Upload
deadmatrix
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
1/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
New Technologies for the
FF Physical Layer
Michael Kessler
Director C+T
Pepperl+Fuchs
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
2/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation2
Specific
needs
for
hazardous
areas
70% of all Foundation Fieldbus applications go into
Chemical and Oil & Gas plants
Fieldbus in hazardous areas requires
Explosion protection
Many different technologies available
High availability for years without stop
Long cable runs
High device count
Easy handling
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
3/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation3
Analogy
to Explosion Protection
The design of a vehicle that can bestopped safely under any
circumstances.
Possible solutions
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
4/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation4
Trivial Solution
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
5/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation5
Trivial Solution
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
6/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation6
Problem
Possible solutions compared tomethods of explosion protection
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
7/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation7
Solution: "Explosion Proof"
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
8/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation8
Solution: "Explosion Proof"
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
9/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation9
"Sand Encapsulation"
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
10/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation10
"Puuuurge???"
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
11/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation11
Increased
Safety
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
12/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation12
"Intrinsic
Safety"
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
13/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation13
DART
Better Breaks!More Power
for IntrinsicSafety!
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
14/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation14
Foundation Fieldbus in Hazardous
Locations
Present Technologies
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
15/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation15
Entity
The
first
step
Evolution from point-to-point
Based on IEC 60079-11
Validation includes calculationsfor L and C
Significant power limitation
Not well suited for fieldbusMax. Values (IIC)
UO 10.9 V
IO 100 mA
PO 1.2 W
L/C Calculation
required1996 by Pepperl+Fuchs: First Entity/FISCO Power Supply
l < 570 m
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
16/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation16
FISCO
Simplifying
Validation
Study confirms higher power values
One power supply per segment
Eliminates calculations for L/C Simpler Still limited power!
Also available with redundant
power supplyMax. Values (IIC)
UO 14 V
IO 120 mA
PO 2.1 W1996 by Pepperl+Fuchs: First Entity/FISCO Power Supply
l < 570 m
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
17/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation17
High-Power
Trunk Concept
Maximum Power + FISCO
Trunk with increased safety
Simple segment design same for any area
Simple validation separate per output
Optional redundancy for power suppliesMax. Values
(IIC)
Choice
of
FISCO or Entityat
each
output
Redundant Power Hub
for
four
segments
l > 670 m
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
18/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation18
Dynamic Arc Recognition and
Termination
The new Dimension in
Intrinsic Safety
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
19/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation19
Principle of classic Intrinsic Safety
Limit power to a value that is not capable of causingignition by sparks in normal operation and faultcondition in hazardous atmospheres
(opening, closing, short circuit)
Typically 2 W
i
U
R L
C
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
20/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation20
Realization of I.S. today (simplified)
Static approach:
The Zener-diode limits the max.
voltage available to the field
The Fuse protects theZener-diode
The resistor limits the max.
current available in the field This is a power limitation
Sparks will be avoided
IStodayField
side
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
21/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation21
DART
The Future of Intrinsic Safety
DART is a new intrinsically safe concept developedand approved by Pepperl+Fuchs and PhysikalischeTechnische Bundesanstalt (PTB) in Braunschweig
DynamicArc Recognition & Termination
The principle of DART is the detection of thedeveloping arc and the fast shut down of power
source and/or sink before the spark becomes
incendive
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
22/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation22
A Typical Spark
Electrical Behavior
IS
US
PS
Initial
Phase
Critical Phase
Spark Duration t
U
,I,P
di/dt
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
23/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation23
Ex ib
IICPOWER SUPPLY CABLE LOAD
Uq
Dynamically detecting an ignition
Turn the Power Off before the Spark becomes incendive
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
24/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation24
Typical Spark
Turned Off by DART
IS
US
PS
Initial
Phase Critical Phase
Spark Durationt
U,
I,P
di/dt
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
25/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation25
DART
Approvals
DART-Apparatus is certified asintrinsically safe apparatus inaccordance with IEC60079-11
German metrology institute andnotified body PTB has developed the required testing procedures
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
26/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation26
DART
For Foundation Fieldbus H1
The Simplicity of Intrinsic Safety
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
27/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation27
General Purpose Area
Zone 2
Zone 1
Redundant, three-port isolated
DART Power Supply
DART Segment Protectors
The intrinsically safe High-Power Trunk
protected by DART
Intrinsically safe spurs
Ex ib IIC
DART: Intrinsically Safe High-Power Trunk
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
28/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation28
Zone 1
More cable distance
Higher device count
Same installation throughout
Hot work on supplies, couplers, devices
For any fieldbus device:
Ex ib
IIC
DART: Intrinsically Safe High-Power Trunk
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
29/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation29
On the Trunk As fast as easy Install one redundant DART Power Hub
Use type 'A' fieldbus cable
Use up to 1000 m trunk cable
Install up to four DART Segment Protectors
Validating
Intrinsic
Safety
with
DART
Intrinsically
safe
Exib
IIC
Easy to understand, easy to engineer
max 1000 m
Type 'A'
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
30/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation30
Technical Data for DART Fieldbus
Technical Data Value
Trunk output power typ. 22 V / 360 mA
Spur output power Min 10.5 @ 34 mA
Impedance
Cable Type A 100
Trunk cable length, max. 1000 m
Overall cable length, max. (as per IEC 61158-2) 1900 m
Spur cable length, max. (as per IEC 61158-2) 120 m
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
31/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation31
Qualitative Comparison
General Performance Summary
EntityFISCO
(redundant)HPTC
DART
Fieldbus
Available Power 0 + +
Validation of Explosion Protection + + +
Power Supply Redundancy
(+*) + +
Online Physical Layer Diagnostics + +
Field Space Requirement + + 0 +Cabinet Space Requirement
() + +
Trunk Live Working + + +
Total Cost of Ownership () 0 +* Hot-standby
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
32/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation32
Size
Comparison: Power Supplies
High-Power Trunk Concept DART-Fieldbus
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
33/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation33
Size
Comparison: Field
Installation
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
34/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
1994 2011 Fieldbus Foundation34
DART: Award-Wining Technology
Live Demonstration
Watch the spark disappear!
8/2/2019 3_New Technologies for FF Physical Layer_Michael_Kessler
35/35
2011 General Assembly
Mumbai, India
35
DART Fieldbus The Simplicity of Intrinsic Safety