1
Development of Peptide-Modified Gemini Nanoplexes for Non-Viral Gene Delivery to the Retina Lokesh Narsineni 1,2* , Ding-Wen (Roger) Chen 1,3 and Marianna Foldvari 1,4 1 School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada , 2 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, [email protected]; 3 Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 4 Waterloo Institute of Nanotechnology, University of Waterloo, Canada © M Foldvari 2009 Drug Delivery and Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology Laboratory School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo Current glaucoma management relies on reducing and maintaining a low intraocular pressure (IOP), an important risk factor for the progression of visual field loss, by pharmacological and invasive surgical treatments. Alternatively, gene therapy with neurotrophic factors (NF) has the potential to provide neuroprotective and neuroregenerative functions for retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) to prevent or restore visual deterioration. The design and development of these systems especially become more complicated when considering the in vivo structural and physicochemical barriers faced by the gene medicine intended to reach the posterior segment of eye, that is the location of neurodegenerative processes. Many lipid, surfactant and polymer based non-viral vectors were tried to deliver gene cargo into the retinal layers of the eye but crossing all the physicochemical barriers and achieving therapeutic levels at the target site has been one of the biggest challenges for these kinds of systems. The main objective was the development of a new generation of nanoplex (NPX) system based on cell adhesion peptide (CAP)- from modified dicationic gemini surfactants (m-s(p)-m) for targeted delivery of neurotrophic factor genes to the retina. 1. Synthesis of m-7N(p)-m (m=12 and 18, p=p 1-5 ) gemini surfactants Scheme 1 General scheme for synthesis of integrin-binding and IgSF peptide functionalized m-7N(p 1-5 )-m gemini surfactant 2. Formulation of m-7NH-m, m-7N(p 1-5 )-m NPXs/pNPXs and lipoplexes/peptide-lipoplexes (LPXs/pLPXs) Fig 3. (a) General schematic structure of gemini surfactant, (b)General formulation steps and schematic models of compacted NPXs/pNPXs and LPXs/pLPXs. Figure generated by Lokesh Narsineni using BioRender.com. Overall, two sets of peptide-modified gemini pNPXs were formulated. Integrin-binding 18-7N (p 1-2 )-18 and neural IgSF CAM binding-peptide-modified 18-7N(p 3-5 )-18 were synthesized and pNPXs were formulated. Their efficiency in delivering reporter/therapeutic gene to the retina was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. In conclusion, the novel multifunctional IgSF peptide and integrin-binding peptide conjugated gemini NPXs provide a promising non-viral in vivo gene delivery approach to retinal cells. INTRODUCTION Summary RESULTS METHODS Fig 1. Barriers, penetration pathways and target locations for gene therapy in the eye (Foldvari et al, 2016) eye the Fig 2. Mediators of RGC apoptosis and NTF deprivation. Figure generated by Lokesh Narsineni using BioRender.com METHODS a. b. Figure 4 Illustration of nanoparticle penetration studies in the 3D-EpiCorneal™ tissue model. Figure generated by Lokesh Narsineni using BioRender.com. Dead cell- GFP+ Dead cell- GFP+ Live cell- GFP(+) Mito(+) Dead cell- GFP(+)Mi to(-) Dead cell- GFP(+)Mi to(-) Live cell- GFP(+) Live cell- GFP(+) Transfection by NPXs and LPXs containing reporter gene Live cell- GFP(-) Live cell- GFP(-) Dead cell- GFP- Dead cell- GFP- Live cell- GFP(-) Mito (+) Live cell- GFP(-) Mito (+) Type of System 3 rd generation gemini surfactant NPs (m-7N(p 1-5 )-m) Second generation gemini NPXs (m-7NH-m) Lipofectamine 3000 Naked gene Incubation for 3 days after administration and retinal layer isolation on day 3 Stain the retina with nuclear stain and prepare for confocal imaging Confocal laser scanning microscopy Figure 7 Schematic method for in vivo studies to determine the ability of pGP-NPXs in transfecting retinal cells in eye . Figure generated by Lokesh Narsineni using BioRender.com. Figure 6 Schematic for evaluation of the TE and toxicity of pNPXs and pLPXs in 3D retinal stem cell derived neurospheres. Figure generated by Lokesh Narsineni using BioRender.com. Figure 5 Schematic of in vitro evaluation of GP and pGP NPXs/pNPXs and LPXs/pLPXs on A7 cell line In vitro corneal penetration studies using the 3D EpiCorneal™ model Transfection efficiency and viability studies by flow cytometry In vitro transfection studies in retinal stem cell-derived neurospheres In vivo retinal gene transfer studies in a CD1 mice RESULTS 1. Synthesis and characterization of m-7N(p)-m (m=18, p=p 1-5 ) gemini surfactants Peptide-modified gemini surfactants (m-7N(p n )-m, m=12 and 18 p n =p 1 ,p 2 ,p 3 ,p 4 and p 5 ) were synthesized using an amide bond coupling technique with HATU/DIPEA as coupling agent. Synthesized m-7N(p)-m gemini surfactants were confirmed by ESI-MS. 18-7N(p 1 )-18, 18- 7N(p 2 )-18, 18-7N(p 3 )-18, 18-7N(p 4 )-18, 18-7N(p 5 )-18 and 12-7N(p 5 )-12 were synthesized and molecular weight (Da) was found to be 1022.65, 1092.782, 1355.09, 920.638, 1493.12 and 1324.80 respectively. 2. Formulation and characterization of m-7NH-m, m-7N(p 1-5 )-m NPXs/pNPXs and lipoplexes/peptide-lipoplexes (LPXs/pLPXs) NPXs/pNPXs, LPXs and pLPXs were formulated using synthesized gemini surfactants as per the protocol listed under methods and characterizations such as particle size and zeta potential were carried out for the prepared formulations. i. Particle size and Zeta potential 2.5:1 pNPXs 2.5:1:0.5 pLPXs 5:1 pNPXs 5:1:0.5 pLPXs 7.5:1 pNPXs 7.5:1:0.5 pLPXs 0 100 200 300 400 Particle Size (d.nm) SD 18-7NH-18 (NS) 18-7N(p 1 )-18 18-7N(p 2 )-18 18-7N(p 3 )-18 18-7N(p 4 )-18 18-7N(p 5 )-18 2.5:1 pNPXs 2.5:1:0.5 pLPXs 5:1 pNPXs 5:1:0.5 pLPXs 7.5:1 pNPXs 7.5:1:0.5 pLPXs 0 20 40 60 Zeta potential(mV) SD 18-7NH-18 (NS) 18-7N(p 1 )-18 18-7N(p 2 )-18 18-7N(p 3 )-18 18-7N(p 4 )-18 18-7N(p 5 )-18 Figure 8 Physicochemical properties of 18-7NH-18 NPXs and LPXs and 18-7N(p 1-5 )-18 pNPXs and pLPXs. A) Z-average particle size of the five 18-7N(p 1-5 )-18 pNPXs and pLPXs, and the parent 18-7NH-18 NPXs and LPXs at 2.5:1, 5:1 and 7.5:1 G:P ratio and 2.5:1:0.5, 5:1:0.5 and 7.5:1:0:5 G:P:L ratios; B) Zeta potential for 18-7NH-18 NPXs and LPXs and 18-7N(p 1-5 )-18 pNPXs and pLPXs. All values expressed as mean ± S.D., n=3. 3. In vitro assessment of transfection efficiency and toxicity of pNPXs in A7 astrocytes using flow cytometry 18-7N(p 1 )-18 18-7N(p 2 )-18 18-7N(p 3 )-18 18-7N(p 4 )-18 18-7N(p 5 )-18 18-7NH-18 Lipo 3000 Untreated-Mito+ 0 5 10 15 20 Transfection efficiency (% ) 2.5:1 pNPXs 5:1 pNPXs 7.5:1 pNPXs 10:1 pNPXs n.s **** n.d Integrin-binding Neural-IgSF binding Controls **** **** n.s **** **** **** Controls Peptide 1 (p 1 ) Peptide 2 (p 2 ) Peptide 3 (p 3 ) Peptide 4 (p 4 ) Peptide 5 (p 5 ) 18-7NH-18 0 5 10 15 20 Transfection efficiency (% ) NC-Untreated-MitoDR NC-Only gWIZ-GFP PC-Lipo 3000 2.5:1 NPXs 5:1 NPXs 7.5:1 NPXs **** **** n.d n.d n.d n.d n.s Integrin-binding Neural-IgSF binding Parent NPXs Peptide controls A. 18-7NH-18:p 1 :DNA 18-7NH-18:p 2 :DNA 18-7NH-18:p 3 :DNA 18-7NH-18:p 4 :DNA 18-7NH-18:p 5 :DNA 18-7NH-18 NPXs Untreated-MitoDR Only gWIZ-GFP Lipo 3000 0 5 10 15 20 Transfection efficiency (% ) n.d n.d *** n.s *** Integrin-binding Neural-IgSF binding Parent NPXs Controls n.s 2.5:5:1 5:5:1 7.5:5:1 Controls 2.5:1 5:1 7.5:1 18-7N(p 1 )-18 18-7N(p 2 )-18 18-7N(p 3 )-18 18-7N(p 4 )-18 18-7N(p 5 )-18 18-7NH-18 Lipo 3000 Untreated cells 0 50 100 150 Viable Population (% ) 2.5:1 pNPXs 5:1 pNPXs 7.5:1 pNPXs 10:1 pNPXs Integrin-binding Neural-IgSF binding Controls Parent NPXs n.s n.s n.s n.s n.s A. B. B. C. D. Figure 9 TE and toxicity of pNPXs and their physical mixtures in A7 astrocytes by flow cytometry. A) TE of pNPXs at 2.5:1, 5:1, 7.5:1 and 10:1 G:P ratios; B) TE of bi-component mixtures of p 1 -p 5 peptides mixed with plasmid at 2.5:1, 5:1 and 7.5:1 ratios; C) TE of tri-component mixtures of p:G:P at 2.5:5:1, 5:5:1 and 7.5:5:1 ratios; D. cell viability assessment after treatment with various pNPXs. TE was measured at 48 hours after dosing by counting the GFP positive cells. Viability was evaluated by Mitotracker Deep Red staining. All values expressed as mean ± S.D., n=3. ****p<0.0001, ***p<0.001, not detected (n.d) and non-significant (n.s) From the IgSF CAM family, TE of 18-7N(p 3 )-18 pNPXs at 2.5:1 and 5:1 ratio was 12.48 ± 0.49% and 15.36 ± 0.73%, respectively. These NPXs have shown to perform significantly (****p<0.001) compared other peptide modified gemini surfactants and m-7NH-m NPXs. Showing the potential of p3 modified gemini surfactant in improving the gene delivery to the A7 cells in vitro. Only peptide- DNA complexes did not show any TE and viability of the treated cells was found to be between 86%- 96%. 4. In vitro EpiCorneal penetration and interaction studies for pNPXs and pLPXs i. Untreated ii. 18-7NH-18 NPXs 0.5 hrs iii. 18-7N(p 1 )-18 NPXs 0.5 hrs iv. 18-7N(p 1 )-18 NPXs 24 hrs iv. 18-7N(p 3 )-18 NPXs 0.5 hrs v. 18-7N(p 3 )-18 NPXs 1 hrs Figure 10 Confocal microscopic images of NPX interactions with 3D EpiCorneal tissue model. (i) untreated, stained with Calcein AM, (ii) cornea treated with 18-7NH-18 NPXs for 0.5 hour, stained Calcein AM, z-stack, (iv, v) cornea treated with 18-7N(p 1 )-18 5:1 pNPXs, stained with Calcein AM at 0.5 and 24 hours respectively; (vi and vii) cornea treated with 18- 7N(p 3 )-18 5:1 pNPXs, stained with Calcein AM at 0.5 and 1 hour, respectively. 5. Transfection efficiency studies in 3D retinal neurosphere Figure 11 Transfection of MiEye8 3D retinal neurospheres with pNPXs. Confocal microscopic images captured 48 hours post treatment with 18- 7N(p 3 )-18 (IgSF-binding peptide modified) pNPXs, brightfield image of the treated neurosphere-(A), 18-7N(p 3 )-18 pNPXs treated-(B),Mitotracker Deep Red stained (c), and 18-7N(p 3 )-18 pNPXs treated neurospheres counter stained with Rbpms antibody tagged with Alexa Fluor 647 (RGC marker, merge image shows both GFP expression (GFP channel) and Rbpms staining (RFP channel) (signifies presence of RGCs differentiated using MiEye8 protocol) and MFI analysis on GFP and anti-RBPMS (red) colocalization analysis (E and F), F. Representative colocalization profile of GFP and RBPMS staining (signifies mature RGC population). A. B. C. D. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Distance ( m) Mean Fluorescence Intensity (a.u) GFP Expression (Green channel) RBPMS-SA-AF647 staining (Red Channel) E. F. 6. Gene delivery to the retina in vivo in a CD1 mouse model Figure 12 Confocal microscopic images of whole mount retinas from CD1 mice treated with 18-7N(p)-18 pNPXs. Whole mount images of retina treated with 18-7N(p 3 )-18 5:1 pNPXs (A) and Saline controls (C). Whole mount retinas were isolated post 72 hours of administration by intravitreal injection. Retinas were stained with Syto 13 and imaged using CLSM 710 using green (Syto 13) and red channel (tdTomato), (D) Lipofectamine 3000 treated, (E) 18-7NH-18 5:1 NPXs treated and Image (B) shows 3D Z-stack orthogonal section analysis of 18-7N(p 3 )-18 pNPXs treated retinas showing gene expression in the RGC layer and INL. A. B. C. D. E Saline control Lipofectamine 3000 18-7NH-18 5:1 NPXs 18-7N(p 1 )-18 5:1 pNPXs 18-7N(p 3 )-18 5:1 pNPXs 0 10 20 30 40 M ean Fluorescence Intensity (a.u) **** **** **** n.s Figure 4-7 Quantitative assessment of gene expression by cMFI analysis of whole mount retinas from CD1 mice treated with pNPXs and NPXs along with controls. All treatment groups were significantly different from saline. All values expressed as mean ± S.D., n=4. ****p<0.0001, ***p<0.001 and non-significant (n.s) 7. BDNF gene expression in the retina in vivo in mice treated with integrin and IgSF binding peptide modified gemini surfactant pNPXs 18-7NH-18 NPXs 18-7N(p 1 )-18 5:1 pNPXs 18-7N(p 3 )-18 5:1 pNPXs Lipofectamine 3000 Saline control 0 100 200 300 400 500 Total BDNF (pg)/eye **** **** **** Figure 4-8 BDNF gene expression in the eye in vivo after treatment with peptide- conjugated pNPXs. Total BDNF produced in each eye was assessed after treating with 18-7NH-18, 18-7N(p 1 )- 18, 18-7N(p 3 )-18 pNPXs, Lipofectamine 3000 and saline controls. All treatments were significantly higher than saline control. Values expressed as mean ± S.D., n=6 Based on the calculated cMFI values 18-7N(p 3 )-18 5:1 pNPXs produced approximately 2- fold higher (32.40 ± 0.80 a.u) gene expression compared to Lipofectamine ® 3000 (18.07 ± 1.487 a.u, ****p<0.0001), 18-7N(p 1 )-18 5:1 pNPXs (16.16 ± 0.80 a.u , ***p<0.001) and 18- 7NH-18 5:1 NPXs (14.79 ± 4.24 a.u , ****p<0.0001). No significant difference in cMFI was observed between 18-7N(p 1 )-18, Lipofectamine 3000 and 18-7NH-18 5:1 NPXs. The highest amount of BDNF was produced after treatment with 18-7N(p 3 )-18 pNPXs (422.60 ± 42.60pg/eye (average weight of an eye-17.71 mg), n=6, ****p<0.0001), followed by 18-7NH-18, 18-7N(p 1 )-18 and Lipofectamine ® 3000 (245.90 ± 39.72, 230.62 ± 24.47, 199.99 ± 29.90 pg/eye, respectively). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 53

53 Development of Peptide-Modified Gemini Nanoplexes for ...Development of Peptide-Modified Gemini Nanoplexes for Non-Viral Gene Delivery to the Retina Lokesh Narsineni1,2*, Ding-Wen

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Development of Peptide-Modified Gemini Nanoplexes for Non-Viral Gene Delivery to the RetinaLokesh Narsineni1,2*, Ding-Wen (Roger) Chen1,3 and Marianna Foldvari1,4

    1School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada, 2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, [email protected]; 3Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 4Waterloo Institute of Nanotechnology, University of Waterloo, Canada

    © M Foldvari 2009

    Drug Delivery and Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology Laboratory

    School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo

    Current glaucoma management relies on reducing and maintaining a low intraocular pressure

    (IOP), an important risk factor for the progression of visual field loss, by pharmacological and

    invasive surgical treatments. Alternatively, gene therapy with neurotrophic factors (NF) has

    the potential to provide neuroprotective and neuroregenerative functions for retinal ganglion

    cells (RGCs) to prevent or restore visual deterioration. The design and development of these

    systems especially become more complicated when considering the in vivo structural and

    physicochemical barriers faced by the gene medicine intended to reach the posterior segment

    of eye, that is the location of neurodegenerative processes. Many lipid, surfactant and polymer

    based non-viral vectors were tried to deliver gene cargo into the retinal layers of the eye but

    crossing all the physicochemical barriers and achieving therapeutic levels at the target site has

    been one of the biggest challenges for these kinds of systems.

    The main objective was the development of a new generation of nanoplex (NPX) systembased on cell adhesion peptide (CAP)- from modified dicationic gemini surfactants (m-s(p)-m)for targeted delivery of neurotrophic factor genes to the retina.

    1. Synthesis of m-7N(p)-m (m=12 and 18, p=p1-5) gemini surfactants

    Scheme 1 General scheme for synthesis of integrin-binding and IgSF peptide functionalized m-7N(p1-5)-m gemini surfactant

    2. Formulation of m-7NH-m, m-7N(p1-5)-m NPXs/pNPXs and lipoplexes/peptide-lipoplexes (LPXs/pLPXs)

    Fig 3. (a) General schematic structure of gemini surfactant, (b)General formulation steps and schematic models

    of compacted NPXs/pNPXs and LPXs/pLPXs. Figure generated by Lokesh Narsineni using BioRender.com.

    Overall, two sets of peptide-modified gemini pNPXs were formulated. Integrin-binding 18-7N

    (p1-2)-18 and neural IgSF CAM binding-peptide-modified 18-7N(p3-5)-18 were synthesized

    and pNPXs were formulated. Their efficiency in delivering reporter/therapeutic gene to the

    retina was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. In conclusion, the novel multifunctional IgSF peptide

    and integrin-binding peptide conjugated gemini NPXs provide a promising non-viral in vivo

    gene delivery approach to retinal cells.

    INTRODUCTION

    Summary

    RESULTS

    METHODS

    Fig 1. Barriers, penetration pathways and target

    locations for gene therapy in the eye (Foldvari et al,

    2016) eye

    the

    Fig 2. Mediators of RGC apoptosis and NTF

    deprivation. Figure generated by Lokesh Narsineni

    using BioRender.com

    METHODS

    a. b.

    Figure 4 Illustration of nanoparticle penetration studies in

    the 3D-EpiCorneal™ tissue model. Figure generated by

    Lokesh Narsineni using BioRender.com.

    Dead cell-GFP+

    Dead cell-GFP+

    Live cell-

    GFP(+)Mito(+)

    Dead cell-

    GFP(+)Mito(-)

    Dead cell-

    GFP(+)Mito(-)

    Live cell-GFP(+)

    Live cell-GFP(+)

    Transfection by NPXs and LPXs containing reporter gene

    Live cell-GFP(-)

    Live cell-GFP(-)

    Dead cell-GFP-

    Dead cell-GFP-

    Live

    cell-

    GFP(-)

    Mito (+)

    Live

    cell-

    GFP(-)

    Mito (+)

    Type of System

    3rd generation gemini surfactant

    NPs (m-7N(p1-5)-m)

    Second generation gemini NPXs

    (m-7NH-m)

    Lipofectamine 3000

    Naked gene

    Incubation for 3 days after administration and retinal layer isolation on day 3

    Stain the retina

    with nuclear stain

    and prepare for

    confocal imaging

    Confocal laser scanning microscopy

    Figure 7 Schematic method for in vivo studies to

    determine the ability of pGP-NPXs in transfecting retinal

    cells in eye . Figure generated by Lokesh Narsineni using

    BioRender.com.

    Figure 6 Schematic for evaluation of the TE and

    toxicity of pNPXs and pLPXs in 3D retinal stem cell

    derived neurospheres. Figure generated by Lokesh

    Narsineni using BioRender.com.

    Figure 5 Schematic of in vitro evaluation of GP and

    pGP NPXs/pNPXs and LPXs/pLPXs on A7 cell line

    In vitro corneal penetration studies using the

    3D EpiCorneal™ model

    Transfection efficiency and viability studies

    by flow cytometry

    In vitro transfection studies in retinal stem

    cell-derived neurospheres

    In vivo retinal gene transfer studies in a

    CD1 mice

    RESULTS

    1. Synthesis and characterization of m-7N(p)-m (m=18, p=p1-5) gemini surfactants

    Peptide-modified gemini surfactants (m-7N(pn)-m, m=12 and 18 pn=p1, p2, p3, p4 and p5) were

    synthesized using an amide bond coupling technique with HATU/DIPEA as coupling agent.

    Synthesized m-7N(p)-m gemini surfactants were confirmed by ESI-MS. 18-7N(p1)-18, 18-

    7N(p2)-18, 18-7N(p3)-18, 18-7N(p4)-18, 18-7N(p5)-18 and 12-7N(p5)-12 were synthesized and

    molecular weight (Da) was found to be 1022.65, 1092.782, 1355.09, 920.638, 1493.12 and

    1324.80 respectively.

    2. Formulation and characterization of m-7NH-m, m-7N(p1-5)-m NPXs/pNPXs and

    lipoplexes/peptide-lipoplexes (LPXs/pLPXs)

    NPXs/pNPXs, LPXs and pLPXs were formulated using synthesized gemini surfactants as per

    the protocol listed under methods and characterizations such as particle size and zeta potential

    were carried out for the prepared formulations. i. Particle size and Zeta potential

    2.5

    :1 p

    NP

    Xs

    2.5

    :1:0

    .5 p

    LP

    Xs

    5:1

    pN

    PX

    s

    5:1

    :0.5

    pL

    PX

    s

    7.5

    :1 p

    NP

    Xs

    7.5

    :1:0

    .5 p

    LP

    Xs

    0

    1 0 0

    2 0 0

    3 0 0

    4 0 0

    Pa

    rtic

    le S

    ize

    (d

    .nm

    )

    SD

    1 8 - 7 N H -1 8 ( N S ) 1 8 - 7 N ( p 1 ) - 1 8 1 8 - 7 N ( p 2 ) - 1 8

    1 8 - 7 N ( p 3 ) - 1 8 1 8 - 7 N ( p 4 ) - 1 8 1 8 - 7 N ( p 5 ) - 1 8

    2.5

    :1 p

    NP

    Xs

    2.5

    :1:0

    .5 p

    LP

    Xs

    5:1

    pN

    PX

    s

    5:1

    :0.5

    pL

    PX

    s

    7.5

    :1 p

    NP

    Xs

    7.5

    :1:0

    .5 p

    LP

    Xs

    0

    2 0

    4 0

    6 0

    Ze

    ta

    po

    te

    ntia

    l(m

    V)

    SD

    1 8 - 7 N H -1 8 ( N S )1 8 - 7 N ( p 1 ) - 1 81 8 - 7 N ( p 2 ) - 1 8

    1 8 - 7 N ( p 3 ) - 1 81 8 - 7 N ( p 4 ) - 1 81 8 - 7 N ( p 5 ) - 1 8

    Figure 8 Physicochemical properties of 18-7NH-18 NPXs and LPXs and 18-7N(p1-5)-18 pNPXs and pLPXs. A) Z-average

    particle size of the five 18-7N(p1-5)-18 pNPXs and pLPXs, and the parent 18-7NH-18 NPXs and LPXs at 2.5:1, 5:1 and 7.5:1

    G:P ratio and 2.5:1:0.5, 5:1:0.5 and 7.5:1:0:5 G:P:L ratios; B) Zeta potential for 18-7NH-18 NPXs and LPXs and 18-7N(p1-5)-18

    pNPXs and pLPXs. All values expressed as mean ± S.D., n=3.

    3. In vitro assessment of transfection efficiency and toxicity of pNPXs in A7 astrocytes using

    flow cytometry

    18-7

    N(p

    1 )-1

    8

    18-7

    N(p

    2 )-1

    8

    18-7

    N(p

    3 )-1

    8

    18-7

    N(p

    4 )-1

    8

    18-7

    N(p

    5 )-1

    8

    18-7

    NH

    -18

    Lip

    o 3

    000

    Un

    tre a

    ted

    -Mit

    o+

    0

    5

    1 0

    1 5

    2 0

    Tr

    an

    sfe

    ctio

    n e

    ffic

    ien

    cy

    (%

    )

    2 .5 :1 p N P X s 5 :1 p N P X s 7 .5 :1 p N P X s 1 0 :1 p N P X s

    n . s

    ****

    n .d

    In te g r in -b in d in g N e u ra l - Ig S F b in d in g C o n tro ls

    * * * *

    ****

    n . s

    ****

    ****

    ****

    Con

    trols

    Pep

    t id

    e 1 (

    p1)

    Pep

    t id

    e 2 (

    p2)

    Pep

    t id

    e 3 (

    p3)

    Pep

    t id

    e 4 (

    p4)

    Pep

    t id

    e 5 (

    p5)

    18-7

    NH

    -18

    0

    5

    1 0

    1 5

    2 0

    Tr

    an

    sfe

    ctio

    n e

    ffic

    ien

    cy

    (%

    )

    N C -U n tre a te d -M ito D R N C -O n ly g W IZ -G F P P C -L ip o 3 0 0 0

    2 .5 :1 N P X s 5 :1 N P X s 7 .5 :1 N P X s

    * * * *

    * * * *

    n .d n .d n .d n .d

    n . s

    In te g r in -b in d in g N e u ra l - Ig S F b in d in g P a r e n t N P X s

    P e p t id e c o n tr o ls

    A.

    18-7

    NH

    -18:p

    1 :D

    NA

    18-7

    NH

    -18:p

    2 :D

    NA

    18-7

    NH

    -18:p

    3 :D

    NA

    18-7

    NH

    -18:p

    4 :D

    NA

    18-7

    NH

    -18:p

    5 :D

    NA

    18-7

    NH

    -18 N

    PX

    s

    Un

    tre a

    ted

    -Mit

    oD

    R

    On

    ly g

    WIZ

    -GF

    P

    Lip

    o 3

    000

    0

    5

    1 0

    1 5

    2 0

    Tr

    an

    sfe

    ctio

    n e

    ffic

    ien

    cy

    (%

    )

    n .d n .d

    * * *

    n . s* * *

    In te g r in -b in d in g N e u ra l - Ig S F b in d in g P a r e n t

    N P X s

    C o n tro ls

    n . s

    2 .5 :5 :1

    5 :5 :1

    7 .5 :5 :1

    C o n tro ls

    2 .5 :1

    5 : 1

    7 .5 :1

    18-7

    N(p

    1 )-1

    8

    18-7

    N(p

    2 )-1

    8

    18-7

    N(p

    3 )-1

    8

    18-7

    N(p

    4 )-1

    8

    18-7

    N(p

    5 )-1

    8

    18-7

    NH

    -18

    Lip

    o 3

    000

    Un

    tre a

    ted

    ce l

    ls

    0

    5 0

    1 0 0

    1 5 0

    Via

    ble

    Po

    pu

    latio

    n (

    %)

    2 .5 :1 p N P X s 5 :1 p N P X s 7 .5 :1 p N P X s 1 0 :1 p N P X s

    In te g r in -b in d in g N e u ra l - Ig S F b in d in g C o n tro lsP a r e n t N P X s

    n . s n . s n . sn . s n . s

    A.

    B.

    B.

    C. D.

    Figure 9 TE and toxicity of pNPXs and their physical mixtures in A7 astrocytes by flow cytometry. A) TE of pNPXs at 2.5:1, 5:1,

    7.5:1 and 10:1 G:P ratios; B) TE of bi-component mixtures of p1-p5 peptides mixed with plasmid at 2.5:1, 5:1 and 7.5:1 ratios; C)

    TE of tri-component mixtures of p:G:P at 2.5:5:1, 5:5:1 and 7.5:5:1 ratios; D. cell viability assessment after treatment with various

    pNPXs. TE was measured at 48 hours after dosing by counting the GFP positive cells. Viability was evaluated by Mitotracker Deep

    Red staining. All values expressed as mean ± S.D., n=3. ****p