4 18 13 0204 63041 Coughlin v Reno Justice Court Clifton Pearson Notice of Appeal 13-11526 Dig

7/29/2019 4 18 13 0204 63041 Coughlin v Reno Justice Court Clifton Pearson Notice of Appeal 13-11526 Dig

1/39

Electronically Filed

Apr 18 2013 03:23 p.mTracie K. LindemanClerk of Supreme Cour

Docket 63041 Document 2013-11526


2/39


3/39


4/39


5/39


6/39


7/39


8/39


9/39


10/39


11/39


12/39


13/39


14/39


15/39


16/39


17/39


18/39


19/39


20/39


21/39


22/39


23/39


24/39


25/39


26/39


27/39


28/39


29/39


30/39


31/39

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

19

20

21

22

23

24

26

27

28

181. This appeal is from an order entered by the Honorable Elliott A Sattler.

25 4. Respondent is the State of Nevada. Respondent is represented by the Washoe

County District Attorneys Office:

Code 1310

IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE

ZACH COUGHLIN,

Petitioner,vs.

RENO JUSTICE COURT, CHIEF JUSTICE SCOTTPEARSON, JUDGE DAVID WAYNECLIFTON/WASHOE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'SOFFICE,

Respondents._____________________________________________/

Case No. CR13-0552Dept. No. 10

CASE APPEAL STATEMENT

This case appeal statement is filed pursuant to NRAP 3(2).

2. Appellant is Zach Coughlin. Appellant is representing himself in Proper Person on

appeal:

3. Appellants address is:

Zach Couglin1471 E 9thSt.Reno, Nevada 89512

Terrance McCarthy, Esq.P.O. Box 30083Reno, Nevada 89520

F I L E DElectronically

04-16-2013:10:51:39 AMJoey Orduna Hastings

Clerk of the Court

Transaction # 3662970


32/39

1

2

3

4

5

6 1

7

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

8 1

91

10

5. Respondents attorney is licensed to practice law in Nevada.

6. Appellant was not represented by appointed counsel in District Court.

7. Appellant is not represented by appointed counsel on appeal.

8. Appellant was not granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the District Court.

9. Proceeding commenced by the filing of a Writ of Mandamus on April 2, 2013.

0. This is a criminal proceeding and the Appellant is appealing Order filed on April 3,

2013.

1. The case has not been the subject of a previous appeal to the Supreme Court:

2. This case does not involve child custody or visitation.

13. This is not a civil case involving the possibility of a settlement.

Dated this 16th day of April, 2013.

JOEY ORDUNA HASTINGSCLERK OF THE COURT

By: /s/ Annie SmithAnnie SmithDeputy Clerk


33/39

SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

COUNTY OF WASHOE

HON. ELLIOTT A. SATTLER

DEPT.

Case History - CR13-0552

D10

se ID: Case Type:CR13-0552 WRIT OF MANDAMUS - CRIMINAL 4/2/2013Initial Filing Date:

eport Date & Time

16/2013

19:03PM

Case Description: ZACH COUGHLIN VS. RENO JUSTICE COURT (D9)

Parties

RESP SCOTT (HONORABLE) PEARSON - @1239180

RESP DAVID (HONORABLE) CLIFTON - @1239183

ATTY Terrence P. McCarthy, Esq. - 2745

PETR ZACHARY COUGHLIN - @1206272

RESP RENO JUSTICE COURT - @160523

RESP WASHOE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - @690646

Charges

Charge No. Charge Code Charge Date Charge Description

Plea Information

Charge No. Plea Code Plea Date Plea Description

Release InformationCustody Status

Hearin s

Event Extra Text:

1

Disposition:

Sched. Date & Time Disposed DateEvent DescriptionDepartment

Agency Cross Reference

Code Agency Description Case Reference I.D.

Actions

Code Code Description Text Action Entry Date

4/2/2013 4330 Writ of Mandamus EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND IPF MOTION

AND DECLARATION OF POVERTY

4/3/2013 3250 Ord Striking ... EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMAUS AND IPF MOTION

AND DECLARATION OF POVERTY IS STRICKEN AND COURT WILL TAKE

NO FURTHER ACTION - Transaction 3635404 - Approved By: NOREVIEW :

04-03-2013:11:58:00

4/3/2013 NEF Proof of Electronic Service Transaction 3635407 - Approved By: NOREVIEW : 04-03-2013:11:59:13

4/12/2013 2515 Notice of Appeal Supreme Court APPELANT, ZACH COUGHLIN, PRO-PER

Report Does Not Contain Sealed Cases or Confidential Information

Page 1 of 2


34/39

se ID: Case Type:CR13-0552 WRIT OF MANDAMUS - CRIMINAL 4/2/2013Initial Filing Date:

eport Date & Time

16/2013

19:03PM

Case Description: ZACH COUGHLIN VS. RENO JUSTICE COURT (D9)

4/16/2013 1350 Certificate of Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CLERK AND TRANSMITTAL - NOTICE OF APPEAL -

Transaction 3662766 - Approved By: NOREVIEW : 04-16-2013:10:26:00


4/16/2013 1310E Case Appeal Statement Transaction 3662970 - Approved By: NOREVIEW : 04-16-2013:10:53:47


Report Does Not Contain Sealed Cases or Confidential Information

Page 2 of 2


35/39



Clerk of the Court


3

4

5

6 IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURTOF THE STATEOF NEVADA

7 IN AND FOR THE CONTY OF WASHOE

8

9

0 ZACH COUGHLIN,

11 Petitioner,

12

13

14

15

16

7

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

vs

ENO JUSTICE COURT CHIEF JUSTICESCOTT PEARSON JUDGE DAVID WAYECLIFTON/W ASHE CONTYDISTICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE,

Respondents

__ __ __ORDER

Case No. CR13-0552

Dept No. 10

The Court is in receipt of EmerKency Pettion for Wrt of Mandaus (si) and IPFMOTION and Declaraton of Pov" (hereinaer the document)(emphasis d varying font in theoriginal) le stamped April 2, 2013 The document n question fails to state a ational caim upon

which the Court can rle Further, the document does not direct the Court to the factual and/o egal

gounds upon which the document should be considered ndeed, the Cour is uncle what s beng

sought by way of the ling of the document

The document fais to follow numerous applicable istrict Court Rues (heenae

"DCR.) d local rles (hereinae, "WDCR) See generally, DCR 12, DCR 13 WDCR 10

-1-


36/39

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

7

18

19

20

2

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

and DCR2 But se WDCR 18 (the Cort does not elieve that WDCR 18 athorizes the

compete aandoent of all of the other rles in crmina matters) DCR 5 states in fl:

These rles shall e lerally constred to secre the proper and ecient adminstration ofthe siness and affairs of the cort and to promote and faciitate the administration of jsticey the cort

These rles cover the practice and procedre in all actions in the district corts of all districtswhere no ocal re covering the same sject has een approved y the spreme cort ocarles wich are approved for a particlar jdcia dstrict shall e applied in each instancewhether they are the same as or inconsistent wth these rles

It s the Corts concsion that the docment is n vioation of DCR5.

The Cort also nds that the petitioner has failed to qalify to represent hmself prsant to

SCR253. See lso Frett v. Clorni, 422 S 806, 95 SCt 2525 1975), Hook v Stte, 124

Nev 8 (2008) and Wyne v. Stte, 100Nev 582 (1984). The canvass reqired prsant to SCR

2531) is mandatory n every case where a defendant appes in district cort and chooses self

representaton

For all of the foregoing reasons it is herey RDEED that the docment is stricken and the

Cort sha take no rther acton on the docment

DATED this y of April 2013.

DSTICT DGE

2


37/39


38/39

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

19

20

21

22

23

24

26

27

181. This appeal is from an order entered by the Honorable Elliott A Sattler.

25 4. Respondents are the Reno Justice Court, Chief Justice Scott Pearson, Judge David

Wayne Clifton/Washoe County District Attorneys Office. Respondents were not

represented at time of appeal.

28 5. Appellant was not represented by appointed counsel in District Court.

6.

Code 1310

IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE

ZACH COUGHLIN,

Petitioner,vs.

RENO JUSTICE COURT, CHIEF JUSTICE SCOTTPEARSON, JUDGE DAVID WAYNECLIFTON/WASHOE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'SOFFICE,

Respondents._____________________________________________/

Case No. CR13-0552Dept. No. 10

AMENDED CASE APPEAL STATEMENT

This case appeal statement is filed pursuant to NRAP 3(2).

2. Appellant is Zach Coughlin. Appellant is representing himself in Proper Person on

appeal:

3. Appellants address is:

Zach Couglin1471 E 9thSt.Reno, Nevada 89512

Appellant is not represented by appointed counsel on appeal.



Clerk of the Court



39/39

1

2

3

4

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5 1

6 1

7 1

7. Appellant was not granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the District Court.

8. Proceeding commenced by the filing of a Writ of Mandamus on April 2, 2013.

9. This is a criminal proceeding and the Appellant is appealing Order filed on April 3,

2013.0. The case has not been the subject of a previous appeal to the Supreme Court:

1. This case does not involve child custody or visitation.

2. This is not a civil case involving the possibility of a settlement.

Dated this 18th day of April, 2013.

JOEY ORDUNA HASTINGSCLERK OF THE COURT

By: /s/ Annie SmithAnnie SmithDeputy Clerk

Documents

4 18 13 0204 63041 Coughlin v Reno Justice Court Clifton Pearson Notice of Appeal 13-11526 Dig