Upload
summit-professional-networks
View
116
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
International Intellectual Property Protection and Enforcement
September 19, 2014
• Flor M. Colón, Associate General Counsel, Xerox Corporation
• Noni Ellison-Southall, Assistant General Counsel, Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.
• Devika Kornbacher, Attorney, Vinson & Elkins LLP
Introductions
2
• Types of Intellectual Property– Trademarks (including domain names)– Copyrights and other works of authorship– Patents and patent-related rights– Trade secrets
• International Protection of Your Brands
• International Protection of Your Works
• International Protection of Your Inventions
• Enforcement Principles
Discussion Points
3
• A “trademark” is a word or a logo used to identify the source of goods
• A “service mark” is a word or logo used to identify the source of services
• A “trade name” is a word or words that used to identify the owner’s business (as distinguished from its goods and services)
Trademarks
4
• “Trade dress” is the visual characteristics of a product (color, size, shape, etc.) used to identify the source of goods
• The underlying rights in and toa trade name, a trademark, a service mark, or trade dress areterritory specific and acquiredthrough use in the marketplaceor filing, depending on jurisdiction
Trademarks
5
• “Reserved” through a registrar – Neither reservation nor registration requires actual use in commerce
• Registrars governed by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), which operates the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)– ICANN has international reach but is in the U.S.
• Registration of one top-level domain (e.g., “.com”) does not include other top-level domains (e.g., “.br” or “.ca”)– Certain top-level domains are restricted to certain types of
organizations (e.g., “.gov” is limited to U.S. governmental entities)
Domain Name Registrations
6
• In the U.S., trademark law governs domain name disputes
• Internationally, trademark owners can also demand arbitration pursuant to the Uniform Policy for Domain Name Dispute Resolution (UDRP)– UDRP is also overseen by ICANN
Domain Name Disputes
7
• Governed by country specific statutes in view of Berne Convention– U.S. did not become a party to the Berne Convention until 1989; 102 years
after the convention’s creation
• Applies to original “works of authorship” fixed in a tangible medium, for example:– Literary works (books, articles, software)– Dramatic works (plays) – Audio-visual works (musicals, movies, music scores)– Paintings, sculptures, choreographic works, architectural plans– Compilations of other copyrighted works
• Digital qualifies as tangible, not just “hard copy” or “print”
Copyrights
8
• Facts, ideas and functional aspects of software are not protected
• In general, a copyright owner owns five exclusive rights:– Copy, distribute, modify, perform, and display.
• Ownership is determined by law unlessmodified by contract (where suchmodification is permitted)
• Term depends on country specific statutes
Copyrights
9
• Moral Rights: A translation of the Frenchterm “droit moral,” the term refers to theability of authors to control the eventualfate of their works – Limited in the U.S.– Recognized more often internationally
• Database Rights: Recognize the investment made in collecting data or other materials, arranging them in a systematic or methodical way, and making them individually accessible by electronic or other means.– Does not protect the software for collection, arrangement, or access– In the U.S., not recognized apart from copyright
Other Works in Rights of Authorship
10
• To be patentable, an invention must exhibit utility, novelty, and be non-obvious (U.S.)/ have an inventive step (Europe)
• Patentable subject matter depends on jurisdiction. In the U.S., the following are patentable:– Articles of Manufacture– Processes– Compositions of Matter– Machines– Improvements
Patents
11
• Inventorship can be different than ownership
• In March 2013, the U.S. joined the rest of the world in becoming a “first to file” instead of “first to invent” jurisdiction
• Does not confer a right to necessarily do anything– Only a right to prevent others from making, using, selling, offering for sell, or
importing the claimed invention
• Can file internationally through PatentCooperation Treaty (administered by the World Intellectual Property Organization)
Patents
12
• Supplementary Protection Certificates (EU version of PTE)
• Statutory Invention Registrations (no longer available)
• Industrial Design Rights (UK/EU version of design patent)
• Mask Works Rights (for semiconductor chips only)
Other Patent-Related Rights
13
• In the U.S., the definition of a trade secret depends on the state
– “...any formula, pattern, device or compilation of information which is used in one’s business and which gives him an opportunity to obtain an advantage over competitors who do not know or use it.” • Restatement of Torts, § 757, comment b (Texas and New York)
– “information that derives independent economic value from not being generally known that is the subject of reasonable efforts to maintain its secrecy”• Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA) (enacted by forty-six states)
• Internationally, the definition of a trade secret also varies by jurisdiction– Most definitions require economic value/competitive advantage
Trade Secrets
14
• Trade secrets, unlike patents, do not give the owner of trade secret rights against the world but only against those who breach confidence or steal the secret
• Trade secret owner cannot exclude others from independently developing and using the information
• Protection lasts as long asthe information is secret
Trade Secrets
15
16
International Protectionof Your Brands
Practical Pointers
• There are four practical tips to ensure international protection of trademarks:– Register– Monitor and protect– Use the trademarks properly and educate others to do
the same– Protect/enforce
International Protection of Your Brands
17
• An owner must register its trademark in every country where it intends to use the mark (directly or via license)– Provides the owner the most control over the use of the
mark by others
– Prevent others from registering the mark or one that can be deemed confusingly similar
– Provides the strongest basis for challenging the unauthorized use of the mark
• Know the applicable laws (“first-to-file”; “first-to-use”)
Registration of the Trademark
18
• Put in place a healthy monitoring program so that you are aware of any infringing conduct and can react quickly
– Internet surveillance – look for unauthorized use of the TM (name or logo) on a website or domain name (e.g., xeroxcopiers.com)
– “Watch notices” – monitor trademark applications for the same mark or confusingly similar marks (e.g., Xeros or Cerox)
Monitor and Police the Trademark
19
– Recordations – record/file the TM with customs where you suspect counterfeit activity may occur (e.g., China, Brazil)
– “Boots on the ground” – make sure that your local employees and channel partners are vigilant about the use of the TM locally and report misuse when they see it• Best ambassadors of the Xerox TM in over 160
countries• E.g., use of “xerox” in Brazil dictionary
Monitor and Police the Trademark
20
• Absolutely critical that the owner uses the TM properly in every country – Every employee– Every licensee– Every written communication– Every ad/marketing campaign– Every time!
• Adopt policies that address the protection of the TM
Use It Properly and Educate
21
• Engage in trademark education advertising campaigns (domestically, globally, internally and externally), especially if you suspect or know about misuse– Xerox started taking steps to protect its mark early on
and by 1972 the company was aggressively protectingthe Xerox trademark
– Educational efforts were widely publicized which helped tell the company’s story (e.g., articles were written about the Xerox ad campaigns)
– Ads were educational, but adopted a humorous tone (more likely to be achieve objective)
Use It Properly and Educate
22
23
24
25
26
• Don’t tolerate the misuse of the mark by third parties and have a process in place to deal with violations– Send cease and desist letters for commercial misuse
followed by administrative or court proceedings for ongoing infringement
– Send “friendlier” letters/notices in instances of innocent misuse (e.g., misuse by public figures)
– File formal oppositions to trademark applications
Protect the TM and Enforce Your Rights
27
28
International Protectionof Your Works
An Entertainment Industry Perspective
• Similar to trademarks, once it is confirmed that the copyright owner has the necessary rights in a particular jurisdiction, the owner can deploy commonly adopted procedures to enforce its copyrights:– Send cease and desist letters– Report to the relevant IP authority– Use Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)– Bring a civil claim– Seek punitive damages– Urge prosecution of criminal offenses
International Protection of Your Works
29
• Before reporting the matter to the relevant IP authority or commencing any legal action against a copyright infringer, it is advisable to issue a cease and desist letter to the infringer– Although this is not a legal requirement, it is highly
recommended
– The letter will help to identify theissues in dispute and establishwhether litigation can be avoidedby resolving the issues through other means, for example, mediation or arbitration
Send Cease and Desist Letter
30
• If a copyright owner has concerns or is aware of any persons that may be infringing its IP, then it would be advisable to report the matter to relevant IP office in the respective country– For example, in the UK, report is made to local Trading Standards
Office and/or the anonymous reporting system of the charity CrimeStoppers, and Action Fraud
– The information provided to the Trading Standards Office may be passed on to other bodies with the power to take action against the trader (e.g., the Competition and Markets Authority, the police and the courts service)
– In Hong Kong, report is made to the Customs and Excise Department – the only department responsible for taking criminal sanctions against copyright and trademark infringements in the SAR
Report to the Relevant IP Authority
31
• “ADR” refers to methods of resolving disputes without having to going to court
– The most common forms are arbitration and mediation
– Intellectual property disputes are frequently resolved on the basis of expert opinions
Use Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
• The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Arbitration and Mediation Center is a neutral, international and non-profit dispute resolution provider– Offers arbitration, mediation and expert
determination services for the resolution ofcommercial disputes between private partiesinvolving intellectual property
– The procedures are open to any person orentity, regardless of nationality or domicile
– The proceeding may be held anywhere in the world, in any language and under any law chosen by the parties
Use Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
33
• Legal action for IP infringement can be brought under statute and common law for IP infringement
• In some cases, issuing a cease and desist letter (as mentioned above) may not be the best way to deal with suspected infringement, because an infringer may choose to hide or destroy evidence– In these circumstances it might be appropriate to
go to court to apply for an interim injunction withoutgiving notice to the infringer
– An interim injunction is an order that the allegedinfringers stop their infringing action pending theoutcome of a trial (which can take many months)
Bring a Civil Claim
34
Other Interim Relief
• Anton Piller Order– Enables the infringers’ premises to be searched for
documentation and evidence relevant to the infringement (e.g., details of purchasers or suppliers), which may otherwise be destroyed if the infringer is put on notice of the infringement
– Applied for on an ex parte injunction basis– Compels infringing party to attend subsequent court
hearing, where court decides whether to continue the injunction until trial
Bring a Civil Claim
35
Other Remedies
• Apart from interim relief, there areother remedies available in copyright infringement actions– Final injunctions– Damages for loss suffered and account
of profits gained by the infringing partyat his expense.
– Attorney’s fees (U.S.)
• In some cases, the court may alsoorder additional damages to be paidby the infringing party to the copyright owner
Bring a Civil Claim
36
• Punitive damages are sometimes granted depending on the conduct of the infringing party
– Reflects the aggravation, harm and damage to the copyright owner as a result of the other party’s unreasonable and deliberative wrongful conduct
– For example, in Hong Kong, under sections 108 and 221 of the Copyright Ordinance (Cap. 528) factors to be considered in awarding punitivedamages include:• flagrancy of the infringement• completeness, accuracy and reliability
of the infringing party’s business accountsand records
Punitive Damages
37
• In certain countries, infringement of IP rights can be criminal offences (as well as being actionable in civil law)
• In Hong Kong, besides civil relief, criminal proceedings are also available – The Customs and Excise Department is responsible for enforcing the
criminal aspects of copyright infringement and trade mark counterfeiting, it has expensive powers of search and seizure and may co-operate with overseas authorities and rights owners to combat infringement
– Criminal provisions for trade mark counterfeiting and copyright infringement are found in Trade Descriptions Ordinance (Cap. 362) and Copyright Ordinance (Cap. 528)
Criminal Offenses
38
• In Singapore, criminal proceedings are available in respect of infringing acts defined as offences under the Copyright Act and Trade Marks Act– In addition, the court may order any infringing copy or article in the
possession of the alleged offender or before the court, which has been sued for making infringing copies, to be destroyed or delivered to the copyright owner
• In the UK, the main recourse for a rights owner is to bring civil infringement proceedings. In certain circumstances, criminal proceedings may be available where there is copyright infringement (sections 107 and 198 of Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988) or trade mark infringement (section 92 to section 96 of Trade Marks Act)
Criminal Offenses
39
• Turner’s licensing partner in China provides a list of offending sites that contain/offer Turner’s Falling Skies Seasons 1-4 (see example below). Turner assists in addressing the piracy issue by sending those sites legal take down notices
Enforcement Examples
40
• Unauthorized translated (Turkish) version of Cartoon Networks’ Regular Show on YouTube:
Enforcement Examples
41https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRF2WZkcDr8
• Turner’s anti-piracy vendor Irdeto Intelligence monitors the most popular UGC sites (e.g., YouTube, Dailymotion, Vimeo, and up to approximately 20 others)
• Irdeto uses their expertise in the industry to determine what sites to monitor and when to add new sites (unless Turner specifically brings one to their attention)
• Generally, once Irdeto finds potential infringements, the videos are reviewed for compliance with rules provided by Turner (based on duration and types of acceptable edits/mash-ups, etc.)
• Irdeto then sends DMCA take-down notices to the sites hosting the videos to be removed
Infringement/Enforcement Examples
42
43
International Protectionof Your Inventions
• Same basic principles as protecting trademarks and copyrights:– Obtain rights– Monitor/identify infringing use, exportation, etc. – Send cease and desist letters– Bring claims (e.g., in court or through arbitration)– Seek injunctions and punitive damages
International Protection of Your Inventions
44
• Patent Cooperation Treaty– Allows deferral of decision on protection in member jurisdictions for
30 months– Requires unity of invention
• Some jurisdictions (e.g., Brazil) require registration of license rights
• Consult local counsel to ensure acquisition of rights (via contract, etc.)from local employees and consultantsthat are hired to invent
Obtaining Rights
45
• Must have evidence of infringement of each and every element of patent claim(s)– Local agents/distributers provide market information
• Federal Patent Court in Germany has become a popular jurisdiction for enforcement of patent rights– More than half of Europe’s patent litigation cases are handled by German
courts– Relatively low litigation costs
• European Patent Office is considering aunified patent court, awaiting ratification byat least 13 member countries
Bringing Claims
46
• International Trade Commission (ITC) is a popular venue for enforcing U.S. patent rights against importation by international infringers and those who sell those infringing imported goods– No monetary damages awarded, but can obtain
• Cease and desist order against sellers of infringing goods
• Limited or general exclusion order against infringing importers
– Faster decision than federal court
Bringing Claims
47
• Judgment/arbitral decision is only as valuable as the ability to enforce it
• May have better chance of enforcementof judgment when patentee/exclusivelicensee is local (but tax benefits may counsel against local ownership)
• Injunction against exportation, manufacture and marketing, not just use
Remedies
48
Questions?
49
• A Guide To Proper Trademark Use For Media, Internet and Publishing Professionals:http://www.inta.org/Media/Documents/2012_TMUseMediaInternetPublishing.pdf
• The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Intellectual Property Roadmap, 12th Edition, 2014: http://www.iccwbo.org/Products-and-Services/Trade-facilitation/IP-Roadmap/
• WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use, Chapter 4, Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights: http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/about-ip/en/iprm/pdf/ch4.pdf
Other Resources
50