72771531 Indian Economy JUNE 2011

8/3/2019 72771531 Indian Economy JUNE 2011

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/72771531-indian-economy-june-2011 1/52

Current State of Indian EconomyJune 2011

Page 1



Current State of Indian Economy – June 20111EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GDP growth GDP growth figures for Q4, 2010-11, highlight an unmistakable downward trend. While in Q1, 2010-11, GDP grew by 9.3 percent, in Q4, 2010-11, GDP growth came down to 7.8 percent. Sectors like manufacturing and mining & quarrying have seen considerable erosion of growth momentum over the last one year. While consumptiondemand is still holding, a sharp decline in growth of investments is seen. Growt

h in Gross Fixed Capital Formation [GFCF] has dipped from 17.4 percent in Q1, 2010-11 to 0.4 percent in Q4, 2010-11. Given the evolving situation, growth in 2011-12 is likely to be close to the 8 percent mark.Quarterly Growth in GDP (2004-05 prices)14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Q1 2010-11 Q2 2010-11 Q3 2010-11 Q4 2010-11GDP at factor cost

Mining and quarrying

Manufacturing

Industrial Production Weakness in industrial production trend continues. In April 2011, IIP registereda growth of 6.3 percent. In April 2010, growth in IIP was to the tune of 13.1 p

ercent. Amongst the use based industrial groups, a similar streak of weakness isseen with growth in the capital goods segment, intermediate goods segment and consumer goods segment slowing down from 35.5 percent, 11.9 percent and 13.8 percent respectively in April 2010 to 14.5 percent, 3.4 percent and 2.9 percent in April 2011.IIP growth and Repo rate14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 Aug'10 Dec'10 Jun'10 Jan'11 May'10 Mar'11 Sep'10 Oct,10 Feb'11 Apr'10 Jul'10 Nov'10 Apr'11

IIP

Repo rate

1

This report has been prepared by the Economic Affairs and Research Division, FICCI Page 2



Core Sector Data for April 2011 shows a perceptible decline in performance of the core sector with growth dipping from 8.5 percent in April 2010 to 4.6 percent in April 2011. Sectors like natural gas, fertilizers, cement and steel are largely responsible for this poor performance. Growth in the coal sector however moved from (-) 2.9 percent in April 2010 to 2.8 percent in April 2011.

Inflation The inflation situation in the economy continues to be a cause for concern. Despite large scale tightening of the monetary policy by the RBI and other steps taken by the government, inflation continues to remain close to the double digit mark. In May 2011, WPI based headline inflation stood at 9.1 percent. This is higher than 8.7 percent inflation recorded in April 2011. Core inflation too has moved up from 8 percent in April 2011 to 8.6 percent in May 2011. Near term outlookfor inflation is not too encouraging and there are chances that we may see inflation jump to the double digit territory on a few occasions. High internationaloil prices, likely decontrol of diesel prices, high global food prices and hikein Minimum Support Prices for the upcoming agriculture season are some of the factors that constitute the upside risks to inflation.

Foreign Trade The strong momentum in exports, seen particularly during the second half of 20-11, has continued in the year 2011-12 as well. In April 2011 exports totaled US$ 23.8 billion and represented a growth of 34.4 percent over the same month of the previous year when exports totaled US$ 17.7 billion. While this strong startin 2011-12 is encouraging, there are indications that this high growth will notbe sustained in the months ahead. Rising interest rates, rising raw materials costs and oil prices, withdrawal of incentive schemes like DEPB and likely slowdow

n in Asian economies are some of the reason that have tempered the outlook for exports. In April 2011, our imports totaled US$ 32.8 billion and registered a growth of 14.1 percent over the same month of the previous year when imports amounted to US$ 28.8 billion. With developments in the Middle East and North Africa region showing no signs of a let up and with OPEC resisting any upward revision indaily oil production quota, oil prices are likely to remain firm in the near term. This will continue to put pressure on India’s overall oil import bill. As regards non-oil imports, while a slowdown in the domestic economy could lead to somemoderation in the non-oil import bill, any large respite here can be ruled as prices of commodities other than oil are also firming up.

Foreign Investments In 2010-11, foreign investment flows into India saw a dip of about 17 percent over the previous year. Further, this dip is largely on account of a slowdown seenin case of FDI. In 2009-10, FDI inflows into India totaled US$ 37.7 billion. In2010-11, this figure came down to US$ 27 billion. Data also shows that of out of the top 25 sectors, 15 sectors have seen a dip in FDI flows during April – Feb 2010-11 compared to the same period in 2009-10. Sectors like services, construction, housing and real estate, telecommunication and agricultural services are theones where investment flows have slowed down considerably. In 2010-11, portfolio flows totaled US$ 31.5 billion and were only a tad below US$ 32.4 billion received in 2009-10. The outlook for portfolio flows in the current year is not tooencouraging. Global fund managers are particularly concerned over the evolving m

acro-economic situation with inflation showing limited signs of abatement and growth slowing down at a fast clip.Page 3





The re-emergence and intensification of the sovereign debt crisis in Europe andthe expected halt of quantitative easing policy in the US by the end of June 2011 are also downside factors for portfolio flows for emerging markets including India.

Forex Reserves In April 2011, India’s foreign exchange reserves totaled US$ 313 billion. The increasing size of our foreign exchange reserves has drawn attention of the policymakers. Just some time back, Dr. Kaushik Basu, Chief Economic Advisor, Ministry ofFinance, had raised the question of India to consider having a Sovereign WealthFund. In more recent times, a few independent analysts have opined that a partof these huge reserves be deployed to import commodities which are or could be in short supply in the economy.

Money and Banking The year on year growth in money supply in the period up to May 21, 2011 was 16.8 percent. Growth in the corresponding period [up to May 22, 2010] in the previo

us year was 15.1 percent. The year on year growth in non-food credit in the period up to May 21, 2011 has been almost 22.1 percent. This is higher than the credit growth target of 19 percent set by the RBI for the current year. Growth in deposits in the period up to May 21, 2011 has been of the order of 17.4 percent and is in line with RBI target growth of 17 percent for the current year. These numbers indicate that the trend seen in the previous year – of deposit growth lagging credit growth – continues in the current financial year. The growth rate in deposits has picked up in recent months and to that extent eased some pressure on the banks as they worked hard to maintain their margins.

Fiscal Situation

The provisional estimates for 2010-11 for various fiscal variables show a definite improvement over the revised estimates (RE), with a more than anticipated rise in revenue collection and reduction in expenditure. The striking feature of the new estimates is the reduction in fiscal deficit [4.7 percent] number comparedto the revised estimate [5.1 percent] given during presentation of the union budget. Though the fiscal deficit numbers for 2010-11 are encouraging, maintainingfiscal discipline in 2011-12 is looking increasingly difficult.

Corporate Sector Performance – Q4, 2010-11 In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010-11, corporate India turned out a good performance both in terms of sales and profits. Such a performance is particularly noteworthy as it came at a time when overall expenses are going up at a fast clip.Net sales of ‘All Industries’ in the fourth quarter of 2010-11 registered a growthof 23.5 percent. This is the highest growth in net sales that we have seen in the last eight quarters. Further, while firms from the manufacturing sector saw anincrease of 22.26 percent in net sales in the last quarter of 2010-11, companies from the services (other than financial) sector saw sales going up by 27.46 percent. Within the manufacturing sector, growth in sales has been particularly strong in sectors such as textiles, cement, steel and transport equipment. Performance of the food and beverages sector and the chemicals sector lagged the average growth for the manufacturing sector as a whole. Total expenses for ‘All Industries’ went up by 23.52 percent in Q4, 2010-11. This growth is the highest seen in last four quarters. Further, while the manufacturing sector saw total expenses ris

e by 21.68 percent in Q4, 2010-11, services (other than financial) saw an increase of 31.29 percent. Within the manufacturing sector, the increase in total expenses in the quarter under review was particularly high in sectors such as cement



[48.12 percent] and steel [30.06 percent].Page 4



Growth in Net Sales (%)30 20 10 0 Q1 09-10 Q2 09-10 Q3 09-10 Q4 09-10 Q1 10-11 Q2 10-11 Q3 10-11 -10 -20 Q4 10-11 40 30 20 10 0 Q1 09-10

Growth in Total Expenses (%)

Q2 09-10

Q3 09-10

Q4 09-10

Q1 10-11

Q2 10-11

Q3 10-11

-10 -20

All industries Manufacturing Services (other than financial)


Page 5

Q4 10-11



Current State of Indian Economy – June 2011INDEX MACRO ECONOMY GDP Growth Industrial Production Core Sector Inflagn Trade Foreign Investments Forex Reserves Exchange Rate Money and Banking Fiscal Situation 7 7 9 13 15 18 20 23 24 25 27 31 31 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 39 39 40 40 42 43 44

CORPORATE SECTOR PERFORMANCE – Q4, 2010-11 All industries Textiles Cement St

emicals Transportation Food and Beverages

ROUND UP OF KEY DEVELOPMENTS Draft National Manufacturing Policy RBI’s Financial Stability Report CHARTS Industrial Production Inflation Foreign Trade and ForeignInvestments DATA ON INTEREST RATES



Current State of Indian Economy – June 2011 GDP GrowthThe Central Statistical Organisation (CSO) has released the revised estimates for GDP for 2010-11. Alongside, it also released the quarterly estimates for GDP for the fourth quarter of 2010-11. According to the latest numbers made availableby CSO, India’s GDP at factor cost at constant prices registered an increase of 8.5 percent in the year 2010-11. This revised estimate of 8.5 percent growth forGDP in 2010-11 is only a shade below the advance estimates that had pegged GDP g

rowth for 201011 at 8.6 percent. This slight dip in overall GDP growth can be attributed to weaker performance in sectors such as ‘mining and quarrying’, ‘manufacturing’, ‘trade, hotels, transport and communication’ and ‘financing, insurance, real estateand business services’ than anticipated earlier. In case of the agriculture and allied activities sector, we find that the revised estimates have pegged growth in 2010-11 at 6.6 percent, which is much higher compared to the advance estimatesthat had put growth at 5.4 percent. In this context it is important to note that the third advance estimates of crop production released by the Ministry of Agriculture have shown a significant upward revision as compared to second advanceestimates in the production of wheat [84.27 million tonnes from 81.47 million tonnes], pulses [17.29 million tonnes from 16.51 million tonnes], oilseeds [302.51lakh tonnes from 278.48 lakh tonnes] and sugarcane [340.54 million tonnes from

336.70 million tonnes]. These revisions are responsible for lifting the GDP growth rate for agriculture and allied activities sector. Another sector where we see a substantial upward revision in growth rate between the advance and revised estimates is the ‘community, social and personal services’ sector. While in its advance estimate, CSO had indicated a growth of 5.7 percent for this sector, in the revised estimates this figure has been moved up to 7.0 percent. This revision comes on the back of a larger increase in total expenditure of the central government than anticipated earlier. The moderation in the expected pace of expansion ofthe ‘mining’ and ‘manufacturing’ sectors can be related to certain adverse policy developments as well as hardening of the interest rates in the economy. Further, as performance of the ‘financing, insurance, real estate and business services’ sector is closely related to performance of the manufacturing sector, this sector too has seen a slippage in growth between advance and revised estimates.

Table 1 – Growth in GDP at factor cost by economic activity (2004-05 prices)2008-09 1 Agriculture, forestry and fishing 2 Mining and quarrying 3 Manufacturing 4 Electricity, gas and water supply 5 Construction 6 Trade, hotels, transportand communication 7 Financing, insurance, real estate and business services 8 Community, social and personal services 9 GDP at factor cost QE: Quick EstimatesAE: Advance Estimates RE: Revised Estimates -0.1 1.3 4.2 4.9 5.4 7.6 12.5 12.7 6.8 2009-10 2010-11 2010-11 (QE) (AE) (RE) 0.4 5.4 6.6 6.9 6.2 5.8 8.8 8.8 8.3 6.4 5.1 5.7 7.0 8.0 8.1 9.7 11.0 10.3 9.2 10.6 9.9 11.8 5.7 7.0 8.0 8.6 8.5 Source– CSO, MOSPI, Govt. of India Page 7



Moving on to the quarterly estimates for GDP growth for the fourth quarter of 2010-11, we see that although the economy’s performance is still decent at 7.8 percent, an unmistakable downward trend is visible. Quarterly growth estimates show that GDP growth has come down from 9.3 percent in Q1, 2010-11 to 8.9 percent in Q2, 2010-11 to 8.3 percent in Q3, 2010-11 and further down to 7.8 percent in Q4,2010-11. Amongst sectors, the ones that have seen a considerable erosion of growth momentum over the last one year are ‘mining and quarrying’ and ‘manufacturing’. While

in case of the former, the growth figures have come down from 7.1 percent in Q1, 2010-11 to 1.7 percent in Q4, 2010-11, in case of the latter, growth has moderated from 12.7 percent in Q1, 2010-11 to 5.5 percent in Q4, 2010-11. The performance of the ‘agriculture and allied activities’ sector in the fourth quarter has been particularly strong at 7.5 percent. The other sectors that have registered strong growth in Q4, 2010-11 are ‘electricity, gas and water supply’ [7.8 percent], construction [8.2 percent], ‘trade, hotels, transport and communication’ [9.3 percent]and ‘financing, insurance, real estate and business services’ [9.0 percent].Table 2 – Growth in GDP at factor cost by economic activity (2004-05 prices) – Quarterly numbersQ1 2010-11 2.4 7.1 12.7 5.6 7.7 12.6 9.8 8.2 9.3 Q2 Q3 Q4 2010-11 2010-11 2010-11 5.4 9.9 7.5 8.2 6.9 1.7 10.0 6.0 5.5 2.8 6.4 7.8 6.7 9.7 8.2 10.9 8.6 9.3 10.0

10.8 9.0 7.9 5.1 7.0 8.9 8.3 7.8 Source – CSO, MOSPI, Govt. of India

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Agriculture, forestry and fishing Mining and quarrying Manufacturing Electricity, gas and water supply Construction Trade, hotels, transport and communication Financing, insurance, real estate and business services Community, social and personal services GDP at factor cost

A look at quarterly GDP figures by expenditure class shows that growth in private final consumption expenditure is maintained at a robust 8 percent even in thefourth quarter of the fiscal 2010-11. However, what is worrisome is the trend inthe growth numbers for gross fixed capital formation, which shows that year on

year growth has tapered from 17.4 percent in Q1, 2010-11 to just about 0.4 percent in Q4, 2010-11. This is a clear indication of weakness in the investment activity level in the economy and does not bode well for growth in the current year.Table 3 – Growth in GDP at market prices by expenditure (2004-05 prices) – QuarterlynumbersQ1 2010Q2 2010Q3 2010Q4 201011 11 11 11 Private Final Consumption Expenditure 8.9 8.9 8.6 8.0 Government Final Consumption Expenditure 6.7 6.4 1.9 4.9 Gross Fixed Capital Formation 17.4 11.9 7.8 0.4 Change in Stocks 11.7 9.0 5.1 4.6 Valuables 28.0 21.2 18.5 32.3 Exports 10.0 10.7 24.8 25.0 Imports 15.5 11.6 0.4 10.3 GDP at Market Prices 9.4 9.1 9.2 7.7 Source – FICCI computations based on data provided by CSO, MOSPI, Govt. of India

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Page 8



With regard to GDP growth in the year 2011-12, it was noted even in our earlierreport that the initial guidance provided by Ministry of Finance of 9 percent growth is looking increasingly difficult to achieve. With time even the governmenthas come around this view and growth projection for the year 2011-12 has been lowered to 8 to 8.5 percent. It is interesting to note that in FICCI’s most recentEconomic Outlook Survey, results of which were released in May 2011, the medianforecast for GDP growth in the current year comes to 8 percent. The inputs and p

rojections provided by various participating economists in this survey show thatwhile the agriculture and allied activities sector is projected to grow by 3.7percent this year, industry and services sector are poised to grow by 8 percentand 9.2 percent respectively. The key risks to growth in India in the current year are the negative impact of continuous tightening of monetary policy by RBI and a slowdown in global growth due to high international oil prices. Further, although the Indian Meteorological Department has projected a normal monsoon this year, we will have to wait for more updates to get a clearer picture on the spatial distribution of the monsoon.Projected GDP growth [India] in 2011-12 Organisation Morgan Stanley IMF FICCI Nomura DBS CARE Standard Chartered Indicus Dun and Bradstreet ADB Projection in %7.7 7.8 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.1 8.7 8.8 8.8

Source – FICCI Compilation

Projected growth [Sectors] in 2011-12 10 8 6 4 2 0GDP Agriculture and allied activities Industry Services

8 3.7

8

9.2

Source – FICCI Economic Outlook Survey, May 2011

Industrial ProductionThe Central Statistical Organisation (CSO) has revised the base year for the industrial production data series from 1993-94 to 2004-05. The new series also incorporates a much larger set of items2 that reflect the contemporary production activity in the country and is expected to offer a better gauge of the country’s industrial activity. The weighting diagram of the three major sectors under two digit level indices and four different goods sectors under use – based classificationhas also changed to capture the changing structure of economy effectively. Thenew set of weights that would now be followed is given in the following table.

2

Some of the items included in the new series are mobile phones, digital cameras,fruit juices, laptops, new chemical items and processed food.

Page 9



Table 4 – Comparison of weights assigned in the Old and New series of IIP IndicesSectors Old series New series 1993-94 Base Year 2004-05 Base Year Two-digit level Indices 10.47 14.16 79.36 75.53 10.17 10.32 100.00 100.00 Use- based Index 35.57 45.68 9.26 8.83 26.51 15.69 28.66 29.81 5.37 8.46 23.30 21.35 100.00 100.00 Source – CSO, MOSPI, Govt. of India

Mining Manufacturing Electricity General Index Basic goods Capital goods Interme

diate goods Consumer goods Durables Non durables General Index

As the above table shows, in the new series, while the weight of the mining sector has gone up that of the manufacturing sector has gone down. Amongst the use based segments, while basic goods have seen their weight go up substantially, intermediate goods have seen a reduction in the weight assigned for construction ofthe index. Even before data as per the new series for industrial production wasbrought out by CSO, economic analysts had predicted that data as per the new series would provide an upward bias to growth as it would incorporate ‘new fast growing sectors’ of the economy. The new numbers have confirmed this and we see a substantial change in growth performance in 201011 when we compare the results of the new series with the results based on the old series. It is also interesting to

note that the adverse impact on industrial production in the period following the global slowdown is also accentuated as per the new series and this is reflected in the numbers for 2009-10. As the data given in the next table shows, overall industrial production [as per the new series] registered a growth of 8.2 percent in 2010-11. And this is much better than the 5.3 percent growth clocked in 2009-10. Further, a good part of industrial growth in 2010-11 was driven by the manufacturing sector, which recorded a growth of 8.9 percent compared to a growthof 4.8 percent in 2009-10. The other two sectors, mining and manufacturing, however saw their performance going down in 2010-11 compared to 2009-10. Coming to the use-based classification, we see that all sectors, barring consumer durables,saw an improvement in performance in 2010-11 over 2009-10. And among the sectors that saw an improvement in performance, the capital goods sector stands out asits growth improved from 1 percent in 2009-10 to 15 percent in 2010-11. As ment

ioned earlier, these numbers, based on the new industrial production series, reflect a much different and improved performance compared to results based on theold series.

Page 10



Table 5 – Trends in Industrial Production – YOY growth in percent2009-10 Old Series 10.5 9.9 11.0 6.0 7.2 20.9 13.6 6.2 24.6 0.4 New Series 5.3 7.9 4.8 6.1 4.7 1.0 6.0 7.7 17.0 1.4 2010-11 Old New Series Series 7.8 8.2 5.9 5.2 8.2 8.9 5.6 5.5 Use-based industrial groups 6.3 6.0 9.5 15.0 8.8 7.2 7.5 8.3 21.0 14.1 2.2 3.9 2010-Apr Old Series 16.6 12.0 18.0 6.9 9.1 64.1 10.8 11.9 32.14.8 New Series 13.1 9.2 14.5 6.5 Old Series 4.4 2.1 4.4 6.4 2011-Apr New Series6.3 2.2 6.9 6.4

General Index Mining Manufacturing Electricity Basic goods Capital goods Intermediate goods Consumer goods Durables Non-durables

6.7 5.6 7.3 35.5 2.5 14.5 11.9 2.4 3.4 13.8 5.9 2.9 23.3 9.2 3.8 6.8 4.5 2.1 Source – CSO, MOSPI, Govt. of India

Coming now to the growth figures for the month of April 2011, we see that overall industrial production [as per the new series] registered a growth of 6.3 percent. This performance is much weaker compared to a growth of 13.1 percent registered in April 2010. Amongst other sectors a palpable slowdown is noticeable in sectors such as mining and manufacturing with growth slowing from 9.2 percent and

14.5 percent respectively in April 2010 to 2.2 percent and 6.9 percent respectively in April 2011. Amongst the use based industrial groups, a similar streak ofweakness is seen with growth in the capital goods segment, intermediate goods segment and consumer goods segment slowing down from 35.5 percent, 11.9 percent and 13.8 percent respectively in April 2010 to 14.5 percent, 3.4 percent and 2.9 percent in April 2011.Table 6 – Trends in Industrial Production – YOY growth in percent [Old Series]Month/ Year Dec'09 Jan'10 Feb'10 Mar'10 Apr'10 Mining Mfg Electricity General IIP growth 17.95 16.78 15.13 15.55 16.64 Month/ Year Dec'10 Jan'11 Feb'11 Mar'11 Apr'11 Mining Mfg Electricity General IIP growth

11.12 15.34 11.02 12.31 11.97

19.62 17.90 16.11 16.45 18.00

5.42 5.57 7.33 8.33 6.87

5.97 1.76 0.99 0.39 2.06

2.07 5.99 2.58 3.68 10.47 4.03 3.63 6.75 3.65 8.42 7.19 7.78 4.37 6.43 4.38 Source – CSO, MOSPI, Govt. of India

Table 7 – Trends in Industrial Production – YOY growth in percent [New Series]Month/ Year Dec'09 Jan'10 Feb'10 Mar'10 Apr'10 Mining 7.52 11.61 8.17 11.07 9.20Mfg 10.24 14.48 15.30 16.31 14.45 Electricity 5.45 5.55 7.35 8.33 6.53 GeneralIIP growth 9.50 13.33 13.73 14.94 13.08 Month/ Year Dec'10 Jan'11 Feb'11 Mar'11Apr'11 Mining 5.93 1.69 0.95 0.27 2.15 Mfg 8.72 8.09 7.21 10.35 6.88 Electricity5.97 10.49 6.76 7.18 6.44 General IIP growth 8.17 7.52 6.44 8.87 6.30

Source – CSO, MOSPI, Govt. of India

The slow growth of the industrial sector seen in the month of April 2011 is partof a longer trend visible since the close of 2010. As data given in the tablesabove show, industrial production numbers have been weak for some time now and this trend is confirmed irrespective of the data series that onePage 11



chooses to evaluate. In fact, as per the old series, the slowdown in industrialgrowth is more accentuated with growth in IIP being under 5 percent in four of the last five months. If we look at the numbers for the industrial production asper the use based classification, we again see a loss of momentum in industrialproduction in recent months. The only point of departure between data based on the old and the new series is in the reported performance of the capital goods sector. Using the old series, we see that capital goods production has registered

negative growth in three of the last five months with growth in April 2011 stillbeing an anemic 2.53 percent. However, as per the new series, capital goods production registered a growth of 15.4 percent and 14.5 percent in the months of March and April 2011.These figures, which are not all that weak, will have to be monitored going ahead to see if some trend is emerging here.Table 8 – Trends in Industrial Production – Use Based / YOY growth in percent [Old Series]Month/ Year Dec'09 Jan'10 Feb'10 Mar'10 Apr'10 Basic 8.35 11.47 8.53 10.79 9.12Capital 42.89 57.93 46.68 36.00 64.10 Intermediate 23.50 22.23 15.85 13.54 10.82Consumer Total Durable Non-durable 10.45 41.04 2.96 0.42 28.21 -7.02 6.27 29.09-0.83 9.27 32.57 1.50 11.88 32.12 4.83 Source – CSO, MOSPI, Govt. of India

Table 9 – Trends in Industrial Production – Use Based / YOY growth in percent [Old Series]Month/ Year Dec'10 Jan'11 Feb'11 Mar'11 Apr'11 Basic 6.10 7.57 6.03 4.39 5.63 Capital -9.00 -18.06 -18.15 13.56 2.53 Intermediate 6.79 7.75 8.61 6.14 2.37 Consumer Total Durable Non-durable 3.50 19.48 -1.89 12.22 23.88 7.89 11.04 23.46 6.008.16 12.74 6.15 5.92 9.19 4.47 Source – CSO, MOSPI, Govt. of India

Table 10 – Trends in Industrial Production – Use Based / YOY growth in percent [NewSeries]Month/ Year Dec'09 Jan'10 Feb'10 Mar'10 Apr'10 Basic 5.81 8.74 5.61 7.35 6.66 Capital 4.84 14.28 39.41 48.60 35.48 Intermediate 12.44 14.19 10.34 10.97 11.89 Total 15.08 18.61 16.61 12.62 13.82 Consumer goods Durable Non-durable 46.45 0.2057.40 0.01 28.89 8.73 12.96 12.36 23.28 6.75 Source – CSO, MOSPI, Govt. of India

Table 11 – Trends in Industrial Production – Use Based / YOY growth in percent [NewSeries]Month/ Year Dec'10 Jan'11 Feb'11 Mar'11 Apr'11 Basic 7.80 7.68 5.58 6.26 7.31 Capital 20.16 5.35 -4.05 15.40 14.46 Intermediate 8.08 7.39 5.75 1.80 3.43 Total 3.57 8.23 12.13 11.67 2.87 Consumer Durable Non-durable 7.78 0.65 12.49 5.02 18.23 7.49 13.92 9.86 3.80 2.07 Source – CSO, MOSPI, Govt. of India Page 12



It was mentioned even in our earlier report that the rising interest rates in the economy have started having a bearing on industrial activity. Recent news reports indicating increase in inventories with automobile dealers, decline in steelimports, slowdown in cement sales, fewer inquiries for purchase of commercial vehicles and build up of unsold stocks with real estate players are all symptomatic of a slowdown and highlight how consumption and investment demand are responding to the evolving interest rate scenario. Such developments have created a neg

ative perception and depressed the confidence level of corporate India.Table 12 – Projects under implementation stalled and new projects announcedUnder Implementation Stalled Nos Rs Crore 257 281384 293 337359 308 311214 330 318251 338 305545 376 272760 390 291816 389 274366 New Projects Nos 654 760 10471169 1178 993 982 989 Rs Crore 242061 382118 458435 572300 708103 356784 292872252912 Source – CMIE

Qtr ending Jun 2009 Sep 2009 Dec 2009 Mar 2010 Jun 2010 Sep 2010 Dec 2010 Mar 2011

In this context it may be mentioned that once the pace of investments, which iscrucial for overall growth of the economy, loses momentum, it is difficult to br

ing it back. Unfortunately, we may just be standing at the tipping point of sucha situation. The data on projects under implementation stalled and new projectsannounced provided by the Centre for Monitoring the Indian Economy (CMIE) confirms that the pace of investments has taken a beating. As the table given above shows while the total number of projects under implementation stalled has been slowly inching up over the last one year, the total number of new projects announced in a quarter has been falling during the same time. When we view the trends in GDP growth and gross fixed capital formation presented in the earlier sectionalong with the trends in industrial production and new investment intentions ofcorporate India, we reach the conclusion that the health of the economy is not in the best of states and that some urgent action is required to arrest this slowdown in investments. In fact, in FICCI’s most recent Business Confidence Survey, members of corporate India had indicated the following five point strategy for th

e authorities to revitalize industrial and economic growth in the country – Loweinterest rates, particularly the cost of credit to SMEs. Fasten the pace of implementation of infrastructure projects. Check the incessant rise in price of industrial inputs and raw materials. Continue with incentives offered to exporters.Maintain fiscal discipline.

Core SectorThe composition of the core sector has also undergone a change with two new segments being added to the existing list of six industries. These two new segmentsare fertilizers and natural gas and with the addition of these segments the combined weight of core sector in IIP has increased from 27 percent to 37.9 percent.As part of this revision, weights of the existing sectors have also seen some change and

Page 13



base year has also been revised to 2004-05. The new expanded list of sectors that now make up the core sector along with the weights attached is presented in the following table.Table 13 – Segments of the Core SectorSegment Overall Index Coal Crude Oil Natural Gas Refinery Products Fertilizers Steel Cement Electricity Weight in the old series Weight in the new series 26.6837.90 3.22 4.38 4.17 5.21 1.71 2.00 5.94 1.25 5.13 6.68 1.99 2.41 10.17 10.32 So

urce – Office of Economic Adviser, MOC&I, Govt of India

If we look at the numbers for the core sector as per the new series, we see thatthis sector registered a growth of 5.7 percent during the year 2010-11. This growth was lower than the growth of 6.6 percent that was posted in the year 2009-10. At the disaggregated level, the sectors that saw a weaker performance in theyear 2010-11 vis-à-vis 2009-10 are coal, natural gas, fertilizers, cement and electricity. The remaining sectors namely crude oil, refinery products and steel sawan improvement in performance in 2010-11 over 2009-10.Table 14 – Growth in the core sector – New series

2009-10 (Apr-March) Overall Coal Crude Oil Natural Gas Refinery Products Fertili

zers Steel Cement Electricity 6.64 8.12 0.55 44.59 -0.45 12.69 6.05 10.53 6.17

2010-11 (Apr-March)

April 2010

April 2011

5.72 8.50 4.62 -0.30 -2.96 2.84 11.94 5.16 10.97 9.97 54.11 -9.32 2.98 5.34 6.62-0.02 7.83 -1.33 8.89 12.91 4.80 4.52 8.76 -1.06 5.48 6.89 6.79 Source – Office of Economic Adviser, MOC&I, Govt of India

As the data given in the table above shows, performance of the coal sector nose-

dived in 2010-11 with growth plummeting from 8.12 percent in 2009-10 to (–) 0.3 percent in 2010-11. The main reason why production in the coal sector remained almost flat in 2010-11 is the tough stance and stringent environmental norms with regard to coal mining adopted by the Ministry for Environment and Forests. Additionally, law and order problems in select mining areas of the country also had abearing on overall coal production. Just like coal, performance of the natural gas sector also deteriorated with growth slipping from a high of 44.6 percent in2009-10 to just about 10 percent in 2010-11. This dip in growth of natural gas production can be ascribed to the fall in natural gas production in the KG D6 basin operated by Reliance. The performance of the fertilizer sector has also beenlackluster with growth slowing down dramatically from 12.69 percent in 2009-10 to a negative 0.02 percent in 2010-11. This poor state of affairs in thePage 14



fertilizer sector can be attributed to reported shortages in availability and supply of both coal and natural gas. In case of the cement sector, the growth numbers show a drop from 10.53 percent in 2009-10 to 4.52 percent in 2010-11. As mentioned in our earlier report, this drop can be attributed to rising cost of rawmaterials (particularly coal) and difficulties in getting environmental clearances. Slowdown in the execution of government projects in recent months particularly in the five poll bound states has also had an impact on cement sector. Additi

onally, there are reports that the construction sector is facing shortages of labour and this has affected cement dispatches and production. The slowdown in growth in the electricity sector from 6.17 percent in 2009-10 to 5.48 percent in 201011 can mainly be attributed to poor performance in the thermal power generation segment that accounts for nearly 65 percent of the total generation capacity in the country. Thermal power generation suffered a major setback during the lastfiscal due to shortage of coal and delays in providing fuel linkages to thermalplants. A considerable number of power projects were said to get delayed because of uncertainty in the availability and supply of coal. The Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoE&F) categorized 203 coal blocks as 'no go' mining zones andthis has also contributed to supply shortfalls. According to estimates given byMinistry of Coal, these 203 coal blocks could have generated around 1.3 lakh MW

of power annually, thus, helping attain the yearly target for the year. Amongstthe sectors that saw an improvement in performance in 2010-11 over the previousyear, crude oil stands out as growth in this sector jumped from 0.55 percent in2009-10 to 11.94 percent in 2010-11. This growth was driven by companies in theprivate sector and the joint sector and their share in domestic oil production improved from 15.6 percent in 2009-10 to 25.7 percent in 2010-11. Reliance Industries and Cairn India showed exemplary performance and contributed the maximum tothis increase in oil output during the year. The latest numbers for the month of April 2011 show that there has been a perceptible decline in the performance of the core sector with growth dipping from 8.5 percent in April 2010 to 4.62 percent in April 2011. Sectors like natural gas, fertilizers, cement and steel arelargely responsible for this poor performance. A positive take away from April 2011 numbers is the performance of the coal sector, which grew by 2.84 percent.

InflationThe inflation situation in the economy continues to be a cause for concern. Despite large scale tightening of the monetary policy by the RBI and other steps taken by the government, inflation continues to remain close to the double digit mark. Data shows that WPI based headline inflation stood at 10 percent in the year2010-11. This is not only much higher compared to the average inflation rate of3.6 percent seen in 2009-10 but also way above the 5 percent mark considered asthe ‘growth promoting inflation level’ or the ‘normal inflation level’ by the RBI. Latest numbers on inflation are available for the month of May 2011 and these show that headline inflation stood at 9.1 percent in May 2011. Although it is slightlylower than 10.5 percent inflation registered in May 2010, it is still too highas per RBI’s standards. Data on the month on month growth in WPI based inflation also shows that the underlying inflationary pressures in the economy are maintained. The month on month growth in inflation in May 2011 stood at 0.7 percent. Inthe previous two months – March and April – the corresponding figures stood at 0.9 percent and 0.7 percent respectively.Page 15



Looking at inflation data at the disaggregated level throws up an interesting trend. For most part of the year 2010, it was the ‘Primary Articles’ segment which contributed substantially to overall inflation. Further, within the ‘Primary Articles’segment, it was ‘Food Articles’ where inflation was at an uncomfortably high level throughout 2010. However, beginning 2011, we see that the contribution of the other two broad segments, namely ‘Fuel & Power’ and ‘Manufactured Goods’, to overall inflation has gone up swiftly while that of ‘Primary Articles’ has come down. It is howeve

r important to note that while inflation in case of ‘Food Articles’ may be trendingdown, it is still high for any comfort. Further, while inflationary pressures seen in case ‘Fuel and Power’ can be attributed to the increase in prices of items like petrol and coal, the buildup of inflationary pressure in manufactured goods islargely the result of rising prices of raw materials and industrial inputs andwhich are being passed on by manufacturers in the final prices of their products. With inflationary pressures slowly spreading to all the three broad segments of WPI, the RBI has also drawn attention towards inflation getting increasingly generalized. In fact, if we look at the numbers for core inflation, which captures the non-volatile components of WPI, then we see that over time the gap betweenheadline inflation and core inflation has been coming down. In fact in the month of May 2011, core inflation stood at 8.6 percent. This was not only higher com

pared to core inflation in the month of April 2011 (8.0 percent) but also closeto overall inflation rate, which, as previously mentioned, stood at 9.1 percentin May 2011. Further, if we look at the numbers for month on month growth of core inflation, then we see that while in April 2011, the MOM growth stood at 0.1 percent, in May 2011, it went up to 0.5 percent.Table 15 – WPI based Inflation – YOY growth in PercentApr 10 10.9 21.4 20.5 14.3 27.9 38.6 35.4 18.1 17.1 16.2 17.8 6.5 34.6 36.4 13.67.9 18.4 3.4 6.4 9.1 7.8 11.3 7.4 5.1 -0.8 4.9 5.5 3.1 8.8 2.2 2.7 May 10 10.520.4 21.4 15.8 28.4 45.5 36.1 14.8 15.8 14.5 13.7 2.3 25.3 29.9 14.4 7.9 18.1 8.6 5.9 7.1 7.5 11.3 5.7 3.7 0.0 4.7 5.2 3.9 8.4 2.0 2.9 Jun 10 10.3 20.1 21.0 18.9 26.2 39.0 39.7 15.8 18.1 17.3 14.9 2.1 22.1 43.7 13.9 7.9 17.1 8.6 5.6 6.1 7.410.2 4.8 3.4 -1.2 5.2 5.2 2.1 8.2 2.2 2.9 Jul 10 10.0 19.1 18.5 13.2 26.1 31.443.5 15.3 16.2 13.2 23.8 2.2 31.6 63.3 13.3 7.9 15.9 8.6 5.8 7.3 7.3 10.1 4.9 4.

6 0.0 5.0 4.4 3.1 7.9 2.3 3.8 Aug 10 8.9 16.0 15.0 3.3 26.9 27.0 39.9 15.8 15.713.1 22.9 2.5 23.8 59.8 12.5 7.9 16.0 5.0 5.2 4.6 6.8 10.4 4.7 5.1 0.1 4.6 4.3 2.1 7.5 2.4 2.9 Sep 10 9.0 18.2 16.3 12.2 24.1 29.5 32.5 20.8 36.3 35.3 43.8 4.726.8 55.1 11.1 7.9 13.6 5.0 5.0 3.6 6.3 9.8 2.8 5.3 -0.1 4.7 4.6 1.6 7.2 3.4 2.9Oct 10 9.1 18.1 14.6 12.4 21.0 27.4 30.2 25.7 42.3 43.7 34.3 7.5 29.4 64.2 11.03.8 14.6 5.0 5.1 3.8 6.4 10.1 1.4 5.4 -1.4 6.2 4.9 2.5 7.7 3.1 3.0 Nov 10 8.2 14.7 10.1 7.9 18.0 18.9 23.8 25.5 44.7 46.6 40.0 3.1 29.5 69.9 10.3 0.2 14.5 5.05.0 1.1 6.0 11.7 2.2 5.7 -1.8 7.5 5.2 2.1 7.8 2.9 2.7 Dec 10 9.4 18.4 15.1 25.818.3 19.4 37.7 25.4 47.1 47.5 44.1 3.3 30.6 63.7 11.3 0.2 15.9 5.0 5.4 1.4 5.7 12.3 2.1 4.6 -1.4 7.8 5.0 3.0 9.2 3.5 2.7 Jan 11 9.5 18.4 16.7 40.0 13.8 15.7 37.7 26.6 56.2 59.6 38.7 3.5 16.1 24.6 11.4 0.1 16.7 3.6 5.3 -0.1 9.6 13.2 4.6 5.7-2.5 9.2 5.5 2.5 8.5 3.3 2.9 Feb 11 9.5 15.9 11.0 16.1 12.5 12.7 30.8 34.4 89.2101.4 38.5 7.9 17.7 23.6 12.4 3.9 17.1 3.6 6.3 0.0 8.6 15.6 3.8 7.1 -1.2 9.6 6.62.5 11.1 3.4 3.0 Mar 11 9.7 13.4 9.4 18.9 4.4 13.5 20.4 27.3 87.7 103.0 38.7 10.9 15.2 25.8 12.5 13.3 14.7 3.6 7.4 2.4 8.8 18.3 3.6 8.4 -1.5 10.6 7.4 3.7 11.73.2 3.6 Apr 11 8.7 12.0 8.7 17.6 4.7 10.7 16.6 27.3 86.1 101.2 39.0 10.0 7.4 13.0 13.3 15.9 15.4 3.6 6.2 5.7 7.4 14.1 2.0 6.0 -1.2 9.2 6.0 3.2 7.1 2.6 2.2 May 11 9.1 11.3 8.4 17.4 6.4 6.4 16.1 22.3 59.0 68.4 40.0 12.2 11.9 13.1 12.3 13.3 15.9 -1.3 7.3 7.3 7.9 15.9 4.7 7.0 -1.4 8.7 7.1 3.0 7.9 3.2 4.0

All Commodities I Primary Articles (A) Food Articles a. Fruits and Veg b. Milk c. Eggs, meat, fish d. Condiments and spices (B) Non-food articles a. Fibers Rawcotton Raw Jute b. Oil seeds (C) Minerals a. Metallic minerals II Fuel and power(A) Coal (B) Mineral oils (C) Electricity III Manufactured products (A) Food products (B) Beverages, tobacco (C ) Textiles (D) Wood and wood products (E) Paper

and paper products (F) Leather and leather products (G) Rubber and rubber products (H) Chemicals and products (I ) Non-metallic mineral products (J) Basic metal, alloys (K) Machinery and machine tools (L) Transport, equpt and parts



Source – Office of Economic Adviser, MOC&I, Govt of India

Coming now to the segment wise analysis, we see that prices in the ‘Manufactured Goods’ category registered an increase of 6.3 percent in the year 2010-11. The corresponding figure in 2009-10 was 1.8Page 16



percent. Further, as per the latest data available, ‘Manufactured Goods’ segment recorded an inflation of 7.3 percent in May 2011. Looking at the sub-categories within this broad group, we see that sectors like food products, beverages and tobacco, paper and paper products, rubber and plastic products, chemical and chemical products, and basic metals and metal products are seeing significant inflation. As already mentioned, the buildup in prices in many of these industries is largely due to increasing cost pressures which manufacturers are now finding diffic

ult to absorb. In case of the ‘Fuel and Power’, overall inflation in 2010-11 stood at 12.2 percent. The corresponding figure in 2009-10 was (-) 2.1 percent. Further, as per the latest data available, this segment recorded an inflation of 12.3 percent in May 2011. Inflation in this segment is being driven by high and risingprices of items like coal and mineral oils. One may recall that petrol prices in the country are now being regularly aligned with international prices following decontrol of the price mechanism and this is having a bearing on overall inflation in this broad category. Finally, in case of the ‘Primary Articles’ category overall inflation in 2010-11 stood at 17.7 percent. The corresponding figure in 2009-10 was 12.7 percent. Further, in the month of May 2011, this segment recordedan inflation of 11.3 percent. Although over time inflation in this segment has been showing signs of moderation and which have come on the back of inflation goi

ng down in case of food articles, the non-food articles segment has seen a trendof rising inflation. In fact, in May 2011, inflation in the non-food articles segment stood at a high 22.3 percent. High and rising prices of fibers like raw cotton and raw jute are responsible for high inflation seen in case of non-food articles. With regard to outlook for inflation in the months ahead, it may be mentioned that at least in the first half of the current year, overall inflation islikely to remain sticky at the present levels. In fact there are good chances that we may see a jump back to the double digit territory on a few occasions. Andthe factors that lie behind this prognosis are given below. First, international crude oil prices continue to remain high. With developments in the Middle Eastand North Africa region showing no signs of abatement and with OPEC countries in their most recent meeting [June 8, 2011] failing to reach a consensus on increasing their daily oil production quota, there are limited chances of oil prices

coming down in the near future. A slowdown in global growth in 2011 that is widely anticipated could put a lid to international oil prices but any large scale downward revision is being ruled out at this moment. As a result, we can expect inflationary pressures in the ‘Fuel and Power’ category to continue. Moreover, this pressure could further mount once the government announces decontrol of diesel and LPG prices. Second, in the context of inflation in the ‘Fuel and Power’ segment, one must also take note of the rising prices of coal. Recent media reports show that coal production target for 2011-12 has been cut down primarily on account ofrising concerns over environmental issues. Coal shortage of nearly 142 milliontonnes is expected in 2011-12 and our imports this year could be as much as 114million tonnes. Besides power generation, this situation of coal shortage does not augur well even for the price line in case of coal. Third, global food pricesare likely to remain firm in the near term. According to recent reports broughtout by FAO, global food prices would continue to remain a concern in 2011. TheFAO has warned that while the harvest this year would be critical, restoring market balances will take some time. Hence, we can expect upward pressures on foodprices in the global markets to persist. As global food prices have a bearing onfood prices in India, we have another element that is not likely to work in favour of bringing inflation down.Page 17



Fourth, the government has recently announced a hike in the Minimum Support Prices [MSP] for goods like paddy, soybean and corn for the upcoming agricultural season. This increase in MSP will also have a bearing on the trend in food pricesin the near term. There are chances that food inflation may accelerate once thenew crop comes into the market in October 2011. Given the above factors, we expect concerns on inflation to remain on the policy agenda through the year 2011. Further, with policy rate hikes by RBI having failed to deliver on the stated obj

ective of reining in inflationary pressures and bringing down inflationary expectations, it is time that government actively pursues supply side measures to curtail inflation.

Foreign TradeFinancial year 2010-11 was exceptionally good for Indian exporters. With overallexports amounting to US$ 245.5 billion, the sector registered a growth of 37.7percent in 2010-11 over the previous year. And this was a record growth witnessed in exports since independence. Further, when we look at the monthly data for exports for the year 2010-11 as given in the table below, we see that growth in exports has been particularly strong since November 2010. While during the periodApril to October 2010, exports grew at an average rate of 26.8 percent, overall

growth was much higher in the remaining part of the year. In fact, during November 2010 and March 2011, India’s exports grew at a whopping 44.3 percent on average. The onset of recovery in the global economy, which was led by the emerging economies, coupled with continuation of export sops announced by the government aspart of the fiscal packages offered during the crisis period gave the sector the much needed impetus. The support provided by the government in the form of measures such as interest subvention of 2 percent on pre and post shipment export credit was instrumental in reviving the badly hit labor intensive export orientedindustries.Table 16 – Exports and Imports in US$ billion / YOY growth in percentExports Imports Trade balance Petroleum crude & products imports 9.5 8.6 7.8 8.26.9 7.5 8.1 7.4 8.4 9.6 8.2 9.4 10.2 Non-POL items imports 19.3 18.0 18.1 18.320.2 17.6 20.6 17.9 19.7 21.8 23.5 25.3 22.6 Export growth Import growth

2010-Apr 2010-May 2010-June 2010-July 2010-Aug 2010-Sep 2010-Oct 2010-Nov 2010-Dec 2011-Jan 2011-Feb 2011-Mar 2011-Apr

17.7 15.7 19.3 16.0 16.4 18.1 17.7 20.2 25.6 21.4 23.6 29.1 23.8

28.8 26.6 25.9 26.5 27.1 25.1 28.6 25.3 28.2 31.4 31.7 34.7 32.8

-11.0 -10.9 -6.7 -10.5 -10.6 -7.0 -11.0 -5.2 -2.6 -10.0 -8.1 -5.6 -9.0

42.2 27.57 41.5 11.7 21.0 23.9 19.4 35.0 55.2 37.5 49.7 43.9 34.4

48.9 32.61 12.4 22.0 20.6 16.7 10.4 1.4 -0.3 24.4 21.1 17.3 14.1 Source – CMIE

In addition, the strategy of the government to continue exploring new and diverse markets for India’s exports proved to be truly rewarding. Destination wise dataavailable for the period April-December 2010 shows a significant increase in exports to regions like Latin America, Africa and other Asian countries. For a longtime India’s exports had been concentrated in US and the European countries and the crisis provided a good opportunity to explore these other markets. India’s exports to Africa grew byPage 18



44.9 percent, to Asia by 43 percent and to Middle East by 31 percent during April-December 2010 over the corresponding period in 2009-10. Given this exemplary performance in exports, Commerce Minister, Mr. Anand Sharma, recently indicated that India should be able to achieve exports of US$ 500 billion by the year 2013-14. He also pointed out that sectors like engineering goods, petroleum products,gems and jewellery, drugs and pharmaceuticals have done particularly well during the year 2010-11. Engineering goods were India’s top exports in the year 2010-11

amounting to US$ 60 billion and registering a growth of over 80 percent vis-à-visthe previous year. Further, while readymade garments registered a growth of 42.9 percent in the year 2010-11 over 2009-10, gems and jewellery and pharmaceuticals both witnessed a growth of about 15 percent. Petroleum products recorded a growth of 50.5 percent in 2010-11. The strong momentum in exports, seen particularly during the second half of 2010-11, has continued in the year 2011-12 as well.Latest numbers available for the month of April 2011 show that exports in thismonth amounted to US$ 23.8 billion and represented a growth of 34.4 percent overthe same month of the previous year when exports totaled US$ 17.7 billion. While this strong start in the year 2011-12 is encouraging, there are indications that this high growth may not be sustained in the months ahead. And there are bothdomestic and external reasons that make such a forecast likely. In fact in FICC

I’s latest Survey on Exports, which was completed in the month of May 2011, exporters indicated that going ahead their performance could weaken on account of thefollowing factors – Firstly, the interest subvention of 2 percent on pre and postshipment credit announced to support the exporters during the slowdown owing tothe crisis came to an end in March 2011. The exporters now have to pay a higherrate of interest to the banks for obtaining export credit. Further, this is happening at a time when the lending rates are already going up following the increase in the base rates of the banks and this would impact the production cost structure of the exporters. Secondly, the DEPB scheme is finally coming to an end. As this is coming in quick succession following the withdrawal of interest subvention, the exporters are finding themselves under reasonable pressure to maintaincompetitiveness in the global market. Although most recent reports show that the government has agreed to an extension of the DEPB scheme by another three mont

hs i.e. till September 20113, a large section of the exporting community feel that India’s exports are still not robust enough and that such incentives should notbe completely done away with. Exporters are hoping that during the interveningthree month period, the government would evolve an alternate scheme that would support exporters. Thirdly, off late there has been a significant increase in exports from India to Asian countries. However, with inflation emerging as concernin other Asian countries as well and the central banks responding by raising interest rates, the demand in this region is likely to face some moderation. This will certainly have some bearing on India’s exports to the Asian market. Fourthly,rising raw material costs and oil prices is also having a bearing on the exporters. Almost three quarters of the respondents in FICCI’s latest Export Survey saidthat they are facing difficulty due to high raw material prices. The textile sector is facing the heat due to surging cotton and yarn prices, the chemical sector is being impacted due to increasing polymer prices, processed foods segment isfacing the brunt of high fruit and vegetable prices and engineering goods are being affected by high steel3

The DEPB scheme was to come to a close by end June 2011. However, the governmenthas decided to extend it by another three months. Page 19



prices. It is also important to note that rising crude oil prices have increasedthe inland transportation cost and even the international ocean freight rates have moved up recently. While the aforementioned factors are likely to dampen thebuoyancy seen in exports in recent times, one must also take note of the stateof the global economy as this has a bearing on the performance of India’s exports.Latest estimates provided by the IMF show that global growth is expected to moderate in the year 2011. According to the IMF, the global economy is expected to

grow by 4.4 percent in the year 2011. In 2010, the global economy grew by 5.0 percent. The IMF has also indicated that the world trade volume is likely to growby 7.4 percent in 2011 as against a growth of 12.4 percent seen in 2010. The general slowdown in the global economy and global trade volumes projected for 2011is also a downside risk to India’s export performance in the current year. Comingto imports next, we see that in the year 2010-11 our imports totaled US$ 350.4 billion. This represents an increase of about 21.8 percent over the previous year’simports of about US$ 287.6 billion. During the year 2010-11, imports of both petroleum crude and products (POL) and nonpetroleum crude and products (Non POL) went up. While POL imports amounted to US$ 101.7 billion in 2010-11 and posted agrowth of 16.7 percent over the previous year, non-POL imports amounted to US$ 248.7 billion and registered a growth of 24.0 percent over the previous year. Lat

est data available shows that in the month of April 2011 our imports totaled US$32.8 billion and registered a growth of 14.1 percent over the same month of theprevious year when imports amounted to US$ 28.8 billion. In the context of thisrise in imports, it is important to take note of the rising international prices of oil, which have pushed our POL import bill upwards. Otherwise in terms of volume there hasn’t been a significant increase in POL imports. Price of oil in theinternational market has been moving up over the last year with the spot pricefor Brent crude ruling around US$ 113 a barrel – an increase of 45 percent over the previous year – in the last week of May 2011. With developments in the Middle East and North Africa region showing no signs of a let up and with OPEC in its last meeting deciding not to hike the overall quota for oil production, oil pricesare likely to remain firm in the near term. This will continue to put pressure on India’s overall oil import bill. As regards non-oil imports, while a slowdown in

the domestic economy could lead to some moderation in the non-oil import bill,any large respite here can be ruled as prices of commodities other than oil arealso firming up. Another point to take note of is the likely increase in importsof LNG in 2011 due to shortfall in RIL’s KG D6 block. This too would lead to an increase in India’s import bill as imported gas is nearly 3 times as costly compared to gas supplied by Reliance. With exports likely to come under pressure and imports showing little signs of easing in the coming months, the trade balance in2011-12 could widen.

Foreign InvestmentsData on total foreign investment flows into the country shows that in 2010-11, foreign investment flows into India saw a dip of about 17 percent over the previous year. Further, when we look at the two main components of foreign investment,namely foreign direct investment and portfolio investment, we see that the dipis largely on account of a slowdown seen in case of FDI. As the table below shows, FDI flows into India in 2009-10 were to the tune of US$ 37.7 billion and in 2010-11 this figure came down to US$ 27 billion. Portfolio flows, which were to the tune of US$ 32.4 billion in 2009-10, saw a marginal dip to about US$ 31.5 billion in 2010-11.Page 20



Table 17 – Foreign Investment Flows in US$ MillionYear FDI YoY Growth Portfolio Investments 2,760 2,021 979 11,377 9,315 12,492 7,003 27,271 -13,855 32,376 31,471 YoY Growth -26.8 -51.6 1,062.1 -18.1 34.1 -43.9289.4 -150.8 -333.7 -2.8 FII* 1,847 1,505 377 10,918 8,686 9,926 3,225 20,328 -15,017 29,048 29,422 YoY Growth -18.5 -75.0 2,796.0 -20.4 14.3 -67.5 530.3 -173.9 -293.4 1.3 Total Investment (FDI+ Portfolio) YoY Growth

2000-01 4,029 2001-02 6,130 52.1 2002-03 5,035 -17.9 2003-04 4,322 -14.2 2004-056,051 40.0 2005-06 8,961 48.1 2006-07 22,826 154.7 2007-08 34,835 52.6 2008-0937,838 8.6 2009-10(P) 37,763 -0.2 2010-11(P) 27,024 -28.4 * FII is included in Portfolio Investment

6,789 8,151 20.1 6,014 -26.2 15,699 161.0 15,366 -2.1 21,453 39.6 29,829 39.0 62,106 108.2 23,983 -61.4 70,139 192.5 58,495 -16.6 Source – Reserve Bank of India

If we look at the figures for FDI over the last few years, we see that the quantum received in 2010-11 was the lowest in the last four years. Quarterly numbersfurther highlight that FDI flows in the fourth quarter of 2010-11 were the lowest since the third quarter of 2007-08. This clear slowing down in the flow of FDI

funds towards India should be a matter of concern for the authorities. Further,data on sector wise FDI flows into India for the period April to February 2010-11 shows that out of a total of top 25 sectors, 15 sectors saw a dip in FDI flows in 2010-11 compared to flows in the previous year. And out of these 15 sectors, it is sectors like services, construction activities, housing and real estate,telecommunication and agricultural services that have taken the biggest hit interms of inflows compared to corresponding period of the previous year i.e. 2009-10.Table 18 – Sector Wise Foreign Direct Investment Flows in US$ MillionSector 2010-11 (Apr- Feb) US$ million 2009-10 (Apr- Feb) US$ million % change in2010-11 vis-à-vis 2009-10 -21.76 -43.49 30.82 -7.41 -58.97 -61.87 180.12 -12.22 1,706.12 151.70 124.75 -15.50 -13.06 10.83 -57.42 5.54 -30.17 78.88 0.54 -63.46 -36.67 ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ % to total FDI Inflows (Apr- Feb 2010-11) 17.84 7.68 7.19 6.74 6.04 5.84

.69 4.18 3.31 3.06 3.02 2.58 2.21 2.09 1.64 1.58 1.30 1.26 1.15 0.99 0.91 % to total FDI Inflows (Apr- Feb 2009-10) 17.02 10.26 4.12 5.48 11.01 11.29 1.51 3.520.13 0.94 0.99 2.27 1.9 1.39 2.86 1.1 1.38 0.52 0.85 1.96 1.05

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Services sector Telecommunications Automobile Power Housing and real estate Construction Metallurgical industries Computer software / hardware Cement and gypsumproducts Petroleum and natural gas Industrial machinery Trading Information andbroadcasting Chemicals other than fertilizers Hotel and tourism Sea transport Consultancy services Hospital and diagnostic centres Drugs and pharmaceuticals Non-conventional energy Food processing

3,274.02 1,410.14 1,320.38 1,236.76 1,109.33 1,071.64 1,044.37 766.24 607.58 562.38 553.49 473.39 406.37 383.69 301.43 290.46 237.87 231.63 211.53 181.94 166.37

4,184.64 2,495.34 1,009.34 1,335.70 2,703.50 2,810.18 372.83 872.88 33.64 223.43246.27 560.23 467.39 346.19 707.93 275.21 340.65 129.49 210.39 497.91 262.71

↓

↓ ↓

↓ ↓ ↓ ↓

↓ ↓

↓ ↓



↓ ↓ Page 21



22 23 24 25

Electrical equipments Textiles Agricultural services Miscellaneous industries

154.36 108.46 41.75 1,323.01

641.41 139.03 1,317.06 1,003.14

-75.93 -21.99 -96.83 31.89

↓ ↓ ↓

0.84 2.61 ↓ 0.59 0.56 0.23 5.43 ↓ 7.24 4.03 Source – SIA Newsletter, DIPP

As this slowdown in FDI is happening at a time when the country is preparing plans to achieve a target growth of 9 to 9.5 percent over the 12th Plan Period, itbecomes important to get to the core of this issue and take corrective action. FDI flows are an important source of funds for us and have in the past supplemented domestic resources for meeting investment requirements in a whole host of sec

tors. FICCI’s interaction with economists, policy experts and analysts shows thatthe emergence of other competing economies, particularly in the Asian region, could be one of the factors that lie behind this slowdown in FDI flows towards India. While this proposition requires further research, economists and policy experts concur with the view that there are tangible factors linked to India which could also be responsible for making foreign investors a little wary for committing more funds. And amongst these domestic factors, two issues stand out. First is the state of the macro-economy, which is far from comfortable. With inflationremaining stubbornly high, growth slowing down due to aggressive monetary tightening by RBI and the government throwing limited light on how the fiscal deficittarget of 4.6 percent for the current year would be achieved, investors may havebeen prompted to get into a ‘wait and watch’ mode before the domestic situation improves. Second set comprises factors such as environment sensitive policies being

pursued with respect to certain sectors, slow movement on resolving the land acquisition problem and issues of governance and corruption that have been grabbing headlines and showing the country in poor light. As all of these issues have abearing on the perception and confidence level of foreign investors, these mayhave limited FDI inflows into the country. In this context, it may be reiteratedthat completion of the much awaited FDI policy reforms in sectors such as insurance, defence and multi-brand retail would also give a boost to overall FDI flows into the country. Coming to portfolio investments, as already mentioned, in 2010-11 portfolio flows totaled US$ 31.5 billion and were only a tad below US$ 32.4 billion received in the previous year. FIIs, which form a major component of portfolio investments, were to the tune of US$ 29.4 billion in 2010-11 and saw little change from the figure for the previous year which was US$ 29 billion. While portfolio flows stood higher than FDI flows last year, the outlook for funds flows on portfolio account going ahead is also not too encouraging. Given continuous monetary policy tightening by the central bank, interest rates are on an upswing. This coupled with rising prices of raw materials is likely to have an adverse impact on the profit margins of firms across sectors in the year ahead. As this would constrain the capacity of firms to distribute dividends, FIIs are likely to take a conservative view on India and Indian companies as they do their return on investment calculations. Signs of this are already emerging as in a recent survey [June 2011] conducted by the Bank of America Merrill Lynch amongst global fund managers, India was placed amongst the least favourite equity market byAsia-Pacific investors. Additionally, with the RBI contemplating tightening ofrules relating to exit of foreign investors and private equity funds who put their money in Indian firms, investors’ sentiments are expected to further

Page 22



weaken. The re-emergence and intensification of the sovereign debt crisis in Europe and the expected halt of quantitative easing policy in the US by the end ofJune 2011 are also downside factors for portfolio flows for emerging markets including India. It may be mentioned that the Finance Minister of India, Pranab Mukherjee, tried to allay fears of fund managers and foreign institutions investorsfocused on India at recent conference. He urged FIIs to be optimistic about Indian growth story and to take a long term view on its performance rather getting

disturbed with the short term developments and statistics. As a measure of assurance, the Finance Minister told fund managers that the government would continueto take investor friendly policies and has already started the next generationfinancial sector reforms such as widening and deepening of the Indian securitiesmarkets, liberalizing the policy on foreign capital flows, strengthening the regulatory and other institutional architecture and reducing transaction cost in the securities markets. These announcements however did little to reduce concernsamongst fund managers, who are looking for better management of the macro-economy and forward movement on crucial economic reforms.

Forex ReservesIndia’s foreign exchange reserves increased as we moved ahead in fiscal 2010-11. A

s data given in the table below shows, while in April 2010, India’s foreign exchange reserves totaled US$ 279.6 billion, in September 2010 this figure had increased to US$ 292.9 billion. Most recent numbers show that the country’s foreign exchange reserves have shot up further crossing the US$ 300 billion mark. With this level of reserves, India is amongst the ten largest holders of foreign exchange reserves in the world.Table 19 – Foreign Exchange Reserves in US$ MillionApril 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 Aug 2010 Sept 2010 Oct 2010 Nov 2010 Dec2010 Jan 2011 Feb 2011 March 2011 April 2011 Forex Reserves 279,633 273,544 275,710 284,183 283,142 292,870 297,956 292,389 297,334 299,224 301,592 305,486 313,671 Source – Reserve Bank of India

The increasing size of our foreign exchange reserves has drawn attention of the

policymakers. As mentioned in our previous report, just some time back, Dr. Kaushik Basu, Chief Economic Advisor, Ministry of Finance, had raised the question of India to consider having a Sovereign Wealth Fund. In more recent times, a fewindependent analysts have opined that a part of these huge reserves be deployedto import commodities which are or could be in short supply in the economy. Thislast suggestion was made in context of managing the stubbornly high inflation by bridging the demandsupply mismatch.Page 23



Exchange RateMost recent trends in the movement of the INR vis-à-vis major vehicle currencies show that the Indian Rupee has depreciated against all the major global currencies. As the data given in the table below shows, the Rupee depreciated against theUS$ by 1.2 percent between April 2011 and May 2011. During the same time period, while the value of the Rupee went down against the Pound Sterling by 1 percent, Rupee’s depreciation against the Japanese Yen was of a much larger magnitude – 3.8

percent. Against the Euro too we saw the Rupee becoming a little weak and depreciating by about 0.4 percent between April 2011 and May 2011.Table 20 – Rupees per unit of foreign currency (Yearly/monthly average basis)USD 40.3561 51.2287 45.4965 44.4995 45.7865 46.5443 46.8373 46.5679 46.0616 44.4583 45.0183 45.1568 45.3934 45.4538 44.9895 44.3681 44.9048 1.2 Pound Sterling 80.8054 72.9041 68.4360 68.2384 67.1747 68.6952 71.5150 72.9736 71.6578 70.3381 71.8498 70.4635 71.5394 73.2921 72.7033 72.7215 73.4310 1.0 Japanese Yen 0.4009 0.5251 0.5018 0.4763 0.4969 0.5122 0.5343 0.5465 0.5454 0.5428 0.5457 0.5425 0.5496 0.5503 0.5502 0.5334 0.5535 3.8 Euro 62.6272 66.9207 61.7653 59.6648 57.655356.9016 59.7636 59.9700 60.0592 61.7153 61.4981 59.6652 60.5178 62.0904 63.031464.2269 64.4829 0.4

March, 2008 March, 2009 March, 2010 2010-11 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 Aug 2010 Sept 2010 Oct 2010 Nov 2010 Dec 2010 Jan 2011 Feb 2011 Mar 2011 April 2011 May 2011 MOM growth in May 2011

Source – Reserve Bank of India

One of the factors that affect the competitiveness of India’s exports vis-à-vis exports from other countries is the relative movement in the national exchange rates. In the following table, we provide the movement in the national currencies ofselect countries vis-à-vis the US$. The data shows that between April 2011 and May2011, majority of the currencies analyzed have depreciated against the US$. Theonly exception is the Indonesian Rupiah, which has appreciated against the US$over the same time period. The Malaysian Ringgit did not see any movement agains

t the US$ during the period under study. Further, amongst all currencies that have weakened against the US$ during this period, it is the South African Rand that lost the most – a depreciation of almost 2.1 percent. This is followed by the Brazilian Real (depreciated by 1.3 percent) and the Indian Rupee (depreciated by 1.1 percent). Both the Pakistani Rupee and the Thai Baht have lost about 0.6 percent each against the US$ over the two month – April/May 2011 – period.

Page 24



Table 21 - Exchange rate vis-à-vis USD for selected countries (monthly average basis)Brazilian Real 2010-11 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 Aug 2010 Sept 2010 Oct 2010 Nov 2010 Dec 2010 Jan 2011 Feb 2011 Mar 2011 April 2011 May 2011 M-o-M growth in May 2011 1.76 1.80 1.81 1.77 1.76 1.72 1.68 1.71 1.70 1.67 1.67 1.661.59 1.61 1.3 Indian Rupee 44.50 45.77 46.56 46.87 46.57 46.04 44.42 44.88 45.17 45.38 45.46 44.99 44.39 44.90 1.1 Indonesian Rupiah 9027.33 9183.39 9148.36 90

53.80 8971.76 8975.11 8928.05 8931.61 9024.20 9036.00 8916.53 8760.48 8651.30 8556.15 -1.1 Malaysian Ringgit 3.21 3.26 3.26 3.21 3.15 3.11 3.10 3.11 3.13 3.06 3.04 3.03 3.01 3.01 0.0 Pakistani Rupee 83.99 84.38 85.37 85.60 85.68 85.86 86.0185.60 85.78 85.76 85.38 85.40 84.68 85.22 0.6 South African Rand 7.35 7.65 7.637.54 7.30 7.13 6.91 6.96 6.84 6.92 7.17 6.92 6.73 6.87 2.1 Thai Baht 32.28 32.37 32.48 32.34 31.78 30.82 29.97 29.85 30.11 30.58 30.71 30.37 30.04 30.24 0.7

Source – International Monetary Fund

Regarding the outlook for the Indian Rupee against the US$ in the months ahead,the majority view amongst analysts and currency strategists is one of depreciation. This bearish view with regard to the Indian Rupee is based on two factors. F

irst is the likely deterioration in the current account due to moderation in exports, continuous rise in imports and a possible slowdown in invisible receipts.Second is the expected slowdown in funds flows into India. While FDI flows intothe Indian market are already on a slowdown mode, FII flows too are showing signs of anxiety over the evolving macro-economic situation with inflation remaininghigh and growth slowing down.

Money and BankingData on money supply growth shows that broad money (M3) registered a growth of 15.9 percent in the year 2010-11. This growth was only a tad lower when comparedto a growth of 16.9 percent registered in the year 2009-10. However, it is important to note that growth in money supply in 2010-11 was considerably weak when compared to the growth of nominal GDP that stood at 19.1 percent. Money supply gr

owth in 2010-11 was driven by growth seen in bank credit to the commercial sector [20.6 percent]. The other important component of money supply, net foreign exchange of assets of the banking sector, registered a moderate growth of just about 7.4 percent in 2010-11. Latest numbers available show that year on year growthin money supply in the period up to May 21, 2011 was 16.8 percent. Growth in the corresponding period [up to May 22, 2010] in the previous year was 15.1 percent. Amongst sources of money supply, while bank credit to the commercial sector registered a growth of 21.3 percent in the period up to May 21, 2011, net bank credit to the government went up by 17.9 percent. Net foreign exchange assets of the banking sector registered a growth of 7.6 percent during the same time period.

Page 25



Table 22 - Sources of Money Supply (percentage change over previous year)2009-10 M3 Net Bank Credit to Government Bank Credit to Commercial Sector Net Foreign Exchange Assets of Banking Sector Government's currency liabilities to thepublic Banking sectors net non-monetary liabilities other than time deposits 16.9 30.7 15.8 -5.2 12.1 -1.1 2010-11 15.9 18.2 20.6 7.4 11.7 26.9 9-Apr-11 17.0 15.2 21.1 8.5 11.7 17.9 23-Apr-11 17.6 17.2 21.0 9.4 10.4 18.9 7-May-11 16.9 17.421.7 9.4 10.4 26.6 21-May-11 16.8 17.9 21.3 7.6 9.4 23.3 Source – CMIE

A look at the components of money supply reveals that the year on year growth inthe period up to May 21, 2011 in both demand deposits with banks and other deposits with RBI has been negative. Currency with the public and time deposits withbanks – the two main components of money supply – however have seen a reasonable growth of 16.5 percent and 19.7 percent respectively.Table 23 - Components of Money Supply (percentage change over previous period)2009-10 Currency with the public Demand deposits with banks Time deposits with banks Other deposits with RBI 15.33 21.96 16.36 -31.08 2010-11 19.11 -0.59 18.15-2.58 09-Apr-11 18.5 4.25 18.8 -55.25 23-Apr-11 18.61 0.73 19.99 -6.92 07-May-1117.62 -0.32 19.47 -18.62 21-May-11 16.52 -1.46 19.69 -21.52 Source – CMIE

Coming now to trends in bank credit and deposit growth, we see that the year onyear growth in nonfood credit in the period up to May 21, 2011 has been almost 22.1 percent. This is higher than the credit growth target of 19 percent set by the RBI for the current year. Growth in deposits in the period up to May 21, 2011has been of the order of 17.4 percent and is in line with RBI target growth of17 percent for the current year. These numbers indicate that the trend seen in the previous year – of deposit growth lagging credit growth – continues in the current financial year. Of course the growth rate in deposits has picked up in recentmonths and to that extent eased some pressure on the banks as they worked hard to maintain their margins. Given the present credit and deposit situation, bankshave been complaining of a tight liquidity situation. There has also been an evident increase in the borrowing of banks under the LAF repo facility over the past few weeks. While the banks on average borrowed Rs. 20,742 crore everyday from

RBI during the month of April 2011, the average borrowing amount per day went upto almost Rs. 50,000 crore in the month of May 2011. With advance tax paymentsfor corporates due for the first quarter of fiscal 2011-12 and further tightening of monetary policy looking likely, banks have stepped up their efforts to raise more funds. This is getting reflected in the higher borrowings seen under theLAF repo facility and higher interest rates being offered for issuance of certificate of deposits [CDs].Table 24 – Growth in Bank Credit and Deposits of SCBs (in percent)Bank Credit Food Credit Non food credit Aggregate Deposits 2010-11 21.4 32.6 21.2 15.9 9-Apr-11 21.97 3.69 22.24 17.2 23-Apr-11 21.89 -9.07 22.36 17.9 7-May-1122.5 12.16 22.67 17.1 21-May-11 22.28 34.72 22.08 17.4 Source – CMIE Page 26



The tightness in the loanable funds market however is expected to ease in the months ahead. And this is on account of both an expected slowdown in the credit growth rate and an improvement in the deposit growth rate. With RBI continuing with its tight monetary policy stance, interest rates in the economy have been going up and have reached a stage where these have started hurting both investment and consumption demand. Already many corporates have indicated that it is becoming difficult to fund investment plans at current interest rates. Also, with deman

d for automobiles, commercial vehicles and realty moderating, one can expect credit growth to taper off in the coming months. As regards deposits, in the year 2010-11 we saw that deposit growth was weak in the first half of the year and then it started going up as banks increased the card rates. Data available for thecurrent year shows that the uptick in deposit growth continues and with depositrates expected to remain at current levels and the outlook for the equity marketbeing not too encouraging, banks should see greater mobilization of deposits.

Fiscal SituationThe provisional data for fiscal indicators of the central government for the year 2010-11 was released by the Controller General of Accounts during the first week of June 2011. These provisional estimates for various fiscal variables show a

definite improvement over the revised estimates (RE), with a more than anticipated rise in revenue collection and reduction in expenditure during 2010-11. Thestriking feature of the new estimate is the reduction in fiscal deficit number compared to the revised estimate given during presentation of the union budget. This depicts the comfortable fiscal position the country enjoyed in the previousfiscal. A look at receipt trends of the central government shows that the totalreceipts increased by almost 37 percent in 2010-11 over 2009-10. While revenue receipts, the major chunk under the receipts head, increased by 38.7 percent, non- debt capital receipts, the other component, showed only a marginal increase of7 percent during 2010-11 over the previous year. Again, within revenue receipts, though non- tax revenue contributed less than tax revenue in absolute terms, the former showed a growth rate of a whopping 90.5 percent. This was due to the huge amount of money government raised through auction of 3G and BWA spectrum.

Table 25 - Trends in Receipt and Expenditure of Central Government: 2010-11 (Rs.Crore)Fiscal Indicators Revenue Receipts Tax Revenues (Net) Non Tax Non-Debt Capital Receipts Recovery of Loans Other Receipts Total Receipts Non-Plan Expenditure OnRevenue Account Interest Payments On Capital Account Plan Expenditure On RevenueAccount On Capital Account Total Expenditure BE RE Provisional Diff between Actuals Growth in 102010-11 2010-11 2010-11 Provisional and RE 2009-10 11 over 09-10 682212 783833 794277 10444 572811 38.66 534094 563685 572790 9105 456536 25.46148118 220148 221487 1339 116275 90.49 45129 31745 35599 3854 33194 7.25 5129 9001 12752 3751 8613 48.06 40000 22744 22847 103 24581 -7.05 727341 815578 82987614298 606005 36.94 735657 821552 821569 17 721096 13.93 643599 726729 726767 38657925 10.46 248664 240757 234739 -6018 213093 10.16 92058 94803 94802 -1 6317150.07 373092 395024 377350 -17674 303391 24.38 315125 326928 312363 -14565 253884 23.03 57967 68096 64987 -3109 49507 31.27 1108749 1216576 1198919 -17657 1024487 17.03 Source – Budget Documents and Controller General of Accounts, Governmentof India Page 27



Further, within tax revenue, it is the customs duty which showed a robust collection of 63.29 percent in 2010-11 over 2009-10 followed by excise duty (33.54), corporation tax (22.35) and service tax (22.06).Table 26 – Trends in Major Taxes of Central Government: 2010-11 (Rs. Crore)Major Taxes Tax revenue (net) Excise duties Customs duty Corporation tax Taxes on income Service tax BE RE Provisional Actuals Growth in 2010-11 over 2010-11 2010-11 2010-11 2009-10 2009-10 534094 563685 572790 456536 25.46 132000 137778 13

8372 103621 33.54 115000 131800 136058 83324 63.29 301331 296377 299422 244725 22.35 128066 149066 139148 132315 5.16 68000 69400 71309 58422 22.06 Source – Budget Documents and Controller General of Accounts, Government of India

Coming next to the trend in expenditure of central government, it may be noted that the total expenditure has grown by 17 percent in 2010-11 over 2009-10, muchless than the 37 percent growth in receipts. Within overall expenditure, while the plan expenditure grew at 24.4 percent, non-plan expenditure showed an increase of 13.9 percent. Excellent tax collection, buoyant non tax revenue and an effective cut down on expenditure growth helped the government to bring down the fiscal deficit for the year 2010-11 to 4.7 percent – a figure much lower than the revised estimate of 5.1 percent announced by the finance minister in his 2011-12 bu

dget speech. This is again much lower than the budget estimate (BE) of 5.5 percent announced during the 2010-11 budget speech. The revenue deficit for the fiscal 2010-11 is 3.1 percent and the primary deficit for the same year is 1.7 percent. These are lower than the revised estimate of 3.4 percent and 2 percent respectively.Table 27 – Deficit Indicators of Central Government: 2010-11 (Rs. Crore)Deficit Indicators BE 2010-11 RE 201011 Provisional 2010-11 Difference between Provisional and RE -31955 -24991 -25937 RE as % of GDP Provisional as % of GDP

Fiscal Deficit Revenue Deficit Primary Deficit

381408 276512 132744

400998 269844 160241

369043 244853 134304

5.1 3.4 2.0

4.7 3.1 1.7

Source – Budget Documents and Controller General of Accounts, Government of India

Though the deficit for 2010-11 gives a sense of relief as far as central government finance go, this moment of elation may just be short lived. Given the evolving economic situation, there is now a wide acceptance amongst economists and public finance experts that during the current year it will be a tough task for thegovernment to rein in the fiscal deficit at the targeted budget estimate of 4.6percent. And if the figures for central government finances for the month of April 2011 are any indication, then the process of fiscal deterioration may well have started already. To get a better sense of the evolving fiscal situation we have compared the figures for April 2011 with the figures for April 2010. As thedata given in the following table shows, total expenditure of the central government in the month of April 2011 stood at Rs. 87,130 crore. In April 2010, totalgovernment expenditure was to the tune of Rs. 67,226 crore. Further, under the expenditure head, we see that it is the non-plan expenditure that has ballooned from Rs. 48,206 crore in April 2010 to Rs. 70,123 crore in April 2011.Page 28



While the government has seen a surge in expenditure in April 2011, total receipts have shown a slip with large scale moderation noticeable in (net) tax receipts.Table 28 – Receipt and Expenditure of Central Government: April 2011 and April 2010 (Rs. Crore)Fiscal Indicators Revenue Receipts Tax Revenues (Net) Non Tax Non-Debt Capital Receipts Total Receipts Non-Plan Expenditure On Revenue Account Interest Payments

On Capital Account Plan Expenditure On Revenue Account On Capital Account TotalExpenditure Apr-11 6880 3774 3106 5589 12469 Apr-10 12979 10062 2917 254 13233Difference between Apr 2011 and Apr 2010 -6099 -6288 189 5335 -764

70123 48206 21917 53087 47496 5591 15078 14134 944 17036 710 16326 17007 19020 -2013 14408 16121 -1713 2599 2899 -300 87130 67226 19904 Source - Controller General of Accounts, Government of India

The early trends seen in the revenue – expenditure mix also find a reflection in the deficit position of the central government for the month of April 2011. The fiscal deficit for the month of April 2011 has overshot the figure for fiscal deficit of April 2010 by a huge margin. The same trend is seen in other deficit ind

icators also. It may also be noted that the fiscal deficit in April 2011 constituted about 18 percent of the total estimated fiscal deficit for the year 2011-12. The situation was better during the corresponding period of the previous fiscal. A similar difference is seen in case of revenue deficit and primary deficit.Table 29 - Trends in Deficit Indicators of Central Government: April 2011 Vs April 2010 (Rs. Crore)Deficit Indicators Fiscal Deficit Revenue Deficit Primary Deficit Apr-11 74661 60615 59583 BE 2011-12 Apr-11 as % Apr-10 BE 2010-11 Apr-10 as % of of BE BE 412817 18.09 53993 381408 14.16 160417 37.79 50638 276512 18.31 144831 41.14 39859 132744 30.03 Source- Controller General of Accounts, Government of India

If the fiscal trend seen in April 2011 continues – a likely situation – then as mentioned earlier, the government will face difficulties in keeping the deficit figu

res under control. The fiscal target for the year 2011-12 was pegged at 4.6 percent anticipating higher revenues and moderation in expenditure by the government. However, possibilities of higher receipts in 2011-12 look increasingly ambitious. All the main components under the receipts head - tax, non-tax and non-debtcapital receipt - may show a moderation in the current fiscal. With no major taxchanges announced in the budget for 2011-12, the government was banking on strong growth in the economy and industry, good corporate performance and a rise inwages and salaries to translate into high growth in tax collections. Now that there are clear indications of an economic and industrial slowdown and fiscal strains building up in the corporate sector, even senior government functionaries have started doubting the feasibility of sticking to the budgeted targets for revenues.Page 29



Union Finance Minister, Mr. Pranab Mukherjee, shared these concerns recently while addressing senior officials of the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC). He warned that the task of meeting the revenue target is very challenging andwill require sustained and strategic efforts throughout the financial year. Further, CBEC Chairman, SD Majumdar, also hinted that they will have to see if a midcourse revision in revenue targets is required. Earlier, Finance Secretary, Sunil Mitra had indicated that amidst slowdown in tax collections, the Finance Minis

try may go slow on disbursal of pending income tax refunds. While this is the case with tax collections, government’s other revenue raising sources like auction of the remaining 3G spectrum and disinvestment of select PSUs may also not fetchanticipated revenues as there may not be enough takers given the tough market conditions. On the expenditure front, government has estimated a very small increase of 3.4 percent in its overall expenditure for the year 2011-12. In all probability this estimate will be exceeded in the current year mainly because of expenditures under the heads of MGNREGA, food, petroleum and fertilizer subsidy. While increased wage rate will push up the MGNREGA expenditure, international priceof oil and fertilizer will push up petroleum and fertilizer subsidy. Also, the food subsidy bill will see a rise with the introduction of Food Security Bill andthe associated high cost that would have to be incurred for collecting and stor

ing much larger amounts of foodgrains. Considering this mismatch in revenue – expenditures, some analysts fear that the fiscal deficit this year may eventually goup to anywhere between 6 to 7 percent. The only way to rectify the expected dent in revenue collections is to improve efficiency in tax collections. The tax departments of the government should leverage information technology tools and evolve a process wherein refunds become automatic. Further, steps should be taken to widen the tax base in the country. Today, just about 3 percent of the people in the country file tax returns. Efforts of the government should be geared towards increasing this base of tax payers and curbing tax evasion. This would automatically lead to a jump in tax revenues. Further, the government should go aheadwith reforms like decontrolling diesel and LPG prices to augment revenue.

Page 30



Performance of the Corporate Sector – Q4, 2010-11Data made available by CMIE on corporate sector performance shows that in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010-11, corporate India turned out a good performance both in terms of sales and profits. Such a performance is particularly noteworthyas it came at a time when overall expenses are going up at a fast clip. As datagiven in the following table shows, net sales of ‘All Industries’ in the fourth quarter of 2010-11 registered a growth of 23.5 percent. This is the highest growth i

n net sales that we have seen in the last eight quarters. Further, while firms from the manufacturing sector saw an increase of 22.26 percent in net sales in the last quarter of 2010-11, companies from the services (other than financial) sector saw sales going up by 27.46 percent. Further, within the manufacturing sector, growth in sales has been particularly strong in sectors such as textiles, cement, steel and transport equipment. Performance of the food and beverages sector and the chemicals sector lagged the average for the manufacturing sector as awhole with food and beverages sector seeing net sales going up by about 8.5 percent in Q4, 2010-11.Table 1 – Performance of the Corporate Sector – Growth in Net Sales, Total Expensesand Profits (%)2009-10 Q1 All industries Manufacturing Food & beverages Chemicals Textiles Non-

metallic mineral products Cement Metals & metal products Steel Transport equipment Services (other than financial) All industries Manufacturing Food & beveragesChemicals Textiles Non-metallic mineral products Cement Metals & metal productsSteel Transport equipment Services (other than financial) All industries Manufacturing Food & beverages Chemicals Textiles Non-metallic mineral products CementMetals & metal products Steel Transport equipment Services (other than financial) 0.03 -8.83 6.83 13.68 15.94 5.96 8.00 -35.39 -39.76 16.96 10.75 2.98 -6.81 -2.14 7.61 13.71 -6.97 -3.12 -30.85 -35.42 21.45 11.74 4.04 -26.52 -23.43 6.68 55.98 46.11 45.23 -60.51 -68.98 -18.04 13.76 Q2 -6.83 -14.89 -7.28 -5.15 13.51 2.54-12.06 -31.62 -36.87 -1.81 3.25 -4.52 -13.02 -13.09 -7.65 10.98 -3.53 -15.66 -25.79 -30.51 -3.90 3.05 -2.44 -23.29 -25.43 25.89 57.87 12.57 11.07 -67.90 -80.44237.97 7.92 Q3 5.14 7.25 -3.23 3.27 13.84 8.68 -11.23 -5.77 -14.05 50.26 3.70 3.89 3.75 -8.60 -0.34 10.37 1.93 -15.91 -2.49 -10.28 33.65 2.50 18.22 68.56 4.48

28.42 58.73 22.18 14.50 32.72 23.79 12.76 Q4 Q1 Net sales (%) 15.95 15.67 24.2922.72 58.30 31.79 19.85 14.77 17.61 13.39 6.66 21.12 -4.88 -6.51 17.44 19.34 10.53 16.70 86.02 61.52 3.67 10.44 Total expenses (%) 11.78 13.19 20.95 19.16 49.6742.32 5.16 15.02 18.58 18.51 0.40 39.08 -3.60 5.00 11.26 15.30 5.25 12.58 91.7245.70 -1.60 12.15 PBDIT (%) 33.34 16.45 168.12 45.03 48.79 6.43 149.36 9.54 9.11 -18.36 8.64 -12.29 -8.78 -31.22 2407.02 114.6 170.58 145.81 201.70 6.95 3.26 2010-11 Q2 17.76 19.39 41.16 17.48 7.05 32.38 0.54 13.41 15.47 35.25 19.51 18.0618.63 36.85 30.87 11.90 40.20 8.79 6.82 3.83 26.01 21.39 Q3 17.81 15.67 23.59 17.28 22.78 26.85 26.63 11.55 13.61 22.78 21.80 16.56 14.48 23.76 18.39 24.98 20.70 59.19 8.42 9.09 19.22 24.92 Q4 23.50 22.26 8.49 17.86 24.65 30.75 43.54 28.8825.28 22.94 27.46 23.52 21.68 8.55 21.27 23.46 42.36 48.12 32.68 30.06 17.88 31.29

43.76 22.39 24.78 130.66 21.24 23.14 1.63 -10.08 19.02 283.30 40.54 14.56 -24.0612.59 23.71 -23.02 6.97 31.71 -47.07 -39.46 35.30 129.44 10.64 32.93 260.85 5.37 32.59 130.60 59.49 15.31 17.40 17.00 38.63 Source – Prowess Database, CMIE

Page 31



Looking at the numbers for total expenses, we see that expenses for ‘All Industries’ went up by 23.52 percent in Q4, 2010-11. This growth is again the highest seenin last four quarters. Further, while the manufacturing sector saw total expenses rise by 21.68 percent in Q4, 2010-11, services (other than financial) saw an increase of 31.29 percent. Further, within the manufacturing sector, the increasein total expenses in the quarter under review was particularly high in sectorssuch as cement [48.12 percent] and steel [30.06 percent]. It the context of rise

in total expenses for industry, it may be mentioned that while firms from the manufacturing sector are facing significant pressure on account of interest expenses, cost of power and price of industrial inputs, firms from the services (other than financial) are stressed on account of sizable increase in interest expenses as these registered an increase of 367 percent in the fourth quarter of 2010-11.Table 2 – Performance of the Corporate Sector – Growth in Total Expenses (%)Total expenses (%) Raw materials, stores, spares & purchase of finished goods (%) Mar-10 Mar-11 12.30 24.61 19.16 27.57 -11.16 20.93 Salaries and wages (%) Power & fuel (%) Interest expenses (%)


Mar-10 11.78 20.95 -1.60

Mar-11 23.52 21.68 31.29

Mar-10 6.52 -1.37 2.63

Mar-11 15.37 12.78 15.19

Mar-10 Mar-11 Mar-10 Mar-11 14.46 23.92 -14.29 30.63 4.59 23.01 -12.49 20.79 -0.55 -23.85 -70.86 366.19 Source – Prowess Database, CMIE

Despite the strong growth in total expenses, the overall profit levels of firms

are holding. Using PBDIT as one of the indicators of profits, we see that for ‘AllIndustries’ PBDIT went up by 24.78 percent in the fourth quarter of 2010-11. Further, while for the manufacturing sector, the increase in PBDIT in Q4, 2010-11 was to the tune of 23.14 percent, for the services (other than financial), growthin PBDIT was much higher at 38.63 percent. It is also interesting to note that while overall expenses have gone up significantly in the case of cement and steelsectors, these sectors have managed to see a good fourth quarter in terms of profits.Growth in Net Sales (%)30 20 10 0 Q1 09-10 Q2 09-10 Q3 09-10 Q4 09-10 Q1 10-11 Q2 10-11 Q3 10-11 -10 -20 Q4 10-11 40 30 20 10 0 Q1 09-10 Q2 09-10 Q3 09-10 Q4 09-10 Q1 10-11 Q2 10-11 Q3 10-11 -10 -20 Q4 10-11

Growth in Total Expenses (%)



Page 32



Performance of the Textiles sector – Q4, 2010-11Textiles: Growth in Net Sales and Total Income30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Q1 09-10 Q2 09-10 Q3 09-10 Q4 09-10 Q1 10-11 Q2 10-11 Q3 10-11 Q4 10-11

Net sales grew by 24.7 percent in Q4, 2010-11. In Q4, 2009-10, growth in net sales was of the order of 17.6 percent. Export income to net sales ratio touched 5

percent in Q4, 2010-11. In Q4, 2009-10, this figure was close to 2.7 percent.

Net Sales Total income

Textiles: Growth in Total Expenses40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 Total Expenses Raw material Stores spares & purchase of finished goods Salaries & wages Power & Fuel Interest Expenses

Cost pressures in the sector are building up. Total expenses went up by 23.5 percent in Q4, 2010-11. In Q4, 2009-10, the increase in total expenses was of the order of 18.58 percent. The increasing pressure on costs is led by expenses on power and fuel and expenses on other raw materials. Outlays on interest cost and w

ages and salaries have also jumped in Q4, 201011.

Q409-10

Q410-11

Textiles: PAT / Total Income14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 Q1 09-10

PAT grew by 48.4 percent in Q4, 2010-11.11.6 8.6 7.4 7.4 9.1 6.7 5.4 6.9

Margins have improved in the last quarter of 2010-11.

Q2 09-10

Q3 09-10

Q4 09-10

Q1 10-11

Q2 10-11

Q3 10-11

PAT /Total Income

Sector UpdatesTextile park to come up in Punjab. A 1700 acre textile park is coming up in theMalwa region with world class facilties. DEPB extended by three months. DEPB scheme has been extended by three months and will now be available till September 2011. In the interim government will work out an alternate duty neutralization scheme for exporters. Government for greater FDI in specialty textiles. Governmentis contemplating steps to enhance FDI flows in segments like technical textiles. Government allows additional cotton exports. Government has allowed exports ofan additional one million bales of cotton in the current season.Page 33

Q4 2010-11





Performance of the Cement sector – Q4, 2010-11Cement: Growth in Net Sales and Total Income50 40 30 20 10 0 Q1 09-10 Q2 09-10 Q3 09-10 Q4 09-10 Q1 10-11 Q2 10-11 Q3 10-11-10 -20 Q4 2010-11

Net sales have seen a strong performance in the second half of 201011 Net salesregistered a growth of 43.5 percent in Q4, 2010-11. In Q4, 2009-10, net sales ha

d dipped by 4.9 percent.

Net Sales

Total income

Cement: Growth in Total Expenses100 80 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60 Total Expenses Raw material Stores spares & purchase of finished goods Salaries & wages Power & Fuel Interest Expenses

Overall expenses have shot up in Q4, 2010-11. The growth in total expenses in Q4, 2010-11 was to the tune of 48.1 percent. In Q4, 2009-10, total expenses had de

clined by 3.6 percent. Evident increase in expenses across all segments. Interest costs and raw material expenses are hitting the industry hard.

Q409-10

Q410-11

Cement: PAT/Total Income20.0 18.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 Q1 09-10

18.3 15.4 12.6 14.3 12.6 5.9 3.1Q2 09-10 Q3 09-10 Q4 09-10 Q1 10-11 Q2 10-11 Q3 10-11 Q4 2010-11

12.5

PAT registered a growth of 26 percent in Q4, 2010-11. Profit margin has shown animprovement in Q4, 2010-11. However, at these levels, margins are still low compared to what was seen in 2009-10.

PAT/Total Income

Sector UpdatesCement prices dip on weak demand, onset of monsoon. Top dealers have reported adecline in prices across regions in June 2011. Demand from infrastructure and realty sector expected to moderate. Cement majors brace up for margin pressure. Steep increase in energy costs [coal] and higher freight costs to keep margin under pressure.

Page 34



Performance of the Steel sector – Q4, 2010-11Steel: Growth in Net Sales and Total Income40 30 20 10 0 Q1 09-10 Q2 09-10 Q3 09-10 Q4 09-10 Q1 10-11 Q2 10-11 Q3 10-11 -10-20 -30 -40 -50 Net Sales Total income Q4 2010-11

Net sales registered a growth of 25.3 percent in Q4, 2010-11. In Q4, 2009-10, net sales had shown a growth of 10.5 percent.

Steel: Growth in Total Expenses (%)60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 Total Expenses aw material Salaries & Power & Fuel Interest R Stores spares wages Expenses & purchase of finished goods

Total expenses of companies from the steel sector registered a growth of 30.1 percent in Q4, 2010-11. In Q4, 2009-10, total expenses had gone up by a mere 5.25percent. Amongst different heads under total expenses, firms from the steel sector are feeling maximum pressure on account of rising prices of raw materials. Infact, expenses on raw materials registered a growth of more than 50 percent inQ4, 2010-11.

Q409-10

Q410-11

Steel: PAT /Total Income15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 Q1 09-10 Q2 09-10 Q3 09-10 Q4 09-10 Q1 10-11 Q2 10-11 Q3 10-11-5.0 -10.0

10.8 5.2

12.3 8.7 8.3 5.9

PAT for firms belonging to the steel sector has gone up by 47.9 percent in Q4, 2

010-11. Profit margin in Q4, 2010-11, has seen an improvement with a figure of 12.3 percent. In Q4, 2009-10, profit margin was to the tune of 10.8 percent.

-4.6

PAT/Total Income

Sector UpdatesSteel imports down 65 percent in April. Steel imports are slowing down. The fallis most visible in sectors that are hit by high interest costs – auto and construction. Steel firms may have to pay more for coking coal imports. In the forthcoming renewal of quarterly contracts, prices for imported coking coal could go up.JPC to monitor prices of raw materials. Steel ministry has asked the Joint Plant Committee to analyses prices of raw materials for steel manufacturing along with their impact on final steel prices.Page 35

Q4 2010-11

-2.8



Performance of the Chemicals sector – Q4, 2010-11Chemical: Growth in Net Sales and Total Income80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10

Net sales registered a growth of 17.8 percent in Q4, 2010-11.In Q4, 2009-10, netsales had shown a growth of 19.9 percent. Ratio of exports to net sales has shown a decline from 7.2 percent in Q4, 2009-10 to 4.3 percent in Q4, 2010-11.

Q1 09-10

Q2 09-10

Q3 09-10

Q4 09-10

Q1 10-11

Q2 10-11

Q3 10-11

Net Sales

Total income

Chemical: Growth in Expenses (%)40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 Q409-10 Q410-11 Total Expenses Raw material Stores spares & purchase of finished goods Salaries & wages Power & Fuel InterestExpenses

Q4 2010-11

Total expenses have shown a growth of 21.3 percent in the fourth quarter of 2010-11. In Q4, 2009-10, total expenses had shown a growth of 5.1 percent. Expenseson interest costs and raw materials have seen a sizable jump during the quarterunder review.

Chemicals: PAT /Total Income35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 Q1 09-10

31.3

PAT has increased by 20.9 percent in Q4, 2010-11. The margins continue to be under pressure and stood at 11.7 percent in Q4, 2010-11.

9.5

10.7

8.4

11.4

10.7

10.9

11.7



Q2 09-10

Q3 09-10

Q4 09-10

Q1 10-11

Q2 10-11

Q3 10-11

PAT/ Total Income

Sector UpdatesCentral panel clears mega petrochemical hub in Tamil Nadu. A PCPIR region has been cleared by an interministerial group. It is expected to attract investments worth Rs. 1 lakh crore. Oil ministry supports gas price pool for fertilizers. Therecommendation made by Saumitra Chaudhuri Committee to implement ‘price pooling’ of

natural gas for fertilizer sector has found petroleum ministry’s support.Page 36

Q4 2010-11



Performance of the Transport equipment sector – Q4, 2010-11Transport Equipment: Growth in Net Sales and Total Income100 80 60 40 20 0 Q1 09-10 Q2 09-10 Q3 09-10 Q4 09-10 Q1 10-11 Q2 10-11 Q3 10-11-20 Q4 2010-11

Growth in net sales has been on a downtrend over the last one year. In Q4, 2010-11, net sales registered a growth of 22.9 percent. In Q4, 2009-10, net sales had

zoomed registering a growth of 86 percent on a year on year basis.

Net Sales

Total income

Transport Equipment: Growth in Total Expenses700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 -100 Total Expenses Raw material Salaries & Storesspares wages & purchase of finished goods Q409-10 Power & Fuel Interest Expenses

Growth in total expenses has moderated in Q4, 2010-11, compared to the growth se

en in Q4, 2009-10. While total expenses registered a growth of 17.9 percent in the quarter ending March 2011, total expenses had grown by 91.7 percent in the quarter ending March 2010.

Q410-11

Transport Equipment: PAT /Total Income8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 Q1 09-10 Q2 09-10 -2.0

PAT has registered a growth of 19.4 percent in Q4, 2010-11.7.2 7.1

7.2

6.9

7.1

2.8 0.6Q3 09-10 Q4 09-10 Q1 10-11 Q2 10-11 Q3 10-11 Q4 2010-11

-1.1

Not much change is seen in the profit margin levels over the last one year. These have been close to the 7 percent mark throughout 2010-11.

PAT /Total Income

Sector UpdatesCar sales grow slowest in 24 months. Passenger car sales witnessed a growth of 7percent in May 2011, which is the slowest in 24 months. Rising interest rates and fuel costs are beginning to take a toll on the automotive sector. Truck salesslow as rising interest rates begin to bite. Truck fleet operators and financiers are reporting a decline in truck sales owing to rising interest rates.

Page 37



Performance of the Food and Beverages sector – Q4, 2010-11Food and Beverages: Growth in Net Sales and Total Income70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20

Growth in net sales has been on a decline over the last few quarters. In Q4, 2009-10, net sales had grown by 58.4 percent. In Q4, 2010-11, growth in net sales was down to just about 8.5 percent.

Q1 09-10

Q2 09-10

Q3 09-10

Q4 09-10

Q1 10-11

Q2 10-11

Q3 10-11

Total income

Net sales

Q4 10-11

Food and Beverages: Growth in Total Expenses140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 -20Total expenses (%) Raw materials, stores, spares & purchase of finished goods (%) Salaries and wages (%) Power & fuel (%) Interest expenses (%)

Growth in total expenses has also come down over the last one year. In Q4, 2009-10, total expenses went up by 49.7 percent. In Q4, 2010-11, total expenses showed a growth of 8.5 percent. The only segment where growth in expenses in Q4, 2010-11 was higher than growth seen in the corresponding period of the previous yearis interest payments.

Q4 09-10

Q4 10-11

Food and Beverages : PAT / Total income10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Q1 09-10

7.9

8.6 5.7

The margins of firms in this sector have been under pressure whole of last year.In Q4, 2009-10, profit margin was about 5.7 percent. In Q4, 2010-11, this camedown to 5.3 percent.

5.3 3.6 3.9 3.3

4.2

Q2 09-10



Q3 09-10

Q4 09-10

Q1 10-11

Q2 10-11

Q3 10-11

PAT / Total income

Sector UpdatesJ&K to encourage investment in establishing food and horticulture processing units. J&K government said it will encourage local as well as outside investments to set up food processing units in the state. New safety law to cost India over 15,000 crore. The implementation of the Food Safety and Standards Rule, 2011 is likely to cost Rs. 15,000 to 17,000 crore to the exchequer.

Q4 10-11

Page 38



Round up of key developments Draft National Manufacturing Policy A high level committee chaired by Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh has approved in principle the draft National Manufacturing Policy. The policy will be placed before the cabinet soon after environment and labour concerns are resolved through inter-ministerial discussions. The salient features of the policy are: To increase the share of manufacturing in the GDPfrom the current 16 percent to 25 percent by 2025 and in the process create an

additional 100 million jobs. To create National Investment and Manufacturing Zones (NIMZs) with world class infrastructure facilities. The proposed zones will enjoy special policy regime, tax concessions, less stringent labour and environment laws, and flexible compliance norms. To set up a Manufacturing Industry Promotion Board (MIPB) at the level of Union Minister of Commerce and Industry to ensure coordination amongst Central Ministries and State Government and to ensure effective implementation of the policy. To set up a Technology Acquisition and Development Fund to promote acquisition and development of appropriate (primarilygreen technologies) technologies. To introduce policy measures to facilitate theexpeditious redeployment of assets belonging to nonviable units, while giving full protection to the interests of employees. This will be done through appropriate Insurance Instrument and/or Sinking Fund. Financial Stability Report by RBI

The Reserve Bank of India presented its assessment of the health of India’s financial sector in its Financial Stability Report, during second week of June. The highlights of the report are: The global risk scenario has improved, though thereare signs of a slowdown in growth during 2011 in most countries, including somedeveloping economies in Asia. Liquidity in the system remained in deficit mode given strong credit demand and high level of currency in circulation. Banks in India will face many challenges as they migrate to the advanced approaches under Basel II and prepare for Basel III. A series of stress testing in respect of credit, liquidity and interest rate risks showed that banks remained reasonably resilient though their profitability could be affected significantly. Banks need toremain vigilant to the headwinds from the prevailing inflation and interest ratesituation which may affect their asset quality as changes in interest rate werefound to have the most significant (negative) impact on slippage ratio of the b

anks. Greater access of domestic corporates to ECBs has resulted in increased currency mismatches. Many companies which have raised money through foreign currency convertible bonds could face severe funding problems in the next two years due to lackluster equity markets. According to RBI, a very large proportion of these FCCBs may not get converted into equity thus requiring their refinancing at the much higher interest rates prevalent today.

Page 39



Charts

18.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 Apr'09 Jun'09 Aug'09Oct'09 Dec'09 Feb'10 Apr'10 Jun'10 Aug'10 Oct,10 Dec'10 Feb'11 Apr'11 Aug'10 Oct,10 Dec'10 Feb'11 Apr'11 Old Series Old Series -10.0 10.0 12.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.08.0 Apr'09 Jun'09 Aug'09 Oct'09 Dec'09 Feb'10 Apr'10 Jun'10 Aug'10 Old Series Oct,10 Dec'10 Feb'11 Apr'11 Jun'10 Apr'10 Feb'10 Dec'09 New Series Oct'09 Aug'09 J

un'09 Apr'09 -5.0 0.0 5.0

Growth in Mining Sector

New Series 10.0 15.0 Apr'09 Jun'09 Aug'09 Oct'09 Dec'09 Feb'10 Apr'10 Jun'10 Aug'10 Oct,10 Dec'10 Feb'11 Apr'11 Old Series New Series -5.0 0.0 5.0

Growth in IIP20.0 25.0

Growth in Manufacturing Sector

Growth in Electricity Sector

New Series

Page 40



ChartsGrowth : Basic Goods Segment14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 Feb'10 Dec'09 Aug'09 Aug'10 Dec'10 Feb'11 Feb'11Jun'09 Oct'09 Jun'10 Apr'09 Apr'10 Oct'10 Apr'11 Apr'11 0.0 Apr'09 Apr'10 Dec'09Aug'09 Aug'10 Dec'10 Feb'10 Feb'11 Apr'11 Jun'09 Oct'09 Jun'10 Oct'10 0.0 -5.015.0 10.0 5.0 25.0 20.0

Growth: Intermediate Goods Segment

New Series

Old Series

New Series

Old Series

Growth: Capital Goods Segment70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 Dec'09 Aug'09 Aug'10 Dec'10 Jun'09 Feb'10

Jun'10 Feb'11 Oct'09 Apr'09 Apr'10 Oct'10 -10.0 -20.0 -30.0 New Series Old Series Apr'11 0.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 20.0

Growth: Consumer Goods Segment

Dec'09

Aug'09

-5.0 -10.0

New Series

Aug'10

Old Series

Dec'10

Feb'10

Oct'09

Apr'09

Apr'10

Oct'10

Jun'09

Jun'10

Page 41



ChartsGrowth : Headline & Core Inflation 12.0 11.0 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 May-10May-11 May-11Page 42

Apr-10

Aug-10

Nov-10

Sep-10

Dec-10

Feb-11

Headline

Core

Growth in Broad Segments of WPI 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 Apr-10 May-10 Aug-10

Mar-11 Mar-11

Sep-10

Nov-10

Dec-10

Primary Articles

Fuel & Power

Manufactured Products

Feb-11

Apr-11

Jun-10

Jul-10

Oct-10

Jan-11

Apr-11

Jun-10

Jul-10

Oct-10

Jan-11



10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

0.0

Charts

-20.0

-10.0

-8,000

-28,000 12,000 22,000 32,000 2,000 Apr-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep

-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Import Export May-09 Jun-09Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Dec-09

-18,000

Direct Investment

Jan-10Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11

India's Trade (US$ billion)

May-10Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10

Foreign Investment Inflows (USS million)

Portfolio Investment Trade Balance

Total

Dec-10Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11

Page 43



Data on Interest RatesBank PLR (%) Mar 2011 State Bank Of India Punjab National Bank Canara Bank BankOf Baroda Bank Of India Union Bank Of India Indian Overseas Bank Corporation Bank Dena Bank ICICI Bank Axis Bank HDFC Bank Weighted Rate 12.75 12.50 13.75 13.7513.50 13.75 13.75 13.60 14.50 16.50 16.50 17.25 14.00 Apr 2011 13.25 12.50 13.75 13.75 13.50 13.75 13.00 13.60 14.00 16.50 16.50 17.25 14.07 Jul 2010 7.50 8.008.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.25 7.75 8.25 7.50 7.50 7.25 7.82 Aug 2010 7.50 8.00 8.00

8.00 8.00 8.00 8.25 7.75 8.25 7.50 7.50 7.25 7.85 Sep 2010 7.50 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.25 7.75 8.25 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.85 Oct 2010 7.60 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 7.75 8.25 7.75 7.75 7.50 8.14 Base Rate (%) Nov 2010 7.60 8.50 8.50 8.508.50 8.50 8.50 8.25 8.45 7.75 7.75 7.50 8.16 Dec 2010 8.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.009.00 8.50 8.25 8.45 8.25 8.00 7.75 8.58 Jan 2011 8.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 8.50 8.90 8.95 8.25 8.25 7.75 8.63 Feb 2011 8.25 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.00 9.50 9.50 9.40 9.45 8.75 8.75 8.20 9.05 Mar 2011 8.25 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.40 9.45 8.75 8.75 8.70 9.12 Apr 2011 8.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.40 9.45 8.759.00 8.70 9.17

Source – CMIE

Page 44

