2
10 11. 389 © Copy Ri ght: Rai Universi ty W O L O O Y A O A A T LESSON 4: CASE STUDY Case Study: Cam paign To Ban Landmines  An t ip e r sonne l l a n d m in e s k il l orm a im t h ou san d s of p eop le ea ch year. Most are civili ans. Many arechildren. Long a f ter wars in di f f erent a rea s of the w orld have ended, the indi scriminate u se of land mines continue to deny the right to li f e a nd liberty of larg e nu mbe rs of civili ans . The International Cam paign to Ban Landm ines (ICBL), launched in 1991, bri ngs together over 1,400 g roups i n over 9 0 countri es who w ork locally, nationally, reg ionally and int erna - ti onally to ban antipersonnel landmines. The broad rang e of t hese groups is noticea ble. They speciali se in human rights, women’s a nd chil dren’s rights, peace , disabi lity, ex- combata nts, me dical exper tise, humanitar ianmineaction, development, arm s control, religion and the environment. Context During 200 2, India and Pakistan have bee n laying landmines along their disputed border in Kashm ir, according to the Interna tional Ca mpa ign to Ban Landmines(ICBL). The ICBL says it is possibly the larg es t deployme nt of mine s in decades. Ma ry Wa reha m, the Landmine M onitor Report’ s global co- ordinator, rece ntly said: “Mine-l ayingin India an d Pakistan is startling beca use of the leng th of the border a nd the length of  the m inef ields and the ir proximity to vi llag es a nd farming land.” Nume rous civilians a nd soldiers ha ve died as a resu lt of the landmines laid on both sides of the Line of Control in the disputed region of Kashmir.  Af t e r d ec l a r i n gc e a s e fi r e s i n 2 0 0 2 , b ot h An go l aan d S r i L an k a have stopped using landmines. However the ICBL has re ported that the g overnm ents of  Burma , Russi a a nd to a lesser e xt ent Nepal, Soma lia a nd Georgia continue to use the de vi ce. Campaign History In 1991 , several non- governm enta l orga nisations and indi viduals beg an to discuss thenee d to coordinate initiatives and a ba n on antipersonnel landmines. Handicap I nternational, Human Rights Watch, Medico Interna tional, M ines Advi sory Group, Physicians f or Hum an Rights, and Vietna m Vetera ns of Ame rica Foundation came togethe r in October 199 2 to forma li se the Interna tional Cam paign to Ban Landm ines (ICBL). The Ca mpa ign calls for an international ban on the use, production, stockpiling and transfer of antipersonnel landm ines. It also proposes incre as ed interna tional resourc es for huma nit arianminecleara nceandminevicti massistance programmes. International Response Governm ents around the w orld responded to the ca mpa ign by negotiating the 1997 Convention on the Prohibition of the Use , S tockpi li ng, Production, a nd Trans fer of Anti- Pers onnel Mine s and on their Destru ction. The M ine Ban Treaty prohi bits, in all circumstances, a ny useof  antipersonnel landm ines. It also req uires tha t stockpiles be destroye d within four yea rs of  the trea ty’s entry into force, and that mines a lready in the ground be destroyed withi n ten yea rs. Signatories The tre aty e ntered into force on 1 Ma rch, 1999 . As of 25 S eptembe r, 2002, 145 countri es had signed or acceded to the trea ty, of which 129have ra ti f ied. The m ost rece nt access ion wa s  Afg h a n i stan. The ICBL said more than adozen g overnm ents, among them Gree ce, I ndonesia, Turkey and Yugoslavi a, had announced their intention to join. In contrast, the Uni ted States, Russia and China are am ong 50 countries that so far have re f used to sign the treaty. The US is believed to have a stockpile of 11.2 million landmines. In 1 997, the ICBL and its co-ordinator, Jody Williams , rec eived the Nobel Pea ce Prize. Plan of Action Today , the Interna tional Cam paign to Ban Landmines network  represe nts over 1,100 groups in over 60 countri es, who work  locally, na tiona ll y, regionally, an d interna tiona ll y to ban antipersonnel landm ines. Its goa ls as outl ined in its 200 4 Plan of Action a re: Universa li sation of the M ine Ban Trea ty (MBT) Compli ance with the tre aty provisions Increas ed resource commitments f rom government and interna tional finan cial institutions for m ine clea ra nce, m ine aw are ness and victim a ssistance, and for stockpile destruction, a n d Firm esta blishment of the norms outl ined in the trea ty as a n interna tional stan dar d of beha vi our by all. Notes :

26 Lecture 04

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

8/11/2019 26 Lecture 04

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/26-lecture-04 1/1

10 11.389

© Copy Right: Rai University

WORLDEC

ONOMYANDGL

OBALIZA

TION

LESSON 4:

CASE STUDY

Case Study: Cam paign To Ban Landmines Antipersonnel landmines kill or maim thousands of peopleeach year. Most are civilians. Many are children.

Long after wars in different areas of the world have ended, theindiscriminate use of land mines continue to deny the right to

life and liberty of large numbers of civilians.

The International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL),

launched in 1991, brings together over 1,400 groups in over 90countries who work locally, nationally, regionally and interna-tionally to ban antipersonnel landmines.

The broad range of these groups is noticeable. They specialise inhuman rights, women’s and children’s rights, peace, disability,

ex-combatants, medical expertise, humanitarian mine action,development, arms control, religion and the environment.

ContextDuring 2002, India and Pakistan have been laying landminesalong their disputed border in Kashmir, according to the

International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL).

The ICBL says it is possibly the largest deployment of mines in

decades.Mary Wareham, the Landmine Monitor Report’s global co-ordinator, recently said: “Mine-laying in India and Pakistan is

startling because of the length of the border and the length of the minefields and their proximity to villages and farming

land.”Numerous civilians and soldiers have died as a result of the

landmines laid on both sides of the Line of Control in the

disputed region of Kashmir. After declaring ceasefires in 2002, both Angola and Sri Lanka

have stopped using landmines.However the ICBL has reported that the governments of 

Burma, Russia and to a lesser extent Nepal, Somalia andGeorgia continue to use the device.

Campaign HistoryIn 1991, several non-governmental organisations and

individuals began to discuss the need to coordinate initiativesand a ban on antipersonnel landmines.

Handicap International, Human Rights Watch, MedicoInternational, Mines Advisory Group, Physicians for Human

Rights, and Vietnam Veterans of America Foundation cametogether in October 1992 to formalise the InternationalCampaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL).

The Campaign calls for an international ban on the use,production, stockpiling and transfer of antipersonnel

landmines. It also proposes increased international resources forhumanitarian mine clearance and mine victim assistance

programmes.

International Response

Governments around the world responded to the campaign by

negotiating the 1997 Convention on the Prohibition of theUse, Stockpiling, Production, and Transfer of Anti-Personnel

Mines and on their Destruction.

The Mine Ban Treaty prohibits, in all circumstances, any use of 

antipersonnel landmines.It also requires that stockpiles be destroyed within four years of the treaty’s entry into force, and that mines already in the

ground be destroyed within ten years.

SignatoriesThe treaty entered into force on 1 March, 1999. As of 25

September, 2002, 145 countries had signed or acceded to thetreaty, of which 129 have ratified. The most recent accession was

 Afghanistan.

The ICBL said more than a dozen governments, among them

Greece, Indonesia, Turkey and Yugoslavia, had announced theirintention to join.

In contrast, the United States, Russia and China are among 50countries that so far have refused to sign the treaty. The US isbelieved to have a stockpile of 11.2 million landmines.

In 1997, the ICBL and its co-ordinator, Jody Williams, receivedthe Nobel Peace Prize.

Plan of ActionToday, the International Campaign to Ban Landmines network 

represents over 1,100 groups in over 60 countries, who work locally, nationally, regionally, and internationally to ban

antipersonnel landmines.

Its goals as outlined in its 2004 Plan of Action are:

Universalisation of the Mine Ban Treaty (MBT)

Compliance with the treaty provisions

Increased resource commitments from government andinternational financial institutions for mine clearance, mine

awareness and victim assistance, and for stockpile destruction,and

Firm establishment of the norms outlined in the treaty as aninternational standard of behaviour by all.

Notes :