12
Dedicated Exclusively to the California Bar Exam Bar Review TORTS & TORTS REMEDIES (Summary Flowcharts)

60257944 Bad Torts Flowchart

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

14

Citation preview

Page 1: 60257944 Bad Torts Flowchart

Dedicated Exclusively to the California Bar Exam

Bar Review

TORTS &TORTS REMEDIES(Summary Flowcharts)

Page 2: 60257944 Bad Torts Flowchart

Copyright© 2009 by BarPassers Bar Review. All rights reserved.

No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and

retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Printed in the United States of America.

Page 3: 60257944 Bad Torts Flowchart

BLANK

Page 4: 60257944 Bad Torts Flowchart

TORTS(Overview)

PERSON

Privacy

PROPERTY

Personal injury

Economic

Intrusion

Publicity

False Light

Comm. Approp.Deceit

Contract (Interference)

Negligence

Strict Liability

Emotional distress

Real

Personal

ReputationLibel

Slander

IS THE TARGET ) A

RESPONS. )?

WHAT ISB’S INJURY?

LIABILITY WIDENING

LIABILITY NARROWING

ACTUAL CAUSE

IDENTIFYB’S THEORY(IES)

INTENTIONAL: )’s Volitional Act and State of Mind

NEGLIGENCE: )’s Unreasonable Conduct

STRICT LIABILITY: )’s Abnormally Dangerous Activity, Defective Product or Animal

Intent

Subst. Certainty

WantonReckless

INTENT NEGLIGENCE STRICTLIABILITY

B

ª

Vicarious liab

Duty to controlContributionIndemnity

Death

Wrongful death action

Survival action

Survival

B

ª

Malicious prosecution/Abuse of process

19E

Page 5: 60257944 Bad Torts Flowchart

Conversion

Trespass

Person

Property

Zone of danger

) ‘s Act

Body Tort

Emotional Distress (Fright)

Physical injuryBystander ?

Intentional: Serious & outrageous

Negligent

Reputation/Privacy

Body

Business

Real

Personal

Î

Deceit

Nuisance

Emotions

Ï

Ï

Trespass

Defamation (Libel/Slander)

Invasion of Privacy

Assault

Battery

False Imprisonment

Intrusion

Public disclosure

False light

Commercial appropriation

Ï

Emotional Distress

Effect of Mistake

Î

Malicious prosecution/Wrongful institution of civilproceedings/Abuse of process

Public

Private

INJURY

Inducing breach of contract/Interference w/prospective business advant.age

Substantial certaintyINTENT

Transferred intent

INTENTIONAL

Exceeds Scope

DEFENSES

Necessity

Authority

Defense

Consent FraudIllegal

DisciplineArrestShopkeeper

OthersProperty

Public

Private

FelonyMisdemeanorPrevention

Self

19F

Page 6: 60257944 Bad Torts Flowchart

NEGLIGENCE

Affirmative Act

DUTY

Omission to ActBystander

Good Samaritan

General Rule: No Duty

Reas. care to foreseeable Bs

ExceptionsLand occupiersEmotional distressWrongful life

Special Relationship

Reliance

Creates the perilConduct

PromiseDuty to careDuty to warnDuty to control

Reasonable care underthe circumstances

STANDARDOF CARE

B in classType of harmExcuse

Î

Mental Illness

Custom

Emergency

Child (Adult activity?)

Carrier

Professional

Statute

LAND OWNERDUTY OF

Trad: Status of B

Modern: Reasonable

RC

Who is theB ?

Î

RC

AritficialConditions

NaturalConditions Activities

RCNo Duty(except trees)

Outside thePremises UnkownTrespasser No Duty No Duty No Duty No Duty

KnownTrespasser

License

Invitee

No Duty RC

RC

RC RC RC

Warn or Make safeKnown Dangers

Warn or Make safeKnown Dangers

Warn or Make safeKnown Dangers

19G

Page 7: 60257944 Bad Torts Flowchart

DEFENSES

Unexcused violation of statute

BREACH

Res ipsa loquitur

Reasonable person

Gravity/Likelihood

)

Burden/Utility

Actual

CAUSATION

But For

Substantial Factor

LegalWagonMound

Dependent

Unforeseeable?

Type

Probably negligence

Probably ªB did not contribute

Summers v. Tice

Direct

Indirect

Foreseeable result?

Extent

Market Share

Effect ofIntervening Force

Foreseeable result?

PolemisExtent

Type

Independent

Abnormal?

Comparative negB ‘s Conduct

Assumption of Risk

Pure

Implied

Reckless )

Last Clear Chance

DAMAGES

Contributory neg

Modified

Express

19H

Page 8: 60257944 Bad Torts Flowchart

STRICT LIABILITY

)ACTIVITY

AbnormallyDangerous

DefectiveProducts

AnimalsDomestic

Wild

High Risk

Cannot Eliminate Risk

Uncommon in Area

's

Intentional (Battery)

Negligence

Strict Liability

Implied Warranties

Express Warranty

Merchantability

Fitness forparticular purpose

Buyer / User / Bystander

Mfr / Retailer / Assembler

Franchisor

):

B:

):

Parties

Goods

Real Prop

Services

New

Used

Defect

Manufacturing (Flaw)

Design

Warning (Lack of)

Consumer Contemplation

Danger/Utility (Feasible Alternative)

Personal Injury

Property Damage

Economic loss

DamagesProduct Itself

Other

Product Misuse

's FaultBContrib/Comparative Fault

Assumption of Risk

Foreseeable

UnforeseeableDefenses

STRICTPRODUCTSLIABILITY

* Also Discuss:1) Negligence2) Warranties

19I

Page 9: 60257944 Bad Torts Flowchart

Concerning B

Individual/Group

Innuendo

Colloquium

) s Fault

Intentional — ok

Negligence — ok

Strict Liability — No

Initial Publisher

Repeaters

Disseminators

Responsible ) s

Damaging to B Slander per se

Ordinary slander

Libel

Business/Profession

Unchaste woman

Disease

Crime

Inducement

DEFAMATION

Published to 3d party

(Communicated)

DefamatoryStatement of

Fact

Reputational harm

Fact vs. opinion

Common LawUse of extrinsic facts

Also consider:

INVASION OF PRIVACY

EMOTIONALDISTRESS

Intentional

Negligent

1. Is the B a public figure or private person?

2. Is the subject matter a public or private concern?

-- Standard-- Damages

3. Was the standard violated?

A. Public figure B v. Media ) New York Times Malice

B. Public figure B v. Non-Media ) New York Times Malice

C. Private B v. Media ) (Public Negligence - actual damages Non-Media ) concern) Malice - presumed damages

D. Private B v. Non-Media ) (Private Negligence -presumed damages concern) Strict Liability ? ? ?

ConstitutionalLaw

Overlay(Approach)

Defenses

Truth

Retraction

Consent

Absolute

Conditional

Spousal

Govt.

Interest

Reporting

Fair Comment

C/L PrivilegesModern - B/P on B

Trad. view - B/P on )

19J

Page 10: 60257944 Bad Torts Flowchart

TORT REMEDIES

ASSAULT

BATTERY

FALSE IMP.

MENTAL DISTRESS

- Nominal ok- Compensatory- Punitives ok if) acts with malice

Ouster

Severance

Injury

Mesne damages

Diminution in value or

Rental value or

Benefit to )

Cost of repair

Diminution in value or

Cost of repair

TRESPASSTO R.P.

Public OK if special type injury

PrivatePermanent nuisance-Diminution in value

Loss of use, enjoyment

NUISANCE

TRESPASS CHATTEL Yes, depends on nature, extent of damages(dim in value or cost of repair)

CONVERSION Yes, FMV

Nominal

Compensatory

Punitive

General

SpecialDestroy

Damage

TakeForeseeable

CertainUnavoidable

Property(Real/personal)

Personal injury

NEGLIGENCEAll losses prox'ly caused

Caveat: economic loss

Caveat: mental distress alone

(No punitives)

STRICT LIABILITY All loses prox'ly caused Caveat: economic lossLimit: Damages flowing from dangerous propensity

(No punitives)

PRODUCTS Depends on Theory: See above

DRI

TYPESOF

DAMAGES

DAMAGES

19K

Page 11: 60257944 Bad Torts Flowchart

RESTITUTION

Constructive Trust

Equitable Lien

Replevin

EjectmentLegal

Equitable(Quasi-K)

Tort liability theory

Inadequacy

Feasibility

Balancing

Property Rt.

Defenses

ofLegal Remedy

Damages

Ejectment

Replevin

Speculative

Multi suits

Real property

Irrep. injury

Jurisdiction

Mandatory vs. Prohibitory

When?

Who?

What torts?

Laches

Unclean Hands

Free speech

Criminal acts

Traditional view

Modern view

Personal

Business

Nat. security

INJUNCTION

TROPrelim. Inj.

Perman. Inj.

DEFAMATION

Damage to reputation Presumed? Libel/Slander Per SeCaveat: Gertz - Actual DamagesSpecial Pecuniary losses always recoverablePunitive-maybe

PRIVACY

Publicity - Distress plus special damagesIntrusion - Distress plus special damagesFalse light - Distress plus special damagesComm. approp. - Benefit to

FRAUD/DECEIT Maj: expectation (benefit of bargain)Min: out of pocket

INTERFERE W/ K Maj: tort measureMin: K. measure

PROSP. ADV. Caveat: speculative

)DAMAGES(continued)

19L

Page 12: 60257944 Bad Torts Flowchart

LAW SCHOOL BENEFITS*

$250 down payment locks in Bar Review Course tuition & entitles Enrollee to:

Volume I – 8 First Year Subject Outlines - Contains detailed substantive law outlines for all First-year subjects including Torts & Torts Remedies, Contracts & Contracts Remedies, Real Property, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Evidence.

Volume II – 6 Upper Division Subject Outlines - Contains detailed substantive law outlines for Upper-level subjects including Wills, Trusts, Community Property, Business Associations (Corporations, Agency, Partnership & LLC’s), Civil Procedure and Professional Responsibility.

Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam (MPRE) Home Study Program - For students taking the March, August or November MPRE, BarPassers offers a 4-hour lecture on audio CD with lecture handout, substantive law outline and four 60-question practice exams with explanatory answers.

$450 down payment locks in Bar Review Course tuition & entitles Enrollee to the above, plus:

1. First Year Program, including:

a. iPod® - Enrollees receive an iPod® containing almost 45 hours of instruction, including substantive review and essay writing workshops for Torts, Contracts, Criminal Law, Real Property and Civil Procedure. The substantive review lectures provide an overview of each subject, while the essay writing workshops highlight frequently tested issues of law, teach issue-spotting approaches and explain how to properly develop and organize an essay answer.

b. First Year Volume - This book contains flowchart handouts and essay hypotheticals for the review lectures and writing workshops contained on the iPod®. The flowcharts are designed to be used with the review lectures to give students a visual framework for learning and organizing the law. They are also used in the workshops to develop issue-spotting approaches and to simplify exam outlining. This book also contains 15 additional essay hypotheticals with model answers for practice. These may be submitted for grading; additional charges apply.

2. Baby Bar Review (if applicable) - BarPassers offers a complete home study review program for students planning to take the June or October Baby Bar Exam. Enrollees receive an iPod® containing substantive review lectures and essay writing and multiple choice skills workshops for Torts, Contracts and Criminal Law. Enrollees also receive our Baby Bar Review Volume which contains flowchart handouts for the review lectures and essay and multiple choice hypotheticals for the workshops. Additional essay and multiple choice questions are included in the volume for practice. Exam grading is also available for an additional charge. For added flexibility, home study programs are available at any time.

$1000 down payment locks in Tutorial Program tuition & entitles Enrollee to the above, plus:

1. Upper Division Program, including:

a. iPod® - Enrollees receive an iPod® containing over 32 hours of substantive review, including lectures covering Constitutional Law, Criminal Procedure, Evidence, Wills, Trusts, Community Property, Business Associations (Corporations, Agency, Partnerships & LLC’s) and Professional Responsibility.

b. Upper Division Volume - This book contains flowchart handouts for the review lectures contained on the iPod®. The flowcharts are designed to be used with the review lectures to give students a visual framework for learning and organizing the law. They can also be used to develop issue-spotting approaches and help to simplify exam outlining.

*Effective 08/11/09; subject to change without notice.

1.800.227.7277 www.barpassers.com