Upload
bryan-miles
View
213
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Hotz-Hart 1
6CP, Parallel Session 1, 21th April 2005Socioeconomic Institute – University of Zurich
‚Entrepreneurial Universities‘ – Lessons from Swiss Universities of Applied Sciences
Swiss Federal Office for Professional Education and Technology OPET
Socioeconomic Institute – University of Zurich
[email protected]; [email protected]
homepage: http://www.soi.unizh.ch/chairs/hotz/index/html
Parallel Session 1, 21th April 2005
Six Countries Programme Conference ‚The Future of Research‘,Rotterdam, 21-22th April 2005
Beat Hotz-Hart(in co-operation with Andreas Reuter-Hofer)
Hotz-Hart 2
6CP, Parallel Session 1, 21th April 2005
Table of Content
1. Entrepreneurial Public Research Organisations
(EPRO): its meaning and trends in Europe
2. Situation in Switzerland: the example of Universities
of Applied Sciences
3. Lessons from Swiss experience on UAS and
implications for successful EPRO
4. Summary and outlook into the future
Hotz-Hart 3
6CP, Parallel Session 1, 21th April 2005
1. Entrepreneurial Public Research Organisation: its meaning
• University reform of organisational setting according to
managerial principles
Customer orientation and marketing of R&D findings, of
competences and infrastructure
Adjustment of employment contract of R&D personel
Creating independent KTT-Offices with a broad portfolio of
services
Build up of its own portfolio of licences and investments
Extending joint finances in teaching and R&D with business
sector
Hotz-Hart 4
6CP, Parallel Session 1, 21th April 2005
... and its major success factors as a ‚Business Model‘
,Entrepreneurial‘ = market-oriented!
• Customer focus / driving forces behind innovation
– Need for stronger science-based knowlegde / fusion technologies by firms
– Need for extensive external enabling services by firms
– More outsourcing and flexibility, acquisition of exclusive market-oriented external knowlegde and expertise by SMEs (‚Open innovation‘, Chesborough)
• Excellent base of human capital and knowledge
• High flexibility
• International network
Hotz-Hart 5
6CP, Parallel Session 1, 21th April 2005
Trends in Europe: Stronger differentiation of institutions
• Build up and expansion of KTT-Offices at Universities and
Universities of Applied Sciences
• Creation of independent KTT-organisations close to
Universities
Build up and internationalisation of large scale R&D-Institutions
• Expansion of R&D-service provider in the private sector (KIBS)
• etc.
Hotz-Hart 6
6CP, Parallel Session 1, 21th April 2005
Trends in Europe: Attempt to classify important examples
Degree of freedom of R&D
Financing R&D
Low(commercialfocus)
High(no commercialfocus)
public privat
Universities of Applied Sciences(incl. their KTT-offices)
KTT by naturalscience-oriented Universities
Big ResearchInstitutes in R&D
Private R&D services
Autonomous KTT-organisationswith own R&D-capacities andstrong relationship to university
GWT Dresden: 79% by firms, total R&D
contracts:100%
FH Schweiz: less than 20% by firms; total R&D contracts?, 5 spin-offs, 5
license agreements
GermanFhG: more than 30% by firms, total R&D contracts: 60%
Imperial College London: 20% by firms; total R&D contracts: more than 40%, 50 spin-offs, 60 license agreements
Hotz-Hart 7
6CP, Parallel Session 1, 21th April 2005
2. Situation in Switzerland
Degree of freedom of R&D
Low(commercialfocus)
High(no commercialfocus)
public privat
ETH Zurich and Lausanne
CantonalUniversities
Big ResearchInstitutes in R&D
Private R&D services
Autonomous KTT-organisationswith own R&D-capacities andstrong relationship to ownuniversity
Universities of Applied Sciences(incl. their KTT-offices)
Financing R&D
Hotz-Hart 8
6CP, Parallel Session 1, 21th April 2005
Situation in Switzerland: The ,political‘ view
... The Example of Switzerland (2) – The ,Political‘ View
Economic System
Knowledge-Transfer
ETH
Cant. Univers.
Scientific System
SME
MNE
UAS
• Performance contract KTT• Practical orientation• ,Transformer‘ of basic research• Political solution of EPRO
Hotz-Hart 9
6CP, Parallel Session 1, 21th April 2005
Situation in Switzerland: The ,true‘ story is more complex!
Economic System
Knowledge-Transfer
FH
MNE
Start-ups
privat R&D
services
Scientific System
Spin-offs
County Univers.
SME
ETH
Hotz-Hart 10
6CP, Parallel Session 1, 21th April 2005
Situation in Switzerland: Empirical Evidence in 2002
R&D contracts,numbers
Patent declaration
Patent portfolio
Licenses and Options
License portfolio
Start-ups by Licensesin 2002
Source: CESTSwiss Fed. Inst. of Technology County Universities UAS
Hotz-Hart 11
6CP, Parallel Session 1, 21th April 2005
Explanation (I): Basic research-oriented innovation processes
Free Basic Research
Applied Research: Technology Development
Product Development
Market Sales
Knowledge-orientiented basic research
proactiv, targeted basic research Product and
Process Development
Market Salesreactiv, targeted
basic research
,Classical‘ approach
The new mode
ETH and Universities
Universities for Applied Sciences Private R&D Services
Hotz-Hart 12
6CP, Parallel Session 1, 21th April 2005
Explanation (I): … and its consequences
Free Basic Research
proactiv, targeted basic research Product and
Process Development
Market Salesreactiv, targeted
basic research
Universities for AppliedSciences
Private R&D Services
ETH and Big Universities
Customer focus: need for …
• stronger science-based knowledge / fusion technologies by firms
• extensive externalenabling services by firms
InstitutionalConsequences!
Customer focus: need for …
• extensive external enabling services by firms
• exclusive market- oriented knowledge
Hotz-Hart 13
6CP, Parallel Session 1, 21th April 2005
Strongly science-based
Empirical Evidence: Outsourcing of R&D expenditure acc. Economic sector und recipient, 2000, in mio CHF
important role of private R&D-services
major EPRO-competition from abroad
Hotz-Hart 14
6CP, Parallel Session 1, 21th April 2005
Empirical Evidence: Major clients of innovation agency, CTI, according to project contracts
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Num
ber
2002
2003
Hotz-Hart 15
6CP, Parallel Session 1, 21th April 2005
Explanation (II): the impact of Bologna – Relationship between teaching and R&D
Bachelor Master
• UAS mainly teaching
• Related to practical and a_R&D
• No research on top level needed
• Missing incentives for staff with aR&D interests
• Mainstream in the eyes of Unis
• Teaching including R&D
• Active R&D on top level needed
• Strong staff with R&D-potential
• Links to companies
• Knowledge base and competences finned out
• Growing separation of aR&D from top level research
Customer focus: Second best solution as partner in transfer of scientific knowledge
• Scientific knowledge base and competences are renewed regularly
Customer focus: First best solution as partner in transfer of scientific knowledge
Hotz-Hart 16
6CP, Parallel Session 1, 21th April 2005
Explanation (III): Education, Labour Market and Competition in R&D
Economic System
Universities
Teaching on tertiary level
UAS
Start-ups
private R&D
services
Spin-offs
Firms
Flow of research-trained
human capital
Competition in KTT
Hotz-Hart 17
6CP, Parallel Session 1, 21th April 2005
3. Lessons from Swiss Experience on UAS
• Driving forces behind innovation and research are interrelated !
– Innovation depends on basic research and a strong science-based knowledge
– Fusion technologies
• Political vision of UAS in danger with respect to R&D and KTT
- Bologna weakens science base of UAS
– Service activities of top universities in KTT are increased
– Firms look for internationally oriented first best-solutions with public or private partners
– Increasing competition of UAS through private services and increasing number of academics
Natural selection of autonomous RTOs brings best results on successful EPRO-Business Model
Hotz-Hart 18
6CP, Parallel Session 1, 21th April 2005
Implications for Successful Business Model on EPRO
• Competition pressure through ….
• growing supply in KTT from private side
• foreign institutes in basic research with potential for transfer increases
• Strength of RTOs is based on basic research
• Customer focus by looking for institutional partners in science-based knowledge transfer
• Its own strong human capital base
• Specialisation and focussing needed -> Build up of new institutions
• Overall supply of services needed (enabling customers!)
Hotz-Hart 19
6CP, Parallel Session 1, 21th April 2005
Summary and outlook
• Growing differentiation between universities and R&D-institutions
• Growing differentiation within research based top universities
• Increasing supply of private services in R&D
• Intensified international competition amongst the best EPRO
• UAS lose relevance in R&D -> Trend towards teaching universities
• R&D of major research institutions focuses more on basic research