270_pub_24

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 270_pub_24

    1/4

    A Novel DFACTS Device for the Improvement of Power

    Quality of the Supply

    P. M. Meshram1 B.Y.Bagde2 R.N.Nagpure3

    1,2 & 3 Sr. Lecturers, Dept. of Electrical Engg., Yeshwantrao Chavan College of Engg., Nagpur, INDIA,

    1. [email protected], 2. [email protected], 3. [email protected]

    ABSTRACT

    The proliferations of the non-linear devices cannot

    be restricted at transmission and distribution level

    because of their compactness and power handling

    capacity but they also draw non-linear current and hencedegrade the power quality. The different non-linear loads

    at the distribution side are adjustable speed drives,fluorescent lighting and personal computers (PCs),

    television sets, refrigerators etc.

    In this paper we propose the controller at the

    distribution side, i.e., between the utility and thecustomer for the improvement of the quality of supply

    and therefore it is called DFACTS device. The concept is

    analyzed and completely simulated for different types of

    loads i.e. linear balanced; linear unbalanced; non-linear

    balanced and non-linear unbalanced.

    Keywords: DFACTS, FACTS, power quality & Voltage

    source converters (VSC)

    1. INTRODUCTION

    For a given transmission line, three key parameters

    determine power flow: terminal bus voltages, lineimpedence, and the relative phase angle between the

    sending and receiving end. To modify these parameters,

    a variety of mechanically switched devices like shunt

    connected capacitors and phase sifting transformers are

    used but none responds quickly enough to changing

    conditions to provide real-time flow control. Each ofthese conventional power controllers has a conceptual

    equivalent based on power electronics. In addition, with

    advanced thyristor technology, novel controllers that

    have no single conventional analog have been developed

    and are termed as FACTS devices [1]. There are several

    FACTS controllers, namely, static var compensator

    (SVC), thyristor controlled phase angle regulator,

    thyristor controlled phase angle regulator (TCPAR),

    static compensator (STATCOM), unified power flow

    controller (UPFC), etc. [2-3].

    The above FACTS devices are used for maintaining

    i.e. either supporting or the preventing from rising the

    voltage means supplying or absorbing the reactive power

    but not exclusively for the improvement of quality of thesupply. This proposed DFACTS device is exclusively for

    the improvement of the quality of the supply. The new

    concept of DFACTS device uses two Voltage Source

    Converters (VSCs) utilizing Pulse Width Modulation

    (PWM) technique where inherent characteristics of

    reducing the lower order harmonics is used for the

    domestic, i.e., at the distribution side for improvement of

    quality of the power supply.

    The proposed concept has been simulated for

    different types of loads and balanced as well as

    unbalanced supply voltages.

    2. PRINCIPLE OF OPERATION

    The two- level, six-pulse voltage source converter

    (VSC) is shown in Fig. 1.

    Let

    Es1 Fundamental component of the ac bus

    voltage.

    Ec1 Fundamental component of VSC s output

    voltage.

    Angle between Es1 and Ec2.

    X Converter reactance.P Active powerQ Reactive power

    dcVsbE

    saE

    scE

    1sE 01cE

    RL,

    RL,

    RL,

    1I

    2I

    3I

    1S 2S 3S

    'S1

    'S2

    'S3

    C

    dcI

    Fig. 1: Power Circuit of a Three Phase VSC.

    X

    EEP cs

    sin11= (1)

    X

    EEEQ scs

    )cos( 111 = (2)

  • 7/30/2019 270_pub_24

    2/4

    From (1), the active power flowing over the VSC is

    primarily determined by . The flow of it is determined

    by the relative position between Es1 and Ec1. When Ec1lags behind Es1, the VSC functions as a rectifier and

    absorbs real power from the left ac network. When Ec1

    leads Es1, the VSC works as an inverter and gives real

    power to the left ac system. Similarly from (2) thereactive power is controlled by Ec1.

    Three basic control modes for the VSC are (a)Constant dc voltage control, (b) Constant dc current

    control, (c) Constant ac voltage control for the passive

    load, mode (c) is used and one side of the system should

    adopt constant dc control method.

    3. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

    The DFACTS device consists of two controllers,

    i.e., constant dc voltage controller and ac voltagecontroller. The constant dc voltage controller maintains

    constant dc voltage while ac voltage controller maintains

    the required rms value of the voltage at the load side.

    The two-voltage source converters are shown connected

    back-to-back in the Fig 2. Ps1 and Qs1 are the active and

    reactive power supplied; Pc1 and Qc1 are the active and

    reactive power absorbed by the VSC. Es1 and Es2 are

    the peak-to-peak voltage of the supply and load side.

    V S C V S CdcE

    D C

    C on tro ller

    at

    S tatio n 1

    A C

    C on tro ller

    at

    S tatio n 2

    2Z

    LZ

    LI

    02cE 22sE

    1Z

    11sE

    I

    01cE

    A ctiv e

    N etw ork

    1sQ1sP 1cQ1cP

    Fig.2: Back-to-Back VSCs

    4. DCVOLTAGE CONTROLLER DESIGN

    The complete mathematical analysis and block

    diagram of the dc voltage controller is given [4]. The

    block diagram of the same is realized in MATLAB 6.5

    5. AC CONTROLLER DESIGN

    For ac voltage control station, assume the dc voltageutilization ratio of the adopted PWM method is 1 and the

    modulation index is .2M 10 2 M

    2C2

    2C2

    dcE

    02cE

    2R 2L

    22sE

    loaQ

    LZFilte

    Fig. 3: Load Side of the Device.

    From Fig. 3, we have

    EdcM

    EC2

    2

    2 = ( ) (3)10 2 M

    2

    2

    2 C

    L

    L

    S EZZ

    E+

    = Z (4)

    From (3) and (4) we get

    EdcZZ

    ZME

    L

    L

    S+

    =2

    2

    22

    ( ) (5)10 2 M

    02

    1

    22

    2;Edc

    ZZ

    Z

    M

    E

    L

    LS

    +=

    (6)

    where:

    2SE load voltage.

    2SE VSC output voltage at the load side.

    2M Modulation index at the load side.

    LZ load impedance.

    dcE dc voltage

    2Z Impedance between VSC inverter and load.

    Eq (6) shows that there is a linear relationship between

    and , so pure PI controller is adequate to meet

    the control equipment.

    2SE 2M

    G en erating

    F irin g

    P u lse

    P I

    F requ en cy

    S ign al

    F irin g

    P u lse

    C a lcu latio n

    o f

    F irin g

    P u lse

    L o ad

    S id e

    V o ltag es

    Fig.4: AC Controller

  • 7/30/2019 270_pub_24

    3/4

    6. SIMULATION RESULTS

    Load

    Voltage

    Load

    Voltage

    Load

    Voltage

    Load

    Voltage

    Fig.5: For Linear Balanced and Unbalanced, Non-

    Linear Balanced & Unbalanced Loads.

    Supply

    Voltage

    Supply

    Voltage

    Fig.6: For Linear Balanced and Unbalanced Loads

    Supply

    Current

    Supply

    Current

    Fig.7: For Linear Balanced and Unbalanced Loads

    Load

    Current

    Load

    Current

    Load

    Current

    Load

    Current

    Fig.8: For Linear Balanced and Unbalanced, Non-

    Linear Balanced and Unbalanced Loads.

    Supply

    Voltage

    SupplyVoltage

    Fig.9: For Non-Linear Balanced and Unbalanced Loads

    Supply

    Current

    Supply

    Current

    Fig.9: For Non-Linear Balanced and Unbalanced Loads

  • 7/30/2019 270_pub_24

    4/4

    The rated parameters of the system are as follows:

    Es1=11kV (peak to peak); R1=0.002ohm, L1=20 H,

    The DC voltage is 500V. The rated capacity of each

    VSC is 500kW and the switching frequency is 2 kHz.

    Increasing the modulation index with increasing DC

    voltage could vary the load voltage magnitude. The

    following different loads are considered.

    (1) Linear balanced load

    La =100 kW, 40 kVAR;

    Lb = 100 kW, 40 kVAR;

    Lc = 100 kW, 40 kVAR

    (2) Linear unbalanced load

    La = 50 kW, 30 kVAR;Lb = 100 kW, 30 kVAR;

    Lc = 50 kW, 50 kVAR;

    (3) Non-linear balanced load

    La = Lb = Lc = 500 kW.

    (4) Non-linear unbalanced loadLa = 167 kW;

    Lb = 167 kW;Lc = 100 kW.

    where La, Lb and Lc are the loads connected to a, b and

    c phases.

    Simulation results for the different loads as well asbalanced as well as unbalanced supply voltages are

    shown in the Fig 5 and Fig 6.

    Following conclusions can be made from the

    Table 1 and Table 2: (a) Supply side voltage and current

    distortions are well within the limits though the loads are

    made deliberately distorted for the balanced supplyvoltages. (b) Though supply is made unbalanced and the

    loads are of different types, supply side voltage and

    current distortions are well within the limits. (c) The fullload capacity is 500kW and it is fully applied in the case

    of non-linear balanced load.

    Table 1: Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) in the Load

    and Supply for Balanced Supply Voltages.

    %

    THDin

    Linear

    Balancedload

    Linear

    unbalancedload

    Non-

    linearbalanced

    load

    Non-linear

    unbalancedload

    Loadvoltage 1.87 3.44 9.26 32.53

    Load

    current1.86 2.97 24.24 55.19

    Supplyvoltage

    0.6 0.37 0.48 0.60

    Supply

    current0.61 2.72 0.49 0.38

    Table 2: Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) in the Load

    and Supply for Unbalanced Supply Voltages.

    %

    THD

    in

    Linear

    Balanced

    load

    Linear

    unbalanced

    load

    Non-

    linear

    balanced

    load

    Non-linear

    unbalanced

    load

    Load

    voltage7.67 3.44 9.13 32.25

    Loadcurrent

    7.23 2.97 24.67 58.15

    Supply

    voltage0.6 0.37 0.54 0.49

    Supplycurrent

    0.92 2.72 0.49 0.40

    7. CONCLUSIONS

    The power quality at the supply side is maintainedthough loads are deliberately made distorted and follows

    the IEEE 519 1992 standards. Therefore this DFACTS

    device could be used at the distribution side i.e. between

    utility and the customer. This device could be called

    series-series controller. In the case 3 i.e. for non linear

    balanced load the full capacity of load was applied and itstill shows the distortions on the supply side are well

    within the standards. Therefore whatever the impurities

    on the load side are not transferred on the supply side

    irrespective loads natures.

    The characteristics of the power qualityimprovement of the proposed DFACTS device is also

    hold good for the balanced as well as un-balanced supply

    voltages. And there is no rigmarole method of

    identifying the harmonics to reduce those and

    subsequently reducing the distortions i.e. for

    improvement of quality of the supply.

    8. REFERENCES

    [1] Karl E. Stahkopf and Mark R. Wilhem TighterControls for Busier SystemsIEEE Spectrum, April

    1997 pp48-52.

    [2] L. Gyugui, Unified power flow for flexible AC

    transmission systemIEE Proceeding, PartC, Vol.

    139, No. 4 July 1992,pp323-332.

    [3] N. G. Hingorani and and L.Gyugui, UnderstandingFACTS, IEEE press, New York,1999.

    [4] Blasko.V. and Agirman I, Modellinng and Control

    of Three-Phase Regenerative AC-DC Converters

    IEEE2001 pp2235-2240.