Upload
mohammed-adnan-khan
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating
1/12
Solutions Ratings Matrix
Vendor Invoice Processing
Cost Data Integrity Project
Step 1 - Establish Criteria for Rating Your Solutions Step 2 - Describe each rating from lowest
1 = Lowest 2 =1.1 Easy to Implement
1.2 Easy to Maintain
1.3 Significant Impact
1.4 Minimal Cost and Time
1.5 Senior Management Support Limited su
1.6 Solution can be Automated Solution must be done manually
1.7
1.8
Step 3 - Describe each solution and assign a rating as defined in Steps 1 & 2
Criteria Criteria Criteria Criteria
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
3.1 Projects reconcile costs to the General Ledger 3 3 5 3
3.2 Projects receive copies of vendor invoices 5 4 3 4
3.3 Someone is trained / assigned to enter invoices 5 5 2 5
3.4
3.5
Step 4 - If you want to weight the criteria so that some criteria are more heavily considered than other
Criteria Criteria Criteria Criteria
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
Weight Assigned > 100% 50% 75% 50%
3.1 Projects reconcile costs to the General Ledger 3 1.5 3.75 1.5
3.2 Projects receive copies of vendor invoices 5 2 2.25 2
3.3 Someone is trained / assigned to enter invoices 5 2.5 1.5 2.5
Very difficult to implement acrossprojects
Difficult, socomply wit
Very high support levels neededto implement
A permaneneeded to i
No significant impact onimproving the process
Modest improcess
Very high costs and time areinvolved
Additionalrequired
Management does not supportthis solution
Solution mivery costly
8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating
2/12
3.4 0 0 0 0 0
3.5 0 0 0 0 0
Step 5 - Place each solution into the following Cost Benefit Matrix to quickly assess its return
L
owHigh
as funding, personnel, equipment, tiime, etc.
such as fewer errors, reduces time, improves
customer satisfaction, lowers costs, etc.
High < - - - - - - - - Costs - - - - - - - - - -
Least Attractive
Cost= All resources to implement, such
Benefit= Both tangible and intangible benefitsSolution 3.1
Sol
Soluti
8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating
3/12
to highest for each of the criteria in Step 1
Somewhat Low 3 = Moderate 4 = Somewhat High 5 = Highest
Some gains will be realized Very solid improvements
port for this solution
Criteria Criteria Criteria Criteria TOTAL
1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 RATING
5 3 22
5 2 23
5 1 23
0
0
, then assign weights and recalculate the ratings
Criteria Criteria Criteria Criteria TOTAL
1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 WGHT
100% 75% RATING
5 2.25 0 0 17
5 1.5 0 0 17.75
5 0.75 0 0 17.25
me projects may notthe change
Somewhat difficult, but allprojects comply over time
Within one year, all projectsshould easily comply
Extremely easy, projecomply quickly
nt level of support ismplement
Some continuing support will beneeded to implement
Only modest levels of supportare needed to implement
Very little if any supponeeded to implement
act on improving the Complete turnaroundprocess
osts and time will be Some modest costs and time areneeded
Relatively low costs and time areinvolved
No measurable costsrequired
Support exists, but some aredoubtful
Good buy-in from managementon this solution
Full and complete supmanagement
ght be automated, but
Solution can be automated, butrequires change
Automated solutions exist, somechanges are needed
Fully automated solutiavailable
8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating
4/12
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Most Attractive
Low
tion 3.2
n 3.3
8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating
5/12
ts should
rt is
f the
r time are
port from
ns are
8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating
6/12
8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating
7/12
Solutions Ratings Matrix
Timesheet Processing
Cost Data Integrity Project
Step 1 - Establish Criteria for Rating Your Solutions Step 2 - Describe each rating from lowest
1 = Lowest 2 =1.1 Easy to Implement
1.2 Easy to Maintain
1.3 Significant Impact
1.4 Minimal Cost and Time
1.5 Senior Management Support Limited su
1.6 Solution can be Automated Solution must be done manually
1.7
1.8
Step 3 - Describe each solution and assign a rating as defined in Steps 1 & 2
Criteria Criteria Criteria Criteria
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
3.1 Managers must approve timesheets 5 4 5 4
3.2 Email notifications when timesheets not entered 2 5 5 4
3.3 Mandatory timesheet training 5 5 2 5
3.4
3.5
Step 4 - If you want to weight the criteria so that some criteria are more heavily considered than other
Criteria Criteria Criteria Criteria
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
Weight Assigned > 100% 50% 75% 50%
3.1 Managers must approve timesheets 5 2 3.75 2
3.2 Email notifications when timesheets not entered 2 2.5 3.75 2
3.3 Mandatory timesheet training 5 2.5 1.5 2.5
Very difficult to implement acrossprojects
Difficult, socomply wit
Very high support levels neededto implement
A permaneneeded to i
No significant impact onimproving the process
Modest improcess
Very high costs and time areinvolved
Additionalrequired
Management does not supportthis solution
Solution mivery costly
8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating
8/12
3.4 0 0 0 0 0
3.5 0 0 0 0 0
Step 5 - Place each solution into the following Cost Benefit Matrix to quickly assess its return
L
owHigh
as funding, personnel, equipment, tiime, etc.
such as fewer errors, reduces time, improves
customer satisfaction, lowers costs, etc.
High < - - - - - - - - Costs - - - - - - - - - -
Least Attractive
Cost= All resources to implement, such
Benefit= Both tangible and intangible benefitsSolution 3.1
Solution 3
Solut
8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating
9/12
to highest for each of the criteria in Step 1
Somewhat Low 3 = Moderate 4 = Somewhat High 5 = Highest
Some gains will be realized Very solid improvements
port for this solution
Criteria Criteria Criteria Criteria TOTAL
1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 RATING
4 2 24
5 4 25
4 3 24
0
0
, then assign weights and recalculate the ratings
Criteria Criteria Criteria Criteria TOTAL
1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 WGHT
100% 75% RATING
4 1.5 0 0 18.25
5 3 0 0 18.25
4 2.25 0 0 17.75
me projects may notthe change
Somewhat difficult, but allprojects comply over time
Within one year, all projectsshould easily comply
Extremely easy, projecomply quickly
nt level of support ismplement
Some continuing support will beneeded to implement
Only modest levels of supportare needed to implement
Very little if any supponeeded to implement
act on improving the Complete turnaroundprocess
osts and time will be Some modest costs and time areneeded
Relatively low costs and time areinvolved
No measurable costsrequired
Support exists, but some aredoubtful
Good buy-in from managementon this solution
Full and complete supmanagement
ght be automated, but
Solution can be automated, butrequires change
Automated solutions exist, somechanges are needed
Fully automated solutiavailable
8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating
10/12
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Most Attractive
Low
.2
ion 3.3
8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating
11/12
ts should
rt is
f the
r time are
port from
ns are
8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating
12/12