Quy trnh Kim tra v nghim thu cho tng hng mc v c cng trnh
BLOCK B O MON GAS PIPELINE PROJECT
EPC STAGE PROJECT EXECUTION PLAN
VUNG ANG QUANG TRACH TPP PROJECT MANAGEMENT BOARDAdd: Hai Phong
Village, Ky Loi Commune, Ky Anh District, Ha Tinh Province
TEL: (84-39)3868767.
FAX: (84-39)3868755.
PROJECTQUANG TRACH 1 (2x600MW) THERMAL POWER PLANT PROJECT
STAGEDETAIL DESIGN
ENGINEERING QUALITY PLAN
Rev.DateDescriptionPVE
CheckedPVE
ApprovedVQPPApproved
PV ENGINEERING J.S.C
Document No.:QT1-VQPP-PVE-xx-00-xx-xxx-0001
Pages: 30 (including this page)
PROJECTQUANG TRACH 1 (2x600MW) THERMAL POWER PLANT PROJECT
STAGEDETAIL DESIGN
PROJECT QUALITY PLAN
Rev.DateDescriptionByCheckPMPVE
PV ENGINEERING J.S.C
Document No.:QT1-VQPP-PVE-xx-00-xx-xx-0001
Pages: 30 (Including this page)
TABLE OF CONTENT61.PROJECT DESCIPTION
2.SCOPE73.RESPONSIBILITIES104.CONTRACT REVIEW105.MANAGEMENT
REVIEW116.PROJECT PLANNING117.DESIGN AND ENGINEERING
CONTROL128.DOCUMENT & DATA CONTROL189.CHECKING AND APPROVAL OF
DOCUMENTATION1910.RECORDS2111.ENGINEERING SERVICES SUB-CONTRACTING
CONTROL2312.PROJECT CONTROL2313.CONTROL OF
NON-CONFORMITY2514.QUALITY AUDITS2615.CORRECTIVE
ACTION2716.PREVENTIVE ACTION2817.ATTACHMENT29
ABBREVIATIONS
The following are typical abbreviations used within PVEs
QMS.
AFCApproved for Construction
APIAmerican Petroleum Institute
ASMEAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers
ASNTAmerican Society for Non Destructive Testing
ASTMAmerican Society for Testing and Materials
AWSAmerican Welding Society
BoD Basis of Design
CARCorrective Action Request
COChange Order
CPP Central Processing Platform
CRChange Request
DCR Design Change Request
E & IElectrical & Instrumentation
EPCEngineering, Procurement & Construction
EPCIEngineering, Procurement, Construction &
Installation
F & G Fire & Gas
FTT Fire Fighting Team
FEED Front End Engineering and Design
GDS Gas Distribution Station
HR Human Resources
HSE Health, Safety & Environment
I &TPInspection & Test Plan
IFC Issued For Construction
ISO International Standardization Organization
ITInformatics Technology
ITBInvitation To Bid
KOM Kick Off Meeting
MDDMMaster Document Distribution Matrix
EMDR Engineering Master Document Register
MOM Minutes of Meeting
MSMethod Statement
NCRNon conformance Report
NDE Non Destructive Examination
P & ID Piping & Instrumentation Diagram
PAR Preventive Action Request
PEMProject Execution Manual
PFDProcess Flow Diagram
QAQuality Assurance
QAMQuality Assurance Manual
QC Quality Control
QMS Quality Management System
QPQuality Plan
WBSWork Breakdown Structure
WI Work Instruction
1. PROJECT DESCIPTIONThe Government has issued Decision No.
110/2007/ QD-TTg dated 18/7/2007 approving the Sixth National Power
Development Plan in period 2006-2015 up to 2025 (Master Plan
No.VI). The Decision specifies that power source development target
must meet sufficiently socio-economic development demand of country
with growth rate level of GDP at about 8.5-9% in period 2006-2010
and higher.
Investing in construction of Quang Trach 1 (2x600MW) TPP is
suitable with the Master Plan VI, meets power load growth demand
for supporting socio-eco development of whole country, creates jobs
and income for local area, and makes stable socio-economic
development of Quang Binh province.
When the project is put into operation, it will raise share of
thermal power source in structure of power generation source of
Vietnam power system, partly deal with dependence of national power
system on hydro-power source, increase security and stability of
power supply for the economy, and positively promote socio-economy
of Quang Binh province in particular and the Central region in
general.
The Project investment suits with development strategy of
Vietnam Oil and Gas sector according to Conclusion No. 41-KL/TW
dated 19/01/2006 of the Politburo and Decision No. 386/Q-TTg dated
09/3/2006 of Prime Minister about approving Development Strategy of
Vietnam Oil and Gas sector up to 2015 and considering to 2025.
Based on development point of Making power industry be decisive
direction with target Making PVN be strong Finance Trade Industry,
interdisciplinary trade inside the country and overseas, in which
power production will be the first focus, brand name of PVN will be
famous not only in Vietnam, but also in ASEAN area and all over the
world.
Quang Trach 1 (2x600MW) coal fired thermal power plant project
will be constructed at Vinh Son hamlet, Quang Dong commune, Quang
Trach district, Quang Binh province. The plant site locates at
Quang Trach power complex whose construction site has been approved
by MOIT according to Decision No. 6416 /QD BCT dated
05/12/2008.
Detailed Engineering of Quang Trach 1 TPP project will be done
by PVE and Procument and Construction will be done by PVC. Scale of
Quang Trach 1 TPP Project shall comprise of engineering,
procurement, delivery to site, construction, testing and
commissioning works for 2x600MW net-capacity thermal power units
with supercritical technology, once through pulverized coal fired
boiler with reheat steam, advanced combustion technology (low NOx),
environment protection equipments such as ESP, FGD; steam
condensing steam turbine with supercritical steam parameters and
auxiliaries. Under the EPC scope, the Engineering Contractor shall
be solely responsible for implementation and supply of design for a
complete operational plant with design lifetime of the plant shall
be at least 40 years for Civil Engineering and Building Works, and
35 operating years for Equipment and Systems under working.2.
SCOPERefer to document No. XXX : Division of Responsibility
(between E Contractor (PVE) and PC Contractor (PVC)).
PV Engineering J.S.C (DETAILED ENGINEERING LEADER OF ENGINEERING
CONTRACTOR) is Contractor to carry out the Detailed Design and
Engineering for almost of Plant. Power Islands vendor and
Sub-contractors to carry out the Detailed Design and Engineering
for STG package (including Central Control and Monitoring System),
ESP package, FGD package, Coal Handling System package, Ash
Handling System package, Water Treatment System package, Stack,
Cooling Water Pump House)2.1. The Scope of work is explained in
Document No. QT1-VQPP-PVE-xx-00-xx-xxx-0001 (Detailed Engineering
Design Preliminary Execution Plan).
The Project Quality Plan describes how PVE will apply its
Quality Management System, which has been established in accordance
to the requirements of the Contract, PVEs Policies and ISO
9001-2008.
The PQP defines the philosophy and methods of the Project
Quality System and provides specific information concerning the
requirements with applicable references to assure the reliability
in quality of Design and Engineering for the project in compliance
with the contract between CLIENT and PVE.
2.2. The Quality Plan based on CLIENT satisfaction, process
approach and optimization is drawn up on the following
principles:
Ensure all the Design and Engineering activities will be
achieved as specified; including the change(s)
Optimize the efficiency of the processes
Ensure the performances guarantees will be satisfied
Eliminate the lost of time
Improve resources efficiency
Provide a common tool to everyone; a common language and
goal
Identification and definition of the measurement means and
indicators in order to monitor and control the Quality System
Guidance to reach the expected Quality level
Work on a professional way
Assure PVE conformity of its contractual obligations
Provides technical and procedural references
Specify the specific requirements in the quality matrix.
Furthermore, the following principles are adopted by PVE:
CLIENT focus
Leadership
Involvement of people
Interfaces approach
Continuous improvement
Factual approach to decision making
Mutually beneficial supplier / sub-contractor relationships.
The Corporate Quality Policy approved by the Director is found
in Attachment 1.
The Management formally expresses its intention to apply the
quality policy and to achieve the objectives.
Each member of the management team endorses the Managers
commitment by visible and active involvement. Importance of meeting
CLIENT as well as Statutory and Regulatory Authorities requirements
is defined in Policy.
The Policy document is considered as a live statement and is
subject to further revisions to comply and meet PVE new and / or
revised Policy when necessary.
Consequently, Policy document shall be dated for control.
2.3. Furthermore, PVE Management recognizes the following
principles as being an asset for successful use of the management
system which will result in benefits to interested parties, such as
improved monetary returns, the creation of value and increased
stability; and therefore, decided to adopt them.
a) Customer focus
PVE depends on its CLIENT and therefore understands the present
and future needs and assesses all means to reach its entire
satisfaction. Quality in its definition is the best tool.
b) Leadership
All leaders in PVE establish uniformity within the Organization
by day to day effort to communicate and maintain the principles in
force. They create appropriate environmental in which peoples can
become fully involved in achieving the objectives.
c) Involvement of people
Peoples are the resources of PVE and their respect and comfort
is essential to ensure their involvement to benefits, and ensure
they take an active interest in the organization. It is well known
by the economists that a satisfied employee will produce more in
quantity and efficiency.
d) Process approach
Different resources (human, natural and financial) as well as
any other fabrication / construction method are managed as a
process. A process comprises inputs and terminates as output. The
output is the result of the specified input.
e) System approach to management
Identifying, understanding and managing interrelated processes
as a system contributes to PVE effectiveness and efficiency in
achieving its objectives.
f) Continuous improvement
Continuous improvement of PVE overall performance is a permanent
objective.
g) Factual approach to decision making
Effective decisions are issued from the analysis of data and
information.
h) Mutually beneficial supplier relationships.
PVE and its suppliers are interdependent and a mutually
beneficial relationship enhances the ability of both to create
value.
In addition:
Appropriate methods, procedures, instructions, plans & all
quality relative documents are controlled and maintained in
place.
Assure that requirements are properly understood by key
personnel and then after by lowest levels.
Ensure that the processes are accurately planned and
organized.
Ensure that personnel involved in the project activities is
adequately trained and qualified and the tasks and responsibilities
have been clearly assigned.
Ensure that procedures and instructions are issued for the
performance of activities.
Ensure, by verifications, audits and in-situ assessment that the
processes are controlled; and works are carried out according to
specified requirements.
Certifying, by means of documented quality records that the
works have been carried out and inspected to the required level of
quality as defined in the Project documentation and work scope.
Define the Indicators and apply them as measurements..
3. RESPONSIBILITIES
Personnel selected to undertake work on this project shall be
chosen on the basis that they have gained adequate experience and
meet CLIENTs requirements.
The Project manager shall ensure these requirements are met.
Generic job descriptions nominating job title, functional
responsibility and authority are obtainable from PVEs Quality
Management System.
4. CONTRACT REVIEW
Reference: PVE-P7.2-2 (Contract Execution Procedure)
???4.1.Responsibilities
Project Director and Manager are the main responsible for
ensuring the success of these capital activities; supported by
Project Engineers and Quality Manager.
Any change to the Contract has to be approved by the Project
Director and documented.
4.2. Prior to final acceptance, the Contract must be reviewed in
details by the management to ensure its entire compliance with the
Bid content and all specific requirements are to be identified.
The main goal of the activity is to ensure PVE will be able to
meet specified Contract requirements in time; including screening
all technical and commercial aspects to ensure feasibility and
constructability of its engineering services at the calculated cost
and specified level of quality and avoid extra costs and delay in
the progress of the work.
Consequently, all the Inputs and the Outputs of each process
have to be very well identified.
Reviewers shall consider previous similar experience to
determine what was good / strong; and what has been problematic;
where the project lost time and money.
The reviewers shall ensure full compliance to the bid; and
financial consequences, schedule and all technical implications and
specificities.
Identification of special needs for human resources shall also
be taken into account.
Any change to the Contract must be covered by documented
request.
5. MANAGEMENT REVIEW
5.1. Management review sessions shall be performed periodically,
at intervals not exceeding (3) months to ensure the continuing
suitability and the effectiveness in meeting the requirements of
PVEs PQP, policies and objectives for quality and the requirements
of ISO 9001:2008 (Quality Management Systems).
5.2.The intervenient for the management review sessions will be
the Project Manager, the Project Engineering Manager and the
Project Quality Manager.
The Inputs will be (without being limited to):
Audit reports,
In Situ assessment reports,
Process Evaluation Sheets,
CAR
PAR
CLIENT feedback.
6. PROJECT PLANNING
Procedure : QT1-VQPP-PVE-xx-00-xx-xx-0004 (Project Coordination
Procedure)
6.1.A Project Schedule has been developed to determine
priorities and milestones for various tasks and activities and for
resources management.
The following project specific plans and documents are being
developed for this project to ensure adequate control is
maintained:
Project Execution Plan
Engineering Master Document Register
Master Document Distribution Matrix
Master Document Register
Project Quality Plan
Project Schedule
Co-ordination Procedure
All Procedure
6.2.Regulations
CONTRACTOR shall adhere, develop and maintain in compliance with
legislative and government requirements of Vietnam. The Vietnam
government regulations are as listed below, but should not be
considered exhaustive.
Vietnam Petroleum Law
Vietnam Environmental Regulations for Oil & Gas
Operations
Vietnam Environmental Law
Vietnam Labour Laws
Vietnam Fire Regulations
Applicable Vietnamese laws and regulations for Marine and
HSE
6.3 Project Schedule
Details of project execution schedule shall be as per Contract
Master Schedule.
The project is scheduled to be completed and ready for start up
in Q2 of 2014.
7. DESIGN AND ENGINEERING CONTROL
7.1.Procedures & References
CLIENT SPECIFICATIONS LIST: Specifications/Procedures list can
be found in document INDEX.
Procedure: PVE-P7.3-1 (Design & Engineering Execution
Procedure)???Codes and Standards: Codes and Standards are specified
in document No: .???See Regulations above.
See Risk management report ???.
See Basis of Design : ???.7.2.Responsibilities
The Project Engineering Manager is responsible for the
implementation and application of the Procedures and applicable
Specifications; including the state of the art and good engineering
practices.
PM is responsible to dispatch the work to the disciplines
engineers and for approval of Project documentation and resulting
reports / forms, etc.
PQM is responsible to conduct scheduled Audits and In Situ
(Surveillance) assessments.
The PQM is also responsible for conducting periodic Processes
Evaluations.7.3. Units of measurements
See Doc. No. ??? (Units of measurement).Units for measurements
shall be Metric.
For Codes & Standards requirements, refer to document No.
???.
7.4.Selection of the materials
The material / corrosion engineer, reporting to the EM is
responsible for the selection of the materials based on the
requirements specified in the project references and the nature of
the process and operation conditions.
The selection of the right material is capital and avoids severe
potential consequences.
The whole process must be assessed to identify all the possible
changes during operations; including the consequences of a sudden
shut-down.
Erosivity and corrosivity studies being of major importance, the
chemical reaction on the base metal must be assessed by a
professional corrosion engineer.
The PQM is responsible for conducting scheduled Audits in the
discipline to verify how selection of materials is decided by
engineering, why a specific choice as a result, the references and
self-assessment sessions by the engineer.
The engineer must assess the design / engineering thoroughly,
and sufficiently to understand the wearing and corrosion
mechanisms; and design temperatures as well in order to chose the
appropriate material capable of resisting to the requirements and
satisfy the performances guarantees and the lifetime of the
equipment. This selection must be auditable.
The requirements apply for all materials used for equipment
fabrication and those used in construction; such as concrete.
Materials selection for corrosion control and any other
requirement shall be carried out as per the Project references.
The material selected for a given process shall be demonstrable
as for its corrosion and / or wearing capability of resisting to
any eventual event such as chemical change in the process.
The material engineer shall produce a material selection diagram
showing the service conditions (Temperature, Pressure), the type of
material selected and why this choice.
FEED results must be carefully reviewed for adequacy.
Particular attention shall be paid for those Pressure Vessels
designed as per ASME Section VIII, Div. 2 (Alternative Rules).
7.5.Control of design electronic program
Procedure: Device Manufacturers recommendations and
instructions.
All electronic programs used for calculations, engineering,
design or any other scientific electronic tools shall be assessed
periodically by the user in order to ensure the accuracy to provide
exact results which have major impact on quality. The user shall
demonstrate that such verifications are conducted on a regular
basis and comply with requirements of ISO 10012-2003, ISO9004.
Normally, the exercise consists of comparing the electronic
device calculation results to results as calculated apart by hand
or with another similar program.
A list of electronic devices shall be established and up-dated
by EM.
The manufacturers certificate of compliance of the device is not
an acceptable proof for the requirement; and therefore, not
accepted in PVEs QMS.
Any deviation or gap disclosed after the assessment of the
device shall result in assessment of previous calculations and data
obtained from the electronic program.
Such deviation and / or gap are subject to the issuance of a
CAR.
7.6.Engineering Planning
Engineering Plan(s) / schedule describes the activities to be
realized by Engineering disciplines in accordance with applicable
Procedures, Specifications and referenced Codes; and all other
elements of the QMS to ensure the work is carried out in a planned,
documented and systematic manner. Planning of detailed schedule and
progress control is implemented in each discipline and is updated
as engineering activities evolve.
The engineering plan shall be detailed as per the following:
Contract review
Resources mobilization
Exhaustive review of the FEED
Detailed Design and Engineering stages
Review, verification and validation as appropriate at each stage
with appropriate bench marks; including completion of the Design
Verification Checklist
Responsibilities, authorities and dedicated approver for the
design
Performances Guarantees assessment.
The planning shall inform about when during the activities the
design verification will be carried out.
7.7.ASME Section VIII, Div. 2 Vessels (alternative rules)
The design for the vessels under ASME Section VIII, Div. 2 shall
be verified as per the requirements of the Code by a professional,
registered and experienced engineer.
7.8Design InputsThe Inputs are those elements necessary to
satisfy the product the Outputs; to ensure the performances of the
Equipments will be met as specified. It ensures also that
reliability and maintainability are safe.
Design Inputs related to Project requirements shall be reviewed
by discipline engineers as per the following criteria:
Functional and performance requirements
Previous similar experience
Safety requirements
Criticality level
Reliability, availability and maintainability requirements.
Complexity of the design.
Practicality of the replacement of some components.
Control of the design documents, including changes at Site
location
Capable of sustaining the lifetime of the equipment.
7.9Design Outputs
The Outputs are the satisfied characteristics of a product /
performances / feasibility / constructability. The Output is the
result of a specified Input such as capacity, debit, lifetime,
performances, etc.
Full and meticulous assessment and verification of the design
are mandatory and required by PVE PM.
The Outputs shall be provided in a form that enables
verification of the design and shall be approved by engineering
manager prior to be released in the process.
7.10Design ReviewDesign review is conducted systematically at a
reasonable stage (Ex: 20-25%) in accordance with planned schedule
to evaluate the ability of the design result and developed to meet
the specified requirements; and to identify any problem and propose
necessary actions. The design review includes the following:
HAZID and HAZOP study
3D Model Review for analysis and clash detection
Clash reports
Performances assessment; including full design review at all
stages and all levels for all disciplines
Plot Plan review
Review of the AFC prior to release
Participants in such review sessions shall include requirements
of functions concerned with the design stage. Records and necessary
actions shall be maintained.
Periodic assessments of design review shall be conducted by the
discipline engineer taking into This activity is documented and
must be auditable.
7.11Design VerificationDesign Verification activities should be
initiated when the project progress turns around 20-25%.
Verification session to be indicated into the design planning
schedule.
The Engineering Manager together with the project Engineer is
responsible for the application of this Procedure.
Design verification shall be performed to ensure that the design
outputs have met the design inputs and Specifications
requirements.
Design verification includes the assessment of the performances,
reliability, maintainability, maintenance, dimensioning,
quantifying, etc to ensure it meets the Contract.
Design Verification includes also the Inter-disciplines
checks.
Records of the results of the verification and necessary actions
are kept. Verification is conducted by an individual who has not
been directly responsible for design task. Refer to the design and
engineering verification procedure for the applicable form;
checklist and report.
This activity shall be documented against the Design
Verification Checklist attached to the applicable procedure and
records must be auditable. The checklist shall be approved by the
engineering manager.
Third Party Verification
Third party verification shall be done by CLIENT.
7.12Design validation
Design validation shall be planned and aims to ensure that the
result of the design is capable of meeting the requirements for the
specified application or intended use in line with specified
requirements.
The validation, wherever practical, shall be completed during
commissioning and performance testing phase prior to handing over
the Plant or system.
Validation means the specified Performance guarantees are
satisfied.
Records of the validation results shall be documented and
maintained.
7.13Design Change ControlEngineering manager is responsible for
this application.
Design change process, records and approval is Audited during
the Internal Audits.
Design change may result may be requested by CLIENT. The design
change shall be reviewed and validated; then approved before
implementation by the same level of authority than initial one.
Engineering is responsible for the preparation of the detailed
design change, and issuing and approval to related organizations
under engineering managers consultation. The review of the design
change shall include evaluation of the effect of the change on
constituent parts and design deliverables already delivered.
Engineering manager is responsible for controlling the design
change; assessed periodically by PQM.
When an element has been changed to the Design, full assessment
of the Performances Guarantees shall be re-conducted for the
applicable portion. Same requirements apply should any significant
change be made to the design after HAZID / HAZOP / Performances
Guarantees assessment sessions.
Project organization is responsible for maintaining records
through Document Control of all changes in chronological order as
part of Final Documentation.
All changes must be approved by CLIENT.
7.14.HAZID and HAZOP Review
Refer to Doc. No.??? requirements; art.3.4.19.
7.15.Self assessment
Each discipline engineer shall periodically conduct self
assessment in order to ensure he is on the right track and that
specified requirements for design and engineering are met and that
subject process is optimized.
Self assessment activity shall be documented.
8. DOCUMENT & DATA CONTROL
8.1.Responsibilities: The document controller is responsible for
all documents and data control activities including back-up, MDDM,
and EMDR control.
EMDR shall be kept up-dated as well.
The document controller reports to the Project Control
Manager.
8.2.Procedures: The following procedures apply to control the
document control process:
- QT1-VQPP-PVE-xx-00-xx-xxx-0002 (Document Numbering
Procedure)
- QT1-VQPP-PVE-xx-00-xx-xxx-0003 (Document Handling
Procedure)
References: ???; art. 10. (Documentation)
Engineering Deliverables : ????; art. 3.4.3 and 3.4.5 .
8.3.Documents generated shall be controlled in a systematic
manner to ensure that the current revisions of relevant documents
are available at the point of use, approved at the right level of
authority and superseded / obsolete version withdrawn from the
point of use or identified as such.
The requirements for documents are as follow:
Must be approved for adequacy prior to issue
Must be up-dated as necessary and re-approved
Must show all revisions numbers / status
Must be available at the point of use
Must be legible and readily identifiable
Documents from external origin must be controlled and
identified
Superseded or obsolete documents shall be withdrawn from point
of use or identified as such.
Deliverable documents will be allocated a unique document
number. Document numbers will be issued by the Document Controller
from the Engineering Master Document Register (EMDR). MDDM doesnt
have to contain the Revision number. Revised documents shall be
produced by copying the existing file and creating a later revision
with a revised file name.
Internal documents shall be given an alphanumeric revision
designation; i.e. Rev. A1 (Issued for IDC), A2. B1 (Issued for
Review). Once the documents have been approved by the Project, the
number shall be removed from the revision status ready for issuing
to the CLIENT for review and then approval.
Initial work in progress documents shall be saved in the project
directory under the applicable discipline folder in Engineering.
Once the document has been approved by the Project Manager it will
then be moved to the applicable Deliverables folder.
Engineering documents which have been marked up shall be
retained by PVEngineering in the project files as evidence of
design review.
9. CHECKING AND APPROVAL OF DOCUMENTATION
9.1.General
The overall quality of all technical documentation on the
project shall be the responsibility of the Engineering Manager.
Sub-contracting documents shall also been reviewed by the PPM
and the PM.
The functional responsibility for implementation of the checking
and approval procedure is that of the PQM.
The originator shall self check the design deliverable for
completeness and compliance with the project requirement.
Where required, documents shall be reviewed internally via an
Interdisciplinary Check subject to the discretion of the Lead
engineer.
All deliverable documents shall be reviewed internally via a
Check Copy Review cycle.
For technical / engineering type documents the Document
Checklist shall by completed by the Originator, Checker and the
Approver during the Check Copy review cycle.
Documents returned with comments from either Interdisciplinary
review or Check Copy review shall be amended, the revision status
updated with the next sequential numerical number eg. Rev "A2" and
recirculated for a second Check Copy review.
If the comments are minor, the document may be revised for
Project Managers approval without recirculation (subject to the
discretion of the Project Manager).
Once the documents have been approved in principle by the
Project Manager the revision status will be amended by removing the
numerical part from the revision status, the document will then be
initialed prior to sending to the CLIENT for review.
All deliverable documents sent to the CLIENT shall have the
document checklist page removed from the document prior to issuing.
The checklist page will be removed electronically using the PDF
editing program and removed physically from the hard copies sent to
the CLIENT. The original documents will remain unchanged.
The first issue of each document to the CLIENT will be Rev "B"
(Issue for Review)
CLIENT review and then approval documents will be transmitted by
the Document Controller in to CLIENT. The document review comments
and document approvals shall be consolidated by CLIENT and returned
to PVE within seven (7) working days from receipt of the
document.
Once a document has been returned from CLIENT review with
mark-ups, the document will be amended, the revision status updated
with the next sequential alphanumeric number eg. Rev "C1" and then
re-issued internally for Interdisciplinary Review (if required) and
Check Copy Review. Once the document has been approved in principle
by the Project Manager the document will be revised as Rev "C" and
then initialed and issued for CLIENT approval.
All document review records shall be maintained in the project
files.
Documents will be sent as hard copies to CLIENT for review or
approval under a transmittal. Where documents are sent to CLIENT
the document will be issued via e-mail with an electronic
transmittal attached.
9.2.Documents Sent for Internal Approval and CLIENT ReviewPVE
will amend the marked up returned documents, update the revision
status as Rev. A2.
Once the document is approved by PVEs Project Manger the number
will be removed from the revision status eg. Rev B and the revision
comment shall read Issued for Review a clean copy of the document
will then be issued in parallel with a transmittal to CLIENT for
review. CLIENT will consolidate the comments from all reviewing
bodies then return the documents to PVEs Document Controller for
scanning and return (electronically) to PVE for amendment.
9.3.Document Review Records
All document review records shall be maintained in the project
files.
10. RECORDS
10.1.Responsibilities :
All project documents issued to provide evidence of conformity
to requirements and demonstrating the effectiveness of the QMS are
called Records.
All such records must be numbered, registered and controlled.
Records are conserved in a location assuring any lost or
deterioration; and PVE is requesting same level of protection from
its Suppliers .
10.2.The document controller is responsible for managing
correctly this process subject to periodic assessment and scheduled
audits by PQM.
The records are generated by each team member in each
discipline.
Quality Records are treated and controlled per the above
referenced procedure together with other document control
procedures.
Records must be retrievable and traceable.
The list of the main quality record is found hereafter for quick
reference.
10.3.List of applicable Records (non exhaustive)
Together with this list, PVE has identified the following
mandatory quality records to be recorded. The list is a live list
and is subject to further revision to reflect the realty of the
Contract evolution.
Engineering documents listed in the quality matrix apply
Documents for Final Documentation
All documents listed in the Government applications requirements
for Permits, Registration, etc . Clash report
3D Model report
Materials selection diagrams
Management review sessions notes and report
Training documentation (see Training)
Planning and product realization documents
Design review notes
Design verification notes and conclusions
Design validation notes and conclusions
Design change including concession and derogation
Performances guarantees assessment report
Suppliers evaluation report
Traceability record
Internal Audits reports
Control of Corrective Action report
Control of Preventive Action report
Any other necessary to demonstrate that specified level of
Quality is met
Third Party Design review / assessment report
HSE report
10.4.Specificities to quality records Prior to be registered,
Quality records must be signed by the entitled authority for
validation and approval. Any further revision shall have the same
treatment.
A non signed record is not legally recognized and consequently
not valid.
The quality record must be signed by authorized entity only
which has the right level of authority.
All appropriate references must appear on records with the date
(DD/MM/YY).
Records remain at CLIENT and legal authorities disposition for
consultation.
Copies, when requested by other entity than PVE must be
previously authorized by PM. That excludes CLIENT request when the
document is subject to deliverables and Final Documentation.
Copies must be certified as authentic copy of the original and
certified as such by the right level of authority as described in
the list of authorized signatures.
Computerized Back-up of soft version must be done every day.
11. ENGINEERING SERVICES SUB-CONTRACTING CONTROL
11.1.Project Manager is responsible for inquiry, review,
expediting and delivery of sub-contracted engineering needed in
accordance with specified purchase requirements.
11.2.PQM is responsible for evaluation of Subcontractor based on
their ability to supply acceptable product to the specified level.
11.3.Criteria for evaluation will be established by the PQM and are
part of the QMS.
Evaluation for bidders inquiry shall be performed both
technically and commercially to ensure that bidder quotation has
met the purchasing requirements. For quality and technical aspects,
bid evaluation shall be conducted by PQM. Commercial aspects are
evaluated by either the PPM or the Finance manager or both.
Before selection of a Supplier, pre-qualification meeting will
be performed, chaired by the PPM, assisted by PQM to ensure the
purchase requirements have been clarified, that Supplier has in
place the appropriate tool and disposition to satisfy the product
requirements.
12. PROJECT CONTROL
Procedure: QT1-VQPP-PVE-xx-00-xx-xxx-0004 (Project Coordination
procedure)12.1.Responsibilities
The project control coordinator is responsible to implement and
apply the requirements of these activities.
The coordinator reports to the Engineering Manager.
12.2.The Project Manager shall establish that all personnel
working on the project are familiar with the Scope of Works and
Basis of Design (BoD) and understand the relevance of the immediate
task. The Project Manager through the Quality Manager shall ensure
that all members of the Project Team have access to, and are
familiar with the Quality Plan and Procedures.
A number of project systems and documents have been or are being
developed, including an Organizational Chart, Project filing
system, Quality Assurance Plan (this document) and document control
documentation.
The Project Manager will utilize key documents to control the
project for this project.
These documents will include the following:
Master Documents Distribution Matrix
Project Execution Plan;
Project Co-ordination Procedure;
Project Quality Assurance Plan;
BoD;
Project Schedule;
Engineering Master Document Register (EMDR).
Project kick off meetings will be held with the project teams in
Vietnam upon the contract award to inform the teams how the project
is to be managed and controlled and the systems put in place to do
such. The kick off meetings will also cover other matters which
shall be recorded in meeting minutes.
12.3.Team MeetingsRegular Project meetings will be held with the
Project team to review the progress of the engineering work.
The meeting agenda will generally include:
HSE items;
Quality items;
Progress against schedule of critical work tasks;
Overview of engineering work complete and in progress;
Comments on and change to the Scope of Works or BoD;
Additional information received from the CLIENT or other outside
sources.
Each meeting shall be minuted and distributed to the Project
Team members, and copies kept in the project files.
13. CONTROL OF NON-CONFORMITY
13.1.Responsibilities
The PQM is responsible for the application of this
procedure.
All the terms related to NCR must be understood in order to
ensure the appropriate documentation is raised and appropriate
corrective action is undertaken at the right level and avoid
confusion and lost of time and money.
For the purpose of this Project, NCR should be covered by a
CAR.
NCR could be used should a major discrepancy be disclosed in the
process.
Consequently, PQM will use rather the Corrective Action
Procedure and resulting findings will be recorded on the CAR
Form.
13.2.During all the phases of the processes, deviations,
findings and non-conformities shall be identified, recorded and
controlled as per the Procedure.
PQM, or dedicated representative is responsible for monitoring
the activity by sporadic In Situ assessments (Surveillance) and
scheduled Audits.
All Non-conformities shall be subjected to documented Non
Conformity Report. The NCR shall describe in detail the object and
cause(s) of the non-conformity; and refer to the applicable
technical reference(s). The NCR shall also provide proposition for
corrective action and show all the appropriate signatures and
date.
Disposition will be approved by CLIENT prior to start the
corrective action. The NCR is after recorded in the Log and
distributed to the entity performing the subject work for
action.
13.3.NCR review and approval prior to be issued
All NCRs must be submitted to PM and PQM for review and approval
prior to proceed to issuance to the concerned Entity.
Proposed corrective action for NCR shall be approved by PM after
engineering review. Corrective action is proposed in writing on the
NCR and approved by PQM and Engineering prior to any repair work or
use as is, rework, re-grade or scrap disposition be undertaken.
13.4.Concession request can be asked to the PQM QA/QC Manager
and CUSTOMER when engineering considers the deviation to the
specified requirement(s) doesnt affect the product quality such as
utile life, reliability, maintainability, performance and/or
cosmetic aspect.
When receiving a non-conformance report from CLIENT , PVE, after
evaluation of the issue and after having concluded that the
situation doesnt affect the practical quality of the product, may
opt to proceed with a Deviation or Concession Request which shall
be recorded.
Concession Request number shall be given by the document
controller and referenced on the NCR if any.
Concession Request and NCR shall be part of the fabrication
dossier and are considered as quality records.
Concession Request and Nonconformity report might be a reason
for Design Change which case shall be documented on the Design
Change Request Form.
14. QUALITY AUDITS
14.1.Responsibilities: The PQM is responsible for the Audit
Procedure implementation and to conduct the said Audits as per the
approved Audit Schedule and issue the reports. The PQM is also
responsible for the follow-up of the corrective actions.
14.2.The Project Manager shall ensure that a quality system
audit is carried out during this stage of the project to ensure
compliance with documented procedures and operating practices. The
audit will take place as per the pre-established schedule.
14.3.A formal audit report to management shall be prepared by
the Auditor. The audit findings and any Corrective Preventive
Action Request (CAR PAR) shall be listed and/or attached.
Distribution of the audit report shall be as determined by the
Auditor.
Informal spot audits will be carried out on each discipline to
ensure that the deliverable documents are developed in compliance
with the project requirements and quality procedures.
Where non-compliances have been identified, a follow up audit
shall be performed to indicate that the corrective action taken has
satisfactorily corrected the deficiency and the Quality Manager
shall then close out the CAR PAR.
A copy of the close out (CAR PAR) is distributed to recipients
of the initial audit report and the status log updated.
The Quality Manager shall retain and file all audit reports,
attachments, CAR PAR and the results of audits as quality
records.
The Quality Manager shall provide all training required by PVE
personnel relating to this Quality Plan.
The Audit report shall be approved by the PQM and the PM.
15. CORRECTIVE ACTION
15.1.All members of PMT are responsible for the application of
this element under the PQM supervision.
The observation and compilation of one or several
non-conformities involving similar discrepancies identified along
within system progress and / or fabrication / construction phases,
throughout all processes results in corrective action request.
Corrective action process also applies for procedural matters and
failure in a system.
Corrective actions shall be implemented as per the following
indicators; through the following activities:
Surveillance,
External and Internal Quality Audits,
Process Evaluation,
Performances guarantees report,
Product return
Peoples,
Outputs from review meetings,
Client Complaints,
Nonconformity case evaluation
Results of self-assessment,
QA indicators reports
Any other means helping to disclose malfunction and possibility
for improvement.
15.2.Corrective action implemented will be proportional to the
extent of the actual non-conformity and risk involved. This is
performed after a root cause analysis of the non-conformity or gap
in the system at all the levels and all activities.
Corrective actions may require changes in methods, procedures
and organization applicable to the current activities needing to be
addressed immediately. All parties involved shall agree upon
Corrective action but the final decision is under the head of the
services responsibility supported by PQM.
Quality, engineering, methods and production shall identify the
needs and methods to implement corrective action and improve the
process.
Besides, the following elements shall be assessed and developed
in order to identify the root cause of a problem (7 TOOLS rule as
established by a cause to effect diagram ):
Manpower,
Methods,
Machines (equipment, tools etc),
Materials,
Money (financial needs),
Management,
Measurements and metrics.
All relatives questions should be studied to find out the root
causes of a dysfunction.
16. PREVENTIVE ACTION
16.1.Implementation of the Preventive action process is a must
within PVE; considering the cost of nonconformity. The cost is
financial, lost of time, credibility lost, and more.
Preventive actions shall be implemented for the following:
The detection of the potential causes of non-conformities along
with all the processes.
The detection of improvement axes relevant to the functioning of
project processes.
Through the following activities / events:
Vigilance,
Surveillance,
External and Internal Quality Audits,
Performances guarantees report
Inspection,
Peoples,
Results of self-assessment,
Outputs from review meetings,
Client feedback,
Suggestions from Projects employees
Any other means helping to disclose malfunction and possibility
for improvement
Results of the assessments should be an output of the management
review sessions.
Preventive actions implemented will be proportional to the
extent of the potential non-conformity and risk involved. This is
performed after a root cause analysis of the potential
non-conformity.
Preventive actions may require changes in methods, procedures
and organization applicable to the current Project needing to be
addressed immediately, or may be a concern for future Projects
where action may be taken accordingly.
16.2.Responsibilities
The PQM Engineering Manager are responsible to identify the
needs, initiate and recommend corrective action process together
with all discipline managers
Induction and training shall be documented and retained in the
project files.
17. ATTACHMENTAttachment - Quality PolicyAttachment - Quality
Policy
PETROVIETNAM OIL AND GAS GROUPPETROVIETNAM INVESTMENT
CONSULTANCY AND ENGINEERING J.S.CPV ENGINEERING QUALITY POLICY
"QUALITY AND SATISFACTION OF CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS DECIDE
PVENGINEERINGS DEVELOPMENT"PV ENGINEERING COMMITS:1. Always provide
the best products and services, ensure the progress, quality,
efficiency, safety and high reliability as agreed with
CUSTOMERs.
2. Continuously improve to achieve the perfection of products
and services, relationships with CUSTOMERs and competitive ability
of company.
3. Continuously train and develop human resource, increase
investment in technical equipment and technology, research and
apply efficient and modern management methods.
Ho Chi Minh City, 20th August 2008
GENERAL DIRECTOR
BUI TUAN ANH
PAGE QT1-VQPP-PVE-xx-00-xx-xxx-0001Rev. 0Page 3/30
