2ac Commissions Cp

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 2ac Commissions Cp

    1/1

    Northwestern Debate Institute2011 File Tit

    2AC---Commissions CP

    1.) Permutation do bothsolves the link to the net benefit2.) Commissions fail miserably and massively piss off congressempirics prove

    Rampell - 8/02, Catherine Rampell, Economic columnist for NYT, 8/02/11, Why Would a Fiscal Commission Work This Time?http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/02/why-would-a-fiscal-commission-work-this-time/

    Here on Capitol Hill, legislators are fuming about being stripped of their power by a new bipartisan fiscal super-committee. But histor

    shows that such commissions have been generally powerless.

    In the last six decades, Washington has assembled more than a dozen blue-ribbon panels to grapple with fiscal problems. These include

    the 1947-49 Hoover Commission, the 1982-84 Grace Commission and of course most recently, the Simpson-Bowles Commission, a

    bipartisan panel President Obama created by executive order just last year that included 12 sitting members of Congress. (If I were Alan

    Simpson and Erskine Bowlesthe namesakes of that task forceI might be a little peeved that my colleagues are effectively repeatin

    the exercise that I spent so much time on last year.)

    The panels were often devised as a way to give political cover to policy makers so they could make unpopular changes to things like

    entitlements and tax rates. In most cases, though, Congress ignored the proposals or deferred action.

    Even the panel usually held up as the exception that proved the rule, the 1981-83 Greenspan Commission set up to revamp Social

    Security, was also largely a failure.According to an unpublished memoir written by one of the now-deceased members of the commission, the panel deadlocked and then

    splintered. President Reagan and the House leadership were able to eke out a deal to save Social Security only by engaging in separate

    negotiations just as the entitlement program was about to go bankrupt.

    3.) No solvency advocate for the cp is a voting issue

    a. Not reciprocalthe aff has to have a solvency advocate

    b. Not educationalnobody advocating the CP in the literature base means we cant be expected to researc

    answersthats the key internal link to clash and in-round education

    c. reject the teamthe damage has been done

    4.) Permutation do the cpits plan plus

    Should implies a recommended course of action, not a definitive action

    American Heritage Dictionary 2009[Should on dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/should]Used to express probability or expectation: They should arrive at noon.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/02/us/politics/02panel.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/19/us/politics/19commission.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/19/us/politics/19commission.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/02/us/politics/02panel.html