2D Seismic Reflection High Resolution

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 2D Seismic Reflection High Resolution

    1/6

    11th SAGA Biennial Technical Meeting and ExhibitionSwaziland, 16 - 18 September 2009, pages 319 - 324

    2D Seismic Reflection Surveys and Structural Mapping: Faults,Dips and Domes

    Geoff Campbell

    1

    1. SAGA, SEG, GAP Geophysics and Quik_Log Geophysics, South Africa, [email protected]

    ABSTRACT

    In the local mineral exploration environment the high resolution imaging capabilities of 2D seismic reflectionsurveys continue to provide rapid, cost-effective mapping solutions over areas of structural mapping concern nototherwise speedily available from borehole data. This is particularly so where time-lines are short. 2D seismicsections sourced from the Wits Gold, Karoo coal, Canadian diamond and Bushveld platinum exploration sectors

    demonstrate in particular; technique versatility in mapping orebodies or marker horizons having a tabular sheet geometry, and satisfying

    minimum thickness plus physical property requirements a large spectrum of structural environments ranging from the benign to the complex.This spectrum ranges from flat dips with minor rolls and grabens through large scale wrench and listric faulting, tomoderate dips with structural terraces or large grabens above Floor doming.

    1. INTRODUCTION

    2D seismic survey contributions to RSA prospecting

    activity over the last decade and a half have been largelyovershadowed by the volume and detail of mapping

    results from 3D seismic surveys over the establishedmines of the Witwatersrand GoldFields, and establishedto newly developing platinum mines of the BushveldComplex. Mining loss-of-ground information ofunprecedently high spatial resolution is now routinelyavailable for mine-planning purposes from such 3D

    surveys , whose deployment currently appears ( at leaston paper ) to be de rigeur over all except the leastprospective of prospects. This in part reflects the by-now highly mature nature of Witwatersrand mines and afast-approaching maturity for many Bushveld Mines

    within their lease-area life-cycle.

    Meanwhile, low levels of 2D seismic survey activityhave been maintained over brownfield sectors, indirectexploration plays mainly driven by the juniors overhitherto poorly mapped sectors of the Witwatersrandand Bushveld Complex. These 2D surveys, while

    lacking the fine mine-planning resolution of their 3Dcounterparts, are relatively inexpensive and require only

    short implementation lead-times while providing earlymapping solutions to litho-structural problems ofimmediate concern in ore-body modeling e.g. where tooptimally place boreholes in a deep drilling project. In

    short, 2D data, in connecting the dots constitutingboreholes, provides a reliable measure of orebody

    continuity and advance mapping of faults with throws inexcess of, say, 30m.

    This paper focuses on 2D seismic mapping resultsacquired by GAP Geophysics or its predecessor overRSA prospects which required the early establishmentof major structures through a judicious combination ofseismic and borehole data. The actual litho-seismic

    mapping target may be the orebody itself (VCR,PlatReef, coals) or marker horizons in the hanging or

    footwall (most gold reefs, Merensky Reef). Faultfeatures are generally not directly mapped but inferredfrom correlatable reflection event terminations andvertical displacements.

    2. DATA ACQUISITION & PROCESSING

    Data was acquired over the period 1983 to 2007 using

    either Vibroseis (20Hz to 96Hz) or BOLT Land AirGunseismic energy sources and a 96 channel seismograph.

    Symmetrical, split-spread arrays with geophone stationspacings of 20m or 50m were utilized in conjunctionwith similarly spaced shotpoints, to generate 48 folddata. Data processing was standard, included refractionand residual statics plus time migration.

    3. CASE STUDIES

    3.1 Wits Gold: Wrench and Listric Faulting

    319

  • 8/11/2019 2D Seismic Reflection High Resolution

    2/6

    2D Seismic Reflection Surveys and Structural Mapping

    The N-S striking De Bron Fault is a steeply dippingwrench fault which throws down to the west by up to1000m, and constitutes the eastern boundary of theCentral Rand Group sediments of the OFS Goldfields.

    Early development of what is now the Joel Gold Mine

    in the southern OFS GoldFields was hastened by resultsfrom reconnaissance seismic and gravity surveys, whichuniquely located the De Bron Fault on the JCI FarmLeeuwfontein, some 2km to the east of its hitherto

    assumed position (Figure 1). This significantlyincreased combined VS5 Reef orebody tonnages overthis and the adjoining JCI Farm (Leeuwbult). Prominentreflectors comprise the base-Karoo/top Central RandGroup at TWT = 300msec (~550m) and the base-Central Rand Group at TWT = 800msec (~2000m)which have flat apparent dips. The De Bron Fault in theeast has a westerly downthrow of 700m, with CRG units

    being absent over the far eastern horst. This

    displacement is not well imaged in the seismic section(it was after all JCIs first even reflection survey), butfault location is unambiguously highlighted by theapparent change in strata dip in the east, and by theKaroo hanging wall graben immediately to the west of

    the fault trace.

    Aside from target location, seismic data played asignificant role in Wits exploration with respect tomapping the large loss-of-ground areas associatedwith fault zones, in advance of deep drilling operations.

    The example of Figure 2 shows a very large listricnormal fault displacing Central and West Rand

    lithologies in the Far West Rand, where the target is theVCR. The exclusion zone is more than 1.5km atsurface. Along the complete seismic section such faultsdefine an imbricate stack pattern.

    3.2 Karoo Coal: Flat Dips and Rolls

    Coal seams, characterized as they are by anomalouslylow densities and sonic velocities, constitute excellent

    reflectors (reflection coefficient, r > 30%) where theysatisfy minimum thickness criteria. Minimumthicknesses are generally regarded as being at least oneeighth to one twelfth of the dominant wavelength of the

    seismic signal (Widness, 1973). The seismic section ofFigure 3 is from the eastern Transvaal CoalFields and

    shows a strong reflection event at TWT = 220msec(~400m depth), mapping out an ~5m thick coal seam.That this seam appears as the strongest event on thesection is in part due to thickness tuning dependant onconstructive interference of top and bottom seismicwavelets: the requirement here is that the target

    thickness be around one quarter of the seismicwavelength (Widness, 1973). On this basis significant

    seismic energy is present at wavelengths of around 25m(following a non-linear Vibroseis sweep of up to200Hz).

    Only minor rolls detract from the otherwise flat dip of

    the coal seam, and no major faulting (throw > 10m) ispresent. A truly benign structural environment.

    3.3 Kimberlite Dyke (Sill): Ultra-thin

    Target and Shallow Dips

    The Snap Lake Diamond Mine in Canada exploits a 2mto 3m thick kimberlite sheet which dips at ~15 todepths in excess of 2000m. Although tagged as a dykeit would locally be more appropriately called a sill.

    While acoustic impedance contrasts between thekimberlite and host rocks point to reflection coefficientsin excess of 20%, it would not normally be considered asuitable seismic target on account of its limited width(Hammer et al 2004). However, orientation surveysusing dynamite in deep shot-holes and Vibroseis surface

    sources generating return frequencies of up to 350Hz

    (with a dominant frequency of 100Hz) allowed formapping of the dyke (Figure xx). With seismicwavelengths of no less than 13m, this implies mappingat the one sixth wavelength interval. On this basis thedyke is not resolved, but detected: the reflection

    package correlating with its locale comprises 3 to 5cycles (~20msec or ~45m). This may reflect internalreverberations and/or non-optimal data processing.

    The dyke signature is confidently mapped from TWT =30msec (~60m) to 425msec (1300m), at an average dipof around 15. No other reflectors are mapped in this

    granite environment. Borehole ties are good and

    correlate well over sections where dip variations areapparent.

    3.4 Bushveld PlatReef: Moderate to Modest

    Dips

    The PlatReef horizon of the Northern Limb of theBushveld Complex comprises a 100m to 300m thickpredominantly pyroxenitic package overlain by MainZone gabbros, which at outcrop dips at ~40 to 45 tothe southwest. It carries PGM mineralization and

    disseminated sulphides. Significant acoustic impedancecontrasts at hanging (gabbros) and footwall (granite)

    contacts predict average reflection coefficients at theseelevations of +4% and -13% respectively. While suchvalues may be expected to generate significantreflection events, gradational changes at the top

    PlatReef contact sometimes degrade seismic mappingcapabilities.

    Early drilling by Afri-Ore downdip from the Anglo-Platinum Open Pit indicated an unexpected apparentshallowing of dip of the PlatReef horizon which, if real(i.e. not due to faulting), could considerably improvemining economics. An orientation seismic survey

    orthogonal to strike confirmed marked shallowing of

    PlatReef dip at depths in excess of 500m (Figure 4).

    320

  • 8/11/2019 2D Seismic Reflection High Resolution

    3/6

  • 8/11/2019 2D Seismic Reflection High Resolution

    4/6

    2D Seismic Reflection Surveys and Structural Mapping

    322

    Figure 1: OFS GoldFields: Joel Mine Gravity Profile And Seismic Section

    Figure 2: Far West Rand GoldFields: Large Scale Listric Faulting

  • 8/11/2019 2D Seismic Reflection High Resolution

    5/6

    Campbell

    Figure 3: Karoo CoalFields: Mapping of a Major Coal Seam and Overlying Sills

    Figure 4: Northern Bushveld Limb: Mapping of the Terraced PlatReef Unit

    323

  • 8/11/2019 2D Seismic Reflection High Resolution

    6/6

    2D Seismic Reflection Surveys and Structural Mapping

    324

    Figure 5: Bushveld Complex: Mapping of UG2 Graben Structure above Floor Dome