Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
29. CHEMICAL ZONATION OF PLAGIOCLASE PHENOCRYSTS FROM LEG 51, 52,AND 53 BASALTS
Claire Bollinger and Michel Semet, Laboratoire de Géochimie et Cosmochimie, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris,Département des Sciences de la Terre, 75230 Paris, France
INTRODUCTION
Chemical zonation of phenocryst phases present a recordof the physicochemical changes in magma from which theycrystallized. Several recent studies (e.g., Bottinga et al.,1966; Albarède and Bottinga, 1972; Kirkpatrick, 1976,1977; Sibley et al., 1976; Shimizu, 1978) have addressedthe zonation of major and trace elements in plagioclase fromthe point of view of the growth dynamics from a magma andhave shown that disequilibrium composition features of thephenocrysts should provide a better understanding of thephysicochemical evolution of the associated magma. As dif-fusion coefficients, growth rates, and chemical compositionof phenocrysts as a function of supercooling become avail-able, parameters like cooling rates and non-equilibrium par-tition of trace elements of crystallizing magmas may bemodeled quantitatively. Oceanic basalts are among the ter-restrial volcanic rocks that show relatively little differentia-tion from primitive liquids originating in the mantle and donot seem to show extensive mixing from different sources.Their relatively simple crystallization history make themwell suited for the detailed study of the chemical zonation oftheir phenocryst assemblages.
The types of zonation patterns found in plagioclasephenocrysts from volcanic rocks and their possible pet-rogenetic interpretation are reviewed by Smith (1974,chapt. 14 to 17). Four main types are present in plagioclasephyric oceanic basalts: continuous zoning, oscillatory zon-ing, patchy zoning, and sector zoning. Some phenocrystsmay show more than one type in the different growth zones,indicating that several growth-controlled phenomena maybe at work during the crystallization of a single crystal.Furthermore, correlation of zonation patterns between thegrowth faces of individual phenocrysts, or between differentcrystals of the same sample (e.g., Sibley et al., 1976), mayhelp in attributing the patterns to specific growth featuressuch as chemical changes in the liquids, cooling ratechanges, settling, floating, and convection in the magma.
Samples were selected from Legs 51, 52, and 53 ofGlomar Challenger for which a thick section of well-characterized basalts was available. The aim of our study isto obtain detailed major and trace element data for severalselected samples of the basalt pile, with the hope of recon-structing some aspects of their petrogenetic history. Thisreport is concerned primarily with zonation patterns of themajor elements (Na, Al, Si, and Ca) and is preliminary inseveral regards; major element data can provide only limitedinformation on the zonation patterns and, more importantly,the resolution in the chemical changes is limited to severalµm by electron microprobe analysis. The second part of the
study consists of detailed trace element determinations inthe samples studied by ion microprobe analysis. A com-prehensive discussion of the results, therefore, will not beattempted at this point.
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE
Most samples studied are mino-cores. Doubly polishedthin sections were prepared by standard petrographictechniques. Chemical analyses were performed with aCAMECA Camebax electron microprobe which has a 40°take-off angle. Wavelength dispersive spectrometers and aprimary current of 0.01 to 0.04 µA were routinely used.The beam was slightly defocused (3-5 µm 0) for largezones, whereas spot analysis (= 1 µm spot 0) was carriedout for the finer zones. A modified Bence-Albee data reduc-tion program (Bence and Albee, 1968) utilizing a LakeCounty labradorite, an Amelia County albite, and an Eifel(Germany) orthoclase standard was used to obtain the majoroxide concentrations.
RESULTS
Most of the samples studied were from pillow basalts,although a few came from massive units. Preliminary pet-rographic examination showed that zonation patterns wereof three general types: (a) relatively homogeneous crystals;(b) oscillatory zoned crystals; (c) oscillatory and sectorzoned crystals.
Phenocrysts from pillow basalts may be of any of thethree types; type b is, however, the most abundant. Massiveunits, on the contrary, mostly contain type b phenocrysts.All phenocrysts have a relatively sodic rim of variablethickness ranging from 10 to 100 µm.
No systematic differences between the samples comingfrom different depths in the boreholes were found. The mostrepresentative samples were, therefore, selected for themicroprobe study (see Table 1). The phenocrysts are eithersubequant or lath-shaped. Prominent growth was along[001], [110], and [201] faces. Patchy zoning is apparentlyrestricted to the cores of the phenocrysts. Bands rich inglassy inclusions may occur anywhere in the crystal and arecontinuous around it. Oscillatory zones generally show twothickness ranges. Larger zones, tens of µm wide, aresubdivided into µm size zones. The latter cannot becompositionally resolved with the electron microprobe.Correlation of the larger zones between different growingfaces, or symmetry related faces, is perfect in most cases. Amajor proportion of the oscillatory zones are planar andparallel to growing faces. However, a few samples showwavy or contorted bands not conforming to prominentfaces. Engulfment of inclusions does not seem to be the
1055
C. BOLLINGER, M. SEMET
TABLE 1Petrographic Descriptions
Leg Hole Sample Unit Description
51 417D 33-4, - Massive basalt, groundmass is coarse12 cm grained, containing oxides; zoned
plagioclase phenocrysts up to 4 mm;crystal types b and c
52 418A 28-2, 5 Moderately porphyritic pillow basalt10 cm with olivine, pyroxene, and plagio-
clase phenocyrsts; groundmass isslightly altered; a spinel inclusionin plagioclase phenocryst; crystaltypes b and c
53
53
53
53
53
53
418A
418A
418A
418A
418A
418A
50-2,105 cm
71-2,52 cm
71-2,66 cm
80-2,55 cm
85-2,93 cm
86-3,93 cm
6b
l l f
l l f
12
12
13
Moderately porphyritic pillow basaltwith olivine and plagioclase pheno-crysts, fine-grained groundmass;plagioclase is fresh and contains al-tered glass inclusions; crystal typesa, b, c
Pillow basalt moderately porphyriticwith olivine and plagioclase pheno-crysts and aphyric matrix; crystaltypes b and c
Glassy zones from a pillow basaltwith 3 mm plagioclase phenocrysts;glass inclusions in the phenocrysts aremostly fresh; cyrstal types b and c
Massive basalt with plagioclase andolivine phenocrysts and very coarsegrained rηatrix; crystal types b and c
Massive basalt with olivine, plagio-clase, and pyroxene phenocrysts andcoarse-grained matrix; crystal type b
Pillow basalt with olivine, plagioclase,and pyroxene phenocrysts and veryfine-grained matrix; crystal types band c
general explanation for this feature for which no rationalehas been found.
Analytical data for the major elements are presented inTable 2. A summary of the results is illustrated in Figure 1which presents a plot of Ca versus Al atom number foranalyses normalized to 8 oxygens; this type of illustrationfollows Bryan (1974). Detailed analyses for K, Mg, and Feare not presented at this point because these elements will bedetermined with higher accuracy with an ion microprobe.Preliminary ion microprobe results show that K is generallyon the order of 100 ppm weight and that Mg and Fe increasefrom core to rim and are enriched in {θlθ} sectors as ob-served by Bryan (1974). The average composition of theplagioclase is An.75-80 and is relatively more calcic than thosedescribed by Bryan (1974). For those analyses where K,Mg, and Fe are reported, the total number of cations is closeto the theoretical 5 to 8 oxygens so that extensive non-stoichiometry does not seem to be present (Figure 2).
DISCUSSION
The Ca versus Al relationship of Figure 1 generallyfollows the one reported by Bryan (1974) in showingenrichment of Ca relative to the theoretical Ab-An solid-solution series. Our data lie closer to the theoretical line;solid solution of the hypothetical end-member Ca (Mg, Fe)SiβOβ, as suggested by the latter author accounts satisfac-torily for the shift. Linear fits to the data for pillow basalts
and massive flows are slightly different, but within the lim-its of error of the least-squares fitted best lines.
Thermodynamics indicate that the most calcic composi-tions are likely to be closer to equilibrium composition forthe crystallization of the plagioclases. Had equilibrium beenmaintained, plagioclases of Anss-w composition should havecrystallized from the basaltic melt. Departure from thiscomposition in the larger oscillatory zoned bands are takento reflect different degrees of undercooling. A crude esti-mate of this parameter may be obtained by comparison ofthe plagioclase composition to that observed under con-trolled temperature conditions for magmas of similar bulkcomposition. Undercoolings of 50° to 100°C gave rise toAnβ5 plagioclases in the Makaopuhi lava lake (Wright andKinoshita, 1968), whereas Clochiatti et al. (1978) obtainedAnβ5 and Ansi plagioclases for 30° and 100°C undercool-ings , respectively. Those observations then suggest that thedegree of undercooling prevailing during crystallization ofthe phenocrysts in the oceanic basalts was less than a fewtens of degrees and possibly as low as a few degrees C.Crystallization of the sodic rims may have occurred atgreater undercoolings of 50° to 100°C, and have corre-sponded to eruption on the ocean floor. Enhanced nuclea-tion rates at this stage are in keeping with the appearance ofmicrophenocrysts of similar composition. Even thoughother phenomena may play a role in the development of thelarger oscillatory zoned bands, variations in cooling rate ofthe body of magma that crystallized the phenocrysts in astep-by-step progression into colder rocks seem to afford anadequate explanation. The variations would induce variabledegrees of constitutional supercooling in the sense of Bot-tinga et al. (1966) and Sibley et al. (1976). In this line ofreasoning, the fine µm-size zones remain inadequatelyexplained. They may be due to the build-up of "poisons" atthe growing surface owing to their slow diffusion in theliquid.
A fair conclusion from the data at hand would be thatdisequilibrium growth effects, such as those suggested byAlbarède and Bottinga (1972), are not pronounced. How-ever, our contention is that the scale of the latter phenome-non is generally below the resolution of microprobeanalysis. The mere fact that sectors have different averagecompositions and that growth zones for different crystallo-graphic faces do not always correspond strongly suggestthat growth rate is an important parameter in controlling thecomposition of the growing layer.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The study has been supported in part by a grant from the CNRS(ATP "Gèochimie"). C.B. benefited from a fellowship of theCentre National pour 1'Exploitation des Oceans. The manuscriptwas improved by the thoughtful comments of Dr. S. Wilhelm andof anonymous reviewers.
REFERENCES
Albarède, F. and Bottinga, Y., 1972. Kinetic disequilibrium intrace element partitioning between phenocrysts and host lava,Geochim. Cosmochim. Ada., v. 136, p. 141-156.
Bence, A.E. and Albee, A.L., 1968. Empirical correction factorsfor the electron microanalysis of silicates and oxides, J. Geol.,v. 76, p. 382.
1056
TABLE 2Analytical Data for Major Elements
SiO 2
A 1 2 O 3
CaO
N a 2 O
K 2 0
MgO
FeO
Total
Nb cations
per 8 oxygens
Si
Al
Ca
Na
K
Mg
I•e
Total
%An
SiO 2
A 1 2 O 3
CaO
N a 2 O
K 2 O
MgO
FeO
Total
Nb cations
per 8 oxygens
Si
Al
Ca
NaK
Mg
Fe
Total
% A n
1
51.7930.0213.64
3.680.09
0.85
100.07
2.359
1.6120.6660.3250.005
0.032
5.000
64.72
24
54.6127.3610.55
5.120.08
1.07
98.79
2.4991.4760.517
0.4540.005
0.041
4.922
50.84
2
48.44
33.4016.61
1.890.04
0.41
100.69
2.204
1.7910.8050.1670.002
0.016
4.985
81.31
25
49.71
32.2115.512.480.05
0.50
100.46
2.2621.7270.756
0.2190.003
0.019
4.986
75.83
3
47.9933.5116.49
1.860.03
0.41
100.29
2.193
1.8050.8070.1650.002
0.016
4.988
81.52
26
50.6831.8215.502.64
0.06
0.49
101.19
2.2881.6930.750
0.2310.003
0.018
4.983
74.85
4
48.1933.4716.73
1.840.03
0.35
100.61
2.1961.7970.8170.1630.002
0.013
4.988
82.11
27
48.3133.3516.52
2.090.01
0.33
100.61
2.2011.7910.806
0.1850.001
0.013
4.996
80.36
5
49.0332.6816.52
2.100.06
0.34
100.73
2.230
1.7520.8050.1850.003
0.013
4.988
80.02
28
52.5429.9114.243.310.04
0.76
100.80
2.371
1.5930.689
0.2900.002
0.025
4.976
68.22
6
48.8532.8316.182.400.04
0.37
100.67
2.224
1.7610.7890.2120.002
0.014
5.003
77.58
29
49.4332.1215.95
2.240.02
0.48
100.24
2.2561.7270.780
0.1980.001
0.018
4.980
78.24
7
50.57
31.5114.89
2.84
0.05
0.52
100.38
2.298
1.6880.7250.2000.003
0.020
4.984
72.65
30
50.2631.94
15.262.450.05
0.46
100.42
2.2831.7100.743
0.2160.003
0.017
4.972
75.89
8
46.6034.6918.44
1.190.03
0.33
101.28
2.121
1.8610.8990.1050.002
0.013
5.001
88.22
31
47.3133.5818.00
1.390.03
0.41
100.72
2.1631.8090.882
0.1230.002
0.016
4.995
86.3
9
50.6931.2314.493.270.07
0.63
100.38
2.3061.6740.7060.2880.004
0.024
5.003
69.08
32
47.9532.8017.54
1.760.03
0.41
100.49
2.1951.7700.860
0.1560.002
0.016
4.999
83.17
Sa
10
46.3234.64
17.801.170.06
0.38
100.37
2.124
1.8720.8750.1040.004
0.015
4.993
87.67
nple51-417D-334
11
46.6834.5417.62
1.320.03
0.45
100.64
2.134
1.8610.8630.1170.002
0.017
4.995
86.39
12
48.15
33.6016.91
2.030.04
0.42
101.15
2.187
1.7980.8230.1790.002
0.016
5.005
80.69
Sample 5 3-418 A-71-2
33
53.2928.6113.523.77
0.06
0.78
100.03
2.4221.5330.658
0.3330.003
0.030
4.979
64.32
34
52.2030.3613.963.190.05
0.59
100.36
2.364
1.6200.678
0.2800.003
0.022
4.967
68.97
35
51.42
30.3614.09
3.13
0.05
0.63
99.68
2.3481.6340.689
0.2770.003
0.024
4.975
69.39
13
47.74
34.0317.13
1.630.04
0.41
100.98
2.171
1.8240.8350.1440.002
0.016
4.990
83.75
36
49.4331.7715.82
2.370.03
0.46
99.88
2.264
1.7150.7760.2100.002
0.018
4.985
77.14
14
47.98
33.7016.94
2.04
0.(12
0.41
101.19
2.1811.8050.7250.1800.001
0.016
5.007
80.72
37
51.5530.8414.442.950.01
0.59
100.38
2.3371.6480.7010.2600.001
0.022
4.969
71.24
15
48.1533.5316.77
2.090.04
0.34
100.92
2.1901.7970.8170.1840.002
0.013
5.004
80.41
38
50.4031.2314.122.720.05
0.41
98.93
2.3151.6910.6950.242
0.003
0.016
4.962
72.70
16
51.7630.95
14.463.380.04
0.58
101.17
2.3331.644
0.6980.2950.002
0.022
4.994
68.63
39
49.4732.0614.98
2.370.03
0.31
99.22
2.2711.7350.7370.2110.002
0.012
4.968
76.61
17
56.41
27.2810.685.650.06
0.98
101.06
2.5241.4380.5120.4900.003
0.037
5.004
49.13
40
47.0634.0117.66
1.240.04
0.34
100.35
2.155
1.8360.867
0.1100.002
0.013
4.983
87.40
18
51.24
30.3314.263.110.08
0.75
99.77
2.341
1.6330.6980.2760.005
0.029
4.982
69.25
41
47.1633.6217.21
1.300.04
0.28
99.61
2.1721.8250.8490.116
0.002
0.011
4.975
86.8.1
19
47.50
34.2117.19
1.480.04
0.55
100.97
2.1611.8350.8380.1310.002
0.021
4.988
84.48
42
53.3228.2513.063.92
0.08
0.96
99.59
2.434
1.5200.6390.3470.005
0.037
4.982
62.16
20
54.73
28.3511.475.150.06
0.93
100.85
2.4641.504
0.5530.4500.003
0.035
5.010
53.12
43
52.0330.2814.583.280.05
0.59
100.81
2.3531.614
0.7060.288
0.003
0.022
4.986
69.28
21
46.62
34.5118.03
1.27
0.04
0.38
100.96
2.1291.858
0.8820.1120.002
0.015
4.999
87.24
44
52.3929.7414.113.37
0.05
0.54
100.20
2.3781.591
0.6860.2970.003
0.021
4.976
68.12
22
47.0?
34.1817.75
1.51
0.03
0.47
100.85
2.145
1.838
0.8680.1340.002
0.018
5.004
84.93
45
48.0032.8816.94
1,65
0.01
0.45
99.93
2.2041.7790.833
0.1470.001
0.017
4.981
83.47
23
47.11
33.7917.221.48
0.05
0.78
100.43
2.159
1.8 25
0.8460.1320.003
0.020
4.995
83.68
46
48.8331.5016.352.02
0.05
0.54
99.29
2.2541.7140.809
0.1810.003
0.021
4.981
79.86
1>NOz>δaso
a
o00
TABLE 2 - Continued
SiO2
A12O3
CaO
Na2OK 2 O
MgO
FeO
Total
Nb cationsper 8 oxygens
Si
Al
Ca
Na
K
Mg
Fe
Total
% An
SiO2
A12O3
CaO
Na2OK 2 O
MgO
FeO
Total
Nb cationsper 8 oxygens
Si
Al
Ca
Na
KMg
Fe
Total
% An
47
48.2231.9217.13
1.880.03
0.50
99.68
2.2241.7350.8460.1680.002
0.019
4.994
81.74
70
49.2531.3815.90
2.390.03
0.34
99.29
2.2691.7040.7850.2140.002
0.013
4.986
77.49
48
50.3731.1215.842.710.06
0.37
100.47
2.2931.6700.7730.2390.003
0.014
4.993
75.05
71
47.9533.2417.052.040.06
0.62
100.94
2.1721.8010.8400.1820.004
0.024
5.021
80.15
Sam
49
49.3632.0916.57
2.170.04
0.44
100.67
2.2471.7220.8080.1920.002
0.017
4.988
79.29
72
47.6033.6217.47
1.790.04
0.44
100.96
2.1701.8060.8530.1790.004
0.017
5.007
82.73
ple52-418A-71-2
50
52.2329.2113.283.410.06
0.83
99.02
2.3961.5800.6530.3030.004
0.032
4.967
65.89
73
47.9232.5416.92
2.210.05
0.43
100.07
2.2031.7630.8330.1970.003
0.017
5.016
79.33
51
48.3831.8315.73
2.190.05
0.51
98.69
2.2441.7400.7820.1970.003
0.020
4.986
78.04
74
54.8928.4211.664.990.12
0.97
101.05
2.4641.5030.5610.4340.007
0.036
5.005
54.05
52
48.6331.9416.582.060.04
0.49
99.74
2.2371.7320.8170.1840.002
0.019
4.990
80'.02
75
51.1431.2314.73
3.430.05
0.59
101.17
2.3101.6620.7130.3000.003
0.022
5.011
68.69
53
48.5432.4216.78
1.840.08
0.36
100.02
2.2251.7520.8240.1640.005
0.014
4.983
81.91
76
50.9631.1514.833.380.07
0.71
100.57
2.3061.6610.7190.2970.004
0.027
5.004
68.67
Sample71-2,
54
50.5530.4514.29
2.980.050.250.54
99.11
2.3251.6500.7040.2660.0030.0170.021
4.986
69.63
77
50.4531.5314.622.880.05
0.37
99.90
2.3011.6950.7140.2550.003
0.014
4.981
72.41
52418A-60-69 cm
55
47.6631.9915.902.060.010.170.42
98.21
2.2231.7580.7940.1870.0010.0120.017
4.991
78.61
78
49.8332.2815.322.520.03
0.47
100.45
2.2651.7290.7460.2220.002
0.018
4.982
75.51
Sample 52418A-80-2, 55-58 cm
56
49.6831.5215.432.670.01
99.31
2.2821.7060.7590.2380.001
4.985
76.05
57
46.1233.2117.50
1.810.02
98.66
2.1521.8260.8750.1640.001
5.018
84.13
58
53.5928.7411.894.730.06
1.02
100.03
2.4221.5380.5780.4160.003
0.039
5.008
55.73
Sample53417A-86-3
79
48.4333.2516.17
1.960.04
0.32
100.04
2.2121.7900.7910.1740.002
0.012
4.981
80.80
80
48.5332.7616.702.240.06
0.50
100.79
2.2121.7600.8160.1980.003
0.019
5.008
78.76
81
51.8029.1213.49
3.990.06
0.5 7
99.03
2.3831.5790.6650.3560.004
0.022
5.008
63.51
59
53.3029.1112.864.320.10
0.89
100.58
2.4111.5520.6230.3790.006
0.034
5.005
59.78
82
51.1229.6614.303.400.03
0.37
98.88
2.3551.7110.7060.3040.002
0.014
4.992
68.81
60
50.2530.9114.86
2.890.06
0.62
99.59
2.3051.6710.7300.2570.004
0.024
4.990
72.00
83
50.8930.4314.36
3.220.06
0.39
99.35
2.3341.6450.7060.2860.004
0.015
4.989
69.83
61
47.1734.1117.90
1.530.03
0.39
101.13
2.1481.8310.8730.1350.002
0.015
5.005
85.93
84
49.2431.7816.34
2.270.04
0.42
100.09
2.2541.7150.8010.2010.002
0.016
4.990
78.53
62
48.4232.6316.332.350.07
0.52
100.32
2.2161.7600.8010.2090.004
0.020
5.010
77.47
85
48.9631.9316.182.440.07
0.48
100.06
2.2441.7250.7950.2170.004
0.018
5.004
76.89
Sample 53-417A-86-3
63
48.9832.5816.522.330.07
0.5 7
101.05
2.2261.7450.8040.2050.004
0.022
5.006
77.68
86
49.7131.8115.042.710.040.290.54
100.14
2.2691.7110.7360.2400.0030.0200.021
4.998
72.25
64
53.8328.5311.835.060.10
1.04
100.39
2.4381.5230.5740.4440.006
0.039
5.025
53.95
87
49.9431.4914.64
2.430.080.430.59
99.60
2.2861.6990.7180.2160.0050.0300.023
4.975
72.52
65
51.9730.7214.133.490.05
0.70
101.06
2.3441.6330.6830.3050.003
0.026
4.994
67.15
88
49.9031.5014.762.830.020.250.44
99.70
2.2841.6990.7240.2510.0010.0170.017
4.993
71.70
66
55.1327.6811.415.310.13
0.83
100.49
2.4871.4720.5510.4640.007
0.031
5.013
52.28
89
49.5731.6915.002.790.030.240.46
99.78
2.2701.7110.7360.2480.0020.0170.018
5.000
72.19
67
50.9930.4415.053.170.06
0.62
100.33
2.2341.6350.7350.2800.003
0.024
5.001
70.54
90
48.7032.2415.39
2.360.050.210.43
99.38
2.2411.7480.7590.2110.0030.0150.016
4.993
75.62
68
47.363.03
17.041.780.04
0.32
99.57
2.1851.7960.8420.1590.002
0.012
4.998
82.79
91
49.4532.4515.28
2.550.030.240.47
100.47
2.2491.7390.7440.2210.0010.0160.016
4.998
74.04
69
47.5832.4817.03
1.870.03
0.41
99.40
2.2001.7700.8440.1680.002
0.016
4.999
82.02
92
50j)631.7715.002.790.030.210.4 3
100.29
2.2781.7040.7310.2460.0010.0140.018
4.990
72.46
TABLE 2 - Continued
SiO2
A 1 2°3CaO
N a 2 °K 2 O
MgO
FeO
Total
Nb cations
per 8 oxygens
Si
Al
Ca
Na
K
Mg
Fe
Total
% An
93
50.41
32.10
14.90
2.85
0.04
0.25
0.43
100.98
2.278
1.700
0.722
0.250
0.003
0.017
0.016
4.995
71.68
94
48.50
32.97
16.15
2.08
0.03
0.20
0.41
100.34
2.214
1.774
0.790
0.184
0.002
0.014
0.016
4.992
78.65
95
48.28
32.68
15.96
2.41
0.03
0.22
0.46
100.04
2.214
1.766
0.784
0.214
0.002
0.015
0.018
5.012
75.93
96
48.00
32.68
16.10
2.03
0.03
0.18
0.43
99.45
2.211
1.774
0.795
0.181
0.002
0.013
0.016
4.992
78.91
Sa
97
49.08
32.07
15.27
2.41
0.03
0.27
0.48
99.61
2.251
1.734
0.750
0.214
0.002
0.018
0.018
4.991
74.75
nple53-418A-86-3
98
48.77
32.37
16.21
2.10
0.05
0.19
0.4 1
100.10
2.232
1.746
0.794
0.187
0.003
0.013
0.016
4.990
78.38
99
49.71
31.65
15.47
2.46
0.04
0.21
0.43
99.97
2.272
1.705
0.757
0.218
0.003
0.017
0.015
4.986
74.95
100
51.72
30.89
14.32
2.92
0.02
0.34
0.56
100.70
2.337
1.641
0.693
0.256
0.001
0.023
0.021
4.972
69.72
101
48.98
31.50
15.29
2.40
0.04
0.21
0.41
98.83
2.265
1.716
0.757
0.215
0.003
0.015
0.016
4.987
75.25
102
47.90
32.24
16.18
2.03
0.03
0.19
0.51
99.28
2.213
1.766
0.801
0.182
0.002
0.013
0.020
4.996
78.68
103
49.87
31.24
15.13
2.64
0.02
98.90
2.296
1.695
0.746
0.236
0.001
4.975
75.89
Sampl
104
52.36
30.11
13.05
3.82
0.11
0.23
0.59
100.27
2.373
1.608
0.634
0.336
0.007
0.016
0.023
4.994
62.40
45-395A-15-1
105
47.21
34.02
16.99
1.65
0.04
0.28
0.29
100.48
2.158
1.808
0.832
0.146
0.003
0.019
0.011
4.977
82.30
owSo>t - 1
Noz>δ
5
t-<>
C. BOLLINGER, M. SEMET
[-• • —
T
s
9
Ss
s/ ®
/
1
~ S 4y v
S
9 /
/
i— — i
T f (
®T ® /®* » /
® Phenocryst from mass
v Phenocryst from pillo
yr
ve basalts
w basalts
/ I
Figure 1. Number of Ca versus number of Al atoms for 8 oxygens in the formula unit.The theoretical Ab-An solid solution is shown as a heavy line. The average line ofBryan s (1974) analyses is shown as a dashed line.
Bottinga, Y., Kudo, A.M., and Weill, D., 1966. Some observa-tions on oscillatory zoning and crystallization of magmaticplagioclase, Am. Mineralogist, v. 51, p. 792-806.
Bryan, W.B., 1974. Fe-Mg relationships in sector zoned sub-marine basalt plagioclase, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., v. 24, p.157-165.
Clocchiatti, R., Havette, A., Weiss, J., and Wilhelm, S., 1978.Les Bytownites du Rift d'Asal. Premiere partie. Etude desverres basaltiques inclus dans les mégacristaux: nouvelle ap-proche pour la connaissance de certains processus pét-rogénétiques, Bull. Soc. Franc. Mineral. Cryst., v. 101, p.66-76.
Kirkpatrick, R. J., 1976. Towards a kinetic model for the crystalli-zation of magma bodies, J. Geophys. Res., v. 81, p. 2565-2571.
, 1977. Nucleation and growth of plagioclase, Maka-opuhi and Alae lava lakes, Kilauea Volcano Hawaii, Geol.Soc. Am. Bull., v. 87, p. 78-84.
Shimizu, N., 1978. Analysis of zoned plagioclase from differentmagmatic environment a preliminary ion microprobe study,Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., v. 39, p. 398-406.
Sibley, D.F., Vogel, J.A., Walker, B.M., and Byerly, G., 1976.The origin of oscillatory zoning in plagioclase: a diffusiongrowth controlled model, Am. J. Sci., v. 276, p. 275-284.
Smith, J.V., 1974. Feldspar minerals: Berlin (Springer Verlag),v. 2(1974).
Wright, T.L. and Kinoshita, W.T., 1968. March 1965 eruption ofKilauea Volcano and the formation of Makaopuhi Lava Lake,J. Geophys. Res., v. 73, p. 3181-3205.
1060
CHEMICAL ZONATION OF PLAGIOCLASE PHENOCRYSTS
80
< 75
70scale 150 µm
distance
Figure 2. Sketch of the crystal represented by Analyses 86to 97, Table 2, and variation of its chemical compositionalong the traverse shown by crosses.
1061