8/16/2019 35_jensen

1/4

The future of the European Social Model – New perspectives for industrial relations, social

and employment policy in Europe? 10-12/09/2014, Dublin, Ireland

Abstract submitted for

Theme 5: Methodology: Which theory, theories and methods do we need and want incomparative IR? Sub-theme 5A: Paradigms in industrial relations research

Classical theories and new trends within the field of Industrial Relations – Changing pattern

of social stratification and the need for new understanding within the theoretical field of

industrial relations

By Carsten Strøby Jensen, Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, University of

Copenhagen

‘Can Industrial Relations be viable if union density is less than 10 percent and if labor unions are

 popularly viewed as narrow special interests groups that harm competitiveness? In other words, is

the decline of organized labor a sword of Democles hanging over the field of industrial relations?”

(Budd 2004: 189)

Taking the above quite from John Budd as a starting point this paper will discuss one of the major

challenges to the field of industrial relations, namely the declining importance of the classical

collective actors like trade unions and employers association within the field of industrial relations.

The paper will discuss how social stratification in late modern societies have changed during the

last twenty to thirty years leading to a more individualized society. Individualization are one of the

challenges that are confronting the traditional systems of industrial relations in Western societies .

Individualizations tends to undermine the traditional collective oriented systems of collective

 bargaining. Industrial relations research have traditionally focused on collective actors and

collective bargaining. The question asked in the paper is, what kind of theories are need in order to

understand and conceptualize labour markets and industrial relation in a world that is less and less

committed to collective actors and collective actions. How can we understand and conceptualize

labour markets in which the traditional major industrial relations actors do not play the same role as

they used to play. Industrial relations research need to be able to conceptualize industrial relations

as a system that does not primarily consists of collective actors. Industrial relations research need to

understand how changing patterns of social stratification change the field of industrial relations.

Selected biography

Ackers, P. (2007) ‘Collective Bargaining and Industrial Democracy: Hugh Clegg and the Political

Foundation of British Industrial Relations Pluralism’, British Journal of Industrial Relations 45(1):

77-101

Ackers, P. & Wilkinson, A. (2003) ‘Introduction: The British Industrial Relations Tradition –

Formation, Breakdown, and Salvage’. In Ackers, P. & Wilkinson, A. (eds.) (2003) Understanding

Work and Employment: Industrial Relations in Transition, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-30

Ackers, P. & Wilkinson, A. (2005) ‘British Industrial Relations Paradigm: A Critical Outline of

History and Prognosis’, Journal of Industrial Relations 47(4): 443-456.

8/16/2019 35_jensen

2/4

Ackers, P. & Wilkinson, A. (2008) ‘Industrial Relations and the Social Science’. In Blyton, P.,

Bacon, N., Fiorito, J. & Heery, E. (2008), The SAGE Handbook of Industrial Relations, London:

Sage, 53-68.

Adams, R.J. (1983) ‘Competing Paradigms in Industrial Relations’, Relations industrielles /

 Industrial Relations, 38 (3):508-531.Adam, R.J. (1993) ‘Theory Construction and Assessment: A Checklist’. In Adams, R.J. & Meltz,

 N.M. (eds.) (1993): Industrial Relations Theory – Its Nature, Scope and Pedagogy, London: IMLR

Press/Rutgers University, 333-352.

Bacon, N. (2003) ‘Human Resource Management and Industrial Relations’. In: Ackers, P. &

Wilkinson (eds.) (2003) Understanding Work and Employment: Industrial Relations in Transition,

Oxford: Oxford University Press, 71-77.

Bellemare, G. (2000) ‘End Users: Actors in the Industrial Relations System?’  British Journal of

Sociology 38(3):383-405.

Bech, U. (1992) Risk Society – Toward a New Modernity. London: Sage.

Bernard, C., Deakin, S. & Hobbs, R. (2004) Reflexive law, corporate social responsibility and the

evolution of labour standards: the case of working time. Working paper No. 294, ESRC Centre forBusiness Research, University of Cambridge.

Bray, M. & Macneil, J (2011) ‘Individualism, Collectivism, and the Case of Awards in Australia’.

 Journal of Industrial Relations 53(1): 149-167.

Clegg, H.A. (1976) Trade Unionism under Collective Bargaining: A Theory Based on Comparisons

of Six Countries. Oxford: Blackwell..

Coase, R. (1937) ‘The Nature of the Firm’. Economica 4(16): 386-405

Coleman, J.S. (1986) ‘Social Theory, Social Research, and a Theory of Action’. The American

 Journal of Sociology 91(6): 1309-1335.

DiMaggio, P. (1988) ‘Interests and Agency in Institutional Theory’. In: Zucker, L.G. (1998),

 Institutional Patterns and Organizations – Culture and Environment , Cambridge, Massachusetts:

Ballinger Publishing Company, 3-23. .

DiMaggio, P. J. & W. Powell (1983) ‘The iron cage revisited - institutional isomorphism and

collective rationality in organizational fields’. American Sociological Review, 48 (2): 147-160.

Dobbin, F. (2005) ‘Is Globalization Making Us All the Same?’ British Journal of Sociology 43(4):

569-576.

Dunlop, J.T. (1958) Industrial Relations System. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston,.

Edwards, P. (2005) ‘The challenging but promising future of industrial relations: developing theory

and methods in context-sensitive research’. Industrial Relations Journal 36(4): 264-282

Edwards, P. (2006) ‘Industrial Relations and Critical Realism: IR’s Tacit Contribution’.

Workingpapers in Industrial relations, 2006:80, University of Warwick.

Elster, J. (1989) The cement of society – A study of social order . Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.

Fox, A. (1974) Beyond contract: Work, Power and Trust Relations, London, Faber.

Frege, C. (2005) ‘Varieties of Industrial Relations Research: Take-Over, Convergence and

Divergence’. British Journal of Industrial Relations 43:2(179-207).

Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press..

Hall, P, & Soskice, D. (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative

advantages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Haworth, N. & Hughes, S (2003) ‘International Political Economy and Industrial Relations’. British

 Journal of Industrial Relations 41(4): 665-682

Hechter, M. (1987) Principles of Group Solidarity. Berkeley: University of California Press,

8/16/2019 35_jensen

3/4

Heery, E. & Frege, C. (2006) ‘New Actors in Industrial Relations’. British Journal of Industrial

 Relations 44(4): 601-604.

Hyman, R. (1975) Industrial relations: A Marxist introduction. London: Macmillan.

Hyman, R. (1994) ‘Theory and Industrial Relations’. British Journal of Industrial Relations

32(2) 165-180.Hyman, R. (2001) Understanding European Trade Unionism – Between Market, Class and Society. 

London: Sage Publications.

Hyman, R. (2001a) ‘The Europeanisation – or erosion – of industrial relations?’ Industrial

 Relations Journal 32(4): 280-293

Hyman, R. (2007) ‘An Anglo-European Perspective on Industrial Relations Research’.

 Arbetsmarknad och arbetsliv, 13 (3-4): 29-41.

Kaufman, B. (2004a) ‘Employment Relations and the Employment Relations System: A Guide

to Theorizing’. In B. Kaufman (ed.), Theoretical Perspectives on Work and the

 Employment Relationship, Champaign, IL: Industrial Relations Research Association, pp.

41-75.

Kaufman, B.E. (2004b) The Global Evolution of Industrial Relations – Events, ideas and the IIRA .Geneva, International labour Office.

Kaufman, B. (2004c) ‘Toward an integrative theory of Human Resource Management’. In B.

Kaufman (ed.), Theoretical Perspectives on Work and the Employment Relationship, Champaign,

IL: Industrial Relations Research Association, 321-366. 

Kaufman, B.E. (2008) ‘Paradigms in Industrial Relations: Original, Modern and Versions in

Between’. British Journal of Industrial Relations 46(2):314-339.

Kaufman, B.E. (2011) ‘The future of employment relations: insights from theory’. In Townsend, K.

& Wilkinson, A. (eds.) (2011) Research Handbook on the Future of Work and Employment

 Relations, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 13-44.

Kerr, C., Dunlop, J.T., Harbison, F. & Myers, C.A. (1960) Industrialism and industrial man: The

 problems of labour and the management of economic growth. Cambridge Mass: Harvard

University.

Kelly, J. (1998) Rethinking Industrial Relations – Mobilization, Collectivism and Long Waves.

London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.

Kessler, I. & Purcell, J. (2004) ‘Individualism and Collectivism in Industrial Relations’. In:

Edwards, P. (2004) (ed.) Industrial Relations – Theory and Practice, second edition, Oxford:

Blackwell Publishing 313-338.

Kochan, T.A., Katz, H.C. & Mckersie, R.B. (1986) The Transformation of American Industrial

 Relations. New York: Basic Books.

Konzelmann, S.J. (2005)’Varieties of Capitalism: Production and Market Relations in the USA and

Japan’. British Journal of Industrial Relations 43 (4): 593-603.Marginson, P. & Sisson, K. (2004) European Integration and Industrial Relations – Multilevel

Governance in the Making. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Murrey, G. (2010) ‘Framing Globalization and Work: A Research Agenda’. Journal of Industrial

 Relations 52(1): 11-25.

Müller-Jentsch, W. (2004) ‘Theoretical Approaches to Industrial Relations’. In: Kaufman, B.E.

(2004): Theoretical Perspectives on Work and the Employment Relationship, Industrial Relations

Research Association Series, Industrial Relations Research Association, University of Illinois 1-40.

Olson, M. (1965) The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups . Cambridge:

Harvard University Press.

8/16/2019 35_jensen

4/4

Piore, M.J. & Safford, S. (2006) ‘Changing Regimes of Workplace Governance, Shifting Axes of

Social Mobilization, and the Challenge to Industrial Relations Theory’. Industrial Relations 45

(3):299-325.

Poole, Michael (1981) Theories of Trade Unionism: A Sociology of Industrial Relations.

London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Poole, M. (1986) Industrial relations – Origins and Patterns of National Diversity. London:

Routledge & Kegan Poul.

Poole, M. (1993) ‘Industrial Relations: Theorizing for a Global Perspective’. In Adams, R.J. &

Meltz, N.M. (eds.) (1993): Industrial Relations Theory – Its Nature, Scope and Pedagogy, IMLR

Press/Rutgers University. London 103-118. Rogowski, R. & Wilthagen, T. (1994) Reflexive labour law, Studies in industrial relations and

employment regulation. Boston: Kluwer Law & Taxation, Deventer Paperback.

Rogowski, R. (2000) ‘Industrial Relations as a Social System’. Industrielle Beziehungen, 7(1): 97-

126.

Rose, N. (1999) Powers of Freedom. Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.Scott, R. (1995) Institutions and Organizations. London: Sage Publications.

Sisson, K. (2007) ‘Revitalising Industrial Relations: making the most of the ‘institutional turn’’.

Workingpapers in Industrial relations, 2007:85, Warwick: University of Warwick.

Traxler, F. (1995) ‘Two Logics of Collective Action in Industrial relations?’ In: Crouch, C. &

Traxler, F. (1995) Organized Industrial Relations in Europe: What Future, Avebury, Aldershot 23-

45.

Traxler, F. (2003) ‘Bargaining, State Regulation and the Trajectories of Industrial Relations’.

 European Journal of Industrial Relations (2): 141-161.

Traxler, F., Blaschke, S. & Kittel, B. (2001) National labour relations in internationalized markets

 – A comparative study of institutions, change and performance. New York: Oxford University.

Wailes, N. (2008) Rethinking Globalization and Employment Relations: Introduction to the

Symposium. Journal of Industrial Relation 50(5): 675-679.

Wailes, N., Ramia, G. & Landsbury, R. (2003) ‘Interests, Institutions and Industrial Relations’.

 British Journal of Industrial Relations 41(4): 617-637

Wailes, N., Bamber, G & Landsbury, R. (2011) ‘International and Comparative employment

relations: an introduction’. In: Bamber, G., Landsbury, R. & Wailes, N. (Eds.) (2011). International

and comparative employment relations – Globalisation and Change (5. ed.). Sydney: Allan &

Unwin 1-35.

Williamson, O.E. (1975) Markets and hierarchie : analysis and antitrust implications : a study in

the economics of internal organization. New York: Free Press.