Upload
iolani
View
25
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Secondary succession: changes in relative abundance of tree species at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest. 34 invertebrate communities in streams A, B, C, D indicate community types determined by classification. Classification. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Secondary succession: changes in relative abundance of tree species at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest
34 invertebrate communities in streamsA, B, C, D indicate community types determined by classification
Classification
Primary succession: colonization of concrete blocks in intertidal zone by algae
Keystone species
Sea otter
urchins
kelp
Heterotrophic succession: fungal populations colonizing pine litter
No disturbance
Periodic density-dependent disturbance
Enteromorpha ChondrusPreferred food Poor food sourceDominant competitor Poor competitor
Littorina littorea
Ecosystem:
Tansley (1935)
“The more fundamental conception is… the whole ecosystem including not only the organism-complex, but also the whole complex of physical factors forming what we call the environment…
We cannot separate the organisms from their special environment with which they form one physical system….
It is the system so formed which provides the basic units of nature on the face of the earth.”
Precipitation
Temperature
temperature
Rat
e of
pho
tosy
n or
resp
iratio
n
Net photosynthesi
s
Gross photosynthesis
respiration
temperature
Net
pho
tosy
nthe
sis
Topt
Water deficit:Potential evapotranspiration (PET) - precipitation (PPT)
Length of growing season
Limiting nutrient availability
NPP along transect from coast of Georgia to edge of continental shelf
CE = InPn−1
×100
Consumption efficiency Energy ingested at trophic level n
Energy produced at trophic level n-1
AE=AnIn×100
Assimilation efficiency Energy assimilated at trophic level n
Energy ingested at trophic level n
PE =PnAn
×100
Production efficiency Energy produced at trophic level n
Energy assimilated at trophic level n
TLTE =Pn
Pn−1×100
Trophic level transfer efficiency
TLTE=CE×AE×PE
forest
lake
grassland
stream
Decomposer
Amino acids,Carbohydrates,
Lipids,Nucleic acidsProteins, etc.
InorganicNutrients
NO3-, SO4--, PO4---Mg, Mn, Fe, Ca, K,
etc
immobilization
H2O + CO2O2
respiration
mineralization
Dead animalor plant matter Organic C,
E, nutrients
Limiting nutrientsImmobilized
Decay rate increasedby increased contentof limiting nutrients
All nutrientsmineralized
Decay rate decreasedby increased contentof limiting nutrients
% re
mai
ning
Time
Stages of decomposition
• Early:– Autolysis– Leaching of dissolved OC, minerals– Colonization by bacteria and fungi– Decomposition of sugars and amino acids > starch
> cellulose– Population explosion of early colonizers
Stages of decomposition
• Intermediate/Late– Microorganisms specializing in using resistant
material colonize > high diversity• 1 g soil: 10,000 genetically distinct bacteria
– Degrade cellulose, complex proteins, lignins– Physical contact required (e.g., membrane surface
enzymes)
Time (weeks) Time (weeks) Time (weeks)
% O
rigin
al re
mai
ning
Nutrient dynamics during decomposition in a Scots pine forest, Sweden
Time (weeks) Time (weeks) Time (weeks)
% O
rigin
al re
mai
ning
Nutrient dynamics during decomposition in a Scots pine forest, Sweden
Terminal e- acceptor Process Gas produced
CO2 Methanogenesis CH4
NO3- Denitrification N2O; N2
NO3- Nitrate reduction NH3
SO4- - Sulfate reduction H2S
Concentrations of solutes in streams draining Hubbard Brook experimental catchments W2 (deforested and treated with herbicides in 1965) and W6 (control)