Upload
migi-laperal
View
21
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Not mine.A baseline study managed by Edna Gapuz, Director of Environment Management Office, Center for Sustainable Human Development, Development Academy of the Philippines.Notes on Waste Plastics Management in Developing Countries
Citation preview
PROJECTINTHEPHILIPPINES
Edna GapuzDirector, Environment Management Office, Center for Sustainable Human Development, Development Academy of the Philippines
Workshop on Waste Plastics Management in Developing Countries 1-4 March 2011, AIST Tsukuba
OutlineOutline
ProjectOverview
PhilippinesPlasticIndustry
NationalPolicyonSolidyWasteManagement
CebuCityWastePlasticsBaseline
AssessmentofCurrentWasteManagementSystem
d Recommendation
OverviewOverview
UNEPDTIEIETCandDAPProjectaimstobuildlocalcapacitytodevelopaPlasticwasteinventoryandassessthecurrentwasteplasticsmanagementplanatcitylevel
IdentifyandimplementESTfortheconversionofwastey pplasticsintoaresource
Assesspotentialforresourceconservationandgreenhousep ggas(GHG)emissionsreduction
Assess feasibility with respects to local socioeconomic and Assessfeasibilitywithrespectstolocalsocio economicandenvironmentalcharacteristics
Draft a pilot project to demonstrate conversion of waste Draftapilotprojecttodemonstrateconversionofwasteplasticstofuel
Plastics Industry Profile in Philippinesy pp
Plastics Industry Profile in Philippinesy pp
Plastics Industry Profile in Philippinesy pp
Philippines Plastic IndustryPhilippines Plastic Industry
Philippines Plastic IndustryPhilippines Plastic Industry
Philippines Plastic IndustryPhilippines Plastic Industry
Philippines Plastic IndustryPhilippines Plastic Industry
Philippines Plastic IndustryPhilippines Plastic Industry
Philippine Ecological Solid Waste Management P li R bli A t 9003Policy: Republic Act 9003
January 26, 2001 Approval of RA 9003 February 16, 2001 Effectivity of RA 9003 December 21, 2001 Signing of the IRR of RA 9003
F b 16 2004 February 16, 2004 All Open Dumpsites should have been closed
or converted to Controlled Disposal Facilities (Sec.or converted to Controlled Disposal Facilities (Sec. 37)
February 16, 2006 All Controlled Disposal Facilities shall be
deemed closed and phase-out (Sec. 37)
Solid Waste under RA 9003Solid Waste under RA 9003
> discarded household commercial waste
> non-hazardousinstitutional andindustrial waste
> street sweepingsg
> construction debris
> agricultural waste
> other non-hazardous/non-toxic wastes
Institutional Institutional Structure Structure (Sec. 4)(Sec. 4)( )( )
DENR EMB NSWMC/SNational Solid WasteManagement Commission
(Policy Making)
DENR-EMB-NSWMC/S(Technical Support
& Enforcement )
Ecological Solid WasteManagement Act
Local GovernmentUnits
(Implementation)Waste Generators/Citizens
ROLE OF THE LGU (Sec 10)ROLE OF THE LGU (Sec. 10)
primarily responsible for the implementation and enforcement of the provisions of this Act within their respective jurisdictions
barangay level shall conduct segregation and collection of solid waste for biodegradable,
t bl d bl tcompostable and reusable wastes
municipality or city shall be responsible for the municipality or city shall be responsible for the collection of non-recyclable materials and special wastes
Creation of the following Solid Waste Creation of the following Solid Waste Management Boards at the LocalManagement Boards at the LocalManagement Boards at the Local Management Boards at the Local Government LevelGovernment Level::
City/Municipal City/Municipal SWM Board
(Sec. 12)SWM Board
(Sec. 12)
Provincial SWM Board (Sec 11)Barangay SWM C itt (SBarangay SWM C itt (SProvincial SWM Board (Sec 11)Provincial SWM Board (Sec. 11) Committee (Sec.
12)Committee (Sec.
12)Provincial SWM Board (Sec. 11)
COMPLIANCE with RA 9003 for LGUsCO C t 9003 o GUs
Sec 21 Segregation at Source Sec 23 Segregated Collection Sec 33 - Recovery/Recycling Systemsy y g y Sec 37 Closure/Conversion of Open
Dumps to CDFDumps to CDF Controlled Disposal Facilities Final Disposal Systems
COMPLIANCE with RA 9003 for LGUsCO C t 9003 o GUs
Sec 21 Segregation at Source The most indispensable element of any The most indispensable element of any
effective ESWM Program Proven by the enactment of an Ordinance that Proven by the enactment of an Ordinance that
mandates at Municipal Solid Wastes (MSW) must be segregated at source and placed in atmust be segregated at source and placed in at least 3 separate containers, (a) Compostables, (b) R l bl d ( ) R id l(b) Recyclables, and (c) Residuals
Compliance is monitored through Barangay Level Monitoring Systems
Classification of Waste underClassification of Waste under RA 9003RA 9003Classification of Waste underClassification of Waste under RA 9003RA 9003
RecyclablesCompostables
Special Wastes Non-recyclables/residuals
COMPOSTABLE WASTECompostable wastes are biodegradable wastes such as food waste, garden waste and animal waste.
Examples are:Examples are:
Fruit and vegetable peelings, leftover foods,vegetable trims, fish/fowl/meat/animal entrails/,
ft h ll d l tsoft shells, seeds, leaves, etc.,
Recyclable materials refer to any wasteRECYCLABLE WASTERecyclable materials refer to any wastematerial retrieved from the waste stream and free from contamination that can still be converted into suitable that can still be converted into suitable beneficial use.
Examples are:
Newspaper, ferrous and non-ferrousscrap metals, corrugated cardboard,aluminum, tin cans, glass, papers, etc.,, , g , p p , ,
SPECIAL WASTESpecial waste refer to household hazardous wastes.
Examples are:Examples are:
Paints, thinner, household batteries, lead-acidbatteries, spray canisters, bulky wastes, consumerelectronics (which refer to worn-out, broken andother discarded items), white goods (which refer tolarge worn-out or broken household appliances),
il ti toil, tires, etc.,
RESIDUAL WASTEResidual wastes are solid waste materials that are non-compostable and non-recyclable.
Examples are:
SSanitary napkins, disposable diapers, worn-outrugs, ceramics, candy wrappers/sachets, cartonswhich contain a plastic lining usually used for
ilk d j i t i tmilk and juice containers, etc.,
Solid Waste Composition
S i l/H d 1%Special/Hazardous, 1%Metals, 5%
Residuals, 4%Gl 3%Glass, 3%
Food and Other
organics
Paper, 12%
organics, 50%Plastics,
25%25%
Waste Analysis and Characterization Survey (WACS)-Metro Manila Solid Waste Management Project, ADB 2003
Current Recycling
Industries HouseholdsCommercial
Establishments
Recycling System in the Philippines
Reuse
Segregated & Retained at Source
Waste Discarded
Collection TruckWaste Pickers
A t /Collection Truck
Sold to T d
Sent to Landfill
Truck Workers
Agents / MiddlemenMRF
Collectors
ExportTradersLandfill Workers
Scavengers
LandfillRecyclingIndustries
g
Import
Traders
(1) Door-to-Door CollectionCollectors move around the target area and gcollect recyclable materials from house-to-house
(2) Stationary CollectionCollection system utilizing MRFs that are set up Collection system utilizing MRFs that are set up within or near the targeted collection area
(3) Waste Collection by TrucksGarbage truck workers segregate recyclable materials g g g ywhile collecting garbage from house-to-house
(4) Dumpsite ScavengingScavengers collect recyclable materials from g ythe mixed wastes disposed in dumpsites
(5) Junkshops/Middlemen/AgentsIndividuals or premises buy recyclable materials from the primary collectors including scavengers waste pickers and primary collectors including scavengers, waste pickers and individuals
(6) Traders (Larger Scale Middlemen)Individuals or premises buy recyclable materials from primary collectors and small junkshops and sometimes primary collectors and small junkshops, and sometimes carry-out pre-treatment, e.g., compacting, shredding
Material Flow of Waste Plastics in the Phili iPhilippines
Local Supply of Recycled Plastic
(C )
Supply of Imported (A) + (B)
Local Production of Virgin RM
(D) net of export
Export of Virgin RM local RM
production exported
Supply of Plastic RM in the Philippines
288,000 596,480 128,762 83,271
Import of Plastic Finished Product
(E)Total Available Finished Plastic Products in RP
(A) + (B) + (C ) + (D) + (E) 344,493
Export of Plastic Finished Product
1,357,735
Total Plastic for Domestic Consumption (A) + (B) + (C ) + (D) + (E) - (F)
Product (F)
96,330
Export of Recycled Plastics
Recycled net of export
Kept & Still in Use
Final Disposal
1,261,405
Recycled Plastics net of export Use Disposal
44,733574,309 399,096
Source: National Statistics Office
243,267973,405
Data on Recycling are PPIA estimates on MPRAI and Non-MPRAI operating capacities
Waste Plastics into FuelC b Cit Phili i CCebu City, Philippines Case
Selection CriteriaSelection Criteria
Quantity and characteristics of waste plastics; Possible application of fuels derived from
waste plastics;p Local commitment and interest; Existence of enabling policy; Existence of enabling policy; Favorable political environment; and Presence of potential project partners
Cebu City as Project SiteCebu City as Project Site
Oldest Philippine city Second international gateway in the country Second international gateway in the country Center of economic activities in the Visayas and
Mindanao areas Second largest urban economic center in the
country. 29,124.78 hectares, 5,598.53 hectares of which are
classified as urban80 ill / B ith 46 t th N th Di t i t 80 villages/ Barangays with 46 at the North District and 34 at the South District.
50 are classified as urban and the rest rural 50 are classified as urban and the rest rural
Cebu City as Project SiteCebu City as Project Site
pegged solid waste reduction targets that push the LGU to perform better in SWM.
First, in the 4th Kitakyushu Initiative Network Meeting (June 2007), Cebu City committed to reduce waste generation by 50% to be monitored until 2010generation by 50%, to be monitored until 2010
Second, the City Solid Waste Management Board (CSWMB) target for 2015 is to make Cebu the(CSWMB) target for 2015 is to make Cebu the cleanest and greenest city in the country (Ten-year plan 2005-2014)plan, 2005 2014).
Cebu City LGUs desire to reduce waste generation. piloting of the biodegradable waste in eight barangays piloting of the biodegradable waste in eight barangays
(The smallest political unit in the Philippines)
Based on Cebu Citys 2006 Waste A tAssessment
organic waste was found to be 50.56% of the total waste
plastics was at 16.87%. Paper was third at 16 18% Paper was third at 16.18%. Other wastes included mixed residue at
7 84% metal at 3 51% special aste at7.84%, metal at 3.51%, special waste at 2.00%, glass at 1.63%, construction
t i l 1 00% h d t 0 32%materials 1.00%, hazardous waste 0.32% and electronic waste at 0.10%.
Classification of Waste Plastic Based 2006 L dFill A ton 2006 LandFill Assessment
0.43% Styrofoam, 6.60% are shopping bags and pp g g 9.84% are classified as other kinds of
plasticsplastics.
Waste SectorsWasteSectors
CommercialSector Wastesdisposedbybusinesses,institutionsandmarketplacesthatthatarecollectedandtransportedbyprivateandgovernmenthaulers.
ResidentialSector Wastesdisposedbyhouseholdscollectedandtransportedbyprivateandgovernmenthaulers.
IndustrialSector Wastegeneratedfromindustrialareasandtransportedbyprivateandgovernmentareasandtransportedbyprivateandgovernmenthaulers.
Baseline in 6 Pilot BarangaysBaselinein6PilotBarangays
BarangayHipodromo
BarangayMabolo
BarangayLoregaSanMiguel
Barangay Luz BarangayLuz
BarangayApas
BarangayBusay
*AllarelocatedintheNorthDistrict
ReasonsforChoosingthepilotsites
L d hi f th i iti ti h b l t d t th Cit LeadershipoftheinitiativehasbeenelevatedtotheCityCouncil,whichensuresachampionandadvocateforanenablingpolicyfortheproject.
NewlyelecteddistrictrepresentativewhosemainplatformistomaketheNorthDistrictanEcozone.ThisdevelopmentprovidesawindowforprojectfundingfromtheCountrysidep p j g yDevelopmentFund(CDF),whichadistrictrepresentativecouldallocateaccordingtoherpriorities.
Supportive business sector through the Cebu Chamber of Supportivebusinesssector,throughtheCebuChamberofCommerce,Inc.(CCCI)anditsmemberorganizations,especiallythecommercialestablishments,suchastheCebuHoldings Inc which is supportive of local solid wasteHoldingsInc.,whichissupportiveoflocalsolidwastemanagementinitiativesandhasbeenassistingneighboringbarangays(includedintheclusterofseven),throughtheCebu Business Park and Neighbouring Barangays AltruisticCebuBusinessParkandNeighbouringBarangaysAltruisticAlliance(CBPNBAAI)formorethanfiveyears.
Waste Material TypesWasteMaterialTypes
l i O hPlastics:
1.PET (orPETE)
P l th li T hth l t
OtherWastes:
8.Paper
9 W dPolyethelineTerephthalate
2.HDPE HighDensityPolyethylene
9.Wood
10.MixedWastesPolyethylene
3.PVC PolyvinylChloride
4.LDPE LowDensityyPolyethylene
5.PP Polypropylene
6.PS Polystyrene
7.O Otherplastics(oftenpolycarbonate or ABSpolycarbonateorABS
Types of PlasticsTypesofPlastics
Types of PlasticsTypesofPlastics
Types of PlasticsTypesofPlastics
Types of PlasticsTypesofPlastics
Types of PlasticsTypesofPlastics
Types of PlasticsTypesofPlastics
Types of PlasticsTypesofPlastics
Types of PlasticsTypesofPlastics
Baseline MethodologyBaselineMethodology
Fifteenhouseholdswereselectedperbarangay.Outofthefifteenhouseholds,underthehighincomebracket(P20,000.00andabove),middleincomebracket(P10,000.0019,999.00)andlowincomebracket(P999 00 d b l )(P999.00andbelow).
Wastecollectedincludeallwastegeneratedwithina24hourcycle,giventhewastecollectionisconducteddailyinthebarangays.
Sampling,however,wasnotdoneinconsecutivedays,butscheduledbasedonavailabilityoflocalpointpersonandwastesorters.
Wastecharacterizationwasdoneforfourdaysforthehouseholdsandd f honedayforothersectors.
Onthelastdayofsampling(fourthdayforhouseholds),wasteplasticswerecleaned,ifneeded,anddriedthroughsun/airdrying,basedontheeatherweather.
Afterthewasteplastichasbeendried,theywereweighedagain.Furtherclassificationwasdonetoregistersoftandrigidplasticsafterdrying.
Household Waste Composition (inkg/day/brgy): average per day: 17 tons
Barangay HipodromoLoregaSanMiguel
Mabolo Apas Luz Busay Total
1 PET 11 45 40 51 65 79 101 11 2 48 26 15 247 49
kg/day/brgy): average per day: 17 tons
1 PET 11.45 40.51 65.79 101.11 2.48 26.15 247.49
2 HDPE 74.40 80.06 155.04 164.88 56.93 30.43 561.74
3 PVC 42.71 29.03 199.14 99.75 38.04 408.67
4 LDPE 190 39 191 65 277 53 71 38 22 28 2 22 755 454 LDPE 190.39 191.65 277.53 71.38 22.28 2.22 755.45
5 PP 8.93 9.08 7.35 69.23 15.35 26.94 136.88
6 PS 12.84 23.90 11.55 62.10 14.60 4.75 129.74
7 OTHERS 105 94 137 65 169 39 311 20 98 52 83 36 906 067 OTHERS 105.94 137.65 169.39 311.20 98.52 83.36 906.06
AVE.GENPLASTICS
446.65 511.88 686.64 979.03 309.91 211.89 3,146.00
Paper 279.30 308.75 260.38 713.27 155.70 230.75 1948.15
Wood 144.05 34.17 9.80 14.28 5.94 84.31 292.55
Metal 65.88 46.36 107.79 254.57 2.97 106.18 583.75
Gl 58 06 109 21 237 98 417 31 24 75 160 07 1 007 38Glass 58.06 109.21 237.98 417.31 24.75 160.07 1,007.38
Bio 2,237.45 1,238.11 1,987.82 2,161.24 927.25 869.76 9,421.63
Otherwastes 134.00 149.24 109.89 136.80 27.23 7.13 564.29
TOTALAVE.WASTEGEN
3,365.38 2,397.71 3,400.30 4,676.49 1,453.75 1,670.11 16,963.74
WasteTypegeneratedineachofthesixbbarangay
biodegradableswiththetotalamountgeneratedinthesixbarangaysat9,421.63kilogramsperday.
secondiswasteplasticat3,146.00kilograms.
Paper comes third at 1,948.15 kilograms, Papercomesthirdat1,948.15kilograms,
followedbyglassat1,007.38kilograms.
W d i th ll t t d t i th Woodisthesmallestgeneratedwasteinthehouseholdsatanaverageof292.55kilogramsforthei b dsixbarangaysperday.
Type of Waste Plastics GeneratedTypeofWastePlasticsGenerated
PlastictypeNo.7(Othertypesofplastic) isbeinggeneratedatmostquantitydailyat906.06kilograms.
S d bi i d i N 4 LDPE 755 45 SecondbiggestquantitygeneratedisNo.4LDPEat755.45kilogramsperday.
Third is HDPE at 561 74 kilograms ThirdisHDPEat561.74kilograms.
No.3PVCcomesfourthintermsofquantitiesat408.67kilogramskilograms
Fifth,correspondingtoNo.1PET,is247.49kilograms.
L t t l ti t d i th i b th LeastwasteplasticgeneratedinthesixbarangaysaretheNo.5PPat136.88andNo.6PSat129.74kilograms.
Summary of Pilot Area BaselineSummaryofPilotAreaBaseline
TotalHouseholdWasteComposition(Averagein6Barangays:57%biodegradables;18%plastics;12%paper
1 PETE2HDPE
3%Others
TotalHHWasteComposition(ave.ofthe6brgys)
1PETE1%
3%
3PVC2%
4 LDPE4% 5PP
1%6PSBio
Others3%
1%
7OTHER5%
Paper12%
Bio57%
Metal3%Glass
6%
Wood2%
PercentagesofeachTypeofWasteoverTotalWasteGenerated,HouseholdWasteComposition(in, p (kg/day/brgy)
Barangay Hipodromo LoregaSanMiguel Mabolo Apas Luz Busay
PLASTICS 13.27% 21.35% 20.19% 20.94% 21.32% 12.69%
Paper8.30% 12.88% 7.66% 15.25% 10.71% 13.82%
Paper
Wood4.28% 1.43% 0.29% 0.31% 0.41% 5.05%
1 96% 1 93% 3 17% 5 44% 0 20% 6 36%Metal
1.96% 1.93% 3.17% 5.44% 0.20% 6.36%
Glass1.73% 4.55% 7.00% 8.92% 1.70% 9.58%
Bio66.48% 51.64% 58.46% 46.21% 63.78% 52.08%
3.98% 6.22% 3.23% 2.93% 1.87% 0.43%
OtherWaste
Total100%
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
PlasticWasteComposition(A f Si B )(AverageofSixBarangays)
PETE 7%
HDPE 17%
PVC 13%
LDPE 25% LDPE25%
PP 5%
PS 4%
Other 29%
InstitutionalWasteComposition(datafrom15pointsourcesin5barangays
d t l fl t th l d i th WACS With thi dataonlyreflectsthesamplesduringtheWACS.Withthislimitation,thedatashouldnotbeinterpretedasrepresentativeofthesectorsbutrather,onlyforthespecific
l t k f th tsamplestakenfromthesesector.
OtherInstitutional Waste Composition
Wood, 0%Metal, 1%
Glass, 2%
Bio, 26%
Other Wastes, 3
%
Plastics, 39%
Paper, 29%
CommercialWasteComposition(datafrom16pointsourcesin5barangays)
d t l fl t th l d i th WACS With thi dataonlyreflectsthesamplesduringtheWACS.Withthislimitation,thedatashouldnotbeinterpretedasrepresentativeofthesectorsbutrather,onlyforthespecific
l t k f th tsamplestakenfromthesesector.Commercial Waste Composition
Plastics5% Paper
1%
Other Wastes
60%
Wood0%
MetalBio eta1%
Glass3%
30%
3%
IndustrialWasteComposition(data from Pacific Foundry, a metal(datafromPacificFoundry,ametalcompanyinBarangayHippodromo)
d l fl h l d h h h l h dataonlyreflectsthesamplesduringtheWACS.Withthislimitation,thedatashouldnotbeinterpretedasrepresentativeofthesectorsbutrather,onlyforthespecificsamplestakenfromthesesector.
Other Wastes
1%
Industrial Waste CompositionWaste plastics come from domestic waste
Wood0%
Metal4%
Glass0%
Bio14%
1%from domestic waste generated at the companys canteen/cafeteria
Plastics58%
Paper23%
0%canteen/cafeteria
AverageMoistureContentofWastePl i f H h ld BPlasticfromHouseholdsperBarangay
Barangay Hipodromo Lorega SM Mabolo Luz Apas AverageBarangay Hipodromo LoregaSM Mabolo Luz Apas Average
Percentage 16.84% 16.42% 20.18% 53.13% 23.32%
10.03%
SoftandRigidWastePlasticsin Metric TonsinMetricTons
Barangay Hipodromo LoregaSM Mabolo Luz Apas Total
Rigid
1.080
0.520 1.250
0.320
0.050 2.850
Soft 2.685 2.740 1.790 3.160 0.990 7.215
Total 3.765 3.26 3.04 3.48 1.04 10.65
more soft plastics are being generated in the households than rigid plastics. The values below are for the fivethan rigid plastics. The values below are for the five barangays where the washing (if needed) and drying, were conducted.
Tenyear Waste Generation ProjectionTen yearWasteGenerationProjection
YEARWasteGeneration(MT/day)
Hipodromo Lorega Mabolo Apas Luz Busay
Generation(kg/day/person)
0.34 0.21 0.15 0.25 0.09 0.18
2010 3.55 2.53 3.58 4.93 1.53 1.76
2011 3.65 2.60 3.68 5.07 1.58 1.81
2012 3.75 2.67 3.79 5.21 1.62 1.86
2013 3 85 2 74 3 89 5 35 1 66 1 912013 3.85 2.74 3.89 5.35 1.66 1.91
2014 3.96 2.82 4.00 5.50 1.71 1.97
2015 4.07 2.90 4.11 5.66 1.76 2.02
2016 4.18 2.98 4.23 5.81 1.81 2.08
2017 4.30 3.06 4.34 5.98 1.86 2.13
2018 4.42 3.15 4.47 6.14 1.91 2.19
2019 4.54 3.24 4.59 6.31 1.96 2.25
2020 4.67 3.33 4.72 6.49 2.02 2.32
World Banks Philippine Environment Monitor 2001 assumed that the urban population would generate one percent (1%) increase in waste generationpopulation would generate one percent (1%) increase in waste generation per year.
The waste generation projection is based on the population projection
barangaywastecharacterization,i i f d dsiximportantsetofdataaregenerated
T l A G i f H h ld W TotalAverageGenerationforHouseholdWasteComposition(inkg/day/brgy)P f l i i h l i h PercentageofplasticsagainstthetotalwasteinthebarangaysP f h h f l i PercentageoftheeachtypeofplasticsamongotherplastictypesM i f l i Moisturecontentofwasteplastics
Percentageofrigidandsoftwasteplastic Projectionquantitiesforalltypesofwastefrom
2010to2020.
PercentagesofeachtypeoverT l W G dTotalWasteGenerated
PERCENTAGEOFEACHTYPEOVERTOTAL WASTE PERCENTAGESOF EACHTYPEOVERTOTAL WASTE PERCENTAGESOF EACHTYPEOVERTOTAL WASTE
PLASTICS
Other Wastes
4%
PERCENTAGE OF EACH TYPE OVER TOTAL WASTE GENERATED (Hipodromo)
PLASTICS
Other Wastes3%
PERCENTAGES OF EACH TYPE OVER TOTAL WASTE GENERATED (Mabolo)
PLASTICS21%
Other Wastes6%
PERCENTAGES OF EACH TYPE OVER TOTAL WASTE GENERATED (Lorega SM)
PLASTICS13%
Paper8% Wood
4%Metal
2%
Glass2%
Bio67%
20%
Paper8%
Wood0%
Metal%
Glass7%
Bio59%
21%
Paper13%
Wood1%
Bio52%
3% 1%Metal
2%Glass5%
PERCENTAGES OF EACH TYPE OVER TOTAL WASTE GENERATED (Luz) PERCENTAGES OF EACH TYPE OVER TOTAL WASTE
GENERATED (Apas)
PERCENTAGES OF EACH TYPE OVER TOTAL WASTE GENERATED (Busay)
PLASTICS21%
Other Wastes2%
PLASTICS
Other Wastes3%
GENERATED (Apas)
PLASTICS13%
Other Wastes0%
Paper11%
WoodBio64%
PLASTICS21%
Paper15%
Bio46%
13%Paper14%
Wood5%Glass
Bio52%
Wood0%
Metal0%
Glass2%
64%
Wood0%Metal
6%
Glass9%
5%Metal6%
10%
PercentageofPlasticTypesoverTotal Plastics GeneratedTotalPlasticsGenerated
%of PlasticTypesover Total PlasticsGenerated %of Plastic Typesover Total Plastics Generated %of PlasticTypes over Total Plastics Generated
1 - PET2% 2 - HDPE
17%7 - OTHERS
24%
% of Plastic Types over Total Plastics Generated(Hipodromo)
1 - PET10%
2- HDPE67 - OTHERS
25%
% of Plastic Types over Total Plastics Generated(Mabolo)
1 PET10%
2 HDPE17%
7 OTHERS32%
%ofPlasticTypesoverTotalPlasticsGenerated(Apas)
3 - PVC9%
4 - LDPE43%
5 - PP2%
6 - PS3%
24% 2 HDPE22%
3 - PVC0%
4 - LDPE40%
5 - PP1%
6 -PS2%
25% 17%
3 PVC20%4 LDPE
7%
5 PP7%
6 PS
32%
0%
% of Plastic Types over Total Plastics Generated(Lorega San Miguel)
% Plastic Types over Total Plastics Generated (Luz)
7%
% of Plastic Types over Total Plastics Generated(B )
1 - PET8% 2 - HDPE
15%7 - OTHERS
27%
(Lorega-San Miguel) 1 - PET
1%
2 - HDPE18%
7 - OTHERS32%
(Luz)
1 - PET12% 2 - HDPE
15%7- OTHERS
(Busay)
3 - PVC6%
4 - LDPE37%
5 - PP
6 - PS5%
% 18%
3 - PVC32%
6 PS
32% 15%
3 - PVC18%5 - PP
13%
7 OTHERS39%
2%4 - LDPE
7%5 - PP
5%
6 - PS5%
4 - LDPE1%
13%
6 - PS2%
ExistingMaterialsRecoveryFacilitiesi C b f 4th Q 2009inCebuasof4th Qtr2009
only10%ofthetotalrequirementforMRFs,asthereare80barangaysbutonlyeightMRFsoperational. AyalaCenterCebuCity BrgyCalambaCebuCityB Hi d C b Cit BrgyHipodromoCebuCity
BrgyInayawanCebuCity Brgy Labangon Cebu City BrgyLabangonCebuCity BrgyLuzCebuCity Reclamation AreaNursery Cebu City ReclamationAreaNurseryCebuCity StoNinoVillageCebuCity
Within the pilot area only Brgy Luz has an operating MRF Withinthepilotarea,onlyBrgy.LuzhasanoperatingMRF. Hipodromo,althoughlistedwithone,doesnothavean
operationalMRF.
LGUs in SWMLGUsinSWM
Deputized Tanodp
AssessmentofCurrentM S I i iManagementSystems:Institutions
j i tit ti t th it l l l i k l i lid majorinstitutionsatthecitylevel,playingkeyrolesinsolidwastemanagement.
CSWMB CitySolidWasteManagementBoardy g DPS managestheactualcleaningthecityofgarbage.One
ofitsdivisions,theGarbageCollectionandTransportOperation Division collects and disposes the wastes TheOperationDivision,collectsanddisposesthewastes.TheLandfillManagementisalsodirectlyundertheDPS.
CESET enforcementatthecityandbarangaylevels NGOsandtheprivatesectorplayanimportantpartinSWM
e.g.Brgy.Luzwouldnothavebeenabletosucceedi th i P B P ith t th tintheirPerasaBasura ProgramwithoutthesupportoftheCebuHoldingsInc.andtheCBPNBAAI,anNGO that was consequently formed out of theNGOthatwasconsequentlyformedoutofthepartnershipwiththebarangay.
Local PolicyLocalPolicy
CebuCityOrdinanceNo.2031. AnOrdinancefortheImplementationofSolidWasteSegregationatSource,
idi l i h f d h C i fProvidingPenaltiesThereofandtheCreationofaSpecialFundforincentives.
CityOrdinanceNo.2234 thatcreatedtheCebuCityEnvironmentandNaturalResourcesOffice(CCENRO)
FinancingFinancing
Th j f f di SWM i d ThreemajorsourcesforfundingSWMoperationsandprojects : budget prepared by the Barangay Council from the budgetpreparedbytheBarangayCouncil,fromtheIRAandthelocalincome
grants and donations from corporate and other grantsanddonationsfromcorporateandotherfundinginstitutions
specialfundsdistributedbythecity,suchasthep y yP80,000.00giventoeightbarangayswherethecitywillpilotbarangaylevelcomposting.Specialfundsco ld also come from the pro incial and nationalcouldalsocomefromtheprovincialandnationalgovernment.
FinancingFinancing
B d id h h h iBarangaysdecideonhowmuchtheyaregoingtospendonSWM.H hi l l f iHowever,thislocalgovernmentfunctionwasneverprioritizedandthusfundingisalwaysnever enoughneverenough
localofficialsseeksupportfromtheprivatesectorsector.
ThebarangaysalsoearnfromfinesthattheCESET raise as it issues tickets to those caughtCESETraiseasitissuesticketstothosecaughtdisobeyingthelocalSWMordinances.
TechnologyTechnology
targetinginstallationofMRFsinatleast56outof80barangaysinCebuCity
pilotingeighturbanbarangayswiththecollectionofthebiodegradablesthroughfivebarangayenvironmentalofficers(BEOs).
RecommendationsRecommendations
InstallasystemofsupporttohelpLGUscomply
Enforcemandatorysolidwastediversion(Sec.20).
Rationalutilizationofvariouseconomictools: annual SWM appropriations annualSWMappropriations fees,fines,subsidiesfrompublicinstitutions Grants
Politicalwilltoenforceexistingpolicy
Educationcoupledwithconstancy,andaclearcutsystem.y
Makecomplianceattractive
RecommendationsRecommendations
Complementingandconvergentfunctions
CreativeapproachestoSWMproblems
Strictmonitoringofserviceproviders
Matching services to actual needs Matchingservicestoactualneeds
Promoteanduseofappropriateandsustainablet h l itechnologies
Focusonlowcost,lowtechnologiesupstreamandcomplementwithendofpipesupport
Humanizesolidwastemanagementtoprotectwastepickers.
RecommendationsRecommendations
RehabilitateCebulandfill
Giventhissetup,asystematicoverhaulisneededtodefinetherolesofeachstakeholderinSWMchainandshiftthefocusofattentionfrommeredisposaltorecoveryandrecycling.
Specificy roles of each sector, and as needed, Specificyrolesofeachsector,andasneeded,interfaceandoverlapsdefined.
OpportunitiesforWastePlasticMManagement
Allplasticsarerecyclable.Plasticisaresource,notwaste
Maximize existing policies, technologies, financing Maximizeexistingpolicies,technologies,financingmechanismsandstakeholderstowasteplasticintoas a material or energy resourceasamaterialorenergyresource
Let us work together Let us work together gtowards the
d l t f
gtowards the
development of a development of a recycling-oriented development of a
recycling-oriented recycling oriented society.
recycling oriented society.
Thank you.Thank you.
Environmental Management OfficeEnvironmentalManagementOffice
CenterforSustainableHumanDevelopment
DevelopmentAcademyofthePhilippines
SanMiguelAvenue,OrtigasCenter,PasigCity
Telefax(632)6312169|6310921loc.148
cshddap@yahoo com | p2f cebu@gmail [email protected]|[email protected]