25
Cambridge University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Popular Music. http://www.jstor.org Musical Ambition, Cultural Accreditation and the Nasty Side of Progressive Rock Author(s): Jay Keister and Jeremy L. Smith Source: Popular Music, Vol. 27, No. 3 (Oct., 2008), pp. 433-455 Published by: Cambridge University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40212401 Accessed: 22-08-2014 09:19 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 20 14 09:19:52 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 1/24

 Cambridge University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Popular Music.

http://www.jstor.org

Musical Ambition, Cultural Accreditation and the Nasty Side of Progressive RockAuthor(s): Jay Keister and Jeremy L. Smith

Source: Popular Music, Vol. 27, No. 3 (Oct., 2008), pp. 433-455Published by: Cambridge University PressStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40212401Accessed: 22-08-2014 09:19 UTC

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available athttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of contentin a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:19:52 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 2/24

Popular

Music

2008)

Volume

27/3.

Copyright

© 2008

Cambridge University

ress,

pp.

433-455

doi:10.1017/S0261143008102227

rinted

n

the United

Kingdom

Musicalambition,ulturalaccreditationnd the

nasty

ide

of

progressive

ock1

JAY

KEISTER

and

JEREMY

L. SMITH

Department

f

Music,

niversityf

Colorado,oulder,

O,

USA

E-mail:

[email protected],

[email protected]

Abstract

Progressive

ock

f

he

arly

970shasbeen emoniseds

a nadir n

the

istoryf

ock

rimarily

because

f

he mbitions

f

progressive

ock

musicians. ritics

ave

nterpreted

hese mbitions

as

attempts

oelevate ock

music o the evel

fhigh

rt

n

order o

gain

cultural

ccreditation

from

n

unspecified

ultural lite.

This

nterpretation

s

furtherompounded

y

the ommon

notion

hat

rogressive

ock's

ubject

matter

s

dominated ore

y

ndividualistic

uests or

spirituality

han

by

socio-political

ritique,

esulting

n a

stereotypef

progressive

ock s

apolitical, retentious

nd

conventionallypwardly

obile. riticswhohave

propagated

his

stereotype

including

ome

musicologists

havemisunderstoodhe ountercultural

olitics

f

youngmusiciansuringhis ra andhaveoverlookedhehighlyeveloped usical oeticsf

progressive

ock

hatwere

n

facthighly

oliticised.

his

paper

xamines

our f

the

eading

progressive

ock ands

f

he

arly

970s

Emerson,

ake nd

Palmer,

ing

Crimson,

enesis

and

Yes and

reveals he

nasty

ide

of progressive

ock:

scathing

riticism

f rampant

militarism

nd ocial

onformity

hat uns ountero

the

revailing

arrativen which

he

enre

is

dismissed

s an

escapistantasy

ith n elitist

genda.

Introduction

Nice asties

rede

riguer

hese

ays.

Guardian

eekly,August

970)

Progressiveock f he 970s sgenerallyegardedsamovementoundedy group

of

musicians

fthe

Britishounter-culture

nspired y

the

xperimental

nd

psych-

edelic

rock f

the

Beatles,

imi

endrix

nd

Cream,

mong

others.2 t its

height

progressive

ock

ands such

as

Emerson,

ake and

Palmer,

es

and

Genesis om-

manded

he

music

ndustry's

ost

avishly

emunerative

eals as

they

ntroduced

formal

tructures

nd

nstrumentation

fclassical

music,

azz

and worldmusic nto

rock

o

culpt op

record

lbums nto

omplex,

ulti-movementorks n

a

scale

hat

was

unprecedented

n

their

tylistic

radition.herewerealso

less

visible

roups,

such

as

Van der Graaf

Generator,

enry

Cow,

Magma

and

Faust,

who created

aggressive

an-tonal

orks

with

pocalypticyrics

nd

dystopianmagery

o

pave

thewayforxperimentsnextremeockmusic y atter-dayroupsuch s TheMars

Volta3

nd

John

orn's

Naked

City,

who have

drawn

ontroversy

ver

heir

epic-

tions f

ystematic

uman

orture,

xecution

nd

criminal

iolence.

n

various

ways

the

forementioned

rogressive

roups

f the

1970s ook he

ead

in

developing

433

This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:19:52 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 3/24

434

Jay

Keister

nd

Jeremy

.

Smith

musical

anguage

o

express

uch

unsettlingositions.

t s not

urprising

hat

ro-

gressive

metal

ands such s

Tool,

Primus

nd

Opeth,

who

stand

mong

hemost

provocative

f

recent

rtists,

hare

stylisticffinity,

s well s

a

common

abel,

with

progressiveock fthe1970s.But riticsnd students fprogressiveockhavenot

appreciated

his

spect

f he

movement.

nstead,

here

s a

strange

ense f almness

attributedo

this

style

hathas

haunted ts

reception

o this

day.

Through

he

perpetration

f

myth

hat he

musical mbitionsf

progressive

rtists an ounter

to

theaesthetics f

rock,

he

disturbing

ature f ts

dentity

s

'progressive'

as

been ost.

We contend hat his

eculiar

ritical mission elies

fundamental

is-

conception

bout he

motivationsehind hismusic.

Of

ll

popular

tyles

f

music,

rogressive

ock s the

nly

ne characterised

y

its

musical mbition.

he

Oxfordnglish

ictionary

efines he

word mbitiontself

as 'the rdent

esire o rise o

highposition,

r to

attain

ank,

nfluence,

istinction

or

other

referment'

nd

lists nother

onnotation

f

ostentation,

isplay

f

the

outwardokens fposition,sriches,ress, ain-glory,omp' OED 1989,v. ambi-

tion').

The

derisory

one

here

notwithstanding,

heres no

denying

hat he erm

its

well the

flamboyant

ehaviour f

Keith

merson,

ick

Wakeman

nd other

oung

progressive

ock tarswho

were

enjoying

exual

nd

exhibitionistic

riumphs

hat

made hem

he

nvy

f heir

eers.

ut atherhan onsider heir utward

isplays

f

ostentation

n

fashion nd

attitude,

ock

ritics

nd

musicologists

like

have ocated

the

ocio-political

mbitionsf

progressive

ockers

recisely

n

theirmusical

ctivi-

ties,

n

the

appropriation

f

nonpopular

musical orms

. .

European

classical"

music,

azz

and

vant-garde

usic'

Weinstein

002,

.

91

.

Not

only

s

t

ypical

o ee

this s an

expression

f

sociocultural

ovement,

pecifically

n

attempt

o

put

forth

value for heupper-middlelass' ibid., . 92) it s alsocommonlysserted hat he

upper-middle

lass

supposedly

nvolved erewas a musical stablishment

un

by

adults.

n

this cenario

he ambitions f these

progressive

ockerswere

directed

toward

single

goal

to be

'accepted

by

their lders'

Hatch

and Milward

987,

p.

150).4

We

beginby

questioning

he

objective

ehind

his

musical mbition:Was

it

really

irected oward he

pprobation

f dults? o answer hiswe

turn

irsto

the

often-citediner

otes f he lbum

Acquiring

he aste

y

he

rogressive

andGentle

Giant. he

authors sed this

orum o

pompously

tate hatit s our

goal

to

expand

the

rontiersf

ontemporary

opular

music t the

isk

f

being npopular

. .

From

the

utsetwe have

abandoned ll

preconceived

houghts

n

blatant

ommercialism.

Insteadwehopetogiveyousomethingarmore ubstantialndfulfilling.llyou

need o

do is sit

ack,

nd

acquire

he aste'

Gentle

Giant

971

.

Commentators

ave

had a field

ay

with his

tatement.

ere,

from hemouths fthemusicians

hem-

selves,

was an

expression

f all

the elitism nd

pretension

hat

betrayed

ock's

supposed

dolescent

opulism,

r,

n

the

memorable ordswithwhich ester

angs

described

rogressive

ock's lassical

usions,

the nsidious efoulmentf

all that

was

gutter ure

n

rock'

Bangs

002,

.

50).

But

look t the ontextf he tatement

by

Gentle iant

eveals more

omplicated

ituation.heband hose o llustrate

he

same album

with

over rt hat o

thoroughly

eflates heir

igh-toned

ote nside

that t

seems o meet

Bangs

right

here

n

the

gutter

e found o free f

corrupting

elements.

urely

he ame dult

membersf he lite

whowould

ppreciate

he

highart one f he iner oteswouldbe

put

off

y

the over f he ame lbum hat hows

a

tongue

bout

o

acquire

he aste' f

peach

hat

esembles

person's

uttocks

see

Figure).

This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:19:52 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 4/24

Musical

ambition 435

Figure.

cquiring

heTaste

lbum

over,

entle iant.

With his athroomumour, entleGiant pensthedoortothenasty ide of

progressive

ock.

ynasty

we mean

verything

hat

might

e

considered

ad form

n

musical

stablishmentircles: rom

mages

of

tongues alivating

ear

buttocks

o

offensive

n-stage

ntics such s

flag urnings

to

excruciatingly

oud

and disso-

nant

epictions

fwarfarend detailed arrativesf

human astration.

t he ore f

all

this

astiness,

e

believe,

as

something

onfrontational,

opulist

nd

political.

n

the

wake of urban

riots,

olitical

ssassinations

nd

student

massacres

n

college

campuses

n

the ate

1960s,

many

n

the

youth

ulture urned o

the

nasty

ide

of

political

ntercourse.

egardless

f their

ersonal olitical

eliefs,

rogressive

ock

musicians

t

the imewere ssociatedwith his ountercultural

ovement,

ne

that

lashedoutagainst nyformfauthoritypolitical r cultural inwaysthatwere

intended

obe

malevolent,

isruptive

nd foul.5

dmittedly,

t s not

asy

to discuss

these

hings

n

theforum f

scholarlyournal.

However,

we see as

a

paradigm

f

distortionhe

eglect

fGentle iant's

mage

f

uttocks

n

favour f

heir

retentious

This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:19:52 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 5/24

436

Jay

Keister nd

Jeremy

.

Smith

statement

bout art'.Since he ime f

progressive

ock,

hemere

presence

f

any

trappings

f

lassicalmusic r adult'

ntellectualulture as caused

many

o ee t s

an

imperturbable'tyle

fmusic Atton

001,

.

29

.

In

this

aper

we

attempt

o hift

theparadigmnd drawattentionack to the nastier' ide of theprogressiveock

movement.

n

revisiting

ertain

ey

works,

e

hope

o howhow

particular

rand

f

politics

was voiced

through

ven themost

popular

ands ike

ELP,

King

Crimson,

Genesis

nd Yes.

Following

hiswe consider he auses nd

outcomes f he

ritical

derision f the

ingle

most

eplored enre

f

postwar op

music',6

uestioning

he

validity

f his

rope

f ondemnationhat nforms ost

arrativesfrock.

Emerson,

ake

and Palmer:road warriors randed as war

criminals

One

group

rom

he

arly

970swellknown or ts

vain-glory,omp

nd

ostentation

wasEmerson,ake ndPalmerELP .Musical mbition asperhapswhatmadeELP

so iconic

f

progressive

ock

n that

hey,

more

han

ny

other

roup,

rocked he

classics'

n

the iteral

ense.

Certainly

he

repertoire

ackled

y

ELP

was

ambitious

(Mussorgsky,opland,

Ginastera),

ut

he

group's tyle

f

playing

he lassicswith

extremes

f

volume,

istortion,

apid

tempos

nd

amplified

eedbackmade for

collision

f

high

and low culture

hathas created ome confusion

mong

critics

negotiating

he

opulist

estheticsfrock.

Historians

f

progressive

ock ound

he nswer o the ritical

uandary osed

by

ELP's

classical

ppropriations

n

a 1974

ssayby

Lester

angs

n

which e

abels

ELP war criminals'.

he reliance n

Bangs

for n assessment fthis iewhas

been

considerable,

o the

point

where

n

edifice

f orts as beenbuilt

pon phrase,

or

it s treated lmost s a metaphoror hecritical isdainofprogressiveock s a

whole.

But he

osition

angs

akes

n

this rticle

s

actually

mbivalent.

angs

wrote

admirably

f

KeithEmerson

s one who could

churn t out so

relentlessly'

nd

recalled

with obvious

pleasure

the

nasty

ide of Emerson's oncert

ehaviour,

describing

ow

the

keyboardist:

vaulted ff

he

tagewaving

what

ooked ike

theremin

round,

early ecapitating

everal

coeds

nd a

rentacop

o forzak f

upra-

WHIIINE

Reclambering

nstage,

e

capped

venhis

own how

bywiping

is ss

with t:

WZZEEEEEE

Bangs

002,

.

48

r

Despite

his

dmiring

tance,

angs

oes

confronthe ines f lass-based

uthenticity

thatwere rossed

n

ELP's

Classical

usion',

oting

ith

ontempt

ts

mix

f

uppos-

edlyhigh ndlow culturalignals. erhaps, hough, e felt ompelled oadopta

critical

tance

fter

merson efused

o attend is

nterview,

dding

perhaps

o the

critic's

rudging

espect

or his

rrogant,outhful

tar.

n

any

ase,

fter

aiting

he

othermembers

f

theband

during

he nterview or

his rticle

and

facetiously

complimenting

hem

n their

olite

manners),

angs

nared hem

n theirmusical

ambitions:

e

forced hem

o admit

hat

hey oped

their udienceswould seekout

more

music rom

he lassical

epertory

fter

eeing

heir how.

However,

ake and

Palmer onceded

eadily

hat hemain

point

f

heir usion xercise as toentertain

their

udiences,

ot

to

enlighten

hem. o counter

his,

angs

departed

rom

he

precocious

dolescent

mage

he liked

to

portray

n

his

writing

nd

adopted

the

attitude fthe upposed dultthat rogressiveockers ereouttoplease. n this

guise

he ritic

imself

eemedmore

ntent n

protecting

he

purity

f

theClassical

repertory

hanthe

band members.

t was uncharacteristic

f

Bangs

to miss the

opportunity

ere

o

point

ut the

blatant

conoclasm

emonstrated

y

the

group's

This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:19:52 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 6/24

Musical

ambition

437

'insidious

efoulment'fthe lassics.Musicalmatters

side,

Bangs learly

dmired

the ock

andfor

ll

ts

riches, ress,

ain-glory

nd

pomp'

nd

he knewhis

readers

wouldnot

ake

him

eriously

henhe defended ichard

ixon's oncernsbout

he

energyrisis f he ime, hich LPfloutedrossly ith heirruckloadsfvolume-

enhancing,

lectricity-wastingear.

t

was

in

this

ontext f

a

'mock

defence' hat

Bangs

oicedhismemorable

uip against

LP,

abelling

hemwar

criminals'.8

Recent

ommentatorsho have

preferred

o find

n

Bangs's

ssay

condem-

nation

atherhan

grudging

dmirationor

LP

havemissed he

eviewer's ather

accurate

haracterisation

f Emerson's

utlandishlyggressive

tagepersona

nd

ambitious

osition

s

a

musical

ppropriator.

he

origins

f the

ELP

style

re

in

Emerson's

irst ock

and,

The

Nice,

forwhichhe

gained reputation

or lassical

fusions

nd

onstage

ntics. thisAlbert

all

debut

n

1968with he

Nice,

Emerson

violently

hip-lashed

is

band

mates,

epeatedly

tabbed n

American

lag

ndburnt

it on

stage

all the

while

performing

n

oddly

duple-metred

ersion f Leonard

Bernstein'sAmerica', esultingn a lifetimean from he venue.Subsequently,

publicists

or

The Nice

cast thisban from he Albert

Hall

as a

badge

of

honour,

announcing

t

with

pride

n

the inernotes f

a

re-released

D TheBest

f

he

Nice

(1994).

Emerson

ontinued

his raditionf bombastic

howmanship

n

the

1970s,

performing

ith

LP at the

argest

tadia

f he

ime

ndbefore

uge

rowds f

fans,

few of

themmuch

older

thanthe musicians hemselves. s he achieved

uper-

stardom

n

North

merica

ith

LP,

Emerson

ept

is nti-war

essages

efore he

public.

In

1971,

tthe

eight

fAmerica's

ar

n

Southeast

sia,

LP

released he

lbum

Tarkus,

eaturing

he

multi-movementuite

of the ame name.

With

ts

distorted,

rapid-firergannconstantlyhiftingetresnd cover rt f yberneticndmytho-

logical

warrior

reatures,

arkus ecries he

rutality

fmechanised

arfarend the

hypocrisy

hat tands

ehind

t.As was

typical

frock lbums f he

ra,

he

music,

lyrics

nd

album over

rt f

Tarkus ere ntended

obe

experienced

s

a

whole. he

vivid isual

magery

f he

lbum over

epicts

character

ommonlynterpreted

s

Tarkus,

high-tech

armachine

hat

ngages

n

battles

ith ther imilarmachines

until

t

s

defeated

y

Manticore,

mythological

reature

fAsian

rigin.

t

s

hardly

surprising

hat

eople

t the ime

nterpreted

he

Tarkusmachine

nd

the

Manticore

beast

s

metaphors

or heUnited

tates'

igh-tech

ilitary

nd Vietnam'sow-tech

culture.

ertainly

hework

ad

a

sharp

nd

bloody

dge

nd

f

twere

n

analogy

or

Vietnam,

t

was an

apt

one.Not

only

oes

t

tand

s an astute

military

nalysis

f

he

situationn Vietnamt the ime,talso washighly rophetic:heheavily rmoured

Tarkus

s

finally

efeated

y

low-tech

nemy

hat

ets

lose

nough

ofind tsweak

spot

n

the same

manner

hat he

guerrilla

arfare f the

civilian-led iet

Cong

defeated

he

US

military

achine.

urthermore,

hereturn f

the

opening

ection

suggests

hat

Tarkus

might

ave

only

been

momentarily

efeated,

nd

could be

interpreted

s the

ltimate

nvincibility

f he

high-tech

S armada

gainst

techno-

logically

eaker

world

nemy.

Given

he ounter-cultural

ignificance

f

thisVietnam

War

nalogy,

t s sur-

prising

hat

Edward

Macan,

who

argued

so

strenuously

nd

effectively

or he

counter-cultural

oundation

f

progressive

ock,

akes ote f

t,

yet

ushes

hiswork

outof hepoliticalrena:

It s

the ature

f he

oncept

lbum,

owever,

hat

ne

an

nterpretgiven

lbum's

oncept

n

a more

pecific

ense

f

newishes.

or

nstance,

haveheard

t

rgued

hat arkus

epresents

theUnited

tates,

ince

he rmadillo

s an American

nimal;

hat

Manticore,

ith ts

rigins

n

This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:19:52 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 7/24

438

Jay

Keister nd

Jeremy

Smith

Persian nd

perhaps ltimately

ndian

mythology,ymbolizes

outhern

sia;

that he ixth

movement,

Battlefield',

s

actually

bout heVietnam

War;

nd

that he ntire

iece

s therefore

an

antiwar

rotest.

n

one

evel,

rather oubt t.WhileKeith merson as once nvolved

n

flag-burning

ncident

uring

is

days

with he

Nice,

y

the

arly

970s e admittedo

having

lost nterestnprotestolitics.urthermore,inceVietnamrotestongswerenotuncommon

around

1970,

esorting

o a veiledor hidden

protest

ould

have

been

quite

unnecessary.

(Macanl997,p.9O)

Why

s

Macan o

doubtfulf

n

anti-war

nterpretation?

e

apologetically

escribes

Keith

merson,

he

nstage

gitator

ho revelled

n

his anti- merican irade

t the

Royal

Albert

all,

as

someonewho was once

nvolved

n

a

flag-burning

ncident'

(ibid.).

While

Macanrelies

eavily

n

Emerson's tatementso

the

press

n

the

arly

1970s,

we

don't see

any discontinuity

etween he 1960s

gitator

nd the 1970s

musician

who

packaged

his

political

tatements

n

musical

orm,

o matter

hathe

said to

the

ress.

Here,

f

ourse,

e are ll

relying

o ome xtent

n

the

omplexities

involvedwith uthorialntentionality.owever,Macan'ssuggestionhat nti-war

songs

of this

ra were more

explicit

han

usual

at

this ime

imply

miscasts

he

evidence.

Many

anti-war

ongs

of the

period

had universal

messages,

uch as

'Imagine'

y

John

ennon,

Wooden

hips' yCrosby,

tills ndNash

nd War

Pigs'

by

Black abbath

oname

ust

few.

urthermore,

he nti-war

essage

f

Tarkuss

neither

veiled'nor

hidden'.

n

his

subsequent nalysis

f

Tarkus,

acan

dispenses

with

he

dea

that

e,

o

his

redit,

evelops hroughout

isbook:

hat

yrics,

over rt

and

music

re

ll

ntegral

actors

ontributing

o

co-ordinated hole

n

progressive

rock

lbums. nstead

Macan eeks to examine

owthe

iece

s

organized

n

a

purely

musical

asis'

ibid.,

.

91).

This

undersells he

powerful

musical,

yrical

nd visual

poetics fthis lbumpackage hatwas listenedoandstudied or ours n endby

war-conscious

merican

outh

n

the

pre-MTV

ays

ofrock.

In

Tarkus,

he

ubject

f

war

s treated

penly

nd

directly,specially

n

Greg

Lake'smournful

ament,

The

Battlefield',

ith

tsfunereal

rgan y

Emerson. ere

ELP's

rather

nambiguous

isdain fmilitarism

s not

onlyproclaimed

n

thefolk-

inspiredyrics,

ut

s also

embedded

n

the

music.

At

the ndof The

Battlefield',

he

sombre

mood f

he unerals

transformednto

clever atire fmilitarism

n

thenext

section f the

piece,

Aquatarkus'.

his nstrumental

ection eatures

mocking

military

archwith

deliberately

asal

trumpet

ound on

Emerson's

ynthesizer

accompanied

y

militaristicnare rum

eat

played y

Carl

Palmer.

t

s

nteresting

that

his

atirewas

dropped

n

ELP's live

concert

endition

fTarkus

erformed

n

the1974US tour.9ntheir iveversion f Aquatarkus',hehumorousynthesised

trumpet

ound

was

dropped

ndthe

militaristic

nare

rum

was

replaced

y

Palmer's

fuller

ounding roove

on the drum

kit as

the band turned his

ection nto

n

extended

irtuosic

am.

What

was the

eason

or his

hange

n

the

ong?Obviously

LP

happily

ook

advantage

f

any

opportunity

o

show off heir

kills,

ut

perhaps hey

made this

change

hinking

hat

uch a

silly-sounding

usical

oke

would

not work

n

US

Stadium

hows.

However,

he

nti-war

message

f Tarkus

as

emphasised

ather

than

iminished

n

this

iveversion

romhe

US tour s

Greg

ake nsertedhe

horus

of

King

rimson's

nti-war

nthem

Epitaph'

t

the nd

of The

Battlefield',

ust

efore

the

group aunchesnto herevised,rowd-pleasingamof Aquatarkus'. ll thisindicates hat

LP's

quest

was not

imply

o

forwardn

elitist

musical

genda

but

rather

o

pronounce

political

message

o

an

audience hat

hey

urely

ssumed

would

ppreciate

t.

At

the

ame

ime,

hey

made ure o

provide

hat

ame udience

This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:19:52 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 8/24

Musical ambition

439

with heir

money's

orth f

ver-the-top,

ircus-like usical

roductions

hat

laced

entertainment,

ot

high

rt,

tcentre

tage.Although

LP

today,

ike

ting,

ono nd

so

many

thers,

ould

probably

ant obe

regarded

s

artists,

t the

ime

hey

were

playing pto the mage fpopstar ntertainersnstead.

King

Crimson:

napalm

fire,

onic violence and musical karate

If

one

wereto

attack

progressive

ockmusician or

eing verly

ntellectualnd

prone

o

bombastictatements

f

eriousness,

hen necould

perhaps

ookno

further

than

guitarist

obert

ripp

f the eminal

rogressive

ock

group

King

Crimson.

However

much

Fripp's

rudite,

rofessorialmage

has made

him

n

easy target

s

a

negative

rogressive

ock

stereotype,

e continues o

argue against

he anti-

intellectual

tance

n

rock

nd

questions

hether

e

should act

dumb

n

order obe a

rockmusician'Tamm 991, .20).Fripp elieves ock's reatestalue s foundnthe

spontaneous

ommunication

hat an occur etweenmusicians

nd

their udiences

and claimed

hat ock

music ad tremendous

olitical ower:

Music s

a

high-order

anguage

ystem;

.e.,

t s a

meta-language.

he functionf a meta-

language

s to

express

olutions

o

problems osed

n

lower-order

anguage

ystem

.. if

ne

were

nterested

n

political

hange

ne

wouldnot nter

olitical

ife,

newould

go

ntomusic.

(Fripp uoted

n

Tamm

991,

.

128)

Fripp's

ehicle

or

his

politicalmeta-language'

as his band

King

Crimson

whose

debut

oncept

lbum

n

1969,

n the

ourt

f

he rimson

ing,

et he one or

1970s

rogressive

ock

with

screaming

edface

n

the

rontover ndthe ormented

expressionismf theopening ong,21stCenturychizoidMan'. Thesong's yrics

about

napalmed

nnocents

nd barbed

wirewere

matched

y

a hitherto

nprec-

edented

onic

violence

n

rock

music,

itting

tylistically

s well as

chronologically

between

he

xpressionistic

orks

f Penderecki

nd Crumb.

n

addition o

heavy

metal

uitar

nd

pounding

ass this

ong

featured

distorted

axophone

olo

by

an

McDonald,

who forced

imself

nto ontorted

ositions

while

recording

t in

the

studio

n

n effort

omake

t

ound

uitablyngst-ridden

Smith

001,

.

60

.

This irst

incarnation

f

King

Crimson

hat reated

uch

nti-warnthems s 'SchizoidMan'

and

Epitaph'

uickly

issolved

n 1970 fter heir

irst

lbum,

ut

Fripp

maintained

thisconfrontational

tyle

of music

what Genesis

guitarist

teve

Hackett

ptly

described

s 'musical

karate'

Stump

1997,

.

180)

-in

subsequent

ersions f the

grouphe continuedocallKingCrimson.

After

upervising

umerous

ersonnel

hanges,

ripp

ettled n

a

new

ine-up

in 1972 hat

as come

obe viewed

ymany

ans

nd criticss

King

Crimson'senith.

Consisting

f

Fripp,

assist

John

Wetton,

iolinist

avid

Cross,

ercussionist

amie

Muir nd

former

es drummer

ill

Bruford,

his

dynamic

roup

fmusicians as

perhaps

est

ble

torealise

ripp's

dealof

ollective

omposition

nd

mprovisation.

Fulfilling

ripp's

notion f

creating

music

s a

'high

order

anguage ystem',

his

group

produced

ocial

critique

ithout

heuse of

yrics

r a

programme,

he

best

example

of

this

being

the title

rack f the

1972 album

Larks'

Tongues

n

Aspic

(hereafter

TA).

Part

One

and

Part wo of

LTA retwo xtendednstrumentalracks

thatwere ollectivelyomposednd mprovisedy he and nfrontf ive udiences

prior

o he

inal

ecording

f

he

ompleted ieces.

he

final esult f his

vant-garde

jazz-like

pproach

orock

omposition

s

a

musical

attlefield,

ith

uitar,

iolin nd

bass

using

ll manner

f distortion

nd wah-wah

edal

effects,

nd an

enormous

This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:19:52 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 9/24

440

Jay

Keister nd

Jeremy

.

Smith

battery

f

drums nd

percussion

hat

ushes

King

Crimson's iolent

magery

onew

levelswithout

he se of

yrics.

n

the bsence f

ny pecific rogrammatic

arrative,

Gregory

arl

nterprets

his

iece

s an

abstract arrativef

n ndividual

truggling

throughrisis owards ictory, hichhe sees as a trope hat haracterisesing

Crimson's

more

gonised

ecordings

Karl

2002

.10

An

alternative

nterpretation

o

LTA

as

a

narrative f individual

n

crisis'

which

ne

might

urmise

f

t

were

omposed

olely yFripp

thats

more

n

keeping

with

the

band's

collective

pproach

o

musical karate' s a

morefractured

nd

embattled

arrativef

society

n

crisis'. uch n

nterpretation

s

particularlyppro-

priate

o he

ong

artOne ofLTA

hat

s structured

ccording

o he

ynamic

ontrast

of

coustic

nd

electricimbreshat

Macan

1997)

dentifiess central o

progressive

rock,

ut

appears

here s

full-blown

onicviolence

with

walls of

distorted

lectric

guitar,

iolin nd

bass

obliterating

elicate

assages

of coustic

trings

nd

percus-

sion.

The

lyrics

f

humankind's

oom that

illed arlier

King

Crimson lbums f

apocalypticrophecyregone, utthe istenerfLTAmustnegotiate ith n even

more

harrowing

oller oaster

ide f

ension nd

release,

with

lashing

issonance,

contrary

etresnd

noisy

imbreset

gainst

ighly

vocative nd

gentle assages

f

'Eastern-sounding'

trings

nd

percussion.

ing

Crimson

ushedprogressive

ock

ever

utward ith

heir road

ppropriation

f

non-Western usic

n

this 972work.

They

reatedwith

hesenew sounds

frightening

odel f

ociety

hat

uxtaposed

a

traditional,

astoral

ife

with

frighteningly

echanised,

lienated nd mass-

mediated

orce hat

ad

the

power

o

destroy

nything

n

ts

path.

Instead

of

direct

eferenceso wars

then

raging

n

Southeast

Asia,

King

Crimson's

pic

depicts

attle

n

a

more

bstract

ense,

s a clash f

ultures

hrough

dynamicse of nstrumentsndmusical ectionsnwarringpposition.he ultural

crisis f

LTA

begins

with

quiet

pening

ection

eaturing

n

African

amellophone

(mbira)

layedby

Jamie

Muir,

ccompanied

y

David

Cross' violinostinato hat

suggests

n

exotic

den that

s

gradually

vertaken

y

a

massing

f mallbells nd

chimes

verdubbed rom

Muir's

ercussion

rsenal.

his

uiet, et nsettling,pen-

ing

s

followed

y

he low

fade-inf n

nsistent

ulse

f

double-stops

nthe coustic

violin

hat

lowly

uilds

n

volume,

radually

ises

n

pitch

nd s

eventuallyoined y

a

distorted

lectric

uitar

ine.

This

malevolent

ounding

uo ushers

n

a full lectric

ensemble

f

distorted

uitar,

assanddrum

it hat

omes

n

two

uccessive avesof

sonicassault

on

the istener.

eightening

he

sense of violent ssault

during

he

build-up

eading

o the

econd

wave of

attacks,

uir

overdubs everal

quawking

bicycle orns hathriek ystericallynthe ace f his onic ttack,onjuringvivid

image

f

nnocent

laughter.

hroughout

TA

Parts ne and

Two,

s well s

the

ntire

album,

Muir's

arious

coustic ound

devices

scratched

alloons,

ubbed

lass,

eet

sloshing

hrough

mud,

etc.)

provide

many

humanising

lements midst ll

the

electric

imbres,

reating

n

unnerving

ffector he

istener.

Extreme

ontrasts

n

which he

gentle

s

delicately laced

before he

rushing,

mechanised

ssault

of the

powerful

ontinue

hrough

he

restof this

piece.

An

extended

evelopment

ection

ased

on

a

frantic,

scending, uitar

adenza

byFripp

eventually

uilds

up

into a

firestorm

f

rapid-fire

uitar

hord remolandond

crashing ercussion.

t s

finally

elieved

y

a

quiet

nterlude

eaturing

iolin,

uiet

electric

uitar

nd

autoharp. sthe astoralectionndswith soft, sian-sounding

pentatonic

elody,

he isteners

safely

eturned

othe

re-mechanised

aradise

hat

began

he

piece.

At

this

oint

hework

gently

ades o

silence.

Any

ensethat his

might

ead

to

a

peaceful

nding roves

false s

the ilence s

broken

y

the low

This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:19:52 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 10/24

Musical ambition 441

fade-in

f the earlier

ulsating

heme,

which rawlsback

in,

thistimewith

the

double-stop artplayed

on electric

uitar

nd

a new

melody

n theviolin.As

this

insistent

uo of

guitar

nd violin

gradually

scends

n

pitch

nd

builds

n

volume,

human oices reheard or he irstime n the lbum. ut hese oices onefemale

and onemale

seemdisembodied

nd

extremelygitated.

t

ounds s

if

quarrel

r

the

report

f

a crisis s

being

broadcast ver radio or television. s the

tension

continues

o

build,

hese oices hatter

ncomprehensibly

ntil

hemalevoice s heard

to

shout he

word dead ' Several

male

voices re then eard

murmuring

ncompre-

hensibly

n

monotones,

uggesting

ritual

hant

n

the ftermathf

some

kind

of

death

cene.

While t s not

necessary

o

map

any

f hese

mages

o

any pecific

ar,

listeners

f

King

Crimson

n

theVietnam rawere

ertainly

onfronted

y

n

assault

of

ockmusic

hatmatched r xceeded

he

ower

f

high

rt'

works uch s Crumb's

Vietnam-inspired

lack

ngels.

FromGenesis

to castration:

nastyreading

of the

Apocalypse

and

English

society

Genesis,

ne

of

progressive

ock'smost uccessful

ands,

was

founded

t

the llustri-

ous

Charterhouse

chool

n

themid-1960s.

istories f heband

nvariably

ention

thiswhen

hey

ast

he

group

nto

n elite world f

public

chools nd

comfortable

upbringings'

Atton

001,

p.

31).

After

n initial olk-influenced

hase

that asted

until

bout

971,

ounding

embers eter

Gabriel,

ony

Banks nd MikeRutherford

engaged

two

King

Crimson-influenced

ock

musicians,

teve Hackett nd

Phil

Collins,

o

develop

a

noticeably

arder-edged

ound

Thompson

005,

pp.

1-66).

Unabashedlyntellectual,enesis ast llsorts f iteraryndmusical eferencesver

the ourse

f everal

lbums

o create

senseof

overriding

arrative

n

theband's

output.

hisRomantic

roclivity

or

yclicism

s

particularly

vident

n

a

stretchf

music

hat xtended

rom

he ast rack f

heir 972

LP Foxtrota

multi-movement

suite ntitled

Supper's

Ready'

tothe

ast rack f four-sided

lbum,

he amb ies

Down

n

Broadway,

f

1974.Over this

pan

theband drew

together

deas from he

Apocalypse

f

heNew

Testament;

oems

f

William

lake,

.S.

Eliot,

ohn

eats nd

John

unyan

and

others);

vidian

nd Greek

myths

nd

early

Egyptian istory;

Stravinskian,

lassical

nd romantic

usical orms

nd

processes;

roadside allad-

styled

oetry;

rill

Building op

lyrics

nd surreal

magery.

Whathas not been

sufficientlyecognised

s

that his

roup

f ocial

lites sed

their

ntellectual

rowess

to xpressheir irulentondemnationfEnglishnd Americanocietynd mores.11

In

Supper's

Ready',

many

f

the hemes re ntroduced

n

the emi-innocent

guise

of

a surreal

ream: or

xample,

n

a section

Willow

Farm',

linguistic

ex

change

'dad to

dam to

dum to

mum'

prefigures

he

appearance

f the Greek

mythical

igure

iresias

n

the

ong

Cinema

how'on thenext

P,

Selling ngland y

the

ound,

s

perhaps

oes

also the

gruesome

astration

cenenear he loseof

The

Lamb.

ld,

nd

cast

ntomodern imes

ike liot's

iresias,

ho throbbedike

Taxi'

in The

Wasteland

Eliot

1922,

II,

p.

217),

Gabriel's

iresias hares

iswisdomwith n

English

working-class

ouple

bout exual

xperiences

rom othmale

and

female

points

f

view.

The

couple

s cast

promisingly

s Romeo nd

Juliet,

ut

they

re

bleakly rawn ndclearly eed he onsolationiresias rovides.imilarly,ohn,he

author

f

he

Apocalypse

hat s re-told

n

Supper's

Ready',

eturns

s a

supporting

character

n The

amb

longside

he tar

Rael'. Gabriel eems

here ohaverelished

n

the

potential

onfusion

is

audience

might

xperience

n

encountering

hewords

This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:19:52 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 11/24

442

Jay

Keister

nd

Jeremy

.

Smith

'rael'and

real',

specially

s hisownname nded

n

riel'.Thus

n The

amb,

abriel

created

characterhat

sRael

is real')

by

the

nd ofthis wrreal

e-casting

f

John

(one

suspects

Gabriel elished

n

the

oincidence f authorial

ameshere

s

well)

Bunyan'sPilgrim's rogress}2

Genesis

ouched hese

verarchingiterary

hemes

n

music f imilar

ophisti-

cation.For

example,

near the

end of

Supper's Ready'

the

bassist

nd

guitarist

(Rutherford

nd

Hackett)

perform

n

extended nstrumentalstinato

n

E

with

displaced

ccents

uite

imilar o

Stravinsky's

ite

f pringSpicer

000,

.

96).

Over

thisBanks

lays

carefully

rafted

eyboard

olo

that

uilds o

a

climactic

oint

f

harmonicension ith

chord

n

first

nversion,

r 6th hord

a

C

major

hord ver

the

),

to

prepare

he

eturnfGabriel

who

ings

666'.13 fterhis

Pythagoras'

oins

seven

trumpeters

nd

writes he

yrics

n

blood as thenarratorwakensfrom

is

dream

f he

Apocalypse.

he

piece

nds oon fter hiswith

reprise

f he

pening

theme o

help

reate he

otion

hat

he

arrator

nd

hiswife re

fully

wake or real'

when hey ear nangel ing bout he omingf heNewJerusalem'.nthe ontext

of

his lbum

t s

not lear

f

Gabriel

wished o cast

England

s

this

Jerusalem

r to

adopt

he

one f

deep

national oncerno

clear

n

Blake's

oem

by

hat

ame.

Butwe

are

given

warning

hat

he

tory

s not

ver,

s the

yric

heet f his

lbum

nds

with

the

word

(Continued)'.

The next lbum

confirmshat

England

was and

will

be the

subject

s

it

is

unambiguously

ntitled

elling

ngland y

he ound.

his

LP

imitates collection

f

ballads.14

here renews

tems

epicted

n

ong:

nework s

a

musical llustrationf

a

visual

mage

like

many

allads)

nd Gabriel

pens

he

lbum

inging

monophoni-

cally

o mitate

he lder

genre.

hroughout

he

puns

re almost

nbearable,

ut he

point s not ost. Dancingwith heMoonlitKnight',hefirstrack,eginswith

question,

Can

you

tellmewhere

my ountry

ies?'

nd

the nswer o

ll

the

ossible

meanings

f lie' seem

to

point

o theUnited

tates

nd

especially

o tsthen-new

supermarkets

hat

were

preading

o

England

nd

bringing

ith

hem he

mpersonal

relationships

hat

ould

destroy

community.15y

the nd

ofthe lbum he

uper-

market

uns

are

all

too

obvious,

lthough

heUnited tates tself as never

een

explicitly

entioned

y

name.

But

ust

s

they

onnectedhe ndof

Supper'sReady'

with

elling

ngland,

hey

mmediately

nswer

he

uestion osedbySelling ngland

with

heir ext

lbum,

TheLamb ies

Downon

Broadway.eadingEngland

s the

'Lamb',

we now

knowwhere t

ies,

n

New York

City

down on

Broadway'.

There

s a

patronisingly

ffectionateone

throughout

elling ngland,

ut

Genesis oesnot xtendmany omplimentso theBritishhemselves.nthe econd

track,

I

KnowWhat

Like',

or

xample,

he efraineems o

uggest

ather

ointedly

the

losed

mindednessf numbed

ation

with

he

hrase,

I

knowwhat like

nd

likewhat

know'.

n

Lamb,

merica

or,

on one

level,

Babylon),

which his

group

knew ess

ntimately,ets

one f he

ffectionf

elling ngland

nd s treatednstead

from he tart

ith ool

detachment.

f

we

might

orrow Verdian erm ormusical

characternd

describe

elling

ngland's

inta16

s the

allad,

The ambs coloured

y

the

purposely ague

mpressionism

f

Debussy

nd

early

Ravel.

n

any

case,

dis-

tinctly

bsent

re

many

direct

eferenceso American

music,

n un-Genesis-like

omission hat

s made all

the more

prominent

y

the

constant

arrage

f direct

quotationsromop songs ikeRaindrops eepFallingnmyHead' and Runaway'inthe lbum's

yrics

Lieber

nd

Stoller'sOn

Broadway',

s

the ne notable

xcep-

tion).

f

Genesis

ept

ts

musical

istance rom his

ountry,

abriel

was

trenchant

n

his

ocio-political

ritique

n

the

yrics.

n

powerful

uiet

cenewhereinhe

haracter

This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:19:52 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 12/24

Musical

ambition

443

Rael

dies,

Gabrielmakes

viciously

arcastic omment n

US

history

n

a brutal

'Death

American

tyle'parade

of

mages,

s follows:

Groucho,

with

his movies

trailing,

tands

lone

with

is

punch

ine

ailing.

u KluxKlan

erve ot oul

food nd

thebandplays In theMood'/The heerleader aveshercyanidewand,there's

smell

of

peach

blossom

nd bitter

lmond.

Caryl

Chessman

capital unishment

victim]

niffshe

ir nd eads the

arade,

e

knows

n

a

scent,

ou

can

bottle

ll

you

made'.

Later,

he

hero,

lready

ead,

s

iterally

masculated.

Gabrielwas as

mercilesslyxplicative

bouthiswork s he was

gruesome

n

his

details

bout such matters s

death and

-even worse

for

he

male members f

the udience

castration,

singgrotesque

tories

etween

ongs,

horeography

nd

costumes,

oncert

rogrammes,

inernotes

nd

even the

press

tself

o send one

message

fterhe

ther

n

an

ever-changing

oman

clef.

n a

number

f

ways,

Gabriel

went s

far s hecouldwhenhe

got

o he

oint

f astration.iven he

make-up

f he

mainstream

rogressive

ock udience t thetime 'male

adolescents

. .

who

. .

shared imilar ultural ackgrounds,hough heymight ot come from he ame

privilegedackgrounds'

Atton, 001,

.

31

-

the

nforgiving

masculation

cene

n

Lamb hows

a blatant

isregard

or he cock rock' ensibilitiesf

contemporary

audiences.17

abriel

was

willing

t

this ime o

turn

is

nasty olitical

ommentary

inward,

oward

he

ery outh

ulture rom hich e himself ad

emerged.

s a

new

generation

as

entering

he ock

udience,

hose fGabriel's

ge

wereno

onger art

of

singleyouth'

ulture f

hippies. rogressive

ockersuch s

Gabriel ouldnow

direct

heir ttention

oward new

and vicious riticismf heir

ounger

udiences,

as

Ian Anderson f

Jethro

ull did

in

his

similarlyudience-defyinguip

about

his

anti-hero

LittleMilton' f

Thicks

a

Brick hose

sperm

s in

the

gutter

nd

[whose]

love s nthe ink'.

The threat

f

peace

and

love

in

the music of Yes

It s

with he dea of

rt s a

challenge

ather

han comfortabletatus

ymbol

hat

even

groups

ike

Yes,

well known

for ts

Aquarian mage,

oin

this et of

nasty

mainstream

rogressive

ockershat

we havediscussed hus

ar.

Although

uch as

been

aid about

Yes's cohesive

musical

tructures,

tsuse of clecticmusical

ources,

its

peculiar

pproach

o

language,

ts

multi-disciplinarytopian

isions

that

x-

tended

specially

o

album over

rt),

ts

spiritual uests

nd even

obliquely)

ts

politics

nd

ts

ndrogynous

mage,

here eems

till obe some asic onfusionbout

theoverall yntheticmage his and created.18t cannot e denied hatYes was a

band

with

n affirmative

ission,

ut

closer

ook hows

hey

oohad a

provocative

side.

Certainly

ne

might

etect ome stubbornness.

hen riticismsf themove-

ment's

xcesses

were

ecoming

more

ointed,

es

sought

ocreate

onger

nd

onger

spans

f

ohesive

music,

bandoningong-form

ltogether

t times

n

favour f

huge

cyclic

ormsommon

o ate-romantic

usic.

Although

t

s

temptingimply

orecall

the cene

n

KenRussell's

isztomaniaithRickWakeman

rinating

n

a

fireplace,

stronger

asefor

es's

nasty

iderests

with heirrt nd thenature f heirctivisms

an affirmative

thos

n

the

rogressive

tyle.

By

the

timeof

their 973

Tales

rom opographic

ceans,

es had achieved

somethinghatwould eemrather emarkablenrock istoryindeed,nthehistory

of

any

musical

tyle).

Jennifer

ycenga

as

aptly

described his chievements

a

'spiritual

xperience

n

themusic'

nd

categorises

heir

articular

ind f

pirituality

as

panentheistic

eopagan

mmanent

osmology'

Rycenga

002,

.

145).

The

tring

This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:19:52 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 13/24

444

Jay

Keister nd

Jeremy

.

Smith

ofterms

eededto describe he

musical-poetics

fYes's

spirituality

ould seem

o

reduce he

mpact

f

theband's basic achievementnd confirm

nstead he ritical

notion hat he

musicians ad lost ouchwith heir

udience,

hat

t had somehow

wandered ff n an elaboratepiritual uestso personaliseds to losemeaning

altogether

long

with

ny political

ffectiveness.

he

complexity

f thisdefinitive

terminology

otwithstanding,

he sourceof Yes

spirituality

ad a direct

olitical

basis.

As

early

works

y

Yes

confirm,

heband was

fundamentally

nfluenced

y

commonly

eld,

radical

deas of

peace

and

love

that

were

raging

specially

n

the

United tates.

heconfrontational

ature f hese

messages

as

subsequently

aded

from

memory,

ut

at the

time herewere some who

saw the

wearing

f a

peace

medallion

s tantamount

o

an

allegiance

o the communistocieties

who were

engaged

with

he

United tates nd their

llies

n a

cold

war.

Yes

approached

hese

ideas

n

ways

hat eveal

hedefiance hat

riginallyay

behind hem.

Yes's Time

nd Word

f

1969-1970

isplaysmany sychedelicrappings

nd

progressiveins its wo oversofworks yRichieHavens ndStephen tills),ts

orchestral

xcesses nd

ts

apses

nto nthem-likeombast. he lbum lso

provides

insights

nto

Yes's

mage

n

the

arly tages

f he

band's

development.

omeof he

works,

ike

Astral

Traveller',

isplay

he

ink

withTheYesAlbum

works,

uch as

'Starship rooper'

Martin

996,

.

31

.

Others

etray

more adical ide

of he and

and

even n

underlying

ense f

ggression.

These

atter eatures

ppear

learly

n

the

rack

Then',

which

xplores ystem-

atically

he

ways

music an

cause

uspense

n

nearly

inematic

ashion. hemusical

drama

eaches

ts

peak

when

he

penultimate

ord s drawn

ut

to

the

point

where

we are

shocked

y

the

Haydnesque impani

troke hat

unctuates rutally

he

ast

word f he ong.With his onic last he ong nds minously ith hewordThen',

leaving

ntacthe

ortent

nd

threatf n

unknown uture.ike

many

orror

ales,

he

piece

s

a

whole

rojects

sense f us' and them'.

pecifically,

he

ong

romotes

he

idea

of 'New

Day'

of

peace

and

oveand t

hreatens

ith

bliteration

nyone

who

would

tand

pposed

o t.

Thus he

roupmaking

he

hreat

ere,

nterestingly,

s the

peaceful

ne,

n

us'

instead f

'them'. he

oppositional roup

s notdescribed

n

any

detail,

ut

one

feature f the

New

Day

is

surely

hat t would notbe ruled

by

traditional

uthoritarian

igures

nd

their

deas.

Underlying

ll

this,

we

believe,

s

Yes's

confident

essage

bout he

ower

f he

youth

ulture nd the

ignificance

f

their

logans

f ove and

peace.

They

eiteratehe

message,

n

iteral

erms,

n

The

Prophet',

lso

on

Time nd

Word.

ere

peace'

is mentioneds themost

mportant

spiritualharacteristicnd, gain, clearwarnings voicedfor hose n the utside:

'that

omewill

die but

only

hose

who doubt'.

After

ime nd a

Word,

es

developed

further

heir

lready harply

oned

musical

hetorics

they

roduced

ne

impressive

lbum

fter nother.

n

creating

expansive

maginary

orlds f

unprecedented

imensions which ulminated

n

the

four-sided ales

they

ontinued

o

manipulate

heir

isteners

y

shaping

xpecta-

tions

hrough

ethods f

varied

epetition,

usical raits hat

ohn

ovach

1997),

John

.

Palmer

2001)

and

others ave

shown

n

detail

hrough

eticulous usical

analyses.

t

seems

possible

hat

n

the

process hey

ad

ndeed orsakenomeof he

more

bvious

olitical

rappings

the

onfrontational

eace

and

ove of he

sych-

edelic ra,but tseems lsopossible hat hesenotions till uttressedhegroup's

ongoing

ork nd

development.

ertainly

he ater

work,

with

ts

larity

f

purpose

and

polish,

etrays

he raits e

mightxpect

f he rue elievernd

perhaps

ven

he

savvy

o

use codes

thatwould

keep

he

ritics nsure f heir

urposes.

This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:19:52 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 14/24

Musical

ambition 445

In

describing

he

yrics

f I've Seen

All

Good

People'

from heYes

Album,

on

Anderson

as

suggested

hat

heymight

e without

meaning

Macan

1997,

.

70).

Nonetheless,

o us

they

orm

vital

ink

etween es's

progressive

usical-poetics

and ts sychedelicast fTimend Word.nthea' section,YourMove',we findhe

same

hemes f

peace

nd ove

hat

were eatured

n

Then'

nd

The

Prophet',

s

well

as a sense

hattime'

n

particular

illbe

manipulated

othe

point

where t eems o

function

ramatically

s

this and's

way

touse musical

oetics

o

pronounce

callto

action.

ndeed,

n

the

articular

ineAnderson ismisseds chosen

merely

orts

onic

qualities

"Cause

t's

ime,

t's ime

n

time

with

our

ime,

nd

tsnews s

captured/

for he

Queen

touse'

-

we

find

potent xpression

fYes's musical

oetics.

irst,

he

word

time' tself

s

repeated

o the xtent

hat he

urrounding

ords end o ose

their emantic

ole

within he

hrase.

n

this

way

theworddominatesmusical

time'

andbecomes

performative

orce,

ompelling

neto

ct, r,

t

east,

oread heword

'cause'

itself s

a

pun

that

uggests

he

political

cause' as well as thecontracted

conjunction.econdly,ime sagain ssociatedwith rgency.eforetwasan mma-

nent

then',

n

this

nstance,

ith

heword

news',

a favourite ordof the

gospel

preacher,

he ime

s now.The

wordnews tselfs

emphasised

y

ts

hythmic

osition

as the

ast f

string

f ntecedents

all

the thers

mphasising

time')

that nd

on

a

climax

with heword

captured'.

A

politicised

eading

f the

time ssue is furtherolstered

y

an

intriguing

passage

that

provides

linkto

peace,

one

whereAnderson

gain

uses

nonsense

syllables

scat)

for ramatic

urpose.

his

s

howthe

yricsppeared

n the

age

of

reissued

D

(Yes,

1971,

003):

Diddit

iddit

iddit

iddit iddit

iddit iddit idda.

Diddit iddit iddit iddit iddit iddit iddit idda.

Diddit

iddit

iddit iddit

iddit

iddit iddit idda.

Diddit

iddit

iddit

iddit iddit

iddit iddit

idda.

Unstated

n

the

poetic

endition

f his

assage

re two ines

nterpolated

rom

ohn

Lennon's

nthem:

all

we are

aying/is

ive

peace

a chance'

Martin

996,

p.

80-1

.

Musically,

heLennon

uote

s

placed

n

the

ackground

nd s almost rowned ut

in

the

mix

by

the

minous

hordal

equenceTony

Kayeperforms

n

a

particularly

resonant

ipe

organ.

his

mix

ends

o obscure he

Lennon eference

omewhat,

ut

not

o he

oint

f ts

eing

ost.

nstead heres

an overall ffect

hat

uggests

hat

ne

should

hear he

ines s

if t were

ubliminal,

et mportant

oo,

s the

organ

dds

much nthewayof musical eriousnesso otherwisennocuousyricswhichdo,

however,

uggest

he

icking

f

ime,

ndeven

Morse ode.We arefurther

rawn nto

the

hidden heme

when

heLennon

ong

Instant

arma' s mentionedlsewhere

n

the

yrics.

wo

layers

re

very

lear.

Overtly

he

song

s

about

something

ather

innocent:

game

f hess.

ut

ll the odes

nd hidden

meaningsuggest

hat

heres

another

ame

going

n

here oo.

n

this

game,

we are nottold

what

o

do,

but

the

section's

ery

itle ssures

s thatwe

are

xpected

o

play,

omake ur move' oward

the

olitical

auses

ssociated

with

eace

as

proclaimed

y

Lennon

nd

the o-called

psychedelic

eft e came

o

represent.19

The

messages

may

havebeen

lightly

bscured,

utto

some

isteners,

t

east,

Yesof he arly 970s,fter ime, as stillworkingor ne side na divided ociety,

which

was

surely

ohn

ennon's

sychedelic

eft.

thers,

ho

opposed

hat

osition,

presumably

till aw

them

s a force o

fear nd

oppose.

ndeed,

s

it

o resembled

form f

religious

magnetism,

es's more

mbitious

musical

oetics

rather

han

heir

This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:19:52 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 15/24

446

Jay

Keister nd

Jeremy

.

Smith

purely

inguistic

raits)

might

e said to be themost nsidious f

ll the

progressive

voices f he

ra,

t

east rom he

oint

fviewof

n

establishment

hat

pposed

heir

radical

viewpoint.

o

those

engaged,

friend nd

enemy,

es's

spiritual

worlds

'remain[ed s] incurablyarthbound' s Freud'sview of theimaginationtself

(quoted

n

Kumar

990,

.

1

.

If n

hindsight

es's

Tales

macks f he

personal

and

pointless)

piritual

ourney

o

common otheNew

Age,

t s

mportant

oremember

that

hiswas the

roup

who

once

ried,

hrough

ts

mpressiverray

fmusical

kills,

to

yoke

ts

istenersnto

he

very

midst fa social nd

political

attlefield

ver he

politically

oaded ssues

f oveand

a

new

day

of

peace.

A

few till

ememberhe

arly

970s he ld

way.

For

xample,

he

rogressive

rock

nthologist

radley

mith

ptly

escribed his

onfrontationalideofYes

n

his

depiction

f

ll

progressive

usic:

rebellion

equired

ormshat

he lder

enerations

ot

nly

isliked

ut

ouldn't nderstand.

Volume,

bstract

yrics,

eird

tudio

ffects,

ew

nstruments,

nd

engthyams

were

tilized

ina consciousreakwith he

past.

To most

roponents

f henewmusic he raditional

ong

form

the

asily

nderstood

-

to

5-minuteove

song

became

he

nemy, epresentative

f

the

epressive,

gly

gnorantociety

nable o

deal

honestly

ith

ts

roblems.

oth he ontent

(the

yrics)

nd

form

the

music)

had to

change.

Smith

997,

.

12)

As an

aficionado,

mith an

peak

onfidently

bout he ebellious ature f

progres-

sive rock.But

musicologists

ust

truggle

ith

he

widely romoted

arrativesf

rock

music hat end

o

place

his

movementnto hat

ery

dult

ulture mith aw

as

its

nemy.

n

the

ollowing

ectionwe

will

rgue

hat

oday's

riticsnd historians

both

n

the

popularpress

nd

in

academia have

promulgated

n

idea of cultural

accreditation

or

rogressive

usicians hat ad

ittle odo

with

youth

ulture.

nly

whenwe ookbeyondhis otion o hemedia ontrolledy he ands hemselvesn

their

wn

mage-making

nd

musical

utput)

do we find he

nasty

ide that

ruly

characterisedhis

movement. rom

his

perspective

t

seems

appropriate

ow to

suggest

hat

we have

accepted

oo

readily

n

anachronistic

eading

f he ock

ress

and

ts ole t

the ime.t

may

nowhave

he

owers

ttributedo t

by

ritics,

ut

n

the

1970s t

was still

inding

ts wn

voice

n

the

ockworld.

Critical

derision of

progressive

ock and

the

myth

f cultural

accreditation

Althoughnthe uphoria f he ate1960s ockwas celebratedy ome s comingf

age

n

newly

xpanding

medium

hat

incorporatesverything

rom lues o

ndian

classical

aga,

rom

ach o

Stockhausen'

Eisen

1969,

.

xi),

critics

egan

o

develop

aesthetic

aluesfor

ock

uring

he 970s hat

ejected

uch clecticism.

y

he

980s,

critics

ooked ack

on the ate

1960swith

isdain or mbitious

musical

xperiments

that

eemed

o them

retentious

nd

somehow

ommercially

riven:

Behind

engthy

mprovisations

uch

as Cream's

Spoonful'

..

lay

thetheme

f

ndividual

spontaneity,xploration

nd

extension.

hemusical asics

f

pop

now

thoroughly

astered,

rock

was

apparently

eady

or

reater

hings.

ts

authenticity'

as to be discovered

n

the

'natural'

xpression

f n

artistic

utonomy

reed romommercial

estraints

.

The

onfused

but

fruitful

nergies

urrounding

ock

n

the ate

1960swere

ransformednto he

tilled,

ut

highlymarketable,aters fArt'.Chambers983, . Ill)

According

o this

narrative,

henew art'

of

rock,

n

addition to

being highly

market-

able,

offered

nother

romise

to

ambitious

young

musicians:

This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:19:52 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 16/24

Musical ambition 447

Therewas also

the hance hat uch reations ould levate

he tatus f heir

omposers

nd

performers

and

by mplication,op

music

n

general

to level

omparable

ith hat

f he

European

lassical

music f the

past,

nd thus ead to

acceptance

ithin he

circles f the

musical stablishment.

Hatch

nd Millward

987,

.

148)

These uthors

uggest

hatmusical

clecticism

nd

creative

utonomy

erved ock

musicians'

esires or ocio-economicdvancement.

Bernard

endron eferso this

egitimisation

rocess

s cultural

ccreditation'

in

his

study

fthe

relationship

etween

opular

music nd the

vant-garde

2002).

According

o

Gendron,

t theforefrontfthismovement as the

Beatles,

who had

theirworkvalidated

y literary

ritics,

musicologists

nd the

mainstream

ress,

transforming

heirBeatlemania

ows',

n

which

hey

were irst

reateds

a

menace o

Western

ivilisation,20

nto

triumphant

nointment

y

the ultural

stablishment

(ibid.,

p.

161-224).

Gendron's

hesis,

owever,

s built n the

ssumption

hat he

highbrow

ultural stablishment

ad the

power

obestow ome

pparently

oveted

form f ulturalccreditationponyoung ock tars.21his egs he uestionfwho

in

fact

ossessed

hemost

ultural

apital

n

the ate 1960s: he

highbrow

ultural

critics

r the

Beatles hemselves.

Theeconomic

nd

cultural

apital

f he ime

elonged

ot o

highbrow

ritics

and adults

n

ome

kind

f

musical

stablishment',

ut

otheBeatles hemselvesnd

it was theirs

o bestow

upon

others. or

example,

heeffectf

Paul

McCartney's

pronouncements

f

the nfluence

f Stockhausen n the Beatles'music and the

appearance

f

he

omposer's

ace nthe

lbum

over

f

gt

Pepper

as

surely

boost

to Stockhausen's

ultural

apital, iding

he

xpansion

fhis

appeal

nto he

hippie

culture.

tockhausen's

ubsequent

piritualisticippie ersona,

eonard ernstein's

extendedideburnsnd symphonic'lbums f Beatles' ongswere llmarkers f

affinity

etween

he lassical

long-hair'

musicians as

they

were

ometimesalled

by

the

lder

generation

and their

ounger

ock

nd

roll

ounterparts.

est

hey

e

confused

with

straight'

stablishment

ulture,

many

rtists nd writers

n

high

culture

uring

he

ate 1960swent

o

great engths

o

dentify

hemselves

ith

he

hippies

nd

gain

egitimacy

rom he

ulture frock.

heBeatleswere ven

poised

o

consummate

heir ole

s cultural eferees

f he

vant-garde

ith he ormationf

special

abel,

Zapple

Records,

which

had

plans

to release

recordingsy

the

most

cutting

dge

artists

nd thinkers

fthe ime

Inglis

000,

.

12).

As the ntellectual

leaders f

rock,

twas the

Beatles hen

who

nspired

ascent

rogressive

ock

roups

like he

Moody

Blues

ndProcol

Harum

o

orchestrateock

nd

use

concept

lbums s

tools or ulturalriticism,ettinghe tage or heprogressiveockmusicians f he

1970s.On

a

social

evel,

Beatles

fans,

.e.

young

people,

as

many

eem to have

forgotten,

ad

everything

ooffer

othe

p-and-coming

ock tarwhoknew e

or

he

might

ttain

nstant

uccess,

ew

wealth,

nd

supremely

nviable

ohemian

ifestyle

of

virtually

nhindered

exual

gratification

nd

ego

fulfilment.22

Manyyoung

musicians

f

he 970s ound

ock

n

the

ost-Sgt.

epper

ra

to

be

the

uperior

medium

or

irect

xpression

n

music.

hiswas truewhether

hey

were

formally

rained

r self

aught,

r

upper,

middle r

working

lass.23

f

some rock

musicians

amented

he ackof

vibrantulture

f lassicalmusic

as

suggested y

classically

rained ock

musician

ohn

ale's

progressive

ock lbum

itle,

heAcad-

emynPeril the ntidote ascertainlyot obe foundnthe onservatismf lassical

music,

ut nthe

nbridled

nergy

f ock.

n

describing

he

Utopian

reedom'f our

music'

nthe iner

otes o

theNice's

Five

ridges

n

1969,

he

lassically

rained eith

Emerson

made

t

lear

hat e dentified

ot

with he

rchestra,

utwith he ock rio

This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:19:52 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 17/24

448

Jay

Keister nd

Jeremy

.

Smith

'representing

henon-establishment'

ith

'complete

rust

n a

rebellious

pirit'

(Emerson

uoted

n

Covach

997,

.

7).

Similarentimentsere

xpressed

y

nother

leaderof the

progressive

ock

movement,

on

Anderson f

Yes,

who,

ike

Robert

Fripp,lso camefrom working-classackground ith oformalmusical raining:

'We'renot

rying

o

get

nto

lassical

music,

ut

get

what lassicalmusic oes

to

you'

(Anderson

uoted

n

Bowman

002,

.

186

.24

As

with

heBeatles

efore

hem,

ome

progressive

ockbands of

the 1970s

had

highbrows ourting

hem,

uch as the

invitation

xtendedoThe

oftMachine o

perform

t

the

restigious

roms oncert

t

the

Royal

Albert all n

1970. oftMachine

rummer obert

Wyatt

urmised

hat he

Proms

oncert as a failed

ffortomake s

respectable,

ndhad t

ucceeded

think

itcould

havedone lot

more

amage'

Bennett

005,

.

217).

If

ulturalccreditation

as not concern f he

musicians,

t

ertainly

as not

a

concern f

audiences or

progressive

ock.

Progressive

ock

found ts

strongest

following

mong

butwas

not imited o the

hippie

ounterculture

uring

he ate

1960s/early970s hat pposedboth lite ndmainstreamopular ulture.25p-

wardly

mobile tatus

eeking

was

rejected

s

contrary

o thevalue of

personal

nd

spiritual

onesty

fthe

uthentic,

ncompromised

elf

hat

ouldbe

free rom he

constraintsf

materialistic

ociety.

s evident

n

an

ethnography

f the counter-

culture

n

the

arly

970s

y

Paul

Willis

1978),

hippies

id not

worship rogressive

musicians

rom distance

r

think

fthem s

wealthy,

ver-trained usical

nobs,

but

rather

s members

ftheir wn

group.

he

hippies

tudied

y

Willis dentified

progressive

ockmusicians

f he ime s

sharing

he ame ounterculturalalues

nd

interpreting

ife

n

similar

ay

bid.,

p.

163-5

.

In

spite

f

ny

conomic

isparities

between

rdinary

ans nd

their

uddenly ealthy

eroes,

hemusicians'

redibility

withfans s fellowheads' rested ntirelyn musiciansxercisingheir reative

freedomo

speak

out

gainst

ociety. ny ppeals

o

upper-classsquare' ociety

n

the

part

of

progressive

ockerswould

have done littlemore than lienate heir

counterculturalan

ase

ust

s Robert

Wyatt

ad feared

bouthisband's

ppearance

at

theProms

oncert.

In

spite

f or

perhaps

ecause f

their oles s creativeeaders f he ounter-

culture,

rogressive

ockmusicians

avecome o

play

differentole

n

historiesf

rock.

nstead f

being

ememberedor heir

oles

s

anti-establishment

rovocateurs,

now

they

have

been recast s

upwardly

mobilerock

tarsfor he

purposes

f a

narrative

n

which

hey

erve

more

nfamously

s the artists'

ho took ock

eyond

its

boundaries f

cceptability.any

ritics avedescribed 967 s the enith f he

maturationfrock ndthebeginningf decline or hemusic.26ccordingo this

narrative,

kind

f dark

ge'

of ock

xtends rom 968 o bout

976when

unk

ock

emerged

nd

revived he ultural

aluesofrock nd roll hat ad

supposedly

een

lost

uring

his

earth f

uthentic

usic.27 s

progressive

ock as

proven

o

be such

a

useful oil

oconstructn

aestheticsf

rock,

t

s no mere oincidencehat

rogres-

sive

rock's

eign

rom

968-1976s also

the ime

eriod uring

which ock riticism

fully

maturedn

magazines

uch

as

Rolling

tone, reem,

ew

Musical

xpress

nd

Melody

Maker.

Rock

ritics t

the ime f

theBeatles'

gt.Pepper

lbum,

ike

rock

musicians,

drew

heir

alidation

otfrom

ny

ppeals

o

highbrow

ulture,

utfrom

he

ower

of the

youth ounterculture.28hiswas especiallyrue fRollingtonemagazine,which

began

n 1967

s

an

undergroundaper

before

volving

nto he

ndustry

leader f

rock

riticism

y

the

mid-1970s. s a

voice of the

ounterculture,

olling

Stone

etout

to cover

not

nly

ock

music,

ut

lso the

things

nd

attitudes

hat

he

This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:19:52 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 18/24

Musical ambition 449

music mbraces'

Frith

981,

.

169

.

It

was the

music,

owever,

hat

est

epresented

the

deology

f he

youth

ulture nd

provided

he

main

ocus f he

magazine

n

ts

earlyyears.

specially

mportant

n

this

espect

wererecord lbums hat

erved s

social statementsnthis ra ofgreaterreative reedom or ockmusiciansnthe

recording

tudio.

The authoritative

ower

of rock lbums s counterculturalriti-

cisms

fmainstream

ociety

s evident

n

Rolling

tone

magazine's

bsence f

general

coverage

f

political

ffairs

n

favour fmusic

overage

ince ts

founding

n

1967,

until format

hange

n

1973

that ntroduced

eneral olitical

overage

ntothe

magazine

bid.,

.

171

.

Up

until hat

ime,

or

many

n

the

ounterculture,

ock

music

was seen s

the

nlyway

of

making

ense f he ocial urmoilf he

ra,

nd twas

thismusic

hat

alidated heworkof rock ritics s mediators f countercultural

messages.

Emboldened

y

he

ower

f ock s

message

music,

ock ritics asted o time

exerting

heir wn

power

s

an

elite

group

f rbitersf

public

aste

n

the

rapidly

developing ock ndustry. s early s 1967, ritic obert hristgau eganto rail

against

he

rising

ide

of

avant-garde

op' by arguing

hat t was elevated

y

an

ignorant

udience

hat

pplauds

the new" whether

t

s

bogus

or not'

Christgau

quoted

n

Gendron

002,

.

210). Just

t

themoment

henrockmusicians

egan

o

take

p

the

hallenge

y

theBeatles o

expand

ock owards

n

all-inclusive

topian

music,

ome

n

the ock

ress egan

o

attack

ny

furtherclectic

xperimentation

n

rock.

his

move

by

the

press

o

maintain

tylisticurity

n

rock

equired

hat

John

Sheinbaum

as described

s

an

inversion

fmusical

alues',

rejection

f

highbrow

musical

alues

n

favour

f owbrow

musical

alues,

uch s

valuing epetition

ver

musical

evelopment,

timulation

fthe

body

over

timulationfthe

mind,

imple

structuresvercomplicatednes, nd musicofthe ower lass overmusicof the

middle

nd

upper

lass

Sheinbaum

002,

.

24).

Although

heinbaum emonstrates

that

ands

uch s

Yes

employed

musical

aluesfrom

oth ides f he

high-art/low-

art

pectrum,

twas

precisely

he

musical mbitions

o

bridge

he

gap

between

igh

and ow

by

Yes

and other

rogressive

ock

ands hat iolated he

gutter urity'

o

valued

by

rock

ritics.

In

theBeatles's

wake

therock

ress

was a new

phenomenon.

ow it seems o

haveall

the

power

nd

nfluence

hat

Gendron

ttributedo t

n

the 970s.Not

only

are

major

ands uch

s

ELP,

King

Crimson,

enesis

nd

Yes

missing

rom

olling

Stone

magazine's

most ecent

anonic

ist f he 00

greatest

ecord

lbums,

ut

hese

bands

have

yet

to

be

inducted ntothe

Rockand Roll

Hall of

Fame,

which lso

constructstsrock anon xclusivelyn owbrowmusical alues hat ave nformed

the

museumisation'

f rock

n

the

past

two decades.

Progressive

ock eems on-

demned

o

the

margins y

whatBillMartin efers

o as 'blues

orthodoxy'

Martin

1998,

p.

22-3)

n the ame

way

that

vant-garde

nd fusion

azz

have

been

margin-

alised

in

histories

f

azz by

neo-conservative

raditionalists. similar

kind of

marginalisation

ccurs

mong

musicologists

ho

havewrittenbout

he

rogressive

rock

tyle.

rounded

n

n old

musicology

hat

rivileges

n

analyticalrocess

ased

on

high-art

usic,

et

ager

o

embrace ew

deas about

ultural

tudies,

musicolo-

gists

who

tudy rogressive

ock

avebeen

pushed

nto

quandary.

ere

hey

ave

the

pportunity

o

apply

well-honed

ocabulary

ased on

high-art'

usical

uali-

ties hat end o solatemusicfromtscontext,ut t's thewrong ocabularyor

music

hat

was

designed

o

promulgate

political

message.

he

ultimateffects that

a once

vibrant,

asty enre

f

prog'

has nowbeen

cast s

an

imperturbable

orm f

elitism.

This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:19:52 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 19/24

450

Jay

Keister nd

Jeremy

.

Smith

Perhaps

he

most

ernicious

ffectsfthe ultural

ccreditation

yth

n

pro-

gressive

ock's

lace

n

rock

istory

s the

hegemony

hat anbe found

nthe ttitudes

of

some of the

major

figures

f

progressive

ock

themselves,

ho have

eagerly

disassociatedhemselves iththe 1970sstyle heyhelpedto create. n spiteof

increasingublic cceptance

f

nostalgia

n

rock,

rogressive

ock

ioneers

uch

s

Peter

Gabriel nd Robert

ripp

aveworked ard ocreate distance

etween 970s

progressive

ock nd their

resent-day

areers.

ushing

ver

forward,

eterGabriel

has

dismissed is

mpressive

ork

n

early

Genesis s

a kind

fmusical

mmaturity

and

Robert

ripp

ristlest

any

ssociation ith he

rogressivetyle

hat

e

helped

to

create. lmost

s

if n

exchange

or

iding

n

the

lackballing

f

progressive

ock,

Gabriel nd

Fripp

re

highly egarded y

critics

s artists ho continue o

nnovate.

Among

eteransf he 970s

rogressive

ock

nderground,

here ne

might xpect

to

find

desire

forrehabilitationf

the era's musical

egacy,

he same

narrative

appears.

Chris

Cutler,

ho

helped

pioneer

n

avant-gardepproach

o

progressive

rock s drummer ith he roupHenry ow,hasevenwrittennessay nthehistory

ofBritish

progressive)

ock

hat

s

a

textbook

xample

f he

dark

ges

approach

o

rock

istory,

ositioning

isown

group

s oneof he ew eacons f

uthentic

ctivity

during

he1968-1976

ra

Cutler

993,

p.

106-35).

Like

Fripp

nd

Gabriel,

utler

celebrateshe rrival

f

punk

n

the ate 970s s

a

welcome

esponse

o he xcesses

f

the

decade

ibid.,

p.

124-6).

Meanwhile,

or

ormer

rogressive

ockmusicians

ho

havefound

uccess nd

tardom

n

impler,

ainstream

op,

uch

s

Phil

Collins

nd

hisband-mates

n

Genesis,

he

history

f

progressive

ock s

nearly

nvisible,

othing

more han rite

f

passage

nto

he

ig eagues.29

One

of he ew

ttempts

o

change

he

revailing

iewhas come

rom

merson,

Lake ndPalmer,bandwhosemusic ataloguendrecent eunionerformancesre

heavily

nvested

n

nostalgia

f

1970s ock xcess

nd

bombast.

n

the 996 eissue f

their

andmark

rogressive

ock

lbum,

Brain alad

Surgery,

ll threemusicians

describe he

group's

ole

during

he

progressive

ock

ra as

crude,

nti-social

nd

antagonistic,

ecalling

ith

ride

uch mmatureehaviours

destroying

otel ooms

and

throwingp

in

airports

McCulley

996).

Just

s

Emerson

ad

expressed

ack

n

1969,

he

roup

ligns

tself otwith he

allowed raditionf lassical

music,

ut

with

the

dolescent

ndulgence

f ock's

utter.

atherhan

ointing

o he ntold ours

f

practice

nd

preparation

hey

underwent o

perform

inastera

oncertos

nd

Prokofiev's

ymphonic

orks or

uge

udiences f

ontemporaries

n

vast

tadiums,

they mphasise

hat

he

and

was

bloody

ark nd

aggressive

. .

aggressive

o

each

other,ggressiventhemusic, ggressivenperformance'ibid., . 12).Anxious o

show hat

hey

oreshadowed

unk

tarsike

Johnny

otten,

ho

replaced

hem

tthe

forefrontf

rock's

vant-garde,

LP

has

clearly

ome

o

understand

hat ock ritics

arenow

more

owerful

uthenticating

orce

n

popular

music

han

hey

were

n

the

1970s.

With heir

wn

propaganda

fforts,

LP

has

helped

uncover

nasty

ideof

he

progressive

ovementhat as ndeed

een

orely eglected.30

urresearch

uggests

that LP

s not

he

nly

ictim

f his

myopic

reatment.hatwe have ried ooffer

n

its tead

s

a

viewof

Gentle iant's

Aquiring

he aste hat

mphasises

he

ongue

ext

to buttocks

nstead f a

pretentious

tatementf artistic

alues;

a

view of

King

Crimson hat redits heir onicexpressionisms political orce ather han uiet

intellectualism;

viewof

Genesis hat ooks

eyond

he ssumed

world

iews f heir

elite

background

nd

into

he

disturbing

orldviews that

hey romulgated

nd,

finally,

view

that

howsYes not s

a

precursor

o the

gentle

ew

Age,

but social

This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:19:52 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 20/24

Musical ambition

451

force

nacting

palpable

hreat o the nflexible

ociety

f heir

lders.We neednot

reiterateere

he

rovocative

ature

f

ELP

when

hey

were

t

theirmost

opular,

s

they

eem obe

hard twork hemselves

n

campaign

f

ecovering

he

nasty

ideof

progressiveock. ut n their ehalf edosuggestnething,hat erhapsmusicolo-

gists

would do well to

take hem

ust

bit

more

eriously

n

their ecent

uggestion

that

early

0s

ELP

made

Johnny

ottenook ike

fucking

alk

n

the

park'.31

Endnotes

1. Wededicate his rticle

o he

memory

f

Emily

Wasserman

1976-2005),

student

n our

Spring

004

graduate

eminar

n

progressive

rock

t the

University

f

Colorado,

oulder.

2.

The

nearly

imultaneous

ppearance

n

he ate-

1990s f three ooks

on

progressive

ock,

y

Macan

1997),

Martin

1998)

nd

Stump1997),has resultedn a discourse ocused n the

British

nd,

o

lesser

xtent,

uropean,

ontri-

bution

o themovement.

or

he akeof

rgu-

ment,

we have followed

his

trend.

ut

we

hasten

o note

hat,

s some

of the uthors

n

Holm-Hudson

2002)

point

out

(but

others

ignore),

rogressive

usic

ad a

strong

ooting

in

North

merica

t the ame

ime.

3.

In

praise

f

he andThe

Mars

Volta,

Red Hot

Chili

Peppers'guitarist

ohn

rusciante

om-

mented n

the media's

misperception

f

the

connection

etween

rogressive

ock

nd

punk:

'What

hey're

oing

with

ombining

he

nergy

of

punk

rock

nd

progressive

ock

.. I

never

agreed

with hemedia's

perception

hat hose

twokinds f

music

were

pposite

r

omething.

In

L.A.,

t seemed

ike

lot of thebest

punk

musicians ere

lso

nto

rog.

ike,

at

Smear,

for

nstance,

s

a

huge

fan

of

The

MarsVolta

now,

nd t's

ikehe was

always big

Yes

fan'

(Corva2005,p.50).

4. Numerous

uthors

ave criticised

rogressive

rockmusicians

or

heir

pward

mobility.

ro-

gressive

ockers

f

he ate 960s

nd

arly

970s

havebeen

ccused f

making

music

acceptable

for

upper-class

pprobation'

Rockwell

986,

p.

170)

nd

respectable

nough

o

please

Mum

andDad' (DeRogatis 996, .84), consciously

aiming

ttheirbetters",he

eople

nthe uits

and bowlers'

Stokes

986,

.

405),

nd

having

'an ambition

o be taken

eriously

n

classical

or

avant-garde

usical

ircles'

Tucker

986,

p.

480).

5.

Onewell-known

xample

f

bscenity

s

politi-

cal

agitation

rom

his ime

eriod

s

the Fish

Cheer'

y

Country

oe

McDonald

nd he ish

t

the

Woodstock

estival

n

1969.

Along

imilar

lines

were he

obscene,

ntagonising

ongs

of

The

Fugs

nthe ate

960s.

6.

Although

his

isparaging

efinition

f

prog'

comes

from

he

tongue-in-cheek

ock nob's

Dictionary,heauthors'mplicationhatpro-

gressive

ock

may

venbeunfit or ock nob-

bery

s nevertheless

n ndicatorf

progressive

rock's

ow

status

n thediscourse

f rock.

he

full

ntry

s as

follows:

Prog.

Abbreviation

or

progressive

ock,

term sed to describe he

single

most

deploredgenre

of

postwar op

music,

nhabited

y

young

musicians

who,

entranced

y

he

clecticism,

laborate

rrange-

ments,

nd

ostentatious

iligrees

f heBeatles'

Sgt

Pepper

ra,

istortedheirnthusiasmnto

1970smorass f eternal

ong

uiteswithmul-

tiple

ime

ignatures,onderouspace-cadet

r

medievalist

yrics,

idiculous

apes

and head-

pieces especially

here es's

keyboardlayer,

Rick

Wakeman,

as

concerned),

nd

n

overall

wretched

igness

f

sound,

taging,

nd hair.

Butwhile

rog's

most

gregiousulprits

ELP,

Yes,

Jethro

ull,

Rush)

re

easyobjects

f

ridi-

cule,

he

postmodernist

enchant

or

ummag-

ing hrough

very ingle hapter

frock's

ast

has made even thesebands

worthy

f

Snob

investigation

nd adulation'

(Kamp

2005,

pp.

97-8).

7.

What o

Bangs

looked

ike a theremin' as

undoubtedly

merson's

rusty

odular

Moogribbonontroller

nterestingly,oday

he

Moog

company

oes

distribute

heremins).

robably

Bangs'

mistake ouldhavebeen

known o

ny-

one

at the ime

t all familiar ith merson's

equipment.

ut

nearly

onclusive

roof

hat

Bangs

had

made thismistakendentification

was furnished

y

Emerson imself

n

1996,

when e

signed

Mark

Glinsky's

ibbon ontrol-

ler

with he

following

entiments:To

Mark

Don't

Wipe

This n

Your

Arse

Keith merson'.

Glinsky

as a 'local roadie'

for he ame

ELP

1974 tour that

Bangs

had

reviewed;

n his

'Emerson,

ake

and Palmer

Ring'

website e

features

picture

fhimself ith merson old-

ing

the aforementioned

utographed

ibbon

controller

Glinsky,

995-2006).

his ncident

suggests

f

course

hat

merson emembered

wellhis ntics n

that

articular

our.

ut

here

is also the

trong ossibility

uggested

ere

hat

Emerson

may

have

remembered

angs'

voca-

tive

escription

bout he

way

n

which eused

his

equipment

n

stage.

hecontextven

ug-

gests

hat merson

may

have relished

hefact

that

angs

ad

perpetrated

n

naccuracy

n

his

1974 rticle

and

perhaps

merson ow

ustifi-

ably

elishesoo

he act

hat

ecame cross

s a

rather

nasty'

haracter

n

the

article,

espite

subsequent

ssessments

o the

contrary

hat

tend obe voiced

y

his ritics).

8. On

the war criminals'

moniker nd its

use,

see studies uch

as

Spicer

2000,

p.

103n2),

Sheinbaum

2002,

p.

21)

and

Hung

(2003,

This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:19:52 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 21/24

452

Jay

Keister nd

Jeremy

.

Smith

p.

93).

Sheinbaum

later confessed

having

fol-

lowed Macan

in

this

tendency

o

quote Bangs

out of context

Sheinbaum

2004,

p.

956).

9.

This

version can be heard on ELP's live

LP

Welcome ack

My

Friends o the

how

That

Never

Ends . . Ladies nd

Gentlemen,merson,

ake nd

Palmer.

10.

In

his

analysis

of LTA

Parts One

and

Two,

Gregory

arl

refutes he dea that

King

Crimson

were

superficially orrowing

ormal tructures

from

nineteenth-century

omanticmusic

and

instead

achieved

a

similar effect

working

throughpop song

structure

by

transforming

the materials

f rockmusic from

within,

ather

than

by

importing

nassimilatedmaterial

nd

procedures

from

foreign

ealm'

(Karl

2002,

p.

122).

11.

See

Spicer

2000)

for

discussion of the

dispa-

rate musical

influences

n

'Supper's Ready'.

Although

no one

purports

o have discovered

all

of

Genesis's

copious

literaryborrowings,

some of the most

important

re discussed

in

Spicer

(ibid.)

and

(Nicholls

2004,

pp.

129-33).

We

have also

drawn

from

innegan

1994).

12. In

an

interviewwith

Henry

Fielder,

Gabrielde-

scribed

he

tory

s a

type

f

Pilgrim's rogress'

(Finnegan

1994).

13. Gabriel

foreshadows the

appearance

of '666'

with

pervasive

alliteration,viz.,

'six

saintly

shrouded

men';

super-sonic

cientist',

tc.

14.

On theballad

tradition,

ee

Atkinson

2002).

15. Gabriel

presents

his

critique

ubtly

t

first:

n

'Dancing

with

heMoonlit

Knight',

or

xample,the instrumental

epiction

of an

aggressive

dance turns

with

a

film-like ut to

a

scene

where,

with

a hint

of new

anger

in

his

voice,

Gabriel

sings

there's a fat

ld

lady

outside the

saloon;

/laying

out

the credit cards she

plays

Fortune

The

deck is

uneven

right

from the

start/and

ll

of their ands are

playing part'.

16. On

the

concept

of Verdian

tinta,

see Rosen

(1997).

17.

For an

interpretation

f

cock rock'

aesthetics,

see Frith nd

McRobbie

1990,

pp.

383-4).

18.

John

ovach's

classic musical

analysis

of Close

to the

Edge'

(1997)

has now

been

joined by

a

number

of detailed

analytical tudies,many

of

which seek more

fully

to combine musical

analysis

with he

onsideration f other

visual,

social, aesthetic,

tc.)

factors: ee Sheinbaum

(2002),

Macan

(1997),

von der

Horst

2002)

and

Rycenga

(2002).

Yes's

spirituality

nd

their

'Yessonatas' are

discussed

at

length

n

Mosbo

(1994).

Rycenga

and

Martin

also treat Yes's

mystical

and

religious

themes. On Yes's an-

drogynous

image,

see Macan and

von

der

Horst.

Although

t s at

timesdifficulto sort ut

the

relationship

etweenhis

own

political

iews

and

that of

his

subject,

Martin

ptly

describes

Yes as

a

'musical

force' nd

suggests

hat

isten-

ing

with a

'radical

openness'

will

help

further

thevision'

(p.

236).

Martin's Marxist lant s a

welcome

complement

to

musicological

and

spiritualist

eadings

of Yes and if t

s

perhaps

unsuccessful

n

painting

holistic

picture,

his

book offers

many

clues as to

the truenature

of

the Yes

'force',

ncluding

welcome

apprecia-

tion of the formative

nature of

the first

wo

albums.

19.

See Platoff

2005)

for discussion of

Lennon's

politics

and the divisions in the

political

left

at

this

time as reflected

n

the

reception

of

Lennon's music.

20.

An

essay

from 964

by

Paul

Johnson

eveals

the

extent owhich

English

onservatives

much o

the consternation

f the conservative

uthor

courted the Beatles

and

began

to

'worship

at

the shrine of

"pop

culture"

(Johnson

2004,

originally

964).

21.

Ironically,

Gendron's

history

eveals

how rock

actually

bolstered he cultural

lite that

ought

out

the

iberating

timulus f the

youth

ulture

thatthe Beatles had come to

represent.High-

brow' writers

claimed that the music

of the

Beatles was a welcome stimulantfora bored

avant-garde

in

the late 1960s.

Critics as

es-

teemed as Susan

Sontag,

Richard Poirier

and

Joan

Peyser

nvoked the

sensuality

nd beat of

the Beatles music

to

question

the absence

of

pleasure

in an

overly

ntellectualised iscourse

of

high

art

music

(Gendron

2002,

pp.

202-3;

Roka

2004,

pp.

23-4).

Ned Rorem

ompared

the

Beatles o Schumann

nd

proclaimed

herevival

of the

art

ong

to

an

avant-garde

ominated

by

serialism

Gendron

2002,

p.

200;

Stump

1997,

p.

86).

According

o Rorem: the

artful radition

of

great song

has been transferred

rom lite

domains to The Beatles

and their ffshoots

ho

represent

as

any non-specialised

ntellectual

will

tell

you

-

thefinest ommunicable

music

of

our time'

Rorem 2004,p.

103,

originally 968).

22. Frank

Zappa

reminds

us of the more

base

motivations ehind

playing

rock music

in his

'anthropology'

of the rock and roll

band

in

which he

crudely

describes

phallic

displays by

guitar players

n their

uest

for

easy

sex

with

groupies Zappa

1989,

pp.

164-5).

23.

Among

the

many

conservatory-trained

usi-

cians who cast themselves s

rebels,

Daryl Way,

violinist of the

band

Curved

Air and

Royal

College

of Music

graduate,

tated

that lassical

music was a 'dead art

..

as dead

as the Dodo'

(Way quoted

inCarr1971,

p.

17).

Robert

ripp,

a

self-taught uitarist

from a

working-class

family, xpressed

similar criticism

bout the

state

of

Western

art

music,

describing

the

symphony

rchestra s a 'dinosaur'

bound for

extinction

see

Tamm

1991,

p.

26).

24.

Macan's

theory

bout the

ppropriation

fclas-

sical forms

y progressive

rock bands

such as

Yes is that this was

a

response

to

challenges

posed

by psychedelic

music.

Nineteenth-

century

extended forms such

as the

multi-

movement uite

allowed for

engthy

music

that

could

suspend

time

without

relying

n exces-

sive

improvisationMacan 1997,pp. 40-6).25. Sheila

Whiteley rgues

that

participation

n the

counterculturewas not

limited to the

middle

classes

(Whiteley

1992,

pp.

4-5).

Andy

Bennett

demonstrates

Whiteley's ointby

showing

how

This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:19:52 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 22/24

Musical

ambition

453

working-class outh

were involved

n

progres-

sive rock

n

his

study

f

working-class nglish

band that

specialises

in

pub performances

f

Pink

Floyd

covers

Bennett

000,

pp.

172-3).

26. For

examples

of

this,

see Stokes

(1986),Chambers

1983),

Frith

1981,

pp.

212-13)

and

Cutler

1993).

27.

This

dark

ages trope

has also been useful for

descriptions

f earlier

periods

in

rock

history,

such as

the

early

1960s

period

of shallow teen-

age pop

perceived

of as a brief

ull

beforethe

reinvigoration

f

authentic

ock nd roll

by

the

Beatles

see

Ward

1986).

28.

Although

Gendron is

misguided

in

thinking

thatrockmusicians

n

the ate 1960s

depended

on critics for

cultural

accreditation,

he does

acknowledge

that rock critics were

equally

dependent

on rock

music for heir wn

cultural

accreditation

Gendron

2002,

p.

190).

29.

This attitude oward

the

early

days

of

progres-

sive rock s evident

n

the

nterviews f

mostof

themembers fGenesis n

thevideo The

Genesis

Songbook

2001).

30. KeithEmerson

goes

even

further

n

recounting

progressive

ock's

nasty

ide

in

his recent

uto-

biography

Emerson 2004).

31.

In

the notes of this

CD

package,

each

member

individually

oasts of the

aggressiveness

f

the

band,

fromCarl

Palmer's

proud

acknowledge-

ment of the

group's

pomposity

as

a

'saber-

rattling

band'

to Keith

Emerson's and

Greg

Lake's

descriptions

of

pre-punk

behaviour

(McCulleyl996).

References

Atkinson,

.

2002.

The

English

raditional

allad:

Theory,

ethod nd

Practice

Aldershot,

UK,

Asheate)

Atton,

. 2001.

"Living

in

the

past"?:

value discourses

n

progressive

ock

fanzines',

opular

Music, 0/1,

pp.

29-46

Bangs,

L. 2002.

I

he blood teast

ot

Keddy

Kilowatt

hmerson,

Lake

and

ralmer without

nsulation

in

Mainlines,

Blood

Feasts,

nd Bad Tastes:

A

Lester

Bangs

Reader,

d.

J.

Morthland

New

York,

Anchor

Books),

pp.

47-55

Bennett,

. 2000.

Popular

Music

and Youth

Culture:

Music,

dentity

nd Place

New

York,

t.

Martin's

Press)

Bennett,

.

2005.

Soft

Machine:

Out-Bloody-Rageous

London,

SAF

Publishing)

Bowman,

D.S. 2002.

Let them

ll make their wn music:

ndividualism,

Rush and

the

progressive

hard

rock

alloy,

1976-77,

n

Progressive

ock

Reconsidered,

d.

K.

Holm-Hudson

(New

York,

Routledge),

pp.

183-218

Carr,R. 1971. Music stillhas to standon its own merits

-

says DarrylWay

of Curved

Air

New Musical

Express, January

971,

p.

17

Chambers,

.

1983. Urban

Rhythms:

op

Music

and

Popular

Culture

New

York,

St. Martin's

Press)

Corva,

F.T.

2005.

The Mars Volta

tell

t

ike

t

s', Chord,

ebruary

March

2005,

pp.

48-50

Covach,

J.

997.

Progressive

ock,

Close to the

Edge",

and theboundaries

of

tyle',

n

Understanding

ock:

Essays

n Musical

Analysis,

d.

J.

Covach

and G.M. Boone

(New

York,

Oxford),

pp.

3-31

Cutler,

C. 1993.

File Under

opular:

heoreticalnd

Critical

Writings

n Music

Brooklyn,

NY,

Autonomedia)

DeRogatis,

J.

996.

Kaleidoscopeyes: sychedelic

usic From he1960s

To The

1990s

London,

Fourth

state)

Eisen,

J. ed.)

1969.

The

Age of

Rock

New

York,

Vintage

Press)

Eliot,

T.S.

1922.

The Wasteland

New

York,

Boni

and

Liveright)

Emerson,

K.

2004.

Pictures

f

n Exhibitionist

London,

John

Blake

Publishing)

Finnegan,

J.,

McMahan, S.,

et al. 1994. The Annotated

Lamb Lies Down

on

Broadway,

http://

www.rawbw.com/

marka/music/lamb.html>

accessed

18 October

2005)

Frith,

. 1981. Sound

Effects:

outh, eisure,

nd thePolitics

f

Rock

V

Roll

New

York,

Pantheon

Books)

Frith, .,and McRobbie,A. 1990. Rockand sexuality',nOnRecord: ock, op, nd TheWritten ord,d. S.

Frith nd

A.

Goodwin

(New

York,

Pantheon

Books),

pp.

371-89

Gendron,

B. 2002.

BetweenMontmartre

nd The

Mudd

Club:

Popular

Music and theAvant-Garde

Chicago,

University

f

Chicago)

Gentle

Giant.

1971.

Acquiring

heTaste

record

album

notes)

Glinsky,

M.S. 1995-2006.

Emerson,

ake

nd

Palmer,

http://www.markglinsky.com/msgelp.html>

ac-

cessed

13

May

2008)

Gracyk,

. 1996.

Rhythm

nd Noise:An Aesthetics

f

Rock

Durham,

NC,

Duke

University

ress)

Hatch, D.,

and

Millward,

S. 1987.

FromBluesto

Rock:An

Analytical istory

fPop

Music

Manchester,

UK;

Wolfeboro,

H,

USA:

Manchester

University

ress)

Holm-Hudson,

K.

(ed.)

2002.

Progressive

ockReconsidered

New

York,

Routledge)

Hung,

E.

H.-T. 2003.

Defining

rtMusic in Great

Britain,

955-1975,

h.D.

diss.,

Stanford

University

Inglis,

. 2000. Men of

deas?

Popular

music,

nti-intellectuahsm

nd the Beatles

in The

Beatles,

opular

Music and

Society,

d.

I.

Inglis New York,

t. Martin's

Press),pp.

1-22

Johnson,

.

2004(

originally

964).

The menace of

Beatlism',

n

The

Lennon

ompanion,

d.

E. Thomson nd

D. Gutman

Cambridge,

MA,

Da

Capo),

pp.

39-42

Kamp,

D.,

and

Daly,

S. 2005.

TheRock nobs

Dictionary:

n Essential exicon

fRockologwal

nowledge

New

York,

Broadway

Books)

This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:19:52 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 23/24

454

Jay

Keister

nd

Jeremy

.

Smith

Karl,

G. 2002.

King

Crimson's

Larks'

Tongues

n

Aspic:

case

of

convergent

volution',

n

Progressive

ock

Reconsidered,

d.

K.

Holm-Hudson

(New

York,

Routledge), pp.

121-42

Kumar,

K.

1990.

Utopian thought

nd

communal

practice:

RobertOwen

and the Owen

communities',

Theory

nd

Society,

9,

pp.

1-35

Macan,

E.

1997.

Rocking

he

Classics:

English rogressive

ock

nd The

Counterculture

New York,Oxford)Martin,B. 1996. Music

Of

Yes:Structurend Vision n

Progressive

ock

Chicago,

Open

Court)

1998.

Listening

o

theFuture:The Time

of Progressive

ock,

968-1978

Chicago

and La

Salle, IL,

Open

Court)

McCulley,

J.

996.

Emerson,

ake and Palmer Brain alad

Surgery,

otesto CD reissue

Santa

Monica,

CA,

Rhino

Records)

Mosbo,

T.J.

994. Yes: But What

Does

It

Mean?

Exploring

heMusic

of

Yes

Milton,

WI,

Wyndstar)

Nicholls,

D.

2004. Virtual

opera,

or

opera

between the

ears',

Journal

f Royal

Music

Association, 29/1,

pp.

100-42

Oxford

nglish ictionary.

989.

Oxford,

Oxford

University

ress)

Palmer,

J.R.

001.

Yes,

Awaken

,

and the

progressive

ock

tyle',

opular

Music,20/2,

pp.

243-61

Platoff,

.

005.

John

ennon,

Revolution",

and

the

politics

f musical

reception',

he

Journal

fMusicol-

ogy,

2/2,

pp.

241-67

Rockwell,

J.

1986.

The

emergence

of art

rock',

n The

Rolling

tone llustrated

istory f

Rock

&

Roll,

d.

A.

De

Curtis

nd

J.

Henke

(New

York,

Random

House), pp.

492-9

Roka,L. 2004. A

day

in thelife of American music criticism: he

"Sgt. Pepper"

debate of 1967-1969',

Journalism

istory,

0/1,

pp.

20-30

Rorem,

N.

2004

originally

968).

"Themusic of the

Beatles',

n

The

Lennon

ompanion,

d.

E.

Thomson

nd

D.

Gutman

Cambridge,

MA,

Da

Capo), pp.

99-109

Rosen,

D.

1997.

Meter,

character nd tinta n

Verdi's

operas',

in Verdi'sMiddle

Period,

849-1859:Source

Studies,

nalysis,

nd

Performance

ractice

Chicago, University

f

Chicago

Press)

Rycenga,

J.

2002. Tales of

change

within

he sound:

form,

yrics

nd

philosophy

n

the music

of

Yes',

in

Progressive

ock

Reconsidered,

d.

K.

Holm-Hudson

(New

York,

Routledge),pp.

143-66

Sheinbaum,

JJ.

002.

Progressive

ock

nd

the nversion f

musical

values',

n

Progressive

ock

Reconsidered,

ed.

K.

Holm-Hudson

(New

York:

Routledge),pp.

21-42

2004.

Mainlines,

blood

feasts,

nd bad taste:

Lester

Bangs

reader

review)',

Notes, 0,

p.

4

Smith,

B. 1997.

TheBillboard

uide o

Progressive

usic

New

York,

Billboard

Books)

Smith,

.

2001.

n

theCourt

fKing

Crimson

London,

Helter

Skelter

ublishing)

Spicer,

M.S. 2000

'Large-scale strategy

nd

compositionaldesign

in

the

early

music of

Genesis',

in

Expression

n

Pop-Rock

Music:A Collection

f

Critical nd

Analytical ssays,

d. W. EverettNew York,

Garland),

pp.

77-111

Stokes,

G.

1986. The

Sixties',

n

Rock

fAges:

The

Rolling

tone

History f

Rock nd

Roll,

d.

E.

Ward,

G. Stokes

and

K.

Tucker

New

York,

Rolling

tone

Press/Summit

ooks),

pp.

249^163

Stump,

P. 1997.

TheMusic's All

ThatMatters:

History fProgressive

ock

London, Quartet Books)

Tamm,

E.

1991. Robert

ripp:

rom

King

Crimson o Guitar

Craft

London,

Faber

and

Faber)

Thompson,

D.

2005.

Turn t

On

Again:

Peter

Gabriel,

hil

Collins nd Genesis

San

Francisco,

ackbeat

Books)

Tucker,

K.

1986. The

Seventies

nd

beyond',

n

Rock

fAges:

The

Rolling

tone

History f

Rock nd

Roll,

d.

E.

Ward,

G.

Stokes and

K.

Tucker

New

York,

Rolling

tone

Press/Summit

ooks),

pp.

467-621

von

der

Horst,

D.

2002.

Precarious

pleasures:

situating

Close to

the

Edge'

in

conflicting

ale

desires',

n

Progressive

ock

Reconsidered,

d.

K.

Holm-Hudson

(New

York,

Routledge), pp.

167-82

Ward,

E.

1986.

The Fifties nd

before',

n Rock

fAges:

The

Rolling

tone

History f

Rock nd

Roll,

d.

E.

Ward,

G.

Stokes and

K.

Tucker

New

York,

Rolling

tone

Press/Summit

ooks),

pp.

17-246

Weinstein,

.

2002.

Progressive

ock s

text: he

yrics

f

Roger

Waters',

n

Progressive

ock

Reconsidered,

d.

K. Holm-Hudson(New York,Routledge),pp. 91-109

Whiteley,

.

1992. The

Space

Between heNotes:Rock nd

theCounter-Culture

London, Routledge)

Willis,

P.

1978.

Profane

ulture

London,

Routledge

nd Keean

Paul)

Zappa,

F.,

with

Occhiogrosso,

P.

1989. TheReal Frank

appa

Book

New

York,

Poseidon

Press)

Discography

The

Beatles,

Sgt. Pepper's onely

Hearts

Club

Band. EMI.

1967

Emerson,

ake

and

Palmer,

Tarkus.

tlantic.

971

Welcome ack

My

Friends o The

Show

That

Never

nds

. .

Ladies

nd

Gentlemen,merson,

ake nd Palmer.

Manticore.

974

Genesis,

Foxtrot.

harisma. 1972

Selling nglandBy

The Pound.

Charisma.

1973

TheLambLiesDown on

Broadway.

harisma. 1974

Gentle

Giant,

Acquiring

he

Taste.

Vertigo

PHCR-4202. 1971

Jethro

ull,

Thick

s

A

Brick.

hrysalis.

1972

King

Crimson,

n

theCourt

f

he

Crimson

ing.

Atlantic. 969

This content downloaded from 144.122.78.215 on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:19:52 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

8/10/2019 40212401_144_122_78_215_22_08_2014_09_19

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4021240114412278215220820140919 24/24

Musical

ambition

455

Larks'

Tongues

n

Aspic.

Atlantic.

973

The

Nice,

TheBest

of

heNice

featuring

eith merson.

imco

ICK 89391. 1994

Yes,

TimeAnd

A

Word.Atlantic. 970

The Yes Album.Atlantic.

971,

2003

TalesFrom

Topographic

ceans.Atlantic. 973

Videography

The

Genesis

ongbook.

agle

Vision USA. 2001