Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Promoting Technology Integration 1
Promoting Technology Integration
Cole Bielak
University of Colorado at Denver
IT 6720: Research in Information and Learning Technologies Spring 2009
Promoting Technology Integration 2
Introduction
As a licensed teacher in Jefferson County Schools I am endorsed to teach
grades kindergarten through 6th grade. I began my career in Jefferson County
Schools teaching 6th grade in an elementary setting. However, after only one
year of teaching in an elementary school, I found my calling as a 6th grade math
teacher at Evergreen Middle School. This transformation from elementary to
middle school took place due to my passion for working with children in an extra-
curricular setting.
I am blessed to have found a home at Evergreen Middle School for many
reasons. One of the most important reasons being the after school sports
program that EMS offers throughout the school year. Ram Ahead sports is held
in highest regards throughout the Evergreen community. This program has
opened many doors for students in Evergreen by offering them a chance to
dabble in sports that are not often found at other middle schools. Activities that
are offered in the program range from rock climbing to advanced archery. The
program does a wonderful job covering a full spectrum of sports however, an
extra curricular program should demand more that just physical education.
Supplementary after school classes dealing with technology are non-existent in
my middle school. This seems to be an issue considering that Evergreen Middle
School is a leader when it comes to technology integration in Jeffco Schools.
How is it that students at Evergreen Middle School are expected to be proficient
in the use of technology when there seems to be limited opportunities outside of
the classroom for them to excel?
Promoting Technology Integration 3
Evergreen is host to one of only three middle schools in Jefferson County
School District. The student population is quite large with grade levels sixth
through eighth holding over six hundred students on average. Demographics in
the Evergreen area include the upper end of the socioeconomic spectrum.
However, just under 10% of the student population receives free and reduced
lunch. One positive thing about our demographics is the tremendous amount of
parent support that we receive from the community. Without a doubt, parent
involvement and an excellent teaching staff can be credited for the success of
students at Evergreen Middle.
With over one hundred thousand dollars recently spent on hardware and
software alone, teachers and students at Evergreen Middle School are really
excited about the new additions. Each classroom has been equipped with new
hardware that includes a SMART Board, document camera and laptop.
Essentially, our classrooms at EMS have transformed into places of 21st century
learning overnight. After much discussion with teachers who are considered
technology leaders at EMS, it became obvious that the initial use of this recently
purchased technology will subside over time. Many teachers, including myself
worry that students will not use the schools technology to its fullest potential.
Historically, it seems to be the case that whenever the “brand new” effect and
initial applications of technology settle down, use of the equipment begins to
decline. Both the SMART Board and document camera have way too many uses
between them for this factor to ever take place. Especially if there is a program
that is pushing each piece of software to its fullest potential. I believe that Ram-
Promoting Technology Integration 4
Ahead sports is the perfect home for an after school technology program to help
promote 21st century learning at Evergreen Middle School.
As I near the end of my degree in Technology Integration, I feel that it is my
duty to act as coordinator for an after school technology program. As coordinator
for this program I will help create the curriculum as well help instruct the courses.
The focus of an after school tech program includes promoting awareness of
shareware technology and its uses, and building students interest in the
technology and peripherals surrounding them. Most importantly, the greatest
outcome of this program will be creating core curriculum for future generations to
build on. Many students in my building are extremely tech savvy. However, there
seems to be some students who lack basic computer skills. An afternoon tech
program could teach topics such as blogging, internet safety and computer
etiquette, which in turn could help students become exited, and more comfortable
when working in class.
Research Questions
What new computer programs and applications can I offer students to
prepare them as 21st century learners and future professionals?
What programs can be put into place that will help my students identify the
many ways technology can be exciting, and most importantly applicable for
use within projects in the classroom?
Promoting Technology Integration 5
How do I continue to receive additional hardware and software to supplement
the needs of this program?
What assessment tools are most beneficial when helping measure the
success of each individual participant?
Methods
The design of study for this project was completed through a field study
lasting over 2 months. The program was provided to any student interested in
learning more about the technological environment that surrounds them each
day. Initially, my method of collecting data actually came from the participants
themselves. Course evaluations were provided to all students who took a
course in the program. These evaluations helped with the progression of
courses being offered, as well as promoting new ideas for future courses in
the program.
Research Questions
Data Source 1 Data Source 2 Data Source 3
What new computer programs and applications can I offer students to prepare them as 21st century learners and future
Pre-program interest survey that will help determine what classes are offered in the program. This survey will allow the students voices to be heard as the curriculum for each session in designed.
Interview with teachers in the building regarding whether or not students technology use has risen in the classroom.
Post-Program survey for students that identifies what classes in the program are most relevant and beneficial for success in the classroom.
Promoting Technology Integration 6
professionals?
What programs can be put into place that will help my students identify the many ways technology can be exciting, and most importantly applicable for use within projects in the classroom?
Pre-program interest survey that will help determine what classes are offered in the program. This survey will allow the students voices to be heard as the curriculum for each session in designed.
Interview with teachers in the building regarding whether or not students technology use has risen in the classroom.
Post-Program survey for students that identifies what classes in the program are most relevant and beneficial for success in the classroom.
How do I continue to receive additional hardware and software to supplement the needs of this program?
Embedded assessment for eighth grade technology assessment scores in comparison with previous years.
Interview with teachers in the building regarding whether or not students technology use has risen in the classroom.
Post-Program survey for students that identifies what classes in the program are most relevant and beneficial for success in the classroom.
What assessment tools are most beneficial when helping measure the success of each individual participant?
Pre-assessments to evaluate skill levels of each participant.
Interview with teachers in the building regarding whether or not students technology use has risen in the classroom.
Post-assessments to measure growth of each participant within their original skill level.
The most valid and reliable model used when collecting data was Sagor’s
comparing students to themselves approach. “Was this the type of growth I
would have normally have expected from these students had I not used the
innovative program? One way to answer that question would be to look at the
past performance of these same students (Sagor 2000 pg.151)” Essentially, I
compared my participants in the program to themselves as they performed in
Promoting Technology Integration 7
the classroom. This allowed me to metaphorically compare “apples to
apples” when compiling my data. In order for this type of data to be reliable I
needed full cooperation from my participants’ classroom teachers. I relied on
the teachers for support as they helped document this data. Collection of
data in the classroom happened several different ways. First, the classroom
teachers completed evaluations rating the competency of their student’s
technological abilities before they entered the program. Second, I needed
these same classroom teachers to reevaluate the participating students after
the course had subsided. This evaluation exhibited students’ ability to convey
a concept through the use of technology. What I was looking for was
increased technology use in the classroom from students in my program.
This entailed students replacing traditional methods of informal assessment
with 21st century models using the new technology they have learned through
the program.
Participants
Without the collaboration and efforts of the IT Site Coordinator, Chet
Andes, this project would not be possible. As a partner and collaborator in
this project, Chet helped with the design and framework, as well as actually
instructing some of the classes. Participants in this pilot program also
included any student who completed a survey used to help guide the design
Promoting Technology Integration 8
of each class. Staff input was also taken into account as the program
evolved.
Schedule
February 28th Action Research Proposal DeadlineMarch 2nd – 8th Continue gathering and reading literature for
program
Networking with other schools in the district about successful technology clubs.
March 14th Data collection plan dueMarch 16th – 20th Begin collecting data from interest surveys
representing the student body March 16th – 20th Meet with It coordinator and school
administrators to sketch out program curriculum and software
April 6th – 10th Administer pre-assessments to program participants
April 11th Literature review dueApril 13th -17th Program courses are written and designed April 20th-24th Pilot courses are taught and evaluated
April 25th Data analysis dueMay 16th Final action report due
Environmental impact statement:
Even though this program is considered extracurricular and will only be
offered after school, the excitement and awareness of 21st century learning
will spread through out the entire school and community. This program will
gain tremendous popularity as students realize how exciting, yet applicable
the material is when tying it back to their core classes. A majority of the
material offered in each class will carry relevant duality for students as they
practice what has been learned both at home and in the classroom.
Promoting Technology Integration 9
Literature Review:
As I near the end of my fourth year teaching 6th grade at Evergreen Middle
School I can admit that I am finally starting to deal with change pretty well.
When I refer to change, I mean the kind of adjustment that requires me to work in
a noisy construction zone, teach an entirely new content area while implementing
Response to Intervention, and at the same time becoming proficient in learning to
operate a 21st Century classroom. I believe that I have handled this paradigm shift
rather well as I have come to embrace my new classroom that is finally up to date
in terms of technology.
Every classroom at Evergreen Middle School now comes complete with a
SMART Board, document camera, lap top and media player. All of this hardware is
administered through a brain panel on the wall topped off with a P.A. system and
mounted L.C.D. projector. The amazing part about this alteration is that the students
have handled this transition better than the staff. It is almost like the students have
expected this type of system to be in place long before the teachers. Since the
technology upgrade has taken place, it seems like both the students and staff are
settling in and becoming more comfortable with the new hardware and software. It
has been satisfying to watch the teachers become more relaxed in using the new
technology, but there needs to be more opportunities for students to interact with the
technology on a daily basis. Students need time during daily instruction to familiarize
themselves with both the hardware and software that will allow them to be successful
in all content areas. Implementing a comprehensive technology program in my school
Promoting Technology Integration 10
will prepare students for both the classroom and professional world as they learn to
master technology skills expected in the 21st Century.
Findings:
Are Schools Preparing Students for the Professional World?
Research has shown that schools are not preparing students enough in the area of
technology for the working world ahead. Even the most simple of jobs today require
the understanding of basic technology skills. “It simply will not be possible for
schools to resist the increasing influence of computer technology in our society. The
marketplace will grow increasingly insistent that schools prepare students to be the
workers and consumers of a networked society. Educators and educational
institutions must rise to this challenge or become increasingly irrelevant” (Ferguson
2005 pg.3). Technology has revolutionized the professional world including the
entertainment industry. Without technology, especially the World Wide Web,
businesses would not have been able to represent a global market. The internet has
empowered businesses to internationally coincide with one another while building
more productivity each year. Computers have completely modernized the working
world in which we live. Without the advancement in technology driving the work
place, society would cease to evolve.
How is it that we expect children to be prepared for this type of future when they
are given limited opportunities to master new technology in the classroom? “It is
incomprehensible that anyone today would argue that banks, hospitals, or any
Promoting Technology Integration 11
industry should use less technology. Most young people cannot understand arguments
that schools should limit technology use. For them, use of the Internet, for example,
plays a major role in their relationships with their friends, their families, and their
schools.” (Valdez 2003 pg.1). It is apparent that many students have familiarized
themselves with text messaging and networking websites such as Facebook, Twitter
and Myspace. Students are yearning to integrate technology into their lives in any
way possible. Many of these popular social networking sites actually require skills
such as uploading files, embedding videos and some html code. Theses skills are
what most companies expect as an adequate level of proficiency in their workers. In
many cases when kids are at home playing on the computer they are actually fine
tuning many valuable skills that are supporting their education as well preparing them
for a career
Does Technology In the Classroom Increase Student Achievement?
While there seems to be a plethora of anecdotal evidence claiming that technology
in education is increasing student achievement, many researchers believe that there is
very little scientific evidence in existence proving this theory. “Given the lack of
evidence that technology increases academic achievement, it’s not surprising that
some observers are asking whether the resources and time devoted to technology
might produce more significant increases in academic achievement if focused on
other education needs” (Foltos 2003, pg. 2). Despite many critics’ disapproving
thoughts on the chance that technology does increase student achievement, new tools
in the classroom have always been questioned throughout history. For instance,
Promoting Technology Integration 12
during the mid 1990’s when the dry erase board began replacing the chalkboard,
many critics questioned this paradigm shift. Some believed that this transition from
chalk to marker was absurdly expensive for something that did the same thing.
However, the dry erase board has virtually taken over in every classroom to alleviate
allergy conditions as well as making clean up easier. The evolution of the dry erase
board is just one example of technology improving the academic experience. While
there is very little scientific evidence that proves that dry erase boards increase
student achievement across the board, some students have been positively affected by
this technology.
Twenty-first Century technology in the classroom such as interactive white boards
and document cameras are no different than the introduction of the dry erase board.
These technological tools were designed to modify instruction thereby better meeting
the needs of all students. While interactive white boards and document cameras may
not alleviate all allergy conditions, they do help teachers differentiate their instruction
as they strive to meet multiple intelligences and learning styles. "It is found that when
you put the two, (inquiry based learning and true technology integration) together
there's a synergy created that really boosts students' learning" (Foltos, 2003, pg. 2).
Kids living in the Twenty-first Century identify with technology. It seems like
second nature for most adolescence when operating any sort of gadget or apparatus
that deals with technology. Students become more excited about learning when
technology is implemented during instruction, naturally resulting in higher student
achievement. “There is growing evidence that technology is having a positive
impact on student achievement. There was some evidence of impact in the 99/00
Promoting Technology Integration 13
data. Since then, this district has implemented a number of new initiatives that appear
to be increasing that impact. This district’s score improved from 2.0 to 2.9 on a scale
of 1 to 4. The score was determined by reviewing student impact data from the
survey, observations, and focus groups and then matching those to the same rubrics
that were used last year” (Foltos, 2003 pg. 4).
Student Impact
What Are Other School Districts Doing to Improve Students’ 21st Century Skills?
Schools districts are finding a multitude of ways to prepare their students for the
future. The most popular trend found involves school districts across the nation
incorporating technology into their existing curriculum. Software companies are taking
advantage of this trend by providing school districts with programs that teach to both the
core curriculum as well as technology standards. Three of the most prevalent software
companies involving technology integration in schools include ArcView, Easytech and
Promoting Technology Integration 14
the popular, Microsoft. “ArcView is a complete software package that engages students
and enables them to perform spatial analysis, classify data, integrate imagery, interact
with the web and create their own publication-quality maps” (Arcview 2009). ArcView
recognizes technology as a foundational skill to be developed in every subject area and
grade, along with literacy, communication, problem solving and human relations.
“Engaging and interactive, EasyTech improves student learning outcomes in core
curriculum subjects while it provides students with the skills they need for success in the
21st Century”( Easytech, 2009). Easytech seems to be the most assessable and user
friendly. In fact, you can create an account and start setting up students as site users in a
very short amount of time. Lastly, Microsoft has realized that a large market in software
now exists in secondary education. This renowned company has recently revamped their
collegiate software to fit the needs of high school students as well. “Microsoft announced
the expansion of the successful Microsoft DreamSpark student program to include high
school students worldwide. DreamSpark, originally available only to university students,
makes professional-level developer and designer tools as well as training available at no
charge to students to support and advance their learning and skills through technical
design, technology, math, science and engineering activities. Microsoft believes that
giving people the right technology skills and the tools to translate their talent into
business success is critical to stimulating the future growth of local and global
economies. These programs are supported through the Microsoft Unlimited Potential
program.” (Microsoft 2009). These software companies share a common goal as they
strive to prepare students for the professional world ahead. Centering technology on core
curriculum is the trend that these companies plan to revolutionize.
Promoting Technology Integration 15
Listed below are a set of technological objectives that have been found to intertwine with
all core subject areas:
Basic Technology Skill Documentation Multimedia Presentation Use presentation software to create electronic slide shows and to generate overheads.
For these three competencies, students must design a presentation which contains at least 15 slides upon which there are a variety of graphics, animation, charts, sounds, and pictures.
Import graphics, charts, and pictures into presentations. Connect and operate technology needed for presentations. Electronic and Internet Resources Able to send and receive email messages and attachments.
Students send an email containing an attachment.
Able to subscribe, participate in, and search electronic discussion lists.
The students submit evidence of subscribing to and participating in ICN and Indiana’s counselor discussion list, Counselor_Talk. Students also submit evidence of searching the ICN archives on a specific topic.
Able to search the Internet, analyze, filter and appropriately reject non-relevant electronic information in relation to the desired outcome.
Students submit the results of an “advanced” Internet search on topic which contains less than 100 “hits.”
Properly cite electronic sources of information.
Students submit an annotated review of five web sites on a particular subject. The site must be properly cited, using APA style, and the annotation must contain a general review of the site and a critique/rating which includes a description of the site’s content, ease of navigation, aesthetics, and organization.
Able to objectively review and informatively annotate web sites.
View, download, decompress, and open documents and programs from Internet sites, while demonstrating an understanding of appropriate protocols to protect the computer from viruses.
Students are required to download an instant messaging program and describe the anti-virus software that they have on their computer.
Promoting Technology Integration 16
Able to effectively use electronic library search technology.
Students must submit documentation of an “advanced” search conducted on the ISU library electronic catalog, LUIS, and ERIC, both from the ISU library web site and through an Internet site; and, full text databases on ISU’s library Internet site which include Proquest and Inspire/EBSCO Host.
Able to join and participate in chat rooms.
Students participate in ISU course-related chat rooms and participate in Instant Message-type chatting.
(Laturno 2006, pg.3)
Data Collection:
As a sixth grade math teacher at Evergreen Middle School I only teach one sixth
of the schools population. However, the technology program I delivered this spring was
intended for any student in the middle school to participate. Most students at Evergreen
Middle School are eager to participate in extra curricular activities. Especially, activities
that will help them achieve more academically. In order to reach all grade levels sixth
through eighth I used the school broadcasting system to advertise interest surveys as well
as the program itself. Students were able to access my Google site and contribute their
thoughts and ideas about the program. This survey helped build the foundation of the
curriculum used in the first semester of the program. Students were able to visit my
Google Site and answer questions, as well as offer suggestions about what the program
should look like.
Many colleagues at the middle school also contributed a wealth of expertise to
this technology program. Various teachers throughout the building from all content areas
Promoting Technology Integration 17
assisted in this process. As teachers were individually interviewed I collected viable
information that was done through face to face interviews. This process was refreshing
as I gained many insightful thoughts and ideas about what the program most needed.
Information collected from my colleagues was all taken into account regardless of the
skill level or expertise of the staff member. Each teacher answered the same set of
interview questions inquiring skill level and types of technology incorporated during
instruction. Once interviews were conducted the data collected was transferred into
Microsoft Excel where the results became obvious.
Keeping in mind that this program has been designed to evolve with each session
offered; a post survey was given for each participating student to complete. This survey
was accessed through Google Sites using Google Forms to administer the survey.
Students who have taken classes in the program once will most likely return or convince
friends to take a class as well. Essentially, every participant was asked to complete an
evaluation rating the class they attended as well as the program itself. All questions on
the survey were multiple choice, with exception of the last question. This question was
open ended and allowed each participant to elaborate on suggestions needed to make the
class more successful. The results offered thoughts and ideas about what works best for
the participants and what new classes should be offered. Students taking these classes
essentially determine the direction of the program. Using Google Forms made it very
easy to compare both the pre survey and the post evaluation side by side.
Data Analysis:
Promoting Technology Integration 18
As an introductory program, I offered one class this spring on building wikis
through Wikispaces. Participants learned how to design their own wiki space as well as
embedding media and documents through html code. There were 31 students in
attendance that primarily represented the 6th grade. This pilot class met 1 hour a day for
an entire week. The class was a success as the kids had a lot of fun effectively using
prior knowledge to build their sites.
Essentially, all of the methods I used to collect my data came in the form of an
interview or survey. I found administering surveys through Pollcat and Google forms to
be very easy because of user accessibility. Students mentioned how easy it was to visit
my Google Site and open the link to both of my surveys. My face to face interviews
resulted in a little more leg work. Finding time to meet with teachers across grade levels
became a difficult task because of schedule differences. Once all interviews had been
conducted I used Microsoft Excel to compile my data into chart form. Both the online
surveys as well as the interviews I conducted resulted in very similar outcomes.
Originally the data from the pre survey was rather limited. As I posted the
advertisement about my interest survey on the school broadcast system very few students
found the time to take this survey. I guess I shouldn’t have found this surprising that
middle school students weren’t going to take the extra time to take this survey. I knew
that there still were many students that had very strong opinions about the creation of this
program. Some of these students were either reluctant to take this survey or hadn’t seen
the advertisement. To insure that I had enough participants to represent my data I met
with present and former students who have a strong interest in technology. After these
students had taken the survey I conducted a few follow up questions which allowed me
Promoting Technology Integration 19
the chance to pick their brain about technology clubs or organizations that they have
meddled in. Out of 30 informal interviews only 2 of the kids interviewed participated in
technology clubs outside of school. Similarly, the results of the survey also pointed to
students with strong interests in technology, however very little formal experience
outside of their homes. Other fascinating results in the interest survey became apparent as
Google Forms allowed me to view the data in the form of a bar graph. The bar graph
made it very easy to see what software programs were of most importance to the students.
Once I was able to contact enough teachers across the grade levels for interviews
many common themes began appearing. With a total of 7 teachers interviewed from
grade levels 6th through 8th I was really trying to be as consistent as possible as I asked the
exact same 6 questions for each interview. Once I had compiled my data I needed a way
to sort out the various responses from each teacher. I decided to use Microsoft Excel as a
way to categorize each answer into a pie graph. The results from the interviews were not
too surprising as many of the same buzz words were repeated during the interviews. A
majority of the teachers vocalized that they were continually teaching the same lessons
on things that should be standard procedure in middle school. Tasks such as saving files
to the server, attaching documents to email and saving sites under the favorites menu
were just a few of the tasks teachers mentioned.
Participants had an opportunity to evaluate the program and offer suggestions
through a post session survey in Google Forms. A majority of the results were
Promoting Technology Integration 20
constructive and added some great suggestions for the Fall session. The results were
positive as 28 out of 30 students indicated that it was a fun, positive learning experience.
In fact these 28 students also indicated that they would recommend a friend to take any of
the upcoming classes. Hopefully this means higher enrollment for the fall, which would
allow additional support from interested staff members. There were a number of
responses from the students that indicated learning gaming software as well as Photo
Shop should be top priorities for classes offered in the fall 2010 session. More
importantly the results of this survey reported that students would feel more apt to
incorporate technology into independent projects if they were given the option in class.
Findings and Conclusion:
The most practical way that I found to organize my findings was by comparing
my results to my original research questions. There really seemed to be two research
questions that I continually found my data answering through out the process. These
questions are as follows: What new computer programs and applications can I offer
students to prepare them as 21st century learners and future professionals? What
programs can be put into place that will help my students identify the many ways
technology can be exciting, and most importantly applicable for use within projects in the
classroom? These questions fist led me to my site IT coordinator to inquire about what
programs and applications our school and district would support. During my literature
review I also found support by reviewing what programs and applications have been
Promoting Technology Integration 21
successful amongst middle school students in other schools. Once I narrowed down a list
of applications that both research and my district would support, all that was left to
decide was the student’s opinions. Once I posed the list of applications as questions in
the interest survey it was very obvious that the students had their minds made up.
What applications below would you be most interested in learning more about?
The most obvious and disappointing piece of this interest survey was that the most
educational applications such as Google Docs and SMART Board software were not as
popular as I thought they would be. When given the choice to choose it was apparent that
a majority of the students had no interest in taking a class that would help them create
academic presentations.
As I began to start piecing together common themes that surfaced during the
teacher interviews a few realizations hit me. The first realization being that the students
at Evergreen Middle School may not be as tech savvy as they appear. Once the data from
Promoting Technology Integration 22
the interviews had been entered into a pie chart it was obvious what skills, in the
teacher’s opinions, students seem to be lacking when it comes to technology.
Lessons Being Taught to Prepare Students for the Computer Lab
The most surprising fact was that a multitude of students do not know how to save
to the server. When I first saw this data it made me wonder how many student
Promoting Technology Integration 23
documents have been lost over the years in the computer labs. Another surprising fact in
this data was that many teachers were also concerned that a majority of their students
don’t know how to attach files when sending a document via e-mail. This is a very
serious problem considering most projects that students work on in the computer labs are
cumulative over a large span of time. Teachers also expect students to work on these
projects at home during the course of the unit. Not every student in school can affoard a
flash drive, resulting in email being the primary method in sending a project home to
work on.
I found much of the data collected during the teacher interviews to be rather
disheartening. According to my colleagues, a majority of the students in school lack
technology skills required to be proficient in the 21st Century. This data from the teacher
interviews definitely changes things as far as future courses go. With these findings in
mind I am going to change the structure of the whole program entirely. Granted, this
small chunk of data seems insignificant, however this is enough evidence to integrate a
mandatory technology class. With the master schedule drastically changing the look of
next year, every grade level in the middle school will be required to implement a 40
minute advisement period. The school administration is looking for ways to fill gaps in
the areas of literacy, math and technology. This 40 minute period will be a perfect
opportunity to rotate each advisement class through a technology awareness class. All of
the skills mentioned during the interviews as well as in my research will be implemented
once a week during advisement. With only offering a wiki class this spring many
students expressed interest in taking additional classes in fall 2010. During the post
survey that was offered students made it very clear what classes should be offered.
Promoting Technology Integration 24
What courses would interest you most if offered in the fall?
After reviewing the results from the post survey I became more optimistic about
the future of this program. After all 33 students participated in the past wiki class, many
students seemed to be excited about becoming more proficient in Microsoft Word and
Power Point. The results from the post survey offers hope for students being able to
further their skills in technology while implementing these skills in course work. With
multiple courses being offered and plenty of teacher support, the program this fall should
be thriving. Furthermore, with plenty of research and data to support the technology
program, the future of Evergreen Middle School’s technology plan can only evolve.
Conclusion:
As I look back and reflect on the journey of this program I find it amazing how
many resources I needed to tap into to lift this project off of the ground. The birth of
this program really evolved with impeccable timing. With an administration pushing
growth in technology as well as newly equipped classrooms the culture I work in was
Promoting Technology Integration 25
ready for change. Without a technological paradigm shift occurring at Evergreen
Middle School I would not have received as much support and backing from my
professional community on this project. This project was definitely welcomed by
many people that included the ET/IL committee, staff, administration and most
importantly the students. If I would have implemented this program a year earlier, I
would not have received the same amount of support. Honestly, without the right
timing and funding, this program would have been successful.
In order for this technology program to continue evolving, research for better
practices must still take place. Students in future program need to be introduced to
new computer applications as well as hardware updates. Active research needs to
continue in order for Evergreen Middle School to keep up with other technology
programs evolving in schools throughout the country. As technology standards are
further implemented, additional literature resources will become available to build
new curriculum on. As the program grows, many of these courses will most likely
evolve into elective classes offered during the regularly scheduled school day. This
type of system could offer more consistency as well as allow the entire student
population the opportunity to participate. I believe that this program will set the
standard for schools moving towards the 21st learning model. With further research
and dedication from both the instructors and administration, this program will
continue to prepare Evergreen Middle School students for the academic and
professional world.
Promoting Technology Integration 26
References
Easytech. (n.d.). Retrieved April 1, 2009, from http://www.learning.com/EasyTech/
Learning In the Real World. (2007). Retrieved April 1, 2009, from http://www.realworld.org
Microsoft Helps Prepare Global Workforce . (2009, March 26). webwire. Retrieved April 7, 2009, from http://www.webwire.com
Technology: A Catalyst for Teaching and Learning In the Classroom. (2005). NCREL. Retrieved April 1, 2009, from http://www.ncrel.org
Technology and Academic Acheivment. (2002, December). New Horizons Learning. Retrieved April 3, 2009, from http://www.newhorizons.org
The Human Tendancy To Be Technical. (2007, Fall). Journal of Technology Education, 19(1). Retrieved April 1, 2009, from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v19n1/pdf/hansen.pdf
Appendix
Extra Curricular Technology ProgramThank you for taking the time to complete this survey. Your voice will help determine the outcome of this program.
Promoting Technology Integration 27
What courses would interest you most? Please check all that apply
Video Editing and Creation
Photo Shop
Photo Story
Google Docs
Google Sketch-up
SMART Board/ Notebook Software
Gaming Software
Other:
How long should each session last?
1/2 an hour
1 hour
2 hours
How many days a week should each course meet?
Once a week
Twice a week
Three days a week
How long should the program last each time it is offered?
1 week
2 weeks
1 month
6 weeks
2 Months
When should the program be offered? What time would you be able to attend a session?
Before school
Promoting Technology Integration 28
During electives
After School
What computer applications are you comfortable operating.
Microsoft Word
Power Point
Windows Media Player
Windows Movie Maker
I-Tunes
I-Movie
Other:
How many students should be allowed in each class?
5
7
10
12
Other:
How much would you or your parents be willing to spend to register for a class?
20 Dollars
30 Dollars
40 Dollars
50 Dollars
Powered by Google Docs
Terms of Service - Additional Terms
Promoting Technology Integration 29