Upload
asifur-rahman
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
1/27
6.1 a. A primary standard is an enforceable limit on the concentration of acontaminant in water or an enforceable requirement that a particular treatmenttechnique be implemented. Primary standards apply only to contaminants that
impact human health. A secondary standard is a recommended limit on the
concentration of a water constituent or on the measured value of a water quality
parameter (e.g., turbidity). Secondary standards apply to factors that affect adrinking waters aesthetic but not human health attributes.
b. An MCL is a primary standard, whereas an MCLG is a maximumconcentration goal for a drinking water contaminant, which would be desirable
based on human health concerns and assuming all feasibility issues such as cost
and technological capability are not considered. An MCLG is not an enforceablelimit, but does provide the health-based concentration, which the MCL should
seek to approach as closely as possible within the constraints of practical
feasibility. There are many contaminants with MCLGs, but no numeric MCL.These include acrylamide, copper and lead.
6.2 The CWA sets up a system by which the maximum concentration of contaminantsin discharges to surface waters and in the surface waters themselves are set andenforced, while the SDWA provides the legislative mechanism necessary to set
and enforce the maximum contaminant concentrations in drinking water. The
CWA is designed to ensure that the quality of surface waters in the U.S. is, at aminimum, appropriate for the beneficial uses for which the water is designated.
The SDWA is designed to ensure that water supplied by public water systems forhuman consumption meets acceptable health standards at the point of use.
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
2/27
6.3 a. The hydraulic detention time is:( ) ( )
( )hr4.17d0.174
gal7.4805
ftgal/d102.5
ft0.10ft43.0
36
2
==
==
Q
V
b. The critical velocity is:
( )( ) hrft
ft2.40
ft43.0
hr24d
gal7.4804ft
dgal102.5
2
3
2
36
b
o =
==A
Qv
c. The weir loading rate is:
( )( ) hrft
ft51.5ft43.02
hr24
d
gal7.4804
ft
d
gal102.5
rateloadingweir
3
36
w =
== LQ
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
3/27
6.4 From Appendix C: At 20C, = 998.2 kgm-3 and = 0.00100 kgm-1s-1a. The particle settling velocity is:
( ) ( )( )( )( )s
m102.18
sm
kg00100.018
m100.1kg/m2.9984.0m/s9.807
18
-
5-
2-5322
pp
s =
==
dg
v
b.
( )
( )( ) sm102.89
m30m10
s606024
dd/m7,500
4-
3
b
o =
==A
Qv
Since vo > vs, less than 100% of the particles will be removed.
c. The settling velocity of the smallest particle which is 100% removed is equalto vo. So,
( )( ) s
m36.5
s
m103.65
m
kg2.9984.0
s
m9.807
s
m1089.2
sm
kg0.0010018
-
18 5-
21
32
4-2
1
p
sp ==
=
=
g
vd
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
4/27
6.5 From Appendix C: At 20C, = 998.2 kgm-3 and = 0.00100 kgm-1s-1The length to width ratio is 5, soAb = 5w
2
Set vo = vs and solve forw:
( ) ( )m42.7
m10m
kg998.2-200,1
s
m9.8075
sm
kg00100.0
s
m0.10018
d-5
18
21
25
32
3
21
2
p
=
=
=
g
Qw
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
5/27
6.6 From Appendix C: At 15C, = 0.00114 kgm-1s-1a.
b
V
PG
=
( )
( ) ( )
1-
21
21 s50.0
m75.3m17.4sm
kg0.00114
W186 =
=G
Similarly, G2 = 20.1 s-1
and G3 = 10.0 s-1
.
b.
( ) ( )4-
36-153-6
0
3
p
107.546 m
mL10mL108.1m100.20
6 =
==
Nd
Q
GV
N
N
b0 41
+=
( ) ( )( )( ) ( )17.9
s606024
d
d
m16,000
m75.3m17.4s0.501054.741.01
3
2-1-4
0 =
+=
N
N
Therefore, there will be on average 18 singlets per aggregate.
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
6/27
6.7 From Appendix C: At 15C, = 0.00114 kgm-1s-1a.
Accumulation = Reaction: )r(NVdt
dNV =
and
GNN
=
4-)r(
so,
=tN
N
dtG
N
dN
0
4-
0
which yields:
= Gt
NN
4-
0e
b.
( )1-
21
3
3
25-
s3.78
m004.0sm
kg0.00114
s
mkg105.6
=
==V
PG
c.
( )4-
3
735-
0
3
p101.64
6
m0040.0
100.1m100.5
6
=
==
Nd
( ) ( )( )( )( )
==
min30min
s60s78.31064.141.0-exp
L4.0
101.0e
1-4-74-
0
Gt
NN
L
particles106.07 5=N
d.
aggregatesinglets
4.12L1007.6
L0.4
101.0
1-5
7
0 =
=N
N
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
7/27
e.
( ) ( )( )( )( )
==
min30min
s60s78.31064.140.2-exp
L4.0
101.0e
1-4-74-
0
Gt
NN
L
particles101.88 6=N
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
8/27
6.8 a. ( )hr
m640m80
hr
m8.0
32
fa =
== AvQ
b. From the definition of filter efficiency: Vf (Vb + Vr) = fVf (6.8.1)
and the definition of the effective filtration rate gives:Vf (Vb + Vr) = refAftc (6.8.2)
Combining (6.8.1) and (6.8.2) and rearranging yields:
)( )( )cycle)(perm33,370
0.96
hr52m80hr
m7.7 3
2
f
cfeff ===
tArv
From (6.8.1): ( ) ( )( ) cycle)(perm1,3350.96-1m370,33-1 33ffrb ===+ VVV
Thus, the volume of water lost per cycle (Vb
+ Vr) is 1,340 m
3.
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
9/27
6.9 Note that this problem incorporates a practically realistic, yet possibly confusing,nuance in that the total backwash time per cycle (tb) is double the total time thatbackwash water is flowing through the filter (tb). Thus, calculation of the water
volume used in backwash is based on 8 minutes of flow per cycle, whereas the
time the filter is off-line for backwashing is 16 minutes.
a.
( )( )( ) L307,200min
s60min0.8m64sm
L10.0 2
2
'
bf
f
bb =
== tAA
QV
( )( )( ) L316,800min
s60min15m64sm
L5.50 2
2rfar=
== tAvV
( ) ( ) ( ) min1,409min15-min16min6024rbcf === tttt
( )( )( ) L102.98mins60min,4091m64smL5.50 722f
f
ff '
f
=
== tA
AQV
%980.979L102.98
L316,800-307,200-102.98
7
7
f
rbff ==
=
=
V
VVV
b. The fraction of a filtration cycle that is not backwashing is:( )
0.989hr24
min60
hrmin16-hr24
c
brf
=
=
+
t
ttt
so the number of filters required is:
( ) ( ) ( )6.89
989.0L1000
mm64
sm
L5.50
sm2.40
989.0
3
2
2
3
fa
plant =
==Av
Qn
Therefore, at least 7 filters are required.
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
10/27
6.10 a. For a steady state PFR, the Giardia concentration in the contactor effluent is:
*-
0ekNN=
so, ( ) ( )3
1-
3
0*b
m156000,1lnmin0.53
min
s
60sm0.20ln ===
NN
kQV
b. For a steady state CSTR, the mass balance is:QN0 = QN+ k
*NVb
so,( )
( )( ) 3
1-
3
0
*bm22,6001-000,1
min0.53
mins60
sm0.20
1- ==
=
N
N
k
QV
c. For a steady state series of CSTRs, the mass balance is:
( )m*0m
1
1
kN
N
+=
so,( )
( )( )( ) m67.51-000,1
min0.53
mins60
sm0.20
1- 351
1-
31
m
0
*b,1==
=
m
N
N
k
QV
and the total contactor volume is: mVb,1 = 5(67.50 m3) = 337 m3
d.
minmg
L0.265
Lmg2.0
min0.53
0.1
-1*
=
==nC
kk
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
11/27
6.11 For a steady state CSTR, the mass balance is:QN0 = QN+ k
*NVb
so,( )( )
( ) sL0.0156
1-1,000
s80.7L2.00
1-
-1
0
*
b ==
=
NN
kVQ
and the volume produced during ten hours of operation would be:
( ) L562hr
s6060hr10
s
L0.0156 =
=Qt
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
12/27
6.12 Hardness in meq/L:
meq/L7.50mg/meq20.0
mg/L150Ca 2 ==+
meq/L4.92mg/meq12.2mg/L60Mg2 ==+
Total hardness = 7.50 + 4.92 = 12.4 meq/L
Hardness as CaCO3:
33 CaCOasmg/L621
meq
CaCOasmg50.0
L
meq12.4hardnessTotal ==
Table 6.4 would classify this as very hardwater.
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
13/27
6.13 6.16 The solutions for these problems are the solutions for problems 6.2 - 6.5 inthe 2nd edition Solutions Manual.
6.17 Component Concentration
(mg/L)
Equiv. Weight
(mg/meq)
Concentration
(meq/L)
CO2 14.5 22 0.6591
Ca2+
110.0 20 5.500
Mg2+
50.7 12.2 4.156
Na+
75 23.0 3.261
HCO3-
350 61.0 5.738
SO42- 85.5 48.0 1.781
Cl-
16.2 35.5 0.4563
pH 8.2 - -
9.
656
5.
738
0 5.
500
0
Ca2+
HCO 3-
CH
M g2+
Ca-CH
NCH
Mg-NCH
9.
656
5.
738
0 5.
500
0
Ca2+
HCO 3-
CH
M g2+
Ca-CH
NCH
Mg-NCH
a. Mg-CH = CH Ca-CH = 5.738 5.500 = 0.238 meq/Lb. Mg-NCH = TH CH = 9.656 5.738 = 3.918 meq/Lc. 1 meq/L Ca(OH)2 neutralizes 1 meq/L CO2(aq)
so, Ca(OH)2 required = 0.6591 meq/L
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
14/27
6.18
Component Concentration Equiv. Weight
(mg/meq)
Concentration
(meq/L)
CO2 6.0 mg/L 22 0.2727
Ca2+ 50.0 mg/L 20 2.500
Mg2+
20.0 mg/L 12.2 1.639HCO3
- 3.1 mmole/L 61.0 3.100
pH 7.6 - -
4.
139
3.1
00
0 2.
500
0
Ca2+
HCO 3-
CH
M g2+
Ca-CH
NCH
Mg-NCH
4.
139
3.1
00
0 2.
500
0
Ca2+
HCO 3-
CH
M g2+
Ca-CH
NCH
Mg-NCH
Table P6.18 Components, lime and soda ash dosage, and solids generatedComponent (eqn.) Concentration
(meq/L)
Lime
(meq/L)
Soda ash
(meq/L)
CaCO3(s)(meq/L)
Mg(OH)2(s)(meq/L)
CO2(aq) (6.37) 0.2727 0.2727 0 0.2727 0
Ca-CH (6.38) 2.500 2.500 0 5.000 0
Mg-CH (6.39) 0.600 1.200 0 1.200 0.600
Ca-NCH (6.40) 0 0 0 0 0
Mg-NCH (6.41) 1.039 1.039 1.039 1.039 1.039Excess 0.400
Totals 5.412 1.039 7.512 1.639
a. Lime required = (5.412 meq/L)(37.07 mg/meq) = 200.5 mg/L
Soda ash required = (1.039 meq/L)(53.0 mg/meq) = 55.1 mg/L
b. Sludge generated:
+
mg10
kg
gal
L785.3
d
gal1015
meq
mg9.22
L
meq.6391
meq
mg0.50
L
meq512.7
6
6
kg/d24,040=
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
15/27
6.19
Component Concentration Equiv. Weight
(mg/meq)
Concentration
(meq/L)
Concentration
(mg/L CaCO3)
Ca2+ 90 mg/L 20 4.500 225.0
Mg2+ 30 mg/L 12.2 2.4596 123.0
HCO3-
165 mg/L 61.0 2.705 135.3pH 7.5 - - -
348
.0
135
.3
0 225
.0
0
Ca2+
HCO 3-
CH
M g2+
Ca-CH
NCH
Mg-NCHCa-NCH
348
.0
135
.3
0 225
.0
0
Ca2+
HCO 3-
CH
M g2+
Ca-CH
NCH
Mg-NCHCa-NCH
( )[ ][ ][ ]
3
4-
7-
5.7
1
-
3aq2
CaCOmg/L19.14M101.914M104.47
L
mol10
g61.0
mol
L
g0.165
HHCO
CO ==
==
+
K
Table P6.19 Components, lime and soda ash dosage, and solids generated
Component (eqn.) Concentration
(mg/L
CaCO3)
Lime
(mg/L
CaCO3)
Soda ash
(mg/L
CaCO3)
CaCO3(s)(mg/L
CaCO3)
Mg(OH)2(s)(mg/L
CaCO3)
CO2(aq) (6.37) 19.14 19.14 0 19.14 0
Ca-CH (6.38) 135.3 135.3 0 270.6 0
Mg-CH (6.39) 0 0 0 0 0
Ca-NCH (6.40) 90.00 0 90.00 90.00
Mg-NCH (6.41) 123.0 123.0 123.0 123.0 123.0
Excess 20
Totals 297.4 213.0
a.L
mg220.1
CaCOmg100
Ca(OH)mg74
L
CaCOmg297.4Lime
3
23required =
=
b.L
mg225.8
CaCOmg100
Ca(OH)mg061
L
CaCOmg213.0AshSoda
3
23required =
=
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
16/27
6.20 The solution for this problem is the solution for problem 6.6 in the 2nd
edition
Solutions Manual.
6.21Component Concentration Equiv. Weight
(mg/meq)
Concentration
(meq/L)
Concentration
(mg/L CaCO3)
Ca2+ 95 mg/L 20 4.75 238
Mg2+ 26 mg/L 12.2 2.13 107
HCO3- 160 mg/L 61.0 2.62 131
pH 7.0 - - -
6.
88
2.
62
0 4.
75
0
Ca2+
HCO 3-
CH
M g2+
Ca-CH
NCH
Mg-NCHCa-NCH
6.
88
2.
62
0 4.
75
0
Ca2+
HCO 3-
CH
M g2+
Ca-CH
NCH
Mg-NCHCa-NCH
( )[ ][ ][ ]
meq/L1.17M105.868M104.47
L
mol10
g61.0
mol
L
g0.160
HHCO
CO 4-7-
7
1
-
3aq2 ==
==
+
K
Table P6.21 Components, lime and soda ash dosage, and solids generatedComponent (eqn.) Concentration
(meq/L)
Lime
(meq/L)
Soda ash
(meq/L)
CaCO3(s)(meq/L)
Mg(OH)2(s)(meq/L)
CO2(aq) (6.37) 1.17 1.17 0 1.17 0
Ca-CH (6.38) 2.62 2.62 0 5.24 0
Mg-CH (6.39) 0 0 0 0 0
Ca-NCH (6.40) 2.13 0 2.13 2.13 0
Mg-NCH (6.41) 2.13 2.13 2.13 2.13 2.13
Excess 0.400
Totals 6.32 4.26 10.67 2.13
a.L
mg234
meq
mg7.073
L
meq6.32Limerequired =
=
b.L
mg226
meq
mg35
L
meq4.26AshSoda required =
=
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
17/27
6.22 The solution for this problem is the solution for problem 6.7 in the 2nd
edition
Solutions Manual.
6.23Component Concentration Equiv. Weight
(mg/meq)
Concentration
(meq/L)
Concentration
(mg/L CaCO3)
Ca2+ 40.0 mg/L 20 2.00 100
Mg2+ 10.0 mg/L 12.2 0.820 41.0
HCO3- 110 mg/L 61.0 1.80 90.2
pH 7.0 (assumed) - - -
2.
82
1.
80
0 2.
00
0
Ca2+
HCO3-
CH
Mg2+
Ca-CH
NC H
Mg-NCH
Ca-NCH
2.
82
1.
80
0 2.
00
0
Ca2+
HCO3-
CH
Mg2+
Ca-CH
NC H
Mg-NCH
Ca-NCH
( )[ ][ ][ ]
meq/L0.807M104.034M104.47
L
mol10
g61.0
mol
L
g0.110
HHCO
CO 4-7-
7
1
-
3aq2 ==
==
+
K
Table P6.23 Components, lime and soda ash dosage, and solids generatedComponent (eqn.) Concentration
(meq/L)
Lime
(meq/L)
Soda ash
(meq/L)
CaCO3(s)(meq/L)
Mg(OH)2(s)(meq/L)
CO2(aq) (6.37) 0.807 0.807 0 0.807 0
Ca-CH (6.38) 1.80 1.80 0 3.60 0
Mg-CH (6.39) 0 0 0 0 0
Ca-NCH (6.40) 0.200 0 0.200 0.200 0
Mg-NCH (6.41) 0.820 0.820 0.820 0.820 0.820
Excess 0.400
Totals 3.83 1.02 5.43 0.82
a.L
mg142
meq
mg7.073
L
meq3.83Limerequired =
=
b.L
mg54.1
meq
mg35
L
meq1.02AshSoda required =
=
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
18/27
c. Sludge generated:
+
mg10
kg
gal
L785.3
d
gal1073
meq
mg9.22
L
meq.820
meq
mg0.50
L
meq.435
6
6
kg/d41,400=
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
19/27
6.24Qf= 5 10
6L/d Qp = 3 10
6L/d
Cf= 1,500 mg/L Cp = 75 mg/L
Qc, Cc
QfCf= QcCc + QpCp and Qf= Qc + Qp
So,
( )( )( ) ( )( )[ ]
( )mg/L3,640
L/d103-105
mg/L57L/d103-mg/L500,1L/d105
-
-
66
66
pf
ppff
c =
CQCQC
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
20/27
6.25Qf= 5 10
6L/d Qp = 3 10
6L/d
Cf= 1,500 mg/L Cp = 75 mg/L
Cc = 3,640 mg/L
Qc
= 2 106
L/d
a. Water recovery:
60%or0.60
dL105
dL103
6
6
F
P =
==
Q
Qr
b. Salt rejection:
95%or0.95
Lmg1,500
L
mg75
-1-1F
P === CCR
c. Log salt rejection:
( ) ( ) 1.300.95-1log--1log-log
=== RR
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
21/27
6.26 a. The main constituent of concern from the perspective of configuring the
POTW treatment train is biodegradable organic matter. It is, however, arguablefrom the perspective of human health that the main constituents of concern are
human pathogens.
b.Unit operation function based on an overall aim of removing BOD:i. The grit chamber removes the very largest and most settleable
particles, which may contain a modest fraction of organic matter.
ii. The primary sedimentation basin removes most of thegravitationally settleable organic matter (as well as inorganic
matter). Typically about 35% of the BOD can be removed by
primary sedimentation.
iii. The bioreactor converts dissolved and fine particulatebiodegradable organic matter into microbial cell mass and energy
for microbial metabolism.
iv. The secondary clarifier physically removes the cell mass generatedin the bioreactor by gravitational settling.v. Digestors further degrade the organic particles in the primaryclarifier sludge and/or the microbial cell mass separated into the
secondary clarifier sludge by exposing it to more prolonged
biodegradation.
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
22/27
6.27 Both primary and secondary wastewater treatment are designed to remove
biodegradable organic matter (BOM) and the superset of total solids. Primary treatmentonly removes that BOM which can be physically separated from the raw sewage by
floatation, gravitational settling or screening. On the other hand, secondary treatment
removes BOM that may be biodegraded by microbes within a relatively short duration
(typically the hydraulic retention time is less than 1 day). Much of the BOM degraded insecondary treatment is dissolved or colloidal and it is converted into microbial cell mass.
The cells are removed from the secondary effluent by settling in a secondary clarifier (orby exclusion by a membrane).
6.28 6.29 The solutions for these problems are the solutions for problems 6.9 - 6.10 in
the 2nd
edition Solutions Manual.
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
23/27
6.30
well-mixed
aeration pond
Q, S0,X0Q, S,X
V, S,X, rg, rsu
Q = 30 m3/d
S0 = 350 mg/L BOD5S= 20 mg/L BOD5Ks = 100 mg/L BOD5
kd = 0.10 d
-1
m = 1.6 d-1
Y= 0.60 mg VSS/mg BOD5
a. AssumingX0 = 0, the microbe mass balance yields equation 6.57:( )
( )dmds
-1-
1
k
kKS
+=
and solving for the hydraulic detention time, ,
( )[ ]( )( ) ( )[ ]
d6.0d1.0BODmg/L100-d0.1-6.1BODmg/L20
BODmg/L20100
--
1-
5
1-
5
5
sdm
s =+
=+
=dkKkS
SK
b. From equation 6.60 and 6.51,
( )( )
( )( ) LVSSmg
7.07
L
BODmg350d6.1d6.0
L
BODmg20-350
L
BODmg20100
BODmg
VSSmg0.60
-
51-
55
50s
=
+
=
+
= KS
SSSKY
X
and at steady state withX0 = 0, the effluent flux of microbial mass must equal therate of microbial mass production in the pond:
'
grVQX=
and,d
VSSkg0.212
mg01
kg
L
VSSmg07.7
m
L000,1
d
m30
63
3
=
=QX
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
24/27
6.31
well-mixed
aeration lagoon
Q, S0,X0Q, S,X
V, S,X, rg, rsu
l= 60m
w =5 m
h = 2 m
Q = 30 m3/d
S0 = 350 mg/L BOD5
S= 20 mg/L BOD5Ks = 100 mg/L BOD5kd = 0.10 d
-1
m = 1.6 d-1
a. The lagoons hydraulic detention time is:
( )( )( )d1.50
dm400
m2m5m60
3===
Q
V
and the steady state substrate concentration in the lagoon is:
( )( )
( )( )( )
( )( ) ( )( )[ ] LBODmg
161d08.0d1.5-1-d10.1d1.5
d08.0d1.51L
BODmg76.0
-1-
1 5
1-1-
1-5
dm
ds =+
=+
=k
kKS
Therefore, the lagoons BOD5 removal efficiency is:
( ) ( ) 52.2%100
L
BODmg336
L
BODmg161-336
100-5
5
0
0 =
== S SSEff
c. The lagoons daily oxygen demand is:
( )d
Okg70.2
mg10
kg
m
L000,1
L
BODmg161-336
d
m400- 2
63
5
3
0 =
=SSQ
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
25/27
6.32
Q, S0 Qs Qe,Xe, S0
WAS
Qw, Sw,Xw
RAS
Qr, Sr,Xr
V,X, SP.C.
Act. Sludge Basin
S.C.
Q = 0.300 m3/s X= 2,100 mg VSS/L Xr= 10,000 mg VSS/L
c = 9.0 d S0 = 220 mg BOD5/L
dVSSmg
BODmg0.52 5
=
MF
a. Based on the definition of the food to microbe ratio,
( )3
5
5
3
0 m5,220
L
VSSmg100,2
dVSSmg
BODmg0.52
d
s606024
L
BODmg220
s
m0.300
=
=X
MF
QSV
b. Noting thatXr=Xw, the cell retention time can be used to calculate the WASflow rate.
( )
( ) dm
122
L
VSSmg000,10d9.0
L
VSSmg100,2m5220
3
3
wc
w =
==X
VXQ
c. From a hydraulic flow balance around the activated sludge basin, recycle lineand secondary clarifier,
s
m0.299
s606024
d
d
m122-
s
m0.300-
333
we =
== QQQ
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
26/27
d. First, write a microbial mass balance around the secondary clarifier (S.C.).
QsX= QeXe + (Qr+ Qw)Xw
Noting thatXe 0 and Qr= Qs Qe - Qw, simplify and solve forQs.
( ) sm
0.378
L
VSSmg2,100-10,000
L
VSSmg000,10
s
m0.299
-
3
3
w
wes =
==XX
XQQ
and the hydraulic detention time is then:
( )d0.160
d
s606024
s
m
0.378
m5220
3
3
s
=
==
Q
V
7/29/2019 66865-Chptr6PrblmSolns
27/27
6.33 Q, C0 Qe, Ce
Qs, Cs
Q = 20 MGDQs = 0.070 MGD
C0 = 800 mg TS/L
Ce = (1 0.18)C0 = 656 mg TS/L
a. A mass balance around the primary clarifier yields:
( )( )
( )( ) ( )
+
=+=L
TSmg8000.82
L
TSmg8000.82-800
MGD0.070
GD20- ee0
s
s CCCQ
QC
L
TSmg41,800s =C
b. The mass of solids removed annually is:
( )
==
yr
s365606024
mg10
kg
L
mg800,41
m
L1,000
MGD
sm0.04381
MGD0.07063
3
ss tCQm
yearpertonne4,040
yr
TSkg104.04 6 ==m