Upload
vandana-vanu
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
1/29
PRESENTATION
ON
EFFICIENCY IMPRVEMENT IN COALFIRED THERMAL POWER STATION
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
2/29
WHY ENERGY EFFICIENCY IS IMPORTANT ?
Depleting fossil fuel
Optimum plant utilization
Global warming Designated consumer
Generate more energy with same fuel
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
3/29
EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT CAN
GIVE YOU
For an average increase of 1 % in theEfficiency would result in:-
Coal savings of approx. 11 million tons per annum
worth Rs.13,000 Million
CO2 reduction about 13.5 million tons per annum
Lower generation cost per kWh as more efficient
the unit works, the more economical it is.
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
4/29
MAJOR CAUSE OF
INEFFICENCY IN POWER PLANT
High Flue gas exit Temp
Excessive amount of excess air(O2)
Poor Mill/Burners performance causinghigh unburnt carbon in fly and bottom ash
Poor insulation
Poor house Keeping
Poor instrumentation and automation
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
5/29
MAJOR CAUSE OF INEFFICENCY IN
POWER PLANT(Cont---)
Not running the units on design parameter
Heaters not in service or poorperformance of regenerative system
Poor condenser vacuum
Excessive DM water consumption-passing and leakages
Use of Reheat spray to control ReheatTemperature
Poor Cylinder Efficiency of turbine
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
6/29
HOW TO ACHIEVE ENERGY
EFFICIENCY ?
Adopt state of the art technologies
Adopt cutting edge technologies
Review & Re-engineering of the existingsystems
Bench Marking
Energy Auditing
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
7/29
CAN WE IMPROVE EFFICIENCY?
-Yes ,provided we shed the myths and
believe in applying result oriented
efforts.
-Work out to identify & quantify the cost
of hidden losses.
-Bring in requisite operational behavioral
change.
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
8/29
SOME OF THE MYTHS
High PLF & availability translates into
Optimum Efficiency
Heat rate is the responsibility of Efficiency
Management Group at Stations Equipment maintenance to be taken-up
based on periodic overhaul schedule
Boiler performance degradations has norelation to Turbine Cycle performance
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
9/29
Some of the Myths contd
Design heat rate is the best achievable heat rate.
Efficiency tests are the same as performance
guarantee test.
Heat rate improvement requires large investment.
Results follow immediately after testing is
completed.
Heat rate is the responsibility of Energy &Efficiency Management Group (EEMG) atStations.
Station instruments are accurate for monitoring
heat rate parameters.
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
10/29
contd
Design is not the best achievableperformance
Predicted performance based on Turbine Heat BalanceDiagrams and Boiler Efficiency at different loads
Design is based on specific ambient conditions thatvary throughout the year
Actual initial performance could be different from designor changes might have been made to plant
Current performance to be compared to an achievableexpected value to establish efficiency gaps
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
11/29
SYNERGIZE OPERATION
OF UNIT
- Need to clearly understand the relation between
performance & fuel ,operation and design
parameters.
- -Operational behavior and performance- Impacts of operating efficiency of Boiler, Turbine
and their auxiliaries on Net Unit Heat Rate,
- Maximum Achievable Load, Maintenance,&- Availability.
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
12/29
SOME CRITICAL FACTORS AFFECTING
BOILER PERFORMANCE
-Fuel;-Heating Value, Moisture Contents, AshComposition, Ash Contents,& Volatile Matter.
-Operational Parameter:-Level of Excess Air,&operating Condition of Burner Tilt Mechanism.
-Design:-Heating input per plan area, Height ofBoiler, Platens & pendants heat transfer Surfaces,
Burner & wind Box design.
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
13/29
BEHAVIOURAL IMPACTS
-Low heat value results in over firing of fuel causing more heatavailability for super heater and re-heater thus more attemprationspray requirement. Hence increase in THR, overloading of ashhandling system, fans and increased soot blowing
-Moisture content increase causes increase in heat transfer to S.H,and R.H. Hence again increase in attempration spray and THR.
-Ash composition and contents increases damage to pressure partssurfaces because of melting behavior of low fusion ash temperature ofblended coal in particular.
-In consistency in fired fuel characteristics results in variation inexcess air requirement thereby increasing stack loss and hence boilerefficiency reduction, overloading of ID Fan and ultimately unit loadlimitation.
-High heat value causes excessive radiant heat transfer to water wallsthereby leaving lesser heat for super heater and re-heater.
Contd.
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
14/29
IMPACTS contd-Normally excess air ranges from 15% to 30% of stoichiometric air.
-High O2 % and presence of CO at ID Fan outlet are indicator of airin leakages and improper combustion in furnace.
-Poorly effective damper control also is the cause of higher SEC offans both primary and secondary.
-The quality and purity of feed water and make up water is alsorequired to be maintained in a meticulous way by limiting blow downlosses to nearly 1% and by checking the passing and leakages ofvalves. However, maximum 3% of flow can be taken as make up forthese causes including soot blowing requirements.
-Soot blowing is dependent on ash contents and is unit specific.Intelligently devised soot blowing can result in saving the fuel.
Contd.
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
15/29
IMPACTS contd
-Cascading effects on efficiency, loading and
availability because of following systems and
equipments performance also needed to be
looked into. The systems are:-Fuel receiving, preparation and handling systems.
Pulverizing system
Air Heater
Fans
Electrostatic Precipitator
Fly ash handling system
Bottom ash handling system
Waste disposal system
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
16/29
PERFORMANCE IMPACTS ON STEAM
CYCLE , UNIT HEAT RATE,&OUT PUT
Various design & operating parameters of
a unit are responsible for its cycle
performance, heat rate,& out put.
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
17/29
CRITICAL FACTORS AFFECTING
CYCLE PERFORMANCE
1. Re-heater & its system pressure drop
2. Extraction line pressure drop
3. Make up
4. Turbine exhaust pressure
5. Air preheat
6. Condensate sub-cooling
7. S/H & R/H spray flows
8. Wet Bulb Temp.
9. Top Heaters out of service
10. H.P. heater drain pump
11. Type of BFP drives& method of flow control
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
18/29
RH & ITS SYSTEM PRESSURE DROP.
- Every one 1% decrease in drop can
improve THR and output by 0.1% & 0.3%
respectively.
- Normally designed for pressure drop
equivalent to 10% of HP exhaust pressure
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
19/29
EXTRACTION LINE PRESSURE
DROP
Permissible pressure drop between stage
pressure & Shell pressure is maximum
6%.
For every 2% increase in this pressure
drop, THR would be poorer by 0.09%.
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
20/29
Cyclemake up.
- Acceptable value of make up water is 3%
to offset cycle water losses.
- For every 1% increase in make up 0.4%
increase in THR & 0.2% reduction on
output is there.
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
21/29
EXHAUST PRESSURE
Increase & decrease in exhaust pressure
do affect the THR.
Though no valid thumb rule has been
devised so far, however last stage bladedesign & exhaust area of turbine do affect
the impact of changing exhaust pressure.
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
22/29
AIR PRE-HEAT.
Air preheat of combustion air before entry to
regenerative air heater is done with either with
steam coil air pre - heater or hot water pre
heating coil to maintain AVERAGE COLD &TEMPERATURE (ACET) to escape dew point
temperature complications.
Condensate retrieval is necessary to avoid
deterioration to THR depending upon unit loadand combustion pre heating duty.
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
23/29
CONDENSATE SUB-COOLING
For 30% total flow and 2.5 deg C sub-
cooling ,an increase of 0.001% in THR can
be there for every subsequent 10%
increase in flow.
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
24/29
R.H & S.H. SPRAY FLOW
. Spray water whether drawn from BFP or
after the final heater, it is always less the
generative and less productive as well.
Every 1% spray flow, correction need to
be done in THR & load computed from the
curvessupplied with the machine.
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
25/29
TOP HEATER OUT OF SERVICE.
Extraction steam flow meant for top heater
is required to pass through turbine thereby
increasing the output. But at the same
time final feed water tamp. Is loweredresulting in poor THR.
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
26/29
HPH DRAIN PUMP
Retrieval of drip from HPH 6 & 7 is
important for load even around 50%.
Drain pump when deployed can improve
the THR by 2.5kCal/kwh.
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
27/29
BFP DRIVE SELECTION
. Though four options are available for
choosing the suitable BFP drive and
control concepts.
. Adoption of turbine driven BFP to suit the
design requirements can improve THR by
0.56% and output by 0.58%.
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
28/29
PERFORMANCE MONITORING
-Analyze the poor efficiency areas from previous record .
-Zero down to specific system and then to component.
-Carry out performance/diagnostic study as suggested in
the Auditing Manual & operating manual. -Devise a unit specific efficiency control sheet for few
terminal conditions (Act vs Des).
-Monitor once per shift to know the operating efficiency
and check any deterioration.
7/29/2019 2.Final Energy Efficiency
29/29
Thank You