117
4. Base Station Antenna Siting and Measurement This chapter starts by presenting the design procedure used for siting base station antennas in cellular systems. The site location is based on statistical data of the propagation characteristics, which are summarized as a set of compact equations derived from these data. This is called the Okumura-Hata estimation method. 1. This chapter describes this estimation method in detail, together with another method that is appropriate for the design of small cells. 2. Following site location, the base station antenna is then designed to satisfy the specifications. The design procedure for a cellular system is the second topic in the chapter. 3. At the development stage, the designed base station antenna characteristics are evaluated by making use of prototype models. The measurement method, particularly for cellular base station antennas, is the third topic described in the chapter. 4. A unique measurement for base station antennas is the high power test. This chapter describes the special features associated with the high power treatment of the antenna and its measurement method in detail. 5. The last topic in the chapter is the evaluation of the performance of base station antennas. Tests needed before product shipping include electrical, mechanical and reliability performance checks. These tests are described in detail together with practical examples. 1

4. Base Station Antenna Siting and Measurement · 2015. 5. 8. · 4.1 Base Station Antenna Siting • The location of the base station is the most important issue for cellular system

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    11

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 4. Base Station Antenna Siting and Measurement• This chapter starts by presenting the design procedure used for siting base station antennas in

    cellular systems. The site location is based on statistical data of the propagation characteristics, which are summarized as a set of compact equations derived from these data. This is called the Okumura-Hata estimation method.

    1. This chapter describes this estimation method in detail, together with another method that is appropriate for the design of small cells.

    2. Following site location, the base station antenna is then designed to satisfy the specifications. The design procedure for a cellular system is the second topic in the chapter.

    3. At the development stage, the designed base station antenna characteristics are evaluated by making use of prototype models. The measurement method, particularly for cellular base station antennas, is the third topic described in the chapter.

    4. A unique measurement for base station antennas is the high power test. This chapter describes the special features associated with the high power treatment of the antenna and its measurement method in detail.

    5. The last topic in the chapter is the evaluation of the performance of base station antennas. Tests needed before product shipping include electrical, mechanical and reliability performance checks. These tests are described in detail together with practical examples. 1

  • 4.1 Base Station Antenna Siting• The location of the base station is the most important issue for cellular system design.

    • The coverage area of a cellular base station ranges from a radius of 0.5 km to 20 km, and is determined by the number of expected users inside the coverage area and the geographical features in the locality.

    • The Okumura-Hata method is widely used to estimate the propagation loss from a base station with a cell radius between 1 km and 20 km.

    • The Okumura-Hata estimation method described in this section has been used recently in micro-cellular systems with a cell radius below 0.5 km, which are employed to increase the user capacity of a single base station.

    • The propagation loss estimation method is also presented for a cell of a similar small size. The selection of base station location is based on these propagation loss estimations.

    2

  • 4.1.1 Design of Macro Cell Siting Using the Okumura-Hata Curve

    • In mobile communication systems, the propagation characteristics are predicted by an estimation method based on large quantities of data obtained from propagation loss experiments, as described in section 1.2.2.

    • Geographical features inside a range of several tens of kilometers are roughly divided into three different types described below, and the propagation loss is estimated for each type. This technique is well known as Okumura’s curve.

    • The variation of the propagation loss evaluated from measurement data at 150 MHz, 450 MHz, 900 MHz, and 1500 MHz defines the original Okumura curve. This section explains how this method can be used to estimate the propagation loss, as described in section 1.1 [1].

    • Geographical features may be divided roughly into irregular and semi-flat. Irregular features are classified into hills, isolated mountains, inclined geographical features and so on.

    • Land mobile communication services are however mainly used in locations with semi-flat geographical features. Within semi-flat geographical features, an undulating plain is defined as having heights less than 20 m. Local geographical features and buildings are described by a compensation value based on a place where the undulations are small.

    3

  • Fig. 4.1 Okumura’s curve for city area in 900 MHz band• Such semi-flat geographical features are classified as being in the city, in the suburbs, and in

    open areas. An interpretation for a city area, where the buildings have more than two stories, is that the proportion of buildings is equivalent to 23 % of the area [2].

    • Fig. 4.1 shows an example of Okumura’s curve in the 900 MHz band for a city area. Distances below 10km from the base station are shown to have a log scale path loss, while greater distances have a linear scale loss; this is a unique feature of Okumura’s curve.

    Effective height of base station antenna(m)

    free space

    210

    200

    190

    180

    170

    160

    150

    140

    130

    120

    110

    100

    901 2 5 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    305070100150200

    450300

    6008001000

    log scale linear scale

    Distance(km)

    Path loss between dipole antennas[dB]

    4

  • • It is convenient to calculate data using a closed form equation, although propagation loss can be read directly from the Okumura curve. The approximate equation of the Okumura curve, as derived by Hata, is shown below [3].

    • The propagation loss LP in a city area is expressed by an equation at a frequency f MHz (150 ∼ 1500 MHz), for a mobile station antenna of height h m (1∼10 m), with a distance between base station and mobile station of r km (1∼20 km) as follow:

    (4.1)• where the antenna effective height a(hm) is defined as the compensated antenna height of the

    mobile terminal. (4.2)

    • For large cities:f ≤ 200 MHz (4.3a)

    f ≥ 400 MHz (4.3b)

    dBrhhahfL bmbp 10101010 log)log55.69.44()(log82.13log16.2655.69 −+−−+=

    )8.0log56.1()7.0log11.1()( 1010 −−−×= fhfha mm

    1.1)54.1(log29.8)( 210 −= mm hha

    97.4)75.11(log2.3 210 −= mh

    5

  • Fig. 4.2 Definition of antenna effective height

    BS antenna

    0 3km 15km

    Average heighthm

    Earth surface

    • As shown in Fig. 4.2, the antenna effective height is approximated by the height of the average surface of the earth at a point where the mobile terminal is used at between 3 km and 15 km from the base station antenna

    • Next, the propagation loss is considered in areas which may be classified as suburban or pastoral and these include areas such as those along a road where trees and houses disturb the propagation of electromagnetic waves. Under these conditions:

    dB (4.4)• In open areas where high trees, buildings, and other obstructions do not exist within a range of

    300∼400m of the mobile station in the direction of arrival, the propagation loss is given as:dB (4.5)

    4.5)}28/({log2}{ 210 −−= fcityLL pp

    94.40log33.18}{log78.4}{ 102

    10 −+−= ffcityLL pps

    6

  • Fig. 4.3 Propagation loss estimated by Okumura-Hata method

    100

    110

    120

    130

    140

    150

    160

    170

    180

    190

    200

    Path loss between dipole antennas [dB]

    200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

    Frequency [MHz]

    1500150

    distance=20km

    distance=10km

    distance=5km

    distance=2km

    Effective antenna height of base station 50m

    Antenna height of mobile 1.5m

    • The propagation loss estimated by the Okumura-Hata method is shown in Fig. 4.3 as a function of frequency. A coverage area with a radius of more than 1 km of a base station can be obtained using this propagation loss estimation method.

    7

  • • It is possible to calculate the output power and antenna gain of the base station from the propagation loss estimated by the Okumura-Hatte method. If Pt, Gt and Ms represent the transition power, antenna saturation gain and system margin, respectively, the received electric power Per at the cell edge can be formulated as follows:

    (4.6)• The system margin is between 10 and 20 dB and is caused by the unexpected leveling down

    of the received electric field strength due to fading.

    • The noise level at the location of the base station determines the cell edge of a cellular system.The noise level in the frequency range of 800–2000 MHz is between 0 and 10 dBµV, whichmay be converted into the unit of dBm by the conversion equation, or as follow:

    (4.7)• where a feed line having an impedance of 50Ω is assumed.

    • The propagation loss at 900 MHz may be computed for base station antenna with heightshb=50m and hm=1.5m.

    • If the cell radius of the base station in big cities is assumed to be 3 km, the propagation loss Lpbecomes 139 dB from (4.1) through (4.3). If the minimum electric field strength received atthe cell edge is 10dBµV=-103dBm and the system margin Ms=20dB, then the followingequation applies:

    (4.8)

    sptter MLGPP −−+=

    01.113)()( −= VdBVdBP emr µ

    5620139103 =++−=++=+ spertt MLEGP

    8

  • • An antenna gain of 13 dB is necessary for this estimation if the output power of the base station is 20 W, which is equivalent to 43 dBm.

    • Based on this procedure and other factors such as the coverage area of the base station and the gain of the base station antenna, the transmitter output can then be determined.

    • After the above statistical approach, Ikegami introduced a propagation model consisting of free space propagation loss and reflected/detracted loss by buildings [4].

    • Walfisch derived the propagation loss assuming an urban environment as semi-infinite multi screen [5]. In this model, the diffracted wave at the screen top is a dominant factor at received signal at mobile terminals.

    • These two models are integrated as “COST-231 Walfisch-Ikegami” model, which is widely used in recent design of cellular system [6][7].

    9

  • Antenna System Design: ExamplesPropagation loss at 1500 MHzthe height of the base station antenna hb = 30 mthe height of the mobile station hm = 1.5 m. the cell radius of the base station in cities is 1.5 km

    the propagation loss Lp at 1500 MHz is ? dB by Okumura-Hata curvethe minimum electric field strength received at the cell edge is 10 dBµV = -103 dBmthe system margin Ms = 20 dB

    ?=++=+ spertt MLEGP dB

    An antenna gain of ? dB is necessary for this estimation if the output power of the base station is 20 W, which is equivalent to 43 dBm.

    10

  • 4.1.2 Break Point of a Micro cell• Okumura’s curve is derived for early land mobile communication systems for which the

    coverage area of the base stations is assumed to be from several kilometers to 10 km in radius.

    • Therefore, it is difficult to apply to a case where the coverage area is below 1 km from a base station, such as a micro cellular system. This small cell sized is used to increase the capacity and high-speed data transmission capability.

    • The propagation loss of micro cells is based on line of sight propagation (defined in sec. 1.2.1), and a break point is defined at the position where the propagation loss changes rapidly [8][9].

    • The break point can be explained by the two-wave model, by considering the direct path and the ground reflected path. The earth is approximated as a flat surface, as shown in Fig. 4.4, where the propagation distance is denoted by d1 for the direct path between transmission and reception point, and d2 for the ground reflected path.

    d1

    d2

    d

    hb

    hm

    Fig. 4.4 Two-wave model with flat earth

    11

  • • When the heights of the transmitting point hb and the receiving point hm are very small as compared to the distance d between the transmitting and receiving points, path difference between these two paths is given by the following:

    (4.9)

    • The propagation loss increases rapidly when the path difference given by (4.9) is more than a half-wavelength, because a reflection wave from the ground cancels a direct wave, due to the 180o phase difference.

    • The point where the path difference satisfies the above condition is called a break point, and the corresponding distance, d2-d1, is defined as:

    (4.10)

    • However, because fading causes large local fluctuations in the measured electric field, the position of the break point cannot be clearly determined from measurement of the propagation loss.

    222212 )()( mbmb hhdhhddd −+−++=−

    −+−

    ++=

    22

    211

    211

    dhh

    dd

    hhd mbmb

    dhh mb2≅

    λmbhhb

    4=

    12

  • • Assume that a break point exists in an area between 100m and 500m from a base station, and an example measurement result is shown in Fig. 4.5. From measurements at frequencies 457.3 MHz, 2.2 GHz and 4.7 GHz along a checker-shaped road in the city, the break point position bm is given as [10]:

    (4.11)• Quoted propagation loss estimations are based on measured data at 457.3 MHz, 2.2 GHz, and

    4.7 GHz in Yokohama, where main roads are checker-shaped. The scaling factor of 1.9 is derived by the measurements.

    • This reference has been selected because the frequency range is broad and the closed form formula well approximates the propagation loss before and after the break point.

    • The propagation loss in the line of sight region is inversely proportional to the distance r (free space loss), and attenuates according to 1/r4 after the break point. If the same expression as the Okumura curve is taken as the propagation loss, it may be formulated by denoting frequency as f MHz and K as a constant before the break point (db. The value of K is 27.6 in this example.

    λmbhhb

    9.1=

    KfdLbb +−−= log20log20

    KchhbLbdL mbbbba +−+−=+−= log20)9.1log(20log40log40

    13

  • Fig. 4.5 Propagation loss and break point

    (a) 457.3 MHZ, (b) 2.2 GHz, and (c) 4.7 GHz.14

  • • The value of propagation loss estimated by the two-way model is smaller than that obtained from the measured results because of the effective raising of the earth surface by vehicles on the road and the blocking of the propagation path by signboards and pedestrian overpasses.

    • These two factors are shown in Fig.4.6 and are introduced to the propagation loss as:

    (4.14a)

    (4.14b)

    • From the measurement carried out in Sapporo city, it is reported that the above estimation agrees well when values of s=0.001, and ho =1 m are used for daytime and ho 0.5 m for nighttime [11]. This formula can estimate the propagation loss without dividing the path by the break point.

    rm

    rjkrjksr

    d reR

    reerL

    rmoo −−− += )(

    4)(

    1

    1

    απλ

    { }22 )()( omobrm hhhhrr −+−+=

    Fig. 4.6 Two-wave model usingeffective earth surface

    15

  • 4.1.3 Propagation Loss Outside the line of Sight

    • In a propagation model for a micro cellular system, there may be a shape turn in a road at a corner and this results in a non-line of sight scenario.

    • Beyond the corner, the waves encounter multiple reflections and diffractions the corner, as shown in Fig. 4.7. The effects of the diffracted waves are usually small and can be neglected.

    • The propagation loss may be divided into the loss at the corner and that beyond the corner. In general, the loss at the corner varies from 10 dB to 30 dB depending on the propagation conditions, the distances between the transmitting and receiving points, and the corner.

    • The loss may be expressed in terms of the distance d2 from the corner to the receiving point, as:

    dB (4.15)• Reference [10] indicates that α has little frequency dispersion and its recurrence curve may be

    approximated by the measurement data as:dB (4.16)

    • where d1 is the distance from the transmitting point to the corner.

    nnl KdL += 2logα

    0.51log5.14 1 −= dα

    16

  • • A further method for estimating the propagation loss uses the total distance r=d1+d2 without considering the differences for the regions inside or outside the line of sight.

    • In this case, the propagation loss is the same as free space loss for distance up to 30 m away from the transmitting point, and is proportional to 1/r5 from there on.

    • The corresponding expression does not depend on the location of the break point.

    dB (4.17)

    Fig. 4.7 Propagation path at intersection

    6.2730log30log20log50 ++−−= fdLnl

    17

  • 4.1.4 Propagation Loss Estimation by the Ray Tracing Method

    • A large number of propagation experiments are required to derive the approximate equation for the estimation of propagation loss.

    • Recently, the propagation loss, particularly within micro cells, has been estimated by numerical simulations using the ray-tracing method. The ray tracing method approximates electromagnetic waves by optical rays, and is applicable for simulation of reflection, diffraction, and scattering by buildings and other obstacles.

    • It is difficult to model all the real influences precisely. For example, it is impossible to include all the influences of street trees, building’s windows and window frames and moving people inside buildings in the calculation model. However, accurate modeling is indispensable when considering the precise changes in electric field level at the receiving point.

    • On the other hand, a relatively simple calculation model can give the median level of electric field strength at the receiving point and the average propagation loss [12].

    • For example, when most of the buildings in a large city are higher than the height of a base station antenna, the propagation loss along a street can be approximated by a U-shaped waveguide, for which all the surfaces are concrete walls, as shown in Fig. 4.8.

    18

  • • The electric field strength at the receiving point in the U-shaped guide is calculated as the sum of the direct waves from the transmitting point and the reflected waves from the walls.

    • A calculated result obtained using such an approximate model is shown in Fig. 4.9. Once the height of the base station and the radiation pattern of the base station antenna are known a priori, propagation characteristics can be calculated. It is therefore an effective technique for estimating the propagation phenomena in micro cellular systems.

    W

    s

    hb

    0.1 1 10 100 1000-90

    -60

    -30

    r (m)

    dB

    Fig. 4.8 U-shaped guide for ray tracing simulation Fig. 4.9 Calculated electric field distribution from ray tracing method: f = 1.9GHz, W = 10, s = 0.1, hb = 2.5, hm = 1.6 (m).

    V-pol.

    H-pol.

    19

  • Side view

    Strip lineSubstrate

    Ground plane

    Foam

    Mounting plateTop view

    Tunnel

    Flat Antenna Base Station

    E/O O/E

    Optical Fiber

    Unit

    Crank-shaped ground plane Notched ground plane

    Bi-Directional Notch Antenna

    20/58

  • Tunnel Booster Antenna

    21/58

  • Two modes of Bi-directional Notch

    p : probe length

    f1: Dominant mode is patch mode resonance.f2: Secondary mode is probe mode resonance (p≒λ/4).

    f1

    f2

    22/58

  • Current Distribution of Two modes

    patch mode probe modecurrent flow

    Patch mode currents radiate large cross pol. in E plane.

    Patch mode currents should be suppressed for probe mode.

    E plane

    H plane

    23/58

  • λ/2

    Half wavelength dipole antennaOut of phaseexcitation

    A Pair of Dipole Antenna for Bi-Directional Radiation Pattern

    Current direction

    24/58

  • Radiation Pattern of Two Modes

    a

    d

    b

    y

    pc

    z

    sp

    x a=140, b=40, c=50, d=20,p=40, sp=60, g=30 [mm].

    -20

    -10

    00゚

    90゚

    180゚

    270゚

    patch mode probe mode

    -20

    -10

    00゚

    90゚

    180゚

    270゚

    patch mode probe mode

    H (zx) planeE (yz) plane

    25/58

  • -20

    -10

    00゜

    90゜

    180゜

    270゜

    notch without metal planenotch with metal plane

    Notch Antenna

    Metal Plane

    z

    x

    y

    θ

    φ

    Effect of Mounting Ground Plane

    The radiation beam is tilted up by the finite sized ground plane.

    26/58

  • 0 [degree]

    Antenna

    30 [degree]

    60 [degree]•Antenna pattern :sinαθ

    θ [degree] 0 30 60Coverage Area [m] (800MHz) ±170 ±93 ±65

    Coverage Area [m] (1.5GHz) ±140 ±96 ±60

    Coverage Area of Tilted Beam Antenna

    27/58

  • -120

    -100

    -80

    -60

    -40

    -20

    0

    0.1 1 10 100 1000Distance [m]

    Peak Value

    Line of -20[dB]

    Coverage

    Definition of Coverage AreaPr

    opag

    atio

    n lo

    ss (d

    B)

    Monoploe antenna

    28/58

  • p1=60(0.3λ), p2=10(0.05λ), p3=80(0.3λ),

    m1=120, m2=260, h=40 [mm]

    h

    p1p2 p3

    m1

    m2

    Notch Antenna

    Metal Plane

    Parasitic elements

    z

    x

    y

    θ

    φ

    Notch Antenna with Parasitic Elements

    29/58

  • -20

    -10

    00゜

    90゜

    180゜

    270゜

    no element one element two elements three elements

    Parasitic Elements 0 1 2 3Amplitude 1 0.21 0.21 0.24Phase [degrees] 0 16.06 -1.05 -15.28Distance 0 0.3λ 0.35λ 0.4λ

    Εφ (yz plane) radiation pattern

    z

    x

    y

    θ

    φ

    [dB]

    Number of Parasitic Element

    Phase and amplitude of parasitic elements

    30/58

  • Undersea Tunnel Cellular Phone Service

    31/58

  • 4.6km 4.8km 4.4km

    15.1km

    Tokyo-Wan Aqua Line

    32/58

  • 1.5GHz (T)

    1.5GHz (R)

    800MHz (T)

    800MHz (R)

    Strip directors for gain enhancement (3 dB up)500×479×125 mm

    High Gain Tunnel Booster Antenna

    33/58

  • High Gain Antenna for W-CDMA

    34/58

  • Low Cost Tunnel Booster SystemAdvantage:Very low transmission loss by optical fiberDrawback:High cost of E/O, O/E unit

    OpticalFiber

    Booster by outside antenna

    Bidirectional Antenna

    Tunnel

    E/O,O/E unit

    Base Station

    TunnelBaseStation

    Receiver35/58

  • 8.5 [m]

    2.5 [m]

    Receiver

    f= 818[MHz]

    V-pol. for mobile terminal

    V/H-pol. for base station

    Tunnel length 1005 m

    Mt. Mt.

    Road

    Open space

    52[m]19[m]

    Base station

    Propagation Measurement in Tunnel

    36/58

  • 52[m]h

    -150

    -140

    -130

    -120

    -110

    -100

    -90

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

    Prop

    agat

    ion

    Loss

    [dB

    ]

    Distance [m]

    h= 3 [m]h= 6 [m]h=14 [m]

    Propagation Loss Inside Tunnel

    37/58

  • 2-D Simulation ModelConcrete wall @ 5GHz

    1.00.5 jr −=ε0.00.1 jr −=µ

    )(1.0 mD =

    )tanh( DjkZ rrr

    rin εµε

    µ=

    iin

    iinTE Z

    Zθθ

    coscos

    +−

    i

    jkRmn

    TEi ReE

    i−+Γ=

    A point of symmetry

    38

  • Convergence Characteristics

    3-reflection5-reflection

    10-reflection

    CW incidence

    39

  • Image Method

    ∏−⋅=l

    lirti RjkddiGiGE ,)exp(4)()(

    πλ

    22

    1i

    iP E E

    =

    = = ∑

    ici

    iciTE

    θεθ

    θεθ2

    2

    sincos

    sincos

    −+

    −−=Γ

    icic

    icicTM

    θεθε

    θεθε2

    2

    sincos

    sincos

    −+

    −−=Γ

    R : Reflection coefficient, d : Distance, θ : Incident angle, G : Directivity gain of antenna 40

  • Definition of Reflection

    Incident Angle [deg]

    Ref

    lect

    coe

    ffici

    ent [

    dB]

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90-60

    -50

    -40

    -30

    -20

    -10

    0

    TE TM

    Reflection coefficient

    2 2

    2 2

    cos sin

    cos sini i

    TE

    i i

    n

    n

    θ θ

    θ θ

    − −Γ =

    + −

    2 2 2

    2 2 2

    cos sin

    cos sini i

    TM

    i i

    n n

    n n

    θ θ

    θ θ

    − −Γ =

    + −2 60rn jε σλ= −

    EH E

    H

    Reflection plane41

  • Transverse Electric (TE) Incidence

    Incidence/Transmission

    εr1=2, εr2=1θi=40°

    "http://www-antenna.ee.titech.ac.jp/~hira/hobby/edu/em/polarization/rhcpw/index-j.html"

    Reflection/Transmission

    All components 42

  • Transverse Magnetic (TM) Incidence

    εr1=1, εr2=2θi=80°

    "http://www-antenna.ee.titech.ac.jp/~hira/hobby/edu/em/polarization/rhcpw/index-j.html"

    Incidence/Transmission Reflection/Transmission

    All components43

  • 5.0x7.0x3.0 (m)Tx(2.0,1.0,1.0)Rx z=1.5 xy planef=5.2GHz5-reflection

    3-D Simulation Results

    44

  • Time Delay Profile

    10×10×3 (m)Tx(2,2,1)Rx(8,8,1.5)10-reflection

    45

  • 4.2 Design of Cellular Base Station Antennas

    • This section presents the base station antenna structures including the feeding network, and a synthesis method for pattern shaping to give the desired characteristics. As uplink diversity scheme is mandatory for base station systems, the design procedures for space and polarization diversity are also described in this section.

    4.2.1 Antenna Array Structure and Feeding Circuit

    • The horizontal radiation pattern is often omni-directional, but a sector shaped pattern is sometimes used to increase the system capacity.

    • Such sector system covers the whole of the horizontal plane by dividing it into several sectors. The sector pattern is given by the antenna elements supplemented by reflector or parasitic elements in front of the antenna, as shown in Fig. 4.10.

    • A narrow sector pattern with a 60° half-power beam width requires a two-element array in the horizontal direction, excited in phase.

    46

  • Reflector

    Di-pole

    Parasitic element

    Fig. 4.10 Sector beam antenna using reflector and parasitic element

    (a) tournament array (b) colinear arrayFig. 4.11 Feeding network for base station antenna array

    47

  • • The antenna radiation pattern in the vertical plane consists of a shaped beam to control the coverage area of the base station and constitutes an array antenna in the vertical direction.

    • A simple pattern used for cellular systems is a pencil beam to increase the directive gain in the horizontal direction. This pattern is given by an array in which the phases and amplitudes of all the elements are the same.

    • A cooperate-feed network, shown in Fig. 4.11 (a), provides the in-phase excitation. This feed network is useful for high gain antennas of more than 15 dBi, although an antenna gain of about 10 dBi may be obtained with a co-linear array shown in Figure 4.11 (b).

    • Such co-linear array consists of several half-wavelength coaxial cables connecting the inner conductor of the lower element to the upper outer conductor in order to change the phase alternatively at the edge.

    • Although this antenna structure is very simple, the input impedance is not matched at the frequency to give the required radiation pattern. Impedance matching is then obtained by an external matching network.

    • Typical antenna elements for cellular systems are printed dipole, microstrip and printed slot, as shown in Fig. 4.12. The antenna element is selected according to the design of base station and its cost. The feeding network is usually made with microstrip line.

    48

  • Fig. 4.12 Antenna elements for base station antenna

    49

  • 4.2.2 Beam Tilting and Propagation Characteristics

    • To increase the subscriber capacity in current cellular systems, a smaller coverage area is required for each base station.

    • In the frequency division multiple access (FDMA) system, the same frequency can be used in near cells. A restriction in coverage area is also seen in the code division multiple access (CDMA) system, because the increase in the number of users in the same cell raises the base noise level.

    • Therefore, a similar cell form is required for both FDMA and CDMA systems. To restrict the cell size, the beam tilting technique shown in Fig. 4.13 is effective.

    • In the FDMA system, the null position of the antenna pattern is directed towards another cell in order to minimize the interference between cells using the same frequency band.

    • Using tilted beams, the propagation loss becomes larger than that without tilting, as shown in Fig. 4.14, which also shows the effectiveness of using tilted beam antennas

    50

  • • For a system in which the antenna height of the base station is h (m) and the cell radius is a(m), the tilt angle θt may be determined as:

    (4.18)• For example, the tilt angle is θt = 3.8° for a system in which h=100 m and a=1.5 km. For

    practical designs, which include the interference margin between adjacent cells, the real tilt angle is 1 to 2°, which is larger than the value given by (4.18).

    • A design example of the vertical plane pattern for a base station antenna is shown in Fig. 4.15. Denoting θ=0° as the horizon, the lower region 0

  • 0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    0 5 10 15 20 25

    Received electric field strength [dB V/m]

    Distance from the base station [km]

    m

    tilt angle=0

    tilt angle=3

    o

    o

    Fig. 4.13 Beam tilting effect of base station antenna Fig. 4.14 Propagation loss by antenna main beam tilting

    52

  • Beam Tilting Effect of Base Station Antenna

    ( )aht /tan 1−=θ

    θt = 3.8° , h = 100m, a = 1.5km

    θt = 1.15° , h = 30m, a = 1.5km

    53

  • θt

    0 +90-90

    Side lobelevel

    cosec θregion

    2Taylordistributionregion

    0

    -10

    -20

    -30

    -40

    -50

    dB

    -90 -60 -30 0 30 60 90degree

    Fig. 4.15 Example of vertical plane pattern for base station antenna

    Fig. 4.16 Desired radiation pattern in vertical plane: Number of element=16; beam tilt angle=4° and sidelobe level=–13dB

    θtcosec2θ

    54

  • dx

    y

    θsinkdθ

    Co-Phase Excitation for Tilt Beam

    θsinkd−

    θsin2kd

    θsin2kd−

    ( )okd θθδ sinsin −=Phase difference for each antennaoθ Direction of maximum radiation

    Phase difference is required to be 30º for θ0=10 º, 16º for θ0=5 º @d=λ/2.55

  • Sub array

    1

    2

    4

    3

    5

    6

    7

    Radiationelement

    Feednetwork

    Phase shifter

    Power divider

    Feeding Network and Phase Shifter

    56

  • Phase Shifter Arrangement

    θ=10º as the maximum tilt angle

    δm=30º as the maximum phase difference

    om kd θδ sin=

    4-element sub array needs 4× δm=120ºas the phase difference between sub array

    θ=1º, δm=3º, 4× δm=12º

    Wide variable range required57

  • Variable Phase Shifter by Sandwich Dielectric Plates

    Meander line

    Moving direction

    Moveable dielectric plate

    Dielectric substrate

    58

  • Moveable dielectric plate

    Meander tri-plate line

    #1

    #1‘ #2‘

    #2

    Shield box

    Shield boxMoving direction

    Top view Side view

    Variable phase shifter by sandwich dielectric plates

    59

  • Theory of Phase Shifter

    W

    s

    p

    筐体 誘電体 (εd、厚さ d )

    t

    εb

    Metal plate Dielectric plate (thickness d)

    εbεe = b = p + s

    1-2d / b+ (εb /εd )×( 2d / b)

    Effective dielectric constant

    bεe = εb εd≫εb

    b – 2dεd >90

    Thickness ratio betweendielectric materials

    Guide wavelength oftri-plane line is;

    ee ε

    λλ 0=

    60

  • Photo of Variable Phase Shifter

    61/44

  • • To obtain the amplitude Ii and phase φi for the desired antenna pattern, the error value should be minimized. Discreet points of M, in the following vector, express the desired pattern in the vertical plane:

    (4.20)

    • Using (4.19), g (θ) may be given in matrix form from and as:

    (4.21)

    • If the error function to minimize the value of δ is ε, Gd and G are defined as:

    (4.22)

    • The condition for the excitation coefficient of an to minimize ε is then given by the leastsquares method as:

    (4.23)

    =

    )(

    )( 11

    MdM

    d

    d

    g

    gG

    θ

    θ

    =

    =

    NMN

    N

    MM a

    a

    A

    A

    A

    A

    g

    gG

    11

    1

    111

    *

    1 11∑ ∑∑

    = ==

    −=

    M

    m

    N

    nnmndm

    N

    nnmndm aAgaAgε

    01

    *

    1* =

    −=

    ∂∂ ∑ ∑

    = =

    N

    nmn

    N

    nnmndm

    n

    AaAgaε

    62

  • Antenna Pattern SynthesisSymmetrical array using Fourier series expansion

    ∑∑∑==

    −=

    ∆+=++=N

    nno

    N

    n

    jnn

    N

    n

    jnno naaeaeaag

    111)cos(2)( δδθ

    oa 1a 2a 3a1a2a3aElement amplitude

    ( ) ( )( ) ( )

    ( ) ( ) 3322312

    33

    221

    321

    84622

    cos3cos421cos22cos2

    3cos22cos2cos2)(

    xaxaxaaaaaaaa

    aaaag

    o

    o

    o

    ++−+−=

    −+−++=

    +++=

    δδδδ

    δδδθ7-element array

    ∆= cosx63/44

  • Binomial Radiation Pattern ∆= cosx( )

    Nxg

    +=

    21θ

    3=N ( ) ( )323

    33181

    21 xxxxg +++=

    +=θ

    323120 881,4

    83,62

    83,2

    81 aaaaaa ==−=−=

    641,

    323,

    41,

    165

    3210 ==== aaaa

    7-element array

    64/44

  • Binomial Radiation Pattern

    0

    0.25

    0.5

    0.75

    1

    -90 -60 -30 0 30 60 90

    =d

    No side lobe

    65/44

  • 4.2.3 Sector Antennas

    • The sector zone allocation requires a fan-shaped pattern in the horizontal plane. However, an ideal fan-shape cannot be obtained from a real antenna and the span of a sector is specified by the half power beam width. This real sector pattern may be approximated by denoting the half power beam width as φb [14], where:

    -φe ≤ φ ≤ φe dB (4.23a)

    -π ≤ φ≤ φe, φe ≤ φ ≤π dB (4.23b)

    (4.23c)

    • Current cellular systems use three-sector zones, where the half power beam width is 90° or 120°. The beam width depends on the system design.

    • Although a narrow beam increases the user number, it sometime causes blind regions at the cell edge. Therefore, the base station location is important. Six sectors are also used because such an arrangement doubles the capacity of the three-sector system [15].

    ( ))2/cos(log10)( 10 φθ mg =

    FB−=

    ( ) ,)2/cos(log103

    10 b

    −=

    =

    −− me

    21 10cos2φ

    66

  • Photo of Base Station Antenna

    67

  • Horizontal Radiation Pattern

    0

    90

    180

    270

    3020100

    (dB)0

    90

    180

    270

    3020100

    (dB)

    : Ideal Radiation Pattern

    68/44

  • Dual band antennaShort stub

    Reflector

    Feed network circuit

    Dual Band Base Station Antenna

    69

  • Reflector

    Dual band antenna (900/1500 MHz)Parasitic element

    (2GHz)

    Shorted stub

    Triple Band Antenna Element

    70

  • Horizontal Radiation Pattern of Triple Band Antenna

    900MHz 1500MHz 2000MHz

    127° 113° 113°

    71

  • Antenna Arrangement

    72

  • 4.2.4 Diversity Antennas• Up-link diversity reception is mandatory for base station antennas in order to combat multi-

    path fading.

    • The diversity reception described in sec. 1.3.1 is also used to compensate for power imbalance between uplink and downlink, because the uplink signal is weaker than that of the downlink.

    • For a system with space diversity, the same antenna is installed with a spacing of more than 10 wavelengths (λ).

    • The correlation coefficient for this space diversity, as shown in Fig. 4.17, is calculated by assuming that the uplink signals originate from inside the angle ψm with uniform distribution. The correlation coefficient of ρe is evaluated from the definition of (1.30) as

    (4.25)

    • The calculated correlation is shown in Fig. 4-18. For a design value of ρe1.5° is obtained from propagation measurements in the cities [16].

    ,sin2

    =

    XX

    eρ αλπ sin2

    Ψ=

    dX m

    73

  • ψm

    α

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    0 5 10 15 20

    Interval of the antennas d/

    f =1.0H

    o

    f =1.5H

    o

    f =2.0H

    o

    l

    Correlation coefficientr e

    ψm=1.0°

    ψm=1.5°

    ψm=2.0°

    d/λ

    Fig. 4.17 Coordinate system for space diversity antenna Fig. 4.18 Correlation coefficient of space diversity antenna

    74

  • • Mobile telephone services started as vehicular mounted mobile terminals. Developments in electronics technology have resulted in very small and lightweight portable handsets.

    • As a result, everyone now uses a handset placed near the ear at a tilted angle. As derived from statistical data [17], the tilt angle is about 60°, and this decreases the vertical radiation component by 6 dB, and the horizontal component by 5 dB more than the vertical component.

    • This operating condition results in an increase in the horizontal electric field component in the uplink, and polarization diversity is therefore desired for base station designs.

    • Vaughan measured a polarization diversity scheme in the 400 MHz band using a tilted dipole as a mobile terminal [18], and showed the correlation coefficient between horizontal and vertical components to be almost zero in both the city and the suburbs.

    • Propagation experiments by Turkmani at 1.8 GHz resulted in a diversity gain of 1 to 2 dB for vertically-oriented dipole antennas at the mobile terminal and 3 to 5.2 dB for 45° tilted antennas [19].

    • The measured correlation coefficient quoted by Lotse at 1.8 GHz was less than 0.2 [20], and the diversity gain depended the average received signal level.

    • The polarization diversity gain measurement for the case with a human operator using a handset was 7 dB greater than the space diversity in the line of sight region, and 1 dB greater non line of sight region [21]. 75

  • • The polarization diversity system using vertical and horizontal components has the merit of minimizing the antenna installation space, and has been adopted for Japanese cellular systems. An example of this diversity antenna is shown in Fig. 4.19.

    • Another polarization diversity system uses slant polarization of ±45°. The correlation coefficient is about 0.5 and smaller than the diversity in the above, but the received signal levels for both diversity ports are equal, which gives the same diversity gain as with vertical and horizontal diversity systems. This slant diversity system is widely used in cellular systems.

    Fig. 4.19 Vertical and horizontal diversity base station antenna; (a) horizontal polarization patch antenna, (b) vertical polarization patch antenna, and (c) phase shifter.

    76

  • 4.3 Base Station Antenna Measurements• Base station antenna measurements are classified into low power tests and high power tests.

    • In the low power tests, the antenna radiation pattern and the input impedance characteristics are measured. A similar procedure as that used for handset terminal antenna can also be used to measure the input impedance of the base station antenna, and this is presented in Chapter 2.

    • For base station antenna pattern measurement, it is necessary for perform measurements in an open site or near field measurement is needed when the antenna has a high gain.

    • The beam width and the position of the null point should be verified for the designed coverage area of the cell, then, this section presents the measurement method for high gain antennas that cannot be measured in an anechoic chamber.

    • In any case, the passive inter modulation (PIM) causes serious problems especially when the base station antenna is operated at high power levels.

    • This section describes the definition of PIM and its measurement method. Finally, the section also presents the inspection process of the base station antenna as a product.

    77

  • 4.3.1 Antenna Pattern Measurements in Open Sites

    • The distance R between the transmit and receive antennas should satisfy the condition R ≥2D2/λ, defined by (2.11), to measure the far field radiation, as presented in Chapter 2, where the maximum dimension of the antenna is denoted as D.

    • For a cell radius under 3km, the vertical radiation pattern of the base station antenna can be controlled by electronically adjusting the phase of the array elements. Since the dimension in the vertical direction becomes more than 10λ for the pipe-shaped form, and the measurement distance R requires more than 200λ as a far field condition, in the 900 MHz band, a distance of more than 67 m is necessary, which is difficult to obtain in an indoor facility.

    • Measurement in an open site is therefore necessary, and the transmit antenna must be installed on a steel tower or a building, as shown in the Fig. 4.20, in order to satisfy the above far field condition.

    • For radiation pattern measurement, it is necessary to prevent interference from the radio link that is actually in-use and to suppress reflections from surrounding buildings.

    78

  • • In order to avoid receiving waves reflected from the ground, the antenna aperture size dshould satisfy the following equation, where hr is the height of the receive antenna (the antenna used for the measurements) and R is the distance between the transmit and the receive antennas:

    (4.26)• The antenna aperture size d is defined as the largest dimension of the test antenna.

    • If the aperture size of the transmit antenna is much greater than the wavelength, and the antenna aperture is assumed to have a uniform current distribution, the half power beam width 2θh of the transmitting antenna may be approximated by the equation shown below.

    • This equation was derived so that the edge of the half power beam points to the tower base of the receiving antenna:

    (4.27)

    • When the required distance is not available for the measurements, a diffraction fence may be installed on the central ground between the transmit and the receive antennas to avoid the influence of the waves reflected from the ground.

    • The diffraction fence should be mounted so as to not interrupt the main beam between the transmit and receive antennas, and it should be a saw-shape fence in order to give knife edge diffraction.

    rhRd

    2886.0

    21 λ

    ×≥

    dhλθ 886.02 ≅

    79

  • d

    hr

    Test antenna

    R

    d

    hr

    Test antenna

    R

    ht

    Direct path

    Reflection path

    Fig. 4.21 Far-field measurement using ground reflection

    Fig. 4.20 Far-field measurement using a tall tower

    80

  • • A measurement method which uses the reflection from the ground actively is shown in Fig. 4.21. The antenna under test is installed on the tower, and the height of receive antenna near the ground is adjusted so that the maximum electric field strength is received.

    • In this method, it is assumed that the reflection coefficient at the ground has a value close to –1 when both the transmit and the receive antennas are located just above the ground.

    • Measurement can be made in similar conditions by adjusting the height for an arbitrary frequency. Based on the condition that the phase difference in the image antenna becomes (λ/2), the height hr of the antenna under test may be determined as:

    (4.26)

    • For the slant range measurement, the antenna under test is installed on the top of the high steel tower, as shown in Fig. 4.22, and the measurement antenna on the ground is pointed towards it with a large elevation angle.

    • The reflection waves from the ground are radiated from the direction of the side lobes, and this is an effective method to determine the direct path component in the measurement.

    • However, the waves reflected from the surrounding buildings need to be avoided.

    tr h

    Rh4λ

    =

    81

  • R

    Test antenna

    Fig. 4.22 Far-field measurement using slat range

    82

  • 4.3.2 Near-Field Antenna Pattern Measurement• The problems associated with open site measurements include noise from the surroundings of

    the site, the influence of weather, and the requirement for a license to transmit electromagnetic waves at high power levels. A technique for measuring high gain antennas in a stable condition is the near field measurement described in this section.

    4.3.2.1 Vector Kirchhoff Integral and Wave Spectrum Expansion

    • If a virtual boundary S encloses a radiating test antenna, the equivalent electric and magnetic currents J and M are given by the tangential magnetic and electric fields on the surface S according to the expressions:

    (4.29)• The vector Kirchhoff integral given below gives the antenna far field, using the measured

    tangential magnetic and electric field, as:(4.30)

    • where Zo is the characteristic impedance in free space. The procedure requires calibrated, ideal probes for the measurement of both the tangential electric and magnetic fields over the surface S. However, the computation time required to perform the numerical integral in (4.30) is very large [22].

    tHnJ ×= nEM ×= t

    ( )∫ ⋅−

    ×+×=S

    jko

    jkr

    dSeZr

    jke '4

    )( r'rJrMrrΕπ

    83

  • • A different approach which reduces the computation time is given by wave vector expansion and the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). The electric field radiated by the antenna is expressed as a summation of plane waves expanded in the wave spectrum domain, as:

    (4.31)

    • where r and k denote the observation point vector and the wave vector, respectively, and are expressed by the unit vectors, ex, ey, ez in the x, y, z coordinate system as:

    (4.32)• The wave number kz given below, which does not diverge as z→∞, is:

    (4.33)• where k is the wave number in free space.

    • If the measurement region in the xy plane is denoted by A, and the tangential (x, y) component of the wave vector source and the vector in the region A are kt and rt, as shown in Fig. 4.23, the following equations may be derived:

    (4.34)

    (4.35)• where the subscript T denotes the tangential (x, y) components. Equation (4.35) indicates that

    the function of fT(kx, ky) may be evaluated by measuring the tangential electric field components in region A.

    yxyx dkdkjkkrE ∫ ∫+∞

    ∞−

    ⋅−= )exp(),(21)( rkfπ

    ,zyx eeer zyx ++= zyx eeek zyx kkk ++=

    222 kkkjk yxz −+−=

    ∫ ⋅−=A

    yxyx dkdkjkkyx )exp(),(21),( TTTA rkfE π

    ∫ ⋅=A

    yx dxdxyjyxkk )exp(),(21),( TTAT rkEf π

    84

  • • After evaluating fT(kx, ky), the antenna far field may be calculated using (4-31), assuming the observation vector r to be sufficiently large. After variable transformation, (4-31) can be rewritten as:

    (4.36)

    (4.37)

    (4.38)

    • where the outgoing wave, kz ≥ 0, is only considered in the variable transformation. When kr islarge enough for the antenna far field region, (4.36) may be approximated using the saddle-point method [23], which gives:

    (4.39)

    ∫ ∫−

    =2/

    0

    2

    0

    )exp(),(cossin21)(

    π π

    βαααπ

    ddr

    jkrkk yxfrE

    θφθφθ cos,sinsin,cossin rzryrx ===

    ,,

    αβαβα cos,sinsin,cossin kkkkkk zyx ===

    rjkrkkjk yx

    )exp()sinsin,cossin(cos)( −= φθφθθ Tf frE

    Fig. 4.23 Coordinate system for region A, and wave vector 85

  • 4.3.2.2 Near-Field Measurement• In an example of large aperture size, such as a parabolic reflector antenna, the electromagnetic

    fields are defined differently, by distance in the vicinity, in the near field region and in the far field region, respectively, as shown in Fig. 4-24.

    • Accordingly, the equivalent theory for the electromagnetic field in each region gives the radiation field. For field measurements in the vicinity of the antenna, the mutual coupling between the measurement probe and the antenna under test becomes very high and disturbs the electromagnetic field radiated from the antenna.

    • Therefore, measurements in the vicinity of the antenna are very difficult. Although it is possible to exclude this mutual coupling by probe correction techniques, measurements in this region are not generally performed because of the instability of the measured field.

    • Next to the region in the vicinity of the antenna is the near field. A suitable probe for near field measurement consists of an open-ended rectangular waveguide, which does not have an ideal omni-directional pattern.

    • The non-ideal performance can be rectified easily by probe correction [22], and the far field can then be evaluated from the electromagnetic field in the near field region.

    86

  • • Although near field measurements require a space enclosing the antenna, a closed edge plane is not always necessary when the measured field strength is small enough to neglect.

    • The probe’s scanning surface for near field measurements can be planar, cylindrical, or spherical, as shown in Fig. 4.25.

    • Planar surface scanning covers only half the space during the measurements, and is appropriate for high gain antenna measurements such as parabolic antennas.

    • Cellular base station antennas and marine radar antennas have fan shaped patterns with a narrow beam in one plane and a wide beam in the other, and cylindrical scanning is appropriate for near field measurements on these antennas.

    • Spherical scanning has the advantage that low gain antennas can be measured by scanning enclosed surfaces.

    • The scanning area (A×B) and the sampling interval (∆x, ∆y) are discussed in the planar scanning method and are shown in Fig. 4.26. The size of the scanning area is determined by the requirement to obtain more than 35 dB dynamic range in the scanning area, without the need to interpolate the measured data.

    • In this case, the dynamic range is defined by the difference between the maximum electric field strength and the edge field strength. The maximum data point spacing should be such that ∆x = λo/2 and ∆y = λo/2 for planar scanning, using the sampling theorem [22]. 87

  • R

    Antenna

    Vicinityregion

    0 3λ

    Near fieldregion

    2a /λ2

    Far fieldregion

    Fig. 4.24 Electromagnetic fields in vicinity, near-field and far-field regions

    3λ 2a2/λ

    Fig. 4.25 Probe scanning surface for near field measurement Fig. 4.26 Scanning area size and sampling interval for planar scanning 88

  • 4.3.2.3 Far Field Evaluation in Near Field Measurements

    • If the x and y components of the measured electric field are Ex(x,y) and Ey(x,y), respectively, the far field radiation patterns are given by eqs. (4.34) and (4.35) and the coordinate transformation from (x, y, z) to (r, θ, φ) as:

    (4.40)

    (4.41)

    ,i=x,y (4.42)

    • The total number of observed discretized electric fields are 2M and 2N in the x and ydirections, respectively, and Si may then be expressed as:

    xm=m∆x, yn=n∆y (4.43)

    • In the above calculations, the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) can be used to decrease thecomputation time. An outline of FFT is given in the Appendix.

    )sincoscoscos()exp(cos φθφθθθ yx SSrjkrjkE +−=

    )cossin()exp(cos φφθφ yx SSrjkrjkE −−−=

    ( ){ }∫ ∫− −

    +=2/

    2/

    2/

    2/

    sinsincossinexp),(21 B

    B

    A

    AoooooooAii dydxyxjkyxES φθφθπ

    ( ){ }∑∑− −

    ∆∆+=M

    M

    N

    NnommAii yxyxjkyxES φθφθπ

    sinsincossinexp),(21

    89

  • 4.3.3 High-Power and Passive Inter Modulation Tests

    4.3.3.1 Definition of Passive Inter Modulation

    • Passive inter modulation (PIM) is a technique in which a given frequency product is generated by combining several different frequencies which are inputs to a circuit with non-linear input-output characteristics.

    • This non-linear phenomenon is observed at the junction between a connector and a transmission line, where there is a contact between different metals.

    • The base station antenna is used for both transmission and reception and its transmit power level is several watts per channel.

    • The uplink received electric field strength is between 10 and 60 dBµV, which represents a difference from the transmit power of around 100 dB.

    • The received field strength is equivalent to –103 to –53 dBm in the 50 Ω transmission line system. This power imbalance becomes more than 140 dB with multi-channel input to base station antennas, and causes the PIM in the passive device.

    90

  • Passive Inter Modulation (PIM)

    power imbalance > 140 dB

    Non-linear circuitf1 f1

    f2 f2f3

    at the junction between a connector and a transmission line (different metals)

    10 and 60 dBµV(–103 to –53 dBm )

    several watts per channel

    BS

    Junction at connector

    Small gap

    91

  • PIM at Base Station

    BS

    ft1fr1

    Duplex system

    Diversity reception

    f

    ft1

    uplink

    ft2fr1

    downlink

    PIMfr1’Real uplink signal

    92

  • • Most current cellular systems are duplex, with the transmit and receive frequency bands allocated at a certain interval.

    • A further receive antenna is necessary for the base station, in addition to the antennas for transmission and reception, because of the uplink diversity system. A duplex cellular system uses the frequency bands for transmission and reception simultaneously.

    • When the PIM occurs at the antenna for both transmission and reception, it appears on the receive frequency band and the receive channel cannot then be used, due to the interference at the base station.

    • Although the antenna is a passive device, very weak electric discharge phenomena occur at the junctions of the antenna parts during high power operation. Such discharges often appear at the surface of the junctions that are made of different metals.

    • This phenomenon causes the antenna to have a non-linear input-output response that may be regarded as a two-port circuit with transmitter input and free space output.

    • The output signal Y is given as the weighted summation of the input signals X by the expression:

    (4.44)∑∞

    =

    =++++=0

    33

    2210

    k

    kk XaXaXaXaaY

    93

  • • If the two input signals have different angular frequencies, ω1=2πf1 and ω2=2πf2:(4.45)

    • where A1 and A2 are the respective amplitudes of the two signals and the phase angle f of X2 is normalized with respect to that of X1.

    • Substituting (4.45) into (4.44), the components of the non-linear output signals may be obtained. The angular frequency components appearing at the output port may be expressed as follow, for terms up to Xi3, for example:

    1. ω1 and ω2 from the term for X1

    2. 2ω1, 2ω2, and from the term for X2

    3. ω1, ω2, 3ω1, 3ω2 and from the term for X3

    • Taking the M-signal input for X, each power series from the output of the circuit with the input-output response of (4.44) may be expressed as (4.46) by denoting each input signal as

    . Then:(4.46)

    • where ni is an integer given by the expression , in which the sum of all the combinations of ni is included. Then, the angular frequency ωk of the PIM signal corresponding to this non-linear response is given as:

    (4.47)

    )cos(,cos 222111 φωω +== tAXtAX

    tAX iii ωcos=

    ∑∑ =

    =

    = Mn

    nMM

    nnkM

    m

    k XXXnMn

    kXX

    ,1

    22

    11

    1 !!1!

    Mnnnk +++= 21

    kkk nnn ωωωω ±±= 221194

  • • The parameter k is the order of PIM. The PIM signals for odd orders higher than the 3rd causeserious problems in current cellular systems. The interference condition for the PIM may berewritten by denoting p as a natural number as:

    (4.48)• The order of PIM is 2p±1, and these frequencies cause the most serious problems to down

    link frequency. Might be worthwhile to mention that the odd order PIM frequency is close to the input frequencies

    • Fig. 4.27 shows the allocation of uplink and downlink frequency bands for cellular systems with upper and lower limit edge frequencies of f1 and f2, respectively.

    • The frequency interval should be allocated so that it is not affected by the third and fifth order PIM, as shown in Fig. 4.27. However, the PIM should take into account of ideal frequency allocations.

    • PIM signals are expressed as an absolute value in dBm and a relative value in dBc, normalized by the input signal. For example, for a PIM level of –100 dBm the relative PIM value is -143 dBc, normalized by two input signals of 43 dBm.

    ( ) ( )211122 , ωωωωωωωω −+=−+= pp PIMPIM

    95

  • Fig. 4.28 Block diagram of setup for antenna PIM measurement

    SG1 AMP

    SG2 AMP

    Diplxer

    DUT

    BPF

    DL

    SA

    SG = signal generator, AMP = amplifier, DUT = device under test, DL = dummy load ,BPF = band-path filter, SA = spectrum analyzer

    ft1

    ft2

    ft1 ft2

    fr1’

    DL for connector & cable

    Open air for antenna

    96/44

  • f

    Up linkDown link

    3rd PIM

    f1 f22f1 -f2 2f2 -f1 3f2 -2f1 4f2 -3f13f1 -2f24f1 -3f2

    5rd PIM

    7rd PIM

    Fig. 4.27 Frequency allocation for higher order

    The PIM signals for odd orders higher than the 3rd cause serious problems in current cellular systems. The interference condition for the PIM may be rewritten by denoting p as a natural number as:

    ( )122 ωωωω −+= pPIM ( ) 121 ωωωω +−= pPIMThe order of PIM is 12 ±p

    PIM in dBmrelative value in dBc,

    PIM level of –100 dBmrelative PIM value is -143 dBc, (two input signals of 43 dBm)

    97/44

  • 4.3.3.2 PIM Measurement Setup• Fig. 4.28 shows the block diagram of the PIM measurement setup. The measurement system

    consists of three units connected to the three ports of the duplexer, which operates as a transmission port, reception port and common port for both transmission and reception.

    • After amplification to the required power level, the two continuous signals P1 and P2, at different frequencies, are input to the transmit port of the duplexer through the power combiner. The device under test (DUT) is connected to the common port for both transmission and reception.

    • When the DUT is used as a connector and a transmission cable, the power is dissipated in a dummy load. When the DUT is an antenna, the antenna under test is set up inside an anechoic chamber.

    • With this measurement setup, the PIM signal detected at the reception port is measured by a spectrum analyzer. If the PIM signal level is less than the noise level of the spectrum analyzer, a low noise amplifier (LNA) is inserted to adjust the receiving level.

    • By inserting a band-pass filter prior to the LNA, the direct coupling from transmitting port to receiving port is eliminated. The band-pass filter suppresses the undesired PIM occurring in the LNA and the spectrum analyzer.

    98

  • • When the DUT is a connector and a transmission cable, a terminating load is used, as shown in Fig. 4.29. When a resistor is used as a dummy load this also tends to have PIM within it.

    • Therefore, a long coaxial cable, similar to a semi-rigid cable, is often used instead of a resistor. The coaxial cable of length between 50 and 100 m is usually long enough to be used as a dummy load.

    • This long cable then dissipates most of the power. After confirming that there is no PIM excitation at the interconnection between the duplexer and DUT, the PIM may be measured using the above setup.

    • During PIM measurements on antennas, metallic objects should not be located near the antenna under test in order to avoid the occurrence of PIM by induced current excitation.

    • The PIM for antennas should preferably be measured inside an anechoic chamber, although measurements can also be made in open sites. In open site measurements, the main beam of the antenna is directed towards the sky.

    • PIM phenomena may occur at several points, but the PIM signals may be difficult to observe, due to phase cancellation by each other. To avoid this phase cancellation, the PIM should be measured at several different frequencies.

    99

  • SG1 AMP

    SG2 AMP

    Diplxer

    DUT

    BPF

    SA

    Fig. 4.29 Block diagram of setup for connector and cable PIM measurement: SG, signal generator; AMP, amplifier; DUT, device under test; BPF, band-path filter; SA, spectrum analyzer; DL, dummy load.

    100

  • 4.3.3.3 PIM Tests for Products• PIM measurement procedures for commercial base station antennas are described in the

    following.

    • Using the measurement setup described in section 4.3.3.2, a plastic hammer is used to knock each part of the antenna under test.

    • Three kinds of measured PIM phenomena may be observed, these being high level PIM occurring continuously, high level PIM which occurs only during knocking, variable level PIM which occurs as a step function due to knocking.

    • It should be noted that the measured PIM disappears after knocking. Using this knocking test, the problem parts where the PIM occurs can be found. It should be noted with caution, however, that the PIM phenomena sometimes reappear after a period of time.

    101

    プレゼンタープレゼンテーションのノート木槌 wooden hammer, wooden mallet

  • 4.4 Product Inspection• This section presents production inspection tests which should be undertaken before base

    station antennas are shipped. Similar tests are presented in sec. 2-6 for mobile handset terminals.

    • It is necessary for the products to satisfy the specifications. In addition to the electrical performance, the input characteristics and the radiation pattern, mechanical and reliability tests (for example, vibration and moisture-proof tests) are also required, since the products are going to be used a real environment.

    • The antennas discussed in this section are for outdoor base stations as well as for small indoor base stations. Outdoor antennas are usually used for cellular coverage, and indoor antennas for in-building mobile communication systems or for micro cellular systems.

    • The tests presented here are not carried out on all base station antennas and in most cases, the operator and the manufacturer decide the product inspection procedures to be adopted, depending on the environment in which the antennas are intended to be used.

    • This section presents example specification data, but their samples are mainly based on Japanese standards. The environment in Japan is very harsh for base station antennas, because there are earthquakes, typhoons, and heavy snow falls in metropolitan areas. Inspection tests should therefore be chosen appropriately to match the environment in each country.

    102

  • 4.4.1 Radiation pattern4.4.1.1 Directivity Gain• The absolute gain (dBi) or the relative gain (dBd) of an antenna in the direction of maximum

    radiation is measured as the antenna gain. The measurement procedure for antenna gain is described in Section 2.2.3.1.

    4.4.1.2 Radiation Pattern• The specifications for the radiation pattern for base station antennas, defined on the horizontal

    and vertical planes or on the E plane and H plane, are: cross polarization ratio (XPR), as defined in sec. 1.2.5, and half power beam width.

    • The XPR is required to be more than 20 or 25 dB on the specified radiation plane. The beam width is defined by the deviation due to the frequency dependence and varying quality of the product. For example, the edge level of half power beam width for 60° is 3±1 dB, or 3±0.5 dB at φ=±30°. The difference from the definition written in textbooks is due to the inclusion of the above deviation [24].

    • In addition, the polarization in the measurement is based on the slant polarization diversity antenna being measured by means of a ±45° tilted antenna to coincide with the polarization for both transmission and reception. For a space diversity antenna system using only the vertical polarization, the antenna pattern characteristics are tested only for vertical polarization. 103

  • 4.4.1.3 Beam Tilt Angle• To adjust the coverage area of the base station, the antenna main beam is tilted an angle θt

    below the horizon. This angle is then defined as the tilt angle.

    4.4.1.4 Front-to-Back Ratio• In sector zone cellular systems, the front to back (FB) ratio is defined as the ratio between the

    forward main beam level and the backward level. The definition of FB ratio is the forward radiation level at φ=0° divided by the backward level at φ=180°.

    • Another definition is obtained by taking the backward radiation as the maximum radiation level in the region of 120° ≤ φ ≤ 240° or 90° ≤ φ≤ 270°, where φ=0° corresponds to the forward direction.

    • In the ±45° tilted polarization antenna, the backward polarization is orthogonal to the front one. It should be carefully checked in the FB ratio measurement.

    104

  • 4.4.2 Antenna Input-Port Characteristics4.4.2.1 Voltage Standing Wave Ratio• The voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR), defined in section 2.1.1, at the input port of base

    station antennas is required to be less than 2.0 in the specified frequency band.

    4.4.2.2 Power-Resistance Capacity• For the power-resistance test, the input characteristics of the antenna should not vary for a

    specified input power. An example of input power might be 30 W per input port.

    • The power-resistance test is carried out at the center frequency of the specified frequency band. The procedures used in the power test should not cause any heating problems and the VSWR at the input port should not vary at high power input.

    4.4.2.3 Insulation Resistance• Typically, an insulation resistance of more than 100 MΩ is required at the antenna input port,

    with the resistance measured by connecting the probes of an insulation resistance tester between the center conductor and the outer conductor at the input connector [25]. The maximum voltage of the tester in this example is 500 V.

    105

  • 4.4.2.4 High Voltage-Resistance Performance• After applying 1000 V AC for 60 seconds between the center conductor and the outer

    conductor at the antenna input port, it should be verified that the antenna characteristics, such as VSWR, have not changed. The test procedure is the same as for the power-resistance test.

    • The tests for both the insulation resistance and power resistance are not applied to the antenna with a direct short-circuit, as it would be the case for a log-periodic antenna.

    4.4.2.5 Conductivity Performance• As a conductivity performance test, the AC resistance between the inner and outer conductors

    at the antenna input port should be less than 100 mΩ.

    4.4.2.6 Other Performance Tests• In the case of multi-port base station antennas, such as polarization diversity antennas and

    multi-band antennas, the mutual coupling between the antenna ports is defined as the isolation characteristics, as described in section 2.1.2.

    • The isolation should be more than 30 dB, or 25 dB in the range of specified frequency band at the two input/output ports of a polarization diversity antenna.

    106

  • 4.4.3 Feed Circuit• Recent base station antennas adjust their coverage areas by changing their tilt angle in the

    vertical plane, and both mechanical and electrical methods can be used for beam tilting.

    • In the electrical method, the base station antenna consists of several sub-array units, and the phase of each is electronically changed for beam tilting. Therefore, the antenna system has two components, the antenna itself and a feed circuit for phase adjustment.

    • Three types of phase adjusting system may be used for the feed circuit: remote control, manual control and fixed advance. Digital remote control is mostly based on specifications by Antenna Interface Specification Group (AISG) [26].

    • The performances of all the above control schemes are similar and one or other will be selected, depending on the cost of the base station(s). The phase control unit is located separately from the antenna unit, as shown in Fig. 4.30.

    • This feed circuit is tested independently of the antenna unit. The measurements made are the same as for antenna measurements, and include VSWR, power-resistance capability, insulation resistance, high voltage-resistance performance, conductivity performance and mutual coupling between input ports.

    • These tests are not conducted on antennas operated at a fixed beam tilt angle, and those in which phase differences are provided to each antenna element. 107

  • Phasecontrol unit

    Sub array unit

    Radome

    Feeding cable

    Antena unit

    Fig. 4.30 Phase control unit and base station

    108

  • 4.4.4 Appearance and Weight • The dimensions and total weight of each antenna part should be within specification. The

    nameplate, logo and painting color should also be confirmed.

    4.4.4.1 Antenna Construction• The antenna construction, as shown in the specifications, must be verified.

    4.4.4-2 Assembly Instructions• The assembly instructions are required to be sufficiently comprehensive that mistakes will not

    be made during installation.

    4.4.4.3 Range of Mechanical Adjustment• If the beam tilt adjustment is performed mechanically, the range of adjustment available must

    be verified. In addition, the adjustment range of the movable polarization plane should also be checked, if applicable.

    109

  • 4.4.4.4 Wind pressure resistance• Depending on the wind pressure on the antenna, it should be confirmed that the radome and

    the other antenna parts have sufficient mechanical strength to withstand a wind velocity v up to 60m/s. This check is usually carried out by numerical calculation.

    • If the wind pressure is q (kgf/m2) and the wind pressure coefficient is C, the wind pressure loading P (kgf/m2) is:

    (4.49)• where

    (4.50)• and h is the antenna height. The wind pressure coefficient C for antenna pillars with square

    and circular cross sections has values of 2 and 0.8, respectively.

    • Therefore, a circular column is preferable from the viewpoint of wind pressure. In a typical example, the wind pressure loading may be larger than 350 kgf/m2.

    • In addition, the allowed rolling vibration range is within ±2 degrees for a wind velocity of 60 m/s. Furthermore, no noise should be generated by the wind.

    4.3.4.5 Other Tests• If a phase control unit is added to the antenna system, its tolerance should also be checked.

    CqP =

    )16(60),16(120 44 mhhqmhhq ≤=>=

    110

  • 4.4.5 Reliability Examination• The reliability of antennas is examined according to the standard regulations of the

    International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and typical tests involved are described in this section.

    4.4.5.1 Thermal Test (Heat Cycle Test)• The antenna characteristics are examined in a heat cycle test under conditions in which the

    humidity is more than 90 % and the temperature range is from -30° C to +60° C.

    • The actual heat cycle is as follows: After the temperature has been raised from a room temperature of +20° C, the antenna is held at the highest temperature of +60° C for several hours.

    • The temperature is then dropped to the lowest level of -30° C and is held at this level for several more hours. It is then raised again to the highest temperature.

    • This procedure represents one cycle of the thermal test. During a complete test program, the input VSWR is checked after tens of test cycles.

    111

  • • For small indoor base station antennas that can be tested inside a compact box, the variations of temperature with time during a heat cycle test are as described below [27].

    • The temperature is raised from the room level of +20° C to +50° C in one and a half hours, and this high temperature level is held for three hours.

    • The temperature is then dropped from +50° C to -20° C in three hours, and the temperature held at -20° C for three hours. Finally, the temperature is raised again to +20° C in one and a half hours. This variation corresponds to one heat cycle.

    • When automatic temperature control is not available, the following is used as one heat cycle: The temperature is held at +50° C for four hours after raising it from room level, then a temperature of -20° C is maintained for four hours.

    • Finally, the antenna under test is left at room temperature for a further two hours. The antenna characteristics, such as the input VSWR, are evaluated several times during the heat cycle.

    112

  • 4.4.5.2 Heat(Cold) Resistance Performance• Vehicular mounted antennas are tested for a few hours in a heat-resistance test at 90° C and a

    cold–resistance test at -40° C. As a heat shock test, the heat/cold-resistance test covers a period of three hours and is repeated several times. However, this test is not often performed.

    4.4.5.3 Waterproofing and Moisture-Proof Performance• The waterproofing test is carried out on the product before shipping. The moisture-proof test

    is applicable to both the parts and the materials of the antennas.

    • An example of a waterproofing test is as follows: In the same installation as intended for real use, water is sprinkled all over the antenna using a nozzle mounted above the antenna under test at a height of from 300 to 500 mm.

    • As an example of the sprinkling rate, the quantity of water may be 10 ± 0.5l per minute, with a pressure of between 50 and 150 kPa for more than one hour. On completion of this waterproofing test, it is confirmed that the insulation resistance at the antenna input port has not changed.

    • A sealed type antenna used for small base stations may be immersed into a water tank at a depth of more than 400 mm for 24 hours, and the penetration of water is then confirmed by breaking up the antenna.

    113

  • • The moisture-proof performance of small base station antennas can be tested using a box at constant temperature and humidity.

    • As an example of a typical test cycle, the antenna is left inside the box at a temperature of 40° C and a humidity of 80% for 96 hours, it is then placed in an area at room temperature and humidity for an hour. After this cycle, the antenna input VSWR characteristics should not have changed.

    • It should be noted that these waterproof and moisture-proof tests are applied only to a sample of the products [28]. The tests carried out before shipping include VSWR measurement and appearance checking.

    4.4.5.4 Vibration Test• For antennas used in areas subject to vibration, such as on highways, a vibration test is

    required.

    • Before the vibration test, the mechanical resonance frequency is measured by vibrating the antenna at variable frequency in both the vertical and horizontal directions, with an accelerometer attached to each part of the antenna.

    • An example measurement setup is shown in Fig. 4-31.

    114

  • • The antenna is then vibrated at the measured resonant frequency in the x, y, and z directions. In a typical test example, a force of 5G is applied for an hour in the z direction and for half an hour in the x and y directions. After the vibration test, it must be confirmed that the VSWR has not changed.

    (a) Probe attachment for vibration test (b) Vibration test setup

    Fig 4-31 Vibration test

    115

  • References1. “Propagation data and prediction methods for the terrestrial land mobile service using frequency range 30 MHz to 3 GHz,” CCIR SG-5, Report

    567-3 (MOD F).2. Kozono S. and Watanabe K., “Influence of environmental buildings on UHF band mobile radio propagation,” IEEE Trans. Commun., COM-25,

    no. 10, pp. 1133-1143, Oct. 1977.3. Hata M., “Empirical formula for propagation loss in land mobile radio service,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., VT-29, no. 3, pp.317-325, 1980.4. Ikegami, F., et. al., “Propagation factors controlling mean field strength on urban streets,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagt., vol. 22, no. 8, pp.

    822-829, Aug., 1984.5. Walfisch, J., et. al., “A theoretical model of UHF propagation in urban environment,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagt., vol. 36, pp. 1788-1796,

    Dec. 1988.6. European Cooperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research EURO-COST 231, “Urban transmission loss models for mobile radio in

    the 900 and 1800MHz band,” Revision 2, The Hague, Netherlands, 1991.7. ITU-R, Recommendation P. 1411-4, “Propagation data and prediction methods for the planning of short-range outdoor radio communication

    systems and radio local area networks in the frequency range 300MHz to 100GHz,” 2007.8. Green E. and Hata, M. “Micro cellular propagation measurements in an urban environment,” 1991 IEEE International Sym. On Indoor and

    Mobile Radio Communications, King’s College London, pp. 23-25, Sept. 1991.9. Blackar, K. L. et. al., “Path loss and delay spread models as functions of antenna height for micro cellualr system design,” Proc. 1992 IEEE Veh.

    Technol., Conf., Denver, CO, pp. 333-337, May 1992.10. Oda, Y., Tanaka T., and Sato K. "Microwave Band LOS Path Loss Characteristics in Microcellular Mobile Communications," International

    Symposium on Antennas and Propagation, ISAP'96, Chiba, Japan, pp. 1097-1100, Sep. 199611. Oda Y. and Tsunekawa K., "Advanced LOS Path Loss Model in Microwave Mobile Communications," ICAP'97, pp.2.170-2.173, April 199712. Fujimori K. and Arai H. "Indoor Propagation Characteristic Including Radiation Pattern and Polarization of Base Station" Conf. Dig., 1997

    IEEE AP-S, Int, Symp, Montreal, Canada, pp.2006-2009, Jul., 1997.13. Taylor T. T., Design of line-source antennas for narrow beamwidth and low sidelobe,” IRE Trans. AP. Vol. AP-3, pp. 16-28, Jan 1955.14. Ebine Y. "Dual frequency base station antennas for PDC systems in Japan." IEEE AP-S, Int, Symp, And USNC/URSI National Radio Science

    Meeting, Orland, Florida, pp.564-567, July, 1999.15. Fujii T. et. al., “Handling capacity expansion of land mobile communication system,” NTT Review, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 55-61, Mar. 1990.16. Yamada Y., Ebine Y. and Tsunekawa K. , ”Base and mobile station antennas in land mobile radio systems,” IEICE Japan, Trans., Vol, E74, no.

    10, pp. 3202-3209, June 1991.17. Taga T. and Tsunekawa K., "A built-in antenna for 800 MHz band portable radio units," in Proc. of ISAP’85, Kyoto, 121-1, pp.425-428, 1985.18. Vaughan R., "Polarization diversity in mobile communications", IEEE Trans. VT, Vol. 39, No.3, pp.177-186, Aug. 199019. Turkmani A.M.D., et. al. "An experimental evolution of the performance of two branch space and polarization diversity schemes at 1800 MHz",

    IEEE Trans. VT. Vol.44, No 2. pp.318-326, May 199520. Lotse F., Berg J-E., Forssen U., and Idahl P., "Base station polarization diversity reception in macrocellular system at 1800 MHz", IEEE VTS

    46th Vehicular Technology Conference Proceeding, Vol.3, pp. 1643-1646, April 28-May 1, 1996.21. Arai H. and Nakano M., "Up-link polarization diversity and antenna gain measurement of hand held terminal at 900 MHz", MDMC’94, Niigata,

    Japan, Nov. 21-22, 1994. 116

  • References (continued)22. Yaghjian, A.D., “An overview of near-field antenna measurement,” IEEE Trans. AP, vol. AP-34, no. 1, pp.30-45, 1986.23. Kong, J, “Electromagnetic wave theory,” Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 307-312, 1990.24. Kuga, N., Tokyo Institute of Polytechnics, May 2000, personal communication .25. Nakano, M., KDDI R&D LAB, June 2012, personal communication .26. http://www.aisg.org.uk/27. Sugisawa, H., NHK Spring Co., Ltd., April 2000, personal communication .28. Matsuoka, T., Nihon Dengyo Kousaku Co., Ltd., April 2000, personal communication .

    117

    http://www.aisg.org.uk/

    4. Base Station Antenna Siting and Measurement4.1 Base Station Antenna Siting4.1.1 Design of Macro Cell Siting Using the Okumura-Hata CurveFig. 4.1 Okumura’s curve for city area in 900 MHz bandスライド番号 5Fig. 4.2 Definition of antenna effective heightFig. 4.3 Propagation loss estimated �by Okumura-Hata methodスライド番号 8スライド番号 9Antenna System Design: Examples4.1.2 Break Point of a Micro cellスライド番号 12スライド番号 13Fig. 4.5 Propagation loss and break pointスライド番号 154.1.3 Propagation Loss Outside the line of Sightスライド番号 174.1.4 Propagation Loss Estimation �by the Ray Tracing Methodスライド番号 19Bi-Directional Notch AntennaTunnel Booster AntennaTwo modes of Bi-directional NotchCurrent Distribution of Two modesA Pair of Dipole Antenna for Bi-Directional Radiation PatternRadiation Pattern of Two ModesEffect of Mounting Ground PlaneCoverage Area of Tilted Beam AntennaDefinition of Coverage AreaNotch Antenna with Parasitic ElementsNumber of Parasitic ElementUndersea Tunnel Cellular Phone ServiceTokyo-Wan Aqua LineHigh Gain Tunnel Booster AntennaHigh Gain Antenna for W-CDMALow Cost Tunnel Booster SystemPropagation Measurement in TunnelPropagation Loss Inside Tunnel2-D Simulation ModelConvergence CharacteristicsImage MethodDefinition of Reflection Transverse Electric (TE) IncidenceTransverse Magnetic (TM) Incidence3-D Simulation Results Time Delay Profile4.2 Design of Cellular Base Station Antennasスライド番号 47スライド番号 48Fig. 4.12 Antenna elements for base station antenna4.2.2 Beam Tilting and Propagation Characteristicsスライド番号 51スライド番号 52Beam Tilting Effect of Base Station Antenna スライド番号 54Co-Phase Excitation for Tilt Beam Feeding Network and Phase ShifterPhase Shifter ArrangementVariable Phase Shifter by Sandwich Dielectric PlatesVariable phase shifter by sandwich dielectric platesTheory of Phase ShifterPhoto of Variable Phase Shifterスライド番号 62Antenna Pattern SynthesisBinomial Radiation Pattern Binomial Radiation Pattern4.2.3 Sector AntennasPhoto of Base Station AntennaHorizontal Radiation PatternDual Band Base Station AntennaTriple Band Antenna ElementHorizontal Radiation Pattern of Triple Band AntennaAntenna Arrangement4.2.4 Diversity Antennasスライド番号 74スライド番号 75スライド番号 764.3 Base Station Antenna Measurements4.3.1 Antenna Pattern Measurements in Open Sitesスライド番号 79スライド番号 80スライド番号 81スライド番号 824.3.2 Near-Field Antenna Pattern Measurementスライド番号 84スライド番号 854.3.2.2 Near-Field Measurementスライド番号 87スライド番号 884.3.2.3 Far Field Evaluation in Near Field Measurements4.3.3 High-Power and Passive Inter Modulation TestsPassive Inter Modulation (PIM)PIM at Base Stationスライド番号 93スライド番号 94スライド番号 95Fig. 4.28 Block diagram of setup for antenna PIM measurementFig. 4.27 Frequency allocation for higher order4.3.3.2 PIM Measurement Setupスライド番号 99スライド番号 1004.3.3.3 PIM Tests for Products4.4 Product Inspection4.4.1 Radiation patternスライド番号 1044.4.2 Antenna Input-Port Characteristicsスライド番号 1064.4.3 Feed Circuitスライド番号 1084.4.4Appearance and Weight スライド番号 1104.4.5 Reliability Examinationスライド番号 112スライド番号 113スライド番号 114スライド番号 115スライド番号 116スライド番号 117