7.Performance Appraisal & Analysis

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 7.Performance Appraisal & Analysis

    1/3

    Business Management Prepared by: Jamal Chapter 7

    Page 1 of 3

    PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL & ANALYSIS

    Survival and Growth: It depends upon making profit

    Areas of Growth: Revenue, Profitability, Return on Investments, Market Share, No of employees, No

    of products, cash flows etc

    Inflation: Inflation make hinder to achieve and sustain the profitability.

    Consequences of Inflation:

    Difficult to pass on increase in cost in competitive market where customer resists price increase For exporter, the cost of good increase for foreign buyer unless exchange rate falls

    Controlling Inflation:

    Exercise buyer power over supplies and negotiate to reduce the material prices Use material effectively Labour pay rate should be competitive but keep as low as possible Labour efficiency must match the competition Expenses should be rigorously controlled The timing of price increase should monitored carefully

    Inflation can conceal poor performance if company is using historical cost convention.

    NPV Technique to Control Investment:Discounted cash flows can be used to assess the performance of capital investment. Long term

    planning, capital expenditure decision should be based on an evaluation of future cash flow discounted

    at an appropriate cost of capital to an NPV.

    (Refer example on page no 145)

    Contribution Margin Technique:

    CM is the difference b/w sales volume & the variable cost of those sales, either absolute term or per

    unit. Contribution centre is profit centre where expenditure is calculated on a marginal cost basis.

    Contribution and Strategic Decisions:Product Market Issues: It emphasis on two things:

    The no of product required to break even The no of product required to generate adequate return over the life of the investment

    BE Analysis can be very useful in appraising and controlling strategy. Following factors effecting BEmodel.

    Probability of achieving the desirable level of market penetration Favorable or unfavorable condition in the market How competitors react or allow profitable entry Feasibility of cost and quality condition Availability of funds, skills, required manpower etc

    Return on Investment: Divisional PerformanceMany large Org are divided into strategic business units SBUs, which is a separate section responsible

    for planning, developing, producing and marketing its own product and services. Return on investment

    shows how much profit has been made in relation to amount of capital invested.

  • 7/29/2019 7.Performance Appraisal & Analysis

    2/3

    Business Management Prepared by: Jamal Chapter 7

    Page 2 of 3

    Main Reasons to Use ROI:Financial Reporting: Data identifiable from financial statements

    Aggregation: Can be measure for separate division or org as a whole.

    Measurement Problem:

    Different profit centre has diff depreciated fixed assets without regular replacement, so its ROIwill increase year by year. Fixed asset of diff ages may be depreciated in diff ways. Inflation and technological changes effects the ROI of diff centers.

    The Target Return for a Group of Companies:

    Set target return for the group as a whole or for each SBUs No investments project in an SBU if target return not achieve

    Problems:

    Investments are appraised DCF where as actual performance will probably be measured on thebasis of ROI

    Target return ignores allowance \ provisions for different risk of diff SBUs Practically an identified target return may be unsuitable to many SBU in a group. (Refer

    example 5.19)

    There may be issues and conflicts b/w SBUs in short term and long term decision and the orgResidual Income: (RI)It is a pre tax profit less an imputed interest (borrowing cost) charged for invested capital.

    Advantages of RI:I. RI will increase when;

    Investments earning above the cost of capital are undertaken Investment earning below the cost of capital are eliminated

    II. RI is more flexible since a different cost of can be applied to investment with different riskcharacteristics

    Disadvantages:

    Does not facilitate comparison b/w investment centre nor does it relate size of a centre income to the

    size of investment.

    Benchmarking:It is the establishment of targets through date gathering of comparators, the performance is compared at

    each relative level and areas of underperformance identified.

    Types of Benchmarking:Internal Benchmarking: A method of comparing one operating unit or function with another with

    another within the same industry.

    Functional Benchmarking: Internal functions are compared with those of the best external

    practitioner of those functions, regardless of the industry they are in.

    Also known as Operational or generic benchmarking

    Competitive benchmarking: Information is gathered about direct competitors through techniques like

    reverse engineering.

    Strategic Benchmarking: A type of competitive benchmarking aimed at strategic action and org

    change.

    Stages of Benchmarking:a) Gain senior management commitment

  • 7/29/2019 7.Performance Appraisal & Analysis

    3/3

    Business Management Prepared by: Jamal Chapter 7

    Page 3 of 3

    b) Set objectives and determines the areas to benchmarkc) Establish key performance measuresd) Select org to studye) Measure own and others performancef) Compare performancesg) Design and implement improvement programh) Monitor improvement

    Levels of Benchmarking;

    Levels Through Examples

    Resources Competence in Separate

    Activities

    Competence in LinkedActivities

    Resource audit Analyzing activities Analyzing over all performance

    Qt & qlt of resources like manpower Sales call per sales man etc Market share , profitability, productivity

    Advantages:

    Position audit Focus on improvement in key areas Sharing information can be used for innovation Involvement of all employees and management The result should be improved performance eg cost cutting, delivering value etc

    Disadvantages;

    It concentrate on doing things right rather than doing right thing Yesterday solution to tomorrow problem It is copying / catching up exercise rather than development of anything distinctive It depends upon accurate info about comparator companies It is not cost free and can divert management attention It can be hindrance and threat, sharing info with other companies can be burden & security risk.