43370 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 140 / Tuesday, July 22, 2003 / Notices

collection: Form Number: ATF F 6, Part II (5330.3B). Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

(4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: Individuals or households. Other: Business or other for-profit, Federal Government, State, Local, or Tribal Government. The information collection is needed to determine whether firearms, ammunition and implements of war are eligible for importation into the United States. The information is used to secure authorization to import such articles. The form is used by persons who are members of the United States Armed Forces.

(5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: It is estimated that 9,000 respondents will complete a 30 minute form.

(6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: There are 4,500 annual estimated total burden hours associated with this collection.

If additional information is required contact: Brenda E. Dyer, Deputy Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning Staff, Justice Management Division, Department of Justice, Patrick Henry Building, Suite 1600, 601 D Street NW., Washington, DC 20530.

Dated: July 16, 2003. Brenda E. Dyer, Deputy Clearance Officer, Department of Justice.[FR Doc. 03–18580 Filed 7–21–03; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–FB–U

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Justice Programs

Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comments Requested

ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information Collection Under Review: Extension of a Currently Approved Collection Police Corps Service Agreement.

The Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs (OJP) has submitted the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. This proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal

Register Volume 68, Number 66, page 16830 on April 7, 2003, allowing for a 60 day comment period.

The purpose of this notice is to allow for an additional 30 days for public comment until August 21, 2003. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10.

Written comments and/or suggestions regarding the items contained in this notice, especially the estimated public burden and associated response time, should be directed to the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention Department of Justice Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20503, or facsimile (202) 395–5806.

Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points:

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

Overview of this information collection:

(1) Type of Information Collection: Extension of a Currently Approved Collection.

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: Police Corps Service Agreement.

(3) Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department of Justice sponsoring the collection: Form Number: none. The Office of Police Corps Services, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.

(4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: Individuals or Households. The Police Corps Service Agreement is the written contract between the Office of Police Corps and Law Enforcement Education and Police Corps Participants to complete police

corp training, and setting forth the participant’s agreement to provide 4 years of law enforcement service at an accredited agency in exchange for scholarship or reimbursement funds for educational purposes.

(5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: It is estimated that 500 respondents will complete a 30 minute form.

(6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: There are estimated 250 annual total burden hours associated with this collection.

If additional information is required contact: Mrs. Brenda E. Dyer, Deputy Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Policy and Planning Staff, Justice Management Division, Suite 1600, Patrick Henry Building, 601 D Street NW., Washington, DC 20530.

Dated: July 16, 2003. Brenda E. Dyer, Deputy Clearance Officer, Department of Justice.[FR Doc. 03–18579 Filed 7–21–03; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–18–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA–W) issued during the period of July 2003.

In order for an affirmative determination to be made and a certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance to be issued, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222 of the Act must be met.

(1) That a significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision thereof, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; and

(2) That sales or production, or both, of the firm or sub-division have decreased absolutely, and

(3) That increases of imports of articles like or directly competitive with

VerDate Jan<31>2003 19:58 Jul 21, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM 22JYN1

43371Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 140 / Tuesday, July 22, 2003 / Notices

articles produced by the firm or appropriate subdivision have contributed importantly to the separations, or threat thereof, and to the absolute decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision.

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In each of the following cases the investigation revealed that criterion (3) has not been met. A survey of customers indicated that increased imports did not contribute importantly to worker separations at the firm.

None In the following case, the

investigation revealed that the criteria for eligibility have not been met for the reasons specified.

The investigation revealed that criterion (a)(2)(A) (I.C.) (Increased imports) and (a) (2)(B) (II.B) (No shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met.TA–W–51,718; LeCroy Corp., Beaverton,

OR TA–W–51,799; Plastech Corp., Amery,

WITA–W–52,010; Imperial of Morristown,

Inc., Morristown, TNTA–W–51,780; QCR Tech LLC, Madison

Heights, MI TA–W–51,787; Production Pattern Co,

Bedford, OH TA–W–51,859; Memscap, Inc., Formerly

JDS Uniphase’s, Chronos Mems Business Unit, Research Triangle Park, NC

TA–W–51,870; McKenzie Forest Products, Springfield, OR

TA–W–51,969; Knaack Manufacturing Co., Payson, UT

TA–W–51,989; Coates Screen, East Rutherford, NJThe workers firm does not produce an

article as required for certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.TA–W–52,142; Covington Needleworks,

Mt. Olive, MS TA–W–52,137; Computer Sciences

Corp., Customer Support Services, San Diego, CA

TA–W–52,048; Hamilton Sundstrand Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of United Technologies Corp., Long Beach, CA

TA–W–52,131; Motorola, Personal Communications Sector, North America Contact Center, Schaumburg, IL

TA–W–52,147; Furniture Makers Supply, Martinsville, VA

TA–W–52,153; Target.Direct, Westgate Facility, St. Paul, MN

TA–W–52,154; McDonnell Douglas Technical Services, Inc., d/b/a The Aviant Group, Long Beach, CA

TA–W–52,238; PCS Administration (USA), Inc., Northbrook, ILThe investigation revealed that

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B) (Sales or production, or both, did not decline) and (II.B) (has shifted production to a country not under the free trade agreement with the U.S) have not been met. TA–W–51,929; LeSportsac,

Manufacturing and Distribution Division, Stearns, KYThe investigation revealed that

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (II.C) (has shifted production to a country not under the free trade agreement with the U.S.) have not been met.TA–W–51,756; Mattel, Inc., Mt. Laurel,

NJThe investigation revealed that

criteria (2) has not been met. The workers firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier or downstream producer to trade-affected companies.TA–W–52,109; K.C. Holding, Inc.,

formerly doing business as Crews Manufacturing, Newnan, GA

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been issued; the date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of (a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of Section 222 have been met.TA–W–51,321; Rome Cable Corp., a

subsidiary of Rome Group, Inc., Rome, NY: March 18, 2002.

TA–W–51,674; Celeste Industries Corp., including workers of ESI, Barrett Temporaries, and A Perfect Job. Com, Easton, MD: May 1, 2002.

TA–W–51,933; Vigorelli Sportswear, including leased workers of Strategic Outsourcing, Inc., McMinnville, TN: May 22, 2002.

TA–W–51,955; Gilmour Manufacturing Co., Somerset, PA: June 4, 2002.

TA–W–51,998; Ameripol Synpol Corp., Port Neches, TX: January 26, 2003.

TA–W–52,046; Sauer-Danfoss Co., Mini Steering Units Div., Sturtevant, WI: June 10, 2002.

TA–W–52,126; Broyhill Furniture Industries, Inc., Plant 55, a wholly owned subsidiary of Furniture Brands International, Inc., Lenoir, NC: June 3, 2002.

TA–W–52,135; Ford Motor Company, Powertrain Operations, Vulcan Forging Plant, Dearborn, MI: June 23, 2002.

TA–W–52,166; Charles Komar and Sons, Oklahoma Div., McAlester, OK: June 19, 2002.

TA–W–52,225; SCI Enclosures LLC, Stanton, KY: May 12, 2002.

TA–W–51,593; Tamaqua Cable Products, Schuylkill Haven, PA: April 16, 2002.

TA–W–51,611; National Steel Corp (NSC), Corporate Headquarters, Mishakawa, IN, A; Granite City Div., Granite City, IL, B; Great Lakes Operations, Ecorse, MI, C; Midwest Operations, Portage, Inc, D; Procoil Corp., Canton, MI, E; Technical Research Center, Trenton, MI, F; National Steel Pellet Co., Keewatin, MN, G; NSL, Inc., Portage, IN, H; TMH, Portage, IN, I; Delray Connecting Railroad, Detroit, MI: April 8, 2002.

TA–W–51,877; Peak Oilfield Service Co. a subsidiary of Nabors Industries and Cook Inlet Region, Inc., Anchorage, AK: December 30, 2001.

TA–W–51,979; OH, Baby Enterprise, Ltd, New York, NY: June 3, 2002.

TA–W–51,990; Waterfront Sportswear, Inc., Fall River, MA: June 5, 2002.

TA–W–52,016; Trio Dyeing and Finishing, Paterson, NJ: May 20, 2002.

TA–W–52,079; Photocircuits Corp., including leased workers of Brookville Staffing and Sigma Staffing, Glen Cove, NY: June 9, 2002.The following certifications have been

issued. The requirements of (a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of Section 222 have been met.TA–W–51,904; Primanex Corp.,

Fremont, CA: May 20, 2002. TA–W–51,991; Gateway Hosiery Mills,

Inc., North Wilkesboro, NC: June 4, 2002.

TA–W–52,014; Robert Bosch Fuel Systems Corp., formerly Diesel Technology Co., a div. of Robert Bosch North America, Kentwood, MI: June 10, 2002.

TA–W–52,091; Precision Dynamics Corp., Belleville, KS: May 23, 2002.

TA–W–52,156; DeLong Sportswear, Inc., Crowell, TX: June 25, 2002.

TA–W–52,165; Endar Corp., a div. of Blyth, Inc., Temecula, CA: June 19, 2002.

TA–W–52,185; State of Alaska Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission Permit #S04T64124J, Ekuk, AK: June 6, 2002.

TA–W–51,866; GE Transportation Systems, Global Signaling LLC, Grain Valley, MO: May 23, 2002.

TA–W–51,890; Continental Tire North America (CTNA), Mayfield, KY: May 27, 2002.

TA–W–51,948; Irwin Industrial Tool Co., a div. of Newell Rubbermaid, Beatrice, NE: June 3, 2002.

VerDate Jan<31>2003 19:58 Jul 21, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM 22JYN1

43372 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 140 / Tuesday, July 22, 2003 / Notices

TA–W–51,966; Springs Window Fashions, 7200 Stewart Avenue, a div. of Springs Industries, including leased workers of Kelly Services, Inc., & Seek, Inc. Wausau, WI: June 4, 2002.

TA–W–51,981; Emerson Climate Technologies, Flow Controls Div., St. Louis, MO: June 5, 2002

TA–W–52,015; Baxter Healthcare Corp., Mountain Home, AR: June 10, 2002.

TA–W–52,032; Precision Interconnect, a div. of Tyco Healthcare Group, LP, Broomfield, CO: June 12, 2002.

TA–W–51,081; Flex-N-Gate Oklahoma, LLC, Ada, OK: June 2, 2002.

TA–W–52,089; Dixie Industrial Coatings, Inc., Chattanooga, TN: June 9, 2002.

TA–W–52,121; Anvil Knitwear, Inc., a div. of Anvil Holdings, Inc., Hamer, SC: June 17, 2002.

TA–W–52,125; A.O. Smith, Electrical Products Co., EPC, Ripley, TN: June 23, 2002.

TA–W–52,206; Say Cheese, Lewiston, ME: June 26, 2002.

TA–W–52,212; OBG Distribution, LLC, a div. of Oshkosh B’Gosh, Inc., Gainesboro, TN: June 30, 2002.The following certification has been

issued. The requirement of upstream supplier to a trade certified primary firm has been met.TA–W–51,996; Border Chemical, Inc.,

Mount Jewett, PA: June 6, 2002. TA–W–52,013; Shipley Company, LLC, a

subsidiary of Rohm & Haas, Spartanburg, SC: May 29, 2002.I hereby certify that the

aforementioned determinations were issued during the months of July 2003. Copies of these determinations are available for inspection in Room C–5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above address.

Dated: July 14, 2003. Timothy Sullivan, Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.[FR Doc. 03–18547 Filed 7–21–03; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the

Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA–W) issued during the period of June and July 2003.

In order for an affirmative determination to be made and a certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance to be issued, each of the group eligibility requirements of section 222 of the Act must be met.

(1) That a significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision thereof, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; and

(2) That sales or production, or both, of the firm or sub-division have decreased absolutely, and

(3) That increases of imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by the firm or appropriate subdivision have contributed importantly to the separations, or threat thereof, and to the absolute decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision.

Negative Determinations For Worker Adjustment Assistance

In each of the following cases the investigation revealed that criterion (3) has not been met. A survey of customers indicated that increased imports did not contribute importantly to worker separations at the firm.

None

In the following case, the investigation revealed that the criteria for eligibility have not been met for the reasons specified.

The investigation revealed that criterion (a)(2)(A) (I.C.) (Increased imports) and (a) (2)(B) (II.B) (No shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met.TA–W–51,782; Troy Tooling, Inc.,

Rochester Hills, MI.TA–W–51,910; Southwest Windpower,

Inc., Duluth, MN.TA–W–51,916; Twin City E.D.M., Inc.,

Fridley, MN.TA–W–51,792; Mack Industries, Troy,

MI.TA–W–51,512; Unocal, Kenai

Production/Cook Inlet Div., Anchorage, AK.

TA–W–51,400; Credence Corp. Hillsboro, OR.

TA–W–51,675; Aero-Motive Co., a wholly owned subsidiary of Woodhead Industries, Inc., Kalamazoo, MI.

TA–W–51,779; Cordis Endovascular, a wholly owned subsidiary of Johnson and Johnson, Maple Grove, MN.

TA–W–51,815; Sharon Tube Co., Sharon, PA.

TA–W–51,823; OEM Worldwide LLC, Spearfish, SD.

TA–W–51,855; Plexus Corp., Neenah Buildings 1,2,3, Plexus Electronic Assembly Corp., including Manpower and Kelly Services, Neenah, WI.

TA–W–52,059; Brown Foundry, Inc., Swanton, VT.

TA–W–52,092; General Mills Operations, Inc., Bakeries and Food Service Div., including leased workers of Masterson Personnel, Inc., Eden Prairie, MN.

TA–W–51,798 Semitool, Inc., Headquarters, Kalispell, MT; A; San Jose, CA, B; Western Region, Beaverton, OR, C; Central Region, Austin, TX, D; Dallas Office, Dallas, TX, E; Franktown, CO, F; Southwest Office, Temple, AZ, G; Eastern Region, Nashua, NH, H; Williamsburg, VA, I; Orlando, FL, J; Stroudsburg, PA, and K; Montgomery, NY.

The workers’ firm does not produce an article as required for certification under section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA–W–52,034; Lion Bioscience, a subsidiary of Lion AG, Cleveland, OH.

TA–W–52,097; Symantec Corp., Springfield, OR.

TA–W–52,129; Hewlett-Packard Co., Personal Computing Group, Commercial Solutions Center, HP Services Div., Colorado Springs, CO.

TA–W–52,005; Reliability, Inc., Essex Junction, VT.

TA–W–51,960; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Global Infrastructure Organizations, Palo Alto, CA.

TA–W–51,901; J.J. Mac, Incorporated, d/b/a Rainbeau, San Francisco, CA.

TA–W–51,651; Solectron Global Services, a div. of Solectron Corp., Hillsboro, OR.

TA–W–51,707; Lucent Technologies, Inc., Lucent Worldwide Services, Spokane, WA.

TA–W–51,851 A, B; Northwest Airlines, Inc., Duluth, MN, Minneapolis, MN and Atlanta, GA.

TA–W–51,896; Ademco Distribution, Inc. (ADI), a subsidiary of Honeywell International, Inc., Melville, NY.

TA–W–51,932; Northwest Airlines, Inc., Ground Operations Div., Anchorage, AK.

TA–W–51,963; Nortel Networks, Department R084, Research Triangle Park, NC.

VerDate Jan<31>2003 19:58 Jul 21, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM 22JYN1