2nd Quarter 2013 Monitoring Report · 30, 2013 water supply monitoring event are presented herein. In addition to water supply wells, the closed spring “SP-3MW” was sampled on

TEL: 802-860-9400 • FAX: 802-860-9440 • [email protected] • 7 Kilburn Street, Suite 301, Burlington, VT 05401

August 8, 2013 Mr. Gerold Noyes, P.E. Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Waste Management Division 103 S. Main Street, West Building Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0404 Sent via email: [email protected] RE: 2nd Quarter 2013 Monitoring Report UniFirst Plant Site, Williamstown, Vermont (Site #77-0087) Dear Gerold: Waite-Heindel Environmental Management (WHEM) is pleased to present the 2nd Quarter 2013 Monitoring Report for the UniFirst Plant Site in Williamstown, Vermont. Details of the April 30, 2013 water supply monitoring event are presented herein. In addition to water supply wells, the closed spring “SP-3MW” was sampled on April 30 because in October 2012 the recently installed standpipe had been secured with a new lock and could not be accessed for sampling. This report is being submitted electronically per WHEM’s contract with the State of Vermont (contract EC13-04). I will let you distribute the electronic version as appropriate. Do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this report or the work completed. Sincerely, Chris Page Miles E. Waite, Ph.D. Staff Scientist Senior Hydrogeologist Enclosure

2nd Quarter 2013 MONITORING

REPORT

for the

UNIFIRST PLANT SITE WILLIAMSTOWN, VERMONT

VT DEC Site #77-0087

August 8, 2013

Prepared for:

STATE OF VERMONT Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation

Waste Management Division 103 South Main Street, West Building

Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0404

Prepared by:

7 Kilburn Street Suite 301

Burlington, Vermont 05401

(802) 860-9400 www.waiteenv.com

2nd Quarter 2013 Monitoring Report UniFirst Plant Site

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 2

2.0 WATER SUPPLY SAMPLING ...................................................................................... 2 2.1 WATER SUPPLY SAMPLE COLLECTION ............................................................................ 2 2.2 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS ................................................................................................. 3

2.2.1 QA/QC Samples .......................................................................................................... 3

3.0 SPRING “SP-3MW” SAMPLING .................................................................................. 4 3.1 GROUNDWATER SAMPLE COLLECTION ............................................................................ 4 3.2 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS ................................................................................................. 4

4.0 DISCUSSION OF DATA VALIDATION ...................................................................... 5

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................... 6

LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A: Figures Site Location Map Site Plan Appendix B: Tables Table 1.0 Supply Well Results: 2008-2013 Table 2.0 Monitoring Well & Seep Results: 2009-2013 Appendix C: Data Validation Report

August 8, 2013 i WHEM Project #110320012


August 8, 2013 1 WHEM Project #110320012

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On April 30, 2013, Waite-Heindel Environmental Management, LLC (WHEM) conducted water supply sampling at the UniFirst Plant site in Williamstown, Vermont (VT DEC Site #77-0087). A total of five (5) residential water supply wells were sampled by tap sampling methods. No significant problems were encountered during the sampling event, and sampling procedures were in accordance with site protocols. In addition, spring “SP-3MW” was sampled, as the recently installed standpipe was locked with a new lock and could not be accessed during October 2012 groundwater sampling. The water samples were analyzed by TestAmerica Laboratory (TA) using EPA Method 524.2 for volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The following four target VOCs are monitored as part of this project: tetrachloroethene (PCE), trichloroethene (TCE), cis-1,2-dichloroethene (cis-1,2-DCE), and trans-1,2-dichloroethene (trans-1,2-DCE). The laboratory results indicate a trace concentration of TCE was detected in the well from the Beede residence (WP-3) at its highest concentration to date (1.0 ug/L). TCE has been detected at trace levels here before, though never at a concentration above the drinking water guidance. No target VOCs were detected at any of the four other water supply sampling locations (WP-5, WP-7, WP-8, or WP-13). In SP-3MW, a trace concentration of the target compound cis-1,2-DCE was estimated (0.29 ug/L) below laboratory detection limits, but there were no other detections. All analytical results were validated by an independent validator in accordance with Tier III guidelines as described by the USEPA Region I. Based on the Data Validation Report, results for target VOCs were determined to be valid with no qualifications. Based on the results of the April 2013 sampling event, WHEM recommends continuing with water supply monitoring program as specified as specified by the established site protocols. The next supply well sampling event is scheduled to occur in October 2013. Groundwater monitoring from monitoring wells, seeps, springs, and a bedrock monitoring well are also scheduled for October 2013. Regarding the Beede well, due to the sudden increase in TCE concentration, possibly related to an increase in usage for the well with the recent addition of several occupants household, it could be necessary to re-evaluate connection to Town water depending on the next round of results.



1.0 INTRODUCTION The following 2nd Quarter 2013 Monitoring Report for the UniFirst Plant Site in Williamstown, Vermont (see attached Site Location Map in Appendix A) was prepared by Waite-Heindel Environmental Management, LLC (WHEM) for the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (VT DEC). This report has been completed in accordance WHEM's contract with State of Vermont (contract EC13-04) for environmental monitoring. The scheduled tasks for this Site during the 2nd Quarter 2013 have recently been modified, and now include only the sampling of six (6) residential water supplies.

2.0 WATER SUPPLY SAMPLING Water supply sampling was conducted by WHEM at five (5) residences on April 30, 2013. The water supplies sampled were from the drilled well at the Beede residence (WP-3), the drilled well at the Beattie residence (WP-5), the drilled well at the McGlynn residence (WP-7), the drilled well at the Duke residence (WP-8), and the drilled well at the Dindo residence (WP-13). Sampling could not be conducted from the drilled well at the Sweet residence (WP-20) as it was unoccupied at the time of sampling and the water was turned off. Sampling was conducted in accordance with WHEM’s Work Plan and with the FLCM-Water. All sampling locations are shown in the Site Plan in Appendix A. Details and results of the water supply sampling event are described below.

2.1 Water Supply Sample Collection All water supply samples were collected by tap sampling methods. This involved accessing the pre-specified tap (outside hose bib or kitchen sink) at each residence, allowing the cold water to run for a minimum of 10 minutes at an approximate purge rate of 3 gallons/minute, and then slowly collecting the water sample directly from the tap into to laboratory containers. The order of sample collection was as dictated by the FLCM-Water. Tap locations and purge volumes for each of the residences used in the April 2013 sampling event are shown below:

Residence Sample Name Tap Location Approx. Purge Volume (gal)

Beede WP-3 Kitchen 30 Beattie WP-5 Kitchen 30

McGlynn WP-7 Outside 30 Duke WP-8 Kitchen 30 Dindo WP-13 Outside 30 Sweet WP-20 Outside Not sampled

Note that the Work Plan calls for sampling from the kitchen sink of the Dindo residence when possible. Due to inability of WHEM to obtain access to kitchen of this residence (owner not present) on April 30, 2013, this sample was collected from the outside tap instead.



All samples were delivered by WHEM to TA. Water supply samples were submitted for analysis of volatile organic compounds via EPA Method 524.2. Results for PCE, TCE, cis-1,2-DCE and trans-1,2-DCE are discussed below.

2.2 Discussion of Results Validated laboratory analytical results are summarized in Table 1.0 in Appendix B. Full copies of the laboratory report are presented in Data Validation Report prepared by Phoenix Chemistry Service, on file at the VT DEC offices in Waterbury. The text of the Data Validation Report is presented in Appendix C. The laboratory results indicate a trace concentration of TCE was detected in the well from the Beede residence (WP-3) at its highest concentration to date (1.0 ug/L). Additionally, cis-1,2-DCE was estimated (0.32 ug/L) below laboratory reporting limits. TCE has been detected at trace levels here before, but never at a concentration above the drinking water guidance. No target VOCs were detected at any of the four other water supply sampling locations (WP-5, WP-7, WP-8, or WP-13). Based on results going back to the early 1980s, TCE has never been detected above laboratory reporting limits at WP-5, WP-7, WP-8, or WP-13.

2.2.1 QA/QC Samples As part of the QA/QC program, WHEM collected one (1) field duplicate sample (WP-Z) on April 30, 2013. This sample was collected in conjunction with the sample from WP-3 and analyzed by TA using the same method (EPA Method 524.2). A trace of TCE was detected, as well as a trace concentration of cis-1,2-DCE (estimated below reporting limits) for both samples. However, because detections were not greater than 2 times the respective reporting limits, precision of the reported compounds could not be evaluated in this field duplicate pair. WHEM also submitted one (1) trip blank (TB-1) and one (1) field blank (FB-1) on April 30, 2013. No target compounds were reported in either sample. WHEM also arranged for one (1) single-blind performance evaluation sample (PES) for analysis by EPA Method 524.2. WHEM obtained this sample from the vendor (Environmental Resource Associates of Arvada, Colorado) and submitted one set to TestAmerica with the samples labeled as “WP-23”. The results indicate that all of the spiked target compounds were within the vendor’s published QC Performance Acceptance Limits. Further description of the PE sample is presented in the Data Validation Report in Appendix C.



3.0 SPRING “SP-3MW” SAMPLING The closed spring SP-3MW (formerly SP-3) was until recently accessed directly via the springhouse, but in 2012 the springhouse was removed, the spring box filled with sand, and a vertical standpipe was installed within the spring box to allow for continued monitoring of the water. In October 2012, the vertical standpipe at SP-3MW was secured with a new lock and could not be accessed for sampling; therefore, SP-3MW was sampled as part of the April 30, 2013 monitoring round. Sampling was conducted in accordance with WHEM’s Work Plan and with the FLCM-Water, with two minor deviations: due to an oversight in the field, the SP-3MW sample was submitted for analysis by EPA Method 524.2 instead of 8260; additionally, water chemistry parameters were not recorded as they usually are for groundwater samples. The location of SP-3MW is shown in the Site Plan in Appendix A. Details and results of the groundwater sampling event are described below.

3.1 Groundwater Sample Collection Groundwater from SP-3MW was collected using a disposable polyethylene bailer. Depth to water was recorded along with total well depth. The standpipe was then was purged of three well volumes before a grab sample was collected. The sample was poured directly from the bailer into the pre-preserved sample containers provided by the laboratory, making sure no headspace was present in the sample. The sample was placed on ice and delivered to TestAmerica for analysis by EPA Method 524.2. This was an oversight in the field, as the Work Plan and FLCM-Water indicate that groundwater samples be submitted for analysis by 8260B. However, 524.2 analysis yields lower detection limits than 8260B and in no way invalidates the sampling event.

3.2 Discussion of Results Validated laboratory analytical results are summarized in Table 2.0 in Appendix B. Full copies of the laboratory report are presented in Data Validation Report prepared by Phoenix Chemistry Service, on file at the VT DEC offices in Waterbury. The text of the Data Validation Report is presented in Appendix C. The laboratory results indicate that in SP-3MW, the target compound cis-1,2-DCE was estimated (0.29 ug/L) below laboratory detection limits, but there were no other detections. Generally, trace detections of target compounds PCE and TCE have been sporadically detected at this location since monitoring began, with PCE occasionally in exceedance of Groundwater Enforcement Standards. Results from this round were therefore at the lower end of historical ranges for target compounds.



4.0 DISCUSSION OF DATA VALIDATION The laboratory data for water samples collected during April 2013 were validated by Phoenix Chemistry Services, an independent data validator. The validation was performed in accordance with Tier III guidelines as described by the USEPA Region I. Details are presented in the report titled: Data Validation for the UniFirst Project, Bressett and UniFirst Sites, Randolph and Williamstown, VT, Organic Analysis Data, Volatile Organics in Water Samples, Sample Delivery Group Nos. BRES55 and UNIF46, July 8, 2013. The complete report is on file at the VT DEC offices in Waterbury. The text of the report is included as Appendix E. Results for target volatile organic compounds in samples collected from the UniFirst Site on April 30, 2013 were determined to be valid as reported for all samples. There were qualifications for non-target compounds (bromomethane, 2-butanone) as well as some minor lab documentation and presentation issues. While these issues do not directly affect that validity of the analytical data, they could be problematic if the results were to be used in a litigation situation.



5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on results of water supply sampling conducted by WHEM at the UniFirst Plant site on April 30, 2013, the following conclusions are presented:

• The target compound TCE was detected at 1.0 ug/L from the Beede well (WP-3). Additionally, a trace concentration of cis-1,2-DCE was estimated (0.32 ug/L) below reporting limits in the WP-3 sample. While the detection of TCE in the Beede well is not unusual, and the estimated concentration is below the drinking water standard for this compound (5.0 ug/L), the concentration of TCE observed is the highest to date since monitoring of this well began in 1983. It is possible that the relative increase in water demand from the three-member Beede family is causing this spike in concentration. The previous long-term occupant, the late Mrs. Jeffords, lived alone and likely used significantly less water. Alternatively, limited precipitation and snowmelt in Spring 2013 may have contributed. It is likely that a combination of these two factors is at play.

• No target compounds were detected in the supply wells from other residences tested (WP-5, WP-7, WP-8, and WP-13).

• A trace of the target compound cis-1,2-DCE was detected at the former spring SP-3, now called SP-3MW. Neither the compound PCE nor TCE were detected, which have been routinely detected in the past. Future monitoring should determine if this change is an anomaly or somehow related to the filling of the spring.

• Based on the Data Validation Report, results for all target compounds were determined to be valid as reported.

Based on the above information, WHEM recommends continuing with the water supply monitoring program as specified in the Work Plan and FLCM-Water. Depending on the results of the next water supply sampling round, it could be necessary to re-evaluate the usage of the Beede water supply well (WP-3) in favor of connecting the home to town water. The next water supply sampling event is scheduled to occur in October 2013. Groundwater monitoring from monitoring wells, seeps, springs and one bedrock monitoring well are also scheduled for October 2013.


August 8, 2013 WHEM Project #110320012

APPENDIX A:

FIGURES

LEGEND

State-Listed Hazardous Waste Site

Map Source: USGS Mapping 7.5 Minute Quadrangles: Barre West (1988), Brookfield (1983).

Data Source Vermont DEC databases, updated August 2003.

Date: 12/15/12 Drawing No. 1 Scale: 1:24,000 By: MEW

SITE LOCATION MAP

UniFirst Plant Site

Williamstown, Vermont

HIGH SCHOOL

NNNN

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

UNIFIRST PLANT SITE#77-0087

Waite-HeindelEnvironmental Management



APPENDIX B:

TABLES

Owner Location Parameter Groundwater UnitsEnforcement

Method 524.2 StandardBeede WP-3 PCE 0.7 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.7 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U

TCE 5.0 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.18 J 0.5 U 0.18 J 0.08 J 0.10 J 1.0cis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.32 Jtrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.7 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U

Beattie WP-5 PCE 0.7 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.7 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 UTCE 5.0 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 Ucis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 Utrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.7 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U

McGlynn WP-7 PCE 0.7 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.7 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 UTCE 5.0 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 Ucis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 Utrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.7 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U

Duke WP-8 PCE 0.7 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.7 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 UTCE 5.0 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 Ucis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 Utrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.7 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U

Evelyn WP-13 PCE 0.7 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.7 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 UTCE 5.0 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 Ucis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 Utrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.7 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U

Kreisz WP-20 PCE 0.7 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 UTCE 5.0 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 Ucis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 Utrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 0.5 U 0.5 U

Apr-08 Apr-13Oct-10May-09Oct-08 Oct-12Oct-09 Apr-10 Apr-11 Oct-11 Apr-12

Notes:- "PCE" = tetrachlorethene; "TCE" = tricholorethene; "DCE" = dichloroethene. -"U" = not detected above listed quantitation limit; "J" = reported concentration is an estimated value; "UJ" = reported quantitation limit is an estimated value.-"Dry" = well dry during monitoring event; "NA" = not applicable; blank = no sample collected.- All samples analyzed by EPA Method 524.2.- Data entered from the data validation report for each sampling event.- Enforcement Standard for PCE is the Vermont Action Level, taken from the Vermont Department of Health Drinking Water Guidance, December 2002.- Enforcement Standard for TCE, cis-1,2-DCE, and trans-1,2-DCE is the Federal Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL), December 2002.

TABLE 1.0SUPPLY WELL RESULTS: 2008-2013

UniFirst Plant Site, Williamstown, Vermont

WHEM Project #11032-12 Page 1 of 1 VT DEC Site #77-0087

Location Parameter Groundwater UnitsEnforcement

Method 8280B StandardW-1 PCE 5.0 ug/L 25 21 22 24

TCE 5.0 ug/L 0.64 J 0.82 J 0.93 J 1.7cis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Utrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

W-19 PCE 5.0 ug/L 8.7 2.7 3.9 8.1TCE 5.0 ug/L 2.0 0.33 J 1.0 U 0.68 Jcis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Utrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

W-20 PCE 5.0 ug/L 24 22 33 23TCE 5.0 ug/L 22 20 31 23cis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 3.4 3.0 4.5 4.7trans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

W-23 PCE 5.0 ug/L 120 82TCE 5.0 ug/L 3.0 2.3cis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 0.24 J 1.0 Utrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U

W-25 PCE 5.0 ug/L 7.5 8.1 8.9 9.3TCE 5.0 ug/L 1.2 U 1.6 1.9 3.3cis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 0.27 J 0.19 J 1.0 U 0.38 Jtrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 0.25 J

MW-50 PCE 5.0 ug/L 2.0 2.7 2.3 3.1TCE 5.0 ug/L 2.9 3.1 2.2 4.6cis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 0.61 J 0.51 J 0.42 J 1.1trans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 1.0 U 0.25 J 1.0 U 1.0 U

MW-51 PCE 5.0 ug/LTCE 5.0 ug/Lcis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/Ltrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L

MW-A PCE 5.0 ug/LTCE 5.0 ug/Lcis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/Ltrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L

MW-C PCE 5.0 ug/L 16 11 13 20TCE 5.0 ug/L 0.84 J 0.85 J 0.85 J 2.3cis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Utrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

MW-D PCE 5.0 ug/L 77 J 40 54 73TCE 5.0 ug/L 30 J 13 18 30cis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 3.3 J 1.3 1.8 3.3trans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 0.35 J 0.41 J 0.26 J 0.45 J

MW-E PCE 5.0 ug/L 20 12 23 22TCE 5.0 ug/L 6.4 4.4 8.8 8.5cis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 0.79 J 1.2 0.99 J 0.54 Jtrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 1.5 1.1 1.3 0.52 J

PZ-101 PCE 5.0 ug/L 5.6 3.3 6.3 5.0TCE 5.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Ucis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Utrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

DRYDRYDRYDRY

Oct-12

DRYDRYDRYDRY

DRYDRYDRYDRY

Oct-11

DRYDRYDRYDRY

DRYDRYDRYDRY

DRYDRYDRY

DRYDRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

Oct-09

DRYDRYDRY

DRY

Apr-10

DRYDRYDRY

DRY

DRY

DRYDRYDRY

DRYDRYDRY

Oct-10

DRYDRYDRYDRY

DRY

Apr-11

DRYDRYDRYDRY

DRYDRYDRYDRY

Apr-13 *

TABLE 2.0MONITORING WELL & SEEP RESULTS: 2009-2013



Location Parameter Groundwater UnitsEnforcement

Method 8280B Standard

Oct-12Oct-11Oct-09 Apr-10 Oct-10 Apr-11 Apr-13 *

TABLE 2.0MONITORING WELL & SEEP RESULTS: 2009-2013


PZ-102 PCE 5.0 ug/L 15 13 8.6 17TCE 5.0 ug/L 0.33 J 0.34 J 0.21 J 0.42 Jcis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Utrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

MW-25884 PCE 5.0 ug/L 0.36 J 0.40 J 0.61 J 0.51 J 0.49 JTCE 5.0 ug/L 0.80 J 0.88 J 0.82 J 0.75 J 0.76 Jcis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 0.59 J 0.59 J 0.54 J 0.49 J 0.56 Jtrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

W-SEEP PCE 5.0 ug/L 0.26 J 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 0.25 J 0.31 JTCE 5.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Ucis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Utrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

SEEP-1A PCE 5.0 ug/L 2.3 1.8 1.5 1.4 1.4 3.7TCE 5.0 ug/L 1.7 1.1 0.79 J 0.88 J 1.1 2.5cis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 0.20 J 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Utrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

SS-2 PCE 5.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 UTCE 5.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Ucis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Utrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

SS-3 PCE 5.0 ug/L 5.8 4.2 4.2 2.2 JTCE 5.0 ug/L 0.49 J 1.0 U 0.33 J 0.56 Jcis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 0.26 Jtrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

SS-5 PCE 5.0 ug/L 1.0 U 0.66 J 0.39 J 0.77 J 0.25 J 1.0 UTCE 5.0 ug/L 0.85 J 0.75 J 0.59 J 0.51 J 1.2 0.37 Jcis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 2.3 0.25 J 0.30 J 1.0 U 1.2 0.40 Jtrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 0.24 J 1.00 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

SP-3 / PCE 5.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.8 0.73 J 9.9 0.31 J 1.0 USP-3MW TCE 5.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 0.69 J 1.0 U 1.0 U

cis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 0.79 Jtrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

SP-4 PCE 5.0 ug/L 5.6 8.6 11.0 6.4 10.0 2.7TCE 5.0 ug/L 1.6 2.7 1.7 2.0 3.4 0.81 Jcis-1,2-DCE 70.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Utrans-1,2-DCE 100.0 ug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

DRYDRYDRYDRYDRY

DRYDRYDRY

Notes:- "PCE" = tetrachlorethene; "TCE" = tricholorethene; "DCE" = dichloroethene. -"U" = not detected above listed quantitation limit; "J" = reported concentration is an estimated value; "UJ" = reported quantitation limit is an estimated value; "R" = the data are unusable (analyte may or may not be present).- Bold values are reported above detection limits; shaded cells are above guidance levels.-"Dry" = well dry during monitoring event; "NA" = not applicable- Blank spaces indicate that well/seep was not sampled.- Data entered from the data validation report for each sampling event.- Groundwater Enforcement Standards referenced from Table 1, Chapter 12 - Groundwater Protection Rule and Strategey, February 2005- * SP-3MW was sampled on April 30, 2013 becuase it could not be accessed during the October 2012 monitoring event.




APPENDIX C:

DATA VALIDATION REPORT

July 8, 2013 Mr. Gerold Noyes Waste Management Division VT Department of Environmental Conservation 103 South Main Street/ West Building Waterbury, VT 05676-0404 Reference #s: 2013-0522-001 Dear Gerold,

Attached please find the results of the data validation of Sample Delivery Group (SDG) Nos. BRES55 and UNIF46 from the Environmental Monitoring work at the Bressett Site, in Randolph, and the UniFirst Site in Williamstown, VT. The water samples in these SDGs were collected on April 30, 2013. The laboratory analyses were performed by TestAmerica Burlington (formerly STL Burlington) of South Burlington, VT.

The data packages were received on May 22, 2013, and the validation has been performed by

Phoenix Chemistry Services, to the extent possible according to the Tier III guidelines as defined by USEPA Region I, as presented in “Region I EPA-NE Data Validation Manual and Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Environmental Analyses”, December, 1996. The EPA’s National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review (EPA 540/R-99/008, October, 1999), and the Phoenix Chemistry Services Field/Laboratory Coordination Memorandum for Water Monitoring (FLCM), April 2, 2004 were also considered during the evaluation, and professional judgment was applied as necessary and appropriate. Data qualifiers have been applied in the final validation report as necessary and appropriate, in accordance with these guidelines.

Electronic copies of these reports are being submitted to Waite-Heindel Environmental

Management and TestAmerica Burlington, as well as to your attention. No hard copy of this report is being submitted, unless you direct otherwise. The laboratory has been requested to send you an appendix or amendment to the data packages containing the screen results which were not included in the Level 4 data package for SDG No. BRES55, and the pH measurements which were provided separately to the validator. The laboratory is also considering how to address a problem noted during the validation with the calibration of a subset of analytes; the validator determined that there will be no impact on the sample results as a consequence of this issue. However, the laboratory should issue a correction in a format that they may determine. When received, both the missing documents and the corrected reports should be maintained as the final, permanent record for this sample set.

Thank you for this opportunity to provide data validation services to the Waste Management

Division. We look forward to continuing to work with you. If there are any questions or concerns about the material in this report, please do not hesitate to contact me for help and clarification. Sincerely, Deborah H. Gaynor, Ph.D. Principal, Phoenix Chemistry Services

Page 1 of 27

DATA VALIDATION

FOR

UniFirst Project Bressett and UniFirst Sites

Randolph and Williamstown, VT

ORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA Volatile Organics in Water Samples

Sample Delivery Group Nos. BRES55 and UNIF46

Chemical Analyses Performed by:

TestAmerica Burlington 30 Community Drive Dr. Suite 11

South Burlington, VT 05403

FOR

Mr. Gerold Noyes VT Agency of Natural Resources,

Waste Management Division 1 National Life Drive - Davis 1 Montpelier, VT 05620-3704

Data Validation Report by:

Phoenix Chemistry Services 126 Covered Bridge Rd.

N. Ferrisburg, VT 05473 (802)-233-2473

July 8, 2013

Reference #s 2013-0522-001 VOA Validation Report/BRES55_UNIF46/dpd/dhg

Page 2 of 27

Phoenix Chemistry Services SDG Nos. BRES55 and UNIF46 July 8, 2013

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Phoenix Chemistry Services (Phoenix) has completed the validation of the volatile organics analysis data prepared by TestAmerica Laboratories, Burlington (formerly STL Burlington) for 10 potable water samples, 1 performance evaluation (PE) sample, 2 field blanks (FB), and 1 trip blank (TB) from the Bressett Site in Randolph, VT and the UniFirst Site in Williamstown, VT. The laboratory reported the data under Sample Delivery Group (SDG) Nos. BRES55 and UNIF46, which were submitted as two data packages received by Phoenix on May 22, 2013. These SDGs include the following samples:

Table 1. Sample Identifications

Sample Identifier Laboratory ID

SDG No. UNIF46 WP-5 200-16257-1 WP-7 200-16257-2 WP-3 200-16257-3 WP-8 200-16257-4 WP-13 200-16257-5 SP-3MW 200-16257-6 FB-1 200-16257-7 WP-Z 200-16257-8 WP-23 200-16257-13 TRIP BLANK 200-16257-14

SDG No. BRES55 BRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 SHIELDS 200-16257-10 WELL Z 200-16257-11 FB-2 200-16257-12

A cross-reference table of sample IDs was provided in all data packages. The Laboratory noted that

there was a discrepancy in the time of collection recorded on the sample bottle labels versus the time recorded on the chain of custody documents for samples SP-3MW and WELL Z, and used the time recorded on the chain of custody documents for both samples.

Findings of the validation effort resulted in the following qualifications of sample results: • Results for bromomethane and 2-butanone in all samples were qualified as estimated (UJ). The laboratory appropriately applied “J” qualifiers to the sample Form I’s when the concentration of

an analyte was less than the sample-specific practical quantitation limit (PQL). The validator did not remove these qualifiers. All laboratory-specific qualifiers, such as the asterisk (*) and “B” qualifier have been removed by the validator from the spreadsheet results.

The Overall Evaluation of Data (Section XVI) summarizes the validation results. The validation

findings and conclusions for each analytical parameter are detailed in the remaining sections of this report.

Page 3 of 27


Documentation problems observed in the data packages are described in Section XVII. The laboratory is preparing a response plan for an error in the continuing calibration summary forms noted during validation. Missing documents (screen results for SDG No. BRES55, and pH measurements made at the time of screening for all samples) will be submitted by the laboratory, and should be permanently maintained with the data packages.

This validation report shall be considered part of the data packages for all future distributions of the

volatiles (524.2) analysis data.

Page 4 of 27


INTRODUCTION

Analyses were performed according to Safe Drinking Water Act Method 524.2 Rev. 4.1, as documented in TestAmerica SOP BR-MV-005r11 for Method 524.2, and in accordance with requirements in the Field/Laboratory Coordination Memorandum for Water Monitoring (FLCM), April 2, 2004, except as noted within this report. The target compound list for Method 524.2 was limited to the OLM03.1 CLP target compound list plus methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE).

Tentative identification of non-target analyte peaks (i.e., tentatively identified compounds, or TICs)

was not requested for these analyses. Phoenix Chemistry Services’ validation was performed in conformance with Tier III guidelines as

defined by USEPA Region in the “Region I EPA-NE Data Validation Manual: The Data Quality System”, (12/96 Revision). The data were evaluated in accordance with the “Region I EPA-NE Data Validation Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Environmental Analyses”, December 1996. EPA’s National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review (EPA 540/R-99/008, October, 1999) were also considered during the evaluation, and professional judgment was applied as necessary and appropriate.

The data validation process evaluates data on a technical basis for chemical analyses conducted under the CLP or other well-defined Methods. Contract compliance is evaluated only in specific situations. Issues pertaining to contractual compliance are noted where applicable. It is assumed that the data package is presented in accordance with the CLP (CLP-like or SW-846) requirements. It is also assumed that the data package represents the best efforts of the laboratory and has already been subjected to adequate and sufficient quality review prior to submission for validation. In instances where SW-846 or other specific Methods have been used for the analyses, the validation effort is modified to acknowledge the differences in Methodology while maintaining the goals and quality objectives of the CLP.

Results of sample analyses are reported by the laboratory as either qualified or unqualified; various qualifier codes are used by the laboratory to denote specific information regarding the analytical results. During the validation process, laboratory data are verified against all available supporting documentation. Based on this evaluation, qualifier codes may be added, deleted, or modified by the data validator. Raw data is examined in detail to check calculations, compound identification, and/or transcription errors. Validated results are either qualified or unqualified; if results are unqualified, this means that the reported values may be used without reservation. Final validated results are annotated with the following codes, as defined in the EPA Region I Functional Guidelines:

U - The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected. The associated numerical value is the sample quantitation limit. The sample quantitation limit accounts for sample specific dilution factors and percent solids corrections or sample sizes that deviate from those required by the Method.

J - The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity. UJ - The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected. The sample quantitation limit is an

estimated quantity.

R - The data are unusable (analyte may or may not be present). Resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. The R replaces the numerical value or sample quantitation limit. In some instances (e.g., a dilution) a result may be indicated as “rejected” to avoid confusion

Page 5 of 27


when a more quantitatively accurate result is available.

EB, TB, BB - An analyte that was identified in an aqueous equipment (field) blank, trip blank, or bottle blank that was used to assess field contamination associated with soil/sediment samples. These qualifiers are to be applied to soil/sediment sample results only.

These codes are assigned during the validation process and are based on the data review of the results.

They are recorded in the Data Summary Table contained in Attachment A and in the spreadsheet summary files (Attachment B, submitted electronically) of this validation report.

All data users should note two facts. First, the "R" qualifier means that the laboratory-reported value is completely unusable. The analysis is invalid due to significant quality control problems, and provides no information as to whether the compound is present or not. Rejected values should not appear on data tables because they have no useful purpose under any circumstances. Second, no analyte concentration is guaranteed to be accurate even if all associated quality control is acceptable. While strict quality control conformance provides well-defined confidence in the reported results, any analytical result will always contain some error.

The user is also cautioned that the validation effort is based on the materials provided by the laboratory. Software manipulation, resulting in misleading raw data printouts, cannot be routinely detected during validation; unless otherwise stated in the report, these kinds of issues are outside the scope of this review.

Page 6 of 27


Detailed Findings of Measurement Error Associated with the Analytical Analysis I. Preservation and Technical Holding Times (Sample Integrity) The samples for volatiles analysis in SDG Nos. BRES55 and UNIF46 were collected on April 30, 2013. All volatiles analyses were performed within the acceptable holding times for preserved water samples (14 days from collection), as required by Region 1. As referenced in the Case Narrative (as required by the CLP SOW), the samples were properly preserved. The FLCM requires that the pH for each sample is measured within one day after receipt at the laboratory. Sample preservation was listed on the chain of custody documents as appropriately preserved with HCl. No records of the pH measurements (other than the chain of custody and the statement in the Case Narrative that the samples were properly preserved) were present in the Level 4 data packages, as required, and the screen results for SDG No. UNIF46 were only present in the Level 3 data package. Screen results should be submitted within 48 hours of sample receipt, and recorded permanently in the Level 4 data package. The validator requested that the laboratory investigate why the pH measurements were not recorded in the data packages in accordance with FLCM requirements. The laboratory submitted under separate cover the pH measurements made on 5/1/13, at the time of sample screening. All pH values were acceptable (<2). The validator examined the sample screens in the Level 3 data package for SDG No. BRES55, and these were consistent with the reported results. The validator requested that the laboratory appropriately submit all missing documents to the Waste Management Division. These documents should be maintained with the data packages.

The cooler temperature for the field samples on receipt at the laboratory was checked and documented in the data packages, and was 4.6 oC, which is within the acceptance range of 4 oC ±2 oC, for the field samples.

II. GC/MS Instrument Performance Check (Tuning)

The field samples were analyzed on a single GC/MS system identified as instrument L. The tuning of this instrument was demonstrated with analysis of 4-bromofluorobenzene (BFB); tunes were analyzed for each shift (12-hour period) during which the samples or associated standards were analyzed. All three BFB tunes were correctly calculated, within acceptance limits, and were reported accurately on the Form V summaries in the data packages.

III. Initial Calibration (IC)

One IC (5/13/13) was performed on instrument L in support of the Method 524.2 sample analyses reported in these data packages. Documentation of all individual IC standards was present in the data packages and relative response factor (RRF) as well as percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) values were correctly calculated and accurately reported on the Form VI summaries.

No target compounds were manually integrated in the IC or in any of the field samples. All % RSDs

for the IC were below the maximum limit (30%) specified by Region I. All RRF’s were above the 0.05 minimum technical criterion, with the single exception that 2-butanone exhibited an average RRF of 0.0228.

Pursuant to the Region I validation document, results for 2-butanone in all samples warranted

qualification as estimated (UJ), based on the low RRFs achieved. However, 2-butanone was spiked at a concentration of 5 μg/L in the matrix spikes, matrix spike duplicates, laboratory control samples, and

Page 7 of 27

Phoenix Chemistry Services SDG Nos. BRES55 and UNIF46 July 8, 2013 laboratory control sample duplicates analyzed with this data set, and acceptable recoveries for this compound were achieved in these analyses. Therefore, results for 2-butanone were not qualified in any field samples on the basis of the low RRFs in the associated IC standards.

An ICV was analyzed immediately after the IC, as required, and the percent difference results were

correctly calculated and accurately reported in the data packages. All %D values in the ICV were within (range -17.3 to +22.3 %D overall) laboratory established control limits (±30 % D) and within Region 1 limits (±25 % D for an independent standard), with the following exceptions:

Table 2. ICV Exceedances

ICV Standard Compound %D 5/13/2013 14:15 bromomethane +28.8

2-butanone -25.9 On the basis of the unacceptable %D values for bromomethane and 2-butanone in the associated ICV

analysis, results for bromomethane and 2-butanone in all samples were qualified as estimated (UJ).

IV. Continuing Calibration (CC)

Two continuing calibration (CC) standards were run in support of the field sample analyses reported in this data set. Documentation of the CC standards were present in the data packages and RRF as well as percent difference (%D) values were correctly calculated and accurately reported on the Form VII summaries within the data packages, with the exception that the validator noted that the spiked, or true, concentration of a subset of target analytes, including the four ketones and tetrahydrofuran, as well as several non-target analytes in the calibration standards, was incorrectly presented as 11 ug/L instead of 10 ug/L on the Form VII summaries. The validator asked the laboratory to investigate this anomaly, and they reported that the laboratory information system (LIMS) had a data entry error in the reagent preparation module of the LIMS. They are preparing a response plan for this issue.

The validator examined the results for the affected compounds, and determined that in all instances

the calculated %D values will be improved. Since quantitation is performed using the initial calibration, target analytes close to the reporting limit in field samples would be correctly evaluated, and recoveries in all spiked samples are correctly calculated. Therefore, no qualifications were necessary on the basis of this error, and the validation was not further impacted.

The maximum limit for %D in the CC standard allowed by Region 1 is ±25%. All %D results were below this limit for the CC standards, and all RRFs were above the 0.05 minimum criterion, with the following exceptions:

Table 3. CCV Exceedances

CCV Standard Compound RRF %D 5/13/2013 15:00 bromomethane acceptable +29.1

2-butanone 0.0222 acceptable 5/14/2013 08:51 2-butanone 0.0192 acceptable

For the reasons discussed in Section III, no results for 2-butanone were qualified on the basis of the

low RRFs in the associated IC and CC. On the basis of the unacceptable %D value in the associated CC standard, results for bromomethane

Page 8 of 27

Phoenix Chemistry Services SDG Nos. BRES55 and UNIF46 July 8, 2013 in all samples were qualified as estimated (UJ). For the reasons discussed in Section III, no results for 2-butanone were qualified on the basis of the low RRFs in the associated ICs and CCs.

It should be noted that negative % difference values will result in a low bias for positive detects, and a

positive % difference will result in a high bias for positive detects.

V. Blanks

Results for two (2) water-matrix laboratory method blanks (MB) were reported in association with this set of samples. No target analytes were detected in the MBs, with the exception of bromomethane, chloromethane, and methylene chloride at levels above the method detection limit but below 1/2 the reporting limit. These compounds were not detected in any field samples, and only methylene chloride was reported in the PE sample.

One trip blank (TB) was reported in these SDGs. No target analytes were detected in the TB. One field blank (FB) was reported in these SDGs. No target analytes were detected in the FB. One holding (storage) blank (HB) was reported in SDG No. BRES55. No target analytes were

detected in the HB. Results in the trip blank and field blank are not qualified for laboratory contamination. Since

bromomethane, chloromethane, and methylene chloride were not reported in any field samples, no qualifications were required on the basis of laboratory contamination. Since the result for methylene chloride was greater than ten times the concentration in the associated method blank, no qualifications were required for methylene chloride in the PE sample, and the validator removed the laboratory-applied “B” qualifier.

VI. Surrogate Compounds

Recovery of surrogate compounds is not being reported for Method 524.2; instead, the laboratory utilizes the Form VIII and monitors the area recoveries for these four compounds, similarly to the internal standards. All area recoveries for surrogate compounds in Method 524.2 were within method criteria (±30% of CC or ±50% of IC).

VII. Internal Standards (IS)

All IS areas and retention times (RT) were within the established QC limits for all reported sample analyses in these data packages.

VIII. Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD)

Sample BRESSETT KITCHEN was used for the Method 524.2 MS/MSD analyses in this data set. The spiking solutions contained all target compounds at 1 μg/L (except for the ketones at 5 μg/L) for the MS/MSD pair. Percent recoveries (%R) and relative percent differences (%RPD) between paired recoveries were correctly calculated and accurately reported on the Form III summaries for the spiked analytes.

Page 9 of 27


All recoveries were acceptable (range 71 – 120 %R; limits: 70 – 130 %R) and reproducible (RPD range 1-18%; limit 20% RPD).

All analytes were spiked into the MS/MSD analyses; therefore non-spiked target compounds could

not be evaluated against the parent samples to evaluate laboratory precision. IIXX.. Field Duplicates

SDG Nos. BRES55 and UNIF46 contained two potable water field duplicate pairs; the field sampling notes identified sample WP-Z as the field duplicate of sample WP-3, and WELL Z as the field duplicate of sample BRESSETT KITCHEN.

No target analytes were reported in the field duplicate pair BRESSETT KITCHEN and Well Z, so

precision could not be evaluated in this field duplicate pair. Trichloroethene was reported at 1.0 ug/L in WP-3, and at 0.80 ug/L in sample WP-Z, and cis-1,2-dichloroethene was reported below the quantitation limit in both samples.

Precision was acceptable (less than 30 %RPD for all target analytes greater than 2 times the

quantitation limit in at least one member of the field duplicate pair) for trichloroethene at 22.2 %RPD in WP-Z and WP-3.

X. Sensitivity Check

The aqueous MDL and the verification studies for Method 524.2 submitted for this project were completed on 2/1/13, which is within one year prior to the sample analyses in this data set. All analytes had calculated and verified MDLs below the method quantitation limits in these MDL studies.

All of the laboratory control samples and the MS and MSD analyses analyzed with the samples for

both methods were spiked at 1 μg/L (and 5 ug/L for the ketones), as required by the FLCM. Recoveries within or above Region 1 acceptance criteria (60 – 140 %R) were obtained for all target analytes in all spiked analyses, except as noted above. In addition, the low standard of the initial calibration supports the reporting limit for the sample analyses.

XI. Performance Evaluation (PE) Samples/Accuracy Check

Two zero blind PE samples (commonly known as laboratory control sample, LCS) and duplicate (LCSD) pairs were prepared and analyzed by the laboratory at 1 μg/L (ketones at 5 ug/L) on instrument L in support of the Method 524.2 sample analyses in this data set. Percent recoveries were correctly calculated and accurately reported on Form III summaries in the data packages, and all recoveries were acceptable (73 – 130 %R). Laboratory established limits are 70 - 130 %R, and Region 1 limits are 60 - 140 %R. Reproducibility between the LCS and LCSD was acceptable (0 - 20 %RPD; laboratory limit 20 %RPD) for all analytes.

One external single-blind PES sample for Method 524.2 was submitted with the samples in this sampling round. The results of the PES are summarized in Attachment C. All spiked compounds were within the vendor’s published PT Performance Acceptance Limits. Acceptance ranges for the individual or combined xylene isomers were not established by the vendor; however, the total xylenes result was well within its acceptance range.

Page 10 of 27


It should be noted that the acceptance range is established by the vendor according to the NELAC

standard for Performance Test Providers, and is based on regression equations and fixed acceptance criteria. These values are established using ampulated standards diluted in reagent water immediately prior to analysis; however, the PE sample used in this project is a whole-volume sample, prepared by the vendor using reagent water at the vendor’s facility. The whole-volume sample thus represents all shipping, handling, and storage conditions that project samples are subjected to, and is more representative of the potential variability in homogeneity and stability than the original, concentrated and ampulated PE standard.

XII. Target Compound Identification

Reported target compounds were correctly identified with supporting spectra present for all samples in these data packages.

XIII. Compound Quantitation and Reported Quantitation Limits

Target compound quantitation and practical quantitation limits (PQLs) were accurately reported on the Form I summaries.

The laboratory appropriately applied “J” qualifiers to the sample Form 1s when the concentration of

an analyte was less than the sample-specific PQL. The validator did not remove these qualifiers.

The values and associated qualifiers that the validator has judged to be acceptable are presented on the Form 1s in Attachment B, and in the “Validated_Value” and “Validator_Qualifier” columns, respectively, in both the Data Summary Table in Attachment A and the spreadsheet summary file submitted electronically as Attachment C. The Data Summary Table presents all non-detect results for which the result or qualifier was changed during validation, and all positive results, whether or not the value or qualifier was changed as a result of the validation. All results, positive and non-detect, are listed in the spreadsheet summary. If a value or qualifier was changed, this is indicated by the “Y” (for yes) notation in the “Validator_Change” column in the Data Summary Table and spreadsheet summary; if the value or qualifier was not changed during the validation effort, this field is marked with an “N” to indicate “no change”. Sample-specific (practical) quantitation limits are given in the summaries (“PQL” or “High Limit”), and may also be found on the laboratory-generated Form 1 for each sample (Attachment B).

All laboratory-specific qualifiers, such as the asterisk (*) and “B” qualifier have been removed by the

validator from the Form 1s and from the spreadsheet results. Neither is noted as a validation change. XIV. Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs)

Evaluation of unidentified, non-target analyte peaks was not requested or performed for these

samples. XV. System Performance

The analytical systems appear to have been operating well at the time of these analyses based on the evaluation of the available raw data.

Page 11 of 27

Phoenix Chemistry Services SDG Nos. BRES55 and UNIF46 July 8, 2013 XVI. Overall Evaluation of Data

Results for volatile organic compounds were determined to be valid as reported for all samples in SDG Nos. BRES55 and UNIF46, with the following exceptions and observation:

• On the basis of the unacceptable %D values for bromomethane and 2-butanone in the associated

ICV analysis, results for bromomethane and 2-butanone in all samples were qualified as estimated (UJ).

• On the basis of the unacceptable %D value in the associated CC standard, results for

bromomethane in all samples were qualified as estimated (UJ). • The laboratory appropriately applied “J” qualifiers to the sample results when the concentration

of an analyte was less than the sample-specific PQL. The validator did not remove these qualifiers. All laboratory-specific qualifiers, such as the asterisk (*) and “B” qualifier have been removed by the validator from the spreadsheet results.

Documentation problems observed in the data packages are described in Section XVII.

XVII. Documentation

Chain-of-custody (COC) records were present and completed accurately. The laboratory bar codes provide a sufficient replacement for the internal chain of custody (ICOC) records described in the FLCM.

• The Laboratory noted that there was a discrepancy in the time of collection recorded on the

sample bottle labels versus the time recorded on the chain of custody documents for samples SP-3MW and WELL Z, and used the time recorded on the chain of custody documents for both samples.

Data presentation was acceptable, with the following exceptions: • The Case Narrative states that all calculations are performed prior to rounding; this is incorrect,

and the laboratory has previously stated that this statement will be removed or corrected. • The validator noted that the spiked, or true, concentration of a subset of target analytes, including

the four ketones and tetrahydrofuran, as well as several non-target analytes in the calibration standards, was incorrectly presented as 11 ug/L instead of 10 ug/L on the Form VII summaries. Since quantitation is performed using the initial calibration, target analytes close to the reporting limit in field samples would be correctly evaluated, and recoveries in all spiked samples are correctly calculated. Since the validator determined that there is no impact on sample results due to this issue, the validation was completed, and the laboratory is preparing a response plan.

• The laboratory submitted under separate cover the pH measurements made on 5/1/13, at the time

of sample screening. All pH values were acceptable (<2). The validator examined the sample screens in the Level 3 data package for SDG No. BRES55, and these were consistent with the reported results. The validator requested that the laboratory appropriately submit these missing documents to the Waste Management Division. These documents should be maintained with the data packages.

Page 12 of 27


This validation report should be considered part of the data packages for all future distributions of the

volatiles (524.2) analysis data.

Page 13 of 27

ATTACHMENT A

DATA SUMMARY TABLE SDG Nos. BRES55 and UNIF46

Volatile Organics in Water Samples

Page 14 of 27

Data Summary Table Phoenix Chemistry Services

Sample_ID Lab_ID SDG Analyte Validated_Result

Validator_Qualifier PQL Units Dilution

_FactorValidator_Change

FB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 2-Butanone 5 UJ 5 ug/L 1 YFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 2-Hexanone 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 Acetone 5 U 5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 Benzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 Bromodichloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 Bromoform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 Bromomethane 0.5 UJ 0.5 ug/L 1 YFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 Carbon disulfide 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 Carbon tetrachloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 Chlorobenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 Chloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 Chloroform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 Chloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 Dibromochloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 Ethylbenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 m&p-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 Methyl t-butyl ether 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 Methylene Chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 o-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 Styrene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 Tetrachloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 Toluene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 Trichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 Vinyl chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-1 200-16257-7 UNIF46 Xylenes, Total 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 2-Butanone 5 UJ 5 ug/L 1 YSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 2-Hexanone 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 Acetone 5 U 5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 Benzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 Bromodichloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 N

Page 15 of 27





SP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 Bromoform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 Bromomethane 0.5 UJ 0.5 ug/L 1 YSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 Carbon disulfide 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 Carbon tetrachloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 Chlorobenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 Chloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 Chloroform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 Chloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.29 J 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 Dibromochloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 Ethylbenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 m&p-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 Methyl t-butyl ether 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 Methylene Chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 o-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 Styrene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 Tetrachloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 Toluene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 Trichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 Vinyl chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSP-3MW 200-16257-6 UNIF46 Xylenes, Total 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 2-Butanone 5 UJ 5 ug/L 1 YTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 2-Hexanone 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 Acetone 5 U 5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 Benzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 Bromodichloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 Bromoform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 Bromomethane 0.5 UJ 0.5 ug/L 1 YTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 Carbon disulfide 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 Carbon tetrachloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 Chlorobenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 Chloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 Chloroform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 Chloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 Dibromochloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 Ethylbenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 m&p-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 Methyl t-butyl ether 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 Methylene Chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 N

Page 16 of 27





TRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 o-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 Styrene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 Tetrachloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 Toluene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 Trichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 Vinyl chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NTRIP BLANK 200-16257-14 UNIF46 Xylenes, Total 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 2-Butanone 5 UJ 5 ug/L 1 YWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 2-Hexanone 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 Acetone 5 U 5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 Benzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 Bromodichloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 Bromoform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 Bromomethane 0.5 UJ 0.5 ug/L 1 YWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 Carbon disulfide 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 Carbon tetrachloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 Chlorobenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 Chloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 Chloroform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 Chloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 Dibromochloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 Ethylbenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 m&p-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 Methyl t-butyl ether 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 Methylene Chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 o-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 Styrene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 Tetrachloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 Toluene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 Trichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 Vinyl chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-13 200-16257-5 UNIF46 Xylenes, Total 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 N

Page 17 of 27





WP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 2-Butanone 5 UJ 5 ug/L 1 YWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 2-Hexanone 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 Acetone 5 U 5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 Benzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 Bromodichloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 Bromoform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 Bromomethane 0.5 UJ 0.5 ug/L 1 YWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 Carbon disulfide 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 Carbon tetrachloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 Chlorobenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 Chloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 Chloroform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 Chloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.32 J 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 Dibromochloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 Ethylbenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 m&p-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 Methyl t-butyl ether 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 Methylene Chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 o-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 Styrene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 Tetrachloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 Toluene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 Trichloroethene 1 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 Vinyl chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-3 200-16257-3 UNIF46 Xylenes, Total 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 2-Butanone 5 UJ 5 ug/L 1 YWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 2-Hexanone 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 Acetone 5 U 5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 Benzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 Bromodichloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 Bromoform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 Bromomethane 0.5 UJ 0.5 ug/L 1 YWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 Carbon disulfide 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 Carbon tetrachloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 Chlorobenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 Chloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 Chloroform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 Chloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 N

Page 18 of 27





WP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 Dibromochloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 Ethylbenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 m&p-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 Methyl t-butyl ether 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 Methylene Chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 o-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 Styrene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 Tetrachloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 Toluene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 Trichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 Vinyl chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-5 200-16257-1 UNIF46 Xylenes, Total 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 2-Butanone 5 UJ 5 ug/L 1 YWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 2-Hexanone 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 Acetone 5 U 5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 Benzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 Bromodichloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 Bromoform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 Bromomethane 0.5 UJ 0.5 ug/L 1 YWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 Carbon disulfide 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 Carbon tetrachloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 Chlorobenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 Chloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 Chloroform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 Chloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 Dibromochloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 Ethylbenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 m&p-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 Methyl t-butyl ether 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 Methylene Chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 o-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 Styrene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 Tetrachloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 Toluene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 Trichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 Vinyl chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 N

Page 19 of 27





WP-7 200-16257-2 UNIF46 Xylenes, Total 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 2-Butanone 5 UJ 5 ug/L 1 YWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 2-Hexanone 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 Acetone 5 U 5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 Benzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 Bromodichloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 Bromoform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 Bromomethane 0.5 UJ 0.5 ug/L 1 YWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 Carbon disulfide 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 Carbon tetrachloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 Chlorobenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 Chloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 Chloroform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 Chloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 Dibromochloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 Ethylbenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 m&p-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 Methyl t-butyl ether 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 Methylene Chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 o-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 Styrene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 Tetrachloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 Toluene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 Trichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 Vinyl chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-8 200-16257-4 UNIF46 Xylenes, Total 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 2-Butanone 5 UJ 5 ug/L 1 YWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 2-Hexanone 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 Acetone 5 U 5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 Benzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 Bromodichloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 Bromoform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 N

Page 20 of 27





WP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 Bromomethane 0.5 UJ 0.5 ug/L 1 YWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 Carbon disulfide 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 Carbon tetrachloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 Chlorobenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 Chloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 Chloroform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 Chloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.27 J 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 Dibromochloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 Ethylbenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 m&p-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 Methyl t-butyl ether 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 Methylene Chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 o-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 Styrene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 Tetrachloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 Toluene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 Trichloroethene 0.8 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 Vinyl chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWP-Z 200-16257-8 UNIF46 Xylenes, Total 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 2-Butanone 5 UJ 5 ug/L 1 YBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 2-Hexanone 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 Acetone 5 U 5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 Benzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 Bromodichloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 Bromoform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 Bromomethane 0.5 UJ 0.5 ug/L 1 YBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 Carbon disulfide 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 Carbon tetrachloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 Chlorobenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 Chloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 Chloroform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 Chloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 Dibromochloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 Ethylbenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 m&p-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 Methyl t-butyl ether 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 Methylene Chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 o-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 N

Page 21 of 27





BRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 Styrene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 Tetrachloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 Toluene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 Trichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 Vinyl chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NBRESSETT KITCHEN 200-16257-9 BRES55 Xylenes, Total 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 2-Butanone 5 UJ 5 ug/L 1 YFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 2-Hexanone 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 Acetone 5 U 5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 Benzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 Bromodichloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 Bromoform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 Bromomethane 0.5 UJ 0.5 ug/L 1 YFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 Carbon disulfide 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 Carbon tetrachloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 Chlorobenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 Chloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 Chloroform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 Chloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 Dibromochloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 Ethylbenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 m&p-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 Methyl t-butyl ether 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 Methylene Chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 o-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 Styrene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 Tetrachloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 Toluene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 Trichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 Vinyl chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NFB-2 200-16257-12 BRES55 Xylenes, Total 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 N

Page 22 of 27





SHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 2-Butanone 5 UJ 5 ug/L 1 YSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 2-Hexanone 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 Acetone 5 U 5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 Benzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 Bromodichloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 Bromoform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 Bromomethane 0.5 UJ 0.5 ug/L 1 YSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 Carbon disulfide 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 Carbon tetrachloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 Chlorobenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 Chloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 Chloroform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 Chloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 Dibromochloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 Ethylbenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 m&p-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 Methyl t-butyl ether 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 Methylene Chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 o-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 Styrene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 Tetrachloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 Toluene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 Trichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 Vinyl chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NSHIELDS 200-16257-10 BRES55 Xylenes, Total 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 2-Butanone 5 UJ 5 ug/L 1 YWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 2-Hexanone 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 2.5 U 2.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 Acetone 5 U 5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 Benzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 Bromodichloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 Bromoform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 Bromomethane 0.5 UJ 0.5 ug/L 1 YWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 Carbon disulfide 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 Carbon tetrachloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 Chlorobenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 Chloroethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 Chloroform 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 Chloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 N

Page 23 of 27





WELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 Dibromochloromethane 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 Ethylbenzene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 m&p-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 Methyl t-butyl ether 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 Methylene Chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 o-Xylene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 Styrene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 Tetrachloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 Toluene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 Trichloroethene 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 Vinyl chloride 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 NWELL Z 200-16257-11 BRES55 Xylenes, Total 0.5 U 0.5 ug/L 1 N

Page 24 of 27

ATTACHMENT B

SPREADSHEET SUMMARIES

(submitted electronically) SDG Nos. BRES55 and UNIF46

Volatile Organics in Water Samples

Page 25 of 27

ATTACHMENT C

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE RESULTS

SDG Nos. BRES55 and UNIF46 Volatile Organics in Water Samples

Page 26 of 27

DATA SUMMARY FORM: VOLATILE COMPOUNDSWATER PE SAMPLES

(ug/L)

Site Names: Bressett, Randolph, VT Sampling Date: 4/30/13& UniFirst, Northfield, VT

SDGs No. BRES55 and UNIF46 Phoenix Chemistry Services No. 2013-0522-001

Client ID WP-23 %Lab ID Recovery

SDG No. UNIF46 Certified

PQL Value0.5 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8.2 90.4 9.07 5.44 12.70.5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane0.5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 9.5 93.1 10.2 8.16 12.20.5 1,1-Dichloroethane0.5 1,1-Dichloroethene 3.3 91.2 3.62 2.17 5.070.5 1,2-Dichloroethane 13 97.7 13.3 10.6 16.00.5 1,2-Dichloropropane 6.8 94.2 7.22 4.33 10.15.0 2-Butanone 2.5 2-Hexanone2.5 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone5.0 Acetone0.5 Benzene 7 95.5 7.33 4.40 10.30.5 Bromodichloromethane0.5 Bromoform0.5 Bromomethane0.5 Carbon disulfide0.5 Carbon tetrachloride 8.7 89.4 9.73 5.84 13.62.0 Chlorobenzene 11 90.9 12.1 9.68 14.50.5 Chloroethane0.5 Chloroform0.5 Chloromethane2.0 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 3 97.1 3.09 1.85 4.330.5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene0.5 Dibromochloromethane0.5 Ethylbenzene 5.9 91.3 6.46 3.88 9.040.5 m,p-Xylenes 15 89.8 16.7 n/a0.5 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)0.5 Methylene chloride 11 B 100.9 10.9 8.72 13.10.5 o-Xylene 13 92.9 14.0 n/a0.5 Styrene 4.5 94.3 4.77 2.86 6.680.5 Tetrachloroethene 5.7 86.2 6.61 3.97 9.250.5 Toluene 4.3 90.7 4.74 2.84 6.640.5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 17 91.4 18.6 14.9 22.30.5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene0.5 Trichloroethene 1.9 82.6 2.30 1.38 3.220.5 Vinyl Chloride 7 97.2 7.20 4.32 10.10.5 Xylene (total) 28 91.2 30.7 24.6 36.8

PT Acceptance Range

Lot No. S180-703QC True Values

524.2 VOAPage 27 of 27

Documents

2nd Quarter 2013 Monitoring Report · 30, 2013 water supply monitoring event are presented herein. In addition to water supply wells, the closed spring “SP-3MW” was sampled on