5.01 Solutions Rating

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating

    1/12

    Solutions Ratings Matrix

    Vendor Invoice Processing

    Cost Data Integrity Project

    Step 1 - Establish Criteria for Rating Your Solutions Step 2 - Describe each rating from lowest

    1 = Lowest 2 =1.1 Easy to Implement

    1.2 Easy to Maintain

    1.3 Significant Impact

    1.4 Minimal Cost and Time

    1.5 Senior Management Support Limited su

    1.6 Solution can be Automated Solution must be done manually

    1.7

    1.8

    Step 3 - Describe each solution and assign a rating as defined in Steps 1 & 2

    Criteria Criteria Criteria Criteria

    1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

    3.1 Projects reconcile costs to the General Ledger 3 3 5 3

    3.2 Projects receive copies of vendor invoices 5 4 3 4

    3.3 Someone is trained / assigned to enter invoices 5 5 2 5

    3.4

    3.5

    Step 4 - If you want to weight the criteria so that some criteria are more heavily considered than other

    Criteria Criteria Criteria Criteria

    1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

    Weight Assigned > 100% 50% 75% 50%

    3.1 Projects reconcile costs to the General Ledger 3 1.5 3.75 1.5

    3.2 Projects receive copies of vendor invoices 5 2 2.25 2

    3.3 Someone is trained / assigned to enter invoices 5 2.5 1.5 2.5

    Very difficult to implement acrossprojects

    Difficult, socomply wit

    Very high support levels neededto implement

    A permaneneeded to i

    No significant impact onimproving the process

    Modest improcess

    Very high costs and time areinvolved

    Additionalrequired

    Management does not supportthis solution

    Solution mivery costly

  • 8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating

    2/12

    3.4 0 0 0 0 0

    3.5 0 0 0 0 0

    Step 5 - Place each solution into the following Cost Benefit Matrix to quickly assess its return

    L

    owHigh

    as funding, personnel, equipment, tiime, etc.

    such as fewer errors, reduces time, improves

    customer satisfaction, lowers costs, etc.

    High < - - - - - - - - Costs - - - - - - - - - -

    Least Attractive

    Cost= All resources to implement, such

    Benefit= Both tangible and intangible benefitsSolution 3.1

    Sol

    Soluti

  • 8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating

    3/12

    to highest for each of the criteria in Step 1

    Somewhat Low 3 = Moderate 4 = Somewhat High 5 = Highest

    Some gains will be realized Very solid improvements

    port for this solution

    Criteria Criteria Criteria Criteria TOTAL

    1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 RATING

    5 3 22

    5 2 23

    5 1 23

    0

    0

    , then assign weights and recalculate the ratings

    Criteria Criteria Criteria Criteria TOTAL

    1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 WGHT

    100% 75% RATING

    5 2.25 0 0 17

    5 1.5 0 0 17.75

    5 0.75 0 0 17.25

    me projects may notthe change

    Somewhat difficult, but allprojects comply over time

    Within one year, all projectsshould easily comply

    Extremely easy, projecomply quickly

    nt level of support ismplement

    Some continuing support will beneeded to implement

    Only modest levels of supportare needed to implement

    Very little if any supponeeded to implement

    act on improving the Complete turnaroundprocess

    osts and time will be Some modest costs and time areneeded

    Relatively low costs and time areinvolved

    No measurable costsrequired

    Support exists, but some aredoubtful

    Good buy-in from managementon this solution

    Full and complete supmanagement

    ght be automated, but

    Solution can be automated, butrequires change

    Automated solutions exist, somechanges are needed

    Fully automated solutiavailable

  • 8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating

    4/12

    0 0 0 0 0

    0 0 0 0 0

    Most Attractive

    Low

    tion 3.2

    n 3.3

  • 8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating

    5/12

    ts should

    rt is

    f the

    r time are

    port from

    ns are

  • 8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating

    6/12

  • 8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating

    7/12

    Solutions Ratings Matrix

    Timesheet Processing

    Cost Data Integrity Project

    Step 1 - Establish Criteria for Rating Your Solutions Step 2 - Describe each rating from lowest

    1 = Lowest 2 =1.1 Easy to Implement

    1.2 Easy to Maintain

    1.3 Significant Impact

    1.4 Minimal Cost and Time

    1.5 Senior Management Support Limited su

    1.6 Solution can be Automated Solution must be done manually

    1.7

    1.8

    Step 3 - Describe each solution and assign a rating as defined in Steps 1 & 2

    Criteria Criteria Criteria Criteria

    1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

    3.1 Managers must approve timesheets 5 4 5 4

    3.2 Email notifications when timesheets not entered 2 5 5 4

    3.3 Mandatory timesheet training 5 5 2 5

    3.4

    3.5

    Step 4 - If you want to weight the criteria so that some criteria are more heavily considered than other

    Criteria Criteria Criteria Criteria

    1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

    Weight Assigned > 100% 50% 75% 50%

    3.1 Managers must approve timesheets 5 2 3.75 2

    3.2 Email notifications when timesheets not entered 2 2.5 3.75 2

    3.3 Mandatory timesheet training 5 2.5 1.5 2.5

    Very difficult to implement acrossprojects

    Difficult, socomply wit

    Very high support levels neededto implement

    A permaneneeded to i

    No significant impact onimproving the process

    Modest improcess

    Very high costs and time areinvolved

    Additionalrequired

    Management does not supportthis solution

    Solution mivery costly

  • 8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating

    8/12

    3.4 0 0 0 0 0

    3.5 0 0 0 0 0

    Step 5 - Place each solution into the following Cost Benefit Matrix to quickly assess its return

    L

    owHigh

    as funding, personnel, equipment, tiime, etc.

    such as fewer errors, reduces time, improves

    customer satisfaction, lowers costs, etc.

    High < - - - - - - - - Costs - - - - - - - - - -

    Least Attractive

    Cost= All resources to implement, such

    Benefit= Both tangible and intangible benefitsSolution 3.1

    Solution 3

    Solut

  • 8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating

    9/12

    to highest for each of the criteria in Step 1

    Somewhat Low 3 = Moderate 4 = Somewhat High 5 = Highest

    Some gains will be realized Very solid improvements

    port for this solution

    Criteria Criteria Criteria Criteria TOTAL

    1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 RATING

    4 2 24

    5 4 25

    4 3 24

    0

    0

    , then assign weights and recalculate the ratings

    Criteria Criteria Criteria Criteria TOTAL

    1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 WGHT

    100% 75% RATING

    4 1.5 0 0 18.25

    5 3 0 0 18.25

    4 2.25 0 0 17.75

    me projects may notthe change

    Somewhat difficult, but allprojects comply over time

    Within one year, all projectsshould easily comply

    Extremely easy, projecomply quickly

    nt level of support ismplement

    Some continuing support will beneeded to implement

    Only modest levels of supportare needed to implement

    Very little if any supponeeded to implement

    act on improving the Complete turnaroundprocess

    osts and time will be Some modest costs and time areneeded

    Relatively low costs and time areinvolved

    No measurable costsrequired

    Support exists, but some aredoubtful

    Good buy-in from managementon this solution

    Full and complete supmanagement

    ght be automated, but

    Solution can be automated, butrequires change

    Automated solutions exist, somechanges are needed

    Fully automated solutiavailable

  • 8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating

    10/12

    0 0 0 0 0

    0 0 0 0 0

    Most Attractive

    Low

    .2

    ion 3.3

  • 8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating

    11/12

    ts should

    rt is

    f the

    r time are

    port from

    ns are

  • 8/8/2019 5.01 Solutions Rating

    12/12