21/04/23 1

First FRCR Examination in Clinical Radiology

Diagnostic Radiology & Radionuclide Radiology

(4b) Patient Dosimetry

John SaundersonRadiation Protection Adviser

21/04/23 2

RCR Syllabus

•Methods

•Diagnostic reference levels (including high dose techniques)

•Magnitude and measurements .

21/04/23 3

Methods

• General radiology

• Fluoroscopy

• Computed Tomography

• Nuclear Medicine .

21/04/23 4

General radiology

• ESD– Thermoluminescent dosemeter (TLD)– exposure factors

• Dose-Area Product (DAP)

• Effective dose .

21/04/23 5

T.L.D.

• Crystals, e.g. lithium fluoride• Radiation causes electrons to be caught in

“traps”• At lab. TLDs heated to 240oC• Electrons released, light emitted• Amount of light emitted proportional to dose .

21/04/23 6

T.L.D.s +/-

+ Small+ Tissue equivalent+ Read 1 Gy+ Easy for radiographer

- No direct readout- Sensitive to heat, UV,

dirt- Tricky to calibrate- Easy to loose- Special ones needed for

low dose (e.g. chest) .

21/04/23 7

Using exposure factors• kV, mAs, field size, FSD• If D = dose at 100 cm for 80 kV, 100 mAs

then• ESD = D

• x kV2/802 • x mAs/100 • x 1002/FSD2 • x BSF

• BSF = backscatter factor, depends on HVL and field size.

21/04/23 8

E.g.• What is ESD for 100 kV, 50mAs, 15 x 15 cm field, 75 cm

FSD for Room 3?• From annual survey

– @ 80 kV, D = 9.1 mGy/100mAs @ 1 m– HVL for 100kV was 3 mmAl

• From tables– BSF for 3mmAl, 15 x 15 field = 1.33

• Therefore, entrance surface dose= 9.1mGy x 1002/802 x 50/100 x 1002/752 x 1.33

= 0.17 mGy .

21/04/23 9

Using exposure factors +/-

+ No fiddly TLD for radiographers!

+ No fiddly TLDs for physicist!

+ Radiographers can calculate ESDs

+ No minimum dose

- No direct readout- Exposure parameters

must be recorded- Assumes tube output not

changed from last survey.

21/04/23 10

Dose Area Product

• Because dose falls with 1/d2 and area increases with d2, DAP is independent of distance.

21/04/23 11

DAP +/-

+ No fiddly TLD for radiographers!

+ Only one number to record

+ Instant answer

- Doesn’t take into account backscatter

- Initial cost (several thousand £)

- Units sometimes cause confusion (cGy.cm2, or

Gy.cm2, Gy.m2) .

21/04/23 12

Effective dose

• Complicated to calculate from ESD or DAP

• Can use computer models which make assumptions on– field size– patient size– field position

21/04/23 13

21/04/23 14

21/04/23 15

21/04/23 16

21/04/23 17

21/04/23 18

Fluoroscopy

• Dose-Area Product (DAP)

• Exposure factors

• Effective dose .

21/04/23 19

DAP +/- for fluoroscopy

+ Instant answer, etc.+ DAP moves with the

tube+ Gives good indication of

relative risks of inducing cancer

- Not directly linked to erythema risk.

21/04/23 20

Exposure factors

• Based on assumed FSDs, etc.

21/04/23 21

Effective dose

• Can be “fudged” using radiograph software.

21/04/23 22

GAFCHROMIC film

21/04/23 23

21/04/23 24

25

GAFCHROMIC film

• optical density is proportional to the absorbed dose• 0.01 Gy to 50 Gy • Energy independent from 30 keV to 30 MeV• £20 per 14” x 17” sheet

21/04/23 26

Computed Tomography

• CT Dose Index (CTDI)

• Dose-Width Product (DWP)

• Effective dose

21/04/23 27

CT Dose Index (CTDI)

• Applies to a single slice

• Can be used to compare– different slice widths– different physical filter– different scanners– etc.

dzTN

zDCTDI

mm

mm

50

50

100

)(

21/04/23 28

Dose-Length Product (DLP)

• DWP = CTDI x n x T

• Gives an idea of relative dose for a whole scan

• Can be used to compare effect of pitch, etc.

21/04/23 29

Effective dose

• NRPB program similar to radiography one

21/04/23 30

21/04/23 31

CT dose/risk calculation• e.g. wrong patient referred for CT scan

(laryngectomy)

21/04/23 32

Nuclear Medicine

• MIRD

• Add up dose to each organ from the dose irradiating from each organ.

21/04/23 33

21/04/23 34

Diagnostic Reference Levels

• Early 80’s survey

• DRLs today

• IRMER

21/04/23 35

Mid-80’s surveyMethod

• Survey of twenty UK hospitals

• 13 most common views

• For each 10-20 patients (60-80kg) at

• DAP or ESD by TLD measured.

21/04/23 36

Mid-80’s survey Results

• E.g. Chest PA– Median ESD = 0.18 mGy– Minimum ESD = 0.03 mGy– Maximum ESD = 1.43 mGy– Max / min = 48 !!.

21/04/23 37

Entrance Surface Dose (mGy) Radiograph

Min. Median 3rd Quartile Max.

Lumbar spine AP 0.8 7.7 10 59

Lat 2.4 20 30 108

LSJ 7.4 35 40 131

Abdomen AP 0.7 6.7 10 62

Pelvis AP 0.9 5.7 10 32

Chest PA 0.03 0.2 0.3 1.4

Lat 0.14 1.0 1.5 11

Skull AP 0.7 4.0 5 14

PA 1.8 4.3 5 13

Lat. 0.4 2.2 3 9

Dose-area product (Gy.cm2) Radiograph

Min. Median 3rd Quartile Max.

Lumbar spine

(3.4 films)

2.0 12 15 93

Barium enema

(8.5 films, 224 s fluoro)

6.2 41 60 272

Barium meal

(7.8 films, 193 s fluoro)

0.5 17 25 163

IVU

(8.2 films)

3.3 29 40 251

Abdomen

(1.4 films)

0.7 5 8 30

Pelvis

(1.1 films)

0.49 4 5 19

21/04/23 38

Mid-80’s surveyRecommendation

• Use 75th percentile as reference value

• i.e. carry out local surveys and take action if average dose is greater than ¾ of national survey doses

• e.g. for chest PA reference = 0.3mGy ESD

• Send results to NRPB to review national reference doses every 5 years.

21/04/23 39

DRLs today• A DRL is essentially a guide to the

rather indistinct border between “good and normal practice” and “bad and abnormal practice”.

21/04/23 40

IRMER

• National DRLs – set as 3rd quartile– average from survey of “standard patients”– should be below DRL

• Local DRLs– ?Average for Trust?– Most should be below average

21/04/23 41

21/04/23 42

21/04/23 43

21/04/23 44

21/04/23 45

21/04/23 46

21/04/23 47

Staff and Environmental Monitoring

• Devices– TLD– OSLD– Film– Electronic

• Body

• Extremity

• Environment

21/04/23 48

Relevant measurement techniques

21/04/23 49

Measuring Dose

• Luxel dose badges

• TLD finger rings– Can be cold sterilized– Heat sensitive

21/04/23 50

Luxel badges

• Wear underneath lead rubber apron

• Assume dose to badge = effective dose

• Can be worn for 2 weeks to 3 months (usually 1 month)

• Must be returned promptly.

21/04/23 51

Electronic Dosemeters• Used by Radiation Physics staff to test x-ray unit

and measure environmental doses

21/04/23 52

21/04/23 53

Absent Badges

Participant Name, Number

Begin wear date

End wear date

Dosimeter Location

Body Dose (mSv)

Extremity Dose (mSv)

Body Dose YTD

Exremity Dose YTD

Notes Derived

FALSE ARCHER, MS G,00176 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest 0.1   1.27     MEASURED

FALSE ARCHER, MS G,00176 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Right Finger   0.2   1.2   MEASURED

FALSE ATKINSON,A,00308 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest 0.03   0.18     MEASURED

FALSE AVERY, DR G,00298 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest 0.04   0.24     MEASURED

FALSE AVERY, DR G,00298 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Left Finger   0.2   9.6   MEASURED

FALSE AVERY, DR G,00298 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Right Finger   0.2   23.7   MEASURED

FALSE AZOR, B,00587 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest 0.02   0.1     MEASURED

FALSE BAJALAN, L,00325 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest         Component Note: H-Unused MEASURED

FALSEBARLOW,

NICHOLAS,00053 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest         Component Note: H-Unused MEASURED

FALSE BEADLE, MRS E,00609 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest         Component Note: H-Unused MEASURED

FALSE BEADLE, MRS E,00609 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Right Finger   0.2   1.2   MEASURED

FALSEBOTTOMLY, JAYNE,00694 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest         Component Note: H-Unused MEASURED

1BOWERING, SUE,00279 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest           ABSENT

FALSE BRAMALL, M,00588 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest 0.01   0.03     MEASURED

FALSE BROWN, SUSAN,00326 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest 0.03   0.07     MEASURED

FALSE BYASS, DR O,00384 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest         Component Note: H-Unused MEASURED

FALSE BYASS, DR O,00384 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Left Finger   0.2   13.3   MEASURED

FALSE BYASS, DR O,00384 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Right Finger   0.2   14.9   MEASURED

FALSE CAST, DR J,00376 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest 0.01   0.99     MEASURED

FALSE CAST, DR J,00376 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Waist 0.48   4.13   overapron MEASURED

FALSE CAST, DR J,00376 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Right Finger   1.1   14.8   MEASURED

YTD = year to date

Luxel badge results(Sept 2013, CHH Radiology)

21/04/23 54

Absent Badges

Participant Name, Number

Begin wear date

End wear date

Dosimeter Location

Body Dose (mSv)

Extremity Dose (mSv)

Body Dose YTD

Exremity Dose YTD

Notes Derived

FALSE ARCHER, MS G,00176 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest 0.1   1.27     MEASURED

FALSE ARCHER, MS G,00176 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Right Finger   0.2   1.2   MEASURED

FALSE ATKINSON,A,00308 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest 0.03   0.18     MEASURED

FALSE AVERY, DR G,00298 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest 0.04   0.24     MEASURED

FALSE AVERY, DR G,00298 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Left Finger   0.2   9.6   MEASURED

FALSE AVERY, DR G,00298 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Right Finger   0.2   23.7   MEASURED

FALSE AZOR, B,00587 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest 0.02   0.1     MEASURED

FALSE BAJALAN, L,00325 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest         Component Note: H-Unused MEASURED

FALSEBARLOW,

NICHOLAS,00053 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest         Component Note: H-Unused MEASURED

FALSE BEADLE, MRS E,00609 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest         Component Note: H-Unused MEASURED

FALSE BEADLE, MRS E,00609 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Right Finger   0.2   1.2   MEASURED

FALSEBOTTOMLY, JAYNE,00694 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest         Component Note: H-Unused MEASURED

1BOWERING, SUE,00279

01/09/2013

30/09/2013 Chest          

ABSENT

FALSE BRAMALL, M,00588 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest 0.01   0.03     MEASURED

FALSE BROWN, SUSAN,00326 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest 0.03   0.07     MEASURED

FALSE BYASS, DR O,00384 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest         Component Note: H-Unused MEASURED

FALSE BYASS, DR O,00384 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Left Finger   0.2   13.3   MEASURED

FALSE BYASS, DR O,00384 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Right Finger   0.2   14.9   MEASURED

FALSE CAST, DR J,00376 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest 0.01   0.99     MEASURED

FALSE CAST, DR J,00376 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Waist 0.48   4.13   overapron MEASURED

FALSE CAST, DR J,00376 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Right Finger   1.1   14.8   MEASURED

Luxel badge results

Absent Badges

Participant Name, Number

Begin wear date

End wear date

Dosimeter Location

Body Dose (mSv)

Extremity Dose (mSv)

Body Dose YTD

Extremity Dose YTD

Notes Derived

FALSEC##T, DR J,00376 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Chest 0.01   0.99     MEASURED

FALSEC##T, DR J,00376 01/09/2013 30/09/2013 Waist 0.48   4.13   overapron MEASURED

FALSEC##T, DR J,00376 01/09/2013 30/09/2013

Right Finger   1.1   14.8   MEASURED

Luxel badge results

Effective dose assumed to be underapron dose. 0.99mSv to end Sept, so predicted annual dose = 12/9 x 0.99 = 1.32mSv for year

Finger dose, 4.13 to end Sept, so predicted annual dose = 12/9 x 14.8 = 19.73 mSv for year

21/04/23 56

f i n