion Compatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA y NA y NA NA
2 Day Mxfalus y y y - y y y
Full Cure Mldulus y - y - - - -Density y y y - - y y
Air Voids y y y - - - -
Stabilometer - y y - y - -
COhesiometer - y - - - - -MIS Stabilaneter y y y y y - -
MVS COhesianeter y y y - y y -y
~ y y y y y y
Surface Abrasion
LEGEND
Effects
A = Q = E =
AQE = three-way interaction
Significance
Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level
NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way
92
8 All of the paving mixtures containing low qualshyity aggregates and SEA emulsions studied met Caltrans stabilometer requirements (30 minimum) for Type C asphalt concrete however several mixtures did not meet swell and moisture vapor susceptibility requirements for Type C asphalt concrete Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions which met swell requirements were FH GRH and GRL with SS-15 SEA emulsion and SBH FH FL GRH and GRL with SS-30 SEA emulsion MVS conshyditioned stabilometer value requirements were met only by FL and GRH with the SS-15 SEA emulshysion and GRH with the SS-30 SEA emulsion
9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other consider~ ations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others
93
110 RECOMMENDATIONS
111 This study has investigated the properties of paving mixtures containing several low quality aggregates and several types of emulsified binders Test methshyods and criteria used to design and assess mixture characteristics were those specified for hot-mix asphalt concrete in California An objective of the research study is to determine if solvent free emulshysified binders can be used in place of cutback asphalt binders Therefore in order to permit drawing of appropriate conclusions from the data presented in this report on the effectiveness of the emulsions studied for replacing cutback asphalts additional laboratory work is required It is suggested that properties and characteristics of mixtures containing the project aggregates and cutshyback asphalts be determined The study should evalshyuate the same properties considered in this study Determination of mixture characteristics using cutshyback binders would permit direct comparisons between the cutback and emulsified binder systems and the drawing of more definite conclusions Additionally a study which would determine properties of mixtures containing hot-mixed asphalt cement would be of aid in evaluating results
112 After completion of the additional laboratory studshyies if results so indicate it is recommended that several field experimental studies using aggregates ranging in quality from low to high with solvent free emulsified asphalt binders be undertaken Projects should be constructed in several climatic regions in California (wet and arid) and should include control sections containing both cutback and if possible hot-mixed asphalts Proper labshyoratory mixture designs construction control and field monitoring of results and performance should be used Results of these experiments should proshyvide indications of performance of the various mixtures in actual use
113 Results of this study indicate that mixtures conshytaining the SEA binders are detrimentally affected by moisture to a greater degree than with standard emulsions However performance of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions may be adequate in arid regions Therefore it is recommended that in order
94
to further investigate the usefulness of paving mixshytures containing the SEA emulsions that field experimental test sections using the SEA emulsions be constructed and evaluated$
It is strongly suspected that the moisture vapor susceptibility of the solvent free asphalt emulsion mixes evaluated herein could be reduced by a slight modification of the emulsion formulations This possibility should be evaluated
95
References
1 Request For Proposals Investigation Into The Nature Of Emulsified Asphalts Compatible With California Local Aggregates And Substitution Of Sulfur For Asphalt In Aqueous Emulsified Systems California Air Resource Board Research Division Sacramento Calishyfornia March 1980
2 American Society for Testing and Materials 1981 Annual Book of Standards Part 15 Road Paving Bituminous Materials Travelled Surface Characterisshytics Philadelphia PA 1981
3 Interim Guide to Full-Depth Asphalt Paving Using Varshyious Asphalt Mixes The Asphalt Institute Pacific Coast Division PCD-1 January 1976
4 Kennepahl GJA Logan A and Bean D C Conshyventional Paving Mixes with Sulfur-Asphalt Binders Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975
5 Deme Imants Processing of Sand-Asphalt-Sulfur Mixes Proceedings AAPT Volume 43 1974
6 A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual The Asphalt Instishytute Manual Series No 19 MS-19) March 1979
7 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Use of Cutback Asphalt US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Waste Management Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park North Carolina October 17 1977
8 Highway Chemicals Newsletter Armak Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois Fall 1981
9 Bitumils Mix Manual Chevron USA Asphalt Division January 1977
10 Asphalt Pavement Engineering Wallace Hugh A and Martin J Rogers McGraw Hill Book Company New York 1967
11 Spahr J D The Use of Emulsified Asphalt in Conshystruction and Maintenance Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975
96
12 Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design Asphalt Emulsions Volume 4 1977
13 Dybalski J N 11 The Chemistry of Asphalt Emulsions Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D C January 1976
14 Beagle C w Deflection and Performance of Deep Lift Asphalt Emulsion Base Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976
15 Meier w J Asphalt Emulsion Construction on the Navajo Reservation Twenty-Fifth Annual Arizona Conshyference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 22-23 1976
16 Kallas B F and Shock J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Find Report - Parts I and
11II Research Report 77-1 The Asphalt Institute November 1977
17 Shook J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Analysis of Performance Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976
18 Wimberly C M Emulsified Asphalt Mixes in Arizona Proceedings 24th Annual Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 17-18 1975
19 Izalt J O Galloway B M and Saylock D SandshyAsphalt-Sulfur Pavement Experimental Project Highway US 77 Kennedy County Texas Texas Transportation Institute April 1977
20 McBee w c and Sullivan T A Direct Substitution of Sulfur for Asphalt In Paving Materials 11 Report of Investigations 8303 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines 1978
21 Ludwig A C Gerhardt B B and Dale JM Materials and Techniques for Improving the Engineering Properties of Sulfur Report No FHWA-RD-80-023 Fedshyeral Highway Administration June 1980
22 Jiminez R A and Stakes K J Effects of Heat and Air on the Viscosity of Sulfur-Asphalt Mixtures Preshysented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies San Diego California February 16-18 1981
97
23 Chehovits J G and Anderson D A Upgrading of Marginal Aggregates for Improved Water Resistance of Asphalt Concrete Transportation Research Record 762 pages 46-52 1981
24 Rosner JC and Chehovits J G Highway Binder Materials From Modified Sulfur-Water Emulsionsn Report No FHWARD-82035 Federal Highway Administration November 1981
25 Standard Specifications State of California Department of Transportation January 1978
26 Applied Linear Statistical Models Neter I and Wasserman w Richard D Irwin Inc Homewood Illinois 1974
27 Burr I W and Foster LA A Test For Equality of variances Mimeograph Series No 282 Statistics Department Purdue University Lafayette Indiana 1972
28 Applied Statistical Methods Burr I W Academic Press Inc New York 1974
29 Parr W K Field Observations of the Behavior of Bituminous Pavements As Influenced By Moisture 11 ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 3-16--I959
30 Rice JM Relationship of Aggregate Characteristics to the Effect of Water on Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 17-34 1959
31 Lettman R P and Johnson D L 11 Pressure Induced Stripping in Asphaltic Concrete Highway Research Record 340 pages 13-28 1970
32 Waller F H Jr Emulsion Mix Design Methods An Overview 11 Transportation Research Record 754 1980
33 Design of Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures Report R6-350(74) US Forest Service 1974
34 11Mix Design Procedure For Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Pavement FHWA Region 10 Office of Federal Highway Projects
98
35 Darter M I Ahlfield S R Wilky P L and Wasill R G Development of Emulsified Asphalt Aggregate Cold Mix Design Procedure Research Report 505-5 Department of Civil Engineering University of Illinois 1978
36 A A Gadallah L E Wood and E J Yoder A Suggested Method for the Preparation and Testing of Asphalt-Emulsion-Treated Mixtures Using Marshall Equipment Proceedings AAPT Volume 46 1977
37 Marshall Stability Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois
38 Jiminez R A Final Report-Phase I Asphalt Emulsion Treated Aggregates University of Arizona Research Report HPR-1-13(150) January 1977
39 George K P Interim Report on Criteria for Emulshysified Asphalt Stabilization of Sandy Soils Univershysity of Mississippi for Mississippi State Highway Department October 1976
40 Fong G K Mix Design Methods for Base and Surface Courses Using Emulsified Asphalt A State-of-the-Art Report Report No FHWA-RD-78-113 Federal Highway Administration October 1978
41 Schmidt R J A Practical Method for Measuring the Resilient Modulus of Asphalt-Treated Mixes Highway Research Record 404 1972
42 Manual of Test Volume 2 State of California Department of Transportation Transporation Laboratory Third Edition 1978
43 Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete Manual Series No 2 (MS-2) The Asphalt Institute March 1979
99
-
APPENDIX A
OPTIMUM FLUIDS AT COMPACTION DATA
-
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table Al
Percent Residue
631 631 631
702 702 702
595 595 595
678 678 678
689 689 689
645 645 645
Fluids at Compaction Data css-o
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
467 367 216
1098 998 847
571 413 360
1273 1115 10 62
455 370 341
1050 965 936
590 450 400
1268 1128 1078
492 183 109
1181 872 798
404 311 139
1049 956 784
Dry Density
(pcf)
1304 1337 1347
1283 1326 1306
133l 1310 9 1317
1328 1295 1304
1404 1529 154 1
1429 1466 1462
Al
css-o CSS-0HIGH QUALITY155- DRY LOW QUALITYbull SAN BERNARDINO 1551
bull SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO 150-I I 150 FRESNObull GRANITEROCK bull GRANITEROCK
I ~
145 LoPT=B5 145 () () - -0 0
~140 gt1401 L- 0 PT= 85 OPT=100gt-i
N Cl) OPT=100 Cl)
DRYZ 135 Z 135w w Cl Cl
amp130 amp130 Cl 0
125 125
120 I i I I i I i I I I 120 I I J I I i I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure Al Fluids at Compaction Figure A2 Fluids at Compaction High Quality Aggre-gate CSS-0 Low Quality CSS-0
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A2
Percent Residue
605 605 605
704 704 704
595 595 595
695 695 695
556 556 556
604 604 604
Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-0
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
4 16 316 183
1021 921 788
494 389 262
1198 1093
966
529 392 360
1124 987 955
519 479 301
1214 1174
996
284 187 124
840 743 680
319 256 165
923 860 769
Dry Density
(pcf)
1331 131 6 1316
1305 1320 1313
1282 1313 1312
1321 1298 1279
1478 1479 1463
1452 1463 1453
A3
155 CMS-0 HIGH QUALITY
150~ DRY bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
145 bull GRANITEROCK72_ OPT=90 0 0
~140gt-ii OPT=105i Cl)
Z 135 w 0
gt- D~0 130 middot 0
125 [OPT100
120 I i I i i I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A3 Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-0
155] 150
0 1451 0
~140gt- Cl)
Z 135 w 0
fc130 0
125
120 I 6
CMS-0
LOW QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
bull GRANITEROCK
v[A OPTf90
pound 0 PT12DoOPTr110
7 I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A4 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-0
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A3
Percent Residue
769 769 769
746 746 746
595 595 595
714 714 714
570 570 570
587 587 587
Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-7
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
460 391 294
1229 1160 1063
573 436 301
13 19 1182 1047
513 380 2 57
1108 975 852
513 404 334
1227 1118 1048
231 170 080
801 740 650
263 146 109
850 733 6096
Dry Density
(pcf)
1329 1377 1376
1335 135l 134 2
1357 1333 1342
1299 1317 1308
1519 1523 1498
1503 1517 1514
AS
CMS-7 155-- HIGH QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNOlSO~ nPT80 145
0 -0 -140 middot gt-
r t deg Cl)
Z 135 w Cl
fi130 Cl
125-1
120 I 6
GRANITEROCK
~OPT=105
IJ
I 7
I I i I i I 8 9 10 11 12 13
TOTAL FLUIDS
I 14
I 15
Figure AS Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-7
155
150
145
0 -0
gt--140
t Cl)
Z 135 w Cl
fc 130 Cl
125
120 I 6
CMS-7 LOW QUALITY
C bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
GRANITEROCKOPT 80
~OPT105
~
tos i I I i J i i I I 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A6 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-7
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A4
Percent Residue
765 765 765 765 765 765
815 815 815 815 815 815
765 765 765
817 817 817 817 817 8el7
574 574 574
738 738 738 738 738 738
Fluids at Compaction Data SS 15 SEA
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
563 426 315 580 346 178
1328 1191 1080 1345 1111
943
595 418 309 599 256 137
14 10 1233 1124 1414 1071 952
600 440 356
1365 1205 1121
683 541 418 629 457 283
1500 1358 1235 1446 1274 1100
374 247 128
948 821 702
451 301 175 435 186 073
1189 1039
913 1173
924 811
Dry Density
(pcf)
1289 1319 1335 1286 1331 1332
1278 1314 1315 1276 1304 1299
1281 1325 1313
1259 1290 1303 1275 1292 1294
1450 1485 1482
1428 1459 1468 1437 1465 1465
A7
bull bull
SS 15 SEA 155 HIGH QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot
150 FRESNO
bull GRANITEROCK
145
0 0 -
OPT=75
-_ gt=140 I-ii OPT100co C)
z 135 w _--0PTr1200
gt-0 130--0
125
120 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A7 Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 15 SEA
SS 15 SEA LOW QUALITY155
bull SAN BERNARDINO-
FRESNO 150
bull GRANITEROCK 145
~-0 0 LOPT=80a140gt-t Cf)
Z135 w r-OPT=105 0
gt-0 130 -~middot 0
OPT120J 125
120 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure AB Fluids at Compaction Low Quality SS 15 SEA
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table AS
Percent Residue
688 688 688
722 722 722 722 722 722
680 680 680 680 6 80 680
726 726 7 26 726 726
510 510 510
596 596 596 596 596 596
Fluids at Compaction Data SS 30 SEA
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
595 468 150
1283 1156
838
645 438 267 660 566 440
1367 1160
989 1382 1288 1162
650 531 432 629 422 332
1330 1211 1112 1309 1102 1012
767 614 443 547 370
1493 1340 1169 1273 1096
413 300 167
923 810 677
468 3 46 191 485 258 096
1064 942 787
10 ~ 81 854 692
Dry Density
(pcf)
1299 1337 1332
1286 1319 1324 1281 1302 1326
129l 1315 1333 1294 1333 131 5
1259 1278 1322 1294 1313
1464 1509 1496
1435 1472 1499 1426 1487 1476
A9
SS 30 SEASS 30 SEA LOW QUALITY
155 HIGH QUALITY 1551 bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddotbull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO
FRESNO 150150-I -middotmiddot-- -bull --middotmiddot I ~ t -- a GRANITEROCK a GRANITEROCK
145145
~-bull80 0 --0 00 ~140~140
J-gt- gt-~ I- = OPT=100 Cl)0 Cl) [Ij 135Z 135
lJJ Cl
gt- ~1300 130 middot ClCl ( 0
OPT=110 125~ OPT=115125
120-t----~--------------r---120 I l J J J I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 156 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS TOT AL FLUIDS
Figure A9 Fluids at Compaction Figure AlO Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 30 SEA Low Quality SS 30 SEA
-~
i
APPENDIX B
MIXTURE DESIGN DATA
TABLE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality css-o Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absortied Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
lhit Weight pcf
StabiJcneter Value
~iareter Value
Jesilient -bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
500
----------
40
u 30 ltgt
ffi 20 w ~10
m lt
o
w l 400 lt gt a w t 300 0 iii ~ 200 8
100 12
10111
ui 0
i5 8gt lt
6
4
50
21740
24488
112
194
100
400
1357
375
197
117
345
60
21823
24163
97
199
100
500
1362
330
207
134
271
70
21772
23853
87
208
100
600
1359
272
193
118
260
Iesign 7 0
87
208
100
600
1359
272
193
118
260
24
22d c lt i
20i
= 0 i5
18 gt
16
140
138 - a
~136 z w 0
134
132
bull 500 a
0 400 uil 300 0
~ 200 zi 100 iii w a
--
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE CONTENT Jo (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Bl
TABLE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residue 0intent 50 60 70 Dsian 7 o
Bulk Siecipoundic Gravity 21804
llleoretical Specipoundic Gravity 24280
Air Voids 102
VMA 192
Absorbed Asphalt 063
Efpoundective Asphalt 437
Unit Weight pf 1361
Stabilcirieter Value 427
Cbhesicireter Value 352
Fesilielt Mxlulus 103psi
2-day 85
middotFinlJ 355
50
40
_ gt a 30 w w
~ 20 10
500
300
200
100
8
6
4
l 400 gt
~ w 0
~ 8
12
_ 10
= 0 gt
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
21863 21992
23964 23660
88 71 71
197 200 200
063 063 063
537 637 637
1364 1372 1372
363 313 313
292 234 234
63 83 83 429 232 232
24
22
ci i
20i
= = 0 gt
18
16
138
p6 ~ Q
134 a w
o 132
130
500 Q -
o 400 --3 300 0 ~-~ 200 a ~ 100 w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COtlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
B2
TABLE B3 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllroretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
~fective Asphalt
Unit Weight middotCf
Stabilareter VaJue
Cbhesiareter VaJue
Resilient l-bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
so
11140 gt o30 IU w ~20
m
10
w l 400 gt 0
~ 0 ~ 200 8
100
14
12 11-
In Q
ho C
8
6
50 60 70 Dsi9 7 O 21308 21729 21595 24562 24235 23922
132 103 97 97 210 202 215 215 113 113 113 113 387 487 587 587
1329 1356 1348 1348 378 345 375 375
314 270 280 280
82 96 104 104 281 260 267 267
500
300 ~
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS
24
11-22ci
ltI i i 20 Cl) Q 180 gt
16
138
136 u - 134 Cl) z IU Q
132
130
bull500
400 Inl 300 Q bull~ 200 z ~ 100middot IU 0
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS
FIGURE B3 Mixture Design Data Sari Bernardin6 High Quality CMS o Replication 1
B3
TABLE B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue GJntent
Bulk seecific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity
50
21491
24334
60
21459
24014
70
21526
23709
Iesiqn 70
Air Voids 117 106
VMA 204 212
Absocbed Asphalt 0 72 o 72
Effective Asphalt 428 528
Unit Weight pcf 1341 133 9
Stabilrneter Value 437 406
GJhesiareter Value 337 248 3
Iesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-cay
Final
50
w 40 gt 0 30 w w 0 20 co 10
500
w
3 400 gt 0 w t- 300 w 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
_ 10
0 8gt -lt
6
4
FIGURE
61 66
410 318
24
22~ ci
i 20
~
18 a gt
16
138
_136 u a 134 z ~ w 0
132
130
bull500
a
a 400 -3 300 _ a ~ 200 z ~ 100-
w 0
90 90
21 7 21 7
0 72 072
628 628
1343 1343
344 J44
252 252
82 82
250 250
---------
D 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDU CONTENT I (A_GGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B4
TABLE BS Mixture Design Data San Bernardin9 High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Siecific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
lir Voids
VMA
2bserberl Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stalgtilaneter Value
Cbhesiareter Value 3
Resilient Mgtdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
40
Ill 30 lt( gt a 20 Ill Ill 0 10
~ iii lt CII 0
400
Ill
3 300 lt(
gt a Ill200 == 0
~100 c 8
0
12
10 ui 0
0 8gt 5 lt(
6
4
FIGURE
~
~
5 6 7 84 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
50 60 70 Cesian 70
21652
24484
21904
24149
22005
23828
116
198
107
3-93
135l
345
224
18
240
93 77 77 196 200 200 107 107 107 493 593 593
1367 1373 1373 288 235 235
136 80 80
17 21 21 128 78 78
24
22ci lt(
z 20il
= CII C 0
18 gt
16
I-~
140
+38- ~136 1- z Ill 0 134
132
bull 500 a
o 400 3 300 C
~ 200 z 100 Ill a ~
0 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino_BS High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
BS
TABLE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Residue Content
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Ihegtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tmit WeightL pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesllllleter Value
Iesilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
a 20 UI w i
~10
lt 0
400
3300 lt gt a ~200 w i 0
119 93
197 l93
126 126
374 474
l353 l372
357 283
l26 l03
45 36
203 132
2440
30 22 0 0lt ltgt
16
~100 ~ 8 0 132
500 a
o 400 --ai 300 -
middot 0
~
~
w a
_ 10
ltn 0
0 8gt lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
50 60 70 Cesign 7 o
2l679
24595
21990
24255
22190
23931
- i 20
a 180 gt
140
138 - a
~136 z w 0 134
200
100middot
0 4
73 73
193 193
126 1 26
574 574
1385 1385
235 235
82 82
3l 3l
64 64
-0 $ e
~ 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B6
TABLE B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Pesidue Qlnte~t
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihroretical Speciic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
~tabilcmeter Value
ohesicrneter Value
resilient lbdulus l0 3psi
2-aay
Final
60 72 8 5 Iesicm 75
21762 21906 21779
23981 23617 23245 93 73 63 70
202 205 220 21 0
063 063 063 063
537 657 787 687
1358 1367 1359 1365 375 290 203 270
474 401 239 360
163 172 161 170 449 329 310 320
2440
ii 30 22 ci
Cl c cgt z 20 201 s ~ 310 e 18 0
gt c
0 16
500 140
w
3 400 _138c gt
~ 300 s 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
- 10 0 0 0 8gt c
6
4
FIGURE
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIOUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COITEIT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
il36 z IU Cl 134
132
bull 500
c 400 -
3 300 - Cl
sectl 200 ~- z ~ 100
w
0
B7
111 10 ui e 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
TABLE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
500
400 gt C
72 85 resian 7 s
21873 21738
23581 23210
72 63 70 207 22l 21 0
055 055 055 665 795 695
1365 1356 1365 287 188 265
349 341 345
191 187 190 287 266 280
24 ------------
111 22
Cl Cl lt -i ~ 20
= a 18 0 gt
16 _____________
138
136 a 134 () w a
132
130___________
soar------------ D a
1 400 ~
ui3 300 C
~ 200
100
w C
0---------------------5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUlc CONTENT lt
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
BB
Fesidue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcrreter Value
Cbhesiareter Value 3Resilient -bdulus 10 psi
2-day
Finll
60
m 50 - 40
IIJ ~ 30 CJ lt 1- 20
60
21669
23943
95
205
055
545
1352
560
416
195
425
~ 300 0 ()
~ 200 8
100---------------
12 -------------
RESIDUE CONTENT lto (AGGREGATE BASIS)
TABLE B9 Mixture Design Data San Ber~irdino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Pesiclue Content 60 Z1 as D=sign 7 5
Bulk Spccific Gravity 21697 21368 21255
Iheoretical Specific Gravity 23973 23610 23238
Air Voids 94 95 85 93
VMA 204 225 middot 23 8 230
middot-Absorbed Asphalt 061 061 061 061
Effective Asphalt 539 659 789 689
middot middotmiddotUnit Weight pcf 1354 133 3 1326 1330
-Stabilareter Value 460 375 225 340
CohesianeterValue 400 422 499 440
Iesilient MxUlus 103psi
2-oay 159 i0s 185 185
Final 290 299 283 295
60
w
l 400
24
22
ci 0 i 20l
= Q 180 gt
16
138
136
gt a 134~ 300 w l z0 IU 132 200
8 130
100-----------------_---I
12 ---------------- 500
o 400 10 ~
300 bull bullQ
Q0 8gt ~ 200 z
6 ~ 100
w a4 ___ __________ o
5 6 7 8 9 s 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COtlTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B9 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication l
B9
TABLE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Pesidue Conte1t 60 72 85 resign 75
Bulk Spcecific Gravity
Theoretical Sjeeipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Ohesianeter Value
Pesilient ~us 103psi
2---day
Final
60
50 lt gt cc40 w -w
~30 = CJ
lt 20
21635
24066
10l
206
078
522
1350
51 8
482
151
285
21481
23699
94
221
078
642
1341
378
459
150
286
24
11-22
ci Cl lt
~ 20 z
C 18
0 gt
21302
23323
87 92
237 225
078 078
7 72 6 72
1329 1338
246 350
343 430
162 155
254 280
I 16
500 138
UJ
400 136 lt gt
acc ~ UJ
134 300 z2 UI CJ_32 ~ 200
8 130
bull500
a
c 400 - 10 300 ~ Jf
C0 8gt ~ 200 ~ lt z
6 ~ 100-
UJ 0
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDU~ COrlTENT
(AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino
100 12
~
Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
BlO
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
TABLE Bll
Residue Content
Bulk Secific Gravity
Iheiretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesicrneter Value
Resilient MXiulus l03psi
2-day
Final
60 72 85 D=sign 75
21817 22108 21917
23977 23601 23216
90 63 56 62
200 198 215 200
o 72 o 72 o 72 o 72
528 648 778 678
136l 1380 1368 137 5
242 162 76 130
151 175 215 190
52 63 41 55
202 122 60 110
244middot0
~ 30 22 ci lt 20 i 201 IU = en ~ 10 E 18 m 0lt gt
0 16
----
w
l 400 lt gt a ~ w 0 ~ 8
12
-t
ltn 0 0 gt a lt
FIGURE
5
500
300
200 ~ 100
10
8
6
134
500 a
c 400 -
_ 300 0
g 200
~ 100 ~in IU a
0 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Bll Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
142
I-40 u a
~ 138 in w 0
136 ~
Bll
TABLE Bl2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Pesidue Q)ntent
Bulk Spzcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic
Air Voids
V bull t-LA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Gravity
60
22026
24085
85
192
092
508
72
22062
23705
69
200
092
628
85
21901
23315
61
215
092
758
resign 75
67
205
092
6 58
Unit Weight pcf 1374
Stabiloreter Value 193
Ohesiareter Value 177 3
Resilient Mxrulus 10 psi
2-day 63
Fi-ial 138
40
m 30 J lt gt a 20 IU w 0 10 ~ lt
0
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w 9 ~ 200 _________ 8
100 12
10 9 0 8gt ~6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE 8ASISI
1377
127
193
1367
90
160
137 5
120
180
53
107
32
52
48
95
24
22ci 0 lt
20
= ~
9 18 0 gt
16
142
140 a
~138 z w C
136
134
9
500 a
dego 400-
3 300 ~- a ~ 200 z ~ 100
w a
0 5
~ 6 7 8 9
RES IOU~ CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl2 Mixture Design Data -san Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Bl2
TABLE Bl 3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcrneter VaJue
CJgthesiarneter Value
Pesilient MxbJ11lS 10 3psi
2-day
Final
60
so gt
40a w 0 30 GI 20
500
l 400 gt a w t- 300 w 5 rn ~ 200 8
100 12
Ill 10 0 8gt
6
4
50
21789
24250
10l
164
1 95
305
1360
513
330
191
282
~ bull
~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASIS)
60
21762
2 34 34
91
173
1 95
405
135middot8
567
284
168
434
24
Ill 22ci Cl
is 20
= 0 gt
18
16
142
140- ~138 iii z 0
136
134
bull500
o 400 -
l 300 C
~ 200 z 100 iii a
0 4
70 resign 70
21872
23632
75 75 177 177
1 bull 95 1 95 505 505
136S 136S 393 393
280 280
217 217 482 482
~
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASISI
FIGURE Bl3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality css~o Replication 1
Bl3
--------------
TABLE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Resid= Content 50 60 70 eesicn 7o
Bulk Siecific Gravity 21692 21677 21662
Ihroretical Specific Gravity 24501 24176 23865
Air Voids 115 103 92 92
VMA 169 176 185 185
Absorbed Asphalt 240 240 240 240
Effective Asphalt 260 360 460 460
Unit Weight pcpound 1354
Stabilaneter Value 580
Cohesicrneter Value 270 3Resilielt Mdulus 10 psi
2-day 149
Final 408
60
w so lt gt
w C o w le 0 30 m lt
20
500
w
~ 400 lt gt C
~ 300 w S ~ 200 ~ 8
100 12
- 10 m a 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AG GREGATE BASIS)
1353 1352 1352
442 327 327
276 183 183
173 191 191
373 299 299
24
22d c lt z
20E 18 0 gt
16
140
138 u C
136 w C 134
132
500 C
1 400 gt- m =gt 300 a ~ 200
l 100- IU C
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication
Bl4
2
bull bull bullbull
TABLE Bl5 Mixture Design-Data Fresno High Quality CMS-QReplication 1
Bulk Spcific Gravity
lheoreticaJ Specific Gravity Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mldulus l0 3psi 2-clay
Final
60
m 50 C gt a 40 w w
~ 30 C m
10
~idue Content 50 6_ 0 70 Daisi2 7 O
5oor----------
w
l 400 C gt a ~ 300 w I 0 iii ~ 200 8
100-------------
12 ----------
111 10 C
0 8gt C
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT J
(AG GREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl5 Mixture
21755 21305 23795 23497 86 93 93
163 198 198 l 69 l 69 l69 431 531 531
1336 1329 1329 420 307 307
247 230 230
180 i55 155
246 253 253
24
22d
Cl C
i 20I
J ~ C 18 ~ 0 gt
16
21434
24106
11l
179
l69
331
1337
472
373
175
247
138
136- 134 z w C
132
130
bull 500
dego 400 - l 300 C
~ 200 z l 100 iii w a
0
-~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT J (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Bl5
TABLE Bl6 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
helretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
lbsorled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabil=ter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
Eesilient Mxrulus 10
2-day
Firal
60
50 J gt c 40
~ 30 m 20
500
w
l 400 gt a ~ 300 w
3psi
50 60 70
21339 2 1398 21475
24241 23925 23623
120 106 91
181 187 192
1 94 l 94 1 94
306 406 506
1331 1335 1340
558 43 7 377
340 313 219
149 152 154
317 345 288
Jesign70
91
192
194
506
1340
377
219
154
288
24
22d CJ i sect 20
= a 18 ~ 0 gt
16
138
136
a 134
z w ~ C ~ 200 132 8
130 100
14 500 a
o 400 - 12
3 300 - ~ 0 C gt 10 a ~ 200 ~ z
l 100
8
w a
0 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl6bull Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Bl6
TABLE Bl 7 Mixture Qesign Data Fresno High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
Pesidue Content 50 60 70 Cesign 7 O
Bulk siec~tic Gravity 21959 22101 22128
Iheoretical Specific Gravity 24539 24201 23879
Air Voids 105 87 73 73
VMA 158 160 167 167
~rbed Asphalt 252 252 252 252
Effective Asphalt 248 348 448 448
Unit Weight pcf 1370 1379 1380 1380
S~ter Value 467 370 213 213
Clgthesiareter Value 289 3Resilient l-Ddulus 10 psi
2-clay 47
FinaJ 294
50
Ill 40 o(
gt cc 30 Ill w 0 20 lt 10
500
w l 400 lt gt cc ~ 300 Ill 0 ~ 200 8 ~
100 12
10 deg C
0 gt 8 ~l lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
147 122 122
65 35 35
214 75 75
22
J 20 o(
ii 18 16 ~ 0 gt
14
142
140 u Q
~138 z Ill
Cl 136
134
500 Q
o400 uil 300 Cl
g 200 z ~ 100 ~w cc
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
IIESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Bl7
TABLE Bl8 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Dsiqn 70
Bulk Specific Gravity 22191 22285 22092
Theoretical Specific Gravity 24199 23874 23563
Air Voids 82 66 62 62
VMA 149 153 168 168
Absorled AsphaJt 192 192 192 192
Effective AsphaJt 308 408 508 508
Unit Weight pcf 1385
Stabilareter Value 357
Cohesianeter Value 268 3Resilient MxhIJus 10 psi
2-day 75
Final 217
40
w 30 J lt gt a 20 w w i
~ 10
0
500
w
3 400 gt a
l 300 w i
ltn
~ 200 8
139l
342
238
137 9
233
192
137 9
233
192
84
117
63
73
63
73
20
0 0 ~ i
= 0 gt
18
16
14
12
~
144
142 140 z w 0
138
136 100-----1---1--1---l
12 ---------- 500 0bull
o 400 -11110 en a 3 300 = 0 08gt ~ 200
z 6 ~ 100middot
w a
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT
4
RESIDUE CONTENT
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Bl8
FresnoTABLE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Low Quality css-o Replication 1
Eesidlle Content 60 70 80 Dasi51 7 5
Bulk Specific Gravity 21698 21611 21514 Iheoretical Specilic Gravity 23803 23505 23220
Air Voids 89 81 73 77
VMA 175 186 198 192
Absorbed Asphalt 171 l 71 171 171
Effective Asphalt 429 529 629 679
Unit Weight pcf 1354 1349 1342 1345
Stabi]cmeter Value 513 398 359 380
eohesianeter value 506 449 481 465
Resilient Modulus 10 3psi
2-day 176 176 241 205
Final 312 383 353 365
2460
all so 22 ci cgt
40 I-
20 E
I = g 30 18iii 0 gt
20
16
500
300
100
10
8
6
4
138
136l 400
u -gt a
~ I 0 in l1200 8
12
111 Q
0 gt ~
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE COITENT Jo
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
~ ~ 134 z w 0
132
130
500 -
l 400 -
300 ~n
Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 in Ill IC
0
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Bl9
TABLE B20 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residlle Content i
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihegtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
CJhesiareter Value 3
Resilient Mxfulus 10 psi
2-day
Finll
60
50 lt 40 w w
~ 30 m lt 20
500
w
3 400 lt gt a ~ ~ 300 w 51 rn 200 8
100----------------
12 --------------
10 9 0 8gt lt
6
4 s 6 7 8
RESIDUE COPlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
60 70 80 resign 75
21451 21476 21666
23932 23629 23340
104
185
194
406
1339
586
436
147
313
91
192
1 94
506
1340
403
416
179
347
24
22 0 0 lt
~ 20
= 9 18 0 gt
16
140
138 - Cl
136 w cl34
132
bull 500
-0 400__
3 300 I
~ 200
~ 100 rn w a
0
7 2 82
192 192
194 194
606 656
1352 1345
24 8 325
333 375
186 182
361 358
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COPITEPlT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
~
Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
B20
TABLE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
lesidue Content 60 70 80 resign 75
Bulk Siecific Gravity 21525 21406 21152 lllroretical Specific Gravity 23855 23555 23268 Air Voids 98 91 91 91 VMA 182 194 211 2middot03 1osorled Asphalt 180 1 80 180 180 Effective Asphalt 420 520 620 570 Ulit Weight pcf 1343 1336 1330 1335 Stabilateter Value 487 460 373 415 Oxlesiareter Value 418 392 323 355
3lesilielt Mldulus 10 psi
2-clay 188 177 200 190
Final 289 299 281 290
6or----------- 24
m 50 lt gt 11 40 w w I
~ 30 m lt 20
_J_
22ci 0 lt z
20EE
= 0 180 gt
16
5oor---------- 138
w
l 400 lt gt
136- a ~ 300 w i 0
fa34 z w
~ 200 Cll32 -8
100-----------i-~ 130
12 ------------ 500bulla
10 ________ o 400 - 0
0 gt
8
gJdeg 300 0
~- 200 ---e-
lt z
6 l 100 w 4
5 6 7 8 9 0
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication
B21
1
TABLE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Fesidue Cbntent 55
Bulk Spcific Gravity 21243
lheoretical Specific Gravity 23859
Air Voirls 109
VMA 189
Absorbed Asphalt 152
Effective 1spralt 398
Unit Weight pd 1326
atabil~ter Value 620
Cbhesiareter Value 430 3Fesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-oay 160
Final 387
70
a 60 gt a 50 w w == = 40 0
m
30
500
w l 400 lt gt cc
~ 3001- 0 ~ 200 8
100
16
136
134 u Q
iu2 z w 0 130
128
12 -----------
10 bull
ltIi 0
~ s
6
4middot1-_________ _
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l _AGGREGATE BASIS)
21164
23557
101
200
152
498
1321
481
432
180
377
24
22
z 20Si
= 18e 0 gt
bull 500
o 400-ltIi j 300 0
~ 200 zl 100 w cc
0
65 75 iesiqn 7 s
21095
23269
93 93
210 210
152 l 52
598 598
1316 1316
367 367
450 450
171 171
387 387
-----~bull-----
8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7
FIGURE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B22
1 TABLE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno
Low Quality CMS-7 Replication
70 -~ 0 Cesign 75 Pesidue Content
Bulk Spcific Graviv1
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit Weight pcf
Stallilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mxlulus 10 3psi
2--day
Final
40
Ill 30 c gt 0 20 UI lo Q 10=c 0
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w lo Q 200 8
100
~
60
21829
23899
87
170
197
403
1362
293
206
84 144
21981
23587
67
l73
197
503
1372
200
249
76 131
21960
23289
5middot 7
middot18l
197
603
1370
100
241
69 93
62
177
197
553
1370
150
245
73
110
12
10 5 Q 8gt 5 lt
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (ACGREGATE BASIS)
24
It
22 t-ci c
z 20i
= 5 18 t-Q gt
16
142
140 - 638
z w Q
136
134
bull 500
o 400 - 3 300 0
~ 200 z 100 iii UI 0
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (ACGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno LOW Quality CMS-7 Replication
B23
1
TABLE B24 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Urit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Glhesianeter Value
Resilient Mldulus 10
2-day
Final
40
m 30 gt c 20 w ~ w i
~ 10 m lt ~ 0
3psi
24
22
C C lt i
20~ ~
9 18 0 gt
16
500 142
w 1403 400 gt
Ca gt138I 300 tw
i z w Q 136~ 200
8
134
~
~
100 12 500
C
dego 400 - Ill 10 3 300 0 0 Q8gt ~ 200
~ z 6 100middot
w a
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIOUC CONTENT
(AGGREGATE 8ASIS] (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)
80
21686
23262
68
19l
l91
609
1353
125
215
77
114
Cesign 75
71
184
L 91
559
1360
200
235
77
135
60
21936
23870
81
166
191
409
1369
358
252
84
211
70
21850
23559
73
177
191
509
1364
270
250
77
157
Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE B24 Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B24
TABLE B25 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-Or Replication 1
Residue Clgtntent 47
Bulk Siecific Gravity 23965
llleoretical Specific Gravity 26825
Air Voids 107
VMA 207
Absorbed Asphalt 27
Effective Asphalt 443
Unit Weight pcf 1495
Stabilaneter Value 302
Cohesiaoeter Value 235 3
Resilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-day 158
Final 300
40
30 _ gt a 20I- ii 0_
10iii I-en 0 500----------
Ill
3 400 gt ati 300 ii 0 iii l 200 8
100---i----L---J
12 ----------
jit 10 e 0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I 4
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
57 67 Design 55
24521 24581
26411 26017
72 55 80
196 202 200
27 27 27
543 643 523
1530 1534 1520
247 200 27
275 203 275
164 116 160
276 197 280
24
jlt
22ci c i
20Si
= en e 18 0 gt
16
156
_154 ~ i152 iii z C
150
148
soo----------
dega 400 _
en
~300 ~ ~ 200 1-zl 100 iii w a
01----~-i--J 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Mixture Design Data GraniterockFIGURE B25 High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
B25
TABLE B26 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Besidue Content If 7 57 67 D2sign 55
Bulk SfeCific Gravity 2 4131 24573 24597
lhagtreticai Specific Gravity 26951 26532 26134
Air Voids 105 74 59 78
VMA 20l 195 20l 197
Absorted Asphalt 46 46 46 46
Effective Asphalt 424 524 624 504
Unit Weight pcf 1506 1533 1535 1525
stabi1anaiter Value 282 258 is2 270
Cllhesicmter Value 204 155 138 160
Resilient Mdulus 103psL
2-day 115 143 126 130
Final 313 225 173 240
40
w 30 lt gt a 20 w w la 0 10 m lt
0
~
24
22ci C
lt z
20la ~ = E 18 -0 gt
16
156
154 - a
~152 z w r0
150
148
-
500
o 400 ~
300 0
g 200 ~ z -~ 100
500
w ~ 400 lt gt a IU t- 300 w la 0 ~ 200
~8
100 12
10 0 0 8gt lt
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
w a
o 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT lo RESIDUE CONTENT II
-cGREGATE s-s1s1 (-GGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B26 Mixture Design Data Grani terock High Quality CSS-0 Replication
B26
2
TABLE B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Residue Ogtntent 47 57 67 ~ign 55
Bulk Spcific Gravity 23886 24116 24078
Ihooretical Specific Gravity 26675 26267 25879
Air Voids 105 81 70 82
VMA 210 210 21 8 210
Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 oos 005
Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545
Unit Weight pcf 149l 1505 1502 1505
Stabilareter Value 337 350 250 350
Ogthesicneter Value 238 3
Eesilient Mldulus l0 psi
2-day 104
Final 287
50
Ill 40 J C gt cc 30 Ill Ill l 0
C
10
20iii 500
w
l 400 C gt cc I 300 Ill l 0 in ~ 200 8
100 12
1110 0 0 8gt
c cc
6
4
FIGURE
~
~
177 204 200
144 150 140
254 247 260
24 ----------
a 18 0 gt
16 __i____i_-J
154
j52 u -a
~1501- ------iiiz -Ill 0
148
______________ 146
soar---------- a
o 400 1--
~ 300 _ ~
~ 200 z ~ 100 en w 0
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
B27
8
TABLE B28 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue Ointent 4 7 57 67 Cesign 55
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihroretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
CJlhesianeter Value
Pesilient Mldulus 10 3psi
2-day
Final
40
30 lt gt = w 20 0
- 10 lt
0
500
w - 3 400
lt gt a l 300 w 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
i 10 ui C
0 8gt lt
6
4
FIGURE
23861
26649
10S
207
014
456
1489
338
145
124
307
~
--------
~ 5 6 7 84
RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
24025 23925
26242 25855
85
210
014
556
1499
283
135
135
307
24
22
0 lt i
20i
= 18 0 gt
16
154
152 u Q
i150 z w 0 148
146middot
500- o 400 -
300 _ Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 4
75 87
220 209
014 014
656 536
1493 1490
220 300
129 140
142 130
277 307
_--
~
-___
85 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B28 bull Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B28
TABLE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Pesicllle Cbntent 47 57 67 resign 55 Bulk Siecific Gravity 24618 24637 24728 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26905 26475 26066 Air Voids 84 69 51 71 VlltLA 185 192 197 190 Absocbed Asphalt 047 0 bull 47 047 047 Effective Aspbalt 423 523 623 503 Urit Weight pcf 1536 1537 1543 1537 Stabilaneter Value 410 330 198 350 QJhesianeter Value 166
Resiliextt Mldulus 10 3psi
2-clay
Final
50
40 c
ffi 30 IE g20 iii c
10
500
l 400 c
a ~ 300 IE C ~ 200 8
100 12
ot 10 C
0 8
5
C
6
4
46
158
~
~ 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI
120 131 130
35 30 38
56 28 80
24
gt11 22
c c c
i 2031
= ~ C 180
16
158
156 t-
u - 154 z w 0
152
150
500
~
~ 0
bull a 400 - uil 300 ~
200
C
~ z ~ w a
100middot
8 4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
B29
TABLE B30 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Pesidue Content 4-7 h---7 6 -7 IEsicn 5 5
Bulk Specific Gravity 24519 24638 24706 Iheoretical Specific Gravity 26609 26265 25793 Air Voids 79 62 42 65 VMA 189 192 198 19l
middot Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 005 005 Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545 Unit Weight pcf 1530 1537 1542 1535 Stabilareter Value 420 327 247 350 Cohesiareter Value 126
3Resilient Mldulus 10 psi
Z--day 47 Final 144
50
40 J lt gt a 30 w w
~ 20 m lt 10
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w 2 ~ 200 8 ~
100 12
111- 10 ui 0 gt 8
lt
6
4
114 182 120
43 29 45
79 33 90
24
ii-22
ci 0 lt i
20l ~= 18 0 gt
16
158
156 0
l 154 z ~w c 152
150
500
Q -dego 400 - ui3 300 C
~ 200 z
~ 100middot~
w a ~ 0
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8 4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
FIGURE B30 Mixture Design Data High Quality CMS-7
Graniterock Replication 2
B30
TABLE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
~sidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weigllt pcf
Stabi]aneter Value
Cohes~ter Value
~silient MXJulus 103psi
2--day
final
40
30 C gt ffi20
~10 iii C ltII 0
500
l 400 C gt IC
~ 300 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
11 10 0
0 8gt C
6
4
55 65 75 resign 60 24268 24286 24206
26358 25966 25592 80
200
020
530
t515
80
268
182
338
~
65
207
020
630
t515
t_92
233
169
308
24
bull 220 0 C
ze 20
= 0 18 -0 gt
16
156
154
u i152 ~ z 0
150 bull
148
54 72
21 7 204
020 020
730 580
1511 1515
90 235
193 250
145 175
250 320
500 o 400 - l 300 0
~ 200 zi 100 iii IC
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replicationl
B31
TABLE B32 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residue 0ntent
Bulk Secific Gravity
llleoretical Speipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
-Absorled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
StabilcIIeter Value
Qlhesianeter Value 3Jesilient middotMgtdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
40
m30 lt gt cc20 w
w E
~10 ID lt 0
79
198
027
523
1518
203
243
201
354
~ soar-----------
w
400 lt gt a
~ 300 w E 0 ~ 200 8
100---I--~---------
12 -----------
111 10 C
0 8gt lt
6 --4
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l (ACiCiFIECiATE BASIS)
FIGURE B32 Mixture
55 65 75 Lesign 6 0
24329 24246 24077
26401 26007 25632
68 61 73 208 22l 203
027 027 027 623 723 573
1513 1502 1515
165 110 185 215 205 225
168 184 185 340 272 345
24
22 C C
z i 20
= 0 0
18 gt
16
156
154
a
gt152 en z Ill 0 150
148
bull 500 Q
deg 0 400- =gt 300 0
~ 200 z l 100 w
-
0 4 5 6middot 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(ACiGFIEGATE BASIS)
Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication
B32
2
TABLE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Eesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheore_tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VbullMA
lbsorbed_ Asphalt
Effective_ Asphalt
Qnit Weight pcf
~~ter Value
Q)hesianeter Value
Resiiient Mxlulus 10 3psi
2~y
Final
40
11130 C
a20 =
~10 C m
ltII 0
500
Ill
3 400 C
a ~ 300 w = 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
ll 10 ui E 0 8
c
6
4
I-
1-
55
23824
26318
95
215
014
536
1487
287
381
224
380
65 75
23896 23701 25928 25555 78 73
220 233
014 014 636 736
1491 1479 195 161
265 212
212 196
404 341
24
11 22d
c
z 20i
= ltII E 18 0
16
154
152- a
150 I-
Iesign 6 0
84
218
014
586
1490
240
320
215
395
z w Q
148
bull 146
500 a
c 400 ~ ui
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
l 300 Q
~ 200 zl 100 w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIOUla CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-a Replication 1
B33
- - ----- -
TABLE B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Rssidue Ogtntent
Bulk Secific Gravity
lhairetical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
AbsoIbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stabil~ter Value
Olhesiareter Value 3lesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-day
Firal
40
m 30 lt gt a 20 w w
= ~ 10
m lt
0
- --- -middot -middot 500
w l 400 lt gt
Ea
300 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
1l 10 middot 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 4
FIGURE
55
23834
26371
96
214
022
528
1487
279
207
176
332
65
23784
25978
84
223
022
628
1484
208
270
185
336
75
23628
25604
77
236
022
728
1474
167
334
181
350
iesiqn 6 bull 0
90
21 8
022middot
578
1485
245
240
180
334
~
~
24
1l 22
0
lt i
20i
= 0 gt
18
16
152
150 - 148
~ 146
144
500
o-400 middot --- J 300 C
~ 200 z
middot ~ 100 en a
0 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication
B34
2
B35 Mixture Design Data GraniterockTABLE Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Residue Content 55
Bwk Specific Gravity 24720
lheoretical Specific Gravity 26164
Air Voids 55
VMA 185
Absorbed Asphalt 001
Effective Asphalt 549
Unit Weight pcf 1543
StabilCampTeter value 293
Ohesiareter Value 174
Besilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day 69
Final 153
40
~ 30 _
c gt ffi 20 w I
Q 10
c 0
500
w 3 400 -
c gt a
~ 300 w I g bull ~ 200 8 ----r
100middot
10
8 -
~
Q
0 6gt a =c
4 ~ 2
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS
65 75 DesiSE 60
2 4 720 24515
25767 25388
40 34 48
193 207 189 001 001 001 649 749 599
1543 1530 1543 205 97 250
156 283 170
46 22 55 72 so 110
24
~
22ci C c
i 20i
= Cl 180 gt
16
lSadeg
156
u -a
654 z 0 152
150
500 ii a
a 400 - 3 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7
FIGURE B35 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
B35
12 r---------- 500bull _ 10
o 400 -middot 0 gt 5 C
8
tnl 300 Q
~ 200 z
6 ~ 100 ~ IU 0
4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT I
(AGCREGA TE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
TABLE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
55 65 75 resicn 6 0 Residue Content
Bulk siecific Gravity 24816 2 4721 24560
lheoretical Specific Gravity 26389 25983 25596
Air Voids 60 49 40 55
VMA 182 193 205 187
Absorlei Asphalt middot 035 035 035 035
Effective Asphalt 515 615 715 565
UUt Weight cf 1548 1543 1533 1545
Stabilaneter Value 298 193 130 250
Qlhesicmeter Value 188 I57 118 180 3
Resilient MJdulus 10 psi
soor-----------158
w l 400 Ishy 156 gt lt u
0a
w
300 w ~154E 0 z
w Q ~ 200 152
8 150100----middot-~-1-__c__~
2-day
Final
40
~ 30 J lt gt a 20 w
s 10 0
lt
0
92 43 27 65 186 79 46 135
24
22
~ =
ci lt 0
i 20~
18 0 gt
16
FIGURE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B36
Table B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
FJiuivalent ~sidue amtent 60 70 80 resign 70
Iesidue Ontent
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absomed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
lhit Weight pcpound
Stabilareter Value Ohesiareter Value
~ilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
Ill
50
40 A gt a w 30 w i 0 J
iii 201-
10
400
w3 300 gt a Ill t 200 i 0
8 ~iii ll 100 1-
0 12
lit 10 0 0 8gt a lt
6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)
630
21584
24451
117
210
140
460
1347
415
208
735
21570
24143
107
219
140
560
1346
488
61
840
21385
23848
103
233
140
660
1334
382
63
resign 7 35
107
219
140
560
1346
488
63
96
339 141
325
126
299 141 325
24
lit 22d
Cl
z 20i
= 0 180
gt
16
138
136 ltgt
i134 iii ~ z w 0 132
130
bull 500
o 400 -
3
300 ------------- 0
~ 200 z ~ 100 w o_____________a
9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B37
----
Table B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Pesidue omtent 60 70 80 Design 70
Pesidue omtent 630 735 8 40 Dsign 735
Bulk Specific Gravity 21710 21722 21714
lllroretical Specific Gravity 24298 23995 23705
Air Voids
VMA
lbsorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Chhesianeter Value
Eeilient Mldulus 103psi
2--clay
Final
so
40 J w
gt a 30 w w 0 20 m
10 400
w 300 gt a w 200 w i 100 8
0
12
if 10 a
~0 8gt a lt
6
4
107
205
112
488
1355
395
llO
113
290
95
213
112
588
1356
398
62
122
271
84
22l
112
688
1355
318
70
138
282
24
22 c 0
20
0 180 gt
16
140
138 -a
136 _iii z bull --w 0 134
132
bull 500 a
o 400
m 300 J 0 bull ~ 200 z 100
w a
0
95
213
)12
588
1356
398
62
122
271
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT J
(AGCilEGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B38
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Table B39
Fquivalent ~idue COntent
~idue Cbntent
Bulk SJecific Gravity lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Oihesianeter Value
~ilient Mldulus l03psi
2-day
Fiial
so
w 40 lt gt cc 30 ~ w E
0 20 m lt 10
400
m POO lt gt a U 200 E 0 iii w c 100 8
0
12
- 10 vi Cl
0 gt ac
6
60 70 80
690 805 920
21790 21826 21910
24255 23977 23710
102 90 76
207 214 219
080 080 080
610 710 810
1360 1362 1367
437 400 289
219 229 202
141 158 184
333 282 273
24
~ 22ci
CJ lt z
20ii
= Cl 180
gt
16
----------
~ lo
140
138 Q l136 iii w Cl
134
132
500 Q
0 400 n3 300 Cl
~ 200 i-bull
100
z ~ 0 a
Cesign 70
Cesign 805
90
214
080
710
1362
400
229
158
282
-------
-
-~
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B39 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication l
B39
8
Table B40 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Eesidue cantent
Iesidue Omtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lhagtretical Speiliic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Abro1plusmned Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tklit Weight pcpound
Stabilareter Value
OJhesianeter Value
EEsilient Mldulus l03psi
2-day
Final
50
w 40 J lt gt a 30 w
w i
3 20 lt 0 10
400-----------
DI 3 300 lt gt a wti 200 i 0 w8100
0 -------l--l-1
12 ----------
- 10 ltn 0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
60 70 80 690 805 920
21986 21964- 21948
24499 2A212 23938
103 93 83
200 209 218
124 124 l24
476 576 676
1372 1371 1360
422 403 265
270 306 160
99 140 154
298 310 254
24
-22
ci lt
=i 20i
a 0 18 0 gt
16
140
138 - a
l136 z w 0 134
132
bull500
a
o 400 -
ltn =gt 300 -J a
~ 200 z 100 DI 0
0 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT Ii (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Dsign 70
Design 805
93
209
124
576
1371
403
306
140
310
9
Figure B40 Mixture Design Data High Quality SS-30
San Bernardino SEA Replication 2
B40
Table B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent lesidue ~tent
Ilesidue Omtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lbagtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stabilateter Value
CllhesiaIEter Value
Resilient MXlulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
w 40 i- _ gt 30a w I- ~ w 0 20 m I-CII 10
400
w l 300 gt a w lj 200 0 w 100 8
0
12
111 10 Q
0 8gt a ~
6
4
~
6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
65 75 85 Design 75 683 789 89J tesign 789
21624 21445 21375 24097 23802 23520
103 99 92 213 228 238 100 100 100 550 650 750
1349 1338 1334 423 295 285 70 174 82
150 139 138 318 310 2S4
24
22d i
20ii
= CII Q 180 gt
16
138
- 136
u
134I- z ~132
130
bull 500 o 400 _ l 300 1- Q
sectl 200 I-z ~ 100 CII w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
99
228
100
650
1338
295
174
139
310
5
Figure B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B41
Table B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent PesidJJe Content
Residue Omtent
Bulk Specific GIavity
lheoretical Specific GIavity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit weight pcpound
Stabiloreter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mxulus 103psi
SC
w 40 gt a 30 w w i 0 J 20
10
400
w 3 300 gt a w t 200 i
9 ltI)
w = 1008
0
12
11 10 u a 0 8gt
6
4
2-day
Final
~
~
5 6 7 8 flESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGflEGATE BASIS)
65 75 85
683 788 89J 21424 21394 21455
24147 23851 23567
ll3 103 90
22l 229 234
l09 l09 l09
541 641 741
133 7 1335 1339
412 328 280
129 103 81
167 141 162
325 260 280
24
22ci 0 201
= 0 gt
18
16
i-
138
136 Q i134 _ 0 z w bull0 132
130
soor----------- D C
o 400
ltn3 300 a ~ 200 z 100 (I)
w
-
~
a 0------------ 5 6 7 8 9
flESIOUE CONTENT I
(AGGflEGA TE BASIS)
Design 75
Design 7 86
103
229
l09
641
1335
328
103
141
260
9
Figure B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B42
Table B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent Residue Omtent
Residue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllagtreticalSpecilicGravity
Air Voids
VMA
AbsorlJed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcpound
Stabilcrreter value
Cllhesianeter value
lelilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
400-----------
Illl 300 lt gt a w t 200 lo 0 w 8100
0 ________ ___ __
12 ----------
~ 10 0
~ 8 bull a c
6
4 -_______ ___ __
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS
65 75 85 748 863 978 21752 21661 21638 24136 23863 23602 99 92 83
213 225 234 081 081 081 569 669 769
1357 1352 1350 466 367 235
224 266 138
220 189 209 478 337 281
Ilsign 75
Design 863
92
225
081
669 1352
367
266
189
337
24 ----------
~
220 Cl lt ii 20
0 18 0
gt
16 ----------------14or-----------
138 -0 a 136 z w Q
134
132
= c 400 - l 300 Q
~ 200 f-middot z 100 w a o----------
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
_____________J
Figure B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardinor Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B43
Table B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Iesidue Cbntent 65 75 85 Design 75
lesidue Omtent 748 86~ resign~Zl 863
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleo~tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asjtlalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
lesilient Mxlulus 103psi
2-day
Final
so
w gt 0 30 IE 0 20 iii lt
10
400
3 300 lt gt 0 w l 200 IE 0 X w
100 8
0
12
- 10 en 0 0 8gt
6
4
~ 40 bull
~ 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
21676
23998
97
208
055
595
1353
409
248
189
308
24
22
ci c lt i
20ii
= 0 0
18 gt
16
21711 21641
23729 23472
85 78 85
223 234 223
055 oss 055
695 795 695
1355 135l 1355
283 227 283
187 186 187
198 177 198
255 285 255
140
138 a
136 - z 0 134 --
132
500 a
o 400 -
vi3 300 - 0
sectj 200 z ~ 100
0 0 5 6 middot 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino~ Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B44
Table B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Equivalent Jesidue Content 60 70 80 Design 70
tesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
trut Weight pcpound
Stabilcineter Value
Cbhesiateter Value
tesilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
IU 40 _ C gt 30a IU IU = middoto 20 m C (I) 10
400
IU
300 C gt a IU
ti 200 = 0 ~ IU c 100 8
0
12
10 ai 0 8gt C
6
4
~
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)
630 735 840 Design 7 35
21651 21581 21592
24033 23739 23457
99 91 80 91 180 190 198 190
399 499 599 499 135l 1347 134 7 1347
309 439 358 439
150 236 202 236
140 171 148 171 294 390 367 390
24
bull 22
Cl Cl C
i 20i
= (I) Q 180
gt
16 140
138 0 a
i136 z IU
134 bull bull
Q
132
500 D
c 400 _ 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 IU a
0 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B45
Table B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Residue Cbntent 60 70 80 Design 70 Residue Cbntent 6JO Z35 EdQ Jesign 7 35
Bulk Spcific Gravity 21413 21627 21711 lhroretical Specific Gravity 24321 24017 23726 Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcneter Value
Ohesianeter Value
llesilient Mgtdulus 10 3psi
2-day
Final
so
Ill 40 I lt gt 0 30 w Ill i 0 20 Cl lt
10
400
111
l 300 lt gt 0 w lj 200 i
~ w = 1008 -----___
0
12
II- 10 a 0 8gt lt
6
4
120
189
249
351
1336
407
79
147
361
24
II-22
ci
lt ~ 20i
= 0
0 18
gt
16
138
136 u C
l134 w 132
130
bull 500
C
o 400 ~
---------_J 300 0
~ 200
~ 100 Ill 0
0
99
189
249
451
1350
396
76
165
340
85
193
249
551
1355
360
64
175
305
99
189
249
451
1350
396
76
165
340
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT 1
9 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE COIHENT f
9
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B46
---------
Table B4 7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Bulk Specific Gravity
lhalretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorlled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilaieter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
llesilient MJdulus 103psi
2-clay
Final
50
40w lt(
gt IC 30 w w
0 20 iii lt( ltI)
10
400
w 3 300 ~ lt(
gt IC w t 200 0 iii 111 i 100 8
0 ___ _______ __ _ __
12 ----------
Fquivalent Pesidue Content 60 70 80 Iesign 70
Pesidue Qlntent 690 805 92Q Dcsign 805
21958 22006
24182 23909
92 88 92
18l 188 18l 256 256 256
444 544 444
1370 1373 1370
342 291 342
78 73 78
184 167 184
303 298 303
10 0
0 8gt IC
c 6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B47 Mixture
21880
24453
105
176
256
344
1365
443
58
174
381
24
22ci
5 20
= 0
0 18
gt
16
~ I I
138
136 ~ ~134 bull z 111 0 132
130
bull 500
o 400 3 300 - Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 ltI) 111 IC
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B47
Table B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
El_uivalent Residue Cbntait 60 70 80 Iesign 70
Residue Cbntent 690 aQi 2 2Q Dsign 805 Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Olhesiateter Value
Resilient Mldulus middot103psi
2-day
Final
21816
24403
106
178
244
356
1361
482
136
183
393
21806
24120
96
187
244
456
1361
411
130
187
374
21996
23849
78
189
244
556
1373
314
106
260
361
96
187
244
456
1361
411
130
187
374
24so
w 40 22 ci 0 gt a 30 ~ 20w w = 20 ishy C 18iii 0 gt Ill 10 _ ___ ____________
16 400------------
140
w l 300 138 gt 0
Qa w
636t 200 z0 w --------_ Qw 134c 100 8
0 ___ _____________ 132
bull50012 -----------
a
1 400 -_ 10
ltti ltti l 300 -C 0 C8gt ~ 200 lt z
6 l 100 w a
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT S RESIDUE CONTENT S (AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B48
Table B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
EquivaJent Residue antent 65 75 85 Design 75 Residue Content 63J z aa a 23 resign 7 88 Bulk Specific Gravity 21404 21439 21381 lheoretical Specific Gravity 23563 23286 Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcf
Stabilaneter Value
Cohesianeter Value
~ient 1bdul11S 103psi
2~y
Firal
50
w 40 gt a 30 w w 0 20 iii lt 10
400
3 300 w
gt a w t 200 0 in i w
100 8
0 12
10 0 Q
0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6
23020 92 79 71 79
193 199 209 199 140 140 140 140 510 610 710 610
1336 1338 1334 1338 424 397 308 397 79 308 266 308
173 185 196 185 330 319 285 319
24
22ci c lt
~ 20c Q 180
gt
16
138
136 u -Cl
~134 in ~z w 132
130
soar----------- Qbull
o 400
middot3 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a Q___________ ___ __
7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT deg RESIDUE COIITENT deg (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B49
Table BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Fquivalent lesidue Content
Besidlle 0-ntent
Bulk Specific Gravity
Illeoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pf
Stabilcmeter Value
ltbhesiaieter Value
Besilient Mxlulus 103psi
2--day
Final
50
~ 40 I lt gt 30 w 0 20 01 lt 10
400
w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 w r lOO 8
o 12
10 ai ~ 0 8gt a lt
6
~
4 5 6 7 8
IIESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
65 75 85 683 788 893 21527 21362 21337
24013 23721 23441 104 99 90
188 202 211
225 225 225
425 525 625
1343 1333 1332
410 418 290
261 62 100
188 197 211
334 348 331
24
22 ~ ci c lt
20 f 18 0 gt
16
138
136 0 a
134 z w 0 132
130
500 a
o 400
ai bull 300 I bull C
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
IIESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design 75
Design 788
99
202
225
525
1333
418
62
197
348
Figure BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
BSO
Table B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno
Fquivalent Residue Clintent
Residue 0rrtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorlei Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
thlit Weight pcf
StabiJaneter value
Ohesiaretel value 3lelilient MJdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
50
w
40
c gt a 30 w w = g 20 iii c Ill 10
400----------
middota
l 300 bull c gt a w t 200 = 0 w c 100 8
0 _______ ____ _
12 ------------
_ 10 ~ 8 c
6
4 _________ __
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B51
Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
65 75 85 748 863 978
21728
24022
96
186
200
450
1356
436 100
199
376
24
11 22
c c c
z 20ii
Ill0 180
gt
16
Design 75
Design 863
86
195
200
550
1355
392 260
212
362
21716
23753
86
195
200
550
1355
392 260
212
362
21673
23495
78
205
200
650
1353
378 201
230
3l7
~
140
138 Q j136 bull --_ z w 0134
132
500 Q
o 400 bull -l 300 ~ 0 ~ 200 I-z ~ 100 w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Table B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent lesidue OJntent 65 75 85 Design 75 Pesidue Ointent 748 863 978 Design 863 Bulk Specific Gravity 21595 21708 21637 ~retical Specific Gravity 23977 23708 23452 Air Voids 99 84 77 84 VMA 19l 195 206 195 Absorbed Asphalt l92 l92 l92 l92 Effective Asphalt 458 558 658 558 Unit Weight pf 1347 1354 1350 1354 Stabilareter Value 502 262 239 262 Cllhesianeter Value 257 136 154 136 Pesilient MJdulus 103psi
2--day 217 201 228 201 Final 371 307 290 307
2450
w 40 22 0 0lt ltgt ia 30
bull 20i
= 0 20 18iii 0lt gt 10
16 400
~
~
140
w 3 300 -ltgt
138 lt gt
aa w t 200 deg136 z0 w 0
134 w
100 8
1320
12 500 a
0 400 10
3 300 C 0 Q8gt ~ 200 lt z
6 100 w a
4 0 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT ~ RESIDUE CONTENT ~ (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B52
Table B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent ~sidue Cbntent 45 55 65 Design 55 ~idue Cbntent 473 578 6~~ Design 5 78 Bulk Specific Gravity 24210 24403 24473 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26934 26528 26142 Air Voids
VMA
Absocbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
StabiJaneter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Iesilient M)dulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
w _ 40 C gt II 30w w 0 20 iii C ~
10
400
w l 300 C gt II
iiw
200
~ w --------r 100 8
0 12
ot 10 -0
0 8gt II c
6
4
101 80 64 80 199 20l 206 20l
022 022 022 022 423 523 623 523
151l 1523 1527 1523 308 288 197 288
ll7 ll2 140 112
95 llO 122 llO 306 272 214 272
24
ci 22
C
i -~20Es = E 18 0
gt
16
156
154 - gt152 iii z ~ w 0
150
148
bull 500
o 400 Inl 300 0
~ 200 z ~ 100 w II
0
--~
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT r (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7 8 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B53
Table B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Residue Glntent 45 ss 65 Jesign 55 Residue Omtent 47 5 ZB 6 83 resign ~za Bulk Specific Gravity 24197 24253 24435 lheoretical Specific Gravity 26843 26441 26058 Air Voids 99 83 62 83 VMA 199 206 208 206 Absorbed Asphalt 09 09 09 09 Effective Asphalt 441 541 641 541 lklit Weight P=f 1510 1513 152S 1513 StabLkmter Value 38l 307 204 307 CJgthesianeter Value 73 85 149 85 Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day 170 159 142 159 Final 333 367 193 367
so
w 40 J lt gt 0 30w w le 0 20J
CJ lt 10
24
It
22ci 0 lt i -------20 = 18 0 gt
16 400
____
~
156
w 3 300 154 lt gt - a0 w gt 152l 200 le __-0 z w w c 150 8100
148 0
12 500
D C
o 400 r- 10 -u 300
J 0 9
8 Cgt ~ ~ 200 z
6 ~ 100
w 0
4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE COIITEIIT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B54
----------
Table B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Rep~ication 1
Equivalent Residue Contentmiddot
Residue Ontent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
~tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tklit Weight pcpound
Stabilaneter value
Cbhesiaieter Value
Resilient -bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
45 55 65
518 633 748
24695 24765 24666
26898 26520 26160
82 66 57
187 193 205
001 001 001
449 549 649
154l 1545 1539
41l 310 24l
159 157 165
183 178 193
371 318 250
50
w 40 c gt a 30 w-w == 0 20 ~ 10
400------------
~ 300 lt(
gt a
t 200 == 0 in bullw 8100
0 __ ________ ___ ___
12 ----------
t 10 rti C
~ 8 a c
6
4 s 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI
4
24
Ill 22
0 c c
ze 20
II)
C 18 0
gt
16
158
156- 154 Ill z w 0 152
150
500 iii
8 4
~
0 400-
i300-~ g 200 1-z l 100 iii a 0 __ _______ ____
5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design 55
Design 633
66
193
001
549
1545
310
157
178
318
___
8
Figure B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
BSS
Table B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality
Equivalent Rsidue Content 45
Rsidue Cbntent 518
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllooretical specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
lbsoibed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesicmeter Value 3
Iesilient Mldwus 10 psi
2--day
Final
400-----------
w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 I 0 ltII w8100
olt----__1__--1_---1
12 ----------
10 u
0 8gt a lt
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT l
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
24594
27024
90
190
019
431
1535
450
198
191
360
24
Ill 22
0 C
lt i
20i ~ ltII C 18 C gt
16
158
156 0
i54 iii z ILi
J52
150
SS-30 SEA
55 65
63J 7 ~a 24844
26641
67
190
019
531
1550
324
212
173
308
24856
26276
54
199
019
631
155l
234
225
166
259
_________
~
500----------- 0
dego 400 -
~300~~ C
~ 200 z i 100
w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COIITEHT l
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Replication 2
Design 55
Lesign 633
67
190
019
531
1550
324
212
173
308
Figure B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B56
---------
Table B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality
ElIuivaJent lesidue Omtent
lesidue Cbntent
Bulk Spacific Gravity
~retical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Uut Weight pcf
Stabilaneter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
lesilient Mldulus 103psi
so
w 40 lt gt a 30 w w ~ 20 m lt II)
10
400
w 3 300 lt gt a w lj 200 0 w z 1008
0 12
Ill 10 Q
0 8gt lt
6
4
2-day
Final
~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
so 530
24024
26676
99
207
031
469
1499
354
138
183
352
SS-15 SEA Replication 1
60 70 Design 60 636 7 42 Design 636
24040 23986 26279 25901 85 74
214 223
031 031 569 669
1500 1497 223 149
222 126
159 160 302 234
24
Ill
c 22 ~ c
lt i
20i1
== (II C 180 gt
16
152
150 u -a
648 z w Q
146 1-
144
bull 500 a
o 400 - 3 300 C
~ 200 z ~ 100 (II w a
~ 0
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
85
214
031
569
1500
223 222
159
302
8
Figure B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B57
Table B58 Mixture Design Data Low Quality SS-15
Fquivalent Residue Content 60 60
Rsidue Cbntent 525 630
23944
~retical Specific Gravity
Bulk Sjecific Gravity 26592
Air Voids 100
209VMA
1bsocbed Asphalt 015
Effective Aspbalt 485
Unit Weight pcf 1494
Stabilareter Value 377
Olhesiaeter Value 151
Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi
162
375 2-day
Final
so
w 40 _ gt c 30 w w i
~20 m I-0
10
400
Ill
300 gt w I 200 i 2 w i 100 8
_________ 0 --middotmiddot-
12-------bull------
ti 10 9 0 8gt
6
4
24
- 22ci
0
20i
= 9 18 0 gt
16
152
150 u a
148 z---- w0146
144
500 Q
o 400 _ 300 Q
~ 200 I-z ~ 100
w a
23988
26022
84
215
015
585
1497
307
180
165
356
Graniterock SEA Replication 2
70
735 23793
25830
79
229
015
685
1485
217
170
169
277
~
~
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7
RESIOUE CONTENT li RESIDUE COPlTENT li (AGGREGATE 8ASIS) (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)
Design 60
resign 630
84
215
585
1497
307
180
165
356
8
Figure B58 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B58
Table B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Equivalent esidue omtent 5 0 60 70 Design 60
esidue Cbntent 5 75 690 805 Dsign 690
Bulk Specific Gravity 24389 24362 24419
Jheo=eticaJ Specific Gravity 2 6670 26303 25953
Air Voids 8 6 74 59 7 4
VMA 198 207 214 20 7
Absorbed Asphalt 009 009 009 009
Effective Asphalt 491 591 691 591
Unit Weight pcf 1522 1520 1524 1520
Stabilareter Value 38l 292 220 292
Cbhesiclneter Value 263 186 176 186
~t Mldulus 103psi
2-day 222 222 207 222
Fulal 380 289 293 289
5
w 40 C gt a 30 Ill ~ 20 m C 1- 10
24 ----------
22 bull C Cl C
zi 20
C1 o 18 0 gt
16 ___-________-------i-_-
400---------- 15a------------
156l 300 C gt - a =deg 154ti 200
iii z0 IUiii 0 152 bull bull~ 10018
150 ___ _______ __J0 ---i--J~-L--1
500----------12 ----------- bull o 400 -
Ill 10 ui l 300 -Q
Qg 8 g 200a lt z 6 l 100
iii a
01--J-----__ __4 -------r------- 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
RESIDUE COrlTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B59
Table B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Design 60
Eeidue omtent 575 690 805 D=sign 690
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleo~tical Specific Gravity
1lir Voids
VMA
Absocbed Asralt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcf
Stabilcmeter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
Eeilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
Ill 40 J
lt gt a 30 w I-w 0 20 Ill lt I-
10
400
w 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 Id
8100
0 12
10 m Q
0 8gt 5 lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
~
RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASISI
24371 24441 24445
26744 26373 26020
89 73 61 73
199 205 213 205
019 019 019 019
481 581 681 581
1521 1525 1525 1525
335 236 191 236
220 164 180 164
194 199 191 199
388 329 294 329
24
22
ci 0 lt i
20i
= a
= 18 0 gt
16
158
156 u a
deg154 = w Q
152 ---------150
500 a
1 400 m3 300 1 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100
Ill a
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COHTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B60
APPENDIX C
DATA ANALYSIS SOLVENT FREE AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS
Table Cl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL e_AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
95 85 80
867
76
88
90 85 85
867
29
33
95 85 85
883
58
65
85 70 80
783
76
98
100 100 100
1000
00
00
100 100 100
1000
00
00
C M s 0
D A T A x s
CV
80 80 80
800
00
oo
80 75 75
767
29
38
75 80 70
750
50
67
70 80 75
750
50
67
90 90
100
933
58
62
95 100
95
967
29
30
C M s 1
D A T A
X s
CV
80 75 70
750
50
67
60 70 55
617
76
124
70 70 65
683
-2 9
42
65 70 60
650
50
77
65 70 70
683
29
42
70 60 65
650
50
77
Table C2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating
F01
E 2 ll877 7777778 243aassese9 1)75102041 329 532 ~ middot2 1ll77777777~ 73RBSeSf89 32571~2-~5 3~ 29 532 J 1 150 ooocooo 150JOJOOOO 5f122llll9 414 746
EA ll 8114 llllll11444 2111111111 3J51224 266 396 -E~ middot2- 1-0frOOfr~ 0-9 middot50-middot000 3 oco middot2middot20110816 middot 329 532 Agt 2 77 7777778 38 8815589 17142857 329 532 nJ 4 1555555~55 388881889 171112857 266 396
FR RmiddotJR 36 8166666567 225851B52
------------------------------------------------middot---------------------ronmiddotL 53 -esoo--000000r
Cl
100
P
c5 75 z-t-lt8 50 w t-lt bull css-oC
CMS-0w 25a C middot+ CMS-7 C lt
0-----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Cl Mean AggregateCqqting at middotoesign Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 867 css-o 883 CSS-0 783 css-o 1000 css-o 1000middotcss-o middot I I CMS-0 800 CMS-0 7~ 7 CMS-0 750 CMS-0 933 CMS-0 967lrMS-0 750
I CMS-7 750 CMS-7 617 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 65 0 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating
C2
Table C3 Film Stripping
EMULSION
AGGREGATE SAN
BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK
C s s 0
D A T A
5
0
10
5
5
0
X s
CV
25
35
1414
75
35
47l
25
35
1414
C M s 0
D A T A
0
5
5
7
0
0
X s
CV
25
35
1414
60
14
236
00
oo oo
C M s 7
D A T A
0
0
0
5
0
0
X s
CV
00 OQ 00
25 35
1414
00 00
oo
Table C4 ANOVA Summary Film Stripping
AN-OVA
middotmiddotDPmiddot -ss- F middotFe5
E 2 33 7777778 1euro8888889 23555191 426 802 A 2 -ti8 7777778 343888889 4 7984496 426 802
E X II 4 9 2222226 23055557 3217054 363 642 ERROI 9 645000000 71666667 ---------------TOTAL 17 1762777782
C3
fl w 0 lti 1L a =gt en C w C C-a I-en
40
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-730
20
10
0 SB F GR
Figure C3 Film Stripping
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
css-o 25 css-o 75 css-o 25
GMS-0 25 CMS-0 60 CMS-0 oo
CMS-7 oo CMS-7 25 CMS-7 oo
----middot----middot-middotmiddotmiddot
Nlte Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping
C4
Table CS 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue
Content 10 3 psi
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW D
118 170A 217 205 160 175
C T 83 190 191 182 130 185A s )ts 101 180 204 194 145 180
0 s 25 14 18 16 21 7
CV 246 79 90 84 146 39 D 104 185 155A 190 140 215
C T 82 155 154 171 130 180A M x 93s 170 155 181 135 198
s 16 21 1 13 7 250 CV 167 125 05 74 52 125
D A ab 55 35 73 38 55
C T
82A 48 63 77 45 65 M X s pound81 -- - 52 49 75 42 60 s7 l 5 20 3 5 7
CV 18 96 404 38 11 9 11 8
Table C6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus
A N ) V l
-D-F -SS
E 2 832263888888 _ 2-- -5441-- 722-2222-J 1 89933611111
E~ 4 5386 7777779 -1J- 2- -3-8-1-+-rG-55--5-5-5 7- bull AJ 2 144235~899 EA 4 58024444443
ERROR 113- 3951500 00~-J
---------------------------------------------------------------------TOT-W- -3-5 -11806-4---638 881gt-9-
(116131944444 2720-8611111 89933611111 13466944445 1-9Q lh-5--amp7--+7-8-7211944445
14506111111 219 527-7778
1895577629 -12 394-1541-409569480
61345059 S-~937872 32952081 56gt7870Ll
357 3-S7 443 295
-]y5+ 3S7 295
605 6 05--833 461
-6--05-605 461
cs
bull css-omiddot 300 C CMS-0
M 0 diams CMS-7
(J
3200 gt C 0 E 1-
ffi 100
01----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure CS 2 Day ResiLient Modulus
SAN middotBERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 101 css-o 180 rss-o 204 css-0_194 CSS-0 145 CMS-0 198
CMS-0 93 CMS-0 170 ICMS-0 155 CMS-0 181 CMS-0 135 css-o 180l l l I I CMS-7 81 CMS-7 52 CMS-7 49 CMS-7 75 CMS-7 42 CMS-7 60
Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C6 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking 2 Day
Resilient Modulus 10 3 psi
C6
Table C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Content 10 psi
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A (
s
CV
260
232
246
20
80
320
280
300
28
94
482
299
391
129
33l
365
358
362
5
l4
280
240
260 28
109
320
345
333
18
53
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
267
250
259
12
47
295
280
288
ll
37
253
288
271
25
92
290
387
339
69
203
260
307
284
33
11 7
395
334
365
43
118
C M s 7
D A T A
X
s
CV
78
64
71-
10
139
110
95
103
ll
104
75
73
74
l
19
110
135
123
18
144
80
90
85
7
83
110
135
123
18
144
middotTable C8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus
-~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------F-r05- ---F-01--
E
J El -E- Al EAJ
-ERRJR
2 2-1 4 -~ 2 4
18
3592750555555 -14506 722-2221-171610COOOOJ 147394444445
1---1-1----lf466-li-+ 19215000000 55353333333
2850GOOC0000
17-16375277778 72~336H-1-11
1716100)0000 36848611111 sect8~5833---3-33--9607500000
13840833333 ~ 58-3 33-33 333
11315528C7 -45810702
109385263 23272807 ~U981l-2-1-6067895 3741579
357 -3 r7 443 2 95 3~7-357 295
605 605 833 461 605 605 4 6 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------~- 3-5- -448+1----2-222-2-
C7
bull css-o500
CMS-0 U) diams CMS-7C
C) 400 middoto -
~ 300
J Ci 200
1-z 100 J-UJ UIa
01-------------------------~---~-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
eMS-0 259 ess-a 300 ess-a 391 ess-a 362 eMS-0 284 CMS-0 365
ess-o 246l l l l l ICMS-0 288 eMS-0 271 CMS-0 339 ess-o 260 ess-o 333
CMS-7 71 CMS-7 103 CMS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123
t-ote Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure ca Newrnan-Keuls Ranking Full Cure 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi
ca
Table C9 Density at Design Residue Content pcpound
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
1359
1372
1366
09
07
1365
1365
1365
0
0
1365
1352
1359
09
07
1345
1345
1345
0
0
1520
1525
1523
04
02
1515
1515
1515
0
0
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
1348
1343
1346
04
03
1330
1338
1334
06
04
1329
1340
1335
08
06
1335
1316
1326
- 13
10
1505
1490
1498
11
07
1490
1485
1488
04
02
C M s 7
D A T A
x s
CV
1373 1385
1379
09 06
1375 137 5
1375
0 0
1380
1379
1380
01 01
1370
1360
1365
07 05
1537
1535
1536
01 01
1543
1545
1544
01 01
Table ClO ANOVA Surtunary Density
A II O V ~
-SS F bull O1
E _ 0
2 i
lCB4155555 Z08-tOS389
II 311277~
54207777R 1 ouos2sirrs
4340277
135q23660 -25lS 7i80R63-
1087331173
3S7 3 ~7 443
i()5 605 83
EA Q
4 -2
1599U4U5 _iuseeg
399E11 -3-3UUL45-
10J17398 bull~3785-C7
295 -~S7-
4 f 1 -6CS
A) 2 13772222 o6886111 17251218 357 605 EAJ q 2C361111 5090278 12752262 295 4 61
-ERRJR- 13- 718-()001 399166-7-
35
C9
bull css-o160 CMS-0 diams CMS-7
150
() -a gt 140 -en z w
middotC 13
1201~bull-------------r---------------SBH SBL FH FL ~RH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C9 - Density at Design Residue Content
SAN middotBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 138o CMS-7 1365ICMS-7 1375 CMS-7 1544
css-o 1366
I-7 bull rMS-7 1536
css-o 1365 css-o 1359 css-o 1345 css-o 1523 CSS-0 j515
CMS-0 1346 CMS-0 1334 CMS-0 1335 CMS-0 132 6 CMS-0 1498 CMS-0 1488
Nte Values with a ccmnm vertical line are not statistically different
Figure ClO Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcpound
ClO
Table Cll Air Voids at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
D 87 7 0-A 75 77 80 72
C T 71 70 92 82 78 73A s )s 79 70 84 80 79 73
0 s ll 0 12 04 01 01
CV 143 0 144 45 18 10 D 97 93A 93 91 82 84
C T 90 92 A
91 93 87 90
M x 94 93 92 s 92 84 87 s os 01 01 _0l 04 04
0 53 08 15 15 42 49CV D A 77 62 73 62 71 48
C T 73 61 62 71 65A 55
M X s 75 62 68 67 68 52 s 03 01 08 06 04 057
CV 38 12 115 96 62 96
Table Cl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids
A I O Y 11
-DF ss -F 05 F01
E 2 382650000 191325000 69)150301 3~7 605 -A 2 -2-681667 1340334 ll03567311 -3- 57 605
Q 1 2f677778 26677778 952324f6 4 13 I 33 EA lj 13S33333 3313333 122011409 2 95 Ii 61 ti -2 l8105555- -905-277-8- 326553tO 357 tiOS II) 2 6572221 3296111 11953707 357 605 E~l 4 88411445 2211111 797552 795 4 f 1 ERElll 111 11991)0)00 bull2172222-
-------------------------~------------------------------------------rou1 s SJ 3100000-
Cll
11
10
iP- en 0-0 gt aa
9
8
7
6
5
4
bull css-o CMS-o diams CMS~7
SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
F-igure Cll Air Voids at middotoesign Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 94 CMS-0 93 CMS-0 92 ICMS-0 92 CMS-0 84 ICMS-0 87
IIcss-o 79 css-o 7 0 I II
css-o 79 css-o 73
I ~_ I~ CMS-7 7 5 CMS-7 62 CMS-7 68 CMS-7 48 - - bull-- ~ -----~middot-middotmiddot--middot-middotmiddot-middot ---middotmiddot
~= Values with a OCIlOn vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids
Cl2
Table Cl3 Stabilorneter Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
272
3113
293 29
99
270
265
268 04
13
393
327
360 47
130
380
325
353 39
110
270
270
270 0
0
235
185
210 35
168
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
375
344
360
22
61
340
350
345
07
21
307
377
342
50
145
415
367
39l
33
85
350
300
3-2 5
35
109
240
245
243
04
15
C M s 7
D A T A
x s
CV
235
23-5
235
0
0
130
120
125
07
57
213
233
-223
14
63
150
200
175
35
202
350
350
350
0
0
250
250
25 o_ 0
0
Table Cl4~ ANOVA Summary Stabilorneter Value
A N O V 1
soua= SS r 01
E 2 2
7086172721 9702C93fl9
3543086361 4SS10Uf95
505343236 ~-9189501
357 357
605 605
) 1 175 6950250 1756950250 25053)2i8 443 833 EA 4 6718347112 167 9586 778 23955053 2 95 461 ~ ~544 -4 Q-432-ll-25-0- --S--~ 38 ~5-19- -3 5- ios AJ 2 941227166 47(1euro13583 57122663 357 605 EAJ 4 289779333 72319A33 10314831 2 95 II f 1
Ell ngtR -18 1r2024gt0) -i- bull112472-
---------------------------------------------------------------------0-T- ----5- 4-9B1 is~v~
Cl3
50
w 40 I ltgt a 30w I-w ~ 200 I-m lt 10I-u
0 SSH SBL FH FL GRH
AGGREGATE
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
GRL
Figure Cl3 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 350 CMS-7 250ICMS-0 360 ICMS-0 345 r=ss-o 36o rMS-0 39l
css-o 268 CMS-0 342 css-o 353 CMS-0 325 CMS-0 243Icsbull-bull _ CMS-7 235 CMS-7 12S CMS-7 223 CMS-7 175 css-o 270 css-o 210
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value
Cl4
Table Cl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOWHIGH LOW LOWHIGH D 360193 280 465 275 250A T 234 345 183 375 160 225C A
s x 214 353 232 420 218 238s s 29 11 69 64 18810
136 30 296 152 37 4 74CV D 280 440 230 355 200 320 T A
252 430 219 450 140 240C A M x 266 435 225 403 170 280s s 20 7 67 428 570
74 16 16735 250 202CV D
80 190 122 245 130 170 T A
82 180 192 235 120 180C A M X 81 185 157 240 125 175s s l 7 so 7 777
CV 18 3038 31 5 57 40
Table Cl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value
-SS--
pound 2 1309717272222 654858611111 1102309084 357 605 __ 2 3Ber61222222 194033611--111 -1-1t2J3570 -3 57 605 J 1 12)524904445 120524f94111145 711)1137379 1143 l 33
EA 4 2311~U411111145 57795111111 355~57119 295 4 ~ 1
~ + --8-066---H~i-i--2 ---4-B3-a~--H ~T4-=7-7S~J -3 S7 605 1J 2 111206 7222222 71033511111 ll3~31111 3 57 605 EAJ 4 500gt1111111 12512777778 7587162 235 4 (- 1
RAO- -18 -999 500-000( -1-6--2-7 -75-00000-
--------------------------------------------------------------------tO+--l- el-i- 3-fi-99g6-3-R-~
Cl5
bull css-o500
Q1__________---___-----~
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure ClS CohesiometerValue at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 232rMS-0 435 CMS-0 280rMS-0 266 rss-o 420 tss-o 218
css-o 214 css-o 353 CMS-0 225 CMS-0 403 css-o 238ICMS-0 170
CMS-7 81 CMS-7 185 CMS-7 157 CMS-7 240 CMS-7 125 CMS-7 175
Nrte Values with a oamon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value
~400 -I ltgt cc 300 w 1-w E 2000 -() w c 1008
CMS-0 diams CMS-7
Cl6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Table Cl7 Swell at Design Residue Content in
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
0 0000 0003 0000 0008 0000 0000A C T 0000 0005 0000 0007 0000 0002
A 0000 0004 0000 0009 0000 0000 s j( 00000 00040 00000 00080s 00000 00007
0 s 00000 00010 00000 0 0010 00000 00012
CV 00 250 00 125 00 1732 D 0000 _o 045 0020 0036 0000 0000A 0006 0029 0018 0040 0001 0000TC A 0007 0040 0022 0039 0000 0000
M x 00043 00380 00200 00383 00003 00000 s s 00038 00082 00020 00021 00006 00000 0
874 215CV 100 54 1732 oo
D 0000 0004 0000 0003 0000 0000A T 0000 0002 0000 0000 0000 0000
C A 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000
M x 00000 OQ023s 00000 00010 00000 00000 s 00000 00015 00000 00017 00000 00000
7 oo 655 1732CV 00 00 oo
Table Cl8 ANOVA Summary Swell
P N O V ~
SOUR-middotEmiddot l)f -ss- -lSmiddot F rs FM
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------E 2 C031905 )015953 7576385211 329 532 J 2 0012203 OOOf112 2~97R1n75 329 532 l 000858(1 )()QSf80 11122112111111 414 846
H LI 0016535 00)111311 1963258575 266 396 Emiddot) middot2middot 00079 51- a0ll397S 1eg ~16527 329 532 AJ 2 00011958 )0021179 111 ns1ne 329 532 EAJ II 0006609 OC01652 7e117l97t3 266 396
EDl 36 )000751 OOOJ021
TOBImiddot middot53middot ----008959-9-middot
Cl7
05
04
z 03
-I -I w
u 3 02
01
0 SBH SBL FH
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
FL GRH GRL AGGREGATE
FigureCl Swell at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 00003 css-o 00007CMS-0 00043 CMS-0 -0380 CMS-0 00200 CMS-0 00303
CMS-0 00000css-o 00080 css-o 00000Icss-o 00000 Icss-o 00040 ICSS-0 00000
CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00000CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00023 CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00010
Rte Values with ~--~~~ ~~ lb-le are not ~tatistically different
Figure Cl8 Newman-Keuls Ranking swell in
Cl8
Table Cl9o MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
-------EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
GRANITEROCKFRESNOSAN BERNARDINO
LOW LOWHIGH HIGH LOW HIGH D
124 72198 137 287 243A 227 90145 178 83 260TC 57197 135 252 270A
s 207 104 258 73139 239s s 17 05 56 29 14 17
0 CV 82 280 82638 233 53
D 197 160145 145 90 205A 19l 17092 100 80 220TC 158 105 138190A M x 182 119 11 7 85 205 156 s s 21 37 25 1607 15 0
115 737 105316 21l 83CV D 21 omiddot 240202 185 98 330A
220 20087 181 34588TC 216 210138 223 77 338A M x 215 217142 196 88 338s
s 2111 0805 58 237
23 405 120 22 96118CV
Table C20 ANOVA Summary -MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
----------------------- I N O V A
SO0RE --DF -lS--
middotE __ 2 2
401 11310n -5831137037
2008568519 --2915568519
166S53085 2111762euro92-
3-9 J29
532 532
Q 1 14f5364f296 14653646296 1215099198 4 14 746 EA-Ev
4 -frac34
2784740740 -1-1-i 0359259
696185185 -56-tl-1-79tr30-
5 772 8571 -6450815
266 middot-3-29
396 -5-32middotmiddot
110 2 355470370 177735185 1bull11738C30 329 532 EAO II 12794711075 3198euro9519 25523909 266 396
-Ei8JB 36- 11311 111euro66euro7 120596296
---------------------------------------------------------------------FOTAJ- --5-3- -31131--343-14 8-1-
Cl9
50 bull css-o ti) CMS-0 gt 40 diams CMS-7E I
a w 30I-w E 0 -I 20-ca ltC I-Cl) 10
0--------------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Cl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOWmiddot HIGH LOW
CMS-7 215 CMS-7 142 css-o 104 I ICMS-7 338 CMS-7 21 7
css-o 207 css-o 139 i CMS-7 88 CMS-0 156middot css-o middot
CMS-0 182 CMS-Q 119 CMS-0 117 CMS-0 85 CMS-0 205 css-o 73
Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
C20
-----------------------------------------
Table C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
IEMULSON
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIG_H LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A x s
CV
135 104 104
114
18
157
70 85 51
69
17
248
105 66
136
102
35
343
148 197
-173
35
201
107 101
72
93
19
201
74 107
92
91
17
182
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
128 85
174
119
31
256
73 59 -
66
10
150
69 36 65
56
18
318
158 110
-134
34
253
77 96 68
80
14
178
53 66
113
77
32
408
C M s 7
D A T A x s
CV
141 79 52
91
46
503
185 60 63
103
71
695
125 201
96
141
54
386
192 164 126
161
33
206
131 130 120
127
6
48
72 230
76
126
90
715
Table C22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
l II O Y A
-soaas -OF- -S-S- -F- FrOS
E -llmiddot J
n -tJ-AO EllJ
RROi
----------
2 2 1 u -2-2 4
36middot -------
199090000000 middot 39113 411111111111
4111296296 61982222222
-t-72-1-middot-11181-18-1-754737037011 41156 5185186
85722 middotbull)0(0000 ----------------
995115000000 -1971-7222222
11111216296 151195555556 -360-yen5-110-711 1middot
j8236851852 11166296297
middotmiddot2381 166667
111805138 -0280488 17265A9 6507548
-36111086-15058033
41589422
329 329 414 2 66 329 329 266
532 -532 746 396
-532 532 3915
-----------------------------------lOo-1- middottt 1-300-lamp833-333-3-
C21
400
CJgt ~ 300 I
0 w I-w 200
-~ 0 CJwc 1000 ()
0
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Valueat Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 ll9 CMS-7 103 ICMS-7 141 css-o 173 CMS-7 127 CMS-7 126
css-o ll4 css-o 69 1middotcss-o 102 CMS-7 161 css-o 93 css-o 91
CMS-7 91 CMS-0 66 middotCMS-0 56 CMS~O 134 CMS-0 80 CMS-0 77
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C22 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
C22
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table C23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
724 811 637
724
123
170
1289 -
1276
1283
09
07
627 628 695
650
39
60
622 940
1427
996
405
407
475 407
1276
719
483
672
803 790 498
697
172
247
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
1217 393
1260
957
489
511
2075 2879 1875
2276
532
233
1943 1195 2012
171 7
453
264
1241 1224 1208
1224
1 7
13
676 574 550
600
67
112
986 787 815
863
108
125
C M s 7
D A T A x s
CV
642 620 774
679
83
123
102 426 662
397 281
709
59 7 369 470
479 114
239
588 60l 290
493
176
357
301 263 393
319
67
210
238 284 227
250 30
121
Table C24 ANOVA Surmnary Surface Abrasion
Fmiddot F01middotmiddotss --------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------
e Amiddot
2 -gt
530361248149 22)938237037
315180624075 110469111)519
432152433 1sn1of15
329 329
532 532
1 n
1 4
[14699201852 9733 179629euro
446992gt1952 24332949074
61289-8 3335u~111
414 266
746 396
EJ J
2 2
middot59516003103 85017525926
291seoo1as1 425)8752963
4 9nn2 5 828630
329 329
532 532
EI 4 196475151852 4911877963 57349619 266 396
ERRJl 36 262551800000 72931l~-556
--------------------------------------------------------------------
middotTnUmiddot 53- middot159689-~0964815middot
C23
300
E C)
C)200 Cl)
0 J
z 0 en 100 lti a al lti
01-----r----~---------r---------SBH SBL
Figure C23
SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW
CMS-0 957 CMS-0 2276
css-o 724 css-o 1283
CMS-7 679 CMS-7 397
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content
FRESNO
HIGH
CMS-0 171 7
css-o 65o
CMS-7 479l
LOW
CMS-0 1224
ICSS-0 996
CMS-7 493
GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW
css-o
CMS-0
719
600
ICMS-0 863Icss-
CMS-7 319 CMS-7 250
Ngtte Val~ with~ ~n vertical line are not stati~tically different
Figure C24 Newman-Keuls Ranking Surface Abrasion grams
C24
APPENDIX D
DATA ANALYSIS SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS
----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
Table Dl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15
SEA
D A T A
75 85 85
85 80 85
80 75 70
65 70 70
85 90 90
80 85 85
X s
tV
817
58
71
833
29
35
7-50
50
67
683
29
42
middot88 3
29
33
833
29
35
ss 30 see
D A T A
85 80 85
75 80 80
75 85 85
70 80 70
90 85 95
90 80 90
x s
CV
833
29
35
783
29
37
81 7
58
71
733
58
79
-900
50
56
883
29
33
C M s 7
D A T A
80 75 70
60 70 55
70 70 65
65 70 60
65 70 70
70 )0 65
x s
CV
750 50
67
617 76
124
683 29
42
650 50
77
683 29
42
650
50
77
Table D2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating
rmiddot rs F05 F 0 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------F 2 235 712593 1179 f-296297 553913Q113 329 532 a 2 63 bullTlt1ll81I R 31L97UC7U 1521731 3 29 532 E~
11 3f2 116i14f Jmiddot 39 (1)7111~gtI 1
3~2 ~-2900 9976~5185
17 ~li347F3 UfB47826
4 14 256
746 96
i) ~ pound 2S 11252i 12 29(-29 bull 5086957 329 532
a~ 2 12 ~-~737r o lt19518~ 2E260e7 329 53 2 u ll 1f3 bull illf illt7 41t3S1B52 191156522 2 G6 3~f
iE1190il 3i 76 pound61iz~57 212~-25
Dl
-~ -CJ z I-lt(
0 0 U1 -lt( C bull SS 15 SEA w 25 SS 30 SEA CJ cc
diams CMS - 7CJ lt(
0 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dle Mean Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
I SS-30 733SS-301 $33 SS-15amp 833 lss-301 sn 7 I ISS-30 900 SS-30 883
SS-151 817 SS-301 783 SS-15 683 SS-15 883 SS-15 833SS-lSi 750
CIS--7 750 CS-7 617 OS-7 683 CMS-7 650 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650
Ngtte Values with a comon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating
D2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
Table D3 Film Stripping
EMULSION
AGGREGATE SAN
BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK
s s
15
0 A T A
30
15 20
30 15
25
X s
CV
225
106
47l
250
71
283
200
71 354
s s
30
D A T A
25
25
0
0
5
0
X s
CV
25middoto
oo
00
oo oo
oo
2middotmiddot5
35
1413
C M s 7
D A T A
0
0 0
5
0 0
X s
CV
oo
00 oo
25
35
1413
oo
00 oo
Table D4 ANOVA Swnmary Film Stripping
----------------- ---------------- --middot-----------middot----- middot--middotmiddotmiddot middot- middotmiddot-middot----middot -middot-- middotmiddotmiddot--- --- -------- -A N O V J
-SW~ middotnt r-
pound 2 14333333113 7166666667 27 1S78lttl7 l 2 2]33333333 1165666euro67 middot11t1210~26 Eirl 141 55f 3333335 13958333311 i2894737
Dlli~RI 9 237 50CCDIOmiddot) 2638888P9
lOUL t7 bull--- bullbull - bull- 0 bull bullbull bull- bull bull 0 -------- bull-- bull- bull---bull ---- lt -bullbull bull - bullbullbull--bullbullbullbullbull-bullbull-- bullbullbull bull ___ bull --bull bull bull bull --- bull bull-bullho bullbull bull- bull bull ~-- bull- UO rArr-d bull
D3
cit -w
0 lt( ll a (I)
C w 0 C-a I-ti)
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
20
1
0 SB F GR
Figure D3c Film Stripping
SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO
Iss-3
SS-15
250
225
SS-15~7 250
25
SS-15
ISS-30
200
25
ClIS-7 oo middot SS-30 00 CMS-7 00
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping
D4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue 3Content 10 psi
-------ElAULSWN
----QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCK SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
D S$ 1U H9 171 185 110 159
i22 2~1 165 197 159 165A15Jo-ot----t----+---ii---+----t-----ti 132 140 168 191 135 162
SEA s i3 1 4 9 35 4
CV Ul2 10 25 44 258 26
$5 ---
D
~ A
158
140
189
198 184 187
212
201
178
173
222
199
gtUfl x l49 194 186 207 176 211 SEA s 13 6 2 8 4 16
CV 85 33 11 38 20 77
C M
D A T A
80
82 55 48
35
63
73
77
38
45 55
65
s x 81 52 49 75 42 60
7 s
CV
1
18
5
96 20
404
3
38 5
119
7
118
Table D6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus
--=======-=-middot------=====--=- ---------------------==-~----------=-----e=-----BF SS lS F F05 F01
pound 2 ln~13~ 3lBillllll1l 52367 191141145 3715181747 357 605 I 2 29111 GllS5SSS6 111155 bull 5211778 103289966 357 605 l 1 3l$3351l11112 33$3-3611112 240095590 4113 A33 lEamp liL 31121111l11U1t zst-n22t77 8 ssu21119a 295 461 pound~ 2 1217222222 16093611111 432112657 357 605 III 2 n~ bullEHOq 1a ----------
521iwSSSS5 15S911111111 25Jot 5lll)~Oll)il))I
31l527777R 4117277777~ iJl9166657
22C3627) -2H1157
357 2~95
6~5 11 61
-=====------middot--- -- -- middotmiddot-- --middot-llOl~L lS
DS
bull SS 15 SEA 11 SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
-(D -l Q 0 E J-
ffi 1 J-(J wa gtlt 0 Q--------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL (I
AGGREGATE
Figure D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-3~1 l49 SS-3H J86 SS-10 207 SS-30 176 SS-30 211
SS-15amp 132 SS-15amp l40 SS-151168 SS-l51 l91 ss-lSi 135 SS-15 162I I I CS-7 81 CMS-7 52 OS-7 42 CMS-7 60
llite Values with a amron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent
Figure D6 Newman-Keuls Ranking 2 Day 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi
D6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Table D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Contentr 10 psi
-EMULSION OUALITY LEVELcAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15
SEA
D A T A
325
271
l]JD
260
390
340
319
348
272
367
302
356
x s
CV
29S
38
128
285
35
124
365
35
97
334
21
62
320
67
21 0
329
38
116
ss 30 SEJ
0 A T A
282
310
337
255
303
374
362
307
318
308
289
329
x s
CV
296
20
67
296
58
196
339
50
148
335
39
116
313
7
23
309
28
92
C M s 7
D A T A
78
64
110
95
75
73
110
135
80
90
85
7
83
110
135
x s
CV
71
10
139
103
11
104
74
1
19
123
18
144
123
18
144
Table D8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus
A N O V ll
E 2- 3r39El11 3middotl8tB89 196 994 L19 44 44 5 178 q233024 3 57 6 CS 2 9111~7222223 4058 3611112 3 57577(13 357 6csbulla 11 611~ li9llll41115 ~16 ampll44445 S585579 443 833
_n_ sect 251l-illll41sectl41 -531 31i 11111 AS7121pound3 295 4 61 EJ 2 lt 115 $555555 227 521777 8 1994213 357 605 iampJ 2 170555555 15)277778 0770121 357 605 __ElJ 1324111ilJlilil4 5 208 bull 11Ul 11 bull 184922 2 95 4 ( 1
nan 11 19P73 SOOJIO~ 11111D833l33
middotmiddot-- =--=--=-==-===--c-=-c------_--=--ngtllllll
----------------------------------middot----
D7
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
traquo diams CMS - 7a ()
0--Gl ~- I J _J bull C 02 E I-z w J-(J w C
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATEmiddot
Figure D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HJGH lOW HJGH LOW HIGH LOW
I I I Iss-il51 298 1SS-31l 295 ss-]5~ 365 SS-30 335 1middot SS-15 320 SS-15 329
SS-301 296 SS-l5amp 235 SS-301 339 SS-15 334 SS-30 313 SS-30 309
CIIS--7 71 OS-7 103 CHS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123
t-bte Values with a armon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D8 Newman-Keuls Ranking Full Cure
Resilient Modulus 103 psi
D8
----- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D9 Density at Design Residue Content pcf
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
LOWHJGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH D l341 6 ll339 1347 1338 1523ss 1500A T 1356 133S 1350 1333 1513 1497A
1~ x l351 l337 1349 1336 1518 1499 sSEA 07 02 02 04 07 02
05 02 02 03CV 05 01
D 1362 1352 1370 1355 1545A 1520ss T 1371 1355 1361 1354 1550 1525
30 A
x 1367 1354 1366 1355 1548 1523 SEA 02 06s 06 01 04 04
05 02 05 01 02 02CV D 1373 1375 1380 1370 1537 1543AC T 1385 1375 137 9 1360 1535 1545AM x 1379 1375 1380 1365 1536 1544s s 09 oo 01 07 01 017
06 ooCV 01 05 01 01
Table DlO ANOVA Summary Density
N O V ll -----middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddotmiddot-- -- --------- -------middot --------------- ----- - - -
smI=pound DF ss F F05 F01
pound 2 2738H9 310369445 153505090 357 605 ~ 2 2273iWlllbull38B9 11369544445 5530 gt35704 357 lj -~5 ~ 1 11-6~2SilllaquollO 12 602500C 524057772 443 R33 n I tpoundlUll11 Jl-69lll45 2-324621e 2 95 4 61 E 2 3131poundpound57 15i5S33J 7 7537nB 357 li os lJ 2 ltClfltSf-57 0433334 21458C6 357 s 05 n~ Iii )l216poundfi6lii 9556667 47372764 295 451
EHJii 11l 3 bull nsilraquorn 2019444
------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -- -middotmiddot-middot ----- -middotmiddot - middot-------
35 23611rJC556
D9
1 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
-0 a gt1 ()
z
diams CMS-7
w C
120 SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure D9 Density at Design Residue Coritent
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
OS--7 1379 aS-7 ]375 IClIS-7 l380 IOlS-7 1365 ISS-30 1548 CMS-7 1544ISS-30~ 1367 SS--30~ J354 SS-30~ 1366 SS-30~ 1355 CMS-7 1536 SS-30 1523
SS-15bull 1351 ss-is~ 1337 SS-15bull 1349 ss-1s 1336 SS-15 1518 SS-15 1499
NJte Values with a omron vertical lme are not statistically different
Figure D10 Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcf
DlO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
Table D11 Air Voids at Design Residue Content
-EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
107
)5
9 10l
91
99
79
99
80
83
8 bull5
84
I s
ICY
U)
Ill 9
B4
10l
03
28
95
06
60
89
14
159
82
02
26
85
01
08
ss 30j
SEA
D A T A
90
93
92
85
92
96
86
84
66
67
74
73
x s
CV
92
02
23
89
05
56
94
03
30
85
01
l 7
67
01
ll
74
01
10
C M s 7
D A T A
77
73
62
61
73
62
63
71
71
65
48
55
x s
CV
75
03
38
62
O~l
12
68
08
u5
67
06
96
68
04
62
52
05
96
Table Dl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids
A ll O V A --e--ee-ee=-==== -- -- middot- -- --- middot- - ------- - middot-----middot----middot ______ __________ ---middot- ----- - ------------- -
iiUEllilE ss ~s F F01
E 45111Hoiii6pound 225l08333 812457541 357 605 ll 1~-lilliillt~~)Q 7930)000 2519405 357 505 IJJ 11 ili$6J4141~ 16469444 59230768 443 8 33 E1 2J53ll3ll -5S5333 4 -2 bull 11755245 295 4 6 1
EJ 15672223 bull 783pound 112 2~131820 357 605 I 21022223 bull 1li 1112 bull 3$35365 357 cs
EampJ 2971111ll J27778 26713286 2 95 4t1 iElllllHgt 5cgt~SiIJOIgt -2790556
-middot--middot ------- --middot - middotmiddot- -middotmiddot--middot-- --3li
D11
11 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
-l
a - 8
-a 0 7gt tc ltI 6
5
4 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dll
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot
middot HIGH LOW
SS-]5amp JlJl ISS-ll5~ 10l
ISS-301 92 SS-311l11 89ICMS-7 75 CS-7 fi2
Air Voids at Design Residue Content
FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
=- 95 I I ISS-15 89 SS-15 82 SS-15 8 5
SS-31 94 SS-30 85 SS-30 74ICMS-7 68
OS-7 68 CMS-7 67 SS-30 67 CMS-7 52
Ngtte Values with a ommn vertical line are not statistically dilferent
Figure D12 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids
Dl2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
middotmiddotEMULSION OUAUTY LEVEL
~- AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
48S 3g_g
295
middot 32 8
439
396
397
418
288
307
223
307
X s
CV
443
64
144
312
23
75
418
30
73
408
15
36
298
13
45
265
59
224
ss 3Wo SEA
0 A T A
400
403
367
283
342
411
392
262
310
32-4
292
236
x s
CV
402
02
05
325
59
183
377
49
130
327
92
281
31 7
10
31
264
40
150
C M s 7
D A T A
235
235
130
120
213
233
150
200
350
350
250
250
x s
CV
235
00
00
125
07
57
223
14
63
175
35
202
350
oo oo
250
00
oo
Table Dl4 ANOVA Swnrnary Stabilometer Value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------A N O V A
---------~----------middot------middot-middotmiddot-- -middot--middot--middotmiddot--middot------ bull middotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middot middot------middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot--- --middotmiddot ---_ -- middotmiddot-middotmiddot-- -- - - - -----ss r r05 r01
2 1 i 7~ Sbull1lfipound5161S 5879033333 332259711 357 605 I 2 igtS895QGDgt 279475000 195117552 357 ~os i ll ~l ~
11 111 2 2
l~illflll1111111 7DS nll3331
1~il])2222] 755J5556
~ 111 8 11111~=-- 10115 834 71011111
37 7502778
275769841 128178912
U938281 251M309
11113 295 357 357
833 4f1 605 605
Ell~ 14middot 3~53lt1$1H 116340278 5750926 295 461 fElilli U 25977~illlllCII~ 1111H72222
------------------------ bull- ~bull OOM---bullbullbullbull- - bull------_________ _
roru
013
w J ltC gt a w 1-w E 0 I-m ltC Ishyen
SBH SBL FH FL
bull SS 15 SEA 5S 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-)Sll 441_3 SS-l 325I SS-JSi 4131 SS-15 40 8 CMS-7 350 SS-15 265
SS-30 402 SS-JSa 31_2I ISS-30~ 377 SS-30~ 327 SS-30 317 SS-30 264
CS-7 235 CMS-7 125 ISS-15 298 CMS-7 250
Nlte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D14 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value
Dl4
-------------------
Table Dl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
ii3
ii2
l7-1
ilJD3
236
76
308
62
112
85
222
180
l s
CY
63
lJ1
10
Jl39
SlJ
363
l56
J13
725
185
174
940
99
19
194
201
30
148
ss 30 SEA
0 A T A
229
306
266
187
78
130
260
136
157
212
186
164
x s
CV
268
55
204
227
56
247
104
37
354
198
88
443
185
39
211
175
16
89
C M s 7
D A T A
80
82
190
180
122
192
245
235
130
120
170
180
x s
CV
81
l
18
185
7
38
157
50
315
240
7
30
125
7 57
175
7
40
Table Dl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value
--------------------middot--------------------------------------------------------------A N O V A
-=====-=-=--=-- ===== ss
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1i712 7222222 83563611111 226671165 357 605 I 2 l~12 lllllliilllllllB9 71144441145 129864 357 605 ~ 1l 251116l 144141llllj 2ti-~H~bull4dimiddot4 4 44 5 71775602 443 833 n l4 37511ll 777JTI7JJ S395bull J 9 ~4middot444 2548 5405 295 4 e 1 poundJ 2 72lllS3SlffiifISlmiddot9 3fi22f9111114UU 9026921 357 6C5
n 2 1 iSigt555S
11321Bl 111111I 117lIT177778
33220277778 1277032 9~11333
357 297
605 461
Eliflll 11 f15357 tlOilOOibull 3ilf65Jgt)oo
---------------------------------------middot-------------------------------------------
D15
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7w
J lt(
gt a w Jshyw I 0-() w
8
O--------r-----r-----------r----r-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
c 1
Figure D15
SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW
SS-3(1JlS 268
81IOS-7
ISS-]5i 63 SS-lSl 139
Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 240 SS-30 185 SS-15 201
SS-lSi 155 SS-30l 198 CMS-7 125 SS-30 175
SS-JOi 104 SS-151 185 SS-15 99 CMS-7 175
Note Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Dl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value
D16
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D17 Swell at Design Residue Content in
EfAULSEON
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDI NO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH lOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 s~
D A T A
048 -
0413
06S
069
on
005
006
008
-025 045
005
004
004
005
009
014
Jt s
CY
HS
0010
000
D68
-003
45
bull 006
002
241
035
010
286
004
001
133
009
005
483
ss 30 SEA
D A T A
023
023
020
063
066
055
000
ooo
008
031
023
028
000 000 003
ooo
001
000
x s
CV
022
002
79
061
006
93
003
005
1732
027
004
148
oin
002
1732
ooo
001
1732
C M s 7
D A T A
000
ooo
000
004
002
001
ooo
ooo
000
003
000
ooo 000 000 ooo
ooo
ooo
000
x s
CV
000
ooo
ooo
002
002
655
ooo
ooo
ooo
001
002
1732
ooo
ooo
ooo
ooo
ooo
000
Table D18 ANOVA Summary Swell ( Transformed Data)
A N O Y A
E 2 _1025326 0912663 2353471(154 329 532 -Amiddot middotmiddot2 1366452 0683226 1761825136 329 532 0 1 0368219 03613219 949521081 1114 7116
EA 11 04627$7 0115697 298345558 266 396 -EQ- 2-- --006-903G- -0(134515-middot -8-9003553 middot3l9 -S-32 A) 2 0150358 ~0075179 193863014 329 532 UO 4 0083986 0020997 54143375 26 396
-ERRORmiddot 36 0139606middot 0003178
-TOTIIL 53 --446-576-11
D17
05 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
04
z -J
J w IJJ
SBH SBL
diams CMS - 7
~oo
_02
01
FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dl7 Swell at Design Residue Content
SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-ll51 ii-IS SS-]5i il68 SS-15 a006 SS-15 bull 035 SS-15 004 SS-15 009I I I I SS-3Cli 022 SS-301 061 ISS-301 003 SS-30 bull 027 ISS-30 bull 001 ISS-30 bull 000
ClS-7 000 CIS-7 002 OS-7 000 OIS-7 001 CMS-7 000 CMS-7 000
NJte Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D18 Newman-Keuls Ranking Swell in
D18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
Table Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSl10N
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOWHIGH 0 156 48 175 229 2lO 125ss A ll5 60 20l ll7 228 120T 13_g 4e 170 132 212 130A15 i 137 52 182 200 2l 7 125 smiddotSEA 2l 37 l7 30 lO 05
1middot5]CY 133 92 148 46 40 D 98 106 lll 76 2l 0 lllAss 203 109 76 5l 235 95T ll3 85 63 59 233 125
30 A
x 138 100 83 62 226 llOSEll s 57 l3 25 l3 l4 l5
412 131 298 206 62 136CV D 2lO 202 185 98 330 240A 220 87 18l 88 345 200C T 216 138 223 77 338 2lOAM x 215 142 196 88 338 217s
5805 23 lls 08 2l7
23 405 ll8 120 22 96CV
Table D20 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Stabilorneter Value
N O V A
-------middot------------------------------------------------------ ---------------DF -$ -F os- r01
pound 2 5919875926 2l59917963 39C147075fl 329 53 2 690 i1111pounda$11 iii 345 022110111 US51521111 329 5 32 Ill 1 763129-i296 763 1296 296 100671B132 414 7 U6
Ea t93 11171111]J)7lll 1007863519 1329576P8 266 391bullIEill -2 middot -E~ti35~259 -23middot0-H9fgt29 C-~6522- middot3 29 532 AO 2 S3amp11171t1137ll 11192351$5 55305370 329 532 El s1111i1r1075 135268519 17~qq579 266 396bullmiddotDll~t 311i 27239~333~ 7 5903711)111
53
--------------------------------------------------------middot-----------------------
D19
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA0)
gt diams CMS - 7 l I
a w 30fshyw E 0 J 2-en ltC Ishyen 10
SBH SSL FH FL GRH GRL01amp---------------------------_
AGGREGATE
Figure Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
middotHtGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
QS-1 235 CS-7 142 196 SS-15 200 CMS-7 338 CMS-7 217GS-
Iss-3H uaI I I ISS-3Qi lilG SS-15i ]S2 IOMS-7 88 SS-30 22~ SS-15 125
SS-151 137 ss-i5~ 52 SS-30~ 83 SS-30 62 SS-15 217 SS-30 110
fute Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent
Figure D20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
D20
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Table D2l MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
-------_cEMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
ss 1 sa
D A T A
x s
HIGH
Ul3 ~ JlU
43
64
IOW
~ TWlI ~
--
H1GH
159 1-43 126
143
17
LOW
123 187
60
123
64
HIGH
130 179 153
154
25
LOW
120 104 143
122
20
CV D A5S T A30 x
SEA s
171
139 88
104
110
26
-98 91 -95
4
116
114 116
69
100
27
515
TWT TWT TWT
--
159
111 101 15~
122
28
160
83 65 63
70
11
CV D AC T AM x5 s
7 CV
236
141 79 52
91
46
503
37
185 60 63
103
71
695
267
125 201
96
141
54
386
-192 164 126
161
33
206
23l
131 130 120
127
6
48
157
72 230
76
126
90
715
Too weak to test
Table D22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
SOO~e 55- -f middotFmiddot OS- F01
pound 2 19956 G31tl3Tt 99780165185 52791162 329 532 -1 2- 223ii~ 92592~-~ middot111544629630 -59015431 3middot29 5 32 J 1 n21lliiilliEiiii~ 1middot112106656666 75185029 414 746 lEJ Ill 32il76711ltCl~lll9l 132191851852 43485622 2euro6 396 ~ 2- ~373hllllllllllllllqSmiddot iiilfgtamp 1222-223- -3bull6middot3300811 -3 29 532 1i 2 1S011Hil12 75i0555556 bull ~397100 329 532 Eli
-a~llt-Iii
36 511J7777777
middot5B11113BB333 12799444444 129e l9 25 92 6middot
5771861 266 396
D21
bull SS 15 SEA U) SS 30 SEA gt diams CMS - 7E I
a w J-~ 200 0 en w5 100 0
SBH SBL FH FL AGGREGATE
GRH GRL
Figure D21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINO FRESNO
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 126SS-15 154]03 JCMS-7 161106-7 rmm SS-15 122CMS-7 127SS-30amp 95 ltMgt-7 ]Aj_ SS-15 123
SS-30 70
t-bte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
SS-30 122SS-151 93 SS-l51 fflT SS-30amp 100 SS-30 TWT
Figure D22 Ne-wman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
D22
Table D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW
ss 15 SEA
ss 30 SEA
C M s 7
HIGH D bullbullmiddot 979 715A middot 1143 569T A 1047 599
X - - 1056 - 628 s - - 82 - 77
CV - - 78 - 123
D 987 1474 548A T 907 1536 433 A 1447 615
x - - 947 1486 532 s - 57 46 92
CV - - 60 31 173 D 642 102 597 588 301A T 620 426 369 60l 263 A 774 662 470 290 3q_3
x 679 397 479 493 31 9
s 83 281 114 176 67
CV 123 709 239 357 21 0
1285 1353 1493
1377
106
77
627 72 2 634
661
53
80
238 284 22 7
250
30
121
Specimen swelled during soak could not ne tested Specimen disintegrated during testing
D23
300
E CJgt -200 en
en 0 J
z0 middot cii 100 lt( cc CD lt(
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
01--------r----T----J-----r----r SBH FH FL GRH GRL
middotAGGREGATE
Figure D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content
D24
APPENDIX E
FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL DESIGNS
Table El
Thickness T in Inches to Satisfyl
Tensile Strain Requirements (Reference 3)
Subirade l~octulus psi 30~0 6000 12000 30oco
Jverage Ann~abullAir erlerature J degF lt40 40-55 55-65 gt65 40 40-55 55-65 gt65 lt40 40-55 55-651gt65 lt4 0 40-55 55-65 gt65
T~affic EALbull 10bull
IllIf psi 50000 4 9 66 7 8 91 37 50 5e 66 2 26 28 29 2 2 2 2
1000~0 37 5 3 62 12 27 40 47 53 2 21 25 26 2 2 2 2
300000 21 J4 4 3 51 2 28 31 middot3 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
600000 2 24 3 2 39 2 2 2 _2 28 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2middot 2 2 2 290JCOO 2 2 26 33 2 2 2 22 2 2 2
Traffic EAL= 10s
trJ MR psi bull 50000 83 ll5 139 165 70 97 112 127 54 1-3 83 93 2 3 27 28 29 f-J
42 58 69 78 2 25 27 27100000 63 90 108 129 54 76 91 105
3COOOO 4o 58 73 8 3 3 51 60 73 24 39 ~8 56 2 2 20 22
600000 28 45 55 67 21 37 47 55 2 21 36 44 2 2 2 2
900000 21 37 4 7 57 2 30 39 48 2 21 29 37 2 I 2 2 2
TraCf1c 2 ~AL a 10~ I ia psi bull 50000 130 161 216 2~ 116 16l 187 213 98 131 151 172 63 66 93 58
82 0100000 98 14) 171 203 68 126 152 176 75 106 125 142 52 7 3
3CCOOO 6o 91 11 3 139 55 82 101 122 4 7 69 86 102 31 49 59 59
e~oooo 46 68 86 106 ~o 60 76 94 3middot 3 52 64 i9 2 35 4 r 54
900~00 37 56 72 69 )2 51 63 80 24 4 3 5 4 67 2 28 3 8 ul Trarr1el EAL~ 10 7
la psi bull 50000 192 24 24 24 178 239 24 24 156 205 235 24 12l 153 165 17 3 I
24 24 228 24 119 168 195 222 95 129 147 1s IlCOOCO 1~5 21 0 13 5 193
56 aa 10a 12 I-3CC000 aa 136 167 205 ~-3 12 156 186 74 11l 138 16~
I- l 6 a2 10060~ 1 ouo 6 4 100 125 156 59 92 ll 6 l~ 5 53 82 104 128
108 3 3 53 6 8 859ccooo 53 82 10 5 132 so 77 97 121 4 ~ 68 86
For asphalt volume Vb= 11 are air voids Va= 5 Use Figure El to correct thickness of other valuemiddots of Vb and Va
Table E2
Subsradlt Mcdulus psi
Thickness T in Inches to Satisfys Subgrade Strain Requirements (Reference 3)
6100 120003000 300CC
tr N
A~erage A~nual Ar Te11perature degF
Traffic EALbull 10bull
~IP psi 50000a
100000
300000
600000
900000
Traffic EAL 10 5
MR psibull 50000
lC0000
300000
600000
900000
Tra~~lc EAL c 1c6
MR psibull 50000
100000
300000
600POO
900000
Trafficz EALbull 10 7
MRt psibull 50000
100000
300000
600000
900000
lt40
55
55
55
55
55
81
81
81
81
81
115
115
115
115
115
155
155
155
155
155
40-55
83
60
55
55
55
121
87
81
Bl
Bl
168
123
11
115
ll5
226
165
155
155
155
55-65 gt65 lt40
108 115 46
73 82 46
55 55 46
5_ 45
55 55 46
145 165 69
106 120 69
a1 81 69
81 81 69
81 81 69
201 224 98
14B 165 98
115 115 98
115 115 98
115 115 98
24 24 1)6
199 222 135
15 155 136
155 155 136
155 155 136
40-55
10
50
46
46
46
103
74
69
69
69
150
108
98
98
9B
204
150
135
136
136
55-65 G5 lt40
83 93 30
61 70 30
46 46 30
45 46 30
46 46 30
124 139 55
91 102 55
69 69 55
69 69 55
69 69 55
173 193 83
130 147 83
98 98 83
98 98 83
98 98 83
239 24 120
179 199 120
136 136 120
136 136 120
135 136 120
40-55
4
3~
30
30
30
83
60
55
55
55
122
90
83
83
83
17 5
130
120
middot12 o
120
55-65 gt65 lt~O
62 69 25
46 53 25
30 30 25
30 30 25
30 30 25
9 106 29
82 29i 2 middot 55 55 29
55 55 29
55 55 29
144 15S 60
108 12l 60
83 83 60
83 83 60
83 83 6 0
205 226 90
155 112 90
120 120 90
120 120 90
120 120 90
40-55
31
25
25
25
25
52
30
29
29
29
86
65
60
60
60
127
98
90
90
90
55-65 bull65
33 35
29 3c
25 25 I 25 25 i 25 2s
51 67
47 52
29 29
29 29
29 29
95 10
76 85
60 I 6C
6C i 6o 50
14bull 3 14
112 126
90 90
90 90
90 90
Tj In Tc In 24 2 22
20
18
16 3
14
12 4
~ 10 Va+ vb 5
099
8 08 6
077 7 06
6 805
9045 1003
4 12
14
3 16
18
20
22 2 24
Figure El Correction of Pavement Design Thickness for Air Voids and
Asphalt Content of Mix (Reference 3)
E3
-------
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000 psi
MAAT 55- 65 F-Ul 400 CL
C) 0 300 (J) J
~ 200 0 ~
I- 100z w J-(J) 0+----------------------C w 0 2 4 6 8 middot10 12
THICKNESS IN
1X104 EAL
1X105EAL
Figure E2 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
M-AAT )65 F- -~---Ul 400 1x104 EALCL
CW)
0 300 (J) J 200C 0 ~
-~ 100 w -J -(J) 0w 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a
THICKNESS IN
1X105EAL
Figure E3 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 6000 psi MAAT = )65F
s
E4
w 400 c
()
0 300 () - 200 Cl 0 E
~ 100 w J-
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT 56-65 F
1x10 EALI 4
I 1X105 EAL
w o~---------------------r-w 1 2 3 4a
THICKNESS IN
Figure E4 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT )65F-w 400 4I 1X10 EALc () I 1X105EAL 0 300 I () I - I 200C I0 E I I- 100z w I-J I-() 0w 1 2 3 4c
THICKNESS IN~
Figure ES Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65Fs
ES
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
MAAT 55-65 F-en400 41X10 EALIC
(I) 1X105EAL middot 0
I I 300
en I J 200C 0
f-- 100z w J-en 0LU 2 4 6 8 10 14a
-THICKNESS IN
Figure E6 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
MmiddotAAT )65 F cn4oo I 1X104 EALa
(I) 1X105EAL 0 300
I I
en -I
~200 0 ~ 100 LU --en -I
0-1-----------------------LU 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a THICKNESS IN
Figure E7 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = )65F
E6
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT 55-65 F-u 400 41x10 EAL0
M 1x105EAL 0 T- 300 -en J 200C 0 E I- 100z w-J- en 0w C 0 middot1 2 3 4 middot5 6
THICKNESS IN
Figure E8 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000psi
M-AAT )65 F-en400
I --- - - ~- 1X104 EAL
C
a 1X105 EAL
0 I T- 300
I-en J
200 C 0 E
I- 100z w J-en 0w 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
THICKNESS IN
Figure E9 Thickness For Subgrade StrainRequirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65F
s
E7
Table E3
Thickness Requirements inches
= 6000 psi EAL= 1 X 104 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
MrT
l
CF Tc Ts
246000 34
64 37 43
300000 31
68 4middot 0 43
391000 27
lt 61 33 43
362000 28
64 31 43
260000 28
bull bull 61 35 43
333000 30
65 33 43
C M s 0
Mr Ti CF T Tc
s
259000 29
59 36 43
288000 32
bull 61 3 8 43
271000 32
59 39 43
339000 30
60 37 43
284000 32
59 40 43
365000 29
60 37 43
C M s 7
M T7
l
CF TTc
s
71000 55
65 60 43
103000 47 71
45 43
74000 54
67 53 43
123000 44 69
45 43
85000 52
65 54 43
123000 44
73 46 43
ss 15
M T7
l
CF T Tc s
298000 31
57 40 43
285000 32
59 38 43
365000 28
58 37 43
334000 30
61 36 43
320000 30
60 36 43
329000 30
61 36 43
ss 30
M T7
l
CF Tc Ts
296000 31
60 37 43
296000 31
62 36 43
339000 30
59 38 43
335000 30
bull 63 35 43
313000 31
65 34 43
309000 31
65 34 43
Ngtte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi TI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume middotTc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= llrickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
E8
Table E4
Thickness Requirements inches
Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
246000 68
64 74 70
300000 62 68
62 68
391000 55 61
65 68
362000 57 64
63 68
260000
57 bull 61
68 70
333000 59 65
65 68
C M s 0
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
259000 65 59
80 70
288000 63
bull 61 75 68
271000 64 59
78 70
339000 59 60
72 68
284000 63 59
78 68
365000 57 60
70 68
C M s 7
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
71000 100
bull 65 107 105
103000 90 bull 71
84 88
74000 100
67 102 104
123000 85 69
85 81
85000 95 65
102 97
123000 85 73
78 81
ss 15
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
298000 62 57
78 68
285000 63 59
76 68
365000 57 58
72 68
334000 59 61
72 68
320000 60 60
73 68
329000 59 61
70 68
ss 30
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
296000 62
60 74 68
296000 62
62 71 68
339000 59 59
72 68
335000 59
63 68 68
313000 60
bull 65 65 68
309000 60
65 65 68
1bte
M = Resilient mJdulus in psirf = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
E9
Table ES
Thickness Requirements inches 4
Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M Tdeg
J
CF T Tc
246000 40
64 46 45
300000middot 37 68
37 43
391000 33 61
38 43
362000 35
64 39 43
260000 39
61 45 45
333000 35
65 38 43
C M s 0
MT J
CF T Tc
s
259000 39 59
48 45
288000 38 61
middot4 6 44
271000 38 59
47 44
339000 35 60
43 43
284000 38 59
46 44
365000 35 60
43 43
C M s 7
M T7
J CF T Tc
s
71000 60 65
65 68
103000 52 71
48 64
74000 60 67
60 68
123000 50 bull 69 59 62
85000 58 65
63 67
123000 50 73
49 62
ss 15
M T7
J CF T Tc
s
298000 37 57
50 43
285000 38 59
48 44
365000 35 58
45 43
334000 35 61
43 43
320000 3 6
60 44 43
329000 37 61
45 43
ss 30
M T7
J CF TTc
s
296000 37 60
45 43
296000 37 62
43 43
339000 35 59
44 43
335000 35 bull 63
41 43
313000 36
65 39 43
309000 36
65 39 43
Nrte
M = Resilient nodulus in psiTI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T
5 = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El0
Table E6
Thickness Requirements inches
105E = 6000 psi EAL= 1 x psi MAAT = )65Fs
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
246000
79 64
87 70
300000
74 68
74 70
391000 69
61 81 70
362000 70
64 77 70
260000 77
61 90 70
333000 71
65 77 70
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 77
59 94 70
288000 75
61 90 70
271000 76
59 92 70
339000 71
60 87 70
284000 75
59 91 70
365000 69
60 85 70
C M s 7
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
71000 111
65 118 112
103000 103
middot11 95 98
74000 111
67 110 11l
123000 98
69 95 93
85000 109
65 119 109
123000 98
73 87 93
ss 15
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
298000 74 57
94 70
285000 7 5 59
94 70
365000 69 58
88 70
334000 7 1 middot 61
84 70
320000 72 60
87 70
329000 71 61
84 70
ss 30
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
296000 74
60 90 70
296000 74
62 86 70
339000 71 59
87 70
335000 71
63 82 70
313000 73
bull 65 78 70
309000 73
65 78 70
Note
M = Resilient midulus in psi11 = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness f9r tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade stram requirements inches
Ell
Table E7
Thickness Requirements inches4
= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
middot~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO -GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
246000 2 0
64 23 25
300000 20
68 2middot 0 25
391000 20
61 24 25
362000 20
64 23 25
260000 20
61 24 25
333000 20
65 22 25
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 20
59 25 25
288000 20
bull 61 24 25
271000 20
59 25 25
339000 20
60 25 25
284000 20
59 25 25
365000 20
60 25 25
C M s 7
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
71000 20
65 22 31
103000 20
middot71 20 29
74000 20
67 21 31
123000 20
69 20 28
85000 20
65 22 30
123000 20
73 20 28
ss M T7
l
298000 20
285000 20
365000 20
334000 20
320000 2 0
329000 20
15 CF T Tc
s
57 26 25
59 25 25
58 26 25
61 24 25
bull 60 25 25
61 24 2 i
ss 30
M T7
l
CF TTc
s
296000 20
60 25 25
296000 20
62 24 25
339000 20
59 25 25
335000 20
bull63 23 25
313000 20
65 22 25
309000 20
65 22 25
N)te
M = Resilient nodulus in psi middot T7 = Unrorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inchesct= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume T = Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T~ = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El2
Table E8
Thickness Requirements inches
Es= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s
M T7
l
246000 22
300000 20
391000 20
362000 20
260000 21
333000 20
s 0
CF T Tc
s
64 24 32
68 20 29
61 24 29
64 23 29
61 24 l 1
65 23 29
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 21 59
25 31
288000 21
bull 6J 24 30
271000 21 59
25 30
339000 20 60
25 29
284000
21 59
25 1 n
365000
20 60
25 2 q
C M
M T7
l
71000 27
103000 25
74000 27
123000 24
85000
26
123000
24 s 7
CF T Tc
s
65 28 53
71 24 45
bull 67 28 53
69
23 43
65
27 49
73
22 43
ss M T7
l
298000 20
285000 21
365000 20
334000 20
320000 20
329000 20
15 CF
TTc
s
57 27 29
59 26 30
58 27 29
61 24 29
60 25 29
61 24 2 q
ss 30
M r~i CF T Tc
s
296 ooomiddot 20 60
24 29
296000 20 62
23 29
339000 20 59
24 29
335000 20 63
23 29
313000 20 65
23 29
309000 20 65
23 29
i-krte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psiTf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade strain requirements inches
El3
Table E9
Thickness Requirements inches 4 = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
EMULSION __ QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
246000 20 64
23 25
300000 20 68
21 25
391000 20 61
24 25
362000 20 64
23 25
260000 20 61
24 25
333000 20 65
22 25
C M s 0
259000 20 59
26 25
288000 20
bull 61 middot24 25
271000 20 59
26 25
339000 20 60
25 25
284000 20 59
26 25
365000 20 60
25 25
C M s 7
MT7
1 CF T Tc
s
71000 20 65
22 58
103000 2~0 middotn
20 52
74000 20 67
21 58
123000 20 69
20 48
85000
20 65
22 57
123000
20 73
20 48
$$
15
MTdeg
1
CF T Tc
s
-298 000 20 57
27 25
285000 20 59
26 25
365000 20 58
26 25
334000 20 61
24 25
320000 2 0 60
25 25
329 000 20 61
24 25
ss 30
MT7
1
CF T Tc
s
296000 20 60
25 25
296000 20 62
24 25
339000 20 59
26 25
335000 20 63
23 25
313000 20 65
22 25
309000 20 65
22 25
tote
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot rf = Unagtrrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El4
Table ElO
Thickness Requirements inches 5E = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
s
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T--deg
J
CF T Tc
s
246000
24 64
27 31
300000
23 68
24 29
391000
22 61
25 29
362000
22 64
2_s 29
260000
26 61
31 30
333000
22 65
24 29
C M s 0
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s
259000 23
59 28 30
288000 23
bull 61 27 30
271000 23
59 28 30
339000 22
60 26 29
284000 23
59 28 30
365000 21
60 25 29
C M s 7
ss 15
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s M T--deg
J
CF T Tc
s
71000 28
bull 65 30 61
298000 23 57
25 29
103000 27
~ 71 27 52
285000 23 59
28 30
74000 28
bull 67 28 60
365000 22
58 28 29
123000 26
69 26 48
334000 22 61
25 29
85 000 28
65 31 58
320000 22
60 26 29
123000 26
73 24 48
329000 22 61
25 29
55
30
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s
296000 23
60 27 29
296000 23
62 27 29
339000 22 59
27 29
335000 22
63 25 29
313000 22
65 24 29
309000 23
65 25 29
tbte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot Tf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Ihickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
II11~~~1~~i~IIII 08860 ElS
Table 34
SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL
SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT
DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS
effect of aggregate type effect of aggregate quality level effect of emulsion type
AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction
A a E AQ AE QE AQE
Emulsion Compatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA y NA y NA NA
2 Day Mxfalus y y y - y y y
Full Cure Mldulus y - y - - - -Density y y y - - y y
Air Voids y y y - - - -
Stabilometer - y y - y - -
COhesiometer - y - - - - -MIS Stabilaneter y y y y y - -
MVS COhesianeter y y y - y y -y
~ y y y y y y
Surface Abrasion
LEGEND
Effects
A = Q = E =
AQE = three-way interaction
Significance
Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level
NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way
92
8 All of the paving mixtures containing low qualshyity aggregates and SEA emulsions studied met Caltrans stabilometer requirements (30 minimum) for Type C asphalt concrete however several mixtures did not meet swell and moisture vapor susceptibility requirements for Type C asphalt concrete Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions which met swell requirements were FH GRH and GRL with SS-15 SEA emulsion and SBH FH FL GRH and GRL with SS-30 SEA emulsion MVS conshyditioned stabilometer value requirements were met only by FL and GRH with the SS-15 SEA emulshysion and GRH with the SS-30 SEA emulsion
9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other consider~ ations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others
93
110 RECOMMENDATIONS
111 This study has investigated the properties of paving mixtures containing several low quality aggregates and several types of emulsified binders Test methshyods and criteria used to design and assess mixture characteristics were those specified for hot-mix asphalt concrete in California An objective of the research study is to determine if solvent free emulshysified binders can be used in place of cutback asphalt binders Therefore in order to permit drawing of appropriate conclusions from the data presented in this report on the effectiveness of the emulsions studied for replacing cutback asphalts additional laboratory work is required It is suggested that properties and characteristics of mixtures containing the project aggregates and cutshyback asphalts be determined The study should evalshyuate the same properties considered in this study Determination of mixture characteristics using cutshyback binders would permit direct comparisons between the cutback and emulsified binder systems and the drawing of more definite conclusions Additionally a study which would determine properties of mixtures containing hot-mixed asphalt cement would be of aid in evaluating results
112 After completion of the additional laboratory studshyies if results so indicate it is recommended that several field experimental studies using aggregates ranging in quality from low to high with solvent free emulsified asphalt binders be undertaken Projects should be constructed in several climatic regions in California (wet and arid) and should include control sections containing both cutback and if possible hot-mixed asphalts Proper labshyoratory mixture designs construction control and field monitoring of results and performance should be used Results of these experiments should proshyvide indications of performance of the various mixtures in actual use
113 Results of this study indicate that mixtures conshytaining the SEA binders are detrimentally affected by moisture to a greater degree than with standard emulsions However performance of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions may be adequate in arid regions Therefore it is recommended that in order
94
to further investigate the usefulness of paving mixshytures containing the SEA emulsions that field experimental test sections using the SEA emulsions be constructed and evaluated$
It is strongly suspected that the moisture vapor susceptibility of the solvent free asphalt emulsion mixes evaluated herein could be reduced by a slight modification of the emulsion formulations This possibility should be evaluated
95
References
1 Request For Proposals Investigation Into The Nature Of Emulsified Asphalts Compatible With California Local Aggregates And Substitution Of Sulfur For Asphalt In Aqueous Emulsified Systems California Air Resource Board Research Division Sacramento Calishyfornia March 1980
2 American Society for Testing and Materials 1981 Annual Book of Standards Part 15 Road Paving Bituminous Materials Travelled Surface Characterisshytics Philadelphia PA 1981
3 Interim Guide to Full-Depth Asphalt Paving Using Varshyious Asphalt Mixes The Asphalt Institute Pacific Coast Division PCD-1 January 1976
4 Kennepahl GJA Logan A and Bean D C Conshyventional Paving Mixes with Sulfur-Asphalt Binders Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975
5 Deme Imants Processing of Sand-Asphalt-Sulfur Mixes Proceedings AAPT Volume 43 1974
6 A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual The Asphalt Instishytute Manual Series No 19 MS-19) March 1979
7 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Use of Cutback Asphalt US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Waste Management Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park North Carolina October 17 1977
8 Highway Chemicals Newsletter Armak Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois Fall 1981
9 Bitumils Mix Manual Chevron USA Asphalt Division January 1977
10 Asphalt Pavement Engineering Wallace Hugh A and Martin J Rogers McGraw Hill Book Company New York 1967
11 Spahr J D The Use of Emulsified Asphalt in Conshystruction and Maintenance Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975
96
12 Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design Asphalt Emulsions Volume 4 1977
13 Dybalski J N 11 The Chemistry of Asphalt Emulsions Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D C January 1976
14 Beagle C w Deflection and Performance of Deep Lift Asphalt Emulsion Base Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976
15 Meier w J Asphalt Emulsion Construction on the Navajo Reservation Twenty-Fifth Annual Arizona Conshyference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 22-23 1976
16 Kallas B F and Shock J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Find Report - Parts I and
11II Research Report 77-1 The Asphalt Institute November 1977
17 Shook J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Analysis of Performance Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976
18 Wimberly C M Emulsified Asphalt Mixes in Arizona Proceedings 24th Annual Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 17-18 1975
19 Izalt J O Galloway B M and Saylock D SandshyAsphalt-Sulfur Pavement Experimental Project Highway US 77 Kennedy County Texas Texas Transportation Institute April 1977
20 McBee w c and Sullivan T A Direct Substitution of Sulfur for Asphalt In Paving Materials 11 Report of Investigations 8303 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines 1978
21 Ludwig A C Gerhardt B B and Dale JM Materials and Techniques for Improving the Engineering Properties of Sulfur Report No FHWA-RD-80-023 Fedshyeral Highway Administration June 1980
22 Jiminez R A and Stakes K J Effects of Heat and Air on the Viscosity of Sulfur-Asphalt Mixtures Preshysented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies San Diego California February 16-18 1981
97
23 Chehovits J G and Anderson D A Upgrading of Marginal Aggregates for Improved Water Resistance of Asphalt Concrete Transportation Research Record 762 pages 46-52 1981
24 Rosner JC and Chehovits J G Highway Binder Materials From Modified Sulfur-Water Emulsionsn Report No FHWARD-82035 Federal Highway Administration November 1981
25 Standard Specifications State of California Department of Transportation January 1978
26 Applied Linear Statistical Models Neter I and Wasserman w Richard D Irwin Inc Homewood Illinois 1974
27 Burr I W and Foster LA A Test For Equality of variances Mimeograph Series No 282 Statistics Department Purdue University Lafayette Indiana 1972
28 Applied Statistical Methods Burr I W Academic Press Inc New York 1974
29 Parr W K Field Observations of the Behavior of Bituminous Pavements As Influenced By Moisture 11 ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 3-16--I959
30 Rice JM Relationship of Aggregate Characteristics to the Effect of Water on Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 17-34 1959
31 Lettman R P and Johnson D L 11 Pressure Induced Stripping in Asphaltic Concrete Highway Research Record 340 pages 13-28 1970
32 Waller F H Jr Emulsion Mix Design Methods An Overview 11 Transportation Research Record 754 1980
33 Design of Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures Report R6-350(74) US Forest Service 1974
34 11Mix Design Procedure For Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Pavement FHWA Region 10 Office of Federal Highway Projects
98
35 Darter M I Ahlfield S R Wilky P L and Wasill R G Development of Emulsified Asphalt Aggregate Cold Mix Design Procedure Research Report 505-5 Department of Civil Engineering University of Illinois 1978
36 A A Gadallah L E Wood and E J Yoder A Suggested Method for the Preparation and Testing of Asphalt-Emulsion-Treated Mixtures Using Marshall Equipment Proceedings AAPT Volume 46 1977
37 Marshall Stability Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois
38 Jiminez R A Final Report-Phase I Asphalt Emulsion Treated Aggregates University of Arizona Research Report HPR-1-13(150) January 1977
39 George K P Interim Report on Criteria for Emulshysified Asphalt Stabilization of Sandy Soils Univershysity of Mississippi for Mississippi State Highway Department October 1976
40 Fong G K Mix Design Methods for Base and Surface Courses Using Emulsified Asphalt A State-of-the-Art Report Report No FHWA-RD-78-113 Federal Highway Administration October 1978
41 Schmidt R J A Practical Method for Measuring the Resilient Modulus of Asphalt-Treated Mixes Highway Research Record 404 1972
42 Manual of Test Volume 2 State of California Department of Transportation Transporation Laboratory Third Edition 1978
43 Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete Manual Series No 2 (MS-2) The Asphalt Institute March 1979
99
-
APPENDIX A
OPTIMUM FLUIDS AT COMPACTION DATA
-
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table Al
Percent Residue
631 631 631
702 702 702
595 595 595
678 678 678
689 689 689
645 645 645
Fluids at Compaction Data css-o
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
467 367 216
1098 998 847
571 413 360
1273 1115 10 62
455 370 341
1050 965 936
590 450 400
1268 1128 1078
492 183 109
1181 872 798
404 311 139
1049 956 784
Dry Density
(pcf)
1304 1337 1347
1283 1326 1306
133l 1310 9 1317
1328 1295 1304
1404 1529 154 1
1429 1466 1462
Al
css-o CSS-0HIGH QUALITY155- DRY LOW QUALITYbull SAN BERNARDINO 1551
bull SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO 150-I I 150 FRESNObull GRANITEROCK bull GRANITEROCK
I ~
145 LoPT=B5 145 () () - -0 0
~140 gt1401 L- 0 PT= 85 OPT=100gt-i
N Cl) OPT=100 Cl)
DRYZ 135 Z 135w w Cl Cl
amp130 amp130 Cl 0
125 125
120 I i I I i I i I I I 120 I I J I I i I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure Al Fluids at Compaction Figure A2 Fluids at Compaction High Quality Aggre-gate CSS-0 Low Quality CSS-0
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A2
Percent Residue
605 605 605
704 704 704
595 595 595
695 695 695
556 556 556
604 604 604
Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-0
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
4 16 316 183
1021 921 788
494 389 262
1198 1093
966
529 392 360
1124 987 955
519 479 301
1214 1174
996
284 187 124
840 743 680
319 256 165
923 860 769
Dry Density
(pcf)
1331 131 6 1316
1305 1320 1313
1282 1313 1312
1321 1298 1279
1478 1479 1463
1452 1463 1453
A3
155 CMS-0 HIGH QUALITY
150~ DRY bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
145 bull GRANITEROCK72_ OPT=90 0 0
~140gt-ii OPT=105i Cl)
Z 135 w 0
gt- D~0 130 middot 0
125 [OPT100
120 I i I i i I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A3 Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-0
155] 150
0 1451 0
~140gt- Cl)
Z 135 w 0
fc130 0
125
120 I 6
CMS-0
LOW QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
bull GRANITEROCK
v[A OPTf90
pound 0 PT12DoOPTr110
7 I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A4 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-0
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A3
Percent Residue
769 769 769
746 746 746
595 595 595
714 714 714
570 570 570
587 587 587
Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-7
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
460 391 294
1229 1160 1063
573 436 301
13 19 1182 1047
513 380 2 57
1108 975 852
513 404 334
1227 1118 1048
231 170 080
801 740 650
263 146 109
850 733 6096
Dry Density
(pcf)
1329 1377 1376
1335 135l 134 2
1357 1333 1342
1299 1317 1308
1519 1523 1498
1503 1517 1514
AS
CMS-7 155-- HIGH QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNOlSO~ nPT80 145
0 -0 -140 middot gt-
r t deg Cl)
Z 135 w Cl
fi130 Cl
125-1
120 I 6
GRANITEROCK
~OPT=105
IJ
I 7
I I i I i I 8 9 10 11 12 13
TOTAL FLUIDS
I 14
I 15
Figure AS Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-7
155
150
145
0 -0
gt--140
t Cl)
Z 135 w Cl
fc 130 Cl
125
120 I 6
CMS-7 LOW QUALITY
C bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
GRANITEROCKOPT 80
~OPT105
~
tos i I I i J i i I I 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A6 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-7
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A4
Percent Residue
765 765 765 765 765 765
815 815 815 815 815 815
765 765 765
817 817 817 817 817 8el7
574 574 574
738 738 738 738 738 738
Fluids at Compaction Data SS 15 SEA
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
563 426 315 580 346 178
1328 1191 1080 1345 1111
943
595 418 309 599 256 137
14 10 1233 1124 1414 1071 952
600 440 356
1365 1205 1121
683 541 418 629 457 283
1500 1358 1235 1446 1274 1100
374 247 128
948 821 702
451 301 175 435 186 073
1189 1039
913 1173
924 811
Dry Density
(pcf)
1289 1319 1335 1286 1331 1332
1278 1314 1315 1276 1304 1299
1281 1325 1313
1259 1290 1303 1275 1292 1294
1450 1485 1482
1428 1459 1468 1437 1465 1465
A7
bull bull
SS 15 SEA 155 HIGH QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot
150 FRESNO
bull GRANITEROCK
145
0 0 -
OPT=75
-_ gt=140 I-ii OPT100co C)
z 135 w _--0PTr1200
gt-0 130--0
125
120 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A7 Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 15 SEA
SS 15 SEA LOW QUALITY155
bull SAN BERNARDINO-
FRESNO 150
bull GRANITEROCK 145
~-0 0 LOPT=80a140gt-t Cf)
Z135 w r-OPT=105 0
gt-0 130 -~middot 0
OPT120J 125
120 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure AB Fluids at Compaction Low Quality SS 15 SEA
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table AS
Percent Residue
688 688 688
722 722 722 722 722 722
680 680 680 680 6 80 680
726 726 7 26 726 726
510 510 510
596 596 596 596 596 596
Fluids at Compaction Data SS 30 SEA
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
595 468 150
1283 1156
838
645 438 267 660 566 440
1367 1160
989 1382 1288 1162
650 531 432 629 422 332
1330 1211 1112 1309 1102 1012
767 614 443 547 370
1493 1340 1169 1273 1096
413 300 167
923 810 677
468 3 46 191 485 258 096
1064 942 787
10 ~ 81 854 692
Dry Density
(pcf)
1299 1337 1332
1286 1319 1324 1281 1302 1326
129l 1315 1333 1294 1333 131 5
1259 1278 1322 1294 1313
1464 1509 1496
1435 1472 1499 1426 1487 1476
A9
SS 30 SEASS 30 SEA LOW QUALITY
155 HIGH QUALITY 1551 bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddotbull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO
FRESNO 150150-I -middotmiddot-- -bull --middotmiddot I ~ t -- a GRANITEROCK a GRANITEROCK
145145
~-bull80 0 --0 00 ~140~140
J-gt- gt-~ I- = OPT=100 Cl)0 Cl) [Ij 135Z 135
lJJ Cl
gt- ~1300 130 middot ClCl ( 0
OPT=110 125~ OPT=115125
120-t----~--------------r---120 I l J J J I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 156 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS TOT AL FLUIDS
Figure A9 Fluids at Compaction Figure AlO Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 30 SEA Low Quality SS 30 SEA
-~
i
APPENDIX B
MIXTURE DESIGN DATA
TABLE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality css-o Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absortied Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
lhit Weight pcf
StabiJcneter Value
~iareter Value
Jesilient -bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
500
----------
40
u 30 ltgt
ffi 20 w ~10
m lt
o
w l 400 lt gt a w t 300 0 iii ~ 200 8
100 12
10111
ui 0
i5 8gt lt
6
4
50
21740
24488
112
194
100
400
1357
375
197
117
345
60
21823
24163
97
199
100
500
1362
330
207
134
271
70
21772
23853
87
208
100
600
1359
272
193
118
260
Iesign 7 0
87
208
100
600
1359
272
193
118
260
24
22d c lt i
20i
= 0 i5
18 gt
16
140
138 - a
~136 z w 0
134
132
bull 500 a
0 400 uil 300 0
~ 200 zi 100 iii w a
--
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE CONTENT Jo (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Bl
TABLE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residue 0intent 50 60 70 Dsian 7 o
Bulk Siecipoundic Gravity 21804
llleoretical Specipoundic Gravity 24280
Air Voids 102
VMA 192
Absorbed Asphalt 063
Efpoundective Asphalt 437
Unit Weight pf 1361
Stabilcirieter Value 427
Cbhesicireter Value 352
Fesilielt Mxlulus 103psi
2-day 85
middotFinlJ 355
50
40
_ gt a 30 w w
~ 20 10
500
300
200
100
8
6
4
l 400 gt
~ w 0
~ 8
12
_ 10
= 0 gt
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
21863 21992
23964 23660
88 71 71
197 200 200
063 063 063
537 637 637
1364 1372 1372
363 313 313
292 234 234
63 83 83 429 232 232
24
22
ci i
20i
= = 0 gt
18
16
138
p6 ~ Q
134 a w
o 132
130
500 Q -
o 400 --3 300 0 ~-~ 200 a ~ 100 w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COtlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
B2
TABLE B3 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllroretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
~fective Asphalt
Unit Weight middotCf
Stabilareter VaJue
Cbhesiareter VaJue
Resilient l-bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
so
11140 gt o30 IU w ~20
m
10
w l 400 gt 0
~ 0 ~ 200 8
100
14
12 11-
In Q
ho C
8
6
50 60 70 Dsi9 7 O 21308 21729 21595 24562 24235 23922
132 103 97 97 210 202 215 215 113 113 113 113 387 487 587 587
1329 1356 1348 1348 378 345 375 375
314 270 280 280
82 96 104 104 281 260 267 267
500
300 ~
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS
24
11-22ci
ltI i i 20 Cl) Q 180 gt
16
138
136 u - 134 Cl) z IU Q
132
130
bull500
400 Inl 300 Q bull~ 200 z ~ 100middot IU 0
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS
FIGURE B3 Mixture Design Data Sari Bernardin6 High Quality CMS o Replication 1
B3
TABLE B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue GJntent
Bulk seecific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity
50
21491
24334
60
21459
24014
70
21526
23709
Iesiqn 70
Air Voids 117 106
VMA 204 212
Absocbed Asphalt 0 72 o 72
Effective Asphalt 428 528
Unit Weight pcf 1341 133 9
Stabilrneter Value 437 406
GJhesiareter Value 337 248 3
Iesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-cay
Final
50
w 40 gt 0 30 w w 0 20 co 10
500
w
3 400 gt 0 w t- 300 w 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
_ 10
0 8gt -lt
6
4
FIGURE
61 66
410 318
24
22~ ci
i 20
~
18 a gt
16
138
_136 u a 134 z ~ w 0
132
130
bull500
a
a 400 -3 300 _ a ~ 200 z ~ 100-
w 0
90 90
21 7 21 7
0 72 072
628 628
1343 1343
344 J44
252 252
82 82
250 250
---------
D 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDU CONTENT I (A_GGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B4
TABLE BS Mixture Design Data San Bernardin9 High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Siecific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
lir Voids
VMA
2bserberl Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stalgtilaneter Value
Cbhesiareter Value 3
Resilient Mgtdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
40
Ill 30 lt( gt a 20 Ill Ill 0 10
~ iii lt CII 0
400
Ill
3 300 lt(
gt a Ill200 == 0
~100 c 8
0
12
10 ui 0
0 8gt 5 lt(
6
4
FIGURE
~
~
5 6 7 84 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
50 60 70 Cesian 70
21652
24484
21904
24149
22005
23828
116
198
107
3-93
135l
345
224
18
240
93 77 77 196 200 200 107 107 107 493 593 593
1367 1373 1373 288 235 235
136 80 80
17 21 21 128 78 78
24
22ci lt(
z 20il
= CII C 0
18 gt
16
I-~
140
+38- ~136 1- z Ill 0 134
132
bull 500 a
o 400 3 300 C
~ 200 z 100 Ill a ~
0 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino_BS High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
BS
TABLE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Residue Content
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Ihegtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tmit WeightL pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesllllleter Value
Iesilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
a 20 UI w i
~10
lt 0
400
3300 lt gt a ~200 w i 0
119 93
197 l93
126 126
374 474
l353 l372
357 283
l26 l03
45 36
203 132
2440
30 22 0 0lt ltgt
16
~100 ~ 8 0 132
500 a
o 400 --ai 300 -
middot 0
~
~
w a
_ 10
ltn 0
0 8gt lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
50 60 70 Cesign 7 o
2l679
24595
21990
24255
22190
23931
- i 20
a 180 gt
140
138 - a
~136 z w 0 134
200
100middot
0 4
73 73
193 193
126 1 26
574 574
1385 1385
235 235
82 82
3l 3l
64 64
-0 $ e
~ 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B6
TABLE B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Pesidue Qlnte~t
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihroretical Speciic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
~tabilcmeter Value
ohesicrneter Value
resilient lbdulus l0 3psi
2-aay
Final
60 72 8 5 Iesicm 75
21762 21906 21779
23981 23617 23245 93 73 63 70
202 205 220 21 0
063 063 063 063
537 657 787 687
1358 1367 1359 1365 375 290 203 270
474 401 239 360
163 172 161 170 449 329 310 320
2440
ii 30 22 ci
Cl c cgt z 20 201 s ~ 310 e 18 0
gt c
0 16
500 140
w
3 400 _138c gt
~ 300 s 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
- 10 0 0 0 8gt c
6
4
FIGURE
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIOUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COITEIT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
il36 z IU Cl 134
132
bull 500
c 400 -
3 300 - Cl
sectl 200 ~- z ~ 100
w
0
B7
111 10 ui e 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
TABLE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
500
400 gt C
72 85 resian 7 s
21873 21738
23581 23210
72 63 70 207 22l 21 0
055 055 055 665 795 695
1365 1356 1365 287 188 265
349 341 345
191 187 190 287 266 280
24 ------------
111 22
Cl Cl lt -i ~ 20
= a 18 0 gt
16 _____________
138
136 a 134 () w a
132
130___________
soar------------ D a
1 400 ~
ui3 300 C
~ 200
100
w C
0---------------------5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUlc CONTENT lt
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
BB
Fesidue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcrreter Value
Cbhesiareter Value 3Resilient -bdulus 10 psi
2-day
Finll
60
m 50 - 40
IIJ ~ 30 CJ lt 1- 20
60
21669
23943
95
205
055
545
1352
560
416
195
425
~ 300 0 ()
~ 200 8
100---------------
12 -------------
RESIDUE CONTENT lto (AGGREGATE BASIS)
TABLE B9 Mixture Design Data San Ber~irdino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Pesiclue Content 60 Z1 as D=sign 7 5
Bulk Spccific Gravity 21697 21368 21255
Iheoretical Specific Gravity 23973 23610 23238
Air Voids 94 95 85 93
VMA 204 225 middot 23 8 230
middot-Absorbed Asphalt 061 061 061 061
Effective Asphalt 539 659 789 689
middot middotmiddotUnit Weight pcf 1354 133 3 1326 1330
-Stabilareter Value 460 375 225 340
CohesianeterValue 400 422 499 440
Iesilient MxUlus 103psi
2-oay 159 i0s 185 185
Final 290 299 283 295
60
w
l 400
24
22
ci 0 i 20l
= Q 180 gt
16
138
136
gt a 134~ 300 w l z0 IU 132 200
8 130
100-----------------_---I
12 ---------------- 500
o 400 10 ~
300 bull bullQ
Q0 8gt ~ 200 z
6 ~ 100
w a4 ___ __________ o
5 6 7 8 9 s 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COtlTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B9 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication l
B9
TABLE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Pesidue Conte1t 60 72 85 resign 75
Bulk Spcecific Gravity
Theoretical Sjeeipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Ohesianeter Value
Pesilient ~us 103psi
2---day
Final
60
50 lt gt cc40 w -w
~30 = CJ
lt 20
21635
24066
10l
206
078
522
1350
51 8
482
151
285
21481
23699
94
221
078
642
1341
378
459
150
286
24
11-22
ci Cl lt
~ 20 z
C 18
0 gt
21302
23323
87 92
237 225
078 078
7 72 6 72
1329 1338
246 350
343 430
162 155
254 280
I 16
500 138
UJ
400 136 lt gt
acc ~ UJ
134 300 z2 UI CJ_32 ~ 200
8 130
bull500
a
c 400 - 10 300 ~ Jf
C0 8gt ~ 200 ~ lt z
6 ~ 100-
UJ 0
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDU~ COrlTENT
(AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino
100 12
~
Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
BlO
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
TABLE Bll
Residue Content
Bulk Secific Gravity
Iheiretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesicrneter Value
Resilient MXiulus l03psi
2-day
Final
60 72 85 D=sign 75
21817 22108 21917
23977 23601 23216
90 63 56 62
200 198 215 200
o 72 o 72 o 72 o 72
528 648 778 678
136l 1380 1368 137 5
242 162 76 130
151 175 215 190
52 63 41 55
202 122 60 110
244middot0
~ 30 22 ci lt 20 i 201 IU = en ~ 10 E 18 m 0lt gt
0 16
----
w
l 400 lt gt a ~ w 0 ~ 8
12
-t
ltn 0 0 gt a lt
FIGURE
5
500
300
200 ~ 100
10
8
6
134
500 a
c 400 -
_ 300 0
g 200
~ 100 ~in IU a
0 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Bll Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
142
I-40 u a
~ 138 in w 0
136 ~
Bll
TABLE Bl2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Pesidue Q)ntent
Bulk Spzcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic
Air Voids
V bull t-LA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Gravity
60
22026
24085
85
192
092
508
72
22062
23705
69
200
092
628
85
21901
23315
61
215
092
758
resign 75
67
205
092
6 58
Unit Weight pcf 1374
Stabiloreter Value 193
Ohesiareter Value 177 3
Resilient Mxrulus 10 psi
2-day 63
Fi-ial 138
40
m 30 J lt gt a 20 IU w 0 10 ~ lt
0
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w 9 ~ 200 _________ 8
100 12
10 9 0 8gt ~6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE 8ASISI
1377
127
193
1367
90
160
137 5
120
180
53
107
32
52
48
95
24
22ci 0 lt
20
= ~
9 18 0 gt
16
142
140 a
~138 z w C
136
134
9
500 a
dego 400-
3 300 ~- a ~ 200 z ~ 100
w a
0 5
~ 6 7 8 9
RES IOU~ CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl2 Mixture Design Data -san Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Bl2
TABLE Bl 3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcrneter VaJue
CJgthesiarneter Value
Pesilient MxbJ11lS 10 3psi
2-day
Final
60
so gt
40a w 0 30 GI 20
500
l 400 gt a w t- 300 w 5 rn ~ 200 8
100 12
Ill 10 0 8gt
6
4
50
21789
24250
10l
164
1 95
305
1360
513
330
191
282
~ bull
~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASIS)
60
21762
2 34 34
91
173
1 95
405
135middot8
567
284
168
434
24
Ill 22ci Cl
is 20
= 0 gt
18
16
142
140- ~138 iii z 0
136
134
bull500
o 400 -
l 300 C
~ 200 z 100 iii a
0 4
70 resign 70
21872
23632
75 75 177 177
1 bull 95 1 95 505 505
136S 136S 393 393
280 280
217 217 482 482
~
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASISI
FIGURE Bl3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality css~o Replication 1
Bl3
--------------
TABLE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Resid= Content 50 60 70 eesicn 7o
Bulk Siecific Gravity 21692 21677 21662
Ihroretical Specific Gravity 24501 24176 23865
Air Voids 115 103 92 92
VMA 169 176 185 185
Absorbed Asphalt 240 240 240 240
Effective Asphalt 260 360 460 460
Unit Weight pcpound 1354
Stabilaneter Value 580
Cohesicrneter Value 270 3Resilielt Mdulus 10 psi
2-day 149
Final 408
60
w so lt gt
w C o w le 0 30 m lt
20
500
w
~ 400 lt gt C
~ 300 w S ~ 200 ~ 8
100 12
- 10 m a 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AG GREGATE BASIS)
1353 1352 1352
442 327 327
276 183 183
173 191 191
373 299 299
24
22d c lt z
20E 18 0 gt
16
140
138 u C
136 w C 134
132
500 C
1 400 gt- m =gt 300 a ~ 200
l 100- IU C
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication
Bl4
2
bull bull bullbull
TABLE Bl5 Mixture Design-Data Fresno High Quality CMS-QReplication 1
Bulk Spcific Gravity
lheoreticaJ Specific Gravity Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mldulus l0 3psi 2-clay
Final
60
m 50 C gt a 40 w w
~ 30 C m
10
~idue Content 50 6_ 0 70 Daisi2 7 O
5oor----------
w
l 400 C gt a ~ 300 w I 0 iii ~ 200 8
100-------------
12 ----------
111 10 C
0 8gt C
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT J
(AG GREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl5 Mixture
21755 21305 23795 23497 86 93 93
163 198 198 l 69 l 69 l69 431 531 531
1336 1329 1329 420 307 307
247 230 230
180 i55 155
246 253 253
24
22d
Cl C
i 20I
J ~ C 18 ~ 0 gt
16
21434
24106
11l
179
l69
331
1337
472
373
175
247
138
136- 134 z w C
132
130
bull 500
dego 400 - l 300 C
~ 200 z l 100 iii w a
0
-~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT J (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Bl5
TABLE Bl6 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
helretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
lbsorled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabil=ter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
Eesilient Mxrulus 10
2-day
Firal
60
50 J gt c 40
~ 30 m 20
500
w
l 400 gt a ~ 300 w
3psi
50 60 70
21339 2 1398 21475
24241 23925 23623
120 106 91
181 187 192
1 94 l 94 1 94
306 406 506
1331 1335 1340
558 43 7 377
340 313 219
149 152 154
317 345 288
Jesign70
91
192
194
506
1340
377
219
154
288
24
22d CJ i sect 20
= a 18 ~ 0 gt
16
138
136
a 134
z w ~ C ~ 200 132 8
130 100
14 500 a
o 400 - 12
3 300 - ~ 0 C gt 10 a ~ 200 ~ z
l 100
8
w a
0 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl6bull Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Bl6
TABLE Bl 7 Mixture Qesign Data Fresno High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
Pesidue Content 50 60 70 Cesign 7 O
Bulk siec~tic Gravity 21959 22101 22128
Iheoretical Specific Gravity 24539 24201 23879
Air Voids 105 87 73 73
VMA 158 160 167 167
~rbed Asphalt 252 252 252 252
Effective Asphalt 248 348 448 448
Unit Weight pcf 1370 1379 1380 1380
S~ter Value 467 370 213 213
Clgthesiareter Value 289 3Resilient l-Ddulus 10 psi
2-clay 47
FinaJ 294
50
Ill 40 o(
gt cc 30 Ill w 0 20 lt 10
500
w l 400 lt gt cc ~ 300 Ill 0 ~ 200 8 ~
100 12
10 deg C
0 gt 8 ~l lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
147 122 122
65 35 35
214 75 75
22
J 20 o(
ii 18 16 ~ 0 gt
14
142
140 u Q
~138 z Ill
Cl 136
134
500 Q
o400 uil 300 Cl
g 200 z ~ 100 ~w cc
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
IIESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Bl7
TABLE Bl8 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Dsiqn 70
Bulk Specific Gravity 22191 22285 22092
Theoretical Specific Gravity 24199 23874 23563
Air Voids 82 66 62 62
VMA 149 153 168 168
Absorled AsphaJt 192 192 192 192
Effective AsphaJt 308 408 508 508
Unit Weight pcf 1385
Stabilareter Value 357
Cohesianeter Value 268 3Resilient MxhIJus 10 psi
2-day 75
Final 217
40
w 30 J lt gt a 20 w w i
~ 10
0
500
w
3 400 gt a
l 300 w i
ltn
~ 200 8
139l
342
238
137 9
233
192
137 9
233
192
84
117
63
73
63
73
20
0 0 ~ i
= 0 gt
18
16
14
12
~
144
142 140 z w 0
138
136 100-----1---1--1---l
12 ---------- 500 0bull
o 400 -11110 en a 3 300 = 0 08gt ~ 200
z 6 ~ 100middot
w a
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT
4
RESIDUE CONTENT
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Bl8
FresnoTABLE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Low Quality css-o Replication 1
Eesidlle Content 60 70 80 Dasi51 7 5
Bulk Specific Gravity 21698 21611 21514 Iheoretical Specilic Gravity 23803 23505 23220
Air Voids 89 81 73 77
VMA 175 186 198 192
Absorbed Asphalt 171 l 71 171 171
Effective Asphalt 429 529 629 679
Unit Weight pcf 1354 1349 1342 1345
Stabi]cmeter Value 513 398 359 380
eohesianeter value 506 449 481 465
Resilient Modulus 10 3psi
2-day 176 176 241 205
Final 312 383 353 365
2460
all so 22 ci cgt
40 I-
20 E
I = g 30 18iii 0 gt
20
16
500
300
100
10
8
6
4
138
136l 400
u -gt a
~ I 0 in l1200 8
12
111 Q
0 gt ~
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE COITENT Jo
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
~ ~ 134 z w 0
132
130
500 -
l 400 -
300 ~n
Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 in Ill IC
0
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Bl9
TABLE B20 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residlle Content i
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihegtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
CJhesiareter Value 3
Resilient Mxfulus 10 psi
2-day
Finll
60
50 lt 40 w w
~ 30 m lt 20
500
w
3 400 lt gt a ~ ~ 300 w 51 rn 200 8
100----------------
12 --------------
10 9 0 8gt lt
6
4 s 6 7 8
RESIDUE COPlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
60 70 80 resign 75
21451 21476 21666
23932 23629 23340
104
185
194
406
1339
586
436
147
313
91
192
1 94
506
1340
403
416
179
347
24
22 0 0 lt
~ 20
= 9 18 0 gt
16
140
138 - Cl
136 w cl34
132
bull 500
-0 400__
3 300 I
~ 200
~ 100 rn w a
0
7 2 82
192 192
194 194
606 656
1352 1345
24 8 325
333 375
186 182
361 358
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COPITEPlT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
~
Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
B20
TABLE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
lesidue Content 60 70 80 resign 75
Bulk Siecific Gravity 21525 21406 21152 lllroretical Specific Gravity 23855 23555 23268 Air Voids 98 91 91 91 VMA 182 194 211 2middot03 1osorled Asphalt 180 1 80 180 180 Effective Asphalt 420 520 620 570 Ulit Weight pcf 1343 1336 1330 1335 Stabilateter Value 487 460 373 415 Oxlesiareter Value 418 392 323 355
3lesilielt Mldulus 10 psi
2-clay 188 177 200 190
Final 289 299 281 290
6or----------- 24
m 50 lt gt 11 40 w w I
~ 30 m lt 20
_J_
22ci 0 lt z
20EE
= 0 180 gt
16
5oor---------- 138
w
l 400 lt gt
136- a ~ 300 w i 0
fa34 z w
~ 200 Cll32 -8
100-----------i-~ 130
12 ------------ 500bulla
10 ________ o 400 - 0
0 gt
8
gJdeg 300 0
~- 200 ---e-
lt z
6 l 100 w 4
5 6 7 8 9 0
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication
B21
1
TABLE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Fesidue Cbntent 55
Bulk Spcific Gravity 21243
lheoretical Specific Gravity 23859
Air Voirls 109
VMA 189
Absorbed Asphalt 152
Effective 1spralt 398
Unit Weight pd 1326
atabil~ter Value 620
Cbhesiareter Value 430 3Fesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-oay 160
Final 387
70
a 60 gt a 50 w w == = 40 0
m
30
500
w l 400 lt gt cc
~ 3001- 0 ~ 200 8
100
16
136
134 u Q
iu2 z w 0 130
128
12 -----------
10 bull
ltIi 0
~ s
6
4middot1-_________ _
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l _AGGREGATE BASIS)
21164
23557
101
200
152
498
1321
481
432
180
377
24
22
z 20Si
= 18e 0 gt
bull 500
o 400-ltIi j 300 0
~ 200 zl 100 w cc
0
65 75 iesiqn 7 s
21095
23269
93 93
210 210
152 l 52
598 598
1316 1316
367 367
450 450
171 171
387 387
-----~bull-----
8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7
FIGURE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B22
1 TABLE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno
Low Quality CMS-7 Replication
70 -~ 0 Cesign 75 Pesidue Content
Bulk Spcific Graviv1
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit Weight pcf
Stallilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mxlulus 10 3psi
2--day
Final
40
Ill 30 c gt 0 20 UI lo Q 10=c 0
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w lo Q 200 8
100
~
60
21829
23899
87
170
197
403
1362
293
206
84 144
21981
23587
67
l73
197
503
1372
200
249
76 131
21960
23289
5middot 7
middot18l
197
603
1370
100
241
69 93
62
177
197
553
1370
150
245
73
110
12
10 5 Q 8gt 5 lt
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (ACGREGATE BASIS)
24
It
22 t-ci c
z 20i
= 5 18 t-Q gt
16
142
140 - 638
z w Q
136
134
bull 500
o 400 - 3 300 0
~ 200 z 100 iii UI 0
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (ACGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno LOW Quality CMS-7 Replication
B23
1
TABLE B24 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Urit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Glhesianeter Value
Resilient Mldulus 10
2-day
Final
40
m 30 gt c 20 w ~ w i
~ 10 m lt ~ 0
3psi
24
22
C C lt i
20~ ~
9 18 0 gt
16
500 142
w 1403 400 gt
Ca gt138I 300 tw
i z w Q 136~ 200
8
134
~
~
100 12 500
C
dego 400 - Ill 10 3 300 0 0 Q8gt ~ 200
~ z 6 100middot
w a
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIOUC CONTENT
(AGGREGATE 8ASIS] (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)
80
21686
23262
68
19l
l91
609
1353
125
215
77
114
Cesign 75
71
184
L 91
559
1360
200
235
77
135
60
21936
23870
81
166
191
409
1369
358
252
84
211
70
21850
23559
73
177
191
509
1364
270
250
77
157
Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE B24 Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B24
TABLE B25 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-Or Replication 1
Residue Clgtntent 47
Bulk Siecific Gravity 23965
llleoretical Specific Gravity 26825
Air Voids 107
VMA 207
Absorbed Asphalt 27
Effective Asphalt 443
Unit Weight pcf 1495
Stabilaneter Value 302
Cohesiaoeter Value 235 3
Resilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-day 158
Final 300
40
30 _ gt a 20I- ii 0_
10iii I-en 0 500----------
Ill
3 400 gt ati 300 ii 0 iii l 200 8
100---i----L---J
12 ----------
jit 10 e 0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I 4
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
57 67 Design 55
24521 24581
26411 26017
72 55 80
196 202 200
27 27 27
543 643 523
1530 1534 1520
247 200 27
275 203 275
164 116 160
276 197 280
24
jlt
22ci c i
20Si
= en e 18 0 gt
16
156
_154 ~ i152 iii z C
150
148
soo----------
dega 400 _
en
~300 ~ ~ 200 1-zl 100 iii w a
01----~-i--J 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Mixture Design Data GraniterockFIGURE B25 High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
B25
TABLE B26 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Besidue Content If 7 57 67 D2sign 55
Bulk SfeCific Gravity 2 4131 24573 24597
lhagtreticai Specific Gravity 26951 26532 26134
Air Voids 105 74 59 78
VMA 20l 195 20l 197
Absorted Asphalt 46 46 46 46
Effective Asphalt 424 524 624 504
Unit Weight pcf 1506 1533 1535 1525
stabi1anaiter Value 282 258 is2 270
Cllhesicmter Value 204 155 138 160
Resilient Mdulus 103psL
2-day 115 143 126 130
Final 313 225 173 240
40
w 30 lt gt a 20 w w la 0 10 m lt
0
~
24
22ci C
lt z
20la ~ = E 18 -0 gt
16
156
154 - a
~152 z w r0
150
148
-
500
o 400 ~
300 0
g 200 ~ z -~ 100
500
w ~ 400 lt gt a IU t- 300 w la 0 ~ 200
~8
100 12
10 0 0 8gt lt
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
w a
o 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT lo RESIDUE CONTENT II
-cGREGATE s-s1s1 (-GGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B26 Mixture Design Data Grani terock High Quality CSS-0 Replication
B26
2
TABLE B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Residue Ogtntent 47 57 67 ~ign 55
Bulk Spcific Gravity 23886 24116 24078
Ihooretical Specific Gravity 26675 26267 25879
Air Voids 105 81 70 82
VMA 210 210 21 8 210
Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 oos 005
Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545
Unit Weight pcf 149l 1505 1502 1505
Stabilareter Value 337 350 250 350
Ogthesicneter Value 238 3
Eesilient Mldulus l0 psi
2-day 104
Final 287
50
Ill 40 J C gt cc 30 Ill Ill l 0
C
10
20iii 500
w
l 400 C gt cc I 300 Ill l 0 in ~ 200 8
100 12
1110 0 0 8gt
c cc
6
4
FIGURE
~
~
177 204 200
144 150 140
254 247 260
24 ----------
a 18 0 gt
16 __i____i_-J
154
j52 u -a
~1501- ------iiiz -Ill 0
148
______________ 146
soar---------- a
o 400 1--
~ 300 _ ~
~ 200 z ~ 100 en w 0
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
B27
8
TABLE B28 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue Ointent 4 7 57 67 Cesign 55
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihroretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
CJlhesianeter Value
Pesilient Mldulus 10 3psi
2-day
Final
40
30 lt gt = w 20 0
- 10 lt
0
500
w - 3 400
lt gt a l 300 w 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
i 10 ui C
0 8gt lt
6
4
FIGURE
23861
26649
10S
207
014
456
1489
338
145
124
307
~
--------
~ 5 6 7 84
RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
24025 23925
26242 25855
85
210
014
556
1499
283
135
135
307
24
22
0 lt i
20i
= 18 0 gt
16
154
152 u Q
i150 z w 0 148
146middot
500- o 400 -
300 _ Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 4
75 87
220 209
014 014
656 536
1493 1490
220 300
129 140
142 130
277 307
_--
~
-___
85 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B28 bull Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B28
TABLE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Pesicllle Cbntent 47 57 67 resign 55 Bulk Siecific Gravity 24618 24637 24728 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26905 26475 26066 Air Voids 84 69 51 71 VlltLA 185 192 197 190 Absocbed Asphalt 047 0 bull 47 047 047 Effective Aspbalt 423 523 623 503 Urit Weight pcf 1536 1537 1543 1537 Stabilaneter Value 410 330 198 350 QJhesianeter Value 166
Resiliextt Mldulus 10 3psi
2-clay
Final
50
40 c
ffi 30 IE g20 iii c
10
500
l 400 c
a ~ 300 IE C ~ 200 8
100 12
ot 10 C
0 8
5
C
6
4
46
158
~
~ 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI
120 131 130
35 30 38
56 28 80
24
gt11 22
c c c
i 2031
= ~ C 180
16
158
156 t-
u - 154 z w 0
152
150
500
~
~ 0
bull a 400 - uil 300 ~
200
C
~ z ~ w a
100middot
8 4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
B29
TABLE B30 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Pesidue Content 4-7 h---7 6 -7 IEsicn 5 5
Bulk Specific Gravity 24519 24638 24706 Iheoretical Specific Gravity 26609 26265 25793 Air Voids 79 62 42 65 VMA 189 192 198 19l
middot Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 005 005 Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545 Unit Weight pcf 1530 1537 1542 1535 Stabilareter Value 420 327 247 350 Cohesiareter Value 126
3Resilient Mldulus 10 psi
Z--day 47 Final 144
50
40 J lt gt a 30 w w
~ 20 m lt 10
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w 2 ~ 200 8 ~
100 12
111- 10 ui 0 gt 8
lt
6
4
114 182 120
43 29 45
79 33 90
24
ii-22
ci 0 lt i
20l ~= 18 0 gt
16
158
156 0
l 154 z ~w c 152
150
500
Q -dego 400 - ui3 300 C
~ 200 z
~ 100middot~
w a ~ 0
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8 4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
FIGURE B30 Mixture Design Data High Quality CMS-7
Graniterock Replication 2
B30
TABLE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
~sidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weigllt pcf
Stabi]aneter Value
Cohes~ter Value
~silient MXJulus 103psi
2--day
final
40
30 C gt ffi20
~10 iii C ltII 0
500
l 400 C gt IC
~ 300 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
11 10 0
0 8gt C
6
4
55 65 75 resign 60 24268 24286 24206
26358 25966 25592 80
200
020
530
t515
80
268
182
338
~
65
207
020
630
t515
t_92
233
169
308
24
bull 220 0 C
ze 20
= 0 18 -0 gt
16
156
154
u i152 ~ z 0
150 bull
148
54 72
21 7 204
020 020
730 580
1511 1515
90 235
193 250
145 175
250 320
500 o 400 - l 300 0
~ 200 zi 100 iii IC
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replicationl
B31
TABLE B32 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residue 0ntent
Bulk Secific Gravity
llleoretical Speipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
-Absorled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
StabilcIIeter Value
Qlhesianeter Value 3Jesilient middotMgtdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
40
m30 lt gt cc20 w
w E
~10 ID lt 0
79
198
027
523
1518
203
243
201
354
~ soar-----------
w
400 lt gt a
~ 300 w E 0 ~ 200 8
100---I--~---------
12 -----------
111 10 C
0 8gt lt
6 --4
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l (ACiCiFIECiATE BASIS)
FIGURE B32 Mixture
55 65 75 Lesign 6 0
24329 24246 24077
26401 26007 25632
68 61 73 208 22l 203
027 027 027 623 723 573
1513 1502 1515
165 110 185 215 205 225
168 184 185 340 272 345
24
22 C C
z i 20
= 0 0
18 gt
16
156
154
a
gt152 en z Ill 0 150
148
bull 500 Q
deg 0 400- =gt 300 0
~ 200 z l 100 w
-
0 4 5 6middot 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(ACiGFIEGATE BASIS)
Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication
B32
2
TABLE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Eesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheore_tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VbullMA
lbsorbed_ Asphalt
Effective_ Asphalt
Qnit Weight pcf
~~ter Value
Q)hesianeter Value
Resiiient Mxlulus 10 3psi
2~y
Final
40
11130 C
a20 =
~10 C m
ltII 0
500
Ill
3 400 C
a ~ 300 w = 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
ll 10 ui E 0 8
c
6
4
I-
1-
55
23824
26318
95
215
014
536
1487
287
381
224
380
65 75
23896 23701 25928 25555 78 73
220 233
014 014 636 736
1491 1479 195 161
265 212
212 196
404 341
24
11 22d
c
z 20i
= ltII E 18 0
16
154
152- a
150 I-
Iesign 6 0
84
218
014
586
1490
240
320
215
395
z w Q
148
bull 146
500 a
c 400 ~ ui
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
l 300 Q
~ 200 zl 100 w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIOUla CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-a Replication 1
B33
- - ----- -
TABLE B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Rssidue Ogtntent
Bulk Secific Gravity
lhairetical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
AbsoIbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stabil~ter Value
Olhesiareter Value 3lesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-day
Firal
40
m 30 lt gt a 20 w w
= ~ 10
m lt
0
- --- -middot -middot 500
w l 400 lt gt
Ea
300 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
1l 10 middot 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 4
FIGURE
55
23834
26371
96
214
022
528
1487
279
207
176
332
65
23784
25978
84
223
022
628
1484
208
270
185
336
75
23628
25604
77
236
022
728
1474
167
334
181
350
iesiqn 6 bull 0
90
21 8
022middot
578
1485
245
240
180
334
~
~
24
1l 22
0
lt i
20i
= 0 gt
18
16
152
150 - 148
~ 146
144
500
o-400 middot --- J 300 C
~ 200 z
middot ~ 100 en a
0 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication
B34
2
B35 Mixture Design Data GraniterockTABLE Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Residue Content 55
Bwk Specific Gravity 24720
lheoretical Specific Gravity 26164
Air Voids 55
VMA 185
Absorbed Asphalt 001
Effective Asphalt 549
Unit Weight pcf 1543
StabilCampTeter value 293
Ohesiareter Value 174
Besilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day 69
Final 153
40
~ 30 _
c gt ffi 20 w I
Q 10
c 0
500
w 3 400 -
c gt a
~ 300 w I g bull ~ 200 8 ----r
100middot
10
8 -
~
Q
0 6gt a =c
4 ~ 2
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS
65 75 DesiSE 60
2 4 720 24515
25767 25388
40 34 48
193 207 189 001 001 001 649 749 599
1543 1530 1543 205 97 250
156 283 170
46 22 55 72 so 110
24
~
22ci C c
i 20i
= Cl 180 gt
16
lSadeg
156
u -a
654 z 0 152
150
500 ii a
a 400 - 3 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7
FIGURE B35 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
B35
12 r---------- 500bull _ 10
o 400 -middot 0 gt 5 C
8
tnl 300 Q
~ 200 z
6 ~ 100 ~ IU 0
4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT I
(AGCREGA TE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
TABLE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
55 65 75 resicn 6 0 Residue Content
Bulk siecific Gravity 24816 2 4721 24560
lheoretical Specific Gravity 26389 25983 25596
Air Voids 60 49 40 55
VMA 182 193 205 187
Absorlei Asphalt middot 035 035 035 035
Effective Asphalt 515 615 715 565
UUt Weight cf 1548 1543 1533 1545
Stabilaneter Value 298 193 130 250
Qlhesicmeter Value 188 I57 118 180 3
Resilient MJdulus 10 psi
soor-----------158
w l 400 Ishy 156 gt lt u
0a
w
300 w ~154E 0 z
w Q ~ 200 152
8 150100----middot-~-1-__c__~
2-day
Final
40
~ 30 J lt gt a 20 w
s 10 0
lt
0
92 43 27 65 186 79 46 135
24
22
~ =
ci lt 0
i 20~
18 0 gt
16
FIGURE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B36
Table B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
FJiuivalent ~sidue amtent 60 70 80 resign 70
Iesidue Ontent
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absomed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
lhit Weight pcpound
Stabilareter Value Ohesiareter Value
~ilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
Ill
50
40 A gt a w 30 w i 0 J
iii 201-
10
400
w3 300 gt a Ill t 200 i 0
8 ~iii ll 100 1-
0 12
lit 10 0 0 8gt a lt
6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)
630
21584
24451
117
210
140
460
1347
415
208
735
21570
24143
107
219
140
560
1346
488
61
840
21385
23848
103
233
140
660
1334
382
63
resign 7 35
107
219
140
560
1346
488
63
96
339 141
325
126
299 141 325
24
lit 22d
Cl
z 20i
= 0 180
gt
16
138
136 ltgt
i134 iii ~ z w 0 132
130
bull 500
o 400 -
3
300 ------------- 0
~ 200 z ~ 100 w o_____________a
9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B37
----
Table B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Pesidue omtent 60 70 80 Design 70
Pesidue omtent 630 735 8 40 Dsign 735
Bulk Specific Gravity 21710 21722 21714
lllroretical Specific Gravity 24298 23995 23705
Air Voids
VMA
lbsorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Chhesianeter Value
Eeilient Mldulus 103psi
2--clay
Final
so
40 J w
gt a 30 w w 0 20 m
10 400
w 300 gt a w 200 w i 100 8
0
12
if 10 a
~0 8gt a lt
6
4
107
205
112
488
1355
395
llO
113
290
95
213
112
588
1356
398
62
122
271
84
22l
112
688
1355
318
70
138
282
24
22 c 0
20
0 180 gt
16
140
138 -a
136 _iii z bull --w 0 134
132
bull 500 a
o 400
m 300 J 0 bull ~ 200 z 100
w a
0
95
213
)12
588
1356
398
62
122
271
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT J
(AGCilEGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B38
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Table B39
Fquivalent ~idue COntent
~idue Cbntent
Bulk SJecific Gravity lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Oihesianeter Value
~ilient Mldulus l03psi
2-day
Fiial
so
w 40 lt gt cc 30 ~ w E
0 20 m lt 10
400
m POO lt gt a U 200 E 0 iii w c 100 8
0
12
- 10 vi Cl
0 gt ac
6
60 70 80
690 805 920
21790 21826 21910
24255 23977 23710
102 90 76
207 214 219
080 080 080
610 710 810
1360 1362 1367
437 400 289
219 229 202
141 158 184
333 282 273
24
~ 22ci
CJ lt z
20ii
= Cl 180
gt
16
----------
~ lo
140
138 Q l136 iii w Cl
134
132
500 Q
0 400 n3 300 Cl
~ 200 i-bull
100
z ~ 0 a
Cesign 70
Cesign 805
90
214
080
710
1362
400
229
158
282
-------
-
-~
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B39 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication l
B39
8
Table B40 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Eesidue cantent
Iesidue Omtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lhagtretical Speiliic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Abro1plusmned Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tklit Weight pcpound
Stabilareter Value
OJhesianeter Value
EEsilient Mldulus l03psi
2-day
Final
50
w 40 J lt gt a 30 w
w i
3 20 lt 0 10
400-----------
DI 3 300 lt gt a wti 200 i 0 w8100
0 -------l--l-1
12 ----------
- 10 ltn 0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
60 70 80 690 805 920
21986 21964- 21948
24499 2A212 23938
103 93 83
200 209 218
124 124 l24
476 576 676
1372 1371 1360
422 403 265
270 306 160
99 140 154
298 310 254
24
-22
ci lt
=i 20i
a 0 18 0 gt
16
140
138 - a
l136 z w 0 134
132
bull500
a
o 400 -
ltn =gt 300 -J a
~ 200 z 100 DI 0
0 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT Ii (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Dsign 70
Design 805
93
209
124
576
1371
403
306
140
310
9
Figure B40 Mixture Design Data High Quality SS-30
San Bernardino SEA Replication 2
B40
Table B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent lesidue ~tent
Ilesidue Omtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lbagtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stabilateter Value
CllhesiaIEter Value
Resilient MXlulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
w 40 i- _ gt 30a w I- ~ w 0 20 m I-CII 10
400
w l 300 gt a w lj 200 0 w 100 8
0
12
111 10 Q
0 8gt a ~
6
4
~
6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
65 75 85 Design 75 683 789 89J tesign 789
21624 21445 21375 24097 23802 23520
103 99 92 213 228 238 100 100 100 550 650 750
1349 1338 1334 423 295 285 70 174 82
150 139 138 318 310 2S4
24
22d i
20ii
= CII Q 180 gt
16
138
- 136
u
134I- z ~132
130
bull 500 o 400 _ l 300 1- Q
sectl 200 I-z ~ 100 CII w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
99
228
100
650
1338
295
174
139
310
5
Figure B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B41
Table B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent PesidJJe Content
Residue Omtent
Bulk Specific GIavity
lheoretical Specific GIavity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit weight pcpound
Stabiloreter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mxulus 103psi
SC
w 40 gt a 30 w w i 0 J 20
10
400
w 3 300 gt a w t 200 i
9 ltI)
w = 1008
0
12
11 10 u a 0 8gt
6
4
2-day
Final
~
~
5 6 7 8 flESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGflEGATE BASIS)
65 75 85
683 788 89J 21424 21394 21455
24147 23851 23567
ll3 103 90
22l 229 234
l09 l09 l09
541 641 741
133 7 1335 1339
412 328 280
129 103 81
167 141 162
325 260 280
24
22ci 0 201
= 0 gt
18
16
i-
138
136 Q i134 _ 0 z w bull0 132
130
soor----------- D C
o 400
ltn3 300 a ~ 200 z 100 (I)
w
-
~
a 0------------ 5 6 7 8 9
flESIOUE CONTENT I
(AGGflEGA TE BASIS)
Design 75
Design 7 86
103
229
l09
641
1335
328
103
141
260
9
Figure B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B42
Table B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent Residue Omtent
Residue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllagtreticalSpecilicGravity
Air Voids
VMA
AbsorlJed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcpound
Stabilcrreter value
Cllhesianeter value
lelilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
400-----------
Illl 300 lt gt a w t 200 lo 0 w 8100
0 ________ ___ __
12 ----------
~ 10 0
~ 8 bull a c
6
4 -_______ ___ __
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS
65 75 85 748 863 978 21752 21661 21638 24136 23863 23602 99 92 83
213 225 234 081 081 081 569 669 769
1357 1352 1350 466 367 235
224 266 138
220 189 209 478 337 281
Ilsign 75
Design 863
92
225
081
669 1352
367
266
189
337
24 ----------
~
220 Cl lt ii 20
0 18 0
gt
16 ----------------14or-----------
138 -0 a 136 z w Q
134
132
= c 400 - l 300 Q
~ 200 f-middot z 100 w a o----------
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
_____________J
Figure B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardinor Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B43
Table B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Iesidue Cbntent 65 75 85 Design 75
lesidue Omtent 748 86~ resign~Zl 863
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleo~tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asjtlalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
lesilient Mxlulus 103psi
2-day
Final
so
w gt 0 30 IE 0 20 iii lt
10
400
3 300 lt gt 0 w l 200 IE 0 X w
100 8
0
12
- 10 en 0 0 8gt
6
4
~ 40 bull
~ 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
21676
23998
97
208
055
595
1353
409
248
189
308
24
22
ci c lt i
20ii
= 0 0
18 gt
16
21711 21641
23729 23472
85 78 85
223 234 223
055 oss 055
695 795 695
1355 135l 1355
283 227 283
187 186 187
198 177 198
255 285 255
140
138 a
136 - z 0 134 --
132
500 a
o 400 -
vi3 300 - 0
sectj 200 z ~ 100
0 0 5 6 middot 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino~ Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B44
Table B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Equivalent Jesidue Content 60 70 80 Design 70
tesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
trut Weight pcpound
Stabilcineter Value
Cbhesiateter Value
tesilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
IU 40 _ C gt 30a IU IU = middoto 20 m C (I) 10
400
IU
300 C gt a IU
ti 200 = 0 ~ IU c 100 8
0
12
10 ai 0 8gt C
6
4
~
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)
630 735 840 Design 7 35
21651 21581 21592
24033 23739 23457
99 91 80 91 180 190 198 190
399 499 599 499 135l 1347 134 7 1347
309 439 358 439
150 236 202 236
140 171 148 171 294 390 367 390
24
bull 22
Cl Cl C
i 20i
= (I) Q 180
gt
16 140
138 0 a
i136 z IU
134 bull bull
Q
132
500 D
c 400 _ 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 IU a
0 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B45
Table B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Residue Cbntent 60 70 80 Design 70 Residue Cbntent 6JO Z35 EdQ Jesign 7 35
Bulk Spcific Gravity 21413 21627 21711 lhroretical Specific Gravity 24321 24017 23726 Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcneter Value
Ohesianeter Value
llesilient Mgtdulus 10 3psi
2-day
Final
so
Ill 40 I lt gt 0 30 w Ill i 0 20 Cl lt
10
400
111
l 300 lt gt 0 w lj 200 i
~ w = 1008 -----___
0
12
II- 10 a 0 8gt lt
6
4
120
189
249
351
1336
407
79
147
361
24
II-22
ci
lt ~ 20i
= 0
0 18
gt
16
138
136 u C
l134 w 132
130
bull 500
C
o 400 ~
---------_J 300 0
~ 200
~ 100 Ill 0
0
99
189
249
451
1350
396
76
165
340
85
193
249
551
1355
360
64
175
305
99
189
249
451
1350
396
76
165
340
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT 1
9 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE COIHENT f
9
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B46
---------
Table B4 7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Bulk Specific Gravity
lhalretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorlled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilaieter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
llesilient MJdulus 103psi
2-clay
Final
50
40w lt(
gt IC 30 w w
0 20 iii lt( ltI)
10
400
w 3 300 ~ lt(
gt IC w t 200 0 iii 111 i 100 8
0 ___ _______ __ _ __
12 ----------
Fquivalent Pesidue Content 60 70 80 Iesign 70
Pesidue Qlntent 690 805 92Q Dcsign 805
21958 22006
24182 23909
92 88 92
18l 188 18l 256 256 256
444 544 444
1370 1373 1370
342 291 342
78 73 78
184 167 184
303 298 303
10 0
0 8gt IC
c 6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B47 Mixture
21880
24453
105
176
256
344
1365
443
58
174
381
24
22ci
5 20
= 0
0 18
gt
16
~ I I
138
136 ~ ~134 bull z 111 0 132
130
bull 500
o 400 3 300 - Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 ltI) 111 IC
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B47
Table B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
El_uivalent Residue Cbntait 60 70 80 Iesign 70
Residue Cbntent 690 aQi 2 2Q Dsign 805 Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Olhesiateter Value
Resilient Mldulus middot103psi
2-day
Final
21816
24403
106
178
244
356
1361
482
136
183
393
21806
24120
96
187
244
456
1361
411
130
187
374
21996
23849
78
189
244
556
1373
314
106
260
361
96
187
244
456
1361
411
130
187
374
24so
w 40 22 ci 0 gt a 30 ~ 20w w = 20 ishy C 18iii 0 gt Ill 10 _ ___ ____________
16 400------------
140
w l 300 138 gt 0
Qa w
636t 200 z0 w --------_ Qw 134c 100 8
0 ___ _____________ 132
bull50012 -----------
a
1 400 -_ 10
ltti ltti l 300 -C 0 C8gt ~ 200 lt z
6 l 100 w a
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT S RESIDUE CONTENT S (AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B48
Table B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
EquivaJent Residue antent 65 75 85 Design 75 Residue Content 63J z aa a 23 resign 7 88 Bulk Specific Gravity 21404 21439 21381 lheoretical Specific Gravity 23563 23286 Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcf
Stabilaneter Value
Cohesianeter Value
~ient 1bdul11S 103psi
2~y
Firal
50
w 40 gt a 30 w w 0 20 iii lt 10
400
3 300 w
gt a w t 200 0 in i w
100 8
0 12
10 0 Q
0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6
23020 92 79 71 79
193 199 209 199 140 140 140 140 510 610 710 610
1336 1338 1334 1338 424 397 308 397 79 308 266 308
173 185 196 185 330 319 285 319
24
22ci c lt
~ 20c Q 180
gt
16
138
136 u -Cl
~134 in ~z w 132
130
soar----------- Qbull
o 400
middot3 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a Q___________ ___ __
7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT deg RESIDUE COIITENT deg (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B49
Table BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Fquivalent lesidue Content
Besidlle 0-ntent
Bulk Specific Gravity
Illeoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pf
Stabilcmeter Value
ltbhesiaieter Value
Besilient Mxlulus 103psi
2--day
Final
50
~ 40 I lt gt 30 w 0 20 01 lt 10
400
w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 w r lOO 8
o 12
10 ai ~ 0 8gt a lt
6
~
4 5 6 7 8
IIESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
65 75 85 683 788 893 21527 21362 21337
24013 23721 23441 104 99 90
188 202 211
225 225 225
425 525 625
1343 1333 1332
410 418 290
261 62 100
188 197 211
334 348 331
24
22 ~ ci c lt
20 f 18 0 gt
16
138
136 0 a
134 z w 0 132
130
500 a
o 400
ai bull 300 I bull C
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
IIESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design 75
Design 788
99
202
225
525
1333
418
62
197
348
Figure BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
BSO
Table B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno
Fquivalent Residue Clintent
Residue 0rrtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorlei Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
thlit Weight pcf
StabiJaneter value
Ohesiaretel value 3lelilient MJdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
50
w
40
c gt a 30 w w = g 20 iii c Ill 10
400----------
middota
l 300 bull c gt a w t 200 = 0 w c 100 8
0 _______ ____ _
12 ------------
_ 10 ~ 8 c
6
4 _________ __
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B51
Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
65 75 85 748 863 978
21728
24022
96
186
200
450
1356
436 100
199
376
24
11 22
c c c
z 20ii
Ill0 180
gt
16
Design 75
Design 863
86
195
200
550
1355
392 260
212
362
21716
23753
86
195
200
550
1355
392 260
212
362
21673
23495
78
205
200
650
1353
378 201
230
3l7
~
140
138 Q j136 bull --_ z w 0134
132
500 Q
o 400 bull -l 300 ~ 0 ~ 200 I-z ~ 100 w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Table B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent lesidue OJntent 65 75 85 Design 75 Pesidue Ointent 748 863 978 Design 863 Bulk Specific Gravity 21595 21708 21637 ~retical Specific Gravity 23977 23708 23452 Air Voids 99 84 77 84 VMA 19l 195 206 195 Absorbed Asphalt l92 l92 l92 l92 Effective Asphalt 458 558 658 558 Unit Weight pf 1347 1354 1350 1354 Stabilareter Value 502 262 239 262 Cllhesianeter Value 257 136 154 136 Pesilient MJdulus 103psi
2--day 217 201 228 201 Final 371 307 290 307
2450
w 40 22 0 0lt ltgt ia 30
bull 20i
= 0 20 18iii 0lt gt 10
16 400
~
~
140
w 3 300 -ltgt
138 lt gt
aa w t 200 deg136 z0 w 0
134 w
100 8
1320
12 500 a
0 400 10
3 300 C 0 Q8gt ~ 200 lt z
6 100 w a
4 0 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT ~ RESIDUE CONTENT ~ (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B52
Table B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent ~sidue Cbntent 45 55 65 Design 55 ~idue Cbntent 473 578 6~~ Design 5 78 Bulk Specific Gravity 24210 24403 24473 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26934 26528 26142 Air Voids
VMA
Absocbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
StabiJaneter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Iesilient M)dulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
w _ 40 C gt II 30w w 0 20 iii C ~
10
400
w l 300 C gt II
iiw
200
~ w --------r 100 8
0 12
ot 10 -0
0 8gt II c
6
4
101 80 64 80 199 20l 206 20l
022 022 022 022 423 523 623 523
151l 1523 1527 1523 308 288 197 288
ll7 ll2 140 112
95 llO 122 llO 306 272 214 272
24
ci 22
C
i -~20Es = E 18 0
gt
16
156
154 - gt152 iii z ~ w 0
150
148
bull 500
o 400 Inl 300 0
~ 200 z ~ 100 w II
0
--~
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT r (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7 8 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B53
Table B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Residue Glntent 45 ss 65 Jesign 55 Residue Omtent 47 5 ZB 6 83 resign ~za Bulk Specific Gravity 24197 24253 24435 lheoretical Specific Gravity 26843 26441 26058 Air Voids 99 83 62 83 VMA 199 206 208 206 Absorbed Asphalt 09 09 09 09 Effective Asphalt 441 541 641 541 lklit Weight P=f 1510 1513 152S 1513 StabLkmter Value 38l 307 204 307 CJgthesianeter Value 73 85 149 85 Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day 170 159 142 159 Final 333 367 193 367
so
w 40 J lt gt 0 30w w le 0 20J
CJ lt 10
24
It
22ci 0 lt i -------20 = 18 0 gt
16 400
____
~
156
w 3 300 154 lt gt - a0 w gt 152l 200 le __-0 z w w c 150 8100
148 0
12 500
D C
o 400 r- 10 -u 300
J 0 9
8 Cgt ~ ~ 200 z
6 ~ 100
w 0
4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE COIITEIIT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B54
----------
Table B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Rep~ication 1
Equivalent Residue Contentmiddot
Residue Ontent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
~tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tklit Weight pcpound
Stabilaneter value
Cbhesiaieter Value
Resilient -bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
45 55 65
518 633 748
24695 24765 24666
26898 26520 26160
82 66 57
187 193 205
001 001 001
449 549 649
154l 1545 1539
41l 310 24l
159 157 165
183 178 193
371 318 250
50
w 40 c gt a 30 w-w == 0 20 ~ 10
400------------
~ 300 lt(
gt a
t 200 == 0 in bullw 8100
0 __ ________ ___ ___
12 ----------
t 10 rti C
~ 8 a c
6
4 s 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI
4
24
Ill 22
0 c c
ze 20
II)
C 18 0
gt
16
158
156- 154 Ill z w 0 152
150
500 iii
8 4
~
0 400-
i300-~ g 200 1-z l 100 iii a 0 __ _______ ____
5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design 55
Design 633
66
193
001
549
1545
310
157
178
318
___
8
Figure B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
BSS
Table B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality
Equivalent Rsidue Content 45
Rsidue Cbntent 518
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllooretical specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
lbsoibed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesicmeter Value 3
Iesilient Mldwus 10 psi
2--day
Final
400-----------
w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 I 0 ltII w8100
olt----__1__--1_---1
12 ----------
10 u
0 8gt a lt
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT l
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
24594
27024
90
190
019
431
1535
450
198
191
360
24
Ill 22
0 C
lt i
20i ~ ltII C 18 C gt
16
158
156 0
i54 iii z ILi
J52
150
SS-30 SEA
55 65
63J 7 ~a 24844
26641
67
190
019
531
1550
324
212
173
308
24856
26276
54
199
019
631
155l
234
225
166
259
_________
~
500----------- 0
dego 400 -
~300~~ C
~ 200 z i 100
w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COIITEHT l
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Replication 2
Design 55
Lesign 633
67
190
019
531
1550
324
212
173
308
Figure B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B56
---------
Table B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality
ElIuivaJent lesidue Omtent
lesidue Cbntent
Bulk Spacific Gravity
~retical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Uut Weight pcf
Stabilaneter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
lesilient Mldulus 103psi
so
w 40 lt gt a 30 w w ~ 20 m lt II)
10
400
w 3 300 lt gt a w lj 200 0 w z 1008
0 12
Ill 10 Q
0 8gt lt
6
4
2-day
Final
~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
so 530
24024
26676
99
207
031
469
1499
354
138
183
352
SS-15 SEA Replication 1
60 70 Design 60 636 7 42 Design 636
24040 23986 26279 25901 85 74
214 223
031 031 569 669
1500 1497 223 149
222 126
159 160 302 234
24
Ill
c 22 ~ c
lt i
20i1
== (II C 180 gt
16
152
150 u -a
648 z w Q
146 1-
144
bull 500 a
o 400 - 3 300 C
~ 200 z ~ 100 (II w a
~ 0
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
85
214
031
569
1500
223 222
159
302
8
Figure B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B57
Table B58 Mixture Design Data Low Quality SS-15
Fquivalent Residue Content 60 60
Rsidue Cbntent 525 630
23944
~retical Specific Gravity
Bulk Sjecific Gravity 26592
Air Voids 100
209VMA
1bsocbed Asphalt 015
Effective Aspbalt 485
Unit Weight pcf 1494
Stabilareter Value 377
Olhesiaeter Value 151
Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi
162
375 2-day
Final
so
w 40 _ gt c 30 w w i
~20 m I-0
10
400
Ill
300 gt w I 200 i 2 w i 100 8
_________ 0 --middotmiddot-
12-------bull------
ti 10 9 0 8gt
6
4
24
- 22ci
0
20i
= 9 18 0 gt
16
152
150 u a
148 z---- w0146
144
500 Q
o 400 _ 300 Q
~ 200 I-z ~ 100
w a
23988
26022
84
215
015
585
1497
307
180
165
356
Graniterock SEA Replication 2
70
735 23793
25830
79
229
015
685
1485
217
170
169
277
~
~
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7
RESIOUE CONTENT li RESIDUE COPlTENT li (AGGREGATE 8ASIS) (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)
Design 60
resign 630
84
215
585
1497
307
180
165
356
8
Figure B58 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B58
Table B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Equivalent esidue omtent 5 0 60 70 Design 60
esidue Cbntent 5 75 690 805 Dsign 690
Bulk Specific Gravity 24389 24362 24419
Jheo=eticaJ Specific Gravity 2 6670 26303 25953
Air Voids 8 6 74 59 7 4
VMA 198 207 214 20 7
Absorbed Asphalt 009 009 009 009
Effective Asphalt 491 591 691 591
Unit Weight pcf 1522 1520 1524 1520
Stabilareter Value 38l 292 220 292
Cbhesiclneter Value 263 186 176 186
~t Mldulus 103psi
2-day 222 222 207 222
Fulal 380 289 293 289
5
w 40 C gt a 30 Ill ~ 20 m C 1- 10
24 ----------
22 bull C Cl C
zi 20
C1 o 18 0 gt
16 ___-________-------i-_-
400---------- 15a------------
156l 300 C gt - a =deg 154ti 200
iii z0 IUiii 0 152 bull bull~ 10018
150 ___ _______ __J0 ---i--J~-L--1
500----------12 ----------- bull o 400 -
Ill 10 ui l 300 -Q
Qg 8 g 200a lt z 6 l 100
iii a
01--J-----__ __4 -------r------- 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
RESIDUE COrlTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B59
Table B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Design 60
Eeidue omtent 575 690 805 D=sign 690
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleo~tical Specific Gravity
1lir Voids
VMA
Absocbed Asralt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcf
Stabilcmeter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
Eeilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
Ill 40 J
lt gt a 30 w I-w 0 20 Ill lt I-
10
400
w 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 Id
8100
0 12
10 m Q
0 8gt 5 lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
~
RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASISI
24371 24441 24445
26744 26373 26020
89 73 61 73
199 205 213 205
019 019 019 019
481 581 681 581
1521 1525 1525 1525
335 236 191 236
220 164 180 164
194 199 191 199
388 329 294 329
24
22
ci 0 lt i
20i
= a
= 18 0 gt
16
158
156 u a
deg154 = w Q
152 ---------150
500 a
1 400 m3 300 1 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100
Ill a
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COHTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B60
APPENDIX C
DATA ANALYSIS SOLVENT FREE AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS
Table Cl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL e_AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
95 85 80
867
76
88
90 85 85
867
29
33
95 85 85
883
58
65
85 70 80
783
76
98
100 100 100
1000
00
00
100 100 100
1000
00
00
C M s 0
D A T A x s
CV
80 80 80
800
00
oo
80 75 75
767
29
38
75 80 70
750
50
67
70 80 75
750
50
67
90 90
100
933
58
62
95 100
95
967
29
30
C M s 1
D A T A
X s
CV
80 75 70
750
50
67
60 70 55
617
76
124
70 70 65
683
-2 9
42
65 70 60
650
50
77
65 70 70
683
29
42
70 60 65
650
50
77
Table C2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating
F01
E 2 ll877 7777778 243aassese9 1)75102041 329 532 ~ middot2 1ll77777777~ 73RBSeSf89 32571~2-~5 3~ 29 532 J 1 150 ooocooo 150JOJOOOO 5f122llll9 414 746
EA ll 8114 llllll11444 2111111111 3J51224 266 396 -E~ middot2- 1-0frOOfr~ 0-9 middot50-middot000 3 oco middot2middot20110816 middot 329 532 Agt 2 77 7777778 38 8815589 17142857 329 532 nJ 4 1555555~55 388881889 171112857 266 396
FR RmiddotJR 36 8166666567 225851B52
------------------------------------------------middot---------------------ronmiddotL 53 -esoo--000000r
Cl
100
P
c5 75 z-t-lt8 50 w t-lt bull css-oC
CMS-0w 25a C middot+ CMS-7 C lt
0-----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Cl Mean AggregateCqqting at middotoesign Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 867 css-o 883 CSS-0 783 css-o 1000 css-o 1000middotcss-o middot I I CMS-0 800 CMS-0 7~ 7 CMS-0 750 CMS-0 933 CMS-0 967lrMS-0 750
I CMS-7 750 CMS-7 617 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 65 0 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating
C2
Table C3 Film Stripping
EMULSION
AGGREGATE SAN
BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK
C s s 0
D A T A
5
0
10
5
5
0
X s
CV
25
35
1414
75
35
47l
25
35
1414
C M s 0
D A T A
0
5
5
7
0
0
X s
CV
25
35
1414
60
14
236
00
oo oo
C M s 7
D A T A
0
0
0
5
0
0
X s
CV
00 OQ 00
25 35
1414
00 00
oo
Table C4 ANOVA Summary Film Stripping
AN-OVA
middotmiddotDPmiddot -ss- F middotFe5
E 2 33 7777778 1euro8888889 23555191 426 802 A 2 -ti8 7777778 343888889 4 7984496 426 802
E X II 4 9 2222226 23055557 3217054 363 642 ERROI 9 645000000 71666667 ---------------TOTAL 17 1762777782
C3
fl w 0 lti 1L a =gt en C w C C-a I-en
40
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-730
20
10
0 SB F GR
Figure C3 Film Stripping
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
css-o 25 css-o 75 css-o 25
GMS-0 25 CMS-0 60 CMS-0 oo
CMS-7 oo CMS-7 25 CMS-7 oo
----middot----middot-middotmiddotmiddot
Nlte Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping
C4
Table CS 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue
Content 10 3 psi
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW D
118 170A 217 205 160 175
C T 83 190 191 182 130 185A s )ts 101 180 204 194 145 180
0 s 25 14 18 16 21 7
CV 246 79 90 84 146 39 D 104 185 155A 190 140 215
C T 82 155 154 171 130 180A M x 93s 170 155 181 135 198
s 16 21 1 13 7 250 CV 167 125 05 74 52 125
D A ab 55 35 73 38 55
C T
82A 48 63 77 45 65 M X s pound81 -- - 52 49 75 42 60 s7 l 5 20 3 5 7
CV 18 96 404 38 11 9 11 8
Table C6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus
A N ) V l
-D-F -SS
E 2 832263888888 _ 2-- -5441-- 722-2222-J 1 89933611111
E~ 4 5386 7777779 -1J- 2- -3-8-1-+-rG-55--5-5-5 7- bull AJ 2 144235~899 EA 4 58024444443
ERROR 113- 3951500 00~-J
---------------------------------------------------------------------TOT-W- -3-5 -11806-4---638 881gt-9-
(116131944444 2720-8611111 89933611111 13466944445 1-9Q lh-5--amp7--+7-8-7211944445
14506111111 219 527-7778
1895577629 -12 394-1541-409569480
61345059 S-~937872 32952081 56gt7870Ll
357 3-S7 443 295
-]y5+ 3S7 295
605 6 05--833 461
-6--05-605 461
cs
bull css-omiddot 300 C CMS-0
M 0 diams CMS-7
(J
3200 gt C 0 E 1-
ffi 100
01----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure CS 2 Day ResiLient Modulus
SAN middotBERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 101 css-o 180 rss-o 204 css-0_194 CSS-0 145 CMS-0 198
CMS-0 93 CMS-0 170 ICMS-0 155 CMS-0 181 CMS-0 135 css-o 180l l l I I CMS-7 81 CMS-7 52 CMS-7 49 CMS-7 75 CMS-7 42 CMS-7 60
Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C6 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking 2 Day
Resilient Modulus 10 3 psi
C6
Table C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Content 10 psi
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A (
s
CV
260
232
246
20
80
320
280
300
28
94
482
299
391
129
33l
365
358
362
5
l4
280
240
260 28
109
320
345
333
18
53
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
267
250
259
12
47
295
280
288
ll
37
253
288
271
25
92
290
387
339
69
203
260
307
284
33
11 7
395
334
365
43
118
C M s 7
D A T A
X
s
CV
78
64
71-
10
139
110
95
103
ll
104
75
73
74
l
19
110
135
123
18
144
80
90
85
7
83
110
135
123
18
144
middotTable C8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus
-~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------F-r05- ---F-01--
E
J El -E- Al EAJ
-ERRJR
2 2-1 4 -~ 2 4
18
3592750555555 -14506 722-2221-171610COOOOJ 147394444445
1---1-1----lf466-li-+ 19215000000 55353333333
2850GOOC0000
17-16375277778 72~336H-1-11
1716100)0000 36848611111 sect8~5833---3-33--9607500000
13840833333 ~ 58-3 33-33 333
11315528C7 -45810702
109385263 23272807 ~U981l-2-1-6067895 3741579
357 -3 r7 443 2 95 3~7-357 295
605 605 833 461 605 605 4 6 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------~- 3-5- -448+1----2-222-2-
C7
bull css-o500
CMS-0 U) diams CMS-7C
C) 400 middoto -
~ 300
J Ci 200
1-z 100 J-UJ UIa
01-------------------------~---~-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
eMS-0 259 ess-a 300 ess-a 391 ess-a 362 eMS-0 284 CMS-0 365
ess-o 246l l l l l ICMS-0 288 eMS-0 271 CMS-0 339 ess-o 260 ess-o 333
CMS-7 71 CMS-7 103 CMS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123
t-ote Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure ca Newrnan-Keuls Ranking Full Cure 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi
ca
Table C9 Density at Design Residue Content pcpound
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
1359
1372
1366
09
07
1365
1365
1365
0
0
1365
1352
1359
09
07
1345
1345
1345
0
0
1520
1525
1523
04
02
1515
1515
1515
0
0
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
1348
1343
1346
04
03
1330
1338
1334
06
04
1329
1340
1335
08
06
1335
1316
1326
- 13
10
1505
1490
1498
11
07
1490
1485
1488
04
02
C M s 7
D A T A
x s
CV
1373 1385
1379
09 06
1375 137 5
1375
0 0
1380
1379
1380
01 01
1370
1360
1365
07 05
1537
1535
1536
01 01
1543
1545
1544
01 01
Table ClO ANOVA Surtunary Density
A II O V ~
-SS F bull O1
E _ 0
2 i
lCB4155555 Z08-tOS389
II 311277~
54207777R 1 ouos2sirrs
4340277
135q23660 -25lS 7i80R63-
1087331173
3S7 3 ~7 443
i()5 605 83
EA Q
4 -2
1599U4U5 _iuseeg
399E11 -3-3UUL45-
10J17398 bull~3785-C7
295 -~S7-
4 f 1 -6CS
A) 2 13772222 o6886111 17251218 357 605 EAJ q 2C361111 5090278 12752262 295 4 61
-ERRJR- 13- 718-()001 399166-7-
35
C9
bull css-o160 CMS-0 diams CMS-7
150
() -a gt 140 -en z w
middotC 13
1201~bull-------------r---------------SBH SBL FH FL ~RH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C9 - Density at Design Residue Content
SAN middotBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 138o CMS-7 1365ICMS-7 1375 CMS-7 1544
css-o 1366
I-7 bull rMS-7 1536
css-o 1365 css-o 1359 css-o 1345 css-o 1523 CSS-0 j515
CMS-0 1346 CMS-0 1334 CMS-0 1335 CMS-0 132 6 CMS-0 1498 CMS-0 1488
Nte Values with a ccmnm vertical line are not statistically different
Figure ClO Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcpound
ClO
Table Cll Air Voids at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
D 87 7 0-A 75 77 80 72
C T 71 70 92 82 78 73A s )s 79 70 84 80 79 73
0 s ll 0 12 04 01 01
CV 143 0 144 45 18 10 D 97 93A 93 91 82 84
C T 90 92 A
91 93 87 90
M x 94 93 92 s 92 84 87 s os 01 01 _0l 04 04
0 53 08 15 15 42 49CV D A 77 62 73 62 71 48
C T 73 61 62 71 65A 55
M X s 75 62 68 67 68 52 s 03 01 08 06 04 057
CV 38 12 115 96 62 96
Table Cl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids
A I O Y 11
-DF ss -F 05 F01
E 2 382650000 191325000 69)150301 3~7 605 -A 2 -2-681667 1340334 ll03567311 -3- 57 605
Q 1 2f677778 26677778 952324f6 4 13 I 33 EA lj 13S33333 3313333 122011409 2 95 Ii 61 ti -2 l8105555- -905-277-8- 326553tO 357 tiOS II) 2 6572221 3296111 11953707 357 605 E~l 4 88411445 2211111 797552 795 4 f 1 ERElll 111 11991)0)00 bull2172222-
-------------------------~------------------------------------------rou1 s SJ 3100000-
Cll
11
10
iP- en 0-0 gt aa
9
8
7
6
5
4
bull css-o CMS-o diams CMS~7
SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
F-igure Cll Air Voids at middotoesign Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 94 CMS-0 93 CMS-0 92 ICMS-0 92 CMS-0 84 ICMS-0 87
IIcss-o 79 css-o 7 0 I II
css-o 79 css-o 73
I ~_ I~ CMS-7 7 5 CMS-7 62 CMS-7 68 CMS-7 48 - - bull-- ~ -----~middot-middotmiddot--middot-middotmiddot-middot ---middotmiddot
~= Values with a OCIlOn vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids
Cl2
Table Cl3 Stabilorneter Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
272
3113
293 29
99
270
265
268 04
13
393
327
360 47
130
380
325
353 39
110
270
270
270 0
0
235
185
210 35
168
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
375
344
360
22
61
340
350
345
07
21
307
377
342
50
145
415
367
39l
33
85
350
300
3-2 5
35
109
240
245
243
04
15
C M s 7
D A T A
x s
CV
235
23-5
235
0
0
130
120
125
07
57
213
233
-223
14
63
150
200
175
35
202
350
350
350
0
0
250
250
25 o_ 0
0
Table Cl4~ ANOVA Summary Stabilorneter Value
A N O V 1
soua= SS r 01
E 2 2
7086172721 9702C93fl9
3543086361 4SS10Uf95
505343236 ~-9189501
357 357
605 605
) 1 175 6950250 1756950250 25053)2i8 443 833 EA 4 6718347112 167 9586 778 23955053 2 95 461 ~ ~544 -4 Q-432-ll-25-0- --S--~ 38 ~5-19- -3 5- ios AJ 2 941227166 47(1euro13583 57122663 357 605 EAJ 4 289779333 72319A33 10314831 2 95 II f 1
Ell ngtR -18 1r2024gt0) -i- bull112472-
---------------------------------------------------------------------0-T- ----5- 4-9B1 is~v~
Cl3
50
w 40 I ltgt a 30w I-w ~ 200 I-m lt 10I-u
0 SSH SBL FH FL GRH
AGGREGATE
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
GRL
Figure Cl3 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 350 CMS-7 250ICMS-0 360 ICMS-0 345 r=ss-o 36o rMS-0 39l
css-o 268 CMS-0 342 css-o 353 CMS-0 325 CMS-0 243Icsbull-bull _ CMS-7 235 CMS-7 12S CMS-7 223 CMS-7 175 css-o 270 css-o 210
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value
Cl4
Table Cl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOWHIGH LOW LOWHIGH D 360193 280 465 275 250A T 234 345 183 375 160 225C A
s x 214 353 232 420 218 238s s 29 11 69 64 18810
136 30 296 152 37 4 74CV D 280 440 230 355 200 320 T A
252 430 219 450 140 240C A M x 266 435 225 403 170 280s s 20 7 67 428 570
74 16 16735 250 202CV D
80 190 122 245 130 170 T A
82 180 192 235 120 180C A M X 81 185 157 240 125 175s s l 7 so 7 777
CV 18 3038 31 5 57 40
Table Cl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value
-SS--
pound 2 1309717272222 654858611111 1102309084 357 605 __ 2 3Ber61222222 194033611--111 -1-1t2J3570 -3 57 605 J 1 12)524904445 120524f94111145 711)1137379 1143 l 33
EA 4 2311~U411111145 57795111111 355~57119 295 4 ~ 1
~ + --8-066---H~i-i--2 ---4-B3-a~--H ~T4-=7-7S~J -3 S7 605 1J 2 111206 7222222 71033511111 ll3~31111 3 57 605 EAJ 4 500gt1111111 12512777778 7587162 235 4 (- 1
RAO- -18 -999 500-000( -1-6--2-7 -75-00000-
--------------------------------------------------------------------tO+--l- el-i- 3-fi-99g6-3-R-~
Cl5
bull css-o500
Q1__________---___-----~
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure ClS CohesiometerValue at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 232rMS-0 435 CMS-0 280rMS-0 266 rss-o 420 tss-o 218
css-o 214 css-o 353 CMS-0 225 CMS-0 403 css-o 238ICMS-0 170
CMS-7 81 CMS-7 185 CMS-7 157 CMS-7 240 CMS-7 125 CMS-7 175
Nrte Values with a oamon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value
~400 -I ltgt cc 300 w 1-w E 2000 -() w c 1008
CMS-0 diams CMS-7
Cl6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Table Cl7 Swell at Design Residue Content in
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
0 0000 0003 0000 0008 0000 0000A C T 0000 0005 0000 0007 0000 0002
A 0000 0004 0000 0009 0000 0000 s j( 00000 00040 00000 00080s 00000 00007
0 s 00000 00010 00000 0 0010 00000 00012
CV 00 250 00 125 00 1732 D 0000 _o 045 0020 0036 0000 0000A 0006 0029 0018 0040 0001 0000TC A 0007 0040 0022 0039 0000 0000
M x 00043 00380 00200 00383 00003 00000 s s 00038 00082 00020 00021 00006 00000 0
874 215CV 100 54 1732 oo
D 0000 0004 0000 0003 0000 0000A T 0000 0002 0000 0000 0000 0000
C A 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000
M x 00000 OQ023s 00000 00010 00000 00000 s 00000 00015 00000 00017 00000 00000
7 oo 655 1732CV 00 00 oo
Table Cl8 ANOVA Summary Swell
P N O V ~
SOUR-middotEmiddot l)f -ss- -lSmiddot F rs FM
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------E 2 C031905 )015953 7576385211 329 532 J 2 0012203 OOOf112 2~97R1n75 329 532 l 000858(1 )()QSf80 11122112111111 414 846
H LI 0016535 00)111311 1963258575 266 396 Emiddot) middot2middot 00079 51- a0ll397S 1eg ~16527 329 532 AJ 2 00011958 )0021179 111 ns1ne 329 532 EAJ II 0006609 OC01652 7e117l97t3 266 396
EDl 36 )000751 OOOJ021
TOBImiddot middot53middot ----008959-9-middot
Cl7
05
04
z 03
-I -I w
u 3 02
01
0 SBH SBL FH
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
FL GRH GRL AGGREGATE
FigureCl Swell at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 00003 css-o 00007CMS-0 00043 CMS-0 -0380 CMS-0 00200 CMS-0 00303
CMS-0 00000css-o 00080 css-o 00000Icss-o 00000 Icss-o 00040 ICSS-0 00000
CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00000CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00023 CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00010
Rte Values with ~--~~~ ~~ lb-le are not ~tatistically different
Figure Cl8 Newman-Keuls Ranking swell in
Cl8
Table Cl9o MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
-------EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
GRANITEROCKFRESNOSAN BERNARDINO
LOW LOWHIGH HIGH LOW HIGH D
124 72198 137 287 243A 227 90145 178 83 260TC 57197 135 252 270A
s 207 104 258 73139 239s s 17 05 56 29 14 17
0 CV 82 280 82638 233 53
D 197 160145 145 90 205A 19l 17092 100 80 220TC 158 105 138190A M x 182 119 11 7 85 205 156 s s 21 37 25 1607 15 0
115 737 105316 21l 83CV D 21 omiddot 240202 185 98 330A
220 20087 181 34588TC 216 210138 223 77 338A M x 215 217142 196 88 338s
s 2111 0805 58 237
23 405 120 22 96118CV
Table C20 ANOVA Summary -MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
----------------------- I N O V A
SO0RE --DF -lS--
middotE __ 2 2
401 11310n -5831137037
2008568519 --2915568519
166S53085 2111762euro92-
3-9 J29
532 532
Q 1 14f5364f296 14653646296 1215099198 4 14 746 EA-Ev
4 -frac34
2784740740 -1-1-i 0359259
696185185 -56-tl-1-79tr30-
5 772 8571 -6450815
266 middot-3-29
396 -5-32middotmiddot
110 2 355470370 177735185 1bull11738C30 329 532 EAO II 12794711075 3198euro9519 25523909 266 396
-Ei8JB 36- 11311 111euro66euro7 120596296
---------------------------------------------------------------------FOTAJ- --5-3- -31131--343-14 8-1-
Cl9
50 bull css-o ti) CMS-0 gt 40 diams CMS-7E I
a w 30I-w E 0 -I 20-ca ltC I-Cl) 10
0--------------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Cl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOWmiddot HIGH LOW
CMS-7 215 CMS-7 142 css-o 104 I ICMS-7 338 CMS-7 21 7
css-o 207 css-o 139 i CMS-7 88 CMS-0 156middot css-o middot
CMS-0 182 CMS-Q 119 CMS-0 117 CMS-0 85 CMS-0 205 css-o 73
Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
C20
-----------------------------------------
Table C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
IEMULSON
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIG_H LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A x s
CV
135 104 104
114
18
157
70 85 51
69
17
248
105 66
136
102
35
343
148 197
-173
35
201
107 101
72
93
19
201
74 107
92
91
17
182
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
128 85
174
119
31
256
73 59 -
66
10
150
69 36 65
56
18
318
158 110
-134
34
253
77 96 68
80
14
178
53 66
113
77
32
408
C M s 7
D A T A x s
CV
141 79 52
91
46
503
185 60 63
103
71
695
125 201
96
141
54
386
192 164 126
161
33
206
131 130 120
127
6
48
72 230
76
126
90
715
Table C22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
l II O Y A
-soaas -OF- -S-S- -F- FrOS
E -llmiddot J
n -tJ-AO EllJ
RROi
----------
2 2 1 u -2-2 4
36middot -------
199090000000 middot 39113 411111111111
4111296296 61982222222
-t-72-1-middot-11181-18-1-754737037011 41156 5185186
85722 middotbull)0(0000 ----------------
995115000000 -1971-7222222
11111216296 151195555556 -360-yen5-110-711 1middot
j8236851852 11166296297
middotmiddot2381 166667
111805138 -0280488 17265A9 6507548
-36111086-15058033
41589422
329 329 414 2 66 329 329 266
532 -532 746 396
-532 532 3915
-----------------------------------lOo-1- middottt 1-300-lamp833-333-3-
C21
400
CJgt ~ 300 I
0 w I-w 200
-~ 0 CJwc 1000 ()
0
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Valueat Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 ll9 CMS-7 103 ICMS-7 141 css-o 173 CMS-7 127 CMS-7 126
css-o ll4 css-o 69 1middotcss-o 102 CMS-7 161 css-o 93 css-o 91
CMS-7 91 CMS-0 66 middotCMS-0 56 CMS~O 134 CMS-0 80 CMS-0 77
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C22 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
C22
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table C23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
724 811 637
724
123
170
1289 -
1276
1283
09
07
627 628 695
650
39
60
622 940
1427
996
405
407
475 407
1276
719
483
672
803 790 498
697
172
247
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
1217 393
1260
957
489
511
2075 2879 1875
2276
532
233
1943 1195 2012
171 7
453
264
1241 1224 1208
1224
1 7
13
676 574 550
600
67
112
986 787 815
863
108
125
C M s 7
D A T A x s
CV
642 620 774
679
83
123
102 426 662
397 281
709
59 7 369 470
479 114
239
588 60l 290
493
176
357
301 263 393
319
67
210
238 284 227
250 30
121
Table C24 ANOVA Surmnary Surface Abrasion
Fmiddot F01middotmiddotss --------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------
e Amiddot
2 -gt
530361248149 22)938237037
315180624075 110469111)519
432152433 1sn1of15
329 329
532 532
1 n
1 4
[14699201852 9733 179629euro
446992gt1952 24332949074
61289-8 3335u~111
414 266
746 396
EJ J
2 2
middot59516003103 85017525926
291seoo1as1 425)8752963
4 9nn2 5 828630
329 329
532 532
EI 4 196475151852 4911877963 57349619 266 396
ERRJl 36 262551800000 72931l~-556
--------------------------------------------------------------------
middotTnUmiddot 53- middot159689-~0964815middot
C23
300
E C)
C)200 Cl)
0 J
z 0 en 100 lti a al lti
01-----r----~---------r---------SBH SBL
Figure C23
SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW
CMS-0 957 CMS-0 2276
css-o 724 css-o 1283
CMS-7 679 CMS-7 397
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content
FRESNO
HIGH
CMS-0 171 7
css-o 65o
CMS-7 479l
LOW
CMS-0 1224
ICSS-0 996
CMS-7 493
GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW
css-o
CMS-0
719
600
ICMS-0 863Icss-
CMS-7 319 CMS-7 250
Ngtte Val~ with~ ~n vertical line are not stati~tically different
Figure C24 Newman-Keuls Ranking Surface Abrasion grams
C24
APPENDIX D
DATA ANALYSIS SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS
----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
Table Dl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15
SEA
D A T A
75 85 85
85 80 85
80 75 70
65 70 70
85 90 90
80 85 85
X s
tV
817
58
71
833
29
35
7-50
50
67
683
29
42
middot88 3
29
33
833
29
35
ss 30 see
D A T A
85 80 85
75 80 80
75 85 85
70 80 70
90 85 95
90 80 90
x s
CV
833
29
35
783
29
37
81 7
58
71
733
58
79
-900
50
56
883
29
33
C M s 7
D A T A
80 75 70
60 70 55
70 70 65
65 70 60
65 70 70
70 )0 65
x s
CV
750 50
67
617 76
124
683 29
42
650 50
77
683 29
42
650
50
77
Table D2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating
rmiddot rs F05 F 0 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------F 2 235 712593 1179 f-296297 553913Q113 329 532 a 2 63 bullTlt1ll81I R 31L97UC7U 1521731 3 29 532 E~
11 3f2 116i14f Jmiddot 39 (1)7111~gtI 1
3~2 ~-2900 9976~5185
17 ~li347F3 UfB47826
4 14 256
746 96
i) ~ pound 2S 11252i 12 29(-29 bull 5086957 329 532
a~ 2 12 ~-~737r o lt19518~ 2E260e7 329 53 2 u ll 1f3 bull illf illt7 41t3S1B52 191156522 2 G6 3~f
iE1190il 3i 76 pound61iz~57 212~-25
Dl
-~ -CJ z I-lt(
0 0 U1 -lt( C bull SS 15 SEA w 25 SS 30 SEA CJ cc
diams CMS - 7CJ lt(
0 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dle Mean Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
I SS-30 733SS-301 $33 SS-15amp 833 lss-301 sn 7 I ISS-30 900 SS-30 883
SS-151 817 SS-301 783 SS-15 683 SS-15 883 SS-15 833SS-lSi 750
CIS--7 750 CS-7 617 OS-7 683 CMS-7 650 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650
Ngtte Values with a comon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating
D2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
Table D3 Film Stripping
EMULSION
AGGREGATE SAN
BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK
s s
15
0 A T A
30
15 20
30 15
25
X s
CV
225
106
47l
250
71
283
200
71 354
s s
30
D A T A
25
25
0
0
5
0
X s
CV
25middoto
oo
00
oo oo
oo
2middotmiddot5
35
1413
C M s 7
D A T A
0
0 0
5
0 0
X s
CV
oo
00 oo
25
35
1413
oo
00 oo
Table D4 ANOVA Swnmary Film Stripping
----------------- ---------------- --middot-----------middot----- middot--middotmiddotmiddot middot- middotmiddot-middot----middot -middot-- middotmiddotmiddot--- --- -------- -A N O V J
-SW~ middotnt r-
pound 2 14333333113 7166666667 27 1S78lttl7 l 2 2]33333333 1165666euro67 middot11t1210~26 Eirl 141 55f 3333335 13958333311 i2894737
Dlli~RI 9 237 50CCDIOmiddot) 2638888P9
lOUL t7 bull--- bullbull - bull- 0 bull bullbull bull- bull bull 0 -------- bull-- bull- bull---bull ---- lt -bullbull bull - bullbullbull--bullbullbullbullbull-bullbull-- bullbullbull bull ___ bull --bull bull bull bull --- bull bull-bullho bullbull bull- bull bull ~-- bull- UO rArr-d bull
D3
cit -w
0 lt( ll a (I)
C w 0 C-a I-ti)
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
20
1
0 SB F GR
Figure D3c Film Stripping
SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO
Iss-3
SS-15
250
225
SS-15~7 250
25
SS-15
ISS-30
200
25
ClIS-7 oo middot SS-30 00 CMS-7 00
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping
D4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue 3Content 10 psi
-------ElAULSWN
----QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCK SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
D S$ 1U H9 171 185 110 159
i22 2~1 165 197 159 165A15Jo-ot----t----+---ii---+----t-----ti 132 140 168 191 135 162
SEA s i3 1 4 9 35 4
CV Ul2 10 25 44 258 26
$5 ---
D
~ A
158
140
189
198 184 187
212
201
178
173
222
199
gtUfl x l49 194 186 207 176 211 SEA s 13 6 2 8 4 16
CV 85 33 11 38 20 77
C M
D A T A
80
82 55 48
35
63
73
77
38
45 55
65
s x 81 52 49 75 42 60
7 s
CV
1
18
5
96 20
404
3
38 5
119
7
118
Table D6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus
--=======-=-middot------=====--=- ---------------------==-~----------=-----e=-----BF SS lS F F05 F01
pound 2 ln~13~ 3lBillllll1l 52367 191141145 3715181747 357 605 I 2 29111 GllS5SSS6 111155 bull 5211778 103289966 357 605 l 1 3l$3351l11112 33$3-3611112 240095590 4113 A33 lEamp liL 31121111l11U1t zst-n22t77 8 ssu21119a 295 461 pound~ 2 1217222222 16093611111 432112657 357 605 III 2 n~ bullEHOq 1a ----------
521iwSSSS5 15S911111111 25Jot 5lll)~Oll)il))I
31l527777R 4117277777~ iJl9166657
22C3627) -2H1157
357 2~95
6~5 11 61
-=====------middot--- -- -- middotmiddot-- --middot-llOl~L lS
DS
bull SS 15 SEA 11 SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
-(D -l Q 0 E J-
ffi 1 J-(J wa gtlt 0 Q--------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL (I
AGGREGATE
Figure D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-3~1 l49 SS-3H J86 SS-10 207 SS-30 176 SS-30 211
SS-15amp 132 SS-15amp l40 SS-151168 SS-l51 l91 ss-lSi 135 SS-15 162I I I CS-7 81 CMS-7 52 OS-7 42 CMS-7 60
llite Values with a amron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent
Figure D6 Newman-Keuls Ranking 2 Day 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi
D6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Table D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Contentr 10 psi
-EMULSION OUALITY LEVELcAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15
SEA
D A T A
325
271
l]JD
260
390
340
319
348
272
367
302
356
x s
CV
29S
38
128
285
35
124
365
35
97
334
21
62
320
67
21 0
329
38
116
ss 30 SEJ
0 A T A
282
310
337
255
303
374
362
307
318
308
289
329
x s
CV
296
20
67
296
58
196
339
50
148
335
39
116
313
7
23
309
28
92
C M s 7
D A T A
78
64
110
95
75
73
110
135
80
90
85
7
83
110
135
x s
CV
71
10
139
103
11
104
74
1
19
123
18
144
123
18
144
Table D8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus
A N O V ll
E 2- 3r39El11 3middotl8tB89 196 994 L19 44 44 5 178 q233024 3 57 6 CS 2 9111~7222223 4058 3611112 3 57577(13 357 6csbulla 11 611~ li9llll41115 ~16 ampll44445 S585579 443 833
_n_ sect 251l-illll41sectl41 -531 31i 11111 AS7121pound3 295 4 61 EJ 2 lt 115 $555555 227 521777 8 1994213 357 605 iampJ 2 170555555 15)277778 0770121 357 605 __ElJ 1324111ilJlilil4 5 208 bull 11Ul 11 bull 184922 2 95 4 ( 1
nan 11 19P73 SOOJIO~ 11111D833l33
middotmiddot-- =--=--=-==-===--c-=-c------_--=--ngtllllll
----------------------------------middot----
D7
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
traquo diams CMS - 7a ()
0--Gl ~- I J _J bull C 02 E I-z w J-(J w C
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATEmiddot
Figure D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HJGH lOW HJGH LOW HIGH LOW
I I I Iss-il51 298 1SS-31l 295 ss-]5~ 365 SS-30 335 1middot SS-15 320 SS-15 329
SS-301 296 SS-l5amp 235 SS-301 339 SS-15 334 SS-30 313 SS-30 309
CIIS--7 71 OS-7 103 CHS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123
t-bte Values with a armon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D8 Newman-Keuls Ranking Full Cure
Resilient Modulus 103 psi
D8
----- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D9 Density at Design Residue Content pcf
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
LOWHJGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH D l341 6 ll339 1347 1338 1523ss 1500A T 1356 133S 1350 1333 1513 1497A
1~ x l351 l337 1349 1336 1518 1499 sSEA 07 02 02 04 07 02
05 02 02 03CV 05 01
D 1362 1352 1370 1355 1545A 1520ss T 1371 1355 1361 1354 1550 1525
30 A
x 1367 1354 1366 1355 1548 1523 SEA 02 06s 06 01 04 04
05 02 05 01 02 02CV D 1373 1375 1380 1370 1537 1543AC T 1385 1375 137 9 1360 1535 1545AM x 1379 1375 1380 1365 1536 1544s s 09 oo 01 07 01 017
06 ooCV 01 05 01 01
Table DlO ANOVA Summary Density
N O V ll -----middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddotmiddot-- -- --------- -------middot --------------- ----- - - -
smI=pound DF ss F F05 F01
pound 2 2738H9 310369445 153505090 357 605 ~ 2 2273iWlllbull38B9 11369544445 5530 gt35704 357 lj -~5 ~ 1 11-6~2SilllaquollO 12 602500C 524057772 443 R33 n I tpoundlUll11 Jl-69lll45 2-324621e 2 95 4 61 E 2 3131poundpound57 15i5S33J 7 7537nB 357 li os lJ 2 ltClfltSf-57 0433334 21458C6 357 s 05 n~ Iii )l216poundfi6lii 9556667 47372764 295 451
EHJii 11l 3 bull nsilraquorn 2019444
------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -- -middotmiddot-middot ----- -middotmiddot - middot-------
35 23611rJC556
D9
1 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
-0 a gt1 ()
z
diams CMS-7
w C
120 SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure D9 Density at Design Residue Coritent
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
OS--7 1379 aS-7 ]375 IClIS-7 l380 IOlS-7 1365 ISS-30 1548 CMS-7 1544ISS-30~ 1367 SS--30~ J354 SS-30~ 1366 SS-30~ 1355 CMS-7 1536 SS-30 1523
SS-15bull 1351 ss-is~ 1337 SS-15bull 1349 ss-1s 1336 SS-15 1518 SS-15 1499
NJte Values with a omron vertical lme are not statistically different
Figure D10 Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcf
DlO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
Table D11 Air Voids at Design Residue Content
-EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
107
)5
9 10l
91
99
79
99
80
83
8 bull5
84
I s
ICY
U)
Ill 9
B4
10l
03
28
95
06
60
89
14
159
82
02
26
85
01
08
ss 30j
SEA
D A T A
90
93
92
85
92
96
86
84
66
67
74
73
x s
CV
92
02
23
89
05
56
94
03
30
85
01
l 7
67
01
ll
74
01
10
C M s 7
D A T A
77
73
62
61
73
62
63
71
71
65
48
55
x s
CV
75
03
38
62
O~l
12
68
08
u5
67
06
96
68
04
62
52
05
96
Table Dl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids
A ll O V A --e--ee-ee=-==== -- -- middot- -- --- middot- - ------- - middot-----middot----middot ______ __________ ---middot- ----- - ------------- -
iiUEllilE ss ~s F F01
E 45111Hoiii6pound 225l08333 812457541 357 605 ll 1~-lilliillt~~)Q 7930)000 2519405 357 505 IJJ 11 ili$6J4141~ 16469444 59230768 443 8 33 E1 2J53ll3ll -5S5333 4 -2 bull 11755245 295 4 6 1
EJ 15672223 bull 783pound 112 2~131820 357 605 I 21022223 bull 1li 1112 bull 3$35365 357 cs
EampJ 2971111ll J27778 26713286 2 95 4t1 iElllllHgt 5cgt~SiIJOIgt -2790556
-middot--middot ------- --middot - middotmiddot- -middotmiddot--middot-- --3li
D11
11 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
-l
a - 8
-a 0 7gt tc ltI 6
5
4 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dll
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot
middot HIGH LOW
SS-]5amp JlJl ISS-ll5~ 10l
ISS-301 92 SS-311l11 89ICMS-7 75 CS-7 fi2
Air Voids at Design Residue Content
FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
=- 95 I I ISS-15 89 SS-15 82 SS-15 8 5
SS-31 94 SS-30 85 SS-30 74ICMS-7 68
OS-7 68 CMS-7 67 SS-30 67 CMS-7 52
Ngtte Values with a ommn vertical line are not statistically dilferent
Figure D12 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids
Dl2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
middotmiddotEMULSION OUAUTY LEVEL
~- AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
48S 3g_g
295
middot 32 8
439
396
397
418
288
307
223
307
X s
CV
443
64
144
312
23
75
418
30
73
408
15
36
298
13
45
265
59
224
ss 3Wo SEA
0 A T A
400
403
367
283
342
411
392
262
310
32-4
292
236
x s
CV
402
02
05
325
59
183
377
49
130
327
92
281
31 7
10
31
264
40
150
C M s 7
D A T A
235
235
130
120
213
233
150
200
350
350
250
250
x s
CV
235
00
00
125
07
57
223
14
63
175
35
202
350
oo oo
250
00
oo
Table Dl4 ANOVA Swnrnary Stabilometer Value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------A N O V A
---------~----------middot------middot-middotmiddot-- -middot--middot--middotmiddot--middot------ bull middotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middot middot------middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot--- --middotmiddot ---_ -- middotmiddot-middotmiddot-- -- - - - -----ss r r05 r01
2 1 i 7~ Sbull1lfipound5161S 5879033333 332259711 357 605 I 2 igtS895QGDgt 279475000 195117552 357 ~os i ll ~l ~
11 111 2 2
l~illflll1111111 7DS nll3331
1~il])2222] 755J5556
~ 111 8 11111~=-- 10115 834 71011111
37 7502778
275769841 128178912
U938281 251M309
11113 295 357 357
833 4f1 605 605
Ell~ 14middot 3~53lt1$1H 116340278 5750926 295 461 fElilli U 25977~illlllCII~ 1111H72222
------------------------ bull- ~bull OOM---bullbullbullbull- - bull------_________ _
roru
013
w J ltC gt a w 1-w E 0 I-m ltC Ishyen
SBH SBL FH FL
bull SS 15 SEA 5S 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-)Sll 441_3 SS-l 325I SS-JSi 4131 SS-15 40 8 CMS-7 350 SS-15 265
SS-30 402 SS-JSa 31_2I ISS-30~ 377 SS-30~ 327 SS-30 317 SS-30 264
CS-7 235 CMS-7 125 ISS-15 298 CMS-7 250
Nlte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D14 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value
Dl4
-------------------
Table Dl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
ii3
ii2
l7-1
ilJD3
236
76
308
62
112
85
222
180
l s
CY
63
lJ1
10
Jl39
SlJ
363
l56
J13
725
185
174
940
99
19
194
201
30
148
ss 30 SEA
0 A T A
229
306
266
187
78
130
260
136
157
212
186
164
x s
CV
268
55
204
227
56
247
104
37
354
198
88
443
185
39
211
175
16
89
C M s 7
D A T A
80
82
190
180
122
192
245
235
130
120
170
180
x s
CV
81
l
18
185
7
38
157
50
315
240
7
30
125
7 57
175
7
40
Table Dl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value
--------------------middot--------------------------------------------------------------A N O V A
-=====-=-=--=-- ===== ss
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1i712 7222222 83563611111 226671165 357 605 I 2 l~12 lllllliilllllllB9 71144441145 129864 357 605 ~ 1l 251116l 144141llllj 2ti-~H~bull4dimiddot4 4 44 5 71775602 443 833 n l4 37511ll 777JTI7JJ S395bull J 9 ~4middot444 2548 5405 295 4 e 1 poundJ 2 72lllS3SlffiifISlmiddot9 3fi22f9111114UU 9026921 357 6C5
n 2 1 iSigt555S
11321Bl 111111I 117lIT177778
33220277778 1277032 9~11333
357 297
605 461
Eliflll 11 f15357 tlOilOOibull 3ilf65Jgt)oo
---------------------------------------middot-------------------------------------------
D15
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7w
J lt(
gt a w Jshyw I 0-() w
8
O--------r-----r-----------r----r-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
c 1
Figure D15
SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW
SS-3(1JlS 268
81IOS-7
ISS-]5i 63 SS-lSl 139
Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 240 SS-30 185 SS-15 201
SS-lSi 155 SS-30l 198 CMS-7 125 SS-30 175
SS-JOi 104 SS-151 185 SS-15 99 CMS-7 175
Note Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Dl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value
D16
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D17 Swell at Design Residue Content in
EfAULSEON
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDI NO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH lOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 s~
D A T A
048 -
0413
06S
069
on
005
006
008
-025 045
005
004
004
005
009
014
Jt s
CY
HS
0010
000
D68
-003
45
bull 006
002
241
035
010
286
004
001
133
009
005
483
ss 30 SEA
D A T A
023
023
020
063
066
055
000
ooo
008
031
023
028
000 000 003
ooo
001
000
x s
CV
022
002
79
061
006
93
003
005
1732
027
004
148
oin
002
1732
ooo
001
1732
C M s 7
D A T A
000
ooo
000
004
002
001
ooo
ooo
000
003
000
ooo 000 000 ooo
ooo
ooo
000
x s
CV
000
ooo
ooo
002
002
655
ooo
ooo
ooo
001
002
1732
ooo
ooo
ooo
ooo
ooo
000
Table D18 ANOVA Summary Swell ( Transformed Data)
A N O Y A
E 2 _1025326 0912663 2353471(154 329 532 -Amiddot middotmiddot2 1366452 0683226 1761825136 329 532 0 1 0368219 03613219 949521081 1114 7116
EA 11 04627$7 0115697 298345558 266 396 -EQ- 2-- --006-903G- -0(134515-middot -8-9003553 middot3l9 -S-32 A) 2 0150358 ~0075179 193863014 329 532 UO 4 0083986 0020997 54143375 26 396
-ERRORmiddot 36 0139606middot 0003178
-TOTIIL 53 --446-576-11
D17
05 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
04
z -J
J w IJJ
SBH SBL
diams CMS - 7
~oo
_02
01
FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dl7 Swell at Design Residue Content
SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-ll51 ii-IS SS-]5i il68 SS-15 a006 SS-15 bull 035 SS-15 004 SS-15 009I I I I SS-3Cli 022 SS-301 061 ISS-301 003 SS-30 bull 027 ISS-30 bull 001 ISS-30 bull 000
ClS-7 000 CIS-7 002 OS-7 000 OIS-7 001 CMS-7 000 CMS-7 000
NJte Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D18 Newman-Keuls Ranking Swell in
D18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
Table Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSl10N
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOWHIGH 0 156 48 175 229 2lO 125ss A ll5 60 20l ll7 228 120T 13_g 4e 170 132 212 130A15 i 137 52 182 200 2l 7 125 smiddotSEA 2l 37 l7 30 lO 05
1middot5]CY 133 92 148 46 40 D 98 106 lll 76 2l 0 lllAss 203 109 76 5l 235 95T ll3 85 63 59 233 125
30 A
x 138 100 83 62 226 llOSEll s 57 l3 25 l3 l4 l5
412 131 298 206 62 136CV D 2lO 202 185 98 330 240A 220 87 18l 88 345 200C T 216 138 223 77 338 2lOAM x 215 142 196 88 338 217s
5805 23 lls 08 2l7
23 405 ll8 120 22 96CV
Table D20 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Stabilorneter Value
N O V A
-------middot------------------------------------------------------ ---------------DF -$ -F os- r01
pound 2 5919875926 2l59917963 39C147075fl 329 53 2 690 i1111pounda$11 iii 345 022110111 US51521111 329 5 32 Ill 1 763129-i296 763 1296 296 100671B132 414 7 U6
Ea t93 11171111]J)7lll 1007863519 1329576P8 266 391bullIEill -2 middot -E~ti35~259 -23middot0-H9fgt29 C-~6522- middot3 29 532 AO 2 S3amp11171t1137ll 11192351$5 55305370 329 532 El s1111i1r1075 135268519 17~qq579 266 396bullmiddotDll~t 311i 27239~333~ 7 5903711)111
53
--------------------------------------------------------middot-----------------------
D19
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA0)
gt diams CMS - 7 l I
a w 30fshyw E 0 J 2-en ltC Ishyen 10
SBH SSL FH FL GRH GRL01amp---------------------------_
AGGREGATE
Figure Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
middotHtGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
QS-1 235 CS-7 142 196 SS-15 200 CMS-7 338 CMS-7 217GS-
Iss-3H uaI I I ISS-3Qi lilG SS-15i ]S2 IOMS-7 88 SS-30 22~ SS-15 125
SS-151 137 ss-i5~ 52 SS-30~ 83 SS-30 62 SS-15 217 SS-30 110
fute Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent
Figure D20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
D20
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Table D2l MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
-------_cEMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
ss 1 sa
D A T A
x s
HIGH
Ul3 ~ JlU
43
64
IOW
~ TWlI ~
--
H1GH
159 1-43 126
143
17
LOW
123 187
60
123
64
HIGH
130 179 153
154
25
LOW
120 104 143
122
20
CV D A5S T A30 x
SEA s
171
139 88
104
110
26
-98 91 -95
4
116
114 116
69
100
27
515
TWT TWT TWT
--
159
111 101 15~
122
28
160
83 65 63
70
11
CV D AC T AM x5 s
7 CV
236
141 79 52
91
46
503
37
185 60 63
103
71
695
267
125 201
96
141
54
386
-192 164 126
161
33
206
23l
131 130 120
127
6
48
157
72 230
76
126
90
715
Too weak to test
Table D22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
SOO~e 55- -f middotFmiddot OS- F01
pound 2 19956 G31tl3Tt 99780165185 52791162 329 532 -1 2- 223ii~ 92592~-~ middot111544629630 -59015431 3middot29 5 32 J 1 n21lliiilliEiiii~ 1middot112106656666 75185029 414 746 lEJ Ill 32il76711ltCl~lll9l 132191851852 43485622 2euro6 396 ~ 2- ~373hllllllllllllllqSmiddot iiilfgtamp 1222-223- -3bull6middot3300811 -3 29 532 1i 2 1S011Hil12 75i0555556 bull ~397100 329 532 Eli
-a~llt-Iii
36 511J7777777
middot5B11113BB333 12799444444 129e l9 25 92 6middot
5771861 266 396
D21
bull SS 15 SEA U) SS 30 SEA gt diams CMS - 7E I
a w J-~ 200 0 en w5 100 0
SBH SBL FH FL AGGREGATE
GRH GRL
Figure D21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINO FRESNO
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 126SS-15 154]03 JCMS-7 161106-7 rmm SS-15 122CMS-7 127SS-30amp 95 ltMgt-7 ]Aj_ SS-15 123
SS-30 70
t-bte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
SS-30 122SS-151 93 SS-l51 fflT SS-30amp 100 SS-30 TWT
Figure D22 Ne-wman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
D22
Table D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW
ss 15 SEA
ss 30 SEA
C M s 7
HIGH D bullbullmiddot 979 715A middot 1143 569T A 1047 599
X - - 1056 - 628 s - - 82 - 77
CV - - 78 - 123
D 987 1474 548A T 907 1536 433 A 1447 615
x - - 947 1486 532 s - 57 46 92
CV - - 60 31 173 D 642 102 597 588 301A T 620 426 369 60l 263 A 774 662 470 290 3q_3
x 679 397 479 493 31 9
s 83 281 114 176 67
CV 123 709 239 357 21 0
1285 1353 1493
1377
106
77
627 72 2 634
661
53
80
238 284 22 7
250
30
121
Specimen swelled during soak could not ne tested Specimen disintegrated during testing
D23
300
E CJgt -200 en
en 0 J
z0 middot cii 100 lt( cc CD lt(
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
01--------r----T----J-----r----r SBH FH FL GRH GRL
middotAGGREGATE
Figure D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content
D24
APPENDIX E
FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL DESIGNS
Table El
Thickness T in Inches to Satisfyl
Tensile Strain Requirements (Reference 3)
Subirade l~octulus psi 30~0 6000 12000 30oco
Jverage Ann~abullAir erlerature J degF lt40 40-55 55-65 gt65 40 40-55 55-65 gt65 lt40 40-55 55-651gt65 lt4 0 40-55 55-65 gt65
T~affic EALbull 10bull
IllIf psi 50000 4 9 66 7 8 91 37 50 5e 66 2 26 28 29 2 2 2 2
1000~0 37 5 3 62 12 27 40 47 53 2 21 25 26 2 2 2 2
300000 21 J4 4 3 51 2 28 31 middot3 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
600000 2 24 3 2 39 2 2 2 _2 28 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2middot 2 2 2 290JCOO 2 2 26 33 2 2 2 22 2 2 2
Traffic EAL= 10s
trJ MR psi bull 50000 83 ll5 139 165 70 97 112 127 54 1-3 83 93 2 3 27 28 29 f-J
42 58 69 78 2 25 27 27100000 63 90 108 129 54 76 91 105
3COOOO 4o 58 73 8 3 3 51 60 73 24 39 ~8 56 2 2 20 22
600000 28 45 55 67 21 37 47 55 2 21 36 44 2 2 2 2
900000 21 37 4 7 57 2 30 39 48 2 21 29 37 2 I 2 2 2
TraCf1c 2 ~AL a 10~ I ia psi bull 50000 130 161 216 2~ 116 16l 187 213 98 131 151 172 63 66 93 58
82 0100000 98 14) 171 203 68 126 152 176 75 106 125 142 52 7 3
3CCOOO 6o 91 11 3 139 55 82 101 122 4 7 69 86 102 31 49 59 59
e~oooo 46 68 86 106 ~o 60 76 94 3middot 3 52 64 i9 2 35 4 r 54
900~00 37 56 72 69 )2 51 63 80 24 4 3 5 4 67 2 28 3 8 ul Trarr1el EAL~ 10 7
la psi bull 50000 192 24 24 24 178 239 24 24 156 205 235 24 12l 153 165 17 3 I
24 24 228 24 119 168 195 222 95 129 147 1s IlCOOCO 1~5 21 0 13 5 193
56 aa 10a 12 I-3CC000 aa 136 167 205 ~-3 12 156 186 74 11l 138 16~
I- l 6 a2 10060~ 1 ouo 6 4 100 125 156 59 92 ll 6 l~ 5 53 82 104 128
108 3 3 53 6 8 859ccooo 53 82 10 5 132 so 77 97 121 4 ~ 68 86
For asphalt volume Vb= 11 are air voids Va= 5 Use Figure El to correct thickness of other valuemiddots of Vb and Va
Table E2
Subsradlt Mcdulus psi
Thickness T in Inches to Satisfys Subgrade Strain Requirements (Reference 3)
6100 120003000 300CC
tr N
A~erage A~nual Ar Te11perature degF
Traffic EALbull 10bull
~IP psi 50000a
100000
300000
600000
900000
Traffic EAL 10 5
MR psibull 50000
lC0000
300000
600000
900000
Tra~~lc EAL c 1c6
MR psibull 50000
100000
300000
600POO
900000
Trafficz EALbull 10 7
MRt psibull 50000
100000
300000
600000
900000
lt40
55
55
55
55
55
81
81
81
81
81
115
115
115
115
115
155
155
155
155
155
40-55
83
60
55
55
55
121
87
81
Bl
Bl
168
123
11
115
ll5
226
165
155
155
155
55-65 gt65 lt40
108 115 46
73 82 46
55 55 46
5_ 45
55 55 46
145 165 69
106 120 69
a1 81 69
81 81 69
81 81 69
201 224 98
14B 165 98
115 115 98
115 115 98
115 115 98
24 24 1)6
199 222 135
15 155 136
155 155 136
155 155 136
40-55
10
50
46
46
46
103
74
69
69
69
150
108
98
98
9B
204
150
135
136
136
55-65 G5 lt40
83 93 30
61 70 30
46 46 30
45 46 30
46 46 30
124 139 55
91 102 55
69 69 55
69 69 55
69 69 55
173 193 83
130 147 83
98 98 83
98 98 83
98 98 83
239 24 120
179 199 120
136 136 120
136 136 120
135 136 120
40-55
4
3~
30
30
30
83
60
55
55
55
122
90
83
83
83
17 5
130
120
middot12 o
120
55-65 gt65 lt~O
62 69 25
46 53 25
30 30 25
30 30 25
30 30 25
9 106 29
82 29i 2 middot 55 55 29
55 55 29
55 55 29
144 15S 60
108 12l 60
83 83 60
83 83 60
83 83 6 0
205 226 90
155 112 90
120 120 90
120 120 90
120 120 90
40-55
31
25
25
25
25
52
30
29
29
29
86
65
60
60
60
127
98
90
90
90
55-65 bull65
33 35
29 3c
25 25 I 25 25 i 25 2s
51 67
47 52
29 29
29 29
29 29
95 10
76 85
60 I 6C
6C i 6o 50
14bull 3 14
112 126
90 90
90 90
90 90
Tj In Tc In 24 2 22
20
18
16 3
14
12 4
~ 10 Va+ vb 5
099
8 08 6
077 7 06
6 805
9045 1003
4 12
14
3 16
18
20
22 2 24
Figure El Correction of Pavement Design Thickness for Air Voids and
Asphalt Content of Mix (Reference 3)
E3
-------
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000 psi
MAAT 55- 65 F-Ul 400 CL
C) 0 300 (J) J
~ 200 0 ~
I- 100z w J-(J) 0+----------------------C w 0 2 4 6 8 middot10 12
THICKNESS IN
1X104 EAL
1X105EAL
Figure E2 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
M-AAT )65 F- -~---Ul 400 1x104 EALCL
CW)
0 300 (J) J 200C 0 ~
-~ 100 w -J -(J) 0w 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a
THICKNESS IN
1X105EAL
Figure E3 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 6000 psi MAAT = )65F
s
E4
w 400 c
()
0 300 () - 200 Cl 0 E
~ 100 w J-
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT 56-65 F
1x10 EALI 4
I 1X105 EAL
w o~---------------------r-w 1 2 3 4a
THICKNESS IN
Figure E4 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT )65F-w 400 4I 1X10 EALc () I 1X105EAL 0 300 I () I - I 200C I0 E I I- 100z w I-J I-() 0w 1 2 3 4c
THICKNESS IN~
Figure ES Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65Fs
ES
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
MAAT 55-65 F-en400 41X10 EALIC
(I) 1X105EAL middot 0
I I 300
en I J 200C 0
f-- 100z w J-en 0LU 2 4 6 8 10 14a
-THICKNESS IN
Figure E6 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
MmiddotAAT )65 F cn4oo I 1X104 EALa
(I) 1X105EAL 0 300
I I
en -I
~200 0 ~ 100 LU --en -I
0-1-----------------------LU 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a THICKNESS IN
Figure E7 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = )65F
E6
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT 55-65 F-u 400 41x10 EAL0
M 1x105EAL 0 T- 300 -en J 200C 0 E I- 100z w-J- en 0w C 0 middot1 2 3 4 middot5 6
THICKNESS IN
Figure E8 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000psi
M-AAT )65 F-en400
I --- - - ~- 1X104 EAL
C
a 1X105 EAL
0 I T- 300
I-en J
200 C 0 E
I- 100z w J-en 0w 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
THICKNESS IN
Figure E9 Thickness For Subgrade StrainRequirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65F
s
E7
Table E3
Thickness Requirements inches
= 6000 psi EAL= 1 X 104 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
MrT
l
CF Tc Ts
246000 34
64 37 43
300000 31
68 4middot 0 43
391000 27
lt 61 33 43
362000 28
64 31 43
260000 28
bull bull 61 35 43
333000 30
65 33 43
C M s 0
Mr Ti CF T Tc
s
259000 29
59 36 43
288000 32
bull 61 3 8 43
271000 32
59 39 43
339000 30
60 37 43
284000 32
59 40 43
365000 29
60 37 43
C M s 7
M T7
l
CF TTc
s
71000 55
65 60 43
103000 47 71
45 43
74000 54
67 53 43
123000 44 69
45 43
85000 52
65 54 43
123000 44
73 46 43
ss 15
M T7
l
CF T Tc s
298000 31
57 40 43
285000 32
59 38 43
365000 28
58 37 43
334000 30
61 36 43
320000 30
60 36 43
329000 30
61 36 43
ss 30
M T7
l
CF Tc Ts
296000 31
60 37 43
296000 31
62 36 43
339000 30
59 38 43
335000 30
bull 63 35 43
313000 31
65 34 43
309000 31
65 34 43
Ngtte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi TI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume middotTc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= llrickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
E8
Table E4
Thickness Requirements inches
Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
246000 68
64 74 70
300000 62 68
62 68
391000 55 61
65 68
362000 57 64
63 68
260000
57 bull 61
68 70
333000 59 65
65 68
C M s 0
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
259000 65 59
80 70
288000 63
bull 61 75 68
271000 64 59
78 70
339000 59 60
72 68
284000 63 59
78 68
365000 57 60
70 68
C M s 7
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
71000 100
bull 65 107 105
103000 90 bull 71
84 88
74000 100
67 102 104
123000 85 69
85 81
85000 95 65
102 97
123000 85 73
78 81
ss 15
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
298000 62 57
78 68
285000 63 59
76 68
365000 57 58
72 68
334000 59 61
72 68
320000 60 60
73 68
329000 59 61
70 68
ss 30
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
296000 62
60 74 68
296000 62
62 71 68
339000 59 59
72 68
335000 59
63 68 68
313000 60
bull 65 65 68
309000 60
65 65 68
1bte
M = Resilient mJdulus in psirf = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
E9
Table ES
Thickness Requirements inches 4
Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M Tdeg
J
CF T Tc
246000 40
64 46 45
300000middot 37 68
37 43
391000 33 61
38 43
362000 35
64 39 43
260000 39
61 45 45
333000 35
65 38 43
C M s 0
MT J
CF T Tc
s
259000 39 59
48 45
288000 38 61
middot4 6 44
271000 38 59
47 44
339000 35 60
43 43
284000 38 59
46 44
365000 35 60
43 43
C M s 7
M T7
J CF T Tc
s
71000 60 65
65 68
103000 52 71
48 64
74000 60 67
60 68
123000 50 bull 69 59 62
85000 58 65
63 67
123000 50 73
49 62
ss 15
M T7
J CF T Tc
s
298000 37 57
50 43
285000 38 59
48 44
365000 35 58
45 43
334000 35 61
43 43
320000 3 6
60 44 43
329000 37 61
45 43
ss 30
M T7
J CF TTc
s
296000 37 60
45 43
296000 37 62
43 43
339000 35 59
44 43
335000 35 bull 63
41 43
313000 36
65 39 43
309000 36
65 39 43
Nrte
M = Resilient nodulus in psiTI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T
5 = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El0
Table E6
Thickness Requirements inches
105E = 6000 psi EAL= 1 x psi MAAT = )65Fs
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
246000
79 64
87 70
300000
74 68
74 70
391000 69
61 81 70
362000 70
64 77 70
260000 77
61 90 70
333000 71
65 77 70
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 77
59 94 70
288000 75
61 90 70
271000 76
59 92 70
339000 71
60 87 70
284000 75
59 91 70
365000 69
60 85 70
C M s 7
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
71000 111
65 118 112
103000 103
middot11 95 98
74000 111
67 110 11l
123000 98
69 95 93
85000 109
65 119 109
123000 98
73 87 93
ss 15
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
298000 74 57
94 70
285000 7 5 59
94 70
365000 69 58
88 70
334000 7 1 middot 61
84 70
320000 72 60
87 70
329000 71 61
84 70
ss 30
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
296000 74
60 90 70
296000 74
62 86 70
339000 71 59
87 70
335000 71
63 82 70
313000 73
bull 65 78 70
309000 73
65 78 70
Note
M = Resilient midulus in psi11 = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness f9r tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade stram requirements inches
Ell
Table E7
Thickness Requirements inches4
= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
middot~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO -GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
246000 2 0
64 23 25
300000 20
68 2middot 0 25
391000 20
61 24 25
362000 20
64 23 25
260000 20
61 24 25
333000 20
65 22 25
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 20
59 25 25
288000 20
bull 61 24 25
271000 20
59 25 25
339000 20
60 25 25
284000 20
59 25 25
365000 20
60 25 25
C M s 7
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
71000 20
65 22 31
103000 20
middot71 20 29
74000 20
67 21 31
123000 20
69 20 28
85000 20
65 22 30
123000 20
73 20 28
ss M T7
l
298000 20
285000 20
365000 20
334000 20
320000 2 0
329000 20
15 CF T Tc
s
57 26 25
59 25 25
58 26 25
61 24 25
bull 60 25 25
61 24 2 i
ss 30
M T7
l
CF TTc
s
296000 20
60 25 25
296000 20
62 24 25
339000 20
59 25 25
335000 20
bull63 23 25
313000 20
65 22 25
309000 20
65 22 25
N)te
M = Resilient nodulus in psi middot T7 = Unrorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inchesct= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume T = Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T~ = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El2
Table E8
Thickness Requirements inches
Es= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s
M T7
l
246000 22
300000 20
391000 20
362000 20
260000 21
333000 20
s 0
CF T Tc
s
64 24 32
68 20 29
61 24 29
64 23 29
61 24 l 1
65 23 29
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 21 59
25 31
288000 21
bull 6J 24 30
271000 21 59
25 30
339000 20 60
25 29
284000
21 59
25 1 n
365000
20 60
25 2 q
C M
M T7
l
71000 27
103000 25
74000 27
123000 24
85000
26
123000
24 s 7
CF T Tc
s
65 28 53
71 24 45
bull 67 28 53
69
23 43
65
27 49
73
22 43
ss M T7
l
298000 20
285000 21
365000 20
334000 20
320000 20
329000 20
15 CF
TTc
s
57 27 29
59 26 30
58 27 29
61 24 29
60 25 29
61 24 2 q
ss 30
M r~i CF T Tc
s
296 ooomiddot 20 60
24 29
296000 20 62
23 29
339000 20 59
24 29
335000 20 63
23 29
313000 20 65
23 29
309000 20 65
23 29
i-krte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psiTf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade strain requirements inches
El3
Table E9
Thickness Requirements inches 4 = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
EMULSION __ QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
246000 20 64
23 25
300000 20 68
21 25
391000 20 61
24 25
362000 20 64
23 25
260000 20 61
24 25
333000 20 65
22 25
C M s 0
259000 20 59
26 25
288000 20
bull 61 middot24 25
271000 20 59
26 25
339000 20 60
25 25
284000 20 59
26 25
365000 20 60
25 25
C M s 7
MT7
1 CF T Tc
s
71000 20 65
22 58
103000 2~0 middotn
20 52
74000 20 67
21 58
123000 20 69
20 48
85000
20 65
22 57
123000
20 73
20 48
$$
15
MTdeg
1
CF T Tc
s
-298 000 20 57
27 25
285000 20 59
26 25
365000 20 58
26 25
334000 20 61
24 25
320000 2 0 60
25 25
329 000 20 61
24 25
ss 30
MT7
1
CF T Tc
s
296000 20 60
25 25
296000 20 62
24 25
339000 20 59
26 25
335000 20 63
23 25
313000 20 65
22 25
309000 20 65
22 25
tote
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot rf = Unagtrrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El4
Table ElO
Thickness Requirements inches 5E = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
s
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T--deg
J
CF T Tc
s
246000
24 64
27 31
300000
23 68
24 29
391000
22 61
25 29
362000
22 64
2_s 29
260000
26 61
31 30
333000
22 65
24 29
C M s 0
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s
259000 23
59 28 30
288000 23
bull 61 27 30
271000 23
59 28 30
339000 22
60 26 29
284000 23
59 28 30
365000 21
60 25 29
C M s 7
ss 15
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s M T--deg
J
CF T Tc
s
71000 28
bull 65 30 61
298000 23 57
25 29
103000 27
~ 71 27 52
285000 23 59
28 30
74000 28
bull 67 28 60
365000 22
58 28 29
123000 26
69 26 48
334000 22 61
25 29
85 000 28
65 31 58
320000 22
60 26 29
123000 26
73 24 48
329000 22 61
25 29
55
30
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s
296000 23
60 27 29
296000 23
62 27 29
339000 22 59
27 29
335000 22
63 25 29
313000 22
65 24 29
309000 23
65 25 29
tbte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot Tf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Ihickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
II11~~~1~~i~IIII 08860 ElS
8 All of the paving mixtures containing low qualshyity aggregates and SEA emulsions studied met Caltrans stabilometer requirements (30 minimum) for Type C asphalt concrete however several mixtures did not meet swell and moisture vapor susceptibility requirements for Type C asphalt concrete Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions which met swell requirements were FH GRH and GRL with SS-15 SEA emulsion and SBH FH FL GRH and GRL with SS-30 SEA emulsion MVS conshyditioned stabilometer value requirements were met only by FL and GRH with the SS-15 SEA emulshysion and GRH with the SS-30 SEA emulsion
9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other consider~ ations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others
93
110 RECOMMENDATIONS
111 This study has investigated the properties of paving mixtures containing several low quality aggregates and several types of emulsified binders Test methshyods and criteria used to design and assess mixture characteristics were those specified for hot-mix asphalt concrete in California An objective of the research study is to determine if solvent free emulshysified binders can be used in place of cutback asphalt binders Therefore in order to permit drawing of appropriate conclusions from the data presented in this report on the effectiveness of the emulsions studied for replacing cutback asphalts additional laboratory work is required It is suggested that properties and characteristics of mixtures containing the project aggregates and cutshyback asphalts be determined The study should evalshyuate the same properties considered in this study Determination of mixture characteristics using cutshyback binders would permit direct comparisons between the cutback and emulsified binder systems and the drawing of more definite conclusions Additionally a study which would determine properties of mixtures containing hot-mixed asphalt cement would be of aid in evaluating results
112 After completion of the additional laboratory studshyies if results so indicate it is recommended that several field experimental studies using aggregates ranging in quality from low to high with solvent free emulsified asphalt binders be undertaken Projects should be constructed in several climatic regions in California (wet and arid) and should include control sections containing both cutback and if possible hot-mixed asphalts Proper labshyoratory mixture designs construction control and field monitoring of results and performance should be used Results of these experiments should proshyvide indications of performance of the various mixtures in actual use
113 Results of this study indicate that mixtures conshytaining the SEA binders are detrimentally affected by moisture to a greater degree than with standard emulsions However performance of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions may be adequate in arid regions Therefore it is recommended that in order
94
to further investigate the usefulness of paving mixshytures containing the SEA emulsions that field experimental test sections using the SEA emulsions be constructed and evaluated$
It is strongly suspected that the moisture vapor susceptibility of the solvent free asphalt emulsion mixes evaluated herein could be reduced by a slight modification of the emulsion formulations This possibility should be evaluated
95
References
1 Request For Proposals Investigation Into The Nature Of Emulsified Asphalts Compatible With California Local Aggregates And Substitution Of Sulfur For Asphalt In Aqueous Emulsified Systems California Air Resource Board Research Division Sacramento Calishyfornia March 1980
2 American Society for Testing and Materials 1981 Annual Book of Standards Part 15 Road Paving Bituminous Materials Travelled Surface Characterisshytics Philadelphia PA 1981
3 Interim Guide to Full-Depth Asphalt Paving Using Varshyious Asphalt Mixes The Asphalt Institute Pacific Coast Division PCD-1 January 1976
4 Kennepahl GJA Logan A and Bean D C Conshyventional Paving Mixes with Sulfur-Asphalt Binders Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975
5 Deme Imants Processing of Sand-Asphalt-Sulfur Mixes Proceedings AAPT Volume 43 1974
6 A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual The Asphalt Instishytute Manual Series No 19 MS-19) March 1979
7 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Use of Cutback Asphalt US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Waste Management Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park North Carolina October 17 1977
8 Highway Chemicals Newsletter Armak Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois Fall 1981
9 Bitumils Mix Manual Chevron USA Asphalt Division January 1977
10 Asphalt Pavement Engineering Wallace Hugh A and Martin J Rogers McGraw Hill Book Company New York 1967
11 Spahr J D The Use of Emulsified Asphalt in Conshystruction and Maintenance Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975
96
12 Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design Asphalt Emulsions Volume 4 1977
13 Dybalski J N 11 The Chemistry of Asphalt Emulsions Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D C January 1976
14 Beagle C w Deflection and Performance of Deep Lift Asphalt Emulsion Base Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976
15 Meier w J Asphalt Emulsion Construction on the Navajo Reservation Twenty-Fifth Annual Arizona Conshyference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 22-23 1976
16 Kallas B F and Shock J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Find Report - Parts I and
11II Research Report 77-1 The Asphalt Institute November 1977
17 Shook J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Analysis of Performance Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976
18 Wimberly C M Emulsified Asphalt Mixes in Arizona Proceedings 24th Annual Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 17-18 1975
19 Izalt J O Galloway B M and Saylock D SandshyAsphalt-Sulfur Pavement Experimental Project Highway US 77 Kennedy County Texas Texas Transportation Institute April 1977
20 McBee w c and Sullivan T A Direct Substitution of Sulfur for Asphalt In Paving Materials 11 Report of Investigations 8303 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines 1978
21 Ludwig A C Gerhardt B B and Dale JM Materials and Techniques for Improving the Engineering Properties of Sulfur Report No FHWA-RD-80-023 Fedshyeral Highway Administration June 1980
22 Jiminez R A and Stakes K J Effects of Heat and Air on the Viscosity of Sulfur-Asphalt Mixtures Preshysented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies San Diego California February 16-18 1981
97
23 Chehovits J G and Anderson D A Upgrading of Marginal Aggregates for Improved Water Resistance of Asphalt Concrete Transportation Research Record 762 pages 46-52 1981
24 Rosner JC and Chehovits J G Highway Binder Materials From Modified Sulfur-Water Emulsionsn Report No FHWARD-82035 Federal Highway Administration November 1981
25 Standard Specifications State of California Department of Transportation January 1978
26 Applied Linear Statistical Models Neter I and Wasserman w Richard D Irwin Inc Homewood Illinois 1974
27 Burr I W and Foster LA A Test For Equality of variances Mimeograph Series No 282 Statistics Department Purdue University Lafayette Indiana 1972
28 Applied Statistical Methods Burr I W Academic Press Inc New York 1974
29 Parr W K Field Observations of the Behavior of Bituminous Pavements As Influenced By Moisture 11 ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 3-16--I959
30 Rice JM Relationship of Aggregate Characteristics to the Effect of Water on Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 17-34 1959
31 Lettman R P and Johnson D L 11 Pressure Induced Stripping in Asphaltic Concrete Highway Research Record 340 pages 13-28 1970
32 Waller F H Jr Emulsion Mix Design Methods An Overview 11 Transportation Research Record 754 1980
33 Design of Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures Report R6-350(74) US Forest Service 1974
34 11Mix Design Procedure For Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Pavement FHWA Region 10 Office of Federal Highway Projects
98
35 Darter M I Ahlfield S R Wilky P L and Wasill R G Development of Emulsified Asphalt Aggregate Cold Mix Design Procedure Research Report 505-5 Department of Civil Engineering University of Illinois 1978
36 A A Gadallah L E Wood and E J Yoder A Suggested Method for the Preparation and Testing of Asphalt-Emulsion-Treated Mixtures Using Marshall Equipment Proceedings AAPT Volume 46 1977
37 Marshall Stability Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois
38 Jiminez R A Final Report-Phase I Asphalt Emulsion Treated Aggregates University of Arizona Research Report HPR-1-13(150) January 1977
39 George K P Interim Report on Criteria for Emulshysified Asphalt Stabilization of Sandy Soils Univershysity of Mississippi for Mississippi State Highway Department October 1976
40 Fong G K Mix Design Methods for Base and Surface Courses Using Emulsified Asphalt A State-of-the-Art Report Report No FHWA-RD-78-113 Federal Highway Administration October 1978
41 Schmidt R J A Practical Method for Measuring the Resilient Modulus of Asphalt-Treated Mixes Highway Research Record 404 1972
42 Manual of Test Volume 2 State of California Department of Transportation Transporation Laboratory Third Edition 1978
43 Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete Manual Series No 2 (MS-2) The Asphalt Institute March 1979
99
-
APPENDIX A
OPTIMUM FLUIDS AT COMPACTION DATA
-
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table Al
Percent Residue
631 631 631
702 702 702
595 595 595
678 678 678
689 689 689
645 645 645
Fluids at Compaction Data css-o
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
467 367 216
1098 998 847
571 413 360
1273 1115 10 62
455 370 341
1050 965 936
590 450 400
1268 1128 1078
492 183 109
1181 872 798
404 311 139
1049 956 784
Dry Density
(pcf)
1304 1337 1347
1283 1326 1306
133l 1310 9 1317
1328 1295 1304
1404 1529 154 1
1429 1466 1462
Al
css-o CSS-0HIGH QUALITY155- DRY LOW QUALITYbull SAN BERNARDINO 1551
bull SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO 150-I I 150 FRESNObull GRANITEROCK bull GRANITEROCK
I ~
145 LoPT=B5 145 () () - -0 0
~140 gt1401 L- 0 PT= 85 OPT=100gt-i
N Cl) OPT=100 Cl)
DRYZ 135 Z 135w w Cl Cl
amp130 amp130 Cl 0
125 125
120 I i I I i I i I I I 120 I I J I I i I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure Al Fluids at Compaction Figure A2 Fluids at Compaction High Quality Aggre-gate CSS-0 Low Quality CSS-0
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A2
Percent Residue
605 605 605
704 704 704
595 595 595
695 695 695
556 556 556
604 604 604
Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-0
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
4 16 316 183
1021 921 788
494 389 262
1198 1093
966
529 392 360
1124 987 955
519 479 301
1214 1174
996
284 187 124
840 743 680
319 256 165
923 860 769
Dry Density
(pcf)
1331 131 6 1316
1305 1320 1313
1282 1313 1312
1321 1298 1279
1478 1479 1463
1452 1463 1453
A3
155 CMS-0 HIGH QUALITY
150~ DRY bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
145 bull GRANITEROCK72_ OPT=90 0 0
~140gt-ii OPT=105i Cl)
Z 135 w 0
gt- D~0 130 middot 0
125 [OPT100
120 I i I i i I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A3 Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-0
155] 150
0 1451 0
~140gt- Cl)
Z 135 w 0
fc130 0
125
120 I 6
CMS-0
LOW QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
bull GRANITEROCK
v[A OPTf90
pound 0 PT12DoOPTr110
7 I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A4 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-0
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A3
Percent Residue
769 769 769
746 746 746
595 595 595
714 714 714
570 570 570
587 587 587
Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-7
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
460 391 294
1229 1160 1063
573 436 301
13 19 1182 1047
513 380 2 57
1108 975 852
513 404 334
1227 1118 1048
231 170 080
801 740 650
263 146 109
850 733 6096
Dry Density
(pcf)
1329 1377 1376
1335 135l 134 2
1357 1333 1342
1299 1317 1308
1519 1523 1498
1503 1517 1514
AS
CMS-7 155-- HIGH QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNOlSO~ nPT80 145
0 -0 -140 middot gt-
r t deg Cl)
Z 135 w Cl
fi130 Cl
125-1
120 I 6
GRANITEROCK
~OPT=105
IJ
I 7
I I i I i I 8 9 10 11 12 13
TOTAL FLUIDS
I 14
I 15
Figure AS Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-7
155
150
145
0 -0
gt--140
t Cl)
Z 135 w Cl
fc 130 Cl
125
120 I 6
CMS-7 LOW QUALITY
C bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
GRANITEROCKOPT 80
~OPT105
~
tos i I I i J i i I I 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A6 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-7
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A4
Percent Residue
765 765 765 765 765 765
815 815 815 815 815 815
765 765 765
817 817 817 817 817 8el7
574 574 574
738 738 738 738 738 738
Fluids at Compaction Data SS 15 SEA
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
563 426 315 580 346 178
1328 1191 1080 1345 1111
943
595 418 309 599 256 137
14 10 1233 1124 1414 1071 952
600 440 356
1365 1205 1121
683 541 418 629 457 283
1500 1358 1235 1446 1274 1100
374 247 128
948 821 702
451 301 175 435 186 073
1189 1039
913 1173
924 811
Dry Density
(pcf)
1289 1319 1335 1286 1331 1332
1278 1314 1315 1276 1304 1299
1281 1325 1313
1259 1290 1303 1275 1292 1294
1450 1485 1482
1428 1459 1468 1437 1465 1465
A7
bull bull
SS 15 SEA 155 HIGH QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot
150 FRESNO
bull GRANITEROCK
145
0 0 -
OPT=75
-_ gt=140 I-ii OPT100co C)
z 135 w _--0PTr1200
gt-0 130--0
125
120 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A7 Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 15 SEA
SS 15 SEA LOW QUALITY155
bull SAN BERNARDINO-
FRESNO 150
bull GRANITEROCK 145
~-0 0 LOPT=80a140gt-t Cf)
Z135 w r-OPT=105 0
gt-0 130 -~middot 0
OPT120J 125
120 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure AB Fluids at Compaction Low Quality SS 15 SEA
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table AS
Percent Residue
688 688 688
722 722 722 722 722 722
680 680 680 680 6 80 680
726 726 7 26 726 726
510 510 510
596 596 596 596 596 596
Fluids at Compaction Data SS 30 SEA
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
595 468 150
1283 1156
838
645 438 267 660 566 440
1367 1160
989 1382 1288 1162
650 531 432 629 422 332
1330 1211 1112 1309 1102 1012
767 614 443 547 370
1493 1340 1169 1273 1096
413 300 167
923 810 677
468 3 46 191 485 258 096
1064 942 787
10 ~ 81 854 692
Dry Density
(pcf)
1299 1337 1332
1286 1319 1324 1281 1302 1326
129l 1315 1333 1294 1333 131 5
1259 1278 1322 1294 1313
1464 1509 1496
1435 1472 1499 1426 1487 1476
A9
SS 30 SEASS 30 SEA LOW QUALITY
155 HIGH QUALITY 1551 bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddotbull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO
FRESNO 150150-I -middotmiddot-- -bull --middotmiddot I ~ t -- a GRANITEROCK a GRANITEROCK
145145
~-bull80 0 --0 00 ~140~140
J-gt- gt-~ I- = OPT=100 Cl)0 Cl) [Ij 135Z 135
lJJ Cl
gt- ~1300 130 middot ClCl ( 0
OPT=110 125~ OPT=115125
120-t----~--------------r---120 I l J J J I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 156 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS TOT AL FLUIDS
Figure A9 Fluids at Compaction Figure AlO Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 30 SEA Low Quality SS 30 SEA
-~
i
APPENDIX B
MIXTURE DESIGN DATA
TABLE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality css-o Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absortied Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
lhit Weight pcf
StabiJcneter Value
~iareter Value
Jesilient -bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
500
----------
40
u 30 ltgt
ffi 20 w ~10
m lt
o
w l 400 lt gt a w t 300 0 iii ~ 200 8
100 12
10111
ui 0
i5 8gt lt
6
4
50
21740
24488
112
194
100
400
1357
375
197
117
345
60
21823
24163
97
199
100
500
1362
330
207
134
271
70
21772
23853
87
208
100
600
1359
272
193
118
260
Iesign 7 0
87
208
100
600
1359
272
193
118
260
24
22d c lt i
20i
= 0 i5
18 gt
16
140
138 - a
~136 z w 0
134
132
bull 500 a
0 400 uil 300 0
~ 200 zi 100 iii w a
--
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE CONTENT Jo (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Bl
TABLE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residue 0intent 50 60 70 Dsian 7 o
Bulk Siecipoundic Gravity 21804
llleoretical Specipoundic Gravity 24280
Air Voids 102
VMA 192
Absorbed Asphalt 063
Efpoundective Asphalt 437
Unit Weight pf 1361
Stabilcirieter Value 427
Cbhesicireter Value 352
Fesilielt Mxlulus 103psi
2-day 85
middotFinlJ 355
50
40
_ gt a 30 w w
~ 20 10
500
300
200
100
8
6
4
l 400 gt
~ w 0
~ 8
12
_ 10
= 0 gt
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
21863 21992
23964 23660
88 71 71
197 200 200
063 063 063
537 637 637
1364 1372 1372
363 313 313
292 234 234
63 83 83 429 232 232
24
22
ci i
20i
= = 0 gt
18
16
138
p6 ~ Q
134 a w
o 132
130
500 Q -
o 400 --3 300 0 ~-~ 200 a ~ 100 w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COtlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
B2
TABLE B3 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllroretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
~fective Asphalt
Unit Weight middotCf
Stabilareter VaJue
Cbhesiareter VaJue
Resilient l-bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
so
11140 gt o30 IU w ~20
m
10
w l 400 gt 0
~ 0 ~ 200 8
100
14
12 11-
In Q
ho C
8
6
50 60 70 Dsi9 7 O 21308 21729 21595 24562 24235 23922
132 103 97 97 210 202 215 215 113 113 113 113 387 487 587 587
1329 1356 1348 1348 378 345 375 375
314 270 280 280
82 96 104 104 281 260 267 267
500
300 ~
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS
24
11-22ci
ltI i i 20 Cl) Q 180 gt
16
138
136 u - 134 Cl) z IU Q
132
130
bull500
400 Inl 300 Q bull~ 200 z ~ 100middot IU 0
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS
FIGURE B3 Mixture Design Data Sari Bernardin6 High Quality CMS o Replication 1
B3
TABLE B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue GJntent
Bulk seecific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity
50
21491
24334
60
21459
24014
70
21526
23709
Iesiqn 70
Air Voids 117 106
VMA 204 212
Absocbed Asphalt 0 72 o 72
Effective Asphalt 428 528
Unit Weight pcf 1341 133 9
Stabilrneter Value 437 406
GJhesiareter Value 337 248 3
Iesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-cay
Final
50
w 40 gt 0 30 w w 0 20 co 10
500
w
3 400 gt 0 w t- 300 w 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
_ 10
0 8gt -lt
6
4
FIGURE
61 66
410 318
24
22~ ci
i 20
~
18 a gt
16
138
_136 u a 134 z ~ w 0
132
130
bull500
a
a 400 -3 300 _ a ~ 200 z ~ 100-
w 0
90 90
21 7 21 7
0 72 072
628 628
1343 1343
344 J44
252 252
82 82
250 250
---------
D 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDU CONTENT I (A_GGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B4
TABLE BS Mixture Design Data San Bernardin9 High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Siecific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
lir Voids
VMA
2bserberl Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stalgtilaneter Value
Cbhesiareter Value 3
Resilient Mgtdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
40
Ill 30 lt( gt a 20 Ill Ill 0 10
~ iii lt CII 0
400
Ill
3 300 lt(
gt a Ill200 == 0
~100 c 8
0
12
10 ui 0
0 8gt 5 lt(
6
4
FIGURE
~
~
5 6 7 84 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
50 60 70 Cesian 70
21652
24484
21904
24149
22005
23828
116
198
107
3-93
135l
345
224
18
240
93 77 77 196 200 200 107 107 107 493 593 593
1367 1373 1373 288 235 235
136 80 80
17 21 21 128 78 78
24
22ci lt(
z 20il
= CII C 0
18 gt
16
I-~
140
+38- ~136 1- z Ill 0 134
132
bull 500 a
o 400 3 300 C
~ 200 z 100 Ill a ~
0 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino_BS High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
BS
TABLE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Residue Content
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Ihegtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tmit WeightL pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesllllleter Value
Iesilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
a 20 UI w i
~10
lt 0
400
3300 lt gt a ~200 w i 0
119 93
197 l93
126 126
374 474
l353 l372
357 283
l26 l03
45 36
203 132
2440
30 22 0 0lt ltgt
16
~100 ~ 8 0 132
500 a
o 400 --ai 300 -
middot 0
~
~
w a
_ 10
ltn 0
0 8gt lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
50 60 70 Cesign 7 o
2l679
24595
21990
24255
22190
23931
- i 20
a 180 gt
140
138 - a
~136 z w 0 134
200
100middot
0 4
73 73
193 193
126 1 26
574 574
1385 1385
235 235
82 82
3l 3l
64 64
-0 $ e
~ 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B6
TABLE B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Pesidue Qlnte~t
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihroretical Speciic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
~tabilcmeter Value
ohesicrneter Value
resilient lbdulus l0 3psi
2-aay
Final
60 72 8 5 Iesicm 75
21762 21906 21779
23981 23617 23245 93 73 63 70
202 205 220 21 0
063 063 063 063
537 657 787 687
1358 1367 1359 1365 375 290 203 270
474 401 239 360
163 172 161 170 449 329 310 320
2440
ii 30 22 ci
Cl c cgt z 20 201 s ~ 310 e 18 0
gt c
0 16
500 140
w
3 400 _138c gt
~ 300 s 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
- 10 0 0 0 8gt c
6
4
FIGURE
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIOUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COITEIT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
il36 z IU Cl 134
132
bull 500
c 400 -
3 300 - Cl
sectl 200 ~- z ~ 100
w
0
B7
111 10 ui e 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
TABLE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
500
400 gt C
72 85 resian 7 s
21873 21738
23581 23210
72 63 70 207 22l 21 0
055 055 055 665 795 695
1365 1356 1365 287 188 265
349 341 345
191 187 190 287 266 280
24 ------------
111 22
Cl Cl lt -i ~ 20
= a 18 0 gt
16 _____________
138
136 a 134 () w a
132
130___________
soar------------ D a
1 400 ~
ui3 300 C
~ 200
100
w C
0---------------------5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUlc CONTENT lt
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
BB
Fesidue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcrreter Value
Cbhesiareter Value 3Resilient -bdulus 10 psi
2-day
Finll
60
m 50 - 40
IIJ ~ 30 CJ lt 1- 20
60
21669
23943
95
205
055
545
1352
560
416
195
425
~ 300 0 ()
~ 200 8
100---------------
12 -------------
RESIDUE CONTENT lto (AGGREGATE BASIS)
TABLE B9 Mixture Design Data San Ber~irdino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Pesiclue Content 60 Z1 as D=sign 7 5
Bulk Spccific Gravity 21697 21368 21255
Iheoretical Specific Gravity 23973 23610 23238
Air Voids 94 95 85 93
VMA 204 225 middot 23 8 230
middot-Absorbed Asphalt 061 061 061 061
Effective Asphalt 539 659 789 689
middot middotmiddotUnit Weight pcf 1354 133 3 1326 1330
-Stabilareter Value 460 375 225 340
CohesianeterValue 400 422 499 440
Iesilient MxUlus 103psi
2-oay 159 i0s 185 185
Final 290 299 283 295
60
w
l 400
24
22
ci 0 i 20l
= Q 180 gt
16
138
136
gt a 134~ 300 w l z0 IU 132 200
8 130
100-----------------_---I
12 ---------------- 500
o 400 10 ~
300 bull bullQ
Q0 8gt ~ 200 z
6 ~ 100
w a4 ___ __________ o
5 6 7 8 9 s 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COtlTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B9 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication l
B9
TABLE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Pesidue Conte1t 60 72 85 resign 75
Bulk Spcecific Gravity
Theoretical Sjeeipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Ohesianeter Value
Pesilient ~us 103psi
2---day
Final
60
50 lt gt cc40 w -w
~30 = CJ
lt 20
21635
24066
10l
206
078
522
1350
51 8
482
151
285
21481
23699
94
221
078
642
1341
378
459
150
286
24
11-22
ci Cl lt
~ 20 z
C 18
0 gt
21302
23323
87 92
237 225
078 078
7 72 6 72
1329 1338
246 350
343 430
162 155
254 280
I 16
500 138
UJ
400 136 lt gt
acc ~ UJ
134 300 z2 UI CJ_32 ~ 200
8 130
bull500
a
c 400 - 10 300 ~ Jf
C0 8gt ~ 200 ~ lt z
6 ~ 100-
UJ 0
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDU~ COrlTENT
(AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino
100 12
~
Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
BlO
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
TABLE Bll
Residue Content
Bulk Secific Gravity
Iheiretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesicrneter Value
Resilient MXiulus l03psi
2-day
Final
60 72 85 D=sign 75
21817 22108 21917
23977 23601 23216
90 63 56 62
200 198 215 200
o 72 o 72 o 72 o 72
528 648 778 678
136l 1380 1368 137 5
242 162 76 130
151 175 215 190
52 63 41 55
202 122 60 110
244middot0
~ 30 22 ci lt 20 i 201 IU = en ~ 10 E 18 m 0lt gt
0 16
----
w
l 400 lt gt a ~ w 0 ~ 8
12
-t
ltn 0 0 gt a lt
FIGURE
5
500
300
200 ~ 100
10
8
6
134
500 a
c 400 -
_ 300 0
g 200
~ 100 ~in IU a
0 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Bll Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
142
I-40 u a
~ 138 in w 0
136 ~
Bll
TABLE Bl2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Pesidue Q)ntent
Bulk Spzcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic
Air Voids
V bull t-LA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Gravity
60
22026
24085
85
192
092
508
72
22062
23705
69
200
092
628
85
21901
23315
61
215
092
758
resign 75
67
205
092
6 58
Unit Weight pcf 1374
Stabiloreter Value 193
Ohesiareter Value 177 3
Resilient Mxrulus 10 psi
2-day 63
Fi-ial 138
40
m 30 J lt gt a 20 IU w 0 10 ~ lt
0
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w 9 ~ 200 _________ 8
100 12
10 9 0 8gt ~6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE 8ASISI
1377
127
193
1367
90
160
137 5
120
180
53
107
32
52
48
95
24
22ci 0 lt
20
= ~
9 18 0 gt
16
142
140 a
~138 z w C
136
134
9
500 a
dego 400-
3 300 ~- a ~ 200 z ~ 100
w a
0 5
~ 6 7 8 9
RES IOU~ CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl2 Mixture Design Data -san Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Bl2
TABLE Bl 3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcrneter VaJue
CJgthesiarneter Value
Pesilient MxbJ11lS 10 3psi
2-day
Final
60
so gt
40a w 0 30 GI 20
500
l 400 gt a w t- 300 w 5 rn ~ 200 8
100 12
Ill 10 0 8gt
6
4
50
21789
24250
10l
164
1 95
305
1360
513
330
191
282
~ bull
~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASIS)
60
21762
2 34 34
91
173
1 95
405
135middot8
567
284
168
434
24
Ill 22ci Cl
is 20
= 0 gt
18
16
142
140- ~138 iii z 0
136
134
bull500
o 400 -
l 300 C
~ 200 z 100 iii a
0 4
70 resign 70
21872
23632
75 75 177 177
1 bull 95 1 95 505 505
136S 136S 393 393
280 280
217 217 482 482
~
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASISI
FIGURE Bl3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality css~o Replication 1
Bl3
--------------
TABLE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Resid= Content 50 60 70 eesicn 7o
Bulk Siecific Gravity 21692 21677 21662
Ihroretical Specific Gravity 24501 24176 23865
Air Voids 115 103 92 92
VMA 169 176 185 185
Absorbed Asphalt 240 240 240 240
Effective Asphalt 260 360 460 460
Unit Weight pcpound 1354
Stabilaneter Value 580
Cohesicrneter Value 270 3Resilielt Mdulus 10 psi
2-day 149
Final 408
60
w so lt gt
w C o w le 0 30 m lt
20
500
w
~ 400 lt gt C
~ 300 w S ~ 200 ~ 8
100 12
- 10 m a 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AG GREGATE BASIS)
1353 1352 1352
442 327 327
276 183 183
173 191 191
373 299 299
24
22d c lt z
20E 18 0 gt
16
140
138 u C
136 w C 134
132
500 C
1 400 gt- m =gt 300 a ~ 200
l 100- IU C
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication
Bl4
2
bull bull bullbull
TABLE Bl5 Mixture Design-Data Fresno High Quality CMS-QReplication 1
Bulk Spcific Gravity
lheoreticaJ Specific Gravity Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mldulus l0 3psi 2-clay
Final
60
m 50 C gt a 40 w w
~ 30 C m
10
~idue Content 50 6_ 0 70 Daisi2 7 O
5oor----------
w
l 400 C gt a ~ 300 w I 0 iii ~ 200 8
100-------------
12 ----------
111 10 C
0 8gt C
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT J
(AG GREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl5 Mixture
21755 21305 23795 23497 86 93 93
163 198 198 l 69 l 69 l69 431 531 531
1336 1329 1329 420 307 307
247 230 230
180 i55 155
246 253 253
24
22d
Cl C
i 20I
J ~ C 18 ~ 0 gt
16
21434
24106
11l
179
l69
331
1337
472
373
175
247
138
136- 134 z w C
132
130
bull 500
dego 400 - l 300 C
~ 200 z l 100 iii w a
0
-~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT J (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Bl5
TABLE Bl6 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
helretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
lbsorled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabil=ter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
Eesilient Mxrulus 10
2-day
Firal
60
50 J gt c 40
~ 30 m 20
500
w
l 400 gt a ~ 300 w
3psi
50 60 70
21339 2 1398 21475
24241 23925 23623
120 106 91
181 187 192
1 94 l 94 1 94
306 406 506
1331 1335 1340
558 43 7 377
340 313 219
149 152 154
317 345 288
Jesign70
91
192
194
506
1340
377
219
154
288
24
22d CJ i sect 20
= a 18 ~ 0 gt
16
138
136
a 134
z w ~ C ~ 200 132 8
130 100
14 500 a
o 400 - 12
3 300 - ~ 0 C gt 10 a ~ 200 ~ z
l 100
8
w a
0 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl6bull Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Bl6
TABLE Bl 7 Mixture Qesign Data Fresno High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
Pesidue Content 50 60 70 Cesign 7 O
Bulk siec~tic Gravity 21959 22101 22128
Iheoretical Specific Gravity 24539 24201 23879
Air Voids 105 87 73 73
VMA 158 160 167 167
~rbed Asphalt 252 252 252 252
Effective Asphalt 248 348 448 448
Unit Weight pcf 1370 1379 1380 1380
S~ter Value 467 370 213 213
Clgthesiareter Value 289 3Resilient l-Ddulus 10 psi
2-clay 47
FinaJ 294
50
Ill 40 o(
gt cc 30 Ill w 0 20 lt 10
500
w l 400 lt gt cc ~ 300 Ill 0 ~ 200 8 ~
100 12
10 deg C
0 gt 8 ~l lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
147 122 122
65 35 35
214 75 75
22
J 20 o(
ii 18 16 ~ 0 gt
14
142
140 u Q
~138 z Ill
Cl 136
134
500 Q
o400 uil 300 Cl
g 200 z ~ 100 ~w cc
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
IIESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Bl7
TABLE Bl8 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Dsiqn 70
Bulk Specific Gravity 22191 22285 22092
Theoretical Specific Gravity 24199 23874 23563
Air Voids 82 66 62 62
VMA 149 153 168 168
Absorled AsphaJt 192 192 192 192
Effective AsphaJt 308 408 508 508
Unit Weight pcf 1385
Stabilareter Value 357
Cohesianeter Value 268 3Resilient MxhIJus 10 psi
2-day 75
Final 217
40
w 30 J lt gt a 20 w w i
~ 10
0
500
w
3 400 gt a
l 300 w i
ltn
~ 200 8
139l
342
238
137 9
233
192
137 9
233
192
84
117
63
73
63
73
20
0 0 ~ i
= 0 gt
18
16
14
12
~
144
142 140 z w 0
138
136 100-----1---1--1---l
12 ---------- 500 0bull
o 400 -11110 en a 3 300 = 0 08gt ~ 200
z 6 ~ 100middot
w a
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT
4
RESIDUE CONTENT
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Bl8
FresnoTABLE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Low Quality css-o Replication 1
Eesidlle Content 60 70 80 Dasi51 7 5
Bulk Specific Gravity 21698 21611 21514 Iheoretical Specilic Gravity 23803 23505 23220
Air Voids 89 81 73 77
VMA 175 186 198 192
Absorbed Asphalt 171 l 71 171 171
Effective Asphalt 429 529 629 679
Unit Weight pcf 1354 1349 1342 1345
Stabi]cmeter Value 513 398 359 380
eohesianeter value 506 449 481 465
Resilient Modulus 10 3psi
2-day 176 176 241 205
Final 312 383 353 365
2460
all so 22 ci cgt
40 I-
20 E
I = g 30 18iii 0 gt
20
16
500
300
100
10
8
6
4
138
136l 400
u -gt a
~ I 0 in l1200 8
12
111 Q
0 gt ~
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE COITENT Jo
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
~ ~ 134 z w 0
132
130
500 -
l 400 -
300 ~n
Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 in Ill IC
0
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Bl9
TABLE B20 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residlle Content i
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihegtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
CJhesiareter Value 3
Resilient Mxfulus 10 psi
2-day
Finll
60
50 lt 40 w w
~ 30 m lt 20
500
w
3 400 lt gt a ~ ~ 300 w 51 rn 200 8
100----------------
12 --------------
10 9 0 8gt lt
6
4 s 6 7 8
RESIDUE COPlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
60 70 80 resign 75
21451 21476 21666
23932 23629 23340
104
185
194
406
1339
586
436
147
313
91
192
1 94
506
1340
403
416
179
347
24
22 0 0 lt
~ 20
= 9 18 0 gt
16
140
138 - Cl
136 w cl34
132
bull 500
-0 400__
3 300 I
~ 200
~ 100 rn w a
0
7 2 82
192 192
194 194
606 656
1352 1345
24 8 325
333 375
186 182
361 358
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COPITEPlT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
~
Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
B20
TABLE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
lesidue Content 60 70 80 resign 75
Bulk Siecific Gravity 21525 21406 21152 lllroretical Specific Gravity 23855 23555 23268 Air Voids 98 91 91 91 VMA 182 194 211 2middot03 1osorled Asphalt 180 1 80 180 180 Effective Asphalt 420 520 620 570 Ulit Weight pcf 1343 1336 1330 1335 Stabilateter Value 487 460 373 415 Oxlesiareter Value 418 392 323 355
3lesilielt Mldulus 10 psi
2-clay 188 177 200 190
Final 289 299 281 290
6or----------- 24
m 50 lt gt 11 40 w w I
~ 30 m lt 20
_J_
22ci 0 lt z
20EE
= 0 180 gt
16
5oor---------- 138
w
l 400 lt gt
136- a ~ 300 w i 0
fa34 z w
~ 200 Cll32 -8
100-----------i-~ 130
12 ------------ 500bulla
10 ________ o 400 - 0
0 gt
8
gJdeg 300 0
~- 200 ---e-
lt z
6 l 100 w 4
5 6 7 8 9 0
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication
B21
1
TABLE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Fesidue Cbntent 55
Bulk Spcific Gravity 21243
lheoretical Specific Gravity 23859
Air Voirls 109
VMA 189
Absorbed Asphalt 152
Effective 1spralt 398
Unit Weight pd 1326
atabil~ter Value 620
Cbhesiareter Value 430 3Fesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-oay 160
Final 387
70
a 60 gt a 50 w w == = 40 0
m
30
500
w l 400 lt gt cc
~ 3001- 0 ~ 200 8
100
16
136
134 u Q
iu2 z w 0 130
128
12 -----------
10 bull
ltIi 0
~ s
6
4middot1-_________ _
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l _AGGREGATE BASIS)
21164
23557
101
200
152
498
1321
481
432
180
377
24
22
z 20Si
= 18e 0 gt
bull 500
o 400-ltIi j 300 0
~ 200 zl 100 w cc
0
65 75 iesiqn 7 s
21095
23269
93 93
210 210
152 l 52
598 598
1316 1316
367 367
450 450
171 171
387 387
-----~bull-----
8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7
FIGURE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B22
1 TABLE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno
Low Quality CMS-7 Replication
70 -~ 0 Cesign 75 Pesidue Content
Bulk Spcific Graviv1
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit Weight pcf
Stallilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mxlulus 10 3psi
2--day
Final
40
Ill 30 c gt 0 20 UI lo Q 10=c 0
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w lo Q 200 8
100
~
60
21829
23899
87
170
197
403
1362
293
206
84 144
21981
23587
67
l73
197
503
1372
200
249
76 131
21960
23289
5middot 7
middot18l
197
603
1370
100
241
69 93
62
177
197
553
1370
150
245
73
110
12
10 5 Q 8gt 5 lt
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (ACGREGATE BASIS)
24
It
22 t-ci c
z 20i
= 5 18 t-Q gt
16
142
140 - 638
z w Q
136
134
bull 500
o 400 - 3 300 0
~ 200 z 100 iii UI 0
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (ACGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno LOW Quality CMS-7 Replication
B23
1
TABLE B24 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Urit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Glhesianeter Value
Resilient Mldulus 10
2-day
Final
40
m 30 gt c 20 w ~ w i
~ 10 m lt ~ 0
3psi
24
22
C C lt i
20~ ~
9 18 0 gt
16
500 142
w 1403 400 gt
Ca gt138I 300 tw
i z w Q 136~ 200
8
134
~
~
100 12 500
C
dego 400 - Ill 10 3 300 0 0 Q8gt ~ 200
~ z 6 100middot
w a
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIOUC CONTENT
(AGGREGATE 8ASIS] (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)
80
21686
23262
68
19l
l91
609
1353
125
215
77
114
Cesign 75
71
184
L 91
559
1360
200
235
77
135
60
21936
23870
81
166
191
409
1369
358
252
84
211
70
21850
23559
73
177
191
509
1364
270
250
77
157
Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE B24 Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B24
TABLE B25 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-Or Replication 1
Residue Clgtntent 47
Bulk Siecific Gravity 23965
llleoretical Specific Gravity 26825
Air Voids 107
VMA 207
Absorbed Asphalt 27
Effective Asphalt 443
Unit Weight pcf 1495
Stabilaneter Value 302
Cohesiaoeter Value 235 3
Resilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-day 158
Final 300
40
30 _ gt a 20I- ii 0_
10iii I-en 0 500----------
Ill
3 400 gt ati 300 ii 0 iii l 200 8
100---i----L---J
12 ----------
jit 10 e 0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I 4
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
57 67 Design 55
24521 24581
26411 26017
72 55 80
196 202 200
27 27 27
543 643 523
1530 1534 1520
247 200 27
275 203 275
164 116 160
276 197 280
24
jlt
22ci c i
20Si
= en e 18 0 gt
16
156
_154 ~ i152 iii z C
150
148
soo----------
dega 400 _
en
~300 ~ ~ 200 1-zl 100 iii w a
01----~-i--J 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Mixture Design Data GraniterockFIGURE B25 High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
B25
TABLE B26 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Besidue Content If 7 57 67 D2sign 55
Bulk SfeCific Gravity 2 4131 24573 24597
lhagtreticai Specific Gravity 26951 26532 26134
Air Voids 105 74 59 78
VMA 20l 195 20l 197
Absorted Asphalt 46 46 46 46
Effective Asphalt 424 524 624 504
Unit Weight pcf 1506 1533 1535 1525
stabi1anaiter Value 282 258 is2 270
Cllhesicmter Value 204 155 138 160
Resilient Mdulus 103psL
2-day 115 143 126 130
Final 313 225 173 240
40
w 30 lt gt a 20 w w la 0 10 m lt
0
~
24
22ci C
lt z
20la ~ = E 18 -0 gt
16
156
154 - a
~152 z w r0
150
148
-
500
o 400 ~
300 0
g 200 ~ z -~ 100
500
w ~ 400 lt gt a IU t- 300 w la 0 ~ 200
~8
100 12
10 0 0 8gt lt
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
w a
o 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT lo RESIDUE CONTENT II
-cGREGATE s-s1s1 (-GGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B26 Mixture Design Data Grani terock High Quality CSS-0 Replication
B26
2
TABLE B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Residue Ogtntent 47 57 67 ~ign 55
Bulk Spcific Gravity 23886 24116 24078
Ihooretical Specific Gravity 26675 26267 25879
Air Voids 105 81 70 82
VMA 210 210 21 8 210
Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 oos 005
Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545
Unit Weight pcf 149l 1505 1502 1505
Stabilareter Value 337 350 250 350
Ogthesicneter Value 238 3
Eesilient Mldulus l0 psi
2-day 104
Final 287
50
Ill 40 J C gt cc 30 Ill Ill l 0
C
10
20iii 500
w
l 400 C gt cc I 300 Ill l 0 in ~ 200 8
100 12
1110 0 0 8gt
c cc
6
4
FIGURE
~
~
177 204 200
144 150 140
254 247 260
24 ----------
a 18 0 gt
16 __i____i_-J
154
j52 u -a
~1501- ------iiiz -Ill 0
148
______________ 146
soar---------- a
o 400 1--
~ 300 _ ~
~ 200 z ~ 100 en w 0
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
B27
8
TABLE B28 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue Ointent 4 7 57 67 Cesign 55
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihroretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
CJlhesianeter Value
Pesilient Mldulus 10 3psi
2-day
Final
40
30 lt gt = w 20 0
- 10 lt
0
500
w - 3 400
lt gt a l 300 w 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
i 10 ui C
0 8gt lt
6
4
FIGURE
23861
26649
10S
207
014
456
1489
338
145
124
307
~
--------
~ 5 6 7 84
RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
24025 23925
26242 25855
85
210
014
556
1499
283
135
135
307
24
22
0 lt i
20i
= 18 0 gt
16
154
152 u Q
i150 z w 0 148
146middot
500- o 400 -
300 _ Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 4
75 87
220 209
014 014
656 536
1493 1490
220 300
129 140
142 130
277 307
_--
~
-___
85 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B28 bull Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B28
TABLE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Pesicllle Cbntent 47 57 67 resign 55 Bulk Siecific Gravity 24618 24637 24728 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26905 26475 26066 Air Voids 84 69 51 71 VlltLA 185 192 197 190 Absocbed Asphalt 047 0 bull 47 047 047 Effective Aspbalt 423 523 623 503 Urit Weight pcf 1536 1537 1543 1537 Stabilaneter Value 410 330 198 350 QJhesianeter Value 166
Resiliextt Mldulus 10 3psi
2-clay
Final
50
40 c
ffi 30 IE g20 iii c
10
500
l 400 c
a ~ 300 IE C ~ 200 8
100 12
ot 10 C
0 8
5
C
6
4
46
158
~
~ 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI
120 131 130
35 30 38
56 28 80
24
gt11 22
c c c
i 2031
= ~ C 180
16
158
156 t-
u - 154 z w 0
152
150
500
~
~ 0
bull a 400 - uil 300 ~
200
C
~ z ~ w a
100middot
8 4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
B29
TABLE B30 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Pesidue Content 4-7 h---7 6 -7 IEsicn 5 5
Bulk Specific Gravity 24519 24638 24706 Iheoretical Specific Gravity 26609 26265 25793 Air Voids 79 62 42 65 VMA 189 192 198 19l
middot Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 005 005 Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545 Unit Weight pcf 1530 1537 1542 1535 Stabilareter Value 420 327 247 350 Cohesiareter Value 126
3Resilient Mldulus 10 psi
Z--day 47 Final 144
50
40 J lt gt a 30 w w
~ 20 m lt 10
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w 2 ~ 200 8 ~
100 12
111- 10 ui 0 gt 8
lt
6
4
114 182 120
43 29 45
79 33 90
24
ii-22
ci 0 lt i
20l ~= 18 0 gt
16
158
156 0
l 154 z ~w c 152
150
500
Q -dego 400 - ui3 300 C
~ 200 z
~ 100middot~
w a ~ 0
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8 4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
FIGURE B30 Mixture Design Data High Quality CMS-7
Graniterock Replication 2
B30
TABLE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
~sidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weigllt pcf
Stabi]aneter Value
Cohes~ter Value
~silient MXJulus 103psi
2--day
final
40
30 C gt ffi20
~10 iii C ltII 0
500
l 400 C gt IC
~ 300 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
11 10 0
0 8gt C
6
4
55 65 75 resign 60 24268 24286 24206
26358 25966 25592 80
200
020
530
t515
80
268
182
338
~
65
207
020
630
t515
t_92
233
169
308
24
bull 220 0 C
ze 20
= 0 18 -0 gt
16
156
154
u i152 ~ z 0
150 bull
148
54 72
21 7 204
020 020
730 580
1511 1515
90 235
193 250
145 175
250 320
500 o 400 - l 300 0
~ 200 zi 100 iii IC
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replicationl
B31
TABLE B32 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residue 0ntent
Bulk Secific Gravity
llleoretical Speipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
-Absorled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
StabilcIIeter Value
Qlhesianeter Value 3Jesilient middotMgtdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
40
m30 lt gt cc20 w
w E
~10 ID lt 0
79
198
027
523
1518
203
243
201
354
~ soar-----------
w
400 lt gt a
~ 300 w E 0 ~ 200 8
100---I--~---------
12 -----------
111 10 C
0 8gt lt
6 --4
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l (ACiCiFIECiATE BASIS)
FIGURE B32 Mixture
55 65 75 Lesign 6 0
24329 24246 24077
26401 26007 25632
68 61 73 208 22l 203
027 027 027 623 723 573
1513 1502 1515
165 110 185 215 205 225
168 184 185 340 272 345
24
22 C C
z i 20
= 0 0
18 gt
16
156
154
a
gt152 en z Ill 0 150
148
bull 500 Q
deg 0 400- =gt 300 0
~ 200 z l 100 w
-
0 4 5 6middot 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(ACiGFIEGATE BASIS)
Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication
B32
2
TABLE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Eesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheore_tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VbullMA
lbsorbed_ Asphalt
Effective_ Asphalt
Qnit Weight pcf
~~ter Value
Q)hesianeter Value
Resiiient Mxlulus 10 3psi
2~y
Final
40
11130 C
a20 =
~10 C m
ltII 0
500
Ill
3 400 C
a ~ 300 w = 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
ll 10 ui E 0 8
c
6
4
I-
1-
55
23824
26318
95
215
014
536
1487
287
381
224
380
65 75
23896 23701 25928 25555 78 73
220 233
014 014 636 736
1491 1479 195 161
265 212
212 196
404 341
24
11 22d
c
z 20i
= ltII E 18 0
16
154
152- a
150 I-
Iesign 6 0
84
218
014
586
1490
240
320
215
395
z w Q
148
bull 146
500 a
c 400 ~ ui
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
l 300 Q
~ 200 zl 100 w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIOUla CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-a Replication 1
B33
- - ----- -
TABLE B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Rssidue Ogtntent
Bulk Secific Gravity
lhairetical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
AbsoIbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stabil~ter Value
Olhesiareter Value 3lesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-day
Firal
40
m 30 lt gt a 20 w w
= ~ 10
m lt
0
- --- -middot -middot 500
w l 400 lt gt
Ea
300 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
1l 10 middot 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 4
FIGURE
55
23834
26371
96
214
022
528
1487
279
207
176
332
65
23784
25978
84
223
022
628
1484
208
270
185
336
75
23628
25604
77
236
022
728
1474
167
334
181
350
iesiqn 6 bull 0
90
21 8
022middot
578
1485
245
240
180
334
~
~
24
1l 22
0
lt i
20i
= 0 gt
18
16
152
150 - 148
~ 146
144
500
o-400 middot --- J 300 C
~ 200 z
middot ~ 100 en a
0 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication
B34
2
B35 Mixture Design Data GraniterockTABLE Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Residue Content 55
Bwk Specific Gravity 24720
lheoretical Specific Gravity 26164
Air Voids 55
VMA 185
Absorbed Asphalt 001
Effective Asphalt 549
Unit Weight pcf 1543
StabilCampTeter value 293
Ohesiareter Value 174
Besilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day 69
Final 153
40
~ 30 _
c gt ffi 20 w I
Q 10
c 0
500
w 3 400 -
c gt a
~ 300 w I g bull ~ 200 8 ----r
100middot
10
8 -
~
Q
0 6gt a =c
4 ~ 2
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS
65 75 DesiSE 60
2 4 720 24515
25767 25388
40 34 48
193 207 189 001 001 001 649 749 599
1543 1530 1543 205 97 250
156 283 170
46 22 55 72 so 110
24
~
22ci C c
i 20i
= Cl 180 gt
16
lSadeg
156
u -a
654 z 0 152
150
500 ii a
a 400 - 3 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7
FIGURE B35 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
B35
12 r---------- 500bull _ 10
o 400 -middot 0 gt 5 C
8
tnl 300 Q
~ 200 z
6 ~ 100 ~ IU 0
4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT I
(AGCREGA TE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
TABLE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
55 65 75 resicn 6 0 Residue Content
Bulk siecific Gravity 24816 2 4721 24560
lheoretical Specific Gravity 26389 25983 25596
Air Voids 60 49 40 55
VMA 182 193 205 187
Absorlei Asphalt middot 035 035 035 035
Effective Asphalt 515 615 715 565
UUt Weight cf 1548 1543 1533 1545
Stabilaneter Value 298 193 130 250
Qlhesicmeter Value 188 I57 118 180 3
Resilient MJdulus 10 psi
soor-----------158
w l 400 Ishy 156 gt lt u
0a
w
300 w ~154E 0 z
w Q ~ 200 152
8 150100----middot-~-1-__c__~
2-day
Final
40
~ 30 J lt gt a 20 w
s 10 0
lt
0
92 43 27 65 186 79 46 135
24
22
~ =
ci lt 0
i 20~
18 0 gt
16
FIGURE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B36
Table B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
FJiuivalent ~sidue amtent 60 70 80 resign 70
Iesidue Ontent
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absomed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
lhit Weight pcpound
Stabilareter Value Ohesiareter Value
~ilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
Ill
50
40 A gt a w 30 w i 0 J
iii 201-
10
400
w3 300 gt a Ill t 200 i 0
8 ~iii ll 100 1-
0 12
lit 10 0 0 8gt a lt
6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)
630
21584
24451
117
210
140
460
1347
415
208
735
21570
24143
107
219
140
560
1346
488
61
840
21385
23848
103
233
140
660
1334
382
63
resign 7 35
107
219
140
560
1346
488
63
96
339 141
325
126
299 141 325
24
lit 22d
Cl
z 20i
= 0 180
gt
16
138
136 ltgt
i134 iii ~ z w 0 132
130
bull 500
o 400 -
3
300 ------------- 0
~ 200 z ~ 100 w o_____________a
9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B37
----
Table B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Pesidue omtent 60 70 80 Design 70
Pesidue omtent 630 735 8 40 Dsign 735
Bulk Specific Gravity 21710 21722 21714
lllroretical Specific Gravity 24298 23995 23705
Air Voids
VMA
lbsorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Chhesianeter Value
Eeilient Mldulus 103psi
2--clay
Final
so
40 J w
gt a 30 w w 0 20 m
10 400
w 300 gt a w 200 w i 100 8
0
12
if 10 a
~0 8gt a lt
6
4
107
205
112
488
1355
395
llO
113
290
95
213
112
588
1356
398
62
122
271
84
22l
112
688
1355
318
70
138
282
24
22 c 0
20
0 180 gt
16
140
138 -a
136 _iii z bull --w 0 134
132
bull 500 a
o 400
m 300 J 0 bull ~ 200 z 100
w a
0
95
213
)12
588
1356
398
62
122
271
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT J
(AGCilEGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B38
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Table B39
Fquivalent ~idue COntent
~idue Cbntent
Bulk SJecific Gravity lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Oihesianeter Value
~ilient Mldulus l03psi
2-day
Fiial
so
w 40 lt gt cc 30 ~ w E
0 20 m lt 10
400
m POO lt gt a U 200 E 0 iii w c 100 8
0
12
- 10 vi Cl
0 gt ac
6
60 70 80
690 805 920
21790 21826 21910
24255 23977 23710
102 90 76
207 214 219
080 080 080
610 710 810
1360 1362 1367
437 400 289
219 229 202
141 158 184
333 282 273
24
~ 22ci
CJ lt z
20ii
= Cl 180
gt
16
----------
~ lo
140
138 Q l136 iii w Cl
134
132
500 Q
0 400 n3 300 Cl
~ 200 i-bull
100
z ~ 0 a
Cesign 70
Cesign 805
90
214
080
710
1362
400
229
158
282
-------
-
-~
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B39 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication l
B39
8
Table B40 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Eesidue cantent
Iesidue Omtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lhagtretical Speiliic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Abro1plusmned Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tklit Weight pcpound
Stabilareter Value
OJhesianeter Value
EEsilient Mldulus l03psi
2-day
Final
50
w 40 J lt gt a 30 w
w i
3 20 lt 0 10
400-----------
DI 3 300 lt gt a wti 200 i 0 w8100
0 -------l--l-1
12 ----------
- 10 ltn 0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
60 70 80 690 805 920
21986 21964- 21948
24499 2A212 23938
103 93 83
200 209 218
124 124 l24
476 576 676
1372 1371 1360
422 403 265
270 306 160
99 140 154
298 310 254
24
-22
ci lt
=i 20i
a 0 18 0 gt
16
140
138 - a
l136 z w 0 134
132
bull500
a
o 400 -
ltn =gt 300 -J a
~ 200 z 100 DI 0
0 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT Ii (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Dsign 70
Design 805
93
209
124
576
1371
403
306
140
310
9
Figure B40 Mixture Design Data High Quality SS-30
San Bernardino SEA Replication 2
B40
Table B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent lesidue ~tent
Ilesidue Omtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lbagtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stabilateter Value
CllhesiaIEter Value
Resilient MXlulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
w 40 i- _ gt 30a w I- ~ w 0 20 m I-CII 10
400
w l 300 gt a w lj 200 0 w 100 8
0
12
111 10 Q
0 8gt a ~
6
4
~
6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
65 75 85 Design 75 683 789 89J tesign 789
21624 21445 21375 24097 23802 23520
103 99 92 213 228 238 100 100 100 550 650 750
1349 1338 1334 423 295 285 70 174 82
150 139 138 318 310 2S4
24
22d i
20ii
= CII Q 180 gt
16
138
- 136
u
134I- z ~132
130
bull 500 o 400 _ l 300 1- Q
sectl 200 I-z ~ 100 CII w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
99
228
100
650
1338
295
174
139
310
5
Figure B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B41
Table B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent PesidJJe Content
Residue Omtent
Bulk Specific GIavity
lheoretical Specific GIavity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit weight pcpound
Stabiloreter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mxulus 103psi
SC
w 40 gt a 30 w w i 0 J 20
10
400
w 3 300 gt a w t 200 i
9 ltI)
w = 1008
0
12
11 10 u a 0 8gt
6
4
2-day
Final
~
~
5 6 7 8 flESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGflEGATE BASIS)
65 75 85
683 788 89J 21424 21394 21455
24147 23851 23567
ll3 103 90
22l 229 234
l09 l09 l09
541 641 741
133 7 1335 1339
412 328 280
129 103 81
167 141 162
325 260 280
24
22ci 0 201
= 0 gt
18
16
i-
138
136 Q i134 _ 0 z w bull0 132
130
soor----------- D C
o 400
ltn3 300 a ~ 200 z 100 (I)
w
-
~
a 0------------ 5 6 7 8 9
flESIOUE CONTENT I
(AGGflEGA TE BASIS)
Design 75
Design 7 86
103
229
l09
641
1335
328
103
141
260
9
Figure B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B42
Table B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent Residue Omtent
Residue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllagtreticalSpecilicGravity
Air Voids
VMA
AbsorlJed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcpound
Stabilcrreter value
Cllhesianeter value
lelilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
400-----------
Illl 300 lt gt a w t 200 lo 0 w 8100
0 ________ ___ __
12 ----------
~ 10 0
~ 8 bull a c
6
4 -_______ ___ __
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS
65 75 85 748 863 978 21752 21661 21638 24136 23863 23602 99 92 83
213 225 234 081 081 081 569 669 769
1357 1352 1350 466 367 235
224 266 138
220 189 209 478 337 281
Ilsign 75
Design 863
92
225
081
669 1352
367
266
189
337
24 ----------
~
220 Cl lt ii 20
0 18 0
gt
16 ----------------14or-----------
138 -0 a 136 z w Q
134
132
= c 400 - l 300 Q
~ 200 f-middot z 100 w a o----------
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
_____________J
Figure B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardinor Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B43
Table B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Iesidue Cbntent 65 75 85 Design 75
lesidue Omtent 748 86~ resign~Zl 863
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleo~tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asjtlalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
lesilient Mxlulus 103psi
2-day
Final
so
w gt 0 30 IE 0 20 iii lt
10
400
3 300 lt gt 0 w l 200 IE 0 X w
100 8
0
12
- 10 en 0 0 8gt
6
4
~ 40 bull
~ 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
21676
23998
97
208
055
595
1353
409
248
189
308
24
22
ci c lt i
20ii
= 0 0
18 gt
16
21711 21641
23729 23472
85 78 85
223 234 223
055 oss 055
695 795 695
1355 135l 1355
283 227 283
187 186 187
198 177 198
255 285 255
140
138 a
136 - z 0 134 --
132
500 a
o 400 -
vi3 300 - 0
sectj 200 z ~ 100
0 0 5 6 middot 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino~ Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B44
Table B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Equivalent Jesidue Content 60 70 80 Design 70
tesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
trut Weight pcpound
Stabilcineter Value
Cbhesiateter Value
tesilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
IU 40 _ C gt 30a IU IU = middoto 20 m C (I) 10
400
IU
300 C gt a IU
ti 200 = 0 ~ IU c 100 8
0
12
10 ai 0 8gt C
6
4
~
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)
630 735 840 Design 7 35
21651 21581 21592
24033 23739 23457
99 91 80 91 180 190 198 190
399 499 599 499 135l 1347 134 7 1347
309 439 358 439
150 236 202 236
140 171 148 171 294 390 367 390
24
bull 22
Cl Cl C
i 20i
= (I) Q 180
gt
16 140
138 0 a
i136 z IU
134 bull bull
Q
132
500 D
c 400 _ 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 IU a
0 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B45
Table B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Residue Cbntent 60 70 80 Design 70 Residue Cbntent 6JO Z35 EdQ Jesign 7 35
Bulk Spcific Gravity 21413 21627 21711 lhroretical Specific Gravity 24321 24017 23726 Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcneter Value
Ohesianeter Value
llesilient Mgtdulus 10 3psi
2-day
Final
so
Ill 40 I lt gt 0 30 w Ill i 0 20 Cl lt
10
400
111
l 300 lt gt 0 w lj 200 i
~ w = 1008 -----___
0
12
II- 10 a 0 8gt lt
6
4
120
189
249
351
1336
407
79
147
361
24
II-22
ci
lt ~ 20i
= 0
0 18
gt
16
138
136 u C
l134 w 132
130
bull 500
C
o 400 ~
---------_J 300 0
~ 200
~ 100 Ill 0
0
99
189
249
451
1350
396
76
165
340
85
193
249
551
1355
360
64
175
305
99
189
249
451
1350
396
76
165
340
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT 1
9 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE COIHENT f
9
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B46
---------
Table B4 7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Bulk Specific Gravity
lhalretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorlled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilaieter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
llesilient MJdulus 103psi
2-clay
Final
50
40w lt(
gt IC 30 w w
0 20 iii lt( ltI)
10
400
w 3 300 ~ lt(
gt IC w t 200 0 iii 111 i 100 8
0 ___ _______ __ _ __
12 ----------
Fquivalent Pesidue Content 60 70 80 Iesign 70
Pesidue Qlntent 690 805 92Q Dcsign 805
21958 22006
24182 23909
92 88 92
18l 188 18l 256 256 256
444 544 444
1370 1373 1370
342 291 342
78 73 78
184 167 184
303 298 303
10 0
0 8gt IC
c 6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B47 Mixture
21880
24453
105
176
256
344
1365
443
58
174
381
24
22ci
5 20
= 0
0 18
gt
16
~ I I
138
136 ~ ~134 bull z 111 0 132
130
bull 500
o 400 3 300 - Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 ltI) 111 IC
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B47
Table B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
El_uivalent Residue Cbntait 60 70 80 Iesign 70
Residue Cbntent 690 aQi 2 2Q Dsign 805 Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Olhesiateter Value
Resilient Mldulus middot103psi
2-day
Final
21816
24403
106
178
244
356
1361
482
136
183
393
21806
24120
96
187
244
456
1361
411
130
187
374
21996
23849
78
189
244
556
1373
314
106
260
361
96
187
244
456
1361
411
130
187
374
24so
w 40 22 ci 0 gt a 30 ~ 20w w = 20 ishy C 18iii 0 gt Ill 10 _ ___ ____________
16 400------------
140
w l 300 138 gt 0
Qa w
636t 200 z0 w --------_ Qw 134c 100 8
0 ___ _____________ 132
bull50012 -----------
a
1 400 -_ 10
ltti ltti l 300 -C 0 C8gt ~ 200 lt z
6 l 100 w a
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT S RESIDUE CONTENT S (AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B48
Table B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
EquivaJent Residue antent 65 75 85 Design 75 Residue Content 63J z aa a 23 resign 7 88 Bulk Specific Gravity 21404 21439 21381 lheoretical Specific Gravity 23563 23286 Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcf
Stabilaneter Value
Cohesianeter Value
~ient 1bdul11S 103psi
2~y
Firal
50
w 40 gt a 30 w w 0 20 iii lt 10
400
3 300 w
gt a w t 200 0 in i w
100 8
0 12
10 0 Q
0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6
23020 92 79 71 79
193 199 209 199 140 140 140 140 510 610 710 610
1336 1338 1334 1338 424 397 308 397 79 308 266 308
173 185 196 185 330 319 285 319
24
22ci c lt
~ 20c Q 180
gt
16
138
136 u -Cl
~134 in ~z w 132
130
soar----------- Qbull
o 400
middot3 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a Q___________ ___ __
7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT deg RESIDUE COIITENT deg (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B49
Table BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Fquivalent lesidue Content
Besidlle 0-ntent
Bulk Specific Gravity
Illeoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pf
Stabilcmeter Value
ltbhesiaieter Value
Besilient Mxlulus 103psi
2--day
Final
50
~ 40 I lt gt 30 w 0 20 01 lt 10
400
w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 w r lOO 8
o 12
10 ai ~ 0 8gt a lt
6
~
4 5 6 7 8
IIESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
65 75 85 683 788 893 21527 21362 21337
24013 23721 23441 104 99 90
188 202 211
225 225 225
425 525 625
1343 1333 1332
410 418 290
261 62 100
188 197 211
334 348 331
24
22 ~ ci c lt
20 f 18 0 gt
16
138
136 0 a
134 z w 0 132
130
500 a
o 400
ai bull 300 I bull C
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
IIESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design 75
Design 788
99
202
225
525
1333
418
62
197
348
Figure BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
BSO
Table B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno
Fquivalent Residue Clintent
Residue 0rrtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorlei Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
thlit Weight pcf
StabiJaneter value
Ohesiaretel value 3lelilient MJdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
50
w
40
c gt a 30 w w = g 20 iii c Ill 10
400----------
middota
l 300 bull c gt a w t 200 = 0 w c 100 8
0 _______ ____ _
12 ------------
_ 10 ~ 8 c
6
4 _________ __
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B51
Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
65 75 85 748 863 978
21728
24022
96
186
200
450
1356
436 100
199
376
24
11 22
c c c
z 20ii
Ill0 180
gt
16
Design 75
Design 863
86
195
200
550
1355
392 260
212
362
21716
23753
86
195
200
550
1355
392 260
212
362
21673
23495
78
205
200
650
1353
378 201
230
3l7
~
140
138 Q j136 bull --_ z w 0134
132
500 Q
o 400 bull -l 300 ~ 0 ~ 200 I-z ~ 100 w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Table B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent lesidue OJntent 65 75 85 Design 75 Pesidue Ointent 748 863 978 Design 863 Bulk Specific Gravity 21595 21708 21637 ~retical Specific Gravity 23977 23708 23452 Air Voids 99 84 77 84 VMA 19l 195 206 195 Absorbed Asphalt l92 l92 l92 l92 Effective Asphalt 458 558 658 558 Unit Weight pf 1347 1354 1350 1354 Stabilareter Value 502 262 239 262 Cllhesianeter Value 257 136 154 136 Pesilient MJdulus 103psi
2--day 217 201 228 201 Final 371 307 290 307
2450
w 40 22 0 0lt ltgt ia 30
bull 20i
= 0 20 18iii 0lt gt 10
16 400
~
~
140
w 3 300 -ltgt
138 lt gt
aa w t 200 deg136 z0 w 0
134 w
100 8
1320
12 500 a
0 400 10
3 300 C 0 Q8gt ~ 200 lt z
6 100 w a
4 0 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT ~ RESIDUE CONTENT ~ (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B52
Table B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent ~sidue Cbntent 45 55 65 Design 55 ~idue Cbntent 473 578 6~~ Design 5 78 Bulk Specific Gravity 24210 24403 24473 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26934 26528 26142 Air Voids
VMA
Absocbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
StabiJaneter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Iesilient M)dulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
w _ 40 C gt II 30w w 0 20 iii C ~
10
400
w l 300 C gt II
iiw
200
~ w --------r 100 8
0 12
ot 10 -0
0 8gt II c
6
4
101 80 64 80 199 20l 206 20l
022 022 022 022 423 523 623 523
151l 1523 1527 1523 308 288 197 288
ll7 ll2 140 112
95 llO 122 llO 306 272 214 272
24
ci 22
C
i -~20Es = E 18 0
gt
16
156
154 - gt152 iii z ~ w 0
150
148
bull 500
o 400 Inl 300 0
~ 200 z ~ 100 w II
0
--~
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT r (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7 8 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B53
Table B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Residue Glntent 45 ss 65 Jesign 55 Residue Omtent 47 5 ZB 6 83 resign ~za Bulk Specific Gravity 24197 24253 24435 lheoretical Specific Gravity 26843 26441 26058 Air Voids 99 83 62 83 VMA 199 206 208 206 Absorbed Asphalt 09 09 09 09 Effective Asphalt 441 541 641 541 lklit Weight P=f 1510 1513 152S 1513 StabLkmter Value 38l 307 204 307 CJgthesianeter Value 73 85 149 85 Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day 170 159 142 159 Final 333 367 193 367
so
w 40 J lt gt 0 30w w le 0 20J
CJ lt 10
24
It
22ci 0 lt i -------20 = 18 0 gt
16 400
____
~
156
w 3 300 154 lt gt - a0 w gt 152l 200 le __-0 z w w c 150 8100
148 0
12 500
D C
o 400 r- 10 -u 300
J 0 9
8 Cgt ~ ~ 200 z
6 ~ 100
w 0
4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE COIITEIIT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B54
----------
Table B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Rep~ication 1
Equivalent Residue Contentmiddot
Residue Ontent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
~tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tklit Weight pcpound
Stabilaneter value
Cbhesiaieter Value
Resilient -bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
45 55 65
518 633 748
24695 24765 24666
26898 26520 26160
82 66 57
187 193 205
001 001 001
449 549 649
154l 1545 1539
41l 310 24l
159 157 165
183 178 193
371 318 250
50
w 40 c gt a 30 w-w == 0 20 ~ 10
400------------
~ 300 lt(
gt a
t 200 == 0 in bullw 8100
0 __ ________ ___ ___
12 ----------
t 10 rti C
~ 8 a c
6
4 s 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI
4
24
Ill 22
0 c c
ze 20
II)
C 18 0
gt
16
158
156- 154 Ill z w 0 152
150
500 iii
8 4
~
0 400-
i300-~ g 200 1-z l 100 iii a 0 __ _______ ____
5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design 55
Design 633
66
193
001
549
1545
310
157
178
318
___
8
Figure B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
BSS
Table B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality
Equivalent Rsidue Content 45
Rsidue Cbntent 518
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllooretical specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
lbsoibed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesicmeter Value 3
Iesilient Mldwus 10 psi
2--day
Final
400-----------
w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 I 0 ltII w8100
olt----__1__--1_---1
12 ----------
10 u
0 8gt a lt
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT l
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
24594
27024
90
190
019
431
1535
450
198
191
360
24
Ill 22
0 C
lt i
20i ~ ltII C 18 C gt
16
158
156 0
i54 iii z ILi
J52
150
SS-30 SEA
55 65
63J 7 ~a 24844
26641
67
190
019
531
1550
324
212
173
308
24856
26276
54
199
019
631
155l
234
225
166
259
_________
~
500----------- 0
dego 400 -
~300~~ C
~ 200 z i 100
w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COIITEHT l
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Replication 2
Design 55
Lesign 633
67
190
019
531
1550
324
212
173
308
Figure B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B56
---------
Table B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality
ElIuivaJent lesidue Omtent
lesidue Cbntent
Bulk Spacific Gravity
~retical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Uut Weight pcf
Stabilaneter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
lesilient Mldulus 103psi
so
w 40 lt gt a 30 w w ~ 20 m lt II)
10
400
w 3 300 lt gt a w lj 200 0 w z 1008
0 12
Ill 10 Q
0 8gt lt
6
4
2-day
Final
~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
so 530
24024
26676
99
207
031
469
1499
354
138
183
352
SS-15 SEA Replication 1
60 70 Design 60 636 7 42 Design 636
24040 23986 26279 25901 85 74
214 223
031 031 569 669
1500 1497 223 149
222 126
159 160 302 234
24
Ill
c 22 ~ c
lt i
20i1
== (II C 180 gt
16
152
150 u -a
648 z w Q
146 1-
144
bull 500 a
o 400 - 3 300 C
~ 200 z ~ 100 (II w a
~ 0
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
85
214
031
569
1500
223 222
159
302
8
Figure B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B57
Table B58 Mixture Design Data Low Quality SS-15
Fquivalent Residue Content 60 60
Rsidue Cbntent 525 630
23944
~retical Specific Gravity
Bulk Sjecific Gravity 26592
Air Voids 100
209VMA
1bsocbed Asphalt 015
Effective Aspbalt 485
Unit Weight pcf 1494
Stabilareter Value 377
Olhesiaeter Value 151
Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi
162
375 2-day
Final
so
w 40 _ gt c 30 w w i
~20 m I-0
10
400
Ill
300 gt w I 200 i 2 w i 100 8
_________ 0 --middotmiddot-
12-------bull------
ti 10 9 0 8gt
6
4
24
- 22ci
0
20i
= 9 18 0 gt
16
152
150 u a
148 z---- w0146
144
500 Q
o 400 _ 300 Q
~ 200 I-z ~ 100
w a
23988
26022
84
215
015
585
1497
307
180
165
356
Graniterock SEA Replication 2
70
735 23793
25830
79
229
015
685
1485
217
170
169
277
~
~
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7
RESIOUE CONTENT li RESIDUE COPlTENT li (AGGREGATE 8ASIS) (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)
Design 60
resign 630
84
215
585
1497
307
180
165
356
8
Figure B58 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B58
Table B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Equivalent esidue omtent 5 0 60 70 Design 60
esidue Cbntent 5 75 690 805 Dsign 690
Bulk Specific Gravity 24389 24362 24419
Jheo=eticaJ Specific Gravity 2 6670 26303 25953
Air Voids 8 6 74 59 7 4
VMA 198 207 214 20 7
Absorbed Asphalt 009 009 009 009
Effective Asphalt 491 591 691 591
Unit Weight pcf 1522 1520 1524 1520
Stabilareter Value 38l 292 220 292
Cbhesiclneter Value 263 186 176 186
~t Mldulus 103psi
2-day 222 222 207 222
Fulal 380 289 293 289
5
w 40 C gt a 30 Ill ~ 20 m C 1- 10
24 ----------
22 bull C Cl C
zi 20
C1 o 18 0 gt
16 ___-________-------i-_-
400---------- 15a------------
156l 300 C gt - a =deg 154ti 200
iii z0 IUiii 0 152 bull bull~ 10018
150 ___ _______ __J0 ---i--J~-L--1
500----------12 ----------- bull o 400 -
Ill 10 ui l 300 -Q
Qg 8 g 200a lt z 6 l 100
iii a
01--J-----__ __4 -------r------- 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
RESIDUE COrlTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B59
Table B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Design 60
Eeidue omtent 575 690 805 D=sign 690
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleo~tical Specific Gravity
1lir Voids
VMA
Absocbed Asralt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcf
Stabilcmeter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
Eeilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
Ill 40 J
lt gt a 30 w I-w 0 20 Ill lt I-
10
400
w 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 Id
8100
0 12
10 m Q
0 8gt 5 lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
~
RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASISI
24371 24441 24445
26744 26373 26020
89 73 61 73
199 205 213 205
019 019 019 019
481 581 681 581
1521 1525 1525 1525
335 236 191 236
220 164 180 164
194 199 191 199
388 329 294 329
24
22
ci 0 lt i
20i
= a
= 18 0 gt
16
158
156 u a
deg154 = w Q
152 ---------150
500 a
1 400 m3 300 1 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100
Ill a
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COHTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B60
APPENDIX C
DATA ANALYSIS SOLVENT FREE AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS
Table Cl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL e_AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
95 85 80
867
76
88
90 85 85
867
29
33
95 85 85
883
58
65
85 70 80
783
76
98
100 100 100
1000
00
00
100 100 100
1000
00
00
C M s 0
D A T A x s
CV
80 80 80
800
00
oo
80 75 75
767
29
38
75 80 70
750
50
67
70 80 75
750
50
67
90 90
100
933
58
62
95 100
95
967
29
30
C M s 1
D A T A
X s
CV
80 75 70
750
50
67
60 70 55
617
76
124
70 70 65
683
-2 9
42
65 70 60
650
50
77
65 70 70
683
29
42
70 60 65
650
50
77
Table C2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating
F01
E 2 ll877 7777778 243aassese9 1)75102041 329 532 ~ middot2 1ll77777777~ 73RBSeSf89 32571~2-~5 3~ 29 532 J 1 150 ooocooo 150JOJOOOO 5f122llll9 414 746
EA ll 8114 llllll11444 2111111111 3J51224 266 396 -E~ middot2- 1-0frOOfr~ 0-9 middot50-middot000 3 oco middot2middot20110816 middot 329 532 Agt 2 77 7777778 38 8815589 17142857 329 532 nJ 4 1555555~55 388881889 171112857 266 396
FR RmiddotJR 36 8166666567 225851B52
------------------------------------------------middot---------------------ronmiddotL 53 -esoo--000000r
Cl
100
P
c5 75 z-t-lt8 50 w t-lt bull css-oC
CMS-0w 25a C middot+ CMS-7 C lt
0-----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Cl Mean AggregateCqqting at middotoesign Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 867 css-o 883 CSS-0 783 css-o 1000 css-o 1000middotcss-o middot I I CMS-0 800 CMS-0 7~ 7 CMS-0 750 CMS-0 933 CMS-0 967lrMS-0 750
I CMS-7 750 CMS-7 617 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 65 0 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating
C2
Table C3 Film Stripping
EMULSION
AGGREGATE SAN
BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK
C s s 0
D A T A
5
0
10
5
5
0
X s
CV
25
35
1414
75
35
47l
25
35
1414
C M s 0
D A T A
0
5
5
7
0
0
X s
CV
25
35
1414
60
14
236
00
oo oo
C M s 7
D A T A
0
0
0
5
0
0
X s
CV
00 OQ 00
25 35
1414
00 00
oo
Table C4 ANOVA Summary Film Stripping
AN-OVA
middotmiddotDPmiddot -ss- F middotFe5
E 2 33 7777778 1euro8888889 23555191 426 802 A 2 -ti8 7777778 343888889 4 7984496 426 802
E X II 4 9 2222226 23055557 3217054 363 642 ERROI 9 645000000 71666667 ---------------TOTAL 17 1762777782
C3
fl w 0 lti 1L a =gt en C w C C-a I-en
40
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-730
20
10
0 SB F GR
Figure C3 Film Stripping
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
css-o 25 css-o 75 css-o 25
GMS-0 25 CMS-0 60 CMS-0 oo
CMS-7 oo CMS-7 25 CMS-7 oo
----middot----middot-middotmiddotmiddot
Nlte Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping
C4
Table CS 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue
Content 10 3 psi
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW D
118 170A 217 205 160 175
C T 83 190 191 182 130 185A s )ts 101 180 204 194 145 180
0 s 25 14 18 16 21 7
CV 246 79 90 84 146 39 D 104 185 155A 190 140 215
C T 82 155 154 171 130 180A M x 93s 170 155 181 135 198
s 16 21 1 13 7 250 CV 167 125 05 74 52 125
D A ab 55 35 73 38 55
C T
82A 48 63 77 45 65 M X s pound81 -- - 52 49 75 42 60 s7 l 5 20 3 5 7
CV 18 96 404 38 11 9 11 8
Table C6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus
A N ) V l
-D-F -SS
E 2 832263888888 _ 2-- -5441-- 722-2222-J 1 89933611111
E~ 4 5386 7777779 -1J- 2- -3-8-1-+-rG-55--5-5-5 7- bull AJ 2 144235~899 EA 4 58024444443
ERROR 113- 3951500 00~-J
---------------------------------------------------------------------TOT-W- -3-5 -11806-4---638 881gt-9-
(116131944444 2720-8611111 89933611111 13466944445 1-9Q lh-5--amp7--+7-8-7211944445
14506111111 219 527-7778
1895577629 -12 394-1541-409569480
61345059 S-~937872 32952081 56gt7870Ll
357 3-S7 443 295
-]y5+ 3S7 295
605 6 05--833 461
-6--05-605 461
cs
bull css-omiddot 300 C CMS-0
M 0 diams CMS-7
(J
3200 gt C 0 E 1-
ffi 100
01----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure CS 2 Day ResiLient Modulus
SAN middotBERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 101 css-o 180 rss-o 204 css-0_194 CSS-0 145 CMS-0 198
CMS-0 93 CMS-0 170 ICMS-0 155 CMS-0 181 CMS-0 135 css-o 180l l l I I CMS-7 81 CMS-7 52 CMS-7 49 CMS-7 75 CMS-7 42 CMS-7 60
Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C6 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking 2 Day
Resilient Modulus 10 3 psi
C6
Table C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Content 10 psi
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A (
s
CV
260
232
246
20
80
320
280
300
28
94
482
299
391
129
33l
365
358
362
5
l4
280
240
260 28
109
320
345
333
18
53
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
267
250
259
12
47
295
280
288
ll
37
253
288
271
25
92
290
387
339
69
203
260
307
284
33
11 7
395
334
365
43
118
C M s 7
D A T A
X
s
CV
78
64
71-
10
139
110
95
103
ll
104
75
73
74
l
19
110
135
123
18
144
80
90
85
7
83
110
135
123
18
144
middotTable C8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus
-~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------F-r05- ---F-01--
E
J El -E- Al EAJ
-ERRJR
2 2-1 4 -~ 2 4
18
3592750555555 -14506 722-2221-171610COOOOJ 147394444445
1---1-1----lf466-li-+ 19215000000 55353333333
2850GOOC0000
17-16375277778 72~336H-1-11
1716100)0000 36848611111 sect8~5833---3-33--9607500000
13840833333 ~ 58-3 33-33 333
11315528C7 -45810702
109385263 23272807 ~U981l-2-1-6067895 3741579
357 -3 r7 443 2 95 3~7-357 295
605 605 833 461 605 605 4 6 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------~- 3-5- -448+1----2-222-2-
C7
bull css-o500
CMS-0 U) diams CMS-7C
C) 400 middoto -
~ 300
J Ci 200
1-z 100 J-UJ UIa
01-------------------------~---~-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
eMS-0 259 ess-a 300 ess-a 391 ess-a 362 eMS-0 284 CMS-0 365
ess-o 246l l l l l ICMS-0 288 eMS-0 271 CMS-0 339 ess-o 260 ess-o 333
CMS-7 71 CMS-7 103 CMS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123
t-ote Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure ca Newrnan-Keuls Ranking Full Cure 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi
ca
Table C9 Density at Design Residue Content pcpound
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
1359
1372
1366
09
07
1365
1365
1365
0
0
1365
1352
1359
09
07
1345
1345
1345
0
0
1520
1525
1523
04
02
1515
1515
1515
0
0
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
1348
1343
1346
04
03
1330
1338
1334
06
04
1329
1340
1335
08
06
1335
1316
1326
- 13
10
1505
1490
1498
11
07
1490
1485
1488
04
02
C M s 7
D A T A
x s
CV
1373 1385
1379
09 06
1375 137 5
1375
0 0
1380
1379
1380
01 01
1370
1360
1365
07 05
1537
1535
1536
01 01
1543
1545
1544
01 01
Table ClO ANOVA Surtunary Density
A II O V ~
-SS F bull O1
E _ 0
2 i
lCB4155555 Z08-tOS389
II 311277~
54207777R 1 ouos2sirrs
4340277
135q23660 -25lS 7i80R63-
1087331173
3S7 3 ~7 443
i()5 605 83
EA Q
4 -2
1599U4U5 _iuseeg
399E11 -3-3UUL45-
10J17398 bull~3785-C7
295 -~S7-
4 f 1 -6CS
A) 2 13772222 o6886111 17251218 357 605 EAJ q 2C361111 5090278 12752262 295 4 61
-ERRJR- 13- 718-()001 399166-7-
35
C9
bull css-o160 CMS-0 diams CMS-7
150
() -a gt 140 -en z w
middotC 13
1201~bull-------------r---------------SBH SBL FH FL ~RH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C9 - Density at Design Residue Content
SAN middotBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 138o CMS-7 1365ICMS-7 1375 CMS-7 1544
css-o 1366
I-7 bull rMS-7 1536
css-o 1365 css-o 1359 css-o 1345 css-o 1523 CSS-0 j515
CMS-0 1346 CMS-0 1334 CMS-0 1335 CMS-0 132 6 CMS-0 1498 CMS-0 1488
Nte Values with a ccmnm vertical line are not statistically different
Figure ClO Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcpound
ClO
Table Cll Air Voids at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
D 87 7 0-A 75 77 80 72
C T 71 70 92 82 78 73A s )s 79 70 84 80 79 73
0 s ll 0 12 04 01 01
CV 143 0 144 45 18 10 D 97 93A 93 91 82 84
C T 90 92 A
91 93 87 90
M x 94 93 92 s 92 84 87 s os 01 01 _0l 04 04
0 53 08 15 15 42 49CV D A 77 62 73 62 71 48
C T 73 61 62 71 65A 55
M X s 75 62 68 67 68 52 s 03 01 08 06 04 057
CV 38 12 115 96 62 96
Table Cl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids
A I O Y 11
-DF ss -F 05 F01
E 2 382650000 191325000 69)150301 3~7 605 -A 2 -2-681667 1340334 ll03567311 -3- 57 605
Q 1 2f677778 26677778 952324f6 4 13 I 33 EA lj 13S33333 3313333 122011409 2 95 Ii 61 ti -2 l8105555- -905-277-8- 326553tO 357 tiOS II) 2 6572221 3296111 11953707 357 605 E~l 4 88411445 2211111 797552 795 4 f 1 ERElll 111 11991)0)00 bull2172222-
-------------------------~------------------------------------------rou1 s SJ 3100000-
Cll
11
10
iP- en 0-0 gt aa
9
8
7
6
5
4
bull css-o CMS-o diams CMS~7
SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
F-igure Cll Air Voids at middotoesign Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 94 CMS-0 93 CMS-0 92 ICMS-0 92 CMS-0 84 ICMS-0 87
IIcss-o 79 css-o 7 0 I II
css-o 79 css-o 73
I ~_ I~ CMS-7 7 5 CMS-7 62 CMS-7 68 CMS-7 48 - - bull-- ~ -----~middot-middotmiddot--middot-middotmiddot-middot ---middotmiddot
~= Values with a OCIlOn vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids
Cl2
Table Cl3 Stabilorneter Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
272
3113
293 29
99
270
265
268 04
13
393
327
360 47
130
380
325
353 39
110
270
270
270 0
0
235
185
210 35
168
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
375
344
360
22
61
340
350
345
07
21
307
377
342
50
145
415
367
39l
33
85
350
300
3-2 5
35
109
240
245
243
04
15
C M s 7
D A T A
x s
CV
235
23-5
235
0
0
130
120
125
07
57
213
233
-223
14
63
150
200
175
35
202
350
350
350
0
0
250
250
25 o_ 0
0
Table Cl4~ ANOVA Summary Stabilorneter Value
A N O V 1
soua= SS r 01
E 2 2
7086172721 9702C93fl9
3543086361 4SS10Uf95
505343236 ~-9189501
357 357
605 605
) 1 175 6950250 1756950250 25053)2i8 443 833 EA 4 6718347112 167 9586 778 23955053 2 95 461 ~ ~544 -4 Q-432-ll-25-0- --S--~ 38 ~5-19- -3 5- ios AJ 2 941227166 47(1euro13583 57122663 357 605 EAJ 4 289779333 72319A33 10314831 2 95 II f 1
Ell ngtR -18 1r2024gt0) -i- bull112472-
---------------------------------------------------------------------0-T- ----5- 4-9B1 is~v~
Cl3
50
w 40 I ltgt a 30w I-w ~ 200 I-m lt 10I-u
0 SSH SBL FH FL GRH
AGGREGATE
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
GRL
Figure Cl3 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 350 CMS-7 250ICMS-0 360 ICMS-0 345 r=ss-o 36o rMS-0 39l
css-o 268 CMS-0 342 css-o 353 CMS-0 325 CMS-0 243Icsbull-bull _ CMS-7 235 CMS-7 12S CMS-7 223 CMS-7 175 css-o 270 css-o 210
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value
Cl4
Table Cl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOWHIGH LOW LOWHIGH D 360193 280 465 275 250A T 234 345 183 375 160 225C A
s x 214 353 232 420 218 238s s 29 11 69 64 18810
136 30 296 152 37 4 74CV D 280 440 230 355 200 320 T A
252 430 219 450 140 240C A M x 266 435 225 403 170 280s s 20 7 67 428 570
74 16 16735 250 202CV D
80 190 122 245 130 170 T A
82 180 192 235 120 180C A M X 81 185 157 240 125 175s s l 7 so 7 777
CV 18 3038 31 5 57 40
Table Cl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value
-SS--
pound 2 1309717272222 654858611111 1102309084 357 605 __ 2 3Ber61222222 194033611--111 -1-1t2J3570 -3 57 605 J 1 12)524904445 120524f94111145 711)1137379 1143 l 33
EA 4 2311~U411111145 57795111111 355~57119 295 4 ~ 1
~ + --8-066---H~i-i--2 ---4-B3-a~--H ~T4-=7-7S~J -3 S7 605 1J 2 111206 7222222 71033511111 ll3~31111 3 57 605 EAJ 4 500gt1111111 12512777778 7587162 235 4 (- 1
RAO- -18 -999 500-000( -1-6--2-7 -75-00000-
--------------------------------------------------------------------tO+--l- el-i- 3-fi-99g6-3-R-~
Cl5
bull css-o500
Q1__________---___-----~
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure ClS CohesiometerValue at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 232rMS-0 435 CMS-0 280rMS-0 266 rss-o 420 tss-o 218
css-o 214 css-o 353 CMS-0 225 CMS-0 403 css-o 238ICMS-0 170
CMS-7 81 CMS-7 185 CMS-7 157 CMS-7 240 CMS-7 125 CMS-7 175
Nrte Values with a oamon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value
~400 -I ltgt cc 300 w 1-w E 2000 -() w c 1008
CMS-0 diams CMS-7
Cl6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Table Cl7 Swell at Design Residue Content in
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
0 0000 0003 0000 0008 0000 0000A C T 0000 0005 0000 0007 0000 0002
A 0000 0004 0000 0009 0000 0000 s j( 00000 00040 00000 00080s 00000 00007
0 s 00000 00010 00000 0 0010 00000 00012
CV 00 250 00 125 00 1732 D 0000 _o 045 0020 0036 0000 0000A 0006 0029 0018 0040 0001 0000TC A 0007 0040 0022 0039 0000 0000
M x 00043 00380 00200 00383 00003 00000 s s 00038 00082 00020 00021 00006 00000 0
874 215CV 100 54 1732 oo
D 0000 0004 0000 0003 0000 0000A T 0000 0002 0000 0000 0000 0000
C A 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000
M x 00000 OQ023s 00000 00010 00000 00000 s 00000 00015 00000 00017 00000 00000
7 oo 655 1732CV 00 00 oo
Table Cl8 ANOVA Summary Swell
P N O V ~
SOUR-middotEmiddot l)f -ss- -lSmiddot F rs FM
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------E 2 C031905 )015953 7576385211 329 532 J 2 0012203 OOOf112 2~97R1n75 329 532 l 000858(1 )()QSf80 11122112111111 414 846
H LI 0016535 00)111311 1963258575 266 396 Emiddot) middot2middot 00079 51- a0ll397S 1eg ~16527 329 532 AJ 2 00011958 )0021179 111 ns1ne 329 532 EAJ II 0006609 OC01652 7e117l97t3 266 396
EDl 36 )000751 OOOJ021
TOBImiddot middot53middot ----008959-9-middot
Cl7
05
04
z 03
-I -I w
u 3 02
01
0 SBH SBL FH
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
FL GRH GRL AGGREGATE
FigureCl Swell at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 00003 css-o 00007CMS-0 00043 CMS-0 -0380 CMS-0 00200 CMS-0 00303
CMS-0 00000css-o 00080 css-o 00000Icss-o 00000 Icss-o 00040 ICSS-0 00000
CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00000CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00023 CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00010
Rte Values with ~--~~~ ~~ lb-le are not ~tatistically different
Figure Cl8 Newman-Keuls Ranking swell in
Cl8
Table Cl9o MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
-------EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
GRANITEROCKFRESNOSAN BERNARDINO
LOW LOWHIGH HIGH LOW HIGH D
124 72198 137 287 243A 227 90145 178 83 260TC 57197 135 252 270A
s 207 104 258 73139 239s s 17 05 56 29 14 17
0 CV 82 280 82638 233 53
D 197 160145 145 90 205A 19l 17092 100 80 220TC 158 105 138190A M x 182 119 11 7 85 205 156 s s 21 37 25 1607 15 0
115 737 105316 21l 83CV D 21 omiddot 240202 185 98 330A
220 20087 181 34588TC 216 210138 223 77 338A M x 215 217142 196 88 338s
s 2111 0805 58 237
23 405 120 22 96118CV
Table C20 ANOVA Summary -MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
----------------------- I N O V A
SO0RE --DF -lS--
middotE __ 2 2
401 11310n -5831137037
2008568519 --2915568519
166S53085 2111762euro92-
3-9 J29
532 532
Q 1 14f5364f296 14653646296 1215099198 4 14 746 EA-Ev
4 -frac34
2784740740 -1-1-i 0359259
696185185 -56-tl-1-79tr30-
5 772 8571 -6450815
266 middot-3-29
396 -5-32middotmiddot
110 2 355470370 177735185 1bull11738C30 329 532 EAO II 12794711075 3198euro9519 25523909 266 396
-Ei8JB 36- 11311 111euro66euro7 120596296
---------------------------------------------------------------------FOTAJ- --5-3- -31131--343-14 8-1-
Cl9
50 bull css-o ti) CMS-0 gt 40 diams CMS-7E I
a w 30I-w E 0 -I 20-ca ltC I-Cl) 10
0--------------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Cl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOWmiddot HIGH LOW
CMS-7 215 CMS-7 142 css-o 104 I ICMS-7 338 CMS-7 21 7
css-o 207 css-o 139 i CMS-7 88 CMS-0 156middot css-o middot
CMS-0 182 CMS-Q 119 CMS-0 117 CMS-0 85 CMS-0 205 css-o 73
Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
C20
-----------------------------------------
Table C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
IEMULSON
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIG_H LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A x s
CV
135 104 104
114
18
157
70 85 51
69
17
248
105 66
136
102
35
343
148 197
-173
35
201
107 101
72
93
19
201
74 107
92
91
17
182
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
128 85
174
119
31
256
73 59 -
66
10
150
69 36 65
56
18
318
158 110
-134
34
253
77 96 68
80
14
178
53 66
113
77
32
408
C M s 7
D A T A x s
CV
141 79 52
91
46
503
185 60 63
103
71
695
125 201
96
141
54
386
192 164 126
161
33
206
131 130 120
127
6
48
72 230
76
126
90
715
Table C22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
l II O Y A
-soaas -OF- -S-S- -F- FrOS
E -llmiddot J
n -tJ-AO EllJ
RROi
----------
2 2 1 u -2-2 4
36middot -------
199090000000 middot 39113 411111111111
4111296296 61982222222
-t-72-1-middot-11181-18-1-754737037011 41156 5185186
85722 middotbull)0(0000 ----------------
995115000000 -1971-7222222
11111216296 151195555556 -360-yen5-110-711 1middot
j8236851852 11166296297
middotmiddot2381 166667
111805138 -0280488 17265A9 6507548
-36111086-15058033
41589422
329 329 414 2 66 329 329 266
532 -532 746 396
-532 532 3915
-----------------------------------lOo-1- middottt 1-300-lamp833-333-3-
C21
400
CJgt ~ 300 I
0 w I-w 200
-~ 0 CJwc 1000 ()
0
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Valueat Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 ll9 CMS-7 103 ICMS-7 141 css-o 173 CMS-7 127 CMS-7 126
css-o ll4 css-o 69 1middotcss-o 102 CMS-7 161 css-o 93 css-o 91
CMS-7 91 CMS-0 66 middotCMS-0 56 CMS~O 134 CMS-0 80 CMS-0 77
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C22 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
C22
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table C23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
724 811 637
724
123
170
1289 -
1276
1283
09
07
627 628 695
650
39
60
622 940
1427
996
405
407
475 407
1276
719
483
672
803 790 498
697
172
247
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
1217 393
1260
957
489
511
2075 2879 1875
2276
532
233
1943 1195 2012
171 7
453
264
1241 1224 1208
1224
1 7
13
676 574 550
600
67
112
986 787 815
863
108
125
C M s 7
D A T A x s
CV
642 620 774
679
83
123
102 426 662
397 281
709
59 7 369 470
479 114
239
588 60l 290
493
176
357
301 263 393
319
67
210
238 284 227
250 30
121
Table C24 ANOVA Surmnary Surface Abrasion
Fmiddot F01middotmiddotss --------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------
e Amiddot
2 -gt
530361248149 22)938237037
315180624075 110469111)519
432152433 1sn1of15
329 329
532 532
1 n
1 4
[14699201852 9733 179629euro
446992gt1952 24332949074
61289-8 3335u~111
414 266
746 396
EJ J
2 2
middot59516003103 85017525926
291seoo1as1 425)8752963
4 9nn2 5 828630
329 329
532 532
EI 4 196475151852 4911877963 57349619 266 396
ERRJl 36 262551800000 72931l~-556
--------------------------------------------------------------------
middotTnUmiddot 53- middot159689-~0964815middot
C23
300
E C)
C)200 Cl)
0 J
z 0 en 100 lti a al lti
01-----r----~---------r---------SBH SBL
Figure C23
SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW
CMS-0 957 CMS-0 2276
css-o 724 css-o 1283
CMS-7 679 CMS-7 397
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content
FRESNO
HIGH
CMS-0 171 7
css-o 65o
CMS-7 479l
LOW
CMS-0 1224
ICSS-0 996
CMS-7 493
GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW
css-o
CMS-0
719
600
ICMS-0 863Icss-
CMS-7 319 CMS-7 250
Ngtte Val~ with~ ~n vertical line are not stati~tically different
Figure C24 Newman-Keuls Ranking Surface Abrasion grams
C24
APPENDIX D
DATA ANALYSIS SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS
----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
Table Dl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15
SEA
D A T A
75 85 85
85 80 85
80 75 70
65 70 70
85 90 90
80 85 85
X s
tV
817
58
71
833
29
35
7-50
50
67
683
29
42
middot88 3
29
33
833
29
35
ss 30 see
D A T A
85 80 85
75 80 80
75 85 85
70 80 70
90 85 95
90 80 90
x s
CV
833
29
35
783
29
37
81 7
58
71
733
58
79
-900
50
56
883
29
33
C M s 7
D A T A
80 75 70
60 70 55
70 70 65
65 70 60
65 70 70
70 )0 65
x s
CV
750 50
67
617 76
124
683 29
42
650 50
77
683 29
42
650
50
77
Table D2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating
rmiddot rs F05 F 0 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------F 2 235 712593 1179 f-296297 553913Q113 329 532 a 2 63 bullTlt1ll81I R 31L97UC7U 1521731 3 29 532 E~
11 3f2 116i14f Jmiddot 39 (1)7111~gtI 1
3~2 ~-2900 9976~5185
17 ~li347F3 UfB47826
4 14 256
746 96
i) ~ pound 2S 11252i 12 29(-29 bull 5086957 329 532
a~ 2 12 ~-~737r o lt19518~ 2E260e7 329 53 2 u ll 1f3 bull illf illt7 41t3S1B52 191156522 2 G6 3~f
iE1190il 3i 76 pound61iz~57 212~-25
Dl
-~ -CJ z I-lt(
0 0 U1 -lt( C bull SS 15 SEA w 25 SS 30 SEA CJ cc
diams CMS - 7CJ lt(
0 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dle Mean Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
I SS-30 733SS-301 $33 SS-15amp 833 lss-301 sn 7 I ISS-30 900 SS-30 883
SS-151 817 SS-301 783 SS-15 683 SS-15 883 SS-15 833SS-lSi 750
CIS--7 750 CS-7 617 OS-7 683 CMS-7 650 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650
Ngtte Values with a comon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating
D2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
Table D3 Film Stripping
EMULSION
AGGREGATE SAN
BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK
s s
15
0 A T A
30
15 20
30 15
25
X s
CV
225
106
47l
250
71
283
200
71 354
s s
30
D A T A
25
25
0
0
5
0
X s
CV
25middoto
oo
00
oo oo
oo
2middotmiddot5
35
1413
C M s 7
D A T A
0
0 0
5
0 0
X s
CV
oo
00 oo
25
35
1413
oo
00 oo
Table D4 ANOVA Swnmary Film Stripping
----------------- ---------------- --middot-----------middot----- middot--middotmiddotmiddot middot- middotmiddot-middot----middot -middot-- middotmiddotmiddot--- --- -------- -A N O V J
-SW~ middotnt r-
pound 2 14333333113 7166666667 27 1S78lttl7 l 2 2]33333333 1165666euro67 middot11t1210~26 Eirl 141 55f 3333335 13958333311 i2894737
Dlli~RI 9 237 50CCDIOmiddot) 2638888P9
lOUL t7 bull--- bullbull - bull- 0 bull bullbull bull- bull bull 0 -------- bull-- bull- bull---bull ---- lt -bullbull bull - bullbullbull--bullbullbullbullbull-bullbull-- bullbullbull bull ___ bull --bull bull bull bull --- bull bull-bullho bullbull bull- bull bull ~-- bull- UO rArr-d bull
D3
cit -w
0 lt( ll a (I)
C w 0 C-a I-ti)
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
20
1
0 SB F GR
Figure D3c Film Stripping
SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO
Iss-3
SS-15
250
225
SS-15~7 250
25
SS-15
ISS-30
200
25
ClIS-7 oo middot SS-30 00 CMS-7 00
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping
D4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue 3Content 10 psi
-------ElAULSWN
----QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCK SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
D S$ 1U H9 171 185 110 159
i22 2~1 165 197 159 165A15Jo-ot----t----+---ii---+----t-----ti 132 140 168 191 135 162
SEA s i3 1 4 9 35 4
CV Ul2 10 25 44 258 26
$5 ---
D
~ A
158
140
189
198 184 187
212
201
178
173
222
199
gtUfl x l49 194 186 207 176 211 SEA s 13 6 2 8 4 16
CV 85 33 11 38 20 77
C M
D A T A
80
82 55 48
35
63
73
77
38
45 55
65
s x 81 52 49 75 42 60
7 s
CV
1
18
5
96 20
404
3
38 5
119
7
118
Table D6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus
--=======-=-middot------=====--=- ---------------------==-~----------=-----e=-----BF SS lS F F05 F01
pound 2 ln~13~ 3lBillllll1l 52367 191141145 3715181747 357 605 I 2 29111 GllS5SSS6 111155 bull 5211778 103289966 357 605 l 1 3l$3351l11112 33$3-3611112 240095590 4113 A33 lEamp liL 31121111l11U1t zst-n22t77 8 ssu21119a 295 461 pound~ 2 1217222222 16093611111 432112657 357 605 III 2 n~ bullEHOq 1a ----------
521iwSSSS5 15S911111111 25Jot 5lll)~Oll)il))I
31l527777R 4117277777~ iJl9166657
22C3627) -2H1157
357 2~95
6~5 11 61
-=====------middot--- -- -- middotmiddot-- --middot-llOl~L lS
DS
bull SS 15 SEA 11 SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
-(D -l Q 0 E J-
ffi 1 J-(J wa gtlt 0 Q--------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL (I
AGGREGATE
Figure D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-3~1 l49 SS-3H J86 SS-10 207 SS-30 176 SS-30 211
SS-15amp 132 SS-15amp l40 SS-151168 SS-l51 l91 ss-lSi 135 SS-15 162I I I CS-7 81 CMS-7 52 OS-7 42 CMS-7 60
llite Values with a amron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent
Figure D6 Newman-Keuls Ranking 2 Day 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi
D6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Table D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Contentr 10 psi
-EMULSION OUALITY LEVELcAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15
SEA
D A T A
325
271
l]JD
260
390
340
319
348
272
367
302
356
x s
CV
29S
38
128
285
35
124
365
35
97
334
21
62
320
67
21 0
329
38
116
ss 30 SEJ
0 A T A
282
310
337
255
303
374
362
307
318
308
289
329
x s
CV
296
20
67
296
58
196
339
50
148
335
39
116
313
7
23
309
28
92
C M s 7
D A T A
78
64
110
95
75
73
110
135
80
90
85
7
83
110
135
x s
CV
71
10
139
103
11
104
74
1
19
123
18
144
123
18
144
Table D8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus
A N O V ll
E 2- 3r39El11 3middotl8tB89 196 994 L19 44 44 5 178 q233024 3 57 6 CS 2 9111~7222223 4058 3611112 3 57577(13 357 6csbulla 11 611~ li9llll41115 ~16 ampll44445 S585579 443 833
_n_ sect 251l-illll41sectl41 -531 31i 11111 AS7121pound3 295 4 61 EJ 2 lt 115 $555555 227 521777 8 1994213 357 605 iampJ 2 170555555 15)277778 0770121 357 605 __ElJ 1324111ilJlilil4 5 208 bull 11Ul 11 bull 184922 2 95 4 ( 1
nan 11 19P73 SOOJIO~ 11111D833l33
middotmiddot-- =--=--=-==-===--c-=-c------_--=--ngtllllll
----------------------------------middot----
D7
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
traquo diams CMS - 7a ()
0--Gl ~- I J _J bull C 02 E I-z w J-(J w C
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATEmiddot
Figure D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HJGH lOW HJGH LOW HIGH LOW
I I I Iss-il51 298 1SS-31l 295 ss-]5~ 365 SS-30 335 1middot SS-15 320 SS-15 329
SS-301 296 SS-l5amp 235 SS-301 339 SS-15 334 SS-30 313 SS-30 309
CIIS--7 71 OS-7 103 CHS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123
t-bte Values with a armon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D8 Newman-Keuls Ranking Full Cure
Resilient Modulus 103 psi
D8
----- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D9 Density at Design Residue Content pcf
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
LOWHJGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH D l341 6 ll339 1347 1338 1523ss 1500A T 1356 133S 1350 1333 1513 1497A
1~ x l351 l337 1349 1336 1518 1499 sSEA 07 02 02 04 07 02
05 02 02 03CV 05 01
D 1362 1352 1370 1355 1545A 1520ss T 1371 1355 1361 1354 1550 1525
30 A
x 1367 1354 1366 1355 1548 1523 SEA 02 06s 06 01 04 04
05 02 05 01 02 02CV D 1373 1375 1380 1370 1537 1543AC T 1385 1375 137 9 1360 1535 1545AM x 1379 1375 1380 1365 1536 1544s s 09 oo 01 07 01 017
06 ooCV 01 05 01 01
Table DlO ANOVA Summary Density
N O V ll -----middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddotmiddot-- -- --------- -------middot --------------- ----- - - -
smI=pound DF ss F F05 F01
pound 2 2738H9 310369445 153505090 357 605 ~ 2 2273iWlllbull38B9 11369544445 5530 gt35704 357 lj -~5 ~ 1 11-6~2SilllaquollO 12 602500C 524057772 443 R33 n I tpoundlUll11 Jl-69lll45 2-324621e 2 95 4 61 E 2 3131poundpound57 15i5S33J 7 7537nB 357 li os lJ 2 ltClfltSf-57 0433334 21458C6 357 s 05 n~ Iii )l216poundfi6lii 9556667 47372764 295 451
EHJii 11l 3 bull nsilraquorn 2019444
------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -- -middotmiddot-middot ----- -middotmiddot - middot-------
35 23611rJC556
D9
1 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
-0 a gt1 ()
z
diams CMS-7
w C
120 SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure D9 Density at Design Residue Coritent
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
OS--7 1379 aS-7 ]375 IClIS-7 l380 IOlS-7 1365 ISS-30 1548 CMS-7 1544ISS-30~ 1367 SS--30~ J354 SS-30~ 1366 SS-30~ 1355 CMS-7 1536 SS-30 1523
SS-15bull 1351 ss-is~ 1337 SS-15bull 1349 ss-1s 1336 SS-15 1518 SS-15 1499
NJte Values with a omron vertical lme are not statistically different
Figure D10 Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcf
DlO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
Table D11 Air Voids at Design Residue Content
-EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
107
)5
9 10l
91
99
79
99
80
83
8 bull5
84
I s
ICY
U)
Ill 9
B4
10l
03
28
95
06
60
89
14
159
82
02
26
85
01
08
ss 30j
SEA
D A T A
90
93
92
85
92
96
86
84
66
67
74
73
x s
CV
92
02
23
89
05
56
94
03
30
85
01
l 7
67
01
ll
74
01
10
C M s 7
D A T A
77
73
62
61
73
62
63
71
71
65
48
55
x s
CV
75
03
38
62
O~l
12
68
08
u5
67
06
96
68
04
62
52
05
96
Table Dl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids
A ll O V A --e--ee-ee=-==== -- -- middot- -- --- middot- - ------- - middot-----middot----middot ______ __________ ---middot- ----- - ------------- -
iiUEllilE ss ~s F F01
E 45111Hoiii6pound 225l08333 812457541 357 605 ll 1~-lilliillt~~)Q 7930)000 2519405 357 505 IJJ 11 ili$6J4141~ 16469444 59230768 443 8 33 E1 2J53ll3ll -5S5333 4 -2 bull 11755245 295 4 6 1
EJ 15672223 bull 783pound 112 2~131820 357 605 I 21022223 bull 1li 1112 bull 3$35365 357 cs
EampJ 2971111ll J27778 26713286 2 95 4t1 iElllllHgt 5cgt~SiIJOIgt -2790556
-middot--middot ------- --middot - middotmiddot- -middotmiddot--middot-- --3li
D11
11 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
-l
a - 8
-a 0 7gt tc ltI 6
5
4 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dll
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot
middot HIGH LOW
SS-]5amp JlJl ISS-ll5~ 10l
ISS-301 92 SS-311l11 89ICMS-7 75 CS-7 fi2
Air Voids at Design Residue Content
FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
=- 95 I I ISS-15 89 SS-15 82 SS-15 8 5
SS-31 94 SS-30 85 SS-30 74ICMS-7 68
OS-7 68 CMS-7 67 SS-30 67 CMS-7 52
Ngtte Values with a ommn vertical line are not statistically dilferent
Figure D12 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids
Dl2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
middotmiddotEMULSION OUAUTY LEVEL
~- AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
48S 3g_g
295
middot 32 8
439
396
397
418
288
307
223
307
X s
CV
443
64
144
312
23
75
418
30
73
408
15
36
298
13
45
265
59
224
ss 3Wo SEA
0 A T A
400
403
367
283
342
411
392
262
310
32-4
292
236
x s
CV
402
02
05
325
59
183
377
49
130
327
92
281
31 7
10
31
264
40
150
C M s 7
D A T A
235
235
130
120
213
233
150
200
350
350
250
250
x s
CV
235
00
00
125
07
57
223
14
63
175
35
202
350
oo oo
250
00
oo
Table Dl4 ANOVA Swnrnary Stabilometer Value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------A N O V A
---------~----------middot------middot-middotmiddot-- -middot--middot--middotmiddot--middot------ bull middotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middot middot------middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot--- --middotmiddot ---_ -- middotmiddot-middotmiddot-- -- - - - -----ss r r05 r01
2 1 i 7~ Sbull1lfipound5161S 5879033333 332259711 357 605 I 2 igtS895QGDgt 279475000 195117552 357 ~os i ll ~l ~
11 111 2 2
l~illflll1111111 7DS nll3331
1~il])2222] 755J5556
~ 111 8 11111~=-- 10115 834 71011111
37 7502778
275769841 128178912
U938281 251M309
11113 295 357 357
833 4f1 605 605
Ell~ 14middot 3~53lt1$1H 116340278 5750926 295 461 fElilli U 25977~illlllCII~ 1111H72222
------------------------ bull- ~bull OOM---bullbullbullbull- - bull------_________ _
roru
013
w J ltC gt a w 1-w E 0 I-m ltC Ishyen
SBH SBL FH FL
bull SS 15 SEA 5S 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-)Sll 441_3 SS-l 325I SS-JSi 4131 SS-15 40 8 CMS-7 350 SS-15 265
SS-30 402 SS-JSa 31_2I ISS-30~ 377 SS-30~ 327 SS-30 317 SS-30 264
CS-7 235 CMS-7 125 ISS-15 298 CMS-7 250
Nlte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D14 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value
Dl4
-------------------
Table Dl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
ii3
ii2
l7-1
ilJD3
236
76
308
62
112
85
222
180
l s
CY
63
lJ1
10
Jl39
SlJ
363
l56
J13
725
185
174
940
99
19
194
201
30
148
ss 30 SEA
0 A T A
229
306
266
187
78
130
260
136
157
212
186
164
x s
CV
268
55
204
227
56
247
104
37
354
198
88
443
185
39
211
175
16
89
C M s 7
D A T A
80
82
190
180
122
192
245
235
130
120
170
180
x s
CV
81
l
18
185
7
38
157
50
315
240
7
30
125
7 57
175
7
40
Table Dl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value
--------------------middot--------------------------------------------------------------A N O V A
-=====-=-=--=-- ===== ss
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1i712 7222222 83563611111 226671165 357 605 I 2 l~12 lllllliilllllllB9 71144441145 129864 357 605 ~ 1l 251116l 144141llllj 2ti-~H~bull4dimiddot4 4 44 5 71775602 443 833 n l4 37511ll 777JTI7JJ S395bull J 9 ~4middot444 2548 5405 295 4 e 1 poundJ 2 72lllS3SlffiifISlmiddot9 3fi22f9111114UU 9026921 357 6C5
n 2 1 iSigt555S
11321Bl 111111I 117lIT177778
33220277778 1277032 9~11333
357 297
605 461
Eliflll 11 f15357 tlOilOOibull 3ilf65Jgt)oo
---------------------------------------middot-------------------------------------------
D15
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7w
J lt(
gt a w Jshyw I 0-() w
8
O--------r-----r-----------r----r-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
c 1
Figure D15
SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW
SS-3(1JlS 268
81IOS-7
ISS-]5i 63 SS-lSl 139
Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 240 SS-30 185 SS-15 201
SS-lSi 155 SS-30l 198 CMS-7 125 SS-30 175
SS-JOi 104 SS-151 185 SS-15 99 CMS-7 175
Note Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Dl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value
D16
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D17 Swell at Design Residue Content in
EfAULSEON
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDI NO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH lOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 s~
D A T A
048 -
0413
06S
069
on
005
006
008
-025 045
005
004
004
005
009
014
Jt s
CY
HS
0010
000
D68
-003
45
bull 006
002
241
035
010
286
004
001
133
009
005
483
ss 30 SEA
D A T A
023
023
020
063
066
055
000
ooo
008
031
023
028
000 000 003
ooo
001
000
x s
CV
022
002
79
061
006
93
003
005
1732
027
004
148
oin
002
1732
ooo
001
1732
C M s 7
D A T A
000
ooo
000
004
002
001
ooo
ooo
000
003
000
ooo 000 000 ooo
ooo
ooo
000
x s
CV
000
ooo
ooo
002
002
655
ooo
ooo
ooo
001
002
1732
ooo
ooo
ooo
ooo
ooo
000
Table D18 ANOVA Summary Swell ( Transformed Data)
A N O Y A
E 2 _1025326 0912663 2353471(154 329 532 -Amiddot middotmiddot2 1366452 0683226 1761825136 329 532 0 1 0368219 03613219 949521081 1114 7116
EA 11 04627$7 0115697 298345558 266 396 -EQ- 2-- --006-903G- -0(134515-middot -8-9003553 middot3l9 -S-32 A) 2 0150358 ~0075179 193863014 329 532 UO 4 0083986 0020997 54143375 26 396
-ERRORmiddot 36 0139606middot 0003178
-TOTIIL 53 --446-576-11
D17
05 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
04
z -J
J w IJJ
SBH SBL
diams CMS - 7
~oo
_02
01
FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dl7 Swell at Design Residue Content
SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-ll51 ii-IS SS-]5i il68 SS-15 a006 SS-15 bull 035 SS-15 004 SS-15 009I I I I SS-3Cli 022 SS-301 061 ISS-301 003 SS-30 bull 027 ISS-30 bull 001 ISS-30 bull 000
ClS-7 000 CIS-7 002 OS-7 000 OIS-7 001 CMS-7 000 CMS-7 000
NJte Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D18 Newman-Keuls Ranking Swell in
D18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
Table Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSl10N
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOWHIGH 0 156 48 175 229 2lO 125ss A ll5 60 20l ll7 228 120T 13_g 4e 170 132 212 130A15 i 137 52 182 200 2l 7 125 smiddotSEA 2l 37 l7 30 lO 05
1middot5]CY 133 92 148 46 40 D 98 106 lll 76 2l 0 lllAss 203 109 76 5l 235 95T ll3 85 63 59 233 125
30 A
x 138 100 83 62 226 llOSEll s 57 l3 25 l3 l4 l5
412 131 298 206 62 136CV D 2lO 202 185 98 330 240A 220 87 18l 88 345 200C T 216 138 223 77 338 2lOAM x 215 142 196 88 338 217s
5805 23 lls 08 2l7
23 405 ll8 120 22 96CV
Table D20 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Stabilorneter Value
N O V A
-------middot------------------------------------------------------ ---------------DF -$ -F os- r01
pound 2 5919875926 2l59917963 39C147075fl 329 53 2 690 i1111pounda$11 iii 345 022110111 US51521111 329 5 32 Ill 1 763129-i296 763 1296 296 100671B132 414 7 U6
Ea t93 11171111]J)7lll 1007863519 1329576P8 266 391bullIEill -2 middot -E~ti35~259 -23middot0-H9fgt29 C-~6522- middot3 29 532 AO 2 S3amp11171t1137ll 11192351$5 55305370 329 532 El s1111i1r1075 135268519 17~qq579 266 396bullmiddotDll~t 311i 27239~333~ 7 5903711)111
53
--------------------------------------------------------middot-----------------------
D19
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA0)
gt diams CMS - 7 l I
a w 30fshyw E 0 J 2-en ltC Ishyen 10
SBH SSL FH FL GRH GRL01amp---------------------------_
AGGREGATE
Figure Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
middotHtGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
QS-1 235 CS-7 142 196 SS-15 200 CMS-7 338 CMS-7 217GS-
Iss-3H uaI I I ISS-3Qi lilG SS-15i ]S2 IOMS-7 88 SS-30 22~ SS-15 125
SS-151 137 ss-i5~ 52 SS-30~ 83 SS-30 62 SS-15 217 SS-30 110
fute Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent
Figure D20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
D20
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Table D2l MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
-------_cEMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
ss 1 sa
D A T A
x s
HIGH
Ul3 ~ JlU
43
64
IOW
~ TWlI ~
--
H1GH
159 1-43 126
143
17
LOW
123 187
60
123
64
HIGH
130 179 153
154
25
LOW
120 104 143
122
20
CV D A5S T A30 x
SEA s
171
139 88
104
110
26
-98 91 -95
4
116
114 116
69
100
27
515
TWT TWT TWT
--
159
111 101 15~
122
28
160
83 65 63
70
11
CV D AC T AM x5 s
7 CV
236
141 79 52
91
46
503
37
185 60 63
103
71
695
267
125 201
96
141
54
386
-192 164 126
161
33
206
23l
131 130 120
127
6
48
157
72 230
76
126
90
715
Too weak to test
Table D22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
SOO~e 55- -f middotFmiddot OS- F01
pound 2 19956 G31tl3Tt 99780165185 52791162 329 532 -1 2- 223ii~ 92592~-~ middot111544629630 -59015431 3middot29 5 32 J 1 n21lliiilliEiiii~ 1middot112106656666 75185029 414 746 lEJ Ill 32il76711ltCl~lll9l 132191851852 43485622 2euro6 396 ~ 2- ~373hllllllllllllllqSmiddot iiilfgtamp 1222-223- -3bull6middot3300811 -3 29 532 1i 2 1S011Hil12 75i0555556 bull ~397100 329 532 Eli
-a~llt-Iii
36 511J7777777
middot5B11113BB333 12799444444 129e l9 25 92 6middot
5771861 266 396
D21
bull SS 15 SEA U) SS 30 SEA gt diams CMS - 7E I
a w J-~ 200 0 en w5 100 0
SBH SBL FH FL AGGREGATE
GRH GRL
Figure D21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINO FRESNO
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 126SS-15 154]03 JCMS-7 161106-7 rmm SS-15 122CMS-7 127SS-30amp 95 ltMgt-7 ]Aj_ SS-15 123
SS-30 70
t-bte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
SS-30 122SS-151 93 SS-l51 fflT SS-30amp 100 SS-30 TWT
Figure D22 Ne-wman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
D22
Table D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW
ss 15 SEA
ss 30 SEA
C M s 7
HIGH D bullbullmiddot 979 715A middot 1143 569T A 1047 599
X - - 1056 - 628 s - - 82 - 77
CV - - 78 - 123
D 987 1474 548A T 907 1536 433 A 1447 615
x - - 947 1486 532 s - 57 46 92
CV - - 60 31 173 D 642 102 597 588 301A T 620 426 369 60l 263 A 774 662 470 290 3q_3
x 679 397 479 493 31 9
s 83 281 114 176 67
CV 123 709 239 357 21 0
1285 1353 1493
1377
106
77
627 72 2 634
661
53
80
238 284 22 7
250
30
121
Specimen swelled during soak could not ne tested Specimen disintegrated during testing
D23
300
E CJgt -200 en
en 0 J
z0 middot cii 100 lt( cc CD lt(
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
01--------r----T----J-----r----r SBH FH FL GRH GRL
middotAGGREGATE
Figure D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content
D24
APPENDIX E
FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL DESIGNS
Table El
Thickness T in Inches to Satisfyl
Tensile Strain Requirements (Reference 3)
Subirade l~octulus psi 30~0 6000 12000 30oco
Jverage Ann~abullAir erlerature J degF lt40 40-55 55-65 gt65 40 40-55 55-65 gt65 lt40 40-55 55-651gt65 lt4 0 40-55 55-65 gt65
T~affic EALbull 10bull
IllIf psi 50000 4 9 66 7 8 91 37 50 5e 66 2 26 28 29 2 2 2 2
1000~0 37 5 3 62 12 27 40 47 53 2 21 25 26 2 2 2 2
300000 21 J4 4 3 51 2 28 31 middot3 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
600000 2 24 3 2 39 2 2 2 _2 28 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2middot 2 2 2 290JCOO 2 2 26 33 2 2 2 22 2 2 2
Traffic EAL= 10s
trJ MR psi bull 50000 83 ll5 139 165 70 97 112 127 54 1-3 83 93 2 3 27 28 29 f-J
42 58 69 78 2 25 27 27100000 63 90 108 129 54 76 91 105
3COOOO 4o 58 73 8 3 3 51 60 73 24 39 ~8 56 2 2 20 22
600000 28 45 55 67 21 37 47 55 2 21 36 44 2 2 2 2
900000 21 37 4 7 57 2 30 39 48 2 21 29 37 2 I 2 2 2
TraCf1c 2 ~AL a 10~ I ia psi bull 50000 130 161 216 2~ 116 16l 187 213 98 131 151 172 63 66 93 58
82 0100000 98 14) 171 203 68 126 152 176 75 106 125 142 52 7 3
3CCOOO 6o 91 11 3 139 55 82 101 122 4 7 69 86 102 31 49 59 59
e~oooo 46 68 86 106 ~o 60 76 94 3middot 3 52 64 i9 2 35 4 r 54
900~00 37 56 72 69 )2 51 63 80 24 4 3 5 4 67 2 28 3 8 ul Trarr1el EAL~ 10 7
la psi bull 50000 192 24 24 24 178 239 24 24 156 205 235 24 12l 153 165 17 3 I
24 24 228 24 119 168 195 222 95 129 147 1s IlCOOCO 1~5 21 0 13 5 193
56 aa 10a 12 I-3CC000 aa 136 167 205 ~-3 12 156 186 74 11l 138 16~
I- l 6 a2 10060~ 1 ouo 6 4 100 125 156 59 92 ll 6 l~ 5 53 82 104 128
108 3 3 53 6 8 859ccooo 53 82 10 5 132 so 77 97 121 4 ~ 68 86
For asphalt volume Vb= 11 are air voids Va= 5 Use Figure El to correct thickness of other valuemiddots of Vb and Va
Table E2
Subsradlt Mcdulus psi
Thickness T in Inches to Satisfys Subgrade Strain Requirements (Reference 3)
6100 120003000 300CC
tr N
A~erage A~nual Ar Te11perature degF
Traffic EALbull 10bull
~IP psi 50000a
100000
300000
600000
900000
Traffic EAL 10 5
MR psibull 50000
lC0000
300000
600000
900000
Tra~~lc EAL c 1c6
MR psibull 50000
100000
300000
600POO
900000
Trafficz EALbull 10 7
MRt psibull 50000
100000
300000
600000
900000
lt40
55
55
55
55
55
81
81
81
81
81
115
115
115
115
115
155
155
155
155
155
40-55
83
60
55
55
55
121
87
81
Bl
Bl
168
123
11
115
ll5
226
165
155
155
155
55-65 gt65 lt40
108 115 46
73 82 46
55 55 46
5_ 45
55 55 46
145 165 69
106 120 69
a1 81 69
81 81 69
81 81 69
201 224 98
14B 165 98
115 115 98
115 115 98
115 115 98
24 24 1)6
199 222 135
15 155 136
155 155 136
155 155 136
40-55
10
50
46
46
46
103
74
69
69
69
150
108
98
98
9B
204
150
135
136
136
55-65 G5 lt40
83 93 30
61 70 30
46 46 30
45 46 30
46 46 30
124 139 55
91 102 55
69 69 55
69 69 55
69 69 55
173 193 83
130 147 83
98 98 83
98 98 83
98 98 83
239 24 120
179 199 120
136 136 120
136 136 120
135 136 120
40-55
4
3~
30
30
30
83
60
55
55
55
122
90
83
83
83
17 5
130
120
middot12 o
120
55-65 gt65 lt~O
62 69 25
46 53 25
30 30 25
30 30 25
30 30 25
9 106 29
82 29i 2 middot 55 55 29
55 55 29
55 55 29
144 15S 60
108 12l 60
83 83 60
83 83 60
83 83 6 0
205 226 90
155 112 90
120 120 90
120 120 90
120 120 90
40-55
31
25
25
25
25
52
30
29
29
29
86
65
60
60
60
127
98
90
90
90
55-65 bull65
33 35
29 3c
25 25 I 25 25 i 25 2s
51 67
47 52
29 29
29 29
29 29
95 10
76 85
60 I 6C
6C i 6o 50
14bull 3 14
112 126
90 90
90 90
90 90
Tj In Tc In 24 2 22
20
18
16 3
14
12 4
~ 10 Va+ vb 5
099
8 08 6
077 7 06
6 805
9045 1003
4 12
14
3 16
18
20
22 2 24
Figure El Correction of Pavement Design Thickness for Air Voids and
Asphalt Content of Mix (Reference 3)
E3
-------
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000 psi
MAAT 55- 65 F-Ul 400 CL
C) 0 300 (J) J
~ 200 0 ~
I- 100z w J-(J) 0+----------------------C w 0 2 4 6 8 middot10 12
THICKNESS IN
1X104 EAL
1X105EAL
Figure E2 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
M-AAT )65 F- -~---Ul 400 1x104 EALCL
CW)
0 300 (J) J 200C 0 ~
-~ 100 w -J -(J) 0w 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a
THICKNESS IN
1X105EAL
Figure E3 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 6000 psi MAAT = )65F
s
E4
w 400 c
()
0 300 () - 200 Cl 0 E
~ 100 w J-
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT 56-65 F
1x10 EALI 4
I 1X105 EAL
w o~---------------------r-w 1 2 3 4a
THICKNESS IN
Figure E4 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT )65F-w 400 4I 1X10 EALc () I 1X105EAL 0 300 I () I - I 200C I0 E I I- 100z w I-J I-() 0w 1 2 3 4c
THICKNESS IN~
Figure ES Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65Fs
ES
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
MAAT 55-65 F-en400 41X10 EALIC
(I) 1X105EAL middot 0
I I 300
en I J 200C 0
f-- 100z w J-en 0LU 2 4 6 8 10 14a
-THICKNESS IN
Figure E6 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
MmiddotAAT )65 F cn4oo I 1X104 EALa
(I) 1X105EAL 0 300
I I
en -I
~200 0 ~ 100 LU --en -I
0-1-----------------------LU 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a THICKNESS IN
Figure E7 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = )65F
E6
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT 55-65 F-u 400 41x10 EAL0
M 1x105EAL 0 T- 300 -en J 200C 0 E I- 100z w-J- en 0w C 0 middot1 2 3 4 middot5 6
THICKNESS IN
Figure E8 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000psi
M-AAT )65 F-en400
I --- - - ~- 1X104 EAL
C
a 1X105 EAL
0 I T- 300
I-en J
200 C 0 E
I- 100z w J-en 0w 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
THICKNESS IN
Figure E9 Thickness For Subgrade StrainRequirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65F
s
E7
Table E3
Thickness Requirements inches
= 6000 psi EAL= 1 X 104 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
MrT
l
CF Tc Ts
246000 34
64 37 43
300000 31
68 4middot 0 43
391000 27
lt 61 33 43
362000 28
64 31 43
260000 28
bull bull 61 35 43
333000 30
65 33 43
C M s 0
Mr Ti CF T Tc
s
259000 29
59 36 43
288000 32
bull 61 3 8 43
271000 32
59 39 43
339000 30
60 37 43
284000 32
59 40 43
365000 29
60 37 43
C M s 7
M T7
l
CF TTc
s
71000 55
65 60 43
103000 47 71
45 43
74000 54
67 53 43
123000 44 69
45 43
85000 52
65 54 43
123000 44
73 46 43
ss 15
M T7
l
CF T Tc s
298000 31
57 40 43
285000 32
59 38 43
365000 28
58 37 43
334000 30
61 36 43
320000 30
60 36 43
329000 30
61 36 43
ss 30
M T7
l
CF Tc Ts
296000 31
60 37 43
296000 31
62 36 43
339000 30
59 38 43
335000 30
bull 63 35 43
313000 31
65 34 43
309000 31
65 34 43
Ngtte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi TI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume middotTc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= llrickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
E8
Table E4
Thickness Requirements inches
Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
246000 68
64 74 70
300000 62 68
62 68
391000 55 61
65 68
362000 57 64
63 68
260000
57 bull 61
68 70
333000 59 65
65 68
C M s 0
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
259000 65 59
80 70
288000 63
bull 61 75 68
271000 64 59
78 70
339000 59 60
72 68
284000 63 59
78 68
365000 57 60
70 68
C M s 7
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
71000 100
bull 65 107 105
103000 90 bull 71
84 88
74000 100
67 102 104
123000 85 69
85 81
85000 95 65
102 97
123000 85 73
78 81
ss 15
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
298000 62 57
78 68
285000 63 59
76 68
365000 57 58
72 68
334000 59 61
72 68
320000 60 60
73 68
329000 59 61
70 68
ss 30
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
296000 62
60 74 68
296000 62
62 71 68
339000 59 59
72 68
335000 59
63 68 68
313000 60
bull 65 65 68
309000 60
65 65 68
1bte
M = Resilient mJdulus in psirf = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
E9
Table ES
Thickness Requirements inches 4
Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M Tdeg
J
CF T Tc
246000 40
64 46 45
300000middot 37 68
37 43
391000 33 61
38 43
362000 35
64 39 43
260000 39
61 45 45
333000 35
65 38 43
C M s 0
MT J
CF T Tc
s
259000 39 59
48 45
288000 38 61
middot4 6 44
271000 38 59
47 44
339000 35 60
43 43
284000 38 59
46 44
365000 35 60
43 43
C M s 7
M T7
J CF T Tc
s
71000 60 65
65 68
103000 52 71
48 64
74000 60 67
60 68
123000 50 bull 69 59 62
85000 58 65
63 67
123000 50 73
49 62
ss 15
M T7
J CF T Tc
s
298000 37 57
50 43
285000 38 59
48 44
365000 35 58
45 43
334000 35 61
43 43
320000 3 6
60 44 43
329000 37 61
45 43
ss 30
M T7
J CF TTc
s
296000 37 60
45 43
296000 37 62
43 43
339000 35 59
44 43
335000 35 bull 63
41 43
313000 36
65 39 43
309000 36
65 39 43
Nrte
M = Resilient nodulus in psiTI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T
5 = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El0
Table E6
Thickness Requirements inches
105E = 6000 psi EAL= 1 x psi MAAT = )65Fs
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
246000
79 64
87 70
300000
74 68
74 70
391000 69
61 81 70
362000 70
64 77 70
260000 77
61 90 70
333000 71
65 77 70
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 77
59 94 70
288000 75
61 90 70
271000 76
59 92 70
339000 71
60 87 70
284000 75
59 91 70
365000 69
60 85 70
C M s 7
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
71000 111
65 118 112
103000 103
middot11 95 98
74000 111
67 110 11l
123000 98
69 95 93
85000 109
65 119 109
123000 98
73 87 93
ss 15
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
298000 74 57
94 70
285000 7 5 59
94 70
365000 69 58
88 70
334000 7 1 middot 61
84 70
320000 72 60
87 70
329000 71 61
84 70
ss 30
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
296000 74
60 90 70
296000 74
62 86 70
339000 71 59
87 70
335000 71
63 82 70
313000 73
bull 65 78 70
309000 73
65 78 70
Note
M = Resilient midulus in psi11 = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness f9r tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade stram requirements inches
Ell
Table E7
Thickness Requirements inches4
= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
middot~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO -GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
246000 2 0
64 23 25
300000 20
68 2middot 0 25
391000 20
61 24 25
362000 20
64 23 25
260000 20
61 24 25
333000 20
65 22 25
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 20
59 25 25
288000 20
bull 61 24 25
271000 20
59 25 25
339000 20
60 25 25
284000 20
59 25 25
365000 20
60 25 25
C M s 7
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
71000 20
65 22 31
103000 20
middot71 20 29
74000 20
67 21 31
123000 20
69 20 28
85000 20
65 22 30
123000 20
73 20 28
ss M T7
l
298000 20
285000 20
365000 20
334000 20
320000 2 0
329000 20
15 CF T Tc
s
57 26 25
59 25 25
58 26 25
61 24 25
bull 60 25 25
61 24 2 i
ss 30
M T7
l
CF TTc
s
296000 20
60 25 25
296000 20
62 24 25
339000 20
59 25 25
335000 20
bull63 23 25
313000 20
65 22 25
309000 20
65 22 25
N)te
M = Resilient nodulus in psi middot T7 = Unrorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inchesct= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume T = Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T~ = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El2
Table E8
Thickness Requirements inches
Es= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s
M T7
l
246000 22
300000 20
391000 20
362000 20
260000 21
333000 20
s 0
CF T Tc
s
64 24 32
68 20 29
61 24 29
64 23 29
61 24 l 1
65 23 29
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 21 59
25 31
288000 21
bull 6J 24 30
271000 21 59
25 30
339000 20 60
25 29
284000
21 59
25 1 n
365000
20 60
25 2 q
C M
M T7
l
71000 27
103000 25
74000 27
123000 24
85000
26
123000
24 s 7
CF T Tc
s
65 28 53
71 24 45
bull 67 28 53
69
23 43
65
27 49
73
22 43
ss M T7
l
298000 20
285000 21
365000 20
334000 20
320000 20
329000 20
15 CF
TTc
s
57 27 29
59 26 30
58 27 29
61 24 29
60 25 29
61 24 2 q
ss 30
M r~i CF T Tc
s
296 ooomiddot 20 60
24 29
296000 20 62
23 29
339000 20 59
24 29
335000 20 63
23 29
313000 20 65
23 29
309000 20 65
23 29
i-krte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psiTf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade strain requirements inches
El3
Table E9
Thickness Requirements inches 4 = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
EMULSION __ QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
246000 20 64
23 25
300000 20 68
21 25
391000 20 61
24 25
362000 20 64
23 25
260000 20 61
24 25
333000 20 65
22 25
C M s 0
259000 20 59
26 25
288000 20
bull 61 middot24 25
271000 20 59
26 25
339000 20 60
25 25
284000 20 59
26 25
365000 20 60
25 25
C M s 7
MT7
1 CF T Tc
s
71000 20 65
22 58
103000 2~0 middotn
20 52
74000 20 67
21 58
123000 20 69
20 48
85000
20 65
22 57
123000
20 73
20 48
$$
15
MTdeg
1
CF T Tc
s
-298 000 20 57
27 25
285000 20 59
26 25
365000 20 58
26 25
334000 20 61
24 25
320000 2 0 60
25 25
329 000 20 61
24 25
ss 30
MT7
1
CF T Tc
s
296000 20 60
25 25
296000 20 62
24 25
339000 20 59
26 25
335000 20 63
23 25
313000 20 65
22 25
309000 20 65
22 25
tote
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot rf = Unagtrrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El4
Table ElO
Thickness Requirements inches 5E = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
s
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T--deg
J
CF T Tc
s
246000
24 64
27 31
300000
23 68
24 29
391000
22 61
25 29
362000
22 64
2_s 29
260000
26 61
31 30
333000
22 65
24 29
C M s 0
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s
259000 23
59 28 30
288000 23
bull 61 27 30
271000 23
59 28 30
339000 22
60 26 29
284000 23
59 28 30
365000 21
60 25 29
C M s 7
ss 15
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s M T--deg
J
CF T Tc
s
71000 28
bull 65 30 61
298000 23 57
25 29
103000 27
~ 71 27 52
285000 23 59
28 30
74000 28
bull 67 28 60
365000 22
58 28 29
123000 26
69 26 48
334000 22 61
25 29
85 000 28
65 31 58
320000 22
60 26 29
123000 26
73 24 48
329000 22 61
25 29
55
30
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s
296000 23
60 27 29
296000 23
62 27 29
339000 22 59
27 29
335000 22
63 25 29
313000 22
65 24 29
309000 23
65 25 29
tbte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot Tf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Ihickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
II11~~~1~~i~IIII 08860 ElS
110 RECOMMENDATIONS
111 This study has investigated the properties of paving mixtures containing several low quality aggregates and several types of emulsified binders Test methshyods and criteria used to design and assess mixture characteristics were those specified for hot-mix asphalt concrete in California An objective of the research study is to determine if solvent free emulshysified binders can be used in place of cutback asphalt binders Therefore in order to permit drawing of appropriate conclusions from the data presented in this report on the effectiveness of the emulsions studied for replacing cutback asphalts additional laboratory work is required It is suggested that properties and characteristics of mixtures containing the project aggregates and cutshyback asphalts be determined The study should evalshyuate the same properties considered in this study Determination of mixture characteristics using cutshyback binders would permit direct comparisons between the cutback and emulsified binder systems and the drawing of more definite conclusions Additionally a study which would determine properties of mixtures containing hot-mixed asphalt cement would be of aid in evaluating results
112 After completion of the additional laboratory studshyies if results so indicate it is recommended that several field experimental studies using aggregates ranging in quality from low to high with solvent free emulsified asphalt binders be undertaken Projects should be constructed in several climatic regions in California (wet and arid) and should include control sections containing both cutback and if possible hot-mixed asphalts Proper labshyoratory mixture designs construction control and field monitoring of results and performance should be used Results of these experiments should proshyvide indications of performance of the various mixtures in actual use
113 Results of this study indicate that mixtures conshytaining the SEA binders are detrimentally affected by moisture to a greater degree than with standard emulsions However performance of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions may be adequate in arid regions Therefore it is recommended that in order
94
to further investigate the usefulness of paving mixshytures containing the SEA emulsions that field experimental test sections using the SEA emulsions be constructed and evaluated$
It is strongly suspected that the moisture vapor susceptibility of the solvent free asphalt emulsion mixes evaluated herein could be reduced by a slight modification of the emulsion formulations This possibility should be evaluated
95
References
1 Request For Proposals Investigation Into The Nature Of Emulsified Asphalts Compatible With California Local Aggregates And Substitution Of Sulfur For Asphalt In Aqueous Emulsified Systems California Air Resource Board Research Division Sacramento Calishyfornia March 1980
2 American Society for Testing and Materials 1981 Annual Book of Standards Part 15 Road Paving Bituminous Materials Travelled Surface Characterisshytics Philadelphia PA 1981
3 Interim Guide to Full-Depth Asphalt Paving Using Varshyious Asphalt Mixes The Asphalt Institute Pacific Coast Division PCD-1 January 1976
4 Kennepahl GJA Logan A and Bean D C Conshyventional Paving Mixes with Sulfur-Asphalt Binders Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975
5 Deme Imants Processing of Sand-Asphalt-Sulfur Mixes Proceedings AAPT Volume 43 1974
6 A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual The Asphalt Instishytute Manual Series No 19 MS-19) March 1979
7 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Use of Cutback Asphalt US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Waste Management Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park North Carolina October 17 1977
8 Highway Chemicals Newsletter Armak Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois Fall 1981
9 Bitumils Mix Manual Chevron USA Asphalt Division January 1977
10 Asphalt Pavement Engineering Wallace Hugh A and Martin J Rogers McGraw Hill Book Company New York 1967
11 Spahr J D The Use of Emulsified Asphalt in Conshystruction and Maintenance Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975
96
12 Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design Asphalt Emulsions Volume 4 1977
13 Dybalski J N 11 The Chemistry of Asphalt Emulsions Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D C January 1976
14 Beagle C w Deflection and Performance of Deep Lift Asphalt Emulsion Base Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976
15 Meier w J Asphalt Emulsion Construction on the Navajo Reservation Twenty-Fifth Annual Arizona Conshyference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 22-23 1976
16 Kallas B F and Shock J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Find Report - Parts I and
11II Research Report 77-1 The Asphalt Institute November 1977
17 Shook J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Analysis of Performance Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976
18 Wimberly C M Emulsified Asphalt Mixes in Arizona Proceedings 24th Annual Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 17-18 1975
19 Izalt J O Galloway B M and Saylock D SandshyAsphalt-Sulfur Pavement Experimental Project Highway US 77 Kennedy County Texas Texas Transportation Institute April 1977
20 McBee w c and Sullivan T A Direct Substitution of Sulfur for Asphalt In Paving Materials 11 Report of Investigations 8303 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines 1978
21 Ludwig A C Gerhardt B B and Dale JM Materials and Techniques for Improving the Engineering Properties of Sulfur Report No FHWA-RD-80-023 Fedshyeral Highway Administration June 1980
22 Jiminez R A and Stakes K J Effects of Heat and Air on the Viscosity of Sulfur-Asphalt Mixtures Preshysented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies San Diego California February 16-18 1981
97
23 Chehovits J G and Anderson D A Upgrading of Marginal Aggregates for Improved Water Resistance of Asphalt Concrete Transportation Research Record 762 pages 46-52 1981
24 Rosner JC and Chehovits J G Highway Binder Materials From Modified Sulfur-Water Emulsionsn Report No FHWARD-82035 Federal Highway Administration November 1981
25 Standard Specifications State of California Department of Transportation January 1978
26 Applied Linear Statistical Models Neter I and Wasserman w Richard D Irwin Inc Homewood Illinois 1974
27 Burr I W and Foster LA A Test For Equality of variances Mimeograph Series No 282 Statistics Department Purdue University Lafayette Indiana 1972
28 Applied Statistical Methods Burr I W Academic Press Inc New York 1974
29 Parr W K Field Observations of the Behavior of Bituminous Pavements As Influenced By Moisture 11 ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 3-16--I959
30 Rice JM Relationship of Aggregate Characteristics to the Effect of Water on Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 17-34 1959
31 Lettman R P and Johnson D L 11 Pressure Induced Stripping in Asphaltic Concrete Highway Research Record 340 pages 13-28 1970
32 Waller F H Jr Emulsion Mix Design Methods An Overview 11 Transportation Research Record 754 1980
33 Design of Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures Report R6-350(74) US Forest Service 1974
34 11Mix Design Procedure For Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Pavement FHWA Region 10 Office of Federal Highway Projects
98
35 Darter M I Ahlfield S R Wilky P L and Wasill R G Development of Emulsified Asphalt Aggregate Cold Mix Design Procedure Research Report 505-5 Department of Civil Engineering University of Illinois 1978
36 A A Gadallah L E Wood and E J Yoder A Suggested Method for the Preparation and Testing of Asphalt-Emulsion-Treated Mixtures Using Marshall Equipment Proceedings AAPT Volume 46 1977
37 Marshall Stability Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois
38 Jiminez R A Final Report-Phase I Asphalt Emulsion Treated Aggregates University of Arizona Research Report HPR-1-13(150) January 1977
39 George K P Interim Report on Criteria for Emulshysified Asphalt Stabilization of Sandy Soils Univershysity of Mississippi for Mississippi State Highway Department October 1976
40 Fong G K Mix Design Methods for Base and Surface Courses Using Emulsified Asphalt A State-of-the-Art Report Report No FHWA-RD-78-113 Federal Highway Administration October 1978
41 Schmidt R J A Practical Method for Measuring the Resilient Modulus of Asphalt-Treated Mixes Highway Research Record 404 1972
42 Manual of Test Volume 2 State of California Department of Transportation Transporation Laboratory Third Edition 1978
43 Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete Manual Series No 2 (MS-2) The Asphalt Institute March 1979
99
-
APPENDIX A
OPTIMUM FLUIDS AT COMPACTION DATA
-
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table Al
Percent Residue
631 631 631
702 702 702
595 595 595
678 678 678
689 689 689
645 645 645
Fluids at Compaction Data css-o
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
467 367 216
1098 998 847
571 413 360
1273 1115 10 62
455 370 341
1050 965 936
590 450 400
1268 1128 1078
492 183 109
1181 872 798
404 311 139
1049 956 784
Dry Density
(pcf)
1304 1337 1347
1283 1326 1306
133l 1310 9 1317
1328 1295 1304
1404 1529 154 1
1429 1466 1462
Al
css-o CSS-0HIGH QUALITY155- DRY LOW QUALITYbull SAN BERNARDINO 1551
bull SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO 150-I I 150 FRESNObull GRANITEROCK bull GRANITEROCK
I ~
145 LoPT=B5 145 () () - -0 0
~140 gt1401 L- 0 PT= 85 OPT=100gt-i
N Cl) OPT=100 Cl)
DRYZ 135 Z 135w w Cl Cl
amp130 amp130 Cl 0
125 125
120 I i I I i I i I I I 120 I I J I I i I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure Al Fluids at Compaction Figure A2 Fluids at Compaction High Quality Aggre-gate CSS-0 Low Quality CSS-0
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A2
Percent Residue
605 605 605
704 704 704
595 595 595
695 695 695
556 556 556
604 604 604
Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-0
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
4 16 316 183
1021 921 788
494 389 262
1198 1093
966
529 392 360
1124 987 955
519 479 301
1214 1174
996
284 187 124
840 743 680
319 256 165
923 860 769
Dry Density
(pcf)
1331 131 6 1316
1305 1320 1313
1282 1313 1312
1321 1298 1279
1478 1479 1463
1452 1463 1453
A3
155 CMS-0 HIGH QUALITY
150~ DRY bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
145 bull GRANITEROCK72_ OPT=90 0 0
~140gt-ii OPT=105i Cl)
Z 135 w 0
gt- D~0 130 middot 0
125 [OPT100
120 I i I i i I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A3 Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-0
155] 150
0 1451 0
~140gt- Cl)
Z 135 w 0
fc130 0
125
120 I 6
CMS-0
LOW QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
bull GRANITEROCK
v[A OPTf90
pound 0 PT12DoOPTr110
7 I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A4 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-0
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A3
Percent Residue
769 769 769
746 746 746
595 595 595
714 714 714
570 570 570
587 587 587
Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-7
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
460 391 294
1229 1160 1063
573 436 301
13 19 1182 1047
513 380 2 57
1108 975 852
513 404 334
1227 1118 1048
231 170 080
801 740 650
263 146 109
850 733 6096
Dry Density
(pcf)
1329 1377 1376
1335 135l 134 2
1357 1333 1342
1299 1317 1308
1519 1523 1498
1503 1517 1514
AS
CMS-7 155-- HIGH QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNOlSO~ nPT80 145
0 -0 -140 middot gt-
r t deg Cl)
Z 135 w Cl
fi130 Cl
125-1
120 I 6
GRANITEROCK
~OPT=105
IJ
I 7
I I i I i I 8 9 10 11 12 13
TOTAL FLUIDS
I 14
I 15
Figure AS Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-7
155
150
145
0 -0
gt--140
t Cl)
Z 135 w Cl
fc 130 Cl
125
120 I 6
CMS-7 LOW QUALITY
C bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
GRANITEROCKOPT 80
~OPT105
~
tos i I I i J i i I I 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A6 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-7
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A4
Percent Residue
765 765 765 765 765 765
815 815 815 815 815 815
765 765 765
817 817 817 817 817 8el7
574 574 574
738 738 738 738 738 738
Fluids at Compaction Data SS 15 SEA
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
563 426 315 580 346 178
1328 1191 1080 1345 1111
943
595 418 309 599 256 137
14 10 1233 1124 1414 1071 952
600 440 356
1365 1205 1121
683 541 418 629 457 283
1500 1358 1235 1446 1274 1100
374 247 128
948 821 702
451 301 175 435 186 073
1189 1039
913 1173
924 811
Dry Density
(pcf)
1289 1319 1335 1286 1331 1332
1278 1314 1315 1276 1304 1299
1281 1325 1313
1259 1290 1303 1275 1292 1294
1450 1485 1482
1428 1459 1468 1437 1465 1465
A7
bull bull
SS 15 SEA 155 HIGH QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot
150 FRESNO
bull GRANITEROCK
145
0 0 -
OPT=75
-_ gt=140 I-ii OPT100co C)
z 135 w _--0PTr1200
gt-0 130--0
125
120 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A7 Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 15 SEA
SS 15 SEA LOW QUALITY155
bull SAN BERNARDINO-
FRESNO 150
bull GRANITEROCK 145
~-0 0 LOPT=80a140gt-t Cf)
Z135 w r-OPT=105 0
gt-0 130 -~middot 0
OPT120J 125
120 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure AB Fluids at Compaction Low Quality SS 15 SEA
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table AS
Percent Residue
688 688 688
722 722 722 722 722 722
680 680 680 680 6 80 680
726 726 7 26 726 726
510 510 510
596 596 596 596 596 596
Fluids at Compaction Data SS 30 SEA
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
595 468 150
1283 1156
838
645 438 267 660 566 440
1367 1160
989 1382 1288 1162
650 531 432 629 422 332
1330 1211 1112 1309 1102 1012
767 614 443 547 370
1493 1340 1169 1273 1096
413 300 167
923 810 677
468 3 46 191 485 258 096
1064 942 787
10 ~ 81 854 692
Dry Density
(pcf)
1299 1337 1332
1286 1319 1324 1281 1302 1326
129l 1315 1333 1294 1333 131 5
1259 1278 1322 1294 1313
1464 1509 1496
1435 1472 1499 1426 1487 1476
A9
SS 30 SEASS 30 SEA LOW QUALITY
155 HIGH QUALITY 1551 bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddotbull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO
FRESNO 150150-I -middotmiddot-- -bull --middotmiddot I ~ t -- a GRANITEROCK a GRANITEROCK
145145
~-bull80 0 --0 00 ~140~140
J-gt- gt-~ I- = OPT=100 Cl)0 Cl) [Ij 135Z 135
lJJ Cl
gt- ~1300 130 middot ClCl ( 0
OPT=110 125~ OPT=115125
120-t----~--------------r---120 I l J J J I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 156 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS TOT AL FLUIDS
Figure A9 Fluids at Compaction Figure AlO Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 30 SEA Low Quality SS 30 SEA
-~
i
APPENDIX B
MIXTURE DESIGN DATA
TABLE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality css-o Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absortied Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
lhit Weight pcf
StabiJcneter Value
~iareter Value
Jesilient -bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
500
----------
40
u 30 ltgt
ffi 20 w ~10
m lt
o
w l 400 lt gt a w t 300 0 iii ~ 200 8
100 12
10111
ui 0
i5 8gt lt
6
4
50
21740
24488
112
194
100
400
1357
375
197
117
345
60
21823
24163
97
199
100
500
1362
330
207
134
271
70
21772
23853
87
208
100
600
1359
272
193
118
260
Iesign 7 0
87
208
100
600
1359
272
193
118
260
24
22d c lt i
20i
= 0 i5
18 gt
16
140
138 - a
~136 z w 0
134
132
bull 500 a
0 400 uil 300 0
~ 200 zi 100 iii w a
--
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE CONTENT Jo (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Bl
TABLE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residue 0intent 50 60 70 Dsian 7 o
Bulk Siecipoundic Gravity 21804
llleoretical Specipoundic Gravity 24280
Air Voids 102
VMA 192
Absorbed Asphalt 063
Efpoundective Asphalt 437
Unit Weight pf 1361
Stabilcirieter Value 427
Cbhesicireter Value 352
Fesilielt Mxlulus 103psi
2-day 85
middotFinlJ 355
50
40
_ gt a 30 w w
~ 20 10
500
300
200
100
8
6
4
l 400 gt
~ w 0
~ 8
12
_ 10
= 0 gt
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
21863 21992
23964 23660
88 71 71
197 200 200
063 063 063
537 637 637
1364 1372 1372
363 313 313
292 234 234
63 83 83 429 232 232
24
22
ci i
20i
= = 0 gt
18
16
138
p6 ~ Q
134 a w
o 132
130
500 Q -
o 400 --3 300 0 ~-~ 200 a ~ 100 w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COtlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
B2
TABLE B3 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllroretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
~fective Asphalt
Unit Weight middotCf
Stabilareter VaJue
Cbhesiareter VaJue
Resilient l-bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
so
11140 gt o30 IU w ~20
m
10
w l 400 gt 0
~ 0 ~ 200 8
100
14
12 11-
In Q
ho C
8
6
50 60 70 Dsi9 7 O 21308 21729 21595 24562 24235 23922
132 103 97 97 210 202 215 215 113 113 113 113 387 487 587 587
1329 1356 1348 1348 378 345 375 375
314 270 280 280
82 96 104 104 281 260 267 267
500
300 ~
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS
24
11-22ci
ltI i i 20 Cl) Q 180 gt
16
138
136 u - 134 Cl) z IU Q
132
130
bull500
400 Inl 300 Q bull~ 200 z ~ 100middot IU 0
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS
FIGURE B3 Mixture Design Data Sari Bernardin6 High Quality CMS o Replication 1
B3
TABLE B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue GJntent
Bulk seecific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity
50
21491
24334
60
21459
24014
70
21526
23709
Iesiqn 70
Air Voids 117 106
VMA 204 212
Absocbed Asphalt 0 72 o 72
Effective Asphalt 428 528
Unit Weight pcf 1341 133 9
Stabilrneter Value 437 406
GJhesiareter Value 337 248 3
Iesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-cay
Final
50
w 40 gt 0 30 w w 0 20 co 10
500
w
3 400 gt 0 w t- 300 w 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
_ 10
0 8gt -lt
6
4
FIGURE
61 66
410 318
24
22~ ci
i 20
~
18 a gt
16
138
_136 u a 134 z ~ w 0
132
130
bull500
a
a 400 -3 300 _ a ~ 200 z ~ 100-
w 0
90 90
21 7 21 7
0 72 072
628 628
1343 1343
344 J44
252 252
82 82
250 250
---------
D 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDU CONTENT I (A_GGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B4
TABLE BS Mixture Design Data San Bernardin9 High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Siecific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
lir Voids
VMA
2bserberl Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stalgtilaneter Value
Cbhesiareter Value 3
Resilient Mgtdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
40
Ill 30 lt( gt a 20 Ill Ill 0 10
~ iii lt CII 0
400
Ill
3 300 lt(
gt a Ill200 == 0
~100 c 8
0
12
10 ui 0
0 8gt 5 lt(
6
4
FIGURE
~
~
5 6 7 84 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
50 60 70 Cesian 70
21652
24484
21904
24149
22005
23828
116
198
107
3-93
135l
345
224
18
240
93 77 77 196 200 200 107 107 107 493 593 593
1367 1373 1373 288 235 235
136 80 80
17 21 21 128 78 78
24
22ci lt(
z 20il
= CII C 0
18 gt
16
I-~
140
+38- ~136 1- z Ill 0 134
132
bull 500 a
o 400 3 300 C
~ 200 z 100 Ill a ~
0 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino_BS High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
BS
TABLE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Residue Content
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Ihegtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tmit WeightL pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesllllleter Value
Iesilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
a 20 UI w i
~10
lt 0
400
3300 lt gt a ~200 w i 0
119 93
197 l93
126 126
374 474
l353 l372
357 283
l26 l03
45 36
203 132
2440
30 22 0 0lt ltgt
16
~100 ~ 8 0 132
500 a
o 400 --ai 300 -
middot 0
~
~
w a
_ 10
ltn 0
0 8gt lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
50 60 70 Cesign 7 o
2l679
24595
21990
24255
22190
23931
- i 20
a 180 gt
140
138 - a
~136 z w 0 134
200
100middot
0 4
73 73
193 193
126 1 26
574 574
1385 1385
235 235
82 82
3l 3l
64 64
-0 $ e
~ 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B6
TABLE B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Pesidue Qlnte~t
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihroretical Speciic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
~tabilcmeter Value
ohesicrneter Value
resilient lbdulus l0 3psi
2-aay
Final
60 72 8 5 Iesicm 75
21762 21906 21779
23981 23617 23245 93 73 63 70
202 205 220 21 0
063 063 063 063
537 657 787 687
1358 1367 1359 1365 375 290 203 270
474 401 239 360
163 172 161 170 449 329 310 320
2440
ii 30 22 ci
Cl c cgt z 20 201 s ~ 310 e 18 0
gt c
0 16
500 140
w
3 400 _138c gt
~ 300 s 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
- 10 0 0 0 8gt c
6
4
FIGURE
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIOUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COITEIT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
il36 z IU Cl 134
132
bull 500
c 400 -
3 300 - Cl
sectl 200 ~- z ~ 100
w
0
B7
111 10 ui e 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
TABLE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
500
400 gt C
72 85 resian 7 s
21873 21738
23581 23210
72 63 70 207 22l 21 0
055 055 055 665 795 695
1365 1356 1365 287 188 265
349 341 345
191 187 190 287 266 280
24 ------------
111 22
Cl Cl lt -i ~ 20
= a 18 0 gt
16 _____________
138
136 a 134 () w a
132
130___________
soar------------ D a
1 400 ~
ui3 300 C
~ 200
100
w C
0---------------------5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUlc CONTENT lt
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
BB
Fesidue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcrreter Value
Cbhesiareter Value 3Resilient -bdulus 10 psi
2-day
Finll
60
m 50 - 40
IIJ ~ 30 CJ lt 1- 20
60
21669
23943
95
205
055
545
1352
560
416
195
425
~ 300 0 ()
~ 200 8
100---------------
12 -------------
RESIDUE CONTENT lto (AGGREGATE BASIS)
TABLE B9 Mixture Design Data San Ber~irdino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Pesiclue Content 60 Z1 as D=sign 7 5
Bulk Spccific Gravity 21697 21368 21255
Iheoretical Specific Gravity 23973 23610 23238
Air Voids 94 95 85 93
VMA 204 225 middot 23 8 230
middot-Absorbed Asphalt 061 061 061 061
Effective Asphalt 539 659 789 689
middot middotmiddotUnit Weight pcf 1354 133 3 1326 1330
-Stabilareter Value 460 375 225 340
CohesianeterValue 400 422 499 440
Iesilient MxUlus 103psi
2-oay 159 i0s 185 185
Final 290 299 283 295
60
w
l 400
24
22
ci 0 i 20l
= Q 180 gt
16
138
136
gt a 134~ 300 w l z0 IU 132 200
8 130
100-----------------_---I
12 ---------------- 500
o 400 10 ~
300 bull bullQ
Q0 8gt ~ 200 z
6 ~ 100
w a4 ___ __________ o
5 6 7 8 9 s 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COtlTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B9 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication l
B9
TABLE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Pesidue Conte1t 60 72 85 resign 75
Bulk Spcecific Gravity
Theoretical Sjeeipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Ohesianeter Value
Pesilient ~us 103psi
2---day
Final
60
50 lt gt cc40 w -w
~30 = CJ
lt 20
21635
24066
10l
206
078
522
1350
51 8
482
151
285
21481
23699
94
221
078
642
1341
378
459
150
286
24
11-22
ci Cl lt
~ 20 z
C 18
0 gt
21302
23323
87 92
237 225
078 078
7 72 6 72
1329 1338
246 350
343 430
162 155
254 280
I 16
500 138
UJ
400 136 lt gt
acc ~ UJ
134 300 z2 UI CJ_32 ~ 200
8 130
bull500
a
c 400 - 10 300 ~ Jf
C0 8gt ~ 200 ~ lt z
6 ~ 100-
UJ 0
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDU~ COrlTENT
(AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino
100 12
~
Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
BlO
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
TABLE Bll
Residue Content
Bulk Secific Gravity
Iheiretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesicrneter Value
Resilient MXiulus l03psi
2-day
Final
60 72 85 D=sign 75
21817 22108 21917
23977 23601 23216
90 63 56 62
200 198 215 200
o 72 o 72 o 72 o 72
528 648 778 678
136l 1380 1368 137 5
242 162 76 130
151 175 215 190
52 63 41 55
202 122 60 110
244middot0
~ 30 22 ci lt 20 i 201 IU = en ~ 10 E 18 m 0lt gt
0 16
----
w
l 400 lt gt a ~ w 0 ~ 8
12
-t
ltn 0 0 gt a lt
FIGURE
5
500
300
200 ~ 100
10
8
6
134
500 a
c 400 -
_ 300 0
g 200
~ 100 ~in IU a
0 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Bll Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
142
I-40 u a
~ 138 in w 0
136 ~
Bll
TABLE Bl2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Pesidue Q)ntent
Bulk Spzcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic
Air Voids
V bull t-LA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Gravity
60
22026
24085
85
192
092
508
72
22062
23705
69
200
092
628
85
21901
23315
61
215
092
758
resign 75
67
205
092
6 58
Unit Weight pcf 1374
Stabiloreter Value 193
Ohesiareter Value 177 3
Resilient Mxrulus 10 psi
2-day 63
Fi-ial 138
40
m 30 J lt gt a 20 IU w 0 10 ~ lt
0
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w 9 ~ 200 _________ 8
100 12
10 9 0 8gt ~6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE 8ASISI
1377
127
193
1367
90
160
137 5
120
180
53
107
32
52
48
95
24
22ci 0 lt
20
= ~
9 18 0 gt
16
142
140 a
~138 z w C
136
134
9
500 a
dego 400-
3 300 ~- a ~ 200 z ~ 100
w a
0 5
~ 6 7 8 9
RES IOU~ CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl2 Mixture Design Data -san Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Bl2
TABLE Bl 3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcrneter VaJue
CJgthesiarneter Value
Pesilient MxbJ11lS 10 3psi
2-day
Final
60
so gt
40a w 0 30 GI 20
500
l 400 gt a w t- 300 w 5 rn ~ 200 8
100 12
Ill 10 0 8gt
6
4
50
21789
24250
10l
164
1 95
305
1360
513
330
191
282
~ bull
~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASIS)
60
21762
2 34 34
91
173
1 95
405
135middot8
567
284
168
434
24
Ill 22ci Cl
is 20
= 0 gt
18
16
142
140- ~138 iii z 0
136
134
bull500
o 400 -
l 300 C
~ 200 z 100 iii a
0 4
70 resign 70
21872
23632
75 75 177 177
1 bull 95 1 95 505 505
136S 136S 393 393
280 280
217 217 482 482
~
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASISI
FIGURE Bl3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality css~o Replication 1
Bl3
--------------
TABLE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Resid= Content 50 60 70 eesicn 7o
Bulk Siecific Gravity 21692 21677 21662
Ihroretical Specific Gravity 24501 24176 23865
Air Voids 115 103 92 92
VMA 169 176 185 185
Absorbed Asphalt 240 240 240 240
Effective Asphalt 260 360 460 460
Unit Weight pcpound 1354
Stabilaneter Value 580
Cohesicrneter Value 270 3Resilielt Mdulus 10 psi
2-day 149
Final 408
60
w so lt gt
w C o w le 0 30 m lt
20
500
w
~ 400 lt gt C
~ 300 w S ~ 200 ~ 8
100 12
- 10 m a 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AG GREGATE BASIS)
1353 1352 1352
442 327 327
276 183 183
173 191 191
373 299 299
24
22d c lt z
20E 18 0 gt
16
140
138 u C
136 w C 134
132
500 C
1 400 gt- m =gt 300 a ~ 200
l 100- IU C
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication
Bl4
2
bull bull bullbull
TABLE Bl5 Mixture Design-Data Fresno High Quality CMS-QReplication 1
Bulk Spcific Gravity
lheoreticaJ Specific Gravity Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mldulus l0 3psi 2-clay
Final
60
m 50 C gt a 40 w w
~ 30 C m
10
~idue Content 50 6_ 0 70 Daisi2 7 O
5oor----------
w
l 400 C gt a ~ 300 w I 0 iii ~ 200 8
100-------------
12 ----------
111 10 C
0 8gt C
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT J
(AG GREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl5 Mixture
21755 21305 23795 23497 86 93 93
163 198 198 l 69 l 69 l69 431 531 531
1336 1329 1329 420 307 307
247 230 230
180 i55 155
246 253 253
24
22d
Cl C
i 20I
J ~ C 18 ~ 0 gt
16
21434
24106
11l
179
l69
331
1337
472
373
175
247
138
136- 134 z w C
132
130
bull 500
dego 400 - l 300 C
~ 200 z l 100 iii w a
0
-~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT J (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Bl5
TABLE Bl6 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
helretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
lbsorled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabil=ter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
Eesilient Mxrulus 10
2-day
Firal
60
50 J gt c 40
~ 30 m 20
500
w
l 400 gt a ~ 300 w
3psi
50 60 70
21339 2 1398 21475
24241 23925 23623
120 106 91
181 187 192
1 94 l 94 1 94
306 406 506
1331 1335 1340
558 43 7 377
340 313 219
149 152 154
317 345 288
Jesign70
91
192
194
506
1340
377
219
154
288
24
22d CJ i sect 20
= a 18 ~ 0 gt
16
138
136
a 134
z w ~ C ~ 200 132 8
130 100
14 500 a
o 400 - 12
3 300 - ~ 0 C gt 10 a ~ 200 ~ z
l 100
8
w a
0 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl6bull Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Bl6
TABLE Bl 7 Mixture Qesign Data Fresno High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
Pesidue Content 50 60 70 Cesign 7 O
Bulk siec~tic Gravity 21959 22101 22128
Iheoretical Specific Gravity 24539 24201 23879
Air Voids 105 87 73 73
VMA 158 160 167 167
~rbed Asphalt 252 252 252 252
Effective Asphalt 248 348 448 448
Unit Weight pcf 1370 1379 1380 1380
S~ter Value 467 370 213 213
Clgthesiareter Value 289 3Resilient l-Ddulus 10 psi
2-clay 47
FinaJ 294
50
Ill 40 o(
gt cc 30 Ill w 0 20 lt 10
500
w l 400 lt gt cc ~ 300 Ill 0 ~ 200 8 ~
100 12
10 deg C
0 gt 8 ~l lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
147 122 122
65 35 35
214 75 75
22
J 20 o(
ii 18 16 ~ 0 gt
14
142
140 u Q
~138 z Ill
Cl 136
134
500 Q
o400 uil 300 Cl
g 200 z ~ 100 ~w cc
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
IIESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Bl7
TABLE Bl8 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Dsiqn 70
Bulk Specific Gravity 22191 22285 22092
Theoretical Specific Gravity 24199 23874 23563
Air Voids 82 66 62 62
VMA 149 153 168 168
Absorled AsphaJt 192 192 192 192
Effective AsphaJt 308 408 508 508
Unit Weight pcf 1385
Stabilareter Value 357
Cohesianeter Value 268 3Resilient MxhIJus 10 psi
2-day 75
Final 217
40
w 30 J lt gt a 20 w w i
~ 10
0
500
w
3 400 gt a
l 300 w i
ltn
~ 200 8
139l
342
238
137 9
233
192
137 9
233
192
84
117
63
73
63
73
20
0 0 ~ i
= 0 gt
18
16
14
12
~
144
142 140 z w 0
138
136 100-----1---1--1---l
12 ---------- 500 0bull
o 400 -11110 en a 3 300 = 0 08gt ~ 200
z 6 ~ 100middot
w a
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT
4
RESIDUE CONTENT
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Bl8
FresnoTABLE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Low Quality css-o Replication 1
Eesidlle Content 60 70 80 Dasi51 7 5
Bulk Specific Gravity 21698 21611 21514 Iheoretical Specilic Gravity 23803 23505 23220
Air Voids 89 81 73 77
VMA 175 186 198 192
Absorbed Asphalt 171 l 71 171 171
Effective Asphalt 429 529 629 679
Unit Weight pcf 1354 1349 1342 1345
Stabi]cmeter Value 513 398 359 380
eohesianeter value 506 449 481 465
Resilient Modulus 10 3psi
2-day 176 176 241 205
Final 312 383 353 365
2460
all so 22 ci cgt
40 I-
20 E
I = g 30 18iii 0 gt
20
16
500
300
100
10
8
6
4
138
136l 400
u -gt a
~ I 0 in l1200 8
12
111 Q
0 gt ~
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE COITENT Jo
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
~ ~ 134 z w 0
132
130
500 -
l 400 -
300 ~n
Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 in Ill IC
0
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Bl9
TABLE B20 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residlle Content i
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihegtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
CJhesiareter Value 3
Resilient Mxfulus 10 psi
2-day
Finll
60
50 lt 40 w w
~ 30 m lt 20
500
w
3 400 lt gt a ~ ~ 300 w 51 rn 200 8
100----------------
12 --------------
10 9 0 8gt lt
6
4 s 6 7 8
RESIDUE COPlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
60 70 80 resign 75
21451 21476 21666
23932 23629 23340
104
185
194
406
1339
586
436
147
313
91
192
1 94
506
1340
403
416
179
347
24
22 0 0 lt
~ 20
= 9 18 0 gt
16
140
138 - Cl
136 w cl34
132
bull 500
-0 400__
3 300 I
~ 200
~ 100 rn w a
0
7 2 82
192 192
194 194
606 656
1352 1345
24 8 325
333 375
186 182
361 358
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COPITEPlT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
~
Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
B20
TABLE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
lesidue Content 60 70 80 resign 75
Bulk Siecific Gravity 21525 21406 21152 lllroretical Specific Gravity 23855 23555 23268 Air Voids 98 91 91 91 VMA 182 194 211 2middot03 1osorled Asphalt 180 1 80 180 180 Effective Asphalt 420 520 620 570 Ulit Weight pcf 1343 1336 1330 1335 Stabilateter Value 487 460 373 415 Oxlesiareter Value 418 392 323 355
3lesilielt Mldulus 10 psi
2-clay 188 177 200 190
Final 289 299 281 290
6or----------- 24
m 50 lt gt 11 40 w w I
~ 30 m lt 20
_J_
22ci 0 lt z
20EE
= 0 180 gt
16
5oor---------- 138
w
l 400 lt gt
136- a ~ 300 w i 0
fa34 z w
~ 200 Cll32 -8
100-----------i-~ 130
12 ------------ 500bulla
10 ________ o 400 - 0
0 gt
8
gJdeg 300 0
~- 200 ---e-
lt z
6 l 100 w 4
5 6 7 8 9 0
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication
B21
1
TABLE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Fesidue Cbntent 55
Bulk Spcific Gravity 21243
lheoretical Specific Gravity 23859
Air Voirls 109
VMA 189
Absorbed Asphalt 152
Effective 1spralt 398
Unit Weight pd 1326
atabil~ter Value 620
Cbhesiareter Value 430 3Fesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-oay 160
Final 387
70
a 60 gt a 50 w w == = 40 0
m
30
500
w l 400 lt gt cc
~ 3001- 0 ~ 200 8
100
16
136
134 u Q
iu2 z w 0 130
128
12 -----------
10 bull
ltIi 0
~ s
6
4middot1-_________ _
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l _AGGREGATE BASIS)
21164
23557
101
200
152
498
1321
481
432
180
377
24
22
z 20Si
= 18e 0 gt
bull 500
o 400-ltIi j 300 0
~ 200 zl 100 w cc
0
65 75 iesiqn 7 s
21095
23269
93 93
210 210
152 l 52
598 598
1316 1316
367 367
450 450
171 171
387 387
-----~bull-----
8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7
FIGURE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B22
1 TABLE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno
Low Quality CMS-7 Replication
70 -~ 0 Cesign 75 Pesidue Content
Bulk Spcific Graviv1
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit Weight pcf
Stallilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mxlulus 10 3psi
2--day
Final
40
Ill 30 c gt 0 20 UI lo Q 10=c 0
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w lo Q 200 8
100
~
60
21829
23899
87
170
197
403
1362
293
206
84 144
21981
23587
67
l73
197
503
1372
200
249
76 131
21960
23289
5middot 7
middot18l
197
603
1370
100
241
69 93
62
177
197
553
1370
150
245
73
110
12
10 5 Q 8gt 5 lt
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (ACGREGATE BASIS)
24
It
22 t-ci c
z 20i
= 5 18 t-Q gt
16
142
140 - 638
z w Q
136
134
bull 500
o 400 - 3 300 0
~ 200 z 100 iii UI 0
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (ACGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno LOW Quality CMS-7 Replication
B23
1
TABLE B24 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Urit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Glhesianeter Value
Resilient Mldulus 10
2-day
Final
40
m 30 gt c 20 w ~ w i
~ 10 m lt ~ 0
3psi
24
22
C C lt i
20~ ~
9 18 0 gt
16
500 142
w 1403 400 gt
Ca gt138I 300 tw
i z w Q 136~ 200
8
134
~
~
100 12 500
C
dego 400 - Ill 10 3 300 0 0 Q8gt ~ 200
~ z 6 100middot
w a
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIOUC CONTENT
(AGGREGATE 8ASIS] (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)
80
21686
23262
68
19l
l91
609
1353
125
215
77
114
Cesign 75
71
184
L 91
559
1360
200
235
77
135
60
21936
23870
81
166
191
409
1369
358
252
84
211
70
21850
23559
73
177
191
509
1364
270
250
77
157
Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE B24 Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B24
TABLE B25 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-Or Replication 1
Residue Clgtntent 47
Bulk Siecific Gravity 23965
llleoretical Specific Gravity 26825
Air Voids 107
VMA 207
Absorbed Asphalt 27
Effective Asphalt 443
Unit Weight pcf 1495
Stabilaneter Value 302
Cohesiaoeter Value 235 3
Resilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-day 158
Final 300
40
30 _ gt a 20I- ii 0_
10iii I-en 0 500----------
Ill
3 400 gt ati 300 ii 0 iii l 200 8
100---i----L---J
12 ----------
jit 10 e 0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I 4
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
57 67 Design 55
24521 24581
26411 26017
72 55 80
196 202 200
27 27 27
543 643 523
1530 1534 1520
247 200 27
275 203 275
164 116 160
276 197 280
24
jlt
22ci c i
20Si
= en e 18 0 gt
16
156
_154 ~ i152 iii z C
150
148
soo----------
dega 400 _
en
~300 ~ ~ 200 1-zl 100 iii w a
01----~-i--J 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Mixture Design Data GraniterockFIGURE B25 High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
B25
TABLE B26 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Besidue Content If 7 57 67 D2sign 55
Bulk SfeCific Gravity 2 4131 24573 24597
lhagtreticai Specific Gravity 26951 26532 26134
Air Voids 105 74 59 78
VMA 20l 195 20l 197
Absorted Asphalt 46 46 46 46
Effective Asphalt 424 524 624 504
Unit Weight pcf 1506 1533 1535 1525
stabi1anaiter Value 282 258 is2 270
Cllhesicmter Value 204 155 138 160
Resilient Mdulus 103psL
2-day 115 143 126 130
Final 313 225 173 240
40
w 30 lt gt a 20 w w la 0 10 m lt
0
~
24
22ci C
lt z
20la ~ = E 18 -0 gt
16
156
154 - a
~152 z w r0
150
148
-
500
o 400 ~
300 0
g 200 ~ z -~ 100
500
w ~ 400 lt gt a IU t- 300 w la 0 ~ 200
~8
100 12
10 0 0 8gt lt
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
w a
o 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT lo RESIDUE CONTENT II
-cGREGATE s-s1s1 (-GGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B26 Mixture Design Data Grani terock High Quality CSS-0 Replication
B26
2
TABLE B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Residue Ogtntent 47 57 67 ~ign 55
Bulk Spcific Gravity 23886 24116 24078
Ihooretical Specific Gravity 26675 26267 25879
Air Voids 105 81 70 82
VMA 210 210 21 8 210
Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 oos 005
Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545
Unit Weight pcf 149l 1505 1502 1505
Stabilareter Value 337 350 250 350
Ogthesicneter Value 238 3
Eesilient Mldulus l0 psi
2-day 104
Final 287
50
Ill 40 J C gt cc 30 Ill Ill l 0
C
10
20iii 500
w
l 400 C gt cc I 300 Ill l 0 in ~ 200 8
100 12
1110 0 0 8gt
c cc
6
4
FIGURE
~
~
177 204 200
144 150 140
254 247 260
24 ----------
a 18 0 gt
16 __i____i_-J
154
j52 u -a
~1501- ------iiiz -Ill 0
148
______________ 146
soar---------- a
o 400 1--
~ 300 _ ~
~ 200 z ~ 100 en w 0
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
B27
8
TABLE B28 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue Ointent 4 7 57 67 Cesign 55
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihroretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
CJlhesianeter Value
Pesilient Mldulus 10 3psi
2-day
Final
40
30 lt gt = w 20 0
- 10 lt
0
500
w - 3 400
lt gt a l 300 w 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
i 10 ui C
0 8gt lt
6
4
FIGURE
23861
26649
10S
207
014
456
1489
338
145
124
307
~
--------
~ 5 6 7 84
RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
24025 23925
26242 25855
85
210
014
556
1499
283
135
135
307
24
22
0 lt i
20i
= 18 0 gt
16
154
152 u Q
i150 z w 0 148
146middot
500- o 400 -
300 _ Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 4
75 87
220 209
014 014
656 536
1493 1490
220 300
129 140
142 130
277 307
_--
~
-___
85 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B28 bull Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B28
TABLE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Pesicllle Cbntent 47 57 67 resign 55 Bulk Siecific Gravity 24618 24637 24728 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26905 26475 26066 Air Voids 84 69 51 71 VlltLA 185 192 197 190 Absocbed Asphalt 047 0 bull 47 047 047 Effective Aspbalt 423 523 623 503 Urit Weight pcf 1536 1537 1543 1537 Stabilaneter Value 410 330 198 350 QJhesianeter Value 166
Resiliextt Mldulus 10 3psi
2-clay
Final
50
40 c
ffi 30 IE g20 iii c
10
500
l 400 c
a ~ 300 IE C ~ 200 8
100 12
ot 10 C
0 8
5
C
6
4
46
158
~
~ 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI
120 131 130
35 30 38
56 28 80
24
gt11 22
c c c
i 2031
= ~ C 180
16
158
156 t-
u - 154 z w 0
152
150
500
~
~ 0
bull a 400 - uil 300 ~
200
C
~ z ~ w a
100middot
8 4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
B29
TABLE B30 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Pesidue Content 4-7 h---7 6 -7 IEsicn 5 5
Bulk Specific Gravity 24519 24638 24706 Iheoretical Specific Gravity 26609 26265 25793 Air Voids 79 62 42 65 VMA 189 192 198 19l
middot Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 005 005 Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545 Unit Weight pcf 1530 1537 1542 1535 Stabilareter Value 420 327 247 350 Cohesiareter Value 126
3Resilient Mldulus 10 psi
Z--day 47 Final 144
50
40 J lt gt a 30 w w
~ 20 m lt 10
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w 2 ~ 200 8 ~
100 12
111- 10 ui 0 gt 8
lt
6
4
114 182 120
43 29 45
79 33 90
24
ii-22
ci 0 lt i
20l ~= 18 0 gt
16
158
156 0
l 154 z ~w c 152
150
500
Q -dego 400 - ui3 300 C
~ 200 z
~ 100middot~
w a ~ 0
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8 4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
FIGURE B30 Mixture Design Data High Quality CMS-7
Graniterock Replication 2
B30
TABLE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
~sidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weigllt pcf
Stabi]aneter Value
Cohes~ter Value
~silient MXJulus 103psi
2--day
final
40
30 C gt ffi20
~10 iii C ltII 0
500
l 400 C gt IC
~ 300 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
11 10 0
0 8gt C
6
4
55 65 75 resign 60 24268 24286 24206
26358 25966 25592 80
200
020
530
t515
80
268
182
338
~
65
207
020
630
t515
t_92
233
169
308
24
bull 220 0 C
ze 20
= 0 18 -0 gt
16
156
154
u i152 ~ z 0
150 bull
148
54 72
21 7 204
020 020
730 580
1511 1515
90 235
193 250
145 175
250 320
500 o 400 - l 300 0
~ 200 zi 100 iii IC
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replicationl
B31
TABLE B32 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residue 0ntent
Bulk Secific Gravity
llleoretical Speipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
-Absorled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
StabilcIIeter Value
Qlhesianeter Value 3Jesilient middotMgtdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
40
m30 lt gt cc20 w
w E
~10 ID lt 0
79
198
027
523
1518
203
243
201
354
~ soar-----------
w
400 lt gt a
~ 300 w E 0 ~ 200 8
100---I--~---------
12 -----------
111 10 C
0 8gt lt
6 --4
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l (ACiCiFIECiATE BASIS)
FIGURE B32 Mixture
55 65 75 Lesign 6 0
24329 24246 24077
26401 26007 25632
68 61 73 208 22l 203
027 027 027 623 723 573
1513 1502 1515
165 110 185 215 205 225
168 184 185 340 272 345
24
22 C C
z i 20
= 0 0
18 gt
16
156
154
a
gt152 en z Ill 0 150
148
bull 500 Q
deg 0 400- =gt 300 0
~ 200 z l 100 w
-
0 4 5 6middot 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(ACiGFIEGATE BASIS)
Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication
B32
2
TABLE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Eesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheore_tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VbullMA
lbsorbed_ Asphalt
Effective_ Asphalt
Qnit Weight pcf
~~ter Value
Q)hesianeter Value
Resiiient Mxlulus 10 3psi
2~y
Final
40
11130 C
a20 =
~10 C m
ltII 0
500
Ill
3 400 C
a ~ 300 w = 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
ll 10 ui E 0 8
c
6
4
I-
1-
55
23824
26318
95
215
014
536
1487
287
381
224
380
65 75
23896 23701 25928 25555 78 73
220 233
014 014 636 736
1491 1479 195 161
265 212
212 196
404 341
24
11 22d
c
z 20i
= ltII E 18 0
16
154
152- a
150 I-
Iesign 6 0
84
218
014
586
1490
240
320
215
395
z w Q
148
bull 146
500 a
c 400 ~ ui
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
l 300 Q
~ 200 zl 100 w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIOUla CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-a Replication 1
B33
- - ----- -
TABLE B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Rssidue Ogtntent
Bulk Secific Gravity
lhairetical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
AbsoIbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stabil~ter Value
Olhesiareter Value 3lesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-day
Firal
40
m 30 lt gt a 20 w w
= ~ 10
m lt
0
- --- -middot -middot 500
w l 400 lt gt
Ea
300 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
1l 10 middot 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 4
FIGURE
55
23834
26371
96
214
022
528
1487
279
207
176
332
65
23784
25978
84
223
022
628
1484
208
270
185
336
75
23628
25604
77
236
022
728
1474
167
334
181
350
iesiqn 6 bull 0
90
21 8
022middot
578
1485
245
240
180
334
~
~
24
1l 22
0
lt i
20i
= 0 gt
18
16
152
150 - 148
~ 146
144
500
o-400 middot --- J 300 C
~ 200 z
middot ~ 100 en a
0 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication
B34
2
B35 Mixture Design Data GraniterockTABLE Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Residue Content 55
Bwk Specific Gravity 24720
lheoretical Specific Gravity 26164
Air Voids 55
VMA 185
Absorbed Asphalt 001
Effective Asphalt 549
Unit Weight pcf 1543
StabilCampTeter value 293
Ohesiareter Value 174
Besilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day 69
Final 153
40
~ 30 _
c gt ffi 20 w I
Q 10
c 0
500
w 3 400 -
c gt a
~ 300 w I g bull ~ 200 8 ----r
100middot
10
8 -
~
Q
0 6gt a =c
4 ~ 2
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS
65 75 DesiSE 60
2 4 720 24515
25767 25388
40 34 48
193 207 189 001 001 001 649 749 599
1543 1530 1543 205 97 250
156 283 170
46 22 55 72 so 110
24
~
22ci C c
i 20i
= Cl 180 gt
16
lSadeg
156
u -a
654 z 0 152
150
500 ii a
a 400 - 3 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7
FIGURE B35 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
B35
12 r---------- 500bull _ 10
o 400 -middot 0 gt 5 C
8
tnl 300 Q
~ 200 z
6 ~ 100 ~ IU 0
4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT I
(AGCREGA TE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
TABLE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
55 65 75 resicn 6 0 Residue Content
Bulk siecific Gravity 24816 2 4721 24560
lheoretical Specific Gravity 26389 25983 25596
Air Voids 60 49 40 55
VMA 182 193 205 187
Absorlei Asphalt middot 035 035 035 035
Effective Asphalt 515 615 715 565
UUt Weight cf 1548 1543 1533 1545
Stabilaneter Value 298 193 130 250
Qlhesicmeter Value 188 I57 118 180 3
Resilient MJdulus 10 psi
soor-----------158
w l 400 Ishy 156 gt lt u
0a
w
300 w ~154E 0 z
w Q ~ 200 152
8 150100----middot-~-1-__c__~
2-day
Final
40
~ 30 J lt gt a 20 w
s 10 0
lt
0
92 43 27 65 186 79 46 135
24
22
~ =
ci lt 0
i 20~
18 0 gt
16
FIGURE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B36
Table B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
FJiuivalent ~sidue amtent 60 70 80 resign 70
Iesidue Ontent
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absomed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
lhit Weight pcpound
Stabilareter Value Ohesiareter Value
~ilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
Ill
50
40 A gt a w 30 w i 0 J
iii 201-
10
400
w3 300 gt a Ill t 200 i 0
8 ~iii ll 100 1-
0 12
lit 10 0 0 8gt a lt
6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)
630
21584
24451
117
210
140
460
1347
415
208
735
21570
24143
107
219
140
560
1346
488
61
840
21385
23848
103
233
140
660
1334
382
63
resign 7 35
107
219
140
560
1346
488
63
96
339 141
325
126
299 141 325
24
lit 22d
Cl
z 20i
= 0 180
gt
16
138
136 ltgt
i134 iii ~ z w 0 132
130
bull 500
o 400 -
3
300 ------------- 0
~ 200 z ~ 100 w o_____________a
9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B37
----
Table B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Pesidue omtent 60 70 80 Design 70
Pesidue omtent 630 735 8 40 Dsign 735
Bulk Specific Gravity 21710 21722 21714
lllroretical Specific Gravity 24298 23995 23705
Air Voids
VMA
lbsorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Chhesianeter Value
Eeilient Mldulus 103psi
2--clay
Final
so
40 J w
gt a 30 w w 0 20 m
10 400
w 300 gt a w 200 w i 100 8
0
12
if 10 a
~0 8gt a lt
6
4
107
205
112
488
1355
395
llO
113
290
95
213
112
588
1356
398
62
122
271
84
22l
112
688
1355
318
70
138
282
24
22 c 0
20
0 180 gt
16
140
138 -a
136 _iii z bull --w 0 134
132
bull 500 a
o 400
m 300 J 0 bull ~ 200 z 100
w a
0
95
213
)12
588
1356
398
62
122
271
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT J
(AGCilEGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B38
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Table B39
Fquivalent ~idue COntent
~idue Cbntent
Bulk SJecific Gravity lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Oihesianeter Value
~ilient Mldulus l03psi
2-day
Fiial
so
w 40 lt gt cc 30 ~ w E
0 20 m lt 10
400
m POO lt gt a U 200 E 0 iii w c 100 8
0
12
- 10 vi Cl
0 gt ac
6
60 70 80
690 805 920
21790 21826 21910
24255 23977 23710
102 90 76
207 214 219
080 080 080
610 710 810
1360 1362 1367
437 400 289
219 229 202
141 158 184
333 282 273
24
~ 22ci
CJ lt z
20ii
= Cl 180
gt
16
----------
~ lo
140
138 Q l136 iii w Cl
134
132
500 Q
0 400 n3 300 Cl
~ 200 i-bull
100
z ~ 0 a
Cesign 70
Cesign 805
90
214
080
710
1362
400
229
158
282
-------
-
-~
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B39 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication l
B39
8
Table B40 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Eesidue cantent
Iesidue Omtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lhagtretical Speiliic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Abro1plusmned Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tklit Weight pcpound
Stabilareter Value
OJhesianeter Value
EEsilient Mldulus l03psi
2-day
Final
50
w 40 J lt gt a 30 w
w i
3 20 lt 0 10
400-----------
DI 3 300 lt gt a wti 200 i 0 w8100
0 -------l--l-1
12 ----------
- 10 ltn 0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
60 70 80 690 805 920
21986 21964- 21948
24499 2A212 23938
103 93 83
200 209 218
124 124 l24
476 576 676
1372 1371 1360
422 403 265
270 306 160
99 140 154
298 310 254
24
-22
ci lt
=i 20i
a 0 18 0 gt
16
140
138 - a
l136 z w 0 134
132
bull500
a
o 400 -
ltn =gt 300 -J a
~ 200 z 100 DI 0
0 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT Ii (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Dsign 70
Design 805
93
209
124
576
1371
403
306
140
310
9
Figure B40 Mixture Design Data High Quality SS-30
San Bernardino SEA Replication 2
B40
Table B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent lesidue ~tent
Ilesidue Omtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lbagtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stabilateter Value
CllhesiaIEter Value
Resilient MXlulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
w 40 i- _ gt 30a w I- ~ w 0 20 m I-CII 10
400
w l 300 gt a w lj 200 0 w 100 8
0
12
111 10 Q
0 8gt a ~
6
4
~
6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
65 75 85 Design 75 683 789 89J tesign 789
21624 21445 21375 24097 23802 23520
103 99 92 213 228 238 100 100 100 550 650 750
1349 1338 1334 423 295 285 70 174 82
150 139 138 318 310 2S4
24
22d i
20ii
= CII Q 180 gt
16
138
- 136
u
134I- z ~132
130
bull 500 o 400 _ l 300 1- Q
sectl 200 I-z ~ 100 CII w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
99
228
100
650
1338
295
174
139
310
5
Figure B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B41
Table B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent PesidJJe Content
Residue Omtent
Bulk Specific GIavity
lheoretical Specific GIavity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit weight pcpound
Stabiloreter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mxulus 103psi
SC
w 40 gt a 30 w w i 0 J 20
10
400
w 3 300 gt a w t 200 i
9 ltI)
w = 1008
0
12
11 10 u a 0 8gt
6
4
2-day
Final
~
~
5 6 7 8 flESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGflEGATE BASIS)
65 75 85
683 788 89J 21424 21394 21455
24147 23851 23567
ll3 103 90
22l 229 234
l09 l09 l09
541 641 741
133 7 1335 1339
412 328 280
129 103 81
167 141 162
325 260 280
24
22ci 0 201
= 0 gt
18
16
i-
138
136 Q i134 _ 0 z w bull0 132
130
soor----------- D C
o 400
ltn3 300 a ~ 200 z 100 (I)
w
-
~
a 0------------ 5 6 7 8 9
flESIOUE CONTENT I
(AGGflEGA TE BASIS)
Design 75
Design 7 86
103
229
l09
641
1335
328
103
141
260
9
Figure B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B42
Table B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent Residue Omtent
Residue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllagtreticalSpecilicGravity
Air Voids
VMA
AbsorlJed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcpound
Stabilcrreter value
Cllhesianeter value
lelilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
400-----------
Illl 300 lt gt a w t 200 lo 0 w 8100
0 ________ ___ __
12 ----------
~ 10 0
~ 8 bull a c
6
4 -_______ ___ __
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS
65 75 85 748 863 978 21752 21661 21638 24136 23863 23602 99 92 83
213 225 234 081 081 081 569 669 769
1357 1352 1350 466 367 235
224 266 138
220 189 209 478 337 281
Ilsign 75
Design 863
92
225
081
669 1352
367
266
189
337
24 ----------
~
220 Cl lt ii 20
0 18 0
gt
16 ----------------14or-----------
138 -0 a 136 z w Q
134
132
= c 400 - l 300 Q
~ 200 f-middot z 100 w a o----------
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
_____________J
Figure B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardinor Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B43
Table B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Iesidue Cbntent 65 75 85 Design 75
lesidue Omtent 748 86~ resign~Zl 863
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleo~tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asjtlalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
lesilient Mxlulus 103psi
2-day
Final
so
w gt 0 30 IE 0 20 iii lt
10
400
3 300 lt gt 0 w l 200 IE 0 X w
100 8
0
12
- 10 en 0 0 8gt
6
4
~ 40 bull
~ 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
21676
23998
97
208
055
595
1353
409
248
189
308
24
22
ci c lt i
20ii
= 0 0
18 gt
16
21711 21641
23729 23472
85 78 85
223 234 223
055 oss 055
695 795 695
1355 135l 1355
283 227 283
187 186 187
198 177 198
255 285 255
140
138 a
136 - z 0 134 --
132
500 a
o 400 -
vi3 300 - 0
sectj 200 z ~ 100
0 0 5 6 middot 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino~ Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B44
Table B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Equivalent Jesidue Content 60 70 80 Design 70
tesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
trut Weight pcpound
Stabilcineter Value
Cbhesiateter Value
tesilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
IU 40 _ C gt 30a IU IU = middoto 20 m C (I) 10
400
IU
300 C gt a IU
ti 200 = 0 ~ IU c 100 8
0
12
10 ai 0 8gt C
6
4
~
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)
630 735 840 Design 7 35
21651 21581 21592
24033 23739 23457
99 91 80 91 180 190 198 190
399 499 599 499 135l 1347 134 7 1347
309 439 358 439
150 236 202 236
140 171 148 171 294 390 367 390
24
bull 22
Cl Cl C
i 20i
= (I) Q 180
gt
16 140
138 0 a
i136 z IU
134 bull bull
Q
132
500 D
c 400 _ 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 IU a
0 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B45
Table B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Residue Cbntent 60 70 80 Design 70 Residue Cbntent 6JO Z35 EdQ Jesign 7 35
Bulk Spcific Gravity 21413 21627 21711 lhroretical Specific Gravity 24321 24017 23726 Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcneter Value
Ohesianeter Value
llesilient Mgtdulus 10 3psi
2-day
Final
so
Ill 40 I lt gt 0 30 w Ill i 0 20 Cl lt
10
400
111
l 300 lt gt 0 w lj 200 i
~ w = 1008 -----___
0
12
II- 10 a 0 8gt lt
6
4
120
189
249
351
1336
407
79
147
361
24
II-22
ci
lt ~ 20i
= 0
0 18
gt
16
138
136 u C
l134 w 132
130
bull 500
C
o 400 ~
---------_J 300 0
~ 200
~ 100 Ill 0
0
99
189
249
451
1350
396
76
165
340
85
193
249
551
1355
360
64
175
305
99
189
249
451
1350
396
76
165
340
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT 1
9 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE COIHENT f
9
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B46
---------
Table B4 7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Bulk Specific Gravity
lhalretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorlled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilaieter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
llesilient MJdulus 103psi
2-clay
Final
50
40w lt(
gt IC 30 w w
0 20 iii lt( ltI)
10
400
w 3 300 ~ lt(
gt IC w t 200 0 iii 111 i 100 8
0 ___ _______ __ _ __
12 ----------
Fquivalent Pesidue Content 60 70 80 Iesign 70
Pesidue Qlntent 690 805 92Q Dcsign 805
21958 22006
24182 23909
92 88 92
18l 188 18l 256 256 256
444 544 444
1370 1373 1370
342 291 342
78 73 78
184 167 184
303 298 303
10 0
0 8gt IC
c 6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B47 Mixture
21880
24453
105
176
256
344
1365
443
58
174
381
24
22ci
5 20
= 0
0 18
gt
16
~ I I
138
136 ~ ~134 bull z 111 0 132
130
bull 500
o 400 3 300 - Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 ltI) 111 IC
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B47
Table B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
El_uivalent Residue Cbntait 60 70 80 Iesign 70
Residue Cbntent 690 aQi 2 2Q Dsign 805 Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Olhesiateter Value
Resilient Mldulus middot103psi
2-day
Final
21816
24403
106
178
244
356
1361
482
136
183
393
21806
24120
96
187
244
456
1361
411
130
187
374
21996
23849
78
189
244
556
1373
314
106
260
361
96
187
244
456
1361
411
130
187
374
24so
w 40 22 ci 0 gt a 30 ~ 20w w = 20 ishy C 18iii 0 gt Ill 10 _ ___ ____________
16 400------------
140
w l 300 138 gt 0
Qa w
636t 200 z0 w --------_ Qw 134c 100 8
0 ___ _____________ 132
bull50012 -----------
a
1 400 -_ 10
ltti ltti l 300 -C 0 C8gt ~ 200 lt z
6 l 100 w a
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT S RESIDUE CONTENT S (AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B48
Table B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
EquivaJent Residue antent 65 75 85 Design 75 Residue Content 63J z aa a 23 resign 7 88 Bulk Specific Gravity 21404 21439 21381 lheoretical Specific Gravity 23563 23286 Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcf
Stabilaneter Value
Cohesianeter Value
~ient 1bdul11S 103psi
2~y
Firal
50
w 40 gt a 30 w w 0 20 iii lt 10
400
3 300 w
gt a w t 200 0 in i w
100 8
0 12
10 0 Q
0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6
23020 92 79 71 79
193 199 209 199 140 140 140 140 510 610 710 610
1336 1338 1334 1338 424 397 308 397 79 308 266 308
173 185 196 185 330 319 285 319
24
22ci c lt
~ 20c Q 180
gt
16
138
136 u -Cl
~134 in ~z w 132
130
soar----------- Qbull
o 400
middot3 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a Q___________ ___ __
7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT deg RESIDUE COIITENT deg (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B49
Table BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Fquivalent lesidue Content
Besidlle 0-ntent
Bulk Specific Gravity
Illeoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pf
Stabilcmeter Value
ltbhesiaieter Value
Besilient Mxlulus 103psi
2--day
Final
50
~ 40 I lt gt 30 w 0 20 01 lt 10
400
w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 w r lOO 8
o 12
10 ai ~ 0 8gt a lt
6
~
4 5 6 7 8
IIESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
65 75 85 683 788 893 21527 21362 21337
24013 23721 23441 104 99 90
188 202 211
225 225 225
425 525 625
1343 1333 1332
410 418 290
261 62 100
188 197 211
334 348 331
24
22 ~ ci c lt
20 f 18 0 gt
16
138
136 0 a
134 z w 0 132
130
500 a
o 400
ai bull 300 I bull C
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
IIESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design 75
Design 788
99
202
225
525
1333
418
62
197
348
Figure BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
BSO
Table B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno
Fquivalent Residue Clintent
Residue 0rrtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorlei Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
thlit Weight pcf
StabiJaneter value
Ohesiaretel value 3lelilient MJdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
50
w
40
c gt a 30 w w = g 20 iii c Ill 10
400----------
middota
l 300 bull c gt a w t 200 = 0 w c 100 8
0 _______ ____ _
12 ------------
_ 10 ~ 8 c
6
4 _________ __
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B51
Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
65 75 85 748 863 978
21728
24022
96
186
200
450
1356
436 100
199
376
24
11 22
c c c
z 20ii
Ill0 180
gt
16
Design 75
Design 863
86
195
200
550
1355
392 260
212
362
21716
23753
86
195
200
550
1355
392 260
212
362
21673
23495
78
205
200
650
1353
378 201
230
3l7
~
140
138 Q j136 bull --_ z w 0134
132
500 Q
o 400 bull -l 300 ~ 0 ~ 200 I-z ~ 100 w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Table B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent lesidue OJntent 65 75 85 Design 75 Pesidue Ointent 748 863 978 Design 863 Bulk Specific Gravity 21595 21708 21637 ~retical Specific Gravity 23977 23708 23452 Air Voids 99 84 77 84 VMA 19l 195 206 195 Absorbed Asphalt l92 l92 l92 l92 Effective Asphalt 458 558 658 558 Unit Weight pf 1347 1354 1350 1354 Stabilareter Value 502 262 239 262 Cllhesianeter Value 257 136 154 136 Pesilient MJdulus 103psi
2--day 217 201 228 201 Final 371 307 290 307
2450
w 40 22 0 0lt ltgt ia 30
bull 20i
= 0 20 18iii 0lt gt 10
16 400
~
~
140
w 3 300 -ltgt
138 lt gt
aa w t 200 deg136 z0 w 0
134 w
100 8
1320
12 500 a
0 400 10
3 300 C 0 Q8gt ~ 200 lt z
6 100 w a
4 0 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT ~ RESIDUE CONTENT ~ (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B52
Table B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent ~sidue Cbntent 45 55 65 Design 55 ~idue Cbntent 473 578 6~~ Design 5 78 Bulk Specific Gravity 24210 24403 24473 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26934 26528 26142 Air Voids
VMA
Absocbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
StabiJaneter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Iesilient M)dulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
w _ 40 C gt II 30w w 0 20 iii C ~
10
400
w l 300 C gt II
iiw
200
~ w --------r 100 8
0 12
ot 10 -0
0 8gt II c
6
4
101 80 64 80 199 20l 206 20l
022 022 022 022 423 523 623 523
151l 1523 1527 1523 308 288 197 288
ll7 ll2 140 112
95 llO 122 llO 306 272 214 272
24
ci 22
C
i -~20Es = E 18 0
gt
16
156
154 - gt152 iii z ~ w 0
150
148
bull 500
o 400 Inl 300 0
~ 200 z ~ 100 w II
0
--~
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT r (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7 8 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B53
Table B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Residue Glntent 45 ss 65 Jesign 55 Residue Omtent 47 5 ZB 6 83 resign ~za Bulk Specific Gravity 24197 24253 24435 lheoretical Specific Gravity 26843 26441 26058 Air Voids 99 83 62 83 VMA 199 206 208 206 Absorbed Asphalt 09 09 09 09 Effective Asphalt 441 541 641 541 lklit Weight P=f 1510 1513 152S 1513 StabLkmter Value 38l 307 204 307 CJgthesianeter Value 73 85 149 85 Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day 170 159 142 159 Final 333 367 193 367
so
w 40 J lt gt 0 30w w le 0 20J
CJ lt 10
24
It
22ci 0 lt i -------20 = 18 0 gt
16 400
____
~
156
w 3 300 154 lt gt - a0 w gt 152l 200 le __-0 z w w c 150 8100
148 0
12 500
D C
o 400 r- 10 -u 300
J 0 9
8 Cgt ~ ~ 200 z
6 ~ 100
w 0
4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE COIITEIIT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B54
----------
Table B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Rep~ication 1
Equivalent Residue Contentmiddot
Residue Ontent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
~tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tklit Weight pcpound
Stabilaneter value
Cbhesiaieter Value
Resilient -bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
45 55 65
518 633 748
24695 24765 24666
26898 26520 26160
82 66 57
187 193 205
001 001 001
449 549 649
154l 1545 1539
41l 310 24l
159 157 165
183 178 193
371 318 250
50
w 40 c gt a 30 w-w == 0 20 ~ 10
400------------
~ 300 lt(
gt a
t 200 == 0 in bullw 8100
0 __ ________ ___ ___
12 ----------
t 10 rti C
~ 8 a c
6
4 s 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI
4
24
Ill 22
0 c c
ze 20
II)
C 18 0
gt
16
158
156- 154 Ill z w 0 152
150
500 iii
8 4
~
0 400-
i300-~ g 200 1-z l 100 iii a 0 __ _______ ____
5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design 55
Design 633
66
193
001
549
1545
310
157
178
318
___
8
Figure B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
BSS
Table B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality
Equivalent Rsidue Content 45
Rsidue Cbntent 518
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllooretical specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
lbsoibed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesicmeter Value 3
Iesilient Mldwus 10 psi
2--day
Final
400-----------
w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 I 0 ltII w8100
olt----__1__--1_---1
12 ----------
10 u
0 8gt a lt
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT l
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
24594
27024
90
190
019
431
1535
450
198
191
360
24
Ill 22
0 C
lt i
20i ~ ltII C 18 C gt
16
158
156 0
i54 iii z ILi
J52
150
SS-30 SEA
55 65
63J 7 ~a 24844
26641
67
190
019
531
1550
324
212
173
308
24856
26276
54
199
019
631
155l
234
225
166
259
_________
~
500----------- 0
dego 400 -
~300~~ C
~ 200 z i 100
w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COIITEHT l
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Replication 2
Design 55
Lesign 633
67
190
019
531
1550
324
212
173
308
Figure B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B56
---------
Table B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality
ElIuivaJent lesidue Omtent
lesidue Cbntent
Bulk Spacific Gravity
~retical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Uut Weight pcf
Stabilaneter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
lesilient Mldulus 103psi
so
w 40 lt gt a 30 w w ~ 20 m lt II)
10
400
w 3 300 lt gt a w lj 200 0 w z 1008
0 12
Ill 10 Q
0 8gt lt
6
4
2-day
Final
~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
so 530
24024
26676
99
207
031
469
1499
354
138
183
352
SS-15 SEA Replication 1
60 70 Design 60 636 7 42 Design 636
24040 23986 26279 25901 85 74
214 223
031 031 569 669
1500 1497 223 149
222 126
159 160 302 234
24
Ill
c 22 ~ c
lt i
20i1
== (II C 180 gt
16
152
150 u -a
648 z w Q
146 1-
144
bull 500 a
o 400 - 3 300 C
~ 200 z ~ 100 (II w a
~ 0
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
85
214
031
569
1500
223 222
159
302
8
Figure B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B57
Table B58 Mixture Design Data Low Quality SS-15
Fquivalent Residue Content 60 60
Rsidue Cbntent 525 630
23944
~retical Specific Gravity
Bulk Sjecific Gravity 26592
Air Voids 100
209VMA
1bsocbed Asphalt 015
Effective Aspbalt 485
Unit Weight pcf 1494
Stabilareter Value 377
Olhesiaeter Value 151
Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi
162
375 2-day
Final
so
w 40 _ gt c 30 w w i
~20 m I-0
10
400
Ill
300 gt w I 200 i 2 w i 100 8
_________ 0 --middotmiddot-
12-------bull------
ti 10 9 0 8gt
6
4
24
- 22ci
0
20i
= 9 18 0 gt
16
152
150 u a
148 z---- w0146
144
500 Q
o 400 _ 300 Q
~ 200 I-z ~ 100
w a
23988
26022
84
215
015
585
1497
307
180
165
356
Graniterock SEA Replication 2
70
735 23793
25830
79
229
015
685
1485
217
170
169
277
~
~
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7
RESIOUE CONTENT li RESIDUE COPlTENT li (AGGREGATE 8ASIS) (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)
Design 60
resign 630
84
215
585
1497
307
180
165
356
8
Figure B58 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B58
Table B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Equivalent esidue omtent 5 0 60 70 Design 60
esidue Cbntent 5 75 690 805 Dsign 690
Bulk Specific Gravity 24389 24362 24419
Jheo=eticaJ Specific Gravity 2 6670 26303 25953
Air Voids 8 6 74 59 7 4
VMA 198 207 214 20 7
Absorbed Asphalt 009 009 009 009
Effective Asphalt 491 591 691 591
Unit Weight pcf 1522 1520 1524 1520
Stabilareter Value 38l 292 220 292
Cbhesiclneter Value 263 186 176 186
~t Mldulus 103psi
2-day 222 222 207 222
Fulal 380 289 293 289
5
w 40 C gt a 30 Ill ~ 20 m C 1- 10
24 ----------
22 bull C Cl C
zi 20
C1 o 18 0 gt
16 ___-________-------i-_-
400---------- 15a------------
156l 300 C gt - a =deg 154ti 200
iii z0 IUiii 0 152 bull bull~ 10018
150 ___ _______ __J0 ---i--J~-L--1
500----------12 ----------- bull o 400 -
Ill 10 ui l 300 -Q
Qg 8 g 200a lt z 6 l 100
iii a
01--J-----__ __4 -------r------- 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
RESIDUE COrlTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B59
Table B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Design 60
Eeidue omtent 575 690 805 D=sign 690
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleo~tical Specific Gravity
1lir Voids
VMA
Absocbed Asralt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcf
Stabilcmeter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
Eeilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
Ill 40 J
lt gt a 30 w I-w 0 20 Ill lt I-
10
400
w 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 Id
8100
0 12
10 m Q
0 8gt 5 lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
~
RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASISI
24371 24441 24445
26744 26373 26020
89 73 61 73
199 205 213 205
019 019 019 019
481 581 681 581
1521 1525 1525 1525
335 236 191 236
220 164 180 164
194 199 191 199
388 329 294 329
24
22
ci 0 lt i
20i
= a
= 18 0 gt
16
158
156 u a
deg154 = w Q
152 ---------150
500 a
1 400 m3 300 1 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100
Ill a
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COHTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B60
APPENDIX C
DATA ANALYSIS SOLVENT FREE AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS
Table Cl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL e_AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
95 85 80
867
76
88
90 85 85
867
29
33
95 85 85
883
58
65
85 70 80
783
76
98
100 100 100
1000
00
00
100 100 100
1000
00
00
C M s 0
D A T A x s
CV
80 80 80
800
00
oo
80 75 75
767
29
38
75 80 70
750
50
67
70 80 75
750
50
67
90 90
100
933
58
62
95 100
95
967
29
30
C M s 1
D A T A
X s
CV
80 75 70
750
50
67
60 70 55
617
76
124
70 70 65
683
-2 9
42
65 70 60
650
50
77
65 70 70
683
29
42
70 60 65
650
50
77
Table C2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating
F01
E 2 ll877 7777778 243aassese9 1)75102041 329 532 ~ middot2 1ll77777777~ 73RBSeSf89 32571~2-~5 3~ 29 532 J 1 150 ooocooo 150JOJOOOO 5f122llll9 414 746
EA ll 8114 llllll11444 2111111111 3J51224 266 396 -E~ middot2- 1-0frOOfr~ 0-9 middot50-middot000 3 oco middot2middot20110816 middot 329 532 Agt 2 77 7777778 38 8815589 17142857 329 532 nJ 4 1555555~55 388881889 171112857 266 396
FR RmiddotJR 36 8166666567 225851B52
------------------------------------------------middot---------------------ronmiddotL 53 -esoo--000000r
Cl
100
P
c5 75 z-t-lt8 50 w t-lt bull css-oC
CMS-0w 25a C middot+ CMS-7 C lt
0-----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Cl Mean AggregateCqqting at middotoesign Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 867 css-o 883 CSS-0 783 css-o 1000 css-o 1000middotcss-o middot I I CMS-0 800 CMS-0 7~ 7 CMS-0 750 CMS-0 933 CMS-0 967lrMS-0 750
I CMS-7 750 CMS-7 617 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 65 0 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating
C2
Table C3 Film Stripping
EMULSION
AGGREGATE SAN
BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK
C s s 0
D A T A
5
0
10
5
5
0
X s
CV
25
35
1414
75
35
47l
25
35
1414
C M s 0
D A T A
0
5
5
7
0
0
X s
CV
25
35
1414
60
14
236
00
oo oo
C M s 7
D A T A
0
0
0
5
0
0
X s
CV
00 OQ 00
25 35
1414
00 00
oo
Table C4 ANOVA Summary Film Stripping
AN-OVA
middotmiddotDPmiddot -ss- F middotFe5
E 2 33 7777778 1euro8888889 23555191 426 802 A 2 -ti8 7777778 343888889 4 7984496 426 802
E X II 4 9 2222226 23055557 3217054 363 642 ERROI 9 645000000 71666667 ---------------TOTAL 17 1762777782
C3
fl w 0 lti 1L a =gt en C w C C-a I-en
40
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-730
20
10
0 SB F GR
Figure C3 Film Stripping
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
css-o 25 css-o 75 css-o 25
GMS-0 25 CMS-0 60 CMS-0 oo
CMS-7 oo CMS-7 25 CMS-7 oo
----middot----middot-middotmiddotmiddot
Nlte Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping
C4
Table CS 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue
Content 10 3 psi
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW D
118 170A 217 205 160 175
C T 83 190 191 182 130 185A s )ts 101 180 204 194 145 180
0 s 25 14 18 16 21 7
CV 246 79 90 84 146 39 D 104 185 155A 190 140 215
C T 82 155 154 171 130 180A M x 93s 170 155 181 135 198
s 16 21 1 13 7 250 CV 167 125 05 74 52 125
D A ab 55 35 73 38 55
C T
82A 48 63 77 45 65 M X s pound81 -- - 52 49 75 42 60 s7 l 5 20 3 5 7
CV 18 96 404 38 11 9 11 8
Table C6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus
A N ) V l
-D-F -SS
E 2 832263888888 _ 2-- -5441-- 722-2222-J 1 89933611111
E~ 4 5386 7777779 -1J- 2- -3-8-1-+-rG-55--5-5-5 7- bull AJ 2 144235~899 EA 4 58024444443
ERROR 113- 3951500 00~-J
---------------------------------------------------------------------TOT-W- -3-5 -11806-4---638 881gt-9-
(116131944444 2720-8611111 89933611111 13466944445 1-9Q lh-5--amp7--+7-8-7211944445
14506111111 219 527-7778
1895577629 -12 394-1541-409569480
61345059 S-~937872 32952081 56gt7870Ll
357 3-S7 443 295
-]y5+ 3S7 295
605 6 05--833 461
-6--05-605 461
cs
bull css-omiddot 300 C CMS-0
M 0 diams CMS-7
(J
3200 gt C 0 E 1-
ffi 100
01----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure CS 2 Day ResiLient Modulus
SAN middotBERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 101 css-o 180 rss-o 204 css-0_194 CSS-0 145 CMS-0 198
CMS-0 93 CMS-0 170 ICMS-0 155 CMS-0 181 CMS-0 135 css-o 180l l l I I CMS-7 81 CMS-7 52 CMS-7 49 CMS-7 75 CMS-7 42 CMS-7 60
Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C6 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking 2 Day
Resilient Modulus 10 3 psi
C6
Table C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Content 10 psi
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A (
s
CV
260
232
246
20
80
320
280
300
28
94
482
299
391
129
33l
365
358
362
5
l4
280
240
260 28
109
320
345
333
18
53
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
267
250
259
12
47
295
280
288
ll
37
253
288
271
25
92
290
387
339
69
203
260
307
284
33
11 7
395
334
365
43
118
C M s 7
D A T A
X
s
CV
78
64
71-
10
139
110
95
103
ll
104
75
73
74
l
19
110
135
123
18
144
80
90
85
7
83
110
135
123
18
144
middotTable C8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus
-~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------F-r05- ---F-01--
E
J El -E- Al EAJ
-ERRJR
2 2-1 4 -~ 2 4
18
3592750555555 -14506 722-2221-171610COOOOJ 147394444445
1---1-1----lf466-li-+ 19215000000 55353333333
2850GOOC0000
17-16375277778 72~336H-1-11
1716100)0000 36848611111 sect8~5833---3-33--9607500000
13840833333 ~ 58-3 33-33 333
11315528C7 -45810702
109385263 23272807 ~U981l-2-1-6067895 3741579
357 -3 r7 443 2 95 3~7-357 295
605 605 833 461 605 605 4 6 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------~- 3-5- -448+1----2-222-2-
C7
bull css-o500
CMS-0 U) diams CMS-7C
C) 400 middoto -
~ 300
J Ci 200
1-z 100 J-UJ UIa
01-------------------------~---~-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
eMS-0 259 ess-a 300 ess-a 391 ess-a 362 eMS-0 284 CMS-0 365
ess-o 246l l l l l ICMS-0 288 eMS-0 271 CMS-0 339 ess-o 260 ess-o 333
CMS-7 71 CMS-7 103 CMS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123
t-ote Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure ca Newrnan-Keuls Ranking Full Cure 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi
ca
Table C9 Density at Design Residue Content pcpound
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
1359
1372
1366
09
07
1365
1365
1365
0
0
1365
1352
1359
09
07
1345
1345
1345
0
0
1520
1525
1523
04
02
1515
1515
1515
0
0
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
1348
1343
1346
04
03
1330
1338
1334
06
04
1329
1340
1335
08
06
1335
1316
1326
- 13
10
1505
1490
1498
11
07
1490
1485
1488
04
02
C M s 7
D A T A
x s
CV
1373 1385
1379
09 06
1375 137 5
1375
0 0
1380
1379
1380
01 01
1370
1360
1365
07 05
1537
1535
1536
01 01
1543
1545
1544
01 01
Table ClO ANOVA Surtunary Density
A II O V ~
-SS F bull O1
E _ 0
2 i
lCB4155555 Z08-tOS389
II 311277~
54207777R 1 ouos2sirrs
4340277
135q23660 -25lS 7i80R63-
1087331173
3S7 3 ~7 443
i()5 605 83
EA Q
4 -2
1599U4U5 _iuseeg
399E11 -3-3UUL45-
10J17398 bull~3785-C7
295 -~S7-
4 f 1 -6CS
A) 2 13772222 o6886111 17251218 357 605 EAJ q 2C361111 5090278 12752262 295 4 61
-ERRJR- 13- 718-()001 399166-7-
35
C9
bull css-o160 CMS-0 diams CMS-7
150
() -a gt 140 -en z w
middotC 13
1201~bull-------------r---------------SBH SBL FH FL ~RH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C9 - Density at Design Residue Content
SAN middotBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 138o CMS-7 1365ICMS-7 1375 CMS-7 1544
css-o 1366
I-7 bull rMS-7 1536
css-o 1365 css-o 1359 css-o 1345 css-o 1523 CSS-0 j515
CMS-0 1346 CMS-0 1334 CMS-0 1335 CMS-0 132 6 CMS-0 1498 CMS-0 1488
Nte Values with a ccmnm vertical line are not statistically different
Figure ClO Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcpound
ClO
Table Cll Air Voids at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
D 87 7 0-A 75 77 80 72
C T 71 70 92 82 78 73A s )s 79 70 84 80 79 73
0 s ll 0 12 04 01 01
CV 143 0 144 45 18 10 D 97 93A 93 91 82 84
C T 90 92 A
91 93 87 90
M x 94 93 92 s 92 84 87 s os 01 01 _0l 04 04
0 53 08 15 15 42 49CV D A 77 62 73 62 71 48
C T 73 61 62 71 65A 55
M X s 75 62 68 67 68 52 s 03 01 08 06 04 057
CV 38 12 115 96 62 96
Table Cl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids
A I O Y 11
-DF ss -F 05 F01
E 2 382650000 191325000 69)150301 3~7 605 -A 2 -2-681667 1340334 ll03567311 -3- 57 605
Q 1 2f677778 26677778 952324f6 4 13 I 33 EA lj 13S33333 3313333 122011409 2 95 Ii 61 ti -2 l8105555- -905-277-8- 326553tO 357 tiOS II) 2 6572221 3296111 11953707 357 605 E~l 4 88411445 2211111 797552 795 4 f 1 ERElll 111 11991)0)00 bull2172222-
-------------------------~------------------------------------------rou1 s SJ 3100000-
Cll
11
10
iP- en 0-0 gt aa
9
8
7
6
5
4
bull css-o CMS-o diams CMS~7
SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
F-igure Cll Air Voids at middotoesign Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 94 CMS-0 93 CMS-0 92 ICMS-0 92 CMS-0 84 ICMS-0 87
IIcss-o 79 css-o 7 0 I II
css-o 79 css-o 73
I ~_ I~ CMS-7 7 5 CMS-7 62 CMS-7 68 CMS-7 48 - - bull-- ~ -----~middot-middotmiddot--middot-middotmiddot-middot ---middotmiddot
~= Values with a OCIlOn vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids
Cl2
Table Cl3 Stabilorneter Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
272
3113
293 29
99
270
265
268 04
13
393
327
360 47
130
380
325
353 39
110
270
270
270 0
0
235
185
210 35
168
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
375
344
360
22
61
340
350
345
07
21
307
377
342
50
145
415
367
39l
33
85
350
300
3-2 5
35
109
240
245
243
04
15
C M s 7
D A T A
x s
CV
235
23-5
235
0
0
130
120
125
07
57
213
233
-223
14
63
150
200
175
35
202
350
350
350
0
0
250
250
25 o_ 0
0
Table Cl4~ ANOVA Summary Stabilorneter Value
A N O V 1
soua= SS r 01
E 2 2
7086172721 9702C93fl9
3543086361 4SS10Uf95
505343236 ~-9189501
357 357
605 605
) 1 175 6950250 1756950250 25053)2i8 443 833 EA 4 6718347112 167 9586 778 23955053 2 95 461 ~ ~544 -4 Q-432-ll-25-0- --S--~ 38 ~5-19- -3 5- ios AJ 2 941227166 47(1euro13583 57122663 357 605 EAJ 4 289779333 72319A33 10314831 2 95 II f 1
Ell ngtR -18 1r2024gt0) -i- bull112472-
---------------------------------------------------------------------0-T- ----5- 4-9B1 is~v~
Cl3
50
w 40 I ltgt a 30w I-w ~ 200 I-m lt 10I-u
0 SSH SBL FH FL GRH
AGGREGATE
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
GRL
Figure Cl3 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 350 CMS-7 250ICMS-0 360 ICMS-0 345 r=ss-o 36o rMS-0 39l
css-o 268 CMS-0 342 css-o 353 CMS-0 325 CMS-0 243Icsbull-bull _ CMS-7 235 CMS-7 12S CMS-7 223 CMS-7 175 css-o 270 css-o 210
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value
Cl4
Table Cl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOWHIGH LOW LOWHIGH D 360193 280 465 275 250A T 234 345 183 375 160 225C A
s x 214 353 232 420 218 238s s 29 11 69 64 18810
136 30 296 152 37 4 74CV D 280 440 230 355 200 320 T A
252 430 219 450 140 240C A M x 266 435 225 403 170 280s s 20 7 67 428 570
74 16 16735 250 202CV D
80 190 122 245 130 170 T A
82 180 192 235 120 180C A M X 81 185 157 240 125 175s s l 7 so 7 777
CV 18 3038 31 5 57 40
Table Cl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value
-SS--
pound 2 1309717272222 654858611111 1102309084 357 605 __ 2 3Ber61222222 194033611--111 -1-1t2J3570 -3 57 605 J 1 12)524904445 120524f94111145 711)1137379 1143 l 33
EA 4 2311~U411111145 57795111111 355~57119 295 4 ~ 1
~ + --8-066---H~i-i--2 ---4-B3-a~--H ~T4-=7-7S~J -3 S7 605 1J 2 111206 7222222 71033511111 ll3~31111 3 57 605 EAJ 4 500gt1111111 12512777778 7587162 235 4 (- 1
RAO- -18 -999 500-000( -1-6--2-7 -75-00000-
--------------------------------------------------------------------tO+--l- el-i- 3-fi-99g6-3-R-~
Cl5
bull css-o500
Q1__________---___-----~
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure ClS CohesiometerValue at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 232rMS-0 435 CMS-0 280rMS-0 266 rss-o 420 tss-o 218
css-o 214 css-o 353 CMS-0 225 CMS-0 403 css-o 238ICMS-0 170
CMS-7 81 CMS-7 185 CMS-7 157 CMS-7 240 CMS-7 125 CMS-7 175
Nrte Values with a oamon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value
~400 -I ltgt cc 300 w 1-w E 2000 -() w c 1008
CMS-0 diams CMS-7
Cl6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Table Cl7 Swell at Design Residue Content in
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
0 0000 0003 0000 0008 0000 0000A C T 0000 0005 0000 0007 0000 0002
A 0000 0004 0000 0009 0000 0000 s j( 00000 00040 00000 00080s 00000 00007
0 s 00000 00010 00000 0 0010 00000 00012
CV 00 250 00 125 00 1732 D 0000 _o 045 0020 0036 0000 0000A 0006 0029 0018 0040 0001 0000TC A 0007 0040 0022 0039 0000 0000
M x 00043 00380 00200 00383 00003 00000 s s 00038 00082 00020 00021 00006 00000 0
874 215CV 100 54 1732 oo
D 0000 0004 0000 0003 0000 0000A T 0000 0002 0000 0000 0000 0000
C A 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000
M x 00000 OQ023s 00000 00010 00000 00000 s 00000 00015 00000 00017 00000 00000
7 oo 655 1732CV 00 00 oo
Table Cl8 ANOVA Summary Swell
P N O V ~
SOUR-middotEmiddot l)f -ss- -lSmiddot F rs FM
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------E 2 C031905 )015953 7576385211 329 532 J 2 0012203 OOOf112 2~97R1n75 329 532 l 000858(1 )()QSf80 11122112111111 414 846
H LI 0016535 00)111311 1963258575 266 396 Emiddot) middot2middot 00079 51- a0ll397S 1eg ~16527 329 532 AJ 2 00011958 )0021179 111 ns1ne 329 532 EAJ II 0006609 OC01652 7e117l97t3 266 396
EDl 36 )000751 OOOJ021
TOBImiddot middot53middot ----008959-9-middot
Cl7
05
04
z 03
-I -I w
u 3 02
01
0 SBH SBL FH
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
FL GRH GRL AGGREGATE
FigureCl Swell at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 00003 css-o 00007CMS-0 00043 CMS-0 -0380 CMS-0 00200 CMS-0 00303
CMS-0 00000css-o 00080 css-o 00000Icss-o 00000 Icss-o 00040 ICSS-0 00000
CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00000CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00023 CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00010
Rte Values with ~--~~~ ~~ lb-le are not ~tatistically different
Figure Cl8 Newman-Keuls Ranking swell in
Cl8
Table Cl9o MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
-------EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
GRANITEROCKFRESNOSAN BERNARDINO
LOW LOWHIGH HIGH LOW HIGH D
124 72198 137 287 243A 227 90145 178 83 260TC 57197 135 252 270A
s 207 104 258 73139 239s s 17 05 56 29 14 17
0 CV 82 280 82638 233 53
D 197 160145 145 90 205A 19l 17092 100 80 220TC 158 105 138190A M x 182 119 11 7 85 205 156 s s 21 37 25 1607 15 0
115 737 105316 21l 83CV D 21 omiddot 240202 185 98 330A
220 20087 181 34588TC 216 210138 223 77 338A M x 215 217142 196 88 338s
s 2111 0805 58 237
23 405 120 22 96118CV
Table C20 ANOVA Summary -MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
----------------------- I N O V A
SO0RE --DF -lS--
middotE __ 2 2
401 11310n -5831137037
2008568519 --2915568519
166S53085 2111762euro92-
3-9 J29
532 532
Q 1 14f5364f296 14653646296 1215099198 4 14 746 EA-Ev
4 -frac34
2784740740 -1-1-i 0359259
696185185 -56-tl-1-79tr30-
5 772 8571 -6450815
266 middot-3-29
396 -5-32middotmiddot
110 2 355470370 177735185 1bull11738C30 329 532 EAO II 12794711075 3198euro9519 25523909 266 396
-Ei8JB 36- 11311 111euro66euro7 120596296
---------------------------------------------------------------------FOTAJ- --5-3- -31131--343-14 8-1-
Cl9
50 bull css-o ti) CMS-0 gt 40 diams CMS-7E I
a w 30I-w E 0 -I 20-ca ltC I-Cl) 10
0--------------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Cl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOWmiddot HIGH LOW
CMS-7 215 CMS-7 142 css-o 104 I ICMS-7 338 CMS-7 21 7
css-o 207 css-o 139 i CMS-7 88 CMS-0 156middot css-o middot
CMS-0 182 CMS-Q 119 CMS-0 117 CMS-0 85 CMS-0 205 css-o 73
Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
C20
-----------------------------------------
Table C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
IEMULSON
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIG_H LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A x s
CV
135 104 104
114
18
157
70 85 51
69
17
248
105 66
136
102
35
343
148 197
-173
35
201
107 101
72
93
19
201
74 107
92
91
17
182
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
128 85
174
119
31
256
73 59 -
66
10
150
69 36 65
56
18
318
158 110
-134
34
253
77 96 68
80
14
178
53 66
113
77
32
408
C M s 7
D A T A x s
CV
141 79 52
91
46
503
185 60 63
103
71
695
125 201
96
141
54
386
192 164 126
161
33
206
131 130 120
127
6
48
72 230
76
126
90
715
Table C22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
l II O Y A
-soaas -OF- -S-S- -F- FrOS
E -llmiddot J
n -tJ-AO EllJ
RROi
----------
2 2 1 u -2-2 4
36middot -------
199090000000 middot 39113 411111111111
4111296296 61982222222
-t-72-1-middot-11181-18-1-754737037011 41156 5185186
85722 middotbull)0(0000 ----------------
995115000000 -1971-7222222
11111216296 151195555556 -360-yen5-110-711 1middot
j8236851852 11166296297
middotmiddot2381 166667
111805138 -0280488 17265A9 6507548
-36111086-15058033
41589422
329 329 414 2 66 329 329 266
532 -532 746 396
-532 532 3915
-----------------------------------lOo-1- middottt 1-300-lamp833-333-3-
C21
400
CJgt ~ 300 I
0 w I-w 200
-~ 0 CJwc 1000 ()
0
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Valueat Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 ll9 CMS-7 103 ICMS-7 141 css-o 173 CMS-7 127 CMS-7 126
css-o ll4 css-o 69 1middotcss-o 102 CMS-7 161 css-o 93 css-o 91
CMS-7 91 CMS-0 66 middotCMS-0 56 CMS~O 134 CMS-0 80 CMS-0 77
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C22 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
C22
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table C23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
724 811 637
724
123
170
1289 -
1276
1283
09
07
627 628 695
650
39
60
622 940
1427
996
405
407
475 407
1276
719
483
672
803 790 498
697
172
247
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
1217 393
1260
957
489
511
2075 2879 1875
2276
532
233
1943 1195 2012
171 7
453
264
1241 1224 1208
1224
1 7
13
676 574 550
600
67
112
986 787 815
863
108
125
C M s 7
D A T A x s
CV
642 620 774
679
83
123
102 426 662
397 281
709
59 7 369 470
479 114
239
588 60l 290
493
176
357
301 263 393
319
67
210
238 284 227
250 30
121
Table C24 ANOVA Surmnary Surface Abrasion
Fmiddot F01middotmiddotss --------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------
e Amiddot
2 -gt
530361248149 22)938237037
315180624075 110469111)519
432152433 1sn1of15
329 329
532 532
1 n
1 4
[14699201852 9733 179629euro
446992gt1952 24332949074
61289-8 3335u~111
414 266
746 396
EJ J
2 2
middot59516003103 85017525926
291seoo1as1 425)8752963
4 9nn2 5 828630
329 329
532 532
EI 4 196475151852 4911877963 57349619 266 396
ERRJl 36 262551800000 72931l~-556
--------------------------------------------------------------------
middotTnUmiddot 53- middot159689-~0964815middot
C23
300
E C)
C)200 Cl)
0 J
z 0 en 100 lti a al lti
01-----r----~---------r---------SBH SBL
Figure C23
SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW
CMS-0 957 CMS-0 2276
css-o 724 css-o 1283
CMS-7 679 CMS-7 397
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content
FRESNO
HIGH
CMS-0 171 7
css-o 65o
CMS-7 479l
LOW
CMS-0 1224
ICSS-0 996
CMS-7 493
GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW
css-o
CMS-0
719
600
ICMS-0 863Icss-
CMS-7 319 CMS-7 250
Ngtte Val~ with~ ~n vertical line are not stati~tically different
Figure C24 Newman-Keuls Ranking Surface Abrasion grams
C24
APPENDIX D
DATA ANALYSIS SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS
----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
Table Dl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15
SEA
D A T A
75 85 85
85 80 85
80 75 70
65 70 70
85 90 90
80 85 85
X s
tV
817
58
71
833
29
35
7-50
50
67
683
29
42
middot88 3
29
33
833
29
35
ss 30 see
D A T A
85 80 85
75 80 80
75 85 85
70 80 70
90 85 95
90 80 90
x s
CV
833
29
35
783
29
37
81 7
58
71
733
58
79
-900
50
56
883
29
33
C M s 7
D A T A
80 75 70
60 70 55
70 70 65
65 70 60
65 70 70
70 )0 65
x s
CV
750 50
67
617 76
124
683 29
42
650 50
77
683 29
42
650
50
77
Table D2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating
rmiddot rs F05 F 0 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------F 2 235 712593 1179 f-296297 553913Q113 329 532 a 2 63 bullTlt1ll81I R 31L97UC7U 1521731 3 29 532 E~
11 3f2 116i14f Jmiddot 39 (1)7111~gtI 1
3~2 ~-2900 9976~5185
17 ~li347F3 UfB47826
4 14 256
746 96
i) ~ pound 2S 11252i 12 29(-29 bull 5086957 329 532
a~ 2 12 ~-~737r o lt19518~ 2E260e7 329 53 2 u ll 1f3 bull illf illt7 41t3S1B52 191156522 2 G6 3~f
iE1190il 3i 76 pound61iz~57 212~-25
Dl
-~ -CJ z I-lt(
0 0 U1 -lt( C bull SS 15 SEA w 25 SS 30 SEA CJ cc
diams CMS - 7CJ lt(
0 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dle Mean Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
I SS-30 733SS-301 $33 SS-15amp 833 lss-301 sn 7 I ISS-30 900 SS-30 883
SS-151 817 SS-301 783 SS-15 683 SS-15 883 SS-15 833SS-lSi 750
CIS--7 750 CS-7 617 OS-7 683 CMS-7 650 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650
Ngtte Values with a comon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating
D2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
Table D3 Film Stripping
EMULSION
AGGREGATE SAN
BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK
s s
15
0 A T A
30
15 20
30 15
25
X s
CV
225
106
47l
250
71
283
200
71 354
s s
30
D A T A
25
25
0
0
5
0
X s
CV
25middoto
oo
00
oo oo
oo
2middotmiddot5
35
1413
C M s 7
D A T A
0
0 0
5
0 0
X s
CV
oo
00 oo
25
35
1413
oo
00 oo
Table D4 ANOVA Swnmary Film Stripping
----------------- ---------------- --middot-----------middot----- middot--middotmiddotmiddot middot- middotmiddot-middot----middot -middot-- middotmiddotmiddot--- --- -------- -A N O V J
-SW~ middotnt r-
pound 2 14333333113 7166666667 27 1S78lttl7 l 2 2]33333333 1165666euro67 middot11t1210~26 Eirl 141 55f 3333335 13958333311 i2894737
Dlli~RI 9 237 50CCDIOmiddot) 2638888P9
lOUL t7 bull--- bullbull - bull- 0 bull bullbull bull- bull bull 0 -------- bull-- bull- bull---bull ---- lt -bullbull bull - bullbullbull--bullbullbullbullbull-bullbull-- bullbullbull bull ___ bull --bull bull bull bull --- bull bull-bullho bullbull bull- bull bull ~-- bull- UO rArr-d bull
D3
cit -w
0 lt( ll a (I)
C w 0 C-a I-ti)
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
20
1
0 SB F GR
Figure D3c Film Stripping
SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO
Iss-3
SS-15
250
225
SS-15~7 250
25
SS-15
ISS-30
200
25
ClIS-7 oo middot SS-30 00 CMS-7 00
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping
D4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue 3Content 10 psi
-------ElAULSWN
----QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCK SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
D S$ 1U H9 171 185 110 159
i22 2~1 165 197 159 165A15Jo-ot----t----+---ii---+----t-----ti 132 140 168 191 135 162
SEA s i3 1 4 9 35 4
CV Ul2 10 25 44 258 26
$5 ---
D
~ A
158
140
189
198 184 187
212
201
178
173
222
199
gtUfl x l49 194 186 207 176 211 SEA s 13 6 2 8 4 16
CV 85 33 11 38 20 77
C M
D A T A
80
82 55 48
35
63
73
77
38
45 55
65
s x 81 52 49 75 42 60
7 s
CV
1
18
5
96 20
404
3
38 5
119
7
118
Table D6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus
--=======-=-middot------=====--=- ---------------------==-~----------=-----e=-----BF SS lS F F05 F01
pound 2 ln~13~ 3lBillllll1l 52367 191141145 3715181747 357 605 I 2 29111 GllS5SSS6 111155 bull 5211778 103289966 357 605 l 1 3l$3351l11112 33$3-3611112 240095590 4113 A33 lEamp liL 31121111l11U1t zst-n22t77 8 ssu21119a 295 461 pound~ 2 1217222222 16093611111 432112657 357 605 III 2 n~ bullEHOq 1a ----------
521iwSSSS5 15S911111111 25Jot 5lll)~Oll)il))I
31l527777R 4117277777~ iJl9166657
22C3627) -2H1157
357 2~95
6~5 11 61
-=====------middot--- -- -- middotmiddot-- --middot-llOl~L lS
DS
bull SS 15 SEA 11 SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
-(D -l Q 0 E J-
ffi 1 J-(J wa gtlt 0 Q--------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL (I
AGGREGATE
Figure D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-3~1 l49 SS-3H J86 SS-10 207 SS-30 176 SS-30 211
SS-15amp 132 SS-15amp l40 SS-151168 SS-l51 l91 ss-lSi 135 SS-15 162I I I CS-7 81 CMS-7 52 OS-7 42 CMS-7 60
llite Values with a amron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent
Figure D6 Newman-Keuls Ranking 2 Day 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi
D6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Table D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Contentr 10 psi
-EMULSION OUALITY LEVELcAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15
SEA
D A T A
325
271
l]JD
260
390
340
319
348
272
367
302
356
x s
CV
29S
38
128
285
35
124
365
35
97
334
21
62
320
67
21 0
329
38
116
ss 30 SEJ
0 A T A
282
310
337
255
303
374
362
307
318
308
289
329
x s
CV
296
20
67
296
58
196
339
50
148
335
39
116
313
7
23
309
28
92
C M s 7
D A T A
78
64
110
95
75
73
110
135
80
90
85
7
83
110
135
x s
CV
71
10
139
103
11
104
74
1
19
123
18
144
123
18
144
Table D8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus
A N O V ll
E 2- 3r39El11 3middotl8tB89 196 994 L19 44 44 5 178 q233024 3 57 6 CS 2 9111~7222223 4058 3611112 3 57577(13 357 6csbulla 11 611~ li9llll41115 ~16 ampll44445 S585579 443 833
_n_ sect 251l-illll41sectl41 -531 31i 11111 AS7121pound3 295 4 61 EJ 2 lt 115 $555555 227 521777 8 1994213 357 605 iampJ 2 170555555 15)277778 0770121 357 605 __ElJ 1324111ilJlilil4 5 208 bull 11Ul 11 bull 184922 2 95 4 ( 1
nan 11 19P73 SOOJIO~ 11111D833l33
middotmiddot-- =--=--=-==-===--c-=-c------_--=--ngtllllll
----------------------------------middot----
D7
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
traquo diams CMS - 7a ()
0--Gl ~- I J _J bull C 02 E I-z w J-(J w C
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATEmiddot
Figure D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HJGH lOW HJGH LOW HIGH LOW
I I I Iss-il51 298 1SS-31l 295 ss-]5~ 365 SS-30 335 1middot SS-15 320 SS-15 329
SS-301 296 SS-l5amp 235 SS-301 339 SS-15 334 SS-30 313 SS-30 309
CIIS--7 71 OS-7 103 CHS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123
t-bte Values with a armon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D8 Newman-Keuls Ranking Full Cure
Resilient Modulus 103 psi
D8
----- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D9 Density at Design Residue Content pcf
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
LOWHJGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH D l341 6 ll339 1347 1338 1523ss 1500A T 1356 133S 1350 1333 1513 1497A
1~ x l351 l337 1349 1336 1518 1499 sSEA 07 02 02 04 07 02
05 02 02 03CV 05 01
D 1362 1352 1370 1355 1545A 1520ss T 1371 1355 1361 1354 1550 1525
30 A
x 1367 1354 1366 1355 1548 1523 SEA 02 06s 06 01 04 04
05 02 05 01 02 02CV D 1373 1375 1380 1370 1537 1543AC T 1385 1375 137 9 1360 1535 1545AM x 1379 1375 1380 1365 1536 1544s s 09 oo 01 07 01 017
06 ooCV 01 05 01 01
Table DlO ANOVA Summary Density
N O V ll -----middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddotmiddot-- -- --------- -------middot --------------- ----- - - -
smI=pound DF ss F F05 F01
pound 2 2738H9 310369445 153505090 357 605 ~ 2 2273iWlllbull38B9 11369544445 5530 gt35704 357 lj -~5 ~ 1 11-6~2SilllaquollO 12 602500C 524057772 443 R33 n I tpoundlUll11 Jl-69lll45 2-324621e 2 95 4 61 E 2 3131poundpound57 15i5S33J 7 7537nB 357 li os lJ 2 ltClfltSf-57 0433334 21458C6 357 s 05 n~ Iii )l216poundfi6lii 9556667 47372764 295 451
EHJii 11l 3 bull nsilraquorn 2019444
------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -- -middotmiddot-middot ----- -middotmiddot - middot-------
35 23611rJC556
D9
1 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
-0 a gt1 ()
z
diams CMS-7
w C
120 SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure D9 Density at Design Residue Coritent
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
OS--7 1379 aS-7 ]375 IClIS-7 l380 IOlS-7 1365 ISS-30 1548 CMS-7 1544ISS-30~ 1367 SS--30~ J354 SS-30~ 1366 SS-30~ 1355 CMS-7 1536 SS-30 1523
SS-15bull 1351 ss-is~ 1337 SS-15bull 1349 ss-1s 1336 SS-15 1518 SS-15 1499
NJte Values with a omron vertical lme are not statistically different
Figure D10 Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcf
DlO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
Table D11 Air Voids at Design Residue Content
-EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
107
)5
9 10l
91
99
79
99
80
83
8 bull5
84
I s
ICY
U)
Ill 9
B4
10l
03
28
95
06
60
89
14
159
82
02
26
85
01
08
ss 30j
SEA
D A T A
90
93
92
85
92
96
86
84
66
67
74
73
x s
CV
92
02
23
89
05
56
94
03
30
85
01
l 7
67
01
ll
74
01
10
C M s 7
D A T A
77
73
62
61
73
62
63
71
71
65
48
55
x s
CV
75
03
38
62
O~l
12
68
08
u5
67
06
96
68
04
62
52
05
96
Table Dl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids
A ll O V A --e--ee-ee=-==== -- -- middot- -- --- middot- - ------- - middot-----middot----middot ______ __________ ---middot- ----- - ------------- -
iiUEllilE ss ~s F F01
E 45111Hoiii6pound 225l08333 812457541 357 605 ll 1~-lilliillt~~)Q 7930)000 2519405 357 505 IJJ 11 ili$6J4141~ 16469444 59230768 443 8 33 E1 2J53ll3ll -5S5333 4 -2 bull 11755245 295 4 6 1
EJ 15672223 bull 783pound 112 2~131820 357 605 I 21022223 bull 1li 1112 bull 3$35365 357 cs
EampJ 2971111ll J27778 26713286 2 95 4t1 iElllllHgt 5cgt~SiIJOIgt -2790556
-middot--middot ------- --middot - middotmiddot- -middotmiddot--middot-- --3li
D11
11 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
-l
a - 8
-a 0 7gt tc ltI 6
5
4 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dll
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot
middot HIGH LOW
SS-]5amp JlJl ISS-ll5~ 10l
ISS-301 92 SS-311l11 89ICMS-7 75 CS-7 fi2
Air Voids at Design Residue Content
FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
=- 95 I I ISS-15 89 SS-15 82 SS-15 8 5
SS-31 94 SS-30 85 SS-30 74ICMS-7 68
OS-7 68 CMS-7 67 SS-30 67 CMS-7 52
Ngtte Values with a ommn vertical line are not statistically dilferent
Figure D12 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids
Dl2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
middotmiddotEMULSION OUAUTY LEVEL
~- AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
48S 3g_g
295
middot 32 8
439
396
397
418
288
307
223
307
X s
CV
443
64
144
312
23
75
418
30
73
408
15
36
298
13
45
265
59
224
ss 3Wo SEA
0 A T A
400
403
367
283
342
411
392
262
310
32-4
292
236
x s
CV
402
02
05
325
59
183
377
49
130
327
92
281
31 7
10
31
264
40
150
C M s 7
D A T A
235
235
130
120
213
233
150
200
350
350
250
250
x s
CV
235
00
00
125
07
57
223
14
63
175
35
202
350
oo oo
250
00
oo
Table Dl4 ANOVA Swnrnary Stabilometer Value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------A N O V A
---------~----------middot------middot-middotmiddot-- -middot--middot--middotmiddot--middot------ bull middotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middot middot------middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot--- --middotmiddot ---_ -- middotmiddot-middotmiddot-- -- - - - -----ss r r05 r01
2 1 i 7~ Sbull1lfipound5161S 5879033333 332259711 357 605 I 2 igtS895QGDgt 279475000 195117552 357 ~os i ll ~l ~
11 111 2 2
l~illflll1111111 7DS nll3331
1~il])2222] 755J5556
~ 111 8 11111~=-- 10115 834 71011111
37 7502778
275769841 128178912
U938281 251M309
11113 295 357 357
833 4f1 605 605
Ell~ 14middot 3~53lt1$1H 116340278 5750926 295 461 fElilli U 25977~illlllCII~ 1111H72222
------------------------ bull- ~bull OOM---bullbullbullbull- - bull------_________ _
roru
013
w J ltC gt a w 1-w E 0 I-m ltC Ishyen
SBH SBL FH FL
bull SS 15 SEA 5S 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-)Sll 441_3 SS-l 325I SS-JSi 4131 SS-15 40 8 CMS-7 350 SS-15 265
SS-30 402 SS-JSa 31_2I ISS-30~ 377 SS-30~ 327 SS-30 317 SS-30 264
CS-7 235 CMS-7 125 ISS-15 298 CMS-7 250
Nlte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D14 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value
Dl4
-------------------
Table Dl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
ii3
ii2
l7-1
ilJD3
236
76
308
62
112
85
222
180
l s
CY
63
lJ1
10
Jl39
SlJ
363
l56
J13
725
185
174
940
99
19
194
201
30
148
ss 30 SEA
0 A T A
229
306
266
187
78
130
260
136
157
212
186
164
x s
CV
268
55
204
227
56
247
104
37
354
198
88
443
185
39
211
175
16
89
C M s 7
D A T A
80
82
190
180
122
192
245
235
130
120
170
180
x s
CV
81
l
18
185
7
38
157
50
315
240
7
30
125
7 57
175
7
40
Table Dl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value
--------------------middot--------------------------------------------------------------A N O V A
-=====-=-=--=-- ===== ss
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1i712 7222222 83563611111 226671165 357 605 I 2 l~12 lllllliilllllllB9 71144441145 129864 357 605 ~ 1l 251116l 144141llllj 2ti-~H~bull4dimiddot4 4 44 5 71775602 443 833 n l4 37511ll 777JTI7JJ S395bull J 9 ~4middot444 2548 5405 295 4 e 1 poundJ 2 72lllS3SlffiifISlmiddot9 3fi22f9111114UU 9026921 357 6C5
n 2 1 iSigt555S
11321Bl 111111I 117lIT177778
33220277778 1277032 9~11333
357 297
605 461
Eliflll 11 f15357 tlOilOOibull 3ilf65Jgt)oo
---------------------------------------middot-------------------------------------------
D15
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7w
J lt(
gt a w Jshyw I 0-() w
8
O--------r-----r-----------r----r-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
c 1
Figure D15
SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW
SS-3(1JlS 268
81IOS-7
ISS-]5i 63 SS-lSl 139
Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 240 SS-30 185 SS-15 201
SS-lSi 155 SS-30l 198 CMS-7 125 SS-30 175
SS-JOi 104 SS-151 185 SS-15 99 CMS-7 175
Note Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Dl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value
D16
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D17 Swell at Design Residue Content in
EfAULSEON
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDI NO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH lOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 s~
D A T A
048 -
0413
06S
069
on
005
006
008
-025 045
005
004
004
005
009
014
Jt s
CY
HS
0010
000
D68
-003
45
bull 006
002
241
035
010
286
004
001
133
009
005
483
ss 30 SEA
D A T A
023
023
020
063
066
055
000
ooo
008
031
023
028
000 000 003
ooo
001
000
x s
CV
022
002
79
061
006
93
003
005
1732
027
004
148
oin
002
1732
ooo
001
1732
C M s 7
D A T A
000
ooo
000
004
002
001
ooo
ooo
000
003
000
ooo 000 000 ooo
ooo
ooo
000
x s
CV
000
ooo
ooo
002
002
655
ooo
ooo
ooo
001
002
1732
ooo
ooo
ooo
ooo
ooo
000
Table D18 ANOVA Summary Swell ( Transformed Data)
A N O Y A
E 2 _1025326 0912663 2353471(154 329 532 -Amiddot middotmiddot2 1366452 0683226 1761825136 329 532 0 1 0368219 03613219 949521081 1114 7116
EA 11 04627$7 0115697 298345558 266 396 -EQ- 2-- --006-903G- -0(134515-middot -8-9003553 middot3l9 -S-32 A) 2 0150358 ~0075179 193863014 329 532 UO 4 0083986 0020997 54143375 26 396
-ERRORmiddot 36 0139606middot 0003178
-TOTIIL 53 --446-576-11
D17
05 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
04
z -J
J w IJJ
SBH SBL
diams CMS - 7
~oo
_02
01
FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dl7 Swell at Design Residue Content
SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-ll51 ii-IS SS-]5i il68 SS-15 a006 SS-15 bull 035 SS-15 004 SS-15 009I I I I SS-3Cli 022 SS-301 061 ISS-301 003 SS-30 bull 027 ISS-30 bull 001 ISS-30 bull 000
ClS-7 000 CIS-7 002 OS-7 000 OIS-7 001 CMS-7 000 CMS-7 000
NJte Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D18 Newman-Keuls Ranking Swell in
D18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
Table Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSl10N
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOWHIGH 0 156 48 175 229 2lO 125ss A ll5 60 20l ll7 228 120T 13_g 4e 170 132 212 130A15 i 137 52 182 200 2l 7 125 smiddotSEA 2l 37 l7 30 lO 05
1middot5]CY 133 92 148 46 40 D 98 106 lll 76 2l 0 lllAss 203 109 76 5l 235 95T ll3 85 63 59 233 125
30 A
x 138 100 83 62 226 llOSEll s 57 l3 25 l3 l4 l5
412 131 298 206 62 136CV D 2lO 202 185 98 330 240A 220 87 18l 88 345 200C T 216 138 223 77 338 2lOAM x 215 142 196 88 338 217s
5805 23 lls 08 2l7
23 405 ll8 120 22 96CV
Table D20 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Stabilorneter Value
N O V A
-------middot------------------------------------------------------ ---------------DF -$ -F os- r01
pound 2 5919875926 2l59917963 39C147075fl 329 53 2 690 i1111pounda$11 iii 345 022110111 US51521111 329 5 32 Ill 1 763129-i296 763 1296 296 100671B132 414 7 U6
Ea t93 11171111]J)7lll 1007863519 1329576P8 266 391bullIEill -2 middot -E~ti35~259 -23middot0-H9fgt29 C-~6522- middot3 29 532 AO 2 S3amp11171t1137ll 11192351$5 55305370 329 532 El s1111i1r1075 135268519 17~qq579 266 396bullmiddotDll~t 311i 27239~333~ 7 5903711)111
53
--------------------------------------------------------middot-----------------------
D19
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA0)
gt diams CMS - 7 l I
a w 30fshyw E 0 J 2-en ltC Ishyen 10
SBH SSL FH FL GRH GRL01amp---------------------------_
AGGREGATE
Figure Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
middotHtGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
QS-1 235 CS-7 142 196 SS-15 200 CMS-7 338 CMS-7 217GS-
Iss-3H uaI I I ISS-3Qi lilG SS-15i ]S2 IOMS-7 88 SS-30 22~ SS-15 125
SS-151 137 ss-i5~ 52 SS-30~ 83 SS-30 62 SS-15 217 SS-30 110
fute Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent
Figure D20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
D20
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Table D2l MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
-------_cEMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
ss 1 sa
D A T A
x s
HIGH
Ul3 ~ JlU
43
64
IOW
~ TWlI ~
--
H1GH
159 1-43 126
143
17
LOW
123 187
60
123
64
HIGH
130 179 153
154
25
LOW
120 104 143
122
20
CV D A5S T A30 x
SEA s
171
139 88
104
110
26
-98 91 -95
4
116
114 116
69
100
27
515
TWT TWT TWT
--
159
111 101 15~
122
28
160
83 65 63
70
11
CV D AC T AM x5 s
7 CV
236
141 79 52
91
46
503
37
185 60 63
103
71
695
267
125 201
96
141
54
386
-192 164 126
161
33
206
23l
131 130 120
127
6
48
157
72 230
76
126
90
715
Too weak to test
Table D22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
SOO~e 55- -f middotFmiddot OS- F01
pound 2 19956 G31tl3Tt 99780165185 52791162 329 532 -1 2- 223ii~ 92592~-~ middot111544629630 -59015431 3middot29 5 32 J 1 n21lliiilliEiiii~ 1middot112106656666 75185029 414 746 lEJ Ill 32il76711ltCl~lll9l 132191851852 43485622 2euro6 396 ~ 2- ~373hllllllllllllllqSmiddot iiilfgtamp 1222-223- -3bull6middot3300811 -3 29 532 1i 2 1S011Hil12 75i0555556 bull ~397100 329 532 Eli
-a~llt-Iii
36 511J7777777
middot5B11113BB333 12799444444 129e l9 25 92 6middot
5771861 266 396
D21
bull SS 15 SEA U) SS 30 SEA gt diams CMS - 7E I
a w J-~ 200 0 en w5 100 0
SBH SBL FH FL AGGREGATE
GRH GRL
Figure D21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINO FRESNO
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 126SS-15 154]03 JCMS-7 161106-7 rmm SS-15 122CMS-7 127SS-30amp 95 ltMgt-7 ]Aj_ SS-15 123
SS-30 70
t-bte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
SS-30 122SS-151 93 SS-l51 fflT SS-30amp 100 SS-30 TWT
Figure D22 Ne-wman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
D22
Table D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW
ss 15 SEA
ss 30 SEA
C M s 7
HIGH D bullbullmiddot 979 715A middot 1143 569T A 1047 599
X - - 1056 - 628 s - - 82 - 77
CV - - 78 - 123
D 987 1474 548A T 907 1536 433 A 1447 615
x - - 947 1486 532 s - 57 46 92
CV - - 60 31 173 D 642 102 597 588 301A T 620 426 369 60l 263 A 774 662 470 290 3q_3
x 679 397 479 493 31 9
s 83 281 114 176 67
CV 123 709 239 357 21 0
1285 1353 1493
1377
106
77
627 72 2 634
661
53
80
238 284 22 7
250
30
121
Specimen swelled during soak could not ne tested Specimen disintegrated during testing
D23
300
E CJgt -200 en
en 0 J
z0 middot cii 100 lt( cc CD lt(
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
01--------r----T----J-----r----r SBH FH FL GRH GRL
middotAGGREGATE
Figure D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content
D24
APPENDIX E
FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL DESIGNS
Table El
Thickness T in Inches to Satisfyl
Tensile Strain Requirements (Reference 3)
Subirade l~octulus psi 30~0 6000 12000 30oco
Jverage Ann~abullAir erlerature J degF lt40 40-55 55-65 gt65 40 40-55 55-65 gt65 lt40 40-55 55-651gt65 lt4 0 40-55 55-65 gt65
T~affic EALbull 10bull
IllIf psi 50000 4 9 66 7 8 91 37 50 5e 66 2 26 28 29 2 2 2 2
1000~0 37 5 3 62 12 27 40 47 53 2 21 25 26 2 2 2 2
300000 21 J4 4 3 51 2 28 31 middot3 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
600000 2 24 3 2 39 2 2 2 _2 28 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2middot 2 2 2 290JCOO 2 2 26 33 2 2 2 22 2 2 2
Traffic EAL= 10s
trJ MR psi bull 50000 83 ll5 139 165 70 97 112 127 54 1-3 83 93 2 3 27 28 29 f-J
42 58 69 78 2 25 27 27100000 63 90 108 129 54 76 91 105
3COOOO 4o 58 73 8 3 3 51 60 73 24 39 ~8 56 2 2 20 22
600000 28 45 55 67 21 37 47 55 2 21 36 44 2 2 2 2
900000 21 37 4 7 57 2 30 39 48 2 21 29 37 2 I 2 2 2
TraCf1c 2 ~AL a 10~ I ia psi bull 50000 130 161 216 2~ 116 16l 187 213 98 131 151 172 63 66 93 58
82 0100000 98 14) 171 203 68 126 152 176 75 106 125 142 52 7 3
3CCOOO 6o 91 11 3 139 55 82 101 122 4 7 69 86 102 31 49 59 59
e~oooo 46 68 86 106 ~o 60 76 94 3middot 3 52 64 i9 2 35 4 r 54
900~00 37 56 72 69 )2 51 63 80 24 4 3 5 4 67 2 28 3 8 ul Trarr1el EAL~ 10 7
la psi bull 50000 192 24 24 24 178 239 24 24 156 205 235 24 12l 153 165 17 3 I
24 24 228 24 119 168 195 222 95 129 147 1s IlCOOCO 1~5 21 0 13 5 193
56 aa 10a 12 I-3CC000 aa 136 167 205 ~-3 12 156 186 74 11l 138 16~
I- l 6 a2 10060~ 1 ouo 6 4 100 125 156 59 92 ll 6 l~ 5 53 82 104 128
108 3 3 53 6 8 859ccooo 53 82 10 5 132 so 77 97 121 4 ~ 68 86
For asphalt volume Vb= 11 are air voids Va= 5 Use Figure El to correct thickness of other valuemiddots of Vb and Va
Table E2
Subsradlt Mcdulus psi
Thickness T in Inches to Satisfys Subgrade Strain Requirements (Reference 3)
6100 120003000 300CC
tr N
A~erage A~nual Ar Te11perature degF
Traffic EALbull 10bull
~IP psi 50000a
100000
300000
600000
900000
Traffic EAL 10 5
MR psibull 50000
lC0000
300000
600000
900000
Tra~~lc EAL c 1c6
MR psibull 50000
100000
300000
600POO
900000
Trafficz EALbull 10 7
MRt psibull 50000
100000
300000
600000
900000
lt40
55
55
55
55
55
81
81
81
81
81
115
115
115
115
115
155
155
155
155
155
40-55
83
60
55
55
55
121
87
81
Bl
Bl
168
123
11
115
ll5
226
165
155
155
155
55-65 gt65 lt40
108 115 46
73 82 46
55 55 46
5_ 45
55 55 46
145 165 69
106 120 69
a1 81 69
81 81 69
81 81 69
201 224 98
14B 165 98
115 115 98
115 115 98
115 115 98
24 24 1)6
199 222 135
15 155 136
155 155 136
155 155 136
40-55
10
50
46
46
46
103
74
69
69
69
150
108
98
98
9B
204
150
135
136
136
55-65 G5 lt40
83 93 30
61 70 30
46 46 30
45 46 30
46 46 30
124 139 55
91 102 55
69 69 55
69 69 55
69 69 55
173 193 83
130 147 83
98 98 83
98 98 83
98 98 83
239 24 120
179 199 120
136 136 120
136 136 120
135 136 120
40-55
4
3~
30
30
30
83
60
55
55
55
122
90
83
83
83
17 5
130
120
middot12 o
120
55-65 gt65 lt~O
62 69 25
46 53 25
30 30 25
30 30 25
30 30 25
9 106 29
82 29i 2 middot 55 55 29
55 55 29
55 55 29
144 15S 60
108 12l 60
83 83 60
83 83 60
83 83 6 0
205 226 90
155 112 90
120 120 90
120 120 90
120 120 90
40-55
31
25
25
25
25
52
30
29
29
29
86
65
60
60
60
127
98
90
90
90
55-65 bull65
33 35
29 3c
25 25 I 25 25 i 25 2s
51 67
47 52
29 29
29 29
29 29
95 10
76 85
60 I 6C
6C i 6o 50
14bull 3 14
112 126
90 90
90 90
90 90
Tj In Tc In 24 2 22
20
18
16 3
14
12 4
~ 10 Va+ vb 5
099
8 08 6
077 7 06
6 805
9045 1003
4 12
14
3 16
18
20
22 2 24
Figure El Correction of Pavement Design Thickness for Air Voids and
Asphalt Content of Mix (Reference 3)
E3
-------
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000 psi
MAAT 55- 65 F-Ul 400 CL
C) 0 300 (J) J
~ 200 0 ~
I- 100z w J-(J) 0+----------------------C w 0 2 4 6 8 middot10 12
THICKNESS IN
1X104 EAL
1X105EAL
Figure E2 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
M-AAT )65 F- -~---Ul 400 1x104 EALCL
CW)
0 300 (J) J 200C 0 ~
-~ 100 w -J -(J) 0w 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a
THICKNESS IN
1X105EAL
Figure E3 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 6000 psi MAAT = )65F
s
E4
w 400 c
()
0 300 () - 200 Cl 0 E
~ 100 w J-
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT 56-65 F
1x10 EALI 4
I 1X105 EAL
w o~---------------------r-w 1 2 3 4a
THICKNESS IN
Figure E4 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT )65F-w 400 4I 1X10 EALc () I 1X105EAL 0 300 I () I - I 200C I0 E I I- 100z w I-J I-() 0w 1 2 3 4c
THICKNESS IN~
Figure ES Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65Fs
ES
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
MAAT 55-65 F-en400 41X10 EALIC
(I) 1X105EAL middot 0
I I 300
en I J 200C 0
f-- 100z w J-en 0LU 2 4 6 8 10 14a
-THICKNESS IN
Figure E6 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
MmiddotAAT )65 F cn4oo I 1X104 EALa
(I) 1X105EAL 0 300
I I
en -I
~200 0 ~ 100 LU --en -I
0-1-----------------------LU 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a THICKNESS IN
Figure E7 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = )65F
E6
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT 55-65 F-u 400 41x10 EAL0
M 1x105EAL 0 T- 300 -en J 200C 0 E I- 100z w-J- en 0w C 0 middot1 2 3 4 middot5 6
THICKNESS IN
Figure E8 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000psi
M-AAT )65 F-en400
I --- - - ~- 1X104 EAL
C
a 1X105 EAL
0 I T- 300
I-en J
200 C 0 E
I- 100z w J-en 0w 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
THICKNESS IN
Figure E9 Thickness For Subgrade StrainRequirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65F
s
E7
Table E3
Thickness Requirements inches
= 6000 psi EAL= 1 X 104 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
MrT
l
CF Tc Ts
246000 34
64 37 43
300000 31
68 4middot 0 43
391000 27
lt 61 33 43
362000 28
64 31 43
260000 28
bull bull 61 35 43
333000 30
65 33 43
C M s 0
Mr Ti CF T Tc
s
259000 29
59 36 43
288000 32
bull 61 3 8 43
271000 32
59 39 43
339000 30
60 37 43
284000 32
59 40 43
365000 29
60 37 43
C M s 7
M T7
l
CF TTc
s
71000 55
65 60 43
103000 47 71
45 43
74000 54
67 53 43
123000 44 69
45 43
85000 52
65 54 43
123000 44
73 46 43
ss 15
M T7
l
CF T Tc s
298000 31
57 40 43
285000 32
59 38 43
365000 28
58 37 43
334000 30
61 36 43
320000 30
60 36 43
329000 30
61 36 43
ss 30
M T7
l
CF Tc Ts
296000 31
60 37 43
296000 31
62 36 43
339000 30
59 38 43
335000 30
bull 63 35 43
313000 31
65 34 43
309000 31
65 34 43
Ngtte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi TI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume middotTc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= llrickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
E8
Table E4
Thickness Requirements inches
Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
246000 68
64 74 70
300000 62 68
62 68
391000 55 61
65 68
362000 57 64
63 68
260000
57 bull 61
68 70
333000 59 65
65 68
C M s 0
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
259000 65 59
80 70
288000 63
bull 61 75 68
271000 64 59
78 70
339000 59 60
72 68
284000 63 59
78 68
365000 57 60
70 68
C M s 7
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
71000 100
bull 65 107 105
103000 90 bull 71
84 88
74000 100
67 102 104
123000 85 69
85 81
85000 95 65
102 97
123000 85 73
78 81
ss 15
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
298000 62 57
78 68
285000 63 59
76 68
365000 57 58
72 68
334000 59 61
72 68
320000 60 60
73 68
329000 59 61
70 68
ss 30
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
296000 62
60 74 68
296000 62
62 71 68
339000 59 59
72 68
335000 59
63 68 68
313000 60
bull 65 65 68
309000 60
65 65 68
1bte
M = Resilient mJdulus in psirf = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
E9
Table ES
Thickness Requirements inches 4
Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M Tdeg
J
CF T Tc
246000 40
64 46 45
300000middot 37 68
37 43
391000 33 61
38 43
362000 35
64 39 43
260000 39
61 45 45
333000 35
65 38 43
C M s 0
MT J
CF T Tc
s
259000 39 59
48 45
288000 38 61
middot4 6 44
271000 38 59
47 44
339000 35 60
43 43
284000 38 59
46 44
365000 35 60
43 43
C M s 7
M T7
J CF T Tc
s
71000 60 65
65 68
103000 52 71
48 64
74000 60 67
60 68
123000 50 bull 69 59 62
85000 58 65
63 67
123000 50 73
49 62
ss 15
M T7
J CF T Tc
s
298000 37 57
50 43
285000 38 59
48 44
365000 35 58
45 43
334000 35 61
43 43
320000 3 6
60 44 43
329000 37 61
45 43
ss 30
M T7
J CF TTc
s
296000 37 60
45 43
296000 37 62
43 43
339000 35 59
44 43
335000 35 bull 63
41 43
313000 36
65 39 43
309000 36
65 39 43
Nrte
M = Resilient nodulus in psiTI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T
5 = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El0
Table E6
Thickness Requirements inches
105E = 6000 psi EAL= 1 x psi MAAT = )65Fs
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
246000
79 64
87 70
300000
74 68
74 70
391000 69
61 81 70
362000 70
64 77 70
260000 77
61 90 70
333000 71
65 77 70
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 77
59 94 70
288000 75
61 90 70
271000 76
59 92 70
339000 71
60 87 70
284000 75
59 91 70
365000 69
60 85 70
C M s 7
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
71000 111
65 118 112
103000 103
middot11 95 98
74000 111
67 110 11l
123000 98
69 95 93
85000 109
65 119 109
123000 98
73 87 93
ss 15
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
298000 74 57
94 70
285000 7 5 59
94 70
365000 69 58
88 70
334000 7 1 middot 61
84 70
320000 72 60
87 70
329000 71 61
84 70
ss 30
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
296000 74
60 90 70
296000 74
62 86 70
339000 71 59
87 70
335000 71
63 82 70
313000 73
bull 65 78 70
309000 73
65 78 70
Note
M = Resilient midulus in psi11 = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness f9r tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade stram requirements inches
Ell
Table E7
Thickness Requirements inches4
= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
middot~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO -GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
246000 2 0
64 23 25
300000 20
68 2middot 0 25
391000 20
61 24 25
362000 20
64 23 25
260000 20
61 24 25
333000 20
65 22 25
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 20
59 25 25
288000 20
bull 61 24 25
271000 20
59 25 25
339000 20
60 25 25
284000 20
59 25 25
365000 20
60 25 25
C M s 7
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
71000 20
65 22 31
103000 20
middot71 20 29
74000 20
67 21 31
123000 20
69 20 28
85000 20
65 22 30
123000 20
73 20 28
ss M T7
l
298000 20
285000 20
365000 20
334000 20
320000 2 0
329000 20
15 CF T Tc
s
57 26 25
59 25 25
58 26 25
61 24 25
bull 60 25 25
61 24 2 i
ss 30
M T7
l
CF TTc
s
296000 20
60 25 25
296000 20
62 24 25
339000 20
59 25 25
335000 20
bull63 23 25
313000 20
65 22 25
309000 20
65 22 25
N)te
M = Resilient nodulus in psi middot T7 = Unrorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inchesct= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume T = Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T~ = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El2
Table E8
Thickness Requirements inches
Es= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s
M T7
l
246000 22
300000 20
391000 20
362000 20
260000 21
333000 20
s 0
CF T Tc
s
64 24 32
68 20 29
61 24 29
64 23 29
61 24 l 1
65 23 29
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 21 59
25 31
288000 21
bull 6J 24 30
271000 21 59
25 30
339000 20 60
25 29
284000
21 59
25 1 n
365000
20 60
25 2 q
C M
M T7
l
71000 27
103000 25
74000 27
123000 24
85000
26
123000
24 s 7
CF T Tc
s
65 28 53
71 24 45
bull 67 28 53
69
23 43
65
27 49
73
22 43
ss M T7
l
298000 20
285000 21
365000 20
334000 20
320000 20
329000 20
15 CF
TTc
s
57 27 29
59 26 30
58 27 29
61 24 29
60 25 29
61 24 2 q
ss 30
M r~i CF T Tc
s
296 ooomiddot 20 60
24 29
296000 20 62
23 29
339000 20 59
24 29
335000 20 63
23 29
313000 20 65
23 29
309000 20 65
23 29
i-krte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psiTf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade strain requirements inches
El3
Table E9
Thickness Requirements inches 4 = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
EMULSION __ QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
246000 20 64
23 25
300000 20 68
21 25
391000 20 61
24 25
362000 20 64
23 25
260000 20 61
24 25
333000 20 65
22 25
C M s 0
259000 20 59
26 25
288000 20
bull 61 middot24 25
271000 20 59
26 25
339000 20 60
25 25
284000 20 59
26 25
365000 20 60
25 25
C M s 7
MT7
1 CF T Tc
s
71000 20 65
22 58
103000 2~0 middotn
20 52
74000 20 67
21 58
123000 20 69
20 48
85000
20 65
22 57
123000
20 73
20 48
$$
15
MTdeg
1
CF T Tc
s
-298 000 20 57
27 25
285000 20 59
26 25
365000 20 58
26 25
334000 20 61
24 25
320000 2 0 60
25 25
329 000 20 61
24 25
ss 30
MT7
1
CF T Tc
s
296000 20 60
25 25
296000 20 62
24 25
339000 20 59
26 25
335000 20 63
23 25
313000 20 65
22 25
309000 20 65
22 25
tote
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot rf = Unagtrrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El4
Table ElO
Thickness Requirements inches 5E = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
s
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T--deg
J
CF T Tc
s
246000
24 64
27 31
300000
23 68
24 29
391000
22 61
25 29
362000
22 64
2_s 29
260000
26 61
31 30
333000
22 65
24 29
C M s 0
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s
259000 23
59 28 30
288000 23
bull 61 27 30
271000 23
59 28 30
339000 22
60 26 29
284000 23
59 28 30
365000 21
60 25 29
C M s 7
ss 15
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s M T--deg
J
CF T Tc
s
71000 28
bull 65 30 61
298000 23 57
25 29
103000 27
~ 71 27 52
285000 23 59
28 30
74000 28
bull 67 28 60
365000 22
58 28 29
123000 26
69 26 48
334000 22 61
25 29
85 000 28
65 31 58
320000 22
60 26 29
123000 26
73 24 48
329000 22 61
25 29
55
30
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s
296000 23
60 27 29
296000 23
62 27 29
339000 22 59
27 29
335000 22
63 25 29
313000 22
65 24 29
309000 23
65 25 29
tbte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot Tf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Ihickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
II11~~~1~~i~IIII 08860 ElS
to further investigate the usefulness of paving mixshytures containing the SEA emulsions that field experimental test sections using the SEA emulsions be constructed and evaluated$
It is strongly suspected that the moisture vapor susceptibility of the solvent free asphalt emulsion mixes evaluated herein could be reduced by a slight modification of the emulsion formulations This possibility should be evaluated
95
References
1 Request For Proposals Investigation Into The Nature Of Emulsified Asphalts Compatible With California Local Aggregates And Substitution Of Sulfur For Asphalt In Aqueous Emulsified Systems California Air Resource Board Research Division Sacramento Calishyfornia March 1980
2 American Society for Testing and Materials 1981 Annual Book of Standards Part 15 Road Paving Bituminous Materials Travelled Surface Characterisshytics Philadelphia PA 1981
3 Interim Guide to Full-Depth Asphalt Paving Using Varshyious Asphalt Mixes The Asphalt Institute Pacific Coast Division PCD-1 January 1976
4 Kennepahl GJA Logan A and Bean D C Conshyventional Paving Mixes with Sulfur-Asphalt Binders Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975
5 Deme Imants Processing of Sand-Asphalt-Sulfur Mixes Proceedings AAPT Volume 43 1974
6 A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual The Asphalt Instishytute Manual Series No 19 MS-19) March 1979
7 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Use of Cutback Asphalt US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Waste Management Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park North Carolina October 17 1977
8 Highway Chemicals Newsletter Armak Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois Fall 1981
9 Bitumils Mix Manual Chevron USA Asphalt Division January 1977
10 Asphalt Pavement Engineering Wallace Hugh A and Martin J Rogers McGraw Hill Book Company New York 1967
11 Spahr J D The Use of Emulsified Asphalt in Conshystruction and Maintenance Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975
96
12 Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design Asphalt Emulsions Volume 4 1977
13 Dybalski J N 11 The Chemistry of Asphalt Emulsions Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D C January 1976
14 Beagle C w Deflection and Performance of Deep Lift Asphalt Emulsion Base Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976
15 Meier w J Asphalt Emulsion Construction on the Navajo Reservation Twenty-Fifth Annual Arizona Conshyference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 22-23 1976
16 Kallas B F and Shock J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Find Report - Parts I and
11II Research Report 77-1 The Asphalt Institute November 1977
17 Shook J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Analysis of Performance Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976
18 Wimberly C M Emulsified Asphalt Mixes in Arizona Proceedings 24th Annual Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 17-18 1975
19 Izalt J O Galloway B M and Saylock D SandshyAsphalt-Sulfur Pavement Experimental Project Highway US 77 Kennedy County Texas Texas Transportation Institute April 1977
20 McBee w c and Sullivan T A Direct Substitution of Sulfur for Asphalt In Paving Materials 11 Report of Investigations 8303 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines 1978
21 Ludwig A C Gerhardt B B and Dale JM Materials and Techniques for Improving the Engineering Properties of Sulfur Report No FHWA-RD-80-023 Fedshyeral Highway Administration June 1980
22 Jiminez R A and Stakes K J Effects of Heat and Air on the Viscosity of Sulfur-Asphalt Mixtures Preshysented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies San Diego California February 16-18 1981
97
23 Chehovits J G and Anderson D A Upgrading of Marginal Aggregates for Improved Water Resistance of Asphalt Concrete Transportation Research Record 762 pages 46-52 1981
24 Rosner JC and Chehovits J G Highway Binder Materials From Modified Sulfur-Water Emulsionsn Report No FHWARD-82035 Federal Highway Administration November 1981
25 Standard Specifications State of California Department of Transportation January 1978
26 Applied Linear Statistical Models Neter I and Wasserman w Richard D Irwin Inc Homewood Illinois 1974
27 Burr I W and Foster LA A Test For Equality of variances Mimeograph Series No 282 Statistics Department Purdue University Lafayette Indiana 1972
28 Applied Statistical Methods Burr I W Academic Press Inc New York 1974
29 Parr W K Field Observations of the Behavior of Bituminous Pavements As Influenced By Moisture 11 ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 3-16--I959
30 Rice JM Relationship of Aggregate Characteristics to the Effect of Water on Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 17-34 1959
31 Lettman R P and Johnson D L 11 Pressure Induced Stripping in Asphaltic Concrete Highway Research Record 340 pages 13-28 1970
32 Waller F H Jr Emulsion Mix Design Methods An Overview 11 Transportation Research Record 754 1980
33 Design of Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures Report R6-350(74) US Forest Service 1974
34 11Mix Design Procedure For Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Pavement FHWA Region 10 Office of Federal Highway Projects
98
35 Darter M I Ahlfield S R Wilky P L and Wasill R G Development of Emulsified Asphalt Aggregate Cold Mix Design Procedure Research Report 505-5 Department of Civil Engineering University of Illinois 1978
36 A A Gadallah L E Wood and E J Yoder A Suggested Method for the Preparation and Testing of Asphalt-Emulsion-Treated Mixtures Using Marshall Equipment Proceedings AAPT Volume 46 1977
37 Marshall Stability Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois
38 Jiminez R A Final Report-Phase I Asphalt Emulsion Treated Aggregates University of Arizona Research Report HPR-1-13(150) January 1977
39 George K P Interim Report on Criteria for Emulshysified Asphalt Stabilization of Sandy Soils Univershysity of Mississippi for Mississippi State Highway Department October 1976
40 Fong G K Mix Design Methods for Base and Surface Courses Using Emulsified Asphalt A State-of-the-Art Report Report No FHWA-RD-78-113 Federal Highway Administration October 1978
41 Schmidt R J A Practical Method for Measuring the Resilient Modulus of Asphalt-Treated Mixes Highway Research Record 404 1972
42 Manual of Test Volume 2 State of California Department of Transportation Transporation Laboratory Third Edition 1978
43 Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete Manual Series No 2 (MS-2) The Asphalt Institute March 1979
99
-
APPENDIX A
OPTIMUM FLUIDS AT COMPACTION DATA
-
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table Al
Percent Residue
631 631 631
702 702 702
595 595 595
678 678 678
689 689 689
645 645 645
Fluids at Compaction Data css-o
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
467 367 216
1098 998 847
571 413 360
1273 1115 10 62
455 370 341
1050 965 936
590 450 400
1268 1128 1078
492 183 109
1181 872 798
404 311 139
1049 956 784
Dry Density
(pcf)
1304 1337 1347
1283 1326 1306
133l 1310 9 1317
1328 1295 1304
1404 1529 154 1
1429 1466 1462
Al
css-o CSS-0HIGH QUALITY155- DRY LOW QUALITYbull SAN BERNARDINO 1551
bull SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO 150-I I 150 FRESNObull GRANITEROCK bull GRANITEROCK
I ~
145 LoPT=B5 145 () () - -0 0
~140 gt1401 L- 0 PT= 85 OPT=100gt-i
N Cl) OPT=100 Cl)
DRYZ 135 Z 135w w Cl Cl
amp130 amp130 Cl 0
125 125
120 I i I I i I i I I I 120 I I J I I i I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure Al Fluids at Compaction Figure A2 Fluids at Compaction High Quality Aggre-gate CSS-0 Low Quality CSS-0
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A2
Percent Residue
605 605 605
704 704 704
595 595 595
695 695 695
556 556 556
604 604 604
Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-0
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
4 16 316 183
1021 921 788
494 389 262
1198 1093
966
529 392 360
1124 987 955
519 479 301
1214 1174
996
284 187 124
840 743 680
319 256 165
923 860 769
Dry Density
(pcf)
1331 131 6 1316
1305 1320 1313
1282 1313 1312
1321 1298 1279
1478 1479 1463
1452 1463 1453
A3
155 CMS-0 HIGH QUALITY
150~ DRY bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
145 bull GRANITEROCK72_ OPT=90 0 0
~140gt-ii OPT=105i Cl)
Z 135 w 0
gt- D~0 130 middot 0
125 [OPT100
120 I i I i i I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A3 Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-0
155] 150
0 1451 0
~140gt- Cl)
Z 135 w 0
fc130 0
125
120 I 6
CMS-0
LOW QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
bull GRANITEROCK
v[A OPTf90
pound 0 PT12DoOPTr110
7 I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A4 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-0
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A3
Percent Residue
769 769 769
746 746 746
595 595 595
714 714 714
570 570 570
587 587 587
Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-7
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
460 391 294
1229 1160 1063
573 436 301
13 19 1182 1047
513 380 2 57
1108 975 852
513 404 334
1227 1118 1048
231 170 080
801 740 650
263 146 109
850 733 6096
Dry Density
(pcf)
1329 1377 1376
1335 135l 134 2
1357 1333 1342
1299 1317 1308
1519 1523 1498
1503 1517 1514
AS
CMS-7 155-- HIGH QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNOlSO~ nPT80 145
0 -0 -140 middot gt-
r t deg Cl)
Z 135 w Cl
fi130 Cl
125-1
120 I 6
GRANITEROCK
~OPT=105
IJ
I 7
I I i I i I 8 9 10 11 12 13
TOTAL FLUIDS
I 14
I 15
Figure AS Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-7
155
150
145
0 -0
gt--140
t Cl)
Z 135 w Cl
fc 130 Cl
125
120 I 6
CMS-7 LOW QUALITY
C bull SAN BERNARDINO
FRESNO
GRANITEROCKOPT 80
~OPT105
~
tos i I I i J i i I I 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A6 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-7
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table A4
Percent Residue
765 765 765 765 765 765
815 815 815 815 815 815
765 765 765
817 817 817 817 817 8el7
574 574 574
738 738 738 738 738 738
Fluids at Compaction Data SS 15 SEA
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
563 426 315 580 346 178
1328 1191 1080 1345 1111
943
595 418 309 599 256 137
14 10 1233 1124 1414 1071 952
600 440 356
1365 1205 1121
683 541 418 629 457 283
1500 1358 1235 1446 1274 1100
374 247 128
948 821 702
451 301 175 435 186 073
1189 1039
913 1173
924 811
Dry Density
(pcf)
1289 1319 1335 1286 1331 1332
1278 1314 1315 1276 1304 1299
1281 1325 1313
1259 1290 1303 1275 1292 1294
1450 1485 1482
1428 1459 1468 1437 1465 1465
A7
bull bull
SS 15 SEA 155 HIGH QUALITY
bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot
150 FRESNO
bull GRANITEROCK
145
0 0 -
OPT=75
-_ gt=140 I-ii OPT100co C)
z 135 w _--0PTr1200
gt-0 130--0
125
120 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure A7 Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 15 SEA
SS 15 SEA LOW QUALITY155
bull SAN BERNARDINO-
FRESNO 150
bull GRANITEROCK 145
~-0 0 LOPT=80a140gt-t Cf)
Z135 w r-OPT=105 0
gt-0 130 -~middot 0
OPT120J 125
120 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS
Figure AB Fluids at Compaction Low Quality SS 15 SEA
Aggregate
SBH
SBL
FH
FL
GRH
GRL
Table AS
Percent Residue
688 688 688
722 722 722 722 722 722
680 680 680 680 6 80 680
726 726 7 26 726 726
510 510 510
596 596 596 596 596 596
Fluids at Compaction Data SS 30 SEA
Moisture at Compaction
Percent Total Fluids
595 468 150
1283 1156
838
645 438 267 660 566 440
1367 1160
989 1382 1288 1162
650 531 432 629 422 332
1330 1211 1112 1309 1102 1012
767 614 443 547 370
1493 1340 1169 1273 1096
413 300 167
923 810 677
468 3 46 191 485 258 096
1064 942 787
10 ~ 81 854 692
Dry Density
(pcf)
1299 1337 1332
1286 1319 1324 1281 1302 1326
129l 1315 1333 1294 1333 131 5
1259 1278 1322 1294 1313
1464 1509 1496
1435 1472 1499 1426 1487 1476
A9
SS 30 SEASS 30 SEA LOW QUALITY
155 HIGH QUALITY 1551 bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddotbull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO
FRESNO 150150-I -middotmiddot-- -bull --middotmiddot I ~ t -- a GRANITEROCK a GRANITEROCK
145145
~-bull80 0 --0 00 ~140~140
J-gt- gt-~ I- = OPT=100 Cl)0 Cl) [Ij 135Z 135
lJJ Cl
gt- ~1300 130 middot ClCl ( 0
OPT=110 125~ OPT=115125
120-t----~--------------r---120 I l J J J I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 156 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
TOTAL FLUIDS TOT AL FLUIDS
Figure A9 Fluids at Compaction Figure AlO Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 30 SEA Low Quality SS 30 SEA
-~
i
APPENDIX B
MIXTURE DESIGN DATA
TABLE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality css-o Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absortied Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
lhit Weight pcf
StabiJcneter Value
~iareter Value
Jesilient -bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
500
----------
40
u 30 ltgt
ffi 20 w ~10
m lt
o
w l 400 lt gt a w t 300 0 iii ~ 200 8
100 12
10111
ui 0
i5 8gt lt
6
4
50
21740
24488
112
194
100
400
1357
375
197
117
345
60
21823
24163
97
199
100
500
1362
330
207
134
271
70
21772
23853
87
208
100
600
1359
272
193
118
260
Iesign 7 0
87
208
100
600
1359
272
193
118
260
24
22d c lt i
20i
= 0 i5
18 gt
16
140
138 - a
~136 z w 0
134
132
bull 500 a
0 400 uil 300 0
~ 200 zi 100 iii w a
--
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE CONTENT Jo (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Bl
TABLE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residue 0intent 50 60 70 Dsian 7 o
Bulk Siecipoundic Gravity 21804
llleoretical Specipoundic Gravity 24280
Air Voids 102
VMA 192
Absorbed Asphalt 063
Efpoundective Asphalt 437
Unit Weight pf 1361
Stabilcirieter Value 427
Cbhesicireter Value 352
Fesilielt Mxlulus 103psi
2-day 85
middotFinlJ 355
50
40
_ gt a 30 w w
~ 20 10
500
300
200
100
8
6
4
l 400 gt
~ w 0
~ 8
12
_ 10
= 0 gt
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
21863 21992
23964 23660
88 71 71
197 200 200
063 063 063
537 637 637
1364 1372 1372
363 313 313
292 234 234
63 83 83 429 232 232
24
22
ci i
20i
= = 0 gt
18
16
138
p6 ~ Q
134 a w
o 132
130
500 Q -
o 400 --3 300 0 ~-~ 200 a ~ 100 w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COtlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
B2
TABLE B3 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllroretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
~fective Asphalt
Unit Weight middotCf
Stabilareter VaJue
Cbhesiareter VaJue
Resilient l-bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
so
11140 gt o30 IU w ~20
m
10
w l 400 gt 0
~ 0 ~ 200 8
100
14
12 11-
In Q
ho C
8
6
50 60 70 Dsi9 7 O 21308 21729 21595 24562 24235 23922
132 103 97 97 210 202 215 215 113 113 113 113 387 487 587 587
1329 1356 1348 1348 378 345 375 375
314 270 280 280
82 96 104 104 281 260 267 267
500
300 ~
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS
24
11-22ci
ltI i i 20 Cl) Q 180 gt
16
138
136 u - 134 Cl) z IU Q
132
130
bull500
400 Inl 300 Q bull~ 200 z ~ 100middot IU 0
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS
FIGURE B3 Mixture Design Data Sari Bernardin6 High Quality CMS o Replication 1
B3
TABLE B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue GJntent
Bulk seecific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity
50
21491
24334
60
21459
24014
70
21526
23709
Iesiqn 70
Air Voids 117 106
VMA 204 212
Absocbed Asphalt 0 72 o 72
Effective Asphalt 428 528
Unit Weight pcf 1341 133 9
Stabilrneter Value 437 406
GJhesiareter Value 337 248 3
Iesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-cay
Final
50
w 40 gt 0 30 w w 0 20 co 10
500
w
3 400 gt 0 w t- 300 w 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
_ 10
0 8gt -lt
6
4
FIGURE
61 66
410 318
24
22~ ci
i 20
~
18 a gt
16
138
_136 u a 134 z ~ w 0
132
130
bull500
a
a 400 -3 300 _ a ~ 200 z ~ 100-
w 0
90 90
21 7 21 7
0 72 072
628 628
1343 1343
344 J44
252 252
82 82
250 250
---------
D 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDU CONTENT I (A_GGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B4
TABLE BS Mixture Design Data San Bernardin9 High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Siecific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
lir Voids
VMA
2bserberl Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stalgtilaneter Value
Cbhesiareter Value 3
Resilient Mgtdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
40
Ill 30 lt( gt a 20 Ill Ill 0 10
~ iii lt CII 0
400
Ill
3 300 lt(
gt a Ill200 == 0
~100 c 8
0
12
10 ui 0
0 8gt 5 lt(
6
4
FIGURE
~
~
5 6 7 84 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
50 60 70 Cesian 70
21652
24484
21904
24149
22005
23828
116
198
107
3-93
135l
345
224
18
240
93 77 77 196 200 200 107 107 107 493 593 593
1367 1373 1373 288 235 235
136 80 80
17 21 21 128 78 78
24
22ci lt(
z 20il
= CII C 0
18 gt
16
I-~
140
+38- ~136 1- z Ill 0 134
132
bull 500 a
o 400 3 300 C
~ 200 z 100 Ill a ~
0 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino_BS High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
BS
TABLE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Residue Content
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Ihegtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tmit WeightL pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesllllleter Value
Iesilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
a 20 UI w i
~10
lt 0
400
3300 lt gt a ~200 w i 0
119 93
197 l93
126 126
374 474
l353 l372
357 283
l26 l03
45 36
203 132
2440
30 22 0 0lt ltgt
16
~100 ~ 8 0 132
500 a
o 400 --ai 300 -
middot 0
~
~
w a
_ 10
ltn 0
0 8gt lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
50 60 70 Cesign 7 o
2l679
24595
21990
24255
22190
23931
- i 20
a 180 gt
140
138 - a
~136 z w 0 134
200
100middot
0 4
73 73
193 193
126 1 26
574 574
1385 1385
235 235
82 82
3l 3l
64 64
-0 $ e
~ 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B6
TABLE B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Pesidue Qlnte~t
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihroretical Speciic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
~tabilcmeter Value
ohesicrneter Value
resilient lbdulus l0 3psi
2-aay
Final
60 72 8 5 Iesicm 75
21762 21906 21779
23981 23617 23245 93 73 63 70
202 205 220 21 0
063 063 063 063
537 657 787 687
1358 1367 1359 1365 375 290 203 270
474 401 239 360
163 172 161 170 449 329 310 320
2440
ii 30 22 ci
Cl c cgt z 20 201 s ~ 310 e 18 0
gt c
0 16
500 140
w
3 400 _138c gt
~ 300 s 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
- 10 0 0 0 8gt c
6
4
FIGURE
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIOUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COITEIT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
il36 z IU Cl 134
132
bull 500
c 400 -
3 300 - Cl
sectl 200 ~- z ~ 100
w
0
B7
111 10 ui e 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
TABLE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
500
400 gt C
72 85 resian 7 s
21873 21738
23581 23210
72 63 70 207 22l 21 0
055 055 055 665 795 695
1365 1356 1365 287 188 265
349 341 345
191 187 190 287 266 280
24 ------------
111 22
Cl Cl lt -i ~ 20
= a 18 0 gt
16 _____________
138
136 a 134 () w a
132
130___________
soar------------ D a
1 400 ~
ui3 300 C
~ 200
100
w C
0---------------------5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUlc CONTENT lt
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
BB
Fesidue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcrreter Value
Cbhesiareter Value 3Resilient -bdulus 10 psi
2-day
Finll
60
m 50 - 40
IIJ ~ 30 CJ lt 1- 20
60
21669
23943
95
205
055
545
1352
560
416
195
425
~ 300 0 ()
~ 200 8
100---------------
12 -------------
RESIDUE CONTENT lto (AGGREGATE BASIS)
TABLE B9 Mixture Design Data San Ber~irdino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Pesiclue Content 60 Z1 as D=sign 7 5
Bulk Spccific Gravity 21697 21368 21255
Iheoretical Specific Gravity 23973 23610 23238
Air Voids 94 95 85 93
VMA 204 225 middot 23 8 230
middot-Absorbed Asphalt 061 061 061 061
Effective Asphalt 539 659 789 689
middot middotmiddotUnit Weight pcf 1354 133 3 1326 1330
-Stabilareter Value 460 375 225 340
CohesianeterValue 400 422 499 440
Iesilient MxUlus 103psi
2-oay 159 i0s 185 185
Final 290 299 283 295
60
w
l 400
24
22
ci 0 i 20l
= Q 180 gt
16
138
136
gt a 134~ 300 w l z0 IU 132 200
8 130
100-----------------_---I
12 ---------------- 500
o 400 10 ~
300 bull bullQ
Q0 8gt ~ 200 z
6 ~ 100
w a4 ___ __________ o
5 6 7 8 9 s 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COtlTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B9 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication l
B9
TABLE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Pesidue Conte1t 60 72 85 resign 75
Bulk Spcecific Gravity
Theoretical Sjeeipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Ohesianeter Value
Pesilient ~us 103psi
2---day
Final
60
50 lt gt cc40 w -w
~30 = CJ
lt 20
21635
24066
10l
206
078
522
1350
51 8
482
151
285
21481
23699
94
221
078
642
1341
378
459
150
286
24
11-22
ci Cl lt
~ 20 z
C 18
0 gt
21302
23323
87 92
237 225
078 078
7 72 6 72
1329 1338
246 350
343 430
162 155
254 280
I 16
500 138
UJ
400 136 lt gt
acc ~ UJ
134 300 z2 UI CJ_32 ~ 200
8 130
bull500
a
c 400 - 10 300 ~ Jf
C0 8gt ~ 200 ~ lt z
6 ~ 100-
UJ 0
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDU~ COrlTENT
(AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino
100 12
~
Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
BlO
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
TABLE Bll
Residue Content
Bulk Secific Gravity
Iheiretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesicrneter Value
Resilient MXiulus l03psi
2-day
Final
60 72 85 D=sign 75
21817 22108 21917
23977 23601 23216
90 63 56 62
200 198 215 200
o 72 o 72 o 72 o 72
528 648 778 678
136l 1380 1368 137 5
242 162 76 130
151 175 215 190
52 63 41 55
202 122 60 110
244middot0
~ 30 22 ci lt 20 i 201 IU = en ~ 10 E 18 m 0lt gt
0 16
----
w
l 400 lt gt a ~ w 0 ~ 8
12
-t
ltn 0 0 gt a lt
FIGURE
5
500
300
200 ~ 100
10
8
6
134
500 a
c 400 -
_ 300 0
g 200
~ 100 ~in IU a
0 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Bll Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
142
I-40 u a
~ 138 in w 0
136 ~
Bll
TABLE Bl2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Pesidue Q)ntent
Bulk Spzcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specipoundic
Air Voids
V bull t-LA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Gravity
60
22026
24085
85
192
092
508
72
22062
23705
69
200
092
628
85
21901
23315
61
215
092
758
resign 75
67
205
092
6 58
Unit Weight pcf 1374
Stabiloreter Value 193
Ohesiareter Value 177 3
Resilient Mxrulus 10 psi
2-day 63
Fi-ial 138
40
m 30 J lt gt a 20 IU w 0 10 ~ lt
0
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w 9 ~ 200 _________ 8
100 12
10 9 0 8gt ~6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE 8ASISI
1377
127
193
1367
90
160
137 5
120
180
53
107
32
52
48
95
24
22ci 0 lt
20
= ~
9 18 0 gt
16
142
140 a
~138 z w C
136
134
9
500 a
dego 400-
3 300 ~- a ~ 200 z ~ 100
w a
0 5
~ 6 7 8 9
RES IOU~ CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl2 Mixture Design Data -san Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Bl2
TABLE Bl 3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Pesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcrneter VaJue
CJgthesiarneter Value
Pesilient MxbJ11lS 10 3psi
2-day
Final
60
so gt
40a w 0 30 GI 20
500
l 400 gt a w t- 300 w 5 rn ~ 200 8
100 12
Ill 10 0 8gt
6
4
50
21789
24250
10l
164
1 95
305
1360
513
330
191
282
~ bull
~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASIS)
60
21762
2 34 34
91
173
1 95
405
135middot8
567
284
168
434
24
Ill 22ci Cl
is 20
= 0 gt
18
16
142
140- ~138 iii z 0
136
134
bull500
o 400 -
l 300 C
~ 200 z 100 iii a
0 4
70 resign 70
21872
23632
75 75 177 177
1 bull 95 1 95 505 505
136S 136S 393 393
280 280
217 217 482 482
~
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASISI
FIGURE Bl3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality css~o Replication 1
Bl3
--------------
TABLE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Resid= Content 50 60 70 eesicn 7o
Bulk Siecific Gravity 21692 21677 21662
Ihroretical Specific Gravity 24501 24176 23865
Air Voids 115 103 92 92
VMA 169 176 185 185
Absorbed Asphalt 240 240 240 240
Effective Asphalt 260 360 460 460
Unit Weight pcpound 1354
Stabilaneter Value 580
Cohesicrneter Value 270 3Resilielt Mdulus 10 psi
2-day 149
Final 408
60
w so lt gt
w C o w le 0 30 m lt
20
500
w
~ 400 lt gt C
~ 300 w S ~ 200 ~ 8
100 12
- 10 m a 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AG GREGATE BASIS)
1353 1352 1352
442 327 327
276 183 183
173 191 191
373 299 299
24
22d c lt z
20E 18 0 gt
16
140
138 u C
136 w C 134
132
500 C
1 400 gt- m =gt 300 a ~ 200
l 100- IU C
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication
Bl4
2
bull bull bullbull
TABLE Bl5 Mixture Design-Data Fresno High Quality CMS-QReplication 1
Bulk Spcific Gravity
lheoreticaJ Specific Gravity Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mldulus l0 3psi 2-clay
Final
60
m 50 C gt a 40 w w
~ 30 C m
10
~idue Content 50 6_ 0 70 Daisi2 7 O
5oor----------
w
l 400 C gt a ~ 300 w I 0 iii ~ 200 8
100-------------
12 ----------
111 10 C
0 8gt C
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT J
(AG GREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl5 Mixture
21755 21305 23795 23497 86 93 93
163 198 198 l 69 l 69 l69 431 531 531
1336 1329 1329 420 307 307
247 230 230
180 i55 155
246 253 253
24
22d
Cl C
i 20I
J ~ C 18 ~ 0 gt
16
21434
24106
11l
179
l69
331
1337
472
373
175
247
138
136- 134 z w C
132
130
bull 500
dego 400 - l 300 C
~ 200 z l 100 iii w a
0
-~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT J (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Bl5
TABLE Bl6 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
helretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
lbsorled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabil=ter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
Eesilient Mxrulus 10
2-day
Firal
60
50 J gt c 40
~ 30 m 20
500
w
l 400 gt a ~ 300 w
3psi
50 60 70
21339 2 1398 21475
24241 23925 23623
120 106 91
181 187 192
1 94 l 94 1 94
306 406 506
1331 1335 1340
558 43 7 377
340 313 219
149 152 154
317 345 288
Jesign70
91
192
194
506
1340
377
219
154
288
24
22d CJ i sect 20
= a 18 ~ 0 gt
16
138
136
a 134
z w ~ C ~ 200 132 8
130 100
14 500 a
o 400 - 12
3 300 - ~ 0 C gt 10 a ~ 200 ~ z
l 100
8
w a
0 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl6bull Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Bl6
TABLE Bl 7 Mixture Qesign Data Fresno High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1
Pesidue Content 50 60 70 Cesign 7 O
Bulk siec~tic Gravity 21959 22101 22128
Iheoretical Specific Gravity 24539 24201 23879
Air Voids 105 87 73 73
VMA 158 160 167 167
~rbed Asphalt 252 252 252 252
Effective Asphalt 248 348 448 448
Unit Weight pcf 1370 1379 1380 1380
S~ter Value 467 370 213 213
Clgthesiareter Value 289 3Resilient l-Ddulus 10 psi
2-clay 47
FinaJ 294
50
Ill 40 o(
gt cc 30 Ill w 0 20 lt 10
500
w l 400 lt gt cc ~ 300 Ill 0 ~ 200 8 ~
100 12
10 deg C
0 gt 8 ~l lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
147 122 122
65 35 35
214 75 75
22
J 20 o(
ii 18 16 ~ 0 gt
14
142
140 u Q
~138 z Ill
Cl 136
134
500 Q
o400 uil 300 Cl
g 200 z ~ 100 ~w cc
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
IIESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Bl7
TABLE Bl8 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Dsiqn 70
Bulk Specific Gravity 22191 22285 22092
Theoretical Specific Gravity 24199 23874 23563
Air Voids 82 66 62 62
VMA 149 153 168 168
Absorled AsphaJt 192 192 192 192
Effective AsphaJt 308 408 508 508
Unit Weight pcf 1385
Stabilareter Value 357
Cohesianeter Value 268 3Resilient MxhIJus 10 psi
2-day 75
Final 217
40
w 30 J lt gt a 20 w w i
~ 10
0
500
w
3 400 gt a
l 300 w i
ltn
~ 200 8
139l
342
238
137 9
233
192
137 9
233
192
84
117
63
73
63
73
20
0 0 ~ i
= 0 gt
18
16
14
12
~
144
142 140 z w 0
138
136 100-----1---1--1---l
12 ---------- 500 0bull
o 400 -11110 en a 3 300 = 0 08gt ~ 200
z 6 ~ 100middot
w a
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT
4
RESIDUE CONTENT
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Bl8
FresnoTABLE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Low Quality css-o Replication 1
Eesidlle Content 60 70 80 Dasi51 7 5
Bulk Specific Gravity 21698 21611 21514 Iheoretical Specilic Gravity 23803 23505 23220
Air Voids 89 81 73 77
VMA 175 186 198 192
Absorbed Asphalt 171 l 71 171 171
Effective Asphalt 429 529 629 679
Unit Weight pcf 1354 1349 1342 1345
Stabi]cmeter Value 513 398 359 380
eohesianeter value 506 449 481 465
Resilient Modulus 10 3psi
2-day 176 176 241 205
Final 312 383 353 365
2460
all so 22 ci cgt
40 I-
20 E
I = g 30 18iii 0 gt
20
16
500
300
100
10
8
6
4
138
136l 400
u -gt a
~ I 0 in l1200 8
12
111 Q
0 gt ~
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE COITENT Jo
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
~ ~ 134 z w 0
132
130
500 -
l 400 -
300 ~n
Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 in Ill IC
0
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
Bl9
TABLE B20 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residlle Content i
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihegtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
CJhesiareter Value 3
Resilient Mxfulus 10 psi
2-day
Finll
60
50 lt 40 w w
~ 30 m lt 20
500
w
3 400 lt gt a ~ ~ 300 w 51 rn 200 8
100----------------
12 --------------
10 9 0 8gt lt
6
4 s 6 7 8
RESIDUE COPlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
60 70 80 resign 75
21451 21476 21666
23932 23629 23340
104
185
194
406
1339
586
436
147
313
91
192
1 94
506
1340
403
416
179
347
24
22 0 0 lt
~ 20
= 9 18 0 gt
16
140
138 - Cl
136 w cl34
132
bull 500
-0 400__
3 300 I
~ 200
~ 100 rn w a
0
7 2 82
192 192
194 194
606 656
1352 1345
24 8 325
333 375
186 182
361 358
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COPITEPlT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
~
Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
B20
TABLE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
lesidue Content 60 70 80 resign 75
Bulk Siecific Gravity 21525 21406 21152 lllroretical Specific Gravity 23855 23555 23268 Air Voids 98 91 91 91 VMA 182 194 211 2middot03 1osorled Asphalt 180 1 80 180 180 Effective Asphalt 420 520 620 570 Ulit Weight pcf 1343 1336 1330 1335 Stabilateter Value 487 460 373 415 Oxlesiareter Value 418 392 323 355
3lesilielt Mldulus 10 psi
2-clay 188 177 200 190
Final 289 299 281 290
6or----------- 24
m 50 lt gt 11 40 w w I
~ 30 m lt 20
_J_
22ci 0 lt z
20EE
= 0 180 gt
16
5oor---------- 138
w
l 400 lt gt
136- a ~ 300 w i 0
fa34 z w
~ 200 Cll32 -8
100-----------i-~ 130
12 ------------ 500bulla
10 ________ o 400 - 0
0 gt
8
gJdeg 300 0
~- 200 ---e-
lt z
6 l 100 w 4
5 6 7 8 9 0
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication
B21
1
TABLE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Fesidue Cbntent 55
Bulk Spcific Gravity 21243
lheoretical Specific Gravity 23859
Air Voirls 109
VMA 189
Absorbed Asphalt 152
Effective 1spralt 398
Unit Weight pd 1326
atabil~ter Value 620
Cbhesiareter Value 430 3Fesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-oay 160
Final 387
70
a 60 gt a 50 w w == = 40 0
m
30
500
w l 400 lt gt cc
~ 3001- 0 ~ 200 8
100
16
136
134 u Q
iu2 z w 0 130
128
12 -----------
10 bull
ltIi 0
~ s
6
4middot1-_________ _
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l _AGGREGATE BASIS)
21164
23557
101
200
152
498
1321
481
432
180
377
24
22
z 20Si
= 18e 0 gt
bull 500
o 400-ltIi j 300 0
~ 200 zl 100 w cc
0
65 75 iesiqn 7 s
21095
23269
93 93
210 210
152 l 52
598 598
1316 1316
367 367
450 450
171 171
387 387
-----~bull-----
8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7
FIGURE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B22
1 TABLE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno
Low Quality CMS-7 Replication
70 -~ 0 Cesign 75 Pesidue Content
Bulk Spcific Graviv1
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit Weight pcf
Stallilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mxlulus 10 3psi
2--day
Final
40
Ill 30 c gt 0 20 UI lo Q 10=c 0
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w lo Q 200 8
100
~
60
21829
23899
87
170
197
403
1362
293
206
84 144
21981
23587
67
l73
197
503
1372
200
249
76 131
21960
23289
5middot 7
middot18l
197
603
1370
100
241
69 93
62
177
197
553
1370
150
245
73
110
12
10 5 Q 8gt 5 lt
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (ACGREGATE BASIS)
24
It
22 t-ci c
z 20i
= 5 18 t-Q gt
16
142
140 - 638
z w Q
136
134
bull 500
o 400 - 3 300 0
~ 200 z 100 iii UI 0
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (ACGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno LOW Quality CMS-7 Replication
B23
1
TABLE B24 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Residue Cbntent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
Iheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Urit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Glhesianeter Value
Resilient Mldulus 10
2-day
Final
40
m 30 gt c 20 w ~ w i
~ 10 m lt ~ 0
3psi
24
22
C C lt i
20~ ~
9 18 0 gt
16
500 142
w 1403 400 gt
Ca gt138I 300 tw
i z w Q 136~ 200
8
134
~
~
100 12 500
C
dego 400 - Ill 10 3 300 0 0 Q8gt ~ 200
~ z 6 100middot
w a
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIOUC CONTENT
(AGGREGATE 8ASIS] (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)
80
21686
23262
68
19l
l91
609
1353
125
215
77
114
Cesign 75
71
184
L 91
559
1360
200
235
77
135
60
21936
23870
81
166
191
409
1369
358
252
84
211
70
21850
23559
73
177
191
509
1364
270
250
77
157
Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE B24 Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B24
TABLE B25 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-Or Replication 1
Residue Clgtntent 47
Bulk Siecific Gravity 23965
llleoretical Specific Gravity 26825
Air Voids 107
VMA 207
Absorbed Asphalt 27
Effective Asphalt 443
Unit Weight pcf 1495
Stabilaneter Value 302
Cohesiaoeter Value 235 3
Resilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-day 158
Final 300
40
30 _ gt a 20I- ii 0_
10iii I-en 0 500----------
Ill
3 400 gt ati 300 ii 0 iii l 200 8
100---i----L---J
12 ----------
jit 10 e 0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I 4
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
57 67 Design 55
24521 24581
26411 26017
72 55 80
196 202 200
27 27 27
543 643 523
1530 1534 1520
247 200 27
275 203 275
164 116 160
276 197 280
24
jlt
22ci c i
20Si
= en e 18 0 gt
16
156
_154 ~ i152 iii z C
150
148
soo----------
dega 400 _
en
~300 ~ ~ 200 1-zl 100 iii w a
01----~-i--J 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Mixture Design Data GraniterockFIGURE B25 High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
B25
TABLE B26 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Besidue Content If 7 57 67 D2sign 55
Bulk SfeCific Gravity 2 4131 24573 24597
lhagtreticai Specific Gravity 26951 26532 26134
Air Voids 105 74 59 78
VMA 20l 195 20l 197
Absorted Asphalt 46 46 46 46
Effective Asphalt 424 524 624 504
Unit Weight pcf 1506 1533 1535 1525
stabi1anaiter Value 282 258 is2 270
Cllhesicmter Value 204 155 138 160
Resilient Mdulus 103psL
2-day 115 143 126 130
Final 313 225 173 240
40
w 30 lt gt a 20 w w la 0 10 m lt
0
~
24
22ci C
lt z
20la ~ = E 18 -0 gt
16
156
154 - a
~152 z w r0
150
148
-
500
o 400 ~
300 0
g 200 ~ z -~ 100
500
w ~ 400 lt gt a IU t- 300 w la 0 ~ 200
~8
100 12
10 0 0 8gt lt
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
w a
o 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT lo RESIDUE CONTENT II
-cGREGATE s-s1s1 (-GGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B26 Mixture Design Data Grani terock High Quality CSS-0 Replication
B26
2
TABLE B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Residue Ogtntent 47 57 67 ~ign 55
Bulk Spcific Gravity 23886 24116 24078
Ihooretical Specific Gravity 26675 26267 25879
Air Voids 105 81 70 82
VMA 210 210 21 8 210
Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 oos 005
Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545
Unit Weight pcf 149l 1505 1502 1505
Stabilareter Value 337 350 250 350
Ogthesicneter Value 238 3
Eesilient Mldulus l0 psi
2-day 104
Final 287
50
Ill 40 J C gt cc 30 Ill Ill l 0
C
10
20iii 500
w
l 400 C gt cc I 300 Ill l 0 in ~ 200 8
100 12
1110 0 0 8gt
c cc
6
4
FIGURE
~
~
177 204 200
144 150 140
254 247 260
24 ----------
a 18 0 gt
16 __i____i_-J
154
j52 u -a
~1501- ------iiiz -Ill 0
148
______________ 146
soar---------- a
o 400 1--
~ 300 _ ~
~ 200 z ~ 100 en w 0
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
B27
8
TABLE B28 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Residue Ointent 4 7 57 67 Cesign 55
Bulk Specific Gravity
Ihroretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
CJlhesianeter Value
Pesilient Mldulus 10 3psi
2-day
Final
40
30 lt gt = w 20 0
- 10 lt
0
500
w - 3 400
lt gt a l 300 w 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
i 10 ui C
0 8gt lt
6
4
FIGURE
23861
26649
10S
207
014
456
1489
338
145
124
307
~
--------
~ 5 6 7 84
RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
24025 23925
26242 25855
85
210
014
556
1499
283
135
135
307
24
22
0 lt i
20i
= 18 0 gt
16
154
152 u Q
i150 z w 0 148
146middot
500- o 400 -
300 _ Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 4
75 87
220 209
014 014
656 536
1493 1490
220 300
129 140
142 130
277 307
_--
~
-___
85 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B28 bull Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
B28
TABLE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Pesicllle Cbntent 47 57 67 resign 55 Bulk Siecific Gravity 24618 24637 24728 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26905 26475 26066 Air Voids 84 69 51 71 VlltLA 185 192 197 190 Absocbed Asphalt 047 0 bull 47 047 047 Effective Aspbalt 423 523 623 503 Urit Weight pcf 1536 1537 1543 1537 Stabilaneter Value 410 330 198 350 QJhesianeter Value 166
Resiliextt Mldulus 10 3psi
2-clay
Final
50
40 c
ffi 30 IE g20 iii c
10
500
l 400 c
a ~ 300 IE C ~ 200 8
100 12
ot 10 C
0 8
5
C
6
4
46
158
~
~ 4 5 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI
120 131 130
35 30 38
56 28 80
24
gt11 22
c c c
i 2031
= ~ C 180
16
158
156 t-
u - 154 z w 0
152
150
500
~
~ 0
bull a 400 - uil 300 ~
200
C
~ z ~ w a
100middot
8 4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
B29
TABLE B30 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
Pesidue Content 4-7 h---7 6 -7 IEsicn 5 5
Bulk Specific Gravity 24519 24638 24706 Iheoretical Specific Gravity 26609 26265 25793 Air Voids 79 62 42 65 VMA 189 192 198 19l
middot Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 005 005 Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545 Unit Weight pcf 1530 1537 1542 1535 Stabilareter Value 420 327 247 350 Cohesiareter Value 126
3Resilient Mldulus 10 psi
Z--day 47 Final 144
50
40 J lt gt a 30 w w
~ 20 m lt 10
500
w
3 400 lt gt a
~ 300 w 2 ~ 200 8 ~
100 12
111- 10 ui 0 gt 8
lt
6
4
114 182 120
43 29 45
79 33 90
24
ii-22
ci 0 lt i
20l ~= 18 0 gt
16
158
156 0
l 154 z ~w c 152
150
500
Q -dego 400 - ui3 300 C
~ 200 z
~ 100middot~
w a ~ 0
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8 4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
8
FIGURE B30 Mixture Design Data High Quality CMS-7
Graniterock Replication 2
B30
TABLE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1
~sidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weigllt pcf
Stabi]aneter Value
Cohes~ter Value
~silient MXJulus 103psi
2--day
final
40
30 C gt ffi20
~10 iii C ltII 0
500
l 400 C gt IC
~ 300 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
11 10 0
0 8gt C
6
4
55 65 75 resign 60 24268 24286 24206
26358 25966 25592 80
200
020
530
t515
80
268
182
338
~
65
207
020
630
t515
t_92
233
169
308
24
bull 220 0 C
ze 20
= 0 18 -0 gt
16
156
154
u i152 ~ z 0
150 bull
148
54 72
21 7 204
020 020
730 580
1511 1515
90 235
193 250
145 175
250 320
500 o 400 - l 300 0
~ 200 zi 100 iii IC
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replicationl
B31
TABLE B32 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2
Residue 0ntent
Bulk Secific Gravity
llleoretical Speipoundic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
-Absorled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
StabilcIIeter Value
Qlhesianeter Value 3Jesilient middotMgtdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
40
m30 lt gt cc20 w
w E
~10 ID lt 0
79
198
027
523
1518
203
243
201
354
~ soar-----------
w
400 lt gt a
~ 300 w E 0 ~ 200 8
100---I--~---------
12 -----------
111 10 C
0 8gt lt
6 --4
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l (ACiCiFIECiATE BASIS)
FIGURE B32 Mixture
55 65 75 Lesign 6 0
24329 24246 24077
26401 26007 25632
68 61 73 208 22l 203
027 027 027 623 723 573
1513 1502 1515
165 110 185 215 205 225
168 184 185 340 272 345
24
22 C C
z i 20
= 0 0
18 gt
16
156
154
a
gt152 en z Ill 0 150
148
bull 500 Q
deg 0 400- =gt 300 0
~ 200 z l 100 w
-
0 4 5 6middot 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(ACiGFIEGATE BASIS)
Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication
B32
2
TABLE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1
Eesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheore_tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VbullMA
lbsorbed_ Asphalt
Effective_ Asphalt
Qnit Weight pcf
~~ter Value
Q)hesianeter Value
Resiiient Mxlulus 10 3psi
2~y
Final
40
11130 C
a20 =
~10 C m
ltII 0
500
Ill
3 400 C
a ~ 300 w = 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
ll 10 ui E 0 8
c
6
4
I-
1-
55
23824
26318
95
215
014
536
1487
287
381
224
380
65 75
23896 23701 25928 25555 78 73
220 233
014 014 636 736
1491 1479 195 161
265 212
212 196
404 341
24
11 22d
c
z 20i
= ltII E 18 0
16
154
152- a
150 I-
Iesign 6 0
84
218
014
586
1490
240
320
215
395
z w Q
148
bull 146
500 a
c 400 ~ ui
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
l 300 Q
~ 200 zl 100 w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIOUla CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
FIGURE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-a Replication 1
B33
- - ----- -
TABLE B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2
Rssidue Ogtntent
Bulk Secific Gravity
lhairetical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
AbsoIbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stabil~ter Value
Olhesiareter Value 3lesilient Mldulus 10 psi
2-day
Firal
40
m 30 lt gt a 20 w w
= ~ 10
m lt
0
- --- -middot -middot 500
w l 400 lt gt
Ea
300 0 ~ 200 8
100 12
1l 10 middot 0 gt 8
lt
6
4 4
FIGURE
55
23834
26371
96
214
022
528
1487
279
207
176
332
65
23784
25978
84
223
022
628
1484
208
270
185
336
75
23628
25604
77
236
022
728
1474
167
334
181
350
iesiqn 6 bull 0
90
21 8
022middot
578
1485
245
240
180
334
~
~
24
1l 22
0
lt i
20i
= 0 gt
18
16
152
150 - 148
~ 146
144
500
o-400 middot --- J 300 C
~ 200 z
middot ~ 100 en a
0 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication
B34
2
B35 Mixture Design Data GraniterockTABLE Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
Residue Content 55
Bwk Specific Gravity 24720
lheoretical Specific Gravity 26164
Air Voids 55
VMA 185
Absorbed Asphalt 001
Effective Asphalt 549
Unit Weight pcf 1543
StabilCampTeter value 293
Ohesiareter Value 174
Besilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day 69
Final 153
40
~ 30 _
c gt ffi 20 w I
Q 10
c 0
500
w 3 400 -
c gt a
~ 300 w I g bull ~ 200 8 ----r
100middot
10
8 -
~
Q
0 6gt a =c
4 ~ 2
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS
65 75 DesiSE 60
2 4 720 24515
25767 25388
40 34 48
193 207 189 001 001 001 649 749 599
1543 1530 1543 205 97 250
156 283 170
46 22 55 72 so 110
24
~
22ci C c
i 20i
= Cl 180 gt
16
lSadeg
156
u -a
654 z 0 152
150
500 ii a
a 400 - 3 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7
FIGURE B35 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1
B35
12 r---------- 500bull _ 10
o 400 -middot 0 gt 5 C
8
tnl 300 Q
~ 200 z
6 ~ 100 ~ IU 0
4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT I
(AGCREGA TE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
TABLE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
55 65 75 resicn 6 0 Residue Content
Bulk siecific Gravity 24816 2 4721 24560
lheoretical Specific Gravity 26389 25983 25596
Air Voids 60 49 40 55
VMA 182 193 205 187
Absorlei Asphalt middot 035 035 035 035
Effective Asphalt 515 615 715 565
UUt Weight cf 1548 1543 1533 1545
Stabilaneter Value 298 193 130 250
Qlhesicmeter Value 188 I57 118 180 3
Resilient MJdulus 10 psi
soor-----------158
w l 400 Ishy 156 gt lt u
0a
w
300 w ~154E 0 z
w Q ~ 200 152
8 150100----middot-~-1-__c__~
2-day
Final
40
~ 30 J lt gt a 20 w
s 10 0
lt
0
92 43 27 65 186 79 46 135
24
22
~ =
ci lt 0
i 20~
18 0 gt
16
FIGURE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2
B36
Table B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
FJiuivalent ~sidue amtent 60 70 80 resign 70
Iesidue Ontent
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absomed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
lhit Weight pcpound
Stabilareter Value Ohesiareter Value
~ilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
Ill
50
40 A gt a w 30 w i 0 J
iii 201-
10
400
w3 300 gt a Ill t 200 i 0
8 ~iii ll 100 1-
0 12
lit 10 0 0 8gt a lt
6
4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)
630
21584
24451
117
210
140
460
1347
415
208
735
21570
24143
107
219
140
560
1346
488
61
840
21385
23848
103
233
140
660
1334
382
63
resign 7 35
107
219
140
560
1346
488
63
96
339 141
325
126
299 141 325
24
lit 22d
Cl
z 20i
= 0 180
gt
16
138
136 ltgt
i134 iii ~ z w 0 132
130
bull 500
o 400 -
3
300 ------------- 0
~ 200 z ~ 100 w o_____________a
9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B37
----
Table B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Pesidue omtent 60 70 80 Design 70
Pesidue omtent 630 735 8 40 Dsign 735
Bulk Specific Gravity 21710 21722 21714
lllroretical Specific Gravity 24298 23995 23705
Air Voids
VMA
lbsorted Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Chhesianeter Value
Eeilient Mldulus 103psi
2--clay
Final
so
40 J w
gt a 30 w w 0 20 m
10 400
w 300 gt a w 200 w i 100 8
0
12
if 10 a
~0 8gt a lt
6
4
107
205
112
488
1355
395
llO
113
290
95
213
112
588
1356
398
62
122
271
84
22l
112
688
1355
318
70
138
282
24
22 c 0
20
0 180 gt
16
140
138 -a
136 _iii z bull --w 0 134
132
bull 500 a
o 400
m 300 J 0 bull ~ 200 z 100
w a
0
95
213
)12
588
1356
398
62
122
271
5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT J
(AGCilEGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B38
Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Table B39
Fquivalent ~idue COntent
~idue Cbntent
Bulk SJecific Gravity lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Oihesianeter Value
~ilient Mldulus l03psi
2-day
Fiial
so
w 40 lt gt cc 30 ~ w E
0 20 m lt 10
400
m POO lt gt a U 200 E 0 iii w c 100 8
0
12
- 10 vi Cl
0 gt ac
6
60 70 80
690 805 920
21790 21826 21910
24255 23977 23710
102 90 76
207 214 219
080 080 080
610 710 810
1360 1362 1367
437 400 289
219 229 202
141 158 184
333 282 273
24
~ 22ci
CJ lt z
20ii
= Cl 180
gt
16
----------
~ lo
140
138 Q l136 iii w Cl
134
132
500 Q
0 400 n3 300 Cl
~ 200 i-bull
100
z ~ 0 a
Cesign 70
Cesign 805
90
214
080
710
1362
400
229
158
282
-------
-
-~
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B39 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication l
B39
8
Table B40 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Eesidue cantent
Iesidue Omtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lhagtretical Speiliic Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Abro1plusmned Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tklit Weight pcpound
Stabilareter Value
OJhesianeter Value
EEsilient Mldulus l03psi
2-day
Final
50
w 40 J lt gt a 30 w
w i
3 20 lt 0 10
400-----------
DI 3 300 lt gt a wti 200 i 0 w8100
0 -------l--l-1
12 ----------
- 10 ltn 0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
60 70 80 690 805 920
21986 21964- 21948
24499 2A212 23938
103 93 83
200 209 218
124 124 l24
476 576 676
1372 1371 1360
422 403 265
270 306 160
99 140 154
298 310 254
24
-22
ci lt
=i 20i
a 0 18 0 gt
16
140
138 - a
l136 z w 0 134
132
bull500
a
o 400 -
ltn =gt 300 -J a
~ 200 z 100 DI 0
0 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT Ii (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Dsign 70
Design 805
93
209
124
576
1371
403
306
140
310
9
Figure B40 Mixture Design Data High Quality SS-30
San Bernardino SEA Replication 2
B40
Table B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent lesidue ~tent
Ilesidue Omtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lbagtretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcpound
Stabilateter Value
CllhesiaIEter Value
Resilient MXlulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
w 40 i- _ gt 30a w I- ~ w 0 20 m I-CII 10
400
w l 300 gt a w lj 200 0 w 100 8
0
12
111 10 Q
0 8gt a ~
6
4
~
6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
65 75 85 Design 75 683 789 89J tesign 789
21624 21445 21375 24097 23802 23520
103 99 92 213 228 238 100 100 100 550 650 750
1349 1338 1334 423 295 285 70 174 82
150 139 138 318 310 2S4
24
22d i
20ii
= CII Q 180 gt
16
138
- 136
u
134I- z ~132
130
bull 500 o 400 _ l 300 1- Q
sectl 200 I-z ~ 100 CII w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
99
228
100
650
1338
295
174
139
310
5
Figure B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B41
Table B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent PesidJJe Content
Residue Omtent
Bulk Specific GIavity
lheoretical Specific GIavity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit weight pcpound
Stabiloreter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Resilient Mxulus 103psi
SC
w 40 gt a 30 w w i 0 J 20
10
400
w 3 300 gt a w t 200 i
9 ltI)
w = 1008
0
12
11 10 u a 0 8gt
6
4
2-day
Final
~
~
5 6 7 8 flESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGflEGATE BASIS)
65 75 85
683 788 89J 21424 21394 21455
24147 23851 23567
ll3 103 90
22l 229 234
l09 l09 l09
541 641 741
133 7 1335 1339
412 328 280
129 103 81
167 141 162
325 260 280
24
22ci 0 201
= 0 gt
18
16
i-
138
136 Q i134 _ 0 z w bull0 132
130
soor----------- D C
o 400
ltn3 300 a ~ 200 z 100 (I)
w
-
~
a 0------------ 5 6 7 8 9
flESIOUE CONTENT I
(AGGflEGA TE BASIS)
Design 75
Design 7 86
103
229
l09
641
1335
328
103
141
260
9
Figure B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B42
Table B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent Residue Omtent
Residue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllagtreticalSpecilicGravity
Air Voids
VMA
AbsorlJed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcpound
Stabilcrreter value
Cllhesianeter value
lelilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
400-----------
Illl 300 lt gt a w t 200 lo 0 w 8100
0 ________ ___ __
12 ----------
~ 10 0
~ 8 bull a c
6
4 -_______ ___ __
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS
65 75 85 748 863 978 21752 21661 21638 24136 23863 23602 99 92 83
213 225 234 081 081 081 569 669 769
1357 1352 1350 466 367 235
224 266 138
220 189 209 478 337 281
Ilsign 75
Design 863
92
225
081
669 1352
367
266
189
337
24 ----------
~
220 Cl lt ii 20
0 18 0
gt
16 ----------------14or-----------
138 -0 a 136 z w Q
134
132
= c 400 - l 300 Q
~ 200 f-middot z 100 w a o----------
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
_____________J
Figure B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardinor Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B43
Table B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Iesidue Cbntent 65 75 85 Design 75
lesidue Omtent 748 86~ resign~Zl 863
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleo~tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asjtlalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
lesilient Mxlulus 103psi
2-day
Final
so
w gt 0 30 IE 0 20 iii lt
10
400
3 300 lt gt 0 w l 200 IE 0 X w
100 8
0
12
- 10 en 0 0 8gt
6
4
~ 40 bull
~ 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
21676
23998
97
208
055
595
1353
409
248
189
308
24
22
ci c lt i
20ii
= 0 0
18 gt
16
21711 21641
23729 23472
85 78 85
223 234 223
055 oss 055
695 795 695
1355 135l 1355
283 227 283
187 186 187
198 177 198
255 285 255
140
138 a
136 - z 0 134 --
132
500 a
o 400 -
vi3 300 - 0
sectj 200 z ~ 100
0 0 5 6 middot 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino~ Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B44
Table B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Equivalent Jesidue Content 60 70 80 Design 70
tesidue Content
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
trut Weight pcpound
Stabilcineter Value
Cbhesiateter Value
tesilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
IU 40 _ C gt 30a IU IU = middoto 20 m C (I) 10
400
IU
300 C gt a IU
ti 200 = 0 ~ IU c 100 8
0
12
10 ai 0 8gt C
6
4
~
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)
630 735 840 Design 7 35
21651 21581 21592
24033 23739 23457
99 91 80 91 180 190 198 190
399 499 599 499 135l 1347 134 7 1347
309 439 358 439
150 236 202 236
140 171 148 171 294 390 367 390
24
bull 22
Cl Cl C
i 20i
= (I) Q 180
gt
16 140
138 0 a
i136 z IU
134 bull bull
Q
132
500 D
c 400 _ 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 IU a
0 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B45
Table B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Residue Cbntent 60 70 80 Design 70 Residue Cbntent 6JO Z35 EdQ Jesign 7 35
Bulk Spcific Gravity 21413 21627 21711 lhroretical Specific Gravity 24321 24017 23726 Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilcneter Value
Ohesianeter Value
llesilient Mgtdulus 10 3psi
2-day
Final
so
Ill 40 I lt gt 0 30 w Ill i 0 20 Cl lt
10
400
111
l 300 lt gt 0 w lj 200 i
~ w = 1008 -----___
0
12
II- 10 a 0 8gt lt
6
4
120
189
249
351
1336
407
79
147
361
24
II-22
ci
lt ~ 20i
= 0
0 18
gt
16
138
136 u C
l134 w 132
130
bull 500
C
o 400 ~
---------_J 300 0
~ 200
~ 100 Ill 0
0
99
189
249
451
1350
396
76
165
340
85
193
249
551
1355
360
64
175
305
99
189
249
451
1350
396
76
165
340
5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT 1
9 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE COIHENT f
9
(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B46
---------
Table B4 7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Bulk Specific Gravity
lhalretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorlled Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilaieter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
llesilient MJdulus 103psi
2-clay
Final
50
40w lt(
gt IC 30 w w
0 20 iii lt( ltI)
10
400
w 3 300 ~ lt(
gt IC w t 200 0 iii 111 i 100 8
0 ___ _______ __ _ __
12 ----------
Fquivalent Pesidue Content 60 70 80 Iesign 70
Pesidue Qlntent 690 805 92Q Dcsign 805
21958 22006
24182 23909
92 88 92
18l 188 18l 256 256 256
444 544 444
1370 1373 1370
342 291 342
78 73 78
184 167 184
303 298 303
10 0
0 8gt IC
c 6
4 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B47 Mixture
21880
24453
105
176
256
344
1365
443
58
174
381
24
22ci
5 20
= 0
0 18
gt
16
~ I I
138
136 ~ ~134 bull z 111 0 132
130
bull 500
o 400 3 300 - Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 ltI) 111 IC
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B47
Table B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
El_uivalent Residue Cbntait 60 70 80 Iesign 70
Residue Cbntent 690 aQi 2 2Q Dsign 805 Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Olhesiateter Value
Resilient Mldulus middot103psi
2-day
Final
21816
24403
106
178
244
356
1361
482
136
183
393
21806
24120
96
187
244
456
1361
411
130
187
374
21996
23849
78
189
244
556
1373
314
106
260
361
96
187
244
456
1361
411
130
187
374
24so
w 40 22 ci 0 gt a 30 ~ 20w w = 20 ishy C 18iii 0 gt Ill 10 _ ___ ____________
16 400------------
140
w l 300 138 gt 0
Qa w
636t 200 z0 w --------_ Qw 134c 100 8
0 ___ _____________ 132
bull50012 -----------
a
1 400 -_ 10
ltti ltti l 300 -C 0 C8gt ~ 200 lt z
6 l 100 w a
04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT S RESIDUE CONTENT S (AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B48
Table B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
EquivaJent Residue antent 65 75 85 Design 75 Residue Content 63J z aa a 23 resign 7 88 Bulk Specific Gravity 21404 21439 21381 lheoretical Specific Gravity 23563 23286 Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcf
Stabilaneter Value
Cohesianeter Value
~ient 1bdul11S 103psi
2~y
Firal
50
w 40 gt a 30 w w 0 20 iii lt 10
400
3 300 w
gt a w t 200 0 in i w
100 8
0 12
10 0 Q
0 8gt a c
6
4 5 6
23020 92 79 71 79
193 199 209 199 140 140 140 140 510 610 710 610
1336 1338 1334 1338 424 397 308 397 79 308 266 308
173 185 196 185 330 319 285 319
24
22ci c lt
~ 20c Q 180
gt
16
138
136 u -Cl
~134 in ~z w 132
130
soar----------- Qbull
o 400
middot3 300 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a Q___________ ___ __
7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT deg RESIDUE COIITENT deg (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B49
Table BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Fquivalent lesidue Content
Besidlle 0-ntent
Bulk Specific Gravity
Illeoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pf
Stabilcmeter Value
ltbhesiaieter Value
Besilient Mxlulus 103psi
2--day
Final
50
~ 40 I lt gt 30 w 0 20 01 lt 10
400
w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 w r lOO 8
o 12
10 ai ~ 0 8gt a lt
6
~
4 5 6 7 8
IIESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
9
65 75 85 683 788 893 21527 21362 21337
24013 23721 23441 104 99 90
188 202 211
225 225 225
425 525 625
1343 1333 1332
410 418 290
261 62 100
188 197 211
334 348 331
24
22 ~ ci c lt
20 f 18 0 gt
16
138
136 0 a
134 z w 0 132
130
500 a
o 400
ai bull 300 I bull C
~ 200 z ~ 100 w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
IIESIDUE CONTENT I
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design 75
Design 788
99
202
225
525
1333
418
62
197
348
Figure BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
BSO
Table B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno
Fquivalent Residue Clintent
Residue 0rrtent
Bulk Specific Gravity
lheoretical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorlei Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
thlit Weight pcf
StabiJaneter value
Ohesiaretel value 3lelilient MJdulus 10 psi
2-day
Final
50
w
40
c gt a 30 w w = g 20 iii c Ill 10
400----------
middota
l 300 bull c gt a w t 200 = 0 w c 100 8
0 _______ ____ _
12 ------------
_ 10 ~ 8 c
6
4 _________ __
5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B51
Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
65 75 85 748 863 978
21728
24022
96
186
200
450
1356
436 100
199
376
24
11 22
c c c
z 20ii
Ill0 180
gt
16
Design 75
Design 863
86
195
200
550
1355
392 260
212
362
21716
23753
86
195
200
550
1355
392 260
212
362
21673
23495
78
205
200
650
1353
378 201
230
3l7
~
140
138 Q j136 bull --_ z w 0134
132
500 Q
o 400 bull -l 300 ~ 0 ~ 200 I-z ~ 100 w a
0 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Table B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent lesidue OJntent 65 75 85 Design 75 Pesidue Ointent 748 863 978 Design 863 Bulk Specific Gravity 21595 21708 21637 ~retical Specific Gravity 23977 23708 23452 Air Voids 99 84 77 84 VMA 19l 195 206 195 Absorbed Asphalt l92 l92 l92 l92 Effective Asphalt 458 558 658 558 Unit Weight pf 1347 1354 1350 1354 Stabilareter Value 502 262 239 262 Cllhesianeter Value 257 136 154 136 Pesilient MJdulus 103psi
2--day 217 201 228 201 Final 371 307 290 307
2450
w 40 22 0 0lt ltgt ia 30
bull 20i
= 0 20 18iii 0lt gt 10
16 400
~
~
140
w 3 300 -ltgt
138 lt gt
aa w t 200 deg136 z0 w 0
134 w
100 8
1320
12 500 a
0 400 10
3 300 C 0 Q8gt ~ 200 lt z
6 100 w a
4 0 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9
RESIDUE CONTENT ~ RESIDUE CONTENT ~ (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B52
Table B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
Fquivalent ~sidue Cbntent 45 55 65 Design 55 ~idue Cbntent 473 578 6~~ Design 5 78 Bulk Specific Gravity 24210 24403 24473 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26934 26528 26142 Air Voids
VMA
Absocbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Unit Weight pcf
StabiJaneter Value
Cbhesiareter Value
Iesilient M)dulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
w _ 40 C gt II 30w w 0 20 iii C ~
10
400
w l 300 C gt II
iiw
200
~ w --------r 100 8
0 12
ot 10 -0
0 8gt II c
6
4
101 80 64 80 199 20l 206 20l
022 022 022 022 423 523 623 523
151l 1523 1527 1523 308 288 197 288
ll7 ll2 140 112
95 llO 122 llO 306 272 214 272
24
ci 22
C
i -~20Es = E 18 0
gt
16
156
154 - gt152 iii z ~ w 0
150
148
bull 500
o 400 Inl 300 0
~ 200 z ~ 100 w II
0
--~
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT r (AGGREGATE BASIS)
4 5 6 7 8 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B53
Table B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Residue Glntent 45 ss 65 Jesign 55 Residue Omtent 47 5 ZB 6 83 resign ~za Bulk Specific Gravity 24197 24253 24435 lheoretical Specific Gravity 26843 26441 26058 Air Voids 99 83 62 83 VMA 199 206 208 206 Absorbed Asphalt 09 09 09 09 Effective Asphalt 441 541 641 541 lklit Weight P=f 1510 1513 152S 1513 StabLkmter Value 38l 307 204 307 CJgthesianeter Value 73 85 149 85 Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi
2-day 170 159 142 159 Final 333 367 193 367
so
w 40 J lt gt 0 30w w le 0 20J
CJ lt 10
24
It
22ci 0 lt i -------20 = 18 0 gt
16 400
____
~
156
w 3 300 154 lt gt - a0 w gt 152l 200 le __-0 z w w c 150 8100
148 0
12 500
D C
o 400 r- 10 -u 300
J 0 9
8 Cgt ~ ~ 200 z
6 ~ 100
w 0
4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE COIITEIIT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B54
----------
Table B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Rep~ication 1
Equivalent Residue Contentmiddot
Residue Ontent
Bulk Spcific Gravity
~tical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
tklit Weight pcpound
Stabilaneter value
Cbhesiaieter Value
Resilient -bdulus 103psi
2-day
Final
45 55 65
518 633 748
24695 24765 24666
26898 26520 26160
82 66 57
187 193 205
001 001 001
449 549 649
154l 1545 1539
41l 310 24l
159 157 165
183 178 193
371 318 250
50
w 40 c gt a 30 w-w == 0 20 ~ 10
400------------
~ 300 lt(
gt a
t 200 == 0 in bullw 8100
0 __ ________ ___ ___
12 ----------
t 10 rti C
~ 8 a c
6
4 s 6 7
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI
4
24
Ill 22
0 c c
ze 20
II)
C 18 0
gt
16
158
156- 154 Ill z w 0 152
150
500 iii
8 4
~
0 400-
i300-~ g 200 1-z l 100 iii a 0 __ _______ ____
5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Design 55
Design 633
66
193
001
549
1545
310
157
178
318
___
8
Figure B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
BSS
Table B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality
Equivalent Rsidue Content 45
Rsidue Cbntent 518
Bulk Specific Gravity
lllooretical specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
lbsoibed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
unit Weight pcf
Stabilareter Value
Cohesicmeter Value 3
Iesilient Mldwus 10 psi
2--day
Final
400-----------
w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 I 0 ltII w8100
olt----__1__--1_---1
12 ----------
10 u
0 8gt a lt
6
4 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT l
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
24594
27024
90
190
019
431
1535
450
198
191
360
24
Ill 22
0 C
lt i
20i ~ ltII C 18 C gt
16
158
156 0
i54 iii z ILi
J52
150
SS-30 SEA
55 65
63J 7 ~a 24844
26641
67
190
019
531
1550
324
212
173
308
24856
26276
54
199
019
631
155l
234
225
166
259
_________
~
500----------- 0
dego 400 -
~300~~ C
~ 200 z i 100
w a
0 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COIITEHT l
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Replication 2
Design 55
Lesign 633
67
190
019
531
1550
324
212
173
308
Figure B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B56
---------
Table B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality
ElIuivaJent lesidue Omtent
lesidue Cbntent
Bulk Spacific Gravity
~retical Specific Gravity
Air Voids
VMA
Absorbed Asphalt
Effective Asphalt
Uut Weight pcf
Stabilaneter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
lesilient Mldulus 103psi
so
w 40 lt gt a 30 w w ~ 20 m lt II)
10
400
w 3 300 lt gt a w lj 200 0 w z 1008
0 12
Ill 10 Q
0 8gt lt
6
4
2-day
Final
~
4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)
so 530
24024
26676
99
207
031
469
1499
354
138
183
352
SS-15 SEA Replication 1
60 70 Design 60 636 7 42 Design 636
24040 23986 26279 25901 85 74
214 223
031 031 569 669
1500 1497 223 149
222 126
159 160 302 234
24
Ill
c 22 ~ c
lt i
20i1
== (II C 180 gt
16
152
150 u -a
648 z w Q
146 1-
144
bull 500 a
o 400 - 3 300 C
~ 200 z ~ 100 (II w a
~ 0
4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
85
214
031
569
1500
223 222
159
302
8
Figure B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1
B57
Table B58 Mixture Design Data Low Quality SS-15
Fquivalent Residue Content 60 60
Rsidue Cbntent 525 630
23944
~retical Specific Gravity
Bulk Sjecific Gravity 26592
Air Voids 100
209VMA
1bsocbed Asphalt 015
Effective Aspbalt 485
Unit Weight pcf 1494
Stabilareter Value 377
Olhesiaeter Value 151
Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi
162
375 2-day
Final
so
w 40 _ gt c 30 w w i
~20 m I-0
10
400
Ill
300 gt w I 200 i 2 w i 100 8
_________ 0 --middotmiddot-
12-------bull------
ti 10 9 0 8gt
6
4
24
- 22ci
0
20i
= 9 18 0 gt
16
152
150 u a
148 z---- w0146
144
500 Q
o 400 _ 300 Q
~ 200 I-z ~ 100
w a
23988
26022
84
215
015
585
1497
307
180
165
356
Graniterock SEA Replication 2
70
735 23793
25830
79
229
015
685
1485
217
170
169
277
~
~
0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7
RESIOUE CONTENT li RESIDUE COPlTENT li (AGGREGATE 8ASIS) (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)
Design 60
resign 630
84
215
585
1497
307
180
165
356
8
Figure B58 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2
B58
Table B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
Equivalent esidue omtent 5 0 60 70 Design 60
esidue Cbntent 5 75 690 805 Dsign 690
Bulk Specific Gravity 24389 24362 24419
Jheo=eticaJ Specific Gravity 2 6670 26303 25953
Air Voids 8 6 74 59 7 4
VMA 198 207 214 20 7
Absorbed Asphalt 009 009 009 009
Effective Asphalt 491 591 691 591
Unit Weight pcf 1522 1520 1524 1520
Stabilareter Value 38l 292 220 292
Cbhesiclneter Value 263 186 176 186
~t Mldulus 103psi
2-day 222 222 207 222
Fulal 380 289 293 289
5
w 40 C gt a 30 Ill ~ 20 m C 1- 10
24 ----------
22 bull C Cl C
zi 20
C1 o 18 0 gt
16 ___-________-------i-_-
400---------- 15a------------
156l 300 C gt - a =deg 154ti 200
iii z0 IUiii 0 152 bull bull~ 10018
150 ___ _______ __J0 ---i--J~-L--1
500----------12 ----------- bull o 400 -
Ill 10 ui l 300 -Q
Qg 8 g 200a lt z 6 l 100
iii a
01--J-----__ __4 -------r------- 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
RESIDUE COrlTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1
B59
Table B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
Equivalent Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Design 60
Eeidue omtent 575 690 805 D=sign 690
Bulk Specific Gravity
llleo~tical Specific Gravity
1lir Voids
VMA
Absocbed Asralt
Effective Asphalt
Ulit Weight pcf
Stabilcmeter Value
Cbhesianeter Value
Eeilient Mldulus 103psi
2-day
Final
50
Ill 40 J
lt gt a 30 w I-w 0 20 Ill lt I-
10
400
w 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 Id
8100
0 12
10 m Q
0 8gt 5 lt
6
4 4 5 6 7
~
RESIDUE CONTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASISI
24371 24441 24445
26744 26373 26020
89 73 61 73
199 205 213 205
019 019 019 019
481 581 681 581
1521 1525 1525 1525
335 236 191 236
220 164 180 164
194 199 191 199
388 329 294 329
24
22
ci 0 lt i
20i
= a
= 18 0 gt
16
158
156 u a
deg154 = w Q
152 ---------150
500 a
1 400 m3 300 1 Q
~ 200 z ~ 100
Ill a
0 8 4 5 6 7 8
RESIDUE COHTENT $
(AGGREGATE BASIS)
Figure B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2
B60
APPENDIX C
DATA ANALYSIS SOLVENT FREE AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS
Table Cl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL e_AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
95 85 80
867
76
88
90 85 85
867
29
33
95 85 85
883
58
65
85 70 80
783
76
98
100 100 100
1000
00
00
100 100 100
1000
00
00
C M s 0
D A T A x s
CV
80 80 80
800
00
oo
80 75 75
767
29
38
75 80 70
750
50
67
70 80 75
750
50
67
90 90
100
933
58
62
95 100
95
967
29
30
C M s 1
D A T A
X s
CV
80 75 70
750
50
67
60 70 55
617
76
124
70 70 65
683
-2 9
42
65 70 60
650
50
77
65 70 70
683
29
42
70 60 65
650
50
77
Table C2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating
F01
E 2 ll877 7777778 243aassese9 1)75102041 329 532 ~ middot2 1ll77777777~ 73RBSeSf89 32571~2-~5 3~ 29 532 J 1 150 ooocooo 150JOJOOOO 5f122llll9 414 746
EA ll 8114 llllll11444 2111111111 3J51224 266 396 -E~ middot2- 1-0frOOfr~ 0-9 middot50-middot000 3 oco middot2middot20110816 middot 329 532 Agt 2 77 7777778 38 8815589 17142857 329 532 nJ 4 1555555~55 388881889 171112857 266 396
FR RmiddotJR 36 8166666567 225851B52
------------------------------------------------middot---------------------ronmiddotL 53 -esoo--000000r
Cl
100
P
c5 75 z-t-lt8 50 w t-lt bull css-oC
CMS-0w 25a C middot+ CMS-7 C lt
0-----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Cl Mean AggregateCqqting at middotoesign Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 867 css-o 883 CSS-0 783 css-o 1000 css-o 1000middotcss-o middot I I CMS-0 800 CMS-0 7~ 7 CMS-0 750 CMS-0 933 CMS-0 967lrMS-0 750
I CMS-7 750 CMS-7 617 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 65 0 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating
C2
Table C3 Film Stripping
EMULSION
AGGREGATE SAN
BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK
C s s 0
D A T A
5
0
10
5
5
0
X s
CV
25
35
1414
75
35
47l
25
35
1414
C M s 0
D A T A
0
5
5
7
0
0
X s
CV
25
35
1414
60
14
236
00
oo oo
C M s 7
D A T A
0
0
0
5
0
0
X s
CV
00 OQ 00
25 35
1414
00 00
oo
Table C4 ANOVA Summary Film Stripping
AN-OVA
middotmiddotDPmiddot -ss- F middotFe5
E 2 33 7777778 1euro8888889 23555191 426 802 A 2 -ti8 7777778 343888889 4 7984496 426 802
E X II 4 9 2222226 23055557 3217054 363 642 ERROI 9 645000000 71666667 ---------------TOTAL 17 1762777782
C3
fl w 0 lti 1L a =gt en C w C C-a I-en
40
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-730
20
10
0 SB F GR
Figure C3 Film Stripping
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
css-o 25 css-o 75 css-o 25
GMS-0 25 CMS-0 60 CMS-0 oo
CMS-7 oo CMS-7 25 CMS-7 oo
----middot----middot-middotmiddotmiddot
Nlte Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping
C4
Table CS 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue
Content 10 3 psi
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW D
118 170A 217 205 160 175
C T 83 190 191 182 130 185A s )ts 101 180 204 194 145 180
0 s 25 14 18 16 21 7
CV 246 79 90 84 146 39 D 104 185 155A 190 140 215
C T 82 155 154 171 130 180A M x 93s 170 155 181 135 198
s 16 21 1 13 7 250 CV 167 125 05 74 52 125
D A ab 55 35 73 38 55
C T
82A 48 63 77 45 65 M X s pound81 -- - 52 49 75 42 60 s7 l 5 20 3 5 7
CV 18 96 404 38 11 9 11 8
Table C6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus
A N ) V l
-D-F -SS
E 2 832263888888 _ 2-- -5441-- 722-2222-J 1 89933611111
E~ 4 5386 7777779 -1J- 2- -3-8-1-+-rG-55--5-5-5 7- bull AJ 2 144235~899 EA 4 58024444443
ERROR 113- 3951500 00~-J
---------------------------------------------------------------------TOT-W- -3-5 -11806-4---638 881gt-9-
(116131944444 2720-8611111 89933611111 13466944445 1-9Q lh-5--amp7--+7-8-7211944445
14506111111 219 527-7778
1895577629 -12 394-1541-409569480
61345059 S-~937872 32952081 56gt7870Ll
357 3-S7 443 295
-]y5+ 3S7 295
605 6 05--833 461
-6--05-605 461
cs
bull css-omiddot 300 C CMS-0
M 0 diams CMS-7
(J
3200 gt C 0 E 1-
ffi 100
01----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure CS 2 Day ResiLient Modulus
SAN middotBERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 101 css-o 180 rss-o 204 css-0_194 CSS-0 145 CMS-0 198
CMS-0 93 CMS-0 170 ICMS-0 155 CMS-0 181 CMS-0 135 css-o 180l l l I I CMS-7 81 CMS-7 52 CMS-7 49 CMS-7 75 CMS-7 42 CMS-7 60
Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C6 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking 2 Day
Resilient Modulus 10 3 psi
C6
Table C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Content 10 psi
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A (
s
CV
260
232
246
20
80
320
280
300
28
94
482
299
391
129
33l
365
358
362
5
l4
280
240
260 28
109
320
345
333
18
53
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
267
250
259
12
47
295
280
288
ll
37
253
288
271
25
92
290
387
339
69
203
260
307
284
33
11 7
395
334
365
43
118
C M s 7
D A T A
X
s
CV
78
64
71-
10
139
110
95
103
ll
104
75
73
74
l
19
110
135
123
18
144
80
90
85
7
83
110
135
123
18
144
middotTable C8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus
-~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------F-r05- ---F-01--
E
J El -E- Al EAJ
-ERRJR
2 2-1 4 -~ 2 4
18
3592750555555 -14506 722-2221-171610COOOOJ 147394444445
1---1-1----lf466-li-+ 19215000000 55353333333
2850GOOC0000
17-16375277778 72~336H-1-11
1716100)0000 36848611111 sect8~5833---3-33--9607500000
13840833333 ~ 58-3 33-33 333
11315528C7 -45810702
109385263 23272807 ~U981l-2-1-6067895 3741579
357 -3 r7 443 2 95 3~7-357 295
605 605 833 461 605 605 4 6 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------~- 3-5- -448+1----2-222-2-
C7
bull css-o500
CMS-0 U) diams CMS-7C
C) 400 middoto -
~ 300
J Ci 200
1-z 100 J-UJ UIa
01-------------------------~---~-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
eMS-0 259 ess-a 300 ess-a 391 ess-a 362 eMS-0 284 CMS-0 365
ess-o 246l l l l l ICMS-0 288 eMS-0 271 CMS-0 339 ess-o 260 ess-o 333
CMS-7 71 CMS-7 103 CMS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123
t-ote Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure ca Newrnan-Keuls Ranking Full Cure 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi
ca
Table C9 Density at Design Residue Content pcpound
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
1359
1372
1366
09
07
1365
1365
1365
0
0
1365
1352
1359
09
07
1345
1345
1345
0
0
1520
1525
1523
04
02
1515
1515
1515
0
0
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
1348
1343
1346
04
03
1330
1338
1334
06
04
1329
1340
1335
08
06
1335
1316
1326
- 13
10
1505
1490
1498
11
07
1490
1485
1488
04
02
C M s 7
D A T A
x s
CV
1373 1385
1379
09 06
1375 137 5
1375
0 0
1380
1379
1380
01 01
1370
1360
1365
07 05
1537
1535
1536
01 01
1543
1545
1544
01 01
Table ClO ANOVA Surtunary Density
A II O V ~
-SS F bull O1
E _ 0
2 i
lCB4155555 Z08-tOS389
II 311277~
54207777R 1 ouos2sirrs
4340277
135q23660 -25lS 7i80R63-
1087331173
3S7 3 ~7 443
i()5 605 83
EA Q
4 -2
1599U4U5 _iuseeg
399E11 -3-3UUL45-
10J17398 bull~3785-C7
295 -~S7-
4 f 1 -6CS
A) 2 13772222 o6886111 17251218 357 605 EAJ q 2C361111 5090278 12752262 295 4 61
-ERRJR- 13- 718-()001 399166-7-
35
C9
bull css-o160 CMS-0 diams CMS-7
150
() -a gt 140 -en z w
middotC 13
1201~bull-------------r---------------SBH SBL FH FL ~RH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C9 - Density at Design Residue Content
SAN middotBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 138o CMS-7 1365ICMS-7 1375 CMS-7 1544
css-o 1366
I-7 bull rMS-7 1536
css-o 1365 css-o 1359 css-o 1345 css-o 1523 CSS-0 j515
CMS-0 1346 CMS-0 1334 CMS-0 1335 CMS-0 132 6 CMS-0 1498 CMS-0 1488
Nte Values with a ccmnm vertical line are not statistically different
Figure ClO Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcpound
ClO
Table Cll Air Voids at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
D 87 7 0-A 75 77 80 72
C T 71 70 92 82 78 73A s )s 79 70 84 80 79 73
0 s ll 0 12 04 01 01
CV 143 0 144 45 18 10 D 97 93A 93 91 82 84
C T 90 92 A
91 93 87 90
M x 94 93 92 s 92 84 87 s os 01 01 _0l 04 04
0 53 08 15 15 42 49CV D A 77 62 73 62 71 48
C T 73 61 62 71 65A 55
M X s 75 62 68 67 68 52 s 03 01 08 06 04 057
CV 38 12 115 96 62 96
Table Cl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids
A I O Y 11
-DF ss -F 05 F01
E 2 382650000 191325000 69)150301 3~7 605 -A 2 -2-681667 1340334 ll03567311 -3- 57 605
Q 1 2f677778 26677778 952324f6 4 13 I 33 EA lj 13S33333 3313333 122011409 2 95 Ii 61 ti -2 l8105555- -905-277-8- 326553tO 357 tiOS II) 2 6572221 3296111 11953707 357 605 E~l 4 88411445 2211111 797552 795 4 f 1 ERElll 111 11991)0)00 bull2172222-
-------------------------~------------------------------------------rou1 s SJ 3100000-
Cll
11
10
iP- en 0-0 gt aa
9
8
7
6
5
4
bull css-o CMS-o diams CMS~7
SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
F-igure Cll Air Voids at middotoesign Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 94 CMS-0 93 CMS-0 92 ICMS-0 92 CMS-0 84 ICMS-0 87
IIcss-o 79 css-o 7 0 I II
css-o 79 css-o 73
I ~_ I~ CMS-7 7 5 CMS-7 62 CMS-7 68 CMS-7 48 - - bull-- ~ -----~middot-middotmiddot--middot-middotmiddot-middot ---middotmiddot
~= Values with a OCIlOn vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids
Cl2
Table Cl3 Stabilorneter Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
272
3113
293 29
99
270
265
268 04
13
393
327
360 47
130
380
325
353 39
110
270
270
270 0
0
235
185
210 35
168
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
375
344
360
22
61
340
350
345
07
21
307
377
342
50
145
415
367
39l
33
85
350
300
3-2 5
35
109
240
245
243
04
15
C M s 7
D A T A
x s
CV
235
23-5
235
0
0
130
120
125
07
57
213
233
-223
14
63
150
200
175
35
202
350
350
350
0
0
250
250
25 o_ 0
0
Table Cl4~ ANOVA Summary Stabilorneter Value
A N O V 1
soua= SS r 01
E 2 2
7086172721 9702C93fl9
3543086361 4SS10Uf95
505343236 ~-9189501
357 357
605 605
) 1 175 6950250 1756950250 25053)2i8 443 833 EA 4 6718347112 167 9586 778 23955053 2 95 461 ~ ~544 -4 Q-432-ll-25-0- --S--~ 38 ~5-19- -3 5- ios AJ 2 941227166 47(1euro13583 57122663 357 605 EAJ 4 289779333 72319A33 10314831 2 95 II f 1
Ell ngtR -18 1r2024gt0) -i- bull112472-
---------------------------------------------------------------------0-T- ----5- 4-9B1 is~v~
Cl3
50
w 40 I ltgt a 30w I-w ~ 200 I-m lt 10I-u
0 SSH SBL FH FL GRH
AGGREGATE
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
GRL
Figure Cl3 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 350 CMS-7 250ICMS-0 360 ICMS-0 345 r=ss-o 36o rMS-0 39l
css-o 268 CMS-0 342 css-o 353 CMS-0 325 CMS-0 243Icsbull-bull _ CMS-7 235 CMS-7 12S CMS-7 223 CMS-7 175 css-o 270 css-o 210
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value
Cl4
Table Cl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOWHIGH LOW LOWHIGH D 360193 280 465 275 250A T 234 345 183 375 160 225C A
s x 214 353 232 420 218 238s s 29 11 69 64 18810
136 30 296 152 37 4 74CV D 280 440 230 355 200 320 T A
252 430 219 450 140 240C A M x 266 435 225 403 170 280s s 20 7 67 428 570
74 16 16735 250 202CV D
80 190 122 245 130 170 T A
82 180 192 235 120 180C A M X 81 185 157 240 125 175s s l 7 so 7 777
CV 18 3038 31 5 57 40
Table Cl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value
-SS--
pound 2 1309717272222 654858611111 1102309084 357 605 __ 2 3Ber61222222 194033611--111 -1-1t2J3570 -3 57 605 J 1 12)524904445 120524f94111145 711)1137379 1143 l 33
EA 4 2311~U411111145 57795111111 355~57119 295 4 ~ 1
~ + --8-066---H~i-i--2 ---4-B3-a~--H ~T4-=7-7S~J -3 S7 605 1J 2 111206 7222222 71033511111 ll3~31111 3 57 605 EAJ 4 500gt1111111 12512777778 7587162 235 4 (- 1
RAO- -18 -999 500-000( -1-6--2-7 -75-00000-
--------------------------------------------------------------------tO+--l- el-i- 3-fi-99g6-3-R-~
Cl5
bull css-o500
Q1__________---___-----~
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure ClS CohesiometerValue at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
css-o 232rMS-0 435 CMS-0 280rMS-0 266 rss-o 420 tss-o 218
css-o 214 css-o 353 CMS-0 225 CMS-0 403 css-o 238ICMS-0 170
CMS-7 81 CMS-7 185 CMS-7 157 CMS-7 240 CMS-7 125 CMS-7 175
Nrte Values with a oamon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Cl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value
~400 -I ltgt cc 300 w 1-w E 2000 -() w c 1008
CMS-0 diams CMS-7
Cl6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Table Cl7 Swell at Design Residue Content in
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
0 0000 0003 0000 0008 0000 0000A C T 0000 0005 0000 0007 0000 0002
A 0000 0004 0000 0009 0000 0000 s j( 00000 00040 00000 00080s 00000 00007
0 s 00000 00010 00000 0 0010 00000 00012
CV 00 250 00 125 00 1732 D 0000 _o 045 0020 0036 0000 0000A 0006 0029 0018 0040 0001 0000TC A 0007 0040 0022 0039 0000 0000
M x 00043 00380 00200 00383 00003 00000 s s 00038 00082 00020 00021 00006 00000 0
874 215CV 100 54 1732 oo
D 0000 0004 0000 0003 0000 0000A T 0000 0002 0000 0000 0000 0000
C A 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000
M x 00000 OQ023s 00000 00010 00000 00000 s 00000 00015 00000 00017 00000 00000
7 oo 655 1732CV 00 00 oo
Table Cl8 ANOVA Summary Swell
P N O V ~
SOUR-middotEmiddot l)f -ss- -lSmiddot F rs FM
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------E 2 C031905 )015953 7576385211 329 532 J 2 0012203 OOOf112 2~97R1n75 329 532 l 000858(1 )()QSf80 11122112111111 414 846
H LI 0016535 00)111311 1963258575 266 396 Emiddot) middot2middot 00079 51- a0ll397S 1eg ~16527 329 532 AJ 2 00011958 )0021179 111 ns1ne 329 532 EAJ II 0006609 OC01652 7e117l97t3 266 396
EDl 36 )000751 OOOJ021
TOBImiddot middot53middot ----008959-9-middot
Cl7
05
04
z 03
-I -I w
u 3 02
01
0 SBH SBL FH
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
FL GRH GRL AGGREGATE
FigureCl Swell at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 00003 css-o 00007CMS-0 00043 CMS-0 -0380 CMS-0 00200 CMS-0 00303
CMS-0 00000css-o 00080 css-o 00000Icss-o 00000 Icss-o 00040 ICSS-0 00000
CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00000CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00023 CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00010
Rte Values with ~--~~~ ~~ lb-le are not ~tatistically different
Figure Cl8 Newman-Keuls Ranking swell in
Cl8
Table Cl9o MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
-------EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
GRANITEROCKFRESNOSAN BERNARDINO
LOW LOWHIGH HIGH LOW HIGH D
124 72198 137 287 243A 227 90145 178 83 260TC 57197 135 252 270A
s 207 104 258 73139 239s s 17 05 56 29 14 17
0 CV 82 280 82638 233 53
D 197 160145 145 90 205A 19l 17092 100 80 220TC 158 105 138190A M x 182 119 11 7 85 205 156 s s 21 37 25 1607 15 0
115 737 105316 21l 83CV D 21 omiddot 240202 185 98 330A
220 20087 181 34588TC 216 210138 223 77 338A M x 215 217142 196 88 338s
s 2111 0805 58 237
23 405 120 22 96118CV
Table C20 ANOVA Summary -MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
----------------------- I N O V A
SO0RE --DF -lS--
middotE __ 2 2
401 11310n -5831137037
2008568519 --2915568519
166S53085 2111762euro92-
3-9 J29
532 532
Q 1 14f5364f296 14653646296 1215099198 4 14 746 EA-Ev
4 -frac34
2784740740 -1-1-i 0359259
696185185 -56-tl-1-79tr30-
5 772 8571 -6450815
266 middot-3-29
396 -5-32middotmiddot
110 2 355470370 177735185 1bull11738C30 329 532 EAO II 12794711075 3198euro9519 25523909 266 396
-Ei8JB 36- 11311 111euro66euro7 120596296
---------------------------------------------------------------------FOTAJ- --5-3- -31131--343-14 8-1-
Cl9
50 bull css-o ti) CMS-0 gt 40 diams CMS-7E I
a w 30I-w E 0 -I 20-ca ltC I-Cl) 10
0--------------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Cl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOWmiddot HIGH LOW
CMS-7 215 CMS-7 142 css-o 104 I ICMS-7 338 CMS-7 21 7
css-o 207 css-o 139 i CMS-7 88 CMS-0 156middot css-o middot
CMS-0 182 CMS-Q 119 CMS-0 117 CMS-0 85 CMS-0 205 css-o 73
Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
C20
-----------------------------------------
Table C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
IEMULSON
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIG_H LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A x s
CV
135 104 104
114
18
157
70 85 51
69
17
248
105 66
136
102
35
343
148 197
-173
35
201
107 101
72
93
19
201
74 107
92
91
17
182
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
128 85
174
119
31
256
73 59 -
66
10
150
69 36 65
56
18
318
158 110
-134
34
253
77 96 68
80
14
178
53 66
113
77
32
408
C M s 7
D A T A x s
CV
141 79 52
91
46
503
185 60 63
103
71
695
125 201
96
141
54
386
192 164 126
161
33
206
131 130 120
127
6
48
72 230
76
126
90
715
Table C22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
l II O Y A
-soaas -OF- -S-S- -F- FrOS
E -llmiddot J
n -tJ-AO EllJ
RROi
----------
2 2 1 u -2-2 4
36middot -------
199090000000 middot 39113 411111111111
4111296296 61982222222
-t-72-1-middot-11181-18-1-754737037011 41156 5185186
85722 middotbull)0(0000 ----------------
995115000000 -1971-7222222
11111216296 151195555556 -360-yen5-110-711 1middot
j8236851852 11166296297
middotmiddot2381 166667
111805138 -0280488 17265A9 6507548
-36111086-15058033
41589422
329 329 414 2 66 329 329 266
532 -532 746 396
-532 532 3915
-----------------------------------lOo-1- middottt 1-300-lamp833-333-3-
C21
400
CJgt ~ 300 I
0 w I-w 200
-~ 0 CJwc 1000 ()
0
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Valueat Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-0 ll9 CMS-7 103 ICMS-7 141 css-o 173 CMS-7 127 CMS-7 126
css-o ll4 css-o 69 1middotcss-o 102 CMS-7 161 css-o 93 css-o 91
CMS-7 91 CMS-0 66 middotCMS-0 56 CMS~O 134 CMS-0 80 CMS-0 77
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure C22 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
C22
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table C23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
D A T A
X s
CV
724 811 637
724
123
170
1289 -
1276
1283
09
07
627 628 695
650
39
60
622 940
1427
996
405
407
475 407
1276
719
483
672
803 790 498
697
172
247
C M s 0
D A T A
x s
CV
1217 393
1260
957
489
511
2075 2879 1875
2276
532
233
1943 1195 2012
171 7
453
264
1241 1224 1208
1224
1 7
13
676 574 550
600
67
112
986 787 815
863
108
125
C M s 7
D A T A x s
CV
642 620 774
679
83
123
102 426 662
397 281
709
59 7 369 470
479 114
239
588 60l 290
493
176
357
301 263 393
319
67
210
238 284 227
250 30
121
Table C24 ANOVA Surmnary Surface Abrasion
Fmiddot F01middotmiddotss --------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------
e Amiddot
2 -gt
530361248149 22)938237037
315180624075 110469111)519
432152433 1sn1of15
329 329
532 532
1 n
1 4
[14699201852 9733 179629euro
446992gt1952 24332949074
61289-8 3335u~111
414 266
746 396
EJ J
2 2
middot59516003103 85017525926
291seoo1as1 425)8752963
4 9nn2 5 828630
329 329
532 532
EI 4 196475151852 4911877963 57349619 266 396
ERRJl 36 262551800000 72931l~-556
--------------------------------------------------------------------
middotTnUmiddot 53- middot159689-~0964815middot
C23
300
E C)
C)200 Cl)
0 J
z 0 en 100 lti a al lti
01-----r----~---------r---------SBH SBL
Figure C23
SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW
CMS-0 957 CMS-0 2276
css-o 724 css-o 1283
CMS-7 679 CMS-7 397
bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7
FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content
FRESNO
HIGH
CMS-0 171 7
css-o 65o
CMS-7 479l
LOW
CMS-0 1224
ICSS-0 996
CMS-7 493
GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW
css-o
CMS-0
719
600
ICMS-0 863Icss-
CMS-7 319 CMS-7 250
Ngtte Val~ with~ ~n vertical line are not stati~tically different
Figure C24 Newman-Keuls Ranking Surface Abrasion grams
C24
APPENDIX D
DATA ANALYSIS SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS
----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
Table Dl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15
SEA
D A T A
75 85 85
85 80 85
80 75 70
65 70 70
85 90 90
80 85 85
X s
tV
817
58
71
833
29
35
7-50
50
67
683
29
42
middot88 3
29
33
833
29
35
ss 30 see
D A T A
85 80 85
75 80 80
75 85 85
70 80 70
90 85 95
90 80 90
x s
CV
833
29
35
783
29
37
81 7
58
71
733
58
79
-900
50
56
883
29
33
C M s 7
D A T A
80 75 70
60 70 55
70 70 65
65 70 60
65 70 70
70 )0 65
x s
CV
750 50
67
617 76
124
683 29
42
650 50
77
683 29
42
650
50
77
Table D2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating
rmiddot rs F05 F 0 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------F 2 235 712593 1179 f-296297 553913Q113 329 532 a 2 63 bullTlt1ll81I R 31L97UC7U 1521731 3 29 532 E~
11 3f2 116i14f Jmiddot 39 (1)7111~gtI 1
3~2 ~-2900 9976~5185
17 ~li347F3 UfB47826
4 14 256
746 96
i) ~ pound 2S 11252i 12 29(-29 bull 5086957 329 532
a~ 2 12 ~-~737r o lt19518~ 2E260e7 329 53 2 u ll 1f3 bull illf illt7 41t3S1B52 191156522 2 G6 3~f
iE1190il 3i 76 pound61iz~57 212~-25
Dl
-~ -CJ z I-lt(
0 0 U1 -lt( C bull SS 15 SEA w 25 SS 30 SEA CJ cc
diams CMS - 7CJ lt(
0 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dle Mean Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
I SS-30 733SS-301 $33 SS-15amp 833 lss-301 sn 7 I ISS-30 900 SS-30 883
SS-151 817 SS-301 783 SS-15 683 SS-15 883 SS-15 833SS-lSi 750
CIS--7 750 CS-7 617 OS-7 683 CMS-7 650 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650
Ngtte Values with a comon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating
D2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
Table D3 Film Stripping
EMULSION
AGGREGATE SAN
BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK
s s
15
0 A T A
30
15 20
30 15
25
X s
CV
225
106
47l
250
71
283
200
71 354
s s
30
D A T A
25
25
0
0
5
0
X s
CV
25middoto
oo
00
oo oo
oo
2middotmiddot5
35
1413
C M s 7
D A T A
0
0 0
5
0 0
X s
CV
oo
00 oo
25
35
1413
oo
00 oo
Table D4 ANOVA Swnmary Film Stripping
----------------- ---------------- --middot-----------middot----- middot--middotmiddotmiddot middot- middotmiddot-middot----middot -middot-- middotmiddotmiddot--- --- -------- -A N O V J
-SW~ middotnt r-
pound 2 14333333113 7166666667 27 1S78lttl7 l 2 2]33333333 1165666euro67 middot11t1210~26 Eirl 141 55f 3333335 13958333311 i2894737
Dlli~RI 9 237 50CCDIOmiddot) 2638888P9
lOUL t7 bull--- bullbull - bull- 0 bull bullbull bull- bull bull 0 -------- bull-- bull- bull---bull ---- lt -bullbull bull - bullbullbull--bullbullbullbullbull-bullbull-- bullbullbull bull ___ bull --bull bull bull bull --- bull bull-bullho bullbull bull- bull bull ~-- bull- UO rArr-d bull
D3
cit -w
0 lt( ll a (I)
C w 0 C-a I-ti)
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
20
1
0 SB F GR
Figure D3c Film Stripping
SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO
Iss-3
SS-15
250
225
SS-15~7 250
25
SS-15
ISS-30
200
25
ClIS-7 oo middot SS-30 00 CMS-7 00
~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping
D4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue 3Content 10 psi
-------ElAULSWN
----QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCK SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
D S$ 1U H9 171 185 110 159
i22 2~1 165 197 159 165A15Jo-ot----t----+---ii---+----t-----ti 132 140 168 191 135 162
SEA s i3 1 4 9 35 4
CV Ul2 10 25 44 258 26
$5 ---
D
~ A
158
140
189
198 184 187
212
201
178
173
222
199
gtUfl x l49 194 186 207 176 211 SEA s 13 6 2 8 4 16
CV 85 33 11 38 20 77
C M
D A T A
80
82 55 48
35
63
73
77
38
45 55
65
s x 81 52 49 75 42 60
7 s
CV
1
18
5
96 20
404
3
38 5
119
7
118
Table D6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus
--=======-=-middot------=====--=- ---------------------==-~----------=-----e=-----BF SS lS F F05 F01
pound 2 ln~13~ 3lBillllll1l 52367 191141145 3715181747 357 605 I 2 29111 GllS5SSS6 111155 bull 5211778 103289966 357 605 l 1 3l$3351l11112 33$3-3611112 240095590 4113 A33 lEamp liL 31121111l11U1t zst-n22t77 8 ssu21119a 295 461 pound~ 2 1217222222 16093611111 432112657 357 605 III 2 n~ bullEHOq 1a ----------
521iwSSSS5 15S911111111 25Jot 5lll)~Oll)il))I
31l527777R 4117277777~ iJl9166657
22C3627) -2H1157
357 2~95
6~5 11 61
-=====------middot--- -- -- middotmiddot-- --middot-llOl~L lS
DS
bull SS 15 SEA 11 SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
-(D -l Q 0 E J-
ffi 1 J-(J wa gtlt 0 Q--------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL (I
AGGREGATE
Figure D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-3~1 l49 SS-3H J86 SS-10 207 SS-30 176 SS-30 211
SS-15amp 132 SS-15amp l40 SS-151168 SS-l51 l91 ss-lSi 135 SS-15 162I I I CS-7 81 CMS-7 52 OS-7 42 CMS-7 60
llite Values with a amron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent
Figure D6 Newman-Keuls Ranking 2 Day 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi
D6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Table D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Contentr 10 psi
-EMULSION OUALITY LEVELcAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15
SEA
D A T A
325
271
l]JD
260
390
340
319
348
272
367
302
356
x s
CV
29S
38
128
285
35
124
365
35
97
334
21
62
320
67
21 0
329
38
116
ss 30 SEJ
0 A T A
282
310
337
255
303
374
362
307
318
308
289
329
x s
CV
296
20
67
296
58
196
339
50
148
335
39
116
313
7
23
309
28
92
C M s 7
D A T A
78
64
110
95
75
73
110
135
80
90
85
7
83
110
135
x s
CV
71
10
139
103
11
104
74
1
19
123
18
144
123
18
144
Table D8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus
A N O V ll
E 2- 3r39El11 3middotl8tB89 196 994 L19 44 44 5 178 q233024 3 57 6 CS 2 9111~7222223 4058 3611112 3 57577(13 357 6csbulla 11 611~ li9llll41115 ~16 ampll44445 S585579 443 833
_n_ sect 251l-illll41sectl41 -531 31i 11111 AS7121pound3 295 4 61 EJ 2 lt 115 $555555 227 521777 8 1994213 357 605 iampJ 2 170555555 15)277778 0770121 357 605 __ElJ 1324111ilJlilil4 5 208 bull 11Ul 11 bull 184922 2 95 4 ( 1
nan 11 19P73 SOOJIO~ 11111D833l33
middotmiddot-- =--=--=-==-===--c-=-c------_--=--ngtllllll
----------------------------------middot----
D7
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
traquo diams CMS - 7a ()
0--Gl ~- I J _J bull C 02 E I-z w J-(J w C
SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATEmiddot
Figure D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HJGH lOW HJGH LOW HIGH LOW
I I I Iss-il51 298 1SS-31l 295 ss-]5~ 365 SS-30 335 1middot SS-15 320 SS-15 329
SS-301 296 SS-l5amp 235 SS-301 339 SS-15 334 SS-30 313 SS-30 309
CIIS--7 71 OS-7 103 CHS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123
t-bte Values with a armon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D8 Newman-Keuls Ranking Full Cure
Resilient Modulus 103 psi
D8
----- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D9 Density at Design Residue Content pcf
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
LOWHJGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH D l341 6 ll339 1347 1338 1523ss 1500A T 1356 133S 1350 1333 1513 1497A
1~ x l351 l337 1349 1336 1518 1499 sSEA 07 02 02 04 07 02
05 02 02 03CV 05 01
D 1362 1352 1370 1355 1545A 1520ss T 1371 1355 1361 1354 1550 1525
30 A
x 1367 1354 1366 1355 1548 1523 SEA 02 06s 06 01 04 04
05 02 05 01 02 02CV D 1373 1375 1380 1370 1537 1543AC T 1385 1375 137 9 1360 1535 1545AM x 1379 1375 1380 1365 1536 1544s s 09 oo 01 07 01 017
06 ooCV 01 05 01 01
Table DlO ANOVA Summary Density
N O V ll -----middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddotmiddot-- -- --------- -------middot --------------- ----- - - -
smI=pound DF ss F F05 F01
pound 2 2738H9 310369445 153505090 357 605 ~ 2 2273iWlllbull38B9 11369544445 5530 gt35704 357 lj -~5 ~ 1 11-6~2SilllaquollO 12 602500C 524057772 443 R33 n I tpoundlUll11 Jl-69lll45 2-324621e 2 95 4 61 E 2 3131poundpound57 15i5S33J 7 7537nB 357 li os lJ 2 ltClfltSf-57 0433334 21458C6 357 s 05 n~ Iii )l216poundfi6lii 9556667 47372764 295 451
EHJii 11l 3 bull nsilraquorn 2019444
------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -- -middotmiddot-middot ----- -middotmiddot - middot-------
35 23611rJC556
D9
1 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
-0 a gt1 ()
z
diams CMS-7
w C
120 SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure D9 Density at Design Residue Coritent
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
OS--7 1379 aS-7 ]375 IClIS-7 l380 IOlS-7 1365 ISS-30 1548 CMS-7 1544ISS-30~ 1367 SS--30~ J354 SS-30~ 1366 SS-30~ 1355 CMS-7 1536 SS-30 1523
SS-15bull 1351 ss-is~ 1337 SS-15bull 1349 ss-1s 1336 SS-15 1518 SS-15 1499
NJte Values with a omron vertical lme are not statistically different
Figure D10 Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcf
DlO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
Table D11 Air Voids at Design Residue Content
-EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
107
)5
9 10l
91
99
79
99
80
83
8 bull5
84
I s
ICY
U)
Ill 9
B4
10l
03
28
95
06
60
89
14
159
82
02
26
85
01
08
ss 30j
SEA
D A T A
90
93
92
85
92
96
86
84
66
67
74
73
x s
CV
92
02
23
89
05
56
94
03
30
85
01
l 7
67
01
ll
74
01
10
C M s 7
D A T A
77
73
62
61
73
62
63
71
71
65
48
55
x s
CV
75
03
38
62
O~l
12
68
08
u5
67
06
96
68
04
62
52
05
96
Table Dl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids
A ll O V A --e--ee-ee=-==== -- -- middot- -- --- middot- - ------- - middot-----middot----middot ______ __________ ---middot- ----- - ------------- -
iiUEllilE ss ~s F F01
E 45111Hoiii6pound 225l08333 812457541 357 605 ll 1~-lilliillt~~)Q 7930)000 2519405 357 505 IJJ 11 ili$6J4141~ 16469444 59230768 443 8 33 E1 2J53ll3ll -5S5333 4 -2 bull 11755245 295 4 6 1
EJ 15672223 bull 783pound 112 2~131820 357 605 I 21022223 bull 1li 1112 bull 3$35365 357 cs
EampJ 2971111ll J27778 26713286 2 95 4t1 iElllllHgt 5cgt~SiIJOIgt -2790556
-middot--middot ------- --middot - middotmiddot- -middotmiddot--middot-- --3li
D11
11 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
-l
a - 8
-a 0 7gt tc ltI 6
5
4 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dll
SAN BERNARDINOmiddot
middot HIGH LOW
SS-]5amp JlJl ISS-ll5~ 10l
ISS-301 92 SS-311l11 89ICMS-7 75 CS-7 fi2
Air Voids at Design Residue Content
FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
=- 95 I I ISS-15 89 SS-15 82 SS-15 8 5
SS-31 94 SS-30 85 SS-30 74ICMS-7 68
OS-7 68 CMS-7 67 SS-30 67 CMS-7 52
Ngtte Values with a ommn vertical line are not statistically dilferent
Figure D12 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids
Dl2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
middotmiddotEMULSION OUAUTY LEVEL
~- AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
48S 3g_g
295
middot 32 8
439
396
397
418
288
307
223
307
X s
CV
443
64
144
312
23
75
418
30
73
408
15
36
298
13
45
265
59
224
ss 3Wo SEA
0 A T A
400
403
367
283
342
411
392
262
310
32-4
292
236
x s
CV
402
02
05
325
59
183
377
49
130
327
92
281
31 7
10
31
264
40
150
C M s 7
D A T A
235
235
130
120
213
233
150
200
350
350
250
250
x s
CV
235
00
00
125
07
57
223
14
63
175
35
202
350
oo oo
250
00
oo
Table Dl4 ANOVA Swnrnary Stabilometer Value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------A N O V A
---------~----------middot------middot-middotmiddot-- -middot--middot--middotmiddot--middot------ bull middotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middot middot------middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot--- --middotmiddot ---_ -- middotmiddot-middotmiddot-- -- - - - -----ss r r05 r01
2 1 i 7~ Sbull1lfipound5161S 5879033333 332259711 357 605 I 2 igtS895QGDgt 279475000 195117552 357 ~os i ll ~l ~
11 111 2 2
l~illflll1111111 7DS nll3331
1~il])2222] 755J5556
~ 111 8 11111~=-- 10115 834 71011111
37 7502778
275769841 128178912
U938281 251M309
11113 295 357 357
833 4f1 605 605
Ell~ 14middot 3~53lt1$1H 116340278 5750926 295 461 fElilli U 25977~illlllCII~ 1111H72222
------------------------ bull- ~bull OOM---bullbullbullbull- - bull------_________ _
roru
013
w J ltC gt a w 1-w E 0 I-m ltC Ishyen
SBH SBL FH FL
bull SS 15 SEA 5S 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-)Sll 441_3 SS-l 325I SS-JSi 4131 SS-15 40 8 CMS-7 350 SS-15 265
SS-30 402 SS-JSa 31_2I ISS-30~ 377 SS-30~ 327 SS-30 317 SS-30 264
CS-7 235 CMS-7 125 ISS-15 298 CMS-7 250
Nlte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D14 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value
Dl4
-------------------
Table Dl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 SEA
D A T A
ii3
ii2
l7-1
ilJD3
236
76
308
62
112
85
222
180
l s
CY
63
lJ1
10
Jl39
SlJ
363
l56
J13
725
185
174
940
99
19
194
201
30
148
ss 30 SEA
0 A T A
229
306
266
187
78
130
260
136
157
212
186
164
x s
CV
268
55
204
227
56
247
104
37
354
198
88
443
185
39
211
175
16
89
C M s 7
D A T A
80
82
190
180
122
192
245
235
130
120
170
180
x s
CV
81
l
18
185
7
38
157
50
315
240
7
30
125
7 57
175
7
40
Table Dl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value
--------------------middot--------------------------------------------------------------A N O V A
-=====-=-=--=-- ===== ss
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1i712 7222222 83563611111 226671165 357 605 I 2 l~12 lllllliilllllllB9 71144441145 129864 357 605 ~ 1l 251116l 144141llllj 2ti-~H~bull4dimiddot4 4 44 5 71775602 443 833 n l4 37511ll 777JTI7JJ S395bull J 9 ~4middot444 2548 5405 295 4 e 1 poundJ 2 72lllS3SlffiifISlmiddot9 3fi22f9111114UU 9026921 357 6C5
n 2 1 iSigt555S
11321Bl 111111I 117lIT177778
33220277778 1277032 9~11333
357 297
605 461
Eliflll 11 f15357 tlOilOOibull 3ilf65Jgt)oo
---------------------------------------middot-------------------------------------------
D15
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7w
J lt(
gt a w Jshyw I 0-() w
8
O--------r-----r-----------r----r-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
c 1
Figure D15
SAN BERNARDINO
HIGH LOW
SS-3(1JlS 268
81IOS-7
ISS-]5i 63 SS-lSl 139
Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 240 SS-30 185 SS-15 201
SS-lSi 155 SS-30l 198 CMS-7 125 SS-30 175
SS-JOi 104 SS-151 185 SS-15 99 CMS-7 175
Note Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure Dl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value
D16
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table D17 Swell at Design Residue Content in
EfAULSEON
~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDI NO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH lOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
ss 15 s~
D A T A
048 -
0413
06S
069
on
005
006
008
-025 045
005
004
004
005
009
014
Jt s
CY
HS
0010
000
D68
-003
45
bull 006
002
241
035
010
286
004
001
133
009
005
483
ss 30 SEA
D A T A
023
023
020
063
066
055
000
ooo
008
031
023
028
000 000 003
ooo
001
000
x s
CV
022
002
79
061
006
93
003
005
1732
027
004
148
oin
002
1732
ooo
001
1732
C M s 7
D A T A
000
ooo
000
004
002
001
ooo
ooo
000
003
000
ooo 000 000 ooo
ooo
ooo
000
x s
CV
000
ooo
ooo
002
002
655
ooo
ooo
ooo
001
002
1732
ooo
ooo
ooo
ooo
ooo
000
Table D18 ANOVA Summary Swell ( Transformed Data)
A N O Y A
E 2 _1025326 0912663 2353471(154 329 532 -Amiddot middotmiddot2 1366452 0683226 1761825136 329 532 0 1 0368219 03613219 949521081 1114 7116
EA 11 04627$7 0115697 298345558 266 396 -EQ- 2-- --006-903G- -0(134515-middot -8-9003553 middot3l9 -S-32 A) 2 0150358 ~0075179 193863014 329 532 UO 4 0083986 0020997 54143375 26 396
-ERRORmiddot 36 0139606middot 0003178
-TOTIIL 53 --446-576-11
D17
05 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA
04
z -J
J w IJJ
SBH SBL
diams CMS - 7
~oo
_02
01
FH FL GRH GRL
AGGREGATE
Figure Dl7 Swell at Design Residue Content
SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
SS-ll51 ii-IS SS-]5i il68 SS-15 a006 SS-15 bull 035 SS-15 004 SS-15 009I I I I SS-3Cli 022 SS-301 061 ISS-301 003 SS-30 bull 027 ISS-30 bull 001 ISS-30 bull 000
ClS-7 000 CIS-7 002 OS-7 000 OIS-7 001 CMS-7 000 CMS-7 000
NJte Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different
Figure D18 Newman-Keuls Ranking Swell in
D18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
Table Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
EMULSl10N
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOWHIGH 0 156 48 175 229 2lO 125ss A ll5 60 20l ll7 228 120T 13_g 4e 170 132 212 130A15 i 137 52 182 200 2l 7 125 smiddotSEA 2l 37 l7 30 lO 05
1middot5]CY 133 92 148 46 40 D 98 106 lll 76 2l 0 lllAss 203 109 76 5l 235 95T ll3 85 63 59 233 125
30 A
x 138 100 83 62 226 llOSEll s 57 l3 25 l3 l4 l5
412 131 298 206 62 136CV D 2lO 202 185 98 330 240A 220 87 18l 88 345 200C T 216 138 223 77 338 2lOAM x 215 142 196 88 338 217s
5805 23 lls 08 2l7
23 405 ll8 120 22 96CV
Table D20 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Stabilorneter Value
N O V A
-------middot------------------------------------------------------ ---------------DF -$ -F os- r01
pound 2 5919875926 2l59917963 39C147075fl 329 53 2 690 i1111pounda$11 iii 345 022110111 US51521111 329 5 32 Ill 1 763129-i296 763 1296 296 100671B132 414 7 U6
Ea t93 11171111]J)7lll 1007863519 1329576P8 266 391bullIEill -2 middot -E~ti35~259 -23middot0-H9fgt29 C-~6522- middot3 29 532 AO 2 S3amp11171t1137ll 11192351$5 55305370 329 532 El s1111i1r1075 135268519 17~qq579 266 396bullmiddotDll~t 311i 27239~333~ 7 5903711)111
53
--------------------------------------------------------middot-----------------------
D19
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA0)
gt diams CMS - 7 l I
a w 30fshyw E 0 J 2-en ltC Ishyen 10
SBH SSL FH FL GRH GRL01amp---------------------------_
AGGREGATE
Figure Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
middotHtGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
QS-1 235 CS-7 142 196 SS-15 200 CMS-7 338 CMS-7 217GS-
Iss-3H uaI I I ISS-3Qi lilG SS-15i ]S2 IOMS-7 88 SS-30 22~ SS-15 125
SS-151 137 ss-i5~ 52 SS-30~ 83 SS-30 62 SS-15 217 SS-30 110
fute Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent
Figure D20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value
D20
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Table D2l MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
-------_cEMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
ss 1 sa
D A T A
x s
HIGH
Ul3 ~ JlU
43
64
IOW
~ TWlI ~
--
H1GH
159 1-43 126
143
17
LOW
123 187
60
123
64
HIGH
130 179 153
154
25
LOW
120 104 143
122
20
CV D A5S T A30 x
SEA s
171
139 88
104
110
26
-98 91 -95
4
116
114 116
69
100
27
515
TWT TWT TWT
--
159
111 101 15~
122
28
160
83 65 63
70
11
CV D AC T AM x5 s
7 CV
236
141 79 52
91
46
503
37
185 60 63
103
71
695
267
125 201
96
141
54
386
-192 164 126
161
33
206
23l
131 130 120
127
6
48
157
72 230
76
126
90
715
Too weak to test
Table D22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
SOO~e 55- -f middotFmiddot OS- F01
pound 2 19956 G31tl3Tt 99780165185 52791162 329 532 -1 2- 223ii~ 92592~-~ middot111544629630 -59015431 3middot29 5 32 J 1 n21lliiilliEiiii~ 1middot112106656666 75185029 414 746 lEJ Ill 32il76711ltCl~lll9l 132191851852 43485622 2euro6 396 ~ 2- ~373hllllllllllllllqSmiddot iiilfgtamp 1222-223- -3bull6middot3300811 -3 29 532 1i 2 1S011Hil12 75i0555556 bull ~397100 329 532 Eli
-a~llt-Iii
36 511J7777777
middot5B11113BB333 12799444444 129e l9 25 92 6middot
5771861 266 396
D21
bull SS 15 SEA U) SS 30 SEA gt diams CMS - 7E I
a w J-~ 200 0 en w5 100 0
SBH SBL FH FL AGGREGATE
GRH GRL
Figure D21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content
SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINO FRESNO
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
CMS-7 126SS-15 154]03 JCMS-7 161106-7 rmm SS-15 122CMS-7 127SS-30amp 95 ltMgt-7 ]Aj_ SS-15 123
SS-30 70
t-bte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different
SS-30 122SS-151 93 SS-l51 fflT SS-30amp 100 SS-30 TWT
Figure D22 Ne-wman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value
D22
Table D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams
EMULSION
QUALITY LEVEL
~AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW
ss 15 SEA
ss 30 SEA
C M s 7
HIGH D bullbullmiddot 979 715A middot 1143 569T A 1047 599
X - - 1056 - 628 s - - 82 - 77
CV - - 78 - 123
D 987 1474 548A T 907 1536 433 A 1447 615
x - - 947 1486 532 s - 57 46 92
CV - - 60 31 173 D 642 102 597 588 301A T 620 426 369 60l 263 A 774 662 470 290 3q_3
x 679 397 479 493 31 9
s 83 281 114 176 67
CV 123 709 239 357 21 0
1285 1353 1493
1377
106
77
627 72 2 634
661
53
80
238 284 22 7
250
30
121
Specimen swelled during soak could not ne tested Specimen disintegrated during testing
D23
300
E CJgt -200 en
en 0 J
z0 middot cii 100 lt( cc CD lt(
bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7
01--------r----T----J-----r----r SBH FH FL GRH GRL
middotAGGREGATE
Figure D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content
D24
APPENDIX E
FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL DESIGNS
Table El
Thickness T in Inches to Satisfyl
Tensile Strain Requirements (Reference 3)
Subirade l~octulus psi 30~0 6000 12000 30oco
Jverage Ann~abullAir erlerature J degF lt40 40-55 55-65 gt65 40 40-55 55-65 gt65 lt40 40-55 55-651gt65 lt4 0 40-55 55-65 gt65
T~affic EALbull 10bull
IllIf psi 50000 4 9 66 7 8 91 37 50 5e 66 2 26 28 29 2 2 2 2
1000~0 37 5 3 62 12 27 40 47 53 2 21 25 26 2 2 2 2
300000 21 J4 4 3 51 2 28 31 middot3 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
600000 2 24 3 2 39 2 2 2 _2 28 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2middot 2 2 2 290JCOO 2 2 26 33 2 2 2 22 2 2 2
Traffic EAL= 10s
trJ MR psi bull 50000 83 ll5 139 165 70 97 112 127 54 1-3 83 93 2 3 27 28 29 f-J
42 58 69 78 2 25 27 27100000 63 90 108 129 54 76 91 105
3COOOO 4o 58 73 8 3 3 51 60 73 24 39 ~8 56 2 2 20 22
600000 28 45 55 67 21 37 47 55 2 21 36 44 2 2 2 2
900000 21 37 4 7 57 2 30 39 48 2 21 29 37 2 I 2 2 2
TraCf1c 2 ~AL a 10~ I ia psi bull 50000 130 161 216 2~ 116 16l 187 213 98 131 151 172 63 66 93 58
82 0100000 98 14) 171 203 68 126 152 176 75 106 125 142 52 7 3
3CCOOO 6o 91 11 3 139 55 82 101 122 4 7 69 86 102 31 49 59 59
e~oooo 46 68 86 106 ~o 60 76 94 3middot 3 52 64 i9 2 35 4 r 54
900~00 37 56 72 69 )2 51 63 80 24 4 3 5 4 67 2 28 3 8 ul Trarr1el EAL~ 10 7
la psi bull 50000 192 24 24 24 178 239 24 24 156 205 235 24 12l 153 165 17 3 I
24 24 228 24 119 168 195 222 95 129 147 1s IlCOOCO 1~5 21 0 13 5 193
56 aa 10a 12 I-3CC000 aa 136 167 205 ~-3 12 156 186 74 11l 138 16~
I- l 6 a2 10060~ 1 ouo 6 4 100 125 156 59 92 ll 6 l~ 5 53 82 104 128
108 3 3 53 6 8 859ccooo 53 82 10 5 132 so 77 97 121 4 ~ 68 86
For asphalt volume Vb= 11 are air voids Va= 5 Use Figure El to correct thickness of other valuemiddots of Vb and Va
Table E2
Subsradlt Mcdulus psi
Thickness T in Inches to Satisfys Subgrade Strain Requirements (Reference 3)
6100 120003000 300CC
tr N
A~erage A~nual Ar Te11perature degF
Traffic EALbull 10bull
~IP psi 50000a
100000
300000
600000
900000
Traffic EAL 10 5
MR psibull 50000
lC0000
300000
600000
900000
Tra~~lc EAL c 1c6
MR psibull 50000
100000
300000
600POO
900000
Trafficz EALbull 10 7
MRt psibull 50000
100000
300000
600000
900000
lt40
55
55
55
55
55
81
81
81
81
81
115
115
115
115
115
155
155
155
155
155
40-55
83
60
55
55
55
121
87
81
Bl
Bl
168
123
11
115
ll5
226
165
155
155
155
55-65 gt65 lt40
108 115 46
73 82 46
55 55 46
5_ 45
55 55 46
145 165 69
106 120 69
a1 81 69
81 81 69
81 81 69
201 224 98
14B 165 98
115 115 98
115 115 98
115 115 98
24 24 1)6
199 222 135
15 155 136
155 155 136
155 155 136
40-55
10
50
46
46
46
103
74
69
69
69
150
108
98
98
9B
204
150
135
136
136
55-65 G5 lt40
83 93 30
61 70 30
46 46 30
45 46 30
46 46 30
124 139 55
91 102 55
69 69 55
69 69 55
69 69 55
173 193 83
130 147 83
98 98 83
98 98 83
98 98 83
239 24 120
179 199 120
136 136 120
136 136 120
135 136 120
40-55
4
3~
30
30
30
83
60
55
55
55
122
90
83
83
83
17 5
130
120
middot12 o
120
55-65 gt65 lt~O
62 69 25
46 53 25
30 30 25
30 30 25
30 30 25
9 106 29
82 29i 2 middot 55 55 29
55 55 29
55 55 29
144 15S 60
108 12l 60
83 83 60
83 83 60
83 83 6 0
205 226 90
155 112 90
120 120 90
120 120 90
120 120 90
40-55
31
25
25
25
25
52
30
29
29
29
86
65
60
60
60
127
98
90
90
90
55-65 bull65
33 35
29 3c
25 25 I 25 25 i 25 2s
51 67
47 52
29 29
29 29
29 29
95 10
76 85
60 I 6C
6C i 6o 50
14bull 3 14
112 126
90 90
90 90
90 90
Tj In Tc In 24 2 22
20
18
16 3
14
12 4
~ 10 Va+ vb 5
099
8 08 6
077 7 06
6 805
9045 1003
4 12
14
3 16
18
20
22 2 24
Figure El Correction of Pavement Design Thickness for Air Voids and
Asphalt Content of Mix (Reference 3)
E3
-------
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000 psi
MAAT 55- 65 F-Ul 400 CL
C) 0 300 (J) J
~ 200 0 ~
I- 100z w J-(J) 0+----------------------C w 0 2 4 6 8 middot10 12
THICKNESS IN
1X104 EAL
1X105EAL
Figure E2 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
M-AAT )65 F- -~---Ul 400 1x104 EALCL
CW)
0 300 (J) J 200C 0 ~
-~ 100 w -J -(J) 0w 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a
THICKNESS IN
1X105EAL
Figure E3 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 6000 psi MAAT = )65F
s
E4
w 400 c
()
0 300 () - 200 Cl 0 E
~ 100 w J-
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT 56-65 F
1x10 EALI 4
I 1X105 EAL
w o~---------------------r-w 1 2 3 4a
THICKNESS IN
Figure E4 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT )65F-w 400 4I 1X10 EALc () I 1X105EAL 0 300 I () I - I 200C I0 E I I- 100z w I-J I-() 0w 1 2 3 4c
THICKNESS IN~
Figure ES Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65Fs
ES
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
MAAT 55-65 F-en400 41X10 EALIC
(I) 1X105EAL middot 0
I I 300
en I J 200C 0
f-- 100z w J-en 0LU 2 4 6 8 10 14a
-THICKNESS IN
Figure E6 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi
MmiddotAAT )65 F cn4oo I 1X104 EALa
(I) 1X105EAL 0 300
I I
en -I
~200 0 ~ 100 LU --en -I
0-1-----------------------LU 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a THICKNESS IN
Figure E7 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = )65F
E6
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi
MAAT 55-65 F-u 400 41x10 EAL0
M 1x105EAL 0 T- 300 -en J 200C 0 E I- 100z w-J- en 0w C 0 middot1 2 3 4 middot5 6
THICKNESS IN
Figure E8 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F
SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000psi
M-AAT )65 F-en400
I --- - - ~- 1X104 EAL
C
a 1X105 EAL
0 I T- 300
I-en J
200 C 0 E
I- 100z w J-en 0w 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
THICKNESS IN
Figure E9 Thickness For Subgrade StrainRequirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65F
s
E7
Table E3
Thickness Requirements inches
= 6000 psi EAL= 1 X 104 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
MrT
l
CF Tc Ts
246000 34
64 37 43
300000 31
68 4middot 0 43
391000 27
lt 61 33 43
362000 28
64 31 43
260000 28
bull bull 61 35 43
333000 30
65 33 43
C M s 0
Mr Ti CF T Tc
s
259000 29
59 36 43
288000 32
bull 61 3 8 43
271000 32
59 39 43
339000 30
60 37 43
284000 32
59 40 43
365000 29
60 37 43
C M s 7
M T7
l
CF TTc
s
71000 55
65 60 43
103000 47 71
45 43
74000 54
67 53 43
123000 44 69
45 43
85000 52
65 54 43
123000 44
73 46 43
ss 15
M T7
l
CF T Tc s
298000 31
57 40 43
285000 32
59 38 43
365000 28
58 37 43
334000 30
61 36 43
320000 30
60 36 43
329000 30
61 36 43
ss 30
M T7
l
CF Tc Ts
296000 31
60 37 43
296000 31
62 36 43
339000 30
59 38 43
335000 30
bull 63 35 43
313000 31
65 34 43
309000 31
65 34 43
Ngtte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi TI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume middotTc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= llrickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
E8
Table E4
Thickness Requirements inches
Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
246000 68
64 74 70
300000 62 68
62 68
391000 55 61
65 68
362000 57 64
63 68
260000
57 bull 61
68 70
333000 59 65
65 68
C M s 0
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
259000 65 59
80 70
288000 63
bull 61 75 68
271000 64 59
78 70
339000 59 60
72 68
284000 63 59
78 68
365000 57 60
70 68
C M s 7
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
71000 100
bull 65 107 105
103000 90 bull 71
84 88
74000 100
67 102 104
123000 85 69
85 81
85000 95 65
102 97
123000 85 73
78 81
ss 15
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
298000 62 57
78 68
285000 63 59
76 68
365000 57 58
72 68
334000 59 61
72 68
320000 60 60
73 68
329000 59 61
70 68
ss 30
M T7
1
CF T Tc
s
296000 62
60 74 68
296000 62
62 71 68
339000 59 59
72 68
335000 59
63 68 68
313000 60
bull 65 65 68
309000 60
65 65 68
1bte
M = Resilient mJdulus in psirf = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
E9
Table ES
Thickness Requirements inches 4
Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
EMULSION
~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M Tdeg
J
CF T Tc
246000 40
64 46 45
300000middot 37 68
37 43
391000 33 61
38 43
362000 35
64 39 43
260000 39
61 45 45
333000 35
65 38 43
C M s 0
MT J
CF T Tc
s
259000 39 59
48 45
288000 38 61
middot4 6 44
271000 38 59
47 44
339000 35 60
43 43
284000 38 59
46 44
365000 35 60
43 43
C M s 7
M T7
J CF T Tc
s
71000 60 65
65 68
103000 52 71
48 64
74000 60 67
60 68
123000 50 bull 69 59 62
85000 58 65
63 67
123000 50 73
49 62
ss 15
M T7
J CF T Tc
s
298000 37 57
50 43
285000 38 59
48 44
365000 35 58
45 43
334000 35 61
43 43
320000 3 6
60 44 43
329000 37 61
45 43
ss 30
M T7
J CF TTc
s
296000 37 60
45 43
296000 37 62
43 43
339000 35 59
44 43
335000 35 bull 63
41 43
313000 36
65 39 43
309000 36
65 39 43
Nrte
M = Resilient nodulus in psiTI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T
5 = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El0
Table E6
Thickness Requirements inches
105E = 6000 psi EAL= 1 x psi MAAT = )65Fs
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
246000
79 64
87 70
300000
74 68
74 70
391000 69
61 81 70
362000 70
64 77 70
260000 77
61 90 70
333000 71
65 77 70
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 77
59 94 70
288000 75
61 90 70
271000 76
59 92 70
339000 71
60 87 70
284000 75
59 91 70
365000 69
60 85 70
C M s 7
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
71000 111
65 118 112
103000 103
middot11 95 98
74000 111
67 110 11l
123000 98
69 95 93
85000 109
65 119 109
123000 98
73 87 93
ss 15
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
298000 74 57
94 70
285000 7 5 59
94 70
365000 69 58
88 70
334000 7 1 middot 61
84 70
320000 72 60
87 70
329000 71 61
84 70
ss 30
M T
l
CF T Tc
s
296000 74
60 90 70
296000 74
62 86 70
339000 71 59
87 70
335000 71
63 82 70
313000 73
bull 65 78 70
309000 73
65 78 70
Note
M = Resilient midulus in psi11 = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness f9r tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade stram requirements inches
Ell
Table E7
Thickness Requirements inches4
= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
middot~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO -GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
246000 2 0
64 23 25
300000 20
68 2middot 0 25
391000 20
61 24 25
362000 20
64 23 25
260000 20
61 24 25
333000 20
65 22 25
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 20
59 25 25
288000 20
bull 61 24 25
271000 20
59 25 25
339000 20
60 25 25
284000 20
59 25 25
365000 20
60 25 25
C M s 7
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
71000 20
65 22 31
103000 20
middot71 20 29
74000 20
67 21 31
123000 20
69 20 28
85000 20
65 22 30
123000 20
73 20 28
ss M T7
l
298000 20
285000 20
365000 20
334000 20
320000 2 0
329000 20
15 CF T Tc
s
57 26 25
59 25 25
58 26 25
61 24 25
bull 60 25 25
61 24 2 i
ss 30
M T7
l
CF TTc
s
296000 20
60 25 25
296000 20
62 24 25
339000 20
59 25 25
335000 20
bull63 23 25
313000 20
65 22 25
309000 20
65 22 25
N)te
M = Resilient nodulus in psi middot T7 = Unrorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inchesct= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume T = Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T~ = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El2
Table E8
Thickness Requirements inches
Es= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s
M T7
l
246000 22
300000 20
391000 20
362000 20
260000 21
333000 20
s 0
CF T Tc
s
64 24 32
68 20 29
61 24 29
64 23 29
61 24 l 1
65 23 29
C M s 0
M T7
l
CF T Tc
s
259000 21 59
25 31
288000 21
bull 6J 24 30
271000 21 59
25 30
339000 20 60
25 29
284000
21 59
25 1 n
365000
20 60
25 2 q
C M
M T7
l
71000 27
103000 25
74000 27
123000 24
85000
26
123000
24 s 7
CF T Tc
s
65 28 53
71 24 45
bull 67 28 53
69
23 43
65
27 49
73
22 43
ss M T7
l
298000 20
285000 21
365000 20
334000 20
320000 20
329000 20
15 CF
TTc
s
57 27 29
59 26 30
58 27 29
61 24 29
60 25 29
61 24 2 q
ss 30
M r~i CF T Tc
s
296 ooomiddot 20 60
24 29
296000 20 62
23 29
339000 20 59
24 29
335000 20 63
23 29
313000 20 65
23 29
309000 20 65
23 29
i-krte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psiTf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade strain requirements inches
El3
Table E9
Thickness Requirements inches 4 = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
EMULSION __ QUALITY LEVEL
AGGREGATE
SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
246000 20 64
23 25
300000 20 68
21 25
391000 20 61
24 25
362000 20 64
23 25
260000 20 61
24 25
333000 20 65
22 25
C M s 0
259000 20 59
26 25
288000 20
bull 61 middot24 25
271000 20 59
26 25
339000 20 60
25 25
284000 20 59
26 25
365000 20 60
25 25
C M s 7
MT7
1 CF T Tc
s
71000 20 65
22 58
103000 2~0 middotn
20 52
74000 20 67
21 58
123000 20 69
20 48
85000
20 65
22 57
123000
20 73
20 48
$$
15
MTdeg
1
CF T Tc
s
-298 000 20 57
27 25
285000 20 59
26 25
365000 20 58
26 25
334000 20 61
24 25
320000 2 0 60
25 25
329 000 20 61
24 25
ss 30
MT7
1
CF T Tc
s
296000 20 60
25 25
296000 20 62
24 25
339000 20 59
26 25
335000 20 63
23 25
313000 20 65
22 25
309000 20 65
22 25
tote
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot rf = Unagtrrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
El4
Table ElO
Thickness Requirements inches 5E = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F
s
EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL
~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
C s s 0
M T--deg
J
CF T Tc
s
246000
24 64
27 31
300000
23 68
24 29
391000
22 61
25 29
362000
22 64
2_s 29
260000
26 61
31 30
333000
22 65
24 29
C M s 0
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s
259000 23
59 28 30
288000 23
bull 61 27 30
271000 23
59 28 30
339000 22
60 26 29
284000 23
59 28 30
365000 21
60 25 29
C M s 7
ss 15
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s M T--deg
J
CF T Tc
s
71000 28
bull 65 30 61
298000 23 57
25 29
103000 27
~ 71 27 52
285000 23 59
28 30
74000 28
bull 67 28 60
365000 22
58 28 29
123000 26
69 26 48
334000 22 61
25 29
85 000 28
65 31 58
320000 22
60 26 29
123000 26
73 24 48
329000 22 61
25 29
55
30
M T7
J
CF T Tc
s
296000 23
60 27 29
296000 23
62 27 29
339000 22 59
27 29
335000 22
63 25 29
313000 22
65 24 29
309000 23
65 25 29
tbte
M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot Tf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Ihickness for subgrade strain requirements inches
II11~~~1~~i~IIII 08860 ElS