28
3D System Integration Technology Convergence, Progress and Challenges Eric Beyne

3D System Integration

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 3D System Integration

3D System Integration Technology Convergence, Progress and Challenges

Eric Beyne

Page 2: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

Outline

• INTRODUCTION

• TSV TECHNOLOGY

• TEMPORARY CARRIER WAFER BONDING

• TEMPORARY CARRIER WAFER DE-BONDING

• CONCLUSION

ERIC BEYNE 2

3D System Integration Technology Convergence, Progress and Challenges

Page 3: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

Introduction:

• Characteristic for 3D-TSV System integration as emerging technology :

– Many options

– Complex supply chain

• Difficult for designers to actually use the technology: too many unknowns, lack of 3D-EDA

• Difficult for equipment, material and EDA tool suppliers to develop the appropriate tools and materials

ERIC BEYNE 3

Page 4: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

Introduction

Therefore:

– Need for convergence of technology options

Allows for convergence on design routes

Clearly defines boundaries between

supply chain partners

– Driven by applications enabled by 3D-TSV

technology

ERIC BEYNE 4

Page 5: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

Wafer debonding

3D Integration Process flow overview

ERIC BEYNE 5

Si FEOL

Cu nail

Si BEOL

IC fab: Via-middle TSV Front side bumping:

µbumping or

Flip chip bumping

Wafer Thinning module

Temporary bonding to carrier

Wafer thinning & cleaning

Backside processing • Si recess etch • backside passivation • Cu TSV exposure • Cu-RDL • µBumping or Flip

Chip bumping

• D2D or

D2W • Wafer level Underfill • Wafer reconstruction

3D-Stacking process

Packaging Die stack

Page 6: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

3 Main Technology Modules for 3D TSV Integration

ERIC BEYNE 6

TSV Technology

Wafer thinning & Thin wafer

handling

Chip stacking & stack

packaging

Page 7: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

Outline

• INTRODUCTION

• TSV TECHNOLOGY

• TEMPORARY CARRIER WAFER BONDING

• TEMPORARY CARRIER WAFER DE-BONDING

• CONCLUSION

ERIC BEYNE 7

3D System Integration Technology Convergence, Progress and Challenges

Page 8: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

Active Devices 3D-SIC/SOC Interposer

Baseline Scaling Baseline

Wafer Ø 300 mm 300 mm 300 mm

TSV Ø 5 µm 3 µm 10 µm

TSV depth 50 µm 50 µm 100 µm

Convergence 3D-TSV Process

IMEC’s approach:

"Via-middle": fabrication TSV’s after

FEOL device fabrication processing

but before BEOL interconnect.

Si

Si

5μm 50 μ

m

© IMEC 2011 ERIC BEYNE 8

Page 9: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

3D-SIC TSV 5µm , 50µm deep on 300mm

ERIC BEYNE 9

Top

Middle

Bottom

Oxide Liner

Liner

PMD

STI

Si

PVD Ta/ Cu barrier seed

Cu ECD Fill

TSV anneal & CMP

Accurate

Within wafer TSV depth

Control

• Conformal

• Smooth surface

• Low TSV capacitance

Void-free bottom-up

TSV-fill

Effective

barriers: prevent

Cu diffusion

•Anneal to mitigate Cu pumping

• Limited CMP dishing

Via etch

Page 10: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

Outline

• INTRODUCTION

• TSV TECHNOLOGY

• TEMPORARY CARRIER WAFER BONDING

• TEMPORARY CARRIER WAFER DE-BONDING

• CONCLUSION

ERIC BEYNE 10

3D System Integration Technology Convergence, Progress and Challenges

Page 11: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

Thin wafer handling • Advances in wafer thinning allow wafer thinning down to 50 µm and even less,

while maintaining a total thickness variation, TTV < 1µm

• Thin wafers, below 100 µm become flexible

• Defects at the edge of the wafer cause these wafer to be fragile

ERIC BEYNE 11

Page 12: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

Intermediate Wafer Carrier Which Carrier solutions?

• Bonding to silicon carriers our preferred solution

• Bonding to glass wafers

• Bonding to perforated silicon (or glass) carriers

• Carrier-less system: grinding center wafer, leaving a narrow ridge at edge of wafer to maintain wafer shape (“Tyco”)

ERIC BEYNE 12

Device Wafer

Carrier Wafer

Page 13: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

Requirements Temporary Bonding process • Compatible with post processing:

• Allow for excellent thickness control (TTV) after wafer thinning on carrier

• Allow for (“low temperature” 200 -250ºC) semiconductor processing on wafer backside:

– Thermally stable temporary glue layer, no out gassing

– Compatible with cassettes, loading robots, tool chucks,...

• Easy to de-bond after backside processing, preferably at low temperature without melting solder bumps

ERIC BEYNE 13

Page 14: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

3D TSV Thinning and Backside Process flow

ERIC BEYNE 14

Si carrier wafer

Temporary glue

layer coating

Si (LSI) wafer

Edge trim wafer

Particle cleaning

Wafer to Carrier bonding

Dicing thin wafer on tape

Particle clean

3D stacking

Grinding damage removal

(Wet/dry/CMP) and cleaning

Wafer thinning by grinding

Wafer / carrier debonding

clean & recycle carrier

Thin wafer backside passivation

and TSV via reveal process

Page 15: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

X position (mm)

Y p

ositio

n (

mm

)

Thickness variation

AE100487/D06

-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

300mm Wafer Thinning performance on Si carrier wafers (16µm HT1010 glue)

Thickness variation after thinning to 50µm

ERIC BEYNE 15

TTV = 1.6um

ISIS measurement, 1cm mesh,

1cm edge exclusion

-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 1500

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

Radius position (mm)

Thic

kness v

ariation (

um

)

Thickness variation accross diameterAE100487/D06

X scan

Y scan

1.5µm

Page 16: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

Backside via reveal process

•wafer thinning by Si grinding (no TSV exposure)

•Wafer backside clean and wet Si recess-etch to about 50µm final Si thickness, exposing all TSV’s with ±1 µm variation

ERIC BEYNE 16

Middle Edge Center

Page 17: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

Backside via reveal process •Backside Wafer Passivation

•Mask-less recess etch of passivation and TSV oxide liner on top of Cu-nails: Backside contact to TSV structure

•This approach effectively avoids the use of Si/Cu CMP processing (risk of Cu contamination and cost adder)

ERIC BEYNE 17

Cu

Page 18: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

Outline

• INTRODUCTION

• TSV TECHNOLOGY

• TEMPORARY CARRIER WAFER BONDING

• TEMPORARY CARRIER WAFER DE-BONDING

• CONCLUSION

ERIC BEYNE 18

3D System Integration Technology Convergence, Progress and Challenges

Page 19: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

Dicing tape

Slide-Debonding of thin wafers: • Using intermediate carrier wafer to mechanically support

the thin wafer:

– bond to thin wafer on carrier prior to debonding

– Slide debond thin wafer+intermediate carrier

– Clean thin wafer on this carrier (standard spin tool)

– Debond intermediate carrier after bonding thin wafer to dicing tape

• Carrier solutions:

– Electrostatic or vacuum wafer carriers

– Currently: limited availability

ERIC BEYNE 19

Process carrier

Heated chuck

Glue

carrier

Vacuum chuck

carrier

Page 20: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011 ERIC BEYNE 20 Sliding speed (mm/s)

De

bo

nd

te

mp

era

ture

(C

)

Peak force applied (N) on200mm wafers during debonding

1 2 3 4 5

150

170

190

210

230

250

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

Risk of glue residues

Glue shear-regime

Process

window

Process window for Slide-debonding using HT1010 from Brewer science (200mm)

Sliding speed (mm/Sec)

Peak force (N)

during debonding

Page 21: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

Wafer slide-debonding Process validation

ERIC BEYNE 21

50µm thick 300mm CMOS wafer after slide debond in Suss DB12S using a monopolar

electrostatic support wafer

Page 22: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

Critical aspects slide-debonding

– Need for high temperatures is not desired in

presence of solder bumps

– Sensitive (bumped) wafer surface in contact to

intermediate carrier

– Limited availability of suitable intermediate carrier

systems

ERIC BEYNE 22

Page 23: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

Room-Temperature peel-debonding

–No temperature constraint with respect to solder bumps.

– The thin wafer is bonded to a

dicing tape, prior to debonding:

• The intermediate carrier (or stand-alone

thin wafer handling) is not required

• The sensitive surface of the backside of

the thin wafer is protected by the dicing tape

– Preferred solution

–However:

• New materials in development: similar low Si TTV needs to be adchieved

• Typically requires additional process steps, additional coating materials, specific tools to prepare the surfaces for peel debonding and tools for cleaning of thin wafers on tape (non-standard tools)

ERIC BEYNE 23

Page 24: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

Thin Wafer Peel-debonding directly to Dicing Tape on Frame

ERIC BEYNE 24

50 µm thick 300mm blanket Si wafer after peel debond on tape thin wafer support in Suss DB12T

Page 25: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

Outline

• INTRODUCTION

• TSV TECHNOLOGY

• TEMPORARY CARRIER WAFER BONDING

• TEMPORARY CARRIER WAFER DE-BONDING

• CONCLUSION

ERIC BEYNE 25

3D System Integration Technology Convergence, Progress and Challenges

Page 26: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011

Conclusions 3D-Integration technology has three

key components:

TSV technology

Wafer thinning and thin wafer carrier technology

Micro-bump interconnect technology for 3D

The wafer support system is critical to the success of 3D system integration

However it is not yet fully mature:

Limited set of materials and

equipment available

Most temporary bonding materials

still in optimization phase ERIC BEYNE 26

Page 27: 3D System Integration

© IMEC 2011 27 3D System Integration Program

3D PROGRAM

LamRESEARCH

FOUNDRIES

OSAT

MEMORY IDM

EDA

FABLESS

EQUIPMENT SUPPLIERS

LOGIC IDM

MATERIAL SUPPLIERS

ACKNOWLEDGMENT: PARTNERS

IMEC 3D SYSTEM INTEGRATION PROGRAM

Page 28: 3D System Integration