Upload
earl-hamilton
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
4th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (ICHS)
September 12-14, 2011
Low Energy Hydrogen Sensor
Linke, S., Dallmer, M., Werner R. and Moritz, W.Humboldt University of Berlin, Brook-Taylor-Str.2, 12489 Berlin, Germany;
email: [email protected]
Sensor structure
Hydrogenresponse
Thermalreactivation
Firedetection
LFLExplosion
alarm
2
4th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (ICHS)
September 12-14, 2011
Sensor structure
Si3N4
SiO2
Si
Palladium
•Disadvantages of available
hydrogen sensors:•energy consumption too high for battery powered systems due to elevated working temperature
•price to high for mass products
•poor selectivity
3
4th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (ICHS)
September 12-14, 2011
Electrochemical mechanism ((different to Lundström type))
Palladium
Si LaF3
CV-measurement
4
4th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (ICHS)
September 12-14, 2011
Response of the Pd/LaF3/Si3N4/SiO2/Si field effect structure (solid line and left scale) to different concentrations of hydrogen (doted line and right scale) in synthetic air;
room temperature; measurement 1 hour after preparation of the Pd layer
5
4th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (ICHS)
September 12-14, 2011
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140G
ate
volta
ge s
hift
(m
V)
Time (s)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
Hyd
roge
n co
ncen
trat
ion
(ppm
)
6 days after preparation
6
4th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (ICHS)
September 12-14, 2011
Heating and temperature measurement
1 - Pt; 2 - LaF3; 3 - SiO2/Si3N4; 4 - n-Si; 5 - ohmic contact
No method for fast surface temperature measurement
4-point measurementresistance of Pt
7
4th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (ICHS)
September 12-14, 2011
C o m p ute r
R = 1I
TTL
C o ntro l vo lta g e0-5 V
Lo w vo lta g e im p u lse Hig h vo lta g e20 -1500 V
Diffe re ntia lp ro b e s
IEEE 488
Tra nsfo rm e d h ig vo lta g e im p u lse
Trig g e rsig na l
IR-LEDsin o ut
RM e ss
C o ntro l vo lta g e
vo lta g e o ut
+G a s 1
G a s 2
G a s e xha ust
Re la isTTL
sig na l in
Sa m p le ho ld e r
RS23 2
O p tic s
p ho to c urre ntm e a sure m e nt
Po we r p ulse so urc e
Surfa c ete m p e ra ture
m e a sure m e nt
Se nsitivitym e a sure m e nt
8
4th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (ICHS)
September 12-14, 2011
Calculations of temperature distribution
100ns 1000W100WS
LaF3
240 nm
SiO2/Si3N4
80nm
1 s10 W10Ws
10 s100W1mWs
9
4th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (ICHS)
September 12-14, 2011
Constant surface temperature
0 200 400 600 800 1000300
400
500
600
700
310 nsT<5K
tem
pera
tur/
K
t/ns
Parameters of the electrical heating pulse used in Fig. aboveMax. current 8,4ACur. dens. 2,8*107 Acm-2
Max. voltage 293 VMax. power 2365 WTotal energy 1,82*10-3 J((average 2x10-8 W))
TSi=0,025 K
500 activations simulating 2 years
10
4th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (ICHS)
September 12-14, 2011
Micro hotplate structure
11
4th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (ICHS)
September 12-14, 2011
Temperature distributionfor different impulse duration
Average power consumption 2x10-6 WFast decay to room temperature
12
4th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (ICHS)
September 12-14, 2011
Hydrogen signal in air after thermal reactivation
room temperature
Low concentration range
136 mV/decade
Limit of detection500 ppb
13
4th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (ICHS)
September 12-14, 2011
A Fire Experiment in a Wooden House..........T- Amamoto et al., Sensors and Actuators, B1 (1990) 226-230
14
4th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (ICHS)
September 12-14, 2011
800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 22000
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
ventilation on
Start Heater
TF 2
sig
na
l/mV
t/s
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
3,0
3,5
hydrogen-sensor90 sec earlier
CO-conc
smoke-sensor
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Early state of Fire (smoldering)TF 2 wood on electrical heater
15
4th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (ICHS)
September 12-14, 2011 High concentration range
LFL 4% (40 000 ppm)alarm level 1,6%
Response time t90 (@8000 ppm)= 4 s
150 mV/dec
16
4th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (ICHS)
September 12-14, 2011
Stress test simulating330 days of activations and mesurements
Day 2, 50, 150 and 300
all 330 measurements
17
4th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (ICHS)
September 12-14, 2011
Mechanism
Oxygen sensor
O2 + A* O2 (A*) (1)
O2 (A*) + H2O + e- HO2 (A*) + OH- (2)
OH- + (F*) OH-(F*) (3)Additional hydrogen action
O2 (A*) + H2 H2O (A*) (4)
18
4th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (ICHS)
September 12-14, 2011
Conclusions
- room temperature hydrogen sensor in ppm range and for high concentration
- thermal reactivation is possible
- Low energy consumption for heating impuls
- early fire detection
- alarm at lower explosion level
- Battery power application for long time
- Combination with energy harvesting technology possible