Upload
cuthbert-bailey
View
228
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
9
9-1
Performance Management and
Appraisal
9-2
Learning Objectives
1. Describe the appraisal process.
2. Define performance management
and discuss how it differs from
performance appraisal.
3. Develop, evaluate, and administer
at least four performance
appraisal tools.
9-3
Learning Objectives
4. Explain and illustrate the problems
to avoid in appraising performance.
5. Perform an effective appraisal
interview.
6. Explain how to “segment”
employees for appraisal and reward
purposes.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-4
Describe the appraisal process.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-5
The Basics of Performance Management and Appraisal
• The performance appraisal process steps
1. Sets work standards
2. Assesses performance
3. Provides feedback to the employee
o Figure 9-1 sample
evaluation survey
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-6
Five reasons:1. Used for pay, promotion, and retention
decisions2. Links performance management to
company goals3. The manager can correct deficiencies
and reinforce strengths4. With appraisals employee’s can review
career plans5. Training needs are identified
Performance Management and Appraisal
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-7
Define performance management and discuss how it differs from performance appraisal.
9–8
Comparing Performance Appraisal and Performance Management
• Performance appraisal
• Evaluating an employee’s current and/or past performance relative to his or her performance standards.
• Performance management
• The process employers use to make sure employees are working toward organizational goals.
9–9
Why Performance Management?
• Increasing use by employers of performance management reflects:
• The popularity of the total quality management (TQM) concepts.
• The belief that traditional performance appraisals are often not just useless but counterproductive.
• The necessity in today’s globally competitive industrial environment for every employee’s efforts to focus on helping the company to achieve its strategic goals.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-10
Performance management definition
The continuous process of:
o Identifying
o Measuring
o Developing performance
of individuals and teams
o Aligning performance with the
organization’s goals
Performance Management
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-11
Performance ManagementSix Elements
• Direction sharing
• Goal alignment
• Ongoing performance monitoring
• Ongoing feedback
• Coaching and developmental support
• Recognition and rewards
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-12
Information Technology Supports Performance Management
• Assign financial and nonfinancial goals
• Inform all employees of their goals
• Use IT-supported scorecard software
• Continuously take corrective action
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-13
Defining the Employee’s Goals and Performance Standards
• Manager assess:o Attaining numerical goalso Meeting quality and quantity criteriao Mastering competencies
• Managers goals are SMART: o Specific oMeasurable oAttainableoRelevanto Timely
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.9–14
Classroom Teaching
Appraisal By Students
Figure 9–1
Source: Richard I. Miller, Evaluating Faculty for Promotional and Tenure (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1987), pp. 164–165. Copyright © 1987, Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission.
9–15
Realistic Appraisals
• Motivations for soft (less-than-candid) appraisals
• The unpleasant reaction of the appraisee
• A company appraisal process that’s not conducive to transparency
• Hazards of giving soft appraisals
• Employee loses the chance to improve before being forced to change jobs.
• Lawsuits arising from dismissals involving inaccurate performance appraisals.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-16
IMPROVING PERFORMANCE: HR Tools for Line Managers and
Entrepreneurs
1. Should a manager tell employees what their
goals are or let them participate in setting the
goals?
2. Write a short paragraph that addresses the
question: “Why is it not a good idea to simply tell
employees to ‘do their best’ when assigning a
task?”
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.9–17
Performance Appraisal Roles
• Supervisors
• Usually do the actual appraising.
• Must be familiar with basic appraisal techniques.
• Must understand and avoid problems that can cripple appraisals.
• Must know how to conduct appraisals fairly.
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.9–18
Performance Appraisal Roles (cont’d)
• HR department
• Serves a policy-making and advisory role.
• Provides advice and assistance regarding the appraisal tool to use.
• Prepares forms and procedures and insists that all departments use them.
• Responsible for training supervisors to improve their appraisal skills.
• Responsible for monitoring the system to ensure that appraisal formats and criteria comply with EEO laws and are up to date.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-19
Who Should Do the Appraising?
• Peer appraisals
• Rating committees
• Self-ratings
• Appraisal by subordinates
• 360-degree feedback
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-20
Develop, evaluate, and administer at least four performance
appraisal tools.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-21
Techniques for Appraising Performance
• Graphic rating
scale method
• What to rate?
9–22
Performance Appraisal Methods
• Graphic rating scale
• A scale that lists a number of traits and a range of performance for each that is used to identify the score that best describes an employee’s level of performance for each trait.
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.9–23
Graphic Rating
Scale with Space for
Comments
Figure 9–3
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.9–24
Portion of an Administrative Secretary’s Sample Performance Appraisal Form
Figure 9–4 Source: James Buford Jr., Bettye Burkhalter, and Grover Jacobs, “Link Job Description to Performance Appraisals,” Personnel Journal, June 1988, pp. 135–136.
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.9–25
Performance Management
Outline
Performance Management
Outline
Figure 9–5a Source: www.cwru.edu.
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.9–26Figure 9–5b
Performance Management
Outline(cont’d)
Performance Management
Outline(cont’d)
Source: www.cwru.edu.
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.9–27
Performance Appraisal Methods (cont’d)
• Alternation ranking method
• Ranking employees from best to worst on a particular trait, choosing highest, then lowest, until all are ranked.
• Paired comparison method
• Ranking employees by making a chart of all possible pairs of the employees for each trait and indicating which is the better employee of the pair.
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.9–28
Alternation Ranking Scale
Figure 9–6
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.9–29
Ranking Employees by the Paired Comparison Method
Figure 9–7
Note: + means “better than.” − means “worse than.” For each chart, add up the number of 1’s in each column to get the highest-ranked employee.
9–30
Performance Appraisal Methods (cont’d)
• Forced distribution method
• Similar to grading on a curve; predetermined percentages of ratees are placed in various performance categories.
• Example:
• 15% high performers
• 20% high-average performers
• 30% average performers
• 20% low-average performers
• 15% low performers
• Narrative Forms
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.9–31
Performance Appraisal Methods (cont’d)
• Behaviorally anchored rating scale (BARS)
• An appraisal method that uses quantified scale with specific narrative examples of good and poor performance.
• Developing a BARS:
• Generate critical incidents
• Develop performance dimensions
• Reallocate incidents
• Scale the incidents
• Develop a final instrument
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.9–32
Performance Appraisal Methods (cont’d)
• Advantages of using a BARS
• A more accurate gauge
• Clearer standards
• Feedback
• Independent dimensions
• Consistency
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.9–33
Example of a Behaviorally
Anchored Rating Scale for two
Dimensions for Academic Advising
Figure 9–9
Source:Walter C. Borman, “Behavior Based Rating,” in Ronald A. Berk (ed.), Performance Assessment: Methods and Applications (Baltimore, MD: JohnsHopkins University Press, 1986), p. 103.
Advisor knowledge of program requirements.A. My advisor has excellent knowledge of program requirements and thecourse progression that leads to graduationB. My advisor has very good knowledge of program requirements and thecourse progression that leads to graduationC. My advisor is somewhat lacking in this knowledge, but knows whom to askD. My advisor has some knowledge of my curriculumE. My advisor has little knowledge of my curriculum
Advisor availablility.A. My advisor is easily accessible and stays in contact with me throughoutthe quarterB. My advisor is easily accessible and contacts me about advanceregistration advising at the proper timeC. My advisor is usually accessibleD. It is sometimes hard to reach my advisor in personE. My advisor is extremely hard to get hold of
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.9–34
Examples of Critical Incidents for an Assistant Plant Manager
Table 9–1
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-35
Performance Appraisal Tools
• Alternation ranking
• Paired comparison
• Forced distribution
• Critical incident
• Narrative forms
• Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales
(BARS)
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.9–36
Management by Objectives (MBO)
• Involves setting specific measurable goals with each employee and then periodically reviewing the progress made.1. Set the organization’s goals.
2. Set departmental goals.
3. Discuss departmental goals.
4. Define expected results (set individual goals).
5. Performance reviews.
6. Provide feedback.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-37
Performance Appraisal Tools
• Mixed standard scales
• Management by objectives (MBO)
• Computerized and web-based performance
appraisal
• Electronic performance monitoring (EPM)
• Conversation Days
• Using Multiple Methods
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-38
Explain and illustrate the problems to avoid in
appraising performance.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-39
Dealing with Appraisal Problems and Interviews
• Potential appraisal problems
o Unclear standards
o Halo effect
o Central tendency
o Leniency or strictness
o Recency effects
o Bias
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.9–40
Potential Rating Scale Appraisal Problems
• Unclear standards
• An appraisal that is too open to interpretation.
• Halo effect
• Occurs when a supervisor’s rating of a subordinate on one trait biases the rating of that person on other traits.
• Central tendency
• A tendency to rate all employees the same way, such as rating them all average.
9–41
A Graphic Rating Scale with Unclear Standards
Note: For example, what exactly is meant by “good,” “quantity of work,” and so forth?
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.9–42
Potential Rating Scale Appraisal Problems (cont’d)
• Strictness/leniency
• The problem that occurs when a supervisor has a tendency to rate all subordinates either high or low.
• Bias
• The tendency to allow individual differences such as age, race, and sex to affect the appraisal ratings employees receive.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-43
Guidelines for Effective Appraisals
• Know the problems
• Use the right tool
• Keep a diary
• Get agreement on a plan
• Ensure fairness
• Appraisals and the law
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-44
Review
Unclear Standards
Central Tendency
Halo Effect
Recency Effect
Bias
Leniency/
Strictness
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-45
Perform an effective appraisal interview.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-46
How to Conduct the
Appraisal Interview
• Prepare
• Plan
• Coach
• Be objective
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-47
How to Conduct the Appraisal Interview
• Types of appraisal interviews
• How to conduct the appraisal
interview
o Objective data
o Don’t get personal
o Encouragement
o Agreement
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-48
Managing the Appraisal
Interview
• Handling a defensive subordinate
• Criticizing a subordinate
• The formal written warning
• Realistic appraisals
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-49
• How to Conduct the Appraisal Interview
• Managing the Appraisal Interviewo Type of interviewso Defensivenesso Criticismo Warningso Realism
Review
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-50
Explain how to “segment” employees
for appraisal and reward purposes.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-51
Talent Management and
Employee Appraisal
• Appraising and Actively
Managing Employees
• Segmenting and Actively
Managing Employees in
Practice