4. Gs2012_chapter 2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 4. Gs2012_chapter 2

    1/50

    45

    DRAFT / Housing Studio Kabadkhana:Inclusive City // Global S tudio Bho pal 2012

    KABADKHANA:the makings of

    a community

    DRAFTJanuary 27 2012

  • 8/12/2019 4. Gs2012_chapter 2

    2/50

    46

    DRAFT / Housing Studio Kabadkhana:Inclusive City // Global S tudio Bho pal 2012

    3 # Project Description

    4 # Approach and Design process

    8 # Community Analysis

    9 # The Madrasi Colony Solution

    12 # Case Studies

    14 # Case Study 1: Open Spaces

    22 # Case Study 2: Streetscape

    34 # Case Study 3: Naala

    44 # Housing

    47 # Team Members

    48 # Acknowledgements & References

    49 # Contacts

    CONTENTS

  • 8/12/2019 4. Gs2012_chapter 2

    3/50

    47

    DRAFT / Housing Studio Kabadkhana:Inclusive City // Global S tudio Bho pal 2012

    The Housing Studio takes its departure from the

    current policy initiative under Rajiv Awas Yojana(RAY), a agship program for proiding Hosing

    and Basic services to the urban poor. The

    studio investigated current practice of povertyalleviation as realized in a recent housingproject for the Madrasi Colony slum, whichprovided new G+3 residential dwellings on the

    site of the former slum. In contradistinction tothe development approach applied at MadrasiColony, the studio went on to investigatealternative, scaled and participatory design

    methods, as propagated by RAY, to improvea notied slm in the Kabadkhana area in the

    northern part of Bhopal. The intent of the studio

    is to understand the existing neighborhood asan intricate material, spatial and social fabric,and to provide case study approaches andsolutions to build upon the existing qualities of

    the place to improve the living conditions of theurban poor.

    kabadkhana(+):studio housing

    Three major case stdy areas were identied

    and worked on, namely the existing open and

    public spaces in and around the public middleschool to rethink the potential of open spaces tostrengthen community and public life, the naalaalong the northern border of our study site to

    rethink water management and how it relates tothe material ows within the neighborhood, and

    lastly an exemplary street section connecting

    the naala and open public spaces to investigatethe domestic reality of the neighborhood.The investigations and design proposalswere developed under the preposition that

    it is preferable to work with and build uponthe existing materiality and built fabric of aneighborhood rather then to erase and build

    anew. The wide range of proposals serve toillustrate possible material solutions as well as

    processes applied to build upon found qualities

    of any particular slum site. RAY acknowledgesa scaled approach from basic services to in-

    ll improements and to entirely new hosing

    developments. Based upon our design research,propositions for new housing schemes weredeveloped, and suggestions for materialstandards in larger scale housing developments.

    project description

  • 8/12/2019 4. Gs2012_chapter 2

    4/50

    48

    DRAFT / Housing Studio Kabadkhana:Inclusive City // Global S tudio Bho pal 2012

    approach and processes1

    1. Interviews with local community2. Using Replay Method to involve the children.3. Garbage collection at school4. Taking measurements for proposed site5. Building relationships to understand daily routines

    2 3

    54

  • 8/12/2019 4. Gs2012_chapter 2

    5/50

    49

    approach and processThe traditional understanding of the design

    process focuses on a linear approach, wherethe process is a series of distinct stages leading

    to a nal prodct. In this approach, different

    actors and disciplines contribute their particularknowledge and expertise at key stages duringthe design process. However this linear

    approach is not suitable for complex problemsolving, instead it needs to be cyclic andreectie process where all design disciplines

    are involved at every stage. Collaboration

    between all members of the team generatesinnovative outcomes and is imperative if thegoal is to enhance and to do justice to thecomplex and multifaceted social and material

    realities of the urban poor.

    During the preparation and execution of our

    design research, our team of architects, urbandesigners, planners and researchers workedclosely together on a variety of participatorymethods to understand the executed solution

    at Madrasi Colony and to arrive at inclusive andparticipatory sggestions for the Kabadkhana

    neighbourhood.

    At Madrasi Colony we surveyed the materialevidence in regards to quality, use andhierarchies of spaces, construction quality,

    and qualitative narrative assessments by theinhabitants.

    We approached the design task at Kabadkhana

    with two strategies in mind:a) identifying the perceptions of the spatial andsocial realities of the community andb) to use our own observations as basis for

    design recommendations. These two sets ofinformation were put into dialogue throughcommunity interaction and discussions of designproposals with community stakeholders.

    THE DESIGN PROCESS COMPARISON NON-SEQUENTIAL PRO-

    understanding

    Photo Essay

    Listening

    DEFINEobserve createideas

    TEST

    PROTOTYPE

    Site visits

    Photo essaysurveysinterviews

    Identication

    of 5 issues3 projects

    sketches

    draws

    modeling

    sketchesmodels

    events

    educationmaterial

    New Parallel Process ing

    yesterday

    today

    Project EndeProject Start

    Project EndeProject Start

    Single -discipl neAlone work

    yesterday

    todayProject EndeProject Start

    Cross-disciplne

    Complex

    Proble ms

    throughthe design

    process

    Multip le

    Discip line

    Singl e

    Discipl ine

    yesterday

    Singl e

    Proble ms

    today

    MULTIDICIPLINARY PRO-

    DESIGN THINKING MODEL FOR PARTICIPATORY DE-SIGN

  • 8/12/2019 4. Gs2012_chapter 2

    6/50

    50

    design process case studyOn the basis of community input and our ownobservations a set of educational, spatial and

    material interventions were developed thatcan strengthen and improve the found urbanconditions on a short, mid- and long-term basis.The community input and engagement was

    solicited through three strategies:

    1) Identify community stake holders, such aseducational, religious and other community

    decision makers and facilitators.2)Engage with Children both formallyand informally focusing on the children asgatekeepers to the community both in a spatial

    and social sense. Games in classroom and ininformal environments were used for communitymapping and as entrance to other members of

    the community (parents, teachers etc.)3)Spatial Obserations throgh eldworkBoth qualitative and material problems were

    identied by talking to the commnity and

    through informal observation and mappings.The design process of underwent various loopswith involving the stakeholders during the

    development of the proposals.

    SITE ANALYSIS/ DATA COLLECTIONInterviews with principal, local community

    Replay mapping exercises with the children

    Walks with children onsite

    Involving community in taking photographs oftheir daily routines

    PARTICIPATORY DESIGN OUTCOMETaking measurements with local community

    Turning locals desires into a spatial reality

    Educating locals on technology and design

    options through prototypes

    DESIGN PROPOSAL

    outcomesThe outcomes of our research and design studiowere manifold and correspond to the various

    agendas to frame our proposals. The guidingquestions were:1) What are the deciencies of the MadrasiColony that can serve as lessons learned

    for future policy, development and building

    approaches?2) What are the qalities of the Kabadkhananeighbourhood that can be strengthened andbuilt upon for improving and upgrading theneighbourhood?3) What are the problems within the

    neighbourhood on a material and urban levelthat require improvement as perceived throughthe community?

    In regards to the Madrasi Colony we perceivedvoiced discontent by the inhabitants regardingvarious aspects of the new housing, such as lackof livelihood spaces, affordability, open drainage

    and qality of bilding. Frther we perceied

    some basic and easily aoidable design aws

    such as lack of diversity in the dwelling units,

    missing cross ventilation, and under utilisedspaces for ventilation and daylighting. In regardsto the overall layout of the settlement a distinctlack of consideration to the public and open

    spaces was the general perception.Despite the fact that the Kabadkhana site is

    classied as notied slm we encontered a

    multifaceted community with a rich layeringof social and spatial evidence. A number of

    open and public spaces was used by differentmembers of the community at different times

    and for different occasions and we perceiveda quality and attachment that marks a livingcommunity.

    The problems that were voiced by thecommunity and that were also noted by theteam through on-site observations concerned

    water and waste water, garbage removal,education and basic services.

    MEMORY GAME

    DETAILED DESIGN PROCESS

  • 8/12/2019 4. Gs2012_chapter 2

    7/50

    51

    DRAFT / Housing Studio Kabadkhana:Inclusive City // Global S tudio Bho pal 2012

    initial thoughtsWe began by asking ourselves What are slums?And the answers seemed to always fall into

    three categories - living conditions, relationshipsand personal perceptions. From this point we

    started to communicate with the residents and

    occupants of the neighborhood, asking themwhat it is they needed and what they wanted toimprove their living conditions.

    The initial site visits made us aware ofsomething we had taken for granted of all thesewhileour carpet term community did not do

    jstication to the rich cltres, personalities,history, landscape that layered Kabadkhana. To

    consider community as a homogenous group ofdesires, needs and characteristics and propose

    design according to such presumptions wouldhave negative implications because the root

    of the isses will not be sfciently addressed.

    If we were to bring a signicant change in a

    sensitive manner, the word community wouldrequire a more in depth exploration.

    what is community?RELATION-

    SHIPS

    APOSITIVE

    FuTuRE

    PLACEMAKING

    +

    KABADKHANA:what peoplewant

    ELDERLY

    WOMEN

    MEN

    CHILDREN

    OUTDOOR

    INDOOR

    STREETS

    HOUSES

    COMMUNITY

    CENTERS

    PARKS

  • 8/12/2019 4. Gs2012_chapter 2

    8/50

    52

    Housing Studio Kabadkhana:Inclusive City // Global S tudio Bho pal 2012

    is madrasi colony G+3the solution?

    PROCESSAt rst we isited Madrasi colony and tried to

    understand what a rehabilitation project for a

    slum is? What has government done for theslum dwellers? We collected information about

    their lifestyles, socio-economic status, physicaland environmental status along with currentservices provided to them. We also went to

    Kabadkhana, as one of the notied slms of

    Bhopal to understand what a slum is and how

    do the people live there?We did a srey in Kabadkhana becase

    learnings were not done by us in Madrasi colony

    before JNNURM project intervention. Henceit was necessary to understand the slum, thecommunities living in slums, their need andissues.

    There we learnt what is the actual need of thecommunity in terms of living together and worktogether.

    Based on our understandings/learnings andlooking into the issues generated out ofRehabilitation project like that in Madrasi colony

    we again came to Madrasi colony and tried tocheck issues with regard to not only physical butthe social aspect. Hence we tried to redesign thehousing clusters with our perception applying

    certain concepts like Incremental housing. Wealso gae proposals for the Kabadkhana to

    improve their lifestyles by giving proposals andidentifying major issues like Garbage disposal,drinking water, Naala redevelopment, andmaking children aware of how can they solvetheir small problems by the things available all

    around them.

    uDPFI gidelines and Bhopal Master Plan are the

    main governing bye-laws that we have followed.

    COMMuNITY LIFE

    OVERVIEW

    BROKEN WALLS

  • 8/12/2019 4. Gs2012_chapter 2

    9/50

    53

    DRAFT / Housing Studio Kabadkhana:Inclusive City // Global S tudio Bho pal 2012

    POLICY FRAMEWORK MADRASI

    High-rise Multi-Level Construction:

    Sr.No.

    Standard Height above 24meters

    18 to 24 metershigh buildings

    12.5 to 18.0meter highbuildings

    1 Plot Size 2000 sq. m 1500 sq. m 1000 sq. m

    2 Frontage of ploton wider road

    30 m minimum 21 m minimum 18 m

    3 Minimum widthof road

    Not less than 30m

    Not less than 18m

    12 m

    4 Front OpenSpace

    Minimum Half ofthe height ofproposedbuilding

    12.0 m 9.0 m

    5 Side and RearOpen Space

    Minimum ofbuilding height

    6.0 m 6.0 m

    6 GroundCoverage

    30 % 30 % 30 %

    7 F. A. R. 1:2.0 1:1.50 1:1.30

    8Marginal open spaces should be kept free from obstructions for fire-fighting vehicles.

    9Parking provisions should be as per Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules,1984, Rule 82.

    10Fire fighting equipments and related provisions, water supply, wastewaterdisposal arrangements etc shall be as per Madhya Pradesh Bhumi VikasRules, 1984 and latest provisions of National Building Code..

    11

    Prior to Construction of High Rise Buildings, permission from Committeeformed under Rule 14 (a) of Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984must be obtained. Only after that Competent officer depending upon

    jurisdiction can give relevant permission.

    12These provisions are for all categories of uses and not withstanding anyprovisions in any specified uses in any zone, if the height exceed 18.0meters refer (M.P. Bhumi Vikas Niyam 1984)

    BY-LAWS

    Number of Dwelling Units shall be 104 perhectare and the population shall be 250persons per hectare (Maximum).

    For plots with area greater than 5000 sqare

    meters, grond coerage and F.A.R. calclations

    will be applicable to 60% of land area only and

    this provision will be applicable to multi-storeybuildings, group housing and all other typesof schemes.

  • 8/12/2019 4. Gs2012_chapter 2

    10/50

    54

    what is community:learning from kabadkhanaThis proposal looks at the Kabadkhana area,

    specically the site bordered by Chhola Road

    to the east, the Veer Sawarkar statue andattached road to the south, the forested area tothe west and the naala to the north. This area is

    typied by semi-pcca hosing, inter dispersed

    with occasional pucca houses and clusters ofkucha houses bordering the naala. In terms of

    slm settlements this area is signicantly more

    developed than many, but still lacks muchinfrastructure including a permanent drainagenetwork, sanitation systems and connection

    to municipal water in most areas. There is alarge waste disposal issue, particularly in thenaala, which leads to health issues within thecommunity and the children.

    The majority of work for men within the

    commnity comes the Kabadkhana scrap yardsand the burgeoning workshops along ChholaRoad. The womens role is predominantly ahousehold one; doing washing and cleaningduring the day whilst the men are working and

    the children are at school or playing.

    The community has a fairly even disbursement

    of Hindi and Muslim families, and as such hasboth Hindu temples, and Muslim mosquessituated within the sites boundaries. There isalso one government primary - middle school,

    one government high school and a privateMuslim school situated within the community.

    CIRCULATION

    HOME STREETS

    WOMEN