8.8.Chen-Model for Gasification in Fluidized Bed

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Chen-Model for Gasification in Fluidized Bed

Citation preview

  • A model for black liquor gasification in a fluidized bed

    Z. Chena, A.F. Sarofima,b, M.J. Bockeliea and K. Whittyb

    a Reaction Engineering International77 W. 200 S., Suite 210, Salt Lake City, UT 84101

    b Department of Chemical and Fuels EngineeringUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112

  • Background and Objective Model Development Devolatilization and Gasification Kinetics Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement

    OUTLINE

  • To develop a model to simulate black liquor gasification in a bubbling fluidized bed (Big Island steam reformer process)

    To examine the effects of operating conditions on syngas quality, carbon conversion, gas temperature and axial variations of gas composition and temperature

    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

    MTCI process 200 tpd BLS 4 tube bundles

  • MODEL ASSUMPTIONSThe fluidized bed consists of

    A particle-free bubble phase A wake-cloud phase A dense phase

    Gas in different phases has the same temperature Particles in different phases also have the same temperature Drying and devolatilization are instantaneous

    bubble phasedense phase

    bubble

    cloud

    wake

    Fluidizing gas

  • Bubble Properties

    Bubble size and bubble velocity are determined using correlations found in the literature.

    Bubble fraction is calculated based on the overall gas mass balance.

    Bubble breakup in the tube banks is predicted using a probabilistic model.

  • Mass Balance Equations Bubble Phase

    Exchange Reaction

    flow-Cross Convection

    0)CA(CKfRAf

    dzA)ud(f)CC(dz

    )ACud(f

    wi,bi,bwbn

    1jjb,i,ji,b

    bbwi,2bi,1

    bi,bb

    b =++

    +

    =

    Wake and Dense Phases

    Freeboard

    0RdzdC

    ufn

    1jjf,i,ji,

    fi,o =+ =

    Similar to the above equation

  • Energy Balance EquationsGas Phase

    0Q)RH()]f(1f[1)RH(ff

    R)(f)]T(Td

    6)T(Td

    6h)[)](1f(1f[1

    T(Td6T(T

    d6h)[(1ff

    zT

    uC

    tn

    1ige,i,ge,i,mfwb

    n

    1igw,i,gw,i,mfwb

    bi,n

    libi,b

    4p

    4g

    ppg

    p

    emfwb

    4p

    4g

    ppg

    p

    wmfwb

    ggpg

    =++++

    ++++

    ++

    ==

    =

    )])dd

    0

    Particle Phase

    0]H

    )H)n

    1i

    =+++++

    ++

    =

    =

    watn

    1ise,i,se,i,

    4g

    4p

    pgp

    p

    emfwb

    sw,i,sw,i,4g

    4p

    pgp

    p

    wmfwb

    Q)R(-)T(Td

    6)T(Td

    6h)[)](1f(1f[1

    ]R (-T(Td6)T(T

    d6h)[(1ff

    0R)H(dz

    dTCu

    i,fi,f

    n

    li

    ggpg0 =+=

    Freeboard

  • Devolatilization

    Empirical correlations are used to determine C, H, O and S release (Frederick and Hupa, 1993; Frederick et al., 1995)

    Volatiles are represented by a mixture of CH4, CO, H2O and H2S

    ShHOgHfCOeCHSOHC 224dcba +++=

    Amount of each gas species is determined from the element mole balance

    Char = BLS - volatiles

  • GASIFICATION KINETICS

    Steam gasification (Li and van Heiningen, 1991)

    22 HCOOHC +=+ sm/kmolCp42.1pp

    T25300exp1056.2Rate 3c

    2HOH

    OH

    p

    9

    2

    2

    +

    =

    CO2 gasification (Li and van Heiningen, 1991)

    CO2COC 2 =+ sm/kmolCp4.3pp

    T30070exp1030.6Rate 3c

    COCO

    CO

    p

    10

    2

    2

    +

    =

    Other reactions considered (MFIX)

    224 H3COOHCH +=+42 CHH2C =+

    COOC 221 =+

    2221 COOCO =+

    OH2COO2CH 2224 +=+OHOH 22212 =+

    222 COHOHCO ++

  • PRELIMINARY RESULTS

    Product gas composition Particle and gas temperature Bubble properties Change in gas flow rate in the bed Variation of gas composition along the height

  • Syngas Composition

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    CO CO2 H2O H2

    gas species

    m

    o

    l

    e

    f

    r

    a

    c

    t

    i

    o

    n

    REI modelUU modelDESIGN

    Model results are in good agreement with available data Model predicts 96% carbon conversion

  • 300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    900

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

    dimensionless height

    t

    e

    m

    p

    e

    r

    a

    t

    u

    r

    e

    ,

    K

    TgTp

    Particle and Gas Temperature

    Particle temperature is the same as gas temperature due to a large contacting area Temperature in the bed is not uniform

  • Bubble Properties

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    1.4

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

    dimensionless height

    b

    u

    b

    b

    l

    e

    s

    i

    z

    e

    ,

    m

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    b

    u

    b

    b

    l

    e

    f

    r

    a

    c

    t

    i

    o

    n

    average db

    in the tubebundles

    in openspace

    tube-free bed

    fb

    Bubble size is fairly uniform in the tube bundles

  • Gas Flow Rate and Superficial Velocity

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

    dimensionless height

    s

    u

    p

    e

    r

    f

    i

    c

    i

    a

    l

    g

    a

    s

    v

    e

    l

    o

    c

    i

    t

    y

    (

    u

    0

    )

    ,

    m

    /

    s

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    g

    a

    s

    m

    a

    s

    s

    f

    l

    o

    w

    r

    a

    t

    e

    ,

    k

    g

    /

    s

    Gasification takes place above a dimensionless height of 0.2

  • Gas Species Mole Fraction

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

    dimensionless height

    m

    o

    l

    e

    f

    r

    a

    c

    t

    i

    o

    n COCO2H2OH2

    Water-gas shift reaction proceeds in forward direction in the freeboard

  • Gas Species Mole Fraction

    0

    0.005

    0.01

    0.015

    0.02

    0.025

    0.03

    0.035

    0.04

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

    dimensionless height

    C

    H

    4

    m

    o

    l

    e

    f

    r

    a

    c

    t

    i

    o

    n

    0.00000

    0.00005

    0.00010

    0.00015

    0.00020

    0.00025

    H

    2

    S

    m

    o

    l

    e

    f

    r

    a

    c

    t

    i

    o

    n

    CH4H2S

  • CONCLUSIONS

    A three-phase model has been developed to simulate black liquor gasification in a fluidized bed

    Preliminary results are in good agreement with available data

    Predicted carbon conversion is consistent with field data

  • ACKNOWLEGDEMENT

    This project has been funded by the DOE under a subcontract through the University of Utah (DE-FC26-02NT41490). The DOE project manager is Parrish Galusky. The Georgia-Pacific project manager for this effort isRobert DeCarrera.