5 CDCS IN RUY-I-DOAB DISTRICT SAMANGAN PROVINCE 10/06/13 · 2018-03-12 · Emergency Response Mechanism - Floods assessment report 5 CDCs In Ruy-i-Doab District - Samangan Province

Emergency Response Mechanism - Floods assessment report 5 CDCs In Ruy-i-Doab District - Samangan Province

07/06/2013

1

EMERGENCY RESPONSE MECHANISM

FLOODS ASSESSMENT REPORT

5 CDCS IN RUY-I-DOAB DISTRICT - SAMANGAN PROVINCE

10/06/13

PHOTO 1: MOSQUE IN TALI MAZAR VILLAGE WAS MODERATELY

DAMAGED

PHOTO 2: A TRADITIONAL WATER INTAKE IN CHASHAM-E-

AZIM VILLAGE WAS SEVERELY DAMAGED


07/06/2013

2

Table of Contents

I. KEY RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................................... 3

SECTORIAL RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 3 ERM ACTION PLAN ................................................................................................................................................. 3

II. GENERAL DATA ............................................................................................................................ 4

A. LOCATION OF ASSESSED AREA ........................................................................................................................... 4 B. AREA ACCESSIBILITY ........................................................................................................................................ 5 C. TYPE OF CRISIS ............................................................................................................................................... 5 D. MOVEMENTS OF POPULATION .......................................................................................................................... 6 E. SECURITY CONTEXT......................................................................................................................................... 6 F. DEMOGRAPHICAL ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................................................... 6

SECTORIAL ASSESSMENTS ................................................................................................................ 6

A. PROTECTION AND “DO-NO HARM” ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................... 6 B. SHELTER ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 C. NON FOOD ITEMS .......................................................................................................................................... 7 D. WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE ................................................................................................................... 7 E. HEALTH - NUTRITION ...................................................................................................................................... 8 F. FOOD SECURITY – LIVELIHOOD.......................................................................................................................... 8 G. INFRASTRUCTURES ......................................................................................................................................... 8 H. LOCAL PERCEPTION OF THE NEEDS ..................................................................................................................... 9

ANNEX .................................................................................................................................................. 10

A. KEY FIGURES REVIEW IN SAMANGAN PROVINCE ................................................................................................. 10


07/06/2013

3

I. KEY RECOMMENDATIONS

Beware! In this section are presented the key recommendations. The detailed recommendations are stated within the main report.

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ALL ACTORS:

This report has been written following a rapid assessment. All its contents are therefore a snapshot and must be considered as such, including its limitations. In depth assessments should be carried out prior to any sectorial and non-emergency intervention.

SECTORIAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Recommendations Relevant actor(s)

Advised timeframe

INFRASTRUCTURE :

- Watershed protection projects for 2 CDCs (Sare-e-Tangi and

Shaikhani) to protect the houses, roads and irrigational lands

ERM Mid-term

SHELTER - No need as no house damaged or destroyed

0 0

NFI - No need

0 0

ERM ACTION PLAN

According to our findings and data collected no NFI distribution is recommended. Work on DRR mitigation infrastructures as a mid-term response, as the end of the flood season, would be advised nonetheless.


07/06/2013

4

II. GENERAL DATA

GENERAL DATA COLLECTION METHODOLOGY The assessments have been carried out at the same time by one team. In the assessed villages, the teams gathered key informants to hold a focus group discussion. A demographical survey has been also performed, following a house to house method and direct observations.

A. LOCATION OF ASSESSED AREA

Pro

vin

ce

Dis

tric

t

CD

C

Vill

age

GPS coordinates Location

regarding other cities/villages

Latitude: Longitude: Altitude: Strategic

place/distance (in KM)

SMG

Ruy-i-Doab

Sar-e-Tangi Sar-e-Tangi Bala and Payan

N 35.52269 ° E067.92542° 2509 m

From District center

25 km

Shaikhani Tali Mazar N 35.48724° E067.67410° 2728 m

19 km

Chashma-e- Azim

Chashma-e- Azim

N 35.49817° E 67.73492° 2557 m 14 km

Sar-e-Dara Oabkhurak

Sar-e-Dara Oabkhurak

N 35.51816° E 67.77745° 2478 m 10 km

Masjid Jami Oabkhurak

Masjid Jami Oabkhurak

N 35.50155° E 67.75757° 2817 m 11km

Masjid Kalan Bala

Masjid Kalan Bala

N 35.50176° E 67.75861° 2516 m 12 km

Map 1 : Location of the affected area and roads accessibility

____ PROVINCE BORDER BETWEEN SAMANGAN AND BAMYAN

DISTRICT CENTER: RUY-I-DOAB

________ MAIN ROADS

30 km


07/06/2013

5

B. AREA ACCESSIBILITY

GROUND ACCESS

From Distance to assessed area Track/road

status

Usable

vehicle Distance/Time

AYBAK Between 130 and 145 km (nearest and

remote village) Good condition 4 WD car

From 6 up to 7

hours

The information mentioned in the table above, are reliable in case of good weather condition. Otherwise, the roads could be closed during one or two days after heavy rain or snowfall in the assessed villages during spring and winter season. It is recommended to use 4WD car to reach the affected villages.

C. TYPE OF CRISIS

PERIOD – DATE OF

CRISIS On 23

th May 2013 at 02:30 up to 03:00 pm

NATURE AND

CAUSES OF CRISIS –

MOVEMENTS OF

POPULATION

Strong rain which caused Floods

DIRECT

CONSEQUENCES

Destruction of six water intakes

40 m of roads damaged

One Mosque damaged moderately.

5% of the irrigation lands were damaged by this flood, but it’s not too late to re-sow alfa alfa. Other crops like wheat or barley were not damaged.

PHOTO 3: 20 M OF ROAD DAMAGED IN SAR-E-TANGI


07/06/2013

6

D. MOVEMENTS OF POPULATION

NTR

E. SECURITY CONTEXT

PRESENCE

OF AOGS No

PRESENCE

OF ISAF No

PRESENCE

OF OTHER

ARMED

ACTORS

No

F. DEMOGRAPHICAL ASSESSMENT

i. External information

Date of

estimation/

census

Number of

individuals

Number of

Families Sources of information

LOCAL POPULATION

BEFORE CRISIS 2007 9060 1510 NSP (estimation)

AFFECTED

POPULATION 05/06/2013 0 0 ERM

TOTAL POPULATION

IN ASSESSED AREA 05/06/2013 9060 1510 NSP (estimation)

SECTORIAL ASSESSMENTS

SECTORIAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY: The assessment was carried out by one team through focus group discussion with local leaders, random interviews, village visit and direct door to door observation.

A. PROTECTION AND “DO-NO HARM” ANALYSIS

ETHNICAL

TENSIONS

Tatar and Hazra ethnic group are living in the area. No tensions between the

villagers were reported.

LAND PROPERTY NTR

LAND MINES NTR

COHABITATION

POPULATIONS/

ARMED FORCES

NTR

CHILD

PROTECTION NTR

Do no Harm analysis: NTR

PROTECTION RECOMMENDATIONS: NTR


07/06/2013

7

B. SHELTER

NUMBER OF AFFECTED

HOUSES 0

% OF POPULATION

MISSING HABITABLE

SPACE

0

TYPE OF HOUSING Traditional houses with stones, mud and wood beams on the roofs

LAND OWNERSHIP

PROBLEMS NTR

SHELTER QUALITY Traditional house are in good quality to protect villager from the cold

and hot weather.

CONSTRUCTION

MATERIALS AVAILABILITY

Everything are available in the area, like stones, wood beams, sands

and gravels

Comments:

Houses were not affected by floods.

SHELTER RECOMMENDATIONS: NTR

C. NON FOOD ITEMS

Nobody has lost their NFI.

NFI RECOMMENDATIONS: NTR

D. WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE

i. Water

In the affected area, people use rivers and natural springs. They use also unprotected wells

and protected wells for all their purposes like drinking, washing, cooking.

Water points were not affected by floods.

WATER RECOMMENDATIONS: NTR

ii. Sanitation

50% of the villagers are using their private traditional latrines. Other 50% of the populations

are using the open space.

The above mentioned information is not related to the floods. This is a picture about the

situation in the assessed area.

iii. Hygiene

In the assessed area populations do not have good observations relevant to hygiene due to

their lack of awareness and knowledge.

SANITATION AND HYGIENE RECOMMENDATIONS:

Promote and raise awareness on good hygiene practices in the long term


07/06/2013

8

E. HEALTH - NUTRITION

There is a health care center in the neighboring CDC (Doab center)

The farthest village is 25 km far from the district center and the nearest village is 10 km.

Comments:

No one was injured within this shock in the assessed area.

HEALTH AND NUTRITION RECOMMENDATIONS: NTR

F. FOOD SECURITY – LIVELIHOOD

IMPACT OF CRISIS ON

FS & LIVELIHOOD Livestock was not affected by floods, only some irrigated lands

LIVESTOCK (AVERAGE)

Poorest class : They borrow livestock (donkey, cows) from richer class to plow

their land

Middle class : 2-5 goats, 2-5 sheep, 1-2 cows and 1-2 donkeys

Richer class : 10-25 goats, 10-50 sheep, 1-3 cow and 2-4 donkey and 1-2

horse

MAIN SOURCES OF

INCOME

Breeding (goats, cows, and donkeys) and Farming (wheat, barley, alfalfa,

potato and pea)

FOOD STOCK STATUS More than one month

USUAL FOOD ORIGIN The primary source of food is coming from their own production while the

secondary source is the market before and after crisis

PRICE VARIATION The disaster did not affect the prices in the market

AGRICULTURAL

INPUTS AVAILABILITY

They started to cultivate in middle of March up to middle of May in 2013.

On the rain-fed lands, they plant 60% of wheat, 30% of barley and 10% of

beans/peas.

On the irrigation lands they plant 60% alfalfa, 30% potato and 10% wheat and

barley.

LANDS

60 jeribs damaged in Tali Mazar village

30 jeribs damaged in Chashma-e-Azim,

45 jeribs damaged in Sar-e-Dara Oabkhurak

50 jeribs damaged in Masjid Jami Oabkhurak

20 jeribs damaged in Masjid Kalan Bala Oabkhurak

1 jerib = 2000 M2

The total jeribs of irrigated lands in these 5 CDCs is 4110 jeribs, compare to

205 Jerib affected. The latter represents 5% of the total land, most of which is

used to cultivate alfa alfa for animals fodder.

PREVIOUS

ASSISTANCE NTR

FOOD SECURITY – LIVELIHOOD RECOMMENDATIONS: NTR

G. INFRASTRUCTURES

One water intake was totally destroyed by the flood in Sar-e-Tangi village. It was being used to supply water for MHP (Micro Hydro power) installation. Since the impact, 150 HH are deprived of electricity. The people don’t have the capacity to rebuild it

Other five water intakes were severely damaged in Oabkhorak valley which belongs to four


07/06/2013

9

CDCs. They were using it to irrigate the lands. According to our findings, people have the capacity to temporary rebuild them for their immediate needs because they were built with bag of sand and gravel. Only one among two in Chisma Azim village was built with concrete.

.

PHOTO 4: WATER INTAKE DAMAGED IN OABKHORAK

VILLAGE PHOTO 5: WATER INTAKE FOR MHP SEVERLY DAMAGED

IN SAR-E-TANG VILLAGE

INFRASTRUCTURE RECOMMENDATIONS:

Rebuild one water intake in Sar-e-Tangi village to provide electricity for 150 HH.

H. LOCAL PERCEPTION OF THE NEEDS

According to local leaders, the community prioritizes its needs as following:

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

Repair of Water intakes

Watershed to protect houses and lands

- -

Emergency Response Mechanism - Floods assessment report 5 CDCs in Ruy-i-Doab District - Samangan Province

07/06/2013

10

ANNEX

A. KEY FIGURES REVIEW IN SAMANGAN PROVINCE

Date Village # of

deaths # of

injuries

Total # of socially

vulnerable people

# of dead animals due to the shock # of

affected houses

# of affected

jeribs

# of m of damaged

road

# of m of damaged irrigation

canal Sheep Goat Cow Horse Donkey Poultry Camel

06/06/13

Sar-e-Tangi Bala and

Payan 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0

05/06/13 Tali Mazar 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0

05/06/13 Chashma-e-

Azim 0 0 50

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0

05/06/13 Sar-e-Dara Oabkhurak

0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 45 0 20

05/06/13 Masjid Jami Oabkhurak

0 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 50 0 0

05/06/13 Masjid

Kalan Bala 0 0 35

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0

Data source: Assessed CDC leaders

Affected irrigation canal was mostly filled by sand and gravels which has been cleaned by the community immediately after the flood. The affected road is not blocked due to the effect of this flood.

Documents

5 CDCS IN RUY-I-DOAB DISTRICT SAMANGAN PROVINCE 10/06/13 · 2018-03-12 · Emergency Response Mechanism - Floods assessment report 5 CDCs In Ruy-i-Doab District - Samangan Province