10
28 September 2011 RIS d.o.o www.thinetsolution.com Performance comparison &

28 September 2011

  • Upload
    rupert

  • View
    25

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

28 September 2011. &. Performance comparison. RIS d.o.o www.thinetsolution.com. MS Windows Sessions Thin@ 2.0 Session usage Thin@ - TS performance comparison. MS Windows Sessions Explained (2008 Server, Win 7 & Vista). Thin@ 2.0 Session & WindowStation usage explained. Benchmarking - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: 28 September 2011

28 September2011

RIS d.o.owww.thinetsolution.com

Performance comparison

&

Page 2: 28 September 2011

1. MS Windows Sessions2. Thin@ 2.0 Session

usage3. Thin@ - TS

performance comparison

Page 3: 28 September 2011

MS Windows Sessions Explained(2008 Server, Win 7 & Vista)

Page 4: 28 September 2011

Thin@ 2.0 Session & WindowStation usage explained

Page 5: 28 September 2011

Server sideIntel Core 2 CPU P8400@ 2.26 GHz4 GB RAM64-bit Windows Server 2008 R2

Client side

Benchmarking Hardware configuration

LinkSys 100 Mbps router

Page 6: 28 September 2011

Terminal Services 2008 Testing procedure explained

Server side Client side

Page 7: 28 September 2011

Programmed bot automated actions:

Open applicationDelay 2xTBA

Browse CustomersDelay TBA

Browse Orders for a customerDelay TBA

Print invoice for that orderDelay TBA

Close invoiceDelay TBA

Browse productsDelay TBA

Scroll down through 4 productsDelay TBA

Close productsDelay TBA

Open product listDelay TBA

Zoom outDelay TBA

Close reportREPEAT

Page 8: 28 September 2011

TS 100 concurrent users performanceGreen – number of sessionsBlue – processor time (%)Red – network usage (MBps * 10)Purple – memory usage

Page 9: 28 September 2011

Thin@ 100 concurrent users performance* Number of sessions not displayed, it increases proportionally over time from 0 to 100Blue – processor time (%)Red – network usage (MBps * 10)Purple – memory usage

*NOTE: network usage very small and not visible on the graph

Page 10: 28 September 2011

Thin@ hardware requirements (Compared to TS)

Thin@

CPU 1.5 less

Memory 2x less

Bandwidth 100x less

HDD less