Upload
bluecrete
View
109
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Protection of Mg Alloys Against Galvanic and Other Forms of Corrosion
Wenyue Zhenga, C. Derushieb and Jason Loc
CANMET Materials Technology Laboratory, Natural Resources Canada, 568 Booth Street, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0G1
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Keywords: automotive, structural application, galvanic corrosion, coating, conversion coating, stress corrosion, compatibility, cyclic salt-spray testing, AM 50/60, AE alloy.
Abstract. Galvanic corrosion is a particularly important form of corrosion for Mg alloys used in
automobiles. Our research work focuses on corrosion protection using cost-effective Cr-free
coatings. The top-tanking coatings are found to be effective in preventing general corrosion; some
of these coatings are also good for reducing galvanic corrosion and stress corrosion.
A practical approach for mitigating galvanic corrosion is to increase the electrolytic resistance
between the coated steel and the Mg surfaces. This has been demonstrated in the case of a
conversion coating plus a powder coat applied on the surface of a magnesium alloy and in the case
of a thin Mylar isolation layer installed between the Mg and the steel surfaces.
Introduction
Mg castings of appropriate compositions used in the automotive interior condition can resist well
general corrosion. In terms of general corrosion rates modern Mg alloys can perform quite
satisfactorily in clean atmospheric conditions. For example, in the study by Hillis etal. [1]
, the
measured corrosion rate of AZ91D was less than 4 micrometers per year. In this type of alloys, the
harmful impurity elements are Ni, Fe and Cu. To increase the resistance to corrosion in natural
environment, rare-earth additions have shown to be beneficial [2]
and the good corrosion resistance
of AE alloys, along with their increased creep resistance, has made them the top candidate materials
for many applications.
However, the automotive exterior conditions in cold-climate countries can be very corrosive due
to the use of de-icing salts on the road. The most challenging form of corrosion is galvanic
corrosion. Under the sponsorship of the USAMP (US DOE) and the Canadian Lightweight
Materials Research Initiative (CLIMRI), a research project was initiated at the Materials
Technology Laboratories (MTL) of CANMET to identify cost-effective measures for protecting
magnesium alloys used as structural components such as an engine cradle [3,4]
. The susceptibility of
Mg to stress-corrosion cracking (SCC) is also investigated; this part is relevant to a typical
structural application where certain localized sites may be subject to high stresses.
Evaluation of advanced Chromate-free coating systems
Coating Selection. Although chromate conversion coatings were widely used for Mg alloys used in
aggressive conditions, their future use in automobiles is limited due to the environmental and health
concerns. In this work, a total of eighteen different types of Cr-free coatings were selected [4]
. In
selecting a coating, consideration was given to the technical performance, commercial availability
as well as the effects of the coating materials on the recycling of the component [5]
.
Screening Test Results. ASTM B117 standard was used as a screening tool for the coated and
uncoated Mg samples [4]
. Visual examination of the test plates was performed at preset time
intervals. In the case of the scribed samples, the creeping of corrosion from the scribe line and
degree of disbondment underneath the coating were the criteria for assessing a coating. Based on
the ranking of the test samples after 1000 hours testing, the top coatings were selected for the
validation phase. These coating are: (1) Alodine 5200 with an epoxy powder coat and Magpass
Materials Science Forum Vols. 488-489 (2005) pp. 787-791online at http://www.scientific.net© (2005) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland
All rights reserved. No part of contents of this paper may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without thewritten permission of the publisher: Trans Tech Publications Ltd, Switzerland, www.ttp.net. (ID: 64.76.110.6-28/03/07,18:15:15)
with an epoxy topcoat, (2) Tagnite anodizing with an epoxy topcoat, (3) Anomag anodizing with
Ecoat and (4) Polyurea topcoat
Alodine 5200 [6]
is an organometallic titanium
based primer used as a chromate-replacement
conversion coating. An epoxy powder coat was
used as the topcoat. Figure 1 shows a micrograph of
the cross-section cut of the Mg-coating interface,
which was taken with a focused ion beam
microscope as the conversion layer is less than 0.5
micrometers in thickness. Magpass by AHC is a
new Cr-free conversion coating product with a very
comparable performance. The application processes
of the various conversion coatings are by and large
similar.
Tagnite [7]
is a Cr-free equivalent of the Dow 17 and HAE anodizing coating. The coating
consists mostly of a hard magnesium oxide with minor surface deposition of fused silicates.
Anomag [8]
is another anodizing coating for magnesium. In this work the typical thickness is
between 10 and 15 micrometers; the latest version of Anomag and Tagnite coatings can be made
thinner.
Polyurea [9]
is a fast-curing polymer resulting from the reaction of an isocyanate prepolymer and a
blend of primary and secondary amines. The selection of this product for this project is based on its
good elasticity and adhesion to magnesium and to an epoxy-type topcoat. Although it can be quite
useful for protecting Mg alloy to a certain extent by itself, the main advantage of this coating is that
it can resist chipping and impact damage of the road sand and gravels when used as a topcoat.
Compatibility testing by electrochemical technique
Potentiodynamic polarization testing is a fast way to compare the galvanic compatibility of different
materials. A Solatron 1287 system controlled with a Corrware software was used. The solution
consisted of a 1 M NaCl solution with the pH adjusted to 11 by adding appropriate amount of 0.1 M
NaOH solution.
Figure 2 shows the polarization curves for A356, Mg
alloy AM60 and a new experimental alloys in a salt
solution. AM60 showed a corrosion potential of –1.5 V
(SCE) and the A356 sample showed a potential of about –
1.2 V (SCE). The new experimental Al-Mg alloy showed a
corrosion potential in the vicinity of that of the AM60
alloy. As the galvanic corrosion is driven by the difference
in the corrosion potential of the two coupling metals, it is
conceivable that the galvanic current flow between Mg
alloys and the new Al-Mg alloy would be much smaller
than that between Mg and A356. Another interesting
feature of this comparison is that in the more anodic
potential range the behavior of the new Al-Mg alloys is
very similar to that of A356, indicating a similarity in long-term corrosion resistance.
The LPR resistance of AM60 in 1 M NaCl solution is about 170 Ohms*cm2 and AA6061 alloy
had a resistance of 23,000 Ohms*cm2. The new alloy had a LPR resistance slightly greater than
that of AA 6061 but they are generally in the same range.
Galvanic corrosion testing Using the GM9540 Test Method
GM9540P was chosen as the method for evaluating the galvanic corrosion susceptibility of Mg
(coated and uncoated) fastened with M8 and M10 fasteners. A Singleton CCT-10C cyclic corrosion
Fig. 1 A micrograph of the cross-section of the Mg-
coating interface taken with a FIB microscope.
Fig. 2 Polarization measurements for
AM60, A356 and a new Al-Mg alloy
Magnesium – Science, Technology and Applications788
chamber was used [4]
. Each fastening unit consists of one bolt (M8 or M10), two washers and a hex
nut. The selection of washer materials and their coatings were based on the current industry
recommendations and published performance data [10,11,12]
. A number of in-house made prototype
washers made of the Al-Mg chemistries were also evaluated.
Test results
Bare Mg plate. Figure 3 shows the appearance of the uncoated AM60 plate after 40 cycles of
GM9540 testing. The effects of washers on the galvanic corrosion of Mg are demonstrated very
clearly. The fastener unit which did not contain a washer showed perforation by corrosion in the
vicinity of the bolt, whereas the units with a washer showed much reduced corrosion damage. The
effect of a thin (about 50 micrometer thickness) layer of Mylar sheet on preventing galvanic attack
is shown in Figure 4. In this case, an uncoated steel washer was bolted against the uncoated Mg
plate with the insulating Mylar sandwiched between them. After 40 cycles of testing, the nut was
removed and no sign of corrosion can be seen underneath the Mayler sheet.
On the bare magnesium test plates, the best results were observed with the anodized and sealed
AA6061 washers. A ring of corrosion product can be seen to occur immediately adjacent to the
Ti washer. The experimental alloy washer, Exp2091 showed little effects of galvanic corrosion.
Alodine 5200 with a powder coat [Fig. 5]. In comparison with the bare AM60 plate, the
performance of a coated Mg AM60 plate fastened with various combination of fastening units
showed no visible corrosion on the Mg plate after 40 cycles of testing. There were a few spots of
red-rust emerging on the duplex GM3359 coating on the bolt head itself, likely due to damage
during the application of the torque loading.
Magpass with a powder coat [Fig.6]. Similar results were observed on the test plate coated with
a Magpass conversion layer and then a powder coat as the topcoat, Figure 6.
Magoxide without any topcoat. This series in which anodized plates were bolted with various
Fig.3 Appearance of uncoated AM60 plate after 40
cycles of GM9540 testing.
Fig. 4 Effectiveness of a Mylar sheet under the
washer (bottom center) in preventing galvanic
attack on the Mg plate
Fig. 5 AM60 plate coated with Alodine5200
and a topcoat after 40 cycles of testing. Fig.6 AM60 plate coated with Magpass and
a topcoat after 40 cycles of testing.
Materials Science Forum Vols. 488-489 789
combinations of bolts and nuts showed,
surprisingly, that without an organic topcoat
the semi-conducting oxide layer produced by
anodizing was not sufficient to prevent
galvanic attack by the coated steel bolts.
Figure 7. Note that a good anodizing film such
as Magoxide can very effectively prevent
general corrosion in the environments such as
that in the GM9540 and B117 conditions.
Stress corrosion tests
Stress corrosion tests were carried out using
LPDC AM50 samples. One series of the
samples were coated with an Alodine 5200
conversion coating with an epoxy topcoat; the
other series was tested as-cast. The maximum
stress used was 130% of the yield stress and
the R value was 0.90 to take into account of
any possible load fluctuation in the practice.
The load frequency used was 1.0 Hz, and the
solution used was the GM9540 solution
composition.
The coated sample survived 2.4 million
cycles without the formation of any visible
cracks on the sample surface. On the other
hand, two uncoated samples showed
significant cracking after about 0.4 million
cycles. Figure 8 shows a picture of the LPDC
AM50 alloys containing stress-corrosion
cracks.
Hydrogen embrittlement is thought to be the responsible SCC mechanism in Mg alloys. The
resistance to SCC of the sample coated with Alodine 5200 may be related to the reduction in
hydrogen generation rendered by the presence of the conversion product. Some of the conversion
treatments are known to significantly reduce the formation of hydrogen gas on the Mg surface [13].
Summary and conclusions
Results from completed tasks of this on-going project are very encouraging for future wide-scale
application of Mg alloys as structural components. Specifically, the following conclusions can be
drawn at this stage:
1. Some of the commercially available coating systems for Mg alloys can satisfactorily protect Mg
alloys against aggressive testing conditions established by the industry. For example, chromate-
free conversion coatings, such as Alodine 5200 and Magpass with an epoxy powder coat as well
a sealed anodizing coating, can last sufficiently long to survive the 1000 hours in the ASTM
B117 test chamber.
2. Galvanic corrosion between fasteners and Mg alloys can be effectively mitigated though the use
of a high-resistance insulating layer that separates the magnesium from the cathode material. In
this work, a thin Mylar sheet sandwiched between a steel washer and a magnesium plate as well
as a layer of powder coating on top of a Mg conversion film could effectively prevent the
galvanic attack.
3. In the preliminary SCC tests conducted so far, AM50 samples coated with a conversion product
and a topcoat did not exhibits visible cracking even after 2.4 million load cycles in a GM9540
Fig. 7 Galvanic attack in along the washer on the
anodized Mg plate.
Fig. 8 A uncoated SCC test sample showing cracks
developed along the main fracture surface.
Magnesium – Science, Technology and Applications790
solution whereas uncoated samples showed significant cracking after about 400,000 cycles
under the same test conditions. The beneficial effect of the coating on SCC resistance is likely a
result of its influence in reducing hydrogen generation on the Mg surface.
Acknowledgement
The author(s) acknowledge that this research was supported, in part, by Department of Energy
Cooperative Agreement No. DE-FC05-02OR22910, although such support does not constitute an
endorsement by the Department of Energy of the views expressed herein. Support by the Canadian
Lightweight Materials Research Initiative (CLiMRI) is also acknowledged. The authors wish to
thank all SCMD project members who have provided materials, helpful suggestions and ideas in the
past three years, especially Dick Osborne of GM, The project manager for the SCMD work.
References
[1] J.E. Hillis and R.W. Murray 14th International Die Casting Congress and Exposition, Toronto,
Canada, Paper No. G-T87-003, 1987.
[2] Duan, H; Wang, L; Cai, Q; Zhang, S; Wei, B, China Mechanical Engineering. Vol. 14, no. 20,
pp. 1789-1792. 25 Oct. 2003
[3] R. Osborne, G. Cole, B. Cox and P. Penrod, “USCAR Project on Magnesium Structural
Castings”, Proc. IMA 2000 Magnesium Conference, Vancouver, Canada, 21-23 May,2000, pp
1-5,
[4] W. Zheng, C. Derushie, R. Zhang and J. Lo, Protection of Mg Alloys for Structural Applications
in Automobiles, SAE Paper # 2004-01-0133, SAE.
[5] P. Bakke, S. Sannes and D. Albright, "Effects of Ni, Cu, Si and Co on the Corrosion Properties
of Permanent Mould Cast Medallions and Die Cast Plates of Magnesium Alloy AZ91", SAE
Technical Paper No. 1999-01-0926, SAE, Warrendale, PA, USA
[6] D. Davis, Industrial Paint & Powder (USA), vol. 74, No. 6, June,1998, pp 34-36. (b) P. Kurze,
T. Singe and J. Diesing, “Corrosion protection of magnesium materials (Original Title:
Korrosions-schutz von Magnesium-Werkstoffen.), Metalloberf-lache [Metalloberflache], vol.
54, No. 9, pp 22-24, Sept. 2000.
[7] http://www.tagnite.com
[8] T. Korner, R. Seidel and U. Juptner, “New possibilities for magnesium: Chrome-free surface
treatments for magnesium”, Metalloberflache (Germany), vol. 55, No. 1, pp 20, Jan. 2001
[9] J.A. Johnston and S. Smith, Proc. Alliance for the Polyurethanes Industry (API) Conference,
Salt Lake City, Utah, October 13-16, 2002.
[10]G. Wang, K. Stwart, R. Berkmortel and J.I. Skar, Corrosion Prevention for External
Magnesium Automotive Components, SAE Technical paper No. 2001-01-0421, SAE,
Warrendale, PA, USA
[11]G. Gao, G. Cole, M. Ricketts, J. Balzer and P. Frantzeskakis, “Effects of fastener surface on
galvanic corrosion of automotive magnesium components”, Magnesium 2000: Second
International Conference on Magnesium Science & Technology, Dead Sea, Israel Feb. 22-24,
2000, Proceedings of the Second Israeli International Conference on Magnesium Science &
Technology, pp 321-338.
[12]D. Hawke and T. Ruden, “Galvanic compatibility of coated steel fasteners with magnesium”,
Hydro Magnesium, Publ: Society of Automotive Engineers, 400 Commonwealth Dr.,
Warrendale, PA 15096, USA, 1995 SAE Transactions: Journal of Materials & Manufacturing,
vol.104, 1995, pp 358-362.
[13]En-Hou Han, Wanqiu Zhou, Dayong Shan and Wei Ke, Chemical Conversion Coating on
AZ91D and its Corrosion Resistance, in Magnesium Technology 2004, Edited by Alan Luo,
TMS 2004.
Materials Science Forum Vols. 488-489 791