Upload
frabzi
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
1/38
Design of Clinical Trials of
Antibiotic Therapy for Acute Otitis
Media
Colin D. Marchant, M.D.
Boston University School of Medicine
and
Tufts University School of Medicine
FDA Anti-Infective Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting, November 7, 2001
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
2/38
Outcomes in Trials of
Antibacterial Drugs for AOM
Clinical: Symptomatic improvement, or
symptomatic & otoscopic improvement, etc.
Bacteriologic: eradication of bacteria Bacteriologic/Clinical: Clinical improvement
plus eradication of bacteria in clinical
failures
During Therapy
End of Therapy
After Therapy
Choice of Outcome
Timing of Outcome
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
3/38
Timing of Clinical Outcomes in Trials of
Antibiotic Therapy for Acute Otitis Media
Antibiotic Therapy Post Antibiotic Therapy
48-72 Hrs
Day 4-6
End of Therapy
Day 10-12 Day 28-30
Test of Cure
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
4/38
Effect of Antibiotic Treatment
on Earache in Severe AOM
1 2 3 4 5
Mean
Pain
Score
1.0 PlaceboPenicillin
Mygind et al
Clin Otolaryngol
1981;6:5
Day
*
*
* p < 0.01
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
5/38
Treatment of Severe AOM
% initial treatment failure
Placebo &Myringotomy
Amoxicillin &Myringotomy
N=34 N=96 N=156
23.5% ** 11.5% 9.6% **
** P< 0.01 Kaleida, et al. Pediatric s, 1991
Amoxicillin
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
6/38
Amoxicillin vs Placebo
for Non-severe AOM
Kaleida et. al. Pediatrics 1991;87:466
AmoxN=522
PlaceboN=527
P-Value
Initial Rx Failure 3.9% 7.7% 0.009
Effusion 2 wks 46.9% 62.5%
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
7/38
Bacteriology of Clinical Recurrences of AOM
1 Month After Completion of Treatment
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Days 1-7 Days 8-14 Days 15-21 Days 22-28
Bacteriologic Relapses New Infections
from Leibowitz et al ICCAC Abstract #1968, Sept 2000
Relapses vs New Infections determined forStreptococcus pneumon iaeby
PFGE and serotyping, and forHaemoph i lus inf luenzaeby beta-lactamase
production
N=39 N=34 N=21 N=9
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
8/38
Clinical Recurrences of Acute
Otitis Media After Therapy
Not reduced by prior antibiotic therapy
(Kaleida et al, etc)
Common in patients with eradication of
the initial pathogen (Leibowitz, Carlin,
DelBaccaro)
New infections more common than
relapses (Leibowitz, Carlin, DelBaccaro)
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
9/38
Correlation of Bacteriologic and Clinical
Outcomes in Acute Otitis Media after 3-6
days of Antibiotic Therapy
ClinicalSuccess
93%
Clinical
Failure
7%
ClinicalSuccess
62%
Clinical
Failure
38%
Bacteria Eradicated
from the Middle Ear
Bacteria Persist
in the Middle Ear
P = 0.001
Carlin et al. Pediatr 1991; 118:178
N=253 N=40
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
10/38
Early eradication of pathogens from middle ear fluid
during antibiotic treatment of acute otitis media is
associated with improved clinical outcome
Bacteriologic Failures
Culture (+) n = 57
Dagan et al, PIDJ 17; 776-82, 1998.
Cure
36 (63%)
Failure
21 (37%)Cure
64 (97%)
Failure
2 (3%)
N = 123
Bacteriologic Success
Culture (-) n = 66
Clinical status
from day 4-6
to day 10
Culture result
on day 4-5
Note: 91% of the clinical failures were culture (+) on day 4-5
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
11/38
Clinical Success Rates in Acute
Otitis Media
* P=0.001, ** P=0.013Marchant CD et. al. J Pediatr 1992;120:72
Bacteriologic Success 236/253 (93.2%)
Bacteriologic Failure 25/40 (62.5%)
Non-Bacterial AOM 124/155 (80.0%)
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
12/38
The Pollyanna PhenomenonMeasuring the Efficacy of Anti-bacterial Drugs in
Acute Otitis Media
20
30
40
50
60
70
8090
100
E
fficacy%
Marchant CD, et al J Pediatr 1992;120:72
Bacteriologic
Efficacy
Clinical
Efficacy
Poor drugs look better
than they really are
Excellent drugs appears
worse than they really are
Placebo
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
13/38
The Pollyanna PhenomenonMeasuring the Efficacy of Anti-bacterial Drugs in
Acute Otitis Media
20
30
40
50
60
70
8090
100
E
fficacy%
Marchant CD, et al J Pediatr 1992;120:72
Bacteriologic
Efficacy
Clinical
Efficacy
Poor drugs look better
than they really are
Excellent drugs appear
worse than they really are
Placebo
Clinical Efficacy
in Bacterial AOM
Drugs appear, and are equal
Sample Sizes Required to Detect Differences Between Antibacterial
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
14/38
Sample Sizes Required to Detect Differences Between Antibacterial
Drugs for Acute Otitis Media (AOM): Comparison of Bacteriologic
Versus Clinical Outcomes in a Trial of 2 Drugs With Varying
Bacteriologic Efficacy (Half the patients would be in each arm of a
study)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
30 40 50 60 70 80
Bacteriologic efficacy of drug A when compared with
drug B with 90% bacteriologic efficacy
Numberofpatien
tsrequired
Bacteriologic
diagnosis and
outcome
Bacteriologicdiagnosis/clinical
outcome
Clinical diagnosis
and outcome
Measuring the comparative efficacy of antibacterial agents for acute otitis media: The
Pollyanna Phenomenon. Colin D. Marchant, Susan A. Carlin, Candice E. Johnson, and Paul A.
Shurin. J Pediatr ics1992;120: 72-77.
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
15/38
Parameters Used in Sample Size
Calculations
Significance level = 0.05
Power = 0.90
Inverse sine method
All sample sizes are for a 2-limbed
trial with half of subjects in each limb
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
16/38
Standard Bacteriologic
Efficacy
Good Drug 90%
Fair Drug 70%
Poor Drug 50%
Tap Water 30%
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
17/38
Sample Sizes Required to Detect Differences Between an
Antibacterial Drug with 90% Bacteriologic Efficacy and Drugs with
Fair Efficacy (70%), Poor Efficacy (50%), or Tap water (30%) in
Clinical Trials of Acute Otitis Media
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
Tap Water
(30%)
Poor Drug
(50%)
Fair Drug
(70%)
Numberofpatientsrequired Bacteriologic
diagnosis andoutcome
SymptomaticResponse
BacterialDiagnosis and
Clinical Outcome
Marchant et al J Pediatr ics1992;120: 72-77
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
18/38
Sample Size Calculations for
Clinical Outcomes
Standard BacteriologicEfficacy
Kaleidaet al % Effusion-free
*
Good Drug 90% Amoxicillin 53.1%
Fair Drug 70% 47.9%
Poor Drug 50% 42.7%
Tap Water 30% Placebo 37.5%
* White = Actual Data Yellow = Extrapolated Data
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
19/38
Sample Sizes Required to Detect Differences Between an
Antibacterial Drug with 90% Bacteriologic Efficacy and Drugs with
No Efficacy (30%) Poor Efficacy (50%), Poor Efficacy (70%), or in
Clinical Trials of Acute Otitis Media
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
Tap Water
(30%)
Poor Drug
(50%)
Fair Drug
(70%)
Numberofpatients
required
Bacteriologicdiagnosis andoutcome
Symptomatic Failure
in Severe AOM **
Middle Ear Effusionat 14 Days in Non-severe OM
Symptomatic Failure
in Non-Severe AOM
Bacteriologic Outcomes from Marchant et al J Pediatr ics1992;120: 72-77
Clinical Outcomes based on Kaleida et al Pediatrics 1991;87:466
** compared with
myringotomy
not placebo
B t i l i S t ti d T t f C ** O t
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
20/38
Bacteriologic, Symptomatic and Test of Cure ** Outcomes
in Trials of Antibacterial Therapy in Acute Otitis Media
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Efficacy(%)
Recurrence rate5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Bacteriologic Outcome
Symptomatic Outcome During Therapy
** Test of Cure = symptomatic failures during therapy + clinical recurrences after therapy
Based on data from: Marchant CD et al 1992;120:72 & Kaleida et al Pediatrics 1991;87:466
Drugs appear worse than they really are
Drugs appear better than they really are
Placebo
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
21/38
Sample Sizes Required to Detect Differences Between an
Antibacterial Drug with 90% Bacteriologic Efficacy and Drugs with
Fair Efficacy (70%), Poor Efficacy (50%), or Tap water (30%) in
Clinical Trials of Acute Otitis Media
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
Tap Water
(30%)
Poor Drug
(50%)
Fair Drug
(70%)
Numberofpatientsrequired
Bacteriologicdiagnosis andoutcomeSymptomaticResponse
Test of cure with 10%recurrence rate
Test of cure with 20%recurrence rate
Test of cure with30% recurrence rate
Bacteriologic and Symptomatic Outcomes from Marchant et al J Pediatr ics1992;120: 72-77
Test of cure assumes no effect of antibiotics on recurrence rates as demonstrated by Kaleida et alPediatrics 1991;87:466
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
22/38
Timing of Outcomes in Trials Correlating
Clinical and Bacterriologic Endpoints in
Acute Otitis Media
Antibiotic Therapy Post Antibiotic Therapy
Day 4-6 End of Therapy
Day 10-12
Dagan et al
Carlin/
Marchant
et al
Carlin et al J Pediatr 1991;118:178
Marchant et al J Pediatr 1992;120:72Dagan et al Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998;17:776
B t i l AOM B t i l i B t i l i /Cli i l
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
23/38
Bacterial AOM: Bacteriologic, Bacteriologic/Clinical
and Clinical Outcomes
(Double Tap, Tap and Tap of Clinical Failures, and Single Tap
with Clinical End of Therapy and Test of Cure Outcomes)
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Effic
acy
%
Bacteriologic
Efficacy
Bacteriologic
Outcome if Clinical
Failure Day 4-10
End of Therapy
Clinical
Outcome
Excellent drugs
appear worse than
they really are
Poor drugs
look better than
they really are
PlaceboBased on Dagan et al. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998;17:776.
Drugs appear,and are equal
Test of Cure
Clinical
Outcome
S l Si R i d t D t t Diff B t
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
24/38
Sample Sizes Required to Detect Differences Between an
Antibacterial Drug with 90% Bacteriologic Efficacy and Drugs with
No Efficacy (30%) Poor Efficacy (50%), Fair Efficacy (70%), in
Clinical Trials of Bacterial AOM (Tympanocentesis Trials)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
Tap Water
(30%)
Poor Drug
(50%)
Fair Drug
(70%)
Numberofpatients
required
BacteriologicOutcome - "DoubleTap"
BacteriologicOutcome in ClinicalFailures - " Tap &Tap of Failures"
Clinical Failure inBacterial AOM -Initial Tap Only
Test of Cure inBacterial AOM -Initial Tap Only -Recurrence Rate15%
Based on Dagan et al Pediatr Infect Dis 1998;17:776
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
25/38
Clinical Impact of Drug Efficacy
StandardBacteriologic
Efficacy
Number of children withpersistent symptoms on day
3-6 who otherwise would beasymptomatic for eachmillion prescriptions
Perfect Drug 100% 0
Good Drug 90% 20,000
Fair Drug 70% 60,000
Poor Drug 50% 100,000
Tap Water 30% 140,000
Based on Marchant et al J. Pediatr 1992;120:72
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
26/38
Clinical Trial Sizes to Distinguish Between Drugs
with 90% and 30% Bacteriologic Efficacy
The Tap Water Standard
OutcomeReference usedfor calculations
# SubjectsAnalyzed
# SubjectsRecruited
Bacteriologic Double Tap Howie 1972Marchant 1992
30 40
Bacteriologic in Clinical FailuresTap & Tap of Failures
Dagan1998
52 70
Clinical at End of Therapy Dagan1998
146 195
Symptomatic Response 3-6 Days Carlin1991
234 312
Test of Cure Outcome with 15%Clinical Recurrence Rate
Dagan1998
248 331
Study Designs: Initial Bacteriologic Diagnosis:
* Assumes bacteria are isolated from 75% of AOM cases
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
27/38
Clinical Trial Sizes to Distinguish Between Drugs
with 90% and 30% Bacteriologic Efficacy
The Tap Water Standard
OutcomeReferences Used for
Calculations# Subjects Recruited &
Analyzed
Initial Treatment Failure in
Severe AOM (vs Myringotomy)
Kaleida 1991
Marchant 1992
356
Clinical Resolution 7-14 Days(Meta-analysis)
Rosenfeld 510
Middle Ear Effusion at End ofTherapy
Kaleida 1991Marchant 1992
526
Clinical Outcome at 3-5 Days Marchant 1992 542
Test of Cure Outcome with a20% Clinical Recurrence Rate
Marchant 1992Kaleida 1991
854
Initial Treatment Failure inNon-Severe AOM Kaleida 1991Marchant 1992 1914
Trial Designs - No Tympanocentesis:
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
28/38
Clinical Trial Sizes to Distinguish Between Drugs
with 90% and 50% Bacteriologic Efficacy
The Poor Drug Standard
OutcomeReference usedfor calculations
# SubjectsAnalyzed
# SubjectsRecruited
Bacteriologic Double Tap Howie 1972Marchant 1992
62 83
Bacteriologic in Clinical FailuresTap & Tap of Failures
Dagan1998
210 280
Clinical at End of Therapy Dagan1998
278 371
Symptomatic Response 3-6 Days Carlin1991
466 622
Test of Cure Outcome with 15%Clinical Recurrence Rate
Dagan1998
528 704
Study Designs: Initial Bacteriologic Diagnosis:
* Assumes bacteria are isolated from 75% of AOM cases
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
29/38
Clinical Trial Sizes to Distinguish Between Drugs
with 90% and 50% Bacteriologic Efficacy
The Poor Drug Standard
OutcomeReferences Used for
Calculations# Subjects Recruited &
Analyzed
Initial Treatment Failure in
Severe AOM (vs Myringotomy)
Kaleida 1991
Marchant 1992
716
Clinical Resolution 7-14 Days(Meta-analysis)
Rosenfeld 1082
Clinical Outcome at 3-5 Days Marchant 1992 1136
Middle Ear Effusion at End ofTherapy Kaleida 1991Marchant 1992 1196
Test of Cure Outcome with a20% Clinical Recurrence Rate
Marchant 1992Kaleida 1991
1888
Initial Treatment Failure inNon-Severe AOM Kaleida 1991Marchant 1992 4000
Trial Designs - No Tympanocentesis:
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
30/38
Clinical Trial Sizes to Distinguish Between Drugs
with 90% and 70% Bacteriologic Efficacy
The Fair Drug Standard
OutcomeReference usedfor calculations
# SubjectsAnalyzed
# SubjectsRecruited
Bacteriologic Double Tap Howie 1972Marchant 1992
196 262
Bacteriologic in Clinical FailuresTap & Tap of Failures
Dagan1998
696 928
Clinical at End of Therapy Dagan1998 882 1176
Symptomatic Response 3-6 Days Carlin1991
1606 2142
Test of Cure Outcome with 15%Clinical Recurrence Rate
Dagan1998
1952 2604
Study Designs: Initial Bacteriologic Diagnosis:
* Assumes bacteria are isolated from 75% of AOM cases
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
31/38
Clinical Trial Sizes to Distinguish Between Drugs
with 90% and 70% Bacteriologic Efficacy
The Fair Drug Standard
OutcomeReferences Used for
Calculations# Subjects Recruited &
Analyzed
Initial Treatment Failure in
Severe AOM (vs Myringotomy)
Kaleida 1991
Marchant 1992
2250
Clinical Resolution 7-14 Days(Meta-analysis)
Rosenfeld 3986
Clinical Outcome at 3-5 Days Marchant 1992 4146
Middle Ear Effusion at End ofTherapy Kaleida 1991Marchant 1992 4806
Test of Cure Outcome with a20% Clinical Recurrence Rate
Marchant 1992Kaleida 1991
7368
Initial Treatment Failure inNon-Severe AOM Kaleida 1991Marchant 1992 13266
Trial Designs - No Tympanocentesis:
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
32/38
Conclusions
1. Most trials using bacteriologic
diagnosis and clinical outcome have
been too small to distinguish between
a good drug and tap water and all have
been too small to distinguish between
a good drug and a fair drug
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
33/38
Conclusions2. Most trials using clinical diagnosis and
a clinical outcome have been too small
to distinguish between a good drug
and tap water
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
34/38
Conclusions
3. Data do not support the use of the
Test of Cure outcome as ascientifically valid outcome in clinical
trials of antibacterial drugs for AOM
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
35/38
Recommendations
1. Clinical trial data in support of licensureof antibiotics for AOM should, at a
minimum, exceed the tap water
standard.
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
36/38
Recommendations
2. The FDA should convene a panel of
experts to examine the design ofantibiotic trials for AOM using scientific
data and principles, and revise the
current Guidance for Industryaccordingly.
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
37/38
Recommendations
3. If double tympanocentesis studies are to
be conducted, research into the
effectiveness of various methods ofsystemic and topical analgesia/
anesthesia for tympanocentesis should
be performed (industry should considersponsorship of such studies).
7/30/2019 3802s1_01_Marchant
38/38
Recommendations
4. Improved methods for trials with
clinical outcomes (e.g. more sensitive
outcomes, enriched populations, etc.)should be investigated in rigorous
studies. However, large numbers of
subjects may still be required to
demonstrate efficacy in clinical studies
despite such refinements.